Monthly Archives: March 2017

SALT LAKE CITY The Utah Legislature approved a bill Tuesday to toughen penalties for prostitution-related crimes.

The House passed SB230 with a 71-1 vote, sending it to Gov. Gary Herbert's desk for his consideration.

The bill would give "teeth" to Utah's ability to prosecute prostitution, said House sponsor Rep. Mike Winder, R-West Valley City.

"We have a real problem," he said. "This is not a real victimless crime."

Winder said 75 percent of women who engage in prostitution work for a "pimp."

The bill would better equip law enforcement, he said, because it would expand the reasons why an individual could be found guilty of prostitution.

Under current law, a person can only be convicted if he or she engages in a sexual act for money. But SB230 would include if a person "offers or agrees" to engage in sexual activity for money.

"With the teeth, we can go after the pimps, the Johns and those involved in this," Winder said.

The bill would also change patronizing a prostitute from a class B misdemeanor to a class A misdemeanor, with a third conviction for that crime becoming a third-degree felony.

Aiding or facilitating an act of prostitution would also be enhanced to a class A misdemeanor, with all subsequent convictions becoming third-degree felonies.

Original post:

Legislature boosts penalties for prostitution-related crimes - Deseret News

In defense of brunch Should Ohio revisit its Sunday alcohol policy?

By Sarah Sidlow

Photo:Illustration by Dayton artist Jed Helmers. Reach him at JedHelmers@DaytonCityPaper.com. See more at JedHelmers.com.

Thing to know: blue lawas in, a law that prohibits certain types of activities on Sundays. Because, why would you want to buy a car (or a bottle of liquor) when youre supposed to be worshipping? These laws have existed throughout American history, but are most commonly associated with the late 1800s and the early 1900s.

In Minnesota, the law banning Sunday liquor stores has been on the books for nearly 160 years. But last week, the Minnesota state Senate voted to repeal the law, finally allowing liquor stores to be open on Sundays. Even though there are a few more political hurdles to jump before supporters can raise their Sunday glasses, its looking more and more like Sunday liquor store hours are imminent, and may be a reality by July.

Minnesota was one of just 12 states that still prevented liquor stores from operating on consumers seven-day-a-week lifestyles. By now, you may be wondering how the Buckeye State stacks up. Lets break it down.

According to Ohio Code 4301, liquor may only be sold on Sunday under authority of a permit that authorizes Sunday sale.

What are the benefits of getting rid of the ban? Supporters of the repeal are happy to say, out with the oldand hope the change will better reflect consumer tastes and expectations. In Minnesota, public opinion polls showed big majorities of the public wanted the change. Craft brewers and distillers, as well as major retail chains, also chimed in with support. (Like, a lot of support. Big-box store Total Wine & More alone spent $170,000 lobbying the legislature in 2014 and 2015.)

But the Sunday liquor sale ban has supporters, as well. And they long to return to the days of small business and small-town life. They fear raising restrictions will force mom-and-pop shops to compete in the world of big-box business. And that seems kind of hopeless. They argue that the historic blue laws are some of the last remaining remnants of days gone by, which we all sometimes wish we could get back. Whats the harm in keeping some of the charm?

Others view the ban as a way to reduce crime and encourage other activities. Research published by the U.S. National Library of Medicine found that after Virginia relaxed their Sunday sale policies, minor crime increased by 5 percent and alcohol-involved serious crime rose by 10 percent. (Fun fact: the study also found that the cost of the additional crime was comparable to Virginias revenue from increased liquor salesbut thats not really the point, is it?)

Both sides argue that there are likely far more important issues toward which those governing the state should direct time and resources. This reasoning leads ban supporters to say, just leave it alone and repeal supporters to say, just do it, already!

By Don Hurst

The state should repeal the prohibition of selling liquor on Sundays. The ban is the last remaining survivor of the states blue laws, laws expressly implemented to curb sinful behavior and encourage citizens to participate in religious activities. Legislators believed if you had nothing better to do on Sunday you would go to church.

