It was announced at the end of February that Kremlin-backed media outlets Russia Today (RT) and Sputnik would be banned in the EU, and the decision was confirmed by the Council of the European Union on 2 March 2022, meaning that no broadcasters or online platforms are permitted to distribute RT/Sputnik content within the EU, and regulators are expected to monitor compliance. The ban had led to heated discussions regarding the potential consequences for freedom of expression and access to information online, and to a proposal for a new crisis mechanism in the latest version of the Digital Services Act. Here, Professor Natali Helberger of the University of Amsterdam and Professor Wolfgang Schulz of the Hans-Bredow Institute, Hamburg, explain the implications of the ban for media freedom and freedom of communication.
It shall be prohibited for operators to broadcast or to enable, facilitate or otherwise contribute to broadcast, any content by the legal persons, entities or bodies listed in Annex XV.
Just a few months ago, a sentence like this from an EUCouncil regulationwould have been unthinkable. A sacrosanct principle of the European media order is the ban on state censorship. So does this ban goes against the very values and freedoms that the European Union tries to uphold? And if so, what are the implications?
By banning media outlets from being available in the European Union, the Council is intervening in an area (media regulation) that is usually left to the Member States. It is undisputed and has been confirmed many times by the European Court of Justice that it is the sole responsibility of member states to shape the media landscape; this is part of their cultural competence. Even so, most member states remained quiet in the face of their authority being eroded. The general spirit is that we need to stand together to be tough on Russia. That is understandable in the face of the unjustified and atrocious Russian military invasion that is taking place, and the suffering of the Ukrainian people. But what are the ramifications for the future of censorship?
The Council decision repeatedly states that it fully respects fundamental rights, including the right to freedom of expression. The question is: do the deeds follow the words? As a rule, all forms of speech enjoy freedom of expression protection, even disinformation and some forms of propaganda that are not declared unlawful by national laws. Hence, there are reasons to argue that all media, even RT and Sputnik, do enjoy freedom of protection rights. Does Article 11 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, concerning freedom of expression, apply to RT and Sputnik? Some argue that Sputnik does not qualify as media, but is essentially the prolonged arm of the Russian government, and as such cannot enjoy freedom of expression rights.
To answer that question we have to consider two factors. If the companies are affiliated with a foreign state, they cannot invoke fundamental rights under the EU Charter or the European Convention on Human Rights. Here, the status of the actor, not the content, makes the difference. If the companies are not affiliated with a state, the question is then whether the nature of the content precludes protection or at least justifies limitations. The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe distinguishes different forms of propaganda: propaganda for war and hatred, which according to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights is unlawful and demands legal action with appropriate measures in accordance with international human rights law, even though it may not be declared unlawful in all member states. The second type of propaganda may be against professional standards of journalism, but does not necessarily violate international law. Which type of propaganda do we find on RT and Sputnik? How big a proportion on Sputnik and RT is war propaganda? The fact is: we do not know, or at least the Council Regulation does not present clear evidence. Nor does it appear to be a clear cut case, or easy to find out more, not at least because both senders are categorically banned.
Which leads us to one potential and fundamental problem with the ban, namely that European citizens, policymakers and journalists can have a very legitimate interest in seeking an authentic impression of the narratives of Russian propaganda. One of the historical roots of freedom of information in Europe lies in the experience of prohibiting the listening of enemy broadcasters by oppressive regimes. A problematic side effect of such a ban is that it forces RT and Sputnik content into the shadow, preventing EU citizens and the media to recognise and formulate a resilient response to wrongful propaganda, and affecting their right to receive information.
