Monthly Archives: February 2023

Populism in the United States – Wikipedia

Posted: February 26, 2023 at 2:29 pm

Populism in the United States reaches back to the Presidency of Andrew Jackson in the 1830s and to the People's Party in the 1890s. It has made a resurgence in modern-day politics in not only the United States but also democracies around the world.[1][2] Populism is an approach to politics which views "the people" as being opposed to "the elite" and is often used as a synonym of anti-establishment; as an ideology, it transcends the typical divisions of left and right and has become more prevalent in the US with the rise of disenfranchisement and apathy toward the establishment.[3] The definition of populism is a complex one as due to its mercurial nature; it has been defined by many different scholars with different focuses, including political, economic, social, and discursive features.[4] Populism is often split into two variants in the US, one with a focus on culture and the other that focuses on economics.[5]

A division of American populism into two strains has been suggested: one being an economic form of populism opposed to financial elites, and the other being a cultural populism opposed to intellectual elitism.[6] The economic strain is claimed to have a longer history, including the likes of Andrew Jackson and William Jennings Bryan, while cultural populism is recognized as starting in the 1960s with George Wallace.[6] However, the modern-day rise of populism on both sides of the political spectrum has been said to have stemmed from voter apathy with the current governmental system and those running it, and, subsequently, populist politics are said to play a constitutive role in political realignments, in which moral boundaries between groups are redrawn and categories of "us" and "them" emerge.[7][8]

Populism has risen in recent years; however, the focus is no longer on the general population protesting against the masses, which was historically the case with populism,[9] but rather on more political polarization, whereby a simple majority is the goal of politicians and thus leads to the "tyranny of the majority" in which they do not focus on appeasing opposing politics but reinforcing their own base.[10][11] Moffitt argues that modern-day populists, such as Donald Trump, garner support by radically simplifying the terms of the crises and discussing them in terms of emergency politics, whilst offering a short-term responseappealing to the general public and setting such populists apart from the establishment.[12]

Andrew Jackson was the president from 1829 to 1837 and at the time was called the "People's President".[13] His time in office was characterized by an opposition to institutions, disestablishing the Second Bank of the United States (a central bank), and disobeying the Supreme Court of the United States.[14] Jackson argued that "It is to be regretted that the rich and powerful too often bend the acts of government to their selfish purposes."[6]

The People's Party, also known as the Populist Party or simply the Populists, was a left-wing agrarian populist political party in the United States in the late 19th century.[15][16] The Populist Party emerged in the early 1890s as an important force in the Southern and Western United States, but collapsed after it nominated Democrat William Jennings Bryan in the 1896 United States presidential election. A small faction of the party continued to operate into the first decade of the 20th century, but never matched the popularity of the party in the early 1890s.

The Populist Party's roots lay in the Farmers' Alliance, an agrarian movement that promoted economic action during the Gilded Age, as well as the Greenback Party, an earlier third party that had advocated fiat money. The success of Farmers' Alliance candidates in the 1890 elections, along with the conservatism of both major parties, encouraged Farmers' Alliance leaders to establish a full-fledged third party before the 1892 elections. The Ocala Demands laid out the Populist platform: collective bargaining, federal regulation of railroad rates, an expansionary monetary policy, and a Sub-Treasury Plan that required the establishment of federally controlled warehouses to aid farmers. Other Populist-endorsed measures included bimetallism, a graduated income tax, direct election of Senators, a shorter workweek, and the establishment of a postal savings system. These measures were collectively designed to curb the influence of monopolistic corporate and financial interests and empower small businesses, farmers and laborers.

In the 1892 presidential election, the Populist ticket of James B. Weaver and James G. Field won 8.5% of the popular vote and carried four small Western states. Despite the support of labor organizers like Eugene V. Debs and Terence V. Powderly, the party largely failed to win the vote of urban laborers in the Midwest and the Northeast. Over the next four years, the party continued to run state and federal candidates, building up powerful organizations in several Southern and Western states. Before the 1896 presidential election, the Populists became increasingly polarized between "fusionists", who wanted to nominate a joint presidential ticket with the Democratic Party, and "mid-roaders", like Mary Elizabeth Lease, who favored the continuation of the Populists as an independent third party. After the 1896 Democratic National Convention nominated William Jennings Bryan, a prominent bimetallist, the Populists also nominated Bryan but rejected the Democratic vice-presidential nominee in favor of party leader Thomas E. Watson. In the 1896 election, Bryan swept the South and West but lost to Republican William McKinley by a decisive margin.

After the 1896 presidential election, the Populist Party suffered a nationwide collapse. The party nominated presidential candidates in the three presidential elections after 1896, but none came close to matching Weaver's performance in 1892. Former Populists became inactive or joined other parties. Debs became a socialist leader. Bryan dropped any connection to the rump Populist Party.

Historians see the Populists as a reaction to the power of corporate interests in the Gilded Age, but they debate the degree to which the Populists were anti-modern and nativist. Scholars also continue to debate the magnitude of influence the Populists exerted on later organizations and movements, such as the progressives of the early 20th century. Most of the Progressives, such as Theodore Roosevelt, Robert La Follette, and Woodrow Wilson, were bitter enemies of the Populists. In American political rhetoric, "populist" was originally associated with the Populist Party and related left-wing movements, but beginning in the 1950s it began to take on a more generic meaning, describing any anti-establishment movement regardless of its position on the leftright political spectrum.[17]

According to Gene Clanton's study of Kansas from 1880s to 1910s, populism and progressivism in Kansas had similarities but different policies and distinct bases of support. Both opposed corruption and trusts. Populism emerged earlier and came out of the farm community. It was radically egalitarian in favor of the disadvantaged classes; it was weak in the towns and cities except in labor unions. Progressivism, on the other hand, was a later movement. It emerged after the 1890s from the urban business and professional communities. Most of its activists had opposed populism. It was elitist, and emphasized education and expertise. Its goals were to enhance efficiency, reduce waste, and enlarge the opportunities for upward social mobility. However, some former Populists changed their emphasis after 1900 and supported progressive reforms.[18]

Huey Long was the governor of Louisiana (19281932) and a US senator (19321935).[19] He has been referred to as a demagogue and a populist, with his slogan being "every man a king".[20] He advocated for wealth redistribution through the Share Our Wealth initiative.[21] After announcing a bid to run in the 1936 United States presidential election, he was assassinated.[22]

George Wallace was a governor of Alabama who ran for president four times, seeking the Democratic Party nomination in 1964, 1972, and 1976, as well as being the candidate for the American Independent Party in the 1968 United States presidential election.[23] In 1972, he was shot five times while campaigning and left paralyzed from the waist down.[23] His main political ambition was to protect segregation, proclaiming, "say segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever."[24] He also singled out "pointy-headed intellectuals" and "briefcase-toting bureaucrats", leading to his being labeled a populist.[25]

Ross Perot has also been associated with American populism and has been called a "billionaire populist".[26][27][28] He ran as a third party candidate in the 1992 United States presidential election, gaining 19 million votes.[27][29] Among his policy proposals was the instalment of e-democracy for direct democratic decision-making.[30] Donald Trump later considered running for Perot's Reform party in the 2000 United States presidential election.[31]

Sarah Palin was the governor of Alaska from 2006 to 2009 and the vice presidential candidate for the 2008 United States presidential election. She has been referred to as a cultural populist in the vein of Wallace.[32]

Donald Trump, president from 2017 to 2021, has also been referred to as a populist.[33] His rhetoric presented him as a leader who "alone can fix" the problems of American politics and represent the "forgotten men and women of our country", with echoes of the populism of Jackson's presidency.[34] Donald Trump's modern populism is argued to show the symbiotic relationship between nationalism and populism.[35] Moreover, the rise of Trump's election was argued by some scholars to represent the "tyranny of the majority", whereby Trump's attacks on liberal and progressive politics allowed him to gain enough voters to win, so he did not need to appease the majority of voters or be a president for "every American".[10]

