Category Archives: Freedom

New York, NY -

Jack Harlow has admitted that he prefers the freedom that acting allows compared to the constraints entrenched in the traditions of Hip Hop.

On Monday (May 15), ahead of making his Hollywood debut in the White Men Cant Jump reboot, Harlow reflected on his acting experience at a screener for the film.

I tell the truth on the mic, but maybe sometimes I feel some slight constraints in Hip Hop because theres a tradition to it, and I know Im a guest in the genre, he said (via PEOPLE).

Theres things that go through your head from time to time. But with acting I feel liberated to some degree I feel like I could show up and I could be whoever I want to be today. I dont know, I feel freedom.

The 25-year-old emphasized that this wasnt a one-time deal and he plans on exploring the acting world more in the future alongside rap.

Through this film, I was able to gain my confidence as an actor, and to me, this shit is not a side quest, Harlow continued. This isnt a side mission that Im taking on just to keep the entertainer thing going and make some extra money.

I really got the bug and fell in love with this, and Im developing a deep passion for the craft of this the same way I had in music. I dont want it to be a side hustle, I want to full-on go after this, and Im going after it and Im going to continue to do more.

related news

May 3, 2023

While White Men Cant Jump is coming to Hulu on Friday (May 19), Harlow still fed his rap fans with the surprise Jackman album in April.

He recently reflected on the warm reception to the project after letting it simmer in fans ears for a couple of weeks.

2 weeks have passed and I just wanna say the love & respect Ive felt from not only my peers, Jack wrote. But from YALLthe fansthe folks that have supported me from the beginningit feels fuckin amazing I have never felt so connected to the people listening to my musicthank you.

Read the original here:

Jack Harlow Prefers 'Freedom' Of Acting To 'Constraints' Of Hip Hop - HipHopDX

LEGAL FRAMEWORK

The constitution specifies Islam as the state religion and the principles of sharia as the main source of legislation. The constitution states that freedom of belief is absolute and the freedom of practicing religious rituals and establishing worship places for the followers of divine [Abrahamic] religions is a right regulated by law. The constitution also states citizens are equal before the law, prohibits discrimination on the basis of religion, and makes incitement to hatred based upon religion, belief, sex, origin, raceor any other reason a crime. It prohibits political activity or the formation of political parties based on religion.

The government officially recognizes Sunni Islam, Christianity, and Judaism, and allows only their adherents as defined by the government to publicly practice their religion and build houses of worship. The constitution defines al-Azhar, the main authority on theology and Islamic affairs, as an independent scientific Islamic institution with exclusive competence over its own affairs It is responsible for preaching Islam and disseminating the religious sciences and the Arabic language worldwide. The constitution requires the state to provide sufficient funding for it to achieve its purposes. Al-Azhars Grand Imam is elected by al-Azhars Council of Senior Scholars and is officially appointed by the President for a life term. The President does not have the authority to dismiss him.

By law, capital sentences must be referred to the Grand Mufti, the countrys highest Islamic legal official, for consultation before they can be carried out. The Grand Muftis decision in these cases is consultative and nonbinding on the court that handed down the sentence.

The constitution stipulates the canonical laws of Jews and Christians form the basis of legislation governing their personal status, religious affairs, and selection of spiritual leaders. Individuals are subject to different sets of personal status laws regarding such matters as marriage, divorce, and inheritance depending upon their official religious designation. The Ministry of Interior issues national identity cards for citizens that include official religious designations. Designation options are limited to Muslim, Christian, or Jewish. Although the government designates Jehovahs Witnesses as Christian on identity cards, a presidential decree bans their religious activities. Since a 2009 court order, Bahais and other citizens belonging to unrecognized religious groups may have their religious affiliation denoted by a dash (-) on national identity cards. The Minister of Interior has the authority to issue executive regulations determining what data national identity cards must list.

Neither the constitution nor the civil or penal codes prohibit apostasy from Islam, nor do they outlaw efforts to proselytize. The law states individuals may change their religion. The government recognizes conversion to Islam, but generally does not recognize conversions from Islam to any other religion, except in the case of individuals who were not born Muslim but later converted to Islam, according to a Ministry of Interior decree pursuant to a court order. Reverting to Christianity requires presentation of a document from the receiving church, an identity card, and fingerprints. After a determination is made that the intent of the change which often also entails a name change is not to evade prosecution for a crime committed under the Muslim name, a new identity document is issued with the Christian name and religious designation. In cases in which Muslims not born Muslim convert from Islam, their minor children, and in some cases adult children who were minors when their parents converted, remain classified as Muslims. When these children reach the age of 18, they have the option of converting to Christianity and having that reflected on their identity cards.

The penal code, while not addressing blasphemy by name, states that disdaining and disrespecting any of the heavenly religions (Islam, Christianity, and Judaism) is punishable by six months to five years imprisonment or fines of at least 500 Egyptian pounds (EGP) ($20). Using religion to promote extremist ideology with the aim of inciting strife or contempt of the heavenly religions or their sects or harming national unity carries penalties ranging from six months to five years imprisonment. The law is commonly applied in cases alleging contempt of Sunni Islam and Christianity. The cybercrime law penalizes violating the family principles of Egyptian Society with a minimum imprisonment of six months and a fine of 50,000-100,000 EGP ($2,000-4,000). According to civil society organizations, the term family principles is vague and is often invoked to punish perceived blasphemy.

There are four entities currently authorized to issue fatwas (religious rulings binding on Muslims): the al-Azhar Council of Senior Scholars, the al-Azhar Islamic Research Academy, Dar al-Iftaa (House of Religious Edicts), and the Ministry of Awqafs General Fatwa Directorate. While a part of the Ministry of Justice, Dar al-Iftaa has been an independent organization since 2007.

Islamic, Christian, and Jewish groups may request official recognition from the government, which gives previously unrecognized religious groups the right to be governed by their own canonical laws, practice religious rituals, establish houses of worship, and import religious literature. To obtain official recognition, a religious group must submit a request to the Ministry of the Interiors Administrative Affairs Department. The department then determines whether the group poses a threat to national unity or social peace. As part of this determination, the department consults leading religious institutions, including the Coptic Orthodox Church and al-Azhar. The President then reviews and adjudicates the registration application.

The law does not recognize the Bahai Faith or its religious laws and bans Bahai institutions and community activities. The law does not stipulate penalties for banned religious groups or their members who engage in religious practices, but these groups are denied rights granted to recognized groups, such as having their own houses of worship or other property, holding bank accounts, or importing religious literature.

The government, through the Ministry of Awqaf, appoints, pays the salaries of, and monitors imams who lead prayers in licensed mosques. According to the law, penalties for preaching or giving religious lessons without a license from the Ministry of Awqaf or al-Azhar include a prison term of up to one year, a fine of up to 50,000 EGP ($2,000), or both. The penalty doubles for repeat offenders. Ministry of Awqaf inspectors also have judicial authority to arrest imams for violating this law. A ministry decree prevents unlicensed imams from preaching in any mosque, prohibits holding Friday prayers in mosques smaller than 80 square meters (860 square feet), bans unlicensed mosques from holding Friday prayer services (other prayer services are permitted), and pays bonuses to imams who deliver Friday sermons written and disseminated by the Ministry of Awqaf. Ministry personnel monitor Friday sermons in major mosques and an imam who fails to follow the guidelines for ministry sermons may lose the bonus and be subject to disciplinary measures, including potentially losing his preaching license.

The Prime Minister has the authority to stop circulation of books that denigrate religions, referring to the three recognized Abrahamic faiths. Ministries may obtain court orders to ban or confiscate books and works of art. The cabinet may ban works it deems offensive to public morals, detrimental to religion, or likely to cause a breach of the peace. The Islamic Research Academy of al-Azhar has the legal authority to censor and confiscate any publications dealing with the Quran and the authoritative Islamic traditions (sunnah) and to confiscate publications, tapes, speeches, and artistic materials deemed inconsistent with Islamic law.

A 2016 law delegates the power to issue legal permits and to authorize church construction or renovation to governors of the countrys 27 governorates. The governor must respond within four months of receipt of an application for legalization; any refusal must include a written justification. The law does not provide for review or appeal of a refusal, nor does it specify recourse if a governor fails to respond within the required timeframe. The law also includes provisions to legalize existing unlicensed churches. It stipulates that while a request to license an existing building for use as a church is pending, the use of the building to conduct church services and rites may not be prevented. Under the law, the size of new churches continues to depend on a government determination of the number and need of Christians in the area. Construction of new churches must meet specific land registration procedures and building codes and is subject by law to greater government regulation than that applied to the construction of new mosques.

Under a separate law governing the construction of mosques, the Ministry of Awqaf reviews and approves building permits. A 2001 cabinet decree includes a list of 10 provisions requiring that new mosques built after that date must, among other conditions, be a minimum of 500 meters (1,640 feet) from the nearest other mosque, have a ground surface of at least 175 square meters (1,884 square feet), and be built only in areas where the existing mosques do not accommodate the number of residents in the area. The law does not require Ministry of Awqaf approval for mosque renovations.

In both public and private schools that teach the national curriculum, in all grades Muslim students are required to take courses on principles of Islam and Christian students are required to take courses on principles of Christianity. The religious studies courses they take are based on their official identity card designations, not personal or parental decisions. Students who are neither Muslim nor Christian must choose one or the other course; they may not opt out or change from one to the other once selected. A common set of textbooks for these two courses is mandated for both public and private schools, including parochial schools. Al-Azhar maintains a separate school system that serves an estimated two million students from kindergarten through secondary school, using its own curriculum.

The penal code criminalizes discrimination based on religion and defines it as including any action, or lack of action, that leads to discrimination between people or against a sect due to religion or belief. The law applies to religions whose rituals are publicly held, which technically applies only to the three Abrahamic religions. The law stipulates imprisonment for a term determined by the judge, a fine of no less than 30,000 EGP ($1,200) and no more than 50,000 EGP ($2,000), or both as penalties for discrimination. If the perpetrator is a government employee, the law states that the imprisonment should be no less than three months and the fine no less than 50,000 EGP ($2,000) and no more than 100,000 EGP ($4,000).

Customary reconciliation is a form of dispute resolution that predates the countrys modern judicial and legal systems and is recognized in the law in instances that do not pertain to crimes considered more serious (e.g., those involving homicide, significant injury, or theft). Customary reconciliation sessions rely on the accumulation of a set of customary rules to address conflicts between individuals, families, households, or workers and employees in certain professions. Parties to disputes agree upon a resolution that typically contains stipulations to pay an agreed-upon amount of money for breaching the terms of the agreement.

