Daily Archives: May 17, 2022

The evolution of Rangers: ‘You have to believe’ as Giovanni van Bronckhorst reveals his coaching idols – The Scotsman

Posted: May 17, 2022 at 7:27 pm

Frank Rijkaard, Dick Advocaat and Louis van Gaal all had an input and effect on the Rangers managers playing days and now the Dutchman wants to join those legendary peers by landing a European trophy as a manager.

Management, van Bronckhorst says, is a constant learning cycle, where he has taken the best work of his teachers and reflected the results on his own role at Rangers. He has moulded the key elements to reach a Europa League goal which could not only match one of the many achievements of the past Dutch masters, but earn legendary status at Ibrox.

One previous boss in particular, though, is a model on which van Bronckhorst works and sets up his team.

You learn from every coach you have and Im still learning. As a player, I was still learning at 34 or 35 and as a coach you never stop learning, improving yourself and getting new ideas.

So its an ongoing process, the manager said.

I was privileged to train under some really good coaches. I think the final I played with Barcelona in 2006, when we won the Champions League, we had Frank Rijkaard as coach. As a character and the way I work, I think Im closest to his manners and the way he approaches games.

I always had a good feeling with him because he used the strength of the team. He always made us feel like we were special and able to achieve great things. With him, I had a really good relationship.

Louis van Gaal was another coach I had with the Dutch team. As a coach in general, he is one of the best.

And Dick Advocaat was a coach I had with both Rangers and the Dutch team.

They are not the only historic group van Bronckhorst is seeking to join on Wednesday evening.

The Barcelona Bears of 1972 who brought the Cup Winners Cup back to Scotland the only Rangers team to taste success on the continent are still discussed in feted tones around the corridors of Ibrox, and John Greig ensures their feat is never forgotten.

"John is telling that story every day! No, its good to have. I love having John Greig around because he is a true legend, van Bronckhorst added.

I think its also very important for the players to hear those stories, of the influence and experience they had and what it meant to them. Thats very important because this club is all about history.

I also told my players that we have two big finals and the final in Seville next week will give them a chance to be in the history books of this club.

Then the stories they will tell in 10, 20 or 30 years will be the same stories that all the players from 72 will tell to mine.

It is a chance of greatness, of that there is no doubt. Eintracht Frankfurt are talented but sit 11th in the German top flight, far beyond RB Leipzig and Borussia Dortmund, who Rangers have eliminated already.

Using the Dutch methodology of van Gaal, Rijkaard and company has seen a tactical evolution at Rangers sometimes midway through games and van Bronckhorst will apply more of the elements he has learned through a 30-year football career against Frankfurt that have served Rangers so well against more illustrious opponents including the two German sides already.

Its a Bundesliga team and a very strong team, physically good, well organised and very fast in transitions, said Van Bronckhorst. We also saw when we played against Leipzig. They have had great results, beating Barcelona and West Ham is a great achievement for them the results they have had in Europe will give them confidence. But they have different players to the ones we faced.

The system might be the same but individually they have different strengths but we are watching all the games they have played so far and in the end we will make a plan to try to be victorious against Eintracht.

If you play against a really strong opponent Dortmund at that time were favourites to win the Europa League and you give a performance like that, its good for confidence and your belief in your strength as a team. We stayed really humble and respected the opponent and made sure that we did everything we could to win against every team we played. Thats one of the strengths of this team. Im really happy with that. Frankfurt will be the same. We wont change our approach. We wont change anything in addressing all the tactics. The preparations will be the same as when we played before.

It would be a huge achievement and it also the beauty of football because it doesnt matter how much you spend or what your players are worth, in the end you have the chance to win against a team in 90 minutes.

You can play against a team with much bigger budgets and better players but we have won those games.

I think it is a huge achievement for us and it shows that everything is possible in football once you work hard for it. You have to believe.

Original post:

The evolution of Rangers: 'You have to believe' as Giovanni van Bronckhorst reveals his coaching idols - The Scotsman

Posted in Evolution | Comments Off on The evolution of Rangers: ‘You have to believe’ as Giovanni van Bronckhorst reveals his coaching idols – The Scotsman

Why the Texas Social Media Law is a Menace to Freedom of Speech – Reason

Posted: at 7:26 pm

In December, federal district court Judge Robert Pitman ruled against HB 20, Texas' sweeping new social media law that bars social media firms from engaging in almost any moderation of the content that can appear on their sites. Not only are they forbidden to completely exclude content they disapprove of; they are also not allowed to treat it differently on the site (such as by flagging it as possibly unreliable "misinformation" or reducing its prominence relative to other speech on the same platform).

Last week, the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued a 2-1 ruling imposing a stay on the injunction against enforcement of the law issued by the trial court. The Fifth Circuit ruling is purely procedural, and is not accompanied by any opinion explaining the court's reasoning. So it's hard to say whether the stay is based on purely technical procedural considerations, or signals that the majority believes the law is actually constitutional.

On Friday, the tech firms challenging the law asked the Supreme Court to lift the Fifth Circuit's stay, in a brief drafted by a virtual Who's Who of prominent conservative appellate lawyers, including "super-lawyer" Paul Clement (former Bush administration Solicitor General), and former Texas Solicitor General Scott Keller.

I will not try to assess the purely procedural issues involved in the fight over the stay. But I completely agree with the brief's discussion of the substantive free speech question. HB 20 is blatantly unconstitutional because it compels speech, forbids the exercise of editorial discretion by social media firms, and is meant to target firms the Texas state government believes are hostile to "conservative" speech specifically.

HB 20 is an extreme version of proposals to treat social media firms as "common carriers" who have a legal duty to accept all or virtually all would-be customers. I criticized such proposals in detail here. Most of the points I make are relevant to the present case:

Let's start with first principles. Eugene Volokh asks "Whose rules should govern how Americans speak with other Americans?"..

Th[e] answer is that each American should be able to decide for himself, with extremely rare exceptions. But each person should also be able to decide what kinds of speech are permitted on their property. And that applies to media corporations no less than individuals. Thus, I should be able to advocate virtually any viewpoint I want. But Fox News and the New York Times should be equally free to refuse to broadcast or publish my views.

Both the right to free expression and the right to refuse a platform to speech you disapprove of are vital elements of freedom of speech. If Fox were forced to broadcast left-wing views they object to and the Times had to give space to right-wing ones its editors would prefer to avoid, it would be an obvious violation of their rights. Moreover, in the long run, such policies would actually reduce the quantity and quality of expression overall, as people would be less likely to establish TV stations and newspapers in the first place, if the cost of doing so was being forced to give a platform to your adversaries' views.

