Category Archives: War On Drugs

Legalizing recreational pot is good news to a lot of the region's residents.

Politicians, business owners, lawyers and activists have been quoted extensively on what they think about the legalization of recreational marijuana. So The Day posed a questionto readers to find out what residents in southeastern Connecticut think.

The legislature passed a recreational cannabis bill last year. Provisions of the law prohibit police from citing the smell of marijuana as a reason for probable cause to stop or search a person's car, enable people to possess up to 1.5 ounces of cannabis and grow their ownmarijuana, and aim to award retaillicenses to those who have been disproportionately impacted by the war on drugs, among other stipulations.

The Day asked readers: Would you be opposed to having a dispensary in your town? Why or why not? And, do you find legalization to be a positive or a negative development, why or why not? With nearly 100 responses, this story could only quote a selection of respondents while summarizing the opinions of others.

Day reader Sarah Woodin said she feels "cannabis consumption is at least as safe as alcohol consumption and should be treated as such." Will Shanahan said legalization is "good for the economy and people shouldn't be in jail for weed."

These two answers reflected the dominant thinking in the query responses. Readers talked increased tax revenue and money for both the state and municipalities. They said having a dispensary in town would actually be better than the high number of bars and liquor stores. And they said using weed should not be a crime.

"We incarcerate non-whites more than whites, our prison system should not be as large, private, or for profit as it is, and if you really want to debate the medical and effects on society then most prescription drugs should be illegal as well as tobacco and alcohol, while marijuana should be available for anyone of legal adult age - 18," said a respondent who went by theinitials C.S.

Others also touched on what became an ongoing discussion during legislative debate to legalize recreational marijuana: how the war on drugs targeted people of color for incarceration.

"I feel marijuana is safer than alcohol, and the reason it was illegal was more about controlling people (mostly people of color) and not about harm reduction," Stephen Schofield said.

Respondent Carter Courtney said something similar: "Thousands of lives will not be ruined by overzealous police and prosecutors, and jail populations will decrease."

Some respondents, including Tom Donnee, said people are going to use marijuana whether it's legal or illegal. "Arrests have done nothing but ruin people's lives," he said.

Susan Dombrowski was adamant. "It's literally a weed," she said. "Get over it already. People in jail for selling plants, in America? Ridiculous!"

Jan Magnussen said cannabis, like alcohol, should be legal, controlled and taxed, as that will "remove income from criminal networks, and avoid criminally charging people for use."

Other respondents also said legal retail sale of marijuana would stop people from buying or selling it on the streets.

Though Chris Jawaka said legalization is a positive development, he isn't sure it will stop the "black market." "The problem is that the legal retail stores are going to be forced to charge so much in taxes that it's not going to do anything to put the street dealers out of business," he said.

Lauren Davis said legal sale of marijuana "reduces the risk of consuming street-bought substances possibly laced or tampered with."

Liquor vs. marijuana

Greg Ellis said marijuana is no worse than liquor or cigarettes, "in fact, it can be argued it is safer than either and it has been shown to have medical benefit."

"Towns have zero issue selling liquor or tobacco at any gas station or even within a few hundred feet of a school," he added."To deny a dispensary the same standing is puritan hypocrisy."

Rob Justice said marijuana is "definitely not as dangerous as alcohol, both in terms of behavior and health." And Vana Parker called cannabis a "natural medicine" that is "far better for us than alcohol."

Thomas Moriarty had a local twist on the subject: "East Lyme has seven package stores, why not one outlet that sells a different intoxicant?"

Maria Bareiss said what several other respondents noted about New London and Norwich that the cities could use the economic boost of marijuana businesses before saying New London "could afford to lose about half our liquor stores."

"I would happily have three dispensaries and three liquor stores," she added.

Ken Mayer pointed out that, "We currently have liquor stores, sell cigarettes and have a 'gentlemen's club' in town," and adding a dispensary to the mix wouldn't be a negative.

Dean Morse argued that legalization was delayed for years "due to total ignorance and lobbying from the liquor industry. Marijuana stores should have been open long ago."

Economic incentive

Day readers extolled legalization's effect on state and local economies, in particular the ripple effect of having more businesses in cities such as New London and Norwich.

According to the state law, whichtook effect July 1, municipalities have the discretion to allow or prohibit cannabis businesses within their borders, as well as regulate signs and operating hours of such businesses. In October, Stonington residents voted 2,106 to 1,816 to allow cannabis businesses in town. Just this month, the Stonington Planning and Zoning Commission agreed to seek a six-month moratorium on accepting applications from anyone who wants to operate such a business in town.

The Waterford Planning and Zoning Commission voted in December to place a moratorium on the application, installation and creation of any cannabis establishment fora year until the commission adopts regulations in support or against such establishments.

In November, more than 100 people gathered in downtown Norwich to hear the nuts and bolts of the new law, how to get into the business and how it could benefit the city financially. Mayor Peter Nystrom greeted the collection of entrepreneurs, residents, city leaders and curious attendees by admitting he was a "naysayer" a couple years ago when the state considered legalizing recreational cannabis. "But I'm a realist," he said, accepting that the new law could benefit Norwich.

In Preston, the Planning and Zoning Commission last year approved a six-month moratorium on cannabis establishments to allow time to review the new state law legalizing cannabis growing and retail sales and adjust zoning regulations. The state law allows towns with up to 25,000 residents including Preston to have one retail cannabis establishment and one "micro-cultivator," defined as a licensed grower with between 2,000 and 10,000 square feet of growing space. These restrictions are in place through June 30, 2024, when the state may consider increasing them.

Discussions on how to handle legalization and possible moratoriums have been ongoing in East Lyme, Old Lyme, Montville, New London and Groton, as well, with New London and Montville municipal leaders in particular expressing support for the new law.

