The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Monthly Archives: February 2022
Cannot nip Goa’s casino industry in the bud overnight: Congress – Daijiworld.com
Posted: February 7, 2022 at 6:24 am
Panaji, Feb 6 (IANS): The Congress on Sunday said that it would not be easy to wish away offshore casinos from Panaji, adding that if it comes to power, it would look to regulate the industry to control its "vice" component.
Chairman of the party's Manifesto Committee and former Union Minister of State for Law Ramakant Khalap also said the party would set up a functional Gaming Commission, as an authority to regulate the casino industry in the state.
"Goa is saddled with the issue of casinos. You have seen what has happened to the Mandovi. We are going to take a very holistic approach to this entire thing. It is not possible to just throw them out in the sea immediately," he said at a press conference.
The Congress' take on the controversial casino industry, nearly a week ahead of the state Assembly polls, is a climb down on the party's stated position on the casino industry. Various party leaders had promised to do away with the offshore casinos berthed in the Mandovi river off Panaji, terming them a menace to the state.
There are currently six offshore casinos on the Mandovi river, while there are nearly 10 onshore casinos functioning out of the numerous five star resorts located along the state's coastal strip.
Khalap now claims that it was not possible to nip the casino industry in the bud just yet.
"But a Gaming Commission, a regulatory body, will be put into place and we shall see to it that Goans are particularly protected from the vice of gambling, vice of drugs, vice of liquor and all sorts of things that are prevalent in Goa, everywhere for asking. We are absolutely concerned with the issues and appropriate steps will be taken," he said.
Asked if the party would shut down offshore casinos if it comes to power in the February 14 polls, Khalap said: "I am not saying they (casinos) will be there in the Mandovi. but the whole thing will have to be examined in a proper fashion. From 2012 till today this menace has been created. Overnight you cannot nip it in the bud like that."
View post:
Cannot nip Goa's casino industry in the bud overnight: Congress - Daijiworld.com
Posted in Casino
Comments Off on Cannot nip Goa’s casino industry in the bud overnight: Congress – Daijiworld.com
Jan. 6 Panel Adopts Prosecution Tactics for Its Investigation – The New York Times
Posted: at 6:24 am
The House select committee scrutinizing the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol is borrowing techniques from federal prosecutions, employing aggressive tactics typically used against mobsters and terrorists as it seeks to break through stonewalling from former President Donald J. Trump and his allies and develop evidence that could prompt a criminal case.
In what its members see as the best opportunity to hold Mr. Trump and his team accountable, the committee which has no authority to pursue criminal charges is using what powers it has in expansive ways in hopes of pressuring Attorney General Merrick B. Garland to use the Justice Department to investigate and prosecute them.
The panels investigation is being run by a former U.S. attorney, and the top investigator brought in to focus on Mr. Trumps inner circle is also a former U.S. attorney. The panel has hired more than a dozen other former federal prosecutors.
The committee has interviewed more than 475 witnesses and issued more than 100 subpoenas, including broad ones to banks as well as telecommunications and social media companies. Some of the subpoenas have swept up the personal data of Trump family members and allies, local politicians and at least one member of Congress, Representative Jim Jordan, Republican of Ohio. Though no subpoena has been issued for Mr. Jordan, his text messages and calls have shown up in communications with Mark Meadows, the former White House chief of staff, and in a call with Mr. Trump on the morning of Jan. 6, 2021.
Armed with reams of telephone records and metadata, the committee has used link analysis, a data mapping technique that former F.B.I. agents say was key to identifying terrorist networks in the years after the Sept. 11 attacks. The F.B.I. said it used a similar tactic last month to identify the seller of a gun to a man in Texas who took hostages at a synagogue.
Faced with at least 16 Trump allies who have signaled they will not fully cooperate with the committee, investigators have taken a page out of organized crime prosecutions and quietly turned at least six lower-level Trump staff members into witnesses who have provided information about their bosses activities.
The committee is also considering granting immunity to key members of Mr. Trumps inner circle who have invoked their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination as a way of pressuring them to testify.
Having lived through and being a part of every major congressional investigation over the past 50 years from Iran-contra to Whitewater to everything else, this is the mother of all investigations and a quantum leap for Congress in a way Ive never seen before, said Stanley Brand, a Democrat and the former top lawyer for the House who is now representing Dan Scavino, one of Mr. Trumps closest aides, in the investigation.
It is a development, Mr. Brand suggested, that Democrats might one day come to regret. When a frontier is pushed back, it doesnt recede, he said. They think theyre fighting for the survival of the democracy and the ends justify the means. Just wait if the Republicans take over.
The committees aggressive approach carries with it another obvious risk: that it could fail to turn up compelling new information about Mr. Trumps efforts to hold onto power after his defeat or to make a persuasive case for a Justice Department prosecution. Mr. Trump survived years of scrutiny by the special counsel in the Russia investigation, Robert S. Mueller III, and two impeachments. Despite a swirl of new investigations since he left office, the former president remains the dominant force in Republican politics.
The committee has no law enforcement role, and its stated goal is to write a comprehensive report and propose recommendations, including for legislation, to try to make sure the events of Jan. 6 are never repeated.
Nevertheless, its members have openly discussed what criminal laws Mr. Trump and his allies may have violated and how they might recommend that the Justice Department investigate him. Such a step could put considerable additional pressure on Mr. Garland, who has not given any specific public indication that the department is investigating Mr. Trump or would support prosecuting him.
As the House investigation was gaining momentum late last year, the committees vice chairwoman, Representative Liz Cheney, Republican of Wyoming, read from the criminal code to describe a law she believed could be used to prosecute Mr. Trump for obstructing Congress as it sought to certify the Electoral College count of his defeat.
Ms. Cheney and the other Republican on the committee, Representative Adam Kinzinger of Illinois, were censured by the Republican National Committee on Friday for their participation in the investigation.
Mr. Trumps allies have grown angry not just at the aggressiveness of the committee for example, in making subpoenas public before they have been served but also at the expansive list of people questioned, some of whom, these allies maintain, had minimal to no involvement in the events of Jan. 6.
The tactics being used by the committee were described by nearly a dozen people, including members of the committee, aides, witnesses and their lawyers, and other people familiar with the panels work. Many spoke on the condition of anonymity because they did not want to be identified discussing what the committee says is a confidential investigation.
By comparison, the House select committee that spent two and a half years investigating the 2012 Benghazi attack issued just a dozen or so subpoenas a small fraction of the number issued by the Jan. 6 committee so far and made no criminal referrals. The Jan. 6 panel has already recommended criminal contempt of Congress charges against three witnesses who refused to cooperate, and one, Stephen K. Bannon, has already been indicted by the Justice Department.
Members of the Jan. 6 committee say the obstacles thrown up by Mr. Trump and his allies and the high stakes of the investigation have left the panel with no choice but to use every tool at its disposal.
Its not a criminal investigation, but having experienced former prosecutors who know how to run complex, white-collar investigations working on a plot to overturn the presidential election is a very useful talent among your team, said Representative Adam B. Schiff, Democrat of California and a committee member.
To lead the inquiry, the panel hired Timothy J. Heaphy, the former U.S. attorney for the Western District of Virginia. In that position, he oversaw a number of high-profile prosecutions, including one in which the drugmaker Abbott Laboratories pleaded guilty in a fraud case and paid a $1.5 billion fine.
Ms. Cheney and the committees chairman, Representative Bennie Thompson, Democrat of Mississippi, also hired John Wood, a former U.S. attorney for the Western District of Missouri and a former deputy associate attorney general in the George W. Bush administration. He is a senior investigative counsel for the committee and is focusing on Mr. Trumps inner circle. Neither Mr. Heaphy nor Mr. Wood had previously worked on a congressional investigation.
Some of the Democrats on the committee were concerned that if the panel was too aggressive, Republicans might turn the tables on the Democrats whenever they took back control of the House. But Ms. Cheney insisted that the committee be as aggressive as possible.
She said that the panel would face significant resistance from Mr. Trumps inner circle, and that the committee would be criticized no matter what it did, so there was no reason to hold back in the face of efforts to impede its work.
Mr. Trump moved to block the National Archives from handing over documents from his White House, leading to a monthslong court fight that ended with the committee receiving the documents.
At least 16 witnesses have sued to try to block the committees subpoenas. Four of the panels most sought-after targets the conservative lawyer John Eastman; Jeffrey Clark, the Justice Department lawyer deeply involved in Mr. Trumps plays to try to stay in power; the conspiracy theorist Alex Jones; and the longtime Trump adviser Roger J. Stone Jr. invoked the Fifth Amendment as a way to avoid answering questions without the threat of a contempt of Congress charge.
Three Republican members of Congress Representative Kevin McCarthy of California, the minority leader; Representative Scott Perry of Pennsylvania; and Mr. Jordan told the committee that they would refuse to sit for questioning.
Despite those obstacles, the committee turned its attention to lower-level aides, who investigators knew were in the room for many of the key events that occurred in the lead-up to and during the assault, or were told almost immediately about what had occurred. Those witnesses tended to be younger and have far less money to hire high-end white-collar defense lawyers to fend off the committee. So far, the committee has spoken to at least a half-dozen lower-level aides who fall into this category.
When Mr. Meadows, the former White House chief of staff, refused to testify, the panel turned to his top aide, Ben Williamson, who complied with a subpoena and sat for hours of questioning. After Mr. Clark, the Justice Department lawyer, refused to cooperate, a former senior counsel who worked for him, Kenneth Klukowski, sat for an interview with the committee.
