Monthly Archives: February 2022

PSACisrenewing its call formandatory training that would address systemic racism, harassment, and discrimination in the federal public serviceafter Treasury Board outright rejected the proposalat theCommon Issues bargainingtablein December.

Thistraining for all employees and managers would be facilitator-ledwith an intersectional approach,and coverimportant issuessuch asanti-oppression and discrimination, harassment and violence in the workplace, and Indigenous historythat alignswith the Truth and Reconciliation Commissionscall to action #57.

The employergavetheir decision just daysafterandindirectcontradiction tothe federal governmentspublic apologyfordecadesof sexual harassment,abuse,and workplace harassment at the Department of NationalDefence, andtheirpledgeof$40 billionto Indigenous child welfare.

Treasury Board is being completelydisingenuous,in one breath saying they're committed to doing betterand in the next discounting the value ofemployee and managertraining, saidPSAC National President Chris Aylward. They cant have it both ways. Either they supportthe long overdue needforchange in the public service, or theydont.And disappointingly, based on their blanket rejection of all training proposals,it seems theydont.

In response toourproposals,TreasuryBoardclaimed they already have many resources for employees. The employer also saidthat, despite their strong commitment to these issues, theyhave nointerest in enshriningtrainingintocollective agreements.However, thecourses currently offered by the governmentare often optional andarent taken by all federal public service workers, leaving large gaps in education that canand shouldbe addressedthroughmandatory training for all staff.

Thegovernmentsown2020Public Service Employee Surveyshowsthe importance of more training on these critical issues.Some56 per cent of respondentswerent satisfied with how their concerns or complaints about racism in the workplace were addressed.Of the respondentswhowerevictimsof discrimination,28 per cent experienced race-based discrimination and77per centexperienced it from individuals with authority over them.

Similar resultsemergedfromthe2021PSACMembership Bargaining Input Survey,with35 per cent of respondents who self-identified within an equity groupsayingtheyhaveexperienceddiscrimination in the federal public service,andone-third sayingtheir career progress in the federal public service has been adversely affected by discrimination.This comes as no surprise considering therecent launch of class actionlawsuitsby bothBlackandIndigenouspublic service workers.

The results are clear. The government still has a big problem when it comes to discrimination and harassment in the federal public service, and the optional resources that Treasury Board currently offers employees are not enough to close the gaps.

PSAC will continue to fightto ensure employers actively work to dismantlesystemicracism. Mandatory, intersectional anti-oppression and discrimination training for employees and managers is just one tool we can use to do that. Butit isan important and necessary one, andwewillcontinue to push for it at the table.

TheCommon Issuesbargaining team meets with the employer again February 13, 2022.

See the article here:

Treasury Board rejects proposal for mandatory training on anti-oppression and discrimination - Public Service Alliance of Canada

The Chinese government is using its power to shut down foreign reporting and targeting specific journalists with abuse, censure, physical assault and even expulsion, according to a new report into foreign press freedom in China.

The report warned of unprecedented hurdles facing the countrys foreign journalists as six chose to flee the country in 2021. A further nine said they had been sued or threatened with legal action by sources or government entities.

The country is also allegedly abusing health and safety rules enacted to fight Covid to restrict press freedom, including for reporters covering the genocide of Uyghur people in Xinjiang and those covering the virus outbreak in Wuhan.

The new report, from the Foreign Correspondents Club of China, titled Locked Down or Kicked Out, was based on survey responses provided by 127 out of the clubs 192 members.

The survey suggested there had been little change in Chinese restrictions on pandemic reporting since the first outbreak in Wuhan in December 2019, with correspondents regularly being prevented from visiting key sites in the region.

The main findings of the report were:

In its introduction, the report explained: Foreign correspondents are facing unprecedented hurdles covering China as a result of the governments efforts to block and discredit independent reporting.

As the number of journalists forced out by the Chinese state grows due to excessive intimidation or outright expulsions, covering China is increasingly becoming an exercise in remote reporting.

Growing public attacks reflect an emboldened Chinese government willing to go to great lengths to discredit foreign journalists and their work. Such criticism appears designed to pressure editors and managers at headquarters to dial back objective coverage of China.

It added: Covid-19 has been used frequently by authorities seeking to delay approvals for new journalist visas, shut down reporting trips, and decline interview requests Chinese authorities also appear to be encouraging a spate of lawsuits or the threat of legal action against foreign journalists.

The Telegraphs Beijing correspondent Sophia Yan, who is featured in report, previously told Press Gazette that people that I interview or even meet in passing are routinely detained or harassed, interrogated, sometimes even hacked. She mentioned even being forced to endure fake government roadblocks trying to stop her going down certain streets.

The report contained an array of first-hand accounts from journalists like Yan.

In one case, Georg Fahrio, a correspondent for German newspaper Der Spiegel, was the subject of a five page letter of indignation from the Chinese embassy in Berlin after they reported on allegations of a lab leak being behind the pandemic.

When floods hit Henan province in July, an official regional social media account for the ruling party said people should look out for BBC journalist Robin Brandt and alert the authorities of his location.

One international bureau chief reported being summoned to the Foreign Ministry [many times], including in late November when I was asked that our media [organisation] stop asking the spokesperson publicly about the Peng Shuai affair.

The report also found that Chinese staff and fixers working with foreign journalists faced constant oppression, with 40% of respondents saying Chinese colleagues were threatened or harassed by the government at least once.

Chinese colleagues of foreign correspondents faced everyting from being doxxed (having private personal information leaked), being called traitors and getting called into meetings with state security agents. In one case, a state security agent reportedly threatened a Chinese colleagues family to try to stop them working with foreign reporters. The staff member in question decided to quit their job.

One of the six foreign journalists who chose to flee the country in the last year was the BBCs John Sudworth, who had been reporting in the country for nine years and won awards for his reporting of the Uyghur detainment camps in Xinjiang.

A previous report by Reporters Without Borders alleged that restrictions on reporting on China are so severe they may have been a contributing factor in why the coronavirus pandemic was able to spread worldwide.

The Chinese governments growing use of law suits against journalists to try to stop critical reporting resembles a similar problem now emerging in the UK and USA.

In last years Press Gazette Media Freedom Healthcheck, China was one of ten countries worldwide to receive a red warning classification for press freedom, plurality and media safety.

Read the full report here.

Press Gazette's must-read weekly newsletter featuring interviews, data, insight and investigations.

See more here:

Foreign press face "unprecedented hurdles" due to government repression - Press Gazette

Stephany Rose Spaulding is many things a pastor, an educator and now, a congressional candidate, to name just a few of her impressive attributes.

But one thing she is not is here to play games, as the scholarly freedom fighter is laser-focused on her Chicago community while she wages her bid for the 1st Congressional District of Illinois seat that has been held by U.S. Rep. Bobby Rush for the past 30 years.

MORE: 10 Black Elected Officials Who Are Following In The Footsteps Of Martin Luther King Jr.

Rush who has served 15 terms and is the only person to have ever beaten Barack Obama in an election leaves behind an outsized pair of Congressional shoes that Spaulding, a 43-year-old national spokeswoman for racial justice coalition Just Democracy, hopes to fill.

In a race with a growing number of candidates, keep reading to learn more about Spaulding, a Chicago native, and her plans for the 1st Congressional District of Illinois.

The following interview has been edited for clarity and length.

For our readers who may not be familiar with your background, can you describe your political platform and ideology and the role they play in your Congressional campaign?

My platform and political ideology is rooted in anti-oppression and justice. I am a race and gender scholar by trainingPhD in American Studiesso I have a long professional and public relationship with working to dismantle systems of oppression. I practice the bold politics of love. For me, that means focusing on instilling the tenets of systems that are rooted in faith, compassion, and social transformation. As a Daughter of Chicagos Southside, one need look no further than out the window of my childhood home to see the systemic inequities which still plague us today. The glimmering Chicago skyline acts as the backdrop for one of the most historic Black districts in the country; unfortunately, we have been neglected in areas that have become some of the most impoverished neighborhoods in the entirety of Illinois. To fully fund and invest in the neighborhoods I played in as a young girl means to abolish racism. It means coming together as one people and demanding democracy reform by eliminating the filibuster and expanding the courts; environmental justice and sustainability; education, income and housing equity; and universal healthcare that includes hearing, vision, dental and mental healthcare.

You describe yourself in part as a civil rights activist. Please discuss your participation in liberation politics and the freedom movement and how that has shaped your approach to mainstream politics.

