Monthly Archives: March 2022

Bid to gherao Haryana assembly: Cops use force to disperse Anganwadi workers on protest for months – The Indian Express

Posted: March 4, 2022 at 5:01 pm

Protesting Anganwadi workers, attempting to gherao the Vidhan Sabha in Chandigarh, were pushed back by force by police forces on Sunday. The protestors had divided into various groups across the city and the group blocking the Jalauli toll plaza on the Panchkula-Yamunanagar highway saw a tussle break out between the workers and the police.

The states Anganwadi workers have been protesting against the state government for the past several months, demanding wage hikes, better working conditions, and facilities like insurance among other things. The workers had given a call for march to the Vidhan Sabha on March 3 under a pre-decided programme.

As per Vinod Kumar, Treasurer CITU Haryana, To stop the march of Anganwadi workers to the Legislative Assembly Thursday, the state government has come down with great oppression. Hundreds of our sisters coming from Rohtak, Rewari, Palwal, Gurugram, Mahendragarh, etc., who left for Panchkula with their own means at night, were taken into custody by the police and placed under house arrest. Workers who came from other districts at 4 am were treated similarly at several different places. The workers, enraged by police aggression, camped on the streets and raised slogans against the repressive tactics of the government. Yavanika Park of Panchkula, earmarked for the assembly march, was converted into a police camp. Police officers of surrounding districts were in the park and took into custody any protestors were reached there.

Vehicles carrying the Anganwadi workers were stopped by the police in Ambala, following which they walked kilometres to reach the Jaloli toll plaza. Protesters who were to assemble at Yavnika to begin the protest were not able to reach the site of protest. As per the police, mild force was used and they were detained before they were dropped off a kilometre away from the park. Several leaders of various unions were also taken into custody and later let off.

Read the original post:

Bid to gherao Haryana assembly: Cops use force to disperse Anganwadi workers on protest for months - The Indian Express

Posted in Government Oppression | Comments Off on Bid to gherao Haryana assembly: Cops use force to disperse Anganwadi workers on protest for months – The Indian Express

Sajithra K Wins The Mrs. India Earth Stylish Diva 2021 Title In The World Finals – Outlook India

Posted: at 5:01 pm

Sajithra works as an IT Product Delivery Manager in an international FMCG Company. She has published two books, The Innovation Imperative a book on Innovation co-authored with Ranga Shetty for Mid-level Technical Professionals and Trees from dirty seeds, an anthology of her poems. Sajithra has a Master's degree in Business Administration and a Bachelor's degree in Electronics and Communications Engineering. She is certified on SAFe Agile, DevOps, and ITIL. Her papers on Social media are referenced by Authors worldwide in papers, PhD thesis, and books.

You have different identities in multiple platforms Author, Performer, Start-up founder, Odissi dancer, Pageant winner, Political critic, an IT Delivery manager. What drives you?

I am purpose driven. My values surpass my survival instincts.

Freedom. Generosity. Equality. Innovation. Authenticity.

Breaking sacrosanct ideals is important to uphold these values.

If you were to look at my work, it has always been about Innovation. Change excites me. I have 16 years of experience leading IT Innovation from the perspective of People, Process, and Product. My book is a roadmap on identifying a predictable structure to innovating at work. The practice that I believe in is Agile that is about collaboration across different worlds, adding voice where there was none, and keeping your teams flat. This gives power to the ones closest to the data, not on top of it. Its servant leadership. I loathe peacocking at work. When people only use the tools and do not understand that the heart of it is equality and intrinsic motivation, the practice becomes shallow. One would end up force fitting it to the traditional practices and retain hierarchy. Nothing smothers Innovation like hierarchies can. Theres a lot of unlearning to happen. Else, it will be tokenism and it compromises the outcomes.

At home, its about not adhering to gender norms. My children have a surname thats an amalgamation of our first names. I dont believe that the woman is the natural caretaker of home. I dont believe in the format of the mans home being the primary one. Its inane and sounds like a property exchange between men. My art reflects these values as well. I am working on a movie that is all about breaking the sacrosanct ideals of gender with the core theme on the rights of subalterns.

Socially, my focus is on reducing suffering. I grew up in a Panchayat town and since my world has expanded, its an obligation to do my part. When I first started working, I set aside 10% to support people who are less fortunate. Its breaching 15% now. Over the years, I have seen marriages organised, medical bills paid, education funded with it. Thats the only reason I need work. I had my own start up but then I went back to work because I needed a constant stream of income. I should have enough so that I could give enough. I am working on building better passive income streams so that I am not constrained by this. Else, it has to be a NGO. Perhaps, that's something for 2023.

My political philosophy is about resisting oppression in all forms. I believe that we all are political. When people say that they are neutral, that comes from a place of privilege. That's invariably standing with the oppressor. There's no neutral stand in a world rife with injustice. I have the courage to be open about my political stand.

Words are important to me. I try to not engage in even white lies. It's not really about innocence though. Maybe I am like those witches you see on TV. I can hide the truth but I will not use words that are untrue. I will take the short term costs and suffer for it because I value my words more. Perhaps, I should explore that practice of becoming an Aes Sedai haha. Jokes apart, I enjoy writing because I believe in the power of words. It's ideas that change the world. Words can give life. Words can kill too.

I dont believe in an anthropomorphic god ideal and I am not a sycophant who believes in brown nosing to get ahead. So, the only thing within my control is doing good with the belief that the universe will balance itself. Periyar said that he is against oppression in all forms. Everything I think, speak, and do resonates with that. I believe all this comes from a place of love.

Who is your mentor?

I dont have a circle of people who I am constantly in touch with for mentorship. There are people I inform of my choices and take advice occasionally. Iam fortunate to have a strong network of people who are shaping the world Industrialists, People from the Government, Writers, Artists not taking names. Its very sporadic though. Periyar famously said that people should not follow something he says if that goes against reason. He didnt want followers. The ideology is to follow the thoughts of a person that make sense to you and encourage you to think more, not to be a follower of the person. I am an introvert. I only connect if I feel the need to, but I am always available to friends if I am needed. I resist all forms of control and I dont expect anyone to defer to me either. People who know me understand that.

What are you working on right now?

I am working on a book for Manushyaputhirans Uyirmai publications, a movie with a dream team, and I am partnering to invest in a bicycle company that professes green living. These are all connected to the purpose in life I most identify with being a catalyst of change and it resonates with my values. I look forward to seeing the fruition of this. I dont want to limit myself to one platform. I want to be a catalyst and hence I should be agnostic of formats to make a difference.

View post:

Sajithra K Wins The Mrs. India Earth Stylish Diva 2021 Title In The World Finals - Outlook India

Posted in Government Oppression | Comments Off on Sajithra K Wins The Mrs. India Earth Stylish Diva 2021 Title In The World Finals – Outlook India

The ongoing conflicts that expose the wests double standards – Dazed

Posted: at 5:01 pm

On March 2, the mayor of Kherson, Ukraine, announced that it is the first major city to be taken by Russian forces since their invasion began last Thursday (February 24). Several other Ukrainian cities have endured heavy shelling in the days since the invasion began, while a million people are said to have fled their home country. Ukraine reports that more than 2,000 civilians have died in the last week of conflict, and the death toll among soldiers and volunteers on both sides continues to rise.

