Monthly Archives: May 2022

Turning Point Therapeutics Granted Breakthrough Therapy Designation for Repotrectinib Treatment in Patients With One Prior ROS1 Tyrosine Kinase…

Posted: May 15, 2022 at 9:42 pm

Turning Point Therapeutics, Inc.

SAN DIEGO, May 10, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Turning Point Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: TPTX), a clinical-stage precision oncology company designing and developing novel targeted therapies for cancer treatment, today announced the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted an eighth regulatory designation, and third Breakthrough Therapy designation, to lead drug candidate repotrectinib.

Breakthrough Therapy designation (BTD) was granted for the treatment of patients with ROS1-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have been previously treated with one ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor and who have not received prior platinum-based chemotherapy. The efficacy analyses supporting the BTD application included approximately 50 patients pooled from the Phase 1 and Phase 2 portions of the TRIDENT-1 study. Efficacy evaluations in Phase 2 patients were by physician assessment.

We are excited to receive our third BTD and eighth overall FDA regulatory designation for repotrectinib in an indication where there are no approved targeted therapies, said Mohammad Hirmand, M.D., Chief Medical Officer. We are encouraged by the continued momentum in TRIDENT-1 with enrollment targets achieved in cohorts EXP-1, EXP-4 and EXP-6. We look forward to continuing to progress repotrectinib toward registration with our first pre-NDA meeting with the FDA to discuss the topline data by blinded independent central review from the ROS1-positive advanced NSCLC cohorts of the TRIDENT-1 study expected later this quarter.

BTD is granted by the FDA to expedite the development and regulatory review of an investigational medicine that is intended to treat a serious or life-threatening condition. The criteria for BTD require preliminary clinical evidence that demonstrates the drug may have substantial improvement on at least one clinically significant endpoint over available therapy.

Repotrectinib was previously granted two BTDs in: ROS1-positive metastatic NSCLC patients who have not been treated with a ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and patients with advanced solid tumors that have an NTRK gene fusion who have progressed following treatment with one or two prior TRK tyrosine kinase inhibitors, with or without prior chemotherapy, and have no satisfactory alternative treatments. Repotrectinib was also previously granted four Fast-Track designations in: ROS1-positive advanced NSCLC patients who are ROS1 TKI nave; ROS1-positive advanced NSCLC patients who have been previously treated with one prior line of platinum-based chemotherapy and one prior ROS1 TKI; ROS1-positive advanced NSCLC patients pretreated with one prior ROS1 TKI without prior platinum-based chemotherapy; and NTRK-positive patients with advanced solid tumors who have progressed following treatment with at least one prior line of chemotherapy and one or two prior TRK TKIs and have no satisfactory alternative treatments. Repotrectinib was also granted an Orphan Drug designation in 2017.

Story continues

Enrollment across all six cohorts of the study remains open and continues to progress steadily.

About Turning Point Therapeutics Inc.Turning Point Therapeutics is a clinical-stage precision oncology company with a pipeline of investigational drugs designed to address key limitations of existing cancer therapies. The companys lead drug candidate, repotrectinib, is a next-generation kinase inhibitor targeting the ROS1 and TRK oncogenic drivers of non-small cell lung cancer and advanced solid tumors. Repotrectinib, which is being studied in a registrational Phase 2 study in adults and a Phase 1/2 study in pediatric patients, has shown antitumor activity and durable responses among kinase inhibitor treatment-nave and pre-treated patients. The companys pipeline of drug candidates also includes elzovantinib, targeting MET, CSF1R and SRC, which is being studied in a Phase 1 trial of patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors harboring genetic alterations in MET; TPX-0046, targeting RET, which is being studied in a Phase 1/2 trial of patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors harboring genetic alterations in RET; TPX-0131, a next-generation ALK inhibitor, which is being studied in a Phase 1/2 trial of previously treated patients with ALK-positive advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer; and TPX-4589 (LM-302), a novel ADC targeting Claudin18.2 being studied in a Phase 1 study in gastrointestinal cancers. The company is driven to develop therapies that mark a turning point for patients in their cancer treatment. For more information, visit http://www.tptherapeutics.com.

Forward Looking Statements

Statements contained in this press release regarding matters that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements include statements regarding, among other things, the momentum in TRIDENT-1 study, the ability to continue to progress repotrectinib toward registration, timing of Turning Point Therapeutics first pre-NDA meeting with the FDA to discuss the topline data by blinded independent central review from the ROS1-positive advanced NSCLC cohorts of the TRIDENT-1 study, the potential benefits of BTD, progression of enrollment, and the efficacy and therapeutic potential of repotrectinib. Because such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Words such as plans, will, believes, anticipates, expects, intends, goal, potential and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based upon Turning Point Therapeutics current expectations and involve assumptions that may never materialize or may prove to be incorrect. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements as a result of various risks and uncertainties, which include, without limitation, risks and uncertainties associated with Turning Point Therapeutics business in general, risks and uncertainties related to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic to Turning Points business and the other risks described in Turning Point Therapeutics filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including its annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 28, 2022. All forward-looking statements contained in this press release speak only as of the date on which they were made. Turning Point Therapeutics undertakes no obligation to update such statements to reflect events that occur or circumstances that exist after the date on which they were made.

Contact: Adam D. Levy, PhD, MBAir@tptherapeutics.com858-867-6366

Follow this link:

Turning Point Therapeutics Granted Breakthrough Therapy Designation for Repotrectinib Treatment in Patients With One Prior ROS1 Tyrosine Kinase...

Posted in Alternative Medicine | Comments Off on Turning Point Therapeutics Granted Breakthrough Therapy Designation for Repotrectinib Treatment in Patients With One Prior ROS1 Tyrosine Kinase…

Skipping medication a perilous habit, warn doctors – The Hindu

Posted: at 9:42 pm

Missing a dose or two of diabetes or hypertension medicationmay not seem like a big deal to many people. There are some who even skip it deliberately for several days because it causes no obvious problems -- when they have no symptom/ trouble without the pills, or start taking alternative medicine. General physicians are all too familiar with such cases.

Internal Medicine specialist Hemanth Kalakuntla said he has come across some patients with those non-communicable diseases (NCDs), who skip the medicines and try to trick doctors during consultations. People with diabetes have to get their fasting and post-lunch blood glucose levels checked through tests before consulting a doctor. Some, who stop taking medicines, skip lunch and undergo post-lunch test so that their blood glucose levels does not reflect as being abnormally high. But we have our own ways to detect their situation, he added.

Not sticking to medications for diabetes and hypertension, he said, could cause damage to eyes, kidneys, and worse, lead to brain stroke or heart attack.

Head of Critical Care department at Government Medical College, Nizamabad, Kiran Madhala and his team attend patients in ICUs. Some reasons that patients with the NCDs suffered from severe complications were that they did get their medicines dosage corrected, or did not make lifestyle changes, thereby worsening their condition.

Some of the patients were just not aware that they had hypertension or diabetes, said Dr Kiran, adding that everyone above the age of 30 years should get screened for the NCDs.

Assistant Professor of General Medicine at Osmania General Hospital, Pratibha Lakshmi said a significant per cent of emergency visits to hospitals are by people who stopped taking medicines for various diseases. This is observed in diseases which require long-term compliance to medicines. Some of the diseases are diabetes, hypertension, tuberculosis, HIV, or diseases related to the heart or kidneys, she explained.

When people stop taking medicines, they may suffer form health issues which is likely to necessitate complicated treatment, even surgery. Dr Pratibha said all of that could mean damage to health which brings down quality of life, and spending more money, which ultimately burden the patient and the family.The burden on healthcare increases too, she pointed out.