Joshua Kellytold The Day thathaving a dispensary in town "means we get 3% sales tax revenue, I'd rather have that than have a dispensary one town over and let them get that revenue."

Liz Richard said revenue from legalization will "benefit every town with a dispensary, for exposure, for connecting communities and building trust between law enforcement and citizens."

Jeff H. said legalization will bring a considerable tax benefit to towns "to afford to pay for education and health needs."

Multiple people said they'd welcome a dispensary in Norwich.

"I have multiple sclerosis and I go to the local dispensary, I would love one here in Norwich," Chiara Garrison said.

Respondent B.T., who is supportive of a recreational dispensary in Norwich, said legalization has afforded "a once-in-a-lifetime chance to capitalize on an economic opportunity that has the potential to fill vacant mills and storefronts in Norwich's struggling downtown and in areas such as Greeneville and Taftville."

"As a community disproportionately affected by the failed War on Drugs, Norwich should seize the chance to revitalize its local economy by being a hub for recreational cannabis in Southeastern Connecticut," B.T. added.

Opposition

A small number of respondents opposed legalization and the possibility of retail recreational marijuana purveyors on mostly moral grounds. Some argued the health effects could be destructive.

Joe McCoy took issue with the fact that marijuana has not been federally legalized. "No matter what the State of Connecticut says, marijuana is not legal in any state for any purpose at all," he said. "State nullification of federal law will lead to more of the same thing. It's primarily blue states that are nullifying pot laws. This can lead to red states nullifying other laws."

Others also said they'd be opposed to it because cannabis isn't legal on the federal level.

Some expressed opposition because of a supposed effect on young people.

"I would be fully opposed due to the increase in minors having better access as well as an unnecessary abundance of out-of-town traffic coming to pick up a still federally illegal substance," Justin B. said.

George Sprecace contended that, "The current younger generations already have an overabundance of stupids! And immatures."

Raymond Cieplik and others said the impact of marijuana on the developing brains of young people is unknown and "pot will make its way to kids as it becomes more accessible."

Nanette Hay said she doesn't want to drive "with people under the influence" of marijuana.

Michael Silvia said, "We already have enough people sitting around with their heads in the clouds," adding that a dispensary will only attract "unproductive people."

Richard Pascal said the law essentially authorizes "additional buzzed driving." He added, "Society should be consistent in its efforts to decrease drugged or drunk citizens. Never mind the harmful health effects with smoking that marijuana causes, and there are reported negative effects on personality and the brain. They call it 'dope' for a reason. Society needs more productive citizens, not less productive ones."

Frederick Shakir put it succinctly: "Promoting intoxication is bad for the individual and for the society."

Dave Nowakowski said he didn't find the legislature passed thismeasure in good faith. "I feel the legislature passed the law based mostly on tax income potential and competition with neighboring states," he said,"as opposed to best interests of the residents of CT, particularly our underage residents."

s.spinella@theday.com

Read more here:

The Day - What Day readers think of marijuana legalization - News from southeastern Connecticut - theday.com

Major Curtiss Hartley| Columbia Daily Tribune

Sitting down to write this column, it is 12 degrees at lunch time in Columbia. So that means it will likely get a little warmer over the course of the day and then we are in for a cold, cold night. My smart phone tells me it should get down to about seven degrees.

Man, that is pretty cold. Thank goodness I am inside!

Sadly, not everyone is inside right now. Not everyone will be inside tonight.

Warm space to offer shelter to our neighbors facing homelessness is at a premium every Columbia winter. Night at the Inn is a wonderful community organization that basically only functions during the winter, out of various community churches, offering warm beds to as many as they can. John Trapp is one of Columbias leading advocates for those facing homelessness and he leads the board there.

Just this week it was in the news that temporary warming centers have been opened both by the City of Columbia and The Salvation Army. The city has put cots at Wabash bus station for weekend nights and we are adding as many as we can find at The Salvation Army Harbor House (our shelter for people facing homelesssness, pretty full year-round). Believe it or not, it can be hard to find enough cots to put out for this kind of thing!

Welcome Home (focused on veterans) and St. Francis House are the two other big options, and we are so lucky to have them. Yes, it is going to be a tough winter, with nowhere near enough community resources to meet the need.

Smack in the middle of tough times, here is a story that warms my heart that you might enjoy.

Just yesterday, we heard from one of our supporters here at The Salvation Army who has befriended and is trying to help a man who has been living unsheltered. What is his story? He hit hard times several years ago when he had an accident, was prescribed opiate-based painkillers (percocet), and got addicted (other than that he had not had problems with drugs or alcohol).

Fast forward and it has been five years since the gentleman got himself off of the percocet and he has been trying to get back on track. He moved to Columbia because he had been promised a job at a new restaurant an offer that quickly disappeared as COVID hit and the restaurant never opened. Our unsheltered friend has been struggling ever since.

Today, with nothing but a good heart and a story that might have happened to many of us, this fellow has just himself and the assistance of one person. For her part, she is helping him here and there where she can, including putting him up in one of our finest local, budget hotels (warm, dry, safe, and even with cable). We are hoping we can get him into The Salvation Army Harbor House as a resident, working toward his own job and housing.

So, that is the big deal for now. Certainly, this is always true, but for the next two months or so, we really should consider focusing our charitable impulses on issues of living and dying. When you consider where to give your time; when you consider where to give your money; there are so many great causes, but with the extreme cold there is extra urgency. Please, find a way to give time and money to organizations that help fight the cold.

One person can make a difference. Working together, we can make an even bigger one.

Major Curtiss Hartley is a leader of The Salvation Army in Mid-Missouri, with facilities in Columbia and Jefferson City. The Salvation Army provides a wide range of community services to address poverty and other issues, seeking to rebuild lives and create lasting change.