Bernie Sanders has been called a populist from the opposite side of the political spectrum to Trump.[36][37] However, differences have also been seen between the two.[38] Sanders' populism is opposed to political, corporate, and media elites, especially the US financial industry epitomized by Wall Street, as well as the wealthiest one percent.[39][37] When he did not win the Democratic nomination for president in the 2016 Democratic Party presidential primaries, he was re-elected as an independent senator for his home state Vermont in 2018.[36] Other populist Democratic politicians in Sanders' vein include Elizabeth Warren and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.[40]

More:

Populism in the United States - Wikipedia

Posted in Populism | Comments Off on Populism in the United States – Wikipedia

Hickey on hockey: With NHL all-in on gambling, why the injury secrecy? – Montreal Gazette

Posted: at 2:27 pm

Hickey on hockey: With NHL all-in on gambling, why the injury secrecy?  Montreal Gazette

See original here:

Hickey on hockey: With NHL all-in on gambling, why the injury secrecy? - Montreal Gazette

Posted in Gambling | Comments Off on Hickey on hockey: With NHL all-in on gambling, why the injury secrecy? – Montreal Gazette

15 Best Vitamin Brands of 2022: A Dietitians Picks

Posted: February 24, 2023 at 9:26 am

Finding the best vitamin brands means looking at third-party testing, certifications, ingredients, and brand integrity. We did all the work and found quality options for women, kids, athletes, prenatal, probiotics, and more. Our pick for best overall vitamin brand: Thorne.

If youre unable to meet your nutritional needs through your diet alone, supplements can be a convenient and effective way to do so.

That said, not all vitamin and mineral supplements are created equal.

In fact, some brands are pumped full of fillers, additives, and unhealthy ingredients that can do more harm than good when it comes to your health.

Its important to choose a reputable brand that has undergone extensive testing, ideally by a third-party lab, and is sourced from high quality ingredients. Doing so can ensure that youre getting a supplement thats pure and potent and that your body can use efficiently.

Here are the 15 best vitamin brands to help meet your nutritional needs, as well as the criteria we used to choose them.

When researching the best vitamin brands, we considered the following factors:

Thorne is a supplement company that uses high quality ingredients free of contaminants, fillers, and heavy metals.

All products are manufactured in a facility thats certified by NSF International and the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), which is the regulatory body in Australia responsible for assessing the safety of supplements.

Plus, Thorne makes more than 30 products that are NSF Certified for Sport.

Thorne offers a variety of products, including protein powders, multivitamins, probiotics, and fish oils. The company also provides supplements designed to support healthy aging, bone and joint health, immune function, and energy levels.

In fact, Thorne Womens Multi 50+ was featured as the best multivitamin for women over age 50 in Healthlines roundup of the best multivitamins for womens health.

Additionally, many supplements also vegan and free of gluten, soy, or dairy, although this may depend on the specific product you select.

Pure Encapsulations is dedicated to providing safe, sustainably sourced supplements formulated to address a long list of health concerns.

All the brands products are free of unnecessary fillers and additives, as well as GMOs and many common allergens.

Plus, each supplement is certified gluten-free and undergoes rigorous third-party testing for contaminants and harmful compounds to guarantee safety.

In addition to single-nutrient supplements, Pure Encapsulations offers products for digestive health, immune support, brain function, hormone balance, and more.

For example, Pure Encapsulations Magnesium Glycinate made Healthlines list of the best supplements for anxiety.

Ritual is a company that specializes in making high quality multivitamins free of artificial colors, flavors, and fillers.

It provides detailed information on the sourcing of each nutrient for full transparency, including the supplier and specific form of each micronutrient.

Ritual offers a variety of products for different life stages, including:

For instance, the Ritual Essential for Men Multivitamin is formulated specifically to meet the needs of men over age 18 and is vegan and non-GMO.

Ritual multivitamins are made without dairy, sugar, nuts, or gluten, and theyre tested by an independent lab for heavy metals, allergens, and microbes.

Whats more, Rituals Essential Multivitamin for Women 18+ is USP-verified to ensure purity and potency, and its protein powders are NSF Certified for Sport.

NOW is a family-owned company that focuses on producing budget-friendly supplements free of GMOs and artificial ingredients.

Each product is thoroughly tested in the companys in-house laboratories for purity and the presence of heavy metals, pesticides, and other contaminants.

NOW supplements are manufactured in facilities certified by UL Solutions, a third-party company that inspects facilities to ensure that they comply with good manufacturing practices.

A wide range of products is available on the companys website, including multivitamins, sports supplements, probiotics, herbs, digestive enzymes, and more.

NOW makes 50+ sports supplements that are Informed Sport certified, which means theyve been tested for the presence of substances that are banned for athletes.

The company also offers a variety of single nutrient supplements, such as its NOW Foods Chewable Vitamin D3 5,000 IU, which was selected as one of Healthlines best vitamin D supplements.

You can also filter supplements to find options that are vegan, vegetarian, organic, or free of gluten and other specific allergens.

Llama Naturals offers a selection of flavored gummy vitamins specifically for children, including multivitamins, prebiotics, probiotics, and supplements featuring ingredients like vitamin D and elderberry.

For example, their Plant-Based Multivitamin contains a blend of 13 vitamins and phytonutrients, which are naturally flavored and made with real fruit.

As registered dietitian and health coach Brenda Peralta points out, gummy supplements could be a good option for young children who may have trouble taking pills. Just make sure to keep the bottle safely out of reach.

Not only is each supplement from Llama Naturals certified organic, but all products are also plant-based and free of added sugar and artificial ingredients.

Furthermore, all products undergo third-party testing for safety and are backed by a money-back guarantee.

Be sure to use products only as directed and talk with your pediatrician before starting supplementation if you have any concerns.

Founded by dietitian and fertility nutrition expert Ayla Barmmer, FullWell specializes in producing prenatal vitamins designed to provide support before, during, and after pregnancy.

Though they recently began offering a supplement to promote mens fertility as well along with fish oil and an herbal supplement to promote relaxation, their signature Prenatal Vitamin is still their most popular product.

This supplement provides many nutrients that are essential for promoting a healthy pregnancy, including folate, vitamin D, and vitamin B12, among others (1).

It also contains choline. According to womens health dietitian Coral Edelson, MS, RD, this micronutrient is important for your babys brain development and is not found in all prenatal supplements.

Whats more, FullWell is manufactured in a UL Solutions certified facility and batch tested to ensure safety. Plus, a certificate of analysis (COA) is available upon request.

Especially if youre pregnant or breastfeeding, always talk with a healthcare professional before taking any new supplements.

HUM Nutrition supplements are formulated with clinically proven nutrients and designed to promote everything from hair and skin health to mood, digestion, immune function, and more.

For example, their HUM Nutrition Fan Club, which contains Siberian rhubarb and mix of probiotics and other herbal ingredients, was selected as one of Healthlines best multivitamins for menopause.

Using a simple online quiz, the company provides personalized product recommendations based on your needs and offers free access to a registered dietitian for additional guidance.

Products are triple-tested for purity and verified by a third-party lab to ensure strength and potency. Plus, all supplements are non-GMO, gluten-free, and made without any artificial colors or sweeteners.

Care/of is a personalized subscription-based supplement company that uses a quick online assessment to create a custom daily supplement regimen just for you.

All products are tested multiple times throughout the manufacturing process, both in-house and by third-party labs, to ensure that youre receiving the highest quality supplements possible.