I have spent the past two decades fighting on the frontlines of the modern movement for civil rights, working to advance justice for systematically marginalized communities throughout the United States. Whether co-organizing the HipHop Political Movement Convention in Chicago in 2008, the Protect Black Women Rally and March in Washington, D.C., or advocating for voting rights on the national stagedelivering messages straight to members of Congresswith Just Democracy, I have placed the advancement of liberation practices across the country at the core of my political practices. This work has helped me to understand the benefits and flaws of our democratic republic and has committed me to progressively moving our country forward to a place where politicians are genuine public servants. What that looks like: publicly financed campaigns, term limits from federal to local levels, ranked-choice voting and proportional representation.

Youre also an educator as well as an HBCU graduate. Tell us a little about how education has helped to inform your politics.

I grew up with parents who retired as Chicago Public School educators, so the pursuit of education was instilled in me early on as a child. Over the course of my life, I have learned that education is the greatest equalizer in the battle for justice. Having access to quality, equitable education helps drive society towards anti-oppression. Attending historic Clark Atlanta University was transformative for my outlook on life and understanding of what is possible. We need to be working towards a society in which every person has access to tuition-free education so that we begin removing the multi-generational barriers which keep far too many of us from being able to access colleges, universities, and trade schools. Unfortunately, we are not there yet as a nation and the debate over critical race theory is evidence of how far we must go. To begin, the debate is a shadow-debate in the sense that most dont have the requisite grounding in the discipline to debate it. Consequently, it is being used as a gaslight to attack anti-racism work and defund our schools.

Please explain the significance of the prospects of you filling the longtime congressional seat of Rep. Bobbys Rush,a civil rights icon in his own right.

This is the district of hope. Home to a final stop of the Underground Railroad, to Oscar S. De Priest, Ralph Metcalfe, and where State Senator and future President Barack Obama challenged Black Panther Bobby Rush for the House in 2000, its been a shining light of what is thought possible. It is a community rooted in the rich culture, history and people of Illinois. It was home to thousands of African Americans who left the South during the Great Migration. And it remains the home to great American artists, thinkers and innovators today. For many here, its a beacon of faith in a future that still has yet to be achieved. The grocery stores which we patronized as children are gone, shops are boarded up, and small businesses are gone or struggling.That flame of hope, the dreams of a better tomorrow for a generation of young children, thats the First District which I know and its the legacy I will carry with me into Congress, while also forging a new path forward for Illinoisans.

Political candidates often make campaign promises about their plans for Day 1 on the job. What are your priorities for your presumptive first day in Congress?

Our work must start with protecting voting rights across the country, because they are the bricks through which all change will be made. I also look forward to joining the staunch advocates for change who took a bold stand, demanding that the Bipartisan Infrastructure Package and Build Back Better be passed together. Passing the cornerstone piece of this administrations agendaa bill which was already watered-down by Legislators who dont know what it means to need funding like this just to surviveis well overdue and it should be done. I also believe that we cant stop there and be satisfied without full investment in our communities. I will also work to advance HR 40, the Commission to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African-Americans Act, setting us down the journey towards true, restorative Justice.

The pandemic has especially had an effect on education; in particular, Chicago Public Schools has been in the national spotlight as teachers and students alike protest. Where do you fall on the spectrum of that debate and what do you see as a reasonable resolution, and is there anything you could do from Congress to help them?

Consensus is never reached by staking ones flags at the extremes. We have to have a reasonable option that gets workers of all walks safely back to work, while protecting our childrens best interest. In Congress, we can cancel student debt to keep the economy energized and extend child tax credits so that working families dont feel the financial burden of having to remote work, remote learn, or take off completely if one must quarantine due to COVID. I would also advance legislation that makes testing, protective gear, and sanitation equipment available to businesses and schools for the best safety practices for workers and students.

Speaking of Chicago, please explain the significance of being able to represent the Windy City and especially its Black residents from Congress in the context of Chicagos civil rights legacy.

During the Great Migration, thousands of Black Americans came to cities like Chicago seeking the promises of a nation that wanted our labor, but not necessarily our presence. While sun-down towns remained across the South and rural America, here in Chicago there were neighborhoods where Blacks were threatened with violence if they found themselves after certain hours. We were structurally prohibited from equitable schooling, housing and job opportunities; and yet we came; we persisted; and built thriving communities primarily in Chicagos Southside neighborhoods. Still, the struggle for equal footing in every level of being persisted throughout the city and continues today. Ownership in real estate, as well as mid- to large-scale businesses, is still imbalanced, access to government contracts is disproportionately distributed and the quality of sustainable life pales across racial lines. Consequently, I will bring this history and reality to the legislation that needs to be enacted for true justice and conciliation to take place in our city, state and across the nation.

What do you see as the most pressing issue facing Black Americans right now and how would you use your power in Congress to address it?

The arduous systemic continuation of racism in America is the most pressing issue facing Black Americans. Racism impacts every institution in the nationthe Economy, Education, Housing, Healthcare, the Criminal Justice System and our Climate Crisis.

Youre also an author who has written extensively about topics like racism and whiteness. How have those topics prepared you to be in Congress?

My work has been rooted in the bridging of divides rooted in our society. It is crucial that our Congressional leaders have the ability to effectively communicate the multi-generational traumas and harm caused by even the most well-intending legislation which, when not written with racial justice in mind, can often reinforce systems of oppression, even if unintentionally. It is important for those of us who are privileged enough to be elected to bring the voices and lived experiences of our community to the Halls of Power do so in a way that is constructive. Having the knowledge and skills to show how the issues we face intersect with other communities across the countryand even right here in our own backyard of Chicagos First Districtopens the door to creating legislation that truly puts anti-racism into practice, creating a better society for each and every one of us. As an example, just take a look at President Bidens recent trip to my alma mater of Clark Atlanta University where we saw a long-time Senator standing on the grounds of one of the countrys most historic HBCUs, calling for the abolishment of the filibuster. Thats progress and a beacon of hope for a better, anti-racist future for all.

Finally, you are one of a growing number of Black women seeking national office. Can you discuss 1) what it means to be a part of a historic group of Black women candidates and 2) what it would mean to become a Black Congresswoman in 2022?

Its exciting to be part of a historic group of Black women candidates in 2022. Black women have been the backbones of communities across the nation and it is beyond time that we step into national leadership as well. The diversity of our voices and experiences enriches the national discourse and helps to craft better legislation. Unfortunately, we are still in a season of firsts. Illinois 1st Congressional District has yet to have a woman, let alone a woman of color to represent it, even though demographically the district is predominantly composed of women.

SEE ALSO:

Whats Next For Voting Rights? Disappointed Civil Rights Leaders Wont Give Up After Manchin, Sinema Let Down Americans

Old Tweet Of Kyrsten Sinema Calling John Lewis Her Hero Resurfaces As She Blocks Voting Rights

Read the original:

Meet Stephany Rose Spaulding, The Progressive Congressional Candidate Working To Dismantle Systems Of Oppression - NewsOne

A lengthy investigation published by the New York Times, after working for a year, reveals interesting details about the occupation state's use of Pegasus spyware to gain political influence in the region and the world. The Arabs certainly have the lion's share of involvement in these details.

The investigation confirms that the Pegasus spyware produced by Israel's NSO Company cannot be treated as a purely technical or commercial project, without understanding its close connection with the occupation government. The company was founded and managed by former officers and experts who worked in the Israeli security and intelligence services and licenses can only be sold to countries and governments, only after the approval of the government in Tel Aviv. This means that the company is basically a security and political arm of the government and its intelligence.

The report presents several amazing and shameful details about the occupation's use of the Pegasus spyware to influence the policies of Arab countries and to activate normalisation with these countries.

READ: Jordanian rights lawyer speaks about the Pegasus hacking of her phone

NSO suspended the renewal of Saudi Arabia's Pegasus license after the assassination of journalist, Jamal Khashoggi, but returned it after a phone call between Saudi Crown Prince, Mohammed bin Salman, and Netanyahu. Bin Salman agreed in the call to open the Saudi airspace to the occupation air as a price to renew the license, and then Netanyahu pressured the company to renew the Saudi license, despite its initial refusal.

The program played a major role in facilitating the signing of normalisation agreements between the occupation and each of the Emirates, Bahrain and Morocco, as Tel Aviv agreed to grant the program's license to all countries that signed the normalisation agreements.