Visit link:

Columbia's War on Poverty: Fighting the cold - Columbia Daily Tribune

The nominees for international group of the year at Februarys Brit Awards are truly international: Theres ABBA from Sweden, BTS from South Korea, Mneskin from Italy, and two American acts R&B superduo Silk Sonic and rock band The War on Drugs.

See latest videos, charts and news

See latest videos, charts and news

This is the second nomination in that category for both BTS, who lost last year to HAIM, and The War on Drugs, who lost in 2015 to Foo Fighters. (In Britain, of course, American acts, such as HAIM and Foo Fighters, are considered international.)

Despite the Grammys recent postponement of their planned Jan. 31 show to the spring due to the fast-spreading Omicron variant, the Brit Awards are still on for Feb. 8 at The O2 Arena in London.

Five American acts are competing for international artist of the year Billie Eilish, Doja Cat, Lil Nas X, Olivia Rodrigo and Taylor Swift.

This marks the first time in 29 years that the Brits will present one, gender-neutral category for international solo artists. Two of this years nominees won in the defunct international female solo artist category. Eilish won that award in both 2020 and 2021. Swift won it in 2015; she was nominated three other times, losing to Lana Del Rey (2013), Lorde (2018) and Eilish (2021).

A total of 25 artists are nominated for best international song at this years Brits. (Fifteen singles are nominated, but six are by multiple artists). The roster includes nine artists from the U.S. (Eilish, Doja Cat, SZA, Lil Baby, Lil Nas X, Lil Tjay, 6lack, Rodrigo and Polo G), three from Canada (Drake, Justin Bieber and The Weeknd), three from Germany (ATB, Topic and Jonasu), two from Nigeria (CKay and Joeboy), two from Sweden (A7S and Galantis), and one each from Australia (The Kid LAROI), Ghana (Kuami Eugene), France (David Guetta), Britain (Little Mix), Italy (Mneskin) and The Netherlands (Tisto).

In an odd twist, Frenchman Guetta is nominated for both song of the year, which is the province of British acts, and best international song, which is reserved for acts from outside of Britain. Thats because at least 50% of the artists on his two song of the year nominees are British. He teams with Joel Corry and Raye for Bed, and with Becky Hill for Remember.

But only one-third of the artists on his best international song contender, Heartbreak Anthem, are British. He teams on that record with Swedens Galantis and British group Little Mix. (This also explains why a British group is up for best international song.)

The award for international group was first presented in 1986. It has gone to 18 groups from the U.S., three from (or founded in) Australia (INXS, Crowded House and Tame Impala), two from Ireland (U2 and The Corrs), and one each from Canada (Arcade Fire) and France (Daft Punk).

Here are the nominees for 2022 Brit Awards in the three international categories:

International group:

ABBA

BTS

Mneskin

Silk Sonic

The War On Drugs

International artist:

Billie Eilish

Doja Cat

Lil Nas X

Olivia Rodrigo

Taylor Swift

Best international song:

ATB,Topic&A7S Your Love (9PM)

Billie Eilish Happier Than Ever

CKayfeaturingJoeboyandKuami Eugene Love Nwantiti Remix (Ah Ah Ah)

Doja CatfeaturingSZA Kiss Me More

DrakefeaturingLil Baby Girls Want Girls

Galantis,David Guetta&Little Mix Heartbreak Anthem

Jonasu Black Magic

The Kid LAROI.&Justin Bieber Stay

Lil Nas X Montero (Call Me by Your Name)

Lil Tjay&6lack Calling My Phone

Mneskin I Wanna Be Your Slave

Olivia Rodrigo Good 4 U

Polo G Rapstar

Tisto The Business

The Weeknd Save Your Tears

The winners in all three of these categories will be chosen by The Brits voting academy, which consists of industry professionals.

Originally posted here:

BTS, Maneskin & More Are International Nominees at the 2022 Brit Awards - Billboard

Bangkok, Jan 5 (EFE).- Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte said in a cabinet meeting with experts he will never apologize for the thousands of deaths derived from the violent war on drugs he promoted since he took power in 2016.

I will never, never apologize for those deaths () Kill me, send me to prison, I will never ask for forgiveness, the president said Tuesday night during a televised meeting.

More than 6,200 people, alleged traffickers or drug addicts, have died during the anti-narcotics campaign, according to official data, while human rights organizations say the figure could be between 27,000 and 30,000 dead.

Duterte, whose sole six-year term expires in mid-2022, defended the actions of authorities, who shoot to kill in situations where drug suspects may have attacked them during raids.

In September, the International Criminal Court gave the green light to an investigation for crimes against humanity into the campaign promoted by Duterte. It temporarily suspended the investigations in November at the request of the Philippine government, which is conducting its own investigation of the operations.

The Philippine Justice Department said in October that medical analyzes of many of the 52 cases investigated would deny the official version that suspects drew their pistols before being killed by police.

Following this official report, Duterte assumed full responsibility for the acts, but said that he would only be tried by a court in his country. EFE

nc/lds

Follow this link:

Duterte says he won't apologize for his deadly war on drugs - La Prensa Latina

The article you just read was brought to you by a few thousand dedicated readers. Will you join them?

Thanks for coming by The Tyee and reading one of many original articles well post today. Our team works hard to publish in-depth stories on topics that matter on a daily basis. Our motto is: No junk. Just good journalism.

Just as we care about the quality of our reporting, we care about making our stories accessible to all who want to read them and provide a pleasant reading experience. No intrusive ads to distract you. No paywall locking you out of an article you want to read. No clickbait to trick you into reading a sensational article.

Theres a reason why our site is unique and why we dont have to rely on those tactics our Tyee Builders program. Tyee Builders are readers who chip in a bit of money each month (or one-time) to our editorial budget. This amazing program allows us to pay our writers fairly, keep our focus on quality over quantity of articles, and provide a pleasant reading experience for those who visit our site.