Care/of offers a wide variety of products, including multivitamins, protein powders, probiotics, and supplement blends formulated for specific health concerns such as sleep, digestion, and stress.

Each product includes detailed information on the ingredients it contains, any potential allergens, and the research that backs its health benefits.

Garden of Life is a supplement manufacturer focused on quality, transparency, and sustainability.

In fact, in addition to being certified carbon neutral, many Garden of Life products undergo third-party testing and are certified organic, vegan, gluten-free, or kosher.

Some have also been certified by NSF International or Informed Choice, which are organizations that test products for substances that are banned for athletes.

With a wide selection of products to choose from, Garden of Life offers more than 150 vegan supplements, including probiotics, vitamins, minerals, herbs, and plant-based protein powders.

For instance, the Garden of Life MyKind Organic Plant Collagen Builder is a vegan biotin supplement that contains a blend of other vitamins, minerals, and botanicals to support collagen synthesis.

You can also filter products to find supplements for specific health concerns or dietary restrictions, based on your needs.

Vital Proteins is a popular brand known for their collagen supplements, which are available in a variety of forms and flavors, including vanilla, matcha, and dark chocolate blackberry.

As the most abundant protein in the body, collagen plays a central role in skin, bone, and joint health (2).

Its particularly popular for its anti-aging benefits, with research showing that collagen supplements could help boost skin hydration and elasticity (3).

One of their most popular products, Vital Proteins Beauty Collagen, contains a blend of collagen, probiotics, and hyaluronic acid to promote the health of the hair, skin, and nails.

Many Vital Proteins products are certified organic and free of GMOs, fillers, binders, and artificial ingredients.

According to their website, Vital Proteins also uses independent labs to test supplements for contaminants and heavy metals.

Although Nordic Naturals produces a variety of vitamins and minerals, the company is perhaps best known for its high quality omega-3 supplements that are tailored to fit a range of nutritional needs.

In fact, their Nordic Naturals Ultimate Omega is featured as Healthlines best overall fish oil supplement.

Omega-3 fatty acids have been linked to a long list of benefits and can help promote healthy aging (4).

They may also help reduce inflammation, which can be especially beneficial for those with autoimmune disorders like rheumatoid arthritis (5).

In addition to offering plant-based omega-3 supplements, Nordic Naturals has supplements specifically for athletes, children, teens, pregnant people, and even pets.

All Nordic Naturals products are non-GMO and undergo third-party testing for safety. A COA is also available for all supplements on the companys website.

OLLY is a company committed to promoting health with high quality, flavorful supplements made without any GMOs and artificial ingredients.

The company offers many gummies and softgels formulated to promote hair, nails, and skin health, and they include ingredients like collagen, hyaluronic acid, and biotin.

For example, OLLY Undeniable Beauty is made with vitamin C, vitamin E, and keratin and is one of the top vitamins for hair, nails, and skin.

Other products, including multivitamins, omega-3s, probiotics, and herbal supplements, are also available.

A COA is available for each product from OLLY and several products are certified by NSF. Additionally, supplements are produced in facilities audited by the FDA and other third-party agencies.

Bio-Kult is a brand that specializes in producing high quality probiotics.

Probiotics are a type of bacteria found in the gut that have been linked to a long list of health benefits, including improved immune function, enhanced digestion, and lower cholesterol levels (6).

The brand offers products with a variety of unique strains, each of which is intended to support different conditions. Some are also formulated with ingredients to support other aspects of health, such as garlic, grapefruit extract, or cranberry extract.

For example, Bio-Kult Mind is designed to support brain function and gut health using a blend of probiotics, zinc, and grape and blueberry extracts.

All Bio-Kult products are shelf-stable, non-GMO, and made without gluten, nuts, and eggs. Many are also vegetarian-friendly and have been approved by the Vegetarian Society.

As one of the leading probiotic manufacturers on the market, Culturelle is a top-notch brand trusted by consumers and healthcare professionals alike.

The brand provides probiotics specifically for children, infants, and adults, along with supplements that combine probiotics with other nutrients, such as fiber, vitamin D, and omega-3 fatty acids.

One of their best-selling supplements, Culturelle Digestive Daily Probiotic, is shelf-stable and packs 10 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) into each serving.

Culturelle products are manufactured in a facility thats certified by NSF International, and each product lot is carefully inspected prior to packaging.

Most Culturelle supplements are also free of common allergens like dairy, soy, and gluten, making them great options for those with food allergies.

Klean Athlete is a high quality supplement brand that was founded by athletes for athletes.

The company manufactures a range of products, including multivitamins, probiotics, and omega-3 fatty acid supplements.

It also has a wide selection of supplements designed to optimize athletic performance, such as creatine, whey protein, collagen, and branched-chain amino acids.

Klean Creatine, one of their most popular products, was even featured as one of Healthlines best creatine supplements for 2022.

All products are NSF Certified for Sport, meaning that they have been tested to ensure that theyre free of substances banned for athletes.

This is especially important for competitive athletes. According to Amy Shapiro, MS, RD, CDN, hidden substances can show up in urine or blood tests and may prevent athletes from competing in their sport.

Klean Athlete products are also non-GMO and undergo testing in-house and in accredited laboratories to verify safety.

Read more:

15 Best Vitamin Brands of 2022: A Dietitians Picks

Posted in Food Supplements | Comments Off on 15 Best Vitamin Brands of 2022: A Dietitians Picks

Dietary supplements for weight loss – Mayo Clinic

Posted: at 9:25 am

Dietary supplements for weight loss

Melt away fat. Lose weight naturally. Tempting claims, but do the products deliver?

The promise of fast weight loss is hard to resist. But do weight-loss supplements lighten anything but your wallet? And are they safe?

Dietary supplements are sold as health aids. They're taken by mouth. Common ingredients are vitamins, minerals, fiber, caffeine, herbs and other plants.

Some of the most popular supplements claim to improve nutrition, boost energy, build muscle or burn fat.

Dietary supplements are not medicines. They aren't meant to treat or cure disease.

Companies that make supplements are responsible for the safety of their products. They must ensure that their products are free of contaminants and that they're accurately labeled.

Dietary supplements don't require approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). But if a supplement is found to be unsafe, the FDA can issue warnings or ask that it be withdrawn from the market.

The FDA can also take action against companies that make false or unsupported claims to sell their supplements.

You might be surprised to learn that makers of dietary supplements rarely carry out clinical trials. That's part of the reason why there's little scientific evidence to show that weight-loss supplements work.

For example, raspberry ketone is marketed as a clinically proven weight-loss product. That claim is supported by one clinical trial.

The trial included 70 adults with obesity. All were placed on a restricted diet and exercise program. They were then randomly assigned to receive either a placebo or a supplement containing raspberry ketone, caffeine, bitter orange, ginger and garlic root extract.

The 45 people who completed the trial all lost weight:

While these results are intriguing, the fact that the trial was small and lasted only eight weeks means the results can't be reliably generalized to real-world situations. And importantly, a short trial like this may miss side effects that only become apparent with long-term use.

In addition, the trial used a supplement that contained multiple ingredients. So it's impossible to tell which ingredient was responsible for the weight loss.

Ideally these initial results would be tested in a much longer trial involving hundreds of participants with careful monitoring for side effects. Results from such a trial would allow for an informed decision about the safety and effectiveness of such a product.

Until such trial data is more readily available, claims regarding dietary supplements and weight loss should be treated with caution.

A product isn't necessarily safe simply because it's natural. Though rare, some dietary supplements have been linked to serious problems, such as liver damage.

Supplements can have strong effects. Ephedra (ma-huang) is an herb once used for weight loss. It's now banned by the FDA because it was associated with adverse effects, such as mood changes, high blood pressure, irregular heart rate, stroke, seizures and heart attacks.