Unrelated to the Arab countries, a conflict is taking place between Washington and Tel Aviv over the program after the US put the spyware program on the blacklist, imposing sanctions on it and banning it from use within the US. Israeli circles are claiming that the US sanctions are part of a conspiracy to control the program, while the Biden administration has responded that the program has become an out-of-control danger after it was used by dictatorial governments to prosecute journalists, human rights activists and dissidents.

This conflict takes place at a time when the US is actually seeking to buy the company that produces the Pegasus virus, so that it becomes subject to American laws and procedures and, of course, to ensure it will not be used by certain countries in a way that does not correspond to American interests.

What concerns us, as Arab nations in this investigation, is that it confirms beyond a shadow of a doubt and gives new evidence on the depravity of the Arab regime policies that most of the nations have become aware of. While the occupation state seeks to benefit from scientific research and technical achievements to expand its influence in the world and influence the foreign policy of the countries of the world and the region, and while Washington enters into conflict with its "spoiled ally" in order to ensure its intelligence superiority in the world, the Arab countries open their doors and lands to the occupation, sign normalisation agreements and makes concessions at the expense of the Palestinian people, just to get a spy program that it uses against its own citizens!

This draws a clear picture of the "deviation" of Arab regimes from their political role as, instead of working to protect their citizens and defend the interests of their people, they are making dangerous political concessions for hostile countries in order to obtain capabilities that allow them to spy on their citizens!

READ: Saudi opened its airspace to Israel in return for access to spyware

In the details of this deviation, two very important issues must be mentioned here: The first is that this investigation exposes the lies of the regimes that signed the normalisation agreements in 2020 and justified this with local political reasons and others related to "supporting the Palestinian people." This investigation confirms that the issue of obtaining spyware and cybersecurity technology are at the core of the goals behind normalisation with the occupation. The second issue is that the Arab countries that bought spyware to spy on their citizens have practically handed over the privacy of these citizens to the occupation state, as all the information obtained by Pegasus goes to the servers owned by the Israeli company.

The investigation also confirms the lie of Israel's democracy and its support for democracies. An occupying country cannot be a democracy, and the occupation cannot support democracy in the Middle East. Rather, it is more concerned than others with the establishment of dictatorships in the Arab countries, firstly because it realises how easy it is to manipulate dictatorial regimes to work for it instead of working for their people and, secondly, because it wants to continue spreading the lie of being the only democracy in the Middle East.

The New York Times investigation may have provided many accurate details about the deals of the Pegasus program and its role in buying influence for the occupation in the region and the world. As for us, Arabs, it did not reveal anything to us, but only confirmed to us what we already know about the miserable policies of the Arab regimes, and about the forbidden love between the racist occupation regime and the Arab regimes of oppression.

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.

The rest is here:

Pegasus investigation and the forbidden love between the occupation and Arab regimes - Middle East Monitor

My first encounter with that terrible day, apart from seeing it reported on Irish television news, was when, as a 15 year old Dublin lad, I watched a furious crowd of 20,000 people burn the British embassy there to the ground, two days after the massacre. Feelings were running so high that there was talk of the Irish army marching over the border and several British businesses were attacked. For many it was the latest in a long long line of British atrocities in Ireland, which we had all learned about in school.

Bloody Sunday effectively ended the first phase of the struggle of the Irish nationalist population in the North of Ireland against the blatant injustices and apartheid like state which had been established with the partition of Ireland in 1921. It had been a gerrymandered statelet from the first, carved out from the 9 nine counties of Ulster, into a smaller unit of 6, to ensure a Protestant and Unionist majority. James Craig, its first Prime Minister, described it as A Protestant state for a Protestant people. The British state hived it off effectively and not for nothing did contemporary observers in the 1920s compare the police powers there as akin to those of Mussolinis Italy. It was left to the Unionist elite (mostly landowners and large industrialists) to run it as they wished and as late as the 1960s MPs in the British Parliament were unable to put questions about what went on there as it was legally within the remit of the government of Northern Ireland and that regime was given carte blanche to run it as they saw fit. With a gerrymandered voting system and an almost caste system when it came to the allocation of housing, education and jobs, the only recourse for Nationalists who didnt like it was to emigrate. For those who spoke out the brutal Protestant only police force (the Royal Ulster Constabulary) and their even more brutal reservists, the B Specials would see to it that they were silenced.

The wind of change stirred in 1969 with the rise of the Civil Rights Movement, inspired by the Civil Rights Movement in the US and the student revolts in Paris etc. Most of the leaders were moderate Nationalists, many from a Social Democrat background, like John Hume and Austin Currie. They sought to challenge the status quo through peaceful means and via demonstrations and protests. This was seen as an existential challenge to the sectarian Northern Ireland state and the police and B Specials were unleashed on the demonstrators. Several brutal attacks on the demonstrations followed, along with attacks on Nationalists by Loyalist mobs, as had happened in the 1920s following partition, when pogroms occurred in parts of Belfast and Catholic workers had been driven from the shipyards.

The British government felt forced to act as the scenes of violence in the North of Ireland proved deeply damaging for the UK state, particularly when viewed from the USA, where there was a large Irish population. British troops were dispatched to Ireland, supposedly to support the police and civil powers and to restore order. The British army was supposedly impartial and would act as a buffer between the two communities but in fact Britain was maintaining its old imperial interests in Ireland and many of the regiments sent had deeply sectarian backgrounds and a strong anti-Nationalist and pro-colonial feeling. Some of these troops had been used a few years before to try and suppress anti-colonial struggles elsewhere in Britains empire. Ironically looking back at the centenary of the Irish War of Independence the Black and Tans and Auxiliaries had also been sent to Ireland in 1920 to support the police and end disorder.

Unionism, was in a state of crisis, as it saw the pillars of its sectarian state shaken and called on Britain for support, while allowing its own sectarian police forces full leeway to crush the Civil Rights Movement.

The march and rally in Derry in January 1972 was due to be one of the largest demonstrations yet by the Civil Rights Movement. Many young Nationalists and Catholics had been had been encouraged by the rise of the movement and also by the fact that the world was now watching the North of Ireland in a way which it had not been for the preceding 60 years. There was also real hope and a sense that change was in the air. The Civil Rights Movement had been modelling itself on the one in the US and using anthems such as We shall overcome borrowed from that movement.

The Irish Republican Army, which believed in the use of armed force to drive the British out of the North of Ireland, had been in existence since 1921 but had been a marginal force, sometimes almost disappearing but it re-emerged in 1969 and carried out some small attacks on British forces and police. It had a limited role beside the much larger peaceful Civil Rights Movement, which had the support of the Catholic Church and much of the Catholic bourgeoise.

Britain had introduced internment without trial in an attempt to arrest and detain those Nationalists believed to be in the IRA without access to civil trials, via the Diplock Courts, which were judge only courts, which gave no real voice to those accused. This led to huge resentment in the Nationalist communities and many now turned against the British Army, which some of them had regarded as neutral referees in 1969 when they first arrived. Egged on by the Unionists and Heaths Conservative and Unionist Party government, with all of their ties to the Unionist elite, the British army was turned into an instrument of oppression against the Catholic community.

The march in Derry was to protest against Internment and large numbers were expected. Whole families took part in the protest which was centred in the traditionally Nationalist Bogside area of the city. The notorious Parachute regiment, which we now know had carried out a massacre in Belfasts Ballymurphy a year before and had escaped with impunity, were brought in to support the police and to supposedly ensure that the IRA did not infiltrate the protest and carry out attacks. When the demonstrators being held back by police started to throw stones and petrol bombs the troops were let off the leash and murdered 13 innocent demonstrators in cold blood. The fiction was that those who died had been in the IRA and that the troops had been protecting themselves against IRA fire. This is the line held to this day by the elderly commanding officer of the regiment at the time and some sections of the Unionist community, some of whom flew the flag of the Parachute regiment on flagpoles in Derry this week.

The global outcry after the massacre was immense and the British state had to cover its tracks. It did this, as it had done many times before in its imperial history, by establishing a seemingly impartial legal inquiry which would investigate the incident and acquit British troops of any guilt. This was the Widgery Inquiry which was a farce. Widgery, as expected, cleared the troops of any guilt and claimed that they had been acting in self defence but was unable to find any evidence of the weapons which the victims had been allegedly carrying. Naturally it was denounced as a kangaroo court.