Go here to read the rest:

Skipping medication a perilous habit, warn doctors - The Hindu

Posted in Alternative Medicine | Comments Off on Skipping medication a perilous habit, warn doctors – The Hindu

Transforming healthcare through Naturopathy – wknd.

Posted: at 9:42 pm

DGC Naturopathy

Published: Mon 9 May 2022, 3:12 PM

Over the past years, modern medicine has helped in reducing the mortality rate significantly. However, the excessive usage of medicines has also led to serious side effects on human bodies and lacks emphasis on preventing non-communicable diseases. Hence, an integrated and preventive approach through Naturopathy that seeks to restore and maintain optimum health by emphasizing natures inherent self-healing process can help reduce the burden of disease and lessen healthcare costs.

Encouraging such a holistic approach for the prevention and treatment of diseases, DGC Naturopathy Heart & Cancer Care center has emerged as one of the leading healthcare naturopathy centers, specializing in the treatment of various forms of cancer and other illnesses.

Established by Dr. Dilip Damodar Donekar, DGC Naturopathy Heart & Cancer Care center has contributed to the expansion of holistic medical care by offering comprehensive wellness therapy through Naturopathic treatment. He runs two Naturopathy centers in Maharashtra (Nagpur & Mumbai) which are dedicated for the treatment of chronic and complicated diseases using natural remedies to help the body heal itself. Having completed his Ph.D. in Naturopathy in the USA, he specializes in the treatment of various forms of cancer and also offers treatments for psoriasis, epilepsy, paralysis, migraine, joint pain, jaundice, chronic diseases, asthma, allergy, diabetes, kidney stone, blood pressure, HIV as well as for different problems related to ones skin. He also treats female health issues and offers yoga and meditation sessions for stress relief, healthy living, and spiritual upliftment.

Since Naturopathy considers food and the natural environment as its medicine it is seen as the most natural and non-invasive methodology of alternative medicine that leads to self-healing. A good and sustainable lifestyle encompasses physical and emotional well-being. Todays polluted environment, adulterated food, poor diet, stressful and hectic lifestyles impede ones ability to stay healthy. The Naturopathy philosophy is based on the principle that nature can treat people and help the body to heal itself, says Dr. Donekar. He believes in enhancing the immunity of a body and has developed special treatment protocols and innovative herbal medicines which have given a disease-free life to many, as shared through the success stories and testimonies of his patients.

Listed in Forbes India as one of the best Naturopathic cancer doctors, he is a recognized specialist who uses the principle of Naturopathy for the treatment of patients which has earned him popularity not just in India, but also in many parts of the world such as the UK, USA, UAE, Australia, etc. His practice focuses primarily on any form of cancer, enabling him to work with other researchers in the field towards the development of anti-cancer drug medicine and therapies. He has patients visiting him for consultations from some of the top and well-known hospitals in the country for cancer as well as heart diseases.

He has received several national and international awards from various government dignitaries such as Ashwini Kumar Choubey (Minister of State for Health and Family Welfare), Dr. J K Singh- President of Cancer Care of India- IMA, Nitin Gadkari (Minister for Road Transport & Highways), Bhagat Singh Koshyari (Governor of Maharashtra), Uddhav Thackeray (Chief Minister of Maharashtra), Sudhir Mungantiwar (MLA), Nana Patole (MLA); Bollywood celebrities like Poonam Dhillon, Malaika Arora, Zeenat Aman, Parineeti Chopra as well as from ace sportsman such as Chetan Sharma and Kiran More for his contribution to the world of Naturopathy earning him the popularity of being one of the best naturopathic and cancer care doctors in a short span of time. He has also been recognized as one of the ten influential leaders in the field of alternative medicine in 2021. He is also the recipient of the

CSR Journal Excellence Awards for his contributions toward social welfare and growth through Naturopathy. His work has also received prominence through his publication titled Lockdown- The Nature of Naturopathy (2021), launched by Maharashtra Cabinet Minister Shri Anil Deshmukh.

With a vision to make Naturopathy accessible, he has recently established a new center in Dubai with an objective to partner with the Health Ministry of the country and create awareness about Naturopathy. His contributions to Naturopathy have also received immense appreciation in the Asia Book of Records (2018) organized by the International Naturopathy Organisation (INO) in association with the Ministry of Ayush, Government of India. He holds the India book of Records (2018) for conducting a mass mud bath organized by the International Naturopathy Organisation (INO) in association with the Ministry of Ayush, Government of India.

To know more about him and to get in touch with Dr. Donekar, please visit:

https://en.bharatpedia.org.in/wiki/Dilip_Damodar_Donekar and http://www.naturopathydoctor.in/

Continued here:

Transforming healthcare through Naturopathy - wknd.

Posted in Alternative Medicine | Comments Off on Transforming healthcare through Naturopathy – wknd.

Trump is backing ‘Dr. Oz’ in the Pennsylvania Senate race. What to know about the ex-TV show host – USA TODAY

Posted: at 9:42 pm

Republican J.D. Vance wins Ohio primary after Donald Trump endorsement

Trump's pick for the Ohio GOP candidate, J.D. Vance, wins a spot in the November Senatorial election.

Cody Godwin, USA TODAY

In the Ohio Senate race, former PresidentDonald Trumps endorsement lifted a media personality and outsider candidate to the GOP nomination over a crammed Republican field.

Now, Mehmet Oz, better known as Dr. Oz, hopes thatTrumps influence will come to bear in Pennsylvanias Republican Senate primary, where he holds a thinlead in the polls, according to RealClearPolitics.

Trumpendorsed Oz last monthin his bid to replace retiring Republican Sen. Pat Toomey.

Ozs celebrity status has made him the subject of intense scrutiny by his opponents, who have questioned his loyalty to the country because he holds dual U.S. and Turkish citizenship.

Aside from Oz, the main contendersin the Republican primary are Dave McCormick, a former hedge fund manager, and conservative political commentator Kathy Barnette.

On Politics newsletter: Keep up with the latest breaking politics news

Roe's midterms impact: The Roe v. Wade decision could upend the midterms. Here's where it might matter most

2022 midterm elections: The most interesting Senate races to watch, from Georgia, to Pennsylvania and Florida

Ohio GOP Senate nominee: Who is J.D. Vance?

Oz is best known for his nationally syndicated television program the Dr. Oz Show, which came to an end with his Senate run. Ozs ascent to fame began with frequent appearances on the Oprah Winfrey show, where he appeared as a health expert,before finally getting his own show in 2009.

He had worked as a heart surgeon at the New York Presbyterian Hospital, according to his biography on the Dr. Oz Show website.

In the medical community, Ozs promotion of alternative medicines has made him a controversial figure. Some doctors have gone as far as to publicly call for Columbia University, where Oz taught, to cut its ties with the now Senate candidate, Vox reported.

The university removed Ozs profile from its website, the Daily Beast and others reported, following his Senate race entrance.

Oz earned his doctor of medicine from the University of Pennsylvaniain 1986. He also has an undergraduate degree from Harvard University and a Master ofBusiness Administration from the University of Pennsylvanias Wharton School.

Oz'sparents immigrated to the U.S. from Turkey. His father, Mustafa, had also been a surgeon.

Oz was born on June 11, 1960 in Cleveland, Ohio. He is 61 years old.

Ozs campaign website lists more than a dozen issue areas. In his first campaign ad, Oz appealed to his medical background and addressed the COVID-19 pandemic.