Some weight-loss supplements have been found to contain hidden ingredients, such as prescription drugs, that may be harmful.

It's important to do your homework if you're thinking about trying a weight-loss supplement. Check credible websites, such as those run by the U.S. Office of Dietary Supplements and the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health.

Also be sure to talk with your doctor before taking any supplement. This is especially important if you have health problems, take prescription drugs, or are pregnant or breast-feeding.

Sign up for free, and stay up to date on research advancements, health tips and current health topics, like COVID-19, plus expertise on managing health.

To provide you with the most relevant and helpful information, and understand which information is beneficial, we may combine your email and website usage information with other information we have about you. If you are a Mayo Clinic patient, this could include protected health information. If we combine this information with your protected health information, we will treat all of that information as protected health information and will only use or disclose that information as set forth in our notice of privacy practices. You may opt-out of email communications at any time by clicking on the unsubscribe link in the e-mail.

Subscribe!

You'll soon start receiving the latest Mayo Clinic health information you requested in your inbox.

Please, try again in a couple of minutes

Retry

.

Link:

Dietary supplements for weight loss - Mayo Clinic

Posted in Food Supplements | Comments Off on Dietary supplements for weight loss – Mayo Clinic

"If I Make the Olympics, I’ll Retire at the Olympics." Surf Legend Kelly Slater Will Be … – Latest Tweet – LatestLY

Posted: at 9:23 am

"If I Make the Olympics, I'll Retire at the Olympics." Surf Legend Kelly Slater Will Be ... - Latest Tweet  LatestLY

See the original post here:

"If I Make the Olympics, I'll Retire at the Olympics." Surf Legend Kelly Slater Will Be ... - Latest Tweet - LatestLY

Posted in Olympics | Comments Off on "If I Make the Olympics, I’ll Retire at the Olympics." Surf Legend Kelly Slater Will Be … – Latest Tweet – LatestLY

Belarus: EU and WHO deliver equipment for research of genomes of infectious disease agents – EIN News

Posted: at 9:22 am

Belarus: EU and WHO deliver equipment for research of genomes of infectious disease agents  EIN News

Read the rest here:
Belarus: EU and WHO deliver equipment for research of genomes of infectious disease agents - EIN News

Posted in Genome | Comments Off on Belarus: EU and WHO deliver equipment for research of genomes of infectious disease agents – EIN News

The Top 20+ Questions on Politically Correct Terms [with Answers!]

Posted: February 20, 2023 at 1:43 pm

Politically correct terms are a hot topic. The focus on using PC words has sky-rocketed recently with so much focus on diversity & inclusion in the news. We decided to create a list of the top 20 most-Googled questions on PC terms to help better understand each one.

Disclaimer: There are words or phrases in this article that are politically incorrect and might offend you. I am sharing the exact phrases/questions that people are querying on Google (source: ahrefs). I couldnt think of any other way to answer these questions without listing them exactly as the user typed them into Google. I am not an expert in politically correct terminology.

Ok, here are the top 20 questions users search about on Google (verbatim):

People of Color (POC for short) is widely used but not everyone approves of the term and there are often better alternatives.

A few alternatives are:

People of Color is a term used to identify people who are not white or of European heritage. The phrase People of Color was introduced in the 1960s by Black leaders in an effort to move away from terms like colored people and Blacks. POC is still widely being used worldwide today, but not everyone approves of the phrase.

The Washington Post interviewed 25 People of Colorand was met with comments like:

Not everyone likes this label, it flattens differences and it simplifies complexities.

What is another word for people of color? BIPOC, which stands for Black, Indigenous, People of Color is a more inclusive term that is being widely accepted as a replacement for POC. BIPOC is one of the hottest words in diversity, gaining traction since the Black Lives Matter Movement.

The popularity of the term POC (people of color) dropped 50% from January 2020 to June 2021 (while BIPOC grew 6X during the same period. (source: Google Trends

Are Asians People of Color? It may depend on who you ask. People of Color may be an accepted label for some, but it is always best to ask a person what they prefer to be called.

PC Term Google search volume: Is People of Color politically correct?(450/month);is people of color capitalized (350); people of color synonym (300); people of color definition (300); are asians people of color (700); another word for people of color (5)

What is a politically correct term for disabled? A PC term for disabled is people with disabilities. Disabled is considered a politically incorrect word because it is tied to negative stereotypes. The phrasepeople with disabilities is less de-humanizing.

When referring to a single person with a specific disability it is more appropriate to say the person has that disability instead of saying they are disabled. For example, anarticle on inclusive language at Colorado State University says:

Less Appropriate: Sue is an arthritic, diabetic, paraplegic.

More Appropriate: Sue has arthritis, diabetes, paralyzed, has paralysis in her legs

Another PC word for disabled is the disability community. This phrase refers to a group of people with disabilities and is also received more positively than the word disabled.

Irelands National Disability Authority says the following about addressing people with disabilities:

When writing or speaking about people with disabilities it is important to put the person first. Catch-all phrases such as the blind, the deaf or the disabled, do not reflect the individuality, equality or dignity of people with disabilities.

When speaking about the disabled community, you also hear the word handicapped. A politically correct term for handicapped is disabled person, or person with a disability.

What is the politically correct term for mentally disabled? Neurodivergent, a person who has an emotional disability, or neuroatypical are all PC terms.

PC Term Google search volume: Politically correct term for disabled? (500/month); handicapped or disabled what is politically correct (60); what is the politically correct term for disabled (30); what is the politically correct term for mentally disabled (20); another word for disabled (300); proper term for disabled (200); politically correct term for handicapped (100); another word for handicapped (100)

What is the politically correct term for mental retardation? A PC term for mental retardation is intellectual disability.

The term mental retardation was introduced to replace words like idiot and imbecile that were used in the past to identify people with certain levels of intelligence. But just like those derogatory words, the term retardation has become an insult, along with the word retard.

Mental Retardation as a phrase has even been legally replaced by the term intellectual disability according to an article addressingAppropriate Language About People With Disabilities.

PC Term Google search volume: Politically correct term for retardation (250/month);politically correct term for mental retardation (200); politically correct term for retard (80); what is the politically correct term for mental retardation (80)

There are 4 popular questions around PC terms for the word Black:

What is the politically correct term for Black?

Is Black or African American politically correct?

What is another word for Black?

What are other words for Black?

The terms Black and African American can be used interchangeably, according to Keith Mayes,associate professor of African American and African studies at the University of Minnesota.

Mayes said that descendants of slaves have historically been referred to as African Americans, but the percentage of those folks is decreasing in the United States.Mayes said:

We have more Black people here from other parts of the diaspora and other parts of the continent. We have a lot of East Africans here. West Africans here, always had a lot of Caribbean Blacks in the United States. When I address you as Black or African American, they both apply but it may be a situation where some black folks whose parents come from other parts of the world may not identify as African American. It is better to call them Black American

Finding a PC word for Black can be tricky because it depends on where a person comes from as well as what they prefer to be called. So in this case, it is best to ask someone which term they are comfortable with, whether it be Black, African American, Black American, Black Caribbean, Person of Color, etc.

PC Term Google search volume: Other words for Black (1,700); Another word for Black (1,400); Politically correct term for Black(200/month); What is the politically correct term for a Black person? (100); Black or African American politically correct (150); Another word for African American (80); What is the politically correct term for Black? (20);politically correct term for Black (30)

Is Mulatto offensive? In 2021, the popular rapper Mulatto (who has 1 Black father and white mother) was forced to change her name (to Latto) after a huge backlash over her name not being PC. If you search Google for Mulatto rapper backlash, you get 3.2 million results!

