Daily Archives: March 4, 2017

Making Sen$e columnist Vikram Mansharamani assesses whether the recent digital currencys boom is bubble about to bust. Photo by George Frey/Getty Images

The rapidly rising price ofbitcoinis leading many to question if the digital currencys boom is about to bust.Strategist Peter Schiff, for instance, recently warned todays bitcoin could be tomorrows beanie babies. As of this writing, bitcoin is up almost 30 percent in the past month and over 100 percent in the past year.It has been hitting new highs on an almost daily basis and recently crossed the $1,200 mark.So is there a bitcoin bubble about to burst?

As of this writing, bitcoin is up almost 30 percent in the past month and over 100 percent in the past year So is there a bitcoin bubble about to burst?

To try to answer this question, lets apply the framework for spotting bubbles that I articulated in my 2011 book,Boombustology: Spotting Financial Bubbles Before They Burst.The approach is based on the application of five lenses and generates a probabilistic assessment of a forthcoming bust.

Most mainstream economic theories utilize a supply and demand driven price determination model that generally results in pricestendingtoward equilibrium.I say tending because most serious scholars admit that behavioral and informational issues can distort the price at any one point in time, but there exists an overarching belief that such distortions are rapidly ironed out.Markets are, according to this view, basically efficient.Higher prices dampen demand, and lower prices disincentivize supply.

But what if thats not true?What if higher prices increase demand?Such a dynamic might arise for many reasons, but one eloquent explanation is the Theory of Reflexivity, as proposed by George Soros.Although it has many subtleties beyond the self-fulfilling logic that many ascribe to it, the underlying implication is that prices can and do tendawayfrom equilibrium.The result: booms and busts.

READ MORE: In the age of the Panama Papers, is Bitcoin technology the future?

So has the higher bitcoin price been accompanied by higher demand?Its unclear.The evidence is mixed.On the one hand, it sure seems that as news about and interest in bitcoin rises, so does its price. Its been seen as a safe-haven asset during times of elevated geopolitical, financial or regulatory riskand may even attract price-insensitivebuyers at those times.But on the other hand,the volume of trading has not gone up as prices have.And while volume is at best a crude proxy for demand, it tells us about the general activity level.Lens one: half-check.

Another telltale sign of a bubble is the presence of significant leverage supporting lofty prices.And while its unclear if bitcoin prices are bubbly or not, I dont see any evidence that leverage is fueling the potentially elevated prices. There are no futures contracts that enable large exposures with minimal collateral. There are no options that providede factoleverage.Sure, some investors may be utilizing other collateral to secure credit that is in turn used to buy bitcoin, but this is impossible to track.

Another telltale sign of a bubble is the presence of significant leverage supporting lofty prices.

But more importantly, perhaps, we can look at the amount of debt that has been holding up many of the countries that back traditional fiat currencies. (Hint: its not a small number!)In addition, the fact that printing presses around the world continue to print more and more money implies that traditional currencies are being debased at an alarming rate.With a fixed algorithmic release of additional bitcoins into the market and a cap on the total number that will ultimately be issued, the cryptocurrency represents a non-printable currency (similar in this respect to gold).Lens two: blank.

Overconfidence and new-era thinking are the hallmarks of my third lens, psychology. Whenever individuals develop a devout belief that its different this time, buyers beware.It is rarely different, and asset prices have never risen indefinitely.Rather, they generally go up and down, and in this regard, bitcoin prices are no different.

Its also clear that there is increasing agreement that cryptocurrencies are the new new thing and offer the promise of freedom from authoritarian manipulation of monetary instruments.Even investorPeter Thiel noted the promise of bitcoinby highlighting his own failure: Paypal had these goals of starting a new currency.We failed at that, and we just created a new payment system.I think bitcoin has succeeded on the level of new currency.

And like gold bugs, bitcoin believers tend to exhibit religious conviction in the cryptocurrencys ability to store value.They often go further, suggesting the amazing upside potential they exhibit.Internet analyst Henry Blodget has even suggestedbitcoins could be worth $1 millionper coin.In fact,CNBCs Brian Kelly described bitcoin asnot just digital gold it is a once-in-a-generation investment opportunity, similar to the internet, growing just as fast, if not faster its the internet of money.Lens three: check.

