Monthly Archives: March 2017

Officials with Britains Defense Ministry on Monday called for greater cooperation on cybersecurity between NATO and the European Union.

The demands come in the wake of Britains vote to leave the EU, which British Defense Secretary Michael Fallon indicated Monday would not affect Britains security cooperation with other European nations.

Fallon and Stephen Lovegrove, the Defense Ministrys permanent secretary, both said in separate remarks on Monday that NATO and EU should strengthen cooperation on cybersecurity.

Against evermore complex problems, we must bring together military and nonmilitary responses, and that means making the most of the agreement at Warsaw last year to invigorate the strategic relationship between NATO and the EU, including cooperation on cybersecurity and boosting cooperation counter-hybrid capabilities, Lovegrove said.

He specifically cited threats from Russias hybrid model of warfare.

Separately, Fallon made a similar call for deepened cyber cooperation between the two partnerships during a meeting of the European Union defense ministers in Brussels on Monday.

Today I have urged the EU to cooperate more closely with NATO, to avoid unnecessary duplication and to work together on new threats, including cyber, Fallon said, according to quotes posted on the ministrys website.

Russias cyber and influence campaign targeting the United States presidential election has stoked fears about the potential for future cyberattacks aimed at European elections.

In February 2016, NATO and the EU agreed to a technical arrangement to boost information sharing on cyber-related matters. NATO member states also recognized cyberspace as a domain of operations in which the alliance must defend itself and pledged to boost their cyber defenses at the Warsaw Summit last July.

More recently, NATO deepened cooperation on cyber defense with Finland, which shares a border with Russia.

NATO has also boosted its traditional defenses in Europe in the face of mounting Russian aggression in Ukraine. Moscow has described the buildup as a threat to its own security.

Read the original here:
British defense officials call for more cooperation between NATO, EU on cyber - The Hill

Forbes

Montenegro Awaits Senate Verdict: President Donald Trump Should End NATO Expansion Charade Forbes The postage stamp country of Montenegro expected to be rushed into NATO during Washington's lame duck period before the unpredictable Donald Trump became president. But Senators Rand Paul and Mike Lee, to their credit more concerned about ...

More here:
Montenegro Awaits Senate Verdict: President Donald Trump Should End NATO Expansion Charade - Forbes

Published time: 6 Mar, 2017 18:48Edited time: 6 Mar, 2017 21:18

A total of 8,000 NATO soldiers have been deployed to the Finnmark region of northern Norway, 160-300 km from the Russian border, for a series of joint military exercises.

The Joint Viking 2017 exercises, which involve British, American and Norwegian troops, kicked off Monday and are expected to last until March 15. According to the Norwegian Armed Forces website, the exercises primary goals are to practice crisis management and the defense of Norway.

A total of 8,000 troops are taking part, including 700 soldiers from the US Marine Corps, US Army and the British Royal Marines, which have been integrated into Norwegian units. The British and American troops took part in preparatory exercises to acclimatize them to the harsh Norwegian weather.

For the duration of the exercise, drones have been banned from local airspace.

The Armed Forces will have a lot of activity in the air, with fighter jets, helicopters and transport aircraft. To ensure safety in the air, we therefore introduced a drone ban, military spokesman Ivar Moen told the Norwegian public radio station NRK.

Read more

In previous years, Joint Viking exercises have been held in Hordaland in 2013, Tromso in 2014, Finnmark in 2015 and Trndelag in 2016. The previous exercise in Finnmark was seen as a provocation in Russia, where in response a large-scale exercise was launched in the Kola Peninsula.

This year, however, Moscow was notified of the planned maneuvers in advance, Moen told NRK.

In January, 300 US Marines from Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, were deployed to Norway. Both Norway and the US denied the notion that the deployment was meant to irk Russia as part of NATOs wider campaign to oppose what it calls Russian aggression in Europe, by sending additional troops and weapons closer to the Russian border.