Thus, there should be a very strong presumption against forcing people to provide platforms for views they object to. Can proposals for common carrier regulation of social media overcome that objection? The answer should be a firm "no."

The standard rationale for common carrier regulation is that the the firms in question have some kind of monopoly power.

The reality is very much otherwise. Recent survey data compiled by the Pew Research Foundation finds that many more Americans get news by means other than social media than use the latter. For example, 68% of Americans indicated they regularly get news from media websites and apps, 68% from television, and only 53% from social media sites. Among the overwhelming majority (about 96% of the total sample) who use more than one type of media to get news, 35% preferred TV, 26% preferred news websites and apps, and only 11% said they preferred social media. The same study also found that, on average, Americans trust news from social media sources less than that from television and news websites.

What is true of news is also true of opinion and commentary about political and social issues in the news..

To the extent we are specifically concerned with access for conservative viewpoints, there are large right of center players in both TV media and online news and opinion. These include such major outlets as Fox News, the Wall Street Journal editorial page, the Washington Times, the New York Post, and others.

In sum, social media sites have nothing approaching a monopoly over the market for political information generally, or even over its distribution online.

One measure of Big Tech social media's inability to control political discourse is their utter failure to prevent the rise of widespread attacks on Big Tech itself! Real monopolists worthy of the name should be able to at least suppress speech that directly threatens their own interests.

Moreover, as I explained in a January [2021] op ed in USA Today (itself one of the many alternatives to social media!), the big social media sites don't even command a true monopoly over social media, narrowly defined. Rival sites with different (and often much looser) moderation rules can and do compete with them.. If they aren't as popular as Facebook and Twitter, it's not because of lack of competition, but because fewer consumers like them. Facebook and Twitter themselves challenged previous, supposedly dominant incumbents. If they annoy enough consumers, or if someone develops a more appealing competing platform, today's supposedly unassailable "giants" will suffer the same fate..

Other rationales for imposing common carrier rules on social media firms are even weaker than the monopoly theory.. [this part of my piece critiques analogies between social media and phone lines and mail delivery services].

The potential imminent takeover of Twitter by Elon Musk - who promises to greatly reduce content moderation - is a further sign that the market is fully capable of generating competition for platforms with restrictive moderation of policies.

I also explained why, if courts accept the HB 20 or "common carrier" approach to regulating social media, it would set a dangerous precedent for government control over other media:

In addition to banning content moderation rules that many consumers like, common carrier restrictions also create serious slippery slope risks. If the monopoly rationale for imposing common carrier rules on social media platforms is accepted, it could just as easily justify the imposition of similar requirements on many types of traditional media.

Even if Twitter and Facebook don't actually monopolize the market for political information, it's certainly true they reach various potential audiences that are difficult or impossible to reach in other ways. But, if that justifies forcing them to abjure restrictions on content, the same theory would rationalize imposing the same requirements on other types of media. Fox News, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and a variety of other major broadcast and print media outlets also reach large audiences that can't always be easily reached in other ways. By that rationale, they too can be forced to be common carriers!

Perhaps the problem is not that social media giants monopolize any audience in some economic sense, but that they have too much influence over political discourse relative to some egalitarian baseline. Why should Mark Zuckerberg's views have any more clout than those of the average American? But we can make exactly the same argument for the owners and editors of Fox News, the New York Times, and any other outlet with a large audience. They too have vastly more influence over public discourse than the average American does. And it's not clear that they are any more worthy of their influence than Zuckerberg is.

Giving government a free hand to impose common carrier restrictions on any website or media outlet that "monopolizes" a particular audience or otherwise has "too much" influence is a power that can and will be abused. Call it "common carrier creep!"

The party in power will have obvious incentives to use it to neuter media that oppose them. Even if conservatives are comfortable with giving such discretion to GOP politicians, are they equally at ease with giving it to Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, or Elizabeth Warren? How about the bureaucrats Democratic presidents are likely to appoint to federal regulatory agencies tasked with implementing such common carrier regulations (and deciding which firms should be subject to them)?

Liberal advocates of social media regulation (of whom Warren is a prominent example) should ask themselves whether they would be willing to entrust such regulatory authority to the likes of Donald Trump or Josh Hawley. Given the chance, those guys would be happy to make social media great again - under their definition of greatness, of course.

More:
Why the Texas Social Media Law is a Menace to Freedom of Speech - Reason

Posted in Freedom of Speech | Comments Off on Why the Texas Social Media Law is a Menace to Freedom of Speech – Reason

Censorship won’t cure disinformation (featuring Jacob Mchangama and Nadine Strossen): Part 17 of answers to arguments against free speech – FIRE -…

Posted: at 7:26 pm

In May 2021, I published a list of Answers to 12 Bad Anti-Free Speech Arguments with our friends over at Areo. The great Nadine Strossen former president of the ACLU from 1991 to 2008, and one of the foremost experts on freedom of speech alive today saw the series and offered to provide her own answers to some important misconceptions about freedom of speech. For this entry, I asked Jacob Mchangama, author of the excellent book, Free Speech: A History from Socrates to Social Media, to provide his answer.

Earlier in the series:

Assertion: Disinformation (and misinformation) about such vital topics as elections and COVID must be censored because it constitutes an existential threat to democracy and individual/public health.

Jacob Mchangama: What do the Catholic Church, England under Henry VIII, The Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, and the European Union have in common?

Certainly not much in terms of ideology, ethics, or philosophy. However, for all their fundamental differences each of these states and institutions have prohibited various forms of false information.

For centuries, the Catholic Church was preoccupied with stamping out heresy, which has its roots in the Greek word, haresis, meaning choice. In the Middle Ages, heresy was defined as an opinion chosen by human perception contrary to holy Scripture, publicly avowed and obstinately defended, and could ultimately be punished by death. As late as 1832, Pope Gregory XVI warned that removing the restraints that keep men on the narrow path of truth was a pestilence more deadly to the state than any other and, therefore, the evil of immoderate freedom of opinion, license of free speech, and desire for novelty had to be countered at all costs.

