The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Monthly Archives: February 2022
A Teenager Tracked Elon Musks Jet on Twitter. Then Came the Direct Message. – The New York Times
Posted: February 3, 2022 at 3:50 pm
Mr. Sweeney made a counteroffer to Mr. Musk, according to the screenshots of the exchange, saying that he would abandon the account if Mr. Musk upped the ante to $50,000. He said that he would also accept a Tesla Model 3, an electric car that costs more than $38,000, adding that he was joking.
In the exchange, Mr. Sweeney was asked how he had been able to track Mr. Musk. He explained that he had obtained the planes transponder data. When told that paying to have the Twitter account shut down didnt seem right, Mr. Sweeney made another proposal: How about an internship?
The exchange, which carried on for more than a month, went silent after Jan. 23.
Mr. Sweeney downplayed the privacy and security concerns associated with his tracking account for Mr. Musk, which has more than 305,000 followers.
Its a private jet so he goes right from the jet to the car, he said, adding that he has long been fascinated by tracking planes. I dont think its that big of a concern. Some people are just interested in seeing where he goes.
Mr. Sweeney said that he obtained the data for his aircraft-tracking accounts from the ADS-B Exchange, which describes itself on its website as the worlds largest source of unfiltered flight data.
Dan Streufert, the founder of ADSBexchange.com L.L.C., said in an email on Wednesday that anyone with basic electronics could obtain the signals from aircraft that broadcast their locations. The information is also available by listening to air traffic controllers, he added.
However, it is important to note our website tracks aircraft, not individuals, Mr. Streufert said. We cannot say who is or is not on the plane. Mr. Musks companies own and operate many aircraft this is only one of them. Mr. Musk may find Mr. Sweeneys activities annoying, similar to paparazzi, however, this information is already public from a myriad of sources.
Read the original post:
A Teenager Tracked Elon Musks Jet on Twitter. Then Came the Direct Message. - The New York Times
Posted in Elon Musk
Comments Off on A Teenager Tracked Elon Musks Jet on Twitter. Then Came the Direct Message. – The New York Times
5 picks I love at the Pebble Beach Pro-Am, according to a professional gambler – Golf.com
Posted: at 3:50 pm
By: Josh Sens February 1, 2022
Do you like Jordan Spieth this week? Our expert does.
Getty Images
The West Coast Swing continues this week with a stop that needs no introduction: the AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am.
What was born decades back as Bing Crosbys Clambake lives on today as part competition, part cocktail party, with Bill Murray as leading man, and a supporting cast of celebrities and Tour pros.
Daniel Berger is the defending champ, and hes in the field again. But hes not the odds-on favorite. That designation goes to Patrick Cantlay, who sits atop the betting board, just ahead of Berger, Jason Day, Jordan Spieth, Cameron Tringale and Justin Rose.
The tournament plays on a three-course rota, with Spyglass Hill and the Monterey Peninsula Country Club (Shore) in the mix over the first two days. On Saturday and Sunday, the entire field plays on Pebble only.
The current weather forecast calls for partly cloudy to sunny skies this weekend, with temperatures in the mid-60s. Scores should get into that range, too.
But who will shoot some of the lowest numbers?
For those predictions, we turn to Erick Lindgren, GOLF.coms expert prognosticator. The terms are the same as ever: we give Lindgren a $1,000 gambling budget (just play money), and he supplies us with his five top picks. Here are Lindgrens wagers for the event, which kicks off Thursday morning in Monterey.
(Looking to play any of these bets yourself? We teamed with BetMGM and the online sports book is offering a Risk-Free Bet of up to $1,000).
Lindgren was among the first last year to go all in on Spieths resurgence, and a T3 at Pebble was where the resurgent play began. There are courses and events where Jordan should not be a dog to anyone, Lindgren says. Pebble is one of those.
Jasons history here is simply too good to ignore, says Lindgren, who also likes what he saw out of Day last week at Torrey Pines. The back pain is gone (for now, anyway), and Days stellar short remains intact. Lets ride his good health, hot hand and history here, Lindgren says.
It seems like another lifetime now, but it was just two years ago that Taylor held off a fast-charging Phil Mickelson and won by four shots in this event. His game is starting to percolate, which matches up with love for this tournament, Lindgren says.
Lindgren is a banking on a repeat performance out of Lashley, who opened with six straight birdies on Pebble last year for an opening round 65. Even with a final-round triple bogey, Lashley finished T5. I look for spots to back Nate, and this is definitely a good one, Lindgren says.
Theegalas stock has been on the rise, but Lindgren still sees him as a great value. This is a bet on talent, trying to get in early on him, Lindgren says.
A golf, food and travel writer, Josh Sens has been a GOLF Magazine contributor since 2004 and now contributes across all of GOLFs platforms. His work has been anthologized in The Best American Sportswriting. He is also the co-author, with Sammy Hagar, of Are We Having Any Fun Yet: the Cooking and Partying Handbook.
