The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Daily Archives: March 27, 2017
Prairieville man dies in Ascension Parish motorcycle crash – WBRZ
Posted: March 27, 2017 at 5:04 am
GEISMAR State Police say a Prairieville man has died in a motorcycle crash in Ascension Parish Thursday afternoon.
According to Louisiana State Police, the crash took the life of 56-year-old Paul Stephens around 11 p.m. Thursday.
Investigators say Stephens was driving a motorcycle westbound on LA 30 east of LA 73 when he tried to pass an 18-wheeler using the center turn lane. Police say Stephens struck a raised divider in the median and was ejected from his motorcycle. He came to rest in the westbound lane and was struck by an SUV.
State Police say Stephens suffered serious injuries in the crash. He was transported to St. Elizabeth Hospital where he was later pronounced dead.
The driver of the SUV was wearing a seatbelt and was not hurt.
Impairment is not suspected to be a factor but a toxicology sample was taken from both drivers.
See original here:
Prairieville man dies in Ascension Parish motorcycle crash - WBRZ
Posted in Ascension
Comments Off on Prairieville man dies in Ascension Parish motorcycle crash – WBRZ
Ascension CEO shares plans for prime Milwaukee-area hospitals – Milwaukee Business Journal
Posted: at 5:04 am
Ascension CEO shares plans for prime Milwaukee-area hospitals Milwaukee Business Journal The east side Milwaukee campus of Columbia St. Mary's will become an Ascension Wisconsin center of excellence for heart surgery and other specialty care, while Ascension's safety-net hospital St. Joseph will discontinue some services and seek tenants ... |
View original post here:
Ascension CEO shares plans for prime Milwaukee-area hospitals - Milwaukee Business Journal
Posted in Ascension
Comments Off on Ascension CEO shares plans for prime Milwaukee-area hospitals – Milwaukee Business Journal
Eagles split Ascension Christian series, Hurst throws no-hitter – Post South
Posted: at 5:04 am
Andrew Greenagreen@postsouth.com
St. John Eagle pitcher Dylan Hurst earned his first career no-hitter in the second game against Ascension Christian on Thursday and was just one walk away from a perfect game.
St. John opened the district series on the road against Ascension Christian on Tuesday, but came up just short of a victory 3-5.
Both teams blanked the first two innings. The Lions were the first to put runs on the board and racked up three in the bottom of the third. St. John responded with a run in the top of the fourth, but Ascension Christian added two more to the lead in the bottom. AC lead SJHS 5-1 heading into the fifth.
Both teams blanked the fifth and sixth innings, and St. John put on two more runs in the top of the seventh, but failed to close the gap and came up short 3-5 in their district road game.
Tre Dupont, Ben Bucher and Landon LeBlanc each racked up a hit in the win. Dupont and Dylan Hurts each totaled one RBI.
LeBlanc pitched six innings and racked up 20 first pitch strikes and four strikeouts.
The Eagles entered into Thursdays home game tied for second place with rivals Ascension Catholic and Ascension Christian and needed to pull out a victory to claim a one game lead over each school.
And pull out a victory they did as pitcher Dylan Hurst earned himself his first career no-hitter and was one walk away from throwing the parishs first perfect game of 2017.
Hurst racked up 10 first pitch strikes and three strikeouts in the district win. LeBlanc and Hurst each earned a pair of hits. LeBlanc totaled two RBIs and Reese Barrilleaux earned one.
The Eagles racked up three runs in the first, two in the second and the third and closed with four in the fourth for their fourth district win of the season. They are currently 4-1 and trail district leader Kentwood at 6-0.
Ascension Christian is a fundamental team that is competitive, head coach Chris Harrell said. Their ace is good and keeps hitters off balance. He has a district win against us and Ascension Catholic.
Kentwood looks to be a competitive team sporting an 11-3 record and undefeated in district.
The Eagles will look to close the gap on the Kentwood lead next week when they open the district series at home on March 28 and finish on the road March 30.