My fourth lens is politics, broadly defined to include both regulations and moral hazards.As with any asset, regulations can distort prices by either artificially increasing or dampening supply or demand.

Just think of what happened when political motivations to increase home ownership in the United States nudged more and more people into houses.Without the political incentives, prices may not have risen as handsomely as they did during the housing bubble.Further, the moral hazard endemic in the use of government sponsored mortgage finance enabled lenders to play a game of heads I win, tails you lose.If loans worked out, the lender profited.If it didnt, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac bore the losses.

When it comes to bitcoin, are there any artificial government interventions that are supporting bitcoin prices?No.On the contrary, regulators are trying to discourage interest in bitcoin.Just look to China, where itsmajor bitcoin exchanges were effectively shut down last month by government officials.Butas noted by Elaine Ou inBloomberg View, even China cant kill bitcoin.Bitcoin prices briefly fell upon the news, but quickly recovered and marched higher.Theyre up more than 25 percent in the three weeks since China tried to control trading.

And when it comes to moral hazard, there are no signs of it in bitcoin land.No one bailed out those who lost millions whenbitcoin exchange Mt. Gox filed for bankruptcy.No regulator prevented or intervened to managethe governance disputes that arose on the bitcoin algorithm.Many bitcoin market participants are transacting with open eyes, fully aware of the risks of doing so.There is no FDIC protection, no Federal Reserve put.Lens four: blank.

Kolin Burges, a self-styled cryptocurrency trader and former software engineer who came from London, holds a placard to protest against Mt. Gox. Tokyo-based Mt. Gox was a founding member and one of the three elected industry representatives on the board of the Bitcoin Foundation. Photo by Toru Hanai/Reuters

An application of epidemic logic to the study of financial bubbles can help gauge the relative maturity of manias.If we analogize an investment hysteria to a fever or flu spreading through a population, the variables of concern to us would include the infection rate, the removal rate, and perhaps most importantly, the percentage of the population not (yet) affected.The last metric can be thought of as the fuel available to keep the fire burning.Once we run out of people to infect, so to say, the partys over.New demand will disappear.Prices will fall.

When it comes to bitcoin, the number of potential buyers (that is, those still vulnerable to infection) is very large indeed.To begin, its not particularly easy to buy bitcoin, and thats deterred institutional investors.Specialized exchanges, online wallets and the need to protect private keys create huge friction in transactions, keeping many potential bitcoin buyers away.There isnt an ETF, at least not yet.Stay tuned, however, asan ETF is in the works.And if approved (well know more later this month), theWall Street Journalnotesit might generate a buying frenzy with up to $300 million of inflows during the first week alone, a volume that dwarfs the currently traded daily value of any bitcoin exchange.

READ MORE: Alleged Bitcoin creator comes forward, but questions remain

And with a current market capitalization of around $20 billion, the bitcoin market is miniscule relative to its potential.Consider that the value of privately held gold is in the trillions of dollarsor that the global remittances (a potential use for cryptocurrencies like bitcoin) currently tally into the hundreds of billions of dollars. The bottom line is that bitcoin just isnt as widely held or used as it could be.There is still an enormous population of potential buyers waiting on the sidelines.Andin a recent Twitter poll conducted by investor Mark Hart, only 22 percent of respondents indicated that they were Max Long bitcoin, with 49 percent Planning to buy/add or Curious.Lens 5: blank.

So on my five-point scale, with five being a virtually certain bubble likely to burst imminently, bitcoin only registers one and half points.On the margin, this means that the stage may be set for it to become a bubble, but it doesnt appear to be one yet.It may one day become a full-blown bubble with high bursting risk, but the evidence doesnt suggest were there yet.Recall that government attempts to contain bitcoin have failed, anointing the cryptocurrency with a forbidden fruit status and driving new demand.Or that the possibility of an ETF or other investment instrument may emerge to ease the frictions of purchasing bitcoin.