Representative Jamie Raskin, Democrat of Maryland and a member of the panel, said the committee was not trying to flip witnesses the way investigators might do in a criminal case. But, he said, If you drew some kind of social diagrams of whos testifying and whos not, pretty much everyone is testifying, except for those who are in the immediate entourage of Donald Trump.
Among the other aides who have testified before the committee are Marc Short, Greg Jacob and Keith Kellogg, all of whom worked for former Vice President Mike Pence. Three former spokeswomen for Mr. Trump have also cooperated: Kayleigh McEnany, Stephanie Grisham and Alyssa Farah Griffin.
The committees investigative work related to Mr. Trumps current spokesman illustrates the aggressive steps the panel is taking. The spokesman, Taylor Budowich, turned over more than 1,700 pages of documents and sat for roughly four hours of sworn testimony.
Shortly after testifying, Mr. Budowich learned that the committee had requested financial records from his bank related to pro-Trump rallies. A federal judge turned down an emergency request by Mr. Budowich to force congressional investigators to relinquish his banking records, which JPMorgan Chase had already given to the committee.
Investigators also sought a broad swath of phone records from Ali Alexander, a right-wing rally organizer who was cooperating with the committee, for two months before Jan. 6, 2021 well before he claims to have thought of planning an event that day and for one month after.
Late last month, another example of the panels investigative approach emerged. Mr. Jones, the conspiracy theorist, who has sued the committee, was questioned by investigators in a virtual interview. He later said on his radio show that in the interview he had invoked his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination nearly 100 times.
I just had a very intense experience being interrogated by the Jan. 6 committee lawyers, he said. They were polite, but they were dogged.
Even though Mr. Jones refused to share information with the committee, he said the investigators seemed to have found ways around his lack of cooperation. He said the committee had already obtained text messages from him.
They have everything thats already on my phones and things, he said. I saw my text messages with political organizers tied to the Jan. 6 rally.
Maggie Haberman, Matthew Cullen and Alan Feuer contributed reporting.
View post:
Jan. 6 Panel Adopts Prosecution Tactics for Its Investigation - The New York Times
Posted in Fifth Amendment
Comments Off on Jan. 6 Panel Adopts Prosecution Tactics for Its Investigation – The New York Times
Prosecutors Are Justified in Seeking Bannons Lawyers Records – The Bulwark
Posted: at 6:24 am
When its his liberty on the line, Steve Bannon evidently doesnt subscribe to the venerated axiom Never complain, never explain. Last Friday, Bannons lawyers, on his behalf and with his agreement, filed a motion complaining about federal prosecutors going after the telephone records and email records from the personal and professional accounts of [Bannons] defense counsel, Robert J. Costello.
The Department of Justice sought the documents as part of its November 12 criminal contempt indictment against Bannon for refusing to appear before the House Jan. 6th Committee or to provide documents in response to its subpoenas.
Time for Bannon to put on the big-boy pants. When you stiff legal obligations, you cant expect prosecutors to play nice. Serious prosecutors use every legally authorized weapon in their arsenal.
Yet now that he has brought the DOJs wrath down upon himself, Bannon sounds like something his ex-wife says he once hatefully called others. According to her statement during child-support proceedings, he said that he doesnt like Jews and . . . the way they raise their kids to be whiny brats. Can you hear the faint echo of a pot calling the kettle black?
In seeking the records from Bannons lawyer, the DOJ seems to have Bannon dead to rights. Bannon has asserted an advice of counsel defense. That means that he claims that his lawyer advised him it was fine to refuse to show up when the Jan 6th Committee subpoenaed him.
An advice of counsel claim waives the attorney-client privilege for the obvious reason that the defendant has put in issue what his lawyer said to him. Hence, the jury is entitled to hear the advice in order to decide whether the defense is valid.
In addition, in early November, Costello sat twice for FBI interviews in which he, according to Politico, described repeatedly advising Bannon not to cooperate with the select committee, saying he viewed their process as flawed and illegal. Those interviews reinforce the intentionality of the attorney-client privilege waiver privilege.
Costello is an experienced criminal defense lawyer. It isnt such lawyers practice to talk to the FBI about a clients potentially criminal conduct unless the decision is part of a deliberate strategy to put forward the matters discussed.
Costello may have envisioned multiple benefits in giving the interview. It was before Bannon was indicted, so he may have thought it could help dissuade the DOJ from charging Bannon. And if it didnt, an early disclosure of Bannons defense would bolster it by showing future jurors that Bannon did not make it up on the eve of trial.
Finally, giving the interview could well allow the jury to hear the defense via questioning on the stand of the FBI agent who interviewed Costello. That would avoid Bannon having to become a witness at trial to describe his lawyers advice . . . a smart tactic to avoid exposing him to withering cross-examination about his history of deception. (In 2020, Bannon was indicted for defrauding donors to his build-the-wall scheme before Trump pardoned him.)
In any event, there is no way that Costello gave those interviews without discussing it with Bannon and getting his agreement. That makes Costellos opening the door to his records Bannons decision, too.
DOJ has said that it has been careful to circumscribe its requests from Bannons lawyer, focusing strictly on those to which it is legally entitled. Aside from the information that Mr. Costello voluntarily disclosed on behalf of Mr. Bannon, the DOJ prosecutor wrote in response to Bannons lawyers, the Government has not taken any steps to obtain . . . any confidential communications between Bannon and any of his attorneys.
So wheres the beef, Mr. Bannon? If you dont like what comes along with asserting an advice of counsel defense, dont assert it.
Alternatively, you can end the whole matter. Appear before the committee. If you dont want to say anything, invoke your Fifth Amendment rights.
At that point, while the DOJ would not technically be compelled to drop the indictment, it likely would. Otherwise, at a subsequent trial, your defense lawyer would argue to a jury that you made amends and corrected your conduct. No harm, no foul is typically a winning argument for a white-collar, white-skinned defendant.
Of course, you may be too proud. Or perhaps defiance is your brand. Orif youll excuse a dab of cynical speculationcould it be that testifying would depress your Trump-base fundraising?
Whichever it is, we shouldnt expect an answer that explains. Pardoned con men are more likely to complain.
The rest is here:
Prosecutors Are Justified in Seeking Bannons Lawyers Records - The Bulwark
Posted in Fifth Amendment
Comments Off on Prosecutors Are Justified in Seeking Bannons Lawyers Records – The Bulwark
The Right-Wing Conspiracy Theorists and the Butterflies – Sierra Magazine
Posted: at 6:24 am
When I first met Marianna Wright, executive director of the National Butterfly Centera private nature conservatory near Mission, Texas, thats made national news since having to close indefinitely after Wright was physically attacked by right-wing conspiracists last weekshe was leaping to shore from a pontoon boat on the Rio Grande. I was reporting a story for this magazine about Americas 100th meridian; how that informal climate divide is marching east due to climate change and subtly reshaping life along the way. Wright offered me a beer and, though I had only come to discuss the butterflies her Center labors to protect, immediately launched into a Jeremiad on the Centers neighboring border wall as we puttered upstream alongside itor rather, alongside them.
That red one is the government border wall, and this is the Bannon-Fisher scam, she said. The towering slats of the private wall glared white in the sun and cut off abruptly near an elevated patrol tower skirted with invasive Carrizo cane. That patrol tower hasn't been operational for six months, maybe longer. That's how bad the crisis is.
The more she spoke, the more I realized our sunset cruise wasnt just for pleasure, and it wasnt just to show a strange journalist the Rio Grande. It was, in fact, a tiny act of protest. The Border Patrol, Wright said, has been discouraging public use of the river for years, and she and her colleagues and friends at the National Butterfly Center are insistent on taking it back. They often use the hashtag #reclaimtheriver: And thats what we wish everyone would do, you know? Everybody should be out here enjoying it, just like Mexico does.
Previously the executive director of The Foundation at Mission Regional Medical Center, Wright was recruited to fortify the fledgling National Butterfly Center in 2012. She doesnt hold back. Shes frank. Shes funny. Shes unapologetic. And alongside her operations sponsor, the North American Butterfly Association, shes currently a plaintiff in two separate lawsuits aiming to halt construction of the border walls, both direct threats to their 100-acre wildlife sanctuary and botanical garden.
When the National Butterfly Center was forced to close temporarily last week, following a bizarre encounter with Virginia congressional candidate Kimberly Lowe, I reached out to Wright again via Zoom. Heres what Wright had to say about the border wall, her butterflies, and the rightwing conspiracists who are out to get her.
***
[Note: This interview has been lightly edited for clarity and concision.]
Sierra:On its face, the phrase National Butterfly Center seems wholly innocuous. How did the NBC become so embroiled in Americas border wall debate?
Marianna Wright: On July 20, 2017, I found five government contractors cutting down our trees and mowing down our brush. I got on the phone with my US Border Patrol community liaison. He had no idea what was going on either. The next morning, five Border Patrol agents showed up demanding to speak with me. We met inside the visitor pavilion, and they told me that what we were asserting on the news and on YouTubebecause we had put out video of thishad not happened. I said, Come on, boys, get your trucks. Follow me over the levee. The contractors had left the Brush Hog and the brush boom there, so it was all evident. They laughed and said, Somebody will be in touch.
