Category Archives: DNA

COD Advanced Warfare "DNA BOMB" GAMEPLAY (30 Gunstreak)!
Can We Hit 160 LIKES? If YES, There Will Be Another Video Up Tomorrow 🙂 ------ CONNECT WITH ME ------ Follow my Twitter - https://twitter.com/MiladTiger Follow my Facebook - https://www...

By: FS KING

Excerpt from:
COD Advanced Warfare "DNA BOMB" GAMEPLAY (30 Gunstreak)! - Video

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) A California appeals court struck down a state law that requires the collection of DNA from anyone arrested on suspicion of committing a felony.

The 1st District Court of Appeal said Wednesday that the state Constitution's ban on unreasonable search and seizure prohibited the DNA collection using a cheek swab. The law was approved by voters in 2004.

"We conclude that the DNA Act ... unreasonably intrudes on such arrestees' expectation of privacy," Presiding Justice J. Anthony Kline said in a 3-0 ruling.

There was no immediate order stopping police in California from continuing to collect DNA, and the appellate court's ruling could be appealed. Still, the ruling is important, said Julia Harumi Mass, a senior staff attorney at the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California, which filed a brief in the case.

"It's one of the first opinions to recognize that DNA analysis is fundamentally different from a fingerprint," Mass said. "Arrestee DNA collection raises serious privacy concerns."

Supporters of the law say law enforcement's interest in solving cold cases, identifying crime suspects and even exonerating the wrongly accused outweigh privacy concerns raised by the forced DNA collections.

The state Attorney General's office is reviewing the decision, spokesman David Beltran said.

The appeals court in Wednesday's ruling was reviewing an earlier decision it issued on the law in light of a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that upheld a similar Maryland law. The earlier ruling also found the California law unconstitutional.

The appeals court said the Supreme Court decision did not apply in this case in part because of significant differences between Maryland's law and California's law. Maryland's law, for example, only allows the DNA of suspects to be tested after they have been charged with a crime. California's law allows testing even before charges are filed. The California law also applies to all felony suspects who are arrested regardless of the seriousness of the alleged crime.

The appellate ruling came in the case of Mark Buza, who was suspected of setting a police car on fire in San Francisco, but refused to provide a DNA sample after his arrest.

View original post here:
California court strikes down DNA collection law

Advanced Warfare: Fast 2:50 (170 Second) DNA Bomb on Terrace!
Song Used:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjidGmro6Mw DarksceneGaming #39;s Links Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/darkscenegaming Twitch: http://www.twitch.tv/darkscenegaming Youtube: ...

By: DarkSceneGaming

Continued here:
Advanced Warfare: Fast 2:50 (170 Second) DNA Bomb on Terrace! - Video

DNA w/ Every Gun Episode #5 (Lynx Sniper 40 Gunstreak)
70 likes for another episode! Follow @godisomar on twitter! Lynx DNA Bomb AW Lynx DNA Advanced Warfare Lynx Sniper.

By: OP Omar

Read the rest here:
DNA w/ Every Gun Episode #5 (Lynx Sniper 40 Gunstreak) - Video

Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare- *LIVE* DNA BOMB on Terrace
Hope you guys did enjoy the video, make sure to comment and like the video! Subscribe to my YT channel if you have not already! 70 likes?! Subscribe here: https://www.youtube.com/user/SwaggXBL...

By: SwaggXBL- AW Tips and Tricks

Read the original here:
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare- *LIVE* DNA BOMB on Terrace - Video

Filmpje biologie DNA
extreem mooi filmpje.

By: Ivar Bouw

More here:
Filmpje biologie DNA - Video

Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare DNA Bomb Quest
First Episode trying to get a DNA Bomb like comment and subscribe Call of Duty Advanced Warfare https://store.sonyentertainmentnetwork.com/#!/tid=CUSA00851_00.

By: MerkaHD

Read more from the original source:
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare DNA Bomb Quest - Video

DNA kits are now available, Click here!

