Monthly Archives: February 2022

Majority of Japanese unhappy with progress of booster shots – survey – Reuters

Posted: February 24, 2022 at 2:52 am

Local residents register to receive the booster shot of the Moderna coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccine at a mass vaccination center operated by Japanese Self-Defense Force, in Tokyo, Japan, January 31, 2022. Eugene Hoshiko/Pool via REUTERS

Register

TOKYO, Feb 21 (Reuters) - Most Japanese think the rollout of booster shots against COVID-19 is too slow and many give mixed reviews to Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's handling of the pandemic, including last week's decision to ease border rules, a poll showed.

Anger over the Japanese government's handling of the coronavirus pandemic helped sink the administration of Kishida's predecessor, Yoshihide Suga, and Kishida faces a crucial election for the upper house of parliament in July.

About 73% of respondents to a Kyodo news agency opinion poll over the weekend felt Japan's rollout of booster shots has been far too slow, though 54.1% approved of how the government had tackled the coronavirus overall.

Register

Only 14.4% of the population has received booster shots even though nearly 30% of the country is 65 or older and at greater risk without the protection of the booster. read more

Kishida, who has repeatedly promised to accelerate the booster programme, told a news conference last week he has yet to receive his booster, but should get one early in March.

The booster programme has picked up steam in recent days, with more than 700,000 shots a day - nearing Kishida's goal of 1 million by the end of February. Still, February became the deadliest month of the pandemic for Japan on Saturday, with 3,033 deaths so far this month.

Nearly half of respondents to the two-day telephone survey said it was "too early" to loosen border controls, which have among been the strictest among wealthy nations but were slammed by businesses and educators, a move set to take place in stages from March 1.

About 45.7% said the decision, which will open borders to foreigners except for tourists, came too early, Kyodo said, while 34.9% said it was "appropriate" and 16.3% saw it as too late.

Overall, Kishida's support rose slightly to 56.6% although disapproval of his government edged up 2.2 points to 27.4%.

Register

Reporting by Elaine Lies, additional reporting by Rocky Swift, Editing by Gerry Doyle and Lincoln Feast.

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

View original post here:

Majority of Japanese unhappy with progress of booster shots - survey - Reuters

Posted in Progress | Comments Off on Majority of Japanese unhappy with progress of booster shots – survey – Reuters

Work starts on new U.S. House map, with hints of progress on state legislative maps – Hamilton Journal News

Posted: at 2:52 am

In line with 2020 census results, Ohio must lose one of its 16 U.S. House districts. Legislators passed a new 15-district map in November, but on Jan. 14 the court struck it down as unfairly gerrymandered to favor Republicans. The court made has also separately ruled twice against new Ohio state legislative maps on the same grounds. All of those maps were Republican proposals approved without any Democratic support.

In Congress, Ohio is represented by 12 Republican and four Democrats. The overturned map would have likely created 11 Republican seats and four Democratic ones. In their 4-3 ruling, justices said the maps partisan breakdown should more closely resemble the way Ohioans have recently voted in statewide elections, which is about 54% Republican to 46% Democratic.

The U.S. House map was approved by the General Assembly, but by failing to approve a new version by Feb. 13, legislators threw the task back to the redistricting commission.

Not only did that give the commission another 30 days to settle on a map, Cupp said, but a plan approved by commissioners and deemed acceptable by the state supreme court could go into effect immediately. That would be in time for the May 3 primary election, but a plan approved by less than two-thirds of the General Assembly would not go into effect for 90 days. Cupp has previously said he didnt think he could get the two-thirds majority needed for emergency implementation.

On Feb. 18, the court ordered the redistricting commission to file a response by noon Wednesday showing cause as to why the commission and its members should not be found in contempt. The issue is over why the commissions members did not meet the courts Feb. 17 deadline to approve new state House and Senate maps that meet state constitutional standards and fairly reflect Ohioans overall voting preferences.

The Ohio Redistricting Commission, established by the 2015 constitutional amendment that sought to reduce partisan gerrymandering, consists of Cupp, Sykes, Senate President Matt Huffman, R-Lima; House Minority Leader Allison Russo, D-Upper Arlington; Gov. Mike DeWine; Auditor Keith Faber and Secretary of State Frank LaRose. Republicans outnumber Democrats on the commission 5-2.

Commission members did not say directly what, if any, response they plan to submit. But on Tuesday DeWine repeated what he said at the commissions Feb. 17 meeting, after Republicans rejected a Democratic proposal for state House and Senate maps and failed to submit one of their own.

We have an obligation to follow the constitution, we have an obligation to follow the court orders and finally we have an obligation to produce a map, he said.

Faber moved to reconvene the commission at 4 p.m. Wednesday and 9 a.m. Thursday.

Cupp said Wednesdays meeting would have a dual purpose: a public hearing for a new U.S. House map, and a progress report on new state House and Senate maps.

