The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Monthly Archives: March 2024
Adults in England wrongly think vaping is worse than smoking – study – Euronews
Posted: March 2, 2024 at 2:26 pm
Vaping is not risk-free but is less harmful than cigarette smoking, according to the UK's National Health Service (NHS).
More than half of smokers in England inaccurately think that vaping is more or as harmful as cigarette smoking, according to a new study.
The study included survey responses from more than 28,000 smokers in England between 2014 and 2023.
Some 57 per cent of respondents thought vaping was more or equally as harmful as smoking, while 27 per cent thought e-cigarettes were more harmful.
The risks of vaping are much lower than the risks of smoking and this isnt being clearly communicated to people, said Sarah Jackson, lead author and principal research fellow at University College London.
This misperception is a health risk in and of itself, as it may discourage smokers from substantially reducing their harm by switching to e-cigarettes."
"It may also encourage some young people who use e-cigarettes to take up smoking for the first time, if they believe the harms are comparable," she added.
The findings were published in Jama Network Open and funded by Cancer Research UK.
The researchers also found that the perception of e-cigarettes has worsened over time. In 2014, only 11 per cent of smokers said they were more harmful than cigarettes.
The researchers said this view increased amid reports in the US of lung injuriesassociated with the use of e-cigarette or vaping products.
Laboratory data, however, showed that the cases were linked to vitamin E acetate, an additive in THC-containing e-cigarette or vaping products, according to theCenters for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC).
The study's authors said that more research is needed into the factors that caused people to think vaping was more or as harmful as smoking.
According to the National Health Service (NHS), nicotine vaping is not risk-free but is "substantially less harmful than smoking".
"We only recommend it for adult smokers, to support quitting smoking and staying quit," the NHS added.
There have been concerns about the rise in vaping among young people especially. One study in the US found that some 14 per cent of high school students reported e-cigarette use and that many did not know that vaping products contain nicotine.
The CDC also notes that young people who use e-cigarettes may be more likely to start smoking.
The UK is banning the sale and supply of disposable vapes due to their appeal to young people, including colourful packaging.
"The number of children using vapes has tripled in the last three years and there is strong evidence to suggest that cheap and easy-to-use disposable vapes are partly to blame," the government said.
One limitation of the UCL study was that only current adult smokers were asked about their perception of e-cigarettes so the researchers were "unable to explore changes among nonsmokers or youth".
Read this article:
Adults in England wrongly think vaping is worse than smoking - study - Euronews
Posted in Vaping
Comments Off on Adults in England wrongly think vaping is worse than smoking – study – Euronews
Iowa vaping bill draws opponents from retailers, health care groups – Southernminn.com
Posted: at 2:26 pm
State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Washington D.C. West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico US Virgin Islands Armed Forces Americas Armed Forces Pacific Armed Forces Europe Northern Mariana Islands Marshall Islands American Samoa Federated States of Micronesia Guam Palau Alberta, Canada British Columbia, Canada Manitoba, Canada New Brunswick, Canada Newfoundland, Canada Nova Scotia, Canada Northwest Territories, Canada Nunavut, Canada Ontario, Canada Prince Edward Island, Canada Quebec, Canada Saskatchewan, Canada Yukon Territory, Canada
Zip Code
Country United States of America US Virgin Islands United States Minor Outlying Islands Canada Mexico, United Mexican States Bahamas, Commonwealth of the Cuba, Republic of Dominican Republic Haiti, Republic of Jamaica Afghanistan Albania, People's Socialist Republic of Algeria, People's Democratic Republic of American Samoa Andorra, Principality of Angola, Republic of Anguilla Antarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S) Antigua and Barbuda Argentina, Argentine Republic Armenia Aruba Australia, Commonwealth of Austria, Republic of Azerbaijan, Republic of Bahrain, Kingdom of Bangladesh, People's Republic of Barbados Belarus Belgium, Kingdom of Belize Benin, People's Republic of Bermuda Bhutan, Kingdom of Bolivia, Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana, Republic of Bouvet Island (Bouvetoya) Brazil, Federative Republic of British Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago) British Virgin Islands Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria, People's Republic of Burkina Faso Burundi, Republic of Cambodia, Kingdom of Cameroon, United Republic of Cape Verde, Republic of Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad, Republic of Chile, Republic of China, People's Republic of Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia, Republic of Comoros, Union of the Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, People's Republic of Cook Islands Costa Rica, Republic of Cote D'Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of the Cyprus, Republic of Czech Republic Denmark, Kingdom of Djibouti, Republic of Dominica, Commonwealth of Ecuador, Republic of Egypt, Arab