Category Archives: Vaping

We love hitting the vape. But what do we love more than that?

Vapes infused with Delta-8! Period.

We have come a long way with vapes, from calling them vaporizers to e-cigarettes Nicotine and now Juul, as the kids say. But who knew we would be talking on the best delta 8 disposable vape pens with our heads high up in the sky. I guess nobody ever knew wed come this far, not even Mr. Hon, who once came up with the idea of disposable vape pens by choking on his spicy pork.

From late-night sessions in your friends basement to cloud chasing in a lounge, boy, we really have come far. And through these years, 101 brands for D-8 have popped up, overcrowding the market. Though we are not complaining of the endless choices, we are suckers for a good variety, but it has made it very difficult to choose the good from the bad.

So we trawled in every nook and cranny to filter out the very best disposable vape pens that will never disappoint when it comes to getting blazed.

Here are the detailed reviews of our Top picks:

Exhale Wellness is renowned for manufacturing top-grade Delta-8 products in the market, including their disposable vape pens that are highly raved about. Hailing from Los Angeles, California, this brand has substantial experience in the industry, enabling them to produce inimitable quality products and customer service.

The manufacturers of Exhale Wellness aim to harness the holistic properties of the hemp plant and make them accessible to people. They believe hemp is a better alternative to your traditional medicine that helps restore stability in our entire body with its therapeutic qualities. They strive to spread awareness of this green gold and incorporate premium quality hemp with other nutritious superfoods to create all-rounder products that are vegan, gluten-free, organic, dairy-free, gluten-free, non-GMO with no artificial flavors, or colors.

From the plethora of Delta-8 products, their disposable D8 vape pens are a fan favorite means of discreet toking. These disposable vape pens are filled with 940 mg of Delta-8 sourced from the farms of Colorado and natural terpenes that add flavor and aroma to the strains. The manufacturers do not support the idea of adding artificial additives in their products; hence they steer clear from using solvents like PEG, PG, or MCT oil.

It gets annoying when your vapes run out of battery, but Exhale Wellness has got you covered. It is well known that no one does disposable vape pens like Exhale; they redesigned the generic vape pens and made them rechargeable. However, these vape pens are made for one-time use only; once the vape juice finishes, they are meant to be tossed away. These vape pens are available in nine mouth-watering flavors, out of which our top three favorites are as follows:

Jack Herrer: Named after a marijuana activist, this pen is filled with an uplifting strain that offers a power bank of energy and inspiration. Wiping out any stress or anxiety, this Hybrid strain will make space for the creative juices to flow, leaving you clear-headed.

Cactus Cooler: You will not find a strain this unique at any other place. This refreshing strain will revitalize you with its sweet and tangy taste of pineapple and orange, similar to the famous Cactus soda. This daytime strain will leave you invigorated and chatty for your next party.

Mango: Want to go on a trip to the tropics without leaving the comfort of your couch? This mango vape pen by Exhale will hit home. It will help you wind down after a long day at work, melting away all your worries with a puff. In addition, it helps alleviate any physical discomfort and negative thoughts, putting you into ultimate comfort.

They use premium, organic hemp from Colorado

Renowned firms have mentioned them

All their products get tested via thor-party labs

The COAs of all batches are uploaded on their website

They offer a large assortment of strain variety

Their vape juice contains the regulated amount of THC

No additives or artificial flavors are used in their products

All products are vegan, gluten-free and dairy-free

The website has informed articles on updated news about Delta-8

Their customer service is prompt and friendly

They offer a 20% discount on first order

They only sell their products online

They need no introduction; Delta ExtraX has a long-standing reputation in the hemp industry, with a well-kept image throughout and an endless stream of glaring customer reviews.

This brand has recently launched Delta Vape Disposables, infused with their high-grade Delta-8 THC collection. Needless to say, these carts are equally commendable; their new line of high-quality products is all set to stun hemp enthusiasts. It has not been long since these products hit the market, but they have already made big rounds on the internet. All due to Delta ExtraXs years of experience in the hemp cultivation and manufacturing field.

They aim to offer the very best experience of consuming Delta-8 THC through their top-notch, all-organic Vape Carts. These pens are available in three exciting flavors:

Watermelon Candy Krush Premium: This Indica-dominant fusion taste is just like it sounds; fruity! Its mouthwatering sweet smell will make it hard for any perfumes to stop hitting for more. The watermelon offers relaxing vibes, which makes this strain perfect for sleeping or stimulating appetite. Also, it hits quite quickly and gives a powerful head rush, so a little warning for the noobs to proceed with caution. Other than that, this pen is going to help you chill out and catch that beauty sleep.

Guava Purp Premium: There is no comparison to this strain. This Indica strain originates from Purple Fig and guava strains and has a delectable fruity punch of grapes and herbs. Known for its sweet flavor and gassy aroma, this strain is perfect for those with a sweet tooth. This Indica strain gives you a mellow buzz and euphoric effects at the same time. So if you foresee a busy Monday, start your day with this to make it through.

Insane Punch: This Hybrid Strain leans more towards Indica and is formulated by combining Purple Punch and Purple Train. The royal Purp lineage will help you feel relaxed, quiet, and clear-minded. So whip it this punch and let the creative juices get flowing.

Delta ExtraX infuses the cleanest terpenes in their products that bring out the best effects and are perpetually safe for you. To further ensure the safety of the products, Delta ExtraX sends their pens to get tested via third-party Labs in the raw and finished stage. These affirmative reports cement the quality of these disposables.

=> Click here to visit the official website of Delta ExtraX

Next on our list is Bearly Legal with the most befitting name as a Delta-8 manufacturer. This brand focuses on quality and on providing optimally potent products to their customers. These top-notch indoor hemp hrowers have rapidly transitioned into the best sellers of high-grade D-8 infused products, ranging from broad to narrow-spectrum Delta-8 THC.

Are you tired of fiddling with these vape pens with vape tank? Then Bearly Legal has got your back. They listened carefully to what their customers wanted and introduced a sleek, brand-new disposable vape pen. As a result, you no longer need to worry about charging your vape pens or waiting for them to charge. Instead, you pop them out of the package, hit it right then, and safely get rid of it when it reaches the end. Also, you do not even need to worry about going through the messy process of buying and filling the vape juice anymore; these fuss-free vape pens are here to deliver you a safe euphoric ride.

