The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Monthly Archives: August 2015
Bitcoin – Wikipedia bahasa Indonesia, ensiklopedia bebas
Posted: August 12, 2015 at 7:43 pm
Bitcoin adalah sebuah uang elektronik yang di buat pada tahun 2009 oleh Satoshi Nakamoto. Nama tersebut juga dikaitkan dengan perangkat lunak sumber terbuka yang dia rancang, dan juga menggunakan jaringan peer-ke-peer tanpa penyimpanan terpusat atau administrator tunggal dimana Departemen Keuangan Amerika Serikat menyebut bitcoin sebuah mata uang yang terdesentralisasi . Tidak seperti mata uang pada umumnya, bitcoin tidak tergantung dengan mempercayai penerbit utama. Bitcoin menggunakan sebuah database yang didistribusikan dan menyebar ke node-node dari sebuah jaringan P2P ke jurnal transaksi, dan menggunakan kriptografi untuk menyediakan fungsi-fungsi keamanan dasar, seperti memastikan bahwa bitcoin-bitcoin hanya dapat dihabiskan oleh orang memilikinya, dan tidak pernah boleh dilakukan lebih dari satu kali.
Desain dari Bitcoin memperbolehkan untuk kepemilikan tanpa identitas (anonymous) dan pemindahan kekayaan. Bitcoin - bitcoin dapat disimpan di komputer pribadi dalam sebuah format file wallet atau di simpan oleh sebuah servis wallet pihak ketiga, dan terlepas dari semua itu Bitcoin - bitcoin dapat di kirim lewat internet kepada siapapun yang mempunyai sebuah alamat Bitcoin. Topologi peer-to-peer bitcoin dan kurangnya administrasi tunggal membuatnya tidak mungkin untuk otoritas, pemerintahan apapun, untuk memanipulasi nilai dari bitcoin - bitcoin atau menyebabkan inflasi dengan memproduksi lebih banyak bitcoin.
Bitcoin adalah salah satu dari implementasi pertama dari yang disebut cryptocurrency, pertama kali di deskripsikan oleh Wei Dai pada tahun 1998 dalam milis cypherpunks.[7]
Bitcoin mengandalkan pada jumlah pemindahan di antara rekening publik menggunakan kriptografi kunci publik. Semua transaksi - transaksi terbuka untuk umum dan disimpan dalam sebuah database yang didistribusikan. Untuk mencegah pengeluaran-ganda, jaringan mengimplementasikan sebuah server waktu yang di distribusikan, menggunakan ide perantaian bukti dari kerja. Keseluruhan sejarah dari transaksi - transaksi telah di simpan dengan semestinya dalam database dan untuk mengurangi ukuran dari tempat penyimpanan, sebuah pohon Merkle digunakan.
Bitcoin adalah sebuah implentasi peer-to-peer dari proposal b-money oleh Wei Dai dan proposal Bitgold oleh Nick Szabo. Prinsip dari sistem secara umum telah di deskripsikan pada tahun 2008 oleh Satoshi Nakamoto.
Seseorang yang berpatisipasi di dalam jaringan bitcoin mempunyai sebuah wallet yang menyimpan beberapa keypair - keypair kritografi. Kunci publik - kunci publik, atau alamat -alamat bitcoin, yang bertindak sebagai tujuan akhir(endpoint) mengirim atau menerima untuk semua pembayaran. Kunci pribadi yang terkait hanya memperbolehkan pembayaran hanya dari user itu sendiri. Alamat - alamat tidak mengandung informasi apapun mengenai pemiliknya dan secara umum tidak diketahui.[8] Alamat - alamat dalam format yang dapat dibaca manusia terdiri dari angka - angka acak dan huruf - huruf yang panjangnya sekitar 33 karakter, dalam format 1rYK1YzEGa59pI314159KUF2Za4jAYYTd. Pengguna bitcoin dapat memiliki banyak alamat, dan faktanya dapat mengenerasi alamat baru tanpa batasan apa pun, karena membuat sebuah alamat baru adalah bersifat segera, sebanding dengan membuat sebuah umum/pribadi pasangan kunci baru, dan tidak membutuhkan hubungan dengan node - node apapun dalam jaringan. Dalam membuat tujuan-tunggal/penggunaan-tunggal alamat - alamat dapat membantu anonimitas user tersebut.[butuh rujukan]
Bitcoin - bitcoin mengandung kunci publik (alamat) sang pemilik yang sekarang. Ketika pengguna A mengirim suatu nilai ke pengguna B, A akan melepaskan nilai kepemilikan mereka dengan menambahkan kunci publik (alamat) B ke koin - koin tersebut dan menandatanganinya dengan kunci pribadi dia sendiri.[9] Kemudian dia akan menyiarkan bitcoin - bitcoin ini dalam sebuah pesan yang sesuai, atau disebut transaksi, di dalam jaringan peer-ke-peer. Sisa dari node - node jaringan menvalidasi tanda tangan kritografi dan jumlah dari transaksi sebelum menerimanya.