In the past year, weve been able to double our staff team and boost our reporting. We invest all of the revenue we receive into producing more and better journalism. We want to keep growing, but we need your support to do it.

If you appreciate what The Tyee publishes and want to help us do more, please sign up to be a Tyee Builder today. You pick the amount, and you can cancel any time.

Support our growing independent newsroom and join Tyee Builders today.

See more here:

Activists Who Are Risking All to End the War on Drugs - TheTyee.ca

A main point of conflict for lawmakers is whether tax revenue should go to restorative justice or law enforcement

In late December, Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf took to Twitter to light a fire under the state legislature to end cannabis prohibition statewide.

Pennsylvanians have spoken, and they want to see us legalize recreational marijuana, Gov. Wolf wrote via his official social media account. But its the how of the matter that has lawmakers in the Keystone State divided.

Wolf has steadily pushed for efforts to restore justice to Pennsylvanians who have been over-punished for marijuana offenses. And his recent tweet included a signal to residents that hes not the one stalling progress toward recreational sales. Im for it I just want to be sure we also include measures to restore justice to those who have been harmed by the War on Drugs, he added, before saying: Legislators, lets get this done for PA.

Lawmakers in PA are mostly in agreement that weed should be legal. They just cant agree on how to structure a recreational market. The main disagreement centers around how to allocate the tax revenue that recreational weed will generate.

Right now, there are three separate frameworks for legalization, with six different representatives carving paths to the same destination.

First, there were individual Co Sponsorship Memoranda put forth by Senator Mike Regan (R), a former US Marshal. When he was a member of the state House of Representatives, Rep. Regan participated in the development of the states medical marijuana program. Now a state senator, Regan will work closely with Rep. Amen Brown (D), who wants to make cannabis reform a reality for all citizens of the state, not just corporations and consumers. Brown represents Philadelphia, and hes intent on making sure comprehensive cannabis reform rectifies the harm done by drug laws in his and other cities.

In September 2021, a different pair of state lawmakersReps. Jake Wheatley (D) and Dan Frankel (D)revealed H.B. 2050. According to Wheatley, H.B. 2050s approach to legalization is aimed at facilitating direct participation in the cannabis industry by individuals in communities that have been disproportionately impacted by the criminalization of marijuana, and by small diverse and disadvantaged businesses, laying the foundation for enhancingsocial and economic equity for individuals and communities that have been and continue to be adversely impacted by the criminalization of marijuana.

In October 2021, ahighly-anticipated bipartisan billwas also formally introduced. After months of buildup, Sens. Dan Laughlin (R) and Sharif Street (D) unveiled a nearly 240-page bill months afterfirst outlining key detailsback in February 2021.

But is it possible that all of this brainpower would be better consolidated on one bill? Is this divided approach the reason why even bipartisan efforts to legalize have stalled on the path to ratification?

Neighboring states like New York and New Jersey have been among the leaders in legalization on the East Coast. Both of Pennsylvanias neighbors to the east are prioritizing access and protections for medical and recreational users as they roll out their adult-use markets. New York has even gone so far as to make it illegal for most employers to drug test for marijuana. In New Jersey, Gov. Phil Murphy has already signed three different bills into law outlining the states legal framework for adult usage.

Pennsylvania, on the other hand, has yet to take a definitive step toward legalizing marijuana, in part because of its Republican-dominated General Assembly.

Sens. Laughlin (R) and Street (D) proposed SB 473 with a focus on safety and social equity. They made sure to note that the state would be missing out on between $400 million and $1 billion in new tax revenue if the general assembly doesnt make it happen.

But tax revenue isnt enough for some conservative lawmakers to endorse the idea of freeing, forgiving, and employing former cannabis offenders.

Sen. Street, Rep. Brown, and Gov. Wolf all want robust social equity measures to be written into the law from day one. But the right-leaning legislature is more likely to favor Sen. Regans (R) approach. While Regan wants a bill that funnels money from legalization to police departments, Brown wants to ensure the money being brought in from legalization would go towards social programs.

Some hope the addition of Sen. Brown will make Sen. Regans plan more balanced. Since the two members of the general assembly are coming from very different perspectives, they could find an honest middle ground that moves the state toward a cohesive and effective legal weed market. But its also possible that squabbling over tax allocations could be a long-term barrier that stalls all three of these proposed approaches.

If you live in Pennsylvania, you have the right to contact your local representatives to remind them of why this is such an important issue.

Its exciting to read news of these proposed bills, but Laughlin and Streets S.B. 473 hasnt moved at all since being referred to the Law and Justice Committee on Oct. 18th.

With a Democratic governor and a Republican-dominated general assembly, the probability of ratifying progressive legislation that upholds social justice feels low. And with Gov. Wolf on his way out of his final term, the state could swing back to a Republican executive, which could also dim the chances of legalization. However, there is always the potential of the states general assembly members shifting on the matter.

As more information from neighboring markets and 420-friendly voter data surfaces, the decision to legalize seems more and more like a no-brainer. But authoring a bill that is fair to all of the states citizens will clearly take more than just a few sharp legislative minds stepping up to the plate.

Luckily, Pennsylvanians have at least one governor and six lawmakers who are currently taking a swing at it. The question is: Can they find a way to legalize access statewide while also paying dues to citizens most harmed by the failed War on Drugs?

Sarah Gethers

Sarah Gethers is currently an au pair in Milan, Italy. Gethers has run for local public office in Harrisburg, PA, as well as worked for state government. She has a B.A. in Corporate Communication from Duquesne University.

By submitting this form, you will be subscribed to news and promotional emails from Leafly and you agree to Leafly's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe from Leafly email messages anytime.

