Monthly Archives: May 2022

Fake news trolls have persecuted innocent McCanns for 15 years – The Irish Times

Posted: May 28, 2022 at 8:16 pm

New information about the case of Madeleine McCann, the child who went missing from a Portuguese hotel room in Praia da Luz 15 years ago while her parents notoriously were eating tapas about 50 metres away, brings fresh reminders of a certain kind of human malignance.

Actual evidence has been unearthed, apparently, linking the missing child to the camper van where the sole suspect and convicted rapist, Christian Brckner was living at the time. German prosecutors are "sure" he is the murderer and will soon decide whether he should stand trial for other child-related incidents in Portugal, 10 years apart.

The words "human malignance" go nowhere near describing Brckner's trail of grief and destruction. They describe instead the everyday conspiracy theorists, the ordinary ghouls, the bright-eyed "true crime" enthusiasts who for 15 years have hung Madeleine's disappearance squarely on the girl's grieving parents, Kate and Gerry McCann.

Fifteen years of a relentless search for a child by her parents, by three police forces and a slew of private investigators. Fifteen years of tabloid splashes, books, documentaries, podcasts, libel cases, vile slander and blame games.

Few issues flush out more self-righteous bile than other peoples parenting. From the early days, one element remained constant: the public vilification and online persecution of the missing childs parents.

Kate McCanns stoicism, her grimly maintained jogging routine, her t-shirt selection, her refusal to claw the earth in remorse for her parenting mistakes, were deemed proof that she was not a natural mother.

Gerry McCann tried explained that he and his wife had been advised that self-control might have most impact on a putative kidnapper tuning into their many television appeals. She continued to give tearless, self-flagellating interviews, admitting their mistakes and revealing that their three, much-wanted babies were the result of IVF treatment.

It made no difference.

Five years ago, on the 10th anniversary of the childs disappearance, tweets with the hastag #McCann, eviscerating the couple as cold-hearted liars, were averaging 100 an hour.

It doesnt ever stop. Somewhere in the world, someone is doing this . . . and youre either with them or against them, said Dr John Synnott, a senior lecturer in investigative psychology who led the study at the University of Huddersfield.

The group, operating in what he called an anti-social network, had a strong female presence and for many, it had clearly become a badge of identity, their first thought of the day in a witch-hunt that took up vast proportions of their lives. Some are still out there. To what purpose ?

They like the self-image of righteous campaigners, seekers of justice, proprietors of morality. And the McCanns were easy meat.

The goal was not merely to punish them for child neglect but to prove they had actually killed their daughter and buried her body. Anyone who argued otherwise was a shill, ie in the paid employ of the McCanns and/or engaged in a criminal cover-up with a sinister media/ government/justice complex to protect paedophiles, or just too stupid to accept the social sleuths sophisticated grasp of the facts.

Their pin-up was Gonalo Amaral, the Portuguese lead investigator who was swiftly removed from the case. His 2008 book, Maddie: The Truth about the Lie, which earned him about 400,000, drew a civil lawsuit for damages from the McCanns who were awarded 430,000 plus damages. This was overturned on appeal, and the Portuguese supreme court went on to uphold Amarals right to freedom of expression.

Media commentators whose own papers were profiteering mightily on the back of unverified reports from dodgy Portuguese sources dismissed that sort of thing as a fight to control the narrative.

The suggestion that the McCanns were complicit in their daughters disappearance was bounced around with such casual glee that the couple finally sued the Daily Express for libel and won 550,000 (plus 375, 000 for the so-called Tapas Seven, their holiday companions).

But the word was out there. People chatting in Irish homes, shops, hairdressers and pubs tapped their noses, sage-like just read that paper, watch this doc, see for yourself and casually destroyed two grieving parents.

Right, so why would a stone-cold pair of killers raise and spend millions pursuing a noisy, relentless, multimillion-euro global campaign to keep the investigation alive for 15 years?

Wouldnt you just slink off saying phew, we got away with it? Its the money, stupid, chanted the anti-McCanns.

In many ways the anti-McCanns were a precursor of the circular reasoning that has become social medias default. Ask for independent evidence to support a glib claim, distortion or smear vaccines, Brexit, election steals, politicians and the answer will come, whatabout . . ., educate yourself , MSM shill, too busy doing a real job, bye.

Jay Rosen, a journalism professor at New York University, uses a generic Twitter exchange to illustrate.

Me: Wow. Have you seen evidence for that?

Them: Yes, try looking.

Me: Can you point me to any ?

Them: Im not your golden retriever.

Me: Agreed! Can you point me to any?

Them: Do your own research.

It can be dismissed as online trash of course, easily avoided, so just get off Twitter.

Except these are the certainties and the bad faith assumptions that are shaping whole nations and our world. In this case the kind that resulted in the casual public destruction of parents grieving the unimaginable loss of their child. And plenty of people you know took joy in it.

Original post:

Fake news trolls have persecuted innocent McCanns for 15 years - The Irish Times

Posted in Fake News | Comments Off on Fake news trolls have persecuted innocent McCanns for 15 years – The Irish Times

Fake news alert: Vijay Deverakonda, Samantha injured on Kushi sets? Here’s the truth – Oneindia

Posted: at 8:16 pm

Fact Check

oi-Deepika S

| Published: Tuesday, May 24, 2022, 13:06 [IST]

New Delhi, May 24: Several media reports claimed that actor VijayDeverakonda and SamanthaRuth Prabhu were injured while shooting for Kushi movie .The report further stated that the duo immediately rushed to a hospital and was helped with first aid.

As soon as the news spread on social media, the spokesperson of the film called the report 'fake'.

"There are few reports that Vijay Deverakonda and Samantha Ruth Prabhu were injured while shooting for Kushi movie. There is no truth in this news. The entire team returned to Hyderabad yesterday after successfully completing 30 days of shooting in Kashmir. Don't believe such news," he tweeted.

Earlier reports were rife that Samantha and Vijay were performing a stunt sequence in the Pahalgam area of Kashmir during which they sustained injuries. In both the actors had to run a vehicle over the rope tied on both sides of the Lidder river, but unfortunately, the vehicle fell down into the deep water and both injured their backs.