In matters of family law, when spouses are members of the same religious denomination, courts apply that denominations canonical laws. The courts apply sharia in cases where one spouse is Muslim and the other is a member of a different religion, where both are Christians but members of different denominations, or where the individuals are not members of a government-recognized religious group.

The government recognizes only the marriages of Christian, Jewish, and Muslim citizens, with documentation from a cleric, and does not recognize civil marriages between Egyptian citizens. Marriages between Shia are recognized as Muslim marriages. The law stipulates Muslim women are not permitted to marry non-Muslim men. Non-Muslim men who wish to marry Muslim women must convert to Islam. Christian and Jewish women are not required to convert to Islam to marry Muslim men. A married non-Muslim woman who converts to Islam must divorce her husband if he is not Muslim and is unwilling to convert to Islam. If a married man is discovered to have left Islam, his marriage to a woman whose official religious designation is Muslim is dissolved.

A divorced mother is entitled to custody of her son until the age of 15 and her daughter until the daughter marries. The childrens father has the right to petition the court to ask the children to choose between staying with their mother or father, unless one parent is Muslim and the other is not, in which case the Muslim parent is awarded custody.

The government recognizes civil marriages of Bahais, as well as of individuals from other unrecognized religious groups such as Jehovahs Witnesses, Hindus, and members of the Church of Jesus Christ, if one or both are foreigners. Authorities deny Bahais the rights of married couples pertaining to inheritance, divorce, and sponsoring a foreign spouse. In practice, however, Bahais reported occasional success in filing individual petitions for recognition of their marriages in civil court.

The law generally follows sharia in matters of inheritance. In 2017, an appellate court ruled that applying sharia to non-Muslims in inheritance matters violated the section of the constitution stating that personal status matters for Christian and Jewish communities are governed by their respective religious doctrines. The Constitutional Court has not ruled on this issue.

Sharia provisions forbidding adoption apply to all citizens. The Ministry of Social Solidarity, however, manages a program called Alternative Family which recognizes permanent legal guardianship if certain conditions are met, including requirements that the guardians share the same religion as the child and have been married to one another for a minimum of five years.

The quasigovernmental National Council for Human Rights (NCHR), whose members are by law appointed by parliament, is charged with strengthening protections, raising awareness, and ensuring the observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms, including religious freedom. It also is charged with monitoring enforcement and application of international agreements pertaining to human rights. The councils mandate includes investigating reports of alleged violations of religious freedom.

The constitution mandates that the state eliminate all forms of discrimination through an independent commission, to be established by parliament; parliament has not established such a commission.

The country is a party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights but declared in a reservation that it became a party considering that the provisions of the covenant do not conflict with sharia.

The newspaperal-Wafdreported that in September, the Second Circuit Terrorism Court in Tora sentenced an unnamed individual to 14 years in prison in a retrial for the 2013 mob killing of Shia scholar Hassan Shehata and three of Shehatas followers, including his brother. The original trial was invalidated on a technicality.

In May, the Emergency State Security Criminal Court sentenced Abdel Moneim Aboul Fotouh, leader of the Strong Egypt Party, a former presidential candidate and a former leader within the Muslim Brotherhood, to 15 years in prison for funding a terrorist organization.

On June 23, the human rights advocacy NGO Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights (EIPR) issued a statement warning of the imminent forced deportation that month of Yemeni asylum seeker Abdul-Baqi Saeed Abdo, although according to local human rights advocates, at years end, he remained in Egypt. In 2015, the NCHR registered Saeed, a former Muslim who converted to Christianity in 2013 before moving to Egypt, as an asylum applicant. Egyptian authorities arrested him in December 2021 and accused him of joining a terrorist group and contempt for Islam. EIPR said the state, as a signatory to the 1951 UN Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol, had a duty not to deport Saeed to Yemen where his life or freedom would be threatened due to his religion.

According to a July 4al-Manassaarticle, in February, Ministry of Interior officials pardoned five police officers who were originally sentenced to prison terms of three years each for torturing Coptic merchant Magdy Makin to death in a Cairo police station in 2016. According to the article, at the time of the pardons, the five had only served one year of their sentences and the police force later reinstated one of the pardoned officers. The pardons came in the wake of a broader presidential pardon issued on the anniversary of the countrys 2011 revolution.

According to media reports, on June 6, the Emergency State Security Court in Heliopolis acquitted lawyer and Islamic researcher Ahmed Abdo Maher of contempt of Islam and inciting sectarian strife. In 2021, the Nozha Misdemeanor Court found Maher guilty of contempt of Islam and sentenced him to five years in prison with hard labor, but the Office of Ratification of Emergency State Security Provisions ordered a retrial before a new court after his attorneys appealed the original verdict. The original prosecutor charged Maher based on statements he made in his bookHow the Imams Jurisprudence Is Leading the Nation Astray. Activists and NGOs in 2021 responded to the case by calling for the abolition of the countrys blasphemy law.

According to EIPR, Cairos Economic Court, a circuit court that handles prosecutions brought under the countrys cybercrime law, sentenced Marco Gerges Salib to five years in prison on January 29 for exploitation of religion to promote extremist ideas, contempt for Islam, and infringement on Egyptian family values. Authorities arrested Gerges, a Copt, in 2021 for allegedly storing pornographic photographs deemed offensive to Islam on his mobile phone and comments about religion exchanged in private text messages. The defense stressed that no pictures or comments were posted to the internet and argued the basis for the investigation was an illegal search. On September 12, the Cairo Economic Court rejected his petition to appeal the verdict to the Supreme Constitutional Court. In a statement released on February 1, EIPR said the ruling relied on vague and unconstitutional accusations, including the charge of contempt of religion contained in the penal code, and attacking the values of the Egyptian family and society contained in the Law on Combating Information Technology Crimes, which opens the way wide for the misuse of these accusations in violating the freedoms of opinion, expression, creativity, and belief. According to the rights group defending Gerges, there was little relationship between the charges and the evidence presented against him.

According to secular news websites, in November, national security authorities summoned YouTube content creator and self-professed atheist Hesham al-Masry for questioning after Ahmad Karima, professor of Islamic law and comparative jurisprudence at al-Azhar University, accused him of insulting Islam following a heated online debate between Karima and al-Masry, during which al-Masry criticized Islamic doctrine and the Prophet Muhammad. Authorities released al-Masry without charge in November.

EIPR reported that on February 10, the Court of Cassation (the highest tier in the countrys common court system) rejected the EIPRs appeal on behalf of self-professed atheist activist and blogger Anas Hassan of a 2020 Amreya courts verdict sentencing him to three years imprisonment and a fine of 300,000 EGP ($12,100) for managing The Egyptian Atheists Facebook page. Authorities originally arrested Hassan in 2019, charging him with publishing atheist ideas and criticizing the divinely revealed religions. EIPR stated the Court of Cassations ruling comes in a broader context of prosecutions and trials for online expression in general, and for various religious expressions in particular. This includes a wide range of pursuits of nontraditional Islamic ideas, such as criticizing some traditional figures valued by Sunni Muslims, or expressing the ideas of non-Sunni Islamic sects such as Shias, Ahmadis, and Quranists, in addition to expressing atheistic ideas or declaring lack of faith and criticizing religions.

Local, regional, and international press outlets reported that on January 8, authorities released Copt and human rights activist Ramy Kamel Saied Salib (commonly known as Ramy Kamel). Authorities originally arrested Salib in 2019 following his application for a Swiss visa to speak at a UN forum in Geneva on minority rights and charged him with joining a banned group and spreading false news. Salib had previously presented on issues affecting the Coptic community in the same forum.

The news outletMiddle East Monitorreported that in April, authorities released nine Copts who were arrested on January 30 following a peaceful protest in Samalut, Minya Governorate. The nine were among a group of approximately 70 demonstrators who demanded authorization for the construction of a new church to replace one that had burned down in 2016. According to Amnesty International, the original church was the only place of worship in the village of Ezbet Farag Allah for approximately 800 Coptic Christians, who, after the fire, had to travel to surrounding villages to attend religious services. The January demonstrations followed the governments demolition of the remnants of the burned church and subsequent failure to respond to a formal request that the governorate authorize the construction of a new church.

According to an EIPR statement corroborated by photographs posted on social media, on February 23, Zagazig Criminal Court released Quranist activist Reda Abdel Rahman. Authorities detained Abdel Rahman, the nephew of Ahmed Sobhy Mansour, one of the most prominent advocates of Quranism, in 2020 and accused him of being an ISIS member and espousing takfirithought (i.e., accusing other Muslims of heresy), although he was never tried. Following his release, authorities stopped Rahman at Cairo International Airport and prevented him from travelling internationally without permission from the National Security Agency.

Al-Jazeerareported that on June 9, Cairos Criminal Court sentenced Salafi preacher Mahmoud Shaaban to 15 years in prison for inciting violence, opposing the state, and joining a terrorist group. Authorities charged Shaaban with joining the Free Syrian Army in Syria. Shaaban appeared in a wheelchair during the trial and accused authorities of willful medical negligence.Al-Jazeerareported authorities originally arrested him and three other Salafi preachers in 2019 for their membership in a banned political group, but a court acquitted them in 2021. Authorities rearrested Shaaban shortly after his release following the acquittal.

As reported by Member of Parliament Tarek al-Khouly via a published list of names, on September 9, the Presidential Pardon Committee (reactivated by President Sisi in April) announced the release of YouTube content creators Ahmed Sebaie, a Salafist, and Gergis Samih, a Copt. Both had been in pretrial detention since their separate arrests in 2020 on accusations of joining a terrorist group, spreading false news to destabilize the country, and using the internet to commit a crime. Authorities arrested Sebaie after he released a YouTube video criticizing the Bible and Samih after he created a Facebook post that Muslim neighbors called offensive to Islam.

The NGO Association of Freedom of Thought and Expression reported that on October 19, the South Cairo Court prosecutor summoned poet Amina Abdullah and resumed an investigation into whether she had committed contempt of religion and taken Gods name in vain during a public reading of her poem Daughters of Pain. The association said authorities first summoned her on October 16 but released her on October 18 on 5,000 EGP ($202) bail. Abdullah stated that due to the controversy generated by her poem, she received threats of violence, including threats to disfigure her with acid.

