Category Archives: Second Amendment

Gun rights advocates scored a major victory in June when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 63 that "the Second and Fourteenth Amendments protect an individual's right to carry a handgun for self-defense outside the home."

In the 2008 caseDistrict of Columbia v. Heller, the Court ruled that the Second Amendment secures the right to possess a handgun inside the home for self-defense. Two years later inMcDonald v. Chicago, the justices applied that right against state and local governments under the 14th Amendment, which prohibits states from depriving any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. June's decision inNew York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruenapplied the logic ofHellerandMcDonaldto gun possession in public.

The case involved a New York law requiring that anyone seeking a license to carry a concealed handgun in public satisfy a local official that he has "proper cause" to do so. According to the state, a "generalized" wish to carry a handgun for self-defense was not enough to meet that standard.

"In 43 States," Justice Clarence Thomas noted in the majority opinion, "the government issues licenses to carry based on objective criteria. But in six States, including New York, the government further conditions issuance of a license to carry on a citizen's showing of some additional special need. Because the State of New York issues public-carry licenses only when an applicant demonstrates a special need for self-defense, we conclude that the State's licensing regime violates the Constitution."

The heart of the matter was whether the wide discretion that New York gave local licensing officials was consistent with how constitutional rights are typically treated. "We know of no other constitutional rights that an individual may exercise only after demonstrating to government officers some special need," Thomas wrote. "That is not how the First Amendment works when it comes to unpopular speech or the free exercise of religion. It is not how the Sixth Amendment works when it comes to a defendant's right to confront the witnesses against him. And it is not how the Second Amendment works when it comes to public carry for self-defense."

Justice Brett Kavanaugh, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts, agreed with the majority but wrote separately to emphasize that "the Second Amendment allows a 'variety' of gun regulations." The legal challenges to those various regulations will come knocking at the Court's door soon enough.

This article originally appeared in print under the headline "Gun Rights Win Big at SCOTUS".

Go here to read the rest:
In 'Bruen,' SCOTUS Ruled That Gun Rights Are Secured by 14th Amendment - Reason

I dont usually give Congress credit for passing useful legislation. Bills that run to a thousand pages or more just cant prove beneficial, especially when our elected representatives admit to or even brag about not reading them. An exception to my cynical appraisal of congressional mischief is its designating every September 17 as Constitution Day.

No, it is not a federal holiday which gives everyone a paid day off of work. Nor are there ubiquitous parades and ceremonies to mark the anniversary of the Constitutions signing. About the only requirement is for colleges that receive federal funding, which is all of them except Hillsdale and one or two others, to commemorate the day in some educational manner. The hope, unfortunately misguided, is that our next generation of leaders will know and appreciate the powerful simplicity of the best governing document ever written.

It isnt working. One need only listen to all the demands for its reinterpretation, modification or outright rejection. Abolish the Electoral College because the wrong candidate was elected. Ditto for the Supreme Court for its failure to rule the way some vocal and politicized group demanded.

Even the Bill of Rights is subject to an ideological guillotine. Free speech and the free exercise of religion have come under attack when citizens choose to exercise their rights independently of the received wisdom coming from their political betters. And forget about the Second Amendment.

After these two can you list the other eight? Due process, trial by jury and self-incrimination may come to mind, but what about quartering troops in peacetime or common law suits? They just dont generate the level of heat as the first two. I think thats a good thing in a perverse sort of way.

What gets lost in this fevered discourse are the two most important amendments: the Ninth and the Tenth.

The Ninth states: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Why do we need such an amendment? Does it imply that our rights are granted by the government rather than being inalienable and held to be Creator endowed? If the government can guarantee them, then can it take them away? Thomas Jefferson may have thought this answer to be self-evident but many people today believe and act otherwise, at least to the extent that they argue these rights can be limited or curtailed for cause.

But then who determines if the cause is righteous? A currently favored majority political party? This isnt Great Britain, where its constitution appears to be whatever the House of Commons declares it to be ... today. The checks-and-balance system written into our Constitution is meant to protect against a tyranny of the majority. Give John Adams credit for preaching that sermon.

Perhaps the answer lies with the Tenth Amendment which declares that The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

This echoes our nations Anglo-Saxon heritage rather than the Latinized one pervasive in Europe. It is the people who hold residual rights, voluntarily surrendered to government for limited purposes. Note that it concludes with the phrase the people. Now think about the opening words of the Preamble to the Constitution: We the People. Coincidence? Probably, but then it gives pause for thought.

The Roman legal heritage of our European fellow nations takes the opposite view of this. Citizens are granted the right to do certain things by their government. The premise behind this is obvious: Government is the source of our freedom as defined by it. Read Dan Hannons Inventing Freedom: How the English Speaking People Made the Modern World for an insightful discussion of this significant difference in these two political philosophies.

So if basic rights are natural and endowed by God, how important is a constitution designed to be protected from the current electoral majority? Quite important, if one reads the Founding Fathers. The dysfunctional Articles of Confederation and the multiple defects of the state constitutions provided the impetus to construct a document meant for that generation and their posterity as the Preamble gives it.

The distinction was clear to them: there is ordinary law as determined by the legislature from time to time, and there is fundamental law that arose from the people themselves and not subject to legislative whim. For more on this critical distinction, read Gordon Woods Power and Liberty: Constitutionalism in the American Revolution.