They call these disposable pens; Slim D-8, which people loved so much that it made its way up into the top-seller category in no time. These hassle-free, pre-filled, and pre-charged cartridges infused with Delta-8 THC are said to come in various flavors infused with terpenes, but for now, Bearly came out with a classic, the OG flavor that everybody loves.

Yes, you guessed it right; they started with OG Kush. This flavor is no foreign to the cannasuers; the premium strain goes back to the 90s when it was bred in North California. The unique terpene profile holds a complex scent of diesel, skunk, and spice. This blend gives the strain a lemony, piney, and fuel-like smell that can be recognized in a whiff.

Now lets talk about this sleek number, shall we? This slim bar is compact enough to be discreet and can be slid into your jeans pocket, unlike the bulky vape pens that poke out no matter how further you push them down. However, the small size does not indicate inferior quality. This streamlined, matte black pen is solely designed to match this eras minimalist trends and make it even more portable than the rest.

We noticed that the D-8 THC distillate filled inside the pen has a thick viscosity, almost like syrupy honey. This consistency, to our surprise, helped us make big and thick clouds that impressed many.

So, the only thing you should wait for is the new flavors Bearly is supposedly launching and not your pen charging because aint nobody got time for that.

=> Click here to visit the official website of Bearly Legal

If you travel up North Carolina, you will find lush farms of Poplar Creek at Green Creek. These farms ethically grow tons of organic hemp plants all year round. This family-run farm has one wholesome mission in mind. That is to set out every day to improve by following virtuous practices that result in uncontaminated and potent hemp.

A group of dedicated people with years of experience communally started growing hemp in 2019 and since then expanded their small business to hire more experiences for better performances.

They grow several varieties of hemp plants indoors, inside the greenhouses, without using any pesticides or harmful chemicals that are unsafe for the consumers and the environment. The hemp you consume is grown in small batches by caring hands and then safely extended to the manufacturers of vape pens, their distributors, suppliers and, of course, then to their favored customers.

THC extract is taken from 100% raw hemp bud that gets fully-panel tested. To ensure the highest possible quality and safest hemp batches, quality checks and testing at their farms start from the cultivation process and up follow through to final packaging.

Because your safety is their utmost priority, an abundance of research and development goes into each manufacturing step. The manufacturers of Poplar were late in launching their vape pens because, at first, vape pens did not align with their values. However, upon dozens of requests by their consumers, they dug deep into the root causes that make vape pens unsafe and replaced them with safe alternatives.

They made the following changes that did not bring any detrimental effects to their consumers health:

This brand is probably one of the very few brands that worked on the safety of the vapes body and the juice. Their cartridges are all tested for heavy metals, whereas the ceramic coils for heating are not cheap either. On the other side, the D-8 THC distillate is fully tested to detect any pathogens, pests, and heavy metals. Their stringent filtration and tests ensure the safest and best qualities of hemp vape pens are delivered.

=> Click here to visit the official website of Popular Creek Farms

This brand is all about broadening boundaries and discovering endless possibilities with hemp. They have an army of white coats or white spacesuits, in this case who spend day and night creating unique hemp blends and award-winning terpes.

This brand would not have made it into our list had there been no lab results, so we know for sure that MoonWlkr flies their product samples to a third-party lab. With that being settled, we further inspected the COAs and found out that their full panel testing is carried out via ACS Laboratories. The full panel testing detected any traces of contaminants. At the same time, ACS lab is the biggest hemp and CBD testing facility in the southeast USA, ensuring that the test results are reliable and unbiased. With all USDA guidelines met, we assuredly suggest MoonWlkr hemp for a safe astronomical experience.

Their Delta-8 THC vape carts are perfect for those who hate wastage. This brand is on our frequency with this matter; we love a conscious brand of the carbon footprint. They not only offer disposable pens but an entire vaping package. In addition, these pens are rechargeable, so you can always replace their batteries when they die. This means you will not have to buy a brand new pen when the batteries drain away.

The disposables come into enticing flavors we have never come across before:

Mimas Watermelon ICED OG (800mg) Inspired by the famous Watermelon Zkittlez flavor, this flavor has a little spice added to it. The journey of the flavor starts with a sugary and juicy watermelon smell and lands into a frosty cool finish.

Prometheus Strawnana (800mg) This unique flavor is not known to many. When you hit the pen, you will be greeted with hints of strawberry that fusions smoothly with savory banana undertones.

Despite the higher price point, we are sure many of you will enjoy their disposables because of their potent effects and immaculate quality. However, you can always save some cash by availing yourself of some of the deals they offer. They have a reward system where they generously five out their customers some points on small steps. For example, you get free rewards on

=> Click here to visit the official website of MoonWlkr

We scavenged the entire crowded market of D-8 products to come up with the best, most reviewed brands that promise quality products.

Brand Reputation

If you think which brand you buy the pens from does not matter, they are all the same, or it is all good in the hood; then you might go and buy a weed pen from the bodega at the end of your street.

The first step we took to confirm the brands rep was to head over to the comment sections and reviews. A great product or brand can never make it far without their loyal army of consumers who support them and speak up on their behalf.

We read almost all the reviews, the good and bad. Then, we hunted reviews under the comments section of their social media pages and third-party reviewing platforms. Finally, after all the reading business, we evaluated which brands were worth adding to the list.

Lab Tests

You may have seen everyone paying loads of emphasis on lab-tests and D-8 manufacturers boasting their results up on their website. Still, you never understood the hype behind it, so here are a few reasons why getting D-8 products tested by third-party labs so crucial:

We understand the importance of these tests quite well; hence we kept an eagles eye on the results and COAs attached and inspected further if the companies opted for full panel tests.

Some companies only send their samples to check if the D-8 THC is under the legal limits. However, it is equally important to know what else is present in the D-8 infused distillates. A full panel test detects any contaminants, pesticides, molds, pathogens, and contaminants that are harmful to consumers health.

Source

We dug into the roots to find out where the hemp was grown, well, not quite literally. We opted for brands that were transparent in displaying where the hemp grow and under what circumstances. Only the hemp that we found grew under organic conditions and without harmful chemicals were added to the list.

