Daily Archives: March 29, 2017

Fair showcased technology – Batesville Herald Tribune

Posted: March 29, 2017 at 11:10 am

Dear Editor,

The Committee to Review, Evaluate and Aid Technology in Education (CREATE) Technology Fair was held Tuesday, March 14, to showcase students use of technology in the Batesville area schools. Over 250 students from Batesville High School, Batesville Middle School, Batesville Intermediate School, Batesville Primary School, St. Louis School and Oldenburg Academy participated in the evenings activities.

The CREATE Technology Fair Committee would like to thank all the supporters who helped to make the evening a successful and enjoyable experience for all. The CREATE Foundation has assisted the Batesville area schools with technology since 1994. A special thank you to the CREATE Foundation and the John A. Hillenbrand Foundation for providing the opportunity to showcase students' technology projects.

Thanks also to the following for their support and generosity: Batesville Tool & Die, Peter Paul Office Equipment, Indiana Virtual Academy, Genesis Pathways to Success/Ripley County Community Foundation, Enhanced Telecommunications Corp., Batesville Community Education Foundation, Educational Furniture and Max Cases.

The educators of the Batesville area schools truly appreciate the support of technology in the classrooms.

Jackie Huber

CREATE Technology Fair Committee

Here is the original post:

Fair showcased technology - Batesville Herald Tribune

Posted in Technology | Comments Off on Fair showcased technology – Batesville Herald Tribune

Trump’s Energy Progress – Wall Street Journal (subscription)

Posted: at 11:10 am


Wall Street Journal (subscription)
Trump's Energy Progress
Wall Street Journal (subscription)
One area where President Trump is notching early victories is unleashing American energy, which for years has been held hostage to progressive climate obsessions. On Tuesday Mr. Trump signed an executive order to rescind many of the Obama ...
Trump wants to roll back progress against climate change. He's going to fail.Washington Post
Trump Executive Order Reverses American Climate Change Progress, LeadershipKTIC
The end of climate progress: Trump administration plans to gut climate fundingSalon
The Guardian
all 1,712 news articles »

Read the rest here:

Trump's Energy Progress - Wall Street Journal (subscription)

Posted in Progress | Comments Off on Trump’s Energy Progress – Wall Street Journal (subscription)

Progress toward a Zika vaccine | MIT News – MIT News

Posted: at 11:10 am

Using a new strategy that can rapidly generate customized RNA vaccines, MIT researchers have devised a new vaccine candidate for the Zika virus.

The vaccine consists of strands of genetic material known as messenger RNA, which are packaged into a nanoparticle that delivers the RNA into cells. Once inside cells, the RNA is translated into proteins that provoke an immune response from the host, but the RNA does not integrate itself into the host genome, making it potentially safer than a DNA vaccine or vaccinating with the virus itself.

It functions almost like a synthetic virus, except its not pathogenic and it doesnt spread, says Omar Khan, a postdoc at MITs Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research and an author of the new study. We can control how long its expressed, and its RNA so it will never integrate into the host genome.

This research also yielded a new benchmark for evaluating the effectiveness of other Zika vaccine candidates, which could help others who are working toward the same goal.

Jasdave Chahal, a postdoc at MITs Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, is the first author of the paper, which appears in Scientific Reports. The papers senior author is Hidde Ploegh, a former MIT biology professor and Whitehead Institute member who is now a senior investigator in the Program in Cellular and Molecular Medicine at Boston Childrens Hospital.

Other authors of the paper are Tao Fang and Andrew Woodham, both former Whitehead Institute postdocs in the Ploegh lab; Jingjing Ling, an MIT graduate student; and Daniel Anderson, an associate professor in MITs Department of Chemical Engineering and a member of the Koch Institute and MITs Institute for Medical Engineering and Science (IMES).

Programmable vaccines

The MIT team first reported its new approach to programmable RNA vaccines last year. RNA vaccines are appealing because they induce host cells to produce many copies of the proteins encoded by the RNA. This provokes a stronger immune reaction than if the proteins were administered on their own. However, finding a safe and effective way to deliver these vaccines has proven challenging.

