Page 15«..10..14151617..2030..»

Category Archives: First Amendment

Engineers Triumph in First Amendment Rights Cases – BNN Breaking

Posted: January 5, 2024 at 6:34 pm

Engineers Win Landmark First Amendment Cases Against State Licensing Boards

In an era where freedom of speech is under constant scrutiny, two unlicensed engineers have stood up against the system, challenging the authority of state boards in Oregon and North Carolina, and securing a landmark victory for their First Amendment rights. The cases of Mats Jarlstrom and Wayne Nutt have become symbols of resistance against the suppression of free speech and professional opinion in the field of engineering.

In Oregon, Mats Jarlstrom, an engineer unlicensed in the state, was engaged in an uphill battle against the state licensing board. His research on yellow light timing was met with attempts of suppression, as it underscored the potential danger from shortened yellow light times. These times, allegedly manipulated to increase revenue through traffic citations, posed a significant risk to peoples safety. Despite the boards resistance, Jarlstrom persisted, successfully arguing that his research should not be stonewalled.

Meanwhile, in North Carolina, Wayne Nutt, a retired engineer, faced similar challenges. Despite having a career in chemical engineering from 1967 to 2013, Nutt was warned by the Board of Examiners and Surveyors not to offer his expertise on engineering matters without a professional engineers license. This demand came despite Nutt being exempt from the licensing requirement due to an industrial exception.

Refusing to be silenced, Nutt sued the board, securing representation from the Institute for Justice. A federal court ruled in his favor, stating that his expert opinion is protected by the First Amendment and cannot be legally suppressed by the state. The court cited the boards attempts to stifle Nutts testimony by implying he would be breaking the law as a violation of his First Amendment rights.

Both cases culminated in a resounding affirmation of constitutional rights: the government may regulate the act of engineering, but it cannot regulate the speech of engineers. Through their tenacity, Jarlstrom and Nutt have set a precedent that echoes far beyond their individual cases, marking a significant win for the freedom of speech within the engineering community and beyond.

Visit link:
Engineers Triumph in First Amendment Rights Cases - BNN Breaking

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on Engineers Triumph in First Amendment Rights Cases – BNN Breaking

NRA fights to protect First Amendment. With help from the ACLU – USA TODAY

Posted: at 6:34 pm

usatoday.com wants to ensure the best experience for all of our readers, so we built our site to take advantage of the latest technology, making it faster and easier to use.

Unfortunately, your browser is not supported. Please download one of these browsers for the best experience on usatoday.com

View post:
NRA fights to protect First Amendment. With help from the ACLU - USA TODAY

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on NRA fights to protect First Amendment. With help from the ACLU – USA TODAY

Florida disputes the First Amendment lawsuits filed by Students for Justice in Palestine at USF and UF – WMNF

Posted: at 6:34 pm

Palestine flag. By Sen Kinane/WMNF News.

By Jim Saunders 2023 The News Service of Florida

TALLAHASSEE Gov. Ron DeSantis and the state university system are trying to fend off lawsuits from pro-Palestinian student groups that allege First Amendment violations amid campus debates about the war between Israel and Hamas.

Attorneys for DeSantis and the university system last week filed documents arguing for the dismissal of the lawsuits and requesting that Chief U.S. District Judge Mark Walker reject preliminary injunctions sought by the groups Students for Justice in Palestine at the University of Florida and Students for Justice in Palestine at the University of South Florida.

Walker is scheduled to hold a hearing Jan. 26 in Tallahassee.

The UF and USF groups filed the lawsuits in November after university system Chancellor Ray Rodrigues on Oct. 24 issued a memorandum to university presidents linking the groups to the National Students for Justice in Palestine. Rodrigues memo said the national group had released a toolkit supporting Hamas attack on Israel that started the war known as Operation Al-Aqsa Flood.

These (UF and USF) chapters exist under the headship of the National Students for Justice in Palestine, who distributed a toolkit identifying themselves as part of the Operation Al-Aqsa Flood, Rodrigues memorandum said. Based on the National SJPs support of terrorism, in consultation with Governor DeSantis, the student chapters must be deactivated. These two student chapters may form another organization that complies with Florida state statutes and university policies.

The lawsuits contend that Rodrigues directive violated First Amendment rights and are seeking to prevent it from being carried out.