Faber indicated that maps submitted by one of the plaintiffs who challenged the commissions earlier efforts may be used as a template for the upcoming discussion. Justices specifically referred in their majority opinion to a map proposal by Jonathan Rodden, a professor of political science at Stanford University, as coming close to what they were looking for.

Faber said Roddens plan would likely produce 56 Republican and 43 Democratic seats in the state House. It would probably result in 18 Republican and 15 Democratic seats in the state Senate.

Currently Republicans hold 64 of the 99 House seats and 25 of the 33 Senate seats.

The maps overturned Feb. 7 would give Republicans the advantage in 57 House and 20 Senate districts, but 12 of the proposed Democratic-leaning House and four of the Senate districts would favor Democrats by razor-thin margins, while none of the Republican-leaning seats would be so close.

Russo said Democrats and their legislative staff have still not been been included in any talks on new state legislative maps, and asked for Republican cooperation.

Following the meeting, Sykes said to reach a consensus that would pass court muster, new maps had to have input from all parties.

It should be a commission plan, he said.

See original here:

Work starts on new U.S. House map, with hints of progress on state legislative maps - Hamilton Journal News

Posted in Progress | Comments Off on Work starts on new U.S. House map, with hints of progress on state legislative maps – Hamilton Journal News

Draymond making ‘good progress’ in injury recovery – NBC Sports Bay Area

Posted: at 2:52 am

Draymond Green is inching closer to returning to the hardwood.

After missing the last 20 games, the Warriors' veteran forward gave a positive update on his rehab on Saturday.

I feel good, Green told reporters. I feel really good. Im making a lot of good progress. Im just kind of building back.

The Warriors announced earlier this week that they anticipate him returning sometime after the All-Star break.

Golden State, who has a 13-7 record since Draymonds absence, can definitely use the help.

But even though the Dubs desperately need their defensive anchor back on the court with them, Draymond isnt rushing his recovery.

I don't really have an exact date, Green said. Ive just been taking it week by week and just going along as I progress. I'm really starting to ramp my workouts up more and more so Ill just continue to do that through this break and coming out of the break, Ill see where that falls. Definitely feeling really good where Im at so just continue to work. When I'm ready. But I'm not going to rush back to try and get out there.

Download and follow the Dubs Talk Podcast

Originally posted here:

Draymond making 'good progress' in injury recovery - NBC Sports Bay Area

Posted in Progress | Comments Off on Draymond making ‘good progress’ in injury recovery – NBC Sports Bay Area

Curious Kids: could we change other planets in the Solar System so we could live on them? – The Conversation UK

Posted: at 2:50 am

Can we terraform other planets so that the human race can spread around the Solar System? Xander, aged 14, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

Of the eight planets in the Solar System, we live on Earth, and for good reasons. It has the perfect conditions for life.

Right now, though, we are sculpting Earths surface by deforestation, and changing its atmosphere by adding carbon dioxide, methane and other greenhouse gases. These changes have resulted in global warming, which might lead us to worry that in the future, Earth may not be such a good place for us to live.

Curious Kids is a series by The Conversation that gives children the chance to have their questions about the world answered by experts. If you have a question youd like an expert to answer, send it to curiouskids@theconversation.com and make sure you include the askers first name, age and town or city. We wont be able to answer every question, but well do our very best.

Perhaps this ability to change a planet could make somewhere else in the Solar System suitable for us to live. This planet engineering is called terraforming.

In our Solar System, the most similar planets to Earth are Mars, which is a bit further from the Sun, and Venus, which is a bit closer to the Sun. However, they are still very different to Earth.

There are a lot of ways in which these planets are different to Earth. One is the gases that are in the atmosphere. Both the atmosphere of Mars and that of Venus are mainly made of carbon dioxide. Neither planets atmosphere contains any amounts of oxygen to speak of, which means that right now, we wouldnt be able to breathe on either planet.

Mars is generally considered the most promising planet to terraform. However, as well as being made mostly of carbon dioxide, the atmosphere on Mars is very thin. It doesnt press down on the planet with the same weight that the atmosphere on Earth does.

This pressure from the atmosphere is what keeps water on Earth liquid so we can drink it, and plants can use it to grow. Nearly all of the water on Mars is ice, except for a bit of water vapour in the atmosphere.

In order to create an atmosphere that we could breathe in, and to create enough pressure to keep water liquid, we would need to pump a lot of air into Mars atmosphere a mixture of nitrogen and oxygen until the atmosphere was about as heavy as Earths.

It might be possible to find this nitrogen and oxygen on Mars, which has soil that has been found to contain significant amounts of nitrate a molecule of one nitrogen and three oxygen atoms.

But there would be problems with doing this, including taking nutrients out of the soil that might be needed to grow plants.

Mars is also a very cold place, with an average temperature of about -60.

To change this, we would need to help its atmosphere trap heat. This is called the greenhouse effect. We could do this by pumping more carbon dioxide and methane into it (methane has been found on Mars). This would warm Mars and melt much of its ice, creating a water cycle like in Earths climate. Mars would have seas, rivers and rainfall like Earth.