I am a Son of the American Legion based on my fathers service in World War II. The preamble to our constitution begins with the words: Proud possessors of a priceless heritage. That heritage is inscribed in the timeless words of Americas constitution. May we never lose sight of that.

Mark Franke, M.B.A., an adjunct scholar of the Indiana Policy Review and its book reviewer, is formerly an associate vice-chancellor at Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne.

Mark Franke, M.B.A., an adjunct scholar of the Indiana Policy Review and its book reviewer, is formerly an associate vice-chancellor at Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne.

Read the original here:
The treasure of our Constitution | Opinion | shelbynews.com - Shelbynews

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

PORTLAND, Ore. Voters in Oregon and Washington sounded off on their election priorities both locally and nationally as the midterms approach.

"The farther left the better," Sydney said in Bellingham, Washington, a city located about 20 miles south of the Canadian border.

But extreme candidates won't appeal to voters like Jon, a Seattle resident whose priorities include preserving the Second Amendment as well as a woman's right to have an abortion.

"I'm looking for a Holy Grail candidate," he told Fox News while visiting Portland. "The Dems need to put up a more moderate candidate to get my vote and then the Republicans need to also do the same."

OREGON GOP HOPEFUL CHRISTINE DRAZAN REVEALS PLANS FOR STATE THAT HASN'T ELECTED REPUBLICAN GOVERNOR IN DECADES

Jon from Seattle says he's looking for a "Holy Grail" candidate who isn't too far to the left or right. (Fox News Digital)

He also said he's skeptical voters will find moderate candidates in Washington or Oregon, which he called "essentially one-party states."

"A lot of Americans don't want a collaborator or a moderate candidate anymore. They want someone who's gung-ho and going to go full 100 and very emotional," he said. "I think that makes our politics more dangerous."

A three-way open-seat race for governor is bringing more competition to Oregon, which hasn't elected a Republican to that office since 1982. In Washington, a first-time Republican candidate hopes to unseat Democratic Sen. Patty Murray, who was first elected to the Senate in 1992.

SUPREME COURT'S ROE V. WADE DECISION: READ THE DOBBS V. JACKSON WOMEN'S HEALTH RULING

Brenda told Fox News she supports the Second Amendment but would like to see tougher gun control as Portland continues to deal with high numbers of shootings. There were 114 shooting incidents in the city in July, compared with 34 during the same month in 2019, according to police data.

"This is out of control," Brenda said.

Amber, a Portland resident, said eco-friendly initiatives were her number one priority nationally.

"Understanding that global warming is real and aiming to make the initiatives that help push us in the right direction and kind of combat that," she said.

But locally, safety was top of mind for Amber. She said she wants to see the city of Portland focus on making people "feel comfortable" downtown again.

Farther north in Bellingham, many people told Fox News they hadn't started thinking about the election yet. Those who were planning to vote placed abortion rights, affordable housing and the environment among their top priorities.

People gather to protest the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade on June 24, 2022, in Portland, Oregon. Voters in Oregon and Washington told Fox News abortion, affordable housing and the environment are among their top priorities this election season. (Mathieu Lewis-Rolland/Getty Images)

Women's rights have "been put kind of under attack, especially at the federal level with the Supreme Court and everything," Francis said.

Election experts speculate the Supreme Court's June decision to overturn Roe v. Wade could drive more Democratic voters to the polls, potentially threatening Republicans' shot at taking control of Congress. Washington and Oregon both have state laws protecting abortion rights, but this week Sen. Lindsey Graham announced a federal bill to ban abortion after 15 weeks.

"It's important locally to make sure that you focus on candidates that are going to support your beliefs to hopefully have things go more to the federal level and just kind of be like a snowball effect," Francis said.

HOUSE DEMOCRATS DEMAND TWITTER PUT FORTH PLAN FOR COMBATTING MIDTERMS 'MISINFORMATION'

Voters are also worried about housing costs, as rent and home prices continue to increase in the Pacific Northwest.

"It seems like with COVID when everyone started working remote, you got a lot of people from wealthier cities like Seattle that have a lot more high-paying jobs come into smaller communities" and drive up housing prices, Francis told Fox News.

The median home price in Washington was $560,400 in 2021, nearly double the price of a house just six years previously, according to state data. In 2019, before the coronavirus pandemic began, the median price of a home was just shy of $398,000.

Mary said she wished local legislators would address affordable housing and "unhoused issues" more aggressively. Nationally, she hopes Democrats retain control of the House and Senate even though she doesn't consider herself a Democrat.

Mary says she hopes Democrats retain control of the House and Senate because there was too much "hatemongering" when President Trump was in office. (Fox News Digital)

"I felt like there was a lot of the hatemongering that went on in the last Republican president's term," she said. "Not only BIPOC people but also people's gender differences, and everybody was a loser if they didn't love him."

Kaelyn and Sydney said they hope to see more compassionate candidates elected.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

"Caring about like homeless, people of color, LGBTQ rights, people that have been kind of like pushed to the side forever," Kaelyn said. "Making sure that every little step is taken to help those people out and work towards a better equilibrium."

Keith was most concerned about term limits and said "it's time for a revolution."

"We've got to get the incumbents out and put new people in," he said. "The House of Representatives is supposed to be replaced every two years. Why are they in the house for 30 years?"