Transaksi apapun yang di siarkan ke node - node lainnya tidak secara langsung menjadi resmi sampai diakui dalam sebuah daftar-waktu yang telah dicap dari semua transaksi yang diketahui, yaitu disebut sebagai rantai blok. Pengakuan ini berasal dari sebuah sistem yang-diyakini-jalan untuk mencegah pengeluaran ganda dan pemalsuan.
Saat - saat tertentu, setiap node yang menghasilkan mengoleksi semua transaksi - transaksi tidak diakui yang mana diketahui dari dalam sebuah blok kandidat, sebuah file yang mana di antara lainnya[10], mengandung hash kriptografi dari blok-yang berlaku sebelumnya dan diketahui pula oleh node tersebut. Kemudian node itu mencoba untuk menghasilkan sebuah hash kriptografi dari blok itu dengan karakteristik tertentu, sebuah usaha yang membutuhkan sebuah nilai yang dapat diprediksi dari pengulangan percobaan dan kesalahan. Ketika sebuah node menemukan sebuah solusi, dia akan mengumumkannya ke semua jaringan. Anggota jaringan akan menerima blok baru yang telah di pecahkan dan mengvalidasikannya sebelum menerima, dan kemudian menambahkannya ke rantai.
Akhirnya, rantai-blok mengandung sejarah kriptografi kepemilikan dari semua koin - koin yang berasal dari alamat sang pembuat ke pemilik alamat yang sekarang.[11] Oleh karena itu, kalau seorang pengguna berusaha untuk menggunakan kembali koin-koin yang telah dia belanjakan, maka jaringan akan menolak transaksi tersebut.
Read the original here:
Bitcoin - Wikipedia bahasa Indonesia, ensiklopedia bebas
Posted in Bitcoin
Comments Off on Bitcoin – Wikipedia bahasa Indonesia, ensiklopedia bebas
Jesuit Futurism – Amazing Discoveries
Posted: at 7:40 pm
The Catholic Counter Reformation - Futurism The Jesuits were commissioned by the Pope to develop a new interpretation of Scripture that would counteract the Protestant application of the Bibles prophecies regarding the Antichrist to the Roman Catholic Church. All the reformers studies pointed the finger directly at the Roman Catholic Church as the Antichrist power described in Daniel as the little horn.
Francisco Ribera (1537-1591), a brilliant Jesuit priest and doctor of theology from Spain, answered Papacys call. Like Martin Luther, Francisco Ribera also read by candlelight the prophecies about the Antichrist, the little horn, the man of sin, and the beast of Revelation.
He then developed the doctrine of futurism. His explanation was that the prophecies apply only to a single sinister man who will arise up at the end of time. Rome quickly adopted this viewpoint as the Churchs official position on the Antichrist.
In 1590 Ribera published a commentary on the Revelation as a counter interpretation to the prevailing view among Protestants which identified the Papacy with the Antichrist. Ribera applied all of Revelation to the end time rather than to the history of the church. Antichrist, he taught, would be a single evil person who would be received by the Jews and who would rebuild Jerusalem.i Ribera denied the Protestant Scriptural Antichrist (2 Thessalonians 2) as seated in the church of God-asserted by Augustine, Jerome, Luther, and many reformers. He set on an infidel Antichrist, outside the church of God.ii The result of [Riberas] work was a twisting and maligning of prophetic truth.iii Following close behind Francisco Ribera was another brilliant Jesuit scholar, Cardinal Robert Bellarmine of Rome (1542-1621). Between 1581-1593, Cardinal Bellarmine agreed with Ribera in his work Polemic Lectures Concerning the Disputed points of the Christian Belief Against the Heretics of this Time.