The researchers devised an approach in which they package RNA sequences into a nanoparticle made from a branched molecule that is based on fractal-patterned dendrimers. This modified-dendrimer-RNA structure can be induced to fold over itself many times, producing a spherical particle about 150 nanometers in diameter. This is similar in size to a typical virus, allowing the particles to enter cells through the same viral entry mechanisms. In their 2016 paper, the researchers used this nanoparticle approach to generate experimental vaccines for Ebola, H1N1 influenza, and the parasite Toxoplasma gondii.

In the new study, the researchers tackled Zika virus, which emerged as an epidemic centered in Brazil in 2015 and has since spread around the world, causing serious birth defects in babies born to infected mothers. Since the MIT method does not require working with the virus itself, the researchers believe they might be able to explore potential vaccines more rapidly than scientists pursuing a more traditional approach.

Instead of using viral proteins or weakened forms of the virus as vaccines, which are the most common strategies, the researchers simply programmed their RNA nanoparticles with the sequences that encode Zika virus proteins. Once injected into the body, these molecules replicate themselves inside cells and instruct cells to produce the viral proteins.

The entire process of designing, producing, and testing the vaccine in mice took less time than it took for the researchers to obtain permission to work with samples of the Zika virus, which they eventually did get.

Thats the beauty of it, Chahal says. Once we decided to do it, in two weeks we were ready to vaccinate mice. Access to virus itself was not necessary.

Measuring response

When developing a vaccine, researchers usually aim to generate a response from both arms of the immune system the adaptive arm, mediated by T cells and antibodies, and the innate arm, which is necessary to amplify the adaptive response. To measure whether an experimental vaccine has generated a strong T cell response, researchers can remove T cells from the body and then measure how they respond to fragments of the viral protein.

Until now, researchers working on Zika vaccines have had to buy libraries of different protein fragments and then test T cells on them, which is an expensive and time-consuming process. Because the MIT researchers could generate so many T cells from their vaccinated mice, they were able to rapidly screen them against this library. They identified a sequence of eight amino acids that the activated T cells in the mouse respond to. Now that this sequence, also called an epitope, is known, other researchers can use it to test their own experimental Zika vaccines in the appropriate mouse models.

We can synthetically make these vaccines that are almost like infecting someone with the actual virus, and then generate an immune response and use the data from that response to help other people predict if their vaccines would work, if they bind to the same epitopes, Khan says. The researchers hope to eventually move their Zika vaccine into tests in humans.

The identification and characterization of CD8 T cell epitopes in mice immunized with a Zika RNA vaccine is a very useful reference for all those working in the field of Zika vaccine development, says Katja Fink, a principal investigator at the A*STAR Singapore Immunology Network. RNA vaccines have received much attention in the last few years, and while the big breakthrough in humans has not been achieved yet, the technology holds promise to become a flexible platform that could provide rapid solutions for emerging viruses.

Fink, who was not involved in the research, added that the initial data are promising but the Zika RNA vaccine approach described needs further testing to prove efficacy.

Another major area of focus for the researchers is cancer vaccines. Many scientists are working on vaccines that could program a patients immune system to attack tumor cells, but in order to do that, they need to know what the vaccine should target. The new MIT strategy could allow scientists to quickly generate personalized RNA vaccines based on the genetic sequence of an individual patients tumor cells.

The research was funded by the National Institutes of Health, a Fujifilm/MediVector grant, the Lustgarten Foundation, a Koch Institute and Dana-Farber/Harvard Center Center Bridge Project award, the Department of Defense Office of Congressionally Directed Medical Researchs Joint Warfighter Medical Research Program, and the Cancer Center Support Grant from the National Cancer Institute.