Alternatively, we could think about terraforming Venus. The gravity of Venus is quite similar to that on Earth, but for reasons not fully understood it has an atmosphere almost a hundred times heavier than Earths. The weight of the atmosphere pressing down on us would crush us.

To reduce the weight of the atmosphere on Venus to be more like Earths atmosphere, we would need to remove the carbon dioxide and some of the nitrogen.

Unfortunately, if we knew how to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere on such massive scale, we would be better off doing that on Earth in order to slow down global warming.

Mars and Venus have reached a natural state that differs from Earths. If we turn them into Earth-like planets it means taking them out of balance. Left alone, they would change again. A terraformed Mars or Venus would require constant effort to maintain.

It would be far simpler and easier to build an artificial space colony, big enough to hold a whole ecosystem made up of plants, animals and other forms of life. We could then even possibly travel to another star system, where we might find a planet more like Earth. But we do not have the ability to do this, yet.

Until then, the best kind of terraforming would be to reduce humankinds imprint on Earth.

Originally posted here:

Curious Kids: could we change other planets in the Solar System so we could live on them? - The Conversation UK

Posted in Terraforming Mars | Comments Off on Curious Kids: could we change other planets in the Solar System so we could live on them? – The Conversation UK

People Trust Deepfake Faces Generated by AI More Than Real Ones, Study Finds – Singularity Hub

Posted: at 2:49 am

The proliferation of deepfake technology is raising concerns that AI could start to warp our sense of shared reality. New research suggests AI-synthesized faces dont simply dupe us into thinking theyre real people, we actually trust them more than our fellow humans.

In 2018, Nvidia wowed the world with an AI that could churn out ultra-realistic photos of people that dont exist. Its researchers relied on a type of algorithm known as a generative adversarial network (GAN), which pits two neural networks against each other, one trying to spot fakes and the other trying to generate more convincing ones. Given enough time, GANS can generate remarkably good counterfeits.

Since then, capabilities have improved considerably, with some worrying implications: enabling scammers to trick people, making it possible to splice people into porn movies without their consent, and undermining trust in online media. While its possible to use AI itself to spot deepfakes, tech companies failures to effectively moderate much less complicated material suggests this wont be a silver bullet.

That means the more pertinent question is whether humans can spot the difference, and more importantly how they relate to deepfakes. The results from a new study in PNAS are not promisingresearchers found that peoples ability to detect fakes was no better than a random guess, and they actually rated the made-up faces as more trustworthy than the real ones.

Our evaluation of the photorealism of AI-synthesized faces indicates that synthesis engines have passed through the uncanny valley and are capable of creating faces that are indistinguishableand more trustworthythan real faces, the authors wrote.

To test reactions to fake faces, the researchers used an updated version of Nvidias GAN to generate 400 of them, with an equal gender split and 100 faces each from four ethnic groups: Black, Caucasian, East Asian, and South Asian. They matched each of these with real faces pulled from the database that was originally used to train the GAN, which had been judged to be similar by a different neural network.

They then recruited 315 participants from the Amazon Mechanical Turk crowdsourcing platform. Each person was asked to judge 128 faces from the combined dataset and decide if they were fake or not. They achieved an accuracy rate of just 48 percent, actually worse than the 50 percent you should get from a random guess.

Deepfakes often have characteristic defects and glitches that can help people single them out. So the researchers carried out a second experiment with another 219 participants where they gave them some basic training in what to look out for before getting them to judge the same number of faces. Their performance improved only slightly, to 59 percent.

In a final experiment, the team decided to see if more immediate gut reactions to faces might give people better clues. They decided to see whether trustworthinesssomething we typically decide in a split second based on hard-to-pin-down featuresmight help people make better calls. But when they got another 223 participants to rate the trustworthiness of 128 faces, they found people actually rated the fake ones 8 percent more trustworthy, a small but statistically significant difference.

Given the nefarious uses deepfakes can be put to, that is a worrying finding. The researchers suggest that part of the reason why the fake faces are rated more highly is because they tend to look more like average faces, which previous research has found people tend to trust more. This was born out by looking at the four most untrustworthy faces, which were all real, and the three most trustworthy, which were all fake.

The researchers say their findings suggest that those developing the underlying technology behind deepfakes need to think hard about what theyre doing. An important first step is to ask themselves whether the benefits of the technology outweigh its risks. The industry should also consider building in safeguards, which could include things like getting deepfake generators to add watermarks to their output.

Because it is the democratization of access to this powerful technology that poses the most significant threat, we also encourage reconsideration of the often laissez-faire approach to the public and unrestricted releasing of code for anyone to incorporate into any application, the authors wrote.

Unfortunately though, it might be too late for that. Publicly-available models are already capable of producing highly convincing deepfakes, and it seems unlikely that well be able to put the genie back in the bottle.

Image Credit: geralt / 23929 images

Looking for ways to stay ahead of the pace of change? Rethink whats possible. Join a highly curated, exclusive cohort of 80 executives for Singularitys flagship Executive Program (EP), a five-day, fully immersive leadership transformation program that disrupts existing ways of thinking. Discover a new mindset, toolset and network of fellow futurists committed to finding solutions to the fast pace of change in the world. Click here to learn more and apply today!