The futurist teachings of Ribera were further popularized by an Italian cardinal and the most renowned Jesuit controversialists. His writings claimed that Paul, Daniel, and John had nothing whatsoever to say about the Papal power. The futurists school won general acceptance among Catholics. They were taught that antichrist was a single individual who would not rule until the very end of time.iv Through the work of these two clever Jesuit scholars, Jesuit futurism was born.
Read about the spread of futurism throughout the past centuries
View post:
Jesuit Futurism - Amazing Discoveries
Posted in Futurism
Comments Off on Jesuit Futurism – Amazing Discoveries
Ron Paul Wikipdia
Posted: August 11, 2015 at 12:43 pm
Un article de Wikipdia, l'encyclopdie libre.
Ronald Ernest Ron Paul (n le 20 aot 1935) est un homme politique amricain, membre du Parti rpublicain, reprsentant du Texas la Chambre des reprsentants de 1976 1977, de 1979 1985, puis enfin de 1997 2013. Il a t candidat l'lection prsidentielle de 1988 pour le Parti libertarien, l'investiture du Parti rpublicain pour l'lection prsidentielle de 2008 et pour l'lection prsidentielle de 2012[1].
Partisan du libertarianisme, il prconise un tat fdral au rle limit, de faibles impts, des marchs libres, une politique trangre non interventionniste ainsi qu'un retour des politiques montaires bases sur des mtaux (or, argent) pour talon.
Il est parfois surnomm Doctor No[2] au Congrs parce qu'il est diplm en mdecine mais aussi parce quil vote contre toutes les lois qui selon lui violent la constitution amricaine, augmentent les revenus des membres de la Chambre des Reprsentants, ou augmentent les impts.
Ron Paul est n Green Tree en Pennsylvanie durant la Grande Dpression. Il est le troisime d'une famille modeste de cinq enfants. Durant son enfance, il travaille dans la petite exploitation agricole de ses parents, la livraison de journaux, et dans un drugstore.
En 1957, g de 22 ans, il pouse Carol Wells, rencontre au lyce de Dormont et avec qui il aura cinq enfants. Il fait des tudes suprieures et sort diplm en 1961 de la Duke University School of Medicine. Il devient gyncologue obsttricien Lake Jackson au Texas.
Il s'installe ensuite dans la rgion de Houston au Texas.
En 1974, Ron Paul devient dlgu la convention rpublicaine du Texas. Il se prsente l'lection au sige du 22e district du Texas la Chambre des reprsentants. Il est largement battu par le reprsentant dmocrate sortant Robert R. Casey.
En avril 1976, il est lu lors d'une lection partielle reprsentant rpublicain du 22e district du Texas la chambre des reprsentants afin de terminer le mandat de Robert R. Casey nomm la commission fdrale maritime par le prsident Gerald Ford. Cependant, en novembre 1976, il est battu de 300 voix (0,2%) lors du renouvellement du mandat par le candidat dmocrate Robert Gammage. Ron Paul prend sa revanche en 1978 et est rlu en 1980 et 1982. En 1984, Paul choisit de ne pas se reprsenter la chambre et pose sa candidature pour le Snat. Il est battu ds les primaires rpublicaines par Phil Gramm alors que son sige de reprsentant du 22e district est remport par le rpublicain Tom DeLay. Paul retourne alors dans le secteur priv.
En 1988, Paul est candidat la prsidence des tats-Unis pour le Parti libertarien (tout en restant membre du Parti Rpublicain[3]). Il est battu mais, en obtenant un peu plus de 400000 voix (0,4% des suffrages), il arrive en troisime place du vote populaire derrire George H. W. Bush (lu prsident) et Michael Dukakis.
See the rest here:
Ron Paul Wikipdia
Posted in Ron Paul
Comments Off on Ron Paul Wikipdia
Second Amendment March
Posted: August 10, 2015 at 6:09 pm
Second Amendment March was founded in 2009 for the purpose of organizing a nationwide pro-Second Amendment Rally in Washington, D.C. The original event took place in 2010.Since that event we have focused on Michigan events, working in conjunction with Michigan's largest gun rights organizations.