In 1809, Ohio lawmakers prohibited such unholy activities as gambling, hunting, shooting, dancing, drinking, sporting events, and common labor. If the state wants to outlaw my mowing the lawn on Sundays, then I would reconsider my stance on liquor.

At the time, these laws represented the will of the people, but our society has evolved to include more religious diversity. Some people hold Saturday as the most holy day of the week, while others dont believe any day deserves more veneration. To elevate one day above the others with legislation is a violation of equal treatment of religions.

Not all Protestant morality is bad. All enduring religions and humanist philosophies share some common beliefs. You shouldnt steal a Subaru (or anything else). Throwing a brick through your neighbors window is bad. Murder is also frowned upon.

Acts that harm others are definitely part of the governments sphere of influence, but imposing subjective morality on us is not the governments job. Im a big boy, and I wear big boy pants. I can handle buying alcohol.

Theres a hypocrisy to these laws that leaves a bad taste in my mouth. (Gee, a shot of bourbon would wash that taste out.) Ohio says selling liquor on a Sunday is bad, unless you pay extra money for a special permit. Then its OK. You paid your way into morality. That doesnt make any sense.

Lets follow the logic of blue laws. Supporters dont want people to sin on the Lords Day. We have to be nicer and more righteous on this arbitrary day of the week. If selling liquor is sinful, then what other activities should we outlaw? There is a lot of sin in the Bible.

For example, gluttony is a sin. On Sundays, it shall be unlawful for people eat unhealthfully. Instead of 24 hours, seven days a week, Bills Donuts will have to change the signs to 24 hours, six days a week. The Sunday tradition of standing in line in your pajamas for butter twists would be unlawful. No sugary goodness when you should be praying.

Cutting liquor and sweets on Sundays doesnt go far enough. Often, when people drink, they dance. When you hold your partner too close, the devil is your chaperone. Stomping your feet to the Charleston and the Jitterbug, you might as well be boarding the Soul Train to Hell. No dancing on Sundays.

Liquor and dancing leads to even more sinful behavior, like sex. CVS and Wal-Mart cant sell condoms on the Sabbath. We dont need any sin babies. Its a scientific fact that children conceived on Sundays grow up to be telemarketers. Keep your hands off each other by keeping your hands clasped in prayer.

No access to adult websites either. Ye Holy Web Blocker shall deny access to IP addresses of purveyors of carnal sin. Ladies, dont sidestep these laws by watching copies of Magic Mike or Fifty Shades of Grey. Just to be safe, lets shut down the Victorias Secret website on Sundays, as well.

There are too many sinful options for entertainment. Cable TV is a tool of the devil. Dont believe me? Call customer support. Shut all that down on Sundays. Netflix can only show that fireplace simulator thats popular during Christmas. Nope. Never mind. Fire is too much like hell.

Instead all channels will air nothing but reruns of The Andy Griffith Show. Well, not all the reruns; some of those episodes are just too darn titillating. That time Andy held hands with Miss Helen during their picnic at Lake Myers is so hot that it scorches the virtue of nuns.

Some cling to these laws because they yearn for a simpler time when people were just better. Thats an illusion. The good old days werent any better than today. Peel back the years enough and it gets ugly. No liquor on Sundays, but deny black people service at a restaurant. No Sunday bourbon, but women cant vote.

Blue laws place the government in a position where it dictates morality and infringes on personal liberty. Prohibiting the sale of liquor on a Sunday is not so egregious as to spark a revolution, but it is an example of the dangerous tendency to legislatively impose religion. We face a lot of challenges as a society. Thought rooted in 1809 norms will not help us.

Don Hurst is a combat vet and a former police officer. He now lives in Dayton where he writes novels and plays. Reach DCP freelance writer Don Hurst at DonHurst@DaytonCityPaper.com.

By Victor DeLaine

To paraphrase Nietzsche, Sunday is dead. We killed it. You dont need to be religious to regret its death. Religion may seem silly to us urban sophisticates, but one sane thing that religion gave us was Sunday. We are the worse, the less civilized, for its loss. And with what did we replace it? With a second Saturday, another day of driving, spending, consuming.