Chief Manuel Padilla, who was the head of the US Border Patrol Rio Grande Valley Sector, later showed up unannounced in plainclothes with his attach and a uniformed agent. He told me the government had indeed sent the contractors and they would be back, and they would be back with green uniform presence. I said, Armed federal agents on private property to protect private for-profit corporate employees? And he said, Yes, because people like you tend to get pretty upset when we take their land. And that has indeed been the case. Every time the contractors have come, or even Border Patrol agents themselves, they have come with a great deal of green uniform presence. Surrounding us, attempting to intimidate us, agents on horseback, in their SUVs and trucks, on foot, on the ATVs, the helicopter overhead, all of it.
Shortly after that incident, the National Butterfly Center filed suit against the Department of Homeland Security.
Correct. We filed in early December 2017, and that lawsuit sat with Judge Richard Leon in the DC district for 14 months without a single day in court. Never a hearing. Nothing.
There were several aspects to our complaint. There had been no waiver of law, so the government was actually violating the National Environmental Policy Act, the Endangered Species Act, all sorts of their own laws in this construction project. And at that time, it was a project that had no congressional vote authorizing or even appropriating funds for it. So that was part of our lawsuit: You haven't waived the laws. You haven't exercised eminent domain. And yet here you are, and by virtue of your physical presence and actions here, you have effectively seized our land already.
The second part of the lawsuit were those Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights violations. The US Border Patrol has authority for warrant-less entry for the purpose of patrolling, but the word patrolling has never really been defined. And so Border Patrol has, over the 10 years I've been at the Butterfly Center, denied us access to enter our own property, denied our members and visitors entry, occupied the property physically with personnel and equipment. They drag tires, which obviously are harmful to wildlife and air quality and create erosion. They have installed motion sensors throughout the property, video cameras, dirt box audio technology, and lord knows what else. And we would argue that many of these things do not equal patrolling, including bringing unauthorized third-party contractors onto our land, which they were doing routinely.
The National Butterfly Center has since become a target for many right-wing extremists. Do you believe it was that litigation that put you and the Butterfly Center in their crosshairs?
After we filed suit there was some publicity, but it wasn't such that it provoked a violent backlash. It was mostly what we call disaster tourism. People in their red hats would show up at the Butterfly Center saying, Hey! We want you to show us where they're going to build our president's great big beautiful wall! And we would say, Walk a half mile that way to the levee and the Mission Main Canal, and then go ahead and walk another 1.2 miles to the Rio Grande River. So it really wasn't that bad.
What happened, though, is in May of 2019, [former White House senior advisor]Jared Kushner reportedly told an Oval Office full of GOP senators, We solved the butterfly thing, and we had no idea what that meant. But we quickly found out when Steve Bannons military grade misinformation campaigndesigned to promote a political agenda and influence campaigns and incite violencestarted in El Paso and Sunland Park and then came to Mission, Texas. When they were in El Paso, we discussed the fact that the next stop would likely be Mission and that they would try to buy the land right next door to us.
Both you, as an individual, and the NBC filed an additional lawsuit in 2019 against We Build The Wall, chaired by Steve Bannon, which has since raised over $20 million under the pretense of building a private border wall. What exactly were your complaints?
Our lawsuit against We Build The Wall had two aspects. One was defamation and business disparagement. The other was a land nuisance claim. The We Build the Wall structure is downstream from us. It is built on a sandbar that is a peninsula that juts out. It points toward Mexico. And if everybody could see me right now, they'd see that I'm giving you the middle finger, because that's what this peninsula looks like. And we are upstream at basically a 90-degree angle. So in the next flood, when the Rio Grande River is rushing downstream, this Fisher-Neuhaus-Bannon fence is going to become a dam. It is going to become completely clogged and blocked with organic and inorganic debris that floats downstream in the flood. That dam is going to redirect water. It's going to increase shear. It's going to cause sediment redistribution. It's going to result in accelerated erosion and real land loss for us upstream and inland.
How did We Build The Wall and its followers respond to your litigation?
In order to boost their fundraising, they needed a straw man, and they chose to make the National Butterfly Center and the North American Butterfly Association and me personally their pinata. They totally disparaged our organization and disrupted our operations. They declared that we were a cartel front, that we were involved in human trafficking, that I was selling women and children into sex slavery, that they saw dead bodies on the property swarmed by butterflies, that they had put snipers in the bushes around our property to protect their construction workers from us. There were hundreds of these kinds of lies, and not just on Twitter or YouTube, but on Steve Bannons War Room broadcast and on their other media partners, including the fake news websites that they threw up, like therundownnews.com, which doesn't exist anymore because it fulfilled its purpose in maligning us and garnering millions of dollars for We Build The Wall, which is a dark money fundraising operation.
And what did you make of these wild allegations?
We wanted to laugh it off, but the Walmart massacre had already occurred. 22 people shot in cold blood at Walmart in El Paso, dozens more shot and injured as a direct result of We Build The Walls activities there. That event and those activities, the inflammatory rhetoric, and the exact same operatives and content creators that we saw this week in McAllen and Mission making their fake videos outside of the National Butterfly Centerthey provoked stochastic terrorism and wound up getting more than 22 people shot and killed. So we couldn't laugh about this.
The NBC made news again last week after Kimberly Lowe, a Republican congressional candidate in Virginia, allegedly assaulted you and your son. How did this whole bizarre incident play out?
My son Nicholas was filling in at the front desk because COVID has run through the National Butterfly Center just like everywhere else. He interrupted me on a conference call to say there were two women who had come in and said they were not going to pay admission, but they wanted us to open the property for them to go back to the river and see all the illegals crossing on the rafts. One woman claimed to be running for congress, and the other woman claimed to be her Secret Service agent. I asked him to get the name of the woman who said she was running for congress, and I took a minute or two to look her up online. It was clear to me that she was a MAGA candidate. There are photos of her with Trump and the My Pillow guy and Matt Gaetz and a whole rogues gallery.
I informed them that this was private property and they were not welcome; that I understood who they were and what they were here to do, and we were having none of it. At that point they started with, So that means you're okay with the illegals and the babies being raped? and all of that. I said, If you're not going to leave, we'll call the police, and I signaled to Nicholas who picked up the phone and dialed 911. I followed them out and said, Keep it moving, at which point Michelle, the companion to Kimberly, said, I work for the Secret Service and nothing is off limits to me, and I laughed and said, That is hilarious.
I informed them that this was private property and they were not welcome; that I understood who they were and what they were here to do, and we were having none of it. At that point they started with, So that means you're okay with the illegals and the babies being raped? and all of that.
I turned then and saw that Kimberly appeared to be photographing or filming me at the front of the building. I immediately put my hand up to block herand then I was on the ground. She tackled me. The next thing I knew Nicholas was between me and Michelle, and Kimberly was in her car filming herself, yelling, Michelle, get in the car! Nicholas ran to close the front gate of the Butterfly Center. Michelle gets in the car, and then Kimberly guns it, screaming, Get the fuck out of my way! and swerves to hit my son with her car.
We called 911. The visitor called 911. I called the regular dispatch number. Still no one came. Finally, I called the deputy city manager and told her what had happened, and that we were waiting for police, and she said, Let me alert Chief Dominguez of the Mission Police Department, and then eventually the police did come. It took about an hour, and we now know why. Apparently, everyone on duty was at a pinning ceremony and celebration that Friday afternoon. So instead of answering 911, I guess there was a sheet cake to consume. It's criminal.
Do you believe the board of the North American Butterfly Association has shown appropriate concern for the rhetoric and now physical threats deployed by these far-right extremist groups?
In the beginning, I think there was some skepticism as to how sinister We Build The Wall is. There were folks who were unaware of Cambridge Analytica and what Steve Bannon has made a career doing. And there were people who did not believe that Steve Bannon was a part of this. When we filed suit against We Build The Wall and Fisher Industries and Neuhaus & Sons, we also named [We Build the Wall founder] Brian Kolfage individually, but we did not name Steve Bannon, which I had pressed for. We already had enough evidence, but there were people above me who thought that filing suit against Steve Bannon would be reaching too high. And now they know they were absolutely wrong.
If they didnt believe how serious it was in 2019 and 2020, when we were receiving death threats, and the militia had come to the property, and we had police officers in the state of Texas calling and threatening us, maybe now they know. Theyre actually meeting today to decide whether we should close the Butterfly Center temporarily or indefinitely. And I guess I should say whether we close again, because we did close Friday, Saturday and Sunday of this past week because of credible threats that were shared with us by a former state representative related to the We Stand America, MAGA midterm kickoff rally.
How were those threats communicated to the National Butterfly Center?
While we were waiting for the police, we spent more time on Kimberly Lowe's Facebook page. She was doing her own borderlands tour, hitting all the hot spots that have been popular backdrops for the lies that Bannon and Trump's ICE, DHS and CBP officials continue to use, like Catholic Charities and the National Butterfly Center. And there was a photo of her with a former state representative that I know.
So I called that state representative and said, Do you know this woman? She just came here. He said, I know this is what they intend to do in the election season, and this is how they intend to own their opponents. They say, I went to the border. I saw the dead bodies. I witnessed the cartel trafficking. I touched the Rio Grande River. Have you? And then he told me that I should be armed at all times, or better yet, out of town, and consider closing the center during the rally.
Given all this additional political baggage, how has your job the last five years impacted your family and your personal life?
It's been horrific. In February 2020, before the world shut down for COVID, my son was walking to his car at his high school campus and someone pulled a gun in his face and told him, I should blow your head off right now for who your mother is and what she does. So none of this has been limited to just the Butterfly Center or me. There is a real sickness in our country right now, a mass psychosis. People believed Pizzagate. They believe the We Build The Wall stuff that left people dead at Walmart, just doing their grocery shopping. And now they're trying to do that to us at the National Butterfly Center. We have targets on our backs.
