Daily Archives: March 8, 2022

Creating Space For The Cannabis And Psychedelic Diaspora To Honor Women – Forbes

Posted: March 8, 2022 at 10:18 pm

We're honoring women this month!

I was raised by a single mom who instilled in me the idea that knowledge is cumulative like a tower of many stones stacked on top of each other and that there is something to be learned from every experience no matter how heavy it might be to carry. Today is International Womens Day, and March is Womens History Month. This year, Im creating space for voices from the cannabis and psychedelic diaspora to express appreciation for the women in our community, and to pay respect to those who are no longer with us but whose contributions live on whose stones are the ones we lay ours upon.

Sara Rotman

ADVERTISEMENT

Sara Rotman, CEO and Founder of Wellfounded Botanicals

Founded by farmer and former luxury brand builder Sara Rotman, after experiencing a life-threatening battle with Crohns disease, Wellfounded Botanicals is a new woman and Latinx-owned cannabis brand dedicated to promoting plant-based wellness.

The success of the Wellfounded brand and Busy Bees Organics cannabis farm in which we grow our products rests entirely on the shoulders of the women at Wellfounded. We dont hire or assign team members because of their gender, but it just so happens that weve found the best people in the business, and they happen to be women. They have taught me so much about grace, perseverance, and how to thrive in a world which can be unfavorable to women. Im particularly proud of my legal team, Susan Petrovich and Amy Steinfeld, as well as our Chief Compliance Officer Carmela Beck and our EVP, Director of Brand, Kimberly Brower. Im lucky to be surrounded by women who inspire and support me and the Wellfounded brand - they remind me to maintain my integrity and commitment, agnostic of my gender.

Steven Jung, Chief Operating Officer of PAX

Before joining leading cannabis brand PAX, Steven Jung served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Weedmaps, the leading tech company serving the cannabis

ADVERTISEMENT

Steven Jung

industry. Jung brings an extensive career in operations, and began his career in operations leadership as a Captain in the United States Army where he held both strategic and tactical roles.

"I'm inspired by Stephanie Shepard who, after being incarcerated for cannabis, is now helping others find freedom and reentry support through Last Prisoner Project. Our country's approach to drug policy has caused irreparable and disparate harm no one should be in prison because of this plant. I'm incredibly grateful to Stephanie, and others like her, who are sharing their stories and doing this mission critical work to address decades of injustice and create opportunities for people in cannabis."

TaJanna Mallory, CEO of CannAssistants

Founded by TaJanna Mallory, CannAssistants is a virtual assistant agency that provides administrative support to mid-size cannabis companies, founders, and

ADVERTISEMENT

TaJanna Mallory

business executives. At the core of her work, Mallory believes the foundation of every strong organization is a steady and seamless support staff that excels in daily operations and exceeds client expectations.

I've been fascinated by the resilience that I've seen among women, especially in the past two years. In the cannabis industry, there's always going to be a fight until prohibition ends. I've watched women in this industry like Amber Senter and Chaney Turner, continue the fight for the greater cannabis community while still running their own businesses. "Pivot" is a word that has been exhausted since the pandemic. More than a pivot, I've witnessed women find new and creative ways to crush their obstacles while continuing to fight for the things they are passionate about.

ADVERTISEMENT

Susie Plascencia

Susie Plascencia, Brand Partner at Humo

A Spanish word for smoke, humo is the unmistakable result of cannabis when ignited. Humo Brand Partner, entrepreneur and cannabis advocate Susie Plascencia leads the pioneering, Mexican American owned craft cannabis companys commitment to providing meaningful representation in an industry that has caused disproportionate harm to Latino communities. Plascencia is especially passionate about Latina representation in the cannabis industry.

Womens History Month is especially important in the cannabis industry because its a time to recognize and celebrate the many contributions of those who are often underrepresented in positions of professional leadership. As a woman led company, Humo is so proud to align with queer and Chicana led nonprofit, The Social Impact Center. We understand that repairing the harm caused to communities by the War on Drugs begins with meaningful action and by supporting their transformative programs and criminal record expungement clinics, we know were doing our part to foster a more equitable industry while supporting women in cannabis. Im also personally a supporter of the great work of Women Grow, Supernova Women and Latinas in Cannabis, a nationally recognized online community I founded after seeing a need for Latina representation and empowerment in cannabis.

ADVERTISEMENT

Jeffrey D. Welsh, Partner, Vicente Sederberg, LLP

Jeffrey Welsh

Jeffrey Welsh is a partner at Vicente Sederberg LLP where he focuses his practice on advising companies, brands, entertainment and media properties, other law firms, and investors on how to navigate the California cannabis marketplace.

I've been incredibly blessed to have many inspiring female mentors throughout the course of my life, starting with my Mom, who instilled work ethic, drive, and unconditional love into the fabric of my being. My team at Vicente Sederberg is comprised of many thought leaders who I work with on a daily basis, including Cassia Furman, Shawn Hauser, Sahar Ayinehsazian, Andrea Golan, and Emily Hackman, to name a few! Throughout the industry at large, I am incredibly thankful to be colleagues and friends with Zoe Wilder, a tireless advocate for the plant and a tremendous ambassador to our industry. I am so thankful for all of the incredible women in my life! Love you, Mom!