What:A peaceful gatheringto demonstrate the political strength of Michigan's legal gun owners and Second Amendment advocates
When:Wednesday, April 29 2015 from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
Where:Lansing State Capitol lawn
The Details:
Michigan's Second Amendment March will be held on Wednesday, April 29th at Michigan's Capitol.The event will begin at 10:00 a.m. on the Capitol lawn. Unlike previous years, the actual march part of the event will be around the Capitol Building and it will be midway through the event. Legislature is in session that day. We'll be showing them the political strength of Michigan's legal gun owners. The march is being organized by Skip Coryell's Second Amendment March and jointly promoted and funded by the Michigan Coalition for Responsible Gun Owners, Michigan Open Carry, and Michigan Gun Owners. Please visit our Facebook event page for the most updated information.
Go here to read the rest:
Second Amendment March
Posted in Second Amendment
Comments Off on Second Amendment March
Conscious Evolution TV
Posted: at 5:44 pm
http://whatistranshumanism.org
Transhumanism is a way of thinking about the future that is based on the premise that the human species in its current form does not represent the end of our development but rather a comparatively early phase.
Transhumanism is a loosely defined movement that has developed gradually over the past two decades.
Transhumanism is a class of philosophies of life that seek the continuation and acceleration of the evolution of intelligent life beyond its currently human form and human limitations by means of science and technology, guided by life-promoting principles and values.
Humanity+ formally defines it based on Max Mores original definition as follows:
Transhumanism can be viewed as an extension of humanism, from which it is partially derived. Humanists believe that humans matter, that individuals matter. We might not be perfect, but we can make things better by promoting rational thinking, freedom, tolerance, democracy, and concern for our fellow human beings. Transhumanists agree with this but also emphasize what we have the potential to become. Just as we use rational means to improve the human condition and the external world, we can also use such means to improve ourselves, the human organism. In doing so, we are not limited to traditional humanistic methods, such as education and cultural development. We can also use technological means that will eventually enable us to move beyond what some would think of as human.
The Transhumanist FAQ was developed in 1998 and authored into a formal FAQ in 1999 through the inspirational work of transhumanists, including Alexander Chislenko, Max More, Anders Sandberg, Natasha Vita-More, James Hughes, and Nick Bostrom. Several people contributed to the definition of transhumanism, which was originated by Max More. Greg Burch, David Pearce, Kathryn Aegis, and Anders Sandberg kindly offered extensive editorial comments. The presentation in the cryonics section was, and still is, directly inspired by an article by Ralph Merkle. Ideas, criticisms, questions, phrases, and sentences to the original version were contributed by (in alphabetical order): Kathryn Aegis, Alex (intech@intsar.com), Brent Allsop, Brian Atkins, Scott Badger, Doug Bailey, Harmony Baldwin, Damien Broderick, Greg Burch, David Cary, John K Clark, Dan Clemensen, Damon Davis, Jeff Dee, Jean-Michel Delhotel, Dylan Evans, EvMick@aol.com, Daniel Fabulich, Frank Forman, Robin Hanson, Andrew Hennessey, Tony Hollick, Joe Jenkins, William John, Michelle Jones, Arjen Kamphius, Henri Kluytmans, Eugene Leitl, Michael Lorrey, mark@unicorn.com, Peter C. McCluskey, Erik Moeller, J. R. Molloy, Max More, Bryan Moss, Harvey Newstrom, Michael Nielsen, John S. Novak III, Dalibor van den Otter, David Pearce, pilgrim@cyberdude.com, Thom Quinn, Anders Sandberg, Wesley R. Schwein, Shakehip@aol.com, Allen Smith, Geoff Smith, Randy Smith, Dennis Stevens, Derek Strong, Remi Sussan, Natasha Vita-More, Michael Wiik, Eliezer Yudkowsky, and zebo@pro-ns.net
Over the years, this FAQ has been updated to provide a substantial account of transhumanism. Extropy Institute (ExI) was a source of information for the first version of the Transhumanist FAQ, version 1.0 in the 1990s. WTA adopted the FAQ in 2001 and Nick Bostrom and James Hughes continued to work on it, with the contributions of close to hundred people from ExI and WTA, including Aleph and Transcedo and the UK Transhumanist Association. New material has been added and many old sections have been substantially reworked. In the preparation of version 2.0, the following people have been especially helpful: Eliezer Yudkowsky, who provided editorial assistance with comments on particular issues of substance; Dale Carrico who proofread the first half of the text; and Michael LaTorra who did the same for the second half; and Reason who then went over the whole document again, as did Frank Forman, and Sarah Banks Forman. Useful comments of either substance or form have also been contributed by (in alphabetical order): Michael Anissimov, Samantha Atkins, Milan Cirkovic, Jos Luis Cordeiro, George Dvorsky, James Hughes, G.E. Jordan, Vasso Kambourelli, Michael LaTorra, Eugen Leitl, Juan Meridalva, Harvey Newstrom, Emlyn OReagan, Christine Peterson, Giulio Prisco, Reason, Rafal Smigrodzki, Simon Smith, Mike Treder, and Mark Walker. Many others have over the years offered questions or reflections that have in some way helped shape this document, and even though it is not possible to name you all, your contributions are warmly appreciated.