In Russia, too, many citizens are feeling the indirect effects of a war waged by their president, Vladimir Putin, though many maintain that they are appalled, embarrassed and hurt by the aggressive actions of their government. Thousands have queued at ATMs in a bid to withdraw cash in the face of severe economic sanctions, while thousands more have been arrested for bravely opposing the war in public protests.

The international community has also rallied in support of Ukraine, providing arms and aid, issuing official demands via the UN, cutting economic ties, and calling for peace on city streets. However, many have pointed out the double standards of the wests response, which has been particularly obvious in the racist angle of recent news coverage.

On February 27, as Russian forces closed in on Kyiv, an ITV journalist echoed international fears for the Ukrainian citizens trapped in the city. Now the unthinkable has happened to them, she said. And this is not a developing, Third World nation. This is Europe!

In the US, a February 26 CBS news segment saw a reporter declare: This isnt a place, with all due respect, like Iraq or Afghanistan, that has seen conflict raging for decades. This is a relatively civilised, relatively European [...] city, one where you wouldnt expect that, or hope that its going to happen.

On social media, these comments and many, many more have deservedly caused outrage, exhibiting the wests exceptionalist attitude toward the war in Europe, which has seen people with blue eyes and blonde hair lose their lives. Unfortunately, the wests biased response is also reflected in its material impact on those suffering the consequences of conflict in places such as Afghanistan or Yemen.

Earlier this week, it was announced that Britain could welcome more than 200,000 Ukrainian refugees after easing its visa requirements, yet in recent years its been named one of the worst places in western Europe for refugees from beyond the continents borders, with dismal approval rates for asylum seeker claims. Even people of colour who live in Ukraine have reported shocking racism experienced during their attempts to find safety across the border.

Of course, Ukraine is still in desperate need of aid amid the Russian invasion of its land, but this shouldnt come at the expense of those who western states have often regarded with a detached sense of apathy (or even complicity in their suffering). Below is an incomplete list of other major conflicts that you should be aware of while continuing to campaign for peace in Ukraine.

The south-east Asian country of Myanmar has been engulfed in internal conflicts of varying severities since 1948, the year that the country then named Burma gained independence from the UK. However, the country has seen an increase in fatal combat in the last year, according to data from Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (via the BBC).

This increase stems from the February 2021 coup that saw Myanmars military assume power, with security forces immediately cracking down on protesting civilians. Since then, civilians many of them young people have taken up arms in revolt, with rough figures suggesting that around 12,000 people have been killed as a result of the political violence.

As detailed in a January 2022 statement by the UK government, 49.4 million has been provided to those in need of humanitarian assistance, with sanctions brought against the military regime. However, UK ministers have previously been criticised for their hesitant response and insufficient sanctions, which have allowed Myanmar firms that bankroll the military to remain in operation.

Beginning in 2011, in the wake of an uprising that ousted the countrys authoritarian president, the Yemeni crisis is one of the most deadly armed conflicts currently taking place around the world. According to a UN projection from November 2021, the overall death toll reached 377,000 by the start of this year, while the civil war that started in 2014 continues to contribute to acute poverty and food insecurity in one of Asias poorest countries.

Last year, however, the UK announced a significant reduction in the aid it sends to Yemen, down to at least 87 million in 2021/22 (or around 54 per cent of the 160 million it announced for 2020/21). Even worse, as explained by Owen Jones in January this year, the UK government is directly complicit with these atrocities, supplying bombs and allyship to the Saudi-led coalition that is responsible for airstrikes that have killed dozens of civilians this year alone.

Joe Biden announced the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan in April 2021, with the UK following suit later that year, ending a 20-year military involvement in the country. This doesnt mean peace for the region, however, as the Taliban rapidly seized territory over the course of 2021 and took control of the capital, Kabul, by August.

The country is now back to square one being ruled by a terrorist group who have proven to deny basic human rights and necessities to the people of Afghanistan, the Afghan Youth Associations Shokryah Mohammadi told Dazed in the wake of the Talibans takeover.

Many watching the Islamist group fear for the rights of women and girls living in Afghanistan, as well as increasing internal stability, continued violence and oppression, and economic collapse an ongoing crisis that has historically been exacerbated, rather than improved, by opportunist states such as the US and the UK. According to the Council on Foreign Relations Global Conflict Tracker, this crisis is only worsening.

Combat between forces from the Tigray region of Ethiopia, and the countrys authorities including the Ethiopian National Defence Force, federal police, and forces from neighbouring Eritrea broke out on November 4, 2020, after months of opposition between Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed and leaders of Tigrays main political party, which opposed reforms to the countrys system of government.

In the intervening years, as many as 100,000 people have been killed (according to rough estimates reported by the Guardian in November 2021). Ethiopia is also accused of a variety of human rights violations amid the war, including mass killings, sexual violence and military targeting of civilians.

In April 2021, a parliamentary select committee published a report that stated: The international community has a narrowing window of opportunity to stop this suffering and manage the risk of conflict spreading or becoming protracted. So far, this hasnt happened, and the conflict continues to contribute to desperate shortages of food, fuel, and medical supplies.

The ongoing violence against and oppression of the Palestinian people by the state of Israel is well-documented. In most European countries, ordinary people have gathered in cities to protest Israels bombardment of Gaza and dispossession of its residents, alongside high-profile artists and activist groups.Nevertheless, the UK and many other Western countries continue to provide diplomatic and military assistance to support the colonisation efforts, while profiting from a significant arms trade.

Besides the longstanding treatment of Palestinians as second-class citizens, the Israeli-Palestinian hostilities have caused tens of thousands of fatalities over the decades since they began. Most recently, they flared in May 2021, with freedom protests escalating into 11 days of airstrikes and bombings that reportedly claimed the lives of more than 250 Palestinians, and 13 people in Israel.

More:

The ongoing conflicts that expose the wests double standards - Dazed

Posted in Government Oppression | Comments Off on The ongoing conflicts that expose the wests double standards – Dazed

Ukraine: Hanna calls on British government to follow Irish lead – Belfast Media

Posted: at 5:01 pm

SOUTH Belfast MP Claire Hanna has called on UK Home Secretary Priti Patel to lift visa requirements for Ukranian citizens fleeing the Russian invasion of their country similar to those made by the Irish government.The SDLP woman said that the UK Government has been hard on rhetoric but soft on support for refugees.At the Irish Echo 40 Under 40 awards in New York at the weekend the Consul General of Ireland Helena Nolan told those gathered that Ireland had opened free access for all Ukrainian citizens who wish to come to Ireland.