Englands Henry VIII broke with the Catholic Church, making him the supreme head of both state and the Church of England. To cement his power Henry prohibited publications containing open and manifest errors and slanders contravening the dignity and authority royal of the kings majesty and of his Imperial Crown. Henry built on older precedents, since a Scandalum Magnatum act punishing [F]alse News or Tales scandalizing the king or the Great Men of the Realm had been enacted under Edward I in 1275.

While disinformation is a serious problem worthy of debate and countermeasures, censorship and repression is likely a cure worse than the disease.

On February 24, 1920, a leading member of the German Workers Party (DAP) read the partys manifesto out loud. His name was Adolf Hitler, and his demands included legal warfare against conscious political lying and its dissemination in the press. In Mein Kampf written while in prison Hitler again accused the liberal press of being concerned only with dig[ging] the grave for the German people and REICH whereas the lying Marxist Press was spreading falsehoods to enslave the nation for the benefit of international finance and its masters, the Jews.

According to Hitler, the state meekly allowed the media to hide behind the principle of freedom of the Press and liberty of public opinion, which permitted poison to enter the national bloodstream and infect public life with complete impunity. The solution was to bring the press under state control and free it from the enemies of the people. Shortly after Hitler assumed power through democratic means, the Nazis used constitutional means to expand existing emergency laws permitting the (Nazi) minister of the interior to ban publications that contain obviously inaccurate news, the dissemination of which is likely to endanger vital interests of the state.

And once the Nazis had pushed President Hindenburg to use the emergency provision of the Weimar Constitution to pass the so-called Reichstag Fire Decree to suspend civil liberties including free speech paving the way for a dictatorship, laws against malicious gossip were enacted, which made it a crime to spread rumors about or gossip against the government and its officials.

The European Union can trace its origins to the European Coal and Steel Community aimed at strengthening European integration and avoiding new and devastating wars and persecution like those unleashed by the Nazis. The European Union is committed to democracy and human rights and has a Charter of Fundamental Rights, which protects freedom of expression. However, in early March the EU banned Russian state-sponsored media outlets RT and Sputnik from broadcasting, as a response to these outlets nefarious pro-Kremlin disinformation and propagandistic coverage of the conflict in Ukraine. The ban also requires search engines like Google to delist all search results from Sputnik and RT, and an obligation for social media companies to block their accounts as well as deleting the sharing and reproduction of RT and Sputnik content by other users.

While the scope, severity and consequences of all these laws against false information differ significantly, they are all aimed at protecting against certain forms of false information thought to be particularly dangerous to the fundamental values and institutions of the relevant polity, as defined by the very rulers or political leaders whom laws against false news will be protecting.

This is a lesson of which contemporary authoritarians are keenly aware. In 2021, 47 journalists were imprisoned on charges of spreading false news in countries like Myanmar, Egypt, Rwanda, and Ethiopia, according to data from the Committee to Protect Journalists. Moreover, since the onset of COVID, a censorship pandemic of laws has infected authoritarian states, which prohibits various forms of allegedly false information under the guise of protecting public health, while actually aimed at repressing dissent.

There is little reason to believe that things would be different in America should the Supreme Court decide to roll back landmark First Amendment cases like New York Times v. Sullivan, which now limits the governments power to punish false statements about public issues, in order not to chill vigorous debate and criticism of public officials. The Sedition Act of 1798 showed that even luminaries of the Founding Generation, including Washington, Adams, and Hamilton, were willing to punish false, scandalous, or malicious writings against the government and Congress they dominated, and to use this law in a deeply partisan manner to target their Democratic-Republican opponents.

Those intolerant and tribalist impulses are still alive today. Donald Trump frequently demanded tougher laws against the fake news media. A 2017 poll showed that a plurality (45%) of Republicans agreed that courts should be able to shut down media outlets for publishing or broadcasting stories that are biased or inaccurate, with fewer than 20% of Democrats supporting this idea.

In 2021 when Biden had become president 65% of Democrats agreed that the government should do more to restrict false online information even if it limits freedom of information, whereas only 28% of Republicans were on board. We can be sure that Trump and Biden as well as Democrats and Republicans have conflicting ideas about what types of speech should be deemed inaccurate or false and who should be punished for peddling it.

So, while disinformation is a serious problem worthy of debate and countermeasures, censorship and repression is likely to be a cure worse than the disease.

Nadine Strossen: First Amendment principles permit the government to punish false speech when it directly, immediately causes specific serious harm. Important examples of punishable false speech include defamation, fraud, and perjury. The term disinformation (or misinformation) has no specific legal meaning, but is widely used to designate false or misleading speech that cannot constitutionally be punished precisely because its potential harms are indirect and speculative.

As current debates illustrate, one persons cherished truth is someone elses despised or feared fake news. Speech that critics seek to suppress as disinformation almost never consists of objectively verifiable facts alone, but rather, also involves subjective matters of interpretation and analysis. After all, speakers who intentionally or recklessly utter false factual statements may constitutionally be punished under existing laws such as those against fraud. In contrast, though, the Supreme Court has ruled that [u]nder the First Amendment there is no such thing as a false idea. However pernicious an opinion may seem, we depend for its correction . . . on the competition of other ideas.

Most vulnerable would be ideas that challenge government policy.

To this day, expression by racial justice advocates continues to be assailed as disinformation. For example, a May 2021 NPR story quoted Mike Gonzalez, a senior fellow with the Heritage Foundation, as stating: I feel that Black Lives Matter is one of the greatest sources of disinformation. . . They have manipulated the good nature of many people.

The inherent problems with censoring disinformation specifically plague recent laws that are touted as restricting pandemic-related disinformation. The Economist reported in February 2021 that [c]ensorious governments are abusing fake news laws, invoking the pandemic as an excuse to gag reporters and to silence critics of their anti-pandemic policies. Given the inescapable elasticity of the concept of disinformation, restrictions on it can easily be wielded against important information, even in democratic countries. Throughout the pandemic, we have witnessed constantly evolving and shifting views among expert individuals and agencies, as they steadily gather and analyze additional data. Yesterdays life-endangering disinformation can and has become todays life-protecting gospel. As one example, recall the CDCs changing edicts about mask-wearing.

Because of these unavoidable problems, in 2020, the ACLU brought a lawsuit against Puerto Ricos laws targeting pandemic-related disinformation. The complainants are two prominent investigative journalists, who explained that developing stories on matters of immense public concern are often complex, contentious, and murky, so that inadvertent inaccuracies are inevitable even in the most thoroughly vetted reporting.