The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) reported that in June, dean of al-Azhars Sharia Faculty Mabrouk Attia said women should dress modestly to avoid tempting men. Otherwise, some slavering man may see you and murder you. Attias remarks came in the wake of student Naira al-Ashrafs death at the hands of her boyfriend Muhammad Adel when she refused to marry him. Attias comments sparked sharp backlash on social media and the National Council for Women filed a legal complaint against Attia with the general prosecutor for incitement to murder. Attia said his statements were misinterpreted. Calling al-Ashrafs death a reprehensible and heinous crime, he said Not wearing the veil is not justification for murder. I said that the veil protects [women] and decreases the cases [of attacks against them].

Media reported the Heliopolis public prosecutor launched an investigation of dean Attia for insulting Christianity and Islam after he issued a video in July in which he employed a pun playing on the similarity of the Arabic words for Mars and Messiah. Following complaints from Christians that his comments insulted Jesus, also a revered figure in Islam, Attia publicly apologized. On November 30, a court fined Attia 1,000 EGP ($40).

On October 25, CNN reported a TikTok content creator using the account name al-Prince al-Masry (Prince of Egypt) issued several videos in which he burned the Bible, smashed a cross using slippers, and insulted Jesus. The public prosecutors office subsequently announced on Facebook that it had started an investigation, accusing al-Prince al-Masry of exploiting religion in promoting extremist ideas with the intent of provoking discord and contempt of the heavenly Christian religion and the Christians and harming national unity. His case remained under review at years end.

In March, a judge in the Second Circuit of the Criminal Court ordered the release of a woman pharmacist after five months in detention, reportedly with precautionary measures (conditions of release) to be determined later by the police department. Police in Zagazig District, Sharqia Governorate, arrested the woman in 2021 and authorities charged her with spreading false news and joining a banned group one week after she reported her coworkers for assaulting and harassing her for her decision not to wear a hijab. A video of the assault was widely circulated on Facebook. The Supreme State Security Prosecution initially ordered her detained for 15 days pending an investigation of the charges but extended her detention multiple times.

Media outletCairo24reported that in June, Naguib Gabriel, attorney and head of the Egyptian Federation for Human Rights, stated he would appeal a then recent ruling drawing on sharia principles from the Family Court in Sohag City, Sohag Governorate, that a mans conversion to Islam from Christianity was not adequate grounds for his wife to seek a divorce. Gabriel, representing the converts wife, stated the courts decision was contrary to guarantees in the Coptic Orthodox Churchs bylaws that permit Christians to seek divorce if their spouse departs from the Christian religion. He said, This ruling overturned all established principles in the judiciary, according to which a Christian wife has the right to apply her religions law, and this ruling means that a Christian wife is forced to live with her husband, who has departed from her religion.

In September, social media activists circulated a photograph depicting a certificate of conversion to Islam issued by al-Azhars Islamic Research Academy on behalf of a young Christian, Saad Fahim, from a village in Beni Suef Governorate. They also circulated a medical certificate for the same man from a hospital in Beni Suef that indicated Fahim suffered from a psychological disorder and a delay in mental abilities and had previously been committed to the hospital for psychological treatment. The activists questioned how al-Azhar could accept such a conversion, and whether it was an indicator of forced conversion campaigns.

On August 15, the South Cairo Criminal Court ruled that the Muslim Brotherhood, originally designated as a proscribed terrorist entity in 2013, should be redesignated for five more years. The court also redesignated 277 of its members as terrorists for three more years. The court ruled the 277 persons appearing on the list could immediately return to government jobs from which they had been suspended as a consequence of their inclusion on the list, in addition to receiving their full wages; they had previously received half wages in connection with their suspension from work. The individuals on the list remained barred from international travel. A source familiar with the court toldal-Shoroukthe court made its determination on the grounds that the defendants had the right to earn a living.

In August, the Tahrir Institute for Middle East Policy published an article by an academic on ministering to Christians in the countrys prisons. The academic said prison authorities controlled what written or visual materials religious workers shared with inmates. Guards reportedly did not always recognize the diversity of Christian denominations, asking a Coptic layperson are you not all the same? The academic also suggested that nonbelieving Coptic prisoners felt compelled to attend meetings with religious counselors, lest their absence imply atheism, making them more vulnerable to violence by jailers and prisoners.

In January,al Jazeerareported the Ministry of Awqafs decision on December 29, 2021 to limit the duration of Friday sermons to 10 minutes as a COVID-19 prevention measure sparked widespread criticism on social media. The ministry said preachers and imams who violated the rule would face disciplinary measures, including having their licenses revoked. In a statement released on May 6, Minister of Awqaf Mohammad Mokhtar Gomaa announced that Prime Minister Mostafa Madbouly had approved the full reopening of mosques and shrines, lifting most previous COVID-19 restrictions. Under the new guidance, mosques resumed normal operations starting May 8, allowing the return of religious and Quran recitation lessons. Islamic shrines were also opened during nonprayer times. The announcement appealed to worshipers to continue to wear masks and practice social distancing, adding that the duration of Friday sermons would continue to be capped at 10 minutes. The government had lifted COVID-19 restrictions on church gatherings, although many churches imposed their own restrictions on gatherings during outbreaks.

Media outletOrient.netreported that in July, Dar al-Iftaa issued a fatwa saying Muslims kissing and touching shrines or requesting help from the shrines patrons (i.e., prophets, saints, and righteous people), whether dead or alive, did not contradict monotheism or imply nonbelief in Islam. Thousands of social media users criticized the fatwa, stating that the veneration of shrines and their patrons was associated with Shiism or idolatry.

Media outletArabi21reported that in October, the Ministry of Awqaf arrested the imam of Cairos Abul Ella Mosque pending an investigation after a video clip circulated of individuals dancing and singing inside the mosque on the anniversary of the Prophet Muhammads birthday. The video sparked public anger, with some considering the festivities disrespectful.

The news outletAl-Quds al-Arabireported that in October, authorities canceled several Sufi celebrations, including the commemoration of the birth of 13th-century cleric Sayyid al-Badawi in Gharbia Governorate and a parade procession for the Prophet Muhammads birthday, describing the cancellations as precautionary measures against COVID-19.

In May,al-JumhuriyaOnlinereported Minister of Awqaf Gomaa met with Sheikh Abd al-Hadi al-Qasabi, leader of the Sufi orders. The two agreed that any Sufi religious observances or celebrations should be approved via an exchange of official letters between the General Sheikhdom headed by al-Qasabi and the Awqaf ministry.

In November, thousands of Sufi adherents in Cairo celebrated the birth of Imam al-Hussein in Cairos al-Gamaleya neighborhood near the al-Hussein Mosque. The government reportedly did not issue a permit for the celebration but made no attempt to halt it.

According to the media outletYoum7, in October, followers of the 13th-century Sufi imam Sidi Ibrahim al-Desouqi gathered in the city of Desouq in Kafr al-Sheikh Governorate to commemorate his birthday near his eponymous mosque. Following evening prayer on October 21, authorities, citing a desire to limit crowd size as a public health measure against COVID-19, closed the mosque, with the exception of allowing visits to Desouqis shrine inside. The celebration continued a few days later, with smaller numbers in attendance, including Kafr al-Sheikh governor Jama Nour al-Din.

According to multiple local sources, the government largely continued to allow Bahais, members of the Church of Jesus Christ, Jehovahs Witnesses, and Shia Muslims to worship privately in small numbers, but it continued to deny requests for public religious gatherings by unregistered religious groups.

The NGO Human Rights without Frontiers reported that in January, the African Association of Jehovahs Witnesses and the European Association of Jehovahs Witnesses filed a joint submission to the UN Human Rights Committee seeking reregistration in Egypt. The petitioners said unfounded accusations that the group was Zionist led the government to deregister it in 1960. The petitioners stated, The organization of Jehovahs Witnesses is entirely religious and does not advocate any political arrangement, which would include Zionism. The inability to register meant Jehovahs Witnesses could not build houses of worship or obtain land to bury their dead, necessitating that they worship discreetly in private homes and use privately owned cemeteries. The two associations stated that in 2019, the High Administrative Court rejected the groups appeal of a Ministry of Justice decree preventing Jehovahs Witnesses from officially registering marriages or property ownership in the name of the group. According to the petitioners, the court stated that the beliefs of Jehovahs Witnesses contradicted the countrys public order and morals. The petitioners said, Currently, the National Security Agency unlawfully interrogates and verbally harasses Witnesses on a monthly basis, summoning them without official authorization on the pretext of protecting national interests.

Bassatine Cemetery in Cairo, which members of the Bahai community described as overcrowded and inconveniently distant for Bahais living outside Cairo, remained the only cemetery in the country where Bahais could be buried. Bahais continued to pursue legal action to have the government designate a cemetery for persons whose national identity cards showed a dash [-] under religious affiliation (i.e., all those whom the government considered not to be Muslim, Christian, or Jewish). In December, the Supreme Administrative Court, responding to an appeal by the Bahai community to a previous lower court decision in March, ruled that the government of Alexandria was not obligated to grant land for a cemetery for members of unrecognized religious groups. In the earlier ruling, Alexandrias Administrative Court cited the religious opinion of al-Azhars Islamic Research Academy, which stated that allocating land for a Bahai cemetery would lead to discrimination, further division, fragmentation, and rupture of the fabric ofsociety. Also in December, the Port Said Administrative Court rejected a petition by members of the Bahai community to allocate land for a cemetery there. In May, television commentator Ibrahim Eissa called on President Sisi to intervene to solve the Bahai cemetery crisis, stating the group suffered from being unable to obtain burial permits outside of the Bassatine Cemetery in Cairo. Eissa added, They are Egyptians. It is their right to be buried in their land, and suggested the issue was relevant to the freedom of belief that President Sisi advocated.

One member of the Shia community said the government scheduled repairs and refurbishment of shrines venerated by Shias (e.g., Cairos al-Hussein Mosque) as an excuse to prevent gatherings of Shia pilgrims during Ashura and other observances.

Local media reported that on January 7, Wadi al-Natrun Correctional and Rehabilitation Center allowed several members of clergy to enter the facility to perform prayers for Christian prisoners for Coptic Christmas.