They took away our freedom, Oz said in the ad. Without making us safer.

His campaign site notes Ozs opposition to business shutdowns and support for keeping children in schools. He also told Fox News he was opposed to vaccine mandates.

Another focus of the Oz campaign is energy independence, which was one of manyissues highlighted in Trumps endorsement statement. Hiscampaign site says Oz supports slashing regulations on the fossil fuel industry to increase domestic energy production.

The rest of Ozs platform runs the gamut on the GOP's defining issues during Joe Biden's presidency.

Election security, cancel culture, and get tough on China, are all focuses of the campaign along with more classic Republican positions ongun rights, the economy,immigration and abortions.

On Twitter, Oz weighed in on the leaked majority opinion draft written by Supreme Court Associate Justice Samuel Alito, agreeing with Alitos rebuke of Roe v. Wade.

Aside from Trump, Oz is backed by former RepublicanTexas governor Rick Perry and Fox News Sean Hannity. J.D. Vance, theOhio GOP Senate nominee, and former Republican presidential candidate and Housing and Urban Developmentecretary Ben Carson also support Oz.

One of Ozs children is his daughter Daphne Oz, a chef and TV personality, who hosts a cooking show that replaced her fathers show. In 1985, Oz married his wife Lisa, with whom he has four children.

Follow this link:

Trump is backing 'Dr. Oz' in the Pennsylvania Senate race. What to know about the ex-TV show host - USA TODAY

Posted in Alternative Medicine | Comments Off on Trump is backing ‘Dr. Oz’ in the Pennsylvania Senate race. What to know about the ex-TV show host – USA TODAY

African lobbies call for end to captive breeding of lions as threats intensify – China.org.cn

Posted: at 9:42 pm

The captive breeding of lions to meet the rising demand for alternative medicine and ornamental industries should be halted in order to save the majestic carnivore that roams African jungles, lobby groups said on Wednesday.

The World Animal Protection and Blood Lions said in a joint statement issued in Nairobi, the Kenyan capital, that cruelty meted out on lions in captivity was a reason to halt the practice and allow them to roam freely in their natural habitats.

Edith Kabesiime, the wildlife campaigns manager at World Animal Protection said that legislation should be enacted to ban caging of lions on commercial farms amid threat to their physical and emotional health.

According to Kabesiime, the survival and welfare of lions and other iconic carnivores in Africa was in jeopardy amid caged rearing, trophy hunting and habitat loss.

She urged African governments to support community-driven conservation of lions as opposed to captive breeding that was fueling the spread of pathogens.

Kabesiime lauded South Africa in its pledge to phase out captive breeding of lions adding that a ban on trade in their parts including bones could aid efforts to boost their population in the wild.

A joint study by World Animal Protection and Blood Lions, an advocacy group, that was published in early May noted that breeding lions in a captive environment undermined their health and comfort.

Based on data collected from South Africa's commercial lion farms, the study concluded that captive breeding contravened global best practices on protecting the carnivores from human-induced and climatic threats.

"It is clear from review of scientific literature available that a multitude of animal welfare challenges are associated with caring for lions in captivity," said the study.

Louise de Waal, the director of Blood Lions said that captive breeding, poaching, habitat loss and fragmentation posed an immense threat to the survival of the big cats despite their contribution to tourism and ecological balance. Enditem

Here is the original post:

African lobbies call for end to captive breeding of lions as threats intensify - China.org.cn

Posted in Alternative Medicine | Comments Off on African lobbies call for end to captive breeding of lions as threats intensify – China.org.cn

I’m one of thousands of Australians with chronic fatigue syndrome but I’m lucky: I’ve become a human experiment – ABC News

Posted: at 9:42 pm

What risks would you take if you were only able to function for one, maybe two hours a day? The rest of the day, you must lie down with an eye mask on while listening to something quiet. You can't work, exercise or drive. You can't leave the house for more than an hour or two once a week.

Would you risk an increased chance of skin cancer? Or possible vision damage and blindness?

I would. I am.

Many years ago, I woke up one morning unable to move my body from my bed. It felt like a tonne of wet cement had been poured on top of me and I couldn't shift it. I struggled to answer questions, read, remember things and connect ideas. Getting myself up or out of the house to work became an extreme sport.

After eight years visiting doctor after doctor, I was diagnosed with a disease known as Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME).

ME has no treatment or cure. Millions of people are joining this cohort via long COVID, which shares striking similarities with ME. Both patients and doctors are in a murky world of unknowns.

But I am one of the lucky ones: I've become a human experiment.

If there's a chance a treatment could increase my capacity so I can work, or drive, or socialise independently again, I will try it. When you're trapped with a debilitating illness, any different feeling can be a welcome relief.

I experiment with different medications under the guidance of trusted medical professionals. As I see it, medication is technology. Why wouldn't I use technology to try and improve my quality of life? That's not to say it's a simple or easy process.

For years, I was shunted between different doctors for extensive, expensive tests. They couldn't find anything that medicine had a treatment for. I tried lifestyle changes and alternative therapies to no avail. Finally, I decided it was time to experiment.

I was referred to a specialist with an interest in ME and, when I asked him whether there was anything we could try to "improve my capacity", he was up for the challenge. Each appointment, we discuss different medications we have heard of in the ME space (all are designed to treat other illnesses). Together, we weigh their potential risks and benefits.

My specialist reviews my bloods and decides whether a particular medication is appropriate for me to trial and at what dosage. Each time he says: "We have no idea what will happen and there are no guarantees", and I ask about potential side effects to monitor for and hazards to avoid. We discuss how expensive the medication is and where I can find it. Then we monitor my body's response.

This morning, I took nine pills. Three of them are "private non-PBS prescription", which means they are expensive and untested for treating my illness. Four of the pills slightly increase my brain function to the extent that I wouldn't be able to write this without them but neither my doctor or I know why.

Some medication trials have been ineffective. One drug caused my vision to blur so I couldn't see or read. My specialist at the time advised me to "wait it out" but I decided to pull the pin. Years later, the same medication would end up helping me, I just have to get regular eye tests.

Some of the medication has suppressed my immune system and made me vulnerable to dangerous viruses. Some have caused headaches, gut infections, skin infections, staph infections, anxiety, mood swings, drenching night sweats, constipation, diarrhoea, vertigo, twitching, itching... the list goes on. Many of the medications cause nausea. Sometimes it's manageable, sometimes it's miserable.

These technologies have a way to go. But on my current regime, I can get up and shower (with my shower seat) most days. Sometimes I can write. If I have notice for a big event with loved ones, I can socialise and recover. For me, these are life changing gains.

In an ideal world, though, these medications would be properly tested in controlled studies rather than on very sick people.

Some disabilities are "over medicalised". Disabilities are often seen as medical problems when many really arise from a lack of accessibility. As Dylan Alcott recently explained, when he is in an accessible space, he is not disabled. It is inaccessible spaces that disable him. This is the social model of disability.

Inaccessibility disables me, too stairs and lack of seating or rest areas limit my capacity to move through the world and participate in society. But I am also disabled by a lack of medical attention, research and funding for my disease. In my experience, the thing that most disables people with energy limiting chronic illnesses like ME and long COVID is that governments, medical funding bodies and scientific research communities do not see the problem.

Perhaps one of the reasons for this lack of focus and funding is because most ME patients are women. Diseases predominantly affecting women receive significantly less research funding. This means women and gender diverse people's bodies are still poorly understood in medicine.

Shockingly, female animals and humans were excluded from medical testing until very recently. Women have been prescribed drugs for decades without them having been tested on female bodies.