We covered major aspects like the brands reputation, reliability, lab test, quality, etc. Now you need to keep in mind a few nuances that you prefer in the best vape pens. We have also mentioned small but important points you need to keep in mind before getting a disposable vape.

Like with anything you choose to put in your body, cleaner is better. So choose vapes filled with pure hemp extracts and the least amount of additives and contaminants.

Do not come close to a vape that contains Vitamin E acetate, which is used to thicken and make the vape juices. This sticky chemical has sickened thousands of people; it can stay in your lungs, disturbing their function.

The color of the product inside the vape pen is a clear indicator of the quality so, check the color before hit the pen. If the Delta-8 infused oil is colored brown, purple, dark red, or even green, then do not buy it or use it. These colors indicate poor quality of distillates with contaminants. These impure oils are mostly opaque, while pure oils should be either light pink or yellow colored, almost clear.

Delta-8 THC infused vapes are available in different strengths, so opt for the one depending on your tolerance to D-8 and how long you want the effects to last.

The highly competitive and saturated market of D-8 products is a bonus for us; it means there will always be a brand that offers affordable rates. So Wisley, choose which pen fits in your budget without compromising on quality. Many popular brands offer deals and bundles, so make sure to avail them and some coins for the piggy.

Disposable vape device is compact, non-rechargeable devices that come pre-charged and pre-filled with enjoyable vape juice. The best part about these disposables is that you do not need to worry about charging them or estimating when you will have to re-fill the flavor.

They can be stored for up to a year and are usually recommended for noobs who are new to vape devices or as a backup e-cig. The small size lets you slip it into the smallest pocket of your backpack or trousers, and you get to travel without worrying about standing out in the crowd.

These vaporizers or vapes come in a range of shapes and sizes. They typically consist of the following:

A mouthpiece: You draw the vapor from the piece

A Tank: This canister contains THC distillates

Atomizer: This is the heating source that generates heat that does vapor production

Battery: Vapes mostly contain lithium-ion rechargeable batteries that is a power source to the atomizer.

Power Button: You need to press it to switch on or off the Vape. Some vapes with advanced technology even include temperature settings.

Mostly, yes. They will not burn down your house but make sure to buy vape pens from popular brands that sell best vape pens. If you want to enjoy your vaping experience, try following these steps:

With innovative ways of toking getting introduced every day, vaping companies keep experimenting and launching new e-cigs to keep up with the competent brands. This competition has led to various types of vaping devices, including:

Although the best vape pens are known for having cheaper price tags, they can quickly become expensive if they do not last you long. To help you understand better, here is an example: lets suppose you consume 60mg of CBD a day for medicinal purposes. Your disposable pen costs you $20 and contains a total of 180mg of CBD. This pen is going to last you three days exactly at the cost of $9 per day. This might sound cheaper than other options available, but if we calculate the entire years cost, it will come out at more than $3000.

The permanence of these pens depends primarily on the rate of usage, the amount of vape juice in each pen, and the amount you are allowed to consume per puff. Approximately every Vape holds 150 seconds of inhalation. The longer you draw, the more total pulls will reduce. A THC pen can contain around half a gram of oil infused with approximately 350mg of THC. If an efficient vape lasts 150 times one second puffs, it will estimate into three days of consecutive usage.

You want to get the most bang out of your buck, and we are on your team. Try following these steps and enjoy your vaping sesh longer:

All the aforementioned brands are reputable companies that have years of research and experience behind them. However, every product has its perks and shortcomings; hence, selecting the ideal disposable best vape pen rests on your preference.

For us, a perfect vape should take our stress away at the end of the day and hit the sweet spot. And the disposable that did the job for us was by none other than Delta ExtraX.

Gallery

Read more:

Buy The Best Delta 8 THC Disposable Vape Pens From The Top Brands Of 2021| Strongest THC Vape & Weed Carts Online | HeraldNet.com - The Daily...

SHENZHEN, China--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Chinas leading vaping media, Bluehole New Consumption, today published a feature story on recent vaping regulation updates in the UK, the US and Malaysia. As vaping accepted by more and more health regulators, the industry will witness a more concentrated and standardized market.

Here below is the full article in English:

On October 29, 2021, the U.K government agency, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) announced that NHS could soon prescribe e-cigarettes to help tobacco smokers quit, inviting e-cigarette manufacturers to submit products to undergo the same approval process as prescribed medicines. It could make England the first country to prescribe medicinally licensed e-cigarettes. Under such a circumstance, A medically licensed e-cigarette would have to pass even more rigorous safety checks than those required for them to be sold commercially, according to BBC.

On the same day, the Malaysian government announced to impose excise duty on nicotine vapor products. The managing director of British America Tobacco (BAT) Malaysia, Nedal Salem, said this indicates the Malaysian government is looking to legalize nicotine vapor products: Regulation will not only allow vape users access to reduced-risk alternatives to smoking, but also ensure the products used are compliant to quality and safety standards.

Meanwhile, in October, the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted marketing orders for Vuse Solo and accompanying tobacco flavored e-liquid pods, making it the first set of e-cigarette authorized for sale by the FDA.

From the UK to Malaysia and the U.S, E-cigarette is accepted by more and more health regulators around the world as an effective harm-reduction tool to improve public health.

As BAT Malaysia states, regulation could positively accelerate healthy development of the vaping industry for setting higher quality requirements and safety standards for products. Moreover, regulation measures, such as the marketing authorization and prescription evaluation, could be deemed the regulators acknowledgement of the products public health benefits.

Besides, Mitch Zeller, director of the FDA Center for Tobacco Products, said that many of the tobacco product reviews are in final stages, at a virtual conference hosted by the Food and Drug Law Institute on October 27. However, the agency so far has only authorized three products for their substantial evidence of harm reduction while issuing marketing denial orders for 200 thousand products.

Vuse is currently in a lead position to pass the Premarket Tobacco Product Applications (PMTA) process. It showcases that the FDA (and perhaps other regulators) is more likely to trust and approve products made by market leaders for assured public health benefits and reliability proved by sufficient scientific data.

The FDAs rigorous requirements for products are also applied to manufacturers. SMOORE, the worlds largest vaping manufacturer, is the strategic supplier of VUSE. It features PMTA-related non-clinical evaluation capabilities, including physical testing, chemical testing and health risk assessment. Moreover, SMOOREs CNAS tests have also expanded to 134.

