The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Monthly Archives: May 2023
Muscle Flexing In South China Sea: Why India-ASEAN War Games Send A Strong Signal To Beijing – ABP Live
Posted: May 14, 2023 at 12:07 am
The military might of India and ten ASEAN nations jointly displayed in South China Sea in the first week of May has rattled the Chinese security establishment. The Chinese are worried, not because of a few warships playing war games in its maritime vicinity, but because of Indias diplomatic success in generating consensus among ASEAN members to exercise together with an agenda to ensure peace, security and stability in the South China Sea with the assertion to keep the maritime area free and open for international navigation. This is significant as ASEAN countries have not been able to agree on the Code of Conduct between China and ASEAN for the South China Sea region.
ASEAN has thus conveyed a subtle message to China through this naval extravaganza that it should not claim suzerainty over the maritime area and China should strictly follow the United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), to which China is a signatory, and which has been in force since 1983.
While India and ASEAN were engaged in naval war games, the Chinese sought to intimidate the ASEAN partners by sending Chinese naval militia near the exercise area.TheIndian Navy kept a close watch on the Chinese naval ships, during the sea phase of the exercise on May 7-8. Amid intense debate among Indian and international strategic circle, on maintenance of peace, stability and freedom of navigation rights in the South China Sea, the muscle flexing by India and ASEAN navies on a very grand scale irked China. By playing multi-nation war games in the South China Sea, India together with the navies of ASEAN members sent a strong signal to China that the maritime area is an open sea, and military or civilian ships can traverse the region without reporting to any national authority.
Since the international community regards South China Sea to be open and free for navigation, the maritime area must be guided by UNCLOS, but China has been claiming some of the island territories of the coastal states. Till now, the Indian Navy was conducting bilateral exercise with ASEAN members like Vietnam, Singapore, Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei, Thailand, Philippines etc, but this was the first time when India was able to bring all the ASEAN navies together. The way the Indian Navy succeeded in bringing all the ASEAN members to take part in the first ever India ASEAN joint maritime exercise can only be described as a masterstroke by Indian strategic planners. It shows that the entire 10-member ASEAN wants to have special strategic partnership with India, and simultaneously conveys a subtle message to China, which claims a large part of the international waters as its authority.
Though China has succeeded in creating a wedge among the ten ASEAN members through its cheque book diplomacy, the participation of ASEAN navies in the India-led, but hosted by the Singapore navy, maritime exercise signifies that ASEAN as a group is committed to the South China Sea remaining an international ocean, free of any country's dominance over the maritime area.
Not only India, but all ASEAN states besides rest of the maritime trading nations have a deep interest in keeping the area free of control by any particular power. As China continues to assert its role over the maritime area, the US and other Western powers have upped the ante against China for its aggressive moves. China has drawn an imaginary line over major part of the South China Sea, calling it Nine-dash line, which includes the Indonesian Natuna island and adjoining maritime area. This has led to a dispute between China and Indonesia. China has also staked its claim over islands near the Philippine sea, and deploys its naval militia to deter Philippine naval ships and fishing boats from roaming in the area. Similarly, China has also contested over Islands belonging to Vietnam, Indonesia, Brunei etc.
ALSO READ | Why PM Modi's Papua New Guinea Visit Is Significant As Chinese Influence Grows In Pacific Islands Region
According to an Indian Navy official, about 1,400 personnel manning nine warships participated in the sea phase of the multilateral naval exercise. Indias indigenously designed and built ships-destroyer INS Delhi and stealth frigate INS Satpura, maritime patrol aircraft P8I and integral helicopters exercised with ASEAN naval ships from Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam. The two-day sea phase witnessed a wide spectrum of evolutions at sea, including tactical manoeuvres, cross-deck landings by helicopters, seamanship evolutions and other maritime operations. Apart from honing skills in the maritime domain the exercise enhanced interoperability and demonstrated the ability of Indian & ASEAN navies to operate as an integrated force to promote peace, stability and security in the region.
Significantly, Indian Naval Chief Admiral Hari Kumar also graced the landmark event and co-officiated the first ever ASEAN-India maritime exercise (AIME). The inaugural event was held at the Changi naval base of Singapore. The ceremony was jointly inaugurated by Adm R Hari Kumar and RAdm Sean Wat, Chief of Singapore Navy, in the presence of senior dignitaries from other ASEAN members.
According to the Indian Navy official quoted above, the AIME-23 was aimed at promoting maritime cooperation and enhancing trust, friendship and confidence amongst ASEAN and Indian Navies. The harbour phase at Singapore naval base from May 2 to 4 witnessed a range of professional and social interactions between the participating navies which included cross deck visits, Subject Matter Expert Exchanges (SMEE) and planning meetings. The official explained that the sea phase, which concluded on May 8 in the South China Sea, provided an opportunity for the participating navies to develop closer links in the coordination and execution of operations in the maritime domain. In practice, this means India is trying to create awareness and show significance of united action in the South China Sea in the event of a requirement.
The Indian Navy has also been closely interacting with individual ASEAN members in the high seas. As part of Indias vision of SAGAR (Security And Growth for All in the Region), the navy has been proactively engaging with the countries in the Indian Ocean Region towards enhancing regional maritime security. This has been achieved through bilateral and multilateral exercises, coordinated patrols, joint EEZ surveillance, and humanitarian assistance and disaster relief (HADR) operations. The Indian and ASEAN navies have enjoyed a close and friendly relationship covering a wide spectrum of activities and interactions, which have strengthened over the years.
These moves enhance the Indian Navys efforts to consolidate inter-operability and forge strong bonds of friendship between India and ASEAN members. Indias move is in tune with its Indo-Pacific policy of keeping the area safe, stable and peaceful and free of any country's dominance. As a member of QUAD also, India has been raising its voice through this platform against the Chinese efforts to control the maritime area, which is vital for normal movement of Indian merchant ships, which transports more than half of Indian maritime trade.
The author is a senior journalist and strategic affairs analyst.
[Disclaimer: The opinions, beliefs, and views expressed by the various authors and forum participants on this website are personal.]
Go here to see the original:
Posted in High Seas
Comments Off on Muscle Flexing In South China Sea: Why India-ASEAN War Games Send A Strong Signal To Beijing – ABP Live
Everybody Has a Story: Surviving rough ride in a smelly ship – The Columbian
Posted: at 12:07 am
We had been out for about three days, almost all of it fighting seas bigger than our 115-foot boat, the MIECO (Marshall Islands Import-Export Company) Queen. The storm hit a few hours after we left Majuro, the capital of the Marshall Islands.
It was spring 1973. I had been a Peace Corps volunteer in the Marshall Islands from 1968 to 70. I returned in 1971, got a teaching job, and was now on a field trip for the Marshall Islands Department of Education to give entrance examinations to eighth-grade students who wanted to go to the only public high school in this easternmost part of what was then a trust territory of the United States. I was going to visit schools on four atolls Mili, Ebon, Namdrik and Jaluit and one island, Kili, where the people of Bikini had been moved prior to the nuclear bomb tests of 1946-1958.
The MIECO Queen was legendary and not in a good way. Built in 1956, she was poorly equipped and indifferently maintained. Her main purpose was buying and selling in the remote outer islands buying copra (dried coconut) in 100-pound burlap bags, and selling kerosene, TP, rice, flour, canned meat, matches, fabric and so forth. The people on these islands made and sold copra to make money to supplement the fish and fruits provided by nature. The Japanese and American influences of the past 50-plus years had added some new things to their diet and general daily existence.
Why the owners of the MIECO Queen and its Fijian captain, Moses, didnt know about the storm remains a mystery to me. Maybe they did know and thought it wouldnt be that bad. After all, they had a job to do, a mission to complete. Regardless, we were barely on our way when that storm hit. Making landfall at Mili, the closest atoll, was secondary. Surviving became paramount.
When confronted by big waves, accepted nautical practice is to point the bow of the boat into the waves. Big waves that hit a smallish boat broadside or from the stern put the boat in danger of capsizing. Were the MIECO Queen to sink out of sight of land in a storm in the Pacific Ocean, all of us would drown.
The rest is here:
Everybody Has a Story: Surviving rough ride in a smelly ship - The Columbian
Posted in High Seas
Comments Off on Everybody Has a Story: Surviving rough ride in a smelly ship – The Columbian
Holiday warning over Majorca party boats loved by Brits as officials vow massive new crackdown… – The US Sun
Posted: at 12:07 am
PARTY boat-loving Brits have been urged to rein in their antics onboard as officials in Majorca launched a new crackdown on rowdy tourists.
The island's council said it will bring in the police to deal with noisy "floating discos" and warned of heavy fines.
A slew of locals have already lodged numerous complaints about the party boats disturbing their peace and quiet.
Residents slammed the boisterous bashes and said they have to put up with non-stop partying on boats moored by the beaches.
Hotels have even expressed their fury about parties on the water as they claim unruly tourists and loud music bothers their guests.
It is another blow for holidaymakers jetting away to the Spanish hotspot for a knees-up as the summer season swings into action.
Clubbers have already been warned they could be hit with a 25,000 fine if they attend illegal parties on the island, as officials clamp down on unlicensed events.
Insular Minister of Tourism, Andreu Serra has called for the "maximum collaboration of the municipalities" to combat the party boat problem.
"We have prepared all the operations to act, in collaboration with the Maritime Service of the Civil Guard, to put all the necessary means when complaints are made," she warned.
"At the same time, we will activate all the mechanisms to initiate disciplinary proceedings."
She said Majorca council was aware "that this start of the season is being more complicated than expected, since it is verified that there are more irregularities than in previous years."
The tourism minister said they would put extreme pressure on boats that did not comply with their zero tolerance policy for "tourism of excesses".
But the president of the Balearic Association of Leisure and Entertainment (Abone), Miguel Prez Mars said Majorca needed to take an even harsher approach.
He explained: "The city councils must be tougher with this type of action, despite the fact that they do not have powers at sea.
"We see that there is no political will to tackle this phenomenon at the root, both in terms of non-stop parties and discos on the high seas.
"Something has to happen for the administration to act, when now we are at the right time to control all kinds of illegal actions, which on top of that generate unfair competition for nightlife companies that comply with all the regulations, generate employment and pay the corresponding taxes."
Abone says noisy party boats are causing a huge nuisance not just in Palma and Magaluf, but across the island.
Hotel associations on the island are also asking the Balearic Government and council to eradicate these illegal leisure practices "because the noise bothers both residents and tourists who stay in the hotels."
Residents of Colonia de Sant Jordi on the southeastern coast of Majorca say they "can't take any more" after five years of excessive noise and no action.
At the weekend, nearly 20 party boats gathered off the popular beach and were said to have blasted out music for more than 12 hours.
The revelries reportedly started at 5pm and only wrapped up at 6am the following morning.
