Page 21234..1020..»

Category Archives: Second Amendment

Governor signs firearm bills, vetoes bill to repeal gun-free zones – Buckrail

Posted: March 29, 2024 at 2:49 am

CHEYENNE, Wyo. On Friday, March 22, Governor Gordon signed four bills in support of the second amendment, while vetoing House Bill 125, which would eliminate gun safe zones in schools and hospitals.

Gordon signed SF0073 Concealed firearms-permit eligibility,SF0105 Wyoming Second Amendment Financial Privacy Act,SF0109 Prohibit Red Flag Gun Seizure Act andSF0086 School safety and security-funding, in order to strengthen Wyomings status as a Second-Amendment friendly state, according to the announcement from his office.

According to the Governors Office, Senate File 105 protects the privacy and sensitive financial information of people purchasing firearms, firearms parts or ammunition in Wyoming by prohibiting credit card processors from using firearms or firearm-related merchant category codes. It also prohibits government or private entities from keeping any registry of privately owned firearms.

Senate File 109 prohibits red flag gun laws from being enforced or implemented in Wyoming. The Red Flag Law, also known as the Extreme Risk Protection Order law, prevents individuals showing signs of being a threat to themselves or others from purchasing or possessing any kind of firearm.

Senate File 73 amends concealed carry permit regulations to allow those who have had their firearms taken away to be eligible to have their gun rights restored. The bill states that applications for a permit to carry a concealed firearm will be distributed by the division of criminal investigation and local law enforcement agencies.

Senate File 86 creates an account to reimburse school districts for costs related to possession of firearms on school property by school district employees.

Gordon emphasized his support of firearms in Wyoming but cited Article 2 of the Wyoming Constitution in his opposition of HB0125 Repeal gun free zones and preemption amendments. He said that the bill exceeds the separation of powers in local and state government.

I am a fervent supporter of the Second AmendmentHowever, House Bill 125/Enrolled Act No. 49, erodes historic local control norms by giving sole authority to the Legislature to micromanage a constitutionally protected right, Governor Gordon wrote in his veto letter. Any further clarification of the law, if this bill were enacted, would augment the Legislatures reach into local firearms regulation.

The Governor noted the bill would require each state facility, such as the University of Wyoming, Wyoming State Hospital or the Wyoming Boys School, to receive legislative approval to restrict carrying firearms, or even to set policies including proper weapon storage. It would also repeal the statute that has allowed school districts to establish specific policies allowing concealed carry in their districts.

With the repeal of the bill, state, county and town governments can regulate or ban concealed firearms in public spaces, including schools and hospitals.

According to the Governors Office, House Bill 125 needs more input, discussion and review. The State Building Commission will begin a process to reconsider rules to allow concealed carry permit holders to exercise their rights within the Capitol and other appropriate state facilities. That process will involve public input.

Every piece of legislation must stand for critical review, particularly those affecting our constitutional rights, the Governor wrote. As delivered to my desk, this bill lacks sufficient review and debate.A bill covering such a sensitive topic does not lend itself to successive tweaks to correct flaws, and therefore I believe the Legislature should be open to debating and fully working this bill through its established processes.

The Governors veto letter can be seenhere.

See more here:
Governor signs firearm bills, vetoes bill to repeal gun-free zones - Buckrail

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on Governor signs firearm bills, vetoes bill to repeal gun-free zones – Buckrail

FISA and the Second Amendment: Gun Owners Beware – RealClearPolicy

Posted: February 3, 2024 at 1:14 pm

FISA and the Second Amendment: Gun Owners Beware  RealClearPolicy

Read the rest here:
FISA and the Second Amendment: Gun Owners Beware - RealClearPolicy

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on FISA and the Second Amendment: Gun Owners Beware – RealClearPolicy

Second Amendment protects the rest | Commentary | norfolkdailynews.com – Norfolk Daily News

Posted: at 1:13 pm

Let me take a moment to educate the masses, so to speak not to exclude constitutionalists who spend the vast majority of their time analyzing and dissecting each word and phrase in every amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

There exists a formal and dignified principle that, although unstated, is nevertheless etched in stone. Its non-negotiable. Its cold-blooded, hard-boiled fact. The Second Amendment protects all the rest.

Write that on the bedroom mirror so its the first thing you see when you get out of bed in the morning. Attach it to the door of the refrigerator within which is stored the nutrients nutrients that not only nourish your body but also give you the ability to exercise your mind. Nail it to the blackboard (OK, traditionalist I am) in the classroom that your kids attend so that no socialist-indoctrinated chowderhead can erase it and replace it with some sort of Mandan manifesto hogwash.