But in documents filed last week arguing against a preliminary injunction, attorneys for Rodrigues and the university systems Board of Governors said UF and USF had not disbanded the groups. They also said Rodrigues memorandum is not enforceable, and the Board (of Governors) cannot deactivate student groups.

The chancellors memorandum is akin to an open letter, much like the dozens of statements released by public officials across the country on the same topic over the last 10 weeks, the documents filed in the UF and USF cases said. The chancellors memorandum is no more actionable than these innumerable statements by other public officials.

In his memorandum, Rodrigues pointed to a state law that bars providing support to terrorist organizations. Attorneys for the university system last week wrote that the memorandum does not purport to prohibit, for example, speech or viewpoints critical of Israel or supportive of Palestinian freedom, nor does it support an inference that university regulations or Florida statutes do not apply equally to all similarly situated groups.

Faced with extraordinary tensions and fear on campuses and troubling indicia of disruption from SJP (Students for Justice in Palestine), the chancellor took a reasonable, proactive step based on policies and laws of general applicability: He exhorted universities to follow their existing legal obligations to ensure SJP chapters do not engage in the unlawful tactics that the national SJP encouraged them to deploy, or in other conduct that would violate university policies or state law, the university systems attorneys wrote in arguments joined by DeSantis.

But the lawsuits said the UF and USF groups do not have formal relationships with the national organization. The UF case said Rodrigues memorandum advances unsubstantiated claims that Floridas SJP chapters have violated the states material support for terrorism statute.

By ordering the deactivation of UF SJP on the basis of its constitutionally protected association with an independent group engaged in constitutionally protected speech, the order stifles UF SJPs pro-Palestinian advocacy on campus at a time when the Palestine-Israel conflict is a matter of vital public discourse and concern, the UF lawsuit said. If allowed to take effect, the deactivation order will deprive UF SJP and its members of the resources, platforms and modes of recruitment that enable it to exist and engage in its mission.

The UF lawsuit, filed by American Civil Liberties Union attorneys, said students on public university campuses have the First Amendment right to speak and associate through the formation of student organizations.

The deactivation order denies UF SJP members the right to collectively speak and associate, the lawsuit said. The deactivation order unconstitutionally censors and penalizes UF SJP on the basis of its First Amendment protected association with NSJP (National Students for Justice in Palestine).

During a Nov. 9 Board of Governors meeting, Rodrigues said the next step on the issue was to seek legal guidance to evaluate some of the positions espoused on behalf of the universities and to gather additional information regarding the student groups compliance with laws and policies. Neither the chancellor nor the board indicated an intent or plan to take any further actions in response, the university systems attorneys wrote last week.

But the student groups lawsuits cited fears that deactivation could still occur.

Debates and protests have occurred on campuses across the country after Hamas Oct. 7 attack and as Israel has bombed Gaza in retaliation. Florida leaders have taken numerous steps to show support for Israel during the war.

Read more from the original source:
Florida disputes the First Amendment lawsuits filed by Students for Justice in Palestine at USF and UF - WMNF

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on Florida disputes the First Amendment lawsuits filed by Students for Justice in Palestine at USF and UF – WMNF

The First Amendment applies to pro-Palestinian viewpoints, too – The Hill

Posted: December 31, 2023 at 1:55 am

The First Amendment applies to pro-Palestinian viewpoints, too  The Hill

See the article here:
The First Amendment applies to pro-Palestinian viewpoints, too - The Hill

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on The First Amendment applies to pro-Palestinian viewpoints, too – The Hill

Did UW Board of Regents violate former UWL chancellor’s First Amendment rights? An expert weighs in – Channel3000.com – WISC-TV3

Posted: at 1:55 am

State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Washington D.C. West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico US Virgin Islands Armed Forces Americas Armed Forces Pacific Armed Forces Europe Northern Mariana Islands Marshall Islands American Samoa Federated States of Micronesia Guam Palau Alberta, Canada British Columbia, Canada Manitoba, Canada New Brunswick, Canada Newfoundland, Canada Nova Scotia, Canada Northwest Territories, Canada Nunavut, Canada Ontario, Canada Prince Edward Island, Canada Quebec, Canada Saskatchewan, Canada Yukon Territory, Canada