"This is a party organised to promote drunken tourism at sea and we fear that this will happen again," said one resident.
Another exhausted local fumed: "We have had twelve continuous hours of disco on the high seas and now that summer is coming, this is going to overflow."
The local council said they did call in the police but were told they had no jurisdiction at sea.
The latest measure comes as officials in Majorca and Ibiza attempt to extinguish booze-fuelled chaos and drunken behaviour.
Holidaymakers will now be slapped with asix-drink-a-day limit instead of having alcohol on tap.
The regulations will affect tourists inMagaluf,Majorcaand some areas of party islandIbiza.
And they mean tourists can only have three free tipples at lunch and three with their evening meal.
The block has been put on boozy pub crawls, the sale of alcohol in shops between 9.30pm and 8am and advertising party boats in some areas.
A smoking ban has also been rolled out across some of Spain's most popular beaches.
Read more from the original source:
Posted in High Seas
Comments Off on Holiday warning over Majorca party boats loved by Brits as officials vow massive new crackdown… – The US Sun
Dark waters: how the adventure of a lifetime turned to tragedy – The Guardian
Posted: at 12:07 am
The Clipper round the world yacht race was created for amateurs seeking the ultimate challenge. But did they underestimate the risks?
Thu 11 May 2023 01.00 EDT
On 18 November 2017, Simon Speirs, 60, a retired lawyer from Bristol, was hauling on his waterproofs below deck on a yacht in rough seas in the Southern Ocean. For nearly three months, hed endured cold, cramped quarters, soaked clothing, sea sickness and very little sleep. As one of the crews competing in the Clipper Round the World yacht race, Speirs had completed more than 13,000 nautical miles since leaving Britain, but the wild remoteness of the Southern Ocean was more challenging than anything he had experienced before.
Speirs had a hacking cough and a heavy cold, but as leader of the watch he had to get out on deck. The race had so far taken them across the northern Atlantic Ocean to Uruguay and back across the southern Atlantic to South Africa. Two months in, hed asked for a break. But after only a week his replacement had fallen out of his bunk and hurt his wrist, and Speirs had to resume his role.
By 2pm, the wind was getting stronger; the yacht lurched up and down waves the size of steep hills. The captain ordered the crew to change the headsail to make the boat easier to control. Speirs made his way to the foredeck, but, at that moment, a massive wave hit, sweeping him over the side.
Speirs was still attached to the boat with a tether. For several minutes he was dragged behind the boat in the roiling waves, while the crew tried to haul him back in. Then the clip on his harness snapped, and he lost contact with the yacht. It took three attempts and 32 minutes to pull him back on board, by which time he was dead.
Simon Speirs is exactly the sort of person Robin Knox-Johnston, the veteran sailor, had in mind when he founded the Clipper Round the World yacht race more than 25 years ago. At that time, the only people who got to race boats around the world were professional sailors. Clipper was designed for ordinary people: offering training and the opportunity to join a mixed-ability crew, it would enable customers to achieve the ambition of a lifetime.
The race is held every two years. Eleven yachts, each with a paying crew of 16-22 amateurs, led by a professional skipper and a qualified first mate, start from an English port, and take up to 11 months to cover 40,000 nautical miles. Paying crew can choose to do one or more legs of the journey, and it isnt cheap. To take part in the whole race, over seven or eight legs, costs around 50,000. The route takes in some of the worlds most treacherous seas, but you dont need any sailing experience to participate. According to Clipper Ventures, the company that runs the race, around 40% of participants are complete novices. Since it began, the race has become hugely popular.
Clipper Ventures is not the first outfit to sell an iconic and dangerous challenge to amateurs. On 23 May 2019, 354 climbers made it to the top of Mount Everest in a single day. This included a dentist, an architect, a surgeon, a CEO and a housewife, who had each paid between 33,000 and 100,000. The oldest was 64. The commercialisation of extreme adventure has been made possible by advances in technical equipment like satnav and portable oxygen metres, and turbocharged by a hunger for personal growth and fulfilment. But it has also been accompanied by accidents and tragedies. May 2019 was one of the deadliest seasons on record: 11 climbers died on Everest in nine days. According to reports, overcrowding and underprepared climbers were partly to blame.
There have been other fatal accidents on the Clipper race, too. On 4 September 2015, Andrew Ashman, 49, a paramedic from Orpington, south-east London, was standing in a known danger zone in the yachts cockpit area when he was struck by the boom and suffered a fatal neck injury. Six months later, on the same boat, Sarah Young, 40, an entrepreneur from London with no previous sailing experience, died after being swept overboard by a wave. She was not clipped on.
According to a report by the Marine Accident Investigation Branch (MAIB) into Speirss death, published in June 2019, 17 people fell overboard from Clipper yachts between 2013 and 2018. Just over two weeks before Speirs went overboard, a Clipper yacht ran aground and had to be abandoned in a very serious incident just off the coast of South Africa. An MAIB investigation into that incident published in June 2018 concluded that the inexperience of the crew was a factor: With only one professional, employed seafarer on board, the Clipper yachts were not safely manned for the round the world race.
If you read Clippers material, youd think their number one concern was to keep people safe, but they have failed in so many ways, said Margaret Speirs, Simons widow, when we first met in 2020. I believe the company is compromised by their desire to make money out of these races.
Knox-Johnston has strongly denied such claims. Safety is a core principle of the Clipper Race, ahead of the racing element of the event itself, and therefore the most important part of the training of its crew, Clipper Ventures said in a statement to the Guardian. The company says it has made investments in safety gear, becoming the first ocean-racing company to introduce personal AIS beacons into its lifejackets to aid recovery of a man overboard.
After the deaths of Ashman and Young in the 2015-16 race, the future of Clipper looked uncertain, a source who works at Clipper Ventures told me. I thought, nobody is going to want to sign up. But, in fact, applications increased. People are drawn by the chance to do something exceptional and the risk is part of the attraction. Many customers, the source said, tend to think: This is really dangerous! This is something Ive got to do!
The founder of Clipper Ventures, Knox-Johnston, became the first person to sail solo around the world, without stopping, in 1969. In the memoir he published soon after his return, he describes the hardships he endured. His boat leaks, his water supply gets polluted, his steering gear is smashed, he shoots a shark when it comes too close, and suffers what was later diagnosed as a burst appendix. He carries on, undaunted. This, it seems, is the Knox-Johnston way. At the age of 68, he became the oldest person to race solo around the world. He had got irritated with people saying he was past it.
In the autumn of 1995, the same year he received a knighthood, Knox-Johnston placed newspaper ads to see how many people would be willing to pay to become part of a round-the-world crew. The response suggested that there may be a viable business in the idea. William Ward, a former property developer, who became CEO of Clipper Ventures, invested 1.8m.
Knox-Johnston commissioned eight new boats Bluewater 58 sloops from Colvic, a shipyard near Chelmsford, Essex. The company set up a base in Plymouth, Devon, and Knox-Johnston recruited friends from the sailing world, many ex-servicemen, as skippers. As soon as the boats were completed, they began training crew, taking on additional skippers as they went.
On 16 October 1996, the first race left Plymouth with the eight boats. The race was a success, and over the next few years Clipper built itself into an international brand. Major companies started to sponsor the boats (Garmin, Nasdaq), as did charities such as Unicef, and, from 2002, British cities such as Leeds, Liverpool and Glasgow. Since the first race in 1996, the event has been transformed from a low-key amateur sailing race into a major, and highly profitable, international event attracting the interest of the worlds media and business leaders, wrote Ward in Clipper company accounts in 2007. In the following years, the company continued to grow.
After the 2011-12 race, the company upgraded its yachts, and launched the new Clipper 70s, manufactured in China. They were longer and faster than the previous yachts, reflecting Clippers ambitions for more exciting racing. In 2018, Clipper expanded its business to Asia with the launch of a China-based division, Clipper China. In 2019, the company made a profit of 3.2m; by 2020 it had a staff of 86.
The man at the heart of this success, Knox-Johnston, is, in the words of the Daily Mail, a patriotic Englishman of the old school, who embodies the spirit of the stiff upper lip. He has little time for what he sees as unnecessary bureaucracy. In his autobiography, he criticised the Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA), the government department that enforces safety at sea and sets standards for the Clipper race. Knox-Johnston complained about its ridiculous and inappropriate rules for small racing yachts.
Knox-Johnston sees the race as a life-changing opportunity. Ben Bowley, a skipper and chief instructor, who worked for Clipper Ventures for nine years from 2011, was impressed by Knox-Johnstons vision and belief. He has drive, passion and his ability to convey the awesomeness [of the race] is quite captivating. Having completed the race, Knox-Johnston wrote in his autobiography, people usually feel confident to take on greater challenges. He continued: They have painted their lives with bright colours, not pastel shades, and that brightness is like a drug and they want more of it.
The moment Simon Speirs decided he was going to sail around the world came in 1992, when he was in his mid-30s. Watching the first TV footage of the Whitbread Round the World race, he was entranced by the huge seas of the Southern Ocean. It then became more a case of when rather than if, he later wrote on his blog. Ocean sailing was his wifes idea of misery, but she understood his obsession. Simon was excited about it. It was his retirement dream to do it before he was too old, too infirm, she said.
Speirs, a senior partner in a Bristol legal firm, was meticulous and thorough. He liked to-do lists and DIY, and had a dry sense of humour. He also had an adventurous side. Every two years he would take on a challenge to raise money for charity: he had climbed the Three Peaks (the highest mountains of Scotland, England and Wales), cycled from Lands End to John OGroats, run a 66-mile race in the Lake District.
Speirs originally signed up for the 2015-16 race. But he deferred his place because work was busy and his oldest son was getting married. Better to wait until the next race, 2017-18, when he would be 60 and newly retired. He kept fit by cycling six miles a day to work.
Speirs was a keen amateur sailor. He kept a couple of dinghies on a reservoir in Chew Valley, Somerset, where he had sailing Sundays with his children. He had a son and a daughter with his first wife, who died in 1991, and two sons with Margaret, whom he married in 1996. He had skippered chartered yachts on family holidays in the Mediterranean. But that in no way compares with the experience of these huge racing yachts in these wild oceans, said Margaret.
Training for the Clipper race consists of four courses, levels 1-4, each lasting a week. This process, which is compulsory for participants, covers basic sailing techniques headsail changes, tacking, gybing, helming; as well as race strategy and safety. Trainee crew also sail offshore, mostly in the Solent, and later spend a few nights in the Channel. The Solent and the Channel are widely recognised as one of the best sailing grounds in the world for training, said a spokesperson for Clipper Ventures, because of the complexity of tides, shipping, navigational hazards and inclement weather.
The people who sign up for the Clipper race tend to be middle-aged men of means. Many are at a turning point in their lives: just divorced, promoted, retired, bereaved, recovering from illness. Nathan Harrow, then 43, a business consultant, decided to sign up as a round-the-worlder in the 2017-18 race after a period of stress and depression after redundancy. Clipper was me drawing a line under the old me and getting my confidence back, he told me.