Continue reading here:
5 picks I love at the Pebble Beach Pro-Am, according to a professional gambler - Golf.com
Posted in Gambling
Comments Off on 5 picks I love at the Pebble Beach Pro-Am, according to a professional gambler – Golf.com
Elon Musk: I would be shocked if Tesla does not achieve Full Self-Driving that is safer than human drivers this year (and 5 years ahead of everyone) -…
Posted: at 3:50 pm
Elon Musk gave an update on his expected timeline for Tesla achieving Full Self-Driving capability, and he now says that he would be shocked if Tesla does not achieve Full Self-Driving safer than human this year.
We have heard that before.
Since back in 2018, Musk has been predicting that Tesla will solve full self-driving next year. The company made an early bet on hardware for self-driving, and it has since been promising that it can deliver the technology to millions of vehicles already on the road through software updates.
The CEO has updated the language around his predictions a few times.
For example, he previously talked about Tesla delivering a feature complete version of full self-driving, which means that Tesla vehicles would have the capacity to attempt to drive by themselves on both local roads and highways with driver supervision at all times, but the capacity wouldnt be good. In short, it can drive through intersections, but it often needs assistance from the driver with the goal that it gets better over time.
Tesla delivered that through its FSD Beta program in 2020, but it was a lot more limited than many people hoped and quite far from Musks original promise of Tesla having a million robotaxis on the road.
The automaker has made great progress since the release of FSD Beta, which is now being used by almost 60,000 Tesla owners in the US.
But despite this progress, its hard for many to imagine when it can lead to an actual (for real this time) full self-driving system or even if it can even happen at this point without Tesla needing a new approach with different hardware.
During Teslas Q4 2021 earnings call last week, the CEO updated his timeline for Tesla delivering full self-driving safer than human by saying that he would be shocked if it doesnt happen this year:
I would be shocked if we do not achieve Full Self-Driving safer than human this year. I would be shocked.
Now he didnt elaborate by what metric it would be considered safer than human or if that will be enough for Tesla to take responsibility for the system away from the driver, which is really the only thing that matters to consider a system self-driving.
Despite the lack of detail, the CEO was so confident that he added on Twitter this weekend that Tesla also plans on licensing its self-driving software to other automakers.
He believes that every other company developing self-driving technology is about five years behind Tesla.
Its hard to take these predictions seriously anymore, but based on Musks own standard, we should be.
When admitting to having missed a few self-driving timeline predictions, the CEO once said that you can at least track whether or not progress is being made by the fact that the predicted timelines are getting shorter and not longer.
Its not next year anymore, but this year.
Now give us access to the data that shows some progress. The anecdotal data from beta testers is nice, but we need something more concrete.
During the call last week, Musk even mentioned that beta testers would see improvements if they were to plot their beta interventions per mile.
Why doesnt Tesla collect and release this data for the whole beta fleet? That would be the best way to track progress.
Its time for Tesla to do that if it wants any credibility about delivering on its goal for full self-driving.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Subscribe to Electrek on YouTube for exclusive videos and subscribe to the podcast.
Excerpt from:
Posted in Elon Musk
Comments Off on Elon Musk: I would be shocked if Tesla does not achieve Full Self-Driving that is safer than human drivers this year (and 5 years ahead of everyone) -…
Elon Musk Says He Took His Children to Watch the Common Folk Hoard Supplies in Panic – Futurism
Posted: at 3:50 pm
He's right, but he shouldn't say it.Let Them Have Toilet Paper
In the worlds best example of two wrongs dont make a right, Elon Musk says he took his kids to Walmart to watch the plebeians of the world panic-buy toilet paper.
Musk made a quip about customers springing to buy paper products during Teslas Q4 earnings call this week, in which he compared the the global chip shortage to the toilet paper shortages that hit during the early pandemic and still plague certain areas.
You know, there was a toilet paper shortage during COVID, and like, obviously, it wasnt really certainly a tremendous enhanced need for ass wiping, Musk said, according to a transcript of the call. Peoplegot every paper you could possibly wipe your ass with. I was like, Is this like a real thing or not? I actually took my kids to the H-E-B and Walmart in Texas. Indeed, it was.
Musk went on to mock people for stocking up on toilet paper, saying that if the end of the world was truly coming, it wasnt exactly the kind of thing that would help anyone survive.
Toilet paper is the least of your problems, Musk quipped.
Was Musk being being totally insensitive to all of us non-rich people who have to worry about the real consequences of a real pandemic?
Yes.
Is it pretty pointless to stock up on toilet paper?
Also yes.
But as mentioned, two wrongs dont make a right. Its true that according to WebMD, TP demand grew to $1.45 billion in sales in the 4-week period ending in March of 2020, up 112 percent from the year before. Its also true that if everyone bought just what they needed, there would be enough to go around and stores wouldnt have to limit how many packages a customer could buy.
Additionally, panic-buying only exacerbates supply chain shortages, and all that toilet paper is made from wood pulp, a resource we should trying to use less of, not more.
Grudgingly, yes, Musk is right but that doesnt mean he needs to sound so smug.
