The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Monthly Archives: February 2022
Trumps incendiary Texas speech may have deepened his legal troubles, experts say – The Guardian
Posted: February 7, 2022 at 6:40 am
Donald Trumps incendiary call at a Texas rally for his backers to ready massive protests against radical, vicious, racist prosecutors could constitute obstruction of justice or other crimes and backfire legally on Trump, say former federal prosecutors.
Trumps barbed attack was seen as carping against separate federal and state investigations into his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results and his real estate empire.
Trumps rant that his followers should launch the biggest protests ever in three cities should prosecutors do anything wrong or illegal by criminally charging him for his efforts to overturn Joe Bidens 2020 victory, or for business tax fraud, came at a 30 January rally in Texas where he repeated falsehoods that the election was rigged.
Legal experts were astonished at Trumps strong hints that if he runs and wins a second term in 2024, he would pardon many of those charged for attacking the Capitol on 6 January last year in hopes of thwarting Bidens certification by Congress.
Former Richard Nixon White House counsel John Dean attacked Trumps talk of pardons for the rioters as the stuff of dictators and stressed that failure to confront a tyrant only encourages bad behavior.
Taken together, veteran prosecutors say Trumps comments seemed to reveal that the former president now feels more legal jeopardy from the three inquiries in Atlanta, Washington and New York, all of which have accelerated since the start of 2022.
Trumps anxiety was especially palpable when he urged supporters at the Texas rally to stage the biggest protests we have ever had in Washington DC, in New York, in Atlanta and elsewhere, should any charges be brought, a plea for help that could boomerang and create more legal problems for the former president.
Dennis Aftergut, a former federal prosecutor who is of counsel to Lawyers Defending American Democracy, told the Guardian Trump may have shot himself in the foot with the comments. Criminal intent can be hard to prove, but when a potential defendant says something easily seen as intimidating or threatening to those investigating the case it becomes easier, Aftergut said.
Aftergut added that having proclaimed his support for the insurrectionists, Trump added evidence of his corrupt intent on January 6 should the DOJ prosecute him for aiding the seditious conspiracy, or for impeding an official proceeding of Congress.
Likewise, a former US attorney in Georgia, Michael Moore, said Trumps comments could potentially intimidate witnesses and members of a grand jury, noting that it is a felony in Georgia to deter a witness from testifying before a grand jury.
Trump is essentially calling for vigilante justice against the justice system. Hes not interested in the pursuit of justice but blocking any investigations, Moore added.
Trumps angry outburst came as three investigations by prosecutors that could lead to charges against Trump or top associates all seemed to gain steam last month.
A special grand jury, for example, was approved in Atlanta focused on Trumps call to Georgia secretary of state Brad Raffensperger on 2 January last year, asking him to just find enough votes to block Joe Bidens Georgia victory, a state Trump lost by more than 11,700 votes.
Trumps call for huge protests prompted the Fulton county district attorney, Fani Willis, who is leading the criminal inquiry, to ask the FBI to do a threat assessment to protect her office and the grand jury that is slated to meet in May.
Last month too a top justice official revealed that DOJ is investigating fake elector certifications declaring Trump the winner in several states he lost, a scheme reportedly pushed by Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani by which vice-president Mike Pence could block Congress from certifying Bidens win. To Trumps chagrin, Pence rejected the plan.
Further, the New York state attorney general last month stated in a court document that investigators had found evidence that Trumps real estate business used fraudulent or misleading asset valuations to obtain loans and tax benefits, allegations Trump and his lawyers called politically motivated.
Ex-prosecutors say that Trumps Texas comments are dangerous and could legally boomerang as the prosecutors appear to have new momentum.
Our criminal laws seek to hold people accountable for their purposeful actions, Paul Pelletier, a former acting chief of the fraud section at DOJ, said. Trumps history of inciting people to violence demonstrates that his recent remarks are likely to cause a disruption of the pending investigations against him and family members.
Pelletier added: Should his conduct actually impede any of these investigations, federal and state obstruction statutes could easily compound Mr Trumps criminal exposure.
Trumps remarks resonated especially in Georgia, where former prosecutors say he may now face new legal problems.