Claire Hanna has tabled a written question to the British Home Secretary seeking an assessment of a potential fast track scheme for refugees seeking shelter from the conflict in Ukraine.The invasion of Ukraine is a violation of a sovereign European democracy in the name of Putins aggressive imperialist agenda, said Ms Hanna. Millions of people are going to bed every night not knowing if they or their family will survive, not knowing if their town or city will be levelled by indiscriminate Russian airstrikes, not knowing when this oppression will finally end.The implementation of the most robust economic sanctions has been a clear example of how the international community can mobilise quickly and effectively to squeeze oppressors.Freezing the assets of oligarchs, however, will not bring the kind of immediate relief that frightened families in Kyiv and Kharkiv need. The humanitarian response to this crisis has, in comparison to the sanctions effort, been bitterly disappointing.

The Home Office approach to visas for refugees attempting to escape the conflict, in particular, has been utterly heartless. To see Ministers suggest that Ukrainian citizens desperate for their lives should apply to become seasonal fruit pickers on UK farms, for example, is ghoulish and galling. It stands in stark contrast to the Irish Government which has lifted visa requirements for Ukrainians seeking sanctuary.On Friday morning, I tabled questions to Priti Patel seeking the introduction of a fast-track process for people fleeing conflict in Ukraine and Russia. The action taken by the Home Office to date is deficient, it has left people in danger and it must be addressed immediately. This is a moment to demonstrate the real value of European solidarity beyond warm words.

Do you have something to say on this issue?If so, why not submit a letter to the editor via this link?

Read the original post:

Ukraine: Hanna calls on British government to follow Irish lead - Belfast Media

Posted in Government Oppression | Comments Off on Ukraine: Hanna calls on British government to follow Irish lead – Belfast Media

What Shiva Meant to a Sex Worker, to Savitribai Phule, and to Partition’s Refugees – The Wire

Posted: at 5:01 pm

Today is Maha Shivaratri

Shiva, like many gods and goddesses across South Asia, is known by a staggering variety of names and forms.

Some of these names are popular: Ardhanarishwara (half-woman lord), Maheshwara (the great lord), Gangadhara (bearer of the Ganga).

Some names are unique to sacred sites: at Ujjain, he is Mahakaleshwar (great lord of time), at Varanasi he is Vishwanath (lord of the universe), in Tiruchirappalli, he is Thayumanavar (lord who came as a mother).

This Maha Shivaratri, Id like to draw attention to a few names and forms of Shiva which are perhaps less popular.

Rather than originating in elite texts or well-known pilgrimage centres, these names of Shiva were coined by individuals whom we can describe as coming from the margins of what we now call Hindu society: a 12th-century sex worker in Karnataka, the anti-caste activist and educator Savitribai Phule, and a community of Sindhi refugees in Gujarat.

At a time when Hindu deities and traditions are being weaponised by the intertwined forces of Hindutva (Hindu nationalism) and caste oppression, I suggest these forms of Shiva offer us an alternative vision of peace and justice for all.

These names of Shiva were coined by individuals who we can describe as coming from the margins of what we now call Hindu society. Photo: romana klee/Flickr (CC BY-SA 2.0)

Nirlajjeshwara, Lord Without Shame

For Sule Sankavva, a sex worker who lived in modern-day Karnataka around 900 years ago, Shiva was her beloved Nirlajjeshwara lord without shame.

Sankavva was a member of the Lingayat/Virashaiva tradition, founded in the 12th century CE by Basavanna and characterised by the monotheistic worship of Shiva and its rejection of caste practices and hierarchies. The vachana is a free verse poetic form in Kannada that was developed by poet-saints of this tradition, most famously Akka Mahadevi, Basavanna, Jedara Dasimayya, and others.

Today, we know of only one vachana attributed to Sule Sankavva. In it, she boldly names the violence she faces at the hands of menthreats of bodily mutilation and death. Centuries later, we know that sex workers like Sankavva continue to face deadly violence, not to mention deep-rooted social stigma and discrimination. A 2015 survey found that on average, around a fifth of female sex workers in India were attacked four times a month, and a 2013 report noted that 37% of female sex workers in India reported being physically abused by police.

Given the ostracisation and violence that Sule Sankavva must have faced during her life, it is striking that she addresses Shiva as Nirlajjeshwara, meaning lord without shame.

Based on her sole surviving vachana, it seems that she chose to take refuge in a deity who rejects the notion of shame, thus affirming her self-worth and dignity. In India and across the world, men in positions of power use ideas of shame and honour to police womens bodies and choices.

What would it look like for each of us, no matter our gender identity, to reject shame itself? To both reject internalised shame, but also challenge ourselves not to shame others?

A world in which people of all genders are able to enjoy autonomy and dignity may sound like a far-fetched dream today; but Shiva in the form of Sule Sankavves Nirlajjeshwara encourages us to aspire towards this reality.

Savitribai Phules Destroyer of Ignorance

Centuries after Sule Sankavve, in the neighbouring region of present-day Maharashtra, another remarkable woman invoked Shiva as the destroyer of ignorance. This was none other than Savitribai Phule (1831-1897 CE), remembered as a key figure for modern anti-caste movements and as Indias first woman teacher.

A portrait of Savitribai Phule. Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Savitribai was born into the Mali caste, which is classified today as an Other Backward Caste (OBC) by the Indian government. Along with her husband Jyotirao Phule, she was a pioneering social reformer, committed to girls education, womens rights, and equal rights for Dalits and oppressed castes.

In 1848, when she was just 17 years old, Savitribai, Jyotirao, and her colleague Fatima Sheikh opened the first girls school in India.

In 1854, at the age of 23, Savitribai composed a collection of Marathi poems titled Kavya Phule. In one of these poems, Shiva Prarthana (a prayer to Shiva), she expresses a heartfelt devotion to Shiva.

In this poem, Savitribai includes common epithets of Shiva: Neelakantha, the blue-throated one, and Trilochan, the three-eyed one. However, she also addresses Shiva in a more unexpected way: as the destroyer of ignorance. Near the end of the poem, she declares that He bestows complete knowledge on the ignorant (ajns jn dee pra) and in the final line, she calls out to him: Bless us with the boon of annihilating our ignorance. This is Savitris prayer (ajn na kr, var sarva lbho / prrthan h svitrc).

Hindu theologian Anantanand Rambachan writes that It is easy and temptingto represent ignorance as an abstract, distant and ethereal phenomenon, disconnected from the concrete realities of human life.

Throughout her life, Savitribai Phule challenged ignorance in the forms of caste oppression and patriarchy. And the consequences she faced were anything but abstract: upper caste Hindus would pelt Savitribai and Fatima Sheikh with stones, mud, and cow dung as they would walk to school, to the point where they had to carry clean saris to change into once they reached the school premises.

Also read:The Annihilation of Caste Requires Dismantling Hinduisms Code of Ordinances

With this in mind, Savitribai Phules prayer to Shiva to annihilate our ignorance takes on a concrete dimension, serving as a call to action for each of us to do our part in pushing back against caste and patriarchy.

Shri Nirvasiteshwar, Lord of Refugees

Around 100 years after Savitribai wrote her poem to Shiva, a group of Sindhi refugees created their own vision of Shiva. Displaced from their homeland of Sindh due to the violence of Partition in 1947, a group of Hindu refugees settled in the Kutch district of Gujarat. In 1951, they constructed a temple to Shiva in the town of Adipur, where he is worshiped as Shri Nirvasiteshwar, Lord of Refugees.