More on Musk monologues: Elon Musk Goes on Paranoid Rant About Vaccines
Care about supporting clean energy adoption? Find out how much money (and planet!) you could save by switching to solar power at UnderstandSolar.com. By signing up through this link, Futurism.com may receive a small commission.
Original post:
Elon Musk Says He Took His Children to Watch the Common Folk Hoard Supplies in Panic - Futurism
Posted in Elon Musk
Comments Off on Elon Musk Says He Took His Children to Watch the Common Folk Hoard Supplies in Panic – Futurism
Top 10 Gambling TV Shows of All Time – Critical Blast
Posted: at 3:50 pm
Its always interesting whenever two worlds collide. Gambling has always been one of mankinds favorite hobbies and recreational activities. However, as the 20th century rolled along, people started indulging more in content consumption in the wake of the release of a certain device called the television. These days, gambling movies and TV shows make up a huge part of pop culture and mainstream media. So many people are reliant on television to keep them engaged and entertained on a daily basis. One of the most beautiful aspects of television production is that theres practically a show for any kind of person. And in this article, were going to tackle some of the most prominent gambling-related TV shows of all time.
The first show on this list is going to greatly appeal to poker fans around the world. High Stakes Poker is a televised cash game of no limit Texas holdem. This is the most popular variation of poker wherein players are dealt two hole cards in order to form a five-card hand. The show has been on for 8 seasons and its still going strong. As its name implies, High Stakes Poker is only reserved for high rollers, with buy-ins reaching as much as a million dollars.
Breaking Vegas was a short-lived television series that premiered in 2004 on The History Channel. Despite the fact that it was short-lived, many gambling fans still continue the show to be quite binge-worthy. The show covers various real-life stories of people who have been documented to illegally take money from casinos using clever tricks and technology.
Before Max Kellermans big break as an all-around sports commentator for ESPN, he was the host of a gambling series that premiered in 2006 on Spike TV called King of Vegas. Essentially, the way that King of Vegas worked was that it was a competition between gamblers that forced players to play in different kinds of casino games with a fresh set of $10,000 in chips each.
Poker After Dark was a very popular poker show that had a very similar format with High Stakes Poker. It first premiered back in 2007 and had a run of four years before the show was cancelled in late 2011. However, due to popular demand, the show was rebooted back in 2017 and it features a lot of familiar faces who were in the original run of the show.
Breaking away from reality TV, the next item on this list is a show that was inspired by a Japanese manga series that was written and illustrated by Shinobu Kaitani. Its a show that follows the story of a college student named Nao who receives a mysterious package containing cash amounting to 100 million Japanese Yen. Along with the cash is a note stating that she is now a contestant in the Liar Game Tournamenta competition wherein contestants are forced to lie, cheat, and steal their way to the top.
Another poker entry on this list, the World Poker Tour is different from the other shows mentioned so far since the game is done in a tournament-style format. Poker tournaments require a lot more focus, stamina, and endurance on the part of players, and WPT is often dubbed as the most prestigious competition in all of poker.
A gambling show starring Dustin Hoffman. Whats not to love? Luck originally premiered back in 2012 and was cancelled just two months after its release due to animals being harmed on the set. However, despite the fact that the show was cancelled, the remaining episodes of the shows first season continued to air. This may not be Hoffmans best work, but its still definitely a show thats worth watching.
Las Vegas is a popular comedy-drama series that aired on NBC from 2003 to 2008. The show revolves around a team of people who are working for the fictional Montecito hotel on the Las Vegas strip. Its a standard office-setting drama series that takes an interesting approach to telling the stories of people who work in the gambling industry.
The Casino is another reality-based television show that follows millionaires Thomas Breitling and Tim Poster as they oversee the operations at the Golden Nugget Hotel & Casino in Las Vegas. Its an interesting and more realistic look into the way that casinos are typically run within the gamblnig capital of the world.
Smart Live Casino is an interactive UK-based television show that was first formed in 2007. It differs from the other shows on this list in the sense that its interactive and offers a lot more engagement to its viewers.
See the article here:
Posted in Gambling
Comments Off on Top 10 Gambling TV Shows of All Time – Critical Blast
Elon Musk’s dreams of Mars colonization could be hindered by depopulation – Deutsche Welle
Posted: at 3:50 pm
Elon Musk wants to make humans a multiplanetary species. Colonization of Mars has been the main goal of the entrepreneurs multi-billion dollar company SpaceX since its founding two decades ago.
The billionaire has in the past argued that we need a Plan B if Earth finds itself irreversibly damaged through climate change, overpopulation, a third world war or an eventual mass extinction event.
While the jurys still out on what will ultimately render our planet uninhabitable, in January Musk tweeted a new concern: population collapse.
Contrary to what you might think, there may be some truth to his worry the world's population could decrease after the second half of the century, according toa 2020 studypublished in The Lancet by researchers from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME).
That means there might not be enough people for Musk's Mars colonization plan which the SpaceX CEO acknowledged himself in the same tweet: "If there aren't enough people for Earth, then there definitely won't be enough for Mars.