ADVERTISEMENT

Angela White

Angela White, Equity for Industry Program Manager at Success Centers

Success Centers Angela White focuses on developing sustainable career and entrepreneurial paths previously less accessible to communities impacted by inequality and the War on Drugs.

Its always an honor for me to acknowledge all of the super sisters in cannabis who volunteer their time and talents to the equity community, and have made this work possible for the Equity for Industry Program. Our mission is to empower marginalized community members through education, employment and art programs, so they may develop a positive self-image as well as a sense of hope and purpose for their future. Grateful to all of the women in the industry who have helped us with this important mission! Shout out to Jessica Strange, Marie Montmarquet, Tiffany McBride, Alisha Johnson, Jasmine Hall, Liz Gehl, Dale Sky Jones, Summer Jenkins, Julia Jacobson, Reese Benton, Cindy De La Vega, Nicole Howell Esq, Rhiannon Woo and Merril Gilbert, Suzy Jones, Jennifer Lujan, Christina DaPaci, Hannah Stitt, Esq, and Paige Penbrook Esq. There are many more of you that may not be on this list but you are all deeply respected and appreciated.

ADVERTISEMENT

Shelby Hartman, Co-Founder & CEO of DoubleBlind

Shelby Hartman

Journalist Shelby Hartman was meditating when she had a vision to start a magazine focused on psychedelics. A media company and education platform at the forefront of the rapidly growing psychedelic movement, DoubleBlind reports on some of the most important issues of our time all presented in visually compelling, rigorous long-form features, poetry, art, and photo essays.

Much like in other industries, for decades, men in psychedelics have been platformed disproportionately, relative to women. I, by no means, want to diminish the incredible contributions that men have made to the psychedelic field, but, alongside them, there have often been women who have simply gotten less acclaim. Women such as Kathleen Harrison, Ann Shulgin, Bia Labate, and Amanda Feilding, not to mention the countless women, Indigenous and non-Indigenous, who have been holding space for others to heal for generations. I'm excited to see that changing, as well as to see all of the incredibly inspiring women who have begun to work in psychedelics in more recent decades: Natalie Ginsberg, Liana Gillooly, Lauren Taus, Charlotte James, Melissa Lavasani, my dear cofounder Madison Margolin...I'm almost reluctant to name names, because there's so many more, too many to name. I'm hopeful that this growing devotion to platforming women in psychedelics is a part of a larger movement towards inclusivity within the field, including making sure psychedelic businesses are prioritizing equity and access as well as Indigenous reciprocity. I do believe that if any industry is poised to reimagine what equitable and inclusive businesses look like, it's the psychedelic industry.

ADVERTISEMENT

[Disclosure: I am the co-founder and Chairperson of the Board for the non-profit Last Prisoner Project]

See original here:

Creating Space For The Cannabis And Psychedelic Diaspora To Honor Women - Forbes

Posted in War On Drugs | Comments Off on Creating Space For The Cannabis And Psychedelic Diaspora To Honor Women – Forbes

Mandy Moore announces new album ‘In Real Life’ and shares title track – NME

Posted: at 10:18 pm

Mandy Moore has announced details of her new album In Real Life and shared the records title track you can hear the new song below.

The record will be the follow-up to Moores March 2020 album Silver Landings, and is set for release on May 13 via Verve Forecast.

Produced by Mike Viola, In Real Life which has been previewed today (March 8) by the title track, which you can hear below features a host of collaborators, including Moores husband, Dawes Taylor Goldsmith, and his brother/bandmate Griffin Goldsmith, Lucius Jess Wolfe and Holly Laessig, keyboardist Lee Pardini (The War On Drugs) and bassist Sebastian Steinberg (Sharon Van Etten, Phoebe Bridgers).

So much of this record came from future-tripping on the next chapter of my life and what it might look like: what parenthood would feel like, how it would change everything, and all the excitement and trepidation that comes with that, Moore said of In Real Life in a statement.

At the same time it was about celebrating and acknowledging where we were at the moment and really trying to be completely present in the everyday which is maybe the hardest part of the human condition.

Of the lyrical content of the album, Moore added: To me its all about staying open, staying aware, staying sensitive and empathetic to the people around me.

Theres something about expressing myself through lyrics and melody that makes me feel whole, and I see it as a privilege to have that outlet. And even though this album is very specific to me and my experience theres songs about my baby, my husband, my father, my friends I hope everyones able to see their own lives in it. I hope theyre able to come along on the journey with me, and put themselves in the drivers seat.

Moore has also announced details of a North American tour which will take place across June and July you can find details of the dates and tickets here.

Read the original here:

Mandy Moore announces new album 'In Real Life' and shares title track - NME

Posted in War On Drugs | Comments Off on Mandy Moore announces new album ‘In Real Life’ and shares title track – NME

After Paying $18M in Taxes, Jungle Boys Raided For All Its Cash In Boyle Heights – L.A. TACO

Posted: at 10:18 pm

The bold new world of legal cannabis can feel a lot like the tired old war on drugs of the 80s and 90s, denying rest and relaxation for the L.A. entrepreneurs who sell us cannabis.

Only now, its no longer to ward us away from a relaxing high. Its all about the money.