The Transhumanist FAQ 3.0, as revised by the continued efforts of many transhumanists, will continue to be updated and modified as we develop new knowledge and better ways of accounting for old knowledge which directly and indirectly relate to transhumanism. Our goal is to provide a reliable source of information about transhumanism.
Thank you to all who have contributed in the past and to those who offer new insights to this FAQ!
More here:
Conscious Evolution TV
Posted in Conscious Evolution
Comments Off on Conscious Evolution TV
USATODAY.com – NSA has massive database of Americans …
Posted: at 5:44 pm
REACTION From the White House: The White House defended its overall eavesdropping program and said no domestic surveillance is conducted without court approval. ''The intelligence activities undertaken by the United States government are lawful, necessary and required to protect Americans from terrorist attacks,'' said Dana Perino, the deputy White House press secretary, who added that appropriate members of Congress have been briefed on intelligence activities.
From Capitol Hill: Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said he would call the phone companies to appear before the panel ''to find out exactly what is going on.''
Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont, the ranking Democrat on the panel, sounded incredulous about the latest report and railed against what he called a lack of congressional oversight. He argued that the media was doing the job of Congress. ''Are you telling me that tens of millions of Americans are involved with al Qaeda?'' Leahy asked. ''These are tens of millions of Americans who are not suspected of anything ... Where does it stop?'' The Democrat, who at one point held up a copy of the newspaper, added: ''Shame on us for being so far behind and being so willing to rubber stamp anything this administration does. We ought to fold our tents.''
The report came as the former NSA director, Gen. Michael Hayden - Bush's choice to take over leadership of the CIA - had been scheduled to visit lawmakers on Capitol Hill Thursday. However, the meetings with Republican Sens. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska were postponed at the request of the White House, said congressional aides in the two Senate offices.
Source: The Associated Press
Bush administration officials have said repeatedly that the warrantless surveillance program authorized by President Bush after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks is carefully targeted to include only international calls and e-mails into or out of the USA, and only those that involve at least one party suspected of being a member or ally of al-Qaeda or a related terror group.
Some comments related to what the administration calls the "Terrorist Surveillance Program," and surveillance in general:
Gen. Michael Hayden, principal deputy director of national intelligence, and now Bush's nominee to head the CIA, at the National Press Club, Jan. 23, 2006:
"The program ... is not a drift net over (U.S. cities such as) Dearborn or Lackawanna or Fremont, grabbing conversations that we then sort out by these alleged keyword searches or data-mining tools or other devices that so-called experts keep talking about.
"This is targeted and focused. This is not about intercepting conversations between people in the United States. This is hot pursuit of communications entering or leaving America involving someone we believe is associated with al-Qaeda. ... This is focused. It's targeted. It's very carefully done. You shouldn't worry."
Continued here:
USATODAY.com - NSA has massive database of Americans ...