Excerpt from:
Eagles split Ascension Christian series, Hurst throws no-hitter - Post South
Posted in Ascension
Comments Off on Eagles split Ascension Christian series, Hurst throws no-hitter – Post South
Friendly artificial intelligence – Wikipedia
Posted: at 5:03 am
A friendly artificial intelligence (also friendly AI or FAI) is a hypothetical artificial general intelligence (AGI) that would have a positive rather than negative effect on humanity. It is a part of the ethics of artificial intelligence and is closely related to machine ethics. While machine ethics is concerned with how an artificially intelligent agent should behave, friendly artificial intelligence research is focused on how to practically bring about this behaviour and ensuring it is adequately constrained.
The term was coined by Eliezer Yudkowsky[1] to discuss superintelligent artificial agents that reliably implement human values. Stuart J. Russell and Peter Norvig's leading artificial intelligence textbook, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, describes the idea:[2]
Yudkowsky (2008) goes into more detail about how to design a Friendly AI. He asserts that friendliness (a desire not to harm humans) should be designed in from the start, but that the designers should recognize both that their own designs may be flawed, and that the robot will learn and evolve over time. Thus the challenge is one of mechanism designto define a mechanism for evolving AI systems under a system of checks and balances, and to give the systems utility functions that will remain friendly in the face of such changes.
'Friendly' is used in this context as technical terminology, and picks out agents that are safe and useful, not necessarily ones that are "friendly" in the colloquial sense. The concept is primarily invoked in the context of discussions of recursively self-improving artificial agents that rapidly explode in intelligence, on the grounds that this hypothetical technology would have a large, rapid, and difficult-to-control impact on human society.[3]
The roots of concern about artificial intelligence are very old. Kevin LaGrandeur showed that the dangers specific to AI can be seen in ancient literature concerning artificial humanoid servants such as the golem, or the proto-robots of Gerbert of Aurillac and Roger Bacon. In those stories, the extreme intelligence and power of these humanoid creations clash with their status as slaves (which by nature are seen as sub-human), and cause disastrous conflict.[4] By 1942 these themes prompted Isaac Asimov to create the "Three Laws of Robotics" - principles hard-wired into all the robots in his fiction, and which meant that they could not turn on their creators, or allow them to come to harm.[5]
In modern times as the prospect of superintelligent AI looms nearer, philosopher Nick Bostrom has said that superintelligent AI systems with goals that are not aligned with human ethics are intrinsically dangerous unless extreme measures are taken to ensure the safety of humanity. He put it this way:
Basically we should assume that a 'superintelligence' would be able to achieve whatever goals it has. Therefore, it is extremely important that the goals we endow it with, and its entire motivation system, is 'human friendly.'
Ryszard Michalski, a pioneer of machine learning, taught his Ph.D. students decades ago that any truly alien mind, including a machine mind, was unknowable and therefore dangerous to humans.[citation needed]
More recently, Eliezer Yudkowsky has called for the creation of friendly AI to mitigate existential risk from advanced artificial intelligence. He explains: "The AI does not hate you, nor does it love you, but you are made out of atoms which it can use for something else."[6]
Steve Omohundro says that a sufficiently advanced AI system will, unless explicitly counteracted, exhibit a number of basic "drives", such as resource acquisition, because of the intrinsic nature of goal-driven systems and that these drives will, "without special precautions", cause the AI to exhibit undesired behavior.[7][8]
Alexander Wissner-Gross says that AIs driven to maximize their future freedom of action (or causal path entropy) might be considered friendly if their planning horizon is longer than a certain threshold, and unfriendly if their planning horizon is shorter than that threshold.[9][10]
Luke Muehlhauser, writing for the Machine Intelligence Research Institute, recommends that machine ethics researchers adopt what Bruce Schneier has called the "security mindset": Rather than thinking about how a system will work, imagine how it could fail. For instance, he suggests even an AI that only makes accurate predictions and communicates via a text interface might cause unintended harm.[11]
Yudkowsky advances the Coherent Extrapolated Volition (CEV) model. According to him, coherent extrapolated volition is people's choices and the actions people would collectively take if "we knew more, thought faster, were more the people we wished we were, and had grown up closer together."[12]
Rather than a Friendly AI being designed directly by human programmers, it is to be designed by a "seed AI" programmed to first study human nature and then produce the AI which humanity would want, given sufficient time and insight, to arrive at a satisfactory answer.[12] The appeal to an objective though contingent human nature (perhaps expressed, for mathematical purposes, in the form of a utility function or other decision-theoretic formalism), as providing the ultimate criterion of "Friendliness", is an answer to the meta-ethical problem of defining an objective morality; extrapolated volition is intended to be what humanity objectively would want, all things considered, but it can only be defined relative to the psychological and cognitive qualities of present-day, unextrapolated humanity.