Predictions by the IHME suggest that by 2064 the global population will reach its peak at 9.73 billion, followed by a decrease of almost a billion by the end of the century. These findings show a very different picture from previous projections by the United Nations, which estimate a steady increase to around 11 billion by 2100. Musk called the UN numbers "utter nonsense in the same Twitter post.
Women play a crucial role in these estimates. The population decline is attributed mainly to decreasing birth rates women are having fewer kids. The researchers pointed out that changes in the birth rate are mostly explained by an ongoing trend of better and easier access to education and contraceptives.
But why does this happen? Evidence from Denmark could shed light on the causes. According to a 2018study by the National Bureau of Economic Research, women's earnings droppeddrastically after childbirth while men's stayed the same.
Some countries have tried to tackle these challenges with incentive programs like paid maternity leave, employment protection, child care and economic aid. A good example given by the authors is Sweden, which increased its birth rates from 1.5 in the late 1990s to 1.9 in 2019.
The researchers were also concerned that the lower birth rates tight relation to womens increased attainment of education and contraceptives could pose a real threat to their freedom and rights. Instead of implementing programs to lessen the financial blow many women experience when they become mothers, some countries might, on the contrary, prohibit or restrict access to reproductive health services to prevent population declines. They mentioned past examples like Romania in the 60s and the Soviet Union, which used restrictions and bans to try to increase fertility rates.
Although Musk might not like a less populated world, it wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing, IHME researchers said. They noted it could provide relief to the environment because fewer people use fewer resources and generate fewer carbon emissions. But the authors are clear that although a decline in the population could benefit the planet, it is not a solution against climate change.
Some countries like Japan, Spain and Ukraine could face a halving or more of their population by 2100. China is predicted to fall from its current 1.4 billion people to roughly 700 million, despite the 2015 end to the one-child policy.
But not all countries would see a decline in their population. The models showed that sub-Saharan Africa, North Africa and the Middle East were the only regions expected to have a higher population in 2100 than in 2017.
On average, high-income Western Europe countries would reach a population peak before 2040, much earlier than the predicted 2064 global peak. In the case of Germany, the population would peak at 85 million by 2035 and thendecrease to about 60 million by 2100.
The predictions also point to a decreasing working population in some countries. This would have significant economic consequences, researchers said like lower GDP growth rates. Combined with a growing number of people entering retirement age, a smaller workforce poses hard fiscal challenges to public health and pension programs. In this regard, immigration could help, wrote the authors. World population growth to diminish, spurring geopolitical power shift.
The study mentions that countries that are able to manage to keep their working population through migration, like Canada, Australia and the USA, could prosper.
Estimates like these are, of course, limited to researchers current understanding of population indicators. They may not be able to tell the future, but they can shed some light on it.
See the original post:
Elon Musk's dreams of Mars colonization could be hindered by depopulation - Deutsche Welle
Posted in Elon Musk
Comments Off on Elon Musk’s dreams of Mars colonization could be hindered by depopulation – Deutsche Welle
These Strategies Used by Ultra-Wealthy Entrepreneurs Like Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos Will Help Your Business Stand Out – Entrepreneur
Posted: at 3:50 pm
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
The names Elon Musk, Gary Vaynerchuk, Richard Bransonand Jeff Bezos are much more well-known than the companies they have created. All of them work hard on their personal branding using a whole set of powerful PR techniques. Memes, content pyramid, storytelling and other instruments they usemight also help youstep your game up behind the scenes.
Personal branding for entrepreneurs is crucialto grow business, drive sales, attract investors and hire talents. According to aBRANDfog survey, the most important element of PR and communications strategy for business owners is social-media activity 80% of respondents agreed with that. Moreover, 82% of employees trust a company moreif its executives have a strong reputation online.
Customers dont pay just for a product anymore;they invest in people. Thats why its time to work on your personal-branding strategy.
There are plenty of memes about Tesla and SpaceX on the internet, and they are not separatefrom the image of Elon Musk. Every seeminglyrandom action of his is part of an elaboratestrategy. This strategy has proven extremely successful, as Musk was namedTime's2021"Person of the Year."Here's how Musk has made it happen.
Filming
We have seen Elon Musk in many cult films and TV shows;for example, he was in Iron Manin 2010 and The Big BangTheory, in which the entrepreneur played himself.Because of this, those who follow the news of the electric vehicle or space-technology market aren't the only ones who know about him.
The businessman frequently says in his interviews that he really loves cinema, so his image appearances don't come across as overly forced. Musk even launched a mini-series about his company SpaceX in yet another moveto establish his personal brand and companywith audiences who might not otherwise encounter him.
Speaking up openly
If you Google "Elon Musk says," you'll encounter a litany of the entrepreneur's grand plans and musings: from promises to send a rocket to Marsanddetonate an atomic bomb on the planetto make it habitable for people to predictionsabout the absorption of the Earth by the Sun and the extinction of mankind.Musk's willingess to delve into big ideas generates intrigue and strengthens his personal brand.