Zip Code

Country United States of America US Virgin Islands United States Minor Outlying Islands Canada Mexico, United Mexican States Bahamas, Commonwealth of the Cuba, Republic of Dominican Republic Haiti, Republic of Jamaica Afghanistan Albania, People's Socialist Republic of Algeria, People's Democratic Republic of American Samoa Andorra, Principality of Angola, Republic of Anguilla Antarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S) Antigua and Barbuda Argentina, Argentine Republic Armenia Aruba Australia, Commonwealth of Austria, Republic of Azerbaijan, Republic of Bahrain, Kingdom of Bangladesh, People's Republic of Barbados Belarus Belgium, Kingdom of Belize Benin, People's Republic of Bermuda Bhutan, Kingdom of Bolivia, Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana, Republic of Bouvet Island (Bouvetoya) Brazil, Federative Republic of British Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago) British Virgin Islands Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria, People's Republic of Burkina Faso Burundi, Republic of Cambodia, Kingdom of Cameroon, United Republic of Cape Verde, Republic of Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad, Republic of Chile, Republic of China, People's Republic of Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia, Republic of Comoros, Union of the Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, People's Republic of Cook Islands Costa Rica, Republic of Cote D'Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of the Cyprus, Republic of Czech Republic Denmark, Kingdom of Djibouti, Republic of Dominica, Commonwealth of Ecuador, Republic of Egypt, Arab Republic of El Salvador, Republic of Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Faeroe Islands Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Fiji, Republic of the Fiji Islands Finland, Republic of France, French Republic French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon, Gabonese Republic Gambia, Republic of the Georgia Germany Ghana, Republic of Gibraltar Greece, Hellenic Republic Greenland Grenada Guadaloupe Guam Guatemala, Republic of Guinea, Revolutionary People's Rep'c of Guinea-Bissau, Republic of Guyana, Republic of Heard and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras, Republic of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China Hrvatska (Croatia) Hungary, Hungarian People's Republic Iceland, Republic of India, Republic of Indonesia, Republic of Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq, Republic of Ireland Israel, State of Italy, Italian Republic Japan Jordan, Hashemite Kingdom of Kazakhstan, Republic of Kenya, Republic of Kiribati, Republic of Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait, State of Kyrgyz Republic Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon, Lebanese Republic Lesotho, Kingdom of Liberia, Republic of Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein, Principality of Lithuania Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Macao, Special Administrative Region of China Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar, Republic of Malawi, Republic of Malaysia Maldives, Republic of Mali, Republic of Malta, Republic of Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania, Islamic Republic of Mauritius Mayotte Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco, Principality of Mongolia, Mongolian People's Republic Montserrat Morocco, Kingdom of Mozambique, People's Republic of Myanmar Namibia Nauru, Republic of Nepal, Kingdom of Netherlands Antilles Netherlands, Kingdom of the New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua, Republic of Niger, Republic of the Nigeria, Federal Republic of Niue, Republic of Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway, Kingdom of Oman, Sultanate of Pakistan, Islamic Republic of Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama, Republic of Papua New Guinea Paraguay, Republic of Peru, Republic of Philippines, Republic of the Pitcairn Island Poland, Polish People's Republic Portugal, Portuguese Republic Puerto Rico Qatar, State of Reunion Romania, Socialist Republic of Russian Federation Rwanda, Rwandese Republic Samoa, Independent State of San Marino, Republic of Sao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic of Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of Senegal, Republic of Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles, Republic of Sierra Leone, Republic of Singapore, Republic of Slovakia (Slovak Republic) Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia, Somali Republic South Africa, Republic of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Spain, Spanish State Sri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic of St. Helena St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia St. Pierre and Miquelon St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan, Democratic Republic of the Suriname, Republic of Svalbard & Jan Mayen Islands Swaziland, Kingdom of Sweden, Kingdom of Switzerland, Swiss Confederation Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand, Kingdom of Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of Togo, Togolese Republic Tokelau (Tokelau Islands) Tonga, Kingdom of Trinidad and Tobago, Republic of Tunisia, Republic of Turkey, Republic of Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda, Republic of Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland Uruguay, Eastern Republic of Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Viet Nam, Socialist Republic of Wallis and Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zambia, Republic of Zimbabwe

The rest is here:
Did UW Board of Regents violate former UWL chancellor's First Amendment rights? An expert weighs in - Channel3000.com - WISC-TV3

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on Did UW Board of Regents violate former UWL chancellor’s First Amendment rights? An expert weighs in – Channel3000.com – WISC-TV3

Judge rules in favor of sanctioned Norfolk NRD member – Lincoln Journal Star

Posted: at 1:55 am

A federal judge Wednesday blocked the Lower Elkhorn Natural Resources District from enforcing sanctions against a board member after she spoke to a local newspaper about a complaint she filed with the executive committee against a fellow board member.