Hot on the heels of reports that the sheriffs department and feds are raiding vans moving cash for legal cannabis businessesa move later given blanket acceptance by a federal judgecomes the raid last week on one of L.A.s most longstanding dispensaries, complete with guns drawn on owners and cash swiped from budtenders tip jars.

The raid on Boyle Heights TLC by Jungle Boys dispensary first came to our attention on Instagram, where the 16-year-old business detailed the unexpected appearance of roughly 20 undercover cars last Tuesday. Owners watched on video as employees were rounded up by a variety of law enforcement agencies including CHP, LAPD, and the Sheriffs Department.

As the legal business reached out to its attorneys, soon guns were being pointed at the owners heads, with orders to get on the ground and detainment for the ensuing hour.

Owner Ivan Vanorwick told High Times of the tense encounter, They wont talk to our lawyer. They wont look at the appeal paperwork they just basically said theyre taking all the money inside the building. Im like, wait, this is over the $66,000?

Indeed. All over a late payment, the business was already contesting with The California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA). According to Vanorwick, the charge had previously been submitted to an appeals process, in an attempt to argue late fees racked up by Jungle Boys due to the agencys own inability or refusal to accept payments at the height of COVID-19 infections.

After TLC management was informed that the CDTFA was there to take all of the money, the agencys bill collectors took $174,000 out of the dispensary, and in a move straight out of the Sheriff of Nottinghams playbook, even pinched the contents of jars left out to collect tips for the businesses budtenders. In a subsequent post, we see video of the cops taking money straight from the register.

All of thisthe guns, the raid, the detainmentdespite the late fee reportedly totaling only $66,000, a drop in the pan considering TLC by Jungle Boys reportedly paid over $18 million to the agency last year.

In the original Instagram post, a TLC rep illustrates the insult offered to their injury, when some of the cops present asked how much money they could make cultivating marijuana themselves, all while other authorities employed money counting machines to take every dollar in the building before telling Jungle Boys they were free to open back up and leaving.

Noting how theyve been over taxed and over regulated, the post steams over how the California Cannabis tax system is broken and we will all be out of business while all these agencies continue to get bigger every day, echoing wider industry complaints in California over aggressive taxation dovetailing with poor representation.

The CDTFA, for its part, tells High Times, This is our standard procedure for cannabis businesses or any business. Were not singling out any industry or type of business. If you owe taxes in California, we do our best to collect what is due.

Despite it being 2022 and despite the countrys more open views towards the consumption of a plant that makes you feel good and treats long-term medical problems, deep issues persist that make entering or surviving the cannabis industry, which is now legal in 32 states, ever difficult.

The uncertainty extends to local ganjapreneurs like Jungle Boys, who were targeted with firearms over a late tax payment they were reportedly trying to legally contest. And also affects national cannabis connoisseurs, as well.

Last week, the news quietly broke that the Biden Administrations newly updated employee conduct guidelines will most likely deny security clearance to anyone who has invested in a cannabis business or in cannabis stocks, following 2021 in which actual White House employees were dumped over previous admissions that theyd inhaled.

The more things change, right?

Continued here:

After Paying $18M in Taxes, Jungle Boys Raided For All Its Cash In Boyle Heights - L.A. TACO

Posted in War On Drugs | Comments Off on After Paying $18M in Taxes, Jungle Boys Raided For All Its Cash In Boyle Heights – L.A. TACO

How Americans really feel about critical race theory – TheGrio

Posted: at 10:18 pm

(Photo: Adobe Stock)

Editors note: The following article is an op-ed, and the views expressed are the authors own.Read moreopinionson theGrio.

There are so many times and so many ways Black people have become a political football in America. White people fought a war and almost broke up the country over whether or not we should be free. They started another war, the war on drugs, at a time when there wasnt a major drug epidemic because its easier to repress Black people when its crime or drugs or safe streets.

The recent war over critical race theory has been a novel way of using Black people as a political football or as a way to energize white voters and make them think theres a real threat to their kids that they need to stand up and fight. Once again, we are supposedly the threat that they need to fear. But in this conversation, we should put critical race theory in quotes because were not really talking about actual critical race theorythe legal theory that racism has shaped America. Were talking about critical race theorya right-wing bogeyman thats telling white adults that schools are teaching white children to hate themselves and feel guilty about American history and that it must be stopped.

A recent poll from CBS/YouGov sampling a robust 2,500 people found that despite widespread right-wing caterwauling about CRT, most Americans say they know little to nothing about CRT. Sixty-five percent say theyve heard either a little or nothing about it. The rights national PR campaign has largely fallen on deaf ears, and their messaging isnt in line with what most people think68 percent of those surveyed said, teaching about race in America makes students understand what others went through. Only 23 percent agreed with the GOPs message that it makes students feel guilty about past generations. Eighty-seven percent said books should not be banned for discussing race or depicting slavery. Most people do not want history to be erased.

This is largely good newsmost Americans disagree that teaching students about race and Americas dreadful history on race is a bad thing. Despite all the videos weve seen of people protesting school boards and all the Republican noise, most Americans have not even heard about CRT. The big schism in the poll is thisamong those who have heard of CRT, 81 percent of Democrats say they have a favorable opinion of CRT while 86 percent of Republicans say they have an unfavorable opinion.