Follow this link:

People Trust Deepfake Faces Generated by AI More Than Real Ones, Study Finds - Singularity Hub

Posted in Singularity | Comments Off on People Trust Deepfake Faces Generated by AI More Than Real Ones, Study Finds – Singularity Hub

Japan Wants to Make Half Its Cargo Ships Autonomous by 2040 – Singularity Hub

Posted: at 2:49 am

The Covid-19 pandemic brought into sharp focus how unavoidably global the world economy has become. Production freezes on one side of the globe wreaked havoc on the other, and supply chains havent yet recovered. Some countries are looking to bring production of crucial goods back onto domestic soil, but that doesnt mean the movement of products across international borders will stop, nor even slow.

The UNs International Maritime Organization estimates that over 90 percent of this movement takes place on ships; maritime transport, it says, is by far the most cost-effective way to move en masse goods and raw materials around the world. Ships may be cheaper than planes (or, if one startup has its way, autonomous cargo drones), but theyre far slower.

They also produce a lot of pollution. The fuel ships use contains more sulfur than that used in cars, meaning fewer ships do a lot more environmental damage. A Japanese public-interest group called the Nippon Foundation has set out to remedy this; the group is backing Japans development of autonomous ships, aiming for these to make up half of the countrys local fleet by 2040.

On top of the environmental concerns, Japan has an added motivation for this push towards automationits aging population and concurrent low birth rates mean its workforce is rapidly shrinking, and the implications for the countrys economy arent good.

Thus it behooves the Japanese to automate as many job functions as they can (and the rest of the world likely wont be far behind, though they wont have quite the same impetus). According to the Nippon Foundation, more than half of Japanese ship crew members are over the age of 50.

In partnership with Misui OSK Lines Ltd., the foundation recently completed two tests of autonomous ships. The first was a 313-foot container ship called the Mikage, which sailed 161 nautical miles from Tsuruga Port, north of Kyoto, to Sakai Port near Osaka. Upon reaching its destination port the ship was even able to steer itself into its designated bay, with drones dropping its mooring line.

The Mikage wasnt purpose-built to be autonomous; the seven-year-old ship was retrofitted with a system of sensors, cameras, and satellite navigation. It followed a carefully-planned route while a control center on land monitored relevant wind, current, and weather data, as well as details on nearby ships and potential obstacles.

Similar to how its easier for self-driving cars to operate autonomously on highways than in unpredictable urban settings, the Mikage didnt have too hard of a time navigating itself through open waters. The ships biggest challenge was getting itself in and out of ports; for this, its navigation software calculated and visually displayed the distances and angles between the pier and the ships hull.

The foundation tested a second crewless ship this month. The Suzaku, which was built in 2019 and recently retrofitted to be autonomous, sailed from Tokyo Bay to Ise Bay.

Japan isnt the first nation to start testing autonomous ships (though it is the only one with the ambitious goal of 50 percent autonomy); in 2018 Norway started trials of a small electric container ship called the Yara Birkeland, which is now undergoing additional testing before it can be certified for commercial operations. In 2018 Rolls Royce announced a partnership with Intel to build autonomous ships, launching a system called Intelligent Awareness that helps ships navigate without human help.

Now that multiple companies and countries are developing autonomous shipping technology, the next step is to get the ball rolling on regulations for the seafaring vessels, as they wont be able to leave coastal waters until theres an internationally agreed-upon set of rules for their operation.

Image Credit: PublicDomainPictures / 17902 images

Continued here:

Japan Wants to Make Half Its Cargo Ships Autonomous by 2040 - Singularity Hub

Posted in Singularity | Comments Off on Japan Wants to Make Half Its Cargo Ships Autonomous by 2040 – Singularity Hub

How Long is Horizon Forbidden West: Every Main Quest in the Game – Attack of the Fanboy

Posted: at 2:49 am

How long does it take to beat Horizon Forbidden West? Aloys second adventure is a much more expansive outing than her 2017 debut title, and Guerrillas latest game is packed with plenty to see and do. The main story alone will take you quite some time to experience from start to finish, and its hard not to get distracted with all the side content that the Forbidden West has to offer. Horizon Forbidden West is a massive game, but how long will it take you to complete?

The main story of Horizon Forbidden West can be completed in roughly 20-25 hours. That estimate is for players who ignore all of the games side content and prioritize Aloys main journey through the Forbidden West. Given the games size, however, most people will get wrapped up in at least a few side quests.

If you play the game normally, completing a handful of side quests and optional activities like Cauldrons, Rebel Camps, and Tallnecks, then your playtime can reach 40 hours or longer depending on how far you deviate from the main path. If you want to complete every side activity, upgrade all of your gear, and get the platinum trophy, then youre looking at an estimated 80 hours or more with Horizon Forbidden West.

To recap, heres how long it will take to finish Horizon Forbidden West.