Read more:

Pennsylvania Gov tells lawmakers to stop stalling legalization, but will it help? - Leafly

Its no secret that diabetes is becoming the scourge of America. It plagues one in 10 Americans, and every one of us probably knows someone who struggles with the disease.

In 2017 the U.S. mortality rate for diabetes was 42% higher than the average among 10 other industrialized countries. Thats a poor showing for America.

Many of those Americans are taking insulin, a drug discovered a century ago. Sales of drugs to treat diabetes have increased about 212% from $24 billion in 2011 to $75 billion in 2020, second in total revenue only to drugs used to treat rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory diseases.

With all that money spent on pharmaceuticals to control the disease, you would think the U.S. was getting a loud bang for its buck. Thats not the case.

Reporters at Reuters, the global news service, have just produced an amazing series about diabetes in America revealing that disease has produced a medical catastrophe.

One of the series authors, Chad Terhune, told me the U.S. had been making a lot of progress until around 2010-2011 when complications from the disease seem to have rounded a corner in middle-aged adults.

Diabetes has followed the obesity crisis, Terhune told me. It has a lot to do with healthy lifestyles and health disparities. Its a reflection of income inequality. Sedentary lifestyles, unhealthy diets and lack of consistent medical care for many people also contribute to the halt in progress in improving outcomes for people with the disease.

We also know some patients ration their diabetes medications and skip doctors appointments because they dont have the money to pay the large deductibles and other out-of-pocket costs.

Ironically, it was the insurance industry that pushed those onerous costs onto policyholders to discourage them from seeing doctors. The goal was to impose high cost sharing by their insurance policies in the hope that if people had to pay more out-of-pocket, theyd be less inclined to go to the doctor for every minor ailment. The goal was to lower the overall cost of health care for the country and, of course, benefit insurance companies through fewer claims to be paid out.

Some 20 years after that cost-containment strategy surfaced, the strategy seems has backfired harming thousands of diabetic patients. Delays in care simply impose higher costs because people dont show up for treatment until they are much sicker.

One study of lower-income workers and their family members who had diabetes had 22% more emergency room visits for preventable complications after they had switched to high deductible plans.

Reuters reporters didnt just interview patients, researchers, and experts in diabetes care. They examined the rates of potentially avoidable hospitalizations related to diabetes tracked by the federal Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

They found from 2016 to 2017, the most recent year of available data, hospitalization rates increased for short-term complications, long-term complications, and lower-extremity amputations. When reporters asked for more recent state-specific data, only eight states responded.

One was Indiana. Rates of short-term diabetes complications and amputations increased in all responding states, except Indiana. Rates of controlled diabetes without mention of complications decreased nationally from 2011 to 2015 and in six states that responded through 2018. Indiana, however, reported an increase. So Indiana results are mixed making it hard to judge how well Indiana is doing in preventing diabetes complications.

The Reuters series on diabetes illustrated the three evils in Americas health system: underuse, overuse, and misuse of medical services. It serves as a warning not just for diabetics but for the rest of us who inevitably will need health care in our lives.

View original post here:

Why the U.S. is losing the war on diabetes - Evening News and Tribune

A sense of dj vu has descended all across concert venues in Houston and the culprit is omicron.

The fast-moving strain of the COVID-19 virus has been wreaking havoc on the live music scene, leading to a handful of cancellations. It was likely the cause behind the postponement of the much anticipated New Year's Eve homecoming show for Houston-based world-beaters, Khruangbin, at the 713 Music Hall.

The seemingly exponential rise in cases leaves any early-2022 show a crapshoot, raising concerns over future concerts whether it's due to staffing issues or bands rescheduling shows out of an abundance of caution.

That leaves it up to ticketholders to check the latest status of gigs, not only to make sure they are still a go, but whether COVID safety measures are in place at the venues. In other words, have those vaccination cards and 72-hour COVID test results handy before heading out.

Hopefully, the following January shows will still happen as we have a full slate ahead. CultureMap's best shows of the month are as follows:

Clay MeltonThursday, January 6The Big Barn at Dosey Doe

Equally influenced by Stevie Ray Vaughan and John Mayer, Houston-based Clay Melton is establishing himself as one of the hottest blues-rock acts in the Lone Star State. Simply put, the talented young guitarist-vocalist can shred and is an extremely fun watch, backed by a rock-solid unit in his longtime drummer, Zach Grindle, and bassist Zach Cox.

Hell be recording a live album from the unique confines of The Big Barn at Dosey Doe in Spring alongside a whos-who in the local music scene, including Sir Earl Toon of Kool & the Gang, Evelyn Rubio, and Sarah Grace. That follows the well-received 2021 EP, Back to Blue.

Tickets start at $15 plus fees. Doors open at 6:30 pm.

CultureMap Local Show of the Month: BowiElvis FestivalSaturday, January 8The Continental Club and Big Top Lounge

January 8 holds a special place in the hearts of music fans across the globe as the day produced two of the greatest pop icons in modern musical history: David Bowie and Elvis Presley. Those two cultural forces will meet at the return of BowiElvis Festival.

The 13th edition is back after a one-year hiatus and will feature a number of acts celebrating the late-singers, including Graveltooth, Johnny Falstaff, India Tigers in Texas, Sara Van Buskirk, Elise Morrison, Yaupon, and a burlesque performance by Dem Damn Dames.

Bands will play Bowie and Elvis cover songs in addition to original tunes, and guests can participate in face painting and a costume contest alongside catering that features "The King" Elvis's favorite banana and peanut butter sandwich and "The Bowie," a croque madame with Gruyre, ham, and a fried egg.

Tickets start at $20 plus fees in advance, $35 at the door. Doors open at 7 p.m.