Hannah Ray Lambert is an associate producer/writer with Fox News Digital Originals.

Read the rest here:
Washington and Oregon voters say abortion, affordable housing among top election priorities - Fox News

When Mary Peltola walked up to her new office for the first time on Tuesday, she glanced at a plaque and burst into tears.

Less than two weeks earlier, Peltola won a protracted and crowded special election to become the first Alaska Native elected to Congress. But her reaction to the plaque that read Office of the At Large Congressional District of Alaska, was less about her own personal triumph, she said, than her grief.

Peltola, 49, is completing the term of Rep. Don Young, a Republican who held the seat for nearly 50 years and died in March. Peltola was a close family friend of Youngs; in fact, half a century ago, her parents volunteered on his first congressional campaign. Now, shes his successor.

Its daunting, Peltola says. No one will ever be able to fill his shoes.

In an interview with TIME, Peltola, discussed her plans for finishing Youngs term after her stunning special election victory over former governor and conservative firebrand Sarah Palin. The election was the first in Alaska to use ranked-choice voting, a system that allows voters to rank the candidates in their order of preference. But her days of campaigning are far from over. The Alaska Democrat, who still has a general election to win in November, also talked about how she plans to turn her two-month term into a two-year term.

The interview, consisting of two separate conversations, has been edited and condensed for clarity.

You won a special election thanks in part to many voters writing you in as their second choice. What do you think your race reveals about the virtues of ranked-choice voting?

I think that it reveals that there is an appetite for middle-of-the-road candidates. I think that moving away from closed partisan primaries will help us elect fewer ideologues who are less entrenched and more capable of compromising, reaching consensus, and building coalitions. I think it shows that such candidates are more palatable even among those who may not have picked someone else as their first choice. That adds value as well.

Alaskans were obviously very familiar with Sarah Palin. What were her vulnerabilities in this race?

Although I like her, she can be a polarizing figure. We had a good working relationship. Her two years as governor coincided with my last two years in the statehouse. But her support was in the 30 percent range, and it was hard for her to get beyond that and tap into folks who are not her supporters.

Palin was begging Nick Begich, another Republican, to drop out of the race so she could consolidate Republican support. Did his presence in the race help you?

Begich is much stronger on public policy, and he has ideas and approaches. Im not necessarily sure that if we got more [candidates] out of the field, people who ranked him first would necessarily rank Sarah first. What we saw in ranked-choice voting is that there are many Republican votes and many conservative Alaskans who ranked Nick first and me second, or ranked Nick and no one else. Im not sure necessarily that if one is out of the field, that their votes automatically go to the other.

Tell me about your path to victory in November? How are you going to turn your two-month term into a two-year term?

I need to work at making sure that Im communicating with Republicans and conservative voters. Its important to me that they understand that my values probably align with theirs: We all want good schools for our kids; we all want adequate housing and affordable housing options, whether thats renting or purchasing; we all want to see inflation go down and the cost of living to go down; were all concerned about gas and oil prices going sky high. At the same time, I think most people are very concerned about the preservation of democracy. We want to have confidence in our elected officials.

How are you appealing to conservative voters?

Its just showing them that Im a regular Alaskan. I believe in Second Amendment rights. I believe in womens reproductive rights and our attachment to freedom. I spent 10 years in the state legislature, where I chaired the Bush Caucus, which was composed of 10 rural members out of 40, and we were typically five Republicans and five Democrats. It did not matter what party we were from, we were all just looking to help Alaskans move forward. We worked hard on K-12 education, university funding, and developing more vocational technical programs and properly funding those programs, and having good public safety. These are not partisan issues.

Alaska is a big hunting state. Would you support an assault weapons ban and universal background checks? These are major priorities of national Democrats.

Of course, I support background checks. I dont think that that is an infringement on Second Amendment rights. I would like to see the particulars of an assault weapons ban, because they are used in some instances in hunting in Alaska. And they are tied to food security. But right out of the gate, no, I dont support a complete ban on all assault rifles.

What does it mean to you to be the first Alaska Native elected to Congress?

I am very happy to see that Alaska natives are getting a seat at the table. But I just really want to emphasize to the folks that Im the representative for all Alaskans, regardless of their ethnic background or gender or religious affiliation. Im here to work for all Alaskans.

Are Alaskans tiring of Trump and his acolytes?

I think that he does have a very strong base of support, and that is reflective of the fact that there is a universal feeling now of disenfranchisement, of being forgotten, of being ignored. And this now extends to Caucasians and men, and that is not something that should be dismissed. That is a real feeling. It didnt come out of nowhere. I dont think that theres any use in dismissing that. I think that anybody who has those feelings should be validated that those are authentic feelings. We should find a way to make sure everyone feels that theyre being heard.

Do you want Biden to come to Alaska to campaign with you?

Id like to take a wait-and-see approach. I dont know what is on the horizon. I havent thought about that much. Really, right now, what Im focused on is rolling up my sleeves and getting to work to fill out the remainder of Congressman Youngs term and to get some wins for Alaska. Then I can think about returning to campaign mode.

Do you think he should run for re-election?

I dont have an opinion on that right now.

What was your relationship like with Don Young?