These refugees found solace in the story of Shiva after the death of his first wife Sati, when he roamed the universe as a grief-stricken wanderer. Seeing parallels to their own situation, they decided that they would worship Shiva as the god of all displaced peoples.

To this day, there are plaques displayed outside the Shri Nirvasiteshwar temple in Hindi and Sindhi, which historian Uttara Shahani translates as saying: This is a special manifestation of Shiva who expresses the feelings of crores of uprooted people in these times who have no homes and have had to scatter themselves, hither and thither.

Women sift through ashes to find any of their valuables after fire broke out at Rohingya refugee camp in Haryanas Nuh.

According to United Nations estimates, there are over 80 million displaced people all over the world. India is one of the few countries that has not signed the UNs 1951 Refugee Convention or the 1967 Protocol, meaning that the Indian government sees no legal obligation to recognise or shelter refugees.

Despite this, India is home to nearly 200,000 refugees from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Tibet, and other locations. Sadly, even as some Indian communities have welcomed refugees, Hindu nationalist politicians and leaders have vilified Muslim refugees such as the Rohingya while also weaponising the plight of Hindu and Sikh refugees from neighbouring countries to further animosity towards Indian Muslims.

As India continues to see an influx of refugees from Myanmar, and the countries around the world prepare to welcome Ukrainian refugees, the example of Shiva as Lord of Refugees not just Hindu refugees, but all uprooted people feels more poignant than ever.

The hosts of the podcast Keeping it 101: A Killjoys Introduction to Religion argue that Religion is what people do. Concretely, this means that religion is, and always has been, political. Our gods and goddesses, prayers, customs, and festivals have been shaped by the unique social, economic, and political contexts in which they arose.

Devotees gather at Har Ki Pauri Ghat to offer prayers during Kumbh Mela 2021, in Haridwar, Sunday, April 11, 2021. Photo: PTI

Thus, it would be inaccurate to claim that the politicisation of Hindu traditions under the Modi government is a new phenomenon. And the long history of caste oppression within many Hindu religious traditions is undeniable. But, it is safe to say that over the last few years, Hindu identity and practices are being transformed into tools of majoritarian violence at an unprecedented rate. Add to this the shameful silence of most Hindu religious leaders when it comes to caste violence and religious hatred, and we arrive at a rather bleak picture.

What does this mean for ordinary Hindus today? What does it mean to celebrate Shivaratri when Narendra Modi campaigns from Shivas sacred city of Varanasi and broadcasts his worship of Kashi Vishwanath on national television?

For Hindus who are religious and believe in social justice and peace, we have a choice. Either we can give up on our traditions, leaving them in the hands of the BJP and RSS; or we can get creative. To me, this latter option means to follow in the footsteps of Sule Sankavve, Savitribai Phule, and the Sindhi refugees in Kutch, each of whom imaginatively infused their devotion with their progressive values and politics even if they may not have phrased it that way.

Lets continue to celebrate Shiva in his forms of Ardhanarishwara, Nataraja, and so many others. But starting this Maha Shivaratri, lets also take time to remember him as Lord Without Shame; as the Destroyer of Ignorance in all its forms, primarily caste and patriarchy; and as Lord of Refugees, lover of all displaced peoples.

Let these names and forms inspire us to fight for pluralism, justice, and peace for all beings.

Nikhil Mandalaparthy is the advocacy director at Hindus for Human Rights and a board member of Sadhana: Coalition of Progressive Hindus. He is on Instagram @voicesofbhakti, where he showcases South Asian poetry on religion, caste, and gender, and his Twitter handle is @nikhiletc.

See original here:

What Shiva Meant to a Sex Worker, to Savitribai Phule, and to Partition's Refugees - The Wire

Posted in Government Oppression | Comments Off on What Shiva Meant to a Sex Worker, to Savitribai Phule, and to Partition’s Refugees – The Wire

Eating God? A history of the Eucharist and a glimpse of Roman Catholicism – Evangelical Focus

Posted: at 4:59 pm

At first glance, it seems like a cannibalistic gesture, even if it is addressed to God and not to a human being. Yet it is the quintessence of Roman Catholicism. We are talking about eating God, an act that is at the heart of the Roman Catholic understanding of the Eucharist.

Can Roman Catholicism really be thought of as the religion of eating God? Matteo Al-Kalak, professor of modern history at the University of Modena-Reggio, exploresthis questionis in his latest book, Mangiare Dio. Una storia delleucarestia (Turin: Einaudi, 2021; Eating God. A History of the Eucharist).

The book is a history of the Eucharist from the Council of Trent (1545-1563) onwards in the Italian context and focuses on how the Eucharist has been elevated to a primary identity-marker: practiced, taught, protected, abused, and used for various purposes, including extra-religious ones.

Using a mosaic technique (p.xiv), he analyzes some pieces of the history of the Eucharist.

It is not surprising that facing the challenges posed by the Protestant Reformation (in all its Eucharistic variants, from the German Lutheran version to the Calvinian-Zwinglian Swiss version), the Council of Trent emphasized the sacrificial character of the Mass and made the Eucharist the symbolic pivot of the Counter-Reformation.

Al-Kalaks book is a collection of micro-stories aimed at forming a mosaic that reflects the crucial importance of the Eucharist in the construction of the post-Tridentine Roman Catholic imagination and strongly Eucharistic emphasis.

After reviewing the biblical data, the book summarizes the medieval debates starting from the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) which intertwined three pillars: who was to dedicate (in Roman Catholic language: consacrate) the bread and the wine (i.e. only the clergy), the confession to be preceded, and the true and proper Eucharist.

One of the outcomes of the Council was the institution of the feast of Corpus Domini (The Body of the Lord, 1247). This Lateran synthesis was contested both before and after the Reformation.

The pages on the heretical movements of the 16th century give voice to the doctrinal fluidity of Italian heterodoxy on the Lords Supper (p.19). In this regard, the opinion of Natale Andriotti from Modena is reported. Talking to a friend he said, Do you think that Christ is in that host? Its just a little dough (p.149).

As pieces of the mosaic, other chapters tell stories of Eucharistic miracles, associated with various prodigies, and the development of a kind of preaching centered around Eucharistic themes (from the model offered by Carlo Borromeo in the 17th century to the impetus given by Alfonso Maria de Liguori in the 18th century).

Al-Kalak touches on the meticulous regulation given to the administration of the Eucharist (from the spaces, to the gestures, to the treatment of abuses) outside and inside the Mass (for example, at the bedside of the sick).

Further chapters follow on the Eucharist represented in poetic, pictorial and architectural forms and on the desecrated Eucharist in witchcraft, magic and superstitious practices.

The discussion of the Eucharist in the face of the cultural disruption of the French Revolution is also of great interest. The Eucharist was seen as a polemical tool against the rationalism of modernity and for the re-Christianization of society (Pope Leo XIII).

In recent years, though, Pope Francis is pushing to loosen the criteria for access to the Eucharist to allow the inclusion of those who are in irregular life situations. The book witnesses to the fact that the Eucharistic theologies and practices are not static and given once and for all, but always on the move.