This lack of knowledge is compounded by the incentive for doctors to provide short consults, limiting the potential for women's complex illnesses to be properly treated. Together, these factors result in doctors too often distrusting women and gender diverse people's accounts of their own bodies.

Millions of people globally, up to 80 per cent of them women, present to doctors with the debilitating symptoms of ME. Some doctors tell us to rest or lose weight or see a psychologist. An infectious diseases specialist smiled at me indulgently and suggested I was "just tired" because of my work as a lawyer. One senior immunologist said I would "probably" get better because I was not obese and had a positive attitude; there was "no need" for a further appointment.

Both were wrong because ME is a complex neuro-immune disease. I haven't worked as a lawyer since 2014 and though my optimism has survived, so too has my disease.

Funding is urgently needed for research into ME so that one day when I, and millions of others, go to the doctor, they are not only able tell me what's wrong, but how they can treat it. Instead of saying "we don't know what will happen", they can say "this should give you some relief".

For more information about ME click here. To support homegrown research into ME check out the National Centre for Neuroimmunology and Emerging Diseases at Griffith University.

Alice Rumble is a disabled writer and advocate living with ME. She shares her stories of disability on Instagram at @alice_rumble.

Posted13 May 202213 May 2022Fri 13 May 2022 at 7:00pm, updated13 May 202213 May 2022Fri 13 May 2022 at 10:32pm

Go here to see the original:

I'm one of thousands of Australians with chronic fatigue syndrome but I'm lucky: I've become a human experiment - ABC News

Posted in Alternative Medicine | Comments Off on I’m one of thousands of Australians with chronic fatigue syndrome but I’m lucky: I’ve become a human experiment – ABC News

Targeted Therapies Continue to Expand the Treatment Paradigm in NSCLC – OncLive

Posted: at 9:42 pm

The treatment landscape continues to expand across nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with the FDA approvals of multiple agents, including targeted therapies such as sotorasib (Lumakras) and lorlatinib (Lorbrena), according to faculty from an OncLive State of the Science Summit on lung cancer.

The event, chaired by Christine Bestvina, MD, assistant professor of medicine, hematology and oncology (cancer), University of Chicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, highlighted updates across the lung cancer landscape, including the use of frontline immunotherapy in NSCLC, plus the role CTLA-4 inhibitors could play in this patient population.

Bestvina was joined by her colleagues:

Below, Fidler, Weinberg, Bestvina, Feldman, and Vokes summarize the main messages from their presentations.

Fidler: Comprehensive next-generation sequencing [NGS] is essential for [patients with] stage IV adenocarcinoma. [NGS] should include RNA sequencing and circulating tumor DNA [ctDNA] assays, [which] can maximally capture targeted alterations. We saw that with a [2018 report by Charu Aggarwal, MD, MPH, of Penn Medicine,] where some of the alterations were only captured in the ctDNA assays.

Perioperative PD-L1 [testing] could be useful to guide multimodality therapy, and EGFR testing should be performed on resectable patients that may pursue a neoadjuvant chemotherapy [plus] immunotherapy approach, given the overwhelming disease-free survival benefit with osimertinib [Tagrisso] for [patients with EGFR mutations].

Weinberg: Sotorasib received [FDA] approval in May 2021 for patients with KRAS G12C[mutated] metastatic NSCLC in the second-line setting or later. Adagrasib is a KRAS G12C inhibitor, but it is not yet approved.

In general, [KRAS G12C inhibitors] are tolerated well. Gastrointestinal [adverse] effects [AEs] and liver abnormalities are the largest treatment-related AEs. There is emerging data in studies that we should keep an eye on in terms of combination treatment thats ongoing.

Lorlatinib was approved in March 2021 for the treatment of patients with ALK fusionpositive metastatic NSCLC. Alectinib [Alecensa], for most [clinicians], is still our go-to first-line [treatment] for patients with ALK fusionpositive metastatic NSCLC. But I would consider lorlatinib in the first line if the patient has significant central nervous system metastasis. [It is important to] be aware of the unique [AE] profile of lorlatinib.

Selpercatinib [Retevmo] was FDA approved in May 2020 [for the treatment of patients with RET alterationpositive NSCLC]. Pralsetinib [Gavreto] was approved in September 2020 for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC with RET fusions. [Notably], selpercatinib has less myelosuppressive [AEs].

Larotrectinib [Vitrakvi] was approved in November 2018 [for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients with solid tumors that have an NTRK gene fusion without a known acquired resistance mutation, are metastatic or where surgical resection is likely to result in severe morbidity, and have no satisfactory alternative treatments or that have progressed following treatment]. Entrectinib [Rozlytrek] was approved in August 2019 for the first-line treatment of solid tumors harboring NTRK fusions without resistance mutations. [Additionally], there are emerging second-generation inhibitors to overcome on-target resistance.

Bestvina: Immune monotherapy is whats preferred for patients [with NSCLC] who have high PD-L1 [expression], although chemotherapy [plus] immunotherapy may be preferred in never smokers or patient [who present with more aggressive disease]. Chemotherapy [plus] immunotherapy is whats recommended to for [patients with] a [PD-L1 tumor proportion score of] less than 50%.

The addition of a CTLA-4 [inhibitor] may be helpful for certain patient subgroups. But stay tuned, because lots of combination trials [are expected] to read out soon.

Feldman: In the paradigm of treatment for extensive-stage SCLC, we want to consider clinical trials. In the first-line setting, [treatment options include] etoposide [and] platinum [chemotherapy combined with] either atezolizumab [Tecentriq] or durvalumab [Imfinzi]. In the second-line setting, we have an FDA approval for topotecan and lurbinectedin [Zepzelca]. Many investigators prefer [liposomal] irinotecan instead of topotecan, although that is an off-label usage.

In the third-line setting for patients who havent had a checkpoint inhibitor, one can consider pembrolizumab [Keytruda] or nivolumab [Opdivo]. Otherwise, we still have agents such as paclitaxel and temozolomide [Temodar] to consider in the third-line setting.

Vokes: Survival [rates] in resectable lung cancer are still too low. Although we should be happy with the [current] results, we shouldnt be content and say we dont have to look any further. Targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors have significantly improved treatment outcomes, and resection is the key. [Treatment can be given before or after surgery], but the key is to cut [the disease] out, [if possible].

[The use of] adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapies are evidence based. Osimertinib is [FDA] approved [as an adjuvant treatment following tumor resection in EGFR-mutated NSCLC], and atezolizumab [is approved for use as an adjuvant treatment following resection and platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with stage II to IIIA NSCLC with a PD-L1 expression on 1% or moreof tumor cells]. Moreover, neoadjuvant nivolumab and [platinum-doublet chemotherapy was recently approved for adult patients with resectable NSCLC].

More:

Targeted Therapies Continue to Expand the Treatment Paradigm in NSCLC - OncLive

Posted in Alternative Medicine | Comments Off on Targeted Therapies Continue to Expand the Treatment Paradigm in NSCLC – OncLive

Infant Formula Shortage: Why it’s Happening and What Parents Can Do – Healthline

Posted: at 9:42 pm

A nationwide baby formula shortage is causing frustration and fear for parents in the country.

Over 40 percent of formula is currently out of stock across the country, according to Datasembly. This is due to the closure of a major formula production plant back in February, which was only made worse by pandemic-related supply chain issues.

And while the plant has announced its plans to reopen in the coming weeks, the reality is that parents are still at least a month away from being able to find their preferred formulas back on the shelves.

What do you need to know about this formula shortage, and what can you do to make sure your child is receiving the proper nutrients in the interim? We spoke with experts to find out.