As the regulatory framework outlines a higher entry barrier for the industry, the global vaping industry will witness a more standardized and concentrated market where industry leaders, such as BAT and SMOORE, will further strengthen their leading positions. Meanwhile, the whole industry and the supply chain will benefit from such a well-regulated and standardized market in turn.

To read the original article, please visit: https://www.bluehole.com.cn/news/detail/47350

View original post here:

Bluehole New Consumption Publishes a Feature Story on Recent Vaping Regulation Updates - Business Wire

Democrats are trying to pay for regressive tax cuts in their social spending bill with a big regressive tax hike on vapers.The latest version of the "Build Back Better" plan that's currently being considered in the House of Representatives would slap a new excise tax on any nicotine product "that has been extracted, concentrated, or synthesized" (i.e., nicotine-containing vaping liquid) at the rate of $50.33 per 1,810 milligrams of nicotine.

This is mercifully only half the size of the vaping tax that was included in the first version of the bill. It would nevertheless lead to a massive tax increase on vapers and the businesses that sell to them.

"This tax will close my shop," Keith Gossett, the owner of Bucky's Vape Shop in Columbus, Georgia, told Reason in September about the previous plan to tax vaping liquids at a rate of $100.66 per 1,810 milligrams of nicotine.

The old proposed tax hike would have raised the price of most nicotine-heavy products Gossett sold from $15 to around $75. The new tax proposed by Democrats would instead increase prices of the same products to about $45, or triple what they currently are.

That's bad news for small businesses. It's also bad news for people who are or might be tempted to switch to vaping as a safer alternative to smoking traditional, combustible cigarettes.

Cigarettes also faced steep tax hikes under the old "Build Back Better" bill, somewhat offsetting the higher tax rate that was being slapped on competing vaping liquids. The new bill released this week, however, leaves cigarette taxes untouched.

I don't like the idea of using taxes to encourage people to make healthier decisions. But this latest tax scheme actively encourages people to make unhealthy decisions by trying to make the tax rate between dangerous cigarettes and much safer vaping products equivalent.

Targeting nicotine levels adds a whole extra layer of nonsense to the tax, says the Tax Foundation's Ulrik Boesen.

"A good [tax] design means internalizing externalities related to consumption of a product. With tobacco and nicotine product consumption, these externalities are (1) the health risks connected to frequent use and (2) quantity consumed," he writes. "Nicotine is the addictive substance in the products, but not the harmful ingredient. In other words, the proposal does not target the harmful behavior directly."

The proposed nicotine tax would raise about $10 billion at most, Boesen estimates, and maybe much less given the Food and Drug Administration's current crackdown on which vaping products are allowed in the market.

This revenue will come in lieu of the money Democrats were hoping to raise by cracking down on various estate and gift tax avoidance schemes favored by the wealthy, reports The Intercept,thus "replacing a tax that was highly progressive with one that is highly regressive."

To be sure, cutting taxes on the wealthyor in the "Build Back Better" bill's case, choosing not to increase their effective tax rateis usually a good idea. But paying for those tax cuts (or unrealized tax increases) with higher taxes on poorer people who are also trying to quit smoking doesn't seem like the optimal policy.

Fortunately for vapers, Sen. Joe Manchin (DW.Va.) has come out against the proposed nicotine taxes.

That alone could sink the bill in Senate. The Democrat-controlled House is expected to vote on its version of the "Build Back Better" plan today.

Perhaps in the hopes of getting some positive coverage of their spending bill, House Democrats are also proposing new subsidies for "local journalism." The latest version of the "Build Back Better" bill also folds in a plan to give refundable tax credits of up to $25,000 per local, news-gathering journalist who is employed by either a newspaper or digital news outlet. Publishers with as many as 1,500 employees could claim this tax credit, up from a previous version that would have only made the tax credits available for publications with up to 750 employees.

There are a number of problems with subsidizing the news media in this way. Perhaps the biggest one is that it puts the federal government, and specifically the taxman, in the position of deciding who meets the bill's somewhat subjective definition of a journalist.

As I wrote in September, "imagine IRS agents poring over a newspaper (or Substack) to see if it qualifies for special tax treatment. Not exactly an image consistent with the First Amendment."

New York City Mayorelect Eric Adams is shaking up things at city hall already with a surprise endorsement of cryptocurrency. On Thursday, Adams said that he wanted to make the Big Apple the center of this new industry and that to help things along, he would be taking his first three paychecks in the form of bitcoin, reports Forbes.

Adams made the announcement on Twitter in response to Miami Mayor Francis Suarez, who said that he would like his next paycheck to be 100 percent bitcoin.

Los Angeles is temporarily deferring fines against businesses that are found not enforcing the city's vaccine mandate, which theLos Angeles Timesdescribes as "some of the nation's strictest COVID-19 vaccine verification rules."

Shoplifting in San Francisco is getting so bad that even the cops are allegedly joining in. TheSan Francisco Chroniclereported yesterday that an off-duty police sergeant was arrested on suspicion of robbing a Rite Aid.

Virginia's incoming state attorney general wants to change the law to allow his office to step in when local prosecutors are being too lenient. Sen. Tom Cotton (RArk.), who thinks we have an underincarceration problem, loves the idea.

Pfizer says its new COVID-19 treatment is 90 percent effective at preventing hospitalization.

American companies are stepping up hiring, adding 531,000 jobs in October, reports Politico.

See more here:

Democrats Hike Taxes on Vaping, but Not Tobacco, in Latest Version of 'Build Back Better' Bill - Reason

Aglobal broadcast hostingTHR experts and consumer advocates for safer nicotine products, is being held during the same time as the COP9, to scrutinize and keep us updated on the conference.

The Bureau decided that the reports prepared by WHO (Comprehensive report on research and evidence on novel and emerging tobacco products, contained in document FCTC/COP/9/9) and by the Convention Secretariat (Challenges posed by and classification of novel and emerging tobacco products, contained in document FCTC/COP/9/10), should be presented for information and that related substantive discussions should be deferred to COP10 [in 2023], read the provisional agenda.

An article on Filter had underlined the fact that the WHO is disgracefully happy to keep brushing aside mounting evidence that vaping is much less harmful than smoking.