I know that all of this has shortened my life. The stress mentally and physically is something I feel all the time. Brian Kolfage and Steve Bannon managed to get ahold of my tax returns. We can't even get President Trump's tax returns, but somehow they got ahold of my tax returns. So for the last three years I haven't sought any medical attention other than to go get tested for COVIDnot for my mental health, or my physical healthbecause I have no reason not to think that they would get ahold of those records, too, or anything I might be prescribed. It's been awful, and my son is receiving help and medication.
How has this ongoing controversy affected the National Butterfly Center itself?
I wish that I could speak to that in concrete terms, but you can't prove a negative. If there are people who maybe would have supported us before but won't now, we'll never know. And then there are people, on Twitter for example, who have learned about us because of this insanity; not necessarily because we broadcast it, but because maybe they follow Rolling Stone or BuzzFeed or something like that. As far as our organization and our ability to operate, I think that is very much at risk right now. I think the very future of the National Butterfly Center is on the table.
One way that we are sustainable at this point is that, prior to COVID, we served over 6,000 school children a year with traditional field education. Of course, that was disrupted during COVID, but we hoped it was something that would return and we could continue to build on to keep our nonprofit operating and help us make payroll. But if school districts, if teachers, if parents in our communities believe this stuffand it looks like as much as 50-percent of the population may believe this garbagethen what does the future look like for us?
What keeps you fighting for the National Butterfly Center?
I have a fantastic staff. And I have the most wonderful husband. And I do think about quitting all the time. So who knows? Everybody has their breaking point, and I'm not sure that mine is that far off.
See more here:
The Right-Wing Conspiracy Theorists and the Butterflies - Sierra Magazine
Posted in Fifth Amendment
Comments Off on The Right-Wing Conspiracy Theorists and the Butterflies – Sierra Magazine
We must produce MBAs appropriate to the era we live in, says expert – Business Standard
Posted: at 6:24 am
Sustainability is the buzzword amongst corporate boardrooms, policymakers & regulators, enterprises, institutions, and business advisors today. In the pursuit of aligning to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), stakeholders are continuously trying to develop multi-dimensional approaches effectively analyse complex macro and micro dynamics of sustainability, for them to be able capture emerging opportunities and responding to likely challenges and risks. The interdependence between stakeholders in the society casts the spectrum of Sustainability very wide, and the endeavour is to systematically piece together elements that make up the Sustainability puzzle (often represented by ESG) that underline the wider socio-economic transformation that are already impacting individuals, enterprises, and nations.
Education is fundamental to socio-economic development and there is need for systematic and ongoing sustainability assessment of the education sector. Specifically, enormous private and public resources are invested each year by various stakeholders including students, parents, governments, institutions, teachers, researchers etc. to equip managers with skills to qualify and contribute to the economic development of the country. In the post covid era, it is critical to re-evaluate and embed the sustainability perspective in Management Education. The Covid induced socio-economic problems have further increased the pace of significant alterations in the dynamics that once made management qualification one of the most preferred ways to build a corporate career.
Covid-induced flux
The unrelenting array of Covid induced socio-economic bumps and speed breakers has induced an enormous socio-economic flux on a global scale, which is translating into significant turbulence across social, political, economic, trade, and geo-political ecosystems.
Transitions are painful and as the as Covid continues to thrive, the short-term and long-term impacts are now increasingly imminent. Covid has accelerated sustainability focussed fundamental policy-level changes that will define the life and economics of the post-covid world. It will create new opportunities, require new set of skills and competencies, and require managers to be equipped by critical soft skills and high emotional quotient that will enable them to manage teams and resources of the sustainable, digital first working that may transcend from physical to the metaverse.
The McKinseys 2021 report The future of work after Covid-19 forecasts a massive overhaul of working environment after analysis of 800 work categories across sectors, with a clear correlation projected between impact and the level of proximity involved in the delivery of work. Segments and sectors involving the highest physical proximity like Healthcare, BFSI, Retail, Leisure & Travel are likely are forecasted to face the maximum disruption in their business model, as they strive to build in business sustainability by significantly enhancing dependence and adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), process automation, and advanced data analytics. Significantly, the concludes that the Covid impact and accelerated changes in business models including with transition to newer technologies would cause an enormous workforce transition, requiring almost 25% workers to switch jobs and/or go in for upskilling in markets like the United States.
The BFSI, Retail, Healthcare sectors are also important sectors for the Indian economy and fundamental changes therein are likely to have significant implications for bussing managers, existing employers, education instructions, policymakers to undertake comprehensive analysis from think from long term perspective, analysing if existing skills, products, courses and policies will be relevant, viable and sustainable needs, challenges, risks likely to emerge in post covid era.
Towards sustainability
The covid induced transition landed educational institutions and students a complete flux, with the initial panicky response severely impacting fresh recruitment even in growing developed countries like United States (according to GMAC survey). India meanwhile witnessed significant covid induced deceleration causing substantial job losses that added to employability challenges. Over time the transformation has very rapidly altered the impacted the priorities, skill requirements in addition to the way they allocate resources, define skills, and operate. New management graduates and management institutions specially in India, are hence facing sustainability questions that had long been avoided, as employers demanded for managers with excellent technology competencies, and sought knowledge of social and environment dynamics, data flows, policy dynamics etc; besides the enormous focus now on strong soft skills to overcome digital working challenges.
From Flux to Sustainability
Irrespective of the sector or geography, the path to sustainability has often been marked by conflict between vested commercial interests of well-entrenched players (including the rich and powerful), and that of the fundamentals that underlie the ESG matrix (in this case represented ensuring Environmental Impact/Readiness, Social Impact, and Governance). A management education system and its stakeholders guided by an effective ESG matrix equipped to create a positive social impact by focussing on effective governance by through transparency, due delivery, and systematic process led monitoring as it equips them to capture future opportunities and future ready skills, minimize wastages like redundancies, unemployability and wasteful social expenditure.
Despite sitting on billions of dollars of alumni funding, large research & consultancy-based incomes, and government support, Covid has forced even the IVY League colleges to rethink their business models to stay relevant in the face of competition from the likes of Coursera, edX, LinkedIn etc.; and have already rolled a variety of interesting and engaging formats, course structure and curriculums that are likely help they believe would best meet needs of post covid digital-led business environment requiring fundamentally different management competencies and soft skills.
To achieve the $5 trillion economy goal, India will need a sustainable management education infrastructure that is market-driven and can see beyond the strong institutions of excellence (behind the ISB and IIMs). The sustainability assessment will help uncover the real state and future readiness of management education that otherwise essentially remains hidden, possibly on purpose to serve vested interests. The outflow of talent and resources to foreign lands endorses the poor governance, accountability, employability, and future content readiness of Tier-II management education, which should be of concern to all stakeholders. Clearly, the New Education Policys (NEP) proposals need a necessary push from policymakers to enable a meaningful flow of world-class content, institutions, and faculty into India.
Risk Management
It has become crucial for all stakeholders to carefully research and analyse all risks with a long-term perspective. It is often that the industry complains of Indian engineers and management graduates at are being literally churned out each year being unemployable, even in present times. It only creates a basis for socio-economic unrest in the country, besides wastage of enormous public and private resources, which is a huge public policy risk, in addition to the economic challenge for the country and industry of not having adequate skilled manpower to meet growth needs. Budding managers also have their responsibility, to their own sustainability assessment by ways of all the necessary due-diligence and research, across the world to select the course (not necessarily limited to MBA), as they would be investing their most precious resource in many years or potentially this lifetime of professional career.
Pivot or Perish
We are now in the era of winner takes it all, be it individuals, companies, education intuitions, or even nations. Whoever excels in their ability and commitment to business sustainability will surely be much better equipped to capture the new wave of opportunities, or to withstand increasingly unforeseen risks and challenges.
While 2022 may mark the beginning of better times, as India enters Subhkrutta (Year of light) and China prepares for the Year of Tiger; the shrillness of the third wave highlights, it would be only wise that all stakeholders interests align and they systematically work to mitigate risks by supporting the development of Indias management education sector into a future-ready, strongly governed, internationally competitive, and market-driven management sector equipped to attract international students, research, and faculty. It could well be the movement of pivot or perish.
Go here to read the rest:
We must produce MBAs appropriate to the era we live in, says expert - Business Standard
Posted in Resource Based Economy
Comments Off on We must produce MBAs appropriate to the era we live in, says expert – Business Standard
The Issues Faced By Tourism In India – An Overview – Inventiva
Posted: at 6:24 am
The issues faced by tourism in India An overview
There has been a lot of praise for India as a tourist destination. Even so, tourisms in India face a few challenges. Communication in India is one of them. It is challenging for tourists to communicate in a language they barely understand in foreign countries and states. Learning English may also not be helpful in some circumstances.
The poor form of sanitation, safety, and transportation is a few other issues dragging down Indian tourisms reputation.
Many foreign tourists have stopped visiting India. The government must promote Indias diversity and rich heritage to re-establish its position as a tourist paradise. The roots of Indian culture are firmly rooted in tradition, even though her roots may have branched out to modernism. Many foreign tourists are drawn to these traditions.
The lack of safety in India is among the most important reasons foreign tourists avoid visiting it. The locals have sometimes refused to aid foreign nationals who have experienced harassment because of communication problems. Foreign tourists must therefore feel safe from harassment by the government. There should also be strict punishments for those who harass foreign tourists.