There are 17 main story missions in Horizon Forbidden West and each of them is listed below. Beware that the list below may contain minor spoilers.

The final main story quest, Singularity, is a level 35 mission. Thats not the maximum level in Horizon Forbidden West, but its still up there. Youll likely have to do at least a few side activities in order to reach an appropriate level to finish the main story. Thankfully, there is no shortage of optional activities in Horizon Forbidden West, and most people will end up engaging in at least a few side quests on their journey anyway.

Horizon Forbidden Westis available now on PS4 and PS5.

RELATED TOPICS :

Home / GAME GUIDES / How Long is Horizon Forbidden West: Every Main Quest in the Game

More here:

How Long is Horizon Forbidden West: Every Main Quest in the Game - Attack of the Fanboy

Posted in Singularity | Comments Off on How Long is Horizon Forbidden West: Every Main Quest in the Game – Attack of the Fanboy

Financial Independence Spreadsheet – Mad Fientist

Posted: at 2:47 am

This page explains how to use my personal financial independence spreadsheet.

If you havent already downloaded the spreadsheet, click here to download now!

The first tab in the spreadsheet is where you record your monthly account balances and calculate your net worth.

Luckily, this step is easy because Personal Capital* aggregates all of your accounts for you.

If you dont have a Personal Capital account, you can sign up for free here. Its the best tool Ive found for managing my portfolio so I definitely recommend it.

To fill out this page of the spreadsheet, copy the previous months column, change the column header to the current month, and then populate the fields that have a green background with the latest data from Personal Capital.

Note: You should only update the cells that have a light green background because all other fields have formulas and will update automatically.

In addition to computing your net worth, this tab also shows how much of your money is liquid (i.e. you could access immediately) vs. illiquid (i.e. harder to get at, like money in your 401(k)).

The Investments tab uses the values on the Net Worth tab to provide a picture of where your money is located and what youre invested in.

The Investments tab computes the totals of each type of investment account (e.g. taxable, tax-deferred, etc.) so you can get an idea of how your money will be taxed when you eventually withdraw it.

This sheet is where you can keep track of how much of your HSA you can withdraw early (see this post for how I use my HSA as an investment account) and how much money youve contributed to your Roth IRA (which can also be withdrawn at any time). These are the only two values that you need to update on this tab because everything else is calculated automatically from previously-entered data.

The Investments tab also automatically computes your asset allocation so you can use this sheet for portfolio rebalancing.

Finally, the Investments tab computes the total amount of money available before and after standard retirement age (remember thoughif you plan to retire early and want to access your tax-deferred money sooner, there are ways to do that).

The Averages tab is where you record your monthly spending.

This step is really important because you cant determine if youre financially independent without knowing how much you spend every year.

To make this step easier, I use Mint.com to categorize my monthly expenses.

Personal Capital can do the same thing but since I started using Mint before Personal Capital came out, Ive just continued using it for this purpose.

There are a few interesting calculations that occur on this tab that are worth explaining

The FI tab is the final tab in the spreadsheet and also the most important.

Here, your monthly expenses are annualized and your Time to FI number is calculated based on those expenses.

On this tab, you have to update the Withdrawal Rate and Growth Rate assumptions once but then youll never have to update anything again.

The FI tab is great for motivating you to lower your expenses because when you see that it will take an extra 1.2 years of work to permanently fund your expensive cable TV package, for example, youll probably be more likely to decrease that expense or eliminate it completely.

This tab also shows you how much youre spending on all the major spending categories (e.g. housing, car, etc.), which is really useful when making big lifestyle decisions.

For example, if you see that your car costs you over $500 per month but you dont use it that much, it may be worth calculating how much it would cost to take Ubers/Lyfts instead. Or, you could compare your total housing expenses to how much it could cost to travel and stay in Airbnbs full time and it may make more sense (and be more fun) to become a nomad instead.

Finally (and most importantly), this tab computes how long it will take you to reach FI!

Increase your income and/or lower your expenses to decrease your Years to FI number and walk away from your job even sooner!

For even more information about the spreadsheet, heres a short video I made about it:

I hope you get as much use out of this spreadsheet as I have.

If you run into any issues with formulas or if you dont have any software to open the .xls file, just upload the file to Google Sheets and use it there.

And if you want to easily chart out your progress to financial independence on a pretty graph, check out the FI Laboratory software I developed!

* If you sign up for a free Personal Capital account using the links provided in the post, this site may earn a commission. Thank you for your support!

More:

Financial Independence Spreadsheet - Mad Fientist

Posted in Financial Independence | Comments Off on Financial Independence Spreadsheet – Mad Fientist

Life After Financial Independence | White Coat Investor

Posted: at 2:47 am

A few years ago, The Physician on FIRE and I both became financially independent (FI). We are both 46; he became FI at 39 and I became FI at 42. In some ways, our pathways have diverged since then (he left medicine in 2019 just before turning 44 while I still practice). In other ways, our paths are very similar (we both now get most of our income from what used to be a side hustle). Today, we're going to reflect back on the last 4-7 years since we became FI. Whether you are already FI, already retired, or working toward those goals, we hope you will find this helpful.