Related: 10 Things Entrepreneurs Never Want to Talk About, But Should
Creating a relatable image
Musk hosts "Ask Me Anything"sessions on Reddit andresponds to messages from followers on Twitter. In 2014, he even reposted an ad that was made for Tesla by several college students. People like to feel connected to their heros, so cultivating that sense of camaraderie can go a long way towards boosting the public's perception of you and your business.
American entrepreneur, founder of VaynerMedia and VaynerX, Gary Vaynerchuk generates an enormous amount of content.He has his own blog, YouTube channel, podcast, Twitter, Instagram andFacebook. Because of this activity, Vaynerchuk has built a powerful personal brand that is followed by millions of people. His strategy is based on a few techniques.
Different formats of profitable content
In his blog, the businessman writes about a content pyramid, which involves dividing alarge topic among different formats. He publishes long Q&A videos, short texts, stories, pictures andmemes. On each network, content is released in a unique format, which keeps people coming back for more.
Related: What to Post on Each Social Media Platform: The Complete Guide to Optimizing Your Social Content
Sincerity
Vaynerchukgives concrete examples and reveals his own process. For instance, he advises his followers to get rid of curated social images (for business, for family, for friends) and bewho you are on the internet, as it is impossible to play several roles in different spheres of life at once. Naturally, this sincerity draws people in and bolsters his credibility.
Willingess to engage
Despite the number of people who consume Vaynerchuk's content, any subscriber has the opportunity to communicate with him directly by writing him a message, and Vaynerchuk actively replies to his followers on Twitter every day. This willingess to engage, combined with the entrepreneur's sincere approach, no doubt strenghthens his fan base.
Today, Branson's corporation Virgin Group includes about 400 different companies in the field of sound recording, cellular communications andair transportation. Despite the scale of his businesses,Branson is an open person who is interesting to follow and can be trusted. Here are some of his secrets.
Representing courage and risk
Branson's attitude towards business and risk deserves special attention. He says If you can run one business well, you can run any business well."This ability to take risks and accept the likelihood of failure is indeed exciting. Therefore, the audience likes to follow him and get inspired.
Giving a memorable performance
Even when some of Branson's business ideas dont work as well, he still turns it into a vibrant PR campaign. At the launch of the Virgin Brides bridal salon, the entrepreneur dressed in a bridal dress, which attracted the attention of the audience. That business has not survived, but the image of Branson in that dress is still remembered by many as is Branson's willingess to have fun and connect with people.
Representing openness and simplicity
Branson cares about both Virgin Group employees and customers. The best team members are invited to dinner or on a trip with him. This establishes him as a leader people can look up to and as someone people want tomodel their own behaviors after, which further contributes to the integrity of his brand.
Related: What Richard Branson and Warren Buffett Reveal About Personal Branding
Once the richest man in the world according to Forbes, the founder of Amazon Jeff Bezos speaks about innovation, entrepreneurship, recommends books, launches space projectsand talks about saving the planet. This is what distinguishes his strategy from others.
Drawing attention to environmental and social agendas
Bezos often articulates the need to tackle climate change. He has created the Bezos Earth Fund to that end.He has also visited India and promised to help with the creation of additional jobs. These tactics generally result in positive press and more engagement with his company.
Focusing on the quality of service
Delivering top-notch service is one of Bezos's primary aims.At one conference in 2019, a woman told him she hadn't been able to get a refund on Amazon. She handed the parcel to the entrepreneur, and he accepted itand apologized for the inconvenience. It's likely this display fostered a favorable attitude within the audience.
Related: How to Use Storytelling to Sell Your Brand and Vision
Look for new approaches, act sincerelyand don't forget to tell your audience about it these are the main recommendations for those who are thinking about developing a personal brand. Individuality and honesty captivate people, souse the above tools to help your business stand out among the competition.
Read the original post:
Posted in Elon Musk
Comments Off on These Strategies Used by Ultra-Wealthy Entrepreneurs Like Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos Will Help Your Business Stand Out – Entrepreneur
Warren Buffett would be richer than Elon Musk but gifted 50% of wealth – Markets Insider
Posted: at 3:50 pm
Warren Buffett would have seized Elon Musk's crown as the world's richest person this month, if the famed investor hadn't given half of his fortune to charity.
The Berkshire Hathaway CEO has a net worth of $113 billion, or just over half of Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk's $220 billion fortune, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. If Buffett hadn't donated shares worth $111 billion over the past 16 years, he would be wealthier than Musk today.
Buffett owned nearly 475,000 Berkshire "A" shares in 2006, when he pledged to give 99% of his fortune to good causes. He has almost halved his holdings to about 239,000 shares since then, slashing the value of his Berkshire stake to $112 billion.
The investor's net worth has jumped by over $4 billion this year, as mounting fears of inflation and interest-rate hikes have fueled a 3% rise in Berkshire shares. In contrast, Musk's fortune has plunged by $50 billion this month, reflecting a painful sell-off of technology stocks that cut Tesla's share price by 29%.