Mulatto was once a word used to identify people of mixed race or mixed ethnicity. In 1850 the U.S. Census Bureau used M as a racial category for mulatto, which meant someone with one Black and one white parent. The Mulatto category became a catch-all for people whose race was not just Black or white, this included Native Americans.

A more PC term for Mulatto (as well as mixed race and mixed ethnicity) is biracial or multiracial. Multiracial is used to describe people with blended ancestries.

Over time terms have changed, so another way to be more politically correct is to identify a person by a group, like Latinx or Mexican American.But, mixed race is still used and accepted by people who are comfortable with saying Im Mixed.

NPRs article onAll Mixed Up: What Do We Call People Of Multiple Backgrounds?says that celebrities may also set trends for multiracial people. For example:

Rihanna,Drake,Key and PeeleandShemar Moorehave all used the term biracial to self-identify. Barack Obama, ever tongue-in-cheek, likes to throw aroundmongrelandmutt.Slash,Nicole RichieandTrevor Noahhave used mixed.

PC Term Google search volume: Is mulatto derogatory (450/month); Is mulatto offensive (400/month); Mulatto politically correct (200/month);politically correct word for mulatto(5);Which is more politically correct Mulatto or Mixed Ethnicity? (5)

The terms Dwarf and Midget are widely misused and can be considered derogatory. What is the politically correct term for midget?

First, make sure youre being precise.

Little People of America (LPA) defines midget vs. dwarf in this way:

Dwarfism is a medical or genetic condition that usually results in an adult height of 410 or shorter, among both men and women, although in some cases a person with a dwarfing condition may be slightly taller than that.The average height of an adult with dwarfism is 40, but typical heights range from 28 to 48.

In some circles, a midget is the term used for a proportionate dwarf. However, the term has fallen into disfavor and is considered offensive by most people of short stature. The term dates back to 1865, the height of the freak show era, and was generally applied only to short-statured persons who were displayed for public amusement, which is why it is considered so unacceptable today.

Midget is on its way out

Midget has been met with criticism from organizations like the Little People of America (LPA).

LPA surveyed their community and 90% of members stated that the word midget should never be used in reference to a person with dwarfism.

Recommendations for using the term Midget and Dwarf

The LPA suggests you use:

But the LPA says that most people would rather be referred to by their name than by their label

PC Term Google search volume: How tall is a midget (1,400/mo.); What height is considered a midget (900); Dwarf vs Midget (1,000); Midget vs Dwarf (700); Difference between dwarf and midget; Is midget a slur (500/mo.) How tall is a dwarf (500/mo.) Politically correct term for midget (200/month); proper term for midget (200/month); what is the politically correct term for midget (150); pc term for midget (150) politically correct term for dwarf(100);pc term for dwarf(100); what is the politically correct term for a dwarf? (10)

What is the politically correct term for mental illness? There are many different alternative terms to use when it comes to mental illness. Health Partners has an excellent detailed list of some of these more PC terms for mental illness, and also lists terms to avoid. Some examples:

Dont use Mental Illness as an aggregate term (its too broad)

Instead, use Mental illnesses or A mental illness

Dont use Afflicted by mental illness, suffers from mental illness or is a victim of mental illness

Instead, useLiving with a mental illness

Dont use Mentally ill person

Instead use, Person with a mental illness

Another term related to mental illness is special needs. Special needs has been met with criticism from people with disabilities. What is the politically correct term for special needs? A person with a disability or disabled person is more politically correct. Special needs can make people feel excluded or belittled.

This article,12 different ways to say disabled, has multiple comments surrounding the use of special needs, from both teachers and people with disabilities.

PC Term Google search volume: Politically correct term for mental illness (150/month); what is the politically correct term for mental illness(5)

What is the politically correct term for gypsy? The word gypsy has ties to racial discrimination and the politically correct term is Roma which means people.

The U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum says:

Roma (Gypsies) originated in the Punjab region of northern India as a nomadic people and entered Europe between the eighth and tenth centuries C.E. They were called Gypsies because Europeans mistakenly believed they came from Egypt.

A blog post from the Mindful Mermaid explains why we should stop saying gypsy. The blog says:

Gypsy is straight-up racist, similar to using the n-word. The word is as a racial slur against the Roma people, the PC term for gypsy.

PC Term Google search volume: Politically correct term for gypsy (150/month);what is the politically correct term for gypsy(10)

What is the politically correct term for gay? Gay is an acceptable term, along with gay person, gay people, and lesbian.

GLAAD says however the use of homosexuals should be avoided.

On a related note, a lot of people ask Whats the politically correct term for LGBT?LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender) and its variations are PC terms when referring to gay people. Over time LGBT as an acronym has evolved into many more acronyms in the effort to be more inclusive to the gay community.

The New York Times discussedThe ABCs of L.G.B.T.Q.I.A.+back in 2018. The author talked about the addition of the letter Q for questioning or queer and said:

Now theres also I, for intersex; A, for ally (or asexual, depending on whom youre talking to); and often a plus sign meant to cover anyone else whos not included: L.G.B.T.Q.I.A.+.

PC Term Google search volume:Politically correct term for gay (90/month); What is the politically correct term for gay? (20);Politically correct term for LGBT (40/month)

What is a politically correct term for race? Race is a PC word that is used to divide people into groups based on shared physical or social qualities. Race can be based on skin color, ethnic association, cultural history, or ethnic classification.

Here is a list of race-related terms that are used most frequently:

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, people can choose more than one race to indicate their racial mixture (e.g. American Indian and white).

PC Term Google search volume: Politically correct term for mixed race (100);Politically correct term for race (90/month);what is the politically correct term for a mixed race person(5); Politically correct terms for race (90); list of politically correct terms for race(5)

What is the politically correct term for deaf? Deaf is considered a PC word, as well as hard of hearing or people with hearing loss according to the National Association of the Deaf. Other terms like hearing impaired are not widely accepted in the deaf community and could be considered derogatory.

The term hearing impaired was not coined by the deaf community, and a 2019 article on Medium.com titled The Deaf Culture Hates Being Politically Correct says:

The word impairedmeansweakened or damaged or having a disability of a specific kind.

The deaf community may not see their deafness as a disability, so it is best to avoid hearing impaired. Another word for impaired could be limited hearing or partially deaf.

PC Term Google search volume: Another word for impaired (150); Politically correct term for deaf (80/month);what is the politically correct term for deaf(5)

What is the politically correct term for minority? The term minority was popular in the 1990s and replaced the use of the offensive phrase colored people, but its popularity as a PC term has lost traction in recent years.

One reason that minority is politically incorrect is that the word minor in minority suggests someone of lesser significance.

More inclusive terms are now being used to replace the word minority like:

The other alternative is to refer to groups individually (e.g. Asian American, Mexican American, Inuit, etc.)

PC Term Google search volume: Politically correct term for minority (80/month); what is the politically correct term for minority (5); what is a minority? (1,900/mo.)

Googlers also search for politically correct terms for ethnic groups like the ones listed below.

What is another word for white? Caucasian is the most common, formal word to identify a white person, but federal data collection also simply uses the word white. Caucasian is defined as a person of European origin which derived from the word Caucasus, but according to workforce.com:

Most white people in the U.S. arent descended from the Caucasus region between Europe and Asia (touching Russia, Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan) but from western and northern Europe.

This author says white people is acceptable and politically correct language.

PC Term Google search volume:Another word for white (1,000/mo); Other words for white (600/mo);white or caucasian politically correct(80); What do you call a white person? (70/month);politically correct term for white person(5)

What is the politically correct term for Eskimo? Inuit is the most widely used term to replace Eskimo, which is plural meaning people. The singular term, which means person is Inuk.