The protection of fundamental rights is not unlimited: limits are possible, provided they are necessary in a democratic society and proportionate. But it is the proportionality of a complete ban of a broadcasting service like Sputnik or RT that is at question here. In normal times, we would need to assess and demonstrate the danger that RT content poses. That is likely to be different between the Baltic states and other countries in which large parts of the population have links with Russia, as compared to, lets say, Portugal or Denmark.Right now, there is simply very little data available on the actual reach of RT and Sputnik in different European countries, and across different platforms (for some first estimates, but also the difficulty of gathering relevant data, see this thread from the Reuters Institute). Other considerations, such as the duration, the existence of potential due process safeguards and the potential effectiveness of the action would need to be considered. According to the regulation, the measures, for example, would be maintained until either the war has ended or the Russian Federation, and its associated media outlets, cease to conduct propaganda actions against the Union and its Member States. Without a clear timeframe or definition of what propaganda entails, this could translate potentially into a perpetual measure. The Council Regulation itself provides little evidence that a process of careful weighting has taken place.
The scope of the measure is also unprecedented, covering audiovisual media and social media. The ban is a fundamental departure from the general monitoring ban in Art. 15 of the E-Commerce Directive. Art. 15 was a critical element of our European approach to the open internet and media freedom. It made clear that any state-imposed orders on social media to monitor their platforms and ban particular types of content are not compatible with European values. The pending Digital Services Act (DSA) does not change this. This flagship response of the EU to the problem of disinformation legislates for more societal responsibility for very large online platforms. Still, it leaves it explicitly to the discretion of the platforms themselves to decide if and how to deal with any risks to fundamental rights and public values, precisely to avoid a situation in which a government tells platforms how to moderate content and instrumentalises platforms for a political goal worthy or not. Doing so can be a legitimate route for content that is clearly unlawful, but for all other kinds of content, a situation in which governments instruct platforms on which voices to allow and which to suppress is very problematic, and could be the beginning of the end of the open internet and media freedom.
The Councils decision in this case made short work of the Commissions restraint regarding regulating social media, with a sweeping ban on enabling, facilitating or otherwise contributing to the broadcast of RT and Sputnik. Many prominent social media platformsbanned accessto RT and Sputnik within a couple of days. The Councils decision can andhas been readin the spirit of finally the platforms take responsibility, but it can also be read as an open invitation to platforms to question some of the critical tenets of responsible content moderation that Europe has tried to impress on them (hereandhere). And indeed, only a few days later, Metaannouncedthat it would temporarily not enforce its community policies and allow posts that include hate speech and calls to violence, as long as those are directed at Russian soldiers and Putin himself. Concerns about the ability of platforms to engage in politically-motivated forms of content moderation were until recently one of the main reasons why the European Commission proposed the DSA in the first place.
The Council may well have been acting with the best of intentions and trying to do its bit in exercising pressure on Russia to stop waging war and blatantly disregarding key principles of the international order and fundamental rights, including Russias war on media freedom. And yet, one cannot fail to notice a certain irony here. The European response to a Russian ban on all media that call this a war, is a European ban on media outlets that do not call the situation in Ukraine a war.
The Council decision has been challenged before the European Court of Justice by RT France, but also by the main Dutch journalists union. According to a spokesperson of the Dutch journalists union, allowing the ban to go unchallenged could set a precedent for banning other politicized news outlets. Meanwhile, the ban did already inspire discussions around including a new crisis response mechanism in the DSA. According to a new Art. 27a DSA, the European Commission will be entitled to demand in times of crisis that Very Large Online Platforms or Very Large Online Search Engines take extra measures, whereby the notion of crisis is defined rather broadly as extraordinary circumstances [that] lead to a serious threat to public security or public health in the Union or in significant parts thereof. The last-minute addition to the regulation has been criticised by civil society organisations because it would constitute an overly broad empowerment of the European Commission to unilaterally declare an EU-wide state of emergency and enable potentially far-reaching restrictions of freedom of expression rights. As EDRi and the other 37 civil society organisations stressed, decisions that affect freedom of expression and access to information cannot be legitimately taken through the executive; rather they should be taken by an independent judicial body and be subject to democratic control, particularly in times of crisis. Suggestions by the Dutch government and others to subject Commission decisions according to Art. 27a DSA to a majority vote from the member states have not made it in the latest version of the DSA.