Continued here:

Progress toward a Zika vaccine | MIT News - MIT News

Posted in Progress | Comments Off on Progress toward a Zika vaccine | MIT News – MIT News

Hawks feeling ‘positive’ about Millsap’s progress but have yet to win without him – CBSSports.com

Posted: at 11:10 am

The Atlanta Hawksplay the Phoenix Sunson Tuesday night in an attempt to end two different losing streaks: one, their current seven game slide, and two, their winless 0-8 record without Paul Millsap in the lineup this season. As we found out Monday, Millsap will miss the Hawks next three games , including this contest against the Suns.

That was obviously a tough blow for the team, as they rely heavily on Millsap on both ends of the floor. Tuesday, however, brought some good news, as Hawks coach Mike Budenholzer noted that he feels positive about Millsaps recovery and believes the All-Star forward is making progress. Via the Atlanta Journal-Constitution:

I would actually say its positive, Budenholzer said Tuesday before the Hawks hosted the Suns. I think we are excited. We feel like he is making progress. I think we have what we feel is a good plan. I think the knee is going to get better and better. Assuming nothing happens between now and the weekend, Im actually upbeat. I think its a positive where we are.

With the Hawks in danger of sliding all the way down to the No. 8 spot in the East, its great to hear that the team doesnt believe this will turn into a long-term issue for Millsap. They are certainly going to need him at full strength come playoff time.

See the original post here:

Hawks feeling 'positive' about Millsap's progress but have yet to win without him - CBSSports.com

Posted in Progress | Comments Off on Hawks feeling ‘positive’ about Millsap’s progress but have yet to win without him – CBSSports.com

Center for Medical Progress Video Investigation Planned Parenthood Abortionist: ‘Pay Attention to Who’s in the … – Breitbart News

Posted: at 11:10 am

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

In the latest CMPvideo, Taylor is heard explaining to the journalists that Nucatola trained her.

During a reception at a Planned Parenthood conference, Taylor describes to CMPs undercover journalistsposing as buyers from a biomedical companyhow she delivers intact fetuses during late-term abortions. In the video, aCMP journalist indicates that intact bodies will allow for the harvesting of organs and body parts that are more valuable for scientific research.

At one point in the footage, theabortionist explains the difficulties abortionists encounter when a baby comes through the procedure with signs of life: In Arizona, if the fetus comes out with any signs of life, were supposed to transport it. To the hospital.

When askedif there is any standard procedure for verifying signs of life? Taylor responds by saying, The key is, you need to pay attention to whos in the room, right?

Taylor chucklesand says, Its a mess. Its a mess.

She goes on to say, Arizona is so conservative, I just dont even want to send a full fetus to, for cremation or any of that.

The abortionist explains to the undercover journalists that she performs Dilation & Evacuation (D&E), also known asdismemberment abortions,and takes into consideration the feelings of her staff members who might be upset at the sight of a whole baby coming out during an abortion. Part of the issue is, its not a matter of how I feel about it coming out intact, she says, but I got to worry about my staff, and peoples feelings about it coming out looking like a baby.

Shealso tells the journalists that those handling fetal death certificates in the state refer to the fetus as a baby, andappears to say that she finds it creepy when fetal remains are repeatedly referred to as babies:We have the people who do our paperwork for the fetal death certificates. They email us calling them babies. Baby this, baby that, baby so-and-so. And Im like, thats creepy!

Also in the footage released by CMP, the abortionistsays that usingdigoxin (referred to as dig) as a feticidal agent makes the procedure less physically strenuous for her. My biceps appreciate it when the dig works, she says.I remember when I was a Fellow and I was training, she continues, I was like, oh, I have to hit the gym for this.

CMP project lead David Daleidenreleased the following statement about this investigation:

This footage shows a longtime Planned Parenthood abortion doctor willing to sell baby parts for profit, use criminal abortion methods to get more intact body parts, and even cover up infanticide. This doctor was trained by Planned Parenthoods senior director of medical services, and encouraged by her to participate in the fetal body parts market. This footage is just a preview of the damning and incriminating admissions of Planned Parenthood leaders on our further unreleased tapes, being censored by an unconstitutional gag order from a federal judge in San Francisco.