As there will be fewer chances of tourists being defrauded by frauds with the governments appointment of trained tour guides, tourists will gain from it. We will attract foreign tourists to India if we take these and other precautions regarding their interests.
In the ever-expanding world of tourism, the federal and state governments are increasingly emphasizing proper planning. As such, the Ministry is striving to balance the promotion of tourism (which has proven to increase the GNP in developing countries in particular) with concern for safeguarding the physical, social, and cultural environment in the destination areas.
To balance tourism-related activities and the local environment, planning is vital for the development of tourism-related activities. Development countries are especially vulnerable to this. As a result, the impact is powerful here since they must develop a key infrastructure to maintain the existing unique cultural characteristics and promote overall socio-economic development. Furthermore, by preserving and enhancing their physical environment, they will encourage tourism.
Before any development decisions are made, it is essential to evaluate and analyze whether tourism promotion and infrastructural development will impact the habitat in socio-cultural, socio-economic, physical, and environmental terms.
These structures are more noticeable in hill, beach and wildlife resorts with an acute ecological setting or other culturally sensitive retreats. It is thus essential that any program to promote tourism development emphasizes the benefits and minimizes the negative impacts on the social, economic, and physical environments of the destination areas.
Tourism is an essential thrust area for development in both macro and micro contexts of the National Five Year Plans.
(1)Instead of spreading limited resources over a significant number of circuits or centres, develop selected tourist circuits and centres that are popular among tourists.
2) In India, the tourism industry is diversifying away from traditional sightseeing tours oriented (primarily places of cultural tourism interest) to a more rapidly expanding market based on the countrys atmosphere and environment, emphasizing the aesthetic, environmental, and socio-cultural implications of projects.
(3)There are many nontraditional areas of tourism, such as trekking, winter sports, wildlife tourism, and beach resort tourism, which would enrich the tourism resources of the Himalayas, the vast coastline with sandy beaches and abundant wildlife, and encourage more tourists to stay longer in these areas.
4) Promotion and balanced development of national heritage projects with cultural, historical, and tourism value to leverage the unique advantages of Indian culture as a tourist destination and make use of tourism to preserve the countrys heritage.
As part of the formulation of tourism complexes, the macro-and micro-level planning and development need to ensure the integration of tourism resources and tourism activities to maximize social, economic and environmental benefits and meet tourists needs for infrastructure, leisure and recreation.
Tourist nodes, areas, and networks are examples of how tourism resources and tourist facilities interact spatially. It is essential to develop tourism complexes in an organized manner so that in their regional or area-wise context, investment benefits and performance are optimized.
The Tourism Development Plans will have to accommodate various destinations types and tourism activities based on the diversified demand for infrastructure. There are several tourism activity areas, including:
1) The beauty of nature is high enough for passive recreation,
2) Beach resorts, recreation areas, etc.
3) Areas with comfortable climates such as hill resorts
4) Culturally significant places including museums, monuments, sites of fairs and festivals
5) Places of pilgrimage and temples for religious tourism;
6) Areas designated for adventure tourism include trekking, rock climbing, mountaineering, skiing, etc.
7) Specially designated areas of interest, including sanctuaries for wild animals, areas containing exotic flora and fauna, sanctuaries for birds, etc.
Carrying Capacity :
As a resource-based industry, tourism needs resource assessment to promote tourism in a way that is compatible with other demands. In addition to identifying and assessing the resource under competing demands, it is also essential to arrive at a capacity that will be matched by the supply, both locationally and according to its activity.
For planning tourist facilities and infrastructure, carrying capacity is essential, particularly concerning sensitive destinations such as hilly areas. There is a threshold beyond which the tourist industry becomes overly saturated (physical power), the environment deteriorates (environmental capacity), or visitor enjoyment drops (perceptual ability).
Despite their acceptance today, carrying capacity has been largely unused in planning because of difficulties measuring the thresholds (except perhaps physical ability). Recreational areas are determined at an optimal capacity by combining factors that decide on their biological and ecological capacity with those which decide on their social (perceptual).
It is recommended that guidelines for ecological capacity be developed with an emphasis on hilly environments and nature reserves since these areas are ecologically sensitive, and the habitat forms part of the environment within them. Developers largely ignore these recommendations out of greed, and there is no reason for this to continue.
Only through the combination of natural and manufactured attractions can an area offer visitors that any successful tourism development is formalized. The following are some of our resources. The merits of this system are often overlooked or not considered without a complex systematic inventory and analysis of its values, potential, and limitations.
There are two issues at stake here:
a)What are the techniques for identifying a regions resource base? And
b) how can these resources be assessed for their intrinsic value in the market?
An inventory is necessary for the first, while appropriate evaluation techniques are required for the second. Tourist resources are valued in diversity, attractiveness, and sustainability based on supply and demand (tourist preferences, which are assessed through surveys) with a minimum impact on the local economy, society, and the environment. Environmental impact studies must precede any tourism development program.
Infrastructural Development :
Developing tourist-related physical infrastructure is imperative in order for tourism to function effectively as part of any regions development package. It is also essential to think of infrastructure from the perspective of the overall needs of an area and the host population.
Tourism spots must be attractive enough to draw tourists, which is vital for their development. Three key components can characterize tourism in a tourist centre:
i) Accessibility :
In terms of accessibility, tourist spots or tourist destinations are defined as:
As applicable, there should be local access to the specific places of tourist interest within the town from the closest transportation interchange point, such as an airport, a railroad station or a railway terminal, or the towns entry point. Furthermore, it involves connecting roads from one place to another and providing adequate parking, servicing, and garage facilities in the city and its environs.
Accessibility to the tourist centre and tourist destination area from the nearest point of embarkation for tourists within the region by the three conventional modes of transportation, namely road, rail, and air, as well as opportunities for connecting tourism to other important centres within the region.
ii) Accommodation Facilities and Services:
An important factor is the availability of adequate accommodations in tourist centres and destinations that meet tourists quantitative and qualitative needs. These accommodations can encourage tourists to spend more time at a destination. There is a more significant deterrent to tourist influx in India due to the lack of this basic amenity than the accessibility to such facilities. There would be a need to gauge the amount and kind of accommodation in each of the individual centres based on an assessment of local conditions. By and large, tourists should be able to find comfortable accommodations and have access to all utilities and services and choose from an array of affordable options.
To make a tourist complex attractive, it is essential to ensure an uninterrupted power supply, safe water supply, sewerage, drainage, and sanitation. Additionally, civic infrastructure includes health clinics, telephones and telegraphs, and banks. However, tourism forms and destination locations influence critical aspects of these factors.
iii) Recreational Aspects:
Accommodation availability can be a critical factor in influencing a tourists stay in a tourist centre, but adequate recreational elements can also prolong the tourist season whole. This aspect of development is vitally essential for relaxation and diversion. Tourism encompasses a broad range of recreational activities, including both active and passive outdoor recreation and all commercial recreation activities.
The problem is simplified in some ways in metropolitan and central cities because visitors can take advantage of indoor and outdoor recreational facilities that are legitimate necessities for the local population. However, for small palaces with even more tourist attractions and interest, tourists should have access to exclusive recreational amenities.
To do so, one must consider the socio-cultural environment and milieu of the destination. A tourist centres infrastructure must also include ancillary infrastructure facilities and services to be developed comprehensively. Generally, these consist of facilities for the growth of traditional and indigenous arts and crafts, tourism-related cottage industries, housing for artisans engaged in such activities, and an appropriate amount of land set aside for such purposes.
Accommodation and other ancillary necessities of the service population needed to staff the tourist and hospitality facilities and amenities are essential. Slums with inhumane conditions can result from ignoring this aspect.
The development of tourist infrastructure has been the focus of all nations throughout the world that has developed a systematic approach to tourism development. Many factors have influenced this development. Here are a few of them:
(1) Factors that influence or have the potential to influence proper exploitation of the specific tourism resource (positive and negative).
(2) Effectiveness of a particular resource in supporting tourism development in terms of its impacts on the environment, the ecology, and the socio-cultural aspects at a macro and micro level.
There are also problems relating to access and infrastructure provision financing and management.
Designating favourable zones for tourist infrastructure and safeguarding their natural and manufactured resources are essential elements of a Corsican Tourism Master Plan, along with an Access and Land Control Policy for development in and around the designated areas. An overall macro-level policy plan should direct programming at the micro-level.
Regarding the development of the coastal tourism industry in France, the Master Plan emphasizes:
These initiatives have been aimed at protecting the environment while conserving tourism resources and natural resources.
However, it can hardly be overstated how vital a Physical Development Plan is to the overall Tourism Master Plan on both a macro and micro level.
The critical components of a full-fledged tourism master plan should include:
A fundamental development policy should address how to regulate, reduce, or reduce the pressure on a limited resource, such as a tourist centre, hill resort, or beach complex, which is affected by inappropriate uses.
First, a study of the tourism resource characteristics and potential would be needed to develop a Master Plan. The destination areas physical, social, economic, and environmental attributes should be analyzed. Tourism Master Plans establish the framework for planning, developing, and managing tourism destinations through the following components:
This component of the Master Plan includes:
An essential part of a Master Plan is measuring and planning environmental protection, landscaping, and site development. Further, it should be clarify that the complex is linked to the hinterland and measures to prevent action on its perimeter.
In addition, it is crucial to integrate the growth of the tourism complex with the socio-economic development of the smaller settlements that surround it.