Medicine has gone from being a job to being a well-paid hobby for me. I love to go into the emergency department and see my friends and talk about their families and the last trip they went on. I enjoy going in, sitting down, talking to my patients, and trying to help them find answers to their problems. I enjoy saving an occasional life or doing a needed procedure. I like thinking of myself as a doctor; it is a significant part of my identity. It seems a real waste to me to have spent 11 years in school and training learning how to do something and four years being ordered all over the planet to pay for it just to quit doing it because I don't need the money anymore.

Do I still get annoyed fighting the EMR or when the lab takes forever to do its job? Sure. Are there still plenty of patients who aren't very fun to take care of? Absolutely. But the upsides still dramatically outweigh the downsides for me. However, I'm only going to practice on my terms at this point. When I hit FI, I was working 3/4 time. Afterward, I went to just over half-time, and now I'm at 0.4 FTE working six, eight-hour shifts a month. I work almost exclusively day shifts with an occasional evening shift. I never work after 10 pm. I still do my (now much smaller) share of weekends and holidays, but I'd buy my way out of those if I could. If something particularly onerous were to happen (group lost contract, had to change jobs, multiple lawsuits), maybe I'd just walk away completely. Heck, maybe I'd walk away just due to being annoyed by a new EMR, inadequate staffing, or having to redo a board recertification. However, I'm happy for now to continue working with my friends to help a lot of people in my community who can benefit from my knowledge and skillset.

I did notice a subtle change in my attitude toward work once I realized that the work was completely optional. The small annoyances were things I simply had to live with during the first 10 years of my career.

Nod and smile and place a duplicate order in the computer because thats what the computer wants. Return the page at 0200 to answer a question that could be better answered by a different specialty and could have waited until morning, anyway. Log in for your annual compliance training, dragging and dropping the cartoonish blood-soaked gauze to the appropriate waste container for the sixth consecutive year.

When you depend on the money the job provides, those frustrating moments are necessary evils. You dont have much of a choice in the matter. When you reach a point where your investment portfolio is likely to outearn you in any given year, you question why you continue to put up with that nonsense.

Dont get me wrong; I had many rewarding experiences as an anesthesiologist, and I worked with a lot of great people and cared for some wonderful patients. Still, I always enjoyed my days off more than my workdays and my vacation weeks more than my busy work weeks.

After a nearly two-year trial in which I worked a seven-day workweek each month to better experience life away from the hospital most of the time, I fully retired from medicine in 2019 at the age of 43.

I respect those who continue to work long after reaching financial independence, and in some ways, I envy them. I dont know if theres any type of work Id want to do full-time if I had no need or use for the income it provided. Medicine was an excellent career for me, but I cant honestly say it was a calling.

FI was a surprising revelation to me when I learned about the concept and realized that we basically had it as I was approaching my 40th birthday.

Professionally and psychologically, I wasnt remotely ready to up and leave my job and career right then and there. I was only about a year into a new job, the best job Id had in anesthesia and in a community where I was happy to live.

My wife and I talked about what our future could look like if I werent working, and we came up with a roughly five-year plan for me to potentially make that exit. Spreadsheets were created, and projections were made. I figured Id probably have 40-50 years worth of expenses saved up by the time those five years were up. Thankfully, the stock market was more than cooperative during that timeframe.

After a year of calculation and contemplation, I started a blog to help spread the message of financial independence to my professional peers. I found that I rather enjoyed using this creative side of my brain, and Ive been consistently writing and publishing articles at Physician on FIRE for the better part of six years.

You might look at the site and figure that it looks like it takes a lot of work, and you would be right. I dont call myself a retired person, although the flexibility and freedom I now enjoy in this essentially stressless job Ive given myself feels a lot like retirement, as compared to the demands of the surgical suite.

I have learned that I like being productive in some way and dont like to sit idle for long. I may not be working in medicine, but I work on all sorts of things.

That work may be planning our first big post-pandemic trip, clearing brush on our wooded property, shuttling our kids from one activity to the next, or writing out my thoughts on work for The White Coat Investor.

The most meaningful shift for me has been the ability to choose what sort of work I do and when. Its up to me, its optional, and it's allowed me time to work on things that benefit me, like the exercise routine and language learning that Ive done consecutively for hundreds of days now.

I'm working as hard as I ever did. It is not uncommon for me to put in six hours of work before I go to the hospital or after I come home. Sure, I'm doing less medicine, but an enterprise like WCI, doing work that can be done at any time from anywhere with cell phone coverage, tends to swell to fill the space available to it. In fact, it was primarily the needs of WCI that led to me cutting my shifts at the hospital. I think work is an important part of life, and meaningful work is good for me, my family, and the community around me.