A founding member of NATO, Norway pledged not to host foreign forces to allay Moscows concerns that it could serve as a platform for a surprise attack. For decades, the Scandinavian country only allowed in other allies troops for training purposes. Oslo dismissed the notion that the deployment goes against the old commitment, saying that American troops would be rotated rather than stationed permanently. NATO routinely applies the same reasoning to all its deployments in Eastern Europe as a way of circumventing the alliances agreement with Russia, which bans permanent deployments of significant forces near Russia.

Read this article:
8,000 NATO troops launch exercise near Russian-Norwegian ... - RT

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization has long been a symbol of the free world, enforcing humanitarian agendas and committing itself to universalrights for all. Such a noble force has the support of currently 28 of the most powerful countries in the world including the U.S., Germany, France and the U.K., and one would assume that out of all these members, it would be logical and fair that each country contribute the same percentage. After all, not just the U.S. is committed in making the world a better place.

The U.S. government currently contributes almost a quarter of NATOs operating budget, which is weird considering that NATO has 28 member states. One could argue that not all countries can afford such a huge financial burden, but per capita, many richer European countries such as Luxembourg, which has an annual GDP per capita of $110,697.03, twice the amount of Americas do not put forth the required amount to NATO.

Regulations dictate that all NATO members must spend at least 2 percent of their yearly GDP on defense and so far, a measly five of them have met the bare minimum.

Not only does direct contribution to NATO by the states overshadow any other country, indirect spending eclipses even that. It is estimated that nearly 73percentof all NATO spending comes from the U.S.

American presidents have long held resentments for being forced to be the main economic pillar supporting NATO. There is widespread bipartisan resentment for this issue, which draws the support of Barack Obama, Bernie Sanders, George Bush and most recently, President Donald Trump.

While many liberals contest any word that comes out of Trumps mouth, pulling the U.S. out of an obsolete Cold War relicis a cause that everyone should get behind. Having the U.S. spend so muchto act as world police is unnecessary and a remnant of the past.

The money that the U.S. would save, by reinvesting its NATO expenditures back into its economy, would bolster the economy and create more jobs. Direct spending overseas in Americas own military is already more than enough, and we dont need to give even more money to other countries who do the same thing as us.

If other countries dont even care enough about world security to provide for NATO, then the U.S. shouldnt have to pick up the burden. The U.S. should be content in its current overseas involvement, and by staying out of conflicts it doesnt relate to,the nation could save money and lives.

If other countries dont care for the brutalities that occur and arent investing enough to stop it, the U.S. no longer needs to be the paradigm of freedom in the world. Secretary of Defense General Mattis has said that unless other countries can contribute the same as the U.S., then we would be forced to moderate [our] commitment to NATO.

The need for all countries to be free should not rest merely on Americas shoulders. Freedom and liberty for all should be pursued by all countries. If continued U.S. investment is wanted in NATO, then other members must step up their commitments to world peace.

Featured Illustration: Samuel Wiggins

Read this article:
Shaky commitments to NATO - North Texas Daily

Notwithstanding apprehensions from member nations that the decision would weaken NATO, the European Union (EU) authorized the formation of a new military headquarters.

The facility would be manned by a staff of 30, whose responsibility would be the coordination of the EU member states military. A number of members, including Poland, Hungary and the United Kingdom, have disputed the notion of a combined European army. The defense ministers of all the member countries, however, unanimously decided on establishing the new headquarters.

In a statement released Monday, EU Foreign Affairs Minister Federica Mogherini said, Today we decided to establish a MPCC (Military Planning Conduct and Capability facility) which will command the EUs non-executive military missions. This is one of the fields where traditionally we have had in the history of the European Union more divisiveness since the fifties we were struggling in the defense field.

In an effort to achieve less dependence on the United States, France and Germany have advocated for the creation of common military organizations, joint headquarters and combined resources.

While emphasizing NATOs significance to the EU, Mogherini said the new arrangement is not a European army.

Nevertheless, British Defense Minister Michael Fallon vowed that the U.K. would veto any proposals to challenge Natos position, while the country is still a member of EU.

Speaking with Reuters, he said, We have resisted any mission creep. The danger is duplication (with NATO).

Go here to see the original:
EU Establishes New Military HQ Regardless of Concerns It Compromises NATO - Newsline