My parents were friends with him. My dad taught school together with Don Young in Fort Yukon, a very small community on the Yukon River in the 1960s. They were really good friends. They were hunting buddies. They both had winter trap lines. They bought a bulldozer and took 12-hour shifts fighting a wildfire one summer. My dad doesnt have a lot of close friends, but Don was certainly one of his lifelong friends. When I went to school in Pennsylvania and wasnt able to get home for Thanksgiving, I was invited by Don to spend Thanksgiving with his family in Virginia. That was the first time Id ever spent Thanksgiving without my family. I have tremendous respect and admiration for Don and his 49 years of service to our state and his real commitment to our state and the people of our state.

What does it mean to you now to be filling in his shoes as his successor?

Its daunting. No one will ever be able to fill his shoes.

More Must-Read Stories From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com.

More Must-Read Stories From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com.

See the original post here:
Alaska Native Mary Peltola on Being Elected to Congress - TIME

Angela Underwood

Jan Willem van Hofwege // Shutterstock

Passing the U.S. citizenship test is a vital step toward becoming an American citizen. To pass the civics portion of the test, an applicant must correctly answer six of up to 10 oral U.S. history and government-related questions administered by a U.S. citizen immigration services officer. The questions come from a pool of 100 possible questions.

The questions tell the story of how the 13 colonies fought against Great Britain in the American Revolutionary War; how the U.S. Constitution came to be; and how the federal government was formed by the founding fathers including Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, John Adams, and James Madison.

They also cover U.S. history through World Wars I and II, the Great Depression, the Vietnam War, the Cold War, and 9/11. Some questions require knowledge of the Democratic and Republican parties and the workings of the U.S. Congress.

After passing the test, paying a fee, and completing all other necessary steps and paperwork, applicants who were once considered foreigners become full-fledged American citizens under the U.S. Constitution. Once naturalized, new citizens are entitled to the full rights of a person born in the United States.

Stacker has compiled a list of the 100 questions and answers on the civics test and formatted them like a quiz in the following gallery. Think you can pass the test with flying colors? Read on to see just how tough the questions areand how solid your high school history class recall is. Kicking things off, here's the first question:

#1: What is the supreme law of the land?

You may also like: Your guide to the Cabinet of the United States

Daderot // Wikimedia Commons

Answer #1: The Constitution.

The U.S. Constitution, written in 1787 in the Pennsylvania State House, was ratified by the original 13 colonies in 1788 and went into full effect in 1789 when 38 delegates from each state signed the document. The master copy of the constitution, comprised of seven articles, is on display at the National Archives in Washington D.C.

Question #2: What does the Constitution do?

Ed Uthman // Flickr

Answer #2: Sets up the government; defines the government; protects basic rights of Americans.

The U.S. Constitution sets up the government into three branchesexecutive, legislative, and judicial. The executive branch consists of the U.S. president, the vice president, the Cabinet, and members of all federal agencies, departments, committees, and commissions. The legislative branch includes the U.S. Congress, which is made up of the Senate and House of Representatives. The judicial branch is the U.S. Supreme Court and other federal courts. The rights of American citizens are protected under government laws and by elected members, who must be of a certain age to serve.

Question #3: The idea of self-government is in the first three words of the Constitution. What are these words?

Pixabay

Answer #3: "We the people..."

All citizens of the U.S. are included in the first three words, "We the people," of the U.S. Constitution's preamble.

Question #4: What is an amendment?

Felman // Shutterstock

Answer #4: A change (to the Constitution); an addition (to the Constitution).

The U.S. Constitution has more than two dozen amendments, changes or additions to clarify its meaning and include provisions not included in the first draft. The changes to the original draft range widely. Notable amendments to the U.S. Constitution include the freedom of religion and speech, the right to bear arms, the abolition of slavery, and allowing African American men and all women to vote.

Question #5: What do we call the first 10 amendments to the Constitution?

Charles Haire // Shutterstock

Answer #5: The Bill of Rights.

The first 10 amendments to the U.S. Constitution, written by James Madison in 1791, are known as the Bill of Rights. The amendments were added to protect citizens, expand freedoms, and to limit government power. After several representatives objected to the 10 changes, a decision was made to place the Bill of Rights at the end of the document under Article VII, rather than directly editing the original text.

Question #6: What is one right or freedom from the First Amendment?

You may also like: Political Cartoons From The Last 100 Years

Anthony Correia // Shutterstock

Answer #6: Speech; religion; assembly; press; petition the government.

There are five fundamental rights in the First Amendment. The first two allow people the right to say and believe whatever they want; the third allows people to assemble peacefully; the fourth allows people the right to report the news without government censorship; and the fifth allows people the right not to be witnesses against themselves in a criminal case.

Question #7: How many amendments does the Constitution have?

Public Domain // goodfreephotos

Answer #7: 27

The 27 amendments to the U.S. Constitution, including the first 10 in the Bill of Rights, vary widely. The changes made to the original 1787 draft include the direct election of U.S. senators; limiting a president to two terms; the establishment of the federal income tax; allowing women and African Americans to vote; and the abolition of slavery. The only amendment to be repealed was the Eighteenth, which barred the sale and consumption of alcohol in 1919. Alcohol was made legal in 1933 with the creation of the Twenty-First Amendment.

Question #8: What did the Declaration of Independence do?