In the summer of 2015, Daleiden began the release of his video series that led to the allegations that Planned Parenthood and its counterparts in the biotech field have participated in the sale of the body parts of aborted babies for a profit.

Following a year of congressional investigation, the Senate Judiciary Committee and the House Select Investigative Panel referred Planned Parenthood Federation of America, several of the largest Planned Parenthood affiliates in the country, and three of their business associates in the fetal tissue procurement industry to the FBI and U.S. Department of Justice for criminal prosecution.

The only difference between Planned Parenthoods barbaric abortion business, and that of the notorious Dr. Kermit Gosnell, is that Gosnell was not so careful as to pay attention to whos in the room, Daleiden says. Elected officials must stop forcing taxpayers to subsidize Planned Parenthoods criminal abortion business, and the Department of Justice must immediately open a full investigation and prosecute Planned Parenthood to the fullest extent of the law.

Follow this link:

Center for Medical Progress Video Investigation Planned Parenthood Abortionist: 'Pay Attention to Who's in the ... - Breitbart News

Posted in Progress | Comments Off on Center for Medical Progress Video Investigation Planned Parenthood Abortionist: ‘Pay Attention to Who’s in the … – Breitbart News

US Concerned About Lack of DRC Political Agreement Progress – Voice of America

Posted: at 11:10 am

The United States says it is concerned at the inability of both the government of the Democratic Republic of Congo and an opposition coalition to implement a political transition agreement they reached in December after months of unrest.

The State Department faulted both sides for failing to make the necessary compromises to carry out the agreed-upon steps, which include the appointment of a prime minister.

"Failure to move ahead with the accord clearly thwarts the will of the Congolese people and jeopardizes the progress achieved thus far," acting spokesman Mark Toner said in a statement.

President Joseph Kabila was due to leave office December 19 at the end of his second term, but elections to choose his successor were postponed and Kabila has remained in office.

The agreement between the government and the opposition was supposed to set up a transitional authority led by a prime minister until new elections could be held late this year.

But the two sides remained split on how to implement the agreement, and the country's largest opposition party has called for a large protest on April 10.

See the original post:

US Concerned About Lack of DRC Political Agreement Progress - Voice of America

Posted in Progress | Comments Off on US Concerned About Lack of DRC Political Agreement Progress – Voice of America

WWE United Kingdom Championship to be defended at Progress … – Cageside Seats (blog)

Posted: at 11:10 am

Today, on Facebook, Progress Wrestling co-owner Glen Joseph delivered some monumental news about their upcoming internet pay-per-view (iPPV) this Friday. Lets take a look, and then Ill transcribe the most important bit below

From the desk of NXT General Manager William Regal:

Good morning. It's been brought to my attention that there were certain liberties taken by British Strong Style in the Progress Championship match between Mark Andrews and Pete Dunne last Sunday at the Progress fifth anniversary show. Now Trent Seven's conduct is an internal matter for Progress management to deal with, but as WWE UK Champion, Tyler Bate must realize that he represents the WWE UK brand wherever he performs.

Therefore, due to Tyler Bate's interference in Mark Andrews' Progress title match, I deem it only fair that Mark should get an opportunity at Tyler's WWE UK Championship. So, on Friday, March 31st at Progress: Orlando, for the first time in history, a WWE title will be defended on a Progress show, as I'm ruling that Tyler Bate vs. Mark Andrews is now a WWE UK Championship match, and the winner of that match will go on to represent the WWE UK brand as champion at Axxess and beyond.

Kind regards, William Regal

Yes indeed, Mr. Regal has made us some history. Only the second WWE United Kingdom Championship title defense and its happening on independent wrestling soil, live on iPPV!

And, as Glen points out, its the first WWE title defense of any kind to happen in another promotion in over twenty years, the last being Bull Nakano defending her WWE Womens Championship against Kyoko Inoue at AJW Queendom 1995. (At least, if you dont count the WWF Light Heavyweight Championship, which was defended by Shinjiro Ohtani in New Japan as late as 1997, however it was part of the J-Crown at the time and not actually recognized by WWE.)