So the Republican argument around CRT isnt winning over new voters, but it is connecting with people who are already in their tent. Once again, Republicans are using Black people as a political footballCRT is triggering white victimhood and motivating Republicans to vote. But most Americans see through this smokescreen.

CRT has become the rights new imaginary enemytheir old imaginary enemies include the people who stole the 2020 election, the people who vote illegally and are the reason why we need voter ID, the people who believe in climate change, whoever gave Obama a fake birth certificate, whoever really attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6. Its all part of this bizarro bubble they live in where facts go to die, Black people are the problem and whites are the real victims. The erasure of Black history is critical to maintaining that fiction. Still, for now, most Americans understand that what we call Black history is American history, and its valuable for Black and white children to learn it.

Tour is the host of the podcast Toure Show and the podcast docuseries Who Was Prince? He is also the author of seven books.

TheGrio is FREE on your TV via Apple TV, Amazon Fire, Roku, and Android TV.Please download theGrio mobile apps today!

Read the rest here:

How Americans really feel about critical race theory - TheGrio

Posted in War On Drugs | Comments Off on How Americans really feel about critical race theory – TheGrio

Legislation would prohibit cannabis gifting parties in CT with $10,000 fines – CT Insider

Posted: at 10:18 pm

The General Assembly is considering legislation targeting a loophole in the states retail recreational cannabis law that has allowed gatherings like the controversial High Bazaar in Hamden, where vendors of marijuana flowers and related products gift them to paying customers in a party atmosphere.

Proposed new legislation would ban public gifting parties, with criminal penalties of a year in prison and $10,000 fines for violators.

The proposal drew opposition on Tuesday from Connecticuts cannabis community, who charged that the bill is an attempt to again criminalize the drug less than a year after the legislature legalized marijuana possession and set in motion a new retail industry that could begin statewide adult sales by the end of 2022, as well as recreational home growing in July, 2023.

Another section of the bill, which would ban billboard advertising for cannabis companies, was opposed by outdoor advertisers led by John Barrett, owner of the West Haven-based Barrett Outdoor Communications.

And state Rep. Juan Candelaria, D-New Haven, a longtime proponent of full cannabis legalization, warned that weaknesses in the social equity portion of the law - aimed at helping residents of neighborhoods adversely impacted in the failed war on drugs to obtain careers in the legal landscape - is being weakened by big corporations from out of state that are poised to take over Connecticuts budding, lucrative retail market.

Some of the language presented in the bill...in fact would re-criminalize this plant and would be a major step backwards for all, said Duncan Markovich of Branford, who told lawmakers that he owns a cannabis-related business. The citizens of the state of Connecticut and those of us specifically within the cannabis community, culture, advocacy and industry cannot fathom such draconian language around this plant. Enacting a law that criminalizes the giving of any of this plant-based medicine to our fellow family members, friends or even complete strangers is unethical, unfathomable and borderline nefarious.

For several months, as many as 1,200 visitors on a Saturday would attend the High Bazaar in a Hamden industrial park, with live music, open consumption of cannabis and dozens of vendors, until an injunction stopped the parties last month.

Giving away cannabis products should be no different than offering people vegetables from ones garden, Markovich said during a virtual public hearing on the proposal before the legislative General Law Committee.

But state Rep. Michael DAgostino, D-Hamden, co-chairman of the committee, said that while proponents claim they are not selling cannabis and cannabis-infused materials in the events, its plain that cash is going from the hands of people into the donation boxes - and vendors pockets - in exchange for the substances.

The committees intent, with this language, was to really prevent and rein in these retail gifting events that have been occurring in the state, which really are retail events, DAgostino said. Theyre just an end run around the permitting and transaction process that weve set up through our cannabis laws.

You cant give it away as part of a broader commercial transaction, said Michelle Seagull, the commissioner of the state Department of Consumer Protection, which runs the medical cannabis program and is in the process of creating the adult-retail system. It has to be a lot more than if you just gave it to a friend, Seagull said.

House Minority Leader Vincent Candelora, R-North Branford, a staunch opponent of legalized cannabis, said that societal issues are bound to emerge in the new market. He suggested banning cannabis smoking in public housing complexes, along with prohibiting cannabis-related billboards.

But Justin Welch, a member of the CT CannaWarriors and the New England Craft Cannabis Alliance, which successfully lobbied the 2021 legislation and which co-sponsored the weekly Hamden events, noted the danger and potential sanctimony of the General Assembly enacting a law that reimposes criminal penalties.

I use cannabis daily and rely on gifting for a variety of different reasons, Welch said in prepared testimony. I do not deserve to be punished for this, nor does anyone else. For too long now, good people have been persecuted for their involvement with cannabis. The grassroots cannabis community that exists here in Connecticut will not cease to exist, whether you pass this bill or not. Moving forward we need sensible cannabis policy that looks more like a craft beer policy.

Seagull, under questioning from the committee, stressed that her agency has no legal authority over the gifting parties or billboards that have become ubiquitous along Connecticuts interstate highways since last July 1, when cannabis possession became legal and state cannabis consumers were first directed to Massachusetts cannabis dispensaries.