These concerns about the importance of democratic safeguards and state independence around measures that can potentially restrict freedom of expression and fundamental rights must be taken seriously. So when Europe is agreeing on its approach to disinformation in the DSA, and debating the possible contents and directions of the European Media Freedom Act, it will also have to carefully consider its commitment to media freedoms in times of crisis. It has happened time and again in history that even states and communities committed to the rule of law and human rights act unlawfully in crises with good intentions. Their strength should then lie in creating a regulatory framework for crisis situations for future cases. The European Media Freedom Act could be the right place here to create emergency measures for communication content that safeguard fundamental rights and state neutrality.
Furthermore, the case reveals a fundamental fault line that still runs through the competence structure, not only in times of crisis: How far do the competences of the member states extend in the case of social effects of non-journalistic/editorial content? If their authority is limited to the traditional concept of the media, this would be outside their cultural competence. If one assumes, however, that it is the task of the member states to ensure the functioning of public communication more broadly understood, combating disinformation that is detrimental to democracy is within their remit. Conceptual work still needs to be done here.
This article reflects the views of the authors and not those of the Media@LSE blog nor of the London School of Economics and Political Science.
More here:
- Opinion | U.S. religious freedom effort gets an unwelcome message in Saudi Arabia - The Washington Post - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Freedom Caucus urges GOP to reject government funding deal without border reforms - The Hill - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- The Equal Justice Initiative's soon to open Freedom Monument Sculpture Park - Montgomery Advertiser - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Freedom school district to go to referendum April 2 for capital improvements totaling $62.5 million - Post-Crescent - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Press freedom in Kenya, Uganda and Rwanda: what journalists have to say about doing their jobs - The Conversation Indonesia - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- She bought an animal testing site and turned it into a rehab sanctuary - The Washington Post - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Young Americans for Freedom said UW-Madison's security fees were 'unprecedented.' Records show that's not the full ... - Daily Cardinal - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Responds to Outcome in Ohio GOP Senate Primary - Reproductive Freedom for All - Reproductive Freedom for All - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Biden Redefines Freedom and Democracy - AMAC Official Website - Join and Explore the Benefits - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Freedom snaps three-game streak of wins at home - MaxPreps - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- DePauw Faculty Talks Merit Pay, Academic Freedom, Donor Funds, and Event Planning at Monthly Meeting - The DePauw - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- SC governor: Proposed Medical Freedom Act could place innocent lives at risk - Live 5 News WCSC - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Li Yilei recaptures the freedom of childhood through sound - The FADER - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- The massive copper mine that could test the limits of religious freedom - Grist - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Netflix Is Rethinking Employee Freedom, a Core Tenet of Its Vaunted Culture - WSJ - The Wall Street Journal - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Freedom Caucus touts bill banning Ranked Choice Voting - Pelican Post - Online Newspaper - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Proposed TikTok ban is an affront to economic and personal freedom - The Hill - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Chase Freedom Encourages Cardmembers To Celebrate With Family, Given and Chosen, With Q2 2024 Quarterly ... - Yahoo Finance - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Baseball Game Recap: Freedom Patriots vs. East Bay Indians - MaxPreps - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- 'The veils and the women': Can we really advocate for freedom when we are banning them? - LSE Home - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Freedom wins going away against Brandon - MaxPreps - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Protect the founder of WikiLeaks for the future of press freedom - The Baylor Lariat - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Applauds Confirmation of Judge Nicole Berner to Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals - Reproductive Freedom for All - Reproductive Freedom for All - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Five Themes Discussed at Princeton's Workshop on Decentralized Social Media - Freedom to Tinker - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Meghan Markle Unveils New Brand on Poignant Date with Prince Harry - PEOPLE - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Freedom set to open the 2024 season against Torrey Pines (CA) - 69News WFMZ-TV - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Texas A&M Creating A Task Force To Work On Academic Freedom - Navasota News - December 28th, 2023 [December 28th, 2023]
- H.S. BASKETBALL ROUNDUP: Freedom teams advance to Christmas tournament title games - Morganton News Herald - December 28th, 2023 [December 28th, 2023]
- Gow cites freedom of expression in defending porn videos which led to his firing as UWL chancellor - WIZM NEWS - December 28th, 2023 [December 28th, 2023]
- Sound Of Freedom: All Updates & Controversies Since It Released - Screen Rant - December 28th, 2023 [December 28th, 2023]
- Im ready for freedom, Gypsy Rose Blanchard says as she gets early release from jail after role in moms... - The US Sun - December 28th, 2023 [December 28th, 2023]
- Turkish Airlines Hasn't Applied For Permission to Operate Crucial Fifth-Freedom Flights From Singapore to Australia - paddleyourownkanoo.com - December 28th, 2023 [December 28th, 2023]
- New ballot language submitted for proposed changes to Arkansas Freedom of Information Act - Mountain Home Observer - December 28th, 2023 [December 28th, 2023]
- The SRFOE calls on States to guarantee freedom of expression as a fundamental right for gender equality and the ... - Organization of American States - December 28th, 2023 [December 28th, 2023]
- Irene Crcoles releases 'Closet', a single that screams freedom - WECB - December 28th, 2023 [December 28th, 2023]
- Sound of Freedom Is Now Streaming: Heres Where to Stream the Controversial Crime Thriller Online for Free - Hollywood Reporter - December 28th, 2023 [December 28th, 2023]
- FIA consider more freedom in technical regulations - The Judge 13 - December 28th, 2023 [December 28th, 2023]
- Texas A&M Academic Freedom Task Force Is Nearing Completion Of Its Recommendations - WTAW - December 28th, 2023 [December 28th, 2023]
- 2023 was a dire year for freedom of speech on campus, says this organization. Will next year be any better? - Fox News - December 28th, 2023 [December 28th, 2023]
- The Spellbinding Freedom of Baldur's Gate 3 - The New York Times - December 28th, 2023 [December 28th, 2023]
- Stream It Or Skip It: Sound of Freedom on Prime Video, the Child-Trafficking Movie That Became a Culture War Flashpoint And Box Office Sensation -... - December 28th, 2023 [December 28th, 2023]
- Rare Mammoth Specimen Unearthed at Freedom Mine near Beulah, North Dakota - Net Newsledger - December 28th, 2023 [December 28th, 2023]
- Frontlines of Freedom TV Ep. 1 | 2023 Year In Review | Gaza | Ukraine | Trump RDI - Renew Democracy Initiative - December 28th, 2023 [December 28th, 2023]
- We need more freedom of speech on campus, but that can't include advocating for genocide - Minnesota Reformer - December 28th, 2023 [December 28th, 2023]
- Freedom, first and last Sonoma Sun | Sonoma, CA - Sonoma Valley Sun - December 28th, 2023 [December 28th, 2023]
- Home for the holidays, from wrongful imprisonment - Star Tribune - December 28th, 2023 [December 28th, 2023]