An integrated Physical Development Plan for phasing the complexs construction and providing tourism infrastructure is required to specify these policies and programmes in detail.
Physical Development Issues:
Many aspects of tourism development are not entirely related to economics, such as geography, sociology, anthropology, and the ecology of the area and its inhabitants. To achieve optimum socio-economic gains for the local community and tourist activity, all of these factors need to be thoroughly understood and analyzed. Tourism planning should be conceived as an integrated approach, especially when products are made from vulnerable natural resources.
There is high crowd density at tourist spots and destination areas, so they need to be adequately provided with parking facilities, pedestrian routes, crosswalks, and regions for pedestrian movement and assembling, as well as tourist infrastructure features such as boarding and lodging, civic services, tourist shopping, leisure, and recreational activities, depending on the location, attraction, and projected tourist demand.
The standards and scope of tourist infrastructure will differ from one place to another. It is nevertheless necessary to organize infrastructure facilities in a spatially logical manner. Having proper physical planning and design is also crucial to the success of the tourist spot.
Regardless of whether the tourist spot is a resort or a township, the activities associated with tourism are by definition spatial, whether it is part of a development zone or an isolated complex. A focus should be placed on the integrated development of the tourist centre, with all individual development schemes for various tourist destinations forming part of an overarching plan for the area.
As part of this discussion, it should also be noted that metropolitan and major cities can meet tourists needs, particularly in infrastructure development, mainly by utilizing existing buildings and facilities that are already in place and planned.
However, in small towns and isolated areas, tourists infrastructure needs and services must, by extension and augmentation, be made readily available to locals as well as tourists. In turn, the tourist spots in these small towns may benefit from investment in tourism in an overall positive way.
Furthermore, the development scheme must implement in phases according to its involvement, and a future expansion and augmentation should be built into the design.
City Spots for Tourists:
An essential first step is to zone a tourism activity area. Whenever possible, tourist sites within the city should be zoned and the adequate surrounding area. Special tourist zones. There is a need to identify even larger integrated zones encompassing several such tourist spots in one complex in a city with several tourist destinations, such as historical cities and pilgrimage towns, to allow integration in physical development.
When planning and developing individual tourist spots, such plans should consider the overall tourism development strategy.
It should include the following:
In zoning passive uses in the immediate surrounding of a tourist spot, keeping the spots identity and sanctity should be a paramount concern. Whenever possible, the tourist destination itself needs to stand out in the designated area for infrastructure development without engulfing the infrastructure.
As much as possible, the infrastructure complex of the selected site should be directly accessible from the main road, leaving a sufficient amount of greenery between tourist spots and the complex.
Therefore, a low-profile development is necessary to maintain the integrity of the designated site. Additionally, it is not desirable to distribute infrastructure over a large area but rather to plan all the facilities as a complex to minimize waste and maximize energy efficiency while keeping as much land as possible green for development.
Conservation Through Design :
As part of preserving tourist centres, the tourist character is also preserved. This aspect is more crucial for maintaining small towns, which, owing to their history and heritage, are more frequent attractions for tourists.
The physical expansion and economic diversification of these towns must plan to maintain their historical and cultural heritage. It would be beneficial to keep enough green buffer zones surrounding the new development and around them to promote tourism.
A tourist spots physical conservation may be manifested in a general enhancement and restoration by constructing well laid out gardens, pavements, curio stores, and kiosks and providing tourist equipment, such as tourist literature and guides. Although this topic deserves the most attention, restraint, and design sensibility, the focus should be on preservation over renovation and beautification on a large scale.
Natural features must be preserved when developing a site, especially for tourist-oriented activity zones. Furthermore, a properly designed landscape plan should include the generous planting of trees as an integral part of the site development programme. Buildings should be designed in a low-rise development on the portion of the site allotted for infrastructure facilities.
Spatial Design Aspects :
Developing an area for tourism has the primary aim of attracting tourists. As a result, they have a visual design aspect and aesthetic consideration crucial to their formulation and implementation. It includes the construction of an approach road, landscaping, remodelling, general beautification, or providing tourist housing.
Therefore, the development of tourist spots and complexes must incorporate bare land and infrastructure planning principles with Urban Form and Landscape Design parameters to develop functional and environmentally friendly products and visually and aesthetically appealing.
More here:
The Issues Faced By Tourism In India - An Overview - Inventiva
Posted in Resource Based Economy
Comments Off on The Issues Faced By Tourism In India – An Overview – Inventiva
Middle income trap the way out – The Financial Express
Posted: at 6:24 am
Muhammad Mahmood | Published: February 05, 2022 20:37:27
All least developed countries aim to become middle income countries and many have succeeded like Bangladesh, which achieved the status of a lower middle income country in 2015 and now officially will graduate to become a developing country in 2026. Bangladesh also aspires to become a high middle income country in 2031 and a developed country by 2041.
Only a few like South Korea and Singapore have managed to gain the status as high income countries while countries like Malaysia, Argentina, Uruguay and South Africa have become stuck in the upper middle income trap. And countries like India and Indonesia seem have entered into the lower middle income trap. Overall, most of the middle income trapped countries are located in Asia and Latin America. It is estimated that half of the world's population by 2025 will live in Asian middle income countries. Many of these middle income trapped countries also suffer from persistent pockets of poverty and remain vulnerable to sudden changes in income.
The term middle-income trap (MIT) usually refers to countries that have experienced rapid growth and thus quickly reached middle-income status, but then failed to overcome that income range to further catch up with the developed countries. The MIT is a narrative of growth stagnation. Therefore, the MIT is also characterised by reform stagnation.
Equally, low income countries can also face the prospect of getting trapped into a low income trap or otherwise described as the "poverty trap". In a low income country it is difficult to escape poverty. But poverty trap is not merely the absence of economic means. It is created due to a combination of factors such as the lack of employment, access to education and health care etc.
The MIT was mentioned in a World Bank study titled "An East Asian Renaissance: Ideas for Economic Growth" published in 2007. The report suggested that Medium-income countries have lower growth trends when compared to rich and poor countries.
It is generally postulated that countries at the initial stages of growth start with an agrarian base. From there on, a country over time transits to an industrial economy with the help of surplus extracted from the agriculture sector, then onto a predominantly services oriented economy.
As a result output increases which contributes to rising per capita income. Therefore, the growth process enables a country to move from low income to lower middle income to upper middle income and finally to a high income country.
Many economists, in particular Dani Rodrik expressed concerns over premature de-industrialisation of developing economies where a growing services sector bypasses manufacturing sector with industrialisation peaking at a relatively small share of GDP around 20 per cent or even below. Such a transition path would further distort the long term structural adjustment process causing very slow growth to economic stagnation. It is generally agreed that growth slowdowns are primarily productivity slowdowns.
In fact, some growth models do suggest that the existence of low productivity equilibrium in middle income countries is characterised by low shares of highly skilled workers in highly skilled activities. Many countries also fail to put in place active policies for firms to move their resources from protected domestic to globally competitive export sectors and to upgrade skills of workers working in those sectors.
Economic transformation process implies an increase in productivity of available resources, with the transition to middle income status generally characterised by the movement of resources between activities. Transitioning to high income status leads to levelling out productivity across firms within sectors. This in turn leads further resource reallocation resulting in most productivity growth taking place within certain sectors.
The growth process does not have an automated impetus propelled by time. Empirically, growth performances of countries around the world by and large demonstrate that they remain in a specific income group for extended periods, some even may regress from a lower middle income country into a low income country if the required level of growth momentum can not be maintained.
Overall, it appears developing countries experience great difficulties in their transition from the middle income to the high income. Most empirical studies on the MIT use either the absolute approach or the relative approach.
The absolute threshold approach tends to interpret the MIT as a growth slowdown and it is generally suggested that growth slowdowns typically occur at two different per capita ranges, namely between US$10,000 and US$11,000 and between US$15,000 and US$16,000 range. Out of 101 middle income countries in 1960, only 13 countries became high-income countries by 2019 based on per capita income relative to the US.
The relative threshold considers the MIT as a failed catching up process relative to a developed country like the US or Japan. There are a number of ways in which this can be measured such as the Catch-Up Index (CUI) or like the World Bank which considers a country experiencing the MIT if it stays within the range of about 5 percent to 45 percent of the US per capita income.
The notion of MIT has gained currency in recent years and because it is a very easy to interpret the concept makes it very useful in public policy discussions. In fact, the MIT has provided a theoretical construct to understand why so many countries seem to stagnate at the middle income level. But such a theoretical construct does not provide us with a uniform policy prescription for avoiding the MIT. It is not a destiny but an obstacle that needs to be overcome.
The MIT has shown us that middle income status does not mean that economic growth trajectory gets easier to deal with, if anything, it appears more difficult. Various arguments have been put forward to explain the existence and persistence of the MIT. These arguments include diminishing return to capital, exhaustion of cheap labour and imitation gains, poor quality of human capital, distorted incentives and misallocation of resources, lack of advanced infrastructure, capital, inadequate contract enforcement.
Furthermore, middle income countries also find the transition to next level doubly challenging because the institutional arrangements that helped them to achieve the middle income status created vested interests who benefit from the status quo. If these vested interests are not shoved aside, these countries will fall into the trap and stagnate.
At the heart of it all, the MIT is a governance failure, an inability to take realistically achievable goals of growth and development. Therefore, avoiding the trap can take a careful preparation for implementation of policies and programmes over a required period of time because there is no quick fix for the MIT.