CultureMap Recommends: TWRP with Rich AucoinSunday, January 9White Oak Music Hall (Upstairs)

Hailing from the frosty hinterlands of Canada, fans of high-energy weirdness are in for a real treat when TWRP (formerly Tupperware Remix Party) and Rich Aucoin take over White Oak Music Hall. Both hail from the creative Halifax, Nova Scotia scene and are getting huge accolades not only for their synth-driven indie sounds, but their insane live performances. TWRP's concert gear recalls Power Rangers mixed with Devo, Daft Punk, and manga comic books.

The secret weapon on this bill is Aucoin, a genius-level multi-instrumentalist whose exuberant intellect is expressed in award-winning videos and movie-synched live shows that include actual surfing on crowds and crazy-fun dance parties underneath a elementary school parachute. His latest album,United States, is a amazing listen as well, an ultimately uplifting treatise on modern America. This show is sold out but is worth every penny on the resale market.

Tickets are sold out but there is a waitlist. Doors open at 8 pm.

Washed Out Thursday, January 13Warehouse Live

One of the leaders of the late-2000s chillwave movement alongside luminaries such as Toro Y Moi, Neon Indian, Small Black and others, Ernest Greenes Washed Out project is a vibe unto itself.

Combining dream pop with 80s synths and gentle vocals, Washed Out first garnered major notice with his 2009 EP Life of Leisure,lead single Feel It All Around becoming the title credits song for the hit comedy show, Portlandia.

The song is seemingly now ensconced on the playlist at any and every upscale eatery. His latest is 2020s Paracosm.

Tickets start at $25 plus fees. Doors open at 8 pm.

Maze featuring Frankie Beverly with The Isley Brothers and LeVelleSaturday, January 15Toyota Center

Classic soul and funk gets a major spotlight with a Toyota Center bill that includes Maze, led by Frankie Beverly. Originally from Philadelphia, Maze first made waves when they hooked up with Marvin Gaye in the '70s, scoring hit songs such as "Joy and Pain," "Before I Let Go," and "Happy Feelin's" [sic].

They'll be joined by the timeless, former Motown act, The Isley Brothers, who are instantly recognizable with the hits "This Old Heart of Mine (Is Weak for You)," "Shout," and "Twist and Shout," famously covered by The Beatles.

Tickets start at $69.50 plus fees. Doors open at 6:30 pm.

CultureMap Show of the Month: Sir Elton JohnFriday, January 21 and Saturday, January 22Toyota Center

The last time Sir Elton John rolled through town with his Goodbye Yellow Brick Road tour to perform to a sold-out Toyota Center crowd, it was under the guise of being his last tour before setting off into the sunset. That show included a roll-call of greatest hits that would be a wonderful bookend to a storied career (read the CultureMap review here).

But alas, the icon had second thoughts and is back for a two-show encore, perhaps bolstered by the fantastic hit Dua Lipa/PNAU collaboration, "Cold Heart," that resulted in John's biggest hit song in years, reaching No. 1 in the U.K. and No. 11 in the U.S.

Expect a look back on his biggest hits, a stellar live band, and eye-popping visuals for John fans, or music fans in general, this show is a must-see.

Tickets start at $69.50 plus fees. Doors open at 7 pm.

Shawn ColvinFriday, January 21Heights Theater

We were set to recommend the Lucinda Williams concert at Heights Theater this month but that one is sold out. For those looking for a fantastic singer-songwriter, Shawn Colvin will also appear in the intimate venue.

Colvin got her start in the Midwest and quickly garnered attention when she joined the famed Greenwich Village folk circuit in New York. A tour with Susanne Vega led to a recording contract and since then, she became a fixture at the Lilith Fair tours and racked up three Grammy Award wins, including two for her hit song, "Sunny Came Home," which picked up Record of the Year and Song of the Year.

Her latest isThe Starlighter, a collection inspired by the children's music book,Lullabies and Night Songs.

Tickets start at $28 plus fees. Doors open at 7 p.m.

The War on Drugs with Lo MoonWhite Oak Music Hall (Lawn)

Finding that sweet spot between Bruce Springsteen and Bob Dylan juxtaposed with layered indie guitars, The War on Drugs developed a distinctly American rock sound that recalls vast landscapes and gritty stories of the everyman, set to a sonic palette made for today's audiences.

Led by Adam Granduciel, the band initially started after he struck up a friendship with psych-rocker Kurt Vile. But it wasn't until Vile departed that the band truly took off with 2014'sLost in the Dreamachieving modern classic status and catapulting the act to festival headliners.

The 2017 releaseA Deeper Understanding and last year'sI Don't Live Here Anymore were critical smashes, solidifying The War on Drugs as a touring force.

Tickets start at $46 plus fees. Doors open at 8 pm.

Cat PowerThursday, January 27House of Blues

Cat Power's Chan Marshall has had a strange career. Starting off as an unassuming indie darling most noteworthy for the excellent 1998 full-lengthMoon Pix, the demands of the road proved at times too much for the Atlanta-based singer-songwriter. Show performances were erratic and oftentimes awkward with her deeply personal lyrics at odds with rowdy crowds.

Thankfully, with her social anxiety issues behind her, Marshall has gained new confidence not only as a frontwoman but also as a recording artist, producing excellent albums over the last decade and touring with the likes of Alanis Morissette. She'll be releasing a covers album this year.

Tickets start at $35 plus fees. Show starts at 7 pm.

Read the original:

9 coolest concerts to ring in the new year in Houston this January - CultureMap Houston

At a time when drug addiction is on the rise, villagers in quaint Jharag have waged a war on chitta, a highly addictive synthetic drug made from heroin and other substances.

The panchayat of Jharag in Shimla districts Jubbal and Kotkhai assembly segment has brought a resolution to reward people providing information about drug peddlers active in the area. Jharag is famous for its local deity Nageshwar Devtas temple and has a population of about 1,800. The panchayat comprises five villages.