Kushi, the film is being directed and produced by Shiva Nirvana. It is slated to release on December 23, 2022, in Telugu, Tamil, Kannada and Malayalam.

Vijay Deverakonda, Samantha injured on Kushi sets.

Samantha Ruth Prabhu and Vijay Deverakonda are safe. Dont believe such rumours.

For Breaking News and Instant Updates

Allow Notifications

You have already subscribed

Story first published: Tuesday, May 24, 2022, 13:06 [IST]

Go here to see the original:

Fake news alert: Vijay Deverakonda, Samantha injured on Kushi sets? Here's the truth - Oneindia

Posted in Fake News | Comments Off on Fake news alert: Vijay Deverakonda, Samantha injured on Kushi sets? Here’s the truth – Oneindia

Taskforce to tackle bribery, election violence –

Posted: at 8:16 pm

By Jake Chung / Staff writer, with CNA

The Supreme Prosecutors Office on Wednesday established a task force to combat bribery and election-related violence, which is to take special note of new methods of paying bribes, such as cryptocurrencies and mobile payments.

The November local elections would be a challenge for the judiciary, especially in three areas bribery, fake news and possible foreign intervention Minister of Justice Tsai Ching-hsiang () said at the establishment ceremony.

Local prosecutors offices have established temporary command centers to provide technical support when investigating election cases, Tsai said, exhorting the task force to stop at nothing to prosecute any person seeking to sway an election through wealth or violence.

Law enforcement officers and the judiciary should also take note of new methods of payment, such as cryptocurrencies and mobile payment systems, which could replace traditional ways of paying bribes, he said.

The judiciary should closely monitor any abnormal payments to election candidates or their heelers via the ministrys Financial Intelligence Unit, he added.

The judiciary must also pay attention to whether an election has been swayed by fake news and, in the instance of confirmed fake news, the judiciary must act swiftly to debunk the claims as soon as possible, Tsai said.

Talking about anti-bribery measures is still a useful ploy and adequate use of the Internet to disseminate the message would also help convince young people to call out any acts of vote-buying, Prosecutor General Hsing Tai-chao () said.

The central government plans to create and distribute anti-bribery videos to local prosecutors offices, airports and railway stations, he said.

Anti-bribery efforts and measures to prevent coercion by force would continue as usual, but prosecutorial units would prioritize the prosecution of cases involving fake information, Hsing said.

He added that he would ask local prosecutors offices to task prosecutors with looking into cases of suspected foreign invention, while stepping up police sweeps of underground currency exchanges and betting pools.

Hsing also mentioned cryptocurrency, online game credits and other things with monetary value that could be used to bribe voters as something to look out for.

The judiciary would be looking very closely at whether the source of payments come from foreign sources and prosecute those involved for contravening the Anti-Infiltration Act (), Hsing said.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

Excerpt from:

Taskforce to tackle bribery, election violence -

Posted in Fake News | Comments Off on Taskforce to tackle bribery, election violence –

Lallantop and Aaj Tak spread fake news about what Mahant of Kashi Karwat temple had said about Shivling in Gyanvapi: Here is the truth – OpIndia

Posted: at 8:16 pm

Mahant Ganesh Shankar Upadhyay of Kashi Karwat temple has slammed Aaj Tak and The Lallantop for presenting his statements about the Shivling found in Gyanvapi in a way to suit their own agenda. In a video response he gave to the channels while talking to Khabar India TV, Ganesh Shankar Upadhyay said, If they have led me in a particular direction to say something and then used it to prove their point that there is no temple but there is a mosque; then cant they see that it is originally a temple structure from the front and back and sides? Are they blind?

In a report by The Lallantop and Aaj Tak, Mahant Ganesh Shankar Upadhyays statement, in which he had shared his childhood memories about the wuzukhana of the disputed structure at Gyanvapi, was used to peddle their agenda that there is no Shivling in there and hence implying that the structure is a not a temple but a mosque. The leftist media houses and subsequently the Islamists had used his selected comments to claim that a Hindu priest is saying that there is no Shivling in the structure.

When asked about the Shivling found in Gyanvapi during the videography, Mahant had told the Aaj Tak journalist, Its shape is just like that of a Shivling. According to the information that we are fed since our childhood, it is a fountain. We were told so since our childhood. We have seen it since childhood. We used to go there. We have been to the mosque hundreds of times. We used to sit there for hours. We used to talk with the Maulavis and Sevadars there. The structure existed at that time too. It was seen in the centre there. It is not a new thing for me. Out of curiosity, we used to ask them what is this. So we were told that this is a fountain. We never saw it in operating condition, nor did we bother to ask first. We then asked them how it operates, and how it looks when there are fountains. And you know fountains usually look good and they were saying that it is since the Mughal era, so we were curious.

He further said, So we were like, there is a mosque in front of our home. Our Mahant residence is just 10 meters away. And there is a Mughal time fountain in the mosque as told by them. We had a cordial relationship with the Maulavis. There were no disputes in those days. We used to talk with them many times. So what information we have from those personal talks is that it is a fountain. But we have never seen it in working condition. Now there are visuals in the media. The pond is being cleaned. There is a top view of the structure. It indeed looks like a Shivling only. We have seen the pond in a dry condition for the first time. Though we were told that it is a fountain, now the thing has come up that it is a Shivling. It is a claim of Hindus and the court is to decide it. Nandi is also there, though it is situated at a distance. And there was a Kashi Vishwashwar temple is an undisputed fact. And that temple was destroyed during the Mughal rule. The mosque was made on the top of some part of the temple.

Even while continuing the talk, the Aaj Tak journalist had started his next question with a remark, As you have said that it is a fountain. Even in the reports, Aaj Tak focused on Mahant saying that it is a fountain. In this way, Mahant Ganesh Shankar Upadhyays statements were used to peddle an agenda. They ignored the next part of his statement and focused only on the first part, where he had said what he was told by the Muslim clerics. He didnt claim on his own that the structure is a fountain and not a Shivling.