Forbes estimates that Musk has given less than 1% of his wealth to charity, so his philanthropy hasn't materially eroded his net worth. However, Buffett's giving may have boosted Berkshire's stock price, meaning the investor's fortune might be smaller today without his largesse in recent years.
The Berkshire chief is the only one of the world's 10 wealthiest people whose net worth has grown this year. His centibillionaire peers have seen nearly $150 billion wiped off their combined fortunes in a matter of weeks.
Buffett's philanthropy has put a big dent in his wealth, costing him the title of the world's richest man. Yet his decades of careful investing continue to pay off, as investors are once again flocking to Berkshire for safety, and his collection of stocks and businesses are generating plenty of money for him to give away.
Read more:Warren Buffett is ready to deploy $80 billion if the market crashes this year. 7 experts say the investor should trim his Apple stake, acquire luxury brands, or buy some blue-chip stocks in the meantime.
See the original post:
Warren Buffett would be richer than Elon Musk but gifted 50% of wealth - Markets Insider
Posted in Elon Musk
Comments Off on Warren Buffett would be richer than Elon Musk but gifted 50% of wealth – Markets Insider
What’s NATO, and why does Ukraine want to join? – The Conversation AU
Posted: at 3:49 pm
International concern about Russias provocative stance toward Ukraine continues, even as Russian President Vladimir Putin denies plans for an attack and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy cautioned on Jan. 28, 2022, against the idea that there is war here.
Putin has built up more than 100,000 troops along the Ukrainian border, and the U.S. is ready to deploy thousands of troops. The U.S. has also asked the United Kingdom and other NATO allies to deploy hundreds of soldiers to Eastern Europe.
Putin says he will stand down if NATO prohibits Ukraine from joining its alliance a demand that has been rejected.
Understanding NATO and its history with Ukraine offers insight into the weight of this ultimatum.
NATO is a military alliance established in 1949 by the United States, Canada, France, the United Kingdom, and eight other European countries. Additional countries have since joined NATO most recently North Macedonia in 2020. Thirty nations are now part of the organization.
NATOs 4,200 staff members and member country embassies are headquartered on the outskirts of Brussels.
The alliance works with the United Nations, and the two are sometimes confused including in my classroom, where I teach history of the Soviet Union and the Cold War.
But NATO does have some things in common with the U.N. Both are international organizations that participating countries financially support. Both are dominated by the political influence of Western powers, including the U.S.But the organizations are not the same. NATO is designed to fight war, if necessary, with its military alliance. The U.N. works to avoid war through peacekeeping, political negotiations and other means.
NATOs key, traditional principle is collective defense. This means an attack on one or more members is considered an attack on all members.
NATO has invoked the collective defense principle only once: immediately after the attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, when it deployed European military planes to patrol U.S. skies.
But NATO has used other political and legal means to justify engagement in the Kosovo War in former Yugoslavia during the 1990s and in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars in the 2000s. The U.S. interprets NATOs military mandate broadly, for example, as the right to use force whenever its members interests are at stake.
NATO has long responded to Russian military threats and served as a bulwark to protect against potential Soviet aggression during the Cold War.
Countries could vote by consensus to respond with military force to protect members in the event of any eventual Russian attack on Ukraine. But this military force would not directly protect Ukraine under the collective defense principle, as is not yet a NATO member.
Ukraine has had a partnership with NATO since 1992. NATO established a Ukraine-NATO commission in 1997, providing a discussion forum for security concerns and as a way to further the NATO-Ukraine relationship without a formal membership agreement.
Membership with NATO would significantly increase Ukraines international military backing, allowing for NATO military action within Ukraine and alongside members of its military. This guarantee of military might would act as a firm deterrent to Russian aggression.
NATO is clear about the limits of its support to nonmember countries. While it has supported nonmember countries like Afghanistan during humanitarian emergencies, NATO does not commit to deploying troops to a nonmember state.
Membership would draw Ukraine more firmly toward Europe, making it more likely that Ukraine could join the European Union another policy goal for Ukraine. Membership would also help the country build a closer relationship with the U.S.
Joining the alliance would also pull Ukraine further away from Russias sphere of influence.
But regional tensions could be exacerbated if Ukraine becomes a NATO member, as Russia has said it would interpret the alliances expansion as a direct threat.
While Ukraine is making progress toward gaining NATO membership, it is unlikely to join NATO quickly, if at all.
All NATO members must unanimously approve a new country, based on factors like a functioning democracy and unresolved external territorial disputes, so the Russian troops camped on Ukraines border pose a problem.
NATO membership is open to any European country that can contribute to the security of the North Atlantic area. Aspiring member countries follow a Membership Action Plan, an application process that involves countries detailing their security and political policies. It can take a country 20 years to complete the plan and gain admittance, as in the case of North Macedonia.
Former Ukrainian president Leonid Kuchma publicly announced Ukraines interest in NATO membership in May 2002.
Ukraine then applied for a Membership Action Plan in 2008. This process stalled in 2010 under former President Viktor Yanukovich, a Putin-backed politician who did not want to pursue a NATO relationship.