While short-term price corrections are always possible, there are compelling reasons to believe the long-term outlook for blockchain-enabled currencies like bitcoin is bright.

And the promise of smart contracts inspires visions of unprecedented demand for digital currencies. In fact, just yesterday, a collection of large companies including Microsoft and JP Morgan announcedthey would be forming the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance.Ethereum is a distributed computing platform based on blockchain technologies that features the ability to design smart contracts.The cryptocurrency native to Ethereum isether, and its beencalledthe hottest new thing in digital currency.As the standard-bearer for cryptocurrencies, bitcoin will benefit from any attention ether generates. (Full disclosure: I own both bitcoin and ether.)

While short-term price corrections are always possible, there are compelling reasons to believe the long-term outlook for blockchain-enabled currencies like bitcoin is bright.If youre looking for beanie babies, you best look elsewhere.

Go here to read the rest:
Column: Is the boom of bitcoin a bubble that's about to burst? - PBS NewsHour

Time to Be Long Bitcoin (BTC) Investopedia I jumped on board the Bitcoin train last year and added it to my research platform. Our clients really enjoy it, whether they are actively trading it or just interested in the product. But of the biggest reasons why I decided to start including it in ...

Excerpt from:
Time to Be Long Bitcoin (BTC) - Investopedia

By Arnav Joshi

Virtual currencies like Bitcoin are all the rage in FinTech, and could potentially transform global commerce in the years ahead. Users are adopting them in the thousands each day and the value of trade in these currencies is witnessing unparalleled growth.

The world over, regulators are working out carefully-crafted regulations to foster Bitcoin growth. In India, however, even with the new cashless push by the government and existing Bitcoin trade spiking post-demonetisation, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) continues to shy away from recognising and regulating virtual currencies.

On February 1, the RBI issued a yet another cautionary press release, on the back of an earlier one issued in December 2013, warning users of a risk they are likely to already be aware of -- that it (the RBI) does not regulate and has not licensed any virtual currencies in India, and anyone using them does so at their own risk.

A month later, on March 1, RBI Deputy Governor R. Gandhi raised concerns over virtual currencies, saying they pose potential financial, legal, customer protection and security-related risks.

While the central bank seems to be insulating itself from the repercussions of these currencies remaining unregulated, their use continues to grow exponentially across the world, including in India.

As of an August 2016 (pre-demonetisation) estimate, the number of Bitcoin (the most prominent of several virtual currencies) users in India stood at 50,000 and growing. India now also has a large number of prominent Bitcoin exchanges such as BTCXIndia, Coinsecure, Unocoin and Zebpay. Globally, by some estimates, Bitcoin users alone could breach five million by 2019.

The latest red flag from the RBI may well have been prompted by the recent surge in the price of Bitcoin on Indian Bitcoin exchanges post-demonetisation. Bitcoin is freely tradable currency, and has its own exchanges (including in India) where users can sign up and speculate, buy and sell Bitcoins for other currencies (such as the rupee).

After the cash ban, Bitcoin was quoted to be inflated 20-25 per cent over cost. As of March 2, Bitcoin was trading at Rs 90,000 to a single Bitcoin. In October 2016, this value was Rs 40,000 to a Bitcoin.

The question that arises then is how long can the RBI afford to adopt a hands-off approach to virtual currencies, when regulators elsewhere are adopting proactive measures?

The RBI's research wing, the Institute for Development & Research in Banking Technology, issued a white paper on the applications for blockchain technology in the banking and financial sectors in India in January 2017, which acknowledges the prominence of virtual currencies, but steers towards the underlying distributed ledger (blockchain) technology, rather than virtual currency regulation.

A large number of countries, not just in the West but in India's own neighbourhood, have either adopted or are close to adopting virtual currency regulation in some form. These include China, Russia, Singapore and the Philippines, which issued guidelines for virtual currency exchanges as recently as January.