The Civil Rights Movement had achieved one of its main aims, as the Irish journalist, Fintan OToole wrote recently in the Irish Times: The truth is that those methods were in fact successful; by the end of 1972, the Orange State was gone. The unionist monolith would never return to power.

The anger and resentment produced by both the massacre and the cover up moved the Troubles into a new phase that of armed conflict. Many of those killed in Derry had been young men and many of their friends who has witnessed the massacre now joined the IRA. In an interview held in 1992 one of the friends of a victim, who had himself been on the march, described how he and six of his friends had joined the IRA as a result and as he had witnessed how British rule in Ireland will always result in oppression and bloodshed. He had learned the lesson that generations of Irish nationalists had learned before him, that there was no reasoning with British imperialism in Ireland. Many historians now argue that Bloody Sunday was the central turning point in the Troubles and convinced many young nationalists that peaceful protest against Unionism and the British was ineffective.

Decades later the Saville Inquiry which took 12 years and interviewed hundreds of witnesses overturned the Widgery Inquiry and pronounced all those killed innocent and found that the troops had deliberately killed them and that there had been no involvement by the IRA in the march and no attacks on the troops. David Cameron later apologised to the victims families on behalf of the British state. The sting in the tail was that the Saville Inquiry had promised those giving evidence that no prosecutions would follow.

The families of the Bloody Sunday victims still believe that those responsible should be brought to trial, as should all of those state forces who carried out atrocities in the North of Ireland. The current British government is currently wanting to push through legislation which would ensure that this never happens. They want to close the book on the crimes carried out by British forces and their Loyalist paramilitary allies in Ireland.

Only two years ago in Dublin a theatrical event was held to commemorate another Bloody Sunday, that of the massacre of Irish civilians at a football match by British troops on the rampage in 1920. The event recreated the scene and gave voices to the characters of those who had been murdered. The play The White Handkerchief named after the infamous white handkerchief which the Catholic priest, Father Edward Daly, held before him as wounded victims of Bloody Sunday were carried behind him, is being performed both physically and online by the Derry Playhouse, in the city in which the massacre took place.

Two events separated by 50 years in the long line of murderous actions by the agents of British imperialism and colonialism in Ireland. The events of Bloody Sunday are a reminder that there will never be justice for the victims of British violence in Ireland but they also revealed the true nature of the Northern state and Britains murderous role there.

Source Anti*Capitalist Resistance.

See the article here:

Bloody Sunday 50 years of British injustice in Ireland - International Viewpoint

Maulana Qamar Gani Usmani was arrested by the Gujarat ATS on January 30 in connection to the brutal murder of a Hindu man named Kishan Bharwad in Gujarats Ahmedabad. Usmani has been accused of aiding and abetting Shabbir, the person who had killed Bharwad over alleged blasphemy.

Several videos have surfaced on social media where Usmani is seen instigating Muslims for violence and even murder if someone insults Prophet Muhammad.

More videos of the Islamic hardliner Maulana Usmani have surfaced where he is seen openly instigating the Muslim community for violence and armed offensive over alleged oppression.

In a video available on Facebook, uploaded on January 3 this year, Usmani is seen addressing a gathering of followers. He is seen saying, Our main enemy is the RSS. RSS is so powerful that at first glance it would seem it is foolish to face them. But we (Muslims) have the blessings and courage given by Allah. If we have faith in Allah, we can face even 10 such powers like RSS. They put me in jail for 19 days. They can jail one Qamar Usmani and one Salman Azhari. Because the world will see our love for our religion. The media should record this statement. If one faithful Muslim gives a call for Jihad, all your missiles and all your Armies will be powerless to face the force of Islam.

He further says, It was our mistake that we kept silent when ISIS, with its terrorist actions, made the world believe that jihad is a bad thing. We should have corrected them. We should have told everyone that Jihad is not terrorism but standing upright and doing justice. The day when a real martyr of Islam stands up to inspire Muslims, no forces, no commander can keep Muslims oppressed any longer. They (the Indian government) had appointed one commander for all the three armed forces (CDS Bipin Rawat). See what Allah did to him. All your efforts will fail before the will of Allah.

Usmani further says that Muslims should not just sit and keep praying, they should act and fight.

In another video, Usmani is asking Muslim political leaders and lawmakers to make Islam their priority. He says that all the power and positions are useless if the political leaders do not use that for Islam. He adds that political power should only be used to serve Allah and his cause.

He further says that there are some Muslims who fear police arrests and lathi charges. He adds that the cause of Islam does not need followers who are so calculative about their own safety, but it needs fanatics who forget about themselves for the cause.

Usmani says that during the Delhi protests, he had told Muslims that they should forget about personal safety. We need people who come to the ground with the mentality of sacrifice. Wapas aye to Ghazi, naa aye toh Shaheed (if we return, we are Ghazi and if we fail to return we are martyrs (of Islam).

Ghazi is an Islamic word that means a warrior who kills for Islam.

He further instigates his Muslim followers to be prepared to sacrifice themselves for the Islamic cause. In this video, Usmani effectively admits that he had instigated the violence during the anti-CAA protests and Delhi riots.

While the central government and most state governments take calls to violence seriously, for some reason, open calls given to behead people over alleged instances of blasphemy, frequently done by one particular community, are often ignored by the authorities. The open calls to kill anyone who mocks or criticises Muhammad, or even shares a social media cartoon, have resulted in the Bengaluru riots, and several murders over the years.

Maulana Usmani was seen not just instigating Muslims to take law in their hands and indulge in violence, he had been endorsing the Sar Tan Se Juda slogans. In a video from August 2021 that was shared on Twitter by journalist Swati Goel Sharma, the Delhi police personnel were seen desperately trying to stop Maulana Usmani from holding anti-blasphemy protests. We will go anyhow (to protest) since we have made a call to the public, he was seen announcing.

In February 2021, Usmani had justified themurder of Kamlesh Tiwari. He had said, There is a conspiracy to ruin the lives of Muslims. There is an attempt to make India just like Spain. To achieve it, they are testing how much Muslims in India love their Prophet.

Kishan Bharwad had in the past shared a social media post that was seen as an insult to Prophet Muhammad by some Islamists.

Usmani was earlier arrested for instigating violence over the fake news of mosque vandalism in Tripura. The murderer Shabbir has reportedly told the police that Usmani had told him that it was his right to kill someone whom he sees as anti-Islamic. Usmani is associated with Tahreek Farogh-e-Islami or TFI. Reports say that ATS suspects Usmanis organisation is associated with Pakistans Tehreek-e-Labbaik.

In the murder case of Kishan Bharwad, the Gujarat ATS has so far arrested the killers named Shabbir and Imtiyaz, a Maulvi from Ahmedabad named Ayyub, Maulana Uslamni from TFI, and another few suspects for helping the killers.

Here is the original post:

CDS Bipin Rawats death was Allahs work, Muslims should be prepared to kill or die: Maulana Usmanis videos show how he openly called for violence -...

Hilde Marchant, star reporter for the Daily Express, heard the story from a sailor. At first she didnt believe it. Two nights earlier, the sailor explained, he had been standing on the deck of a ship loaded with British nationals headed to England, and watched as a confetti of parachutes drifted into Rotterdam harbour. Dangling from each silhouetted disc, the sailor insisted, were German soldiers dressed, not in Nazi uniforms, but skirts and blouses. Each carried a submachine gun. When the disguised paratroopers landed, another witness claimed, men and women working as cleaners and servants emerged from basements and back doors wearing German uniforms. These traitorous individuals, the witness said, had come to Holland claiming to be refugees from Nazi oppression, sleeper agents posing as asylum seekers.

On 13 May 1940, three days after the invasion of the Netherlands began, the Daily Express published Marchants story under the headline Germans dropped women parachutists as decoys. Peppered throughout Marchants story was the term fifth columnist one that, a short time before, would have been unrecognisable to most readers. Marchant was one of the first people to adopt the phrase, coined during the 1936 Spanish civil war as shorthand for traitors poised to support an enemy invasion from within. British newspapers had begun to refer to fifth columnists after the German invasion of Norway in early April 1940, when reports circulated that spies had been installed in the country to aid the German invasion. By the time Marchants story ran, there wasnt a reader in Britain unaware of the term, or the notion that a similar network of duplicitous immigrants might lurk in their own towns and villages.

Get the Guardians award-winning long reads sent direct to you every Saturday morning

The storys claims of treachery were, it would later transpire, exaggerated. But the image of the double-crossing immigrant proved indelible, and not only among the readers of newspapers. The British envoy to the Dutch government, Sir Nevile Bland, had also witnessed the landings of the German paratroopers just before he escaped via ship. When Bland reached London the day after the Express story ran, he drafted an eyewitness report. The account, titled Fifth Column Menace, was vivid and fearful. No matter how superficially charming and devoted they appear, Bland wrote, every German or Austrian in Britain is a real and grave menace. When the signal is given to invade Britain, Bland continued, there will be satellites of the monster all over the country who will at once embark on widespread sabotage and attacks on civilians. Britain, Bland concluded, cannot afford to take this risk. ALL Germans and Austrians, at least, ought to be interned at once.

Blands feverish report was widely distributed in Whitehall. A copy reached King George VI, who summoned the home secretary, Sir John Anderson, for a meeting at Buckingham Palace. You must take immediate action against political fifth columnists and other enemies of the state, he told Anderson. Men and women. When the reports claims were broadcast by the BBC, they had an immediate and transformative effect on the British publics attitude towards refugees, and Jews in particular, which until now had been broadly characterised by fragile tolerance.

Before May 1940, not a single person interviewed by the polling group Mass Observation suspected refugees to Britain of espionage, or suggested that they should be interned. Up until then, only 569 individuals had been interned, either through MI5s initial roundups or as the result of mandatory tribunals where senior judges had tested the loyalties of tens of thousands of asylum seekers. Some critics had always maintained that the home secretarys policy had been too feeble. In April 1940, after the German occupation of Norway made an invasion of Britain seem possible, Col Henry Burton, Conservative member for Sudbury, asked members of the House of Commons if it would not be far better to intern all the lot and then pick out the good ones. This view had spread through the Conservative back benches and now, with the news from the Netherlands, the newspapers carried the clarion call for mass internment.

Act! Act! Act! Do It Now! blared a Daily Mail article by G Ward Price, on 24 May. All refugees should be drafted without delay to a remote part of the country and kept under strict supervision. You fail to realise, Price wrote, that every German is an agent. A widespread ignorance of the true numbers of foreigners to whom Britain had offered asylum hastened the change in public attitudes. A poll asked British citizens to estimate the number of refugees who had come to Britain from Nazi Germany in the previous six years. Respondents put the number at anywhere between 2 and 4 million. The true figure was just 73,500.

Hysteria had overcome logic. Most refugees spoke thickly accented English, were unaccustomed to British social norms and would make ineffectual spies. Fifth columnists, if they existed, were far likelier to come from the ranks of British fascists. (On 23 May police arrested Oswald Mosley, leader of the British Union of Fascists, and about 35 of his followers, individuals who would have likely supported Hitlers invasion of Britain from within.) As the Labour politician Herbert Delaunay Hughes wrote, pseudonymously, at the time: It is lamentable how quickly people seem to have forgotten who exactly the refugees are and how it is that they came to this country. Most British citizens acknowledged the injustice inherent in mass internment, but felt that it was nevertheless an appropriate, justifiable measure. You cant say which is good and which bad, said one respondent to a May poll in which half of those interviewed favoured the internment of all enemy aliens. Some of them is very nice people, but its safest to pull them all in.

In the early hours of 5 July 1940, the British police came for Peter Fleischmann, a young German Jewish refugee. He had narrowly avoided the Gestapos moonlit roundups in Berlin two years earlier. At that time a kindly police officer had knocked on the gates of the orphanage that was Fleischmanns home, and warned that the Nazis were coming for him. When he was three, Fleischmanns parents had drowned in an accident while driving by the Wannsee lake. The couple had been writers for an anti-fascist newspaper. Fleischmann later learned the cars steering had been tampered with their deaths apparently an act of political sabotage.

Now it seemed the Gestapo wanted to wipe him out, too. Fleischmann fled to the south of the city and hid in the basement of his familys former housekeeper. When the first Kindertransport was arranged to bring children out of Germany, Fleischmann a few weeks shy of his 17th birthday just qualified for rescue. On 1 December 1938, alongside a brood of the citys Jewish orphans, he embarked the train at the Anhalter Bahnhof railway station, watched by orphanage staff and a few Gestapo officers, who had come to observe the children, with their unpatriotic dark hair and brown eyes, making their pioneering journey.

In Britain, Fleischmann, who dreamed of becoming a professional artist, was taken in by the owners of a Manchester business that specialised in colouring old photographs of young soldiers who had died in the first world war. They provided him with employment and a room in their home in Prestwich. The hours were long, and the conditions a basement filled with rats and shadows insalubrious. But the work might, he reasoned, provide the experience he needed to return to art school.

In Whitehall, however, ongoing discussions soon derailed Fleischmanns humble plans. Starting in November 1939, the government had established nationwide tribunals to test the loyalties of foreign passport-holders living in Britain. More than 50,000 individuals, including Fleischmann, had been classified, as a result, as refugees from Nazi oppression. After the invasion of Holland, however, the state began to debate whether these displaced men and women, many of whom had lost their livelihoods, homes and possessions, should be imprisoned anyway, without trial.

Winston Churchill, during his first cabinet meeting as prime minister, agreed to the internment of all male enemy aliens between the ages of 16 and 60 currently living in coastal counties in Britain. This protected area was where, in the event of Nazi invasion, a spy could cause most harm. Men were to be interned regardless of the refugee status bestowed on them several months earlier. The following day, on Sunday 12 May 1940, Scotland Yards fleet of motorcars roared out of police headquarters. Many of the officers dispatched to make the days arrests had been unaware of their task until they arrived at work that morning. By the end of this first mass roundup, around 2,000 refugees had been taken into custody and handed to the military authorities for internment.

Anderson, the home secretary, was opposed to mass internment, a position that he hoped to hold unless the war begins to go badly. Earlier in the year he wrote to his father of the danger posed to justice by national paranoia: In wartime people are easily worked up; a spy scare can be started at any time as a stunt. Now with German troops in France, the threat of enemy invasion looming, and newspapers stewing with reports of fifth columnists (even the Manchester Guardian had added its voice to the chorus calling for mass internment, stating: No half measures will do), he was forced to concede that there were various bodies and groups of persons in this country against whom action would need to be taken, including refugees. Throughout May, the protected area expanded from coastal counties inland, until no one in Britain was safe from the threat of immediate arrest and indefinite internment based on their nationality, ethnicity, religion or political beliefs.

Internment was in the best interest of the internee, Churchill argued, since public temper in this country would be such that such persons would be in great danger if left at liberty. This argument precisely echoed that made by the Nazi officials to justify the arrest of the partys political opponents. In a speech delivered in March 1933, shortly after the opening of Dachau, the first Nazi concentration camp, Heinrich Himmler reasoned: I felt compelled [to make these arrests] because in many parts of the city there has been so much agitation that it has been impossible for me to guarantee the safety of those particular individuals who have provoked it. The Nazis used a euphemism for this category of arrest Schutzhaft, or protective custody a term that could now be applied to Britains own policy towards Jews. For those individuals who had survived and fled the Nazi concentration camps at Dachau and Buchenwald, now interned by their supposed liberators, it was a befuddling injustice. When Hitler learned of Churchills internment policy, he reportedly gloated: The enemies of Germany are now the enemies of Britain, too. Where are those much-vaunted democratic liberties of which the English boast?

Having allowed the popular press to whip up jingoism and hatred, instead of taking an enlightened lead, the government now used public opinion as justification for strict measures. Among Londoners some sort of neurosis had taken grip, the art historian Klaus Hinrichsen noted. Anyone who was German was considered a Nazi. On Sunday 4 June 1940, Churchill, who had been prime minister for less than a month, addressed the House of Commons to announce the governments new powers of arrest the powers to put down fifth column activities with a strong hand. Churchill acknowledged that the orders would affect a great many people who are the passionate enemies of Nazi Germany. There was, he said, nothing to be done. I am very sorry for them, he added, but we cannot draw all the distinctions which we should like to do.

Status and class, those twin armaments of privilege, provided no protection. Nazism had pushed a wave of luminaries toward Britain. Now these Oxbridge dons, surgeons, dentists, lawyers and celebrated artists were taken into custody. The police arrested Emil Goldmann, a 67-year-old professor from the University of Vienna, in the grounds of Eton College, Britains most elite school. At Cambridge University, dozens of staff and students were detained in the Guildhall, including Friedrich Hohenzollern, also known as Prince Frederick of Prussia, a grandson of Queen Victoria (who, while interned, received food packages from Fortnum & Mason allegedly paid for by the royal family). That years Cambridge law finals nearly had to be cancelled because one of the interned professors had locked away the exam papers, and taken the key.