The volume ends with an interesting postscriptum in which Al-Kalak dwells on the scandal of the Eucharist: only the host is subject to the physiological mechanisms of the human being in such a radical way (191), yet it is believed as a supernatural act filled with mystery.

It combines rational language with sensory ones, opening up to the irrational (p.193). If it is true to say that the Eucharist in the regular mass, in Eucharistic adoration, in Eucharistic processions and fidelity to the pope and to the hierarchy are the two most distinguished features of Roman Catholicism from the Council of Trent onwards (p.195), then a history of the Roman Catholic practice of eating God allows us to enter into the depths of the Roman Catholic religion.

Beyond the fascinating stories told by the book, what is of some interest is its title, Eating God, and its appropriateness to describe the soul of Roman Catholicism.

Already in the early centuries of the church, Christians were sometimes accused of cannibalism precisely in relation to the Lords Supper. What did Jesus mean when he said, Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life (John 6:54)?

The meal of bread and wine associated with the memory of the body and blood of Jesus Christ could give rise to misunderstandings. Was it a truly human body? Was it the blood of a corpse? Was it then a cannibal meal?

Christian apologetics of the early centuries tried to unravel the misunderstandings as much as possible, indignantly rejecting the accusation of cannibalism and, if anything, indicating the biblical parameters of the ordinance instituted by Jesus himself.

Yet, already starting from the Fourth Lateran Council, and even more so from the Council of Trent, the church of Rome embraced transubstantiation, i.e an understanding of the sacrament according to which, after the consecration of the bread and wine and the transformation of their nature into the body and blood of Christ, there is a sense in which the Roman Catholic Eucharist is a real eating of God.

If the bread really becomes the flesh and blood of Jesus (the God-man), taking it in some way means eating God,

Can it really go that far? Evidently yes, according to Rome. While the Reformation insisted on recovering the distinction between Creator and creature, the radical nature of sin and the sufficient mediation of the God-man Jesus Christ for the salvation of those who believe, the Roman Catholic Church instead veered on the analogy between Creator and creature and on the prolongation of Christs mediation in the hierarchical and sacramental church, to the point of considering the creatures eating God as possible, even necessary.

For Roman Catholicism, man is capable of God (capax dei) to the point of having to really eat him.

Is this the meaning of the meal that the Lord Jesus instituted the night he was betrayed and that he gave to the church as a memorial of him in view of his second coming?

The debate on this question in history has been very lively and is still crucial.

In the eating God of the Eucharist, Roman Catholicism puts all its worldview at work: its view of reality as touched but not marred by sin, the extension of the incarnation in the church, the divinization of man, and the already of salvation enjoyed in the fruition of the sacraments without waiting for the not yet of the final banquet.

If you think about it, as absurd as it appears, eating God is a synthesis of Roman Catholicism.

Leonardo De Chirico is an evangelical pastor in Rome (Italy). He is a theologian and an expert in Roman Catholicism. He blogs at VaticanFiles.com.

Published in: Evangelical Focus - Vatican Files - Eating God? A history of the Eucharist and a glimpse of Roman Catholicism

Read the original post:

Eating God? A history of the Eucharist and a glimpse of Roman Catholicism - Evangelical Focus

Posted in Rationalism | Comments Off on Eating God? A history of the Eucharist and a glimpse of Roman Catholicism – Evangelical Focus

The 3 temptations of Vladimir Putin and NATO – The Manila Times

Posted: at 4:59 pm

Read this in The Manila Times digital edition.

Then he [the devil] took him [Jesus] up and showed him all the kingdoms of the world in a single instant. The devil said to him, "I shall give to you all this power and glory; for it has been handed over to me, and I may give it to whomever I wish. All this will be yours, if you worship me." Jesus said to him in reply, "It is written: You shall worship the Lord, your God, and him alone you shall serve."

The Gospel of Saint Luke, 4:5-8

AFTER years of contagion across the globe and days of carnage in Ukraine, Catholics needed no ashes crossed on their foreheads last Wednesday to remind them that they were dust and to dust they shall return. Nor was the Lenten message of sin, atonement and forgiveness needing much explanation to see its relevance to the headlines.

Indeed, the March 6 Sunday Mass Gospel reading from Saint Luke, excerpted above, recounting the three temptations of Jesus after his baptism, may well resonate with believers pondering Russia's invasion and fasting for peace in Europe, now caught in the crossfire of bullets and bombs, sanctions and accusations.

How did all this bloody mess happen? Geopolitics and diplomacy experts can spin out intricate analyses and timelines plotting how Russian President Vladimir Putin began with subtle warnings, then brandished threats and troops, and finally unleashed his divisions after dialogue did not get him the security assurances Russia demanded.

But the triple blandishments of the tempter may well tell the story of how Russians went from Slavic brothers of neighboring Ukrainians to missile-firing invaders of the second-largest country in Europe next to Russia itself.

Turning stones into bread

The first temptation, enticing the famished Jesus after 40 days of fasting to turn stones into bread to satisfy his hunger, is apropos to Russia and Ukraine not only because they are among the 10 largest wheat producers on the planet.

More than just highlighting two giants of grain, our Lord's admonition that "Man does not live by bread alone" underscores what else we need for the fullness of life: "every word that comes from the mouth of God," as other Bible translations add.

In the context of international relations, leaders and governments demand tangible guarantees of security to reassure and impress their peoples. Not just promises of peace, but pledges that fearsome forces would never cross certain lines.

Bread, not just words, even if the promises may speak of God's will for all humanity.

So, Russia wants the most powerful forces on earth, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), never to embrace Ukraine. But even those words the US-led alliance and Ukraine were not willing to give, let alone the bread of NATO boots never stepping into Slavic lands.

With neither words nor bread to bring home, Russia decided to address its fears by marching on the stones of Ukraine and making them bread to feed its hunger for security from Western powers which had invaded thrice in centuries past.

Testing, not trusting

The third temptation sought to stir Jesus into distrust of the Father by throwing himself off a high precipice to see if angels fly down from heaven and keep him from falling to earth. To which our Lord replied: "You shall not put your God to the test."

Certainty and control are what comes to mind in this discourse between Jesus and the devil. So like our modern time of science and technology, when humanity constantly strives to assert control over the world and ascertain proven truths with empirically validated knowledge leaving no room for faith and trust.

So it is between nations: the powers that be must have certainty and control. Trust is never enough, never enough, as a popular musical chants.

Hence, NATO reserves the right to accept whom it may wish into its ranks bristling with the most advanced armaments ever. No matter that such assertion of membership control would erode trust and confidence in a land fearful of invading hordes from the West, especially after the alliance expanded well beyond the agreed limit of its expansion.

Thus, with the Western alliance unwilling to compromise on control, the bear in the east decided to ascertain its security and take armed control of a potential area of hostilities.

The power and the glory

The second temptation appears last in the Gospel of St. Matthew, which may show his Jewish orientation, putting greater value on worshiping God over trusting Him, which Luke may highlight from his perspective influenced by Greek rationalism.