Mary Morrison, a mentor for troubled children, from south-west London, was 65 and perfectly content with her life, when she did the 2015-16 race. One of the guys I was sailing with said, Youre the one least after change, but youll probably change the most, and that was probably true, she says. She gained new friends, an appreciation of the scale and sheer beauty of our planet, and a sense of how we need to look after it more. And it gave me a lot of confidence, she said. Another woman in her 60s, who did the third leg of the 2017-18 race, told me it was the best thing she had ever done.
Crew are assigned to each yacht a few weeks before the race. The aim is to balance experience and ability across the fleet. Whether everyone gets on is a matter of pure chance. Its one big social experiment, said a crew member who did the race in 2007-8 and again in 2017-18. If youre lucky, you have a good time. Its partly to do with the characters involved.
Each boat is certified for 24 people including one skipper, who in 2017 was paid about 38,000 a year, plus 150 a day for six months of training beforehand. (We ensure that our skippers share Clipper Ventures ethos of safety above all else, said Clipper Ventures. Anyone who fails safety standards is dismissed.)
For many years, Clipper were required to have two professional sailors on board during the race, under the MCAs small commercial vessel code. However, a freedom of information request shows that in 2010, Knox-Johnston lobbied the MCA to allow him to replace the second qualified person with a trained-up member of the fee-paying crew. The MCA refused. In 2012, with the MCA under new leadership, Knox-Johnston tried again. We have tried to make the system of having two qualified people aboard each boat work, he said in a meeting with the MCA on 1 August, but, he said, it is not financially sustainable.
Knox-Johnston had a subsequent meeting with the MCA at Clippers base in Gosport, Hampshire, at the end of September. Details of the meeting were not released. A year later, in October 2013, the MCA granted Knox-Johnstons wish. From that point on, it wouldnt be necessary to have two professionals on board. All that was required was one fully qualified skipper, and a second person who had successfully completed the companys coxswain training course.
The Clipper coxswains course lasts 12 days, and is paid for by Clipper. The company aims to have two people on each boat who have taken the course, which covers use of radar, reading wind direction and force from a chart, calculating tidal flow and ocean currents, and manoeuvring the yacht safely into a berth in a port or harbour. Some sources I spoke to were sceptical about whether this training is really a match for hands-on experience. As a professional sailor youre trained to look and see things that are going wrong ahead of catastrophe, said one skipper. Youve got to have this ability to stand back and look at the whole picture, all the time.
After the deaths of Ashman and Young in the 2015-16 race, the MAIB urged Clipper to review its manning policy. The special nature of the Clipper Round the World yacht race places a huge responsibility on one person to ensure the safety of the yacht and its crew at all times, the MAIB wrote in April 2017.
Four months later, the 2017-18 race started without a second paid professional on board any of the boats.
The race was not quite what Speirs had imagined. Seven weeks in, he described the trip on his blog as acute discomfort mingled with elation and awe. High points included the beauty of the sky at night, the soft swish of the boat through calm sea, the camaraderie of the crew and an encounter with a pod of dolphins. Less enjoyable was the sea sickness, the cold and the lack of sleep. Speirs had dropped two trouser sizes since the start of the race, a fact he attributed to the physical effort of sailing. Pulling ropes. Grinding winches. I miss you very much, he wrote in a letter to Margaret, on 10 October. The experience, he said, was not a barrel of laughs. But he still planned to complete all eight stages. I am too stubborn to drop out, he wrote on his blog.
Not all of his fellow crew members were so reluctant to quit. Mark Tucker, then 40, had signed up to do the whole Clipper 2017-18 race and was assigned to Great Britain, the same boat as Speirs. (The boat was sponsored by the British government, as part of a marketing campaign to attract tourism and investment; on 2 August, the crew were photographed outside 10 Downing Street.) However, Tucker left after the first leg because of his concerns about safety. He felt that there was insufficient time before the start of the race for maintenance and repairs to the boat. At the time, he wrote a resignation letter to skipper Andy Burns, explaining his thinking, but he wasnt able to speak candidly in public because hed signed an NDA. In retrospect, Tucker told me, I view them very much as a media/PR company that happens to do a bit of sailing, rather than the other way around.
By the end of the second leg, Speirs was exhausted. At the end of the 10-day stopover in Cape Town, South Africa, he wrote on his blog that he had used the layover to repair and recharge. He went to bed early and ate healthily. He got his haircut and met up with his daughter, Katherine, and her husband. She gave him a fruit cake baked by her mother-in-law.
On 31 October 2017, the Clipper boats began the third leg of the race: Cape Town to Fremantle, Australia. A journey of more than 4,700 nautical miles, it would take about 23 days and pass through the Southern Ocean, one of the worlds most dangerous waters. An area of almost constant high wind and frequent gales, it is where the one of the highest ever waves was recorded 120 feet.
For this third leg, the crew had dropped from 20 at the start of the race to 16. The average age was 50, but the overall sailing experience was greater than on the previous two legs. Tim Jeffery, then 56, an architect from London who had sailed small boats for 15 years, had signed up for the first leg to get to know people, and the third leg for the Southern Ocean. It is the most remote place in the world, he told me. The sea is dramatic. Its challenging because of the size of the waves. You also get very fast sailing and its hard work.
The crew was divided into two groups operating a system of five watches a day: two shifts of six hours from 8am; three shifts of four hours from 8pm. Everyone was given a job: engineer, medic, treasurer. As well as head of his watch, Speirs was the nominated sail repairer. He became known as Tailor of Gloucester on account of the hours he spent at the sewing machine with glasses perched on the end of his nose.
Speirs was also the Clipper coxswain, regarded as the skippers second in command. Great Britain had actually started the race with three paying crew members who had completed the Clipper coxwains course: one was Tucker; the other, apart from Speirs, was Jon Milne, then 50, an IT director, who was injured at the time of Speirss accident. A common theme of Speirss blog was that he felt overworked.
Everyone on Great Britain was delighted with their captain, Andy Burns. Then 31, Burns had started sailing as a schoolboy in Lincolnshire. After working on superyachts and for the Royal National Lifeboat Institution, he joined Clipper Ventures as an instructor in 2015. This was his first race as skipper.
Speirs regarded Burns as an ally. Both were good with people, patient, enthusiastic. Burns prioritised safety over speed. He assessed the abilities and limitations of his crew to the extent that, during leg two, he made the decision not to race competitively, but to sail conservatively, according to the June 2019 MAIB report.
Once the boat was sailing through the Southern Ocean in extremely cold weather, the shortage of experienced hands became a problem. Speirs wasnt able to rest as there was no one to take his place. The boats are set up for a certain number of crew, according to a source at Clipper Ventures. You need that many people to be able to work the boat. If youre one or two people down thats very problematic, and of course it makes the rest of the crew tired.
After the 2014-15 race, a fitness test became part of the interview. Crew have to show they can climb on to a top bunk (not so easy when the boat is listing at 45 degrees) and get on the boat without using a ladder. The source said they felt Clipper Ventures vetting process needed to be tougher. Being at sea can be petrifying. People become frozen with fear and start behaving out of character and become very difficult because theyre frightened.
One person, who did not want to give his name, signed up for leg three on Great Britain in the 2017-18 race. In the final week of training, the boats raced down to France and back. The weather was hideous. We had 18 people on board and there was probably only four or five of us that managed to keep the boat sailing. The rest were incapacitated downstairs. I was burning myself out covering for other people. When we pulled up into the dock, I packed my bags and I said, Im done, its not safe.
The dropout rate among round-the-worlders is 40%, wrote Speirs on his blog. Things must get very bad, because crew are liable for 100% of the fees if they drop out during the race. People remortgage homes and invest significant amounts of money in the adventure, said one former crew member. Sometimes as much as 100k if you include insurance, food, accommodation, flights, kit etc. Its going to take something pretty serious to knock them off course.
Apart from injuries and fatigue among the crew of Great Britain, a major concern was the condition of the boat. In an email to Clippers management on 3 July 2017, six weeks before the start of the race, Speirs had pointed out that Great Britain was leaking. Still working hard to keep water out. Not easy job and pretty hairy when boat kicking around. This should have been sorted out at refit before handover. Its a safety issue, Speirs wrote in his blog on 12 August.
The boat was still leaking when it left Liverpool on 20 August 2017. Within two days the generator packed up. The water maker, which turns salt water into drinking water, didnt work for three weeks. Andy [Burns, the captain] was spending his entire time dealing with maintenance issues on a boat that was three weeks into a year-long circumnavigation, said Mark Tucker. If hes down below sorting out why the water maker doesnt work or the generator doesnt work, hes not on deck coaching people, making sure the boats being sailed safely.
As part of its investigation, MAIB singled out an issue with the guardrail and supporting stanchions, which may have been partly responsible for Speirss death. The guardrail, which was designed to keep crew from falling overboard, was damaged in rough seas on 4 November, 13 days before Speirss accident. The crew managed to lash up the guardrail by wrapping rope around it. The repair was not great, said Tim Jeffery. We had to be extra careful on the foredeck after that.
The MAIB report identified a series of problems with Great Britain. The cumulative effect of the defects was to increase workload for the crew, contributing to their fatigue, lowering morale, and distracting from sailing and gaining sailing experience, it stated.
There were problems on other boats. Unicef had to be bailed out every four hours, on legs one and two, according to one round-the-world sailor. Unicef started the race with a broken fuel pump. The generator failed on the first leg. Two crew members who had signed up to do the whole race left Unicef after leg two, saying they were unhappy with the number of problems with the boat that needed attention.
Staff at Clipper put the malfunctions down to normal wear and tear. The boats had been around the world twice at that point, they say, as well as being used in training and for corporate events. Some people believe that because they are paying to go around the world, the boat should be like hiring a car, said Lance Shepherd, skipper on Liverpool during the 2017-18 race. Everything should be immaculate, ready to go. But that is not how boats work. They are much more fickle and difficult to maintain. Clippers management was prudent, he said. They put safety first and foremost. The boats get stripped right back and overhauled at the end of every race.
But there were also problems with the Clipper 70s from the outset. Clipper Ventures first discovered an issue in 2013, when the new hulls were shipped to the UK from China. There were gaps in the layers of fibreglass-type material, which could make the boat more prone to cracks in extreme seas, a marine surveyor told me.
Clipper had the entire fleet surveyed in February and March 2013. They had the bad parts cut out of the new boats and relaminated, according to Knox-Johnston. Not an easy job, given the scale of the problem, or the time frame in which repairs had to be done. The 2013-14 race was due to start in just over six months time. It couldnt be delayed. Sponsors were signed up, the jamboree of corporate backers, supporters and families was already planned in each port.