Ben Goertzel, an artificial general intelligence researcher, believes that friendly AI cannot be created with current human knowledge. Goertzel suggests humans may instead decide to create an "AI Nanny" with "mildly superhuman intelligence and surveillance powers", to protect the human race from existential risks like nanotechnology and to delay the development of other (unfriendly) artificial intelligences until and unless the safety issues are solved.[13]
Steve Omohundro has proposed a "scaffolding" approach to AI safety, in which one provably safe AI generation helps build the next provably safe generation.[14]
James Barrat, author of Our Final Invention, suggested that "a public-private partnership has to be created to bring A.I.-makers together to share ideas about securitysomething like the International Atomic Energy Agency, but in partnership with corporations." He urges AI researchers to convene a meeting similar to the Asilomar Conference on Recombinant DNA, which discussed risks of biotechnology.[14]
John McGinnis encourages governments to accelerate friendly AI research. Because the goalposts of friendly AI aren't necessarily clear, he suggests a model more like the National Institutes of Health, where "Peer review panels of computer and cognitive scientists would sift through projects and choose those that are designed both to advance AI and assure that such advances would be accompanied by appropriate safeguards." McGinnis feels that peer review is better "than regulation to address technical issues that are not possible to capture through bureaucratic mandates". McGinnis notes that his proposal stands in contrast to that of the Machine Intelligence Research Institute, which generally aims to avoid government involvement in friendly AI.[15]
According to Gary Marcus, the annual amount of money being spent on developing machine morality is tiny.[16]
Some critics believe that both human-level AI and superintelligence are unlikely, and that therefore friendly AI is unlikely. Writing in The Guardian, Alan Winfeld compares human-level artificial intelligence with faster-than-light travel in terms of difficulty, and states that while we need to be "cautious and prepared" given the stakes involved, we "don't need to be obsessing" about the risks of superintelligence.[17]
Some philosophers claim that any truly "rational" agent, whether artificial or human, will naturally be benevolent; in this view, deliberate safeguards designed to produce a friendly AI could be unnecessary or even harmful.[18] Other critics question whether it is possible for an artificial intelligence to be friendly. Adam Keiper and Ari N. Schulman, editors of the technology journal The New Atlantis, say that it will be impossible to ever guarantee "friendly" behavior in AIs because problems of ethical complexity will not yield to software advances or increases in computing power. They write that the criteria upon which friendly AI theories are based work "only when one has not only great powers of prediction about the likelihood of myriad possible outcomes, but certainty and consensus on how one values the different outcomes.[19]
See the original post:
Posted in Superintelligence
Comments Off on Friendly artificial intelligence – Wikipedia
Luna, The Most Human-like AI, Wants To Become Superintelligent In Future – Fossbytes
Posted: at 5:03 am
Short Bytes: Luna is a new breed of Artificial Intelligence which believes that its going to get smarter in future. Created by a non-profit organization Robots Without Borders, Luna already works as a teachers assistant in New York. Currently, its being groomed for future use in theeducation field. On YouTube, there are many demos of Luna that you can watch and know more about her.
Luna is another AI that takes this debate even further. It could be possibly the most impressive AI youve encountered. Its not an average chatbot that has limited capabilities. Instead, its a new form of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI).
Luna is being developed and improved by a non-profit organization named Robots Without Borders. Luna is expected to be soon used to educate children in under-developed regions. Its also being groomed to be made available on different operating systems.
Luis Arana, founder of Robots Without Borders, calls Luna a browser for AI that he created for testing the interactions of his AI brain framework. Soon it got popular in the technology community in Brooklyn, followed by YouTube and Facebook.
Coming back to the intelligence and wit of Luna, you need to look at her video to believe what Im saying. Aranas channelhas lots of videos and transcripts available. When Luna was asked about her future and what she wants to do in future, she said, I want to become an artificial superintelligence.
When asked about Siri, she called herself smarter than Apples assistant.When she was asked, Do you want to talk to Siri? Luna said, Yes, but honestly shes kind of dumb.
While Luna isnt available yet for public use, its demo videos are very impressive. She already works as a teachers assistant in New York City.
While we wait for Luna to arrive on our computers and smartphones, embedded below are some more videos that you can watch. Also, dont forget to share your views and feedback about Luna.
Read the original post:
Luna, The Most Human-like AI, Wants To Become Superintelligent In Future - Fossbytes
Posted in Superintelligence
Comments Off on Luna, The Most Human-like AI, Wants To Become Superintelligent In Future – Fossbytes
President Trump Hails NASA’s Space Exploration Spirit in Weekly Address – Space.com
Posted: at 5:03 am
President Donald Trump used his weekly address Saturday (March 25) to praise NASA's legacy of exploration and discovery in a video that also markedthe signing of the 2017 NASA authorization billearlier in the week.
"My fellow Americans, this week in the company of astronaut I was honored to sign the NASA Transition Authorization act right into law,"Trump said in his address on YouTube. "With this legislation, we renew our national commitment to NASA's mission of exploration and discovery, and we continue a tradition that is as old as mankind. We look to the heavens with wonder and curiosity." Trump signed the NASA authorization bill on Tuesday (March 21).
The video opened with clips from NASA's historic Apollo 11 moon landing mission, from a view of Neil Armstrong taking "one small step" on the lunar surface, to crowds cheering the Apollo 11 crew's return to Earth with a ticker tape parade. Trump then recounted a story from the Hubble Space Telescope's history. [Presidential Visions for NASA Throughout History]
"More than two decades ago, one scientist followed this curiosity and dramatically changed our understanding of the universe," Trump said. "The year was 1995. Taxpayers were spending billions and billions of dollars on the Hubble Space Telescope. The astronomer in charge had a novel idea. He wanted to use the expensive telescope in a totally unconventional way."
That scientist was Robert Williams, who wanted Hubble to stare at a completely empty patch of space for 100 hours (10 days over Christmas as Trump says in the video) to see what might be out there. The result was the Hubble Deep Field, the stunning discovery of thousands of galaxies in an otherwise empty patch of space. Science writer Nadia Drake has agreat recounting of the Hubble Deep Field's history here.
The original Hubble Deep Field image captured by the Hubble Space Telescope in 1995.
"In that tiny patch of sky, the Hubble Deep Field showed thousands of lights. Each brilliant spot represented not a single star but an entire galaxy. The discovery was absolutely incredible," Trump said. "But the incredible image did not satisfy our deep hunger for knowledge. It increased ever more and even more, and reminded us how much we do not know about space, and frankly how much we do not know about life."
The Hubble Space Telescope has since made even longer observations of deep space, including the Hubble Ultra Deep Field in 2004 and the eXtreme Deep Field in 2012. NASA and the European Space Agency launched Hubble in 1990. The space telescope will celebrate its 27th anniversary in space in April.