Posted in NSA
Comments Off on USATODAY.com – NSA has massive database of Americans …
Technoself – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Posted: at 5:40 pm
Technoself studies, commonly referred to as TSS, is an emerging, interdisciplinary domain of scholarly research dealing with all aspects of human identity in a technological society [1] focusing on the changing nature of relationships between the human and technology. As new and constantly changing experiences of human identity emerge due to constant technological change, technoself studies seeks to map and analyze these mutually influential developments with a focus on identity, rather than technical developments. Therefore, the self is a key concept of TSS. The term "technoself," advanced by Luppicini (2013), broadly denotes evolving human identity as a result of the adoption of new technology, while avoiding ideological or philosophical biases inherent in other related terms including cyborg, posthuman, transhuman, techno-human, beman (also known as bio-electric human), digital identity, avatar, and homotechnicus though Luppicini acknowledges that these categories "capture important aspects of human identity".[2] Technoself is further elaborated and explored in Luppicinis Handbook of Research on Technoself: Identity in a Technological Environment.
Technoself evolved from early groundwork in identity studies, philosophy of mind, and cognitive science.[1]Ren Descartes is often credited as one of the first identity theorists of Modernity to question the material world and the certainty of knowledge from the self. Despite heavy criticism, the question he posed regarding the necessary relation between the mind and body is still considered a prevalent theme in contemporary discussions of identity and technology.[3] Another major development in identity studies came from early Social Psychology, Sociology and Psychoanalysis. Beginning with Freud, the psychoanalytic tradition shed some light on the dynamics of identity and personality development. Erving Goffman expanded the inquiry of identity with his dramaturgical theory, which emphasized the centrality of the social realm and the notion of self-presentation to identity. Later, Foucault further expanded the area of inquiry by contemplating how technologies could facilitate the emergence of new ways of relating to oneself.[4]
The most entrenched area of technoself studies is revolved around ontological considerations and conceptualizations of technoself.[1] The effort to identify the essence of human being is frequent in philosophical circles and is entrenched within emerging theoretical scholarship on technoself.[1]DeGrazias (2005) examination on identify/numerical identity to shed light on the ethics of human enhancement. According to DeGrazia, human identity is divided into two parts: 1) numerical identity (concerns the continuity of an individual as the same object over time or across procedure), and 2) narrative identity (concerns the changes in self-perception experienced by an individual over time).[5] By dividing human identity into two parts, DeGrazia is facilitating a discussion on the ethics of human enhancements.[5] Meanwhile, Croon Fors [6](2012) research on the entanglement of the self and digitalization have helped frame ontological considerations related to the conceptualization of technoself studies.[1] Furthermore, the changing nature of identity is a common theme within Technoself studies.[1] As a result, this has given way for scholars to analyze questions such as: How are advances in sensing technologies, biometrics, and genetics changing the way we define and recognize identity? How are technologies changing the way people define themselves and present themselves in society? These types of questions are being heavily analyzed as the conceptualization of identity is changing rapidly.
Central to the understanding of the development of technoself studies as a field of research is the idea that human identity is shaped by the adoption of new technologies and the relationship between humans and technology. Advancements in digital technology have recently forced researchers to consider the conception of the self in relation to the increasing reliance of society on the use of technologies in daily tasks in people's personal and professional lives.[1] Here are some examples of digital technologies we rely on: cellphones, tablets, social media, etc. New technologies, particularly computer-mediated communication tools, have raised questions related to identity in relationship to privacy issues, virtual identity boundaries, online fraud, citizen surveillance, etc. These issues come as our perspective on technology shifts from one of functionality to one of interaction. According to John Lester, in the future "we won't simply enjoy using our tools, we will come to care for them"[1][7]
A cyborg (cybernetic organism) is a term referring to individuals with both biological and artificial parts. Cyborgs are known as being half-human, half machine organisms, due to the fact that they are always connected with technology. This term, which was coined in 1960 by Manfred Clynes, refers to and acknowledges those beings whose abilities have been enhanced due to the presence and advancement of technology. The notion of cyborg has played a part in breaking down boundaries between humans and non-humans living within a technologically advanced society. For example, those who have installed pacemakers, hearing aids, artificial body parts, cochlear implants as well as other technologies that may aid in enhancing an organisms abilities and capacities to perform, either physically or mentally.[1]Hugh Herr, an American rock climber, engineer, and biophysicist, has successfully invented the next generation of cyborg (bionic limbs and robotic prosthetics).[8] As the head of the Media Lab's Biomechatronics group in MIT, he shared his experience and presented the team achievement first time in TED talk show: Hugh Herr: The new bionics that let us run, climb and dance.