Action Sports Photography // Shutterstock

Answer #8: Announced independence (from Great Britain); declared independence (from Great Britain); said that the United States is free (from Great Britain).

The Declaration of Independence, written on July 4, 1776, was the first document that declared 13 colonies in America would become sovereign and separate from the Kingdom of Great Britain. Members of the Continental Congress, including Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, Roger Livingston, and Roger Sherman, created the document together. The Declaration of Independence is the first of three founding documents of the United States government, including the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Question #9: What are two rights in the Declaration of Independence?

Bev Sykes // Wikimedia Commons

Answer #9: Life; liberty; pursuit of happiness.

The first two rights of the Declaration of Independence guarantee the rights of citizens to exist frequently. The third right, the pursuit of happiness, is commonly understood to refer to the right to one's own wealth and property.

Question #10: What is freedom of religion?

ildintorlak // Shutterstock

Answer #10: You can practice any religion, or not practice a religion.

The freedom of religion is also known as the separation of church and state. This amendment prohibits the government from making citizens practice a particular set of moral beliefs. There are two accurately named sections in the First Amendment that concern religion. The Establishment Clause forbids the government from setting up a system of faith or favoring one religion, and the Free Exercise Clause prohibits the government from barring the exercise of faith or lack thereof.

Question #11: What is the economic system in the United States?

You may also like: Defining historical moments from the year you were born

javen // Shutterstock

Answer #11: Capitalist economy; market economy.

Capitalist and market economies make up the U.S. financial system. A capitalist economy consists of private owners and corporations manufacturing goods with minimal government involvement. A market economy is the supply and demand system operated by individual owners and corporations, who produce and price products, and compete to be leaders in their respective industries.

Question #12: What is the "rule of law"?

sergign // Shutterstock

Answer #12: Everyone must follow the law; Leaders must obey the law; Government must obey the law; No one is above the law.

No man, woman, or child, regardless of his or her economic, education, or societal status, is removed from the regulations set forth by the three branches of government. Even the president, who is commander-in-chief of the U.S. Armed Forces, must follow specific laws to remain the leader of the country.

Question #13: Name one branch or part of the government.

Alex Wong // Getty Images

Answer #13: Congress; legislative; president; executive; the courts; judicial.

One branch of the government is the U.S. Congress, which is made up of two chambers including the Senate and the House of Representatives. The Senate is considered the more powerful committee, which is made up of fewer members who collectively hold different rights from those of the House, including the sole authority to conduct an impeachment trial or to reject a presidential appointee to either the executive or judicial branch.

Question #14: What stops one branch of government from becoming too powerful?

Michal Kalasek // SHutterstock

Answer #14: Checks and balances; separation of powers.

There must be a check and balance system between the three brancheslegislative, executive, and judicialof government to assure each entity only exercises its specific responsibilities. Each branch has the capacity to affect the decisions of other branches in specific ways. This separation of powers prevents any one branch of government from dominating its counterparts, keeping the federal system fair and equal.

Question #15: Who is in charge of the executive branch?

Ad Meskens // Wikimedia Commons

Answer #15: The president.

The executive branch is made up of the president, vice president, and Cabinet, and the president is in charge as the head of government and the commander-in-chief of the armed forces. The Twenty-Second Amendment forbids any person elected to the office of the president from serving more than two consecutive four-year terms. There have been 13 presidents who have served two terms, including Grover Cleveland, who served in nonconsecutive periods.

Question #16: Who makes federal laws?

You may also like: Oldest national parks in America

Jesse Collins // Wikimedia Commons

Answer #16: Congress; Senate and House (of Representatives); (U.S. or national) legislature.

Federal laws are created when the U.S. Congress passes legislation, the president signs an executive order, and/or a federal court decision is reached based on the U.S. Constitution. When the U.S. Congress creates and passes bills, the proposed legislation must be approved and signed by the president to become federal law.

Question #17: What are the two parts of the U.S. Congress?

Katherine Welles // Shutterstock

Answer #17: Senate and House (of Representatives).

The two chambers of the U.S. Congress include the Senate and the House of Representatives. The upper chamber is the Senate, which is made up of two senators from each of the 50 states. The lower chamber is the House of Representatives, which is made up of a variable number of representatives from each state and the District of Columbia based on that state's population. Since 1911, there have been 435 representatives in the House at any given time.

Question #18: How many U.S. Senators are there?

Public Domain // Wikimedia Commons

Original post:
Could you pass the U.S. citizenship test?: There are 100 questions on the civics section of the U.S. citizenship test. Applicants are asked ten of...

Something you might have noticed over the last several years is that Donald Trump is a big fan of violence. Not directly getting involved in violencehed never dirty his hands in that waybut inciting people to engage in it on his behalf, the most famous example being the time he incited an insurrection at the US Capitol that left multiple people dead. Which is why it was more than a little disturbing when he warned on Thursday that there would be big problems if he were indicted for hoarding top secret government documents at his house.

In an interview with conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt, Trump said that he didnt believe the people of the United States would stand for charges against him from the Justice Department, adding that such charges would lead to problems in this country, the likes of which perhaps weve never seen before. Asked exactly what he meant by problems, Trump continued to use coded language that few would find difficult to parse. I think theyd have big problems. Big problems, he said. I just dont think theyd stand for it. They will not sit still and stand for this ultimate of hoaxes.