Reverend Samuel Abdullah stated on Facebook that on May 20, for the first time since its establishment, the Air Force Academy in Bilbeis, Sharqia Governorate, held a Christian religious service. The service, which took place in a newly constructed church opened earlier that month, included students and leaders from the academy.

In May, then Minister of Local Development Mahmoud Shaarawy announced that the 25 stops on the 2,100-mile Holy Family Trail, marking the route Christians believe was taken by Mary, Joseph, and Jesus from Israel to Egypt, were almost ready to receive visitors. In September, following months of renovation, the Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities reopened a pilgrimage site on the trail in Cairos Matariya District believed to contain a sycamore tree descended from the one under which Mary reputedly bathed the infant Jesus during the trios journey. On January 11, the Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities announced a special six-month museum exhibition in Sharm al-Sheikh on the history of the Holy Family in Egypt, consisting of manuscripts, icons, and other exhibits.

The Ministry of Awqaf continued to distribute sermon guidelines monthly to Sunni mosques and to recommend imams adhere to prescribed themes. It did not, however, dictate content word for word. According to the countrysNational Counterterrorism Reportreleased by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in September, the Ministry of Awqaf played a crucial role in countering extremist ideology and reforming religious discourse and had taken measures to ensure preachers who deliver Friday sermons are well-versed and trained to perform that crucial role. The report stated the ministry dismisses those who have been convicted in cases of sabotage, corruption, or terrorism, preventing them from preaching again. These measures aim to prevent terrorists and unqualified individuals from abusing mosques in promoting extremist ideology. The report identified as preventive measures degrading the capability of the terrorist Muslim Brotherhood and other terrorist organizations, coordinating with national authorities and religious institutions to refute extremist ideologies, promoting moderate religious teachings, and thwarting terrorist organizations efforts to recruit new followers.

TheNational Counterterrorism Reportstated al-Azhars Observatory for Combating Extremism played a significant role in monitoring and analyzing manifestations of extremism and discrediting extremist ideology. It circulated its publications in more than a dozen languages, including English, Arabic, Urdu, Swahili, Chinese, and Farsi, and organized sensitization and awareness-raising campaigns to promote the true essence of religion and refute extremist ideology. In addition to monitoring, the observatorys staff of approximately 100 individuals offered counterarguments to extremist statements on jihadi websites.

According to theNational Counterterrorism Report, the government aimed at preventing terrorism by monitoring extremist groups inflammatory pages and websites, identifying those in charge of their management, and taking legal action against them. The report cited a 2015 law criminalizing the promotion and glorification of terrorist crimes as the basis for defining extremist groups. According to EIPR, despite the language in the counterterrorism report, the government blocked but did not take legal action against websites that it deemed inflammatory.

Pro-Muslim Brotherhood media outlets reported that following the death of Qatar-based Sunni cleric and spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood Youssef al-Qaradawi in September, the Ministry of Awqaf banned prayers and sermons in mosques mentioning Qaradawi. Qaradawi went into self-imposed exile in Qatar in 2013 following the overthrow of then President Mohammed Morsi, and Egyptian authorities sentenced him to death in absentia in 2015. On September 26, journalist and political commentator Muhammad al-Daysati posted to Twitter, Yousef al-Qaradawi was the mufti of terrorism and he distorted Islam and created strife in Syria, Palestine, Libya, Egypt, and Tunisia and made Muslims kill Muslims so that the Muslim Brotherhood could rule.

Youm7reported that in August, the Disciplinary Court of the Supreme Administration of the State Council sanctioned Sabry Ebada, the former undersecretary of the Ministry of Awqaf in Ismailia Governorate, with an official warning for violations including speaking in an inappropriate manner before worshipers in the mosque, and exceeding the prescribed length for the sermon. The ministry dismissed the undersecretary in 2021 after he delivered a Friday sermon at the al-Matafy Mosque in which he described some of the worshipers as extremists, leading to an altercation between himself and worshipers following his address.

Al-Masrawyreported that in October, the Awqaf ministrys office in Beni Suef Governorate transferred a preacher at the Hajja Fatima Mosque near Beni Suef City and garnished his wages for violating the ministrys prescribed dress code. Worshipers had complained the preacher wore a shirt and pants instead of traditionalgilbabrobes while carrying out his official mosque duties.

Shia activist Haidar Kandil, a former reporter for the daily newspaperal-Dustour, continued to say he experienced travel restrictions and difficulties in finding work, which he attributed to religious discrimination. According to Kandil, in 2021, authorities banned him from travelling to Moscow and required him to check in weekly with police in his hometown, Tanta City. He said officials accused him of contempt of religion, spreading Shiism and antistate ideas, and establishing a group in violation of the law.

Media reported that on March 21, the Supreme Administrative Court rejected the appeal filed by the National Telecommunications Regulatory Authority (NTRA) against an administrative courts 2020 ruling that obligated the NTRA to block Shia websites in general, and theIbn al-Nafisnews website in particular, from the internet. The NTRA had argued monitoring content of websites was outside the scope of its mandate to provide access to web services.

According to a contributor at the Tahrir Institute for Middle East Policy, an international NGO focused on human rights, the government continued to ban the importation and sale of Bahai and Jehovahs Witnesses literature and authorized customs officials to confiscate religious materials from these groups adherents.

Organizers of the state-sponsored annual Cairo International Book Fair, held January 26-February 7, banned some publishing houses from participating and expelled others. For the second consecutive year, Palestinian writer and publisher Bisan Adwan was absent from the fair. Authorities expelled Adwan who had resided in Egypt since childhood from the country in 2020 amid accusations in the progovernment press that she promoted atheism. For the first time, organizers banned Egyptian publishing house Book Juice from participating due to what head of the Egyptian Publishers Association Saeed Abdo said were accusations that Book Juice had links to the Muslim Brotherhood. Book fair management reportedly rejected the Asir al-Kutub publishing houses participation without a justification, according to the firm. The decision followed allegations in the media that the firm published some books and publications authored by Islamists. Company officials told theCairo24website they had reviewed all their religious heritage publications to ensure that they were free of any ideas that support religious extremism and removed a large number of books from the firms electronic platform. The fair included publishers from various Arab countries and hosted approximately 91,000 visitors.

Multiple local and international sources reported that as of years end, the case against EIPR researcher Patrick George Zaki on charges of spreading false news remained ongoing. The charges stemmed from a 2019 article Zaki wrote on anti-Coptic discrimination. In December 2021, the court ordered Zaki released on bail after 22 months in pretrial detention but prohibited him from travelling abroad. On November 29, the court set February 2023 for Zakis next hearing.

Some publishers reported they were wary of publishing books that criticized religious institutions such as al-Azhar or challenged Islamic doctrine.

In November, the State Information Service announced that a cabinet committee tasked with registering unlicensed churches approved the adjusted status of 125 churches and affiliated buildings which were already built, bringing the total number of churches and service buildings granted legal status since 2017 to 2,526 out of 3,730 requests sent to the committee, with the remaining 1,204 pending at years end. There were no reports that the committee had rejected any requests to adjust the status of unlicensed churches. The committee stated representatives of Christian denominations would be invited to attend its next meeting to discuss ways for recently legalized churches to conform to building codes and fire safety standards. In March, President Sisi publicly called for building churches in every new municipality. While some non-Coptic Orthodox groups said the approval process took longer than normal, Coptic leaders said they were satisfied with the pace of committee approvals and that they expected to see decreasing numbers of approvals for previously unlicensed churches in the future as the government addressed the pre-2017 backlog.

In August, local and international media outlets reported on a series of fires inside churches and public places around the country, including an August 13 fire in the Abu Sefein Church in the Giza suburbs of Cairo that killed 41 persons. According to some sources, authorities suspected arson in only one case, a minor fire in Alexandria in which a person allegedly threw lighted cigarettes at a church. Police made no arrests in that case. Some clerical personnel and laypersons said the government bore partial responsibility for the church fires because its pre-2016 legacy of blocking church renovations and registrations led to overcrowded buildings in crowded urban areas with dangerous or poorly maintained electrical wiring.

In August, an unnamed Coptic parliamentarian told the news outletNew Arabthe government and the Coptic Orthodox Church went through a muffled crisis over church properties located within areas and projects that the government had prioritized for economic development. The parliamentarian said the government offered the Coptic Orthodox Church new land in exchange for its current holdings. Other sources said the government and the church cooperated and the government did not force the church to exchange properties.

Al-BawabhNewsreported that in August, President Sisi issued a decree allocating an area of approximately 12 acres of state-owned land in the Qus District, Qena Governorate, to establish a church for Coptic Catholics.

On April 27, President Sisi and the Sultan of the Indian Bohra community, Mufaddal Saifuddin, presided over the reopening of the al-Hussein Mosque in Cairo after extensive renovations. Sisi hailed the Bohra communitys contributions to renovating the mosque.

In May, the Ministry of Awqaf announced the state had constructed, developed, or maintained more than 8,500 Sunni mosques since President Sisi came to power in 2014. In June, Minister Gomaa said that since 2014, the ministry had spent nine billion EGP ($363.7 million) to renovate approximately 9,000 mosques nationwide. In October, the ministry announced that during the year, it had funded construction of 260 new mosques. Gomaa said the ministry paid more than 2.1 billion EGP ($84.8 million) toward social programs, including 200 million EGP ($8 million) toward Islamic education and school construction.

Shia community sources and religious freedom observers again said information contained in a 2019 report by Minority Rights Group International, an international NGO, on challenges facing the countrys Shia community remained valid. The NGOs report stated that there continued to be no Shia congregational halls (husseiniyas) in the country and Shia Muslims remained unable to establish public places of worship.

In July, the Ministry of Awqaf called on citizens to report via WhatsApp any mosque, other than those belonging to Sufi orders, that maintained collection boxes, and stressed the need for all Awqaf directorates, departments, and inspectors to ensure that there were no collection boxes in mosques. The ministry banned the use of collection boxes in mosques in 2021, citing security and transparency concerns, but made an exception for Sufi orders, whose collection boxes worshipers used for donations when they believed God had answered a prayer.

In April, the Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities began restoring the historic Ben Ezra Synagogue in Cairo, a nonworking synagogue that functioned as a museum and tourist attraction.

In early October, human rights activists circulated on social media a list of 50 students, all Copts, whom administrators reportedly assigned to a single class at a public school in Damanhour. The activists stated the all-Copt class was a sign of discrimination and that students of different faiths should be mixed in public school classrooms. Shortly thereafter, the Ministry of Education issued a statement that the special class was a trial to facilitate Christians attendance in religious education classes, but that the plan had since been abandoned and both Muslim and Christian students were now attending classes together.