However, I am trying to keep work from interfering with anything else in my life I want to do. At this point, I need good health more than I need money. So, if work were keeping me from exercising, I should drop work. I need solid family relationships more than I need money. So, if work were keeping me from being there when my wife or kids need me, I should drop work. There are a lot of trips I want to go on and activities I enjoy. If work were keeping me from going on them, I should drop work. But as long as I can do everything I want to do while still working, I figure I'll keep working. However, I'm completely unemployable. The list of demands I would have for any possible future employer (32 weeks vacation, set my own schedule, work from home, etc.) would be so ridiculous that no one would ever hire me.

Not really. It's a little easier to hit the minimum investments for private real estate investments while maintaining diversification than it used to be. But that's about it. The majority of my portfolio is still a few boring index funds/ETFs like VTI, VXUS, VBR, and VSS.

Thats a great question, and if you had asked me a few years ago, I would say that not much has changed other than the account balances being a bit larger than they used to be.

However, Ive found that my appetite for risk has actually increased. Dr. William Bernsteins oft-quoted, If youve won the game, stop playing, is one school of thought that suggests its wise to dial down the risk once youre financially independent and invest more conservatively. Now, I wouldnt subject the roughly 30x expenses necessary to maintain FI to unnecessary risk. Ive got that and then some invested in index funds, holding stocks and bonds.

With some of the overagethat is, money beyond what we need to be considered financially independentIve invested in a mix of real estate deals and startups. The largest among those is an investment in Republic.co, a platform for investing in other startups, more mature pre-IPO companies, and cryptoassets. Ive since made several investments on the platform.

Ive previously hypothesized that my life wouldnt look a whole lot different if we were to have a lot more money. If some of these alternative investments pan out, I may have the opportunity to put that theory to the test. My guess is that the hypothesis would be proven wrong, to some extent.

A decade ago, I had no use for a nose and ear hair trimmer, and now Im on my second one. So theres that. Ive also got boys that are aging out of the kids menu, making dining out a more expensive endeavor.

As far as our overall spending habits, the frugal tendencies that my wife and I have thrived on for decades are hard habits to break. And if it aint broke, why fix it?

That being said, I can also see the folly of our frugal ways in certain circumstances in which it makes good sense to pay for convenience or quality rather than save a buck. We cant take those bucks with us, so Im trying to put them to use in instances where I might have taken the cheap route in the past.

Ive toyed with some mental math to alter the psychology of spending. I figure our net worth is at least 10x what it was a decade ago. Relative to our nest egg, things now cost 90% less than they did 10 years agomaybe 85% when accounting for inflation. That makes parting with money much less painful.

Of course, if I spent 10x more than I used to, our nest egg would be depleted in well under a decade. A better approach may be to use the 4% rule of thumb to determine what we can afford.

If we have 50x to 60x as much as we spend in a typical year, I know that we could double our spending and still have a relatively safe withdrawal rate. That also makes it easier to spend money I might not have a decade ago.

For sure, we spend differently. In fact, by any reasonable standard, the average American would say that we spend with wild abandon. When you know you have already taken care of business (student loans gone, mortgage paid off, kids' college funds full, retirement paid for, home renovation complete, boat and cars paid for) but you are still generating income, you can pretty much do whatever you want with it guilt-free. We basically buy whatever we want. Our budget process has little to do with budgeting and everything to do with cash-flow planning. We only need to know what we spent last month so we can calculate how much to save or give away this month. So that's basically what the process is.

Now we haven't bought a NetJets subscription and we're not into bottle service, but when we do buy stuff, we buy nice stuff. If there is a trip we want to go on, we don't worry about how we're going to pay for it. We just pay for it. We have house cleaners now, but we are also both working and, frankly, both hate to clean. It feels like a pretty luxurious life to us, but our life is honestly pretty affordable on just about any physician's salary. Imagine what you could do with your salary if you didn't have to save for retirement or make any payments. That's what our spending life is like.

Mo' money, mo' problems here. We're religious people, and so we feel God will hold us accountable for how we manage what we possess now and will possess in the future. As Jesus Christ noted after giving the Parable of the Steward,

For unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required

We have always been givers, but now we give away a multiple of what we spend every year. The recipient might be family or friends, it might be a local charity, or it might be a charity operating on the other side of the planet. We want our money to do good while we are still living and to go on doing good long after we are gone. We have used a Donor Advised Fund (DAF) to anonymize and facilitate the giving, and we are even contemplating putting a private charitable foundation in place. It'll never be the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, but we want to do what we can. We also involve our children in the giving process and expect that to continue as they move into adulthood. We are also preparing them to manage inheritances properly. We're with Warren Buffett in that we want to give them enough that they can do anything they want, but not so much that they can do nothing. They will be getting a test inheritance in the form of a UTMA when they leave home (the 20s fund), and how they do with that will likely affect how and how much they inherit later.

I lived in Florida during my anesthesia residency, and more than a few hurricanes impacted the state while I was there. I remember seeing a plea from the Red Cross asking for help with disaster relief.I didnt have much time to give, and I didnt have much money, either. Still, I went to the website and donated $50, and that felt pretty good.