Former prosecutor Aftergut noted that Willis understood the threat when she quickly asked the FBI to provide protection at the courthouse, and he predicted that the immediate effect on the deputy DAs working on the case would be to energize them in pursuing the case.
In a similar vein, ex-ambassador Norm Eisen and States United Democracy Center co-chair said Trumps call for protests in Atlanta, New York and Washington if prosecutors there charge him certainly sounds like a barely veiled call for violence. Thats particularly true when you combine it with his other statements at the Texas rally about how the last crowd of insurrectionists are being mistreated and did no wrong.
In addition, congresswoman Liz Cheney, the co-chair of the House panel investigating the 6 January Capitol assault by Trump followers, has stated that Trumps talk of pardons and encouraging new protests suggests he would do it all again if given the chance.
On another legal front, Aftergut pointed out that some Trump comments at the rally might help prosecutors at DOJ expand their inquiry. Trump handed federal prosecutors another gift when he said that Mike Pence should have overturned the election.
Some veteran consultants say Trumps latest attacks on prosecutors shows he is growing more nervous as investigations appear to be getting hotter.
Trumps prosecutor attacks are wearing thin with the broad Republican electorate, said Arizona Republican consultant Chuck Coughlin Hes trying to whip up the base for his personal gain. This is another iteration of Trumps attacks on the government.
From a broader perspective, Moore stressed that Trumps multiple attacks on the legal system at the Texas rally represent just another erosion of the norms of a civilized society by Trump. The truth has taken a backseat to Trumpism.
View post:
Trumps incendiary Texas speech may have deepened his legal troubles, experts say - The Guardian
Posted in Donald Trump
Comments Off on Trumps incendiary Texas speech may have deepened his legal troubles, experts say – The Guardian
Donald Trump ‘laying the groundwork’ for another presidential run – DW (English)
Posted: at 6:40 am
At a recent rally in Texas, Donald Trump talked about Hillary Clinton and how the 2020 election was allegedlystolen from him through voter fraud.
"The 2020 election was rigged and everyone knows it," Trump asserted, even though all such claims have been thoroughly disproved. The US Supreme Court, which is majority conservative thanks to judges put on the bench by Trump himself, has thrown out a lawsuit seeking to overturn election results in four battleground states.
If this rhetoric sounds familiar, it's because the messaging at Trump rallies today consists of bits and pieces he's been using since he first ran for president (such as the hatred against Hillary Clinton) and the voter fraud conspiracy he's been focused on since his 2020 loss.
"He is doing what he's always done: playing to his base and throwing them red meat," said Brandon Conradis, a campaign editor at the political news site The Hill and a former newswriter with DW. "It's the greatest hits, still."
On January 6, thousands of supporters of former President Donald Trump flocked to the US Capitol, waving flags and claiming the election had been stolen from their political idol. Later, some 800 protesters stormed the iconic building, hunting down lawmakers, beating up police officers and leaving a trail of destruction. Five people died in connection with the riot and dozens were injured.
Many observers later said the riot marked an attempt to overthrow the government, instigated or orchestrated by the former president. A select committee of the US House of Representatives has begun investigating the events, and Trump's possible role in them. For his part, Trump has claimed there was "love in the air" on January 6.
The Capitol riot sparked global outrage. Many Republicans still, however, say the incident was a legitimate means of protest against what they claim was a rigged election. Some Republicans have even staged rallies outside US prisons in support of jailed rioters. The exact interpretation of the January 6 events will certainly have a big impact on the US midterm elections in November 2022.
Hundreds of individuals are facing prosecution over their role in the January 6 attack. So far, over 50 people have been sentenced for their actions on that day. Many left a slew of evidence on social media, boasting of their crimes, which has helped in handing down convictions. Defendants willing to plead guilty can hope to receive a reduced sentence.
The city of Washington, D.C, is suing members of the right-wing extremist group Proud Boys, loyal Trump supporters, to recoup damages for the Capitol attack. Authorities have accused the group's leaders of having conspired "to terrorize the District of Columbia" in "a coordinated act of domestic terrorism." Criminal charges have already been brought against several Proud Boys members.