Commenting on this delay, Executive Coordinator the Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates (CAPHRA) Nancy Loucas had explained why she believes that that discussions and decisions onsafer nicotine alternatives will actually still be taking place at COP9, behind closed doors. Its now clear, however, that was a complete pretence aimed at minimizing a growing backlash against the WHOs anti-vaping agenda, said Loucas.

She has recently highlighted that for further proof that discussions and decisions on safer nicotine alternatives will indeed feature at COP9, one just needs to take a look at the WHOs regional meetings which took place prior to the main event. CAPHRA had obtained the 27 September to 1 October agenda for the WHOs Western Pacific Region Organization, which stated that the meeting was in preparation for The Ninth Conference of the Parties, and would include scientific updates on emerging tobacco and tobacco-like products, and nicotine products, their regulation, and a panel discussion on countries regulatory experiences.

To this effect, aglobal broadcast hosting (THR) experts and consumer advocates for safer nicotine products, had been announced. The event is being held currently, in parallel with COP9.

Dubbed sCOPe, or streaming Consumers On Point everywhere, the five-day livestream will be simulcast via YouTube and Facebook. Presenters and panellists will challenge and scrutinise COP9 including whos influencing andfunding its efforts to demonise vaping, and why.

The main organizer of sCOPe, CAPHRA, highlighted that the event is totally independent and non-aligned, organized with the aim of giving a voice to the public. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, consumers were planning to front up to COP in person and show media our increasing anger for being shut out, once again, from the proceedings. The FCTCs decision to delay COP9 and host it exclusively online, with no discussions to be publicly released, meant consumers had to take alternative action. Hence, the development of sCOPe, she said.

sCOPe is our response to being excluded from the table, as the main stakeholders, of the discussion and decision-making process that directly impacts our health and our right to make informed decisions, she says.

sCOPeis being currently simulcast on YouTube athttps://bit.ly/3aWBPxiand on Facebook as of 12.00pm Hong Kong Time on Monday, 8 November.

Case Studies: Countries Applying WHO Guidelines Have Higher Smoking Rates

Original post:

The WHO "Postponed" Tobacco Harm Reduction Talks Until 2023 - Vaping Post

TAIPEI (Taiwan News) A ban on electronic cigarettes and heated tobacco products (HTPs) passed the third reading at the Taipei City Council on Wednesday (Nov. 3), positioning the capital to become the first city in Taiwan to outlaw novel tobacco products.

The city ordinance stipulates that the manufacture, import, sale, supply, display, or advertising of the products is illegal, while their use is banned within 50 meters of school campuses. The regulation is pending Cabinet approval, wrote CNA.

Violators will be fined between NT$10,000 (US$359) and NT$50,000. Juveniles busted using e-cigarettes or HTPs will be required to receive education about ways to quit smoking, and absences from these classes will incur penalties ranging from NT$2,000 to NT$10,000.

The city's Department of Health suggested businesses selling vaping and heated tobacco products have misled the public by claiming such alternatives help wean people off smoking. However, up to 80% of e-liquid refills are found to contain nicotine in annual sampling inspections led by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, which indicates the risk of addiction, said the department.

The apparent health threat such products can pose has also been a major reason for the tightening of rules.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has warned about the higher levels of toxins in HTP aerosols than in conventional cigarette smoke, while a study published by the Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis in March indicated that at least 164 of the 1,064 chemicals found in vaping devices available in Australia were toxic, according to the John Tung Foundation.

The new products have proved to be appealing to youths, in part due to the various flavors. Last month the Consumers Foundation flagged the prevalence of such merchandise on e-commerce platforms.

The review of a proposed amendment to the Tobacco Hazards Prevention Act has hit a snag as the Cabinet debates the need to separately regulate e-cigarettes and HTPs. Premier Su Tseng-chang () has promised to submit it for legislative reading by the end of this year, reported China Times.

E-cigarettes and other contraband found on Taiwan's e-commerce platforms. (CNA photo)

Read the rest here:

Taipei set to ban sale of vaping and heated tobacco products - Taiwan News

An adaptable kit

The Z80 kit has a stylish design and a sleek finish, and uses an 18650 battery. The addition of new operating modes to the updated Zenith II clearomizer mean you can use it for indirect and restricted direct vaping What a great way to start vaping!

On the top of the box theres a spring-mounted 510 connector. It can take atomizers up to 26mm in diameter, which meets most peoples needs, as is using a single 18650 battery. The box can reach 80 W.

The body of the box is covered with a smooth leather- or suede-look material depending on the finish. It feels soft and smooth in your hand.

You access the battery compartment via a screw cap. Theres a small tab (for picking it up) that makes it easy to handle. 4 degassing outlets increase the safety level of the Z80 in case of battery problems. The cap thread is smooth. It only takes a few seconds to fit the battery.

On the front there are two buttons for settings and under them theres a USB-C port for occasional charging. The activation button is on the top of the box. It is discreetly edged in gold.

The display screen is bright enough and shows all the information youll need for everyday use. The Z80 box has a menu in watts and volts, and a F function. This menu allows you to set a frequency in Hertz to suit the coil youre using. To make this function easier to use, the box displays recommendations about the range of use. Depending on your inhalation style and the e-liquid youre using, you should update the value within the recommended range. The refresh function is a kind of low powered pre-heat function that cleans any e-liquid deposits off the coil. Its a bit unusual when you use it, but it works well. Combining the two functions ensures a much longer coil life than you get in conventional wattage mode.

The Zenith II comes with two mouth pieces (drip tips). The mouthpiece installed when you open the package is for indirect inhalation (into your mouth then into your lungs, like a tobacco cigarette). The second mouthpiece is bigger and black. Its for direct inhalation (when you breathe directly into your lungs). These new features show just how far the Zenith II has come. Its more versatile than its big brother, but well come back to that. Its easy to fill just turn the top ring on the clearomizer to open the filling hole. The split seal guarantees it wont leak, even if you turn the Zenith II upside down. We recommend using bottles with narrow tips to make that process easier. With a 5.5 ml capacity, you wont even need to fill the Zenith II that often.

The design of the Zenith II is sober. The edges are slightly rounded and add to the styling of the clearomizer. The upper rotating ring has a Z for Zenith engraved into it. Its discreet and well integrated. The lower ring, which allows you to access the coil is also machined to make it easier to turn.