Obviously, at no point in the interview did Trump literally tell his supporters to engage in violent acts if he is prosecuted, but thats probably because he knows he doesnt have to. While Trumps allies have insisted that he never explicitly told people to attack the Capitol on January 6, many of the rioters interpreted as much from his speech, as the ex-president encouraged his supporters to fight like hell. Asked by Hewitt how he would respond to legacy media calling him out for inciting violence this time around, Trump said: Thats not inciting. Im just saying what my opinion is. I dont think the people of this country would stand for it.

In the nearly month and a half since the FBI searched his Mar-a-Lago residence for classified documentsones that a Trump lawyer claimed had already been returnedthe ex-president has spent most of his time attacking the government, baselessly accusing federal agents of planting evidence at his house, and otherwise whipping his supporters into a misinformed frenzy. Unsurprisingly, there has reportedly been, per Politico, an uptick in threats against federal law enforcement in the aftermath of the Mar-a-Lago search, which the Senate Judiciary and Homeland Security committees were briefed on this week. It was stunning, the number of threats that have been cataloged since the August 8 search of Mar-a-Lago, Senate Judiciary chair Dick Durbin said, noting the armed man who showed up at an FBI field office in Ohio in the days following the raid. Its a much more dangerous environment because of the political statements made by some individuals since August 8its alarming to me. Specifically calling out Trump, he said: Inviting a mob to return to the streets is exactly what happened here on January 6, 2021. This president knew what he was doingand we saw the results. His careless, inflammatory rhetoric has its consequences.

Last month Attorney General Merrick Garland condemned the broadsides that right-wing commentators, GOP lawmakers, and supporters of the ex-president had been leveling at FBI agents since the raid. I will not stand by silently when their integrity is unfairly attacked, Garland said during a press conference. The men and women of the FBI and the Justice Department are dedicated, patriotic public servants. Every day they protect the American people from violent crime, terrorism, and other threats to their safety while safeguarding our civil rights. They do so at great personal sacrifice and risk to themselves. I am honored to work alongside them.

Trump, of course, had a long history of inciting violence even before January 6. In addition to telling rallygoers to knock the crap out of anyone who showed up to one of his events holding a tomato, hed also previouslyinstructedpolice officers to let suspects heads knock against the side of their squad cars;toldsupporters, in reference to a protester whod been ejected from an event, Id like to punch him in the face;fantasizedabout Second Amendment people preventing the appointment of liberal judges; andendorsed the assault of reporters.

Visit link:
Trump All but Calls For Another January 6 If Hes Indicted Over Classified Documents - Vanity Fair

M4A1 Carbine | Photo: IIIBlackhartIII via Pixabay

A gun-rights advocacy group filed a lawsuit in federal court against the City of Highland Park on Wednesday, alleging their assault weapons and high-capacity magazine bans are a violation of the Constitution.

The National Association for Gun Rights (NAGR) filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

Plaintiff and Highland Park resident Susan Goldman owns semi-automatic firearms and magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds, according to the lawsuit.

Goldman stores her firearms outside of the city limits, in accordance with a 2013 ordinance banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines.

She [Goldman] is especially aggrieved by the fact that the Citys prohibitions require her to store her arms outside the city limits, which requirement renders the arms useless for the defense of her home, the civil complaint said.

NAGR refused to use the term assault weapon in their lawsuit, calling it a rhetorically charged political term.

The group challenged the citys ban, citing the Second Amendment and the U.S. supreme court cases of District of Columbia v. Heller, McDonald v. City of Chicago and New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen.

NAGR asked the court to declare sections of the ordinance unconstitutional on their face or as applied to the extent their prohibitions apply to law-abiding adults seeking to acquire, use, transfer, or possess arms that are in common use by the American public for lawful purpose.

A victory here will establish good legal precedent throughout the entire circuit, including Wisconsin and Indiana, the group said in a statement.

NAGR also filed four other lawsuits against states or cities across the country, including Naperville.

States have been ignoring the Second Amendment and the HellerandMcDonalddecisions for far too long and law-abiding gun owners are sick and tired of their unconstitutional antics, which disarm millions of Americans, President of the National Association for Gun Rights Dudley Brown said.

In light of the Bruendecision and the success weve had in suing localities in Colorado, were going after every Federal Circuit Court which has upheld egregious firearms bans. They must immediately overturn their assault weapons and magazine bans and our suits argue just that, Brown said.

The Highland Park City Council passed a resolution in August supporting statewide and federal bans on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines.

The resolution called them a threat to our American freedom.

It came after a mass shooting in the city during a Fourth of July parade left seven people dead and over 45 injured.

Robert Crimo III, 21, of Highwood, was charged with 21 counts of first-degree murder, 48 counts of attempted murder and 48 counts of aggravated battery with a firearm.

Crimo allegedly fired a total of 83 rounds using three 30-round magazines from his Smith & Wesson M&P 15 semi-automatic rifle, Lake County Assistant States Attorney Ben Dillon said during a bond hearing in July.

The Lake County Board passed a similar resolution supporting state and federal legislation to ban the sale and possession of assault rifles.

NAGR asked the courts to strike down the gun control laws, hoping to establish a nationwide precedent.