Multiple studies have concluded that the most fruitful anti-disinformation tool is accurate information that can check its spread and influence: targeted responses to specific disinformation, as well as preemptive general educational approaches, and enhancing critical media skills. Psychological research shows that even more effective than debunking disinformation after its dissemination is prebunking: inoculating people against disinformation before they are exposed to it.

In contrast with censorship, these counterspeech/more speech strategies not only are more compatible with free speech and democracy; they are also more effective in promoting truth.

Originally posted here:
Censorship won't cure disinformation (featuring Jacob Mchangama and Nadine Strossen): Part 17 of answers to arguments against free speech - FIRE -...

Posted in Freedom of Speech | Comments Off on Censorship won’t cure disinformation (featuring Jacob Mchangama and Nadine Strossen): Part 17 of answers to arguments against free speech – FIRE -…

Weve not had free speech in 20 years. But thats changing… – The US Sun

Posted: at 7:26 pm

MORE than three-fifths of UK women dont say what they are thinking on sensitive issues because they are scared they might get into trouble.

The figure for men is only slightly lower, at 52 per cent.

7

The majority of the population, then, holding its tongue. Watching its Ps and Qs.

The things they think they cant express without censure concern stuff like immigration.

But also suggesting that ethnic minority people have life just the same as the rest of us.

And that someone born with a whopping great todger is a man, end of story.

This poll, conducted by YouGov, came out towards the end of last year.

We pride ourselves in this country of having freedom of speech.

But that hasnt been true for at least two decades. Its a thing of the past, like Toast Toppers and the hula hoop.

When a bloke can receive a visit from the coppers and be told to watch his thinking for having retweeted a joke about transgendering, you know were in BIG trouble.

Likewise when the radical Left tries to silence brilliant speakers, such as the feminist Germaine Greer or the veteran gay rights campaigner Peter Tatchell.

Meanwhile, the students are busy cancelling our entire history on account of slavery.

Suggest that Islam has been implicated in one or two terrorist attacks and youll be accused of Islamophobia and may get a visit from Plod. Even though its demonstrably true.

Freedom of speech has been under sustained attack for a long while now. And the Government has done nothing about it.

I would like to think that is about to change, as a consequence of the Queens Speech this week.

A new Bill of Rights is due to be introduced in the next month or so to replace the Human Rights Act.

And the Government has promised that the right to voice your opinions, regardless of if they offend some melting snowflake, will supposedly be the crucial part of this bill.

The Deputy Prime Minister Dominic Raab said: I feel very strongly that the parameters of free speech and democratic debate are being whittled away, whether by the privacy issue or whether its wokery and political correctness.

I worry about those parameters of free speech being narrowed.Well, sure, Dom and about time too.

The Left argues that silencing people is simply a means of preventing minorities from feeling a bit upset.

But I think they are a little more resilient than the social justice warriors like to make out.

In fact, that is not the reason for our politically correct cancel culture.

The real reason is that the Left wants to close down debate on subjects where its policies simply dont add up.

They are terrified rightly that the vast majority of people in the country simply dont agree with them. Just as that YouGov opinion poll proved.

Punishing people who state uncomfortable truths means far fewer people actually say them. They keep schtum.

But the silencing of debate also breeds resentment and rancour: You cant say THAT any more!

And it attacks the entire basis of our democracy: The right to freedom of conscience, freedom of thought and freedom of speech.

I just hope this bill goes far enough. I hope it abolishes the concept of non-criminal hate crime, for a start.

I hope it forces universities to realise that a minority of the perpetually offended cannot stop outside speakers from addressing those who want to hear them.

Its been a long time coming, this bill.

But at least the Government recognises there is a real problem a very big problem.

And is committed to doing something about it.

YAY! The Social Democratic Partys Wayne Dixon swept into office on a landslide in Leeds last week.

Evicting Labour for the first time in history.

7

The dim-witted Labour candidate wouldnt even shake his hand.

Ha, who cares? It just goes to show that if people think the two main parties can be beaten, voters will turn out.

Were the party that knows what a woman is, and doesnt want all our statues thrown in the river.

Well done Wayne and if you get a chance, look at the YouTube video of his wife jumping for joy at the election result.

Its a hoot.

DO you remember the days when flying was...well, if not great fun, at least easy to do and efficient?

What the hell has happened?

7

We have queues a mile long at our airports.

Some of this is the consequence of Covid, of course.

Too many people are still taking weeks off work with this ineffectual illness.

But the threat of terrorism has also made taking a flight a real pain in the neck.

And then theres the exorbitant cost, occasioned by huge fuel prices.

And always the chance that some unwashed XR hippy div will try to shame you for going on an aeroplane at all.

Think Ill be spending the summer here in Blighty.

These days, foreign travel is just not worth the effort.

King Charles

WELL, he managed to open Parliament without cocking it up.

He walked in a kingly manner through the lobby without stopping to talk to any plants on the way.

He managed to read the Queens Speech.

Without inserting any mental bits about how we should all try homeopathy.

He didnt pass wind or do that annoying wringing of his hands thing he sometimes does.

Maybe Charlie will make a decent King, then.

The last King Charles we had was one of our better monarchs.

I KNOW hes a surfer dude vegan who likes sickly soft rock.

But theres something likeable about our Eurovision contestant Sam Ryder.

7

And hes got a decent voice and a decent tune.

I daresay well come last again, because everybody (except for Ukraine) hates us.

In fact, if Ukraine doesnt win by a mile Ill eat my own fingers.

But at least this time I wont have to hide behind the sofa in shame as usual when the UKs entrant is on.

AND so...Sir Keir Starmer is revealed as being even more weaselly and deceitful than the Prime Minister.

Which takes some doing, frankly.

7

This is the man who demanded more and more Covid restrictions.

Nothing was enough for him. Hed have had us all chained up in the garden shed if hed had his way.

And he demanded the Prime Minister MUST resign when it was revealed Boris Johnson was being investigated by the Old Bill.

But he will not resign himself when being investigated by the Old Bill.

Hell only resign if he gets a fixed penalty notice.

Which the Durham coppers have said they will not do retrospectively.

The nerve of the bloke is gobsmacking.

And never has a petard been hoisted higher.

WHATS wrong with a chipolata? You can get quite big chipolatas.

Id be delighted if some babe said my old fella resembled a tasty and satisfying sausage.

7

All I get instead is references to button mushrooms and, on one occasion, a Midget Gem.

You can hold your head up, Peter Andre.

At least it wasnt a Peperami.