Republic of El Salvador, Republic of Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Faeroe Islands Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Fiji, Republic of the Fiji Islands Finland, Republic of France, French Republic French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon, Gabonese Republic Gambia, Republic of the Georgia Germany Ghana, Republic of Gibraltar Greece, Hellenic Republic Greenland Grenada Guadaloupe Guam Guatemala, Republic of Guinea, Revolutionary People's Rep'c of Guinea-Bissau, Republic of Guyana, Republic of Heard and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras, Republic of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China Hrvatska (Croatia) Hungary, Hungarian People's Republic Iceland, Republic of India, Republic of Indonesia, Republic of Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq, Republic of Ireland Israel, State of Italy, Italian Republic Japan Jordan, Hashemite Kingdom of Kazakhstan, Republic of Kenya, Republic of Kiribati, Republic of Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait, State of Kyrgyz Republic Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon, Lebanese Republic Lesotho, Kingdom of Liberia, Republic of Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein, Principality of Lithuania Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Macao, Special Administrative Region of China Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar, Republic of Malawi, Republic of Malaysia Maldives, Republic of Mali, Republic of Malta, Republic of Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania, Islamic Republic of Mauritius Mayotte Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco, Principality of Mongolia, Mongolian People's Republic Montserrat Morocco, Kingdom of Mozambique, People's Republic of Myanmar Namibia Nauru, Republic of Nepal, Kingdom of Netherlands Antilles Netherlands, Kingdom of the New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua, Republic of Niger, Republic of the Nigeria, Federal Republic of Niue, Republic of Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway, Kingdom of Oman, Sultanate of Pakistan, Islamic Republic of Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama, Republic of Papua New Guinea Paraguay, Republic of Peru, Republic of Philippines, Republic of the Pitcairn Island Poland, Polish People's Republic Portugal, Portuguese Republic Puerto Rico Qatar, State of Reunion Romania, Socialist Republic of Russian Federation Rwanda, Rwandese Republic Samoa, Independent State of San Marino, Republic of Sao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic of Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of Senegal, Republic of Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles, Republic of Sierra Leone, Republic of Singapore, Republic of Slovakia (Slovak Republic) Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia, Somali Republic South Africa, Republic of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Spain, Spanish State Sri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic of St. Helena St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia St. Pierre and Miquelon St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan, Democratic Republic of the Suriname, Republic of Svalbard & Jan Mayen Islands Swaziland, Kingdom of Sweden, Kingdom of Switzerland, Swiss Confederation Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand, Kingdom of Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of Togo, Togolese Republic Tokelau (Tokelau Islands) Tonga, Kingdom of Trinidad and Tobago, Republic of Tunisia, Republic of Turkey, Republic of Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda, Republic of Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland Uruguay, Eastern Republic of Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Viet Nam, Socialist Republic of Wallis and Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zambia, Republic of Zimbabwe
See the rest here:
Iowa vaping bill draws opponents from retailers, health care groups - Southernminn.com
Posted in Vaping
Comments Off on Iowa vaping bill draws opponents from retailers, health care groups – Southernminn.com
Young people lead vaping and use of some illicit drugs soar – Cosmos
Posted: at 2:26 pm
In concerning news a new survey shows rates of current e-cigarette use and vaping in Australia have tripled since 2019 from 2.5% to 7.0% of people.
The data comes from the results of the latest National Drug Strategy Household Survey (NDSHS).
More than 21,000 people across Australia took part in the survey, produced by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), in 2022 and 2023.
Vaping was most common among people aged 1824, with current use increasing substantially between 2019 (5.3%) and 20222023 (21%), says AIHW spokesperson Dr Gabrielle Phillips.
The proportion of all people who have used an e-cigarette at least once in their lifetime has also increased significantly to 19.8% from 11.3% in 2019.
But that number jumps in young adults aged 1824 to almost half (49%).
Episode 2 of the Cosmos: Debunks podcast series on vices, we learned that while we know about the long-term health impacts of smoking tobacco, the effect of vaping wont be fully understood until decades down the line.
The 2022-2023 NDSHS was conducted before new regulations on vapes and e-cigarettes including restriction on importation of vapes except for therapeutic purposes came into effect in early 2024.
The report also provides insights into the use of other drugs including tobacco, alcohol, and illicit substances in Australia.
In promising news, the proportion of people who smoke daily continues to drop from 24% in 1991 to 8.3% in 2022-2023 while the proportion of those who have never smoked continues to increase from 49% in 1991 to 65% in 2022-2023.
Smoking is the leading cause of preventable disease and death in Australia, so its encouraging that we continue to see a decrease in the use of tobacco by people in Australia, says Phillips.
But Phillips says that, despite updated guidelines to reduce alcohol-related harms, the proportion of people in Australia who drink alcohol at risky levels has not changed since 2019.
Alcohol still remains the most commonly used drug in Australia, with 77% of Australians reporting they consumed alcohol in the previous 12 months.
And while almost half (47%) of Australians have used an illicit drug in their lifetime, about 1 in 5 (18%) have done so in the past 12 months.
This recent use of many illicit drugs, including cannabis and cocaine, has remained stable between 2019 and 2022-2023. However, from 2019 to 2022-2023:
Dr Stephen Bright, aSenior Lecturer in Addictionat Edith Cowan University, says the survey shows several interesting trends in drug use.
Australians continue to be one of the worlds highest consumers of cocaine, yet there is little public awareness about the use of this drug since it is perceived to be an upper-class drug despite the significant impact that the production of the drug and trafficking has on the South American rainforest and indigenous communities, he says.
Use of psychedelic drugs has significantly increased making them the third most popular illegal drugs in Australia after cannabis and cocaine. The increased popularity of psychedelic drugs is likely due to increased media hype regarding the potential for these drugs to be used to treat mental health conditions.
To access free and confidential advice about alcohol and other drugs, phone the National Alcohol and Other Drug Hotline 1800 250 015
Follow this link:
Young people lead vaping and use of some illicit drugs soar - Cosmos
Posted in Vaping
Comments Off on Young people lead vaping and use of some illicit drugs soar – Cosmos
Could messages from social media influencers stop young people vaping? A look at the government’s new campaign – The Conversation
Posted: at 2:26 pm
Vaping is on the rise among young Australians. Recent figures from the National Drug Strategy Household Survey show current use of ecigarettes among teenagers aged 1417 increased five-fold from 1.8% in 2019 to 9.7% in 20222023. For young adults aged 1824, use quadrupled from 5.3% to 21% over the same time period.
If these young Australians were using e-cigarettes to quit smoking, perhaps we would have slightly less to worry about. But many young Australians using e-cigarettes do so recreationally and havent previously been exposed to nicotine. Although were still learning about how vaping will affect health in the long term, we know e-cigarettes are harmful.
Reforms introduced this year by the federal government will be key to reducing rates of e-cigarette use among young Australians, while ensuring those who are genuinely using e-cigarettes to quit smoking have a pathway to do so.
It will take some time to see a reduction in e-cigarette use as a result of these reforms. We need to be patient, and give the laws time to work. Enforcement will be key. But if theres anything weve learnt from decades of tobacco control, its that we need a comprehensive approach.
This is where the federal governments latest initiative a social media campaign targeting youth vaping comes in.
Read more: Young non-smokers in NZ are taking up vaping more than ever before. Here are 5 reasons why
Many will be familiar with the anti-smoking TV ads that have aired over the past several decades. Who could forget the Sponge campaign featuring tar being squeezed out of a sponge into a jar to represent the tar in the lungs of those who smoke.
Or the hard-hitting testimonial featuring a former smoker named Terrie diagnosed with oral and throat cancer, who had her larynx removed.
But times have changed. Tobacco smoking continues to decline and young Australians spend a lot of their time on social media. For better or worse, platforms such as Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube and Instagram have become a source of information for youth.
And so we need to be creative with our campaigns. We need to present information in a fresh way.
The governments new influencer-led youth vaping campaign aims to spark a conversation with the next generation of Australians about the harms of vaping and nicotine addiction.
This campaign will feature a range of influencers seeking to combat the large amount of pro-vaping content on social media platforms. These influencers people like Ella Watkins (a writer and actor), Ellyse Perry (a cricketer), Zahlia and Shyla Short (surfers), the Fairbairn Brothers (comedians), and JackBuzza (a gamer) span multiple areas to ensure young Australians with diverse interests are reached. Some have vaped in the past and subsequently quit.
The government hopes these influencers will engage young people using their own unique style and tone, and communicate authentically about the harms associated with e-cigarette use.