I would continue to give where I thought I could make a difference, and in 2013, my wife and I started our first donor-advised fund, donating a bunch of suboptimal mutual funds that were not terribly tax-efficient. Before retiring from medicine, I made it a goal to have 10% of our desired nest egg in donor-advised funds.

We continue to give to and from our DAFs with Vanguard Charitable and Fidelity Charitable. Dr. Dahle and I use the accounts differently. He uses it largely as a pass-through account, whereas I think of ours as more of an endowmenta source of funds that will allow us to give generously for decades, regardless of our future income or lack thereof.

In terms of legacy, its my expectation, or at least my hope, that our children will be financially independent on their own long before our last will and testament is read. I like Warren Buffetts plan to leave his heirs enough money to be able to do anything but not enough to do nothing. Anything more would likely be given to charity, and Id prefer to give most of that while were among the living.

Mind the gap. Any combination of earning more or spending less that grows the gap between money in and money out will allow you to reach financial independence more quickly.

Just be sure to continue to do things that make you happy throughout your FI journey. It has been estimated that about 10% of your happiness can be attributed to life circumstances. In other words, while FI is amazing and a laudable goal, dont expect to be more than about 10% happier once youve achieved it.

Last, if you love your job and, therefore, have no interest in obtaining financial freedom, you ought to reconsider. Your job wont love you back, and it will very likely look a lot different five, 10, or 20 years from now.

Even if your job remains consistent and rewarding, you will change, as will your priorities. Financial independence is the insurance plan that protects you as your relationship with your career evolves.

There is no dramatic change that occurs the instant you hit your number and become FI. All the benefits of FI come gradually as you approach your number and continue even once you have hit it. I still think FI is a worthwhile goal, but the person you become while you work toward the goal is probably more important than actually hitting it. If you find yourself working solely to get to FI, you probably just need a new job and may even want to spend some time thinking about your career. Dr. Dike Drummond advises people to draw a Venn Diagram of their current life and their ideal life and then work so those two lives overlap as much as possible. I did that a few years ago and it has made all the difference. I don't have complete overlap yet, but I'm getting pretty darn close.

What do you think? If you are FI, how would you answer these questions? If you are not FI, does any of the above surprise you? Comment below!

Follow this link:

Life After Financial Independence | White Coat Investor

Posted in Financial Independence | Comments Off on Life After Financial Independence | White Coat Investor

Womens day: Manage finances jointly with your husband for a happy money life – Moneycontrol.com

Posted: at 2:47 am

It takes a lot to build a successful marriage. Most of us work towards harmonizing our hearts and minds. But we underestimate the role of money in marriage. Money may not be important, many of us claim. But joint finances are important, because in a marriage, both the spouses financial independence is equally important. It doesnt really matter if just one or both are earnings members.

Make sure you ascertain what his views on finances are. Find out whether he is a spender or a saver and then come to the conclusion on the way forward. You can discuss and figure out a mean, common path to managing your joint finances in future, says Preeti Zende, Founder, ApnaDhan Financial Services. You should also be transparent about any loans that you may be repaying prior to marriage and insist on your would-be husband sharing similar information with you.

Also listen: Women should take charge of personal and household money matters

Do you know where the money is?

Irrespective of whether you have an independent source of income or not, you must be clued into the financial decisions made for your household. You must be aware of various investments made and have easy access to the copies. Basically, if you are not handling joint finances, then should definitely get hold of account passwords, be aware of the (bank or mutual fund) portals and apps, demat statements and also have hard copies of such investments in place, advises financial planner Nisreen Mamaji, Founder, Moneyworks Financial Services.

You can create an excel sheet to record details of FDs, mutual fund investments, equity shares and so on. Make sure that you are the nominee for these investments, she adds.

Nominate, nominate, nominate

COVID-19 has already made many realise the importance of sharing details of their investments with their family as also keeping nominations updated. If you are newly married, do not be in a hurry to change the nomination in your husbands favour. You may be young, but it makes sense to create a Will to avoid disputes in future, says Zende.

Also read: How to write a fool-proof Will to pass on your assets smoothly

Do not club all your investments and expenses

Many a times, even financially independent women make the mistake of dividing household responsibilities in a manner that is detrimental to their interests.

For instance, the womans salary could be used for monthly expenses, while only the husbands money is invested for the couple and children. This may seem convenient in the short-term, but could lay the ground for disputes in future. It is best if both contribute to household expenses. Likewise, while you can have joint investments with your spouse, you must create wealth for yourself by investing in your own name too, says Zende.

Do not leave financial decision-making to your husband. If your investment philosophies and risk-taking appetites differ, you would need separate financial plans too. Information sharing helps financial planners devise more effective plans. Depending on the couples approach, we can draw up plans where the asset allocation is not duplicated, says Mamaji.

Have adequate life and health insurance covers in place

See the rest here:

Womens day: Manage finances jointly with your husband for a happy money life - Moneycontrol.com

Posted in Financial Independence | Comments Off on Womens day: Manage finances jointly with your husband for a happy money life – Moneycontrol.com