Transhuman is a concept that emerged as a result of the transhumanist movement which is centred around the notion of improving the abilities of human beings mainly through both scientific and technical means.' Unlike the posthuman concept, the notion of transhuman is based on human augmentation but does not commit itself to positing a new separate species.[1] The philosophy of transhumanism was developed in the 1990s by British philosopher Max More who articulated the principles of transhumanism as a futurist philosophy. However, the transhuman philosophy has also been subject to scrutiny by prominent scholars such as Francis Fukuyama.
Posthuman is a concept that aims towards signifying and characterizing a fresh and enhanced type of being. This organism is highly representative of a being that embraces drastic capabilities that exceed current human capabilities that are presently defining human beings. This posthuman state of identity has mainly resulted from the advancement of technological presence. According to Luppicini, posthuman capabilities "suggest a new type of being over and above human. This compromises the neutrality needed for a clear conception of human identity in the face of human-technological integration." This concept aims towards enabling a brighter future concerned with gaining a better perception of the world through various viewpoints.[1]
Homo technicus is a term "first coined by Galvin in 2003 to help refine the definition of human beings to more accurately reflect the evolving condition of human beings intertwined within advancing technological society".[9] It refers to the notion that human beings are technological by nature and evolve simultaneously with technology. Galvin states in his article titled ON TECHNOETHICS "mankind cannot do away with the technical dimension, going even to the point of considering this part of its constitution: mankind is technical by nature. Technology is not an addition to man but is, in fact, one of the ways in which mankind distinguishes itself from animals." [10] Luppicini builds upon the concept of homo technicus in his book Handbook of Research on Technoself: Identity in a Technological Society. Luppicini feels that the notion of homo technicus contributes to the conception of humans as technoselves in two ways. First it helps to solidify the idea of technology as being a key component in defining humans and society and secondly it demonstrates the importance of technology as a human creation that aligns with human values.[9] He further goes onto explain that human interactions with the material world around them helps to create meaning and this unique way of creating meaning has had an impact on how we have evolved as a species.
Also known as bio-electric human. A robot in the form of a human.
Avatars represent the individual, the individuals alter ego, or character(s) within virtual environments controlled by a human user. Avatars provide a unique opportunity to experiment with ones identity construction within virtual worlds (Turkle, 1995) and to do so with others. Examples of avatars can include personas in online games or virtual life simulations such as Second Life.
See the rest here:
Technoself - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Posted in Post Human
Comments Off on Technoself – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Fifth Amendment – Kids | Laws.com
Posted: August 9, 2015 at 8:44 am
A Guide to the Fifth Amendment
The Fifth Amendment, or Amendment V of the United States Constitution is the section of the Bill of Rights that protects you from being held for committing a crime unless you have been indicted correctly by the police. The Fifth Amendment is also where the guarantee of due process comes from, meaning that the state and the country have to respect your legal rights. The Fifth Amendment was introduced as a part of the Bill of Rights into the United States Constitution on September 5, 1789 and was voted for by of the states on December 15, 1791.
History of the Fifth Amendment
Once the United States won their independence from the British Parliament and monarchy that had acted like tyrants, the Framers of the United States Constitution did not trust large, centralized governments. Because of this, the Framers wrote the Bill of Rights, which were the first 10 amendments, to help protect individual freedoms from being hurt by the governmental. They included the Fifth Amendment, which gave five specific freedoms to American citizens.
Understanding the Fifth Amendment Line by Line
If you are confused by what each line means, here are some explanations to make the Fifth Amendment easier to understand:
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury: No one can be put on trial for a serious crime, unless a grand jury decide first that there is enough proof or evidence so that the trial is needed. If there is enough evidence, an indictment is then issued, which means that the person who is charged with the crime will can put on trial for the crime.
Except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger: People in the military can go to trial without a grand jury first deciding that it is necessary. This is the case if the military person commits a crime during a national emergency or a war.
Nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb: If someone is put on trial for a certain crime and the trial ends, the person cannot be tried once more for the same crime. If a person is convicted of a crime and then serves his or her time in jail, or if the person is acquitted, he or she cannot be put on trial a second time.