Crew members later expressed concerns that there were too many problems to fix in the short time before departure. Garmin crew member Kira Pecherska, an experienced and highly qualified sailor, said there was no time for proper sea trials. If you send a boat on a transatlantic journey, especially with beginners on board, who have no experience in sailing at all, at least these boats must be trusted. And you can only trust your boat when you test it. (Clipper Ventures said: Clipper Race yachts are well built, well tested and maintained by a dedicated and highly skilled maintenance team who travel to every port of call on the race route.)
The source who works at Clipper Ventures told me there was anxiety about reporting problems: There is a fear culture, that prevents a lot of that. They [skippers] are thinking, Im going to get crucified for letting that happen.
According to Clipper Ventures, on stopovers Knox-Johnston and Ward have been accessible to all sailing staff and crew for any questions or concerns. They created a culture of openness and this continues with all Clipper Ventures staff today.
At about 2pm on 18 November 2017, Simon Speirs came up on deck, wearing a foul-weather jacket and salopettes. Conditions were rough: his fellow sailors had never seen such massive seas. His wedding ring was tied around his neck on a leather shoelace: jewellery was considered a safety hazard on board. He was one of five crew on the foredeck lowering the headsail. He was attached to the deck with a safety tether.
At 2.14pm, Great Britain was hit by a huge wave. The yacht dropped into a trough, slewed violently, and Speirs was thrown into the water. One crew member, who did not want to be named, saw Speirs with his lifejacket inflated, being dragged alongside the boat. He leaned over to try to grab him, but Speirs was just out of reach. He tried pulling on the tether, but the boat was going too fast. He could see Speirs was struggling as the water buffeted him. He was constantly being hit by the waves. Never able to gather his breath.
The crew member managed to hand Speirs a rope with a lifting hook to attach to his lifejacket, in order to winch him out of the water. Speirs tried to clip the rope to his lifejacket, but he was getting exhausted. Water was going over his face and he was being bashed against the side of the boat. As Speirs was dragged through the sea, his clip bent out of shape. At 2.22pm, it snapped open.
My immediate thought was, thank God, hes not going to drown by being dragged along by this boat, said the crew member. We can get the boat under control and go back and get him. Well get him in two minutes. Its not dark. It will be fine. But turning the boat around in strong wind and very rough seas was not easy. It took three attempts to retrieve Speirs from the sea. Finally, at 2.54pm, 40 minutes after he fell in the water, six crew lifted Speirs on board Great Britain. His lifejacket was cut off and crew carefully carried him below deck. He was already dead.
After Speirss body was brought aboard, the skipper radioed to the Australian coastguard. Clipper tried to contact Margaret, but when they couldnt get through they called the family home and broke the news to their son Toby. They told him his father had died, said Margaret. A 17-year-old lad who is on his own at home. Toby is a sensible lad but Im sure it has scarred him for life. Clipper did wrong by us, very wrong by us.
We tried to contact Mrs Speirs, Simons emergency contact. Unfortunately she was not at home and her mobile phone was switched off, said Jeremy Knight, then chief operating officer at Clipper Ventures, in an email to the crew of Great Britain, after being informed that the Guardian was investigating Speirss death. This decision to break the news to Simons son has proved difficult for the family, and we understand that, Knight wrote. But the alternative, holding off and risking the family finding out through the media, was much worse.
At 7pm that evening, the race director called Margaret and told her that her husband would be buried at sea in eight hours. He was not giving me any options. He told me they had come to that decision for the benefit of the crew so that they wouldnt have to travel with Simons body on board. And they told me the burial at sea would be at three oclock in the morning our time. And by three oclock in the morning we did have some friends and family gathered. The vicar came and we read the service at home that they were having in the Southern Ocean as if we were sharing it.
The burial at sea has robbed me and my family of the opportunity of laying Simon to rest at a place of our choice and allowing us to say goodbye to him in a way that we would have wished to, she continued. It has also deprived our family of the opportunity for a coroners inquest. We didnt get a chance to put questions, hear the responses, to help us understand what happened.
Burns quit Clipper Ventures at the end of leg four. Andy didnt enjoy a second on that boat after Simon died, said the crew member who had tried to rescue Speirs. Jeffery didnt do the final leg, as planned. After Speirss death, he did not feel right leaving his wife and two daughters.
After Speirss death, the MCA would not allow the Clipper boats to sail with only one professional onboard. Clipper Ventures had to recruit a second qualified mate for each boat in the fleet for the rest of the 2017-18 race.
The MCA investigation into the death of Simon Speirs was closed in 2020. The MCA received strong legal advice that the evidence was not enough to bring a prosecution, stated a spokesperson. The MCA referred the case to Hampshire police to follow up an allegation of fraud in the certification of the boats, and they concluded that there were no grounds to pursue an investigation.
Ward was awarded an OBE in 2018 for his services to the economy and to the Great Britain marketing campaign. Knight retired from his role as COO of Clipper Ventures in April 2022 and is currently a magistrate. When we contacted Knox-Johnston in November 2022, he was at sea.
One bright morning last month I spoke to Speirss sons Mike and Toby on Zoom. For more than two years, the family had been fighting a civil action against Clipper Ventures, charging the company with an immature safety culture. They wanted to make Clipper Ventures answer for some of the failings that had led to their fathers death. If you offer a service that is dangerous you have a responsibility to make it as safe as is reasonably possible and I dont think that was done, said Toby.
At the end of February, Clipper Ventures paid the family the net sum of 140,000 to settle the case. The family believe the timing of the settlement was no accident. Clipper Ventures is up for sale. In settling the case, the company admitted no wrongdoing. But the family felt vindicated. They donated the money to the RNLI.
Nothing can make up for the loss of their father. Toby is a student at his fathers alma mater, Queens College, Cambridge. I just wish I could talk to Dad about that, he said. Mike longs to tell his father about the grandchildren he never knew.
For Margaret, the settlement has brought a sense of relief. I can hang up my sword and put all things to do with Clipper Ventures behind me, she told me recently in an email. Simon Speirs had always been a loving husband and father. Now they could once again remember him not just by the way he died, but as the remarkable man he was.
This article was amended on 11 May 2023 to correctly refer to the Solent, rather than the River Solent.
Follow the Long Read on Twitter at @gdnlongread, listen to our podcasts here and sign up to the long read weekly email here.
{{topLeft}}
{{bottomLeft}}
{{topRight}}
{{bottomRight}}
{{.}}
Read more:
Dark waters: how the adventure of a lifetime turned to tragedy - The Guardian
Posted in High Seas
Comments Off on Dark waters: how the adventure of a lifetime turned to tragedy – The Guardian
Guarding our seas and the blue economy – Philstar.com
Posted: at 12:07 am
From the view deck of the Philippine Navy headquarters on Roxas Boulevard, Manila, one can get a majestic view of the famed Manila Bay sunset. It is as breathtaking and magical as the postcards show and it never fails to impress every single time.
A fleet of sleek white yachts and charming boats is backlighted by the setting crimson sun while the waters of Manila Bay glisten like a million diamond studs.
But beyond this beholding sight, somewhere between the devil and the deep blue sea, are maritime challenges which hamper our countrys full potential in harnessing the blue economy.
One recent afternoon while enjoying the view of the setting sun, I sat down with Philippine Navy Vice Commander Rear Admiral Caesar Valencia to talk about the Navys rich history, its enduring legacy and why, in this era of borderless trade, its mandate of guarding our seas is as important as ever.
I learned that there are different kinds of threats facing the Navy. The most prevalent is IUU fishing or illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing which occurs both on the high seas and in areas within national jurisdiction.
The biggest issue which is shared by other countries is IUU fishing. Its rampant. Its not just a problem within the Philippines but in the region, said Rear Adm. Valencia.
Advertising
Scroll to continue
Its disturbing to hear about this. Why do unscrupulous companies and individuals engage in such bad practices which undermine national and regional efforts to conserve and manage fish stocks?
We thank the Navy for keeping a close watch on this.
Another rampant issue is smuggling.
Topping the list is oil smuggling, which is now a decades-old problem in the Philippines. It is commonly sourced from Malaysia where oil is cheaper, said Rear Adm. Valencia.
Cigarette smuggling is also a problem and it continues to hurt our legitimate cigarette players.
Smuggling, as we all know, deprives the government of much needed revenues. But its very challenging to stop it, especially if smugglers are in cahoots with people in power.
Smuggling of guns and illegal drugs is another common problem, more rampant in the northern part as illegal drugs come from the so-called Golden Triangle or that area where the borders of Thailand, Laos and Myanmar meet at the confluence of the Ruak and Mekong rivers. It is said to be a major source of narcotics sold all over the world.
But of the different forms of smuggling, human smuggling is perhaps the most detrimental as it puts peoples lives in danger.
All these and of course the geopolitical tensions between Manila and China are just some of the threats hounding our porous borders.
Guarding this falls on the shoulders of the Philippine Navy, which continues to strengthen its capabilities to face our never-ending maritime challenges and to ensure the growth of the countrys blue economy.
The Navy has come a long, long way. It marks its 125th anniversary on May 20, 2023, having started on May 20, 1898 when the Philippine flag was hoisted on one of our ships.
Ahead of the anniversary celebration, the Navy will be hosting and leading milestone events the 17th ASEAN Navy Chiefs Meeting on May 9 to 11 and the 2nd ASEAN Multilateral Naval Exercise on May 9 to 16.
These twin events aim to promote the countrys self-reliant defense posture in cooperation with the navies of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations.
Aside from this, the Navy, led by Rear Adm. Toribio Adaci Jr.,also continues to modernize.
In 2021, the Department of National Defense signed a P28-billion contract with South Korean shipbuilder Hyundai Heavy Industries for the acquisition of two brand-new corvettes which will arrive by 2025.
Corvettes are small, fast naval vessels capable of conducting anti-ship, anti-submarine and anti-air warfare missions.
The Navy will also have six patrol vessels by 2026 and a submarine.
Yet another boost for the Philippine Navy is that it would be able tobuild its own ships, particularly the small and hard-hitting fast-attack interdictor craft missile (FAIC-M). The 32-meter long FAIC-Ms are high-speed vessels equipped with quick intercept ability, remote stabilized weapons and short-range missiles.
This is because Israel Shipyards Ltd. has transferred to the Navy the keys to a newly-refurbished shipyard within the Naval Station Pascual Ledesma in Cavite, as part of an FAIC-M acquisition project. The Navy will acquire four FAIC-Ms from Israel while another four will be built in the shipyard by Filipino hands, said Rear Adm. Valencia.
In the beginning, the Navy had just three torpedo boats and now, 125 years later, it has a fleet of around 80 combat vessels and has an estimated strength of 24,500 active service personnel. It continues to grow.