While talking with Khabar India TV, furious Mahant Ganesh Shankar Upadhyay lashed out at the agenda peddlers. He said, Those spreading and broadcasting false propaganda are a blot on Sanatan Hindu Dharma. You shoot for five times in different ways and show only the five minutes? You take some statement. Join it to some other and then make the thing that suits you. They have done it under a conspiracy. They have presented my remarks in a way that will divide the collective Hindu opinion. And dividing Hindus is a conspiracy of non-Hindus. There is a need to identify those who are creating this divide. This all is a conspiracy. There is a whole lobby doing that. They may be from the media. They may be from politics or they may be Vidharmi Hindus.

Mahant Ganesh Shankar Upadhyay further said, Shahar Mufti says that we gave away Babri and now nothing more can be given. What did they give? And is it really given by them? Did Hindus beg for that? No. It was a fight of centuries and generations. Thousands of people have given their lives for that. And they talk of Aurangzeb who killed his father, brother, and son. Among all the Mughal rulers, he was the ugliest. And about what centuries of history you are talking about. If you want to talk about centuries, talk to Hindus. How many centuries of history does Islam have? We are here for the last one lakh years. And we have its proofs. We have all the scriptures and Puranas.

Read the rest here:

Lallantop and Aaj Tak spread fake news about what Mahant of Kashi Karwat temple had said about Shivling in Gyanvapi: Here is the truth - OpIndia

Posted in Fake News | Comments Off on Lallantop and Aaj Tak spread fake news about what Mahant of Kashi Karwat temple had said about Shivling in Gyanvapi: Here is the truth – OpIndia

Column: Freedom of speech trumps the right to not be offended – Curry Coastal Pilot

Posted: at 8:14 pm

Over the last few weeks, I have received letters, calls, messages and other complaints about a wide variety of topics loosely related to freedom of speech.

In Curry County, the complaints were mostly about the the Chetco Community Library baord's decision not to remove books some find offensive. I have also heard from people who think I should not let Court Boice share his views, even though they are almost always done in a public meeting.

In my mind, these complaints all boil down to freedom of speech. A lot of people talk about the issue, the vast majority say they support it, but it seems few really understand what freedom of speech is.

First of all, freedom of speech only applies to the government. The government is not allowed to create rules that limit freedom of speech. Private companies, including this one, can limit what they allow their employees to say and can limit what others say on our platform. And we do that. We have rules that prohibit others from using our opinion pages to take shots at private companies and private individuals.

Other than that, we allow a lot of different views to be expressed. If you don't like whoever the current president is, you can share that view. If you don't like what your local government is doing, you can share that view, too. If you are strongly pro-life, or pro-choice, bring it on. We are not going to censor what our readers think because others might be offended.

This whole country was built on arguing - whether we were to have an elected king or a president, life-longers or a temporary-servants. One of the coolest parts of the U.S. government is the peaceful transition of power - to the extent that even if the elected official is a completely against everything you hold near and dear, the power transfers without call to arms. If you read history, all the presidents and elected officials have had people, with every voice they had from every rooftop, completely and unequivocally oppose them. Even John Wilks Booth thought he was a hero, in his mind, because there was such opposition to Lincoln. The debates on the floor of the Continental Congress were barely short of violent, but the case to unite was greater than the case to be right.

Secondly, when it comes to freedom of speech, the Consitutional protections are not there to protect those who want to say friendly, happy things. Freedom of speech protects the most vile, hateful, evil speech out there. If you remember, several years ago, a small group from Westboro Baptist Church was protesting at funerals of fallen service members. The signs the church members held said the most spiteful, hateful things imaginable. Yet, every attempt to quiet them was overturned because free speech equals vile speech.

That doesn't mean there aren't repercussions for speech. While the government can't limit speech, many private businesses have rightly held employees to account for things they have said, written and shared. And that is perfectly legal.

That isn't always popular, but I support speech with little restraint, even if that speech offends me and targets me. Putting limits on speech is a slippery slope, that once began can spiral out of control quickly. Do we as a country really want people being arrested because they have an opinion outside of the norm? If you say yes, who gets to decide what opinion is allowed?

Under a President Joe Biden, what is allowed might look very different than what is allowed under a President Donald Trump. What if the decided opinion completely opposes your own and you are never allowed to air different thought?

We appreciate our readers, and we value their input. We don't want to lose a single one. But we understand that embracing free speech will sometimes mean others get offended. We will not censure or remove writers who say offensive things within our limits.

My hope is if you are offended, rather than getting angry, sit down and send me a letter with your own views. Use this space to share your thoughts. Who knows, maybe you can change some minds.

Read more from the original source:
Column: Freedom of speech trumps the right to not be offended - Curry Coastal Pilot

Posted in Freedom of Speech | Comments Off on Column: Freedom of speech trumps the right to not be offended – Curry Coastal Pilot

Amber Heards Lawyer Asks Jury To Stand Up For Freedom Of Speech In Final Words In Johnny Depps $50M Defamation Trial Against Ex-Wife; Deliberations…

Posted: at 8:14 pm

UPDATE, 11:58 AM PT: We ask ladies and gentlemen, that you hold Mr. Depp accountable for his actions, Amber Heards lawyer Ben Rottenborn exclaimed today in the final moments of Johnny Depps $50 million defamation trial against his ex-wife. Stand up for victims of domestic abuse everyone. Stand up for freedom of speech. Give Amber Heard her life back.

With less than ten minutes left in their closing statement allotment, Heards defense team went for the constitutional juggler with the very last word in the lurid case that has captivated America and the world over the past nearly two months.

Its simple, if you believe that Depp was abusive to Amber one time ..then your job is very easy, Rottenborn said to the jury in the Virginia courtroom. You can not only deny Mr. Depps claim, but affirm Ambers counterclaim

Directly following Heard being repeatedly called a liar and playing the role of her life and Depps vile communications being swept under the rug as a dark, ugly humor, in the plaintiffs rebuttal from attorney Camille Vasquez, the defenses last stand was the definition of short and sharp, as it had to be to have any impact.