Visit link:
Fifth Amendment - Kids | Laws.com
Posted in Fifth Amendment
Comments Off on Fifth Amendment – Kids | Laws.com
The Fifth Amendment – Term Papers – Nana2327
Posted: at 8:44 am
The Fifth Amendment states that people have the right to have a trial if they are accused of a committing crime. The creators of the Bill Of Rights probably thought that people falsely accused should have their rights like anyone else. It also says that if their private property is taken for public use, the owners would get something in return.
The exact words in this amendment say, No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
This amendment was made in the 18th century, some time in 1791, to protect the privileges of the citizens over the cruel government. It was important then and still is now because it gives people the right to be tried by a jury for committed crimes, the choice to be tried twice for doing the same felony, and the opportunity to gain something from their loss of their private property due to being used for public use. For example: if part of your yard was to be demolished in order to build a new road on your street, you would have the right to receive something/compensation in return from the government because they took your private property for public use.
There is a term called pleading the fifth. When you plead the fifth, you are using your Fifth Amendment right to not incriminate yourself with testimony. The Fifth Amendment says you have the right to not testify and incriminate yourself. It means you don't want to say anything that might make you look bad or sound guilty....
Read more from the original source:
The Fifth Amendment - Term Papers - Nana2327
Posted in Fifth Amendment
Comments Off on The Fifth Amendment – Term Papers – Nana2327
Twenty-Fifth Amendment – U.S. Constitution – FindLaw
Posted: at 8:44 am
Amendment Text | Annotations
Section 1. In case of the removal of the President from office or of his death or resignation, the Vice President shall become President.
Section 2. Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.
Section 3. Whenever the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, and until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, such powers and duties shall be discharged by the Vice President as Acting President.
Section 4. Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.
Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress within twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session within twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.
Presidential Succession
The Twenty-fifth Amendment was an effort to resolve some of the continuing issues revolving about the office of the President; that is, what happens upon the death, removal, or resignation of the President and what is the course to follow if for some reason the President becomes disabled to such a degree that he cannot fulfill his responsibilities? The practice had been well established that the Vice President became President upon the death of the President, as had happened eight times in our history. Presumably, the Vice President would become President upon the removal of the President from office. Whether the Vice President would become acting President when the President became unable to carry on and whether the President could resume his office upon his recovering his ability were two questions that had divided scholars and experts. Also, seven Vice Presidents had died in office and one had resigned, so that for some twenty per cent of United States history there had been no Vice President to step up. But the seemingly most insoluble problem was that of presidential inability--Garfield lying in a coma for eighty days before succumbing to the effects of an assassin's bullet, Wilson an invalid for the last eighteen months of his term, the result of a stroke--with its unanswered questions: who was to determine the existence of an inability, how was the matter to be handled if the President sought to continue, in what manner should the Vice President act, would he be acting President or President, what was to happen if the President recovered. Congress finally proposed this Amendment to the States in the aftermath of President Kennedy's assassination, with the Vice Presidency vacant and a President who had previously had a heart attack.
This Amendment saw multiple use during the 1970s and resulted for the first time in our history in the accession to the Presidency and Vice-Presidency of two men who had not faced the voters in a national election. First, Vice President Spiro Agnew resigned on October 10, 1973, and President Nixon nominated Gerald R. Ford of Michigan to succeed him, following the procedures of Sec. 2 of the Amendment for the first time. Hearings were held upon the nomination by the Senate Rules Committee and the House Judiciary Committee, both Houses thereafter confirmed the nomination, and the new Vice President took the oath of office December 6, 1973. Second, President Richard M. Nixon resigned his office August 9, 1974, and Vice President Ford immediately succeeded to the office and took the presidential oath of office at noon of the same day. Third, again following Sec. 2 of the Amendment, President Ford nominated Nelson A. Rockefeller of New York to be Vice President; on August 20, 1974, hearings were held in both Houses, confirmation voted and Mr. Rockefeller took the oath of office December 19, 1974. 1
Footnotes
Read the original:
Twenty-Fifth Amendment - U.S. Constitution - FindLaw
Posted in Fifth Amendment
Comments Off on Twenty-Fifth Amendment – U.S. Constitution – FindLaw