For convenience and ease of working the time and date in, I also present to you the full card for the show.

Progress is coming to the US for the first time on iPPV through WWNLive, and theyre bringing the WWE UK title with them. Excited?

Here is the original post:

WWE United Kingdom Championship to be defended at Progress ... - Cageside Seats (blog)

Posted in Progress | Comments Off on WWE United Kingdom Championship to be defended at Progress … – Cageside Seats (blog)

And even more 3/24/2017 – ReporterNews.com

Posted: at 11:09 am

Abilene 5:01 p.m. CT March 23, 2017

.(Photo: Contributed Photo)

Investing class Paul Anthony Thomas, asset manager with Custom Private Equity, will present a class for individual investors from 6:30-7:30 p.m. Monday at the South Branch ofthe Abilene Public Library, located in the Mall of Abilene. Admission is free.

Christian ethics lectures Jeph Holloway will present the 2017 T.B. Maston Lectures in Christian Ethics at 7 p.m. Monday and 9:30 a.m. Tuesday at Hardin-Simmons University. TheMonday lecture, in Logsdon Chapel, will be "The Rise of the Man-chine: The What and Why of Posthumanism." The Tuesday lecture, in Behrens Auditorium, will be"Participating in Gods Purpose: A Christian Response to the Posthuman Vision." Admission is free.

Lenten organ recitals A Lenten organ recital series will be presented at 12:15 p.m. Tuesday and April 4 at First Baptist Church, 1333 N. Third St. The concerts will be performedon the Shelton Organand will feature performers from five churches.

Spell Abilene! The Adult Literacy Council will present its annual "Spell Abilene!" adult spelling bee at 6 p.m. Tuesday in the South Branch of the Abilene Public Library, located in the Mall of Abilene. Refreshments will be servedand prizes will be awarded to members of the audience. Admission is free.

CarFit TxDOT and the Mature Driver Program will conduct CarFit, a program to improve the safety of older drivers, from 8:30-11:30 a.m. Wednesday at the Rose ParkSenior Center, 2625 S. Seventh St. Technicians will teach participants how to make their vehicle fit them by adjusting steering wheel placement, mirrors,restraints and more. For an appointment, call 325-676-6808.

Good Neighbor Breakfast Connecting Caring Communities will conduct its annual Good Neighbor Breakfast from 7:30-8:30 a.m. Thursday at First Central Presbyterian Church, 400 OrangeSt. Admission is free, but donations will be accepted. RSVP to office@wecareabilene.org.

Screenwriter speaks Screenwriter Lauren Modery, McMurry Universitys 2017 Knox-Bennett Guest Writer, will discuss blogging at 2:30 p.m. Thursday in the Jay-Rollins Library oncampus. A screening of her film, "Loves Her Gun," will begin at 7 p.m. in the Ryan Little Theatre. Admission is free.

Maker Fest Maker Fest, an open house demonstrating Abilene Christian University's Maker Lab, will be open from 3-8 p.m. Thursday in the Brown Library on campus. Activitiesand tool demonstrations will be available. Participants are invited to bring a quadcopter for a flying activity. Admission is free.

'Life in Bloom' banquet The "Life in Bloom" fundraising banquet, benefiting Pregnancy Resources of Abilene, will begin at 7 p.m. Thursday at the Abilene Convention Center, 1100 N.Sixth St. A sponsor reception will begin at 6 p.m. Singer/songwriters Tom Douglas and Allen Shamblin will be featured. Tickets are $35. For tickets, call325-672-6415 or go to http://www.prabilene.com/partner/events.

Swap meet The Big Country Swap Meet, featuring a variety of cars, motorcycles, auto parts and memorabilia, will be open from 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. March 31, and from 7:30 a.m. to7 p.m. April 1, at Big Country Raceway, 5601 W. Stamford St. For more information, go to http://www.bigcountryswapmeet.com.

Art reception A reception night for three art exhibits, "Human Essence," "Textile" and "Images of the West," will be conducted from 5:30-8 p.m. March 31 at the Center forContemporary Arts, 220 Cypress St.

Pageant The Sunburst Beauty Pageant will begin at 6:30 p.m. March 31 at the Mall of Abilene. The competition includes boys up to 3 years old and girls and women up to27 years old. Registration will begin at 5:30 p.m. For more information, go to http://www.sunburstbeauty.com.

Texas Author Series The 2017 Texas Author Series will continue with a talk featuring Rachel Caine, author of "Ink and Bone" and "Paper and Fire," at 2 p.m. April 2 at the SouthBranch of the Abilene Public Library, located in the Mall of Abilene. Admission is free.

Read or Share this story: http://arnne.ws/2nILJvx

Link:

And even more 3/24/2017 - ReporterNews.com

Posted in Posthumanism | Comments Off on And even more 3/24/2017 – ReporterNews.com

Most westerners distrust robots but what if they free us for a better life? – The Guardian

Posted: at 11:09 am

Where westerners see the Terminator, the Japanese see Astro Boy: Research suggests cultural differences influence peoples view of robots. Photograph: Allstar/Warner Bros

Im always amazed at people who tell me they would never trust a driverless car to take them somewhere but then happily get into a car driven by their teenager. Talk about preferring the devil you know.

Driverless vehicles are likely to be much safer than those driven by humans. The safety differential is so large that insurance companies are already looking at alternative business models to make up for the fact that premiums will likely plummet once robots are driving us everywhere.

The barriers to our transition to driverless vehicles, and to other forms of robot intervention into our daily lives, then, are not just technical but social, political and psychological. Trust will be a huge issue and you dont have to think too hard to see why.

You might not have a problem with robots stacking shelves in a warehouse or a supermarket but how comfortable are you with a robot babysitting your child? Or looking after your aged parents? How do you feel about robot soldiers? Or robot sex workers?

A recent survey conducted by the European Commission found that, overall, people have a positive attitude towards robots. About 70% of respondents suggested they were very or fairly positive about them, with only 23% responding negatively. Men were somewhat more positive (76%) than women (65%). There was also a correlation between education levels and positive feelings: the higher the level of education, the more positive people felt towards robots.

Nonetheless, the figures changed markedly when the commission asked more specific questions.

So while most respondents were OK with robots being involved in space exploration or manufacturing, about 60% thought robots should be banned from looking after children, the elderly or the disabled. About 34% thought robots should be banned from education, while between 20 and 27% of those surveyed wanted them banned from healthcare and leisure activities.

Other research suggests cultural differences, with the Japanese often cited as more comfortable with robots than westerners, as evidenced by the fact that robots are more common in Japan. Is this a chicken-or-egg scenario? Are they more trusting of robots because they are more common in everyday life, or are they more common because people are more trusting of them? Whatever the answer, in general it is held that the Japanese are more positive towards robots. Where westerners see the Terminator, the Japanese see Astro Boy.

It seems reasonable to imply from EU figures that, for westerners, the closer robots are involved with our intimate relationships with our children or our parents the less likely we are to trust them. It is also likely that familiarity increases our trust, so that we are happy to trust robots in factories but less happy to let them drive us around.

The exception to the intimacy-trust equation might be sex robots, where other research shows that men in particular are quite comfortable with the idea of sex with robots. Women are less so, though men and women line up closely in their views about using sex robots as an aid for the disabled. And both men and women approve although the approval level is higher among men of sex robots being used in lieu of an affair with a human.

About 60% of people thought robots should be banned from looking after children, the elderly or the disabled.

So familiarity with robots, and the degree to which they are involved with those we love, affects the extent to which we trust them but can we be more precise about where our concerns lie?

According to recent research, peoples views about robots can be grouped into six categories, namely the frightening other, the subhuman other, the human substitute, the sentient other, the divine other and the co-evolutionary path to immortality.