There is no uniform policy prescription for avoiding the MIT. Therefore, addressing the challenges posed by the MIT will require different policies for different countries around the world but underneath there are a number of commonalities standing in the way of becoming a high income country.
Middle income status can be considered as a signal for a successful trajectory for moving the country ahead. That will require to accelerate productive investment and a complex set of skills development, fostering innovation and most importantly of institution development because institutions suited to growth and development differ at different stages of development.
Therefore, the key problem for many countries looking to move forward to achieve high income status is the ability to generate the political will to make needed reforms. Vested interests will strongly oppose any change that threaten their economic power.
Meanwhile, shifting comparative advantage resulting from advances in manufacturing technologies further add to middle income countries' woes along with increasing concerns over wage competitiveness. The new manufacturing technologies have already enabled the sports apparel company Adidas using the 3D technology to re-shore its production from Vietnam to its home country, Germany.
New strategies may require for countries like Bangladesh rebalancing towards domestic demand while export orientation remains in place and levelling the playing field for all firms domestic or foreign. Also, these countries face challenges of altering the course to reflect their shifting comparative advantage in the face of resistance from vested interests that have grown rich and powerful from the status quo.
Bangladesh is the only country so far that has bucked the trend in South Asia by continually increasing the manufacturing share of GDP as measured by the widely used measure of "share of value added by manufacturing" in GDP over the last two decades.
But Bangladesh still remains a capital scarce country. To face the challenges of emerging manufacturing technologies, Bangladesh will have to boost the productivity of its abundant labour force with investment in productivity enhancing skills development, efficient infrastructure, machinery and technology supported by a well functioning and efficient financial system. Also, openness to trade and investment will remain the key instruments to foster innovation to achieve competitive advantage.
[emailprotected]
The rest is here:
Posted in Resource Based Economy
Comments Off on Middle income trap the way out – The Financial Express
Column: Don’t give up trying to save the Klamath River dams. It’s about more than the fish – Siskiyou Daily News
Posted: at 6:23 am
Bob Kaster| The Septugenarian Speaks
Its been almost a year since my last rant against the proposal to remove four dams along the Klamath River.
My attention was recently again drawn to that topic on Dec.14, when the Siskiyou County Water Users Association made a presentation to the Siskiyou County Board of Supervisors, asking the board to adopt a resolution nominating an area called the Ancient Beswick Forest and Cultural Area for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places.
The declared reason for requesting the inclusion of the area was to provide for the protection of the areas resources now and into the future for the citizens of Siskiyou County and the nation.
The proposed area includes the reservoirs created by the Iron Gate Dam and the two Copco dams, all situated in Siskiyou County.The board heard the presentation and took it under advisement, referring it to the countys administrative staff and attorney for analysis.
The primary objective of the measure is to give the designated area, and the dams situated therein, some protection from the irrevocable and potentially disastrous impact on our county that could result from the dam demolition project presently advocated by special interests.
Over the past four years, I have written seven columns for the Siskiyou Daily News outlining the many reasons why I believe taking out the dams is a bad idea, not just for Siskiyou County, but for people everywhere who are concerned about climate change, drought, preservation of water resources, fire suppressionand greenhouse gas emissions.
Ive talked about the dams benefits, including generation of electric power in a manner that doesnt burn fossil fuels or pollute the atmosphere, facilitation of flood controland creation of some great recreational facilities.
Entire communities have been established around the reservoirs created by the dams.People have invested their life savings into buying property and building lake-front homes.These are just a few reasons why dam removal is a bad idea.
Yet the bandwagon to yank out four dams, which do what they were designed to do, still persists.Everyone is on the bandwagon; everyone, that is, except for the majority of those of us who actually live here in the California and Oregon counties where the dams are located.
The Klamath River does have problems, but anyone who thinks that the rivers ills will miraculously go away once the dams are gone, will be sadly disappointed.
Poor and sporadic salmon and steelhead runs, dying fish, poor water quality, and algae existed before the dams were there, and they will still exist after they are gone.
Since at least 1850, the river quality and fishery havent just been impacted by the dams (if at all), but also by many other factors, such as hydraulic mining (no longer legal), overfishing in the Pacific Ocean, intensive water diversions, erosion caused by roads, climate change, logging, floods, agricultural activities, forest fires, ocean atmosphere climate variability, and nutrients in the water caused naturally by the areas volcanic origins, just to name a few.
The Klamath River reservoirs have become a part of Siskiyou Countys wonderfully diverse beauty and landscape, and are important to its recreation-based tourism, a mainstay of our struggling economy.
It's pretty obvious that my rantings in the Siskiyou Daily News have had little if any impact on what seems to be the foregone conclusion that the dams will be taken out.
Over the years, the Board of Supervisors has courageously taken steps to avert the removal of the dams, an important county resource.The voters of the two counties directly affected by dam removal, Siskiyou County and Oregons Klamath County, have overwhelmingly expressed opposition to their removal.
None of these things appear to have made a difference.The powerful forces from Washington, D.C., Sacramento, and Salem, Oregon, and from some Indian tribes, appear to have the clout to overcome any opposition that the local residents, who are most deeply affected, can muster.
Im glad Im not a county supervisor these days.They have a huge responsibility but with limited resources to do their job.
I can understand why they may have some hesitation about expending county funds and resources to oppose dam removal, seemingly inevitable, when such resources are limited.
The board must allocate its resources for the best interests of the county.But they shouldnt give up without a fight.Its too important for the county.
The proposed resolution under consideration, which recommends that the Ancient Beswick Forest and Cultural Area be considered for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places, is one way the board can make a statement about the issue without a significant expenditure of county funds.
The ultimate decision, of course, is up to the California and federal offices of historic places, and is beyond the countys control, but at least it is a demonstration that the county government has the resolve to fight to defeat a proposal harmful to its citizens.
But I would go further and encourage our supervisors to continue to put county resources on the line in the future. Its that important.For example, there are still several steps in the Federal Energy Regulation Commission process before the dam removal proponents and KRRC, the corporation formed to remove the dams, can proceed.
The draft Environmental Impact Report for the project originally scheduled to be issued in February has now been delayed a month or more and will likely be issued late March. That will trigger a 60-day period for public comment before it is finalized.
I would encourage the board to aggressively participate in the EIR process, even if it is costly to do so.The potential environmental devastation caused by release of sediment down the river is difficult to imagine or quantify, and has been consistently understated by KRRC since the beginning of its involvement in the project.And that is only a portion of the potential environmental detriment.
The water users presentation to the board pointed out some environmental concerns not discussed much until now. The primary focus has been on the fish, specifically salmon.
KRRCs claim is that the decline in anadromous fish population is caused because of the dams alleged prevention of the fish from traveling farther upriver to spawn, although there is considerable evidence that other natural impediments historically prevented them from doing that.
But, as the water users presentation pointed out, its about more than just the fish.The presentation included a map of the proposed Ancient Beswick Forest and Cultural Area.The map contains a legend that is a Biome Resource Classifications Index.
When I first saw the map, I wasnt familiar with the term biomeand sought to learn its definition.The National Geographic Society defines a biomeas a large area characterized by its vegetation, soil, climateand wildlife.
The map submitted to the board depicts 26 biomes along the river within the proposed area, and identifies 26 wildlife species associated with those biomes. Some examples are Canada Goose, sandpiper, Western pond turtleand crayfish, to name just a few.
Not all of the 26 species of wildlife on the list depend on the reservoirs to flourish, but some do.My point is that there should be more to the conversation than just the fish, a point clearly made by the water users presentation.
I urge the members of the Board of Supervisors, in carrying out their difficult task of stewardship of the resources under their control, to consider the importance of the dams to the citizens of our county.
Bob Kaster is a long-time Yreka resident and retired Superior Court Judge. In retirement, he has taken up creative and journalistic writing, including novels, short stories, and columns for the Siskiyou Daily News. The Great Yreka Courthouse Gold Heist, originally a series of articles published in the Siskiyou Daily News, has recently been published in book form by the Siskiyou County Historical Society. Sales proceeds benefit the Historical Society. Bobs website is http://bobkaster.com. Email him at bobkaster3@gmail.com.
View original post here:
Posted in Resource Based Economy
Comments Off on Column: Don’t give up trying to save the Klamath River dams. It’s about more than the fish – Siskiyou Daily News
Long road to resilient development – The Phnom Penh Post
Posted: at 6:23 am
The World Bank recently released a report entitled Resilient Development: A Strategy to Diversify Cambodias Growth Model as the latest Cambodia Country Economic Memorandum.
The report revisits Cambodias growth model, with the objective of identifying constraints and opportunities for sustained economic growth and proposing policy options to address them.
Claire H Hollweg, a senior country economist for Cambodia at the Washington-based multilateral lender, sat down with The Posts May Kunmakara to discuss the Kingdoms economic performance in 2020, export diversification and skills development themes touched on in the recent report.
The report mentions that Cambodias growth slowdown in 2020 in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic was among the most pronounced in the East Asia region. What brought about such an enormous impact on the Kingdoms economy?
The report shows that Cambodias economic slowdown lies in the countrys growth generating process. Cambodias growth has been remarkable, but insufficiently diversified in products, markets, and factor inputs.
Five products garments, footwear, rice, cassava and tourism accounted for 80 per cent of total exports; two markets the EU and US accounted for 69 per cent of merchandise exports; and foreign capital through foreign direct investment (FDI) and official development assistance (ODA) accounted for 72 per cent of gross fixed capital formation in 2018.