In the early hours of 5 July, a black mariah pulled up at the Prestwich home of Albert and Gertrude Ripkin, who had taken in Peter Fleischmann and given him work. Fleischmann awoke to the sound of knocking. Albert was not yet up, so Fleischmann opened the door. The officers instruction was curt and urgent. Get your clothes. Come with us. Neither soldier nor criminal, Fleischmann, one of 90 aliens and refugees arrested by Salford police that morning, was denied the civil rights that even convicts enjoy: no charge, no trial, no bail.

None of his story mattered: not the fact he had been orphaned and made homeless by the Nazi regime, nor the fact that he had been brought to England as a destitute child, nor that he had been carefully interviewed by one of the most senior judges in the land and deemed to pose no security risk to his adoptive country. In this new reality, subject to the British governments panicked measures, only Fleischmanns nationality the same nationality that the Nazis hoped to strip from all German and Austrian Jews mattered. Buffeted along a twisted road by the winds of history, Fleischmann was, once again, rootless, unwelcome, homeless.

Across the country, internees were sent to various transit camps to await dispatch to more permanent camps. Fleischmann, like most of those arrested in north-west England, was sent to Warth Mills, a massive, decaying, derelict cotton mill that cast a brutish silhouette on the Lancashire horizon. Its proprietors had been forced by recession to abandon the premises a few years earlier. The site had been abandoned in haste: the floor, a mixture of cobbles and wood, was viscid and slippery with old machine oil, the smell of which mixed with the acrid stench of the canal that ran alongside the building, and stuck in the throat. Transmission belts hung like nooses from rafters. Crankshafts, partly dismounted, dangled at Damoclean angles. Clumps of rotting, mouldy cotton decorated the floor. Spiders ruled the shadows. A series of cast-iron columns crowned with intricate Corinthian capitals, high up in the vaulted murk, supported a glass roof, the sole source of light inside the building, which was pocked with broken panes that let the drizzle in.

The building, three storeys tall at one section, had sat empty and dampening until the British army moved in on 5 June 1940. The first internees arrived seven days later. Theyd had ample time to take in their new homes thuggish frontage. From Bury station they had been marched the four miles or so along Manchester Road towards the mill. It was a walk of shame; hostile onlookers watched as they were paraded in front of the public as prisoners.

To be marched like a bloody prisoner of war, with people watching that really hurt, recalled Peter Katz, a pastor in his mid-50s, who had been one of the first arrivals. I felt degraded. By the time Fleischmann arrived, the place was packed. Inside, a phalanx of British soldiers under the command of a retired officer, Maj Alfred Braybrook, sat behind a row of tables, ready to check the mens belongings. The internees lined up behind ropes. Each man smelled the stench of disinfectant and listened to the sounds of captive men while he waited to be called forward. When Fleischmanns turn came, he approached, and a private grabbed his bag and tipped the contents on to a table. As the soldier sifted Fleischmanns belongings, a seated officer thumbed through his wallet. Fleischmann assumed the men were searching for any items that might be used as weapons, but it soon became clear that anything of value was in danger of confiscation. Just as the Nazis had systematically robbed many of these men of their valuables, so the British officers now took chocolate, cigarettes, writing paper and typewriters, distributing these items among themselves in full view of their prisoners.

The confiscation of razor blades was justifiable, and a case could possibly be made for the seizure of gold sovereigns to preclude black-market trading. Other choices seemed indefensible: watches, books, medicine. One soldier took insulin from a diabetic. For some internees, this was a familiar experience. Many had passed through holding camps at Ascot and Kempton Park, also overseen by Braybrook. At Kempton Park, a young tailor, Kurt Treitel, lost his watch and all his money to larcenous soldiers.

The breach of privacy revealed not only what each internee had considered sufficiently important to bring with him during the harried moments of his arrest, but also the range of vocations represented among the captives. Doctors watched, bewildered, as the soldiers pocketed their stethoscopes. Academics argued that they should be allowed to keep their textbooks. Artists pleaded to keep their drawing paper. For many of the men, this ransacking crowned a brief period that had devastatingly transformed their view of Britain, and their place within it. [We] went around breathing injustice and feeling very sore about all kinds of things, wrote Hirsch Uri, who was arrested alongside a number of other young Orthodox Jews, most of whom had come to England via the Kindertransport. Since gloom only serves to increase ones loquacity, [we] soon became unbearable to ourselves.

Some men at Warth Mills had already experienced great drama in their escapes to England. Two days after the outbreak of war, Gotfried Huelsmann had successfully crossed the Germany-Netherlands border disguised as a greengrocer, driving a van filled with vegetables. To be interned by the country he considered an ally, after such acts of derring-do, was hurtful; to be robbed by those in whom these men had staked their trust, unthinkable. I remember very clearly and this was the dominating thought the feeling of insult, noted Claus Moser, who later became chair of the Royal Opera House. The whole operation was panicky and cruel.

In Warth Mills, 2,000 internees shared a single bath, and 18 water taps a limitation that quickly forced almost every man to give up on shaving, and encouraged some to rise as early as 4am to avoid the mass hustle for the facilities. Laundry could be washed in an empty room, but, without soap or drying facilities, clothes and blankets often emerged as dirty as before. There was no sewerage system, and the lavatories amounted to 60 buckets housed outside, beneath an oblong tent. As the day progressed, the stench became unbearable. The latrines became so choked that, towards the end of the day, men would simply relieve themselves in a quiet corner.

Conditions in the camp were considered, by the numerous German doctors among the inmates, to be a liability for the spread of disease. They wrote and co-signed a memorandum of complaint to Braybrook. Simon Isaac, a former professor at the University of Frankfurt who had overseen makeshift hospitals on the Russian Front, wrote that he had never seen a place less fit for the accommodation of human beings. To be imprisoned in a building not even fit for beasts, as another internee wrote, had a profound effect on the mens view of the country that had offered them sanctuary. Many [have] ceased to believe in the British spirit of humanity which before they had acclaimed, he continued.

The indignities of isolation from friends and relatives, meagre food rations, wet straw mattresses, lice and inadequate sanitary arrangements led many internees to draw parallels between the mill and the Nazi concentration camps from which they had fled. A former member of the German Foreign Office, held in the mill, claimed conditions were much worse than those of the notorious French prisoner of war reprisal camps he had seen in the first world war, where captured men were kept in cold, brutal conditions and subject to epidemics of typhoid and cholera. According to an official Ministry of Information report, two men, both of whom had previously been incarcerated in Nazi concentration camps, died by suicide.

After a week spent at Warth Mills, Fleischmann was transported to one of the more permanent camps, 10 of which were situated on the Isle of Man, where women and children were also interned. When he reached the island, Fleischmanns home was P Camp, or Hutchinson, where about 1,200 internees were billeted in requisitioned boarding houses that bordered a picturesque square, with views leading down to Douglas harbour. After the indignities of Warth Mills, Hutchinson had a bucolic quality, which, depending on an individuals temperament, at times felt like something akin to a holiday camp.

Rather than squander their time in detention, the men worked to turn the camp into a cultural centre. Professional actors staged productions of A Midsummer Nights Dream and Of Mice and Men. Feted musicians performed concerts on the lawn. Oxbridge academics delivered lectures on a vast range of subjects, while the many celebrated artists in the camp produced and exhibited works of art in various disciplines. The journalists and editors published a fortnightly camp newspaper, featuring news, articles, fiction and illustrations. Thanks to the efforts of campaigners such as the MP Eleanor Rathbone, and the Quaker Bertha Bracey, chair of the Central Department for Interned Refugees, the internees were provided with books to open an impromptu library (Lewis Carrolls Alices Adventures in Wonderland and Daphne du Mauriers Rebecca proved to be the most borrowed titles), a table tennis table, and, in time, a shop where they could buy supplies, and even alcohol.