NPR gives reasons Why You Probably Shouldnt Say Eskimo in an article addressing the confusion behind the word. The article says:

People in many parts of the Arctic consider Eskimo a derogatory term because it was widely used by racist, non-native colonizers.

PC Term Google search volume: Politically correct term for Eskimo (50/month);what is the politically correct term for an Eskimo? (5)

Continue reading here:
The Top 20+ Questions on Politically Correct Terms [with Answers!]

Posted in Politically Incorrect | Comments Off on The Top 20+ Questions on Politically Correct Terms [with Answers!]

15 Very Politically Incorrect Things That Are Also Absolutely True …

Posted: at 1:43 pm

Found on r/AskReddit.

Our stereotypes have at least a basis in truth.

A few decades back the bad Asian driver was a popular stereotype. And that came from the years before had a wave of Asian immigrants. Many of them came from countries where most people did not drive. So there were a lot of first and second generation Asian drivers out there and their ratio of accidents where higher than average because of that. Hence the stereotype being born.

Today we are on the third, fourth, and fifth generation of those immigrants who have now grown up around cars. Now that ratio of accidents are about the same across the board and, since there is no longer that grain of truth in that particular stereotype, it is dying out. In fact the only times I hear it anymore are from older people who grew up with it. Younger people dont subscribe to thatstereotype because it no longer makes any sense to them.

Now I am not saying that stereotypes are right and true. I am saying there is a grain of truth behind the stereotype that caused it to come about.

Eugenics works. If we can breed horses to be bigger, we can do the same with people. If we can breed dogs to be smarter, we can do that same to people. You can argue all you want about the moral and social ramifications, but the truth is that people are subject to all the same laws of heredity that animals are.

The rate of homicides involving a firearm decreased by half from 1992 to 2011

I save links to things I find interesting.Heres one about Rape convictions. Women are duped into thinking rapes are harder to solve than they are.

Theres a huge health risk with being mixed race, and thats getting organ transplants apparently.

Religion either is good for the mind/body, or people who are religious are from a healthier (mentally, physically, socially) demographic to begin with. The correlation and causation is hard to gauge, but here are some sources showing positive correlations with religion.

Ive already posted it, but Circumcision has huge negative effects on a person, and the benefits are controversial. Have some studies, the first one in particular, published last year, is one of the most massive.

The idea that men make much more money than women as an unfair advantage may not be as it seems.Since immigration and integration is becoming controversial in Europe.Heres some data on minorities in the UK, who are in fact a disproportionate source of crime.

Similar in Sweden, where immigrants commit a disproportionate amount of crime, mostly those of non-western background. The article is in Swedish but can be translated, but for the most serious crimes the instance among these certain groups is 300-400% higher.

Denmark has a similar problem, but its restrictions on refugees has potentially saved billions. In Denmark immigrants do not necessarily account for a disproportionate number of crimes, only certain immigrants particularly middle eastern. Chinese and Americans actually commit crimes lower than ethnic Danes.

The gender gap for wages is no longer an accurate reflection of systemic discrimination. It is now due primarily to personal choices women choosing to work part time receiving less pay overall, taking time off to raise children, choosing particular low paying industries, not choosing to pursue higher-level positions with certain characteristics, etc. From the report below: the raw wage gap continues to be used in misleading ways to advance public policy agendas without fully explaining the reasons behind the gap.Source:

Also, not talked about are the other effects of this division of labor. Because of the industry choices men and women make, men may get paid more but make up something like 92% of all workplace deaths, and a similar percentage of workplace suicides.Source:page 8.

In short lets stop talking about women being paid less than men. We won that one already.

Bureau of justice stats here:

Between 1980-2008 blacks accounted for 56.9% of all gun related murderswhile being 10-12% of the population. If you were to somehow remove guns from black people gun crime would drop by 50-60% overnight.

Im probably late to the game, but heres one. The USA actually has the highest life expectancy once you remove non-natural deaths such as accidents and murders.Also, I cant remember where I read this one but I remember it: the US also does not have a higher infant mortality rate, it is because not all countries calculate the statistic the same. In many other countries, babies born before a certain week are not counted in the infant mortality rate, while in the US, all of them are.

Young Male Muslims are more likely to be terrorists than elderly Swedish grandmothers.

Proof: I have been unable to find a single case of a Swedish grandmother hijacking a plan or committing a suicide bombing.

Nevertheless, they all have to take their shoes off in airports.

Im new to reddit, and I realize the sentiment on here runs VERY against this, but Ill jump in.

Marrying a promiscuous woman is a poor investment.Essentially, it boils down to Batemans Principle.Briefly, sperm(male sex) is cheap, eggs(female sex) are expensive. A female with an unrestricted sociosexuality (loosely- promiscuity) is incurring substantial risk due to the cost of the act, the differential investment applied, as well as an increase in disease exposure.

The rebuttal for this is the advancement of technology. We now have birth control, which takes away parental investment, the cost, as well as disease exposure. I agree.That covers the physical side of things. In the modern day, slut-shaming occurs due to the psychological side of things.

Kahn and London, 1991 and more recently Teachman, 2003 as well as others have demonstrated that women who have an unrestricted sociosexuality are more likely to be involved in marriages that divorce and extra-pair fertilizations (cheating). No similar robust correlation exists for men. Evolutionary psychologists have hypothesized that this may be due to a release of Oxytocin, which facilitates pair bonding with the previous men(decreasing the value of current commitment) due to the aforementioned differential parental investment.

Furthermore, Agostinelli, 1994 has linked an unrestricted sociosexuality with poor impulse control as well as risky decision making. Additionally, Ramrakha, 2013 has found a strong correlation between drug use in women who have an unrestricted sociosexuality, which has a substantially weaker effect for men.

This psychological and biological landscape paints a picture wherein having many sexual partners leads to poor impulse control and risky decision making for both genders, and in women, correlates with drug use, dissolved marriages and cheating to a much stronger degree.

When considering the divorce, alimony, child-custody, child-support and domestic abuse laws that govern most first world countries. This makes choosing a woman who has an unrestricted sociosexuality a poor investment for your future.

ummmm most black people in the us (70%) cant swim. Looked this up after I saw that story about about all those people in Louisiana who drowned trying to save that little girl and was very surprised.

If you have unprotected heterosexual sex with a HIV-infected woman (that is, insertive penile-vaginal intercourse), there is only a 1 in 2000 chance that the disease will be transmitted. Vice verse, it is still only a 1 in 1000 chance. For receptive anal intercourse, the risk jumps to 1 in 200.

I consider it controversial firstly because the transmission rate is surprisingly low generally, and extremely low (in comparison to general expectations) for heterosexual sex.Source.

Yes. The cause of the sudden windfall reduction of crime in NYC in the late 90s was not due to better policing or a better economy or anything like that, but because 15-30 years ago abortions had a windfall increase. This is also largely based on the finding that unwanted children are more likely to become criminals.

I did a report on how the perceived ideal body differed through American cultures. Long story short, black and Latino men prefer their chicks at least 2-3 dress sizes larger than Caucasian preferences.

Getting rid of all the obese people in the US could save over 21% of their healthcare budget.Source:

Edit : great my most upvoted comment is about eugenics (somewhat) sorry guys.

That children with parents who are MARRIED, are better off emotionally, financially, and health wise that any other type of parent relationships. That includes families in loving cohabitation for 50 years, homosexual marriages and multiple other family situations. I wrote a paper on in a couple years ago. But I was so surprised that maybe that piece of paper actually has an effect.

View original post here:
15 Very Politically Incorrect Things That Are Also Absolutely True ...