The connection is a view about how much like us, or unlike us, a robot might be. The paper suggests our reaction to robots is similar to our reaction to humans: we trust those closest to us, most like us and with whom we are most familiar. We are more wary of strangers, or, in this case, the robot doing something were not used to robots doing.

The sixth option - the co-evolutionary path to immortality is the most interesting. This refers to whats known as posthumanism, the idea that, ultimately, humans will integrate with machines and machine intelligence. For this to happen, our trust of technology would have to be at an all-time high but there are certainly those who see posthumanism as inevitable and desirable.

The entrepreneur Elon Musk recently said, Over time I think we will probably see a closer merger of biological intelligence and digital intelligence. For him, it is a matter of survival in a world where human capabilities will be exceeded by those of robots and other forms of artificial intelligence.

But this warrants further inspection.

Musk is also interested in humans migrating to Mars to set up colonies. Of course, he has a commercial interest in pursuing such plans but I cant help but feel his interest goes deeper than profit. I wonder if this sort of posthumanism isnt a form of Stockholm syndrome, a situation where we are so overwhelmed by a potential threat of extinction that we simply surrender?

So, what on the surface seems like a wildly ambitious series of programs colonise Mars, integrate with robots might actually be a failure of nerve and imagination, a failure to confront the political and social realities of an economic system that is destroying the planet and undermining the ability of humans to earn a decent living, along with a fear that we will be usurped as the pre-eminent intelligence on the planet. Perhaps Musk, and others like him, are less entrepreneurial than suffering from an existential crisis?

Planning to live on Mars, or becoming a cyborg, might actually be a hi-tech version of burying your head in the sand. This is not to say we should shun technology but it is to say that maybe we are thinking about this the wrong way, especially in regard to trust.

Perhaps there is another form of human/robot integration that is possible. Not integration in the Musk sense of turning humans into robots but in the sense of using robots to free us from the sort of work that diminishes our capacity to be fully human: of integrating robots fully into our economy in a way that increases productivity, reduces our reliance on extractive industries, while releasing humans from the need to spend the majority of their life earning a living.

The ancient Greeks believed that labour the sort of repetitive work needed in order to survive was beneath their dignity and this was why they made sure that such work was done by slaves. Freed from this burden, the Greek citizens pretty much invented western civilisation. Is it really too hard for us to imagine a world where we use robots in a similar way, to free us from the grind of daily labour, so that we might instead create a new era of human flourishing?

That is to say, rather than trying to escape the human condition by becoming a robot or going to Mars, would we not be better off using technologies to confront the problems of scarcity, inequality and environmental degradation, and imagine a world that was post-work and post-capitalist rather than posthuman?

For that to be realised, the issue is less likely to be whether we trust robots than whether we trust ourselves enough to pursue the revolutionary change this would involve.

Continued here:

Most westerners distrust robots but what if they free us for a better life? - The Guardian

Posted in Posthumanism | Comments Off on Most westerners distrust robots but what if they free us for a better life? – The Guardian

In defence of hedonism – Irish Times

Posted: at 11:06 am

The notion of hedonism conjures up images of alcohol-fuelled pool parties rather than bookish old blokes holding theoretical discussions. But this much-maligned philosophy has its roots in ancient Greece and has been defended famously by Enlightenment thinkers such as Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill.

By making pleasure an end in itself, hedonism was sure to have its ethical opponents. However, traditional objections to the philosophy are ill-founded, argues Trinity College Dublin lecturer Ben Bramble.

At the outset, he says, it is important to understand that hedonism is a theory of well-being not a charter for selfishness. Simply put, hedonism says that your well-being is fully determined by your pleasures and pains; any two people identical in their pleasures and pains would be identical in their levels of well-being.

The major competitor to hedonism, he explains, is desire-fulfilment theory. Desire-fulfilment theory says that what is good for you is fundamentally, not good feelings but, having the sort of life you want.