Read more: TikTok promotes vaping as a fun, safe and socially accepted pastime and omits the harms
The campaign capitalises on what can be powerful parasocial relationships: one-sided relationships where a person becomes emotionally connected to a public figure such as a celebrity or influencer. Social media influencers are in our childrens bedrooms, bathrooms, and classrooms. Why not use them to promote healthy attitudes and behaviours?
Emerging research suggests the use of social media influencers in anti-vaping campaigns could be a promising strategy for improving the reach of public health messaging and engagement with the target audience.
In the context of vaccination, the use of social influencers in a campaign promoting the flu vaccine in the United States led to significant increases in positive beliefs about the vaccine and marked decreases in negative attitudes toward it.
The use of social influencers to promote a healthy lifestyle is still a relatively new frontier in health communication, and whether this campaign will be effective is a tricky question to answer.
There are several benefits to this approach, such as leveraging the relationships influencers have built with their audience, enhanced authenticity, and meaningful communication of health information.
It also provides an opportunity to shift social norms. In the context of tobacco and vaping control specifically, public health has far fewer resources compared to the tobacco and vaping industries. The strategic use of social influencers can help organisations involved in health promotion to overcome this commercial imbalance.
Read more: How can I help my teen quit vaping?
But there could also be risks associated with this campaign, such as the lack of control over the content an influencer may choose to share, and their actions and opinions on other topics, which may affect their credibility. Vetting influencers and implementing risk mitigation plans will be crucial steps for the government to take.
Specific details of the campaign are yet to be released, so we dont know exactly how the influencers will be engaged to combat increasing rates of e-cigarette use among youth. But we will be closely watching this innovative approach.
Read more:
Posted in Vaping
Comments Off on Could messages from social media influencers stop young people vaping? A look at the government’s new campaign – The Conversation
Iowa vaping bill draws opponents from retailers, health care groups – Blackchronicle
Posted: at 2:26 pm
(The Center Square) An Iowa bill that would add requirements to manufacturers of vaping and e-cigarette products has two surprising allies standing together in opposition: vape shops and health care organizations.
House Bill 682 and its companion legislation, Senate File 2402, would require vaping manufacturers who sell products in the state to include them on a new registry. The registration fee is $100 per product. Retailers could only sell products listed on the registry.
David Scott of Altria, a manufacturer of tobacco and related products, said the bill does not prohibit the sale of any legal product. What the bill does is prevent illegal products from overseas.
China have over 50% of the (products) that are illegal, Scott told a House Ways and Means subcommittee this week. Three out of the five youth brands are illicit but they are still being brought in.
The Food and Drug Administration created a similar registry on the federal level. In January, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the FDAs decisions were made arbitrarily and capriciously and that the agency should reconsider its guidelines. Scott said the FDA admits it doesnt have the resources to monitor the products.
If you are not on the directory, the FDA has no idea what the ingredients are in your vape, Scott said. They have no control of your marketing and we have no idea of the manufacturing process.
Iowa is one of 23 states considering bills that would require a vaping product registry, according to Consumer Advocates for Smoke-free Alternatives Association, an organization opposing the bills.
Sarah Linden, owner of Generation V in Council Bluffs and Davenport, told the subcommittee that the bill would put a strain on her business.
It would eliminate 99% of the vapor products on the market, Linden said. Retailers said vape users will find other ways to get their product if it is unavailable in their stores.
Retailers have an unlikely ally in health care organizations. The American Cancer Society is listed as against the bill in lobbyist declarations. The American Heart Association is undecided. CAFE Iowa Citizens Action Network, an organization that advocates for tobacco control policies to reduce its use, is also against the bill.
At the end of the day, this bill will do nothing to reduce youth consumption, and/or adults likely, said Threase Harms in her testimony. I think as the vape shop owner said that folks will continue to get this whether they bring it in online through their mailbox and have it delivered at their door or they go across state lines.
A better prevention measure would be advertising regulations, placing a tax on the products and a permit fee for retailers, according to Harm.
The bills were approved by subcommittees and will be heard by the Ways and Means committees in their respective chambers.
Read the original:
Iowa vaping bill draws opponents from retailers, health care groups - Blackchronicle
Posted in Vaping
Comments Off on Iowa vaping bill draws opponents from retailers, health care groups – Blackchronicle
Vaping is finally on a downward trend in schools – Lootpress
Posted: at 2:26 pm
The allure of e-cigarette usage for high schoolers is waning, according to newly published survey data by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Counseling Schools used data from the CDC survey, academic studies, and news articles to track trends in vaping and tobacco use among high schoolers in America.
Electronic cigarettes, also known as vapes, entered the U.S. marketplace around 2007. The use of e-cigarettes surged by 900% among middle and high school students between 2011 and 2015, according to a report from the office of former U.S. Surgeon General Vivek H. Murthy.
By 2018, the first U.S. vaping fatality, caused by an exploding e-cigarette pen, made worldwide newsthe same year TikTok became the most downloaded app in the U.S.
Still, the vaping rates of young people persisted. A study published in the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics found that another peak in vaping use among minors in 2019 was associated with highly increased sales of Juul. This once-popular e-cigarette manufacturer introduced higher-dosed nicotine products with flavors like mango, mint, and creme brulee that appealed to young people. CDC data collected in 2023 found that of the students who vape, just under 90% used flavored products.
Minnesota was the first state to make it to a trial with Juul in March 2023 after filing a lawsuit against the company in 2019. Attorney General Keith Ellison said Juul baited, deceived, and addicted a whole new generation of kids after Minnesotans slashed youth smoking rates down to the lowest level in a generation.
While Juul attorney David Bernick said the company did not intentionally drive youth demand, their targeting of adults with a less dangerous product could have spurred increased youth vaping.
Dr. Sarper Taskiran, a senior child and adolescent psychiatrist in the Psychopharmacology Center at the Child Mind Institute, said there is a misconception that vaping isnt harmful to users health. They really think that they are mostly flavors and that they are inhaling a pleasant gas, Taskiran said in an interview for the institutes website.
The aerosol vapor from e-cigarettes contains cancer-causing chemicals, the institute said. The packaging says 5% nicotine, which sounds like nothing, so teens think 95% is water weight or vapor, Taskiran said.
While the amount of nicotine in various e-cigarette products differs, a Healthline analysis shows that 15 puffs of an e-cigarette match the nicotine content of an entire cigar. Nicotine use in adolescents can harm brain development that controls attention, learning, mood, and impulse control. It can also increase the risks of future addictions to other drugs.
Despite all of the harms caused by vaping and the influence of e-cigarette manufacturers on U.S. minors, at its peak, the vaping rate of U.S. high schoolers doesnt come close to the historically high rates of cigarette smoking among the same age cohort some 20 years before. But, according to the CDC data, its decline has been much more rapid than that of cigarette smokers.
1 / 1
Counseling Schools
Efforts to curb e-cigarette smoking among young people have struggled to keep pace with industry trends. In 2019, Juul ceased advertising in the U.S. and discontinued most of its flavors as part of the FDAs ban on teen-preferred flavors from reusable e-cigarettes. The flavor ban didnt apply to disposable vapesthe kind that more than half of teens use, according to the FDAs 2023 National Youth Tobacco Survey. Juul has settled legal cases with 48 states and U.S. territories.
Meanwhile, competitors have flooded the market, many of which are imported and not FDA approved. Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 46% of new reusable and disposable vape brands sold in the U.S., according to the CDCs Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.
As of late 2023, around 2,000 vaping and e-cigarette brands are on the market, 90% of which are from Chinese factories. The FDA has yet to approve any disposable vape brands and is struggling to regulate the market, particularly as diplomatic relations with China remain tense. By contrast, Australia has an outright ban on all disposable vape imports starting January 2024.
The FDA can ban imports of illegal products and warn retailers who are selling unauthorized products, but that doesnt stop minors from getting vapes online.
The internet, more specifically TikTok, is an echo chamber for vaping use among young people. A comprehensive analysis by Australian researchers found that a majority of TikToks featuring vaping (63%) depicted its use positively. In 2020, a third of TikToks users were 14 or younger.
Yet, teen vaping rates appeared to fall by about 40% in 2020, as many were going to school remotely, according to a 2021 CDC survey, which was conducted online for the first time.
Teen vaping rates may continue to decreasewith or without Juuls recent attempt to sell vapes while blocking underage users using Bluetooth technology. TikTokers went viral in late November 2023, vowing to quit vaping in response to reports of child labor abuses in the Democratic Republic of Congos mining of cobalt, used in disposable vapes. Disposable vapes also create huge amounts of e-waste: An estimated 150 million vapes containing cobalt and other materials like iron and copper end up in landfills yearly.
CDC data also shows that vaping among middle schoolers has climbed from 3.3% in 2022 to 4.6% in 2023. Bebi Davis, the vice principal of Kawnanakoa Middle School in Hawaii, told EducationWeek that younger students may not have been as exposed to anti-vaping messages during remote schooling.