Ukraine has more recently re-energized its plans to join NATO, especially in the face of the building Russia-Ukraine conflict and Russias annexation of Crimea in 2014.
In 2017, Ukraine adopted a constitutional amendment that committed itself to NATO membership.
Ukraine then adopted a National Security Strategy aimed at developing its NATO partnership in 2021.
The NATO application process has been dragging on for an indecently long time, Ukraine Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba said in September 2021.
[Over 140,000 readers rely on The Conversations newsletters to understand the world. Sign up today.]
An independent and sovereign Ukraine would support NATOs goal of Euro-Atlantic stability, even if Ukraine has expressed greater urgency than NATO to join the alliance.
But Ukraine joining NATO now would, quite simply, be a liability. The threat of an imminent conflict between Ukraine and Russia would commit NATO to take military action against Russia.
See the rest here:
What's NATO, and why does Ukraine want to join? - The Conversation AU
Posted in NATO
Comments Off on What’s NATO, and why does Ukraine want to join? – The Conversation AU
U.S. and NATO Don’t Budge in Answering Russian Demands – The New York Times
Posted: at 3:49 pm
BRUSSELS The confrontation between Russia and the United States over Ukraine deepened on Wednesday, as leaked documents confirmed the U.S. and NATO rejection of key Russian security demands, while the Biden administration ordered 3,000 additional troops into Eastern Europe.
Although the leaked documents showed the United States had offered to provide more transparency about missile deployments in Eastern Europe, the basic message to Moscow was American and NATO resolve not to bow to Russian demands, in a dispute that has pushed relations to their worst since the Soviet era.
The broad outlines of the U.S. and NATO written replies to the Kremlin had already been known and President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia said Tuesday that Moscows demands had basically been ignored, even as he said his government was still analyzing the responses.
But the publication of those answers provided additional detail and reinforced the obstacles to a resolution, as fears escalated in the West about the large Russian troop buildup surrounding Ukraine.
Even as diplomacy aimed at defusing the crisis intensified on Wednesday, the responses, delivered to the Kremlin last week, underscored the pressure on Mr. Putin to decide whether to go to war over demands the West has rejected or to take up the opportunity to negotiate arms control agreements offered by the West. He said on Tuesday that the United States was trying to goad Russia into war.
The American and NATO replies to Russia were obtained and published by El Pas, the Spanish daily, and confirmed by John F. Kirby, the Pentagon press secretary.
I note that in the past few hours a proposal made by the United States leaked to a European news outlet, Mr. Kirby said. We did not make this document public, but now that it is, it confirms to the entire world what weve been saying.
President Bidens new troop deployment order appeared aimed at reinforcing the message that the United States and its 29 NATO partners were unified in their resolve, and at reassuring NATO members closer to the Russian border.
The troops, including 1,000 already in Germany, will head to NATO members Poland and Romania, Mr. Kirby, said, though there remains no intention of sending troops into Ukraine. He said the deployment was meant to be temporary.
We are making it clear that we are going to be prepared to defend our NATO allies if it comes to that, Mr. Kirby said.
Jen Psaki, the White House press secretary, said in explaining the deployment that there was no question that Russia and President Putin has continued to take escalatory, not de-escalatory steps.
The initial response from Moscow was negative. The unfounded destructive steps will only fuel military tensions and narrow the field for political decisions, Aleksandr V. Grushko, a deputy foreign minister, was quoted as saying by the Interfax news agency.
The developments came as top European leaders pushed a diplomatic outreach to Mr. Putin. Prime Minister Boris Johnson of Britain spoke with him by phone, and Mr. Johnsons office said they had agreed on the need for a peaceful resolution and that aggravation was in no ones interest.
President Emmanuel Macron of France, who has spoken with Mr. Putin at least twice in the past week, spoke with Mr. Biden later Wednesday. In a readout of their phone call, the French presidency said the two leaders had shared the same logic of de-escalation. Mr. Macron is scheduled to talk with the leaders of Russia, Ukraine and Poland on Thursday.
Olaf Scholz, Germanys new chancellor, told the German broadcaster ZDF that he planned to meet with Mr. Putin soon but did not specify a date.
Moscow issued its security demands in mid-December, as the West sounded alarms about a potential invasion of Ukraine. Among the most contentious were Russias insistence that Ukraine, a former Soviet republic of 44 million, never be allowed to join NATO, and that the West scale back its military presence in Eastern Europe to mid-1990s levels.
Mr. Putin wants to expand Moscows sphere of influence to something resembling the one it had before the Soviet Unions collapse 30 years ago. He has described the possibility of Ukraine joining NATO as a threat not just to Russia, but to world peace.
If Ukraine were to align itself fully with the West and acquire NATO weapons, he suggested on Tuesday, it might go to war to recapture Crimea which Russia seized in 2014, a move unrecognized by the international community. That, he said, could lead to war between Russia and the NATO bloc.