Daniel Gutman, director of the First Amendment Clinic that filed the case on Melissa Temple's behalf, called it an important victory for Temple, and First Amendment principles generally.

"The injunction entered by the Court is an important first step in fully restoring Director Temples rights as a duly elected representative," he said in a statement.

Temple was elected to a four-year term, starting January 2023, representing the eastern half of Norfolk on the Lower Elkhorn NRD, a public board charged with conserving, protecting, developing and managing the natural resources of the state.

Three months into the job she filed a complaint against a fellow board member, Scott Clausen, alleging he had made a "degrading comment" at a public meeting about her ability to serve on the board and had "shown a consistent pattern of misogynistic, inappropriate, and offensive behavior while on the LENRD board."

She asked for sanctions against Clausen, but instead of sanctioning Clausen, a majority of the board voted to remove Temple from subcommittee assignments for a year, barred her from being reimbursed for out-of-district travel expenses and publicly reprimanded her afterdetermining she had violated the district's code of decorum by sharing details of her complaint with the public.

In the lawsuit the first filed by theNebraska College of Laws First Amendment Clinic Gutman sought a preliminary injunction seeking to suspend the sanctions as the case works its way through the federal court, alleging they violated her First Amendment right to free speech and prevented her from doing her duties as a duly-elected board member.

In a 15-page order Wednesday, Senior U.S. District Judge John Gerrard said both sides agreed Temple's statements to the Norfolk Daily News were protected by the First Amendment. While the LENRD tried to characterize the sanctions as a result of Temple's "poor judgment" and "lack of decorum," he said it was clear in the letter recommending sanctions that the executive board wanted to punish her for speaking to the newspaper about Clausen.

The question at this stage was whether Temple had been harmed by the actions in a way that would chill an ordinary person in her position from doing the same again.

Gerrard said it "does not offend the Constitution" to remove Temple from sitting on subcommittees, because they are entirely voluntary and none of her voting rights are implicated.

"Now, whether it should do so in the district's best interest is a separate question to be considered by the political body and by the district's voters," he wrote.

But he found that Temple's speech had been chilled by the board's decision to revoke her right to receive reimbursements to which she's statutorily entitled that add up to about $6,600 a year and for which LENRD already has budgeted.

He said Temple and her constituents are the ones suffering "due to her inability to attend workshops, conferences, and out-of-district LENRD projects."

Gerrard said under the statute the LENRD only had the power to disapprove unnecessary out-of-district travel expenses, and she was likely to be successful on her First Amendment retaliation case as it pertained to sanctions regarding per diem and reimbursement payments.

"The LENRD argues that an injunction would 'erode public confidence in the elective process since the decision to censure (Temple) was made in open session of a public meeting.' Frankly, this whole ordeal has the potential to erode public confidence in the LENRD's ability to govern," the judge said.

He said because Temple is a first-year member of the LENRD with no previous governmental experience, the public particularly those who live in the eastern part of Norfolk is served by her ability to attend trainings and programming relevant to her representation.

Gerrard said he had resolved the issues presented at this stage of the proceedings.

"What the parties must resolve is how they are going to move forward and govern together in 2024. As the calendar turns to a new year in a few days, now is a good time for the parties to determine how they will get along and govern in the best interests of the public," he wrote.

"Les Miserables" coming to Lied Center in January; Two Lincoln men challenging gun charges after Supreme Court rulings; South Lincoln Lazlo's "working on plan to reopen" after fire.

St. Teresa Catholic School students Ephram Rutledge (center) and Paul Johnson (right) sing Christmas songs outside the Governor's Mansion during the inaugural "Hometown Christmas" celebration Sunday.

Nebraska's Lexi Rodriguez (right) places the Nebraska logo on a ticket to Tampa after winning in an NCAA Elite Eight match against Arkansas on Saturday, Dec. 9, 2023, at the Devaney Sports Center.

Rabbi Mendel Katzman, executive director at Chabad of Nebraska and a member of the Omaha Police Department Chaplains Corps, uses the shamash to light a second candle of the menorah on Tuesday during a ceremony in the Capitol Rotunda. In Hebrew the word "menorah" translates to lamp.