Not surprisingly, when the pandemic disrupted the cross-border flow of goods, services and capital, Cambodia was ill-positioned to absorb the shock.
Youve talked about the countrys inability to diversify its development. Can you explain more?
Cambodias inability to diversify its development through alternate products, markets and financing sources predates the pandemic, and has its roots in low and declining productivity, low quality and weak export linkages, and high FDI but low domestic investment. The Covid-19 crisis exacerbates these challenges.
The first component is low and declining productivity: Cambodias inability to grow the product basket is explained by low labour productivity, or output per worker, which lags behind most countries globally when at Cambodias development level.
Low labour productivity, at least in part, reflects low human capital. But the largest contributor is low and declining total factor productivity (TFP).
This reports analysis suggests two primary causes. First, resource misallocation within sectors, likely caused by shortcomings of market institutions where market signals governing resource allocation need to be generated in more competitive and well-regulated markets, and an incipient public investment management (PIM) system where greater value for money in domestic public investment is needed.
Second, and more important, low within-firm productivity growth, explained by a challenging business environment that imposes significant obstacles to firms operations. Poor access to finance, inefficient business regulations, prevalent informality, and inadequate electricity are found to be the main constraints to firm productivity performance in Cambodia.
The second component is low quality and weak export linkages: low competitiveness and limited integration within global value chains (GVCs) have led to concentrated markets and trade.
A primary cause of low diversification and inability to upgrade is the quality of FDI, where FDI firms do not create backward linkages or share knowledge, limiting opportunities for technology transfer and productivity spillovers.Barriers in the business environment and the current investment and tax incentives regime influence the quality of FDI.
Other constraints to diversifying and upgrading Cambodias trade are low firm and worker capability, costly trade-related regulatory barriers particularly affecting agricultural products, insufficient trade-related infrastructure, and nascent use of regional trade agreements to support greater market access for exporters.
The third component is high FDI but low domestic investment: the countrys low private savings rate, and as a result low domestic investment, has led to reliance on external financing sources.
Rather than how many households save, how much households save and more important how households save appear to be key factors impeding greater domestic investment.
While 51 per cent of adults reportedly saved some money in the past year, only 22 per cent had any savings at a point in time, and only five per cent participated in formal savings where it can earn higher returns, be better protected, and, from an efficiency perspective, be intermediated to the most productive uses, significantly below other countries at Cambodias level of economic development.There is a relatively lower share of adults with a savings account in Cambodia.
Low formal savings by households stems from inefficiencies in the formal financial sector that pose high barriers including financial sector regulatory gaps, low financial literacy, low technology adoption and therefore limited access to financial services, and underdeveloped financial instruments beyond banks and microfinance institutions (MFIs) that would otherwise support savings.
What recommendations would you offer to diversify development?
Urgent action is needed to support Cambodias economic recovery from Covid-19 in a way that addresses the diversification problem to build back even stronger.
Cambodias policymakers have the opportunity to forge a new growth path by enabling productivity of firms and workers, diversifying exports, and harnessing domestic investment.
An ambitious reform agenda is needed one that focuses on improving capabilities, strengthening regulations, and investing in infrastructure.
Would you mind explaining each of these hypothetical growth paths?
A focus on firms and their workers is key to unleashing productivity. Policy reform in target areas can help the country meet its potential, including: investing in human capital through health and education; supporting more efficient resource allocation through improved market institutions and public investment management; easing the regulatory burden for firms thereby reducing informality and its negative impact; and improving the performance of key services inputs to strengthen domestic linkages.
Diversification of exports can continue driving growth during the recovery from Covid-19. A cross-cutting and medium-term policy agenda to diversify Cambodias trade is structured on upgrading in manufacturing global value chains, creating value addition in agriculture, and increasing competitiveness to export modern services.
Harnessing domestic investment can help finance the next phase of growth. Policy areas include promoting FDI into productive and export sectors; promoting higher domestic savings rates; improving financial inclusion through greater access to savings institutions; supporting digital access through digital technologies; lowering the costs of savings accounts; and supporting financial sector stability and development more broadly.
This interview has been edited for length and clarity.
The rest is here:
Posted in Resource Based Economy
Comments Off on Long road to resilient development – The Phnom Penh Post
Start-ups in Africa need fiscal support to take off – The Herald
Posted: at 6:23 am
The Herald
Ruth Butaumocho African Agenda
Entrepreneurship means Africans no longer have to find a job or be trained to be employees. Instead, it will enable our young people to create their own jobs, become employers, and take charge of their futures, instead of letting the future happen to them.
The above quote from Nigerian Tony Elumelu, one of Africas most prominent philanthropists is a clear submission of the role of entrepreneurship in economy growth and job creation in Africa.
With a majority of African nations diversifying from traditional sources of income, entrepreneurship is increasingly seen as a key to economic growth.
Armed with abundant natural resources, human capital, cultural diversity and self-determination, Africa has in the last few years recorded a boon in entrepreneurial projects from Cape to Cairo.
Enterprising Africans who are spreading their tentacles on the continent and beyond, offering various goods and services, continue to drive home the opportunities inherent in entrepreneurism and, especially at a time of rising competition abroad and commodity pricing fluctuation.
From continental-grown hubs of innovation, mobile service provision, energy, robust farming and food provision projects and a growing network of transportation service, Africa has in the last few years become a hive of business activities.
The trail of success and growth in some of the sectors would have further progressed had Covid-19, not had a huge pinch on the global economic activities.
Notwithstanding the negative impact of Covid-19, the entrepreneurial passion of many Africans is unmatched.
A growing wave of grassroots self-starters are leading by example and raising the bar for Africa in competitive entrepreneurship, a development that has kept the economic activities alive, despite a number of challenges Africa has had to contend with.
Although the investment, innovation hubs may not match that of the Silicon Valley in the United States, the zeal and level of determination among some of the already established and emerging entrepreneurs on the continent is what Africa needs, to attain its potential.
Brilliant young men and women are showing high levels of ingenuity, taking risks and defying obstacles to bring their start-ups to life.
What also gives them a competitive edge is that the established and emerging crop of African entrepreneurs do not only have an eye for business, but they are among some of the most confident in the world in their ability and skills to start a business.
Recently publicised innovations from young Africans in different sectors points to a clear vision and determination to give the continent a competitive edge among other established economies.
Hardly a week passes without the continent recording a success story of new invention, launch of a competitive product on the market and better still, some brainy African joining high tech global companies, which on its own is an affirmation of the abundance of talent, skill and knowledge.
Recently, a Zimbabwean molecular biologist made news by creating over 600 unique ice cream flavours using indigenous produce.
Tapiwa Guzha, who is based in Cape Town used his PhD in Molecular Biology to make more than 600 inventive ice cream flavours, ranging from baobab to edible clay.
In an interview, Guzha said he was on a mission to change the way Africans see their food, hence his decision to create these various ice-cream flavours for Africa.
He said he opted to use indigenous African flavours because he wanted Africans to embrace and be proud of their heritage.
Success stories of entrepreneurship have also been recorded elsewhere in Africa, giving hope that Africa is on a positive trajectory.
Nigerian Jason Njoku, the founder of iROKO Partners, and iROKOTv, the leading online streaming platform in Africa, is among Africans, who are also positively contributing to entrepreneurship in Africa by providing entertainment.
In Rwanda, Jean Nzeyimana is a young and brilliant innovator who is transforming waste in his community into briquettes, a greener alternative to wood charcoal, after forming a cleaning and renewable energy company called Habona.
With the abundance of success innovative stories in Africa, entrepreneurship can best be described as the spark of prosperity, that needs the support of everyone to keep it burning.
It is paramount that African enterprise needs to be matched by public-sector commitment, because Government cannot go it alone.
On their part, governments would need to continuously provide conducive environments, where entrepreneurship can thrive with minimum challenges.
Indigenisation policies, which Zimbabwe and other African countries have, open up windows of opportunities by availing natural resources and enabling policies to promote start-ups.
Policy implementation on existing laws becomes the glue that is needed to create flourishing environment for entrepreneurship.
However, like any other venture, entrepreneurship is not without hurdles, because of confounding challenges that often confront a number of start-ups.
Lack of proper funding models, unavailability of cheap money and stifling operating conditions are among major challenges emerging entrepreneurs face across the continent.
All those obstacles can be overcome by creating sustainable and user-friendly policies and platforms that support start-ups.
Governments involvement is crucial to ensure that there is structural support and resource mobilisation from different platforms.
Successful entrepreneurs also have a role to play through mentoring, providing market linkages and creating revolving funds for viable start-ups.
Africa, is at a stage where it needs to debunk the importance of foreign donors to bank-roll continental projects, who in the end, will claim intellectual property rights on home grown projects.
Local funding from established entrepreneurs, financial institutions and private-public partnership are crucial in keeping the entrepreneurial spirit alive.
On the hand, Africa needs to put its resources where its future lies its own people.
The continent cannot continue to export its raw materials and resources, at this juncture, as these can be used to provide employment and add value to the continent.
The advent of intra-African trade through the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), is a huge business opportunity and has the potential to further promote entrepreneurship in Africa.
By promoting trade among African countries, AfCFTA would be strengthening the continents industrial base and ensuring that Africa produce goods for itself through its fast emerging entrepreneurs.
[emailprotected]
Here is the original post:
Start-ups in Africa need fiscal support to take off - The Herald
Posted in Resource Based Economy
Comments Off on Start-ups in Africa need fiscal support to take off – The Herald