Teacher assessment

THIS is a time of great and frantic worry in the Liddle household.

My daughter is doing her GCSEs. So shes a bit... yknow...STRESSY.

And she asked at one stage: What exactly is the point of these exams?

And do you know, I wonder the same myself.

Tony Blairs son, Euan, has just called for GCSEs to be scrapped. I think hes right.

At 16, the kids should be assessed by their teachers.

Leave the serious exams until A-levels come along.

It would certainly make for a happier house up here.

ISNT it kind of French president Emmanuel Macron to suggest we can join a European alliance?

This would be a politically integrated (his words) trading alliance of European countries.

7

Does the description remind you of anything? The man is deluded.

Whyja think we got out in the first place?

Try to govern your own basket-case country and mind your own business.

Oh, and leave our fish alone.

Read the original here:
Weve not had free speech in 20 years. But thats changing... - The US Sun

Posted in Freedom of Speech | Comments Off on Weve not had free speech in 20 years. But thats changing… – The US Sun

Dry Skin: Eczema, Itchy Skin, Causes, Treatments, Relief, Types

Posted: at 7:24 pm

OverviewWhat is dry skin?

Dry skin is skin that doesnt have enough moisture in it to keep it feeling soft and supple. People with dry skin may have rough-feeling patches that flake off or look scaly. It may or may not be itchy (pruritis). Severe dry skin may crack and bleed.

Dry skin is a common condition that affects people of all ages.

People who live in dry climates, work outside or wash their hands frequently get dry skin. Dry skin can be related to some health issues, like allergies, hormones, and diabetes.

Older people are more prone to dry skin for many reasons:

Your healthcare provider may use the medical term for dry skin: xerosis. Dry skin is often made worse during the winter because of low humidity. However, it can occur year-round. If its severe, dry skin can cause itching and rashes called dermatitis (inflammation of skin). There are several different types of dermatitis, including:

You can develop dry skin for many reasons, including:

Signs of dry skin include:

Dry skin is fairly easy to diagnose by its appearance. Depending on your symptoms, your healthcare provider may order tests to check for health conditions that cause dry skin, such as:

Your healthcare provider may recommend moisturizing your skin with:

Skin thats too dry may crack open and bleed. These cracks expose the body to germs that can cause infections. Rarely, dry, itchy skin can indicate a more serious health problem, such as diabetes or kidney disease.

Applying moisturizers every day can help soften dry skin. You can also try these at-home methods:

Most people can successfully treat dry skin by using a daily moisturizer and taking proactive steps like minimizing exposure to hot water and other irritants. Its a good idea to take care of dry skin for your overall health. Rough, dry skin can feel uncomfortable and look unsightly. And if your skin gets so dry skin that it cracks open, youll be more prone to infections.

You should call your healthcare provider if your skin:

If youre concerned about skin dryness, talk to your healthcare provider. You may want to ask:

Dry skin may look unattractive, and dry, itchy, flaky skin feels uncomfortable. Fortunately, dry skin causes few long-term problems. Although it is typically a chronic condition, it is very manageable. Talk to your healthcare provider about how to prevent and soothe dry skin. If other conditions, like eczema, cause dry skin, your healthcare provider can prescribe medications and offer tips to treat the problem.

Read more:
Dry Skin: Eczema, Itchy Skin, Causes, Treatments, Relief, Types

Posted in Eczema | Comments Off on Dry Skin: Eczema, Itchy Skin, Causes, Treatments, Relief, Types

Foods to Eat and Foods to Avoid If You Have Eczema – The Beet

Posted: at 7:24 pm

For people with eczema, the condition is more than a painful, red, or inflamed skin condition. Its a recurringdisease that is linked to an overactiveimmune system and can be It can be triggered by stress, allergic reactions, foods or other unknown factors. Sufferers not only live withuncomfortable, unsightly, and unwanted red or scaly skin patches, but the knowledge that if can return anytime, disrupting sleep and sidetracking plans.

More than 31 million Americans have some form of eczema research estimates about 20 percent of children and 5 percent of adults. It can range in severity, from very mild to severe. For some people with eczema, food can trigger inflammation, but it can also be a way to avoid it and the resulting symptoms. Following an eczema diet of foods to avoid and foods to include is a well-knownway to help keep inflammation at bay.

Eczema is an umbrella term that includes a number of inflammatory skin conditions, says Amy Kimberlain, RDN, Academy Media Spokesperson. Eczema produces very dry, itchy skin and can even lead to rashes, scaly patches, blisters, and skin infections on different parts of the body, Kimberlain explains. There are seven different types of eczema, the most common is atopic dermatitis Flare-up is the term commonly used to describe a case of worsened symptoms. When they improve or clear up, it may be referred to as a period of remission.

Eczema is not contagious, so theres no danger of catching it from someone else. The cause is not known because, like most health conditions, its quite complex. Some research suggests genetics may play a role, but the root of the condition is the bodys inflammatory response to what is known as a trigger, which is an irritant or allergen that may come from outside the body or internally. The bodys response to the trigger shows itself as a flare-up.

Triggers can be anything like the soap or shampoo you use, to laundry detergent or perfume, any environmental factors like pollen, dust mites, and even changes in the weather, as well as stress, and what some think to be part of their issues food, says Kimberlain. For some people, eczema flare-ups are triggered by allergens in certain foods, which cause the bodys immune system to react and cause inflammation.

According to research, between 20 percent and 80 percent of people with eczema also have some sort of food allergy, so its important to be checked for any food allergies, either by blood test or skin test, says Kimberlain.Foods to Avoid

When a person with eczema eats food theyre allergic to, it prompts an immune response that causes inflammation that may trigger or worsen a flare-up. Its important to work on identifying foods that are causing allergic reactions, says Libby Mills, MS, RD, LDN, FAND, National Spokesperson for the Academy ofNutrition and Dietetics.

This means reading food ingredient labels. Some food allergens are called out as such, Mills explains, but many go by different names, so youve got to do your research so you know what to look for. Dont forget to ask about ingredients and how foods are prepared when youre eating out, says Mills. Some of the most common foods and food allergens associated with eczema flare-ups include:

Any food that causes inflammation should be avoided. This doesnt have to be due to an allergy or even a sensitivity, though it can be. Inflammatory foods include those made with refined grains, refined carbs, and added sugarsmore than likely ultra-processed packaged foods.