Now that middle-schoolers have returned to in-person learning, school staff may struggle to notice changing tobacco technologies. Davis said that vapes that once were mistaken for pens and new oral tobacco pouches can look like candy.
Kurt Ribisl, a University of North Carolina researcher, spoke to NBC News about the middle school data, saying it may be too soon to be concerned. While smoking rates of middle and high schoolers usually rise and fall together, he said that the surveys finding may be a short-term blip.
Data reporting by Wade Zhou. Story editing by Jeff Inglis. Copy editing by Kristen Wegrzyn.
This story originally appeared on Counseling Schools and was produced and distributed in partnership with Stacker Studio.
Continue reading here:
Vaping is finally on a downward trend in schools - Lootpress
Posted in Vaping
Comments Off on Vaping is finally on a downward trend in schools – Lootpress
Kevin Rennie: Jaw-dropping attack on free speech and assembly in a CT town. It hurts us all. – Hartford Courant
Posted: at 2:26 pm
Something is wrong.
Suffield First Selectman Colin Moll wants to exempt the Town Green from First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly.
Moll has proposed extensive rules to regulate activity on the towns centuries old public Green. Moll told the Courant in a statement on Jan. 19, At no point does this policy infringe on any First Amendment rights. Moll must not have read his own revolting proposal, let alone the amendment that is the cornerstone of our democracy.
The policy is designed to better protect the Town and its assets, Moll continued. Anybody can use the Town Green. A policy would simply give guidelines for use. Our First Amendment rights are first for a reason. They are the rights from which all others flow. Moll has proposed requirements, not guidelines.
Molls notion of freedom to assemble includes obtaining permits from his office 30 days before an event and securing $1 million in liability insurance to cover the event. A permit will not be automatically granted. Oh no, there are rules the first selectman will apply in his discretion. The proposed activity event, and/or display will not unreasonably interfere with or detract from the promotion of public health, welfare, safety and recreation. It must not incite violence or crime or disorderly conduct. Maybe it would allow silent vigils, but not if they disrupted traffic, another Moll burden on Constitutional rights.
The Suffield War Memorial lists 257 local residents who served in the Revolutionary War, from David, Joel and John Adams Jr. to Justus, Phineas and Reuben Woolworth. They fought for freedom. They did not leave whatever rudimentary comforts they knew to risk or give their lives in that glorious cause so that nearly 250 years later the towns selectmen could enact rules to silence speech and ban the assembly of citizens.
The War Memorial inspires from its honored place on the Town Green.
Moll is making a name for himself as more than a tiresome crank. He tried out his heavy hand last year on Suffields Kent Memorial Library. Two directors resigned in a year. Other employees quit. Moll wanted to know who was reserving rooms for meetings at the library. He had a beef with a library kindness display that included a childrens book on pronouns.
Moll and his fellow Republicans refused to reappoint four Democrats to the library board. The Suffield Republicans are not only unmindful of freedom of speech rights, they are jaw-dropping ignoramuses. Last fall, one Republican selectman candidate made the nonsensical argument that the kindness display violated the publics First Amendment rights. And now they have widened their war with Molls blitzkrieg against free speech on the Town Green.
Last month Molls proposal came to the attention of the sentinels of freedom at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). It describes itself as a nonpartisan nonprofit [organization] dedicated to defending freedom of speech. In a Feb. 15 letter to Moll and his colleagues, Aaron Terr, FIREs Director of Public Advocacy, explained in six pages why Suffield would be violating the Constitution if it continued on its path of silencing residents and others.
As other organizations go wobbly on the paramount importance of free speech, FIRE has become its preeminent defender. It began as an advocate for free speech on college campuses and has broadened its mission to places like suffocating Suffield.
Suffields proposed regulations, according to FIREs Terr, could restrict activity from an acoustic guitarist to a book club meeting, from a 10-person protest to a lone pamphleteer. The Suffield Town Green has long been a place, as the Supreme Court describes them, for assembly, communicating thoughts between citizens, and discussing public questions.
Molls 30-day application requirement is an exercise in eliminating spontaneous speech. If next week, Hamas was destroyed and Palestinians in Gaza were liberated from its brutal rule or the Houthis were defeated and the children it forces to become soldiers were freed, it would be cause for celebration across much of the world. People in Suffield might want to gather immediately to rejoice. Under Molls rules, they could not assemble on the Town Green.