While the Navy has a long way to go before it becomes a fully modern naval warfare service that is at par with the world,Rear Adm. Valencia said there is a weapon unique to Filipino servicemen and it is the brave Filipino heart.
We may lose but we will give them a bloody loss. The bravery of the Filipino soldier can never be questioned. Even if we are armed with spoons, we wont surrender, said Rear Adm. Valencia.
Hearing this made me proud too that the countrys guardians of the seas are among the bravest in the world.
* * *
Email:eyesgonzales@gmail.com. Follow her on Twitter@eyesgonzales.Columnarchivesat EyesWideOpen on FB.
Read more here:
Posted in High Seas
Comments Off on Guarding our seas and the blue economy – Philstar.com
Driverless boats, enduring sensors on the special ops maritime menu – Defense News
Posted: at 12:07 am
TAMPA, Fla. From lightening the load for combat divers to producing autonomous watercraft to adding in data-based technology to its systems, the office in charge of special operations maritime assets has one objective: access.
Thats how U.S. Navy Capt. Randy Slaff, program executive officer for U.S. Special Operation Commands maritime technology unit, summed up the host of equipping needs for his team on Tuesday at the SOF Week conference.
Access for these special operators means getting in and out of an objective, or observing that area remotely and silently for weeks or months ahead of a mission.
Ensuring that access is how we maintain our joint advantage, Slaff said.
For the divers who carry as much as 425 pounds when they splash down, that means fewer and lighter systems that do more. Key areas to improve upon include finding an alternative to lithium ion batteries currently in use, and enhancing regenerative carbon dioxide scrubbing for the divers rebreather apparatus.
They also need lightweight thermal regulation essentially better wet and dry suits.
And underwater communications could be better; operators cant wait until they surface or reach their objective to find out whether something in their area has changed. They need real-time data transfer at every stage of the mission both to see their environment and to report what they see back to the command, officials have said.
For watercraft both above and below the waters surface, Slaffs staff seeks more variety in the payload those boats and submersibles carry, as well as ways to automate tasks onboard. Those systems include the SEAL Delivery Vehicle; Combatant Craft variants Assault, Medium, Heavy and Riverine: and the dry combat submersible and uncrewed surface vehicles that extend sensor ranges for threat detection.
The SEAL Delivery Vehicle has seen its legacy platform, the SDV MK 8, replaced in recent years with the SDV MK 11, which has a greater range, higher payload, and more advanced communications and navigation, according to information provided by Special Operations Command.
Officials expect the Heavy variant of the Combatant Craft Assault to go into production in fiscal 2024, while the Medium version will start production in late fiscal 2025.
The Assault version is currently under production, according to Slaffs staff presentations.
To get eyes ahead of those speedy boats, the command will begin production of the Combatant Craft Forward Looking Infrared camera, which will bolt onto new watercraft variants going forward.
Some of those boats may be uncrewed or at least have automated piloting as the command seeks to integrate such systems, especially in the littoral region where water meets land.
While those are key to manned missions, the teams need ongoing intelligence regarding happenings across the high seas and nearby. The main problem now is sensors that have the endurance to gather intel without a human require refueling or the replacement of batteries.
Right now, 12-hour sensors are whats available, but Slaffs team needs versions that can endure for weeks or months, he said.
Todd South has written about crime, courts, government and the military for multiple publications since 2004 and was named a 2014 Pulitzer finalist for a co-written project on witness intimidation. Todd is a Marine veteran of the Iraq War.
View original post here:
Driverless boats, enduring sensors on the special ops maritime menu - Defense News
Posted in High Seas
Comments Off on Driverless boats, enduring sensors on the special ops maritime menu – Defense News
List Of The Cleanest Cruise Ships In The World (2023) – Cruise Mummy
Posted: at 12:07 am
Do you want to take a cruise but youve heard horror stories about cruise cough, norovirus and other dirty diseases that you may catch from a floating petri dish?
Well, fear not! Ive put together a list of the worlds cleanest cruise ships!
So, grab your rubber gloves, your antibacterial wipes, and your sense of adventure, because were about to explore the top-tier, pristine, and unblemished corners of the cruising world. Hold onto your mops, folks, its about to get squeaky clean up in here
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) runs a Vessel Sanitation Program (VSP) that helps cruise ships to prevent the spread of illnesses on cruise ships.
As part of the VSP, every cruise ship is inspected for hygiene twice per year. The inspections are unannounced and so thorough that they take a team of two to five inspectors between six and eight hours to complete.
The inspections look at medical facilities, drinking water, swimming pools and spas, kitchens and dining rooms, child activity centres, cabins, ventilation systems and common areas of each ship.
During an inspection, each cruise ship is scored on a 100-point scale. Any score of 85 or below is counted as a fail.
21 cruise ships achieved a perfect score of 100 in their latest Vessel Sanitation Program (VSP) inspections. 5 of these ships were Disney cruise ships, meaning that every ship in the Disney Cruise Line fleet is spotlessly clean.
With such a great attention to detail when it comes to cleanliness, we can say that Disney cruise ships are the cleanest of all.
In the most recent VSP inspections, 21 cruise ships scored a perfect 100 out of 100 for cleanliness. These are show in the table below along with links scores in previous inspections for those ships.
This data is accurate as of May 10 2023. More ships may have been inspected since then. You can see the latest statistics here.
Cruise ships, like any large public space, vary in cleanliness. However, its important to note that cruise ships are subject to stringent sanitation standards that are regularly monitored and enforced.
In the United States, for example, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) operates the Vessel Sanitation Program (VSP). Its worth noting that most cruise ships score well above the passing mark.
However, despite these strict standards and regular inspections, outbreaks of illness can still occur on cruise ships, most commonly gastrointestinal illnesses like norovirus. These outbreaks are usually well-publicized, but they are relatively rare considering the number of people who take cruises every year.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, cruise lines implemented even more stringent cleaning and sanitation procedures, including more frequent cleaning of public areas, use of electrostatic sprayers with disinfectant, enhanced air filtration systems, and policies to encourage physical distancing and hand hygiene.
Despite this, people still catch covid on cruise ships, which is why youll see that many crew members still opt to wear masks. I have had covid twice, and both times I fell ill upon returning from a cruise.
Regular daily cleaning, which includes tasks like tidying up cabins, cleaning public areas, and maintaining dining rooms is an ongoing process that crew members work on around the clock.
On turnaround day (the day when one set of passengers disembarks and a new set embarks), a deeper cleaning takes place. This typically includes more thorough cleaning of cabins, including changing linens, deep cleaning bathrooms, and vacuuming.
On turnaround day, public spaces, including dining rooms and entertainment venues, are also cleaned more intensively. For a large cruise ship, this process typically takes several hours and involves a large team of cleaning staff.
After a cruise ship has been in service for a while, it will occasionally undergo a dry dock, which is a period of several weeks when its taken out of service for maintenance and deep cleaning.
During this time, everything from the engines to the carpets can be cleaned, repaired, or replaced. This could take anywhere from a few weeks to a couple of months depending on the extent of the work being done.
In the case of an outbreak of illness on board, such as norovirus, a ship will undergo an intensive disinfection process. This could take 24 to 48 hours and involves cleaning all surfaces with strong disinfectant.
And there you have it, fellow voyagers the cleanest cruise ships on the high seas! From gleaming decks to sparkling staterooms, these maritime marvels are the epitome of cleanliness and safety, setting the gold standard for the industry.
But lets not forget, while these ships may top the list, the vast majority of cruise ships out there are committed to providing a clean, healthy, and safe environment for their guests. With stringent sanitation practices, regular inspections, and a dedicated crew tirelessly working around the clock, youre in good hands when setting sail on your dream cruise.
So, whether youre cruising on one of these squeaky-clean superstars or another vessel in the vast and varied fleet of cruise ships worldwide, rest assured that your well-being is a top priority.
Yes, cruise ship cleanliness is taken very seriously, and the proof is in the pudding or perhaps, in this case, the buffet line.
Original post:
List Of The Cleanest Cruise Ships In The World (2023) - Cruise Mummy
Posted in High Seas
Comments Off on List Of The Cleanest Cruise Ships In The World (2023) – Cruise Mummy
Sea of Survivors: What if Vampire Survivors and Sea of Thieves had … – Windows Central
Posted: at 12:07 am
Vampire Survivors was a surprise hit of 2022 with its addictive gameplay and pixelated charm, and Sea of Thieves is still appealing to our pirate fantasies of sailing the high seas looking for booty but what if you could combine these two games?
Well someone had that exact thought, enter Sea of Survivors, a rogue-lite adventure on the High Seas.
Published by Nah Yeah Games, Sea of Survivors is categorized on Steam as rogue-lite, bullet hell, pixel graphics, pirate and retro. Sounds great so far!
In the game, you play as the captain of a ship that never stops moving and must dodge and destroy waves of enemies and sea monsters. You can collect weapons, upgrades, curses and treasures to create a unique build every run. You also unlock new abilities, stages and crew members as you progress through the game, as this upgrade screen shows.
The game clips show that the ship moves forward constantly and you can only steer left or right, avoiding obstacles and projectiles while shooting back with your own weapons. You can also use special abilities such as bombs, shields and dashes to survive the onslaught.
The game features procedurally generated stages with different themes, enemies and bosses and each stage has a different objective, such as reaching a certain distance, destroying a certain number of enemies or surviving for a certain amount of time - similar to Vampire Survivors' achievements list but with its own unique pirate twist.
Today's best JSAUX Steam Deck dock deals
From the official gameplay trailer, it appears you can use experience points to level up and choose from three random upgrades that enhance your stats or abilities. You can use gold to buy more weapons and upgrades from shops that appear randomly in the stages. You can also find loot such as curses, treasures and relics that have positive or negative effects on your run.
The color palette is more limited than Vampire Survivors, and there's more rum than blood, but it's great to see more games with this style of gameplay loop being released, and this should be a fun title on the Steam Deck. We can't wait to set sail and try it out.
Today's best Valve Steam Wallet $20 Gift Card deals
Continued here:
Sea of Survivors: What if Vampire Survivors and Sea of Thieves had ... - Windows Central
Posted in High Seas
Comments Off on Sea of Survivors: What if Vampire Survivors and Sea of Thieves had … – Windows Central
King Charles III’s Coronation at the Convergence of Policy … – JURIST
Posted: May 12, 2023 at 11:18 am
In the aftermath of the coronation of King Charles, Professor Louis Ren Beres argues that a quid pro quo for subject loyalty is an irrevocable declaration that the states sovereignty represents the optimal path to power over death...
Its an uncommon association, but certain connections have been suggested between sovereignty (the highest form of earthly authority) and offerings of immortality. For the most part, at the level of philosophical investigation, such connections have not always been subtle. Observes G F Hegel (1820) in The Philosophy of Right: The state is the march of God in the world. And from Heinrich von Treitschkes 1897 Lecture on Politics: Individual man sees in his own country the realization of his earthly immortality.