These foods have been shown to increase the likelihood of elevatedblood sugar, which spikes inflammation. These foods may prompt inflammation, which is linked to chronic disease, in one person, but not in another, Mills explains. So it makes sense to avoid, or at least limit, how much you eat.

Eating foods that fight inflammation can help avoid eczema flare-ups or improve symptoms. A plant-based eating pattern of whole or minimally processed foods makes it simple. Kimberlain suggests a few foods shown to have anti-inflammatory properties that can help:

When looking to fight and manage eczema, its essential that we look at skin health, says Mills. Our skin is, after all, our largest organ, made up of hundreds of millions of cells. Skin cells create a barrier between the inside and the outside world, she says.

Along with good hydration (Mills recommends about 9 cups of water for women and 12.5 for men, allowing for the 2 cups or so that come from food.), Mills suggests foods that help protect that barrier, such as those rich in:

Aim for about 1.5 cups of fruit and 2 cups of vegetables a day, though it will vary per person, this is a good start, she says. Proteinplays an important role in wound healing, and is essential in the return from cracked, broken, and blistered skin to healthy skin.

Many people think theyre getting enough protein yet theyre not. The Recommended Daily Allowance (RDA) for protein is 0.8 grams per kilogram of body weight. Multiply your weight in pounds by 0.36 for the recommended daily grams of protein per day.

They should also focus on avoiding those that trigger it to help relieve eczema symptoms. Dietitians Kimberlain and Mills agree that it really is a simple approach that goes back to the basics: aim to eat a variety of colorful fruits and vegetables, including whole grains, nuts and seeds, legumes and beans, and cook with herbs and spices.

For more expert advice, visit The Beet's Health & Nutrition category.

Read this article:
Foods to Eat and Foods to Avoid If You Have Eczema - The Beet

Posted in Eczema | Comments Off on Foods to Eat and Foods to Avoid If You Have Eczema – The Beet

3 Women With Eczema Describe the Ways They Combat Nighttime Flare-Ups – Verve Times

Posted: at 7:24 pm

If you have eczema, you know what its like that frustrating struggle to catch some ZZZs.

The problem is at once physical and emotional. When my eczema is flared, nighttime often fills me with anxiety, says Nicola Johnston, a digital content creator who lives in Carlisle, England, near the border of Scotland. I have experienced nights in so much pain that I cannot sleep, and Ive scratched so hard that my sheets were covered in blood. This is why Ive worked to establish a good evening routine that will allow me to have a comfortable nights sleep and get the rest that my body needs.

But that rest can be elusive when youre tormented by itching, flaky skin, raised red rashes, cuts, skin tightness, the symptoms listed by Elise Loubatieres, a London-based editor and beauty influencer. In many patients, eczema is itchiest at night, sometimes due to a lack of time for self-care earlier in the day. Natalie Findley, a holistic chef from Whistler, British Columbia, has had a similar experience. Nighttime flare-ups taught me that something wasnt working, she says. Not getting enough sleep was not doing me any good.

If you want to turn down eczema flare-ups, finding out what works best for you calls for trial and error. But it also helps to get advice from people who understand firsthand what youre going through. Here, three women whove been there offer tips on how to prepare for bed, get as comfy as possible, deal with symptoms, and reset your emotions in the morning.

When it comes to preparing for bed, Findley favors consistency. I try to keep my routine the same each night, she says. Before doing anything, she sets an intention to sleep better. From there, Findley likes to cleanse and moisturize my skin, drink some herbal tea, do some journaling, read, express gratitude, and then I am in bed by 10 p.m.

An equally firm believer in the step-by-step approach, Johnston focuses first and foremost on comfort. I start my bedtime routine by having a lukewarm bath to soothe my skin, if my skin is feeling particularly flared, she says. I then apply an emollient-based product that is going to lock in moisture and be slowly absorbed through the night. I put on lightweight satin nightwear that keeps me cool. In making up my bed, I personally prefer a silk pillow, as this is gentler on my facial eczema and doesnt absorb any product I apply to my face like a cotton material would.

Loubatieres scrupulously preps her skin and takes medication to prevent symptoms later. I have been prescribed antihistamines to help with the itching, she explains. I also make sure that I apply emollients to my skin liberally and frequently in the hour leading up to bedtime.

To Findley, the choice of bedding fabric is less important than the way its washed. I dont use any particular kind of sheets to relieve my eczema, but I use natural and clean laundry detergents. she says. Even though many regular products claim to be clean, they use a lot of harmful chemicals and ingredients in detergents that aggravate eczema and your overall health. I use detergents that are hypoallergenic and without any fragrances. My favorite laundry detergent is Tru Earth. Her bedside companion is also natural and gentle: If I need some relief, I always use calendula and comfrey-based salve, with some shea butter, to calm the itchiness and dry skin.

Johnston has an unusual trick for dealing with one of eczemas side effects a trick that involves a trip to the nail salon. A great tip I have found is having acrylic gel manicures, she notes. It means that your nail itself becomes thicker and doesnt break your skin when youre scratching in the night. This has been a great help with healing my eczema.

Aware that overheating can bring on eczema, Loubatieres takes a proactive approach. I try to stay cool using a stand-alone fan, and I also use a handheld fan to pinpoint itchy areas for some relief, she says. I ensure that my sheets and sleepwear are either 100% cotton or silk to reduce irritation. I also have eczema gloves and Cosi Care [aka safe scratchers], which are itching tools that allow you to satisfy an itch without causing damage.

Whenever she begins to feel itchy, Findley does simple breathing exercises to calm her body. I close my eyes, breathe in slowly and count to five, and hold for 2 seconds, then breathe out slowly and count to seven. Or I will just breathe in slowly until my chest and belly are full with air, hold for a few seconds, and breathe out slowly all the way. I repeat this multiple times until Im relaxed. I also imagine myself sinking into my pillow as I breathe out, and it relaxes me and my muscles until I finally fall asleep.

Johnston tries to nap during the day whenever possible. That way, in the event of a nighttime flare-up, shes not completely exhausted the next day, And the extra rest is also calming. By keeping my daytime stress levels to a minimum, she says, flare-ups become less likely.

As Loubatieres sees it, youve lost the battle when you give in to the urge to itch. At night I tend to get what I call scratch attacks, where I uncontrollably and incessantly scratch despite breaking skin and causing myself pain, she says. It feels very satisfying in the moment and provides relief from that bone-deep itching sensation. But I try to get up and distract myself in some way. If I stay in bed and dont keep my hands busy, Im more likely to indulge in a scratch. Indeed, taking up a hobby drawing, knitting, playing guitar, anything that involves using your hands can be an ideal diversion between a flare-up and the welcome moment when you feel really sleepy.