Understand, please, that once the Second Amendment is toast (done and dusted, to cite an old Scottish clich) and your right to possess and use firearms is effectively gone, the United States spontaneously becomes Cuba or North Korea or Venezuela or China or Argentina or Australia or Canada? OK, omit the last one, although the tyrannical Trudeau delights in shoving his weight around clamping down on freedoms once naturally assumed by Canadians.

No, I dont claim to be an oracle in any sense, able to see into the future and predict the unraveling of events. That is risky business. But, when my wife said to me, Congratulations, you were certainly right about that, her tone reflected a hint of disappointment that precluded my taking her comment as praise. Her reference, incidentally, was to my prediction that the $80 billion in weaponry left in Afghanistan would end up being used against us perhaps in the Middle East.

Despite claims to the contrary by Biden administration officials, including Jake Sullivan (who knows less about foreign policy than does your average CNN or MSNBC pundit) and John Kirby (who manages to come up with a feeble excuse for every boneheaded decision the Biden crew makes), documentation proves that Hamas gunmen had access to that very arsenal. Anyone who is surprised about that result is much too stupid to deserve a cabinet position in the US military.

But, unabashed ignorance appears in vogue nowadays especially on college and university campuses where liberal professors have corrupted the minds of helpless students whose (im)moral compass knows not which way to turn. The rising tide of anti-semitism (taking the side of terrorists who delight in raping women, burning people alive, and beheading mere children) should stand as a clarifying moment for the country. Its a sign of sheer irrationality. Still, why expect anything different given evidence that recent graduates cant read (beyond fifth-grade level), cant write (aside from crude text messages), cant add (absent computer assistance), and cant subtract (5 - 2 = 4)? Critical thinking skills? In your dreams.

Yes, the rot that defines higher education has been made possible by Harvard-type elites and corporate CEOs (Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, etc.) who are complicit in its destruction (financial contributions and woke foolishness run amok). Public institutions K-12 are failing, also evidenced by poor performance (near the bottom) in key subject areas compared to other industrialized nations ... which may have something to do with the prolonged disinvestment in history and civics education (averaging $0.05 per pupil).

Frankly, what I find most incredibly shameful and alarming is this. At a time when politics (and politicians?) are more divisive than ever, when America is being torn apart by a myriad of societal issues, when the (social) media is a hotbed of impassioned (misinformed and disinformed) opinion, and when youth are more visible as advocates and activists than ever before (incomprehensible Hamas demonstrations notwithstanding), the knowledge of and appreciation for our countrys history is demonstrably at a dangerously low ebb.

Which tells me that our gratitude and gratefulness for constitutional amendments (freedom of speech, especially) is fleeting if not in dire peril and makes it more crucial than ever that folks understand that the Second Amendment protects all the rest.

More here:
Second Amendment protects the rest | Commentary | norfolkdailynews.com - Norfolk Daily News

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on Second Amendment protects the rest | Commentary | norfolkdailynews.com – Norfolk Daily News

Ricketts Signs Brief to Defend Gun Owners and Second Amendment – Rural Radio Network

Posted: at 1:13 pm

Ricketts Signs Brief to Defend Gun Owners and Second Amendment  Rural Radio Network

Link:
Ricketts Signs Brief to Defend Gun Owners and Second Amendment - Rural Radio Network

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on Ricketts Signs Brief to Defend Gun Owners and Second Amendment – Rural Radio Network

Dems bow to local control on guns then take it away | BRAUCHLER – coloradopolitics.com

Posted: at 1:13 pm

It is hard to tell which of the following Colorado Democrats hate more: the Second Amendment, or local control of government. A newly drafted bill sponsored by Dems allows them to continue to attack both.

Fewer than three years ago, Sen. Sonja Jaquez Lewis of Longmont, Sen. Chris Kolker of Littleton and Sen. Tom Sullivan of Centennial, all Democrats, voted with their party to blow up Colorados long-standing law which ensured a predictable, statewide approach to firearm regulation. Senate Bill 21-256, passed by all Democrats, created a patchwork of local gun laws that create confusion for law-abiding gun owners. The change in the law did not change the behavior of gun-toting criminals, but that is not the goal of the modern Democrat blame-the-guns approach to governance. Purportedly libertarian-ish Democrat Gov. Jared Polis signed the bill into law without hesitation.