Youm7reported the Ministry of Education continued to develop a new curriculum that included increased coverage of respect for human rights and religious tolerance. In June, Minister of Education Reda Hegazy announced the curriculum for grades four through six would include grade-appropriate versions of the bookValues and Respect for Others, an ethics text drawn from Islamic and Christian religious traditions. The book was already in use in classes in the first through third grades, and, according toYoum7, dealt with human values common to all religions, such as honesty, cleanliness, acceptance of others, respect for diversity, tolerance, etc. In October, Minister Hegazy announced the ministry had revised the primary school curriculum to focus on four priorities, including learning to coexist with others. Contrary to remarks Hegazy reportedly made in parliament when he was Deputy Minister of Education in 2021, the government did not issue instructions to remove Quranic verses from the general curriculum and restrict them to religious classes.

In April, the Ministry of Education amended the schedule of exams for primary and secondary school students when made aware that the dates originally announced coincided with Palm Sunday and Easter.

In December, MEMRI reported the Ministry of Education launched an investigation after photographs circulated on social media of junior high school girls in a village in Dakahlia Governorate wearing head-to-toe coverings as the school uniform.Al Arabsaid the school had imposed the dress code for seven years. Critics likened the school to Taliban schools and said it was an act of child abuse. Supporters of the school criticized the secular media attack on the hijab and called the photographs of girls in the prescribed uniforms a heartening Islamic sightthat every devout believer should strictly follow.

Reuters reported that on September 13, the Supreme Administrative Court upheld a decision to remove Mona Prince from her position as an instructor at state-run Suez University. The court justified the decision by saying Prince departed from the approved curriculum and did not adhere to accepted religious dogma while teachingParadise Lostby John Milton; it also criticized her for posting a video on her personal Facebook page of herself dancing. The court condemned her instruction methods as deviating from the scientific description of the academic curricula and spreading ideas that contradict heavenly beliefs and public order.

The Personal Status Law, coving all citizens regardless of religion, remained in place. At years end, the cabinet had still not submitted to the House of Representatives the draft Personal Status Law for Christians that media reported the Ministry of Justice completed in late 2021; Christian representatives from multiple denominations had reviewed and agreed to the ministrys draft. Several parliamentarians said the cabinet might submit the Personal Status Law for Christians once a new Personal Status Law for Muslims had been drafted and submitted. President Sisi created a drafting committee for the latter legislation in June and reviewed the committees progress in December, but as of years end the draft was not complete.

In September, the Coptic news websiteal-Watanireported that in February, authorities removed a four-year-old child, a foundling, from the adoptive Coptic family who were raising him and sent him to an orphanage. Police and Ministry of Social Solidarity officials based the decision to remove the child on the law stating that a child of unknown biological parentage is assumed to be Muslim, which rendered his upbringing in a Christian household potentially illegal. Upon transferring the child to the orphanage, authorities changed his name from the Christian one the adoptive Coptic family had given him to one that could be Christian or Muslim. The family challenged the decision to remove the child in administrative court. The court postponed the case until March 2023.

While the Coptic Orthodox Church did not bar participation in government-sponsored customary reconciliation sessions, a hurch spokesperson said reconciliation sessions should not be used in lieu of the application of the law and should be restricted to clearing the air and making amends following sectarian disputes or violence. At least one Coptic Orthodox diocese in Upper Egypt continued to refuse to participate in reconciliation sessions, criticizing them as substitutes for criminal proceedings rather than a means of addressing attacks on Christians and their churches. Other Christian denominations reported they continued to participate in customary reconciliation sessions.

Human rights groups and some Christian community representatives continued to characterize reconciliation sessions as encroaching on the principles of nondiscrimination and citizenship and said mediators regularly pressured Christian participants to retract their statements and deny facts, leading in some cases to the dropping of criminal charges. Local media reported that in April, Nevine Sobhy, a Christian, reported to local police in Menoufiya Governorate that a pharmacist slapped her twice for not wearing the hijab while visiting his drugstore during Ramadan. Sobhy complained on social media that police then pressured her to resort to customary reconciliation and only allowed her to file an official complaint when she insisted. After 10 days, a customary reconciliation session led by security figures, in the presence of the villages mayor and its churchs priest, concluded with the pharmacist paying Sobhy 100,000 EGP ($4,000) on the condition that Sobhy withdraw her police complaint. According to local media, based on a study of 45 customary reconciliation cases, EIPR found a persistent trend among reconciliation councils to favor the more socially empowered stakeholder. According to EIPR analysis, customary reconciliation is seen as one of the most important reasons for the recurrence of sectarian tensions, as it establishes the absence of justice and support for the perpetrators, and the lack of reparation for the victims.

On February 10, the NGO Coptic Solidarity said there was a 2 percent glass ceiling on Copts in entry-level positions in the judiciary, military and police, and diplomatic corps. The group said, Additionally, Copts are strictly prohibited from entering any of the sensitive government branches (such as the various security and intelligence services as well as the presidential office). Coptic Solidarity reported that on February 5, President Sisi issued a decree regarding 1,167 transfers and promotions of judges and prosecutors. Only 20 (1.7 percent) were Copts. The NGO said that only three of the countrys approximately 165 ambassadors were Copts.

On February 8, President Sisi appointed Judge Boulos, a Copt, to head the Supreme Constitutional Court, the first Christian so appointed. The Coptic community applauded the announcement and the NCHR released a statement praising the move as signaling a new era of promoting equal opportunities without discrimination for all citizens.

Christians continued to report that those admitted at entry levels of government faced limited opportunities for promotion to the upper ranks. In August, al-Watan Newsreported Minister of Military Production Mohamed Salah El Din appointed Emil Helmy Elias, a Copt, as deputy to the chairman of the National Organization for Military Production. Elias was the first Christian appointed to the position.

No Christians served as presidents of the countrys 27 public universities. The government barred non-Muslims from employment in public university training programs for Arabic-language teachers, stating as its reason that the curriculum involved study of the Quran. In February, Coptic Solidarity said Copts occupied less than 5 percent of the 1,550 leadership positions in public universities, despite representing 25 to 30 percent of total students.

Minister of Immigration and Expatriate Affairs Soha Samir Gendi was the only Christian in a cabinet of 32 ministers, replacing previous Minister Nabila Makram, also a Christian. Among the 27 governorates, only Damietta and Ismailia had Christian governors. The governor of Damietta was the countrys first woman Christian governor. Electoral laws reserve 24 seats for Christian candidates in the House of Representatives. During the year, the House of Representatives exceeded the quota, with 31 Christians out of a total of 596 representatives. There were 24 Christian senators 17 elected and seven appointed by President Sisi out of 300 seats in that chamber, including the deputy speaker.

Al-Watanireported that in May, governor of North Sinai Mohamed Abdel-Fadil Shousha ordered that 200 Copts displaced by threat of terrorist violence from the city of Arish in 2017 should be officially assigned to government jobs in their current locations. The decision meant a substantial pay cut for the relocated Copts, since wages and benefits in Arish are higher than in other parts of the country. Following criticism of the decision from the affected employees, the governorate announced in June that the displaced Copts could continue to earn the same salaries they received while working in Arish, provided they presented periodic documentation of their current work status outside of Arish. The Arish Copts expressed relief at the governors decision and appreciation for the governments efforts in its war against terrorism in North Sinai Governorate.

Some Shia stated they were excluded from service in the armed services, and from employment in the security and intelligence services. One Shia community member expressed dissatisfaction that al-Azhar continued to ban education on Shia Islam in schools, requiring Shia students to study Sunni Islam.

The government generally permitted foreign religious workers in the country. Sources continued to report, however, that authorities denied some religious workers visas or refused them entry upon arrival without explanation. In May, several groups of U.S. citizens, at least 25 persons in all, stated they had been barred from reentering Egypt due to their religious beliefs because the government believed they intended to engage in proselytizing.

Read the original here:

2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Egypt - U.S. Embassy in Egypt

LONDON, May 16 (Reuters) - Novelist Salman Rushdie has warned that countries in the West face the most severe threats to freedom of expression and freedom to publish in his lifetime, speaking nine months after a man repeatedly stabbed him onstage in New York.

Rushdie, 75, was awarded the 'Freedom to Publish' award by The British Book Awards on Monday.

"We live in a moment, I think, at which freedom of expression, freedom to publish has not in my lifetime been under such threat in the countries of the West, Rushdie said in a video message from New York broadcast to the award ceremony.

"The freedom to publish, of course, is also the freedom to read and the freedom to write, the ability to write what you want ... to be able to choose what you want to read and not have it decided for you externally."

An attack onstage in August, 2022, during a lecture in New York state left the Indian-born British author blind in one eye and affected the use of one of his hands.

Rushdie has long faced death threats linked to his fourth novel, "The Satanic Verses," which was banned in many countries with large Muslim populations upon its 1988 publication over passages deemed to be blasphemous.

Rushdie, who spent years in hiding after Iran's supreme leader at the time pronounced a fatwa, or religious edict, calling upon Muslims to kill him, also referred to the banning of certain books in some U.S. school libraries and classrooms.

In the countries in the West, until recently, there was a fair measure of freedom in the area of publishing. Now I am sitting here in the United States, I have to look at the extraordinary attack on libraries, and books for children in schools," he said.

"The attack on the idea of libraries themselves. It is quite remarkably alarming, and we need to be very aware of it, and to fight against it very hard."

More than a thousand book titles, many addressing racism and LGBTQ issues, have been banned from U.S. classrooms and libraries in the past two years amid pressure from conservative parents and officials, the writers' organization PEN America has said.

Reporting by Farouq Suleiman, Editing by William James and Bernadette Baum

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Thomson Reuters

Farouq reports on general news across the United Kingdom and Ireland.

Go here to see the original:

Salman Rushdie warns of threat to freedom of expression in West - Reuters

Mass rally organized in Stepanakerts Renaissance Square, May 9, 2023 (Photo: Siranush Sargsyan)

Last week, Artsakhs defenders and supporters in the US eastern region and around the world commemorated the 31st anniversary of the liberation of Shushi and honored the brave soldiers who sacrificed life and limb to pursue freedom and self-determination after years of living under Azerbaijans discriminatory and deadly rule. The Armenians of Artsakh also rallied last week against Azerbaijans campaign to ethnically cleanse them from their indigenous lands, putting the world on notice that only the people of Artsakh have the right to determine their destiny.