Interestingly, the precursor to regulation in a number of these countries were warnings similar to those issued by the RBI. However, these warnings largely came around 2013, at a time when the understanding of the technology and the use of virtual currencies was much lesser than it is today.

In 2017, when users, trading and payments in these currencies are growing and maturing faster than ever, the warn-watch-wait approach simply will not work.

There are a number of downsides to not bringing in regulation when virtual currency use in India is still modest. Prominent among these is that regulation which kicks in when products and technologies have become systemic will invariably cause friction between regulators on the one hand, and businesses and users on the other, requiring stakeholders to make slow and possibly expensive changes to the way they transact.

Another issue is the key role regulation plays in consumer awareness and security. While the RBI may sleep soundly having issued its caveat emptor, given the attractive investment opportunity and ease of use and access virtual currencies offer, users are likely to throw caution to the wind and invest anyway.

The clear downside to this is that investors will likely fall prey to unregulated and unscrupulous Bitcoin exchanges and wallet operators (similar to a Paytm or Mobikwik, but exclusive to storing Bitcoin). Without any oversight, these operators rely on self-regulation. They could have severe gaps in data security, could charge exorbitant interest and transaction fees, and in a worst-case scenario, disappear with investor money altogether.

More importantly, the jury is still out on whether virtual currencies can be used to pseudonymously finance crime, including terrorism, and given the sensitive security scenario in India, it is important for the government to understand, and for the law to control, who can buy them and what they can do with them. As transactions grow, so will the chances and potential for virtual currency-related fraud.

Legal scholars Jack Goldsmith and Timothy Wu have said "government regulation works by cost and bother, not by hermetic seal", which appears to be the line the RBI is taking on virtual currencies.

With emerging technologies, however, especially those as radical as virtual currencies, governments are increasingly learning that the cost and bother of reactive regulation can be substantially greater than proactive regulation.

If the Indian government is serious about its cashless drive, it will have to consider virtual currencies as an integral part of the panacea being touted for our archaic economy.

It is up to the government and the RBI to lead the way by bringing forward-looking regulation for virtual currencies sooner rather than later, because there is already much catching-up to do.

The writer is a Senior Associate at J. Sagar Associates and advises internet and emerging technology clients. Views expressed are personal. He can be contacted at arnav.jo@gmail.com

Read the original:
Bitcoin: Can RBI ignore the elephant in the room? - Economic Times

You may have heard of the gold standard, but it seems that a type of online currency is making a bid for supremacy in the financial world.

Reports yesterday indicate that the price of one bitcoin surpassed the price of one ounce of gold for the first time ever. While both are considered alternative assets by the financial community, it gives some credence to past claims that the online currency might one day reign supreme for investors.

For those who dont know, bitcoin is a type of digital currency that consumers hold electronically. However, unlike other forms of currency, it is sent from one entity to another and is not controlled by a central source, like a bank. The cryptocurrency has a number of advantages, which consumers can learn about in the video below. However, due to the anonymity associated with its trading, it has also been used for a number of scams and illicit activities.

While the value of bitcoin has gone up and down since it was introduced to the market, its recent increase in value may indicate that investors are taking it more seriously. Currently, traders of the currency are awaiting an SEC decision that would allow Winklevoss Bitcoin ETF to become the first bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) in the U.S. market.

The ruling, which is set to be announced on March 11, would open the digital currency to a wider range of investors. However, some analysts have said that the bitcoin ETF has less than a 25% chance of being approved, according to an earlier CoinDesk report.

As of Friday morning, gold had once again climbed back over bitcoin in value; one bitcoin was selling for $1,284.58, while one ounce of gold was selling for $1,319.60.

See the original post:
Bitcoin passes gold in value for the first time ever - ConsumerAffairs

BBC News

'I bought Bitcoins in 2011 - now they're worth 19000' BBC News "For years critics have said Bitcoin will never last - that its value will drop, that it will never be adopted, and even that it's some kind of ponzi scheme," he told Newsbeat. "Today's all time high is another example of how, year on year, Bitcoin is ...

Read more here:
'I bought Bitcoins in 2011 - now they're worth 19000' - BBC News