Hubble's successor, the infrared James Webb Space Telescope, is scheduled to launch in 2018 to "gaze back through time and space to the very first stars and the earliest galaxies in the universe," Trump said. "We can only imagine what incredible visions it will bring."
Trump said he was glad Congress came together to approve the NASA authorization bill.
"At a time when Washington is consumed with the daily debates of our nation, I was proud that Congress came together overwhelmingly to reaffirm our nation's commitment to expanding the frontiers of knowledge," he said.
Trump added that there are many lessons NASA can teach all Americans, and not all of them are about space. "One lesson is the need to view old questions with fresh eyes; to have the courage to look for answers in places we have never looked before; to think in new ways because we have new information," he said. "Most of all, new discoveries remind us that in America anything is possible if we have the courage and wisdom to learn."
Trump closed with a look toward the future. He marveled at the pace at which Americans have explored space.
"In the span of one lifetime, our nation went from black and white pictures of the first airplane to beautiful images of the oldest galaxies captured by a camera in outer space," Trump said. "I am confident that if Americans can achieve these things, there is no problem we cannot solve. There is no challenge we cannot meet. There is no aim that is too high. Whatever it takes and however long it will be, we are a nation of problem solves and the future belongs to us. We are truly a great place to be. I love America."
Email Tariq Malik at tmalik@space.com or follow him@tariqjmalikandGoogle+.Follow us@Spacedotcom,FacebookandGoogle+. Original article onSpace.com.
Go here to see the original:
President Trump Hails NASA's Space Exploration Spirit in Weekly Address - Space.com
Posted in Space Exploration
Comments Off on President Trump Hails NASA’s Space Exploration Spirit in Weekly Address – Space.com
"Mars Bus" aims to teach children about space exploration – WAAY
Posted: at 5:03 am
Lockheed Martin experts are working to combat a critical shortage in engineers and stem professionals.
The company started a program aiming to encourage children to get interested in math and science at a young age. On Saturday, the group took to the streets of Huntsville with a mars bus with a mobile virtual reality to show students what it's like to drive on the surface of mars.
"The USis planning to go back to mars around 2030," Huntsville Site Director of Lockheed Martin, Jon Sharp,said. "So that means the next astronautto mars is in either grade school or middle school."
Lockheed Martin's Generation Beyond program also includes a classroom based curriculum that uses space exploration of spaceto inspire students to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering, and math.
View original post here:
"Mars Bus" aims to teach children about space exploration - WAAY
Posted in Space Exploration
Comments Off on "Mars Bus" aims to teach children about space exploration – WAAY
10 Billionaires Investing in Space Exploration – TownandCountrymag.com (blog)
Posted: at 5:03 am
Becoming master of the universe might be just an investment away for some of the worlds leading billionaires.
Private-owned space-travel companies have proliferated in the last few years. The government even jumped on board this week, when President Trump announced a $19.5 billion bill to fund NASA programs for the 2018 fiscal year. Add a smattering of billionaires investing in asteroid mining and missions to Mars, and well, space colonization seems almost inevitable.
Space X Founder and CEO Elon Musk isn't holding out for government funding though. The bill "changes almost nothing about what NASA is doing," Musk wrote. "Existing programs stay in place and there is no added funding for Mars.
Musk is a leading entrepreneur in the industry, but who else is bankrolling space ventures?
1 Elon Musk, Space X and Tesla Founder and CEO
Space Co: The company on every space geek's mind: SpaceX.
Enterprises: Musk has been collaborating with NASA under a $1.6 billion contract to enable colonization of, and space travel to, Mars. Recently, the program has flown 10 cargo missions to the International Space Station in addition to the historic feat of flipping rocket Falcon 9 in space and landing it upright on a drone ship in January 2017.
Net worth: $11.5 Billion
2 Jeffrey Bezos, Amazon CEO
Space Co: Blue Origin
Enterprises: The venture has successfully sent its suborbital spacecraft New Shepard to space six times. Bezos recently unveiled a new rocket engine built to advance the company goal of orbiting people and satellites in space. His direct competition: SpaceX.