In the light of day, after successfully dealing with her nighttime flare-ups, Findley developed a fresh philosophy. I made it a habit to clean up my diet and reduce stress and anxiety with meditation, journaling, and sleep hygiene. To treat the root cause of my issue, I switched to a plant-based diet. I also cut out dairy, as its pretty inflammatory. I drink a lot of water each day. Now my eczema has cleared up! I find that fueling your body with the proper nutrients will support your immune system, therefore improving your eczema.

Johnston emphasizes the importance of knowing your true self. Often, it feels like you are your eczema, like its a defining characteristic, she says. Its important to learn that your value comes from you and not your skin. I also learned to be kind to my skin. Not looking at it with hatred and resentment, but to see my eczema as a friend that was telling me there is an imbalance somewhere that I need to put right. Its really important to listen to your body and notice your triggers.

Whatever strategies you adopt, Loubatieres says, you should treat yourself with compassion. After a scratch attack, I personally get a huge amount of guilt, she admits. I think Ive caused my skin a lot ofharm. However, I have to remind myself that its a condition that I cannot control. Skin eventually heals. Her best advice for getting a good nights sleep: Dont be so hard on yourself.

Read original article here

See the rest here:
3 Women With Eczema Describe the Ways They Combat Nighttime Flare-Ups - Verve Times

Posted in Eczema | Comments Off on 3 Women With Eczema Describe the Ways They Combat Nighttime Flare-Ups – Verve Times

The Challenges of Parenting a Child With Eczema – Verve Times

Posted: at 7:24 pm

A loving mother wants, above all else, good health for her child. Imagine, then, the emotional impact of discovering that your baby has eczema, of wishing more than anything to take away the itching and irritation. And imagine the worry when a woman with eczema becomes pregnant. The what-ifs are huge.

Fortunately, there is excellent information and inspiration to help a woman in either situation. Here, two moms reveal the great lengths they went to in their determination to give their children relief and good health.

Meghan Elliott, who lives in Kankakee, Illinois, is a busy mother of two: Nora, 4, and Charlie, 1. After the shock of finding that Charlie had eczema from birth, Elliott embarked on a quest to do everything she could to help him. She researched his needs, and then made sure the health system met them.

Charlie had rough, scaly, bumpy skin, says Elliott, an operations manager for the marketing company Mayhill Moon. At first, the inflammation was mostly on his cheeks and thighs, but it later began to develop on his elbows. My sons pediatrician officially diagnosed him with moderate to severe eczema and suggested we take him to a pediatric dermatologist. Not a bad idea, but she and Charlie would have to spend months on a waiting list, which Elliott found extremely frustrating.

Thats when she set out to learn as much as possible about Charlies condition. One thing that struck her was that many children with eczema have moderate to severe food allergies. Seeing how long it took to get referred to a pediatric dermatologist, I then took it upon myself to call a pediatric allergist. Thankfully, they got him in fairly quickly, and we found out that Charlie is severely allergic to all forms of eggs and also has a lactose intolerance.

This was a watershed moment. What we do now is lather his cheeks and chin with CeraVe Healing Ointment before and after he eats so as to not irritate his skin, she says. The ointment helps act like a barrier to any food that could cause a flare-up.

Elliott carefully analyzed every aspect of Charlies routine to give him relief in a variety of ways. One thing that has helped my son is giving him a bath every night, she says. I thought this would dry him out even more, but our dermatologist said a quick 5- to 10-minute lukewarm bath after which we pat him dry and immediately lotion him up will keep all the moisture in his skin. We use CeraVe lotion, shampoo, and body wash during his bath times. We also apply CeraVe healing ointment on his cheeks throughout the day to keep moisture locked in. Charlie was also prescribed two topical ointments to use as needed as well as an oral medication to help when he gets really itchy.

To help him sleep, Elliott relies on the most gentle bedding. We use bamboo crib sheets, and they are very breathable when we use a flannel crib sheet, his cheeks are very irritated when he wakes up, she says. We also do a lot of bamboo clothing. He can wear cotton clothing, too, but we definitely stay away from any wool or polyester. Charlie is now doing well. We have a schedule of doctor follow-ups every 3 to 6 months, and he is doing so much better compared to where we were a year ago.

The emotional toll of worry and constant care is considerable, however. Parenting a child with eczema and food allergies is exhausting and frustrating, she says. Still, push for help in getting your child relief. My advice for other parents also going through this is to always be your childs advocate. They cant advocate for themselves, so it is our responsibility to do that for them.

Karen Fischer is an award-winning nutritionist and author who lives and works on Australias Gold Coast. Dedicated to helping people with eczema through her online support network, shes the owner of Skin Friend, a skin care company. Her own story and that of her daughter Ayva, now 22 is the reason she has made eczema relief her work and passion.

I have lived the pain of head-to-toe eczema, Fischer explains. I have health practitioner qualifications, but I did not truly understand eczema until I lived it.

Before becoming pregnant with Ayva, Fischer found herself dealing with the skin condition. My eczema started off as a tiny patch, she recalls. After a bout of work stress, it suddenly spread to my entire body. Every time I ate, it would spread. Some nights the itch was so bad I could not sleep. I had to constantly wash my sheets, I could not eat out with friends, I was socially isolated. No one understood, and I spent a lot of time at home crying.

Noticing the link between food and her flare-ups, Fischer took a close look at what she ate. Your skin is literally made from the foods you eat, so it made sense to change my diet, she says. Genetics play a role, but I believe that eating healthy, low-chemical foods can compensate for these genetic defects. Identifying which foods seemed to trigger her eczema and eliminating them helped Fischer get better.

Her pregnancy, fortunately, proved uneventful. I had suffered from hand dermatitis before I became pregnant, she says. With healthy eating, it soon went away, so I had a rash-free pregnancy. However, Ayva developed eczema 2 weeks after she was born. Fischer was devastated to see Ayva suffer, and the baby had difficulty sleeping, but it didnt occur to the new mom right away that she could approach her daughters skin condition the same way she had managed her own. I thought eczema was a genetic condition and there was nothing I could do, so I used topical steroids to unsuccessfully treat her eczema, she recalls.