That is why recent meetings hosted in Washington, DC by US Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken with Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan and Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Jeyhun Bayramov are ineffective and can have no meaningful impact on Artsakhs citizens and their unshakable goal of self-determination. Diplomatic efforts that occur against the backdrop of Azerbaijans ongoing blockade of the only road between Artsakh and Armenia and its continuing provocations and killings of Armenians in Artsakh and Armenia are doomed to fail. No viable, lasting solution is possible as long as Azerbaijan is permitted to disregard the rights and security concerns of the Armenian population of Artsakh, the root causes of the conflict are not addressed, and the self-determination rights of Artsakhs 120,000 citizens are not recognized.

Although the government of Azerbaijan continues its efforts to break the spirit of Artsakhs people, last weeks rallies honoring the liberation of Shushi and against Azerbaijans ethnic cleansing efforts show that Artsakhs Armenians cannot be dissuaded in their fight for freedom and justice.

On May 20, those defending the rights of Artsakhs Armenians will travel from Yerevan to the border town of Kornidzor near the Hakari bridge occupied by Azerbaijan to continue to show Azerbaijan and the rest of the world that all efforts to relinquish the human rights of Artsakhs 120,000 men, women and children will be resisted. The demand for Artsakhs freedom will persist and only intensify until the inevitable recognition is secured that Artsakh is and shall always be Armenian.

The ARF Eastern Region Central Committees headquarters is the Hairenik Building in Watertown, Mass. The ARF Eastern Regions media and bookstore are also housed in this building, as are various other important Armenian community organizations. The ARF Eastern Region holds a convention annually and calls various consultative meetings and conferences throughout the year.

See original here:

Government reps can't stop the Armenian nation's demand for ... - Armenian Weekly

Paul Huson, the founder and head of Flyers Rights, a US consumer rights movement for the aviation industry, had been instrumental in fighting Boeing and the US Government in telling the truth, releasing secret documents, and going to court.

eTurboNews reported about this lawsuit in March since experts could not determine if the Boeing 737 MAX, whose original certification is alleged by the DOJ to be a product of a criminal conspiracy, and is safe to fly.

Flyers Rights want FAA and Boeing to be transparent, and the latest case at the US Appeals court in Washington, DC, shows this.

This case began before the last crash of the Boeing Max in 2019.

In a press conference today, Paul Hudson shared some background of where he was coming from, why he called for the press conference, and where he was going with the case.

My name is Paul Hudson. Im the president of Flyers Rights. Paul is also designated to the FAA safety advisory committees.

I was unaware of the max problems until after the first crash.

No one else was either.

Associates at the FAA certainly knew some things, and Boeing knew a lot about how defective their plane was.

The first crash in October of 2019 was far away in Indonesia.

There were no Americans on board.

I was paying attention to it. But then I got a phone call from a frequent traveler. He told me there was a real problem here.

I contacted the Boeing representative with whom Ive been acquainted for many years.

The fact that the plane had a haywire flight control system that had taken over caused many ups and downs and then crashed, killing everyone on this brand-new aircraft.

I asked him why Boeing hadnt grounded this plane.

This was the first week in December of 2018.

He answered: Well, its under investigation with the NTSB, but we cant tell you anything. Its all secret.

I waited a few weeks. I wait a little longer, but I shouldnt have done that.

In March, the second plane went down. Now we had 346 lives lost.

I then met with the associate administrator for safety at the FAA.

His name was Ali Brahimi. I asked him why.

He responded: We wont release the information on any fix to this system. He assured me: We know its safe the next time after it is un-grounded.

The FAA, after the first crash, has said its safe.

Boeing has said its safe.

And even after the second crash, they all said it was safe.

It turned out that China, perhaps Canada, and some other countries had grounded it, and then they overruled the FAA essentially and grounded the plane.

Ali Bahrami said, well keep everything secret, and theres no reason I can say to change things.

Of course, we disagreed and filed a formal freedom of Information request.

It was ignored.

Oh, and by the way, 70 other organizations and people also filed a freedom of information or wire requests that were also ignored.

Flyers Rights was the only one that took it to court. In December of 2019, we began this legal action.

This morning, there was an oral argument before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.

Now the issue is: Should the FAA be able to keep secret all the data relating to its decisions on aircraft certification and, more broadly, on safety enforcement generally?

We think the answer should be no, particularly when you have a crash.

The information should be public or at least released to outside experts so they can evaluate it.

The FAA disagrees.

They want to keep everything secret.

Following the litigation that began in the district court. We found out that they used approximately 95 documents, 9500 pages of documents, to ground the Boeing Max.

In November of 2020, virtually none of it was released.

And everything was labeled a trade secret or proprietary information.

Also, the individuals involved were kept secret under the Personal Privacy Protection Act.

This policy, if its ratified by the appeal court, wont just apply to the Max. It wont just apply to the FAA.

Itll apply to all federal agencies.

Itll apply to everyone, especially those that have jurisdiction over health and safety, because under the FAA policy, almost everything can be labeled as proprietary or trade secrets or some other exception, and that will essentially collapse the intention of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), which is to make a government agency, decisions transparent.

We thought we had some progress in this because the Boeing CEO and the former FAA administrator promised to be transparent.

Congress promised the public that everything would be transparent.

However, when they got to court, it was a different story.

They said they didnt mean what they said.

That was just puffery that had nothing to do with the actual policy.

About a dozen safety experts who agreed with us, including some stakeholders like the Flight Attendants Union, testified, but it didnt matter.

Boeing prevailed at the district court level. And now, these experts also filed a brief in the current appeal.

This morning it was argued by our lead counsel, Joseph Sandler.

Joseph Sandler explained:

I think its safe to say that despite the commitment of the current administration to greater openness and transparency, and meaningful enforcement of the Freedom of Information Act, the court agreed to make it more challenging to find out.

In 2019, the Supreme Court held that if information is normally treated as confidential and proprietary by a business that submits it to a government agency, the presumption is it can be withheld from the public.

So that decision has threatened to make it much more difficult to figure out the basis for agency decisions involving any regulated industry, whether its airlines, cars, or whatever it is.

And in this case, as Paul explained, the FAA deferred it to Boeings determination that every piece of paper they submitted, every documentation minute to persuade the agency to ground the 737 Max, was confidential and proprietary.

It had to be withheld from the public.

I think we were encouraged this morning that the panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit expressed skepticism and concern about the FAAs efforts to throw a complete blanket of secrecy over every document that Boeing had submitted.

It included the FAA comments and responses to Boeings proposed fixes to the aircraft design. It includes the test procedures, and the means of compliance that Boeing itself proposed to demonstrate its compliance with the FAA regulations.

In fact, when this appeal was first filed, the government urged the Court of Appeals to throw it out without even hearing it based on some refinements of the district courts decision, and the court decided to hear it.

Were hopeful that there will to some extent, efforts not to allow to keep everything secret on the part of the FAA.

But it will be necessary for the lower courts to find ways to limit the damage to the Supreme Court decision, to the proper implementation of the Freedom of Information Act, and ultimately may be necessary for Congress to act further if we cant achieve it through the courts.

Register free for IMEX Frankfurt May 23-25 AND click here toschedule your FREE Photo / Video Interview with eTurboNews during IMEX

Original post:

Boeing and FAA put the US Freedom of Information Act in Danger - eTurboNews | eTN

De La Salle's Tanner Griffith, shown here scoring in a file photo, knocked in four runs on Tuesday as the top-seeded Spartans rolled past Castro Valley in the first round of the North Coast Section Division I playoffs. (Shae Hammond/Bay Area News Group)

The Bay Valley Athletic League was overshadowed this spring by the East Bay Athletic League as teams such as Granada and Amador Valley found comfort in the upper half of the baseball rankings.

Not so Tuesday.

On the first day of the North Coast Section playoffs, the BVAL won three games in the Division I bracket, including upset victories by 12th-seeded Pittsburg and 13th-seeded Freedom.

No. 8 seed Liberty also advanced.

On the season-ending side of those results were teams from the EBAL, including fourth-seeded Granada and fifth-seeded Amador Valley.

No. 9 seed Dublin also lost, as did No. 6 seed Foothill to James Logan of the Mission Valley Athletic League.

For Pittsburg, which scored five runs in the final two innings on the road to stun Granada 8-4, it was the programs first NCS playoff victory since 1996, according to its coach, Marco Cartagena.

He called his teams small-ball performance gritty. The Pirates got three hits from Halen Guerrero and three walks from Daniel Trujillo.

Obviously, the EBALs got stacked teams, Cartagena said. They have great teams like De La Salle and San Ramon. They all play great baseball. But I felt this year in our league, we all kind of beat up on each other. Everybody pretty much had an ace. They had one or two pitchers that are really good.

We just fought and we battled. We have tested kids that have been in playoffs. We were in the playoffs last year with the same group almost that lost a tough game at San Ramon. I kind of feel like were not fazed by this moment.

They made that clear on Tuesday. Here are more details:

No. 13 Freedom 2, No. 4 Amador Valley 0 (8 innings)

Shawn McBroom pitched a two-hitter with eight strikeouts, retiring Amador Valley in order in the bottom of the eighth after Freedom broke a tie with two runs in the top half of the frame, as the Falcons pulled off a stunning upset in the first round of the NCS playoffs.

Matthew Foley matched McBroom zero for zero through seven innings but couldnt escape the eighth. The junior pitched 7 1/3 innings, allowing two runs (one earned).

An error on a hard-hit ball by Zach Fesinmeyer accounted for Freedoms first run. McBroom followed with a double to drive in Fesinmeyer with the second run.

Freedom (14-11) will visit BVAL rival Pittsburg in the quarterfinals on Friday.

Amador finished 18-6.

No. 12 Pittsburg 8, No. 5 Granada 4

When Quinn Boyd hit a two-run homer in the home half of the fourth inning, Granada held a 4-3 lead. Pittsburg did not panic. The Pirates scored three runs in the sixth and added two in the seventh to pad the cushion.

Theyre gritty, Cartagena said about his players. We get after it and battle and battle and battle. We wear these pitchers down and thats kind of what happened. We took a lot of pitches. Fouled off a lot of pitches. When we found our spots to put the small ball in, it worked.

Jason Krakoski started for Granada and pitched three innings. Four relievers went the rest of the way.

Six days earlier, Granada was feeling great after its senior ace, Arizona-bound Joshua Morano, shut out De La Salle 6-0 in the semifinals of the EBAL playoffs.

Friday, Granada was four outs from the EBAL championship when San Ramon Valley rallied and won 3-2 in nine innings.

Now, the Matadors season is over. They finished 20-8.

Pittsburg, which also got two hits and two RBIs from Octavio Lopez, improved to 19-9.

In early March, Granada rolled over Pittsburg 7-0 as Morano pitched a one-hitter without a walk over 6 1/3 innings.

No. 8 Liberty 4, No. 9 Dublin 0

Dublin was the only EBAL team to defeat De La Salle before the league playoffs. Now, the Gaels season is over after Libertys David Roberts scattered six walks over six hitless innings and Cole Ehrhorn finished off the no-hitter with a scoreless seventh in a game played at Pittsburg High.

Luke Hyland went 3 for 3 with an RBI and Sutter Doctolero had two hits, including a double, to lead Liberty.

The Lions (17-9) will travel to De La Salle on Friday.

Dublin finished 16-9.

No. 11 James Logan 9, No. 6 Foothill 0

James Logan, playing at home in Union City, held Foothill hitless as Daniel Hernandez pitched 5 1/3 innings and Julian Vasquez retired all four batters he faced.

The loss left the EBAL with a 2-4 record on Tuesday.

Trevian Martinez led MVAL champion Logan with three hits and two RBIs. Daniel Hernandez and Juan Pablo Manzo also knocked in two runs apiece for the Colts (19-6), who will visit Clayton Valley on Friday.

Logan scored five in the first and one in the second to quickly put away last seasons NCS Division I runner-up.

Foothill finished 15-10.

No. 10 Berkeley 6, No. 7 Heritage 0

Daniel Beadles pitched a three-hitter over 6 2/3 innings and Manny Selles went 3 for 4 with a double and five RBIs as Berkeley cruised into the quarterfinals with a victory on the road over Heritage.

The Yellowjackets (19-7) will travel to San Ramon Valley on Friday.

BVAL champ Heritage finished 19-8.

No. 2 San Ramon Valley 5, No. 15 Antioch 1

Tied 1-1 through four innings, San Ramon Valley avoided an upset by its BVAL guest as the Wolves scored two in the fifth and two more in the sixth to advance.

Colin Linteo had two hits, including a triple, and drove in two runs and Max Ellis and Joseph Coupland each had an RBI to lead SRV (19-9).

Charles Reiland allowed one run in five innings and Nate Simonton pitched two scoreless innings to help the Wolves reach the quarterfinals.

Antioch ended its season 15-10.

No. 1 De La Salle 15, No. 16 Castro Valley 4 (5 innings)

De La Salle stretched its NCS playoff winning streak to 21 games as the Concord powerhouse broke open this one with seven runs in the third inning and four more in the fourth.

The Spartans, who have won five consecutive Division I championships dating to 2016, got two hits and four RBIs from Tanner Griffith. Kai Smith added three hits, including a home run, and three RBIs as De La Salle improved to 21-5.

Michael Olsen and Anthony Mares each had two hits and an RBI for Castro Valley, which finished 10-16.

No. 3 Clayton Valley Charter 9, No. 14 College Park 2

Aiden Romero knocked in three runs and Isaiah Landry drove in two as Clayton Valley scored six in the fifth to pull away from visiting College Park.

Landry finished with two hits and Ryder Helfrick had two hits and scored three runs as Clayton Valley upped its record to 20-5.

College Park finished 11-14.

Hideki Prather hit two home runs and finished with four RBIs as third-seeded Campolindo edged No. 14 seed Kennedy-Fremont 4-3 in the Division III playoffs. Campo will be at home on Friday to face No. 6 seed Novato. Jakob Poole allowed two runs over six innings and Daniel Polasek had a hit and two RBIs to lead fourth-seeded Alhambra to a 4-2 victory over No. 12 seed Sonoma Valley in a Division III game. The Bulldogs will play host to Bishop ODowd in a quarterfinal Friday. Justin Jones pitched a two-hitter and Jonah Simkin England and Zachariah Lazzarini each knocked in a run as No. 10 seed Las Lomas ousted No. 7 seed Pinole Valley 2-0. Las Lomas will play No. 2 seed Redwood Christian on Friday at San Leandro Ballpark.

See original here:

NCS baseball playoffs: Pittsburg, Freedom, Liberty step out of EBAL shadow - The Mercury News

Permanent Protections for Floridians from the Biomedical Security State

DESTIN, Fla.Today,Governor Ron DeSantis signed four pieces of legislation that protect Floridians from medical mandates, empower doctors, and prohibit dangerous gain of function research. Through these comprehensive pieces of legislation, Governor DeSantis codified permanent COVID-19 protections in the state and positioned Florida as the national leader for medical freedom. For more information, clickhere.

The landmark legislative package signed today safeguards residents freedom by ensuring no patient is forced by a business, school, or government entity to undergo testing, wear a mask, or be vaccinated for COVID-19. The legislation also affords medical professionals the freedom to collaborate with patients in prescribing alternative treatments and protects physicians freedom of speech. Lastly, Florida is the first state to ban unsafe and unregulated gain-of-function research, like the research conducted in the Wuhan lab.

Our early actions during the pandemic protected Floridians and their freedoms,saidGovernor Ron DeSantis. We protected the rights of Floridians to make decisions for themselves and their children and rejected COVID theater, narratives, and hysteria in favor of truth and data. These expanded protections will help ensure that medical authoritarianism does not take root in Florida.

Governor DeSantis has been a pinnacle for freedom, and today we advance the cause of public health and individual autonomy in medical decisions,saidState Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo. From empowering patients to safeguarding children in schools, Florida continues to enshrine individual liberty and lead with common sense.

Senate Bill 252 Most Comprehensive Medical Freedom Bill in the Nation:

House Bill 1387 Banning Gain of Function Research:

Senate Bill 1580 Physicians Freedom of Speech:

Senate Bill 238 Public Records/Protection from Discrimination Based on Health Care Choices

###

See the rest here:

Governor Ron DeSantis Signs the Strongest Legislation in the ... - Governor Ron DeSantis

CHEYENNE, Wyo., May 17, 2023 /PRNewswire/ -- Return to Freedom Wild Horse Conservation announced on May 17, 2023 that it had filed suit in federal court to stop the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) from stripping about 2 million acres from wild horses in southwest Wyoming for the benefit of private livestock ranchers.

"This decision must not be allowed to stand," said Neda DeMayo, president of Return to Freedom (RTF), a national nonprofit wild horse and burro advocacy organization. "The BLM is using an agreement with livestock ranchers as an excuse to violate its responsibilities under the Wild and Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act. Federally protected wild horses and burros must not be allowed to be removed from our public lands due to private landowner pressure -- or whole herds will vanish across the West."

RTF is joined in the lawsuit by plaintiffs Front Range Equine Rescue (FRER), a Colorado non-profit organization, and wild horse photographers and advocates Meg Frederick and Angelique Rea.

Under the BLM's changes, finalized on May 8, 2023, the agency will:

The BLM says that it amended its Resource Management Plan based on an agreement it entered into in 2013 with the Rock Springs Grazing Association.

The ranching group sued for the removal of all of the wild horses from the 2-million-acre Checkerboard region, an unfenced area of alternating, one-mile-square blocks of public and private land set up in the 1860s as part of negotiations with the Union Pacific railroad.

BLM's reason for removing land from wild horse use: complying with its legal obligations to America's wild horses is too much trouble for it.

"The BLM can't just throw up its hands because Congress handed it a challenge," said Hilary Wood, president of plaintiff FRER. "That's just not good enough for the agency charged with conserving wild horses and burros on our public lands on behalf of all Americans."

The announced changes demonstrate explicit bias and violation of federal law. And during a $1.1 million, three-month-long helicopter roundup from late 2021 to early 2022. the BLM set the stage for the changes by capturing and removing 3,502 wild horses from their home ranges in Southwest Wyoming. Thirty-seven wild horses died during the roundup.

Return to Freedom Wild Horse Conservation(RTF) is a national nonprofit organization dedicated to wild horse preservation through sanctuary, education, conservation,andadvocacy since 1998. It also operates the AmericanWild Horse Sanctuary at three California locations, caring for more than 450 wild horses and burros. Follow us onFacebook,Twitter,andInstagramfor updates about wild horses and burros on the range and at our sanctuary.

Front Range Equine Rescue (FRER) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit working to end the abuse and neglect of horses through rescue and education. It was incorporated in the State of Colorado in 1997. FRER's"Save the Wild Horses" campaign provides rescue, education, advocacy and legal action to protect America's wild horses. To learn more, visitwww.frontrangeequinerescue.org.

SOURCE Return to Freedom Wild Horse Conservation

Read the original:

Return to Freedom Files Suit to Stop BLM from Taking 2 Million ... - PR Newswire

In 2017, the Iowa Legislature responded to concerns from Gov. Terry Branstad and amended Iowa law to ensure that when government employees are forced out of their jobs, the reasons must be made public and not shrouded in secrecy.

The goal was commendable. The governor was right. People deserve to be told why. It is called public accountability.

Since then, the transparency promised six years ago has diminished.

Since then, government employers have been more interested in avoiding embarrassment or uncomfortable questions.

Since then, government has been less interested in informing the people of Iowa in whose name government exists and operates.

Last week, the nonprofit organization I lead stepped up to try to stem this tide of secrecy-over-transparency. The Iowa Freedom of Information Council and I sued the Centerville school board, challenging the legality of its closed meeting in February that ended a two-month suspension of the Centerville High School guidance counselor and baseball coach.

Ryan Hodges was placed on leave around Dec. 1 last year following allegations of inappropriate behavior with a minor. School officials refused in December and again in February to share with the public the nature of Hodges actions. They refused to say whether the investigation found the allegations to be true or whether the investigation found no factual basis for the accusations.

School officials claimed they were not required to make public any of those details because Hodges submitted what they insisted was a voluntary resignation.

Our interest in the Centerville case is not motivated by some prurient interest in the details of what he is accused of engaging in with more than just one female student. Our concerns come from a belief residents of the Centerville district, the people who pay the taxes and sent their kids and grandkids to the schools there, deserve to know what went on at Centerville High School.