The issue behind the formula shortage is two-fold. First is the widespread supply chain issue due to the pandemic, which has affected everything from cars to Nutella.

To make matters worse, in February, the Food & Drug Administration closed Abbott Nutritions Michigan factory after Abbott voluntarily recalled brands of its formula. The formula was tied to a bacterial infection that was linked to the deaths of at least two infants.

Abbott produces Similac, a routine milk-based formula, as well as Similac Advance and other specialty formulas for babies with certain allergies.

The Biden administration has said that they are talking with suppliers in an effort to get more formula on store shelves.

This has led to parents struggling to find appropriate formulas for their kids. They are traveling out of their geographic areas and ordering products online, where not everything meets the same standards as formulas produced in the U.S., said Dr. Matthew Harris, who practices in pediatric emergency medicine, emergency medical services, and pediatrics at Northwell Healths Cohen Childrens Medical Center in New York.

Rebecca Romero, RD, LD, CLC, on the clinical nutrition and lactation team at Nationwide Childrens Hospital in Ohio, said parents are having difficulty getting enough formula to feed their children.

Due to the infant formula shortage, parents are facing the very serious problem of not having enough formula available to feed their children, added Romero. Many stores are having supply issues and parents are being forced to drive store to store to find their childs formula. Additionally, we are seeing an increase in families preparing homemade formula or mixing foods not intended for infants with formula, which can be very risky and compromise the developing infants health.

If your child uses a standard, milk-based powdered formula, several alternatives are available besides Abbotts recalled formulas.

For children taking a specific formula, such as one for a milk protein allergy, experts recommend looking for a similar, alternative formula for what their child is currently taking.

It is important to select a FDA-approved formula, meaning it meets safety standards and is specifically designed to provide appropriate nutrition for infants. If parents are unsure of what product would be considered a safe alternative, they should talk to their childs healthcare provider or dietitian for guidance, said Romero.

Harris noted that other companies, like Enfamil, for example, or other U.S.-produced milk-based formulas have very little difference and would be considered safe to use as an alternative.

As a father of an infant who has a milk protein allergy, which is very common, they cannot take standard formulas, which are all increasingly difficult to find in powdered form, he said. We have been successful finding liquid formulas on Amazon; however, these liquid-based formulas can be more expensive for families facing financial distress.

Right now, parents can also look at ordering online from known entities, like Amazon, Walmart, and CVS.

While this is incredibly stressful for parents as they try to provide appropriate nutrition for their children, experts stress that parents should avoid diluting formula or ordering products from unknown online retailers.

What we want to avoid is parents extending the life of the powder formula by adding water and diluting it, said Harris. That is not good for children because it causes low sodium, and that can lead to seizures, which can be life-threatening. Never dilute formula, hard stop.

Another tip is to not order formulas from websites that may not deliver products certified in the United States. Formulas produced in the U.S. that use a typical 20 calorie-per-ounce, milk-based formula have very little difference from each other.

Harris also recommends double checking any Similac product that parents do happen to find to make sure its not part of the recall.

There are still products on the shelves that are part of the recall that may not have been taken down, he said.

The FDA has also issued warnings against using homemade formula since it isnt regulated and can be contaminated or lack key nutrients.

In a 2021 warning, the FDA said some infants fed homemade formula were hospitalized due to low calcium.

These problems are very serious, and the consequences range from severe nutritional imbalances to foodborne illnesses, both of which can be life-threatening, the FDA said in the 2021 warning.

If parents do happen to find Similac, Alimentum, and EleCare powdered infant formula products, here is what they can check to ensure it is not recalled:

In addition, Abbott Nutrition has recalled Similac PM 60/40 with a lot code of 27032K80 (can) / 27032K800 (case). Parents can also enter the product lot code on the companys website to check.

As healthcare providers, we are aware of the severity of this shortage and how it is impacting families, said Romero. Providers are working closely with families daily to help provide support and guidance to ensure their children are receiving appropriate and adequate formula. Families should make sure to talk to their childs healthcare provider or dietitian if guidance is needed.

Here is the original post:

Infant Formula Shortage: Why it's Happening and What Parents Can Do - Healthline

Posted in Alternative Medicine | Comments Off on Infant Formula Shortage: Why it’s Happening and What Parents Can Do – Healthline

Congress Picks Populism Over Increased Supply With Price Gouging Legislation – Forbes

Posted: at 9:41 pm

WASHINGTON - APRIL 26: U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) reacts as he leaves a news conference on ... [+] high gasoline prices at a gas station on Capitol Hill April 26, 2006 in Washington, DC. The Senate Democratic members called for action against gas price gouging. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Democrats continue to decry high gasoline prices and accuse oil companies of price gouging, but lawmakers should consider whether their policies restricting domestic energy production are to blame for soaring consumer prices.

Democrats may want to look in the mirror before pointing the finger at the people who create jobs and produce the energy this country runs on. The Democrats' own policies are causing the energy scarcity that's driving up prices.

Oil and gas prices have risen because of falling supply. Less than a decade ago, there were 1,600 active drilling rigs in the country producing or searching for oil; now, there's a quarter of that number.

There were twice as many drilling rigs operating in the Gulf of Mexico before the pandemic hit in spring 2020. That was also the last time oil was at or above $100 a barrel.

Why? Because the energy sector faces severe supply chain shortages, including skilled workers who left the industry during the pandemic, and shortages of critical materials such as frac sand and wellbores that have become scarce and expensive.

Those factors have combined to restrain American oil production, which now sits around 11.6 million barrels per day compared to a peak in 2019 of 13 million per day.

Democrats know high energy costs and inflation are a problem in the midterm elections and are desperate to show that they are addressing the issue.

They are sticking to their populist playbook of blaming corporate America for profiteering. They have bashed oil companies incorrectly for price gouging since consumer prices at the pump started rising after President Joe Biden took office over a year ago.

Congressional Democrats are proposing numerous bills against Big Oil for the crime of profiteering. Now, they plan to introduce legislation next week that would expand the Federal Trade Commission's authority to investigate price gouging and give the President the power to declare an energy emergency and limit price increases.

This is how things are done in Venezuela and other socialist countries, not America. Thankfully, none of these measures are likely to become law because Democrats lack the 60 votes required to avoid a filibuster in the Senate.

The FTC already has all the authority necessary to act against manipulation in wholesale and retail oil markets. Dozens of federal investigations into price gouging the most recent was done in November at Biden's request have failed to turn up evidence that producers are keeping prices artificially high. Repeated FTC investigations have found that changes in gasoline prices are based on market factors rising demand meeting limited supply not illegal behavior.

Price gouging legislation is a blatant attempt by Democrats to shift blame for an issue they know consumers are rightfully worried about. And the situation won't get any better as the summer driving season begins in a couple of weeks, adding to the demand pressure. Americans are looking for solutions, not posturing by frightened politicians.

False accusations of price gouging are not only wrong, but they are also dangerous. Attacking the very industry while we need it to increase investment in exploration even the Biden administration has called on the oil industry to increase supply only makes sense to the far-left progressive wing of the Democratic Party.

The price of crude and refined products like gasoline and diesel is set in a global commodity marketplace. Prices are soaring because of a global supply crunch, workforce constraints, the war in Ukraine, and an economic rebound as the United States and much of the world emerge from the effects of the coronavirus pandemic, driving up demand.

Prices at the pump are at or near record highs in many parts of the country due to the growing imbalance between supply and demand.

The EU's moves to ban imports of Russian petroleum have added to the upward pressure on prices. Russia is a major supplier of crude and refined products particularly diesel to Europe. By cutting off Russian supplies, Europe must find replacements elsewhere in the market, which has knock-on effects across global fuel markets. American consumers will feel the pain, too.

Global oil markets are suffering from insufficient investment in new supplies. That is the case in the "upstream" the exploration and development of crude oil supplies and in the "downstream" among refiners that process crude oil into products like gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel that consumers use every day.

Today's supply crunch is as much about a lack of refining capacity as low crude supplies. The world lost roughly 4 million barrels a day of refining capacity during the pandemics demand collapse, including about 1.4 million barrels a day in the United States. In a global oil market of 100 million barrels a day, that is a considerable figure.

With global climate policies and related ESG investor pressures, theres concern that worldwide oil demand will peak in the next decade. Refiners shut excess capacity during the pandemic and, in most cases, don't plan to bring it back now due to political pressures related to the low-carbon energy transition. Refiners are asking themselves why they should invest limited resources in a venture that politicians and markets are betting against?

The Ukraine war makes matters worse because Russia is a major exporter of refined products, and sanctions are taking a significant toll on these sales. Russian refiners can't find buyers for their diesel, so they are reducing production and taking supply off the global markets. Covid-19 lockdowns in China, another major exporter of refined products, have a similar effect.

So, domestic high energy prices are part of a global trend, not a conspiracy by retail gasoline station owners most of which are not owned by major oil companies but by smaller, independent players.

The market fundamentals arent going to be changed by price-gouging legislation. The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) is also not going to ride in and save the day. The Saudi-led cartel has made that clear by consistently resisting President Bidens pleas to add more supply to the market.

The only thing that will alleviate the situation is higher investment in global crude and fuel supplies. Biden knows this, which is why he recently did an about-face on the issue and called for more domestic drilling. But the President and his party's energy and climate policies are still working against the development of new fossil fuel supplies, and theyve done nothing to resolve the lack of refining capacity.

The White House is sending a mixed message on energy, blaming Big Oil for a problem it helped create. Consumers may be footing the bill for Bidens policies now, but Democrats will pay at the polls in November.

Read the rest here:

Congress Picks Populism Over Increased Supply With Price Gouging Legislation - Forbes

Posted in Populism | Comments Off on Congress Picks Populism Over Increased Supply With Price Gouging Legislation – Forbes

Opinion | What J.D. Vances Primary Win Says About Populism and Resentment in the G.O.P. – The New York Times

Posted: at 9:41 pm

[MUSIC]

Its The Argument. Im Jane Coaston.

It seems like right now any conversation about the 2022 midterms is actually kind of about 2024. And any conversation about 2024 is inevitably about Donald Trump even if its not about Donald Trump the person, but Donald Trump the idea. Because even if Donald Trump doesnt run again, his ideas, his ethos, his whole vibe will be. Itll just be coming from a different Republican. In this primary season, were seeing a lot of that. So this week Im joined by two conservative writers who are thinking a lot about what the winning G.O.P. candidates can tell us about the waxing or waning influence of Donald Trump, or the idea of Donald Trump on the party.

Hello. Nice to meet you both.

Hey, good to meet you.

Yeah.

I cant believe weve never talked, I dont think.

Yeah, I actually am kind of surprised that this has never happened until now.

Yeah.

Good, well, thats what youre for, right?

Uh-huh. Yep. Im bringing people together.

Thats right.

We try. Heres David French.

Im a Senior Editor at The Dispatch, a Contributing Writer at The Atlantic, and Memphis Grizzlies fan.

And Chris Caldwell.

Im a Contributing Editor at The Claremont Review of Books, and a Contributing Opinion Writer for The New York Times Opinion Section.

This all started Chris, you wrote an article for New York Times Opinion about J.D. Vance, the best-selling author who just won the Ohio Republican primary election for Senate, analyzing what you think contributed to his popularity in Ohios primary, including and beyond Trumps endorsement, and I think we can use that as an interesting case study and jumping off point for discussion. I was particularly interested, because Im from Ohio. I grew up in Ohio. Its always been a very conservative place in a lot of ways.

But I wanted to walk through your piece with David, because I know he disagrees with some of the major points. First, you say the people who voted for J.D. Vance havent changed. Whats changed is that Trump gave them an outlet for their grievances.

But I disagree with that, because in 2016, Vance was not a Trump supporter. He described him as reprehensible, as cultural heroin. Flash forward to his campaign, he said that he underwent a political evolution of sorts, that Trump was right, elites are corrupt, and then he got Trumps endorsement in the race. So I think if you read Hillbilly Elegy, and you read some of what Vance wrote, it wasnt that there were no problems, it was that Trump was the wrong solution. Why, and what do you think changed, Chris?

Well, as I say, I am not sure that Vance changed as much as you are. I think through traveling with him, I formed the impression that we might have taken some of the wrong things out of Hillbilly Elegy. That is, we might have misidentified the center of the book. That book was written in 2013, 14, 15. It came out into the Trump campaign, and I think people grasped that as a way to explain Trump.

But I think the emotional center of that book is his relationship with his family. And I think that the sociological explanation of the politics of that region I think its secondary. Now, if you look at the political attitudes the book does describe, a lot of them are really youd call them arch conservative.

When I say I think that Trump changed Ohio more than other states, its because of the nature of the Ohio economy and the Ohio culture that grew out of that economy. It is, again, a varied economy. But if you have a manufacturing style economy, it has really suffered more than other economies in the last, lets say, generation. And the fact is, you have never had, with a few peeps here and there, but youve never had a presidential nominee of one of the parties who made a full-throated assault on the arrangements that destroyed that economy. And Trump did that, and its something unique among presidential candidates.

Ive been alive since 1987, and I remember George W. Bushs election in Ohio, and Ohio helped propel him to two presidential elections. And much of the state-level language that George W. Bush and Karl Rove were relying upon was talking about poor white voters, and talking to poor white voters, about a compassionate conservatism.

Right.

So, David, is Vance offering something truly new to low income white voters than say George W. Bush did, or is it a different packaging, and how is that difference actually showing up?

Yeah, I think Bush and Vance were moving towards working class white voters, but appealing to different aspects of the culture of working class white voters. But theres two things going on at once one is, Bush, through the language of compassionate conservatism, is appealing to, not just in Ohio, but broader in the United States of America, appealing to the better angels of our nature. So there are people who are being left behind that we need to help.

So you had Medicare expansion under Bush, for example, you had tariffs under Bush, for example. A lot of sort of the economic conservative purists really got upset about so many of the things that Bush did, and for a while it worked. Now, of course, we know what happened as America soured on the Iraq War. We know what happened in the aftermath of Katrina and the financial crash.

But I think whats different about the appeal now, in the Vances appeal, the Trump appeal, is it is much less reminiscent of a George W. Bush, and much more reminiscent of a George Wallace. And when I see Vance, and when I see this newest incarnation of Vance, Im not seeing so much compassionate conservatism as I am seeing a reemergence though of the kind of populism that dominated much of the South for a very long time in the South. And its a populism of resentment. Its a populism of tribal loyalty. It neglects appeals to better angels of our nature in favor of appeals to rage and anger hatred even.

And I think whats ultimately playing here isnt so much the globalization argument as it is much more the cultural argument. Much less rooted to, oh, here is this specific policy that Donald Trump or J.D. Vance is going to propose that is going to bring back manufacturing to this region, or their specific policy that they advance that the Democrats dont advance that is going to make my life better. I think it goes much, much deeper than that. It makes me question how unique Ohio is.