There is some nuance here. Von Treitschkes statement suggests something less than the classic after-worldly meaning of immortality. He is likely suggesting, after all, that something akin to eternal fame and not life everlasting, best represents this generally invisible dynamic of world politics. Though there can exist no scientifically valid ways of rank-ordering two contending meanings of immortality over time and space, there can be little doubt that any presumptive power over death must bestow greater satisfactions than any purported power over personal reputation.
The Realpolitik Foundation
To be sure. there are variously assorted details. Though difficult to understand, Realpolitik an historical shorthand for traditional power politics draws its animating force from the microcosm, from the individual. While inconspicuous, it is this personal human search for immortality or staying alive that may ultimately drive not only domestic kingships but also comprehensive international relations.
In any final reckoning, each states competitive struggle for the death of other designable states may represent a last-ditch defense against both collective and personal annihilation. Among other things, this obscure simultaneity suggests that the most genuine rationale of Realpolitik is not really the acquisition of territory, wealth or victory. However unwitting or sub-conscious, it is the avoidance of personal death.
This is not an easy idea for scholars and policy-makers to conceptualize, but ignoring it could severely limit humankinds rapidly disappearing chances for survival. Some preliminary understandings can be drawn from King Charles III recent coronation. It is the sovereign state, blessed by Gods vicars here on earth (in this case, the Archbishop of Canterbury) that holds the key to life everlasting.
These ideas are not easily understood by a countrys mass or by career politicians. To begin, searches for collective immortality based on sovereignty may signify core yearnings to avoid personal death. Though such fervid hopes can be nurtured only by assorted convictions of faith, not science, the history of humankind reveals no evidence that Reason could ever trump anti-Reason. Even in our glittering age of advanced technology and AI, conspicuous claims of non-rational belief continue to drive states and sub-states toward an explosively violent geopolitics. Lamentably, any corollary associations of sacredness with national armed force would further ensure that war, terror or genocide serve the highest imaginable forms of human power.
Bases of Deeper Understanding
But how should these very complicated connections be better understood? Why ought anyone acknowledge that a world politics based upon sovereignty offers a plausible path to personal immortality? What are the most revealing connecting factors? About the recent coronation in London, wouldnt we all be better off just asking the usual prosaic questions about King Charles, Camilla, William, Harry, etc.?
With pride of place, history should be our starting point. In his still-illuminating classic, Man and Crisis (1958), 20th century Spanish philosopher Jose Ortega yGasset comments thoughtfully and prophetically: History is an illustrious war against death. Though this comment is captivating and sets the stage for our own present queries about sovereignty and immortality, it still represents only a partial piece of a much wider truth: Ultimately, power over death always represents the greatest conceivable form of power here on earth; but acquiring such power in world politics can sometimes demand the killing of assorted others.
Inter alia, as more-or-less derivative from sovereign authority, there is war, terrorism and genocide.
Credo quia absurdum, said the ancient philosopher Tertullian. I believe because it is absurd. Sovereignty offers a direct link to immortality (collective and personal), but the palpable rewards of power over death are too-frequently tied to engineered violence and armed force. Often its a Faustian bargain.
There is more. To acquire a politically manageable power over death, individuals (microcosm) and states (macrocosm) must first make tangible preparations to bring irreversible fatality to purported enemies. At times, such viscerally belligerent thinking could involve seductive notions of martyrdom. Significantly, as we may learn from the evening news, especially in the Middle East, these notions may call not only for war, but also for terror and genocide. In all cases, the planned mass killing of other human beings is more-or-less comparable to religious sacrifice, a primal ritual oriented toward the intentional deflection of death to others.
There are additional details. Scholars and policy-makers should continuously re-examine vital underlying links between microcosm and macrocosm. In this regard, Elias Canetti, winner of the 1981 Nobel Prize for Literature, once wrote boldly of not being dead as the principal exemplar of ascertainable power. Confronted with what Canetti called terror at the fact of death, humankind both individually, and collectively always seeks one particular advantage above all others. This evident advantage is to remain standing while others prepare to lie down.
In the end, it is only those who can remain upright, however temporarily, who are victorious. It is these fortunate ones, after all, who have keenly managed to divert death to others. By definition, there can be no greater or more advantageous diversion.
A key lesson obtains here for states as well as individuals. For all players, microcosm and macrocosm, the situation of physical survival is the manifestly central expression of all human power. But as sovereignty-centered belligerent nationalism makes meaningful survival more problematic, Realpolitik or power politics inevitably deprives states of their most genuine power lever. Left unmodified, the all against all Westphalian process effectively creates or merely magnifies adversarial relations, and encourages state enemies to enjoy microcosmic triumphs that will remain concealed. These triumphs are the deeply-satisfying human emotions experienced by persons when confronting powerless individuals who are preparing to lie down.
Sovereignty and Victory Over Death
In world politics, the ultimate acquisition of power is never really about land or treasure or conquest or some other reassuring evidence of primacy. It is, rather, a presumed victory over death, ultimately a personal triumph, one described by Heinrich von Treitschke and G F Hegel as closely linked to the unique prerogatives of sovereignty.
The relevant reasoning here is straightforward. When my state is powerful, goes the core argument, so too am I. At some point, when this state seems ready to prevail indefinitely, I too am granted a personal life that is gloriously unending. Stated somewhat succinctly: An immortal state creates (as its citizen or subject) the immortal person.
These abstract ideas can be bewildering. Still, to actually feel such conceptual reasoning at a palpable level, one could intentionally recall the staggering images of mid-1930s Nazi party rallies at Nuremberg. Leni Riefenstahls monumental film celebration of Der Fuhrer, The Triumph of the Will, says it all best. Reminding the German people of Hegels famous aphorism, the legendary film underscores that a nation-state can actually become the march of God in the world.
Today, in 2023, all states continue to be driven by policies that generally bring them neither personal satisfaction nor institutional safety. To the contrary, all they can continue to expect in a chaos-leaning Realpolitik world is a perpetual global landscape of war, terrorism and genocide. In the best of all possible worlds, however, humankind recalling the ancient creed of Epicurus that death fear is foolish and irrational- would consider one indispensable query:
What is death? A bogy. Turn it round and see what it is: you see it does not bite. The stuff of the body was bound to be parted from the airy element, either now or hereafter, as it existed apart from it before. Why then are you vexed if they are parted now? For if not parted now, they will be hereafter. Why so? That the revolution of the universe may be accomplished, for it has need of things present, things future, and things past and done with.
States seemingly fail to understand that death is normally identified by their enemies as a zero-sum event. Anything that is done to sustain ones own national survival invariably represents, for these enemy states, an intolerable threat to their own lives and a diminution of their own power over death. Reciprocally, anything that is done to effectively eliminate hated enemies must expectedly enhance their collective life and augment their collective power. Ideally, these strategies fare best whenever God is on our side.
There is still more. Because of the deeply intimate associations between collectivities/macrocosm (states) and (microcosm) individuals, the reciprocal life advantages of death and dying can be enjoyed doubly.
Normally, even if only at a subconscious level, the living person never really considers himself more powerful than at that very moment when he faces the dying person. Here, as we may learn again from Elias Canetti, the living human being comes as close as he or she can to encountering genuine feelings of personal immortality. In roughly similar fashion, the living nation-state never really regards itself as more powerful than at that moment when it confronts the apparently impending death of a despised enemy state. Only slightly less power-granting are those reassuring sentiments that arise from confrontation with a dying enemy state; that is, the same sentiments experienced by a belligerent state that seeks some tangible victory over another.
In both cases, personal and collective, convention, good taste and sometimes skilled statecraft require that zero-sum feelings about death and power be suppressed. Such polite feelings ought not to be flaunted; nonetheless, they do remain prospectively vital and determinative.
Getting Beyond Appearances in World and National Politics
Oddly, perhaps, in all world politics, power is so closely attached to the presumed conquest of death (national and personal) that core connections have been overlooked. As a result, students and practitioners of international relations continue to focus mainly on epiphenomena, on easily recognizable ideologies, identifiable territories, tangible implements of warfare (arms control and disarmament) and so on. The problem is not that these factors are unimportant to power, but that they are actually of a manifestly secondary or reflected importance.
During a war, any war, the individual soldier, a person who ordinarily cannot experience satisfyingly tangible power during peacetime, is offered an utterly unique opportunity to remedy such absence. Inter alia, the pervasive presence of dead bodies in war cannot be minimized. Actually and incontestably, it is a central fact of belligerency. To wit, the soldier who is surrounded by corpses and knows that he is not yet one of them is normally imbued with an absolute radiance of invulnerability, of immortality, of monumental and perhaps incomparable power.
The adversarial state that commands its soldiers to kill and not to die, feels similarly great power at the removal of a collective adversary. This surviving state, like the surviving individual warrior, is transformed, indisputably and correspondingly, into a potentially primal source of everlasting life. Such abstract observations are hardly fashionable among general populations or political leaders; to the half-educated, they may even appear barbarous and uncivilized. Yet, for now at least, scholars should be seeking not to prescribe more appropriate behavior for sovereign states, but to accurately describe such behavior. Among other obligations, this means looking behind the daily news.
There is more. Always, truth must be exculpatory. True observations may sometimes be indecipherable or objectionable; but they are no less true. What is most important to understand is that to die for the sake of God is actually to not die at all. For example, by dying in a divinely commanded act of killing presumed enemies the Jihadist terrorist really does seek to conquer death, which he fears with a special terror, by living forever.
Ultimately, the love of death proclaimed by Jihadist terrorists is the ironic consequent of an all-consuming wish to avoid death. Since the death that this enemy loves is temporary and temporal, leading in fact to a permanent reprieve from any real death, accepting it as a tactical expedient becomes an easy matter. If, for any reason, the normally welcome death of an individual engaged in holy war were not expected to ensure an authentic life ever-after, its immense attractions would be reversed.
The greater the number of enemy corpses, the more powerful terrorists will feel. Real power, understood as an irremediably zero-sum commodity, is always to gain in aliveness through inflicting death upon enemies.
Power and Survival
An enemy, whether state or non-state, cannot possibly kill as many foes as his primal passion for survival may demand. This means, among other intersecting considerations, that he may seek to induce or direct others to satisfy this particular passion. As a practical matter, this deflecting behavior points toward an undeniable impulse for genocide, an inclination that could be actualized, in the future, by adversarial resort to higher-order forms of terrorism (chemical/biological/nuclear), and/or to crimes against humanity.
The sovereign still has much to learn. But before leaders can fully understand the true nature of enemy intentions and capabilities, they must first acknowledge the most primary connections between power and survival. Once it can be understood that enemy definitions of the former are contingent upon loss of the latter, these leaders will be positioned intellectually to take appropriate remedial action.