To see the difference between these theories, ask yourself: Is pleasure good for you because you want it? Or do you want it because you are in some sense responding to the fact that it is good for you? I think it is the latter. Pleasure is good for us, not because we want it, but just because of how it feels. A pleasurable life would be good for us whether we wanted it or not.

Hedonism does not have many public advocates these days. What prompted you to mount a defence of it? Ben Bramble: I am defending hedonism mainly just because I think it is true.

Like other philosophers, I am interested in getting at truth for its own sake. But I also think that arriving at the right theory of well-being is extremely useful for certain practical matters. How can we know how to live well if we do not know what is good for us all in the first place?

JS Mill famously said it is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied. Do you agree? A popular criticism of hedonism is that it seems to entail that the life of a pig could be higher in well-being than the life of a normal human, providing that the pig has many intense pleasures of, say, slopping around in the mud, lying in the sun, eating its fill, etc.

Mill argued that hedonism does not entail this. In particular, he argued that there are pleasures that human beings can feel that add more to well-being than any amount of the only pleasures pigs can feel.

What are these higher pleasures? They include pleasures of love, learning, aesthetic appreciation, and so on. I agree with Mill.

Now, you might wonder, how can a hedonist consistently hold this view? Mustnt she say that the best life is simply the one with the most pleasure? The answer, I believe and here I depart from Mill has to do with diversity. Diversity of pleasure matters in and of itself. And there is much greater diversity available, I believe, in the higher pleasures than in mere bodily ones. Bodily pleasures, most of the time, are just more of the same.

The point here, it is important to emphasise, is not that bodily pleasures necessarily get boring or stop being pleasurable - though they often do. It is that purely repeated pleasures - pleasures that bring nothing new to our lives in terms of their quality - are, in and of themselves, a waste of time. This is not to say that bodily pleasures are unimportant.

Even purely repeated bodily pleasures can help us carry on in life, and so can act as a kind of oil for our joints. The point is rather that with only such pleasures, we would be missing out on the richest and most varied pleasures available - and, I would add, some of the most pleasurable.

Acceptance of a refined form of hedonism may be reasonable but is it the best way of approaching ethical matters? Hedonism, as Ive said, is just a theory of well-being. By itself, then, it has nothing to say about how we should live. Importantly, it does not say we should live so as to maximise our own self-interest-that (false) theory is called egoism.

I think we should combine hedonism with utilitarianism, the theory on which we should live so as to maximise the well-being of all sentient creatures, including non-human animals. Combining these views, we get the appealing conclusion that we should live so as to help all creatures feel good and avoid feeling bad.

Why is this appealing? Every other theory of how we should live is committed to saying that there are at least some occasions when we should choose something that doesnt maximally improve the feelings of sentient beings ie occasions when we should forgo making some particular individual feel better in favour of doing something that makes nobody feel better. That strikes me as highly counterintuitive.

Does your theory of hedonism have broader implications for how we should treat animals? As I mentioned earlier, I think hedonists should distinguish between mere bodily pleasures and higher pleasures of love, learning, aesthetic appreciation, etc. Bodily pleasures have their place, but higher pleasures have special value.

For this reason, pigs and most other non-human animals, who cannot experience these higher pleasures to the same degree humans can, are cut off from living especially fortunate lives. This is a great shame for pigs, etc.

That said, there are many pleasures, and pains, that non-human animals can feel. This means that they can have lives that can go better or worse for them. So, it is absolutely vital that we take their interests into account.

I think that the way we treat animals today most clearly, in the meat industry is so bad that it is hard to fathom. Meat tastes good, yes. But this benefit to us is infinitesimal when compared to the incredible suffering we inflict on animals to get it. Future generations, I suspect, will look back at us with profound dismay.

ASK A SAGE:

Question: Why is so much public debate unmannerly?

Mary Wollstonecraft replies: Virtue can only flourish amongst equals.

Read more here:

In defence of hedonism - Irish Times

Posted in Ethical Egoism | Comments Off on In defence of hedonism – Irish Times