For quite some time, reports have been pouring in about drug peddlers from nearby areas trying to lure the youth from our panchayat to buy drugs. Some unknown vehicles which do not belong to the locals have been frequenting the villages as well, said panchayat pradhan Ashok Sarta, adding that drug addiction was certainly a cause of concern

The panchayat passed a resolution with unanimity to fight the drug menace and also expose the peddlers from nearby villages and panchayats, he said. The panchayat will reward those giving information about the drug peddlers. We have also formed a team of teenagers from different wards to keep tabs on the addicts as well as the local smugglers and suppliers, Sarta added.

The use of drugs has increased manifolds in the urban as well as rural regions of the state. According to a survey of the National Drug Dependence Treatment Centre at All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Delhi, the prevalence of the usage of charas and ganja is 1.2% in the country, while its higher than the national average at 3.2% in Himachal Pradesh. Similarly, the use of opioids is 2.8% in Punjab, 2.5% in Haryana, 2% in Delhi and 1.7% in Himachal Pradesh against the national average of 0.7%.

But a dangerous trend in recent years has been the shift of the users to chemical drugs. According to the health departments reports, there are nearly 1,170 patients (drug users) lodged in 27 de-addiction centres in HP.

The count of those addicted to chitta (also called diacetylmorphine, a semi-synthetic adulterated form of heroin) has surpassed that of cannabis (charas) and other hard drugs as 34.61% of the addicts in the centres are chitta consumers.

Another major cause for concern, according to the same report, is that the highest number of addicts are in the age group of 15-30 years.

There been a significant rise in the consumption of synthetic drugs among the youths. Not only boys, but girls too are falling prey to addiction, said Dinesh Sharma, head of psychiatry department in the states premier institute Indira Gandhi Medical College (IGMC).

The hospital runs a special outdoor patient department (OPD) for addicts on Saturdays. The trend of using injectable drugs is growing among the youth, particularly in the age group between 17 and 25 years, he said. It is also leading to increase in liver-related diseases like hepatitis C, he added.

With illicit drug trade on the rise, Himachal Pradesh Police had re-devised its strategy to catch smugglers and keep track of addicts.

HP director general of police Sanjay Kundu added Register 29 in all police stations to track addicts and offenders booked under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act.

The station house officers (SHOs) concerned maintain the register and create a database for analysis and better prevention of drug trafficking.

The prevalence of drug addiction and trafficking is more among those aged between 26 and 35 years, who comprise 37% of the total people booked under the NDPS Act.

Gaurav Bisht heads Hindustan Times Himachal bureau. He covers politics in the hill state and other issues concerning the masses. ...view detail

Read this article:

Panchayat in Shimla district wages a war on chitta and its users - Hindustan Times

As people of color make up an increasing number of the people who misuse and develop an opioid addiction, those who receive treatment remain overwhelmingly white. (AdobeStock)

John Woodyear is a primary care physician who specializes in addiction treatment. On most days, his waiting room at the Family Care Clinic & Associates is filled with patients waiting to get their prescription for buprenorphine, a medication to treat opioid substance use disorder (SUD) sold under the brand names Subutex and Suboxone.

Research shows that the medication can reduce the risk of overdose by half and double a patients chances of entering long-term recovery.

Woodyear estimates that more than 90% of his SUD patients are white. That would be expected in the nearly all-white counties in the western part of the state that have been hardest hit by the opioid crisis, or even if Woodyear was white.

But the 68-year-old physician is Black and practices in Troy, a town in Montgomery County that is 36% Black. The racial make-up of his patient population represents a disturbing fact about opioid addiction treatment: as people of color make up an increasing number of the people who misuse and develop an opioid addiction, those who receive SUD treatment remain overwhelmingly white.

Since the current opioid crisis started unfolding in the late 1990s, addiction has increasingly been spoken of as a public health concern. The white, middle-class, suburban and rural populations that were most affected are portrayed as victims, both of overzealous prescribing of prescription opioids and unscrupulous pharmaceutical companies, who are deserving of compassion and care.

Even the language used to describe addiction is less stigmatizing; patients with substance use disorder are no longer referred to as addicts or junkies.

This is a marked contrast to the national response to the crack cocaine epidemic of the 1980s and the war on drugs, declared by Richard Nixon in 1971. For decades, addiction has been considered a personal moral failing that needs to be addressed by punitive measures and incarceration.

Those efforts criminalized substance use, particularly in Black communities. That more punitive approach was on display in the distinctions made between Black and white drug users prosecuted for possession of crack cocaine and powder cocaine in the 1980s. Black people were prosecuted more frequently for crack cocaine, which carried longer and harsher sentences, than were whites for cocaine, which carried lesser penalties, even for greater quantities of drugs.

Attitudes around substance use only began to change once white communities started experiencing high rates of dependence and death from opioids. There are signs, however, that this more enlightened attitude and view of addiction does not extend to all opioid victims.

The gap between the rates at which Black people and white people use and die from opioid overdoses has narrowed steadily in recent years. While the most recent NC DHHS data shows that white North Carolinians overdose deaths were twice the rate of members of the Black community, the rates were comparable on a national scale (19.0 and 17.1), according to data compiled by the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Those numbers flipped during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to preliminary data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). For the first time in more than 20 years, the rate of Black overdose deaths surpassed that of whites.

So how and why did opioids, substances derisively called hillbilly heroin, become the drug of choice for Black people? The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) says virtually every street drug is now contaminated by synthetic opioids such as fentanyl and carfentanil, which are cheaper and more powerful.

Shuchin Shukla, a faculty physician and opioid educator at the Mountain Area Health Education Center in Asheville, says the North Carolina General Assemblys refusal to expand Medicaid has crippled the states ability to address addiction and overdose deaths with treatment.