Yeah, Im curious about that, Chris, because from a what to do perspective, what is the difference between what J.D. Vance would offer and what a compassionate conservative who knows that cutting Medicare is politically a very bad idea do? This isnt J.D. Vance versus Paul Ryan. This is J.D. Vance versus the Republicans who have been Republicans in Ohio since I was a kid.

Right. Yeah, I think David lays it out as a choosing fellow feeling versus choosing group hostility, and I dont think that thats the way it happened. I think that whats happened is a shift in the economy thats brought a shift in the class system.

And I think that, lets say at the dawn of the New Deal, you had a Democratic Party that was, although idiosyncratic, pretty identifiable as the working mans party, and the Republican Party that was more or less a proprietors party. The New Deal changed that, and it created a kind of alternative way of rising through the society. There was sort of a Democratic Party constituency of both working people and, lets say, educational institutions that gave an alternative way to rise.

And so when you get to the 1980s, neither of the parties had a strong class identity. They had a class mythology in them. I think that the Democrats still thought of themselves as the party of the downtrodden working man, but the downtrodden working man might have a second house on one of the Great Lakes with a boat, you know.

Right.

Whats happened lately is a few things. Weve had deindustrialization, but weve also had the rise of a new economy, a lot of it around universities, and the Democrats are the party of universities. And so very gradually to the point where you havent really even noticed, we have emerged back in a world where the parties have class identities.

And so I think that what youre seeing is loud class arguments from certain Republican candidates. Vance is one of them, and thats one of the reasons I began the article by quoting Vance really shouting very passionately about wanting to break up the tech companies. And its not that the people who vote for him dont use the internet or anything like that, but they dont feel they have any say in the way the new, lets say, high tech economy and social order is set up.

David, youre looking askance.

Im thinking were over-analyzing this a lot. I think J.D. Vance is a very online, New Right politician. He has a Twitter constituency

Right.

so he has Ive got your grievances new right Twitter that sort of builds some zealous support that he has in that world, which is really, truthfully, electorally irrelevant. Its mainly useful because he has some of the same hobby horses that Tucker Carlson has, for example, so that helps get him on Tucker Carlson.

But the reality was, there was this race for the Trump endorsement and he captured the Trump endorsement, and then hes running in a multi-candidate primary where that Trump endorsements going to make a big difference. And you know, he goes for the Trump endorsement in a couple of ways. One of the ways he goes is by fighting like Trump, by appealing to that lowest common denominator kind of rhetoric fight, fight, fight, never back down, fight, fight, fight.

This isnt, I dont think, an exercise in difficult sociological analysis. He was in a multi-candidate primary, he appealed to lowest common denominator populism. One of the things he said is, Our people hate the Right people. Our people hate the Right people. And he captured 30 plus percent of the electorates still bigger than folks thought. Now hes going to run in a general election in a two-candidate race, where its really rough for Democrats, and that negative polarization is the single dominant factor of American politics.

I also think its worth recognizing here that because it was a multi-person primary, its not like J.D. Vance won an overwhelming number of votes. There were a lot of people running for that nomination, and he beat Josh Mandel, the most try hard person, perhaps, in the history of American politics. And I do want to pivot to the general election, because Chris, you wrote that Vance told you that he thinks he got Trumps endorsement because he embraced Trump as a political program to be carried out, not just as kind of like a vibe to follow. What is the program? What is he going to do?

Yeah, I should make very clear, though, that was a beautiful quote that Vance gave, but I didnt get it. Actually, its from a Dayton television reporter named Chelsea Sick. So I think that the context in which she asked him that question was the one you say that a lot of candidates were going for the Trump endorsement.

Right.

The one who didnt seek it, Matt Dolan of Cleveland, a State Senator, got about 25 percent of the vote. But this indicates that whoever got that

Endorsement.

endorsement was in a very strong position.

To do what?

Well, it leaves him in a strong position in the election. Now, whats he going to do? I dont know. When he talked about Trumpism being an agenda, he named trade, the border, and not getting us into wars of choice.

And so, I tend to think that Vance will be protectionist, you know. He would not revive the Pacific Trade Pact that Trump pulled out of. He would build the wall, if he could get the votes for it in a non-metaphorical sense, and in a metaphorical sense, he would be much more restrictionist on the Mexican border. And hell oppose the Ukraine war or the United States role in it. I think those are three things trade, the border, foreign policy.

I mean, it still seems to me, and Im curious to get your thoughts, David, that because of what Id call the nationalization of politics I grew up with it makes me sound like Im 80 years old to talk this way but I think it is interesting to me that after growing up with Ohio politics being Ohio centered, as if Ohio was, and I quote, the heart of it all.

But now you see like you were just talking about, the trade policy, and the war in Ukraine, and securing the Mexican border. And Im just like, what does this have to do with my mom? What does this have to do with if I am elected, this thing will happen. Well finally do something about the I-71, 75 interchange. I mean, this is perhaps just a general pet peeve of mine.

But I think that the nationalization of politics coincides with the sense that Congress cant actually do anything because individual congresspeople are talking about the Mexican border, or war with Ukraine which are both really important issues. But at a certain point, if J.D. Vance wants the wall to get built as a United States Senator, hes got some power to do so, but not much. If you are supposed to call your Senator when theres a thing going on in your state and theyre, like, hang on a second, I got to stop unnecessary wars in Ukraine

Yeah.

I would get a sense of who are you here for? Are you here for Ohioans, or are you here for this larger political project?

Well you know, I think that the rise of negative polarization kind of enables a J.D. Vance style candidate, who I see as sort of what is he going to be like in the Senate? I think weve seen the model, and the model is Josh Hawley. I think thats what youll see with J.D. Vance, is youre going to see a guy who will become a Senator and hell file some really performative legislation. He has this whole album side about, you know, seizing the endowments of universities and things like that.

But if were going to take for half a second this idea that if and when he wins the Senate in Ohio that thats going to show that Republicans really dont want to see American military support for Ukraine, we need to rethink that kind of analysis because hes going to win because he won the primary because he got Trumps endorsement. He didnt get Trumps endorsement because of some really difficult, highly ideological test.

One of the reasons he got it is Trump liked his golf swing. I mean, this is the world were living in right now. And what weve constantly tried to do, I feel like, in this post-Trump world is were constantly trying to apply a complex intellectual frame

Yeah, were trying to intellectualize someone who also endorsed Dr. Oz.

Right, endorsed Dr. Oz, endorsed David Perdue in Georgia for the very simple reason that David Perdue will do his bidding on arguing about the 2020 election. And so this is where I feel like theres this disconnect often when we try to intellectualize Trump, and theres this disconnect when we try to intellectualize J.D. Vance.

Trump, A, tapped into this well of animosity. He tapped into it, and I agree that he changed the country in some ways. He changed the country by amplifying pre-existing trends towards partisan antipathy in much of the way that sometimes a symptom can make an underlying disease worse, like a hacking cough can break a rib. He did not really, actually, at the grassroots, introduce some sort of really fascinating new ideological enterprise, because the reality is kind of, whatever Trump did, they liked.

And look, Ive piled a lot on the Republican populist movement now, but let me flip this around a little bit here. The Democrats really made a pivot towards an identity-based coalition. I remember all the talk after 2012 of the coalition of the ascendant, right? People of color, single women, all of the rising demographics of America are going to rise and swamp you. Its all over for you, Republican Party.

Why is it all over for you, Republican Party? Well, youre just too white and too male to win anymore. And I think when your political opponents move very much towards an identity-based coalition and away from a working class-based coalition, you leave a lane and you leave a lot of voters just right there. And if you look at the demographics of Ohio, Ohio is 81 percent white thats more white than in America.