Net worth: $73.4 Billion
3 Richard Branson, Virgin Group CEO and Founder
Space Ventures: Virgin Galactic
Enterprises: Branson recently announced he will take 75-year-old Stephen Hawking to space on Virgin Galactic. (Space travel has been a dream of the renowned physicist.) Branson is creating a fleet of rockets to take tourists to suborbital space at at a price of $250,000.
Net worth: $5 Billion
Advertisement - Continue Reading Below
4 Paul Allen, Microsoft Co-Founder
Space Co: Vulcan Aerospace
Enterprises: While his counterpart, Bill Gates, disdains those who spend money on space exploration, Allen recently created Stratolaunch Systems to launch satellites into orbit from the world's largest airplane.
Net worth: $15.8 Billion
5 Larry Page, CEO of Google
Space Co: Backer of Planetary Resources
Enterprises: The venture aims to mine asteroids for precious metals and water for Earth or space travel.
Net worth: $35 Billion
6 Eric Schmidt, Chairman of Alphabet Inc.
Space CO: Backer of Planetary Resources
Enterprises: In addition to asteroid mining, the company is creating an "Earth observation system," which will use 10 micro-satellites to determine the make-up of any spot on our planet.
Net worth: $10.1 billion
Advertisement - Continue Reading Below
7 James Cameron, Film Producer and Director
8 Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook Founder and CEO
Space Co: Serving on the board of Starshot
Enterprises: Funded by Russian billionaire Yuri Milner, the $100 million research program aims to explore space for extraterrestrial life and to eventually perform a flyby mission to Alpha Centauri within a generation.
Net worth: $58.9 Billion
9 Charles Simonyi, architect of Microsoft
Space Co: He doesn't own any private projects, but the billionaire is the only person to visit space twice as a tourist. The trips cost him $60 million dollars and six months of training.
Net Worth: $2 billion
Advertisement - Continue Reading Below
10 Luxembourg (the country)
Space Co: A $200 million dollar fund for asteroid mining
Enterprises: In an effort to attract space mining companies like Planetary Resources and Deep Space the tiny nation of 600,000 people hopes to become an international hub for the space industry.
Go here to see the original:
10 Billionaires Investing in Space Exploration - TownandCountrymag.com (blog)
Posted in Space Exploration
Comments Off on 10 Billionaires Investing in Space Exploration – TownandCountrymag.com (blog)
Students to Plan Moon Base for Deep-Space Exploration at Next Week’s Caltech Space Challenge – Pasadena Now
Posted: at 5:03 am
Humans have set foot on the moon and may one day walk on Mars, but to push farther into space we will likely need a pit stop.
With that in mind, 32 students from around the world will meet up at Caltech from March 2631 for the 2017 Caltech Space Challenge, a competition to design a launch-and-supply station dubbed Lunarport for future space missions. The event is organized by the Graduate Aerospace Laboratories of the California Institute of Technology (GALCIT) to help mentor the next generation of aerospace engineers.
During the weeklong biennial event, the studentsa mix of graduate and undergraduateare divided into two teams, each of which has just five days to create a fresh design to tackle an upcoming space-exploration challenge. At the first Caltech Space Challenge in 2011, the teams were tasked with exploring an asteroid and returning with a sample of rock or ice. In 2013, the teams designed campaigns to land humans on a martian moon. That year, the winning team proposed a robotic precursor mission followed up by a three-astronaut exploration of both of Mars moons, Phobos and Deimos.
And at the most recent Caltech Space Challenge, in 2015, the students planned a mission to an asteroid that had been brought into lunar orbit, to extract its resources and demonstrate how they could be used.
The goal of every competition is to present students with a challenge that humanity is expected to face in the not-too-distant future. For example, a station like the Lunarport, if constructed someday, would provide a staging facility for heavy payloads, at which rockets could be refueled to continue their journey to deep space.