Feb. 3, 2022, 2:31 p.m. ET
Mr. Putin, whose renewed troop buildup along Ukraines borders led to the current crisis, has regularly expressed concern that NATOs Aegis missile-defense systems in Romania and Poland could also fire offensive Tomahawk cruise missiles at Russia. NATO and Washington insist that the systems are only defensive and are not aimed not at Russia but at other possible adversaries, like Iran.
In its response, the Biden administration proposes a reciprocal transparency mechanism under which Russia could verify the absence of offensive missiles at the sites in Romania and Poland, while the United States would do the same at two missile-launching bases of its choice in Russian territory; one would likely be in Kaliningrad, the slice of Russia bordering two NATO members, Lithuania and Poland.
Moscow has stationed intermediate-range missiles in Kaliningrad that can carry conventional and nuclear warheads, one reason the United States and its allies abandoned the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, known as the I.N.F. Treaty, in 2019.
Ukraines foreign minister, Dmytro Kuleba, endorsed on Wednesday another U.S. proposal to help defuse the crisis: an assurance that it would not deploy offensive missiles or permanently base ground troops in Ukraine. The proposal was presented to Russia as contingent on consultations with the Ukrainian government.
The United States and its NATO allies say they have no combat troops or missiles in Ukraine, and no intention of deploying offensive military capabilities there. They have also made clear that they would not wage war against Russia to defend Ukraine, which is not covered by NATOs commitment to collective defense.
Ominous warnings. Russia called the strike a destabilizing act that violated the cease-fire agreement, raising fears of a new intervention in Ukraine that could draw the United States and Europe into a new phase of the conflict.
The Kremlins position. President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, who has increasingly portrayed NATOs eastward expansion as an existential threat to his country, said that Moscows military buildupwas a response to Ukraines deepening partnership with the alliance.
NATO promised in 2008 that Ukraine and Georgia could one day join the alliance, though it appears no closer to happening now than it did then. The pledge infuriated Mr. Putin, who was already incensed that NATO had added the former Soviet Baltic republics and former Soviet satellites like Poland.
The Russian president has been trying ever since to ensure NATOs door remains shut, including to Finland and Sweden.
The offer to rule out future U.S. deployments in Ukraine addressed a concern Mr. Putin has raised repeatedly: that if Ukraine were to join the alliance, missiles deployed there could reach Moscow in mere minutes.
But it was not a clear-cut concession to Russia. The proposal called for reciprocal commitments by both Russia and the United States to refrain from deploying missiles or troops in Ukraine. Not only has Russia annexed Crimea, it also backs a separatist insurgency that holds a slice of eastern Ukraine.
I would like to note that while the United States has neither missiles nor combat units in Ukraine, Russia has both, Mr. Kuleba said in a video call with foreign journalists. And if this proposal is accepted on a reciprocal basis, that will imply that Russia has to withdraw. So, no, we have no objections.
Mr. Kuleba said he remained hopeful, in part simply because the diplomacy was continuing despite warnings from Western governments, starting months ago, that an intervention could begin in December or January, and now we are at the beginning of February.
In the leaked documents, the United States also proposed negotiations with Moscow on other arms-control measures, announced publicly in Washington in the past. They include a treaty to replace the current New START accord limiting intercontinental-range missiles, and talks to enhance transparency on military exercises and reduce the risk of accidental conflict.
The United States is also prepared to discuss another Russian concern, known as the indivisibility of security the idea that a nation may not seek to increase its security at the expense of anothers.
But Washington rejected any restraint on the rights of any sovereign country to choose or change its security arrangements, including treaties of alliance.
Both Washington and NATO also rejected the Russian demand that they negotiate separate treaties with Moscow that would require them to remove all troops and equipment from NATO member countries that border Russia, including Poland and the Baltic States.
Washington insisted that NATOs enhanced forward battalions in Poland and the Baltic countries, established after Russia annexed Crimea and supported separatists in eastern Ukraine, were not permanent, since they rotate. It said those deployments, totaling 5,000 troops, did not constitute substantial combat forces, in accordance with a 1997 agreement between NATO and Russia.
Instead, the documents say that any more Russian buildup or aggression aimed at Ukraine will force the United States and our Allies to strengthen our defensive posture.
The documents that the United States and NATO provided to Moscow are relatively general in tone and do not attempt to draft treaty language. Instead, they set out for Russia where the United States and NATO are prepared to engage in negotiations once Russia de-escalates around Ukraine.
El Pas did not describe how it obtained the documents; the Kremlin spokesman, Dmitri S. Peskov, said on Wednesday that Russian authorities had not released them.
Steven Erlanger reported from Brussels and Andrew E. Kramer from Kyiv, Ukraine. Michael Crowley, Helene Cooper, Eric Schmitt and Zolan Kanno-Youngs contributed reporting from Washington, Roger Cohen from Paris, Shashank Bengali and Marc Santora from London, and Rick Gladstone from New York.
Go here to see the original:
U.S. and NATO Don't Budge in Answering Russian Demands - The New York Times
Posted in NATO
Comments Off on U.S. and NATO Don’t Budge in Answering Russian Demands – The New York Times