Their captors allowed the internees to establish a hierarchy of governance, a trick developed by the British army to facilitate the colonisation of indigenous groups. Still, Hutchinsons commandant, a former advertising executive named Hubert Daniel, was a benevolent overseer. At the urging of his wife, a frustrated artist, Daniel provided materials and studio space for the artists in the camp, and even hired a grand piano for an outdoor matinee performance by the interned musician Marjan Rawicz. The artists soon established a semi-exclusive artists cafe, housed in a laundry room extension, with food provided by an interned Austrian pastry chef. With its whitewashed walls and bubbling paint, water taps and washboards, the venue lacked the sophistication of the continental cafes the men were used to, but the room was sizable and, when some trellis tables, chairs and stools had been arranged inside, provided a relatively comfortable space for afternoon meetings, conversation and performances by, among others, the famed Kurt Schwitters, the most famous of Hutchinsons artist internees, who recited his dadaist poetry.

For Fleischmann, who had no ties to the outside world, Hutchinson provided the artistic education that had been cut short by the Nazis. Schwitters taught him life-drawing and how to mix paint from ground brick powder. The sculptors Paul Hamann and Georg Ehrlich showed him how to dig clay while out on an escorted walk in the local hills and smuggle it back into the camp. The sculptor Ernst Muller-Blensdorf showed Fleischmann how to carve blocks of firewood.

In later years, everything of which Fleischmann had dreamed since he was a young aspiring artist at the orphanage would come true. Under his adopted name, Peter Midgley, he would be accepted into the Royal College of Art. He would graduate with first-class honours, the top fine art student in his year, rewarded with the RCAs prestigious Rome scholarship. He would become a professional artist, securing commissions to create works for a number of British government departments, universities and the Royal Navy. Nothing bettered the training he received at Hutchinson, however. Everything thereafter, he later said, was just a recap.

Despite the cultural experience, depression was rife throughout the camp, as the men waited for news of their loved ones, worried about their businesses and obsessed over freedom. Lest this all sounds too rosy a situation, Klaus Hinrichsen, the art historian, who was secretary of the Hutchinson Camp University, later noted, let me assure you that all these frantic activities were entered into as a means of distraction from the ever-present anger at the injustice of being interned the constant worry about wives and children left without a provider and under almost nightly bombardment in London and other towns from the lack of communication and, of course suffering from the cramped living conditions and the lack of freedom of movement.

In the autumn of 1940, the British government released a white paper outlining several categories under which internees could apply for release. Those who were too young or too old, too infirm, or who already had permits to work in positions of national importance could apply to be freed. Artists, writers and musicians were not included until later revisions, and had to prove they had achieved distinction in their chosen field. (As Helen Roeder, secretary of the Artists Refugee Committee, put it to the director of the National Gallery: Do you think [the criteria could] be stretched to include the poor souls who have been too busy being hunted to achieve distinction in the arts?)

With hindsight, many internees recognised that they had been relatively comfortable and safe and, apart from the criminal abuse experienced at Warth Mills, their treatment was fair. For most, internment was a near-constant misery that, as the Oxford academic Paul Jacobsthal wrote, caused a trauma. At least 56 internees died in internment on the Isle of Man, many to suicide. And while Peter Midgleys life was transformed by the people he met during internment, the episode also triggered feelings of rejection and abandonment that haunted his dreams. Once or twice a year he would experience the same recurring nightmare: he was back in the camp; everyone around him was released until, finally, he was the last one there, permanently forsaken.

Every government must balance its humanitarian obligations with the need to uphold national security. To categorise refugees from Nazi oppression as enemy aliens, however, was to invite populist scorn and hatred upon those in most need of compassion in wartime, and represented a moral failing on a national scale. Few went as far as Tristan Busch, a former internee who described the British policy as a war crime in his memoir, but it is indisputable that the hasty measures heaped unhappiness and anguish upon thousands of people already enduring the ordeal of fleeing their previous lives. Only a single sentence spoken by John Anderson in the House of Commons on 22 August 1940, months before most of Hutchinsons internees were freed, provided something approaching an apology: Regrettable and deplorable things have happened, he said, as if the cruelties of internment had been the result of natural phenomena, and not a series of deliberate choices.

In May 2021, the Canadian prime minister, Justin Trudeau, issued a formal apology to the more than 30,000 Italian Canadians declared enemy aliens during the second world war 600 of whom were sent to internment camps. There has been no equivalent attempt to repair the damage by the British authorities in failing to distinguish between refugees and enemy aliens a dehumanising term that, in 2021, the US government pledged never again to use. The battle between a nations responsibility to help those in need and to maintain national security persists in every age, every generation. The notion of the refugee who is not who he or she claims to be is an enduring story that can be easily used to justify institutional cruelty or overreach. While the context and detail shifts, the debate remains the same, as does the potential for history to repeat itself. Each successive generation must answer the same question: how far can we go in the rightful defence of our values without abandoning them along the way?

This is an edited extract from The Island of Extraordinary Captives by Simon Parkin, published by Sceptre on 3 February and available from guardianbookshop.com

Follow the Long Read on Twitter at @gdnlongread, listen to our podcasts here and sign up to the long read weekly email here.

The rest is here:

'I remember the feeling of insult': when Britain imprisoned its wartime refugees - The Guardian

Hosting the Winter Olympics during a pandemic was always going to test the Chinese government, by putting its ever-growing ability to exercise political control and virus containment on a collision course with its enthusiasm for international prestige and status.

The 2022 Winter Games, which open on Friday, are being held at a time of particularly intense western criticism of China over human rights abuses, from the mass persecution of Uyghurs in far western Xinjiang labelled a genocide by the United States and other groups including Tibetans, to the crushing of Hong Kongs freedoms.

China denies human rights abuses, but activists have dubbed the gathering in Beijing the Genocide Games, and western powers from the US to the UK have announced a diplomatic boycott of the opening ceremony. The exiled campaign group World Uyghur Congress urged: No one should want another Olympics like this.

There is so little trust of the host nation that many countries have told their athletes to take burner phones, and cyber security experts warned a health app for Olympians could spy on them and steal health and other personal data.

Further censure has come from environmentalists who have warned for years about the negative impact of hosting the Games which need a lot of water for snow and ice in an area of intense water scarcity.

Yet Beijing weathered the controversy when it hosted the Summer Olympics, in 2008, said Susan Brownell of University of Missouri-St Louis, an expert on Chinese sports who was in China for those Games.

Then, high-profile protests dogged the global torch relay, violent suppression of protests in Tibet put Chinese oppression there on the news agenda, there was pressure on leaders to skip the opening ceremony and environmentalists warned about the intense pollution that shrouded Beijing.

But, once the competition began, the focus shifted to the athletes. Beijings calculation is, no doubt, that the same thing will happen this year. Right now, the political and investigative journalists have the front page, but once the Games start, it will be the sports journalists, Brownell said.

Covid has conveniently spared Beijing any worries about protests from the stands, which would have been the most likely arena for political activism in a country where public demonstrations by citizens are in effect banned.

Competitors and the few other foreigners given permission to come to Beijing, including coaches, support staff and journalists, will fly into a sealed-off Olympic world, a closed loop of venues and hotels in just three locations, connected by their own transport vehicles, travelling in their own lanes.

It is staffed by Chinese workers who are not allowed to return to their own homes without a long period of quarantine.

Authorities are so bent on total separation that they have warned Beijing residents against helping Olympians if a loop vehicle crashes.

For Victor Cha, senior vice president at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington DC, these rules seem like a metaphor for how Chinas communist leadership wants the Games to play out overall in a closed system fully under their control.

Covid has really given them the excuse to completely lock down everything. They want to have complete control over the picture of the Olympics and that helps, he said.

There will be an official international protest, in the form of a diplomatic boycott by western governments including the US and the UK, but their absence is unlikely to be a major headache for officials in Beijing, or feature prominently in news coverage through the Games.

They shrug off the diplomatic boycotts. It feeds the domestic narrative that the west is trying to steal Chinas moment in sun, and they can say leaders are not coming anyway because of Covid.

The shutdown of international participation in the Games has put particular political pressure on the athletes, now the only people with a platform to make a statement.

It is impossible to separate sports from business and politics. More than a big sporting occasion, this is also a political event, said Mark Dreyer, author of Sporting Superpower: An Insiders View on Chinas Quest to Be the Best.

The human cost of Chinas political controls has been thrown into the spotlight in a very personal way for athletes by the treatment of one of the countrys best-known, most successful Olympians, tennis star Peng Shuai.

Last year, she vanished from public view after accusing a former senior Communist party official of coercing her into a sexual relationship, and her allegations were scrubbed from the internet.

After international outrage, she made a series of stage-managed public appearances inside China, including with Olympic officials, which have done little to assuage concern about whether she is acting with free will.