- The Freedom to Dress Cannot Be Overstated - Highsnobiety - December 28th, 2023 [December 28th, 2023]
- Freedom Town Column: Selectmen's meetings have resumed at the town office - Conway Daily Sun - December 28th, 2023 [December 28th, 2023]
- Did Disney own the rights to Sound of Freedom? - Dexerto - December 28th, 2023 [December 28th, 2023]
- Freedom Fitness 615 is ready to take on new year's resolutions - Lebanon Democrat - December 28th, 2023 [December 28th, 2023]
- Expressing the freedom of self-expression for Holocaust Memorial Day - North Kesteven District Council - December 28th, 2023 [December 28th, 2023]
- Airdate: Jamie Lee Curtis: Hollywood Call of Freedom - TV Tonight - December 28th, 2023 [December 28th, 2023]
- Harry Belafonte Used Fame to Fight for Freedom - The New York Times - December 28th, 2023 [December 28th, 2023]
- Abducted Anambra truck driver regains freedom - Punch Newspapers - December 28th, 2023 [December 28th, 2023]
- OP-ED: Kwanzaa, Freedom, Justice and Peace: Principles and Practices For A New World - Black Press USA - December 28th, 2023 [December 28th, 2023]
- Webinar to give overview of Arkansas Food Freedom Act - Searcy Daily Citizen - December 28th, 2023 [December 28th, 2023]
- Statement to Mark 25th Anniversary of International Religious ... - USCCB - October 25th, 2023 [October 25th, 2023]
- Freedom of Information Act - Health.mil - October 25th, 2023 [October 25th, 2023]
- 'Freedom' to be featured on GS merchandise - Statesboro Herald - October 25th, 2023 [October 25th, 2023]
- Freedom students say they feel safe on campus; social media ... - thepress.net - October 25th, 2023 [October 25th, 2023]
- What kind of freedom? | News, Sports, Jobs - Marshalltown Times Republican - October 25th, 2023 [October 25th, 2023]
- Woman has few hopes for freedom in shaken bay death conviction - Mississippi Today - October 25th, 2023 [October 25th, 2023]
- MFRR Monitoring Report 575 media freedom violations in the first ... - European Centre for Press and Media Freedom - October 25th, 2023 [October 25th, 2023]
- Michigan's Freedom of Information Act Must Be Significantly Reformed - Mackinac Center for Public Policy - October 25th, 2023 [October 25th, 2023]
- Freedom without justice - IPS Journal - October 25th, 2023 [October 25th, 2023]
- Free speech concerns arise in wake of journal editor Eisen's firing - STAT - October 25th, 2023 [October 25th, 2023]
- Salman Rushdie calls for defense of freedom of expression as he ... - Spectrum News 1 - October 25th, 2023 [October 25th, 2023]
- Governor Murphy Sounds the Alarm on Incoming GOP Assault on ... - InsiderNJ - October 25th, 2023 [October 25th, 2023]
- Soloviev Group Announces Affordable Housing Units in Freedom ... - New York YIMBY - October 25th, 2023 [October 25th, 2023]
- North Macedonia Curbed Roma Citizens' Freedom of Movement ... - Balkan Insight - October 25th, 2023 [October 25th, 2023]
- NCT 127: We are limitless but that freedom also has a lot of ... - NME - October 25th, 2023 [October 25th, 2023]
- Academic freedom or state control: Court hearing will consider blocking key higher ed law in FL - Florida Phoenix - October 23rd, 2023 [October 23rd, 2023]
- Salman Rushdie calls for defense of freedom of expression as he receives German prize - Euronews - October 23rd, 2023 [October 23rd, 2023]
- It's Cold War II, and the enemies of freedom are lining up to forge a new world order - The Telegraph - October 23rd, 2023 [October 23rd, 2023]
- Freedom Caucus Urges GOP Leaders To Remain in Washington ... - The Messenger - October 23rd, 2023 [October 23rd, 2023]
- Statesboro: 'Freedom' the Eagle now has his own merchandise - WJCL News Savannah - October 23rd, 2023 [October 23rd, 2023]
- Escaping North Korea: 'Beyond Utopia' documents one path to ... - The Christian Science Monitor - October 23rd, 2023 [October 23rd, 2023]
- PRH, WNDB Launch Freedom of Expression Award - Publishers Weekly - October 23rd, 2023 [October 23rd, 2023]
- Carbondale branch of NAACP hosts 46th Freedom Fund Banquet - The Southern - October 23rd, 2023 [October 23rd, 2023]
- 'Herald favored our freedom of speech' The Durango Herald - The Durango Herald - October 23rd, 2023 [October 23rd, 2023]