Posted in Politically Incorrect | Comments Off on 15 Very Politically Incorrect Things That Are Also Absolutely True …

From Politically Correct To Cancel Culture, How Accountability … – NPR

Posted: at 1:43 pm

"The goal of cancel culture is to make decent Americans live in fear of being fired, expelled, shamed, humiliated and driven from society as we know it," then-President Donald Trump said during a speech at the 2020 Republican National Convention. It was remarkably similar to a sentiment expressed by another Republican president about political correctness nearly 30 years earlier. Spencer Platt/Getty Images hide caption

"The goal of cancel culture is to make decent Americans live in fear of being fired, expelled, shamed, humiliated and driven from society as we know it," then-President Donald Trump said during a speech at the 2020 Republican National Convention. It was remarkably similar to a sentiment expressed by another Republican president about political correctness nearly 30 years earlier.

When former President Donald Trump announced his lawsuit against Facebook, Twitter and Google this month, he used a word that has become a familiar signal in modern politics.

"We're demanding an end to the shadow-banning, a stop to the silencing and a stop to the blacklisting, banishing and canceling that you know so well," Trump said in a speech.

That term, "canceling," has become central to the present-day debate over the consequences of speech and who gets to exact them. It has ascended from minor skirmishes on Twitter to the highest office in the country, and it actually mirrors a cultural conversation that started three decades ago.

"This is a power struggle of different groups or forces in society, I think, at its most basic," says Nicole Holliday, an assistant professor of linguistics at the University of Pennsylvania. "And this is the same case with political correctness that used to get boiled down to, well, 'Do you have a right to be offended if it means I don't have the right to say something?' "

The idea of being "politically correct," having the most morally upstanding opinion on complicated subjects and the least offensive language with which to articulate it, gained popularity in the 1990s before people on the outside weaponized it against the community it came from just like the idea of "canceling" someone today.

"I do think that 'cancel' in particular is something that was invented sort of by young people, and it actually just kind of means boycott, right? It means 'Do not support this thing,' " Holliday says.

Now, she says, "conservatives have picked it up not to just mean boycott, but rather to say: Our value system is under threat by these people who want to [de-]monetize or de-platform us because we have unpopular opinions."

But it's not just conservatives figures who think cancel culture has gone too far. The fear of being "canceled" has caused some everyday people to be more aware of and at times, concerned about what they say and post online.

So how did an effort to hold people accountable for their actions become politicized and get so out of control? To understand the uproar over cancel culture, it may help to examine the past.

Ruth Perry has seen the long arc of these kinds of debates. She's a professor emeritus of literature at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where she worked for almost four decades and founded the women's studies department in 1984.

Back in her early career, Perry says, she ran with a crowd of idealists.

"We cared about the Earth, we cared about ecology, we cared about treating animals correctly," she says. "We cared about sexism, we cared about white supremacy all these things."

Perry says her peers would use the phrase "politically correct" to tease each other over whether their actions lined up with their ideals.

"Somebody would say, 'Would it be politically correct if we had a hamburger?' somebody who was a vegetarian would say that. Or somebody who was a feminist might say, 'It may not be politically correct, but I think he's really hot,' [about] some sexist movie star or something," says Perry.

"Politically correct" was a kind of in-joke among American leftists something you called a fellow leftist when you thought the person was being self-righteous. "The term was always used ironically," Perry says, "always calling attention to possible dogmatism."

Then, right-wing think tanks and conservatives started to use the term as a form of attack in both the media and academia.

"It felt like, 'Oh, my God, they're using this against us,' " Perry says. "And they're acting as if this term really was a kind of litmus test for political correctness, which it never had been."

A search of newspapers and magazines in the archive Nexis shows just how rapidly the term expanded beyond its original scene. In 1989, the phrase "politically correct" appeared fewer than 250 times in print. By 1994, the archive shows more than 10,000 hits. The idea was everywhere: from comedy shows like Bill Maher's Politically Incorrect to cartoons like Beavis and Butt-Head and even current events shows like Firing Line on PBS.

This national obsession didn't just bubble up organically.

"It is an industry," John Wilson, author of the 1995 book The Myth of Political Correctness, says. "There are all these right-wing foundations and books that were published that made a lot of money promoting this idea."

He adds that the word "myth" in the title of his book is important to understanding how it became a phenomenon.

"A myth is not a falsehood: It doesn't mean it's a lie. It doesn't mean everything is fabricated," he says. "It means that it's a story. And so what happened in the '90s is, people, with political correctness, they took certain sometimes true anecdotes and they created a web, a story out of them, a myth that there was this vast repression of conservative voices on college campuses."

Wilson says there were grains of truth to the conservative argument isolated examples of conflicts and protests, often on college campuses, and real cases of people getting punished or fired but that those isolated cases got magnified into a sweeping national narrative that the right used to claim conservatives were being silenced. And by claiming victimization, Wilson says, conservatives were able to use the term "political correctness" as a bludgeon to hammer the left, a lot like the way the phrase "cancel culture" is used today.

Then, like now, local debates that might have stayed largely unknown beyond college newspapers suddenly became national news.

For example, in 1988, NPR and several other news organizations reported on a fight over Stanford University's freshman requirements. The name of the course at the center of the controversy was "Western Culture," which the students wanted replaced with a more multicultural class, Wilson says. People like Education Secretary William Bennett a Republican took the student protests as a broader attack.

"Right from the beginning, this was an assault on Western culture and Western civilization," he said in a 1988 PBS interview.

By 1991, this panic had reached all the way to the president of the United States.

President George H.W. Bush waves to a crowd of over 60,000 at Michigan Stadium in Ann Arbor, Mich., on May 4, 1991, as he arrives to deliver the University of Michigan's commencement speech. Greg Gibson/Associated Press hide caption

President George H.W. Bush waves to a crowd of over 60,000 at Michigan Stadium in Ann Arbor, Mich., on May 4, 1991, as he arrives to deliver the University of Michigan's commencement speech.

"We find free speech under assault throughout the United States, including on some college campuses," said then-President George H.W. Bush in his commencement address at the University of Michigan in 1991. "The notion of political correctness has ignited controversy across the land."

Bush went on: "The disputants treat sheer force getting their foes punished or expelled, for instance as a substitute for the power of ideas."

Another Republican president, Donald Trump, who denounced political correctness during his 2016 presidential campaign, made the same argument against cancel culture almost 30 years later at the 2020 Republican National Convention.

"The goal of cancel culture is to make decent Americans live in fear of being fired, expelled, shamed, humiliated and driven from society as we know it," Trump said during a speech.

Discussion about public cancellations increased in the years leading up to the 2020 election, and that points to something else that these two battles in the culture wars share.

"There tend to be these flare-ups or panics about political correctness in moments of institutional transformation or instability," historian Moira Weigel says, "and I think it tends to be a way that certain groups claim authority in a changing public sphere."

In those political correctness wars of the '90s, college campuses were becoming more diverse, and Weigel says something similar is taking place right now.

"It usually happens in response to movements for racial and gender and sexuality justice, and I think it's no accident that it's with the rise of BLM [Black Lives Matter] that you see it come back again as a big media theme," she says.

Before the entire country started to weigh in on a single person's actions, "canceling" started out on a much smaller scale.

Meredith Clark, an assistant professor of media studies at the University of Virginia, says "cancel culture" builds on a process of accountability that has unfolded in Black communities for years. But, she takes issue with the description of "canceling" as a part of our broader culture.

"Canceling is what comes out of Black discourse it's what comes out of Black queer discourse but the assignment of 'culture' to that makes it a label that's big enough to be slapped on anyone and anything," she says. "And that is where the weaponization of what is otherwise accountability really takes off."

If this had remained something that just stuck within Black communities, within Latinx communities, then this wouldn't really be a story.