Stay up to speed: Sign up for daily opinion in your inbox Monday-Friday

SB 21-256 made clear the General Assembly believes (o)fficials of local governments are uniquely equipped to make determinations as to regulations necessary in their local jurisdictions and to make determinations as to where concealed handguns can be carried in their local jurisdictions.

Fewer than 30 months later and without any data to support a change Jacquez Lewis, Kolker and Sullivan have changed their minds and now believe local governments are too stupid to determine what laws are necessary in their communities and too untrustworthy to determine where concealed handguns can be carried. No legislator has yet explained what happened to the uniquely equipped local governments. Once again, Democrats show up to save the day with a solution in search of a problem.

Sans any data let alone new data justifying the need for change the bill drafters hijack local control of the regulation of firearms at parks, playgrounds, rec centers, stadiums for any sport and at every level of competition, amusement parks, carnivals, circuses, water parks and any property in any way connected to local government or the grounds next to it. No joke.

This bill draft is the equivalent of the energy-company-crushing setbacks for oil rigs in Colorado. Remember that one? The proposed ballot measure excluded drilling from so many places by creating setbacks from so many sensitive areas that oil production could have lawfully only occurred in Weld County Sheriff Steve Reamss driveway and nowhere else.

This bill draft seeks to push Colorado toward becoming a statewide sensitive space.

Current law prohibits the open carrying of firearms at a polling place, because it may intimidate, threaten, or coerce voters The new law prohibits concealed carrying of weapons for the exact same reasons. To be clear: these gun-hating Dem law makers believe voters may become intimidated, threatened, scared to death, or worse by firearms they cannot see and do not know are there.

After the property owners suck approach of the special legislative session last year, this years legislature and Polis continue their assault on private property rights with this bill. This would-be legislation would ban carrying firearms at numerous private businesses, organizations and on private property, to include: private colleges; churches, synagogues, or other places of worship unless expressly authorized; private nursing homes; any private hospital or place at which medical or health care services are provided, and others.

The most insidious and potentially life-threatening provision of the law is the intended elimination of local school districts authority to protect the children in their charge. For 20 years, rural districts across Colorado the ones with schools 25-plus minutes from law enforcement response to emergencies have had the ability to provide an on-site, immediate response through highly-trained school faculty. Faculty Administrator Safety Training and Emergency Response (FASTER) has trained more than 400 people to carry concealed in their schools across 41 districts in Colorado. The participating schools and school districts have eagerly jumped on the opportunity to better protect their students and faculty. But that is not enough, when it comes to those who hate guns.

Despite not a single bad incident having occurred in the seven years FASTER has been training faculty, the Dems under the Gold Dome appear poised to eliminate it as an option for those communities whose law enforcement protectors are relative eons away.

What could be the penalty for the commission of such damning acts with firearms at sensitive places? In 2021, a concealed carry holder who ran afoul of local gun regulations faced only a civil penalty of no more than $50. The new bill by the same folks who voted in the 2021 bill ups the ante to a criminal misdemeanor and a $250 fine. That's 500% more than the just-enacted bill. There is a bigger question here: If carrying concealed in places prohibited by local or state law is a matter of such supreme importance, that as the bill claims it is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, why a small fine? Why no chance for jail and there is none no matter how many times the law is violated?

The answer is obvious. The Democrats in the legislature (and Polis) hate guns and do not value the Second Amendment. Instead, they take any and every opportunity to chisel away at that right.

Whether this draft bill becomes official or not, the one constant in Colorados experience with Democrat-dominant rule in state government is the gun-hating ends always justify the hypocritical means when it comes to hating firearms and infringing on Second Amendment rights.

George Brauchler is the former district attorney for the 18th Judicial District. He also is an Owens Early Criminal Justice Fellow at the Common Sense Institute. He hosts The George Brauchler Show on 710KNUS Monday through Friday from 6 a.m. to 10 a.m. Follow him on Twitter(X): @GeorgeBrauchler.

See the rest here:
Dems bow to local control on guns then take it away | BRAUCHLER - coloradopolitics.com

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on Dems bow to local control on guns then take it away | BRAUCHLER – coloradopolitics.com

Augusta County Second Amendment guy wants to protect schoolkids from books? – Augusta Free Press

Posted: at 1:13 pm

( BillionPhotos.com stock.adobe.com)

Augusta County is so, so lucky that a rando named Jeremy Nance appointed himself the book czar for the county school system.

This Nance fellow, per a story in the News Leader, is responsible for three of the four books that have been banned from public schools in Augusta County.

Interesting note here: Nance doesnt have any children in the school system.

He says hes speaking up for single moms, single parents who dont have time to go to the school board and teachers who are afraid of retaliation.

Of course he is.

What this Nance dude is, actually, is a far, far right political activist.

A quick Google search tells us that Nance, back in 2019, threatened a boycott of Mill Street Grill, a Downtown Staunton restaurant owned by City Councilman Terry Holmes, because Holmes signaled that he wouldnt support a Second Amendment sanctuary resolution being pushed by the local far, far right.

Guns, guns and more guns, but books like the award-winning Golden Boy, by Abigail Tarttelin, about an intersex teenager books are dangerous.

The objection that Nance has to Golden Boy is a pages-long graphic rape scene involving an adult and the teen protagonist.

As a survivor of childhood sexual abuse by an adult, the problem I have here is, not the book with the rape scene, but the political activist guy who thinks that just pretending the bad stuff that is perpetrated upon kids doesnt happen means, you know, it doesnt happen.

We see this phenomenon with another book that this Nance fellow objected to, The Swallows, by Lisa Lutz, which challenges the boys will be boys hierarchy in a fictional high school, the problem here being, if youre a far, far right activist, boys will be boys is your favorite ex-president raping a woman in a department store dressing room and then claiming she isnt his type.

Its a shame books like this are still in there,Nance told the Augusta County School Board as he raised his objections.

Sure, it is.

But the real shame is that we have a school board here that gives a guy like a Jeremy Nance the power that he has.

This is your daily reminder that elections matter. The school boards chair, David Shiflett, is leading an effort to review the school systems guidelines to make sure that the materials that are in our libraries are age-appropriate for the students that have access to them.

That review is on the agenda for the Augusta County School Board meeting on Thursday night.

You can bet that the review will end with the board empowering more Jeremy Nances to make sure that kids in Augusta County are protected from the uncomfortable realities of the world that we live in.

Well, except for the uncomfortable reality of gun violence.

It boggles the mind that theres a Jeremy Nance who thinks its more traumatic to read a book than it is to have to walk through a metal detector at the entrance to the school and have armed deputies patrolling the halls, but thats where we are.

Go here to see the original:
Augusta County Second Amendment guy wants to protect schoolkids from books? - Augusta Free Press

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on Augusta County Second Amendment guy wants to protect schoolkids from books? – Augusta Free Press

The 2nd Amendment is not about Hunting – WIBC – Indianapolis News & Politics

Posted: October 27, 2023 at 7:30 am

Second Amendment

A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Guy Relfords show on Saturday was about Indiana Universitys symposium The Courts, the 2nd Amendment, and Public Policy. The symposium had the provocative subtitle Just Shoot Me. Academia, liberal courts, and liberal politicians erroneously misinterpret the 2nd Amendment. The 2008 Heller Decision settled much of the debate. Militia does not mean the National Guard. In 1791, when the 2nd Amendment was ratified, militia meant the whole of the body of the people. Any member of the community was considered a member of the militia. As Guy has mentioned on numerous occasions on his show, well-regulated does not mean regulated by the government. Well-regulated means a working and or efficient militia.

The President and many liberal politicians believe that the 2nd Amendment in regard to private ownership of arms is for hunting. While many colonialists were expert hunters, the 2nd Amendment was not written for hunting. It was written for self-defense, and the defense against tyranny.

As Guy so excellently explains using Paul Reveres midnight ride,

In riding through the countryside, he (Revere) did not say, The deer are coming, the deer are coming!

Reveres warning was to alert the people to arm themselves against the British Regulars who were coming for them. The Founding Fathers, when writing the 2nd Amendment, understood the importance of the people being armed against tyranny. They lived it.

Listen to the show in its entirety along with older showshere:

Read the original:
The 2nd Amendment is not about Hunting - WIBC - Indianapolis News & Politics

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on The 2nd Amendment is not about Hunting – WIBC – Indianapolis News & Politics

Opinion: Protecting Our Second Amendment Rights in St. Louis … – The Missouri Times

Posted: at 7:30 am

Recent legislation passed by our County Council threatens to erode our Second Amendment rights. This legislation obstructs citizens right to open carry by mandating the possession of a concealed carry permit, in opposition to Missouris Constitutional Carry laws. This move is not only problematic but also unconstitutional.