Unpopular speech requires protection from the mob, and our Constitution provides it. Molls bombardment of free speech and assembly is especially dangerous for speech that is out of favor. He provides the dreaded hecklers veto to those expressing hostility to some points of view. Loudmouthed locals intent on disrupting a protest on the Town Green would become an excuse for the selectman to ban a gathering. The selectman would be on the wrong side.
Free market capitalism has been very good indeed to tony Suffield. Moll would ban, Terr points out, activities, events, and displays designed to be held for private profit. This would ban, for example, someone being paid to speak and the sale of books, pamphlets and newspapers at an event.
One day Suffield selectmen may require you to show your papers in order to enter the town with leaders who hate our freedom. If they do, remember that it started in the library and on the Town Green.
You can reach Kevin Rennie atkfrennie@yahoo.com.
Follow this link:
Kevin Rennie: Jaw-dropping attack on free speech and assembly in a CT town. It hurts us all. - Hartford Courant
Posted in Free Speech
Comments Off on Kevin Rennie: Jaw-dropping attack on free speech and assembly in a CT town. It hurts us all. – Hartford Courant
Bentley Hosts Forum on Free Speech on College Campuses with Legal Expert Harvey Silverglate – Bentley University
Posted: at 2:26 pm
Bentley recently hosted Harvey Silverglate, free speech advocate and co-founder of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, for a conversation on academic freedom and freedom of speech. Sponsored by the Jeanne and Dan Valente Center for Arts and Sciences and the History Department, the discussion tackled the ongoing debate over what constitutes free speech on college campuses.
Free speech in the United States, Silverglate said, essentially distinguishes this country from virtually every other country, noting that while other countries have free speech, they also have strict anti-defamation laws. Emphasizing the consensus of both liberal and conservative views to protect free speech, he said, Its not a partisan issue anymore. This is a great victory that we have achieved.
Silverglate a criminal defense and civil liberties litigator who has argued free speech cases in front of the U.S. Supreme Court and is the author of books including The Shadow University and The Betrayal of Liberty on Americas Campuses called himself an absolutist when it comes to free speech. The right to express both hate and love speech, he said, should be fully protected in accordance with the law. He noted the particular importance for free speech on liberal arts college campuses meant to encourage conversations from different points of view. Academic freedom is a subset of free speech; and in theory at least, academic freedom should be even more absolute ... But campuses today are actually roiling in debates on this fundamental issue of free speech.
He called for more universities to adopt the Chicago Principles, a model free speech policy statement affirming their commitment to free expression, developed by the University of Chicago.
Universities should be a forum for people to express their views without a stifling atmosphere of censorship, Silverglate said.
Following Silverglates presentation, a question-and-answer session moderated by Valente Center Director Johannes (Hans) Eijmberts provided a forum for debate on issues such as the balance between allowing free speech and prioritizing an institutions values and campus safety, the governments role to protect free speech on college campuses and censorship by social media platforms.
Originally posted here:
Bentley Hosts Forum on Free Speech on College Campuses with Legal Expert Harvey Silverglate - Bentley University
Posted in Free Speech
Comments Off on Bentley Hosts Forum on Free Speech on College Campuses with Legal Expert Harvey Silverglate – Bentley University
POLL: 69% of Americans believe country on wrong track on free speech – Foundation for Individual Rights in Education
Posted: at 2:26 pm
PHILADELPHIA, Feb. 27, 2024 More than two-thirds of Americans believe the country is on the wrong track when it comes to freedom of speech, according to new survey results from the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression and thePolarization Research Lab at Dartmouth College.
When asked about whether people are able to freely express their views, 69% of respondents said things in America are heading in the wrong direction, compared to only 31% who believe that things are heading in the right direction.
The poll also shows that only a quarter of Americans believe the right to freedom of speech is very or completely secure, and almost a third (29%) say it is not at all secure.
The average American already thinks that free speech in America is in dire straits. Most worryingly, they think it will get worse, said FIRE Chief Research Advisor Sean Stevens. These findings should be a wake-up call for the nation to recommit to a vibrant free speech culture before its too late.
Thenew poll, conducted from January 12-19, is the first installment in the National Speech Index, a new quarterly survey designed by FIRE and PRL to measure support for the First Amendment and track how Americans think about the state of free speech in the country over time.