The true goal of certain adversaries is as grotesque as it is unrecognized. This goal is to be left standing while assorted others are made to disappear. These relentless enemies must survive just so that their enemies do not. They cannot, by this zero-sum reasoning, survive together. So long as the enemy is allowed to exist, no matter how cooperative or congenial it has been, some states will not feel safe. They will not feel powerful. They will not feel power over death.
It is always a mistake to believe that Reason governs the world. The true source of governance on this imperiled planet is power, and power is ultimately the conquest of personal death. This conquest, which displays a zero-sum quality among enemies, is not limited to conflicts in any one region. It is always a generic matter, a more or less universal effort that is made especially manifest between enemies. On this generic matter, one should consider the revealing remark of Romanian playwright Eugene Ionesco in his Journal in 1966. Describing killing as a purposeful affirmation of ones own survival, Ionesco observed:
I must kill my visible enemy, the one who is determined to take my life, to prevent him from killing me. Killing gives me a feeling of relief, because I am dimly aware that in killing him, I have killed death. My enemys death cannot be held against me, it is no longer a source of anguish, if I killed him with the approval of society; that is the purpose of war. Killing is a way of relieving ones feelings, of warding off ones own death.
While certain enemies accept zero-sum linkages between power and survival, others do not. Though this may suggest that some states stand on an enviably higher moral plane than their enemies, it may also place the high-minded or virtuous state at a security disadvantage, one that will make it too difficult to remain standing. This consequential asymmetry between state enemies may be addressed by reducing certain adversarial emphases on power-survival connections and/or by increasing enemy emphases on power-survival connections.
Difficult questions will have to be asked. Must a state ultimately become barbarous in order to endure? Must it learn to identify true power with survival over others, a predatory posture that cannot abide the survival of certain enemies? What is required is not a replication of enemy leadership crimes, but policies that recognize personal death-avoidance as the essential starting point for national security. With such recognition, protracted hostility and existential threat could be rejected in their entirety and a new ethos one based on a firm commitment to remain standing at all costs could finally be implemented.
Life and Death as Zero-Sum Qualities
Core changes will be necessary. All sovereigns must rid themselves of the retrograde notion that killing others can confer immunity from personal mortality. In his Will Therapy and Truth and Reality (1936), psychologist Otto Rank affirms: The death fear of the ego is lessened by the killing, the Sacrifice, of the Other. Through the death of the Other, one buys oneself free from the penalty of being killed.
What is being described here remains the greatest form of power anywhere: power over death. Americans and other residents of a deeply interconnected planet have a right to expect that any president of the United States or major world leader would meaningfully attempt to understand these complex linkages. At a minimum, this means that all of our national policies must build upon more genuinely intellectual and scientific sorts of understanding.
There is more. Our just wars, counter-terrorism conflicts and anti-genocide programs, must be conducted as intricate contests of mind over mind. These contests are never just narrowly tactical struggles of mind over matter.
Only a dual awareness of our common human destination, which is death and the associated futility of sacrificial violence, can offer an accessible medicine against adversaries in the global state of nature. Only by this difficult awareness can we ever relieve an otherwise incessant and still-ascending Hobbesian war of all against all.
More than ever before, history deserves pride of place. The United States was founded upon the philosophy of Hobbes and the religion of Calvin. This means something very different in 2023 than it did in 1787.
What should this particular history now signify for American foreign policy preparation? This is not an insignificant query, but it does presuppose an American democracy founded upon authentic learning, not flippantly corrosive clichs or abundantly empty witticisms. In this connection, individual human death fear has much to do with a better understanding of Americas national security options.
A Triumph of Death?
In the end, for individuals, a triumph of death in one form or another is inevitable, and attempts to avoid death by killing certain despised others are necessarily futile and inglorious. Going forward, therefore, it is high time for new and more creative thinking about national sovereignty and human immortality. Instead of simply denying death, a cowardly and potentially corrosive emotion that Sigmund Freud labels wish fulfillment in The Future of an Illusion (1927), we must soon acknowledge the obvious. With such an eleventh-hour acknowledgment, all people and all sovereign states on this endangered planet could begin to think more insightfully about our immutably common destiny. In turn, this will mean using an always-overriding human commonality as the secure basis for expanding empathy and worldwide cooperation.
This is a visionary and fanciful prescription, one rather unlikely to be grasped in time. But there is still a plausible way to begin. This way would require the leaders of all major states to recognize that they are not in any meaningful way world powers (all are equally mortal, and none have any verifiable power over death) and that a coordinated retreat from Realpolitik or traditional geopolitical competition would now be self-interested.
There are other considerations. The primary planetary survival task is a markedly intellectual one, but unprecedented human courage will also be needed. For the required national leadership initiatives, we could have no good reason to ever expect the arrival of a Platonic philosopher-king; still, even some ordinary political leaders could conceivably prove themselves up to the extraordinary task at hand. For this to happen, enlightened citizens of all countries must first cast aside all historically discredited ways of thinking about sovereignty-centered world politics, and (per specific insights of twentieth-century German thinker Karl Jaspers) do whatever possible to elevate empirical science and mind over blind faith and mystery.
In endowing us with memory, writes philosopher George Santayana, nature has revealed to us a truth utterly unimaginable to the unreflective creation, the truth of mortality. The more we reflect, the more we live in memory and idea, the more convinced and penetrated we shall be by the experience of death; still, without really knowing it, this very conviction and experience will have raised us, in a way, above mortality.
The legacy of Westphalia (1648 treaty) includes deification of the state. Although we may discover such murderous deification in the writings of Hegel, Fichte, von Treitschke and various others, there have also always been compelling voices of a different sort. For Nietzsche, the state is the coldest of all cold monsters. It is, he says in Zarathustra, for the superfluous that the state was invented. In a similar vein, we may consider the corroborating view of Jose Ortega yGasset in the Revolt of the Masses. Here, the Spanish philosopher identifies the state as the greatest danger, always mustering its immense resources to crush beneath it any creative minority which disturbs it.
Sovereignty as an Under-Explored Attribute of Life-Everlasting
In the end, sovereignty is always about life, death and immortality. For the most part, it is not for us to choose when we should die. Instead, our words and our destinies, will lie beyond any discernible considerations of conscious decision or individual selection. Still, we can choose to recognize our shared human fate and especially our derivative interdependence. This unbreakable intellectual recognition could carry with it significant global promise.
Much as we might prefer to comfort ourselves with qualitative presumptions of societal hierarchy and national differentiation, we humans are all pretty much the same. Already, this incontestable sameness is manifest to capable scientists and physicians. Our single most important human similarity, however, and the one least subject to any reasonable hint of counter-argument, is that we all die.
It is from the universal terror of this common fate that Westphalian law invests nation-states with the singularly sacred attributes of sovereignty. And it is from the incontestable commonality of death that humankind can finally escape from the predatory embrace of power politics or Realpolitik in world politics.
Ironically, whatever our more-or-less divergent views on what might actually happen to us after death, the basic mortality that we share could still represent the last best chance we have for viable global coexistence and governance. This is the case, however, only if we can first accomplish the astoundingly difficult leap from acknowledging a shared fate as mortal beings to operationalizing our species more expressly generalized feelings of empathy and cooperation.
Across an entire planet, we can care for one another as humans, but only after we have first accepted that the judgment of a resolutely common fate will not be waived by any harms that we may choose to inflict upon others, that is, upon the unworthy. While markedly inconspicuous, modern crimes of war, terror, and genocide are often just sanitized expressions of religious sacrifice. In the most starkly egregious instances, any corresponding violence could represent a consummate human hope of overcoming private mortality through the targeted mass killing or exclusion of certain specific outsiders.
Its a murderous calculus, and not a new thought. Consider psychologist Ernest Beckers ironic paraphrase of Elias Canetti in Escape from Evil: . each organism raises its head over a field of corpses, smiles into the sun, and declares life good.
There is a deeply insightful observation latent in this idea. It is the uniquely dangerous notion that killing can confer immunity from ones own mortality. Similarly, in Will Therapy and Truth and Reality, psychologist Otto Rank affirms: The death fear of the ego is lessened by the killing, the Sacrifice, of the Other. Through the death of the Other, one buys oneself free from the penalty of being killed. What is being described here is plainly the greatest form of power discoverable anywhere: power over death.
A Struggle of Mind Over Mind
Americans and various other residents of our interconnected planet have a right to expect that any president of the United States should attempt to understand such vital and complex linkages. Here, Americas national policies must build upon more genuinely intellectual sorts of understanding. Our allegedly just wars, counter-terrorism conflicts, and anti-genocide programs must be fought or conducted as fully intricate contests of mind over mind, and not just as narrowly tactical struggles of mind over matter.
Only a dual awareness of our common human destination, which is death, and the associated futility of sacrificial violence, can offer accessible medicine against North Korea, China, Russia, Iran, and assorted other more-or-less foreseeable adversaries in the sovereignty-centered state of nature. This natural condition of anarchy was already well known to the Founding Fathers of the United States (most of whom had read Locke, Rousseau, Grotius, Hobbes, Vattel and Blackstone. Now, only this difficult awareness can relieve an otherwise incessant and still-ascending Hobbesian war of all against all.
More than ever before, history deserves a reasonable pride of place. America was expressly founded upon the philosophy of Hobbes and the religion of Calvin. But this means something quite different in 2023 than it did in 1787.
What more precisely should this particular history signify for Biden White House foreign policy preparation? This is not an insignificant query, but it does presuppose an American democracy founded upon some measure of authentic learning, not on flippantly corrosive clichs or abundantly empty witticisms. For the foreseeable future, this is not a plausible presupposition.
Human death fear has much to do with acquiring a better understanding of Americas current enemies, both national (state) and sub-national (terrorist). Reciprocally, only a people who can feel deeply within itself the unalterable fate and suffering of a much broader global population will ever be able to embrace compassion and reject collective violence. Any new American president should prepare to understand what this implies, with pointedly specific reference to the United States and also to this countrys various state and sub-state adversaries.
The existence of system in the world is always obvious, immutable and pertinent. Accordingly, America First actually meant America Alone and America Last. America could never be truly first so long as its president insisted upon achieving such status at the grievous expense of so many others, and while failing to understand that international law is part of the law of the United States. To again seek to secure ourselves by diminishing others would merely be a retrograde playbook for ever-recurrent instances of war, terror and genocide.
For all humankind, the triumph of death is unassailable and inevitable. Attempts to somehow avoid death by killing certain despised others are both futile and inglorious. Going forward, it is high time for new and more creative thinking about global security and human immortality. Instead of denying death, a cowardly and potentially corrosive emotion that Sigmund Freud labeled wish fulfillment (see The Future of an Illusion, 1927), we must finally acknowledge the obvious, perhaps even viewing it as a long-overlooked blessing. With such an eleventh-hour acknowledgment, all people and all nations on this imperiled planet could begin to draw purposefully from our immutably common destiny that is, from our conspicuously shared mortality. Among other things, this means using that always-overriding commonality as the intellectual basis for expanding empathy and a closely-corresponding pattern of worldwide integration.