The biggest change in the new Zenith II is the option to take it apart completely. Unlike the first model, you can change the Pyrex tank. The kit actually comes with a second tank too. Taking the clearomizer apart only takes a few seconds everything screws on and off easily and totally smoothly.

Changing the coil is a breeze. It only fits in one way, thanks to two flat plates either side of the coil. Putting in and removing the coil is easy and once its in, it wont budge. The seals work perfectly. During out tests we didnt see a single leak or any horrible seepage.

What sets the Zenith II apart is this new found versatility. As the go-to clearomizer for indirect inhalation and a very tight draw, the first model gained a great reputation and a large fan base. The new model retains the qualities that made the first clearomizer so successful, and has been developed to offer restricted direct inhalation too. The air flow adjustment ring has a series of 3 small holes for an ultra-tight draw. Turning it a little more gives you a wide opening for a more direct draw. Teaming this up with the Z coils makes the option of using a wide range of powers pretty amazing.

The 0.8 ohm coil is designed for indirect inhalation. Its range of use is between 15 to 18 W, and delivers great, aromatic flavour. Adjusting the air flow adjustment ring gives you variable draft tightness, and that can change the vapour temperature. Its perfect for gourmet liquids. Vapers who prefer lower powers can easily switch to other coils that work with the Zenith II and range from 0.48 ohm to 1.6 ohm. Thats more than enough for most peoples needs.

The second 0.3 ohm resistor, for use between 30 and 40 W, is reserved for restricted direct inhalation. Whichever liquid we tried, the flavours were excellent. Vapour production is consistent with the power used with the coil. Without a doubt, this coil gives beginners the opportunity to try direct inhalation, and also offers a reasonable direct vape for people who like small clouds.

What we like

What we dont like

Excerpt from:

Test: the Coolfire Z80 kit by Innokin - Vaping Post

Researchers found that adolescents who say they vaped cannabis within the last 30 days increased 7-fold from 2013 to 2020. Charlotte Observer/Tribune News Service via Getty Images hide caption

Researchers found that adolescents who say they vaped cannabis within the last 30 days increased 7-fold from 2013 to 2020.

Teen vaping of marijuana doubled between 2013 and 2020, indicating that young people may be swapping out joints, pipes or bongs for vape pens, according to a new study.

Researchers also found that adolescents who say they vaped cannabis within the last 30 days increased 7-fold from 1.6% to 8.4% during the same period.

The report was published in JAMA Pediatrics on Monday by researchers who analyzed 17 studies involving nearly 200,000 adolescents in the U.S. and Canada. Overall, they say, the cumulative data points to what may be a shift in preference from dried herb to cannabis oil products, which is how marijuana is ingested via vaping.

This may be due to the more intense high that can be achieved by cannabis oils, which contain higher levels of THC, the psychoactive ingredient in marijuana, and the misconception that vaping devices are safer than smoking.

However, researchers stressed that vaping marijuana poses serious health dangers for teens.

"Regular use of high THC products could increase the risk of dependence, other substance use and many other health, social and behavioral problems later in life," study author Carmen Lim, a doctoral candidate in health and behavioral sciences at the University of Queensland in Australia, told NPR.

The Monitoring the Future survey a large U.S. survey on drug and alcohol use related attitudes in adolescents is one of the 17 studies included in the new meta-analysis. Although it showed that marijuana use has remained relatively stable among 12th graders in the last few years, hovering around the 35% mark, the growing popularity of electronic pot vaping devices is alarming, Lim said.

"Since marijuana is currently illegal at the federal level, many products are not regulated," she explained.

She noted that the amount of toxicant in marijuana vapes, including cutting agents such as Vitamin E acetate, which can interfere with normal lung functioning when inhaled, remains unknown.

The Centers for Disease and Prevention reported an outbreak of more than 2,800 cases of lung injury, including 68 deaths, that were linked to e-cigarettes and vaping products between March 2019 and February 2020. Investigators eventually determined that the vast majority of people who had sustained lung injuries after vaping had consumed THC-containing products, many of which also contained Vitamin E acetate.

Carol Boyd, co-director of the Center for the Study of Drugs, Alcohol, Smoking and Health at the University of Michigan, told NPR "vaping marijuana appears even worse" for young people than vaping nicotine products.

The 2020 Monitoring the Future survey found that "adolescents' lifetime cannabis vaping" use was associated with several adverse respiratory symptoms.

"In contrast to smoking cannabis, vaping marijuana with an electronic nicotine device increased the likelihood that adolescents would have worrisome pulmonary symptoms, including things like wheezing or whistling in their chest," Boyd said.

They are also more likely to have their sleep disturbed by wheezing and experience a dry cough when exercising, she added.

"They vape because they think it's safer but that's not necessarily the case," Boyd said. "They are misleading themselves."

The study advocates for greater investment in intervention and prevention measures, including better regulation of cannabis vaping products and bans on advertising that target young people.

Read the rest here:

Cannabis vaping among teens has grown sharply in recent years - NPR

To the editor:

Teens all over the country are being influenced by vapes. Vapes are being marketed towards the younger population due to all the fun, different flavors they put out. Over half of teens that vape have said that they do it because of the flavors, along with it being the fun, cool thing to do nowadays.

There has been a recent push to ban all non-tobacco flavored vapes, to try to decrease the number of users. A lot of teens think that vaping is not as harmful as smoking cigarettes, and some are under the assumption that they cannot get addicted to the nicotine in them.

They are wrong. While theyre generally thought to be less harmful than smoking, a lot of the long-term effects of vaping are unknown. Recently, there has been a lung disease that has been able to be tied back to vaping called EVALI, which implies that vaping may have more potentially harmful side effects than people are aware of.

Nicotine has also been shown to possibly harm the developing adolescent brain by effecting the parts that control attention, learning, mood, and impulse control. Overall, teen vaping has several effects on the body along with increasing the risk of them becoming addicted to other drugs in the future.

If you or someone you know wants to quit vaping and needs help you can call or text 1-855-891-9989 and youll be put in contact with a youth coach who can provide free and confidential counseling sessions.