House Minority Leader Vincent Candelora, R-North Branford, a staunch opponent of legalized cannabis, said that societal issues are bound to emerge. He suggested banning cannabis smoking in public housing complexes, which is not part of the pending proposal, and supported banning related billboards. Adults are going to find the product on its own, Candelora said. We dont have to advertise it.

DAgostino said that lawmakers seem restricted to either banning billboards or allowing them, with a likely First Amendment, free-speech court challenge if lawmakers approve the proposed prohibition.

Barrett, who is also president of the six-member Outdoor Advertising Association of Connecticut, which owns 88 percent of the billboards along state highways, said that unless all advertising for cannabis is banned in the state, billboard owners would be singled out in an unconstitutional manner under the proposal.

Candelaria, in dissecting the wishes of the bill proposed by the Social Equity Council that is setting up the framework for business opportunities in under-served communities, warned that the entire state industry might get taken over by corporate interests.

My concern here is that theyll corner the market, said the 20-year House veteran, a deputy speaker of the House.

Others who testified on the bill criticized the states 10-year-old medical cannabis program, charging that high prices and questionable quality is driving holders of medical cards to the High Bazaar and underground markets. A lot of the current producers and the dispensaries are out of state, Candelaria said. They are not people from Connecticut. Our intention was to ensure that equity applicants from our state have an opportunity to conduct cannabis businesses.

The deadline for the General Law Committee to act on bills is March 22.

kdixon@ctpost.com Twitter: @KenDixonCT

Visit link:

Legislation would prohibit cannabis gifting parties in CT with $10,000 fines - CT Insider

Posted in War On Drugs | Comments Off on Legislation would prohibit cannabis gifting parties in CT with $10,000 fines – CT Insider

China is censoring the invasion of Ukraine – Axios

Posted: at 10:16 pm

The Chinese government is scrubbing the countrys media of sympathetic or accurate coverage of Ukraine and systematically amplifying pro-Putin talking points about Russia's invasion of Ukraine..

Why it matters: Chinas wide use of its propaganda and censorship muscle helps insulate Beijing from a domestic backlash against its support for Putin and leaves its citizens with an airbrushed, false version of events, similar to whats seen in Putins state-controlled Russia.

What's happening: Chinese media outlets were told to avoid posting "anything unfavorable to Russia or pro-Western" on their social media accounts, and to only use hashtags started by Chinese state media outlets, according to a leaked censorship directive.

But the Chinese government made a miscalculation in the early days of Russia's invasion, according to a new analysis published by Doublethink Lab, a Taiwan-based organization that researches online disinformation suggesting that Beijing underestimated Europe's resolve.

"They tried to depict the U.S., the West and NATO as not trustworthy, and people in Taiwan as delusional to think the U.S. will protect Taiwan at all," Doublethink Lab CEO Min Hsuan Wu told Axios.

Yes, but: Censorship means that opposing viewpoints are muted, making it seem like anti-west, pro-Russia sentiment is more ubiquitous among Chinese people than may actually be the case.

Go deeper: Governments around the globe hold upper hand online

View original post here:
China is censoring the invasion of Ukraine - Axios

Posted in Censorship | Comments Off on China is censoring the invasion of Ukraine – Axios

Conservatives fear censorship of Russians could be turned against them – Washington Examiner

Posted: at 10:16 pm

The West's effort to curb pro-Russian websites and media outlets in reaction to Russias invasion of Ukraine is driven by lopsided business interests that could eventually censor conservatives, critics say.

Major social media companies, including YouTube, Facebook, TikTok, and Twitter, have moved to reduce Russian propaganda and disinformation on their platforms by aggressively banning or restricting content from Russian state media outlets such as RT, Sputnik, and others.

Conservatives say the social media giants' approach to censoring Russian content is hypocritical and could be aimed at Americans in the near future.

Were seeing Russia being globally deplatformed across the board, and so its impossible not to look at that and think it wont happen to others in America and elsewhere, said Dan Gainor, vice president at the Media Research Center, a conservative media watchdog that tracks censorship on Big Tech platforms.

A group of people, the global mob, have decided to target Russia, but theyre fine with genocides in China. How is that acceptable? There are no rules, and the few that exist keep changing, Gainor said.

Gainor added that there was no consistency or fairness to Russia being censored now when it has invaded other regions in the past without similar consequences. He noted that other countries have also taken violent actions without facing any clampdowns.

Russias attack on Ukraine is one of the first major full-scale military invasions of another country in the age of social media, where online platforms are used by billions and where a separate war is waged online by governments trying to shape alternative narratives.

For example, two anti-Ukrainian disinformation operations that were taken down by Facebook last week were tied to Ukraine Today, a Russian propaganda news outfit created to make Ukraine look like a failed state by using fake Facebook profiles. Russian state media last week also falsely reported a Ukrainian civilian genocide that officials believe was a way to justify the Russian invasion.

The social media giants are aligned in trying to curb Russian disinformation regarding what is happening in Ukraine due to pressure placed on them by users and government officials around the world.

Some of the platforms have even restricted access to Russian government accounts altogether.

INTERNET FRAGMENTS AS RUSSIAN INVASION PUSHES PLATFORMS TO CHOOSE SIDES

Republicans in Congress are wary of the Russian censorship effort by social media platforms because their decisions appear to be driven by government pressure.

In a very limited way, the tech companies should squash Russian disinformation, but theyre now public utilities that are essentially extended realms of the government, which gives me pause, said Rep. Andy Biggs of Arizona, one of the most conservative Republicans in Congress.

I have a dubious, skeptical eye on what the tech companies have chosen to do, which is part of why we need to revisit the laws around tech legal shields, said Biggs, who is also one of former President Donald Trumps top supporters.

Biggs added that he wished there would be a similar reaction and attention from tech companies regarding violent activities in China and Africa.

Libertarians say the targeted social media censorship of Russia versus other countries is driven by the fact that there is less money to be lost by cutting off Russians than those in other countries, namely China.

The censorship decisions are mostly a business decision. Theyre responding to what consumers want or not and trying to hit their bottom line, said Ari Cohn, free speech counsel at TechFreedom, a libertarian-leaning technology think tank.

Personally, I feel a certain level of discomfort that were all collectively saying we dont want certain content from one place, Cohn said.

Cohn added that the Russian censorship efforts by social media platforms are not indicative of significant changes with regard to online content moderation because the Ukraine invasion is a unique event.

Tech industry insiders say that if conservatives or others disagree with how major social media platforms are making content moderation decisions, they can jump to other platforms instead.

I can understand and relate to conservative frustrations with censorship, but we want private businesses to be their own arbiters of what content is appropriate or not, said Carl Szabo, vice president at NetChoice, a tech trade group that represents companies such as Facebook and Google.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

The marketplace is providing the solutions we want in terms of alternative platforms like Truth Social and others," Szabo said. "If youre not getting a square deal with one platform, you can always go to another thanks to competition."

Read more:
Conservatives fear censorship of Russians could be turned against them - Washington Examiner

Posted in Censorship | Comments Off on Conservatives fear censorship of Russians could be turned against them – Washington Examiner

YouTube’s Censorship Reflects Broad Problems With Big Tech – The Intercept

Posted: at 10:16 pm

Ryan Grim, left, and Robby Soave, right, host The Hills morning politics show Rising, in a screenshot from a YouTube broadcast in March 2022.

Photo: The Hill

The politics morning show Rising, produced by The Hill and which I currently co-host, was suspended by YouTube on Thursday for allegedly violating the platforms rules around election misinformation. Two infractions were cited: First, the outlet posted the full video of former President Donald Trumps recent speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference on its page. The speech, of course, was chock full of craziness. Second, Rising played a minutelong clip of Trumps commentary on Russias invasion of Ukraine, which included the claim that none of it would have happened if not for a rigged election.

As an American, Im angry about it and Im saddened by it, and it all happened because of a rigged election. This would have never happened, Trump says in the clip, which you can watch here.

The crime, we learned, that got the show suspended for seven days from its platform was that neither I nor my co-host, Robby Soave, paused to solemnly inform our viewers that Trumps phrase a rigged election referred to his ongoing claim that the election was stolen from him in 2020 and that this claim is false.

We did scrutinize Trumps claims. Along with a guest, The Federalists Emily Jashinsky, we discussed a theory floated by my Intercept colleague Murtaza Hussain that Trump is such a madman of such aggressive unpredictability that perhaps that instability did have some deterrent effect.

Later in the segment, we discussed the New York district attorneys apparent lack of enthusiasm for prosecuting Trump over bank fraud. I argued that whatever the outcome, If you ask the public, do you think Donald Trump would have inflated his property values when trying to get loans and deflated his property values when paying his taxes,youd probably get100 percent of people being like, yes, I suggested.

The notion that any viewer came away from watching that segment with the mistaken idea that Trump whom we described as a fraudster and an actual madman had indeed won the election and that ithad been stolen from him cant be taken seriously. Its absurd, and The Hill is appealing the decision, so far with no success. But YouTubes approach reflects a broad problem with Big Techs approach to censorship: It has nothing but contempt for the viewer. If we had paused to note that Trumps gripe about his election loss was unfounded, what voter who previously believed that claim would be convinced by my simple rejection of it? And who was the person to begin with who was not previously aware that Trump disputes the election outcome? It might possibly be the most known political fact in America.

De-platforming any mention of a rigged election hasnt done anything to slow the theory down. Since YouTube and other platforms cracked down on Trumps election fraud nonsense in late 2020, the belief that the election was rigged has only grown, particularly among Republicans. And the policy has actuallystifled a rational response. As Soave pointed out in Reason, Not only does YouTube punish channels that spread misinformation, but in many cases, it also punishes channels that report on the spread of misinformation.

Last year YouTube came down hard on a wide swath of progressive content creators who had mentioned Trumps claims in order to debunk them. The independent outlet Status Coup, which captured some of the most revealing footage of the January 6 riot at the Capitol photojournalist Jon Farinagave a riveting interview to our podcast Deconstructed that evening licensed much of that footage to cable and network news outlets but was suspended for posting it on its own channel. Covering the event,Status Coupwas told, was tantamount to advancing false claims of election fraud. And so the left was disincentivized from talking at all on YouTube a major source of news particularly for young people about the election or about the January 6 assault, while the right has moved off into other ecosystems.

YouTube created the very mess it now claims its new policies are aimed at cleaning up.