They deserve to know how their elected school board and the districts administrators responded to the allegations brought to their attention by female students during the two-month investigation. The public deserves to know what outside investigators learned about allegations of predatory behavior by Hodges.

They deserve to know why, after Hodges had been on administrative leave for two months, he was allowed to depart without any documented reasons and rationale being made public about the sudden end of his employment, a disclosure the Branstad-era amendment added to the public records law.

They deserve to know why, if the allegations against Hodges were baseless, he was not allowed to return to work with his name cleared. They deserve to know why, if the allegations against Hodges were true, the school board did not begin the firing process. After all, the taxpayers had been continuing to pay his full salary and provide insurance for the two months he was not allowed to work during the investigation.

And equally important, potential future employers deserve to know what baggage Hodges might bring to a new school district after being accused of violating parental trust and possibly Iowa law, too.

Such baggage has not always been easily knowable for prospective employers, or the public. Consider the case of Cody LaKose.

He was arrested in March at Regina High School in Iowa City, where he was a teacher. The criminal charges involve allegations, backed up with cellphone text messages, that LaKose groomed and then had an ongoing sexual relationship with an underage female student at Central DeWitt High School in 2017.

LaKose taught there from 2010 until December 2018, when he abruptly resigned in the middle of his contract. He and the Central DeWitt district signed an agreement to resolve all issues arising out of LaKoses employment with the district.

Just as with Ryan Hodges in Centerville, Central DeWitt officials never provided details about LaKoses conduct or what those issues were.

Instead, Central DeWitt continued to pay LaKose and provide him with insurance benefits for the remainder of the school year. The district also agreed to provide him with mutually agreeable letters of reference he could present to prospective employers.

The Central DeWitt district did not report his sudden resignation, or the background leading to it, to the Iowa teaching licensing board. Having a license in good standing and the absence of transparency about his departure allowed LaKose to obtain teaching jobs in the Cedar Rapids schools and then at Regina High School.

The opaqueness about LaKoses departure shows what can occur when secrecy wins out over transparency and when school officials are more concerned about getting a problem employee out of their district and less concerned about the potential for the person committing misconduct somewhere else in the future.

A footnote to the LaKose case should outrage parents everywhere:

While Central DeWitt Superintendent Dan Peterson insisted he could not say what LaKose did that led to his resignation, after LaKoses arrest in Iowa City, Peterson posted the criminal complaint filed against the former employee on the school districts website. That posting included the name of the girl who went to police last year when she was worried LaKose might try to take advantage of students in another district the way he took advantage of her.

It is hard to understand why the superintendent chose to share that detail. But it should not be hard to understand why there is a need for more transparency about resignations that are not strictly voluntary.

Read more:

Why Iowa Freedom of Information Council is suing the Centerville ... - Iowa Capital Dispatch

On the same stage where her husband, the prominent Russian dissident Vladimir Kara-Murza, was honored for his courage years earlier, Evgenia Kara-Murza took the floor. She was addressing the 15th Annual Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy in Geneva, Switzerland, on Wednesday to speak about her husbandthe political prisoner Russian President Vladimir Putin fears mostand others fighting against authoritarian regimes around the world. Had Evgenias husband not been sentenced to 25 years in a penal colony a month earlier for his vocal opposition to Russias full-scale invasion of Ukraine, perhaps he would have been there with her. It is the longest sentence handed down to a Putin critic to date.

Since Vladimirs detention last year, Evgenia has taken up the mantle of his activism, traveling around the world to speak out against his detention and the crimes of Putins authoritarian regime. Despite her high-profile role, Evgenia insists that, unlike her husband, she is no politician. I have no such ambition whatsoever, she says. I never wanted to be a public speaker. I never wanted to be a public figure. I was happy working from home, being there for the kids when they came from school.

Read More: My Friend Vladimir Kara-Murza Is the Political Prisoner Putin Fears Most

TIME caught up with Evgenia on the sidelines of the summit to discuss her and her husbands activism, the toll it has taken on their family, and whether she can envisage a future in a free, democratic Russia.

Evgenia Kara-Murza: Not fully, because Vladimir is a politician. First and foremost, hes a politician and I believe that one brilliant politician is enough for our family. He has a very clear vision of what Russia can offer to the world as a democratic country, of how to build democracy in Russia.

But I took up his work speaking on behalf of political prisoners, calling for sanctions. And as a Russian citizen, Im devastated by the war and I will do everythingI will talk about it and talk about it again. I will call on politicians not to allow Vladimir Putin to get away with it, not to allow him any victory in this war. Not to force or coerce Ukraine to donate part of its territory to the Russian Federation to appease, yet again, a dictator who can never be appeased. Appeasement doesnt work. Vladimir Putin is a bully. He behaves like a bully. Hes always behaved like a bully. And in the past, hes tried his hand at these same crimes that hes now committing on a large scale.

What were witnessing today was inevitable; it was an absolutely inevitable thing. All those years of impunity have led to this; all those years of Vladimir Putin believing that he could commit a crime and get away with it and commit another one and get away with it. I believe that in these circumstanceswhen the war is raging, when tens of thousands of people are being killed in Ukraine, when tens of thousands of people are arbitrarily detained in RussiaVladimirs work cannot stop. He has been speaking on behalf of political prisoners in Russia for many years before becoming a political prisoner himself. So I have to continue making sure that these voices are heard, that their stories are known, that the world understands that not the entire Russian population stands behind Vladimir Putin and his vision.

I believe that these voices need to be heard, and I continue as best I can. I dont have the skillset. I dont have the knowledge. The first public speech that I ever made, I made last year when Vladimir was arrested.

I think its my fury and adrenaline speaking. Ive been living on adrenaline for over a year now. I sometimes stop and wonder how long can a person live on pure, concentrated adrenaline? I dont know. After Vladimirs poisonings [in 2015 and 2017 in Moscow, in purported retaliation for his anti-Kremlin activism], I lasted a year after each. When he was poised in 2015, I went to Moscow. I was there while he was in a coma, while he was being treated. Then we came back to the United States for rehabilitation. And I literally used to carry him around in my arms because he could not walk without help. He could not use a spoon. He was talking gibberish because he had a stroke while in a coma in Moscow.

I had to hold it all together. We have three kids. The oldest was nine; we had a six-year-old, a three-year-old. I had to hold it all together, and Vladimir. I think it took a year for everything to fall back into some kind of normalcy. And when I felt that everyone was okay and Vladimir was walking and talking and doing his thing, the thing that he does best, that was when I collapsed. So I think I have a delayed reaction and this has saved me before. But now its been over a year, so I sometimes wonder: How much time have I got?

I think you dont know what [strength] you have until youre faced with a situation where you dont really have a choice other than to stand up and do something about it. And I was raised to stand up and do something. I was not raised to just sit quietly and wait for things to happen on their own. That has never been my approach to any kind of crisis. I try to think of what I can do under the circumstances, with whatever I have at hand.

I believe this is what marriage is about. Whenever Vladimir was in a difficult situation, I was there for him. And whenever I fell apart, he was always there for me, to pick up the pieces and put them together. So it has always been a partnership, and I believe that it will continue being a partnership because this is the only way I understand a marriage. Otherwise, why would you live with a person? You share everything and youre there for each other. Thats the only way to me.

I think that the Kremlin has their hands full and they dont really notice me running around the world and screaming. Its mostly the statements, the efforts, the help, and the solidarity of the world with Vladimir that annoys them and that makes them maybe think twice about doing something to him. I dont believe its my activity, per se. I just talk. But Vladimir has made friends all over the world all these years and they all stand in solidarity with him. They always welcome me with open arms because they know and love and respect Vladimir, and so its easy for me to come and speak because Im always welcome being Vladimirs wife.

I do receive a lot of hatred on social media. And honestly, because Im an introverted person, because I dont like publicity, I have never been a big fan of social media. I only use it because I have to right now to spread information. But I try not to read comments. I need the remnants of my sanity to do the work.

My kids. They are the United States. Weve always believed that in order for Vladimir to do his work as he saw fit, the kids needed to be safe. They were born in the States. They are bilingual: they can read and write and speak both English and Russian fluently. Russian has always been a big part of their culture and theyve been to Russia many times. But over the years, it became apparent that it would not be safe for them there. I think [theyre] my place of strength. Going home even for a few days a month. I dont get to spend more at home than just a few days at a time. But when I come home thats my place of strength.

I think they are proud, but also absolutely terrified. You see, these kids have been growing up like this. Vladimir was poisoned when the oldest one was nine. He was poisoned for the second time when she was 11. Shes now 17. Our youngest, the third one, is 11 and his father was just sentenced to 25 years [in a penal colony] in Russia. So our kids have been growing up like this, unfortunately, living in two parallel realities. One reality is where they have a home, a loving family, where they have their friends and schools and their extracurricular activities, their passions, their hobbies. And another one is where the Russian regime is consistently trying to kill their father. And their father, being a genuine Russian patriot, refuses to give up his fight and keeps on and on and on. I can only imagine how excruciatingly painful it is for them.

I will do anything to bring the father back and to make sure that our family is reunited again. I do want to show them that in order to make something happen, you have to fightyou have to go to war, in a way. And I think that Vladimir, somehow amazingly, manages to teach them a lesson as well, even from behind bars. A lesson about always fighting, never giving up without a fight, and always being prepared to stand up for what you believe in and to know that there are risks involved.

If Vladimir survives and the regime in Russia collapses, I know 100% that Vladimir will want to be a part of a new and democratic system in our country. I know that he will be one of those willing to undertake the impossible task of rebuilding a country from scratch and making it into a democracy. Because Im still very much in love with my husband, I think [laughs] I will have to tag along.

I dont know what our kids will choose to do. We want them to have all the opportunities in the world, all the possibilities. Im very happy that theyre growing up in the United States. Im very happy that they are bilingual. Their understanding of the world is definitely more profound. We want them to choose their own path, and we have always tried to create opportunities for that.

Obviously, we will never try to force our kids to move back to Russia with us. We want them to have this possibility, and in order for them to have this possibility, Vladimir has been fighting for a different Russia that would be safe to go to for our kids as well as many, many people. I will stand by him.

This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.

More Must-Reads From TIME

Write to Yasmeen Serhan at yasmeen.serhan@time.com.

Continued here:

Evgenia Kara-Murza on the Fight for Freedom in Russia - TIME