Spilling over six weeks in a Virginia courtroom, this widely covered trial all stems from Depps March 2019 lawsuit against Heard over the late 2018 Washington Post op-ed she penned. In that piece for the Jeff Bezos-owned broadsheet, Heard called herself a public figure representing domestic abuse and detailed the blast radius that she and other women face.

While he said nothing to this effect during the couples 2016 restraining order-filled divorce, Depp has insisted over the last three years that he never abused Heard. The fired Fantastic Beasts actor actually claims that he was the victim of abuse in the relationship Proving unsuccessful in getting the lawsuit dismissed, Heard filed a $100 million countersuit in the summer of 2020. That countersuit came just a few months before Depp proved unsuccessful in his UK libel suit against The Sun tabloid for calling him a wife beater.

Casting off from the closing arguments and final instructions from Judge Penny Azcarte after six weeks of trial, the seven-person jury now goes into deliberation on the defamation case. Check out the jury form they will take with them as a guide here.

Even though Depps Brown Ruddick legal team provided the sharpest POV for most of the trial, Heards defense went hard for the First Amendment in their closing. Perhaps too little, too late amidst the lurid accusations of physical, emotional, verbal and sexual abuse and parade of less than stellar witnesses that have dominated the trial since its April 11 start, the power of the defenses 11th hour pivot now rests with the jury.

Of course, this will not end regardless if Depp triumphs in his defamation case or Heard wins with her $100 million counterclaim. Outside the Fairfax County Courthouse, the reputations of both parties are in tatters. Inside the court system, you can almost bet the Black Pearl therell be an appeal. For the record, Depp has unsuccessfully attempted to mount an appeal in his loss in his 2020 UK libel suit against the Rupert Murdoch-owned The Sun.

Now we wait.

PREVIOUSLY, 9:24 AM PT: This whole case is about blaming Amber Heard for things she didnt do, the Aquaman stars lawyer told a Virginia courtroom today in closing arguments in the $50 million defamation trial from Johnny Depp against his former wife.

But thats what Mr. Depp does, thats what hes always done, started attorney Ben Rottenborn for the defense to the jury and Judge Penney Azcarate on Friday. Blame other people, refuse to take accountability. But the problem for him here is hes running head long into the United States Constitution.

How To Watch The Johnny Depp-Amber Heard Trial: Livestream Link & Trial Schedule

Most of what you have heard in this trial, you do not need to make a decision on, a mainly measured Rottenborn asserted after six weeks of heinous abuse claims and highly explicated testimony recounted by both Depp and Heard, various staffers, doctors, family members, friends and well paid hangers-on. Rottenborn termed the whole case and trial as victim blaming at its most disgusting on the part of the Depp and his Brown Ruddick lawyers.

Having stumbled into various traps by Depps team and seemingly losing the plot over and over, Heards team today came out with precision on Americans sacred document, finally.

Does the First Amendment give Ms. Heard the right to write the words she wrote in this article on December 18, 2018? Rottenborn asked rhetorically. Should someone be able to write an article like that in the United States of America without going through Hell? he went on to say of the focus of the trial.

Ladies and gentleman, let me be very clear, if Amber was abused by Mr. Depp even one time, then she wins, Rottenborn added, calling it ridiculous Depp assertion that he never abused his Rum Diary co-star. They are trying to trick you to believe that Amber has to be perfect to win. Actually, if he fails to prove he didnt abuse Amber one time, she wins.

Depp sued Heard in March 2019 over a December 18, 2018 Washington Post op-ed the actress wrote about becoming a public figure representing domestic abuse. Though the op-end never mentioned Depp by name, the past Oscar nominee claimed it devastated his already waning career. As his attorneys have proclaimed over and over in the April 11 starting trial, Depp also said back in 2019 that he was in fact the one who was abused in the relationship. As was brought up this morning, those claims by Depp are an apparent contradiction to what both sides said publicly in their temporary restraining order filled 2016 divorce.

Characterizing Depp as vindictive on Friday, Rottenborn said the actor will do everything he can to destroy your life, destroy your career.

Just because people might read the article and remember that Amber Heard used to be married to Johnny Depp and she accused him of abuse, that doesnt mean that she designed and intended defamatory implications in writing about herself, Rottenborn also noted in the opening of the defenses closing argument, which are expected to last several hours today.

Having failed to get the case dismissed or moved out of Virginia, Heard in 2020 countersued for $100 million. That countersuit came months before Depps UK libel case against The Sun tabloid for calling him a wife beater proved dramatically unsuccessful in November 2020.

This is the real Johnny Depp, the lawyer said, noting the sexual assault claims and reading out and showing numerous texts from the former Pirates of the Caribbean star to friends like The Avengers Paul Bettany and staffers threating death, sexual violence and global humiliation against Heard. Audio tapes of self-describing monster Depp screaming at Heard that she is a f*cking c*nt and a disturbing 2016 video of an enraged Depp smashing up a kitchen bellowing motherf*cker were also played for the jury for maximum impact following the scorched Earth closing argument from the plaintiffs legal team. Thats abuse, Rottenborn said, noting Depps habit of snickering when such evidence was shown in the Fairfax County Courthouse.

Briefly listing off all the accusations and dirty laundry that has stunk up most of this circus of a trial, Rottenborn exclaimed none of that is in the article. He added: It would be a very different article if shed written about what she suffered, what she told you about the past six weeks.

The facts are absolute overwhelming of abuse, Rottenborn reiterated near the end of his presentation, which was momentarily interrupted by an Amber alert going off on numerous courtroom attendees phones. Any damage to Mr. Depps career is self-caused.

Rottenborn will be succeed in the courtroom by his fellow defense attorney Elaine Bredehoft, who will argue the counterclaims. After that, Depps side will have an hour for rebuttal and then Heards team will have another hour themselves to address the jury. If all goes to schedule, later this afternoon, the seven-person jury will go behind closed doors to consider their verdict.

In theory, we could see a verdict today, before the Memorial Day long weekend begins. However, but in all likelihood, deliberations will continue into next week after the holiday.