Polarization not only divides Americans on policy, but it fractures our assessments of the stability of the bedrock features of our democracy, said PRL Director Sean Westwood. Nearly half of Democrats think free speech rights are headed in the right direction, compared to only 26 percent of Republicans. And more than a third of Republicans think the right to free speech is not secure, compared to only 17 percent of Democrats.
One alarmingly common belief that crosses partisan lines is that idea that the First Amendment goes too far in the rights it guarantees. Around a third of Republicans and a third of Democrats completely or mostly agree with that statement.
To gauge public acceptance of protecting even unpopular beliefs, the survey also presented a list of statements that were controversial, but protected by the First Amendment. Respondents were asked which belief they found most offensive, then asked if they supported several forms of censorship targeting that belief. The most disliked belief varied by race and party, but the most frequent selections were All whites are racist oppressors, America got what it deserved on 9/11, and January 6th was a peaceful protest.
Roughly half of respondents (52%) said their community should not allow a public speech that espouses the belief they selected as the most offensive. A supermajority, 69%, said their local college should not allow a professor who espoused that belief to teach classes.
Those results were disappointing, but not exactly surprising, said Stevens. Here at FIRE, weve long observed that many people who say theyre concerned about free speech waver when it comes to beliefs they personally find offensive. But the best way to protect your speech in the future is to defend the right to controversial and offensive speech today.
Other forms of censorship are less popular. Americans do not support removing books from public libraries that espouse the belief they found most offensive, with roughly three-fifths (59%) opposed to such actions. And almost three-quarters (72%) believe people who voice the belief they found most offensive should not be fired from their jobs.
The National Speech Index is a new quarterly component of Americas Political Pulse, an ongoing weekly survey conducted by the Polarization Research Lab, which will allow researchers to track shifting free speech sentiment in America over time. Each week, a sample of 1,000 individual YouGov panelists is surveyed on partisan animosity in the United States. All data and results presented are weighted to nationally representative demographic targets. The raw data file is availablehere.
The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to defending and sustaining the individual rights of all Americans to free speech and free thought the most essential qualities of liberty. FIRE educates Americans about the importance of these inalienable rights, promotes a culture of respect for these rights, and provides the means to preserve them.
The Polarization Research Lab (PRL) is a nonpartisan collaboration between faculty at Dartmouth College, Stanford University and the University of Pennsylvania. Its mission is to monitor and understand the causes and consequences of partisan animosity, support for democratic norm violations, and support for partisan violence in the American Public. With open and transparent data, it provides an objective assessment of the health of American democracy.
CONTACT:
Alex Griswold, Communications Campaign Manager, FIRE: 215-717-3473; media@thefire.org
Read the original post:
POLL: 69% of Americans believe country on wrong track on free speech - Foundation for Individual Rights in Education
Posted in Free Speech
Comments Off on POLL: 69% of Americans believe country on wrong track on free speech – Foundation for Individual Rights in Education
So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast | Free speech news: NetChoice, Taylor Swift, October 7, and Satan – Foundation for Individual Rights in Education
Posted: at 2:26 pm
On today's free speech news roundup, we discuss the recent NetChoice oral argument, Taylor Swift, doxxing, October 7 fallout on campus, and Satan in Iowa.
Joining us on the show are Alex Morey, FIRE director of Campus Rights Advocacy; Aaron Terr, director of Public Advocacy; and Ronnie London, our general counsel.
Timestamps
0:00 Introduction
0:44 NetChoice oral arguments
19:39 Taylor Swift cease and desist letter
29:20 Publishing unlawfully obtained information
39:28 Harvard and doxxing
47:44 Princeton no contact orders
55:52 Columbia law denies recognition to Law Students Against Antisemitism
1:02:38 Columbia adopts Kalven Report
1:06:06 Indiana University art exhibit canceled, professor suspended
1:14:55 Satan in Iowa
1:21:59 Outro
Show Notes
"So to Speak" 2023-24 Supreme Court Preview (contains discussion of NetChoice cases)
Correspondence between Taylor Swift and Jack Sweeney's attorneys
Bartnicki v. Vopper (2001)
Princeton no contact order
Columbia university grants recognition to Law Students Against Antisemitism
IHRA definition of anti-Semitism
List of universities that have adopted the Kalven Report
Indiana University art exhibit story
Indiana University professor suspended for improper reservation
Iowa Satanism bill
Shurtleff v. Boston (2022)
"So to Speak": Substack
Posted in Free Speech
Comments Off on So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast | Free speech news: NetChoice, Taylor Swift, October 7, and Satan – Foundation for Individual Rights in Education