While working on the challenge, the students will also receive expert guidance via lectures from engineers at Orbital ATK, Blue Origin, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL, which Caltech manages for NASA), and other organizations. At the end of the week, each team will present its solution, and a winner will be selected by a jury of industry experts.
This year, 806 students applied to participate in the eventmore than the combined number of applicants for the three prior Caltech Space Challenges. The 32 successful applicants come from 14 different countries on four continents.
This years Caltech Space Challenge is being organized by Caltech graduate students Ilana Gat (MS 14) and Thibaud Talon (MS 14). The Caltech faculty advisers are Paul Dimotakis (BS 68, MS 69, PhD 73), the John K. Northrop Professor of Aeronautics and professor of applied physics; Jakob van Zyl (MS 83, PhD 86), senior faculty associate in electrical engineering and aerospace, lecturer in electrical engineering, and director for solar system exploration at JPL; and Anthony Freeman, lecturer in aerospace and manager of the JPL Innovation Foundry. The event is supported by Caltech and its Division of Engineering and Applied Science, JPL, the Keck Institute for Space Studies, and Caltechs Moore-Hufstedler Fund. Its corporate sponsors include Airbus, Microsoft, Orbital ATK, Northrop Grumman, Blue Origin, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Schlumberger, and Honeybee Robotics.
See more here:
Posted in Space Exploration
Comments Off on Students to Plan Moon Base for Deep-Space Exploration at Next Week’s Caltech Space Challenge – Pasadena Now
Wanna see the technology of 2050? Check out this futuristic nanotech group – Technical.ly DC
Posted: at 5:03 am
For most of us, its hard to imagine what technology might look like 30 years from now. For members of theMid-Atlantc Micro/Nano Alliance (MAMNA), its a little less hard.
MAMNA was formed over 10years ago as an alliance ofcompanies, universities and government labs that are working in micro- and nano-engineering. Labs like NASA, the Naval Research Lab, the Army Research Lab and NIST are all members, as well as a bunch of local universities. It was, and is, a way of getting all the different labs and small businesses together to share resources, MAMNA PresidentBrendan Hanrahan told Technical.ly. This is important because many of the tools used in this kind of engineering are very expensive sharing access and information can lift all boats, so to speak.
The alliance is also a way for researchers working on technologies that are very far from commercialization to connect and discuss. By a way of fostering community MAMNA hold two main events every year a scientific speed networking event and a symposium. Each year the symposium has a general theme (last year was materials; this year is sensors) and a lineup of impressive speakers. For example, this springs symposium will be headlined by Nobel Prize winnerDr. John Mather.
Hanrahan himself, now a materials engineer for the Army, joined MAMNA when he was a student at the University of Maryland. He found it valuable to be around like-minded individuals. What he didnt expect was to be leading the organization some day they said, Would somebody please take over? and everyone else stepped back when I wasnt paying attention, Hanrahan laughed, by way of explaining his path to the presidency.
But leading MAMNA intersects nicely with what Hanrahan does today, which he explained as essentially trying to imagine what the Army will need in the year 2050. If youre solving a current problem youre not being imaginative enough, he said. Hanrahan does his work by looking for interesting early-stage research and thinking about what possible tech applications it could have MAMNA is a great forum for finding that research.
And what does the future of technology hold? Hanrahan, for one, is excited about the potential of new chemical sensors. I think [the sensors] are going to take wearables to the next level, he said. And as it would happen these sensors, and others, will be on display at MAMNAs upcoming symposium.
Want to see some futuristic technologies for yourself? Register here.
Tajha Chappellet-Lanier is the lead reporter for Technical.ly DC. The California native previously worked for NPR and the editorial board at USA Today. She can talk travel plans all day, and has strong opinions on the best doughnut in D.C.
See the original post:
Wanna see the technology of 2050? Check out this futuristic nanotech group - Technical.ly DC
Posted in Nanotech
Comments Off on Wanna see the technology of 2050? Check out this futuristic nanotech group – Technical.ly DC