Then, a breakthrough: A nurse caring for Ayva told me about food sensitivities, and she set me on the path that led to my daughters eczema clearing up. Nutritional biochemistry was my favorite subject at university, so I designed a diet specifically for Ayva based on the research I had read from various hospital allergy units. Ayvas skin cleared up, and we gradually expanded her diet. The right foods can make your childs body resilient.

Today both mother and daughter are happy and healthy. Eczema is a complicated skin disorder and everyone is quick to give you advice, Fischer says and then offers up some advice of her own. As she sees it, Healthy eating is the long-term, permanent solution.

Read original article here

See the original post here:
The Challenges of Parenting a Child With Eczema - Verve Times

Posted in Eczema | Comments Off on The Challenges of Parenting a Child With Eczema – Verve Times

Manuka Honey Benefits for Skin: Benefits, Masks, and More – Greatist

Posted: at 7:24 pm

People have flocked to honey since, like, the dawn of recorded medicine. But whats so special about manuka honey?

This honey is made from the pollen of the manuka tree found in Australia in New Zealand. The tree has a swarm of skin-nourishing properties (more on that below) that get passed along from the bee-harvested pollen to the honey.

Peep the manuka trees magical skin-nourishing properties.

Remember when everything in the beauty aisle was infused with tea tree oil? Folks stan the stuff because it fights off acne-causing bacteria. Well, manuka oil works similarly.

Research actually shows that oil from manuka trees might be more antibacterial than tea tree oil. A manuka honey mask or wash could give your skin the clean sweep of your life. Just imagine the bacteria being sucked into the honeys sticky, deadly embrace.

Bottom line: Manuka honey might be your new BFF in the fight against zits.

People with eczema will tell you just how irritating it can be to have dry, itchy skin that you must not scratch . But its tempting. So tempting.

Manuka honey to the rescue! This sweet stuff is a humectant, meaning that it moisturizes so that your skin can catch a break.

A tiny study of people with eczema found that applying manuka honey to inflamed areas led to symptom improvement. Even better? They still showed improvements a year later. We need more research to prove these findings, but its a start.

Red, swollen skin is no match for manuka! This honey has inflammatory properties to help fight inflammation from acne, eczema, and more.

In the midst of a breakout? Cash in on this sweet benefit by slapping on a manuka honey mask, turning on your favorite show, and saying goodbye to unsightly, irritated skin.

Manuka honey contains antioxidants, which squash pesky free radicals.

Free radicals arent those scary people you saw on the news, BTW. Theyre unstable atoms that can lead to premature aging and lack of elasticity.

Using manuka honey to slow free radicals could keep your skin looking fresher and younger for longer. Fewer wrinkles and age spots? Oh honey, youre just too good to us!

Manuka honey sounding wondrous enough yet? Theres more!

Aside from helping to clean fresh wounds (remember those antibac properties?), burns, or even areas affected by psoriasis, manuka honey has been known to help fade scars.

More research is needed to confirm this manuka honey benefit for skin. Keep your fingers crossed!

Go here to see the original:
Manuka Honey Benefits for Skin: Benefits, Masks, and More - Greatist

Posted in Eczema | Comments Off on Manuka Honey Benefits for Skin: Benefits, Masks, and More – Greatist

Common skin condition that could be early sign of Parkinson’s disease – Irish Mirror

Posted: at 7:24 pm

Parkinson's disease is a progressive nervous system disorder that affects movement that affects thousands of Irish people.

Its symptoms usually start gradually, often starting with a barely noticeable tremor in just one hand.

Tremors are common, but the disorder also commonly causes stiffness or slowing of movement.

READ MORE:Parkinson's disease symptoms as study identifies two early signs of condition

While there are few treatments and no cure for Parkinson's disease, several signals could indicate whether someone has the condition.

Although lack of movement and stiffness are often indicators of the illness, scientists have said that the skin can also provide signs.

The American Parkinson's Disease Association (APDA) says Seborrheic Dermatitis is "commonly found in people" with Parkinson's disease.

The condition causes "patches of scaly, red skin, and dandruff, primarily on the scalp and on the oily parts of the face such as the sides of the nose".

However, it is important to note this form of dermatitis is particularly prevalent among the general population.

The APDA says in Parkinson's patients, the condition is "thought to be caused by over-secretion of oils from the sebaceous glands in the skin.

"In much the same way that dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system cause non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's such as blood pressure dysregulation and urinary abnormalities, autonomic dysfunction of the nerves that control the oil glands of the face can cause seborrheic dermatitis".

Furthermore, a recent study found this form of dermatitis was associated with an increased risk of Parkinson's.

The HSE describes dermatitis as "a type of eczema caused by contact with something that irritates your skin or something you are allergic to."

Eczema is the name for a group of conditions that cause skin to become dry and irritated.

The HSE says: "Contact dermatitis usually improves if you avoid what is causing the problem. Treatments are also available to help ease the symptoms."

It adds: "If you can avoid the irritants or allergens that cause your symptoms, your skin will clear up."

While dermatitis is a common skin condition, for many, it can be chronic and, as a result, cause deterioration in mental health due to lowered self-esteem.

In recent years, studies have begun to look at whether this forms part of a snowballing effect and whether poor mental health can be linked to worsening dermatitis.

A review of studies related to dermatitis, eczema, and mental health has found eczema increases the risk of anxiety or depression.

Published in the journal PLOS ONE, the research was conducted by the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University in China.

Researchers discovered eczema was associated with a 64 per cent increased risk of depression and a 68 per cent increased risk of anxiety.

As to why eczema causes this increased risk of anxiety, Beth Goldstein said: "Social isolation and stigmatisation can certainly occur as many patients experience their dermatitis on areas of their bodies that are public such as the face, neck, and hands."

Goldstein added this could make "intimate relationships very difficult to navigate" given the aesthetic nature of eczema and dermatitis.

Meanwhile, Dermatologist Vivian Shi added: "It is extremely important to address the mental health component of eczema because the stress can cause flare-ups or worsen existing symptoms."

Shi said treating the mental health side of eczema was "crucial to maximise treatment benefits".

As a result, this research provides a new avenue for understanding the relationship between skin conditions and mental health.

Despite this study review, further research is required in order to identify a link between dermatitis and mental health.

Get breaking news to your inbox by signing up to our newsletter .

Continued here:
Common skin condition that could be early sign of Parkinson's disease - Irish Mirror

Posted in Eczema | Comments Off on Common skin condition that could be early sign of Parkinson’s disease – Irish Mirror