Whether second or third in Scripture, however, the temptation's lure of worldly power and glory is certainly most relevant to the NATO-Russia tussle over Ukraine.

For both President Putin and Russia, at stake are the nation's stature and strength in the world and its quest for the unified glory of "United Russia" the very name of Putin's political party, the largest in the country.

As for the West, no less than President Joseph Biden of the United States, NATO's most powerful member, declared in his first State of the Union Address to the US Congress on March 2 that the conflict with Russia was a global battle between democracy and autocracy,

And the prize is nothing less than the domination by one or the other ideology over the planet and its 7.9 billion souls.

Thus, like gladiators, the great powers bow to the master of the world before dueling to the death, and he will give it to whoever remains standing after the carnage.

As in the Garden of Eden, humanity has again fallen to the tempter. Let us fast, pray and atone for these sins driving our world to perdition.

Follow this link:

The 3 temptations of Vladimir Putin and NATO - The Manila Times

Posted in Rationalism | Comments Off on The 3 temptations of Vladimir Putin and NATO – The Manila Times

In the Beginning Was the WordExcerpt from a New Book by Anthony Esolen – OnePeterFive

Posted: at 4:59 pm

Editors note: a powerful new book by well-known essayist and literary critic Anthony Esolen entitled In the Beginning Was the Word: An Annotated Reading of the Prologue of John was recently published by Angelico Press, from whom we obtained permission to share a part of it with our readers. Our own contributing editor Dr. Peter Kwasniewski wrote the Foreword to the book and tells me that it is dynamite. This compact but profound commentary on the Prologue of John should be of great interest to all Catholics but especially those who assist at the ancient Roman Rite, where these opening verses of the Fourth Gospel are read after nearly every Mass.TSF

Paul and John, the storm of fire and the calm immensity of the sea, speak as one. Behold, I make all things new, says He who sits upon the throne in the Apocalypse (Rev. 21:5). Paul spoke of Gods saving work in the same vein, as the full and ultimate making of things forever new: Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new (2 Cor. 5:17).

What do we make of such a claim about Christ? I have heard many an unbeliever say that the story of Jesus is but the story of every semi-divine hero in the history of the world. That is not true. Quite the contrary. Let us pause to look at the matter.

Alexander the Great traveled all the way to the oasis of Siwah in Libya to consult the oracle of Ammon, whom the Greeks associated with Zeus. He wanted to say that he was the son of Ammonian Zeus, and not the son of the half-barbarian warlord Philip of Macedon, whom, historians believe, Alexanders ambitious mother Olympias put out of her sons path by assassination. Alexander wanted to stamp his aristocratic card. It is an acknowledged trick of the self-promoter, and the ancients themselves saw it as such. The Julian clan in Rome traced their lineage back to Iulus, the son of that Aeneas who, according to old self-promoting Roman folklore, settled his refugees from Troy upon the Italian shores. This Aeneas was the son of Anchises by the goddess Venus. Every important clan wanted a ticket like that. It is like establishing your membership in the Daughters of the American Revolution.

The Pharaohs in Egypt were considered the earthly personifications of the benevolent god of justice, Osiris, guaranteeing the healthy flooding of the Nile, so that people could cast their seed broadside and the bumper crops would come. The Egyptians believed that divine power flowed through the Pharaoh, sure enough, but no one would say of Tutankhamen the boy-king that he was in himself the origin of the universe, and its significance. There are many stories in human lore about heroes who rise from obscurity and neglect to the heights of glory. Beowulf is one, but Beowulf dies in the end, and the smoke rises above his funeral pyre and is swallowed up in the sky, while the Geats he ruled look forward to annihilation at the hands of the Swedes, their old enemies. The world is also full of stories of men who achieve enlightenment, which they then pass along to their followers: Socrates, Buddha, Confucius, Lao-Tzu, Zoroaster, even Longfellows pleasant Hiawatha. Not one of them takes upon his shoulders the sins of the world. Not one of them is or claims to be the Lord of the world.

There is, in the story of Jesus, no sense that he gains enlightenment, no dramatic turning point that puts his life on the path to glory. He is not ever the Prince Siddhartha under the Bodhi tree. He is not ever Mohammed, hitherto an ordinary man working among the caravans, visited by a reciting angel in a cave. We have only one account of his boyhood, whence we gather that he was already that same Jesus we know, calmly confident, speaking and listening and replying. There is in his story nothing of Napoleon or Dick Whittington or Epictetus or Oedipus or Arthur or even Moses. The story of Jesus is not like the story of man. It is instead the key that opens the story of man. It brings those stories into the light, for all men, and for each man. I am the door of the sheep, says the Lord. I am the door: by me if any man enter in, he shall be saved, and shall go in and out, and shall find pasture (Jn. 10:7, 9). Jesus does not conform his story to ours, but we may find the answers to our stories in his: If any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me (Rev. 3:20).

And so Saint John brings us back to the beginning, but what does that mean? Let us consider what he surely has in mind, and what he expects those who hear him to have in mind if they are Jews: In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. The Hebrew for that wordfor we must remember that John was himself a Jew, thinking first in his native Aramaic and then in the sacred parent language of Hebrew, but writing in his third language, Greekis bereshith, at the rosh or the head of things. I believe that it meant more to the Jewish mind than our first means to us, or at the start, or to begin with, or even in the beginning, if we think of beginning only in a temporal sense, for instance as the first domino to fall in a series.

We should not allow our digital clocks and calendars to mislead us. When the Jews celebrated the feast that marked the end of the old year and the beginning of the new, it was not like what Americans do when they gather in Times Square to watch a conglomeration of electric lights fall, and the numerals change on the historical odometer, whereupon everyone takes a drink, and wakes up the next morning foggy and disillusioned. Says God to Moses: Thou shalt observe the feast of tabernacles, that is, of barns, granaries, vats,

Seven days, after that thou hast gathered in thy corn and thy wine: and thou shalt rejoice in thy feast, thou, and thy son, and thy daughter, and thy manservant, and thy maidservant, and the Levite, the stranger, and the fatherless, and the widow, that are within thy gates. Seven days shalt thou keep a solemn feast unto the Lord thy God in the place which the Lord thy God shall choose: because the Lord thy God shall bless thee in all thine increase, and in all the works of thine hands, therefore shalt thou surely rejoice (Dt. 16:1315).