Theres plenty of research showing how overdose rates changed in states that expanded Medicaid, says Shukla. One way or another, the taxpayers are paying for this. We can pay through outpatient treatment, which is relatively cheap and medically and ethically sound, or we can pay for jails and prisons, ER visits, ambulance rides, HIV and Hepatitis C treatment.

That is what North Carolina is currently doing.

Much of substance use treatment services are funded by grants and philanthropic entities, which are inadequate to cover the need. As a result, a substantial share of federal grants are diverted to provide services that would otherwise be covered by Medicaid.

But even those grants are not distributed equitably. A $54 million federal grant allowed the state to provide treatment to 12,000 people, only 7.5% of whom were Black and less than 1% were American Indian, the population most devastated by the opioid crisis.

Many addiction medicine specialists see medication-assisted therapy (MAT) treatment as the best hope for curbing opioid misuse and overdose. Because MAT drugs are also opioids, they satisfy the opioid craving and stave off withdrawal without producing that euphoric high. A variety of studies have found that MAT can cut the all-cause mortality rate among addiction patients by half or more.

In Charlotte, officials and advocates in the substance abuse field gathered for a groundbreaking at a new Wellpath Community Care Center scheduled to open in north Charlotte in early 2022. The care center, located at the corner of West Sugar Creek Road and Hunter Avenue in the Derita neighborhood, will implement MAT programming and outpatient substance use disorder treatment for people struggling with opioids or other substances including alcohol, tobacco, methamphetamine, fentanyl, and cocaine.

Its a comprehensive approach to substance abuse treatment, Wellpath Vice President Melissa Bishop told Queen City Nerve at that event. Well be providing services not only for substance use but also co-occurring services for people struggling with anxiety or depression, which will help in their engagement and treatment and stability. Its a one-stop shop rather than having to make them go to multiple providers.

There are many barriers to accessing this treatment in North Carolina, one of 11 states where buprenorphine prescribers per opioid death rates are well below the national average. Doctors are required to complete an eight-hour training program and get a waiver from the federal Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) to prescribe buprenorphine for addiction; physician assistants and nurse practitioners require 24 hours of training.

The spike in overdose mortality during the pandemic, particularly among Black and Latino communities, led to several new initiatives and additional funding to train more health care providers to prescribe the drug. But getting more doctors on board remains a challenge.

Woodyear is federally certified to prescribe buprenorphine to up to 275 patients, the maximum allowed, and has tried to recruit more MAT providers to the closest population center, Pinehurst, without much success. He said he believes doctors have a prejudice bias toward treating people with addiction.

They dont want them in the office with their middle-class, upper-class patients, he said. They dont want their waiting room looking like an arraignment court.

Blake Fagan is chief education officer at UNC Health Sciences at MAHEC. He once vowed hed never prescribe MAT because he saw it as substituting one addiction for another. After some tragic experiences with his patients, he changed his tune. These days, Fagan not only prescribes MAT, he sees that primary care doctors in residency programs in North Carolina are qualified to prescribe the drug, too.

Despite the widespread acknowledgement that SUD is a crisis irrespective of race and/or ethnicity, there are vast disparities in who has access to quality treatment and care. Few people of any race identified as needing SUD treatment actually receive it but the numbers are most abysmal for people of color: just 10 and 8% of Black and Latino individuals with substance abuse disorder, respectively according to data from SAMHSA. A 2019 national study published in JAMA Psychiatry reported that more than 97% of people prescribed buprenorphine in an in-office setting were white.

Medicare or Medicaid paid for the visits in only 19% of the cases.

Even people with private insurance encounter barriers to opioid addiction treatment. A cohort study published in JAMA Network Open found that only 16.6% of commercially insured patients obtained follow-up treatment after a nonfatal opioid overdose; Black patients were half as likely as whites to obtain a treatment referral.

The numbers are even more dismal for those who are uninsured or on Medicaid who have fewer options for opioid addiction and substance use treatment. Although the Medicaid program covers the drug, low reimbursements discourage many providers from accepting patients who have the coverage.

Woodyear says he is one of the few providers of medications for opioid use disorder who accept Medicaid.

Buprenorphine and the once-a-month injectable Vivitrol are available in regular outpatient settings and mostly to people with private insurance. This was always the plan, says Tracie Gardner, senior vice president of policy advocacy at Legal Action Center which seeks to end punitive measures for health conditions like addiction.

When people observed the uptick in opioid use disorder among white people, they determined that an office-based approach would be preferable because of the belief and stereotypes we have constructed around methadone maintenance, says Gardner. Methadone has been highly racialized and has a very complex and complicated history. It is still under the purview of the Drug Enforcement Agency whereas buprenorphine is treated like a medication to be offered through a health care provider.

The racial disparities also extend to treatment outcomes. Only 28% of clients completed treatment, and the survey results indicate that Black and Latino people are less likely to complete treatment compared to whites. The lack of racial diversity among treatment providers is also a factor. There is a dearth of treatment providers who can address the needs of racially marginalized patients and offer treatment services that take their cultural identity into account.

Drug overdose deaths topped 100,000 in a one-year period during the pandemic for the first time ever, according to provisional data released by the CDC in mid-November.

Thats probably way underestimated just like the number of deaths from COVID is probably way underestimated, Woodyear said. Were dealing with an epidemic that we need to bring the same energy to treating as we have brought to the pandemic.

This article originally appeared at North Carolina Health News, an independent, non-partisan, not-for-profit, statewide news organization dedicated to covering all things health care in North Carolina. This story is part of a reporting fellowship on health care performance sponsored by the Association of Health Care Journalists and supported by The Commonwealth Fund.

Become a Nerve Member: Get better connected and become a member of Queen City Nerve to support local journalism for as little as $5 per month. Our community journalism helps inform you through a range of diverse voices.

See the original post:

Opioid Addiction Treatment in NC Not Separate but Still Unequal - qcnerve.com