KIMBERLEE WIGGERS,

Youngstown State University nursing student,

Lisbon

Today's breaking news and more in your inbox

See the article here:

Teens and the dangers of vaping | News, Sports, Jobs - Morning Journal News

In 2016 the Food & Drug Administration "deemed" electronic cigarettes, vaping pens, and other electronic Nicotine delivery systems ("ENDS") to be "tobacco products" under the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. As a consequence, all ENDS manufacturers were required to submit premarket tobacco applications (PMTAs) in order to continue selling their wares. Under the Tobacco Act, the FDA is only to approve a PMTA if it concludes approval is "appropriate for the protection of public health," taking into account "the risks and benefits to the population as a whole." Without a PMTA, a deemed tobacco product cannot be sold.

PMTAs are supposed to be submitted before a new tobacco product is sold, but this was impossible since the FDA's rule applied to products already on the market. Accordingly, the FDA announced that ENDS manufacturers would have two years to prepare and submit the lengthy and detailed materials necessary for their applications before they would face the prospect of FDA enforcement. The FDA soon realized that the material and information necessary for PMTAs would be substantial, particularly because a separate PMTA is required for each product, defined quite capaciously (i.e. each package size, each flavor, each nicotine level, each delivery system, etc.). So the FDA tried to extend the enforcement deadline until 2022, but anti-tobacco groups sued, and they settled on a 2020 deadline.

The FDA ultimately received applications for over 4.8 million ENDS products from 230 companies. Needless to say, this is a bit more than the agency anticipated, and it has been working to process the applications, denying most of them. Because a PMTA denial is a death sentence, some disappointed ENDS producers have filed suit, challenging the denials and seeking judicial orders blocking FDA enforcement in the meantime.

Yesterday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled on one company's application for a stay pending resolution of its petition challenging the FDA's denial of its PMTAs. The court's opinion inWages and White Lion Investments LLC v. USFDA (WWLI) is a blistering indictment of the agency's decision-making and evaluation of ENDS PMTAs.

InWWLIa unanimous panel granted Triton Distribution's application for a stay, concluding that it had demonstrated not only a strong likelihood of success on the merits, but also that it would suffer irreparable injury without a stay, and the government would not.

A key problem with the way that the FDA handled the PMTAs filed by Triton (and other ENDS manufacturers) is that the FDA based its denial of their applications on a different standard than it had told companies they have to meet. This sort of action is at the heart of arbitrary agency action, and is antithetical to principles of due process.

For years, the FDA had informed ENDS manufacturers that they would not need to conduct long-term health studies on their individual products for their applications. This only makes sense, as ENDS manufacturers only had a limited period of time to prepare their materials. Yet, on August 26 when the FDA announced it was denying PMTAs for 55,000 flavored e-cigarette products, it claimed that such studies were "likely" necessary for approval. A few weeks later, the FDA denied Triton's applications, explaining that the key basis" for the denial, was the lack of "robust and reliable evidence" from long-term studies of the sort FDA had previously told manufacturers were unnecessary. (Triton had nonetheless committed to conduct such studies, but the FDA refused to consider that assurance.)

As Judge Oldham's opinion makes clear, the FDA's decision-making in denying Triton's application is an almost textbook example of what agencies arenot supposed to do. It both changed course without adequate explanation or consideration of serious reliance interests while simultaneously refusing to consider multiple relevant factors and information submitted by Triton.

Here are a few examples from Oldham's opinion:

The FDA failed to reasonably consider Triton's proposed marketing plan. The FDA repeatedly stated that a marketing plan is "a critical factor in[] FDA's statutorily required determination." Premarket Tobacco Product Applications and Recordkeeping Requirements, 86 Fed. Reg. 55,300, 55,324 (Oct. 5, 2021) ("Final Rule"); see also 84 Fed. Reg. 50,566, 50,581 (Sept. 25, 2019) ("Proposed Rule") ("The applicant's marketing plans . . . will provide input that is critical to FDA's determination of the likelihood of changes in tobacco product use behavior, especially when considered in conjunction with other information contained in the application." (emphasis added)); A.45 n.xix ("Limiting youth access and exposure to marketing is a critical aspect of product regulation." (emphasis added)); A.45 (Premarket "assessment includes evaluating the appropriateness of the proposed marketing plan."). Here, however, the FDA simply ignored Triton's plan. It stated: "[F]or the sake of efficiency, the evaluation of the marketing plan in applications will not occur at this stage of review, and we have not evaluated any marketing plans submitted with these applications."

The FDA's excuses for ignoring the "critical factor" of Triton's marketing plan are unpersuasive. First, the FDA says it didn't evaluate Triton's plan for "the sake of efficiency." Ibid. But "efficiency" is no substitute for "reasoned decisionmaking." Michigan, 576 U.S. at 750; see also Judulang v. Holder, 565 U.S. 42, 64 (2011) (emphasizing that "cheapness alone cannot save an arbitrary agency policy"). . . .

In a footnote Judge Oldham notes that the FDA's failure to consider Triton's marketing plan, and how it would control youth access, was particularly striking given that then-FDA Commissioner Scott Gottleib had identified Triton's approach as "best practices."

And then there are Trtiton's reliance interests, which the FDA disregarded in the course of its regulatory "switcheroo."

Between the Deeming Rule's effective date and the deadline for PMTAs, the FDA held public meetings and issued guidance on how e-cigarette manufacturers could get premarket authorization. In its "final guidance," the FDA stated that it did not "expect" that tobacco manufacturers would need to conduct long-term studies to support their PMTA. See, e.g., A.7374; A.92; see also Nicopure Labs, LLC v. FDA, 944 F.3d 267, 282 (D.C. Cir. 2019) ("The FDA has expressed willingness to accept scientific literature reviews instead of commissioned studies in support of e-cigarette applications in appropriate circumstances."). The FDA's expectation did not deviate in its Proposed Rule issued before the Order or the Final Rule issued a couple weeks after the Order. See Final Rule, 86 Fed. Reg. at 55,387 ("FDA does not expect that long-term clinical studies will need to be conducted for each PMTA; instead, it expects that it should be able to rely on other valid scientific evidence to evaluate some PMTAs."); Proposed Rule, 84 Fed. Reg. at 50,619 (similar). Many e-cigarette companies relied on the FDA's repeated insistence that it did "not expect that applicants will have to conduct long-term studies to support an application" and did not perform or submit such evidence.