It is, to be sure, a visionary and fanciful prescription, one unlikely to be grasped in time. But there is still a practical way to begin. It would require the leaders of major states to recognize that they are not in any genuinely meaningful way world powers (in the sense that all are equally mortal; that none has power over death) and that a coordinated retreat from Realpolitik or traditional geopolitical competition must be self-interested and indispensable.
The Obligations of Courage
It follows from all this that the primary planetary survival task is a markedly intellectual one, a matter of mind, but unprecedented courage will also be needed. For the required national leadership initiatives, we could have no reason to expect the timely arrival of a Platonic philosopher-king, but even some ordinary political leaders could conceivably be up to the task to become extraordinary. For this to happen, enlightened citizens of all countries would first have to cast aside all historically discredited ways of thinking about global survival, and do whatever deemed possible to elevate science over blind faith and mystery.
In endowing us with memory, writes George Santayana, nature has revealed to us a truth utterly unimaginable to the unreflective creation. the truth of mortality. The more we reflect, the more we live in memory and idea, the more convinced and penetrated we shall be by the experience of death; yet, without knowing it, perhaps, this very conviction and experience will have raised us, in a way, above mortality.
Though few will actually understand, such a raising is necessarily antecedent to human survival in world politics, though only if it is linked purposefully and self-consciously to global integration. Is it an end that draws near, inquired Karl Jaspers, or a beginning? The correct answer will depend, in large part, on what another major post-war philosopher had to say about the Jungian/Freudian mass.
In Being and Time (1953), Martin Heidegger laments what he calls, in German, das Mann, or The They. Drawing fruitfully upon certain earlier seminal insights of Nietzsche, Kierkegaard as well as Jung and Freud, Heideggers The They represents the ever-present herd, crowd, horde or mass, an untruth (the term favored by Danish philosopher Soren Kierkegaard) that can quickly suffocate indispensable intellectual growth. For Heideggers The They, the crowning untruth lies in (1) its acceptance of immortality at both institutional and personal levels, and (2) its encouragement of the seductive notion that personal power over death is associated with (or actually derivative from) the sovereignty-centered sacredness of nation-states.
The arena of world politics (macrocosm) is violent because individual human beings (microcosm) compulsively fear death. Though patently ironic, the murderous connections are longstanding and difficult to dispute. Ultimately, states battle against other states on behalf of individual human salvation.
While the typical result of such redemptive battles has always been death and mega death, not long or eternal life, an overriding mythology still endures. This is the ironic belief that it is in war, not in peace, that humans are able to acquire power over death. Sometimes, this acquisition is intended to be direct that is, an immediate consequence of killing on the side of God. More generally, however, such power over death devolves indirectly to general populations that are not actually involved in the business of killing. Recalling Bob Dylan, even de facto bystanders can have God on their side.
None of this is to deny the validity of more traditional and conspicuous explanations of Realpolitik or power politics, namely that these struggles are about tangible goods, geography or national security. These conspicuous explanations are not mistaken; they are, however, trivial and epiphenomenal. Such explanations are generally correct, but merely as secondary reflections of what is most genuinely important.
In William Goldings novel Lord of the Flies, the marooned boys make grotesque war upon one another because they have suddenly been thrust into a netherworld of anarchy and chaos, but only because this dissembling exile from civilization now threatens them with personal death. It is only after they have settled upon an amorphous but ubiquitous horror (the beast) that they decide to wage a titanic struggle to survive. And in what amounts to yet another irony of upholding policies of inflicting death in order to bring freedom from death, the boys are rescued by a military ship, a naval vessel that will transport them from their literally primal state of nature on the island to the more comprehensive state of nature of world politics.
In essence, readers quickly learn, the rancorous and barbarous conditions that had obtained on the deserted island were actually just a microcosm of the wider system of international relations. But who can now rescue this wider system of Realpolitik from itself? Before we can meaningfully answer this core question, scholars and policy-makers will need to probe more closely behind visible events of the day, beyond mere reflection. Above all, this probe will have to be suitably theoretical.
Why? Theoretic generality is a trait of all serious scientific meaning. Scientific inquiry in such matters is indispensable.
In the beginning, in that primal promiscuity in which the lethal swerve toward politics first arose, forerunners of modern nation-states established a system of perpetual struggle and violent conflict, a system destined to fail. Captivated by this self-destroying system of international relations, states still allow the degrading spirit of Realpolitik to spread everywhere unchecked, like an ideological gangrene on the surface of the earth. Rejecting all pertinent standards of logic and correct reasoning, this inherently false consciousness of power politics imposes no reasonable standards upon itself. It continues to be rife, despite endless rebuffs. Somehow, Realpolitik takes its long history of defeat as victory. Somehow, its historical proponents have never learned anything.
The vast majority of human beings are unable to accept the biological truth of mortality. Understood in terms of world politics, this suggests that national sovereignty will likely continue to be viewed by many as a suitable institutional antidote to personal death. Such a view may not be explicitly apparent even to Realpolitik adherents, and it would very likely disregard certain palpable benefits other than a presumed power over death (e.g., enhanced personal status of belonging to a powerful country). Nonetheless, it is a perspective that will not simply fade away graciously on its own.
It is high time for candor. Whatever our in-principle preferences, the plain fact of having been born augurs badly for the promise of immortality. Accordingly, the primal human inclination to deny an apparently unbearable truth will continue to generate the same terrors from which we allegedly seek refuge. The irony is once again staggering, but still incontestable.
In its obvious desperation to live perpetually, humankind has embraced a cornucopia of faiths that offer life everlasting is exchange for unchallengeable loyalty to a sacred duty. Such loyalty is then transferred from faith to State, which battles (or prepares to battle) with other states. Though historians, political scientists and pundits routinely describe such conflicts as a tangible struggle for secular influence (power politics), it is often something different. This is a struggle between Good and Bad, Right and Wrong, Decency and Indecency, even the Sons of Light and the Sons of Darkness. In this last example, apocalyptic imagery of the Dead Sea Scrolls is invoked not because any or all of a combatant states rationale is necessarily religious, but because such imagery best portrays the enormity of ideological attachments.
In the United States, ideas of prevailing apocalyptic contest obtained widely during the 1950s Eisenhower years, and later during the Reagan Administration. More recently, Donald Trumps core message of American First was not without underlying or implicit references to righteous struggles in world politics withGod on our Side. For several million Trump supporters, their leaders slogan of America First was essentially an eschatological code term used to signal impending End Times. In view of certain religion-based support for the Trump presidency, a core aspect of his appeal was an implicit linkage of American sovereignty with life everlasting.
Death, says Norbert Elias, is the absolute end of the person. So the greater resistance to its demythologization perhaps corresponds to the greater magnitude of danger experienced. Now, major states in world politics must strive more vigorously to reduce both the magnitude and likelihood of anticipated existential danger. In this connection, they must remain wary of planting new false hopes that offer only illusions of personal survival through perpetual international war or war-planning.
To survive in world politics, citizens of planet earth will first have to detach themselves from various mythical promises of power over death. In the most promising of possible worlds, the pervasively underlying human death fear could be made to disappear, but this auspicious prospect would also seem blatantly implausible. It follows that more gentle and reason-based orientations will be required for world politics than those discoverable within the narrowly self-destroying dynamics of sovereignty-centered belligerent nationalism.
In this regard, there is much to be learned from the May 6, 2023 coronation of King Charles III. This means exploring much deeper linkages between sovereignty and immortality. In the end, species survival must become a preeminently intellectual obligation, one based on comprehensive theory concerning survival, immortality and power over death.
LOUIS REN BERES (Ph.D., Princeton, 1971) is Emeritus Professor of International Law at Purdue. His twelfth and most recent book is Surviving Amid Chaos: Israels Nuclear Strategy (2016). In 2003, Professor Beres was Chair of Project Daniel in Israel (regarding Irans nuclear weapons, prepared especially for PM Ariel Sharon). He has published in The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists; The Jerusalem Post; Israel Defense (Tel Aviv); BESA (Israel); INSS (Israel); JURIST; Air-Space Operations Review (USAF); The Atlantic; Yale Global; Harvard National Security Journal (Harvard Law School); International Security (Harvard); Oxford University Press Yearbook on International Law & Jurisprudence; World Politics (Princeton); Parameters: Journal of the US Army War College (Pentagon); The Strategy Bridge; International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence; The War Room (Pentagon); Modern War Institute (West Point); Horasis (Zrich) and The New York Times.
Suggested citation: Louis Rene Beres, King Charles IIIs Coronation at the Convergence of Policy, Sovereignty, and Immortality, JURIST Academic Commentary, May 9, 2023, https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2023/05/king-charles-coronation-immortality.
This article was prepared for publication by JURIST Commentary staff. Please direct any questions or comments to them at commentary@jurist.org
Opinions expressed in JURIST Commentary are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of JURIST's editors, staff, donors or the University of Pittsburgh.
View post:
King Charles III's Coronation at the Convergence of Policy ... - JURIST
Posted in Immortality Medicine
Comments Off on King Charles III’s Coronation at the Convergence of Policy … – JURIST
Ancient Greek healing temple in Trikala to be restored – The Greek Herald
Posted: at 11:18 am
The Greek Ministry of Culture has announced that the ancient Asclepieion in Thessaly, an important healing temple of the Greek empire, will be restored.
Greeces Minister of Culture and Sports, Lina Mendoni, stated that in the city of Trikala, in Ancient Trikki, there was one of the oldest and most famous (temples) in the entire ancient world, Asclepieion.
The earliest confirmed excavation of the city dates back to the Bronze Age and is located in the area of the present archaeological site of Trikala.
Excavations have uncovered ceramics indicating that the western slopes of the ancient acropolis had been inhabited since the Early Bronze Age (3300 BC) until the Mycenaean era.
Ancient Trikki was first referred to in the Homeric List of Ships, which states that Trikki participated with great force in the Trojan War, with 30 ships led by Asclepius sons, Mahaonas and Podalerios, who were taught medicine by their father.
Asclepius was the Greek god of healing, truth, and prophecy, and is also known as the god of medicine. In later times, he was honoured as a hero and eventually worshipped as a god. Healing temples in his honour began in Thessaly but spread to many parts of Greece.
The practice of sleeping in these healing temples became common in many parts of Greece, as it was believed that Asclepius cured illnesses in dreams.Zeus (the king of the gods), afraid that Asclepius might render all men immortal, slew him with a thunderbolt.
Read more here:
Ancient Greek healing temple in Trikala to be restored - The Greek Herald
Posted in Immortality Medicine
Comments Off on Ancient Greek healing temple in Trikala to be restored – The Greek Herald