First and foremost, this legislation represents a significant overreach by our local government into the lives of our law-abiding citizens. Unlike the gun-grabbing extremists on the County Council, I recognize the vital role that our Second Amendment plays in safeguarding our individual freedoms. This legislation seeks to limit St. Louis County residents ability to openly carry firearms, imposing unnecessary restrictions on those who seek to defend their families by requiring them to obtain a permit.

One of my primary concerns is that this legislation only applies to unincorporated St. Louis County. This approach creates a confusing patchwork of different rules and regulations across our county, as each city within our district would be forced to pass its own, potentially differing laws regarding open carry. Such a haphazard system is not only confusing for our law-abiding citizens but also impractical for law enforcement agencies tasked with enforcing these varying regulations.

Furthermore, this legislation may also be in direct violation of Missouri state statutes, which explicitly prohibit local governments from passing laws that differ from the state laws concerning firearms. Our state constitution upholds the right of our citizens to bear arms, and it is my firm belief that we should not infringe upon those rights.

As a member of the County Council, I voted against this legislation. Criminals will continue to be criminals, and only law-abiding citizens will follow this new law. This law will also further its proponents stated goal, which is increased gun confiscation. Additionally, state and federal law already prohibits the crimes being used as justification to pass this legislation. We need to support the enforcement and prosecution of the laws already on the books.

We must focus on effective and sensible measures that enhance public safety without infringing on our constitutional rights. This means supporting law enforcement and providing resources for mental health services. Our freedoms and our ability to defend our families should be cherished and protected, not undermined by ill-conceived legislation.

Read the original post:
Opinion: Protecting Our Second Amendment Rights in St. Louis ... - The Missouri Times

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on Opinion: Protecting Our Second Amendment Rights in St. Louis … – The Missouri Times

Statement by Vice President Kamala Harris on the Mass Shooting in … – The White House

Posted: at 7:30 am

Yesterday, Lewiston, Maine became yet another community torn apart by senseless gun violence. This time a bowling alley and a restaurant have been turned into scenes of unimaginable carnage.

Doug and I join the President and Dr. Biden in mourning those who were killed, praying for the many who were injured, and grieving for so many more whose lives are forever changed.

The Biden-Harris Administration will continue to provide full support to local authorities in Maine. I join President Biden in urging area residents to follow the warnings and guidance of local officials as the investigation proceeds.

Let us also continue to speak truth about the moment we are in. Gun violence is the leading cause of death for children in our nation. It does not have to be this way.

It is a false choice to suggest we must choose between either upholding the Second Amendment or passing reasonable gun safety laws to save lives. Congress can and must make background checks universal. Pass red flag laws. Ban high-capacity magazines. And renew the assault weapons ban.

In the meantime, President Biden and I are not waiting around. Through the White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention, we will continue to work to save lives.

We do not have a moment to spare, nor a life to spare.

###

Read more from the original source:
Statement by Vice President Kamala Harris on the Mass Shooting in ... - The White House

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on Statement by Vice President Kamala Harris on the Mass Shooting in … – The White House

Letter: Second Amendment matters more than ever – Quad-City Times

Posted: at 7:30 am

I'd always taken my Second Amendment rights for granted. Then Obama came along with his statement they cling to their guns and bibles referring, of course, to flyover country. I went to a gun store and there he was, a half size Obama with a notation Employee of the Month. I went home with a 9 mm.

The words: the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed couldn't be more specific. It is a shame that citizens need laws to protect them against the central government, but we do.

The present denizen of the White House would disarm us in the drop of a hat if it weren't for the 2nd Amendment. Iowa recently added the 2nd Amendment to the state Constitution, becoming the third state to do so. Eighteen additional states now have laws declaring themselves gun sanctuaries. The majority of counties in the U.S. have passed gun sanctuary laws. In Illinois, 80 of its sheriffs refuse to prosecute Pritzkers new gun law.

Why is it so important today? In the 20th Century specifically, 80% of the world's murder victims were victims of their own government. This Is the number of innocent people murdered by governments. Are You anti-state yet? In addition to Stalin and Mao, dozens of tin pot tyrants, e.g., Pol Pot, Edi Amin, casually murdered in the guise of discipline. Disarming the populace is a necessary and sufficient act to achieve tyranny.

Get opinion pieces, letters and editorials sent directly to your inbox weekly!

Continue reading here:
Letter: Second Amendment matters more than ever - Quad-City Times

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on Letter: Second Amendment matters more than ever – Quad-City Times

Page 21234..1020..»