As an aside, news outlets that post and house raw feeds of political events, like C-SPAN, are to me as a reporter invaluable. Long before I co-hostedRising, I found The Hills prolific posting of speeches and press conferences immensely useful. That YouTube wants to end that in order to spare fragile minds from the direct words of politicians is a tragedy for the public, for journalism, and for future historians. (Byits own rules,itought to de-platform C-SPANs channel, but thats probably too idiotic even for YouTube. Or maybe not.)

YouTubes preening is also maddeningly hypocritical. To a quite significant degree, YouTube created the very mess it now claimsits new policies are aimed at cleaning up. In the early days of the platform, YouTube did all it could to funnel viewers to Loose Change, the film arguing that 9/11 was an inside job, helping make it a phenomenally influential take. Conspiracy garbage on Covid-19 vaccines, Davos, flat Earth is favored content by YouTube to this day, because it engages viewers for hours on end. The most reliable way to draw viewers in the politics space over the past year has been to play footsie with all manner of vaccine-related conspiracies, and the pull of the algorithm has drawn entire swaths of commentators into its maw.

YouTube pretends not to like this, and to have rules about it, and yetit programsits algorithm to actively encourage people to tiptoe right up to that line but dont tell creators where exactly that line is and when one crosses it, they get hit with a sniper round from a moderator. The carcass becomes a warning to other hosts but a warning of what? Of whos in charge.

Moderation is reasonable as a principle. If YouTube doesnt want, say, porn on its site, nobody has a constitutional right to post porn there. If YouTube was interested in some sort of moderation that was intended to discourage flagrant lies from getting a boost from the algorithm and thats the key; again, its discussed as a black-and-white speech debate, but its largely about boost and suppression there are waysit can do this. But its not.

YouTube is obviously failing at its stated goal of producing reliable, accurate, informed content, but not because it doesnt know how to do it. It doesnt know how to do it and also maximize profits all of which is more evidence thatits flamboyant moderation decisions are all political posturing to fend off pressure for regulation. YouTube has long wanted the crazy stuff, because thats what pays the bills, and as a result its played a role in the crazy-making of our politics.

Now I get the sense and with an opaque algorithm, thats all you can have that YouTube is done with political content. Its more trouble than its worth. A platform fueled by gamers and reaction videos is less likely to fuel a ransacking of the Capitol and less likely to produce the real concern, a corporate-advertising exodus and just as able to bring in money. The conservative movement has already accepted this reality and is now building rival video platforms to hostitscontent, further polarizing politics. The left, though, has no serious backup plan, only calls for Big Tech to do more.

Here is the original post:
YouTube's Censorship Reflects Broad Problems With Big Tech - The Intercept

Posted in Censorship | Comments Off on YouTube’s Censorship Reflects Broad Problems With Big Tech – The Intercept

Ukrainian academics face exile, harassment and censorship in ongoing war – The Conversation

Posted: at 10:16 pm

Protests at universities and statements from the International Science Council denouncing Russias invasion of Ukraine point to the beginning of a massive refugee crisis and also raise urgent questions about how the conflict will affect Ukraines scholars and research.

Following the Feb. 24 invasion, which has now resulted in more than 1.7 million Ukrainians fleeing the country, Ukraines universities and researchers are being seriously affected with the widespread displacement of faculty and students,and a suspension of all activities.

The full extent of the damage on scholars and research will not be known for some time, but predictions are grim.

Read more: Russian capture of Ukraine's Chernobyl nuclear plant threatens future research on radioactivity and wildlife

Our research expertises are in exploring challenges associated with refugee and migrant integration into dominant societies and in intellectual traditions and the rise of populism.

We also advocate with, and for, refugee and displaced scholars fleeing conflict zones or repressive political circumstances, particularly those perceived as threatening to regimes and extremist groups, and who are at risk of being targeted as a result.

One of us, Karly, co-founded the Young Academy of Scotlands At-Risk Academic and Refugee Membership and is working on the At-Risk and Displaced Academics and Artists program for the Royal Society of Canadas College of New Scholars, Artists and Scientists. The other, Evren, has first-hand experience with dislocation as a displaced scholar from Turkey, and organizes lectures and panels exploring the challenges displaced scholars face in host countries.

Many of Ukraines researchers likely face exile, various forms of harassment or worse; a similar fate will likely await Russian colleagues who try to help them.

These predictions are based on what has happened before in countries facing war, conflict or political turmoil and strife including, in recent years, Syria, Venezuela, Hungary, Ethiopia and Turkey.

When a war or conflict erupts, educational institutions such as schools and universities are primary military targets. The United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) notes that attacking schools and universities enables extremists to spread fear and indoctrinate new recruits.

Iraqs Mosul University was targeted by the Islamic State and its library destroyed in 2014.

Canada was one of 113 countries to endorse UNESCOs 2015 Safe Schools Declaration calling on countries to protect schools and universities from military use during armed conflict.

Universities are also subjected to intellectual dismantling. At the extreme, in countries like Syria, this occurs through the targeted harassment, kidnapping or even murder of professors, researchers and students whose work is perceived as being at odds with the messaging of the regime or authoritarian government.