We are simply asking for the courts to enforce the Supreme Courts pro-gun Bruen ruling by re-evaluating and striking down each of these gun control laws under the new national standard which outlaws gun controls that are not consistent with the text, history, tradition of the Second Amendment as required in the Bruen decision, Brown said.

Original post:
Group files federal lawsuit against City of Highland Park for 'assault weapon,' high-capacity magazine ban - Lake and McHenry County Scanner

Northwell Health, New York states largest health care provider, has been a leader among organizations trying to reduce gun-related violence in the United States. In 2020, it created a center thats dedicated to that effort. In this article, its CEO and the head of the center offer five steps that leaders of all organizations can take to help address this public health crisis.

As leaders at Northwell Health, New York states largest health care provider, weve seen mass shootings and other random acts of gun violence become deadlier and more frequent. In 2021, the United States experienced more firearm-related deaths than any year on record 48,832 to be exact, according to provisional data published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Firearms are now the leading cause of death among children and adolescents. Across our own health system, weve already seen more firearm injured patients this year than any other in our history. While our nation struggles to find solutions to this epidemic, hospitals, health systems, businesses, and all other types of organizations have a responsibility to take an active role in reducing gun violence in America.

The gun safety legislation approved by Congress and signed into law by President Biden in June (known as the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act) was certainly a welcome first step. But theres still much work that must be done to reverse the continuing spike of firearm injuries whether it be firearm-related homicides and violence, suicides, unintentional injuries, or mass shootings that are plaguing communities.

The only way thats going to happen is if members of the business community and other sectors recognize gun violence as the public health crisis that it is. Here are five steps that leaders of organizations can take right now to help prevent gun violence for the sake of their communities, consumers, and employees:

This is an approach embraced by Northwell and a growing number of other health systems and corporations nationwide. In 2020, we created a Center for Gun Violence Prevention to use data-driven strategies to chart a public health approach to gun violence prevention and lead our efforts across health care and community settings to address the underlying causes of gun violence in the New York area and beyond. One of us (Chethan Sathya) was appointed to head it because of his experience as a pediatric trauma surgeon who has treated many children with gunshot wounds and his passion for pursuing prevention efforts.

Creating a dedicated unit headed by a committed frontline champion and supported by a passionate C-Suite leader one who is ideally already engaged with local community and business leaders demonstrates an organizational commitment to address this public health crisis. It empowers employees to have open dialogue and share experiences, lead prevention efforts in their own communities, and become agents of change throughout their own institution. This works wonders in inspiring people to find common ground and support practical solutions, rather than engaging in Second Amendment debates mired in politics.

Depending on your organizations employee makeup and a community assessment of the type of gun violence most prevalent in your area, it may make sense to focus on one type of firearm injury such as firearm homicide and violence, suicide, or unintentional injury or a particular age group.

One candidate to consider is gun violence affecting children and adolescents, which has surpassed motor vehicle crashes as the leading cause of death for children in America. According to the most recent finalized data, all firearm-related deaths in the United States totaled 45,222 in 2020, a 13.9% increase from 2019, while those of children and adolescents (persons up to 19 years of age) skyrocketed by 29.5%. This public health crisis is having an especially devastating effect on Black children and adolescents.

In addition to being less polarizing politically, focusing on gun violence affecting young people gives organizations the opportunity to find common ground with parents from all communities and interact with young people in ways that can make a real difference.

Investments in community violence intervention and programs that address inequity and social determinants of health such as employment and food insecurity can have a big impact. These initiatives can help break the cycle of violence by helping young people get on a better path where they can avoid becoming victims or instigators of gun violence.

Another initiative that can make a major difference is one aimed at getting more gun owners to store their weapons safely, significantly reducing the risk of firearm injury among children and family members in the household. Its estimated that 4.6 million children in the United States live in homes with at least one loaded and unlocked gun. Eight American children are killed or injured every single day with an unsecured firearm. And 80% of the guns used in mass shootings committed by children under the age of 18 are unsecured weapons owned by parents, relatives, or friends. Numerous studies conducted over several decades have shown that access to unsecured firearms in the household substantially increases the risk of firearm injury and death.

Employee education can be a powerful means to reduce gun violence among your own employees and the community at large. In our health system, we not only educate our employees about gun safety; we also screen our patients who may be at risk of gun violence in the communities where they live and work and provide preventative resources when needed.

With the help of a $1.4 million grant from the National Institutes of Health, clinical team members at three Northwell hospitals are screening and counseling all patients who have access to firearms on safe storage practices, providing them with gun locks, and connecting those living in communities with high risk of firearm violence to community services aimed at keeping them safe and out of trouble. You can do the same with your employees.

We also encourage you to include a training module on gun safety and firearm-violence prevention during the onboarding process or and in other training programs. Given that there are 400 million guns in America, the more education we do about safe firearm storage, responsible gun ownership, and ways to prevent firearm violence the better.

Work closely with your human resources leaders to develop materials for employees and a corporate strategy to respond after gun violence occurs locally. They include information on the following:

If your organization has the resources, support local groups that are trying to reduce gun violence. If your organization is in a city, chances are there are community violence intervention (CVI) programs. They work directly with people who are at risk of committing gun violence or becoming victims of it. Such personalized, high-touch support and interaction can interrupt cycles of conflict that drive a significant portion of gun violence. CVIs also serve as a bridge between hospitals and the communities which is important since hospitals can screen patients to identify those at risk of suffering firearms-related injuries and can provide preventative resources.