Seven, of course, is the number of days in the week, and the week is the divine unit of time. It is suggested by the lunar month of roughly four weeks, but otherwise it is not observable, not evident to the eye. If I may stretch a point: the week is like the angels, invisible. We have the week by the memory of what God has done in the beginning: And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all the work which he had made. And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it (Gen. 2:23). For that reason they who worship Him must also keep the day holy, for in six days the Lord made the heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the seventh day, and hallowed it (Ex. 20:11). We in our anti-culture of work that makes many a bad thing and unmakes many a man and woman, and of hedonism that brings no pleasure, are apt to view the command as a prohibition: do no work on the Sabbath. It is better viewed as an invitation: Thou shalt feast! Rest, here, is not simply an interruption in labor. It is the feast, the refreshment, the crown of life. The heavens and the earth and all that is in them are oriented toward the feast. It is the feast that is their root and trunk and crown, their sap and leaf and flower. In the beginning and in the end, there is the feast. []

We walk along a narrow land bridge, with a precipice on each side. To the left is the fall into abstraction and mere philosophy. To the right is the fall into mythology and idolatry. We have here neither Heraclitus nor Homer, but what alone will make sense of each, and both together. So, just as we must not reduce the gospel to a footnote to Greek abstraction, so we must not to reduce the gospel to a story about god-characters, Mr. and Mrs. Zeus, whether the characters are to be interpreted literally or allegorically. The gospel is not a work of mans fevered imagination, nor is it rationalism in symbolic garb. In the beginning was the Word, says John, and if all he meant by it was old dry Stoicism sweetened with some Jewish honey, it is hard to understand why Christians would ever be persecuted by anyone. A shrug would suffice: We are using figures of speech. Figures of speech cover a multitude of vagaries.

Likewise, we may be too accustomed to Johns first verse to feel how stunning it is, as stunning as was the first chapter of Genesis, with its frank, terse, and confident rejection of everything strictly mythological about the creation stories of the peoples roundabout. Here we might pause to take a look at that.

In the beginning God created the heavens and the earthat a stroke, the sacred author dispenses with the theogonies you find everywhere else, the generations of gods, such as Cronus usurping authority from his father Ouranos, and Zeus his son doing the same in turn to him, assisted by his strategic political alliance with some of the Titans, the generation of gods contemporaneous with Cronus. There is nothing of that in Genesis, or of Osiris betrayed and dismembered by his evil brother Seti, and his sister-wife Isis gathering up again all his scattered limbs; or of the Babylonian Marduk enlisting the allegiance of the younger gods to slaughter the ancient sea-goddess Tiamat, and then fashioning the universe from her remains. There is no foundational violence or conquest. There is also no star-worship, no planetary mysticism. For God made the luminaries for times and seasons, the sun to govern the day and the moon to govern the night, and he also made the stars, says the author, as if it were an afterthought. It is a poke in the eye of the Chaldean stargazers. As a mythas a story about how the moon got her spots, or why the whale is so big, the creation account in Genesis would have been a failure, but then it is not intended as a myth, that is, an explanatory story, so much as it is a stripped-down poetic revelation of what the world is: the good and wholly gratuitous creation by God, oriented toward its fulfillment in the worship of God, the feast of the Sabbath.

It is also not a piece of political propaganda. In the beginning (of the earth, that is, and of mankind), in Babylon, there was violence and empire, with Marduk emerging as the dominant god, just as the Babylonians had overrun and built upon the Sumerian civilization that came before. In the beginning (of civilization, that is), in Greece, there was political cunning and reason, in the person of Zeus, outflanking the hideous older gods of brute domination. So did the Greeks project the political organization called the polis back upon the conflict of the generations of the gods. In the beginning (of large-scale agriculture), in Egypt, there was a good god murdered, whose fertility and whose benevolence entered the Nile River and the mud at her banks, making Egyptian civilization possible. None of that, absolutely none of it, is to be had from our sacred author of Genesis.

One might expect the author, if we were talking simply of human agency, to present to us the holy city of Jerusalem, the City of Peace, as present in the seed from the beginning. For man likes to cast the gods in his image, which will usually be a national or tribal image. But Jerusalem is not here. Rather the first city-builder we learn of is Cain, also the first murderer of his kin, his brother Abel. And the first prominent city in Genesis is Babel, emblem of the greatness and the folly of Babylon, and forever after the type of human confusion. Babel is the anti-word, the sign of human language itself falling into change and decay, into misunderstanding and strife.

Just as the beginning of all things is not, in Genesis, a civic myth aimed at justifying any specific place or form of human organization, so also the beginning in John is not local or specific or bound to a culture. We here are talking about all men, everywhere, and about each single man. The scope is universal, and the touch is intimate. No broader range is possible, nor any deeper gaze into the dark corners of every human soul. What cultural trappings we find are minimal, no more than is necessary for any kind of human communication to take place. We expect a people who raise corn to give us a Hiawatha, and they do. We expect a people who live beneath the steady glare of the tropical sun to give us a Quetzalcoatl, intense and merciless, demanding his daily tribute in the blood of the peoples enemies. We might expect the Hebrew herdsmen to give us a god of the sheep and the cattle, but they do not. There was no time, and there never will come a time, when the account in Genesis of the creation and the fall of man will not speak home truths about who we are. The ancient here does not grow old. There was no time, and there never will come a time, when the opening of Johns gospel will not prompt the attentive reader to ponder the very being of God, of his relationship to man and to all things, and of the inner life that is Gods own, a relationship of love.

Photo by Sebastien Gabriel on Unsplash

View original post here:

In the Beginning Was the WordExcerpt from a New Book by Anthony Esolen - OnePeterFive

Posted in Rationalism | Comments Off on In the Beginning Was the WordExcerpt from a New Book by Anthony Esolen – OnePeterFive

EDITORIAL: On Russia, the ANC shows its moral atheism – BusinessLIVE

Posted: at 4:58 pm

If youre wondering why President Cyril Ramaphosas noble promises have failed to translate into action, look no further than the breathtakingly mealy-mouthed statement by the ANCs international relations chair, Lindiwe Zulu.

On Sunday, as Vladimir Putins Russia was on day three of a special military operation that involved shelling residential areas in cities including Kyiv and Kharkiv, Zulu issued a statement expressing her deep concern about the rapid escalation of conflict. Studiously avoiding using the word invasion, she said the ANC was appalled but not surprised by those beating the drum of war when instead they should have been pre-empting confrontation by being insistent on dialogue. Presumably, Zulu means those who called for intervention to stop Russia shelling another sovereign state. Had there been any working televisions, radio, newspapers or the internet in Luthuli House, Zulu who also doubles as SAs intellectually towering minister of social development might have noticed that Putin had pretty much ruled out dialogue when he spoke of the band of drug addicts and neo-Nazis that sits in Kyiv, arguing that Russias interests were non-negotiable.

Its predictable, if depressing: in Ramaphosas ANC, a violent incursion into a sovereign state is just an excuse for another talk shop, another commission, another belated morticians report.

Now, its clear that the picture is more nuanced than a blunt good vs evil binary. Putin is seething that Western countries have ignored his claim that Ukraine broke the Minsk agreement, which would give the two provinces of Donetsk and Luhansk relative autonomy. And hes paranoid about Nato-aligned countries inching east, and incorporating Ukraine this is a red line, he says.

Yet Putins remedy for his embellished grievance is disproportionate and a breach of international law. His ruse for remaking Imperial Russia by sending in 150,000 troops relies on dopes like Zulu swallowing his line that its a peacekeeping mission.

In the ANC statement, Zulu warns that people must apply their minds in the face of brazen propaganda and unprecedented disinformation even as she falls hook, line and sinker for a whopper herself. There must be a throng of slick salesmen outside her door, trying to flog her an emerging cryptocurrency, or the next big thing in 4IR.