Sunday has not been dead long. Many reading these words will recalland, Ill wager, recall fondlywhen all commercial activity, not just selling booze, was off-limits on Sunday. That meant no groceries, no gas stations, no soccer, no restaurants. You just stayed home and hung out with your family.

Ours wasnt the only country that observed Sunday. Youd be surprised how many countries still do. On Sundays in Germany, most stores must remain closed, and trucks are banished from the roads. In Norway, all but gas stations and the smallest shops must take Sunday off. In Switzerland, only a few shops in tourist areas may open on Sunday. In some Australian states, whole categories of retail commerce are restricted on Sunday.

These places are not fundamentalist backwaters. They are advanced, secular, liberal democracies. In some of them, Christianity is practically extinct. To these societies, blue laws are a means not of enforcing religious discipline, but of mitigating the unrelenting rigors of capitalism, of giving the body politic a break from the manic imperative of nonstop consumption. It is for that reasonnot to legislate religionthat such societies set one day in seven aside when King Commerce cannot hawk his wares, cannot separate us from our money, and cannot yoke hirelings to machines.

Bringing Sunday back to this country is not out of the question. We see something like the nostalgia for Sunday in the push to restore Thanksgiving as a day off, even for the hapless employees of Wal-Mart.

But if we cant bring back Sunday, we can at least leave room for its one surviving remnant, Sunday restrictions on liquor sales. What little is left of those restrictions is barely noticeable. We have so curtailed those restrictions already that, if you sleep late on Sunday, you wouldnt even notice them. Of all the ills facing this benighted republic, the scourge of liquor restrictions on Sunday would seem pretty low on the list.

Weigh the pros and cons. What are the awful horrors with which restrictions on Sunday liquor sales afflict us? The only argument against blue laws is the one you always hear from nerdy libertarians who think every law puts us onto a slippery slope to Stalinism. Its less an argument than a sequence of push-button slogans about victimless crimes, separating church and state, and Big Brother, with lots of yammering about rights. When pressed to go beyond such abstractions, they just mumble. The most awful scenario that critics of blue laws can cite is the plight of beer drinkers who must stock their fridges on Saturday with enough beer to last until noon Sunday, when Kroger can sell it again.

If you lift Sunday liquor restrictions, by contrast, the bad results would be far less abstract. For one thing, more liquor sales would meanduh!more liquor consumption. You could then expect more of all the social ills that correlate with drinking, such as drunk driving, wife-beating, and crime. The Dayton City Paper tells us that the repeal of blue laws in Virginia prompted increases in crime that leave little doubt as to cause and effect.

But a graver downside of repeal concerns liquors role in distracting citizens from the real ills that afflict them. With all due respect to Marx, liquor, not religion, is the opiate of the masses. It is like the drug soma in Huxleys Brave New World, dulling your critical intelligence just enough to make dystopia endurable. Booze makes sensible men want to kiss ugly women. It also makes sensible men accept a status quo that sentences them to underpaid drudgery on a corporate treadmill. The laws that took Sunday away were enacted, not because mobs of peasants with pitchforks demanded that their day of rest be taken away, but because Mammon wanted to do the same thing to you on Sunday that he does to you the other six days. And Mammon would like nothing more than to finish the job by plying you with liquor on Sunday, to keep you from getting any sober ideas.

But no matter how you feel about capitalism, abstract rights, and drunk driving, the best reason to tolerate blue laws is, simply, that they are tolerable. Tolerate them the way you tolerate the Amish, the Oregon District, or Wrigley Field, as a quaint vestige of a better way of life.

Reach DCP freelance writer Victor DeLaine at VictorDeLaine@DaytonCityPaper.com.

Tags: blue law, debate forum, headline, Sunday liquor ban, Sunday liquor laws

Original post:

Debate Forum: 3/7 - Dayton City Paper