I know. Im aware.

Jane, news to you, Jane?

Ohio is more white than the rest of America. If you look at Iowa that is now completely in the G.O.P. camp, its super white. And so its not that the Democrats were necessarily wrong that there was an emerging Democratic majority, its just that the majority was emerging in a lot of the wrong places where they didnt need it to emerge. You know, how many more progressives do you need in Brooklyn or Berkeley?

And so youre doubling down on identity-based politics, leaving behind class-based politics. And my issue isnt that Republicans have moved into this open field that Democrats have left them, its more how theyve moved into it than the fact that theyve moved into it.

I just theres a premise thats come up that I think I disagree with both of you on, which is that theres something unusual about a Senate candidate dealing with these national issues.

I dont think its not unusual to me, but my point is that I dont think its good. I think that it is problematic to have candidates who inherently focus on issues that they themselves could not fix, or they themselves could bear no responsibility for.

Oh, but I think you could. I think, you know, the Senate has a constitutional responsibility regarding treaties. Congress gets to declare war, and not

Well, they do.

The border is a national matter. There is a division of labor between, you know, state and national governments, and I think theres a feeling that the government of Ohio is pretty well in hand.

Thinking more about you wrote about Trump in your piece, saying that you know, globalization and being against NAFTA was one of Trumps most effective rallying cries. And you wrote yourself though, Whether Mr. Trump has effectively stopped anything related to globalization can be debated. And it seems that maximalism is the privilege of being able to say anything you want without anyone really calling you on it.

Yeah.

So with Trump, you have someone who doesnt really do anything related to globalization, because its an effective boogeyman. Its effective to just have the thing that is there is a problem, and we all know what the problem is, but youre not going to do anything to fix the problem because either the solution is too politically complicated, or too politically unpopular. We are asking, or would be asking, J.D. Vance to do something, to be a United States Senator to represent my mom.

But if you are leaning hard on, here are all of our problems. We are in late-stage capitalism. We have to fire everyone and liquidate the Kulaks. And then you get into actual office, then what do you do?

I know, but I dont think people are saying that. And I dont think that the difference is between rhetoric and reality, I think it has to do with the passage of time. Governing is really complicated, and I think that failed governments, whatever they propose enacting, learn a lot from the way they were thwarted, and they get better at it as time goes on. So the rhetoric always seems to be at odds with reality until it becomes reality. So I dont, you know, some of these ideas might be good, some of them might be bad, but Im not suspicious of them just because theyre being proposed.

You know, I think you raise a really interesting question about the distinction between fixing and fighting, OK? So you say Ohio has problems A, B, C and D. What are we going to do to fix them? is one kind of thrust in campaigning. Then theres another that says the Democrats have problems A, B, C and D. What are we going to do to fight them?

And I think thats where Trump really discerned the building wave of Republican resentment. It wasnt so much on the fixing prong, it was much more on the fighting prong. And you know, the interesting thing, if youre diving into the ideology of Trumpism, is there isnt really an ideology, its more the ambitions and power hunger of a single man. If you look at his single term in office, his two largest concrete policy achievements were a corporate tax cut designed by Paul Ryan, and the nomination of a whole slew of Federalist Society judges that were put into a pipeline over the last generation of establishment, Republican, judicial and legal activism.

And I would note here on that point that there is no reason to believe that any other Republican president would have not nominated those judges.

Oh, yeah.

The judges were going to be in there, no matter what.

Oh, they were coming out of the establishment pipeline. You do not get more establishment than Brett Kavanaugh. But what did make Trump different, it was the fighting, it was the fighting.

And I think if you talked to J.D. Vance in 2016, he would say, wait a minute, this fighting stuff is a distraction from what needs fixing. And I think what changed in 2016 to 2020 was not these folks, it was J.D. and the way he transitioned from the fixing to the fighting. And I think what he saw in Trump was somebody who would inhibit the fixing. He was somebody who was certainly an avatar for grievances, but not a instrument for remedies.

And I think that thats what Im talking about when Im talking about if you have a population of white working class voters where there are real problems and how do you appeal to them and mobilize them, I think that there are constructive ways to appeal and destructive ways. J.D. was concerned in 2016 that the very method he chose in 2020 was deeply destructive, and yet thats where he went.

I think theres no doubt that Trump is a fighting politician. But I think that fighting I was really struck by the entrance of the word fight into a lot of political rhetoric well before Trump 10 years or so ago. And it seems to have come with a lot of psychological research on how people respond to rhetoric.

And I think its of a piece with the negative advertising which we see because negative advertising, whether we like it or not, has a strange effectiveness on voters. If you listen to Elizabeth Warren, she talks about fighting probably even more than Trump does. I think its really more a best campaign practice than an ideological side-effect.

I dont think anyone disputes it. Theres a wide open lane for populist incitement. I think the issue with J.D. Vance, and the issue with the Republican Party in general, is this move that says, were going to indulge it, were going to stoke it, were going to ride it. There isnt actually a program of governance thats attached to that beyond a few basic impulses about border security, and some vague ideas about trade.

I think its wrong to assume that theres going to be a symmetrical Republican policy program to the Democratic policy program. The Democrats are the party of policy programs. They have a lot more initiative in devising new things for government to do. And youre just not going to find a sort of reflected mirror policy image on Republicans. Its not a symmetry.

The Republicans will tend to be obstructing new policy initiatives. And I havent really thought about what this would mean in terms of rhetoric, but the rhetoric is bound to be different. You know, just simply sitting around and doing nothing, for Republicans, can in certain circumstances be a constructive way to spend four years. And people participate in politics for different reasons, and not all of them are constructive.

Well.

I think we will find unanimous agreement on that one.

[MUSIC]

More with David and Chris on the new standard bearers of Trumps legacy after the break.

[MUSIC]

So we have debated whether Vances win and Trumps endorsement of Vance is about policy or about vibes, and whether some of the fighting rhetoric is just usual stuff politicians do to get elected. I want to talk a little bit now about how much we should infer from his victory about where the G.O.P. is going, and if Trump clearly is king here. And I want to know where you think the Republican platform is, going forward, because I dont think its party stalwarts like Mitch McConnell. I think its, quote unquote, fighters like Ron DeSantis.

Yeah, I think the most politically effective way in which a Republican politician is trying to inherit Trumpism is Ron DeSantis. And thats not a novel insight here, but there are two aspects to the way in which Ron DeSantis is inheriting Trumpism effectively.

And that is, one, he has the right enemy, and that is the media. So he got very fortunate that the mainstream media, left media, really focused on him early in the pandemic, more so than Texas, more so than Tennessee, more so than anywhere else. Really drilled down on him and launched a frontal attack sort of on the Florida approach. And so he built up this immediate constituency just because people are going to rally on the side of whatever Republican is seen to be in the cross-hairs of the media, so he emerged with the, quote unquote, right enemy.

And then the other thing is, what he has done that is different from Trump is that Trumps fighting was a lot of rhetoric, was a lot of tweeting with a lot of outbursts. DeSantis version of fighting is a lot of legislation aimed at targets that are popular targets for the right. So, in essence, DeSantis is the next evolution of Trumpism in that its taking the online beef into the real world through legislation.

Here is the original post:

Opinion | What J.D. Vances Primary Win Says About Populism and Resentment in the G.O.P. - The New York Times

Posted in Populism | Comments Off on Opinion | What J.D. Vances Primary Win Says About Populism and Resentment in the G.O.P. – The New York Times