Then the FDA "pull[ed] a surprise switcheroo on regulated entities." Env't Integrity Project v. EPA, 425 F.3d 992, 996 (D.C. Cir. 2005) (Sentelle, J.); accord Azar v. Allina Health Servs., 139 S. Ct. 1804, 1810 (2019) (citing the "surprise switcheroo" doctrine). Almost a year after the PMTA deadline, the FDA issued its first marketing denial orders for various flavored e-cigarettes and announced that it required the very studies it originally expected it didn't need. . . . Despite the radical difference, the FDA never mentioned, let alone reasonably considered, whether e-cigarette manufacturers, like Triton, could've reasonably relied on the FDA's prior meetings and guidance.

The law requires more. "When an agency changes course, . . . it must be cognizant that longstanding policies may have engendered serious reliance interests that must be taken into account." Regents, 140 S. Ct. at 1913 (quotation omitted). This does not mean that the FDA could not have "determine[d], in the particular context before it, that other interests and policy concerns outweigh any reliance interests. Making that difficult decision was the agency's job, but the agency failed to do it." Id. at 1914. This reinforces that the Order was likely arbitrary, capricious, or otherwise unlawful.

The FDA further failed to consider Triton's reliance interests, whether there were alternatives to denial on this basis, and other evidence submitted by Triton. As Judge Oldham noted, the FDA responded more to some of Triton's claims before the Fifth Circuit than it had when rejecting Triton's PMTA. The court also found that that, on balance, a majority of the other relevant factors favored granting Triton's request for a stay

The opinion also rejected the government's (in my view, borderline frivolous) argument that Triton sought relief -- a stay of FDA enforcement action -- that the court could not give. Yet just as a court could issue a stay barring the deportation of an unlawfully present alien pending review of the alien's claim for asylum or lawful presence, a court may order an administrative agency defendant to preserve the status quo pending the outcome of the litigation (in this case, by not initiating an enforcement action). How a government attorney argued the alternative is beyond me, particularly given the innovative and aggressive arguments in favor of expansive judicial authority to enter stays the federal government is currently making in the S.B. 8 litigation (something which I doubt was lost on this panel).

The Fifth Circuit's WWLI decision indicates the FDA faces a tough road ahead defending many of its PMTA denials--and it appears the FDA knows it. Other manufacturers have also sought relief in court, and even before the Fifth Circuit's decision issued the FDA was already beginning to back down. For instance, on October 11, in the face of a pending stay request before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, the FDA agreed to rescind its denial of PMTAs submitted by Turning Point Brands.

What is particularly galling about the FDA's treatment of ENDS manufacturers is that the FDA is well-aware that ENDS products pose far less risk to users than traditional, combustible cigarettes, and has acknowledged that ENDS can help some smokers quit. Further, there is substantial evidence that limitations on ENDS products will increase smoking, particularly among youth (as has been well-documented). Thus the FDA's cavalier rejection of PMTAs is not only arbitrary and capricious, it is contrary to the FDA's underlying public health mission (and may also be unconstitutional).

The rest is here:

Fifth Circuit Rebukes FDA for Regulatory "Switcheroo" in Denying Vaping Product Applications - Reason

A proposed ban on the sale of flavored tobacco and vaping products in Denver got bogged down Wednesday as members of the City Councils safety committee debated a handful of amendments including changes that would exempt hookah lounges and menthol cigarettes.

Committee members will have three weeks to work on things behind the scenes, agreeing Wednesday to pick up the measure and the five changes proposed so far again at a meeting on Nov. 17 before it can be moved along for consideration by the entire City Council.

Brought forth earlier this month by Councilmembers Amanda Sawyer and Debbie Ortega, the ordinance would make it illegal to sell items including flavored cigars, e-cigarettes, vape pens, vape juices, menthol cigarettes and shisha, the flavored tobacco used in hookah pipes in Denver. The sponsors and their backers argue its a public imperative, with flavored products being used to lure in young people and make them smokers for life.

The youth smoking and vaping epidemic is what we are trying to solve for here, Sawyer said Wednesday. It is an extraordinary problem. It has been declared an epidemic by the Surgeon General.

Adults over 21 could still possess and use those products but they would have to buy them somewhere outside city limits. Seven other Colorado municipalities have similar bans.

Some of Sawyers fellow safety committee members disagreed with an approach they view as too restrictive and likely to drive many small retailers out of businesses.

This is not being done with a scalpel, its being done with a sledgehammer and we are going to impact adults and prevent them from buying products that they want to buy, Councilwoman Kendra Black said.

Proposed amendments talked about Wednesday included an exemption for premium cigars and pipe tobacco and another carve-out for menthol cigarettes.

Councilman Kevin Flynn proposed the menthol amendment late Tuesday night after he said he heard from members of Denvers Black community that both favored and opposed the inclusion of menthol products, a style of tobacco products that has been disproportionately marketed to the Black people. He didnt see it as the Councils place to take that decision out of peoples hands.

The hookah lounge exception is viewed as the most important change to its backers because all shisha is flavored tobacco. The practice of smoking shisha out of hookah pipes in communal settings is a cultural practice that goes back centuries in many Middle Eastern cultures.

As written, the flavor (ban) would put all of the hookah lounges out of business, said Councilman Jolon Clark, who proposed the amendment.

Earlier on the meeting, Clark brought a separate proposed ordinance forward that would make it illegal for hookah lounges to allow customers to smoke between midnight and 7 a.m. The 15 to 20 lounges operating in the city today can stay open after bars close at 2 a.m., leading some, including one located in Clarks District 7, to become hotspots for early morning violence and other bad behavior, he said.

That measure was forwarded to the entire Council and was back by the National Hookah Community Association.

We are behind reasonable regulation that addresses the main issue, said Rima Khoury, an attorney with shisha brand Fumari and secretary of the association said via Zoom. Khoury added, a broad ban on flavors would have unintended consequences since shisha has always been flavored.

Sawyer told The Denver Post earlier this month that the lobbying effort around the proposed ban has been intense. On Wednesday she said she and Councilwoman Ortega were opposed to amendments that might erode the value of this proposal.

View post:

Denvers proposed ban on flavored tobacco, vape products may be tweaked to exempt hookah lounges, menthol products - The Denver Post