If you want to also focus on promoting firearm safety and safe storage practices, there are many groups you can work with. They include law enforcement, health care, mental health organizations, responsible gun owners, advocacy groups, schools, and government all of whom often have diverse initiatives focused on firearm safety in the community.

Just as leaders of private and public sector organizations helped mitigate the impact of Covid-19, you can help support public health campaigns to reduce gun violence. You can talk about this issue with your employees and peers, in public appearances, and on social media. You can advocate for policy changes rooted in public health principles like safe storage and violence intervention, and you can support the need for more research funding. Without better data and better research, we will never be able to make meaningful progress on curbing this epidemic. And by taking a public stance, you can help reframe gun violence as an apolitical public health issue.

We strongly believe that the most effective public health solutions to gun violence must come from the federal government in the form of universal background checks, a ban on weapons of war, safe-storage requirements, research funding, and investments in trauma-informed care and mental health. That said, every private and public sector organization has a part to play in curbing this epidemic.

If leaders of corporations and other large organizations decide that the needless bloodshed ravaging the United States every day is unacceptable, they can help turn the tide. As health care leaders, every ounce of our effort goes into saving lives and helping people live healthy and safely. We want and need broad-based support. Please join us.

Originally posted here:
How U.S. Businesses Can Help Reduce Gun Violence in Their Communities - HBR.org Daily

I would like to write and tell you the reasons we need a good governor, like Darren Bailey, in office to help restore Illinois.

Darren Bailey has fought for the community, the kids and the parents.

Reopening the economy and schools: As governor, he will work to fully reopen the economy and our schools, attract new business, and fuel job creation in Illinois.

Pro-life: As a man of faith, Darren is proudly pro-life and will always stand up to protect the rights of the unborn. As governor, he will continue to defend innocent life.

Second Amendment: Darren is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment and an advocate for the constitutional right to bear arms. As governor, he will continue to protect the Second Amendment.

Education: Darren, along with his wife, founded a preschool through grade 12 Christian school in southern Illinois and he understands the importance of access to quality education. As governor, he will advocate for common sense education reforms that put our children first.

Taxes: Darren firmly believes in fiscal responsibility and knows that every penny matters. Raising taxes hurts hardworking Illinois families and is not a solution for a state with some of the highest tax burdens in the entire nation. As governor, he will work to lower both property and income taxes.

Agriculture: Darren is a third-generation farmer who owns and operates his own family farm today. He knows that agriculture is the backbone of Illinois economy. As governor, he will stand up for his fellow, hardworking farmers.

Government transparency: Darren Bailey fights for the working people, not the political elites. As a legislator, he refuses state pension benefits. As governor, he will promote transparency and ensure safeguards against powerful government overreach.

To restore Illinois, we need Bailey in office.

DawnBergeron,Bloomington

Get opinion pieces, letters and editorials sent directly to your inbox weekly!

More:
LETTER: We need Bailey to restore Illinois | Letters | pantagraph.com - The Pantagraph

Photo by Christy PorterLPD Chaplain Paul Richardson (left) participates in training with the department to ensure his safety, the safety of the officers (Officer Kaleb Berkshire, center, and Summersville Police Chief A.J. Reef, right, shown here), and the safety of the public when he is assisting law enforcement on calls.

By Christy Porter, Managing Editor

Licking Assembly of God Senior Pastor Paul Richardson is an integral part of the Licking Police Department as volunteer chaplain. Richardson took the more formal volunteer position after the departure of Darius Wentz, already having an established relationship with the LPD. Pastors in the Licking community consistently work with the police department providing faith-based Christian assistance when necessary, such as with the Ministerial Alliance.

Richardson has completed additional training and certification to join the police department in this capacity. As a small town boy, he grew up being comfortable with guns, hunting and participating in competitive pistol shooting. Being a part of the LPD training makes him more comfortable with the different scenarios that may take place when joining law enforcement on duty. However he emphasizes that every citizen who practices their second amendment rights should get training; it is a big responsibility.

Chaplains do not make arrests, give tickets or execute other police duties. But like any concerned citizen, a chaplain will not hesitate to jump into a situation if an officer or someone is in danger, clarified Richardson.

Primarily, chaplains provide a sense of calm in the midst of challenging situations. Thats why hospitals, hospices, the military, and even the prisons utilize chaplains. In law enforcement, chaplains provide a sense of calm through presence, conversation, counseling, and other pastoral and spiritual practices, said Richardson. Chaplains can be called upon to assist in death notifications, calm families during a tragedy or provide support during domestic situations.

Another aspect of the chaplaincy is being available to the officers when they need to talk. I ride with them on some of their shifts, providing conversation during uneventful shifts and a second set of eyes or hands during more eventful shifts.

This experience makes Richardson more aware of the levels and complexity of law enforcements job. He is always available, and often present for the raw moments, acting as counselor, therapist and mediator, and monitoring the situations as they unfold, working as a part of the team. Seeing places in the community that were, literally, previously unknown to him, even after 12 years in the community, has been somewhat of a surprise.

Mostly, chaplaincy is a ministry of presence: Just being there can be helpful to families, communities, or officers during the midst of tragedy, summarizes Chaplain Richardson.

More:
Providing a sense of calm The Licking News - The Licking News