Meredith Clark

Clark thinks one reason that cancel culture has become such a hot national topic is people in powerful positions are unaccustomed to having to answer to marginalized people who, through social media, have greater access to them than ever.

"That's what it's all about," Clark says. "If this had remained something that just stuck within Black communities, within Latinx communities, then this wouldn't really be a story."

"But because it has crossed over," she continues, "now this becomes newsworthy, and it becomes something that is positioned as something that every everyday person should fear."

Undoubtedly, the biggest difference between discussions of political correctness in the '90s and cancel culture today is the way social media creates access to both public and private individuals and puts their dialogue on equal footing.

Jon Ronson has been studying that transition for a decade and wrote about the way private individuals have been disproportionately punished for minor transgressions on social media in his 2015 book So You've Been Publicly Shamed. He thinks the issue with cancel culture is not so much one of right versus left, but with the idea that private individuals should be judged in the same way as public figures.

"The term 'cancel culture' has become this ridiculously catchall term where a private individual who did nothing much wrong, whose life was very heavily impacted by an overzealous social media shaming, is suddenly put into the same basket as a provocateur newspaper columnist," Ronson says.

Clark's studies illuminate a similar problem. She says that when you look at the small percentage of the U.S. population that is on Twitter 42% of adults between 18 and 29 and only 27% of adults between 30 and 49, as of February 2021 you understand how out of proportion the narrative of cancel culture is.

"Given the tiny, tiny portion of the American population in particular that uses Twitter, we're not really talking about a lot of people who are clamoring to cancel others," she says. "It sounds loud because it gets amplified. The Twitter commentary gets amplified by mainstream media; it gets picked up in discussions [with people] that otherwise would not have been privy to what was happening online."

Ronson thinks one way to alleviate the debate over cancel culture is to better understand how powerful social media and our actions on it can be.

"This is a very new weapon that we have. On Twitter, we're like children crawling towards guns," he says. As with any weapon, the best advice for navigating social media may be to proceed with caution and think before you shoot.

"I just think it's up to every individual on social media to be curious and patient. ... It's absurd to think that you know everything about somebody just because of one poorly worded tweet, and we are judging people that way," Ronson says.

Ronson says he remembers growing up in a culture of racism, misogyny and homophobia in the United Kingdom in the 1970s and '80s and how the idea of political correctness was used to address those issues. In the cases of both political correctness and cancel culture, he thinks some degree of correction is necessary, but what we're witnessing may be overshooting the mark.

"We're living in this very binary world," he says, "and in this world, people on the right are saying, 'You know, we are being silenced by a woke mob,' and people on the left are saying, 'It's not happening we're just holding people accountable.' "

The truth, Ronson says, "is somewhere in the middle."

Mia Venkat, Noah Caldwell and Patrick Jarenwattananon produced and edited this story for broadcast. Alejandra Marquez Janse adapted it for the web.

View original post here:
From Politically Correct To Cancel Culture, How Accountability ... - NPR

Posted in Politically Incorrect | Comments Off on From Politically Correct To Cancel Culture, How Accountability … – NPR

TMS: What It Felt Like for Me I Psych Central

Posted: at 1:38 pm

TMS aka rTMS for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is a noninvasive type of brain stimulation treatment. Its used for treating depression, migraine, and OCD, among other conditions.

During TMS, magnetic pulses repeatedly stimulate nerve cells in your brain. The pulses are aimed at specific areas of your brain thought to be involved in mood (typically the frontal cortex).

While the way it works and how it can help people with depression (and other conditions) isnt completely understood, essentially, the pulses excite or inhibit certain neurons. In turn, some people find relief from their depression symptoms.

TMS is usually prescribed to people who havent found success with other treatments, such as antidepressants for depression.

Some people get it confused with ECT (electroconvulsive therapy) and other brain stimulation therapies, but theyre not the same. Unlike ECT, you dont need to be sedated, and it doesnt involve seizures. And in TMS, nothing is implanted or surgical.

So TMS is one of the most noninvasive of all brain stimulation therapies.

I have treatment-resistant depression, so finding treatments that work (and keep working) has not been an easy road. On my good days, I try to look at it as a process that will continue to evolve. And who knows what new scientific discoveries will bring?

So when TMS was presented to me as an option, I said yes without really knowing what it would be like.

The first step before TMS treatment can begin is getting it prescribed.

For me, I already had a psychiatrist, so I didnt have to go through the process of finding a new doctor or establishing a relationship you might need to meet with a doctor a few times before they know enough about you and your treatment history to prescribe TMS.

My psychiatrist knew my full medication history and was the one who first brought up the option. When I agreed, it was time for the approval process.

The approval process will vary based on many factors, such as accessibility in your area, your insurance, and the availability of the clinics.

You may also want to reach out to your insurance to find out what they cover. Mine covered the cost and just involved a copay, but the cost of TMS may be steep for others one study mentions between $6,000 to $12,000.

Your insurance might also have different requirements before approving TMS. Mine defines treatment-resistant as having tried at least two antidepressants, but other insurances vary, so you might need to prove youve taken more medications than that.

My doctor completed the paperwork, so that was one burden off my shoulders. Then I waited for the clinic to contact me.

I had to wait about a month and a half from the time my psychiatrist filled out the paperwork until the time I walked through the door for my first appointment.

The first appointment when starting TMS is different from other appointments, not just because you have to fill out the offices paperwork. The first session sets you up for the rest of your sessions and takes about an hour.

In the intake appointment, they figure out where the device needs to be positioned, so its targeting the ideal part of your brain, as well as the power level (or motor threshold).

The technician started by taking measurements of my head to make sure the device (TMS coil, specifically) was properly positioned.

When I first started TMS, the machine they were using was huge, and the coil was in a giant helmet. By the end of my treatments, theyd gotten a new machine where the coil looked more like a shower head and was far less claustrophobic.

The technician adjusted (and adjusted again) as they figured out exactly where to position the coil. But for me, it was just a lot of staring at a wall while wearing earplugs.

Then they tested my motor threshold. The motor threshold is the minimum amount of power needed its sort of like figuring out the dose.

I cant think of a better way to describe TMS than it feeling like youre being vigorously tapped on the head over and over again.

When they tested my motor threshold, they found it by seeing how much power it took to make my thumb twitch. It felt like someone was gradually tapping more forcefully until the desired twitch was achieved.

Honestly, the first appointment was strange. It felt like Id never get used to the sensations (I did), and it was kind of frustrating just sitting there while they made the tiniest of adjustments.

And while I never had side effects in the future, I did get dizzy after that first appointment and had to sit and sip water until the tunnel vision went away. Dizziness is a known side effect.

After that first appointment, it started feeling more like a routine. There was less adjustment, less time involved, and I never felt lightheaded again (just one or two headaches).

But appointments were definitely an investment of time you need to have treatment 5 days a week for the first 4 to 6 weeks. The sessions were only 20 minutes, but if my job hadnt been flexible, I wouldnt have been able to manage.

Every weekday for 4 weeks, Id come in, take my glasses off, put in my earplugs, and sit with my eyes closed for 20 minutes. The technician usually gave me a blanket if I forgot a jacket since the fans blowing from the machine blow right on you and make the room cold.

I started trying to meditate since sitting with my own thoughts for 20 minutes could turn into a negative thought spiral that Id recommend to no one.

Once a week, Id fill out a questionnaire to monitor my symptoms before, during, and at the end of treatment.

After the 4 weeks were up, I continued treatment. But I went from 5 days a week to 3, then 2, then 1, before stopping.

See the article here:

TMS: What It Felt Like for Me I Psych Central

Posted in Tms | Comments Off on TMS: What It Felt Like for Me I Psych Central