Numerous women and LGBTQ+ researchers from various countries have told us they feel vulnerable to acts of violence and segregation because of their sex or how they identify or because of their research in the fields of LGBTQ+ or womens rights.

The International Science Council notes that early-career researchers without well-established networks often find themselves in highly precarious situations when conflicts erupt.

Being able to criticize government policy, to research subjects that are controversial or critical of an authoritarian government or toadvocate in fields like womens health is not a freedom that all academics and students possess.

As the Scholars at Risk Academic Freedom Monitoring Project shows, researcher displacement through war, conflict and targeted violence is a persistent, longstanding issue. Sample data collected from September 2020 to August 2021identified 332 attacks from 272 verified incidents in 65 countries a small subset of all attacks on higher education.

The consequences of these kinds of systemic attacks, due to armed conflict and academic censorship within countries, are severe because not only is immense human capital lost, but global research capacity is undermined.

Academic censorship often targets individual researchers whose political beliefs, activism or research does not align with the narrative that the regime or authoritarian government wishes to advance.

Credible estimates suggest there are at least 10,000 displaced scientists worldwide, but the number is likely much higher.

When a crisis hits, countless people end up internally displaced or in bordering countries. In the past decade, some of the major flashpoints have been Syria, Turkey, Yemen and Venezuela.

Ukraine is experiencing a similar mass displacement now, as many of its citizens seek refuge in other parts of the country or in neighbouring countries such as Poland, Slovakia and Hungary.

Some scholars fleeing conflict also end up in Canada. The Government of Canada and Canadian academia needs a shared commitment to recognizing research all disciplines as a universal undertaking, and to providing safe spaces for persecuted scholars to continue their work.

We are aware of numerous initiatives where some Canadian universities independently or in partnership with NGOs, provide support to displaced researchers through lectureships, visiting professorships, lab assistant roles or postdoctoral fellowships. The support is short term, usually for one, two or three years.

As far as we are aware, there is no systemic research documenting these initiatives across Canada.

While this kind of support is essential, long-term structures recognizing the various needs of scholars at risk are needed both in their home countries and in host countries.

Both Canada and academics in particular need to do more now because our colleagues in Ukraine, Syria, Yemen, Venezuela, Turkey, Ethiopia and many other countries are having, or have had, their academic freedom and rights to research stolen from them, with grave consequences for all of us.

It is essential that Canadians recognize that the Canadian research enterprise extends far beyond our own borders and we have a responsibility to make space for scholars at risk.

Academics and academic organizations in Canada have an important role to play in advocating for substantial support and getting started is easy. They can advocate for academic freedom in partnership with vulnerable colleagues, join or connect with NGOs such as Scholars At Risk or Scholar Rescue Fund, and work within universities to provide research positions or studentships to those forced to flee.

Academics can reach out to colleagues in dangerous situations to ask them what their needs are carefully, so as not to put them in more danger and they can read more history.

Additionally, hiring committees can spend more time reviewing applications that come in from displaced colleagues and take time to consider how they might enhance research and teaching.

When formal routes of diplomacy are severed or severely disrupted through war and conflict, its critical that researchers keep building relationships with one another. When this involves scientists and shared policy building that affects global networks, this is known as grassroots science diplomacy.

This can matter enormously. It can lay the groundwork for peace, and preserving essential research that collectively benefits societies and people across borders.

Read more here:
Ukrainian academics face exile, harassment and censorship in ongoing war - The Conversation

Posted in Censorship | Comments Off on Ukrainian academics face exile, harassment and censorship in ongoing war – The Conversation

Letter to the editor: Censorship is un-American – TribLIVE

Posted: at 10:16 pm

On Jan. 6, 2021, extremists assaulted our Capitol. Understandably, media coverage was extensive, and even now can make the news. While I cannot equate Jan. 6 to Pearl Harbor or 9/11 as did Vice President Kamala Harris, it was undeniably horrific. An American icon was attacked, a woman was killed, $1.5 million of damage resulted, and officers and Congress experienced real terror. Outrage was palpable.

Thankfully, the media keeps us informed.

Are you sure?

After George Floyds criminal death, lawful protests by unified Americans were everywhere. But sadly, after a Portland, Ore., vigil on May 29, 2020, violence erupted, continuing nightly for months. Overall, media reported variations of mostly peaceful protests as described by one correspondent; curiously, fires raged behind him as he spoke. In contrast, APs Mike Balsamo described fireworks and projectiles coming so fast that officers couldnt react quickly enough, injuring several. Five federal buildings were attacked with damage assessed at $2.3 million; one group attempted to set the Multnomah County Justice Center on fire, with workers inside. Where was the outrage?

Theres more. In Portland, people like you and me endured damaged livelihoods. The Portland Business Alliance reported the downtown area lost more than $23 million from vandalism and lost revenue during the protests. Again, where was outrage?

No incidents are identical, but facts should be reported as straightforwardly as possible. We are Americans, and slanting news in any direction is censorship. Americans demand better. When the media chooses what they want us to know, that is censorship. Censorship is not American, no matter your political views. Its time everyone remembers that.

Mary Rita Turka

Murrysville

Go here to see the original:
Letter to the editor: Censorship is un-American - TribLIVE

Posted in Censorship | Comments Off on Letter to the editor: Censorship is un-American – TribLIVE