Puppies that match out of 2 DNAd parents will receive the DNA VIP designation and that designation will be on the temporary puppy certificates as well as the permanent ABRA registration certificate.

Only unalterable form of Pet Identification Non-invasive DNA collection for the canine Promotes breeding integrity Internationally recognized Swift processing time Accuracy greater than 99.9% Lifetime DNA storage Re-Run and Re-Swab service Lifetime membership for Registered Pets No membership fees Unlimited amount of data storage International compatibility Patent Pending DNA Analysis tools

Almost every cell in a dog contains DNA Each of these cells has one complete copy of the DNA that is code for that dog Rubbing off some cells from the inside of the cheek gives us enough DNA to compare that dog to its parents.

DNA Extraction A swab containing cheek cells are placed in a solution PCR Specific regions of the DNA are amplified (copied 60 billion times) using BioPet designed primers Reading the DNA BioPet has 2 ABI 3730 DNA Analyzers used in DNA fragment analysis. Genotyping ABI GeneMappersoftware is used in interpreting fragment analysis data. Checking Genotypes A manual review of data is performed for each sample and marker. Format and upload Data is uploaded to the DNA World Pet Registryfor DNA Proof of Parentage testing

More:
DNA | ABRA - American Bulldog Registry & Archives

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

London (CNN) -- New DNA tests reveal Britain's long-lost King Richard III was blue-eyed and likely blond-haired, but they also raise intriguing questions over whether he -- and other monarchs before and since -- should have been on the throne at all.

Experts researching the case of the "King in the car park" -- a set of remains dug up from beneath a parking lot in the central English city of Leicester in 2012 -- now say they are 99.999% positive that the bones are those of Richard III, who died at the Battle of Bosworth in 1485.

Genetic specialist Turi King, from the University of Leicester, said analysis of various genetic markers offered tantalizing clues to Richard III's appearance -- suggesting that he was not the dark-haired, steely-eyed monarch portrayed in well-known historical images.

"[There are] genes that we know are involved in coding for hair and eye color ... The genetic evidence shows he had a 96% probability of having blue eyes, and a 77% probability of having blond hair, though this can darken with age."

Tests suggest Richard III had blue eyes and -- at least as a child -- blond hair; this portrait is likely to be most accurate.

The remains of King Richard III

The remains of King Richard III

The remains of King Richard III

The remains of King Richard III

Continued here:
Richard III's DNA surprise

SAN FRANCISCO, Dec. 4 (UPI) -- A California state appellate court has defied the U.S. Supreme Court with a ruling tossing out a law requiring DNA collection from everyone arrested for a felony.

"The California DNA Act intrudes too quickly and too deeply into the privacy interests of arrestees," presiding justice J. Anthony Kline wrote for the three-judge panel of the First Appellate District Court of Appeal in San Francisco.

The decision cited 2012 state statistics that 62 percent of those arrested for felonies who were not ultimately convictedalmost 20 percent of the total number of felony busts were never even charged with a crime.

The decision contravenes a Supreme Court decision last year ruling that a similar Maryland DNA law was a valid form of police identification of suspects, like fingerprinting.

The California panel cited the state constitution which declares "privacy" to be an "inalienable right" under a 1972 state law, the Privacy Initiative.

The court noted: "The collection and indefinite storage of DNA samples is the epitome of the kind of stockpiling of personal and private information the Privacy Initiative meant to protect from unnecessary governmental intrusion."

The California case, People v. Buza, involved a San Francisco man who was convicted of arson and other charged, including refusal to provide a DNA sample. The ruling only concerns the DNA charge, for which he was sentenced to six months in jail.

The decision is likely to be appealed to the California Supreme Court.

2014 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Any reproduction, republication, redistribution and/or modification of any UPI content is expressly prohibited without UPI's prior written consent.

U.S. News

Read this article:
California nixes DNA database for suspects