Her treatment was highlighted by protesters at this months Australian Open, who wore T-shirts saying simply Where is Peng Shuai?. Organisers banned them, then backtracked on the ban.

Perhaps concerned by the swell of support for Peng, China has taken the unusual step of going beyond the International Olympic Committee bans on athletes taking political stands.

If they break Chinese laws, with behaviour or speech that is against the Olympic spirit, athletes will face certain punishment, Yang Shu, a member of the Beijing Organising Committee, told a news conference this month.This rhetoric may be intended mostly as deterrent, analysts say. An athletes arrest over a political protest would be shocking, and likely to become an enduring image of an event that Beijing wants remembered as a sporting and logistical triumph.

Rob Koehler of Global Athlete, an advocacy group for sportspeople, said they have reluctantly advised competitors to save protests or criticism of China for when they have finished competing and returned home. That is the hardest and most outrageous thing we have had to say, given how hard we pushed for them to have the right to basic freedom of expression, he said.

Even if China manages to side-step an inflammatory protest or an inflammatory response at the Games, the virus that might once have looked like a gift to a government bent on control has become more of a threat to a successful Olympics, with the highly contagious Omicron circulating widely.

If an outbreak knocks out high-profile athletes, or significantly diminishes the number of competitors, it could start to undermine the events.

Beijing announced on Saturday that, even before the Games had begun, the number of cases in the Olympic village had jumped from two to 19. Cases among athletes and team officials exceeded those among media and other stakeholders for the first time. There has already been disruption to qualifying competitions after athletes tested positive. At the US figure skating championships, Brownell said some athletes developed Covid between competitions, and despite taking extreme precautions.

They had been masking, observing social distancing; the pairs team had only private lessons in the rink with their coach and didnt know where they had got it. It created quite a panic at the championships themselves, Brownell said.

Ironically, Chinas success with controlling earlier variants of Covid has left it particularly vulnerable, public health experts say. Its domestic vaccines are ineffective against Omicron, and because there have still been only a few cases in a country of more than 1.4 billion people, there is almost no natural immunity.

A vulnerable population and an unevenly distributed healthcare system makes the potential of a Covid outbreak terrifying. The devastation that ripped through Wuhan in the earliest days of the pandemic could still be unleashed on the rest of China, and fear of this has almost certainly contributed to the intense testing and quarantine rules.

These factors have affected how the rest of the world, or at least audiences in markets such as the US, will experience the Games. The broadcaster NBC is keeping its commentators at home, covering Beijing from thousands of miles away.

Restrictions on media coverage of the last Games, the Summer Olympics in Japan held last year after a years delay, diminished the viewing experience for many of the millions of people who wanted to follow from home.

My personal feeling was that coverage of the Tokyo Games really lost something. It was pretty clear they didnt invest the same amount of money, the coverage was not as glossy and aesthetically pleasing, said Brownell.

Now, with commentators not actually being in Beijing, thats going to be even more marked. I think the pandemic restrictions could have an impact on how the TV and social media audiences see these Olympics.

There may also be less promotion. In a sign perhaps of how these Olympics are among the most controversial in recent decades, sponsors who pay eye-watering sums to be connected with the Games have not been flaunting those links in the west as they have done in the run-up to previous iterations of the competition.

For years China has forced heavy penalties on sports personalities, companies and managers who risked the slightest public criticism of its politics.

A 2019 tweet by Daryl Morey, then general manager of the Houston Rockets, supporting pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong was estimated to have cost the National Basketball Association hundreds of millions of dollars after he was allowed to stay in his job.

But sponsors in the west are wary of being accused of pandering to China. Perhaps because they are caught between Beijing and Washington, there has been no pre-Games campaign to spur excitement in the US from the card payment giant Visa, Coca-Cola or Procter & Gamble, the Wall Street Journal reported.

The framing in China of the Beijing Winter Games, however, is drastically different from that outside the country focused on igniting national pride, and using the Games to boost participation in sport and expand the domestic winter sports industry.

Chinese citizens participation in sport has been on the rise since the 2008 Games, said Shushu Chen, a lecturer in sport policy and management at the University of Birmingham, who has been tracking the impact of the Summer Games in Beijing and London.

Chen noted that compared with London, residents in Beijing were ostensibly more positive about the inspirational effects of the Olympic Games, which can perhaps be explained by sociocultural contextual differences between the two cases.

Dreyer, who has lived in Beijing since 2007, observed that the wave of enthusiasm in China for winter sports began in 2015, when the country won the hosting rights. China will not top the medals table this year, but it will probably do better than it has ever done before. And it will have many more athletes competing in the Winter Games than previously.

Inside China, the Games are already being hailed as a triumph for Beijing and its ability to rally against the virus, and against western criticism. Internationally, these Games may be remembered very differently.

See the article here:

Sport, politics and Covid collide at the Beijing Winter Olympics - The Guardian

The journalists, politicians, students, and other human rights activists,who were spied on by the Hungarian government are now mulling to take legal action against their government. According to a report by The Guardian, they were allegedly targeted by the Hungarian government in order to keep an eye on their work through Israeli spyware called Pegasus. This came nearly seven months after a consortium of news outlets called-- The Pegasus Project revealed the names of several top journalists, human rights activists, and opposition leaders of Hungary, who were allegedly targetted by the Israeli company NSO. The media report said they had tested devices of several people in a lab and found the devices possibly were infected with the Pegasus spyware.

Quoting the analysis found by Security Lab, The Guardian said the devices had been infected with Pegasus through a zero-click exploit. As per the Guardian, the zero-click exploit enables operators of the spyware to contaminate a phone by clicking on a dubious link. The Hungarian Civil Liberties Union (HCLU) told the British English daily that it will launch legal action on behalf of six clients: Brigitta Csikasz, David Dercsenyi, Daniel Nemeth and Szabolcs Panyi, all journalists; Adrien Beauduin, a Belgian-Canadian PhD student and activist; and a sixth person who requested anonymity.

"It is improper that the procedures of the national security services, which are necessarily carried out in secret, has become a tool of oppression rather than a means of protecting citizens," The Guardian quoted Adam Remport, an official of HCLU as saying.

"What we would like is for our clients to have direct proof of their being surveilled and the disclosure of the data gathered on them. If we can get good rulings it would mean that a new avenue for redress would open for anyone who has been secretly surveilled," added Remport.

When the news agency AP asked the NSO group over the allegations, the spyware said it does not identify its customers for contractual and national security reasons. Further, in a statement, the group reiterated that they sell their products only to government agencies for use against "serious crime and terror.' It is worth mentioning that US President Joe Biden blacklisted the NSO Group and a lesser-known Israeli competitor last week after several reports red-flagged the use of spyware in several people including top defence officials.

Read this article:

Hungary: Victims of alleged Pegasus spyware attack to take legal action against Govt - Republic World

-

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan: As Kashmiris on both sides of the Line of Control (LoC) and the world over are observing the Indian Republic Day as Black Day on Wednesday, Pakistan has reaffirmed its solidarity with the people of Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK).

In response to media queries, the Spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Asim Iftikhar Ahmad said that today, when the Kashmiris in IIOJK and around the world mark January 26 as a black day against Indias oppression, the government and people of Pakistan reaffirm their unshakable resolve to continue to raise their voice and extend all possible support for the right of self-determination of the people of IIOJK.

The Spokesperson said that it is deplorable that in the past few days, the Indian occupation forces have further intensified the military siege already in place in the occupied territory for more than seven decades.

Coercing innocent Kashmiris to hoist Indian flags on the Republic Day is typical of Indias high-handedness to project a false sense of normalcy and a hopeless attempt at masking its systematic and widespread oppression, he said.

Asim Iftikhar said that the Indian governments decision to award so-called gallantry awards to the personnel of its occupation forces is yet another afront to the dignity of the countless victims of Indias state-terrorism characterized by gross human rights violations, extrajudicial killings, arbitrary arrests, suspension of fundamental freedoms, rapes, and the use of draconian laws such as Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and Public Safety Act with complete impunity.

The Spokesperson said that on different occasions, Pakistan has presented to the UN and the international community evidence of crimes against humanity being perpetrated by the Indian occupation forces in IIOJK.

The Spokesperson reiterated that the international community must hold India to account for its oppression, and play its due role in enabling the Kashmiris to exercise their inalienable right to self-determination as pledged to them under the relevant UN Security Council resolutions, without any further delay.

Originally posted here:

Pakistan reaffirms its solidarity with people of Indian Occupied Kashmir - DND