Follow this link:
Amber Heards Lawyer Asks Jury To Stand Up For Freedom Of Speech In Final Words In Johnny Depps $50M Defamation Trial Against Ex-Wife; Deliberations...

Posted in Freedom of Speech | Comments Off on Amber Heards Lawyer Asks Jury To Stand Up For Freedom Of Speech In Final Words In Johnny Depps $50M Defamation Trial Against Ex-Wife; Deliberations…

Inside Amber Heards childhood, journey to atheism and early acting career – HITC – Football, Gaming, Movies, TV, Music

Posted: at 8:13 pm

American actor Johnny Depps defamation case against his ex-wife Amber Heard concluded on 27th May after six long weeks of testifying, cross-examination and various witnessesbeing called to the stand.

During the trial that took place in Virginias Fairfax County Court, Heard recalled her early childhood along with details of her first interactions with the Depp on the set of 2011s movie The Rum Diary.

Lets take a look inside Amber Heards childhood, journey to atheism and early acting career. Where is the Hollywood star from and how did she gain onscreen success?

Long before Amber Heards marriage disagreements were making headlines, the actress was described as a shy girl from her hometown.

On 22 April 1986, Heard was born inAustin, Texas to an internet researcher named Patricia Paige (formerly Parsons) and business owner David Clinton Heard.

Her father owned a small construction company and she has a younger sister named Whitney Henriquez who is now aged 34.

Independent reports that the Heard sisters were raised in a conservative Catholic household with modest finances. The 36-year-old now resides in Los Angeles.

Heard competed in beauty pageants in her younger years. In 2018, she told Glamour that her family made her responsible for raising the funds that she needed, so shed often ask businesses in her area to sponsor her ahead of the competitions.

However, the former beauty queen expressed her mixed feelings when asked how she feels about the industry now as she admitted: Pageants are weird, and I cant support the objectification.

Aside from her time spent on stage, Amber Heard had a few hobbies with her dad, who worked construction and broke horses in his free time. She told Glamour: I was his hunting and fishing buddy.

Prior to becoming a Hollywood star with a private life now the trending subject of a media frenzy, Heard was seen as an introverted schoolgirl.

Recalling the actress old school days, a former classmate told the Daily Mail that she was very quiet, and even earned herself the nickname Amber seen and not Heard because she was so timid.

However, the classmate said that Amber was always ambitious: She always seemed almost like her mind was just off somewhere else and she always said, Im going to go and be an actress and that is what I want to do.

When Heard was only 16, her best friend tragically died in a car accident. Independent states that as a result, she became an atheist. Amber previously told USA Today: That was the hardest blow emotionally that I have ever had to endure. Suddenly, you realize tomorrow might not come. Now I live by the motto, Today is what I have.

After her best friends death, Heard reportedly met her first serious boyfriend who introduced her to the writings of Russian-born atheist Ayn Rand. Nicki Swift reports that after reading all of her books, Heard stated: Ever since then, I have been obsessed with her ideals. All Ive ever needed is myself.

In an interview with Rob Brink for Misbehave, as per Friendly Athiest, the subject of religion came up and Heard was asked about her Catholic upbringing.

She said: Id like to thank the way I was raised for giving me enough knowledge about organized religion to make the adult decision to live the rest of my life without it. I dont think you can believe or not believe in anything unless you know a lot about it. I know Christianity, especially Catholicism, like the back of my hand. And my education has given me the freedom to know that it is completely absurd for me to believe it.

Amber later dropped out of school to pursue a modelling career in New York until switching gears to try acting in Los Angeles.

Heard began by sending her pictures to NYC agencies and doing modelling gigs, as she told The Independent.

While the young teenager apparently had no interest in being a model, she loved how different the big city was from her home in conservative Texas: I thought I had died and gone to heaven, she stated: From that moment on I was different.

The stars father previously told the Daily Mail that his daughter always had her heart set on becoming an actor. He added that she had dropped out of her private Catholic school at age 16 to pursue fame:

She wanted this for her career since she was 12-years-old, from the time she was a little girl.

Although Heards family eventually convinced her to return to Texas, she left again once she was aged 18.

According to USA Today, she later earned her diploma by going through a home-study program.

As an actor, she relived her competition days by playing Miss San Antonio in the action film Machete Kills.

Heard received her first leading role in the unconventional slasher filmAll the Boys Love Mandy Lane. The production premiered at the 2006 Toronto International Film Festival but was not released in Europe until 2008 and in the US until 2013 due to distribution problems, Wikipedia states.

During the defamation case that concluded on 27th May, Heard shared details of her first interactions with Johnny Depp on the set of 2011s movie The Rum Diary in Puerto Rico.

On 18th December 2018, Amber Heard wrote an op-ed forThe Washington Post, which was titled Amber Heard: I spoke up against sexual violence and faced our cultures wrath. That has to change.

In the article, theAquamanactress detailed her exposure to abuse from a very young age and her experience of sexual harassment in college.

Johnny Depp is suing Amber Heard for defamation because of an op-ed she published in the Washington Post in 2018. Heard is countersuing Depp. The case is set to continue.

BridTV

10224

Wildhood | Official Trailer | Hulu

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/bpq5vqx70nY/hqdefault.jpg

1020760

1020760

center

13872

In other news, A look at Jana Kramer and Gleb Savchenko's relationship amidst affair rumours

View post:
Inside Amber Heards childhood, journey to atheism and early acting career - HITC - Football, Gaming, Movies, TV, Music

Posted in Atheism | Comments Off on Inside Amber Heards childhood, journey to atheism and early acting career – HITC – Football, Gaming, Movies, TV, Music

Reason and Religion Go Hand in Hand Especially Paganism – Patheos

Posted: at 8:13 pm

Over on the atheist website OnlySky, Dr. Will Gervais has a very good article titled The treasured atheist idea that reason undercuts faith just doesnt hold up. Dr. Gervais is a Senior Lecturer of psychology at the Centre for Culture and Evolution at Brunel University London hes a social scientist and he knows what hes talking about. The summary of this article says:

In 2012, a paper co-authored by Will Gervais and Ara Norenzayan in the journal Science claimed that confronting religious beliefs with rationality tends to lead people toward atheism. But when more rigorous subsequent studies found zero effect of rationality on religious beliefs, he and Norenzayan publicly disavowed their findings.