Nebraska's Laney Choboy (6) dives into head coach John Cook as she tries to save the ball from going out of bounds in the third set, during an NCAA Regional Semifinal match held at the Bob Devaney Sports Center, on Thursday, Dec. 7, 2023, in Lincoln.

Wearing his black Stetson cavalry hat, Sgt. 1st Class Joseph "Joey" Prichard of Omaha embraces his wife Samantha Prichard on Thursday at the Nebraska National Guard base in Lincoln. This was the second deployment for Prichard, with the first in 2010 to Afghanistan. "It's always a surreal moment. It doesn't hit you until you see them, you know you're coming home," he said. "I couldn't fight the tears. I did it on my first deployment too. I cried when I said goodbye to her, and now when I come home." A total of 91 Nebraska Army National Guard soldiers in the Troop C, 1-134th Cavalry returned to Nebraska on Thursday after a 10-month deployment to the Middle East.

Guests walk by the newly completely hangar-style addition at Lincoln North Star High School during an open house Monday. The $5.4 million expansion will house the school's aviation focus program.

The Journal Star Super-State first team includes (from left) Papillion-La Vista South's Lauren Medeck, Papillion-La Vista's Faith Frame, Bennington's Olivia Mauch, Grand Island's Tia Traudt, Lincoln Southwest's Malayah Long, Papillion-La Vista's Mia Tvrdy and Norris' Anna Jelinek.

The Career Academy students Amber Ortega (left) and Kameron Beckler cook during the annual Lincoln Public Schools culinary competition on Wednesday at The Career Academy.

Creighton's Trey Alexander makes a dunk against Nebraska's Rienk Mast on Sunday, Dec. 3, 2023 during the second half of a game at Pinnacle Bank Arena.

Hana Sindi, from Lincoln, holds a sign and chants alongside fellow protestors on Sunday, Dec. 3, 2023 during a Justice for Palestine march on the pedestrian bridge at Pinnacle Bank Arena. I support Palestinian liberation and freedom from illegal occupation, Sindi said.

11-year-old Dima al-Shorman (left) and her sister, Huda al-Shorman, 12, arrange a miniature farm at a play station on Saturday during the opening day of the new Here We Grow exhibit at Lincoln Childrens Museum.

Nebraska's Kennedi Orr checks her phone as teammate Bekka Allick takes a rest in the locker room after an NCAA Elite Eight match on Saturday, Dec. 9, 2023, at the Devaney Sports Center.

Nebraska's Ally Batenhorst (14) slams down a kill against Georgia Tech's Tamara Otene during an NCAA Sweet 16 match Thursday at the Devaney Sports Center.

Jeremy Charging Hawk (left) counts a handful of dollars he made panhandling with his friend, Calvin, on Friday near 13th and on O streets in downtown Lincoln. A new partnership between CenterPointe and the Lincoln Police Department is designed to keep people experiencing homelessness out of jail.

Bride-to-be Taylor Schulz peruses the wedding dresses on saleat the former location of Dream Dress Express and Tip Top Tux on Saturday in Lincoln.

University of Nebraska-Lincoln assistant professor Aziza Cyamani (second from right) listen as students Wijdan Almamari (right), Will Janecek (from left) and Said Al Mahrouqi discuss their design concept for the Old City Hall on Friday.

Nebraska's Merritt Beason (13) and Bekka Allick (5) celebrate after a block against Missouri in the second setduring a second-round NCAA Tournament match on Saturday at the Devaney Sports Center.

Nebraskas bench erupts as Alexis Markowski is fouled making a basket against Georgia Tech on Saturday, Dec. 2, 2023, during the second half at Pinnacle Bank Arena.

Pius X's Ava Markowski (40) and Millard North's Izzie Galligan (22) fall to the floor as they chase down a loose ball in the first quarter at Lincoln Pius X High School, on Thursday, Nov. 30, 2023.

Bia Espinoza, owner of Susa's Sweets & Balloons, stands at her pop up shop located inside Union Bank Place on Thursday.

Nebraska's Allison Weidner (left) joins her teammates on the bench as they celebrate a point against Florida Atlantic in the third quarteron Wednesday at Pinnacle Bank Arena.

Amanda Docter of Lincoln uses a torch to heat the beginnings of a handmade glass ornament, or "glaskolben," while studio manager Matt Losee watches on Monday during a holiday workshop at Lincoln Hot Glass.

A near-full-moon rises over Memorial Stadium on Sunday, Nov. 26, 2023 in downtown Lincoln.

The first snow of winter falls over the Nebraska State Capitol on Saturday, Nov. 25, 2023 in downtown Lincoln.

Nebraska players, including Quinton Newsome (6), emerge from the tunnel before the game on Friday at Memorial Stadium.

Nebraska's Tamon Lynum (left) watches as Iowa players, from left, Tory Taylor (9), Luke Lachey (85), and Steven Stilianos (86) lift kicker Marshall Meeder (92) to celebrate Meeder's game-winning field goal on Friday at Memorial Stadium.

Nebraska'sJaylen Lloyd (right) celebrates his second quarter touchdown against Iowa with teammate Chubba Purdy on Friday at Memorial Stadium.

Nebraska's Nouredin Nouili (63) embraces his family, including motherMelanieRagaller (left) and sister Luna Ragaller (right),during the Senior Day activities before the Iowa game on Friday at Memorial Stadium.

Robert and Stefanie Kirkland from Lincoln sport turkey costumes during the 5K portion of the YMCA of Lincoln Turkey Trot on Thursday in downtown Lincoln.

Nebraska's Keisei Tominaga celebrates after scoring from beyond the arc in the first half at Pinnacle Bank Arena, on Wednesday, Nov. 22, 2023.

Reach the writer at 402-473-7237 or lpilger@journalstar.com.

On Twitter @LJSpilger

Get local news delivered to your inbox!

Link:
Judge rules in favor of sanctioned Norfolk NRD member - Lincoln Journal Star

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on Judge rules in favor of sanctioned Norfolk NRD member – Lincoln Journal Star

Vermont man who was arrested after flipping off a state trooper SUES saying his First Amendment rights were vi – Daily Mail

Posted: at 1:55 am

Vermont man who was arrested after flipping off a state trooper SUES saying his First Amendment rights were vi  Daily Mail

See more here:
Vermont man who was arrested after flipping off a state trooper SUES saying his First Amendment rights were vi - Daily Mail

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on Vermont man who was arrested after flipping off a state trooper SUES saying his First Amendment rights were vi – Daily Mail

First Amendment claim struck down in Project Veritas case focused on diary of Biden’s daughter – The Associated Press

Posted: at 1:55 am

First Amendment claim struck down in Project Veritas case focused on diary of Biden's daughter  The Associated Press

Excerpt from:
First Amendment claim struck down in Project Veritas case focused on diary of Biden's daughter - The Associated Press

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on First Amendment claim struck down in Project Veritas case focused on diary of Biden’s daughter – The Associated Press

We have a First Amendment: Ex-university chancellor says regents were overreacting when they fired him for adult video side hustle – Fortune

Posted: at 1:55 am

2023 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice| Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information| Ad Choices FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice. S&P Index data is the property of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved. Terms & Conditions. Powered and implemented by Interactive Data Managed Solutions.

See more here:
We have a First Amendment: Ex-university chancellor says regents were overreacting when they fired him for adult video side hustle - Fortune

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on We have a First Amendment: Ex-university chancellor says regents were overreacting when they fired him for adult video side hustle – Fortune

Requiring Web Sites to Post and Report Terms of Service Doesn’t Violate First Amendment – Reason

Posted: at 1:55 am

So holds Judge William Shubb (E.D. Cal.) in X Corp. v. Bonta:

AB 587 requires that social media companies post their terms of service "in a manner reasonably designed to inform all users of the social media platform of the existence and contents of the terms of service." The law also requires that such companies submit twice yearly "terms of service reports" to the Attorney General containing, inter alia, the current version of the terms of service for their platform, as well as a description of content moderation practices used by the social media company for that platform, including, but not limited to, how the company addresses (A) hate speech or racism; (B) extremism or radicalization; (C) disinformation or misinformation; (D) harassment; and (E) foreign political interference.

The "terms of service" as defined in AB 587 appear to bear all of the hallmarks of commercial speech. Under Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corporation (1983), there is "strong support" for finding that the speech is commercial where "(1) the speech is an advertisement, (2) the speech refers to a particular product, and (3) the speaker has an economic motivation."

Although the terms of service may not literally be advertisements in the sense of proposing a commercial transaction, they are directed to potential consumers and may presumably play a role in the decision of whether to use the platform. They refer to the company's product or service, i.e., the social media platform, and communicate important information concerning the platform and how users may utilize the product.

There is also an economic motivation implicated by communicating information about the platform in the company's terms of servicewhich social media companies, including X Corp., typically do voluntarilyso that individuals can decide whether they want to use it.

Because the terms of service are part of a commercial transaction and appear to satisfy the Bolger factors, the court will treat the terms of service requirement as a provision requiring commercial speech. Considered as such, the terms of service requirement appears to satisfy the test set forth by the Supreme Court in Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of Supreme Court of Ohio (1985), for determining whether governmentally compelled commercial disclosure is constitutionally permissible under the First Amendment. The information required to be contained in the terms of service appears to be (1) "purely factual and uncontroversial," (2) "not unjustified or unduly burdensome," and (3) "reasonably related to a substantial government interest."

The reports to the Attorney General compelled by AB 587 do not so easily fit the traditional definition of commercial speech, however. The compelled disclosures are not advertisements, and social media companies have no particular economic motivation to provide them. Nevertheless, the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits [in the Netchoice cases] recently applied Zauderer in analyzing the constitutionality of strikingly similar statutory provisions requiring social media companies to disclose information going well beyond what is typically considered "terms of service."

Following the lead of the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits, and applying Zauderer to AB 587's reporting requirement as well, the court concludes that the Attorney General has met his burden of establishing that that the reporting requirement also satisfies Zauderer. The reports required by AB 587 are purely factual. The reporting requirement merely requires social media companies to identify their existing content moderation policies, if any, related to the specified categories. The statistics required if a company does choose to utilize the listed categories are factual, as they constitute objective data concerning the company's actions. Therequired disclosures are also uncontroversial. The mere fact that the reports may be "tied in some way to a controversial issue" does not make the reports themselves controversial.

While the reporting requirement does appear to place a substantial compliance burden on social medial companies, it does not appear that the requirement is unjustified or unduly burdensome within the context of First Amendment law. "A disclosure is 'unduly burdensome' when the [disclosure] 'effectively rules out' the speech it accompanies." Plaintiff argues that adopting the specified content categories and creating mechanisms to monitor the required metrics would require a vast expenditure of resources, rendering the reporting requirement unduly burdensome. However, AB 587 does not require that a social media company adopt any of the specified categories. Further, Zauderer is concerned not merely with logistical or economic burdens, but burdens on speech.

Finally, the court concludes that the Attorney General has met his burden of showing that the compelled disclosures are reasonably related to a substantial government interest in requiring social media companies to be transparent about their content moderation policies and practices so that consumers can make informed decisions about where they consume and disseminate news and information. Thisinterest is supported by the legislative history. The state's transparency interest is "more than trivial," because social media content moderation is a topic of public concern.

The court also concluded that AB 587 wasn't preempted by 230:

AB 587 only contemplates liability for failing to make the required disclosures about a company's terms of service and statistics about content moderation activities, or materially omitting or misrepresenting the required information. It does not provide for any potential liability stemming from a company's content moderation activities per se. The law therefore is not inconsistent with section 230(c) and does not interfere with companies' ability to "self-regulate offensive third party content without fear of liability."

Note that, unlike the law that was preliminarily enjoined in Volokh v. James(now on appeal to the Second Circuit), which was focused in a viewpoint-based way on supposed "hate speech," AB 587 requires posting of content moderation policies generally, and requires reporting of all such content moderation policies as well. On the other hand, as the opinion notes, AB 587 does target particular viewpoints to some extent: It requires reports to the AG to separately include "A statement of whether the current version of the terms of service defines each of the following categories of content, and, if so, the definitions of those categories, including any subcategories: (A) Hate speech or racism. (B) Extremism or radicalization. (C) Disinformation or misinformation. (D) Harassment. (E) Foreign political interference." I expect that plaintiff will appeal.

The California Attorney General is represented by Gabrielle Downey Boutin.

Continued here:
Requiring Web Sites to Post and Report Terms of Service Doesn't Violate First Amendment - Reason

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on Requiring Web Sites to Post and Report Terms of Service Doesn’t Violate First Amendment – Reason

Page 15«..10..14151617..2030..»