But then, when youve made a career of putting ideology ahead of truth, comforted by the cotton-wool swaddling of phrases like imperial manipulation, maybe its what youre intellectually obliged to do. Hers is a mission statement for a la-la land of dopey diplomats and unctuous officials, inevitably surprised when the inevitable happens.

Not everyone in the ANC is able to spout vacuous revolutionary slogans on command. Naledi Pandor, for one, must be overdue for a stint in a re-education gulag after forgetting that values are subservient to ideology. Last week, Pandors department of international relations & co-operation called for Russia to respect Ukraines sovereignty.

Apparently, this didnt please Ramaphosa, who, the Sunday newspapers reported, was irked at such a resolute take on an issue that could have been diluted into something far more wishy-washy.

Speaking to the media last Friday, Ramaphosa said that if US President Joe Biden had agreed to meet Putin to discuss the Ukraine situation without any conditions, Im sure we would have avoided the calamitous situation that is unfolding now.

Which, of course, is an irrelevant argument.

And yet this is illuminating of Ramaphosas loyalties, driven in part by SAs awkward alliance with the Brics countries Brazil, Russia, India and China.

It underscores the extent to which the ANC has long had a misplaced romanticism of Russia. Maybe its because the ANCs financial woes precluded it buying any textbooks dated after 1989, or maybe its because leaders like David Mabuza are always dashing off to Moscow for a miracle anti-poisoning elixir.

But again, that becomes a subservient concern when you sign up to a bill of rights, and attest to global democratic treaties that oblige you to respect sovereign boundaries.

In recent years the ANCs critics have spoken of its creeping moral agnosticism. Its actually worse than that the party now seems to be embracing a far more active atheism, in which it no longer believes in the ethically courageous path.

Continue reading here:
EDITORIAL: On Russia, the ANC shows its moral atheism - BusinessLIVE

Posted in Atheism | Comments Off on EDITORIAL: On Russia, the ANC shows its moral atheism – BusinessLIVE

Invasion of Ukraine and Russian literature III – MM News

Posted: at 4:57 pm

The last article concluded with the fact that three things are of paramount importance in the Western worldview: Free will, that is, the unbridled autonomy of man. The second is rationalism and the third is a powerful man with extraordinary abilities. Atheism is active as a soul in these three concepts. It is safe to say that atheism is common to almost all the philosophies and concepts that have appeared in Western thought.

For example, if you look at Hedonism, or denial of existence, etc., the denial of God will also be seen there. Where there is denial of God, even if God is present, they will be seen refusing to obey Him. All such ideas were at Tolstoy and Dostoevskys aim.

So when Friedrich Nietzsche in Germany burying God on his side and carving an idol of Superman, Tolstoy had written that in ancient notion whatever happens in this universe is by the Gods will. Then some wise men of the modern age (fifteenth century) declared this concept childish and assigned this position of God to some great conquerors.

Therefore, the creator of History is a powerful man, not God. And of course, theres the concept of free will. So Tolstoy writes, combining these two concepts at once: If every mans freedom were unlimited, if every man had the power to do what he wanted, then the whole history of mankind would be nothing but a mixture of uncoordinated events.

If only one in a million human beings in a thousand years had the power to do something with unlimited authority, then one illegal act of that one person would eliminate the possibility of any law for the whole of humanity. In this short statement Tolstoy denies not only the denial of God but also of the powerful man and its free will and that too with a rational argument which cannot be denied.

In order to make this option acceptable, the concept of rationalism was introduced by the West that man is intelligent and he uses it to do all good. So Dostoevsky destroyed this rationalism in just two lines: Whether its right or wrong, sometimes breaking something is just as enjoyable.

In this simple line, Dostoevsky draws attention to this aspect of human instinct, the denial of which is equivalent to the denial of the sun. Who does not know that man does not make every decision according to the scale of right or wrong. Therefore, the man being intelligent does not guarantee that whatever one do will be right.

Dostoevsky then proves that European nations are on the path to self-destruction. Their luxurious society and their capitalism is nothing but self-destruction. Dostoevskys position can be accurately understood from the introduction of the man in his possession.

According to him, the most prominent identities of man are two. The first is that it is flawed. And second, it is self-harmful. Dostoevskys position can be seen in the use of all types of drugs, from alcohol, tobacco, gambling, and marijuana to heroin. Who does not know that all these things are destructive to man? But arent millions of people still suffering from them? If the intellect can guarantee protection from harm, then no intelligent person should have touched these things.

Hence, Dostoevsky writes here, focusing on the importance of God: If there is no God, then everything is permissible. And his city-wide novel Crime and Punishment is based on the same theme. The protagonist of this novel, Raskolnikov, had every rational reason for killing a rich woman. His plan was also spotless.

There was no fear of being caught. He was not seen during the murder, nor was he arrested after the murder. But after doing the act, his conscience created such turmoil inside him that he did not feel at ease for a moment. This turmoil seems to cover the whole depths of the human psyche throughout the novel. No one has been able to give a greater answer to rationalism other than Dostoevsky has dug up rationalism. What is this voice of conscience? That is God.

Lets go back to the so-called powerful man of the West who has the status of the creator of history in Western thought under infinite freedom. In Western thought, this powerful man exists in two forms. If it is good then it is a hero. If bad its a villain. So from here you can see that the art of Hollywood and Bollywood is based on this concept.

But its not that simple. The historical fact is that if the powerful man is their own, then the one who dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki is also a hero. And if it is a different ideology, then the car bomb detonator is also a villain.

Commenting on this powerful man in War and Peace, Tolstoy says: Its a character of a story that the storyteller has exaggerated. It doesnt just end with this commentary, but it does portray Napoleon in War and Peace as a man of short stature who was no more important than a mere figure in a historical process. That is, he was not the creator of an event, but merely a part of it.

One of the sayings of the teacher Ahmed Javed is of great help in understanding this position of Tolstoy. The Western notion of history is that great heroes or villains are its creators. While my teachers concept of history is that history is of two kinds. One optional and the other incidental.

For example, my optional history is where I studied, where I lived, where I worked. Whereas my incidental history in which my authority is absolutely zero, is what nation I was born in, and what country I was born as a citizen, etc. Now, if you consider, Napoleon is nothing more than a limited part of history, a character of optional history.

If anyone says where did the role of optional history come from? He is the creator of this history by his own choice, so we should not forget that the power to make this optional history was given to him by his incidental history. In which he was born in France and the rest of the history took him to the place from which his triumphant journey began.

Thus Tolstoy seems to give the key in the description of his theory of history that you cannot see any recent event without historical background. There is a continuum of history behind the great event that took place today. And todays event is the result of that continuity.

He illustrates with the example of the human body that the head is not alone. Its burden is borne by innumerable cells and many other organs. So these are the many small and big events of nature that together make a big event. And man is just a character in this event. He is not its creator at all. (To be continued)

Read the original:
Invasion of Ukraine and Russian literature III - MM News

Posted in Atheism | Comments Off on Invasion of Ukraine and Russian literature III – MM News