The data shows that rationality and atheism have a weak and fickle correlation.

To an individual person who left religion, rationality can seem like the most important factor. But in aggregate looking across the entire population of everyone who was raised in a religious home and who tries to apply rationality in their life theres nogeneraltrend whereby rationality leads people to atheism. Peoples individual narratives arent invalid, they just cant speak to broader trends.

Ive always considered myself a reasonable and rational person. I was able to leave the religion of my childhood because it wasnt reasonable I was told I had to believe things I couldnt honestly believe. But I never seriously considered atheism.

Im not going to go deeper into Dr. Gervais article. Read it for yourself I you like. Its not a quick read, but its written for a general audience. The comments section is amusing, in that it demonstrates how atheists like to hang onto their preconceived notions as much as everyone else.

Instead, I want to explore why religion in general and Paganism in particular are very reasonable things.

When most people atheists or otherwise complain about religion what theyre really complaining about is Christianity and conservative Christianity at that. But neither the Southern Baptist Convention nor the Roman Catholic Church are normative of all religions and all religious people.

As a non-Christian, I stay out of the arguments about who is or isnt a true Christian. But as an amateur religious scholar, I will say with confidence that the Episcopal Church, the United Church of Christ, and UU Christians are as much a part of the Christian tradition as the more conservative denominations.

Further, if what you say about religion isnt true of Buddhism, Hinduism, and the worlds remaining indigenous religions, then you arent talking about religion youre talking about Christianity.

Fundamentalism is a bad thing and Im happy to ally with atheists and other people of good will to oppose it. But direct your arrows toward the real enemy, not against religion.

I say this frequently, but its worth repeating until it sinks in. The idea that religion is primarily about what you believe is a modern, Western, Protestant idea. For most people throughout most of history throughout most of the world, religion was and is about what you do, who you are, and whose you are.

Religion is about what you do in your daily practice. Its about what holy days you observe, and how you observe them. Its about what you eat and drink and wear and what you dont.

Mainly, religion is about what values you live by, and what virtues you prioritize over others. My Paganism isnt about rules to follow, its about virtues to embody. Hospitality and reciprocity are my most important virtues, but honesty, courage, and perseverance are also of great importance.

The English word religion comes to us in part from the Latin religare, meaning to bind together. Religion is what makes us a community and a family and not just a collection of individuals.

Belief isnt unimportant. But dont say religion when what you mean is belief religion is much more than belief.

Reason is the proper attribution of cause and effect. Its a process that examines available evidence and comes up with a conclusion supported by that evidence. Done right, it acknowledges the confidence we can have in those conclusions. Some conclusions are 100% certain (or very close to it) while others are likely but do not have enough evidence to be absolutely sure.

Many who call religion unreasonable are operating from a foundation of materialism the philosophical assumption that all that exists is matter and the products of its interactions. It assumes that Gods and spirits not only do not exist, they cannot exist.

Materialism is an assumption, not a conclusion based on evidence. Materialists simply dismiss all the evidence for the existence of Gods and spirits (which is largely experiential evidence). Meanwhile, most people around the world examine their experiences and come to the quite reasonable conclusion that they involved Gods and other spirits.

If all religions were to somehow disappear overnight, we would start building new religions almost immediately. Not because people have a need for belief (and certainly not because they just want to control everybody) but because people have religious experiences. People experience birth and death and they wonder about it. They have an encounter with something they cant explain, and a God spoke to me is the most reasonable explanation they can come up with.

Too many of us minimize our religious experiences, or we rationalize them away. We dont want to appear irrational in a society that often acts more atheist than Christian, or were afraid to talk to our Christian friends about something outside the limits of proper Calvinistic Protestantism.

My Pagan polytheist religion is grounded not in myth but in experience. Our religious experiences are always real. Our interpretations of those experiences may be more accurate or less accurate, more helpful or less helpful. But the experiences themselves are always real.

Science tells us with high confidence that life on Earth evolved once. All living things are related some more closely than others. Humans share 98% of our DNA with chimps and bonobos and 50% with bananas (and all other plants). We were not placed on the Earth as some religions claim. We grew out of the Earth.

Given that, what does it mean to say that the Earth is our mother? What does it mean to acknowledge our relations with every other living thing?

What does it mean that we must consume other living things or we will die?

Nature is not fallen and bad things dont happen because of sin. Bad things happen to us because were one part of Nature, not the head and not the center. We are no more and no less important than every other part.

Deep down, all religions arent the same. They have different assumptions, different goals, and different priorities. And some acknowledge the realities of Nature better than others.

None of us got here on our own. We all have parents, grandparents, and many-times-great grandparents, without whom we simply would not be. We go to schools we didnt build to learn knowledge discovered by those we dont know. We have received much, and the virtue of reciprocity teaches that as we have received, so should we give.

Certainly, we can and should pay it forward to the next generation. But what can we do for those who came before us?

We can remember them. We can call their names, tell their stories, offer them food and drink. That they do not physical consume it is not important. It is the offering that counts.

In remembering them, we learn a little about why we are the way we are.

And we are reminded that some day we will be the ancestors, so let us live so as to be worthy of the honor of those who come after us.

Spirits are the essence of a person, the core of their being. I dont have a spirit, I am a spirit who has a body for now. Gods are simply the mightiest of spirits.

When I have an experience of what I interpret as the God Cernunnos, I am a human spirit interacting with a divine spirit. As a polytheist, I believe Cernunnos is a real, distinct, individual being with His own sovereignty and agency. But perhaps Im overstating things. Perhaps Cernunnos is merely a metaphor and personification of Nature, of the wild, of the hunter and the hunted. Either way I can form a relationship with that spirit.

I can speak to Cernunnos and listen for His reply. I can practice good hospitality and make offerings. I can meditate on His values and virtues, embody them in my life, and in doing so become more like Him.

These are good things, regardless of whether my beliefs about Cernunnos are more accurate or less accurate.

And just as I can form and maintain relationships with my Gods, so can I form and maintain relationships with the spirits of land where I live, the spirits of the elements and directions, the spirits of virtues and values, and all the spirits present in our world and in our lives.

Fundamentalist Christians make the error of assuming that religion their religion, anyway has all the answers to all the questions. Fundamentalist atheists make the error of assuming religion has no answers to any questions.

I say we should use the right tool for the right job.1 What science does, it does very well. We are dishonest if we dismiss the findings of science and believe things that are clearly not true, such as Young Earth Creationism.

But science doesnt do a very good job of telling us what if anything comes after death. Its completely inadequate to tell us how we should live our lives and what it all means. It can tell us what will likely happen if we promote certain values over others, but it cannot tell us whether or not thats a good thing.

I cannot tell you that my Pagan and polytheist religion is true in some objective way and neither can anyone from any other religion, if theyre being honest. What I can tell you is that my life has been significantly better since I started this path. It has more meaning and less stress. I no longer fear what may come after death. Perhaps most importantly, Im part of something bigger than myself.

And that makes my religion a very reasonable thing.

1 Biologist Stephen Jay Gould argued for non-overlapping magisteria the idea that science and religion each represent different areas of inquiry, fact vs. values and the two domains do not overlap. This is not that. As this post explains, my religion is grounded in science and is informed by science, but it goes beyond the bounds of science. Some of the boundaries of science are artificial, because too many scientists are wedded to materialism. Other boundaries represent things science does not yet know, but someday will discover. And some boundaries represent things we will never know (at least not with certainty) because theyre beyond the capacity of our powerful but finite human brains to comprehend.

Continue reading here:
Reason and Religion Go Hand in Hand Especially Paganism - Patheos

Posted in Atheism | Comments Off on Reason and Religion Go Hand in Hand Especially Paganism – Patheos

Letter to the Editor: Find Out for Yourself What College Students Are Learning – Centralia Chronicle

Posted: at 8:13 pm

I recently retired from Centralia College as a tenured professor of criminal justice on March 18 at age 63. I was privileged to instruct three generations of students over 22 years of unblemished academic service. I did not plan to retire early. Until recently, I had planned on teaching several more years. However, I found myself morally and ethically compelled to sever ties with Centralia College when I realized a clear majority of current administrators, faculty and staff now embrace and promote Marxism, critical race theory, transgenderism and atheism to students as young as age 16. Even more troubling is the fact these young and impressionable students are being indoctrinated into accepting and adopting these radical political beliefs and sexuality lifestyles as the new normal for our culture under the false pretense of justice, equity, diversity and inclusion.

Anthropology students are required to view graphic and disturbing gender reassignment surgery videos in class. History and political science students are told, If you want to be more like Jesus youll become a communist. English composition students are assigned essays on topics like Who would you like to kill and why? A student I know failed an English composition essay he wrote about his Christian upbringing. When he asked his professor how to improve his grade, she told him, Go ask your God how you can get a better grade. Chemistry professors spend class time discussing witchcraft, sorcery and incest as depicted in the Game of Thrones television series with their students. The list of inappropriate conduct and classroom practices that routinely occurs at Centralia College is staggering.

In addition, the few remaining faculty members on campus who are moderately conservative now believe they are being targeted for elimination. Their belief is well founded by the fact that senior administrators continue hiring leftist vice presidents and deans from outside Lewis County when many well qualified individuals reside locally. The current board of trustees has done nothing to stem these inexplicable executive leadership and hiring decisions.

My purpose in writing this letter is to sound an alarm and call to action. I implore everyone with children or grandchildren enrolled at the Centralia College to talk with them about these issues. Ask probing questions. Discuss these concerns with your friends, coworkers, neighbors and clergy. Find out for yourself what your childs professors are actually teaching them. I am confident that once you discover the degree of political, sexual and atheistic brainwashing and grooming your children are subjected to daily, you will either withdraw your student from the college, demand new trustees and executive leadership, or both.

Gregory Gilbertson

Naples, Florida

Read more here:
Letter to the Editor: Find Out for Yourself What College Students Are Learning - Centralia Chronicle

Posted in Atheism | Comments Off on Letter to the Editor: Find Out for Yourself What College Students Are Learning – Centralia Chronicle

Republican primaries offer look into future of Trumpism without Trump – The Guardian US

Posted: at 8:12 pm

In his campaign heyday, Donald Trump would declare it the greatest movement in the history of politics and promise: Were going to win so much, youre going to be so sick and tired of winning.

What never occurred to him was that the Make America Great Again movement or Maga might get sick and tired of him first.

The former US president suffered some humiliation on Tuesday when four candidates he handpicked in Georgia lost Republican primary elections in a landslide. It was a stinging rebuke in what has become ground zero for his big lie that the 2020 election was stolen.

But it was no rebuke of Maga and all it stands for.

The hard-right, nativist-populist strain of Republican politics predates Trump and will surely survive him. This years primary season winners in Georgia and elsewhere have been careful not to disavow the movement, or its patriarch, even when they lack his blessing.

Donald Trump has transformed the Republican party over the past five years and it is now a solid majority Trumpist party with everything that entails in policy and in tone, said Bill Galston, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution thinktank in Washington. On the other hand, Republicans, including very conservative ones, are clearly willing to entertain the possibility of Trumpism without Trump.

Trump is now 75 and could be living a quiet, golf-playing retirement like other past presidents. But against the counsel of some of his inner circle, he chose to make this years midterm elections about him and the primaries votes in states and districts to decide which Republicans will take on Democrats in November a referendum on his continued influence.

Trump endorsed candidates in nearly 200 races, from governor to county commissioner, often in contests that are not particularly competitive and help bolster his list of wins. But others have been reckless, vengeful bets aimed at dislodging incumbents who defied his claims of election fraud. So far, the results have been a mixed bag.

The month began well enough in Ohio, where venture capitalist and author JD Vance leaped from third to first place following Trumps late-stage endorsement in the Senate primary.

In North Carolina, Trump helped the 26-year-old former college football player Bo Hines win the nomination for a seat in the House of Representatives. In Pennsylvania, voters chose his preferred candidate for governor, Doug Mastriano, who said he would not have certified Joe Bidens 2020 win of the state.

But other governor races, which often turn on specific local issues, have proved more elusive. Trumps pick in Nebraskas primary, Charles Herbster, lost after allegations surfaced that he had groped women. In Idaho a week later, Governor Brad Little comfortably beat a Trump-backed challenger.

In North Carolina, meanwhile, voters rejected Trumps plea to give a scandal-plagued congressman Madison Cawthorn a second chance. And in Pennsylvania, a Senate primary featuring Trump-endorsed TV doctor Mehmet Oz remains too close to call.

This week Trump again notched some wins including Sarah Sanders, his former White House press secretary, in the primary for governor of Arkansas. But it was all overshadowed by Georgia, where he has pushed his personal vendetta hardest and so squandered political capital.

It was not just that former senator David Perdue, whom Trump had lobbied to run, lost to Governor Brian Kemp, who had refused to overturn the results of the 2020 election in his state. It was also the crushing margin: Kemp beat Perdue by a staggering 52 percentage points.

Rubbing salt into the wound, Georgias secretary of state Brad Raffensperger, who defied Trumps call to find the votes to change the outcome two years ago, also won his partys nomination. Attorney general Chris Carr and insurance commissioner John King, both opposed by Trump, prevailed in their primaries too.

Galston, a former policy adviser to President Bill Clinton, commented: The results in Georgia were really stunning. Few, if any Republicans, have aroused Donald Trumps ire so much as Governor Kemp and Brad Raffensperger and they both did substantially better than expected. Donald Trump went all out in Georgia and he ended up an egg on this face, which is significant.

It may be that the people who have been in the bulls eye of Trumps big lie campaign have started resenting it and took their resentment out. More generally, I think an increasing number of people are asking themselves a question that they werent asking previously: would we be better off with a Trumpist candidate whos not named Donald Trump?

Among those asking the question is Chris Christie, the former governor of New Jersey, who campaigned for Kemp in Georgia and told the Politico website: Trump picked this fight. Senators Ted Cruz and Rand Paul have also felt at liberty to campaign for midterm candidates denied Trumps imprimatur.

Then there is Mike Pence, the former vice-president, who defied his old boss by rallying with Kemp on Monday and telling the crowd: Elections are about the future. Pence, himself a former governor of Indiana, has made a habit of speaking with pride about the accomplishments of the Trump-Pence administration while distancing himself from the big lie.

Should he run for president in 2024, he may pay close attention to how Little, Kemp and others have studiously avoided criticising Trump while capturing swaths of his base by shifting right on abortion, gun rights and culture wars issues and signing legislation to prove it. Ron DeSantis, the governor of Florida, is another likely student of the formula.

That means there is still little room for more old school Republicans such as Senator Mitt Romney and his running mate, Paul Ryan, who lost the presidential election in 2012. Few are making an impact in the primaries. A Republican who wants to pretend that 2016 through 2020 never happened and go back to the Romney-Ryan era is not going to do well in todays Republican party, said Henry Olsen, a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center thinktank in Washington.

But Trump does face a further challenge to his authority from the far right.

Some on this wing effectively accuse him of not being Trumpy enough, as demonstrated last year when he was booed for urging supporters to get vaccinated against the coronavirus (he now barely mentions vaccines in his speeches).

Kathy Barnette, a Senate candidate who mounted a late surge in Pennsylvania with ideas even more extreme than Oz, told the Reuters news agency: Maga doesnt belong to him. Trump coined the word. He does not own it.

Kandiss Taylor, a similarly far-right candidate for governor of Georgia, backs Trumps false claims of voter fraud but is unsure whether she would vote for him again in 2024. She said in an interview with the Guardian: Its not about him. The people of America chose him and hes the one that we elected. Will I vote for him in 2024? It all depends on what happens between now and then and who runs against him.

A further sign of fracturing came this week when Cawthorn, smarting from his defeat in North Carolina, swore revenge on cowardly and weak members of his own party and declared: Its time for the rise of the new right, its time for Dark Maga to truly take command.

The anti-democratic implication was that the end justifies the means in an existential struggle for America. Cawthorn named allies including the Georgia congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, rightwing activist Charlie Kirk, Fox News host Tucker Carlson and Trump himself, suggesting that the former president has already turned to the dark side.

Joe Walsh, a former Republican congressman who belonged to the rightwing Tea Party movement, said: Magas dark enough on its own Trumpism has metastasised beyond Trump and itll go in a bunch of different dark, eerie places but its all the same thing. Trumpism now is the dominant strain in the party.

Magas identity crisis comes as Biden and other Democratic leaders seek to brand their opponents as Ultra-Maga Republicans in the hope that labelling the entire party as extremist will be more effective in the midterms than a singular focus on Trump (though he and his supporters have embraced Ultra-Maga in merchandise and fundraising emails).

Yet while Trumps status as a kingmaker has been diminished, and his Stop the steal obsession is wearing thin, it would be unwise to extrapolate too much from primaries where it was always going to be hard to oust popular, well-funded incumbents.

Trump continues to raise vast sums of money and command loyalty from most Republicans in Congress as well as from the Republican National Committee. Polls suggest that he is more popular with the Republican base now than when he won the nomination for president in 2016. His America first mantra is now in the partys DNA; even the candidates he does not endorse typically do endorse him.

Walsh, who challenged Trump in the 2020 presidential primary and now hosts a podcast, added: Nothing has changed. This is Trumps party and everything thats happened this primary season just continues to reflect that Wake me up when an anti-Trump Republican wins a primary. That would be news.

Read more:

Republican primaries offer look into future of Trumpism without Trump - The Guardian US

Posted in Republican | Comments Off on Republican primaries offer look into future of Trumpism without Trump – The Guardian US