Radio host and conspiracy theorist Alex Jones is considered a key instigator of the Capitol riot. He drummed up support for the pro-Trump march in Washington, calling for a million people to turn up and protest against allegedly corrupt Democratic Party. The congressional panel investigating the events of January 6 has found Jones helped finance the rally.
Images of Jacob Chansley, a topless, tattooed rioter wearing a striking, horned headdress, went around the globe. He soon became a symbol of the January 6 attack. Now, the self-proclaimed "QAnon Shaman" and conspiracy theorist from Phoenix, Arizona, has pleaded guilty and been sentenced to 3 1/2 years in jail.
Capitol Police officer Aquilino Gonell broke down as he rewatched footage of the deadly riot during a hearing of the congressional panel investigating the attack in July. That day, Gonell recalls, he thought "this is how I'm going to die, defending this entrance." One of Gonell's fellow police officers was killed in the Capitol riot, and four others committed suicide in the months that followed.
The reason die-hard Trump supporters managed to force their way into the Capitol is that US security agencies were unprepared. The US Senate found that despite warning signs of a potential attack, the police leadership failed to act: National Guard reinforcements were called in too late, and the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security downplayed the threat of violence.
Many political analysts predict Donald Trump will run again in the 2024 presidential election. While his supporters would be elated, critics would surely regard this as a nightmare come true. Until now, Trump has weathered practically all political scandals not even his role in the January 6 Capitol attack seems to have undermined a potential comeback.
Author: Oliver Pieper, Goran Cutanoski
Trump also came out with a new hit single, if you will, during his rally in Conroe last weekend. The former president spoke out stronger than he ever had before in favor of the insurrectionists who stormed the US Capitol in Washington on January 6, 2021.
"If I run and if I win," he said, referring to the 2024 presidential election, "we will treat those people from January 6 fairly. We will treat them fairly. And if it requires pardons, we will give them pardons because they are being treated so unfairly."
"When Trump says provocative things like this, he above all craves the attention," Michael Cornfield, associate professor of political management at George Washington University, told DW.
The violent attack on the Capitol saw an angry mob disrupting the session of Congress about to formalize Joe Biden's election win. Five people died, more than 700 have since been charged. As a result of the attack, Trump was impeached during his last days in office after being charged with "incitement of insurrection."
In the days following the Conroe rally, numerous high-profile Republicans have spoken out against Trump's idea of pardoning those who stormed the Capitol. South Carolina senator and well-known Trump ally Lindsey Graham said he hoped the perpetrators would "go to jail and get the book thrown at them because they deserve it."
New Hampshire Governor Chris Sununu was also adamantly against the idea. "Of course not," Sununu told CNN when asked whether the Capitol rioters should be pardoned. "Oh my goodness. No."
But high-profile Republicans, observers say, aren't the target audience for Trump's contentious statements anyway.
"Trump doesn't care about" criticism from the high echelons of his party, Conradis said. "He is appealing to his base, and those who stormed the Capitol are definitely part of it. Those are the die-hard [supporters] who are going to vote for him no matter what."
Thousands of people turn up to Trump's rallies like this one in Georgia in June 2021
Keeping his supporters close will be crucial if Trump does decide to run again in the 2024 presidential election. Statements that begin with "If I run and if I win" certainly make it sound like another Trump candidacy is a likely scenario.
"Obviously anything could happen, but where things are right now, he definitely wants to run again and is laying the groundwork," Conradis said. "He doesn't want people to forget about him. He loves the spotlight, he is a showman and he wants the media coverage."
Cornfield is less sure. "He's an entertainer with an important political position and a political past. But his political future is very much up in the air," he said.
Either way should Trump decide to run again, things are looking good for the former president. In a poll first published by The Hill at the end of January, Trump garnered 57% of the vote in a hypothetical 8-candidate 2024 Republican primary, the first place by a wide margin. In second place with 12% is Florida governor Ron DeSantis.
Currently Trump leads polls among potential Republican presidential candidates
Trump has also built up an impressive war chest. He raised $51 million in the second half of 2021 alone, bringing his total funds to $122 million, according to federal filings. Many of those dollars came from small-time donors, "normal Americans," as Conradis put it. "That in itself tells you how much support he still has."
Cornfield points out that Trump has only spent a fraction of this money on supporting candidates on the local and state level in the midterm elections coming up this November. Normally, the politics professor explains, someone looking to run for president would spend much more this way. But he believes Trump is saving the money for something else.
"He's knee-deep in lawsuits and it could get worse," Cornfield said.
And good legal defense is expensive.
Of course, Trump might also hope that he won't have to face any judges at all if things go his way.
"Not to be too cynical, but one of his primary motivations for running again is that he will make the case that because he's a candidate for president, he's immune from prosecution," Cornfield said.
Whether that move would work is a different story. As of now, it's still not clear whether Trump will attempt to take back the White House. If he does, though, the Democrats would face a serious opponent.
"Trump is still the person elected in 2016," Conradis said. "That's why he could win again."
Continued here:
Donald Trump 'laying the groundwork' for another presidential run - DW (English)
Posted in Donald Trump
Comments Off on Donald Trump ‘laying the groundwork’ for another presidential run – DW (English)
Ohio GOP lawmakers to introduce a new congressional map. The odds of it passing are slim – The Columbus Dispatch
Posted: at 6:40 am
Ohiolawmakers will take a second crack at drawing a congressional map that adheres to voter-approved language to curb partisan gerrymandering.
But passing a map that appeases voters, Republicans and Democrats will be atall order if not a downright impossibletask. If lawmakers can't pass a map by Super Bowl Sunday, they will hand the line-drawing power to the Ohio Redistricting Commission,a group that has yet to approve a map that Republicans and Democrats agreed on.
"I think we all fully anticipate that this is something that's going to come to the redistricting commission. I think even Republicans anticipate that," said House Minority Leader Allison Russo, D-Upper Arlington. "So the question is: once it comes to the Ohio Redistricting Commission, will the process play out in a way that's similar or better than what we saw with the state legislative maps?"
Ohio congressional maps: The Ohio Supreme Court just rejected a GOP-drawn congressional map. What happens next?
The Ohio Supreme Court, in a 4-3 decision, rejected the GOP-controlled Legislature's first map, which could have given the GOP a 12-3 advantage in the state. That rejectedmap was drawn by Republican staff members with little to no Democratic input.
The court ruled that mapmakers unduly favored Republican candidates over Democratic ones. "When the dealer stacks the deck in advance, the house usually wins," wrote Justice Michael Donnelly in the court's majority opinion.
Hamilton County, for example, was divided into two GOP districts despite votingDemocraticin many recent county and presidential elections. Advocates of redistricting reform say mapmakers can and should draw a map that gives Republicans an 8-7 or 9-6 advantage.
Fair Districts Ohio, a coalition of good government groups advocating for redistricting reform, proposed a model map that would give the GOP an 8-7 advantage in the state with three safe Democratic seats and six safe Republican ones. The map could serve as a starting point for lawmakers or if ignored, an exhibit in a future legal challenge.
"We are hoping, as the state Legislature tackles this challenge, that they will be very focused on the voters rather than on partisan interests," said Catherine Turcer, executive director of Common Cause Ohio.
Senate President Matt Huffman, R-Lima, told reporters to expect "some action" on a congressional map on Monday or Tuesday after Senate Republicans returnedfrom a Florida fundraiser. Sen. Rob McColley, R-Napoleon, had introduced Senate Bill 286 as a placeholder.
Republicans won't be able to do it alone. They'll need votes from Democrats in the House. Why? Normally a bill takes effect after 90 days too late for the scheduled May 3rd primary.
For a bill to take effect right away, 66% of lawmakers in each chamber need to approve it. Republicans control more than 66% of the seats in the Ohio Senate, but not in the Ohio House.
"If this is a map that is not something that achieves the 10-year map goal that doesn't unduly favor one party, they will not get the votes needed for that emergency clause," Russo said.
Bills can also take effect right away if they include an appropriation of money.
The normal rules for a map also apply: if the planreceives support from 60% of lawmakersand 33% of Democrats in each chamber, it could last for 10 years. Anything that passes short of that would last for four years.
Speaker Bob Cupp, R-Lima, wouldn't say whether he'd prefer lawmakers or the commission to pass the maps.
"We're going to be formulating a reasonable approach, and I am not sure which way would be best at this time," he said.
Jessie Balmert is a reporter for the USA TODAY Network Ohio Bureau, which serves the Akron Beacon Journal, Cincinnati Enquirer, Columbus Dispatch and 18 other affiliated news organizations across Ohio.
Read the rest here:
Posted in Republican
Comments Off on Ohio GOP lawmakers to introduce a new congressional map. The odds of it passing are slim – The Columbus Dispatch
At last the Republican Party comes clean: It stands for terrorism and Trump, against democracy – Salon
Posted: at 6:40 am
In the year-plus since the events of Jan. 6, 2021, the Republican Party has morphed, like an evil insect emerging from a chrysalis, into its final form: a terrorist organization. Rather thanpurging from its ranks those Republicans who supported, endorsed and participated in Donald Trump's coup attempt, the party and its leaders have rallied around them, and remade the party in their image. Rather than voting to impeach and convict Donald Trump, and therefore drive him out of the party, Republican leaders, along with the bulk of their voters and their mouthpieces in the media, have chosen to support him.
Republicans are so loyal to Donald Trump that even after the attack on the Capitol, where Republican members of Congress could easily have been killed 147 of them voted to nullify the results of the 2020 presidential election. In essence, they were completing the "legal" part of Trump's coup, even after the illegal part had failed (at least in that moment).
In the year since then, the scale of Donald Trump and his cabal's conspiracy and coup attempt has only become clearer and more obvious.There is no longer room for plausible deniability; the evidence is overwhelming. The United States was perhaps hours or days away from the overthrow of democracy, and at least an attempt at autocratic or dictatorial rule. Although that coup attempt was not successful, the campaignagainst American democracy continues and is escalating, largely undeterred.
RELATED:Donald Trump's lackeys failed him and saved democracy
In dozens of states across the country, Republicans are passing laws that will make it difficult or impossible for Democrats to win elections. Emulating the systems of authoritarian pseudo-democracies like Russia, Hungary and Turkey, the Republicans want to replace a system of"free and fair" elections (however imperfect those have been in practice) with what experts describe as "competitive authoritarianism" or "managed democracy."
Ultimately, Jan. 6, 2021, was a trial run and a preview of the future, in a country where if Republicans lose the popular vote they clearly intend to resort to illegal and quasi-legal means to obtain, keep and maximize power.
Last Friday, the Republican National Committee finally, and in almost an anti-climactic way, announced who and what it really is. The party's governing body officially censured Reps.Liz Cheney of Wyoming and Adam Kinzinger of Illinoisfor daring to condemn Trump's coup attempt, and for serving the public interest by sitting on the House committee tasked with investigating those traitorous events. The RNC's official statement described Trump's Jan. 6 attack force as "ordinary citizens engaged in legitimate political discourse."
The Washington Postoffered this editorial comment:
Since Jan. 6, 2021, senior party officials have gone from acknowledging Mr. Trump's guilt to punishing those, such as Ms. Cheney, who continue to speak up about a tragedy that no American shouldforget.It remains to be seen what punishment former vice president Mike Pence will endure followinga Friday speech in which he rebuked Mr. Trump's claimsthat he could have overturned the election on Jan.6.Republicans assailing Ms. Cheney and siding with Mr. Trump and his lies about the 2020 election are the ones who imperil the republic. By asserting, as their censure resolution did Friday, that truth is fiction and patriots are turncoats, they have exposed the dark, festering core of what their party is becoming: an unruly revolt against fact and reason that betrays the principles leaders, such as former president Ronald Reagan, championed.
The Republican Party has now given its official endorsement for more right-wing political violence, such as we saw last January at the Capitol and since then in various smaller-scale incidents across the country. Predictably, Republican leaders and spokespeople are now deflecting, obfuscating, lying and seeking to deny reality as they claim that their words were taken out of context and they did not exactly mean what they plainly said.
Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.
This is a common strategy among extremist political organizations as they pretend to be legitimate partners in the very system of democratic governance they are working to destroy.
At important moments in history, people often do not realize what has taken place and how their collective destinies have been altered. In the middle of such events, it is difficult to see the bigger picture and its true implications. In America, this blindness is amplified by a nave cultural belief in the country's narrative of inexorable progress, in which history inevitably follows an upward trajectory, rather than meandering, lurching and then falling backward before moving forward again at some point in the future.
Because America's democracy crisis is a type of interregnum, and a collective crisis of meaning the American people are still muddling through it all, desperately trying to search out some kind of clarity or meaning. Those people who are supposed to be the guides the news media, political elites, "experts", and other public voices are just as lost because they too are vulnerable to the same forces.
We will look back on last Friday, Feb. 4, 2022, as one such moment one when things changed even more for the worse in an already broken America, and most Americans were not aware it had happened. On that same day, Donald Trump's fundraising operation sent out this email:
When will it end, Friend?
AT&T, a majority owner of DirecTV, is banning the very popular One America News Network (OAN) because too many people are watching.
I'm calling on all Conservatives to steer clear of DirecTV, and while you're at it, the same goes for "Concast's" [sic] Xfinity as well.
The Liberals have gone too far, and it's time we do something about it. My team is putting together a petition to show the Left that Americans want to hear REAL NEWS, not FAKE NEWS.
I want to get over 1,000,000 signatures from Patriots who are committing to NOT use DirecTV again, which is why I need your help.
Please add your name IMMEDIATELY to commit to NOT using DirecTV and to stand against the Left-wing MOB.
These Radical Left Lunatics are destroying our Nation, and we are better off without them.
I've requested to see the list of Patriots who proudly stand me, and I'll be looking for your name. Don't let me down.
Under the cover of hysterical and imaginary claims of censorship DirecTV in all probability made a business decision unrelated to ideology Trump and his spokespeople are encouraging eliminationist violence against their perceived enemies, the imaginary "Left-wing MOB" that is "destroying our Nation."
These are not isolated or random threats. Intwo recent political rallies Trump has hinted at the possibility of widespread racist violence, directed in particular against Black people.Last Saturday in Conroe, Texas, he called for mass demonstrations in Atlanta, New York and Washington if he is indicted or prosecuted for his many apparent crimes.
Fox News and the larger right-wing propaganda echo chamber have been circulating the white supremacist "Great Replacement" fantasy, which argues that white people are being supplanted in Western society by Black and brown people. These claims are an encouragement to preemptive violence against Black and brown people, Muslims and other perceived undesirables.
For at least the last six years, Donald Trump and the larger neofascist movement behind him have been using the propaganda technique known as stochastic terrorism, in which "dog-whistle" and other coded appeals are used to encourage political violence. In itself, this is nothing new: Stochastic terrorism has been a key feature of right-wing media and the "conservative" movement for several decades.
Emboldened by the events of Jan. 6, 2021, Republican fascists and the larger white right are becoming bolder and less restrained. Their use of stochastic terrorism has now transitioned toward direct threats, and acts, of political violence. As public opinion polls and other research have shown, millions of Republicans and Trump supporters are prepared to support political violence in order to return Trump to power and to protect what they understand as America's "traditional values" (meaning white privilege and white power). An unknown proportion of those people are willing to engage in such violence personally.
Many Trumpists and other neofascists are flying all-black U.S. flags at rallies or outside their homes to signal that they will offer no mercy in a future armed battle against Democrats, liberals, progressives and others deemed to be "un-American."
RELATED:Black flag: Understanding the Trumpists' latest threatening symbol
White supremacist and other neofascist paramilitaries are marching in the streets of major American cities in a campaign of intimidation (and recruitment). Historically Black colleges and universities have been targeted by bomb threats. In an eerie repeat of one of the worst chapters in human history, Republicans and their followers are endorsing book bans and even staging public book burnings.
Writing at Mother Jones, Mark Follman previewed these developments last year:
Trump has made freshly evident, in other words, that he is serving as the inspirational leader for a domestic terrorism movement. His role as such was first openly described by a handful of leading national security experts in the season of his reelection defeat and tumultuous final months in office. Back then, the discussion centered on Trump using tactics of stochastic terrorism, a method of inciting violence veiled in plausible deniability that those experts (and this journalist) recognized from Trump in the run-up to January 6. A third longtime Republican, a former senior national security official in the George W. Bush administration, described Trump as "an arsonist of radicalization."
As the former president further seeks to rewrite January 6 and stoke incendiary far-right grievances, veiled tactics and plausible deniability are no longer in the equation, according to another expert among those last fall who called out Trump's tactics. "So much commentary still seems uncomfortable or coy about stating what Trump is doing," says Juliette Kayyem, who served as an assistant secretary at the Department of Homeland Security under President Obama and currently directs national security research at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government. "He's not hinting, whistling, or luring these extremists anymore. He's providing an owner's manual. I will never understand why we are being so polite about describing this."
In a recent essay at Salon about Trump's threats of race war, I explored some parallels:
Donald Trump is an entrepreneur of racial and ethnic violence. In that sense, he is not dissimilar to leaders in places like Rwanda or the former Yugoslavia, who used fear, lies, stereotypes and other dehumanizing and eliminationist rhetoric and threats of violence to encourage ethnic genocide. Trump has made it clear that he wants a "race war," in which Black and brown people are targeted for wide-scale violence by white people. There may be thousands, or tens of thousands (or even more) of white people willing to follow his orders. The danger is extreme.
When people reach out to me for advice about how to manage their fears about America in this moment of crisis and impending disaster, I suggest that they should read Chinua Achebe's novel "Things Fall Apart". I also encourage them to consider Achebe's wisdom that:"When suffering knocks at your door and you say there is no seat for him, he tells you not to worry because he has brought his own stool."
In the end, if the current behavior of the American people at large is any indication, they may soon find themselves on the street outside their own house, evicted by suffering as he moves in his friends and family and pretends it was his house all along.
Read more from Chauncey DeVega on America's crisis of democracy:
Here is the original post:
Posted in Republican
Comments Off on At last the Republican Party comes clean: It stands for terrorism and Trump, against democracy – Salon
Trump Is Obsessed With Being a Loser – The Atlantic
Posted: at 6:40 am
Donald Trump has made clear time and time again that, in his view, the worst thing that can happen to a person is to be judged a loser. In the 2020 presidential election he was, in fact, a loser, but his narcissism and the incredibly fragile self-esteem that undergirds it wont allow him to accept that reality. He has spent the past 15 months attempting to overthrow the election in an effort to make himself the winner and, after that effort failed, rewriting the narrative, portraying himself as a victim of THE CRIME OF THE CENTURY.
Almost every public comment Trump makes these days is focused on the election. Americas 45th president said in a statement last week that his vice president, Mike Pence, should have overturned the election. In a speech, he indicated that if he were to become president again, hed likely pardon the people who on January 6, 2021, violently stormed the Capitol to stop the certification of the election, part of his ongoing effort to turn insurrectionists and those charged with seditious conspiracy into martyrs. He also warned that he would incite unrest if prosecutors who are investigating him and his businesses took action against him.
Trumps mind has no room to entertain any other thoughts, at least not for long. His defeat is his obsession; it has pulled him into a deep, dark place. He wants to pull the rest of us into it as well.
I discuss Trump in psychological terms because I have said for a half-dozen yearsand previously in these pagesthat the most important thing to understand about Trump is his disordered personality; its the only way to even begin to think about how to deal with him. (Im not the only person to think that.)
Trump seems unable to incorporate anything critical about himself, hence his need to create an imaginary world in which he really won the 2020 election but was the victim of a conspiracy that borders on intergalactic. Hes performed a moral inversion in which the supporters who stormed the Capitol are the true patriots; they, like he, are being unfairly persecuted. They are the defenders of democracy; the people who are holding them accountable are the enemies of America.
Another reason Trumps mindset matters is that millions of his followerspassionate, committed, incensed, aggrieved, and absolutely sure they are right and righteoushave entered his hall of mirrors. To understand the GOP, one must understand Trump. Its true that his hold on the party has weakened some since he left office; that was inevitable. But he is still far and away the dominant figure in the GOP and, at this juncture at least, its mostly likely presidential nominee in 2024. As Shane Goldmacher and Maggie Haberman of The New York Times put it, the Republican Party is very much still Mr. Trumps, transforming his lies about a stolen 2020 election into an article of faith, and even a litmus test that he is seeking to impose on the 2022 primaries with the candidates he backs. He is the partys most coveted endorser, its top fund-raiser and the polling front-runner for the 2024 presidential nomination.
The Trump era has conditioned many in the Republican Party to think like he doesand those who dont are too afraid to speak out against his malicious transgressions. Even Republican Senator Susan Collins of Mainewho voted to impeach Trump, who represents a blue state, who isnt up for reelection for four years, and who clearly views Trump as a threat to American democracybobbed and weaved when she was asked if she would support Trump in 2024. The proper response would have been: of course not!
As if to prove that the GOP is now an instrument of Trumps obsession, late last week Republican leaders meeting in Salt Lake City censured Representative Adam Kinzinger and Representative Liz Cheney because of their work on the January 6 committee. The Republican National Committee also announced that it would fund Cheneys primary opponent.
Cheney and Kinzinger engaged in a Democrat-led persecution of ordinary citizens who engaged in legitimate political discourse, the Republican National Committees chair, Ronna McDaniel, said. McDaniels words were echoed in the censure, which accused Cheney and Kinzinger of participating in a Democrat-led persecution of ordinary citizens engaged in legitimate political discourse.
Even in a Trump-led party, it is stunning that Republican leaders would seek to whitewash a violent attack on the Capitol to overturn a presidential election. This is not just moral degradation; it is moral nihilism.
McDaniels insistence, after a great deal of blowback, that legitimate political discourse referred only to nonviolent protesters isnt convincing. For one thing, there is no persecutionto use the language from the RNC resolutionby the January 6 congressional committee aimed at people who gathered peacefully before the assault on the Capitol. For another, Trumps dangling of a pardon could apply only to those who were arrested for attacking the Capitol. And in a resolution in which the events of January 6 were central, the RNC did not see fit to say a single critical word about the violent mob that stormed the Capitol. That is itself quite telling.
Amanda Carpenter, who once worked for Senator Ted Cruz, put it well: The fact the RNC is censuring Cheney and Kinzinger for investigating January 6 and not condemning Trump for causing January 6 is absolutely demented.
Even The Wall Street Journal editorial page felt compelled to issue this warning: Republicans should not get within 10 miles of defending the Capitol riot. What is to be gained by the RNCs indulgence of President Trumps vendettas? The answer, of course, is that they may be true believersand even if they arent, they understand, perhaps better than The Journals editorial writers, what MAGA world is demanding.
To put this indulgence in perspective, contrast the behavior of the Republican Party in the United States with the Conservative Party in the United Kingdom. As Mark Landler, the Times London-bureau chief, has noted, Tory members of Parliament have been far more critical of Prime Minister Boris Johnsonwho didnt incite an attack on the House of Commons but did host drinking parties during lockdownthan Republicans have been critical of Trump. The Tory party understands the distinction between partisan loyalty and craven, unpatriotic fealty; the Republican Party does not.
Ive sensed lately that some people on the rightindividuals who defended Trump at virtually every turn in his presidency but knew privately, deep in their heart, that they had made moral accommodations they werent proud ofwish the rest of us would just move on from Trump. Media coverage of the former president brings to the foreground the cost of their Faustian bargain.
Shortly after the election, some of us tried to move on. But unfortunately, Trump and MAGA world had something different in mindundermining trust in our elections, storming the Capitol, propagating malicious and destructive lies. There is now an entire media industryRight Wing Inc.built around the distorted and disturbed mind of Donald J. Trump.
A wise conservative friend of mine who is a critic of the left recently told me, At the elite level, the Republican Party is much worse than the Democratic Party when it comes to the health of American democracy. It is led by, and defined by, Trump, who wants to attack our institutions at every level.
So he does, and so he has. Trump was dangerous, his mind disordered, before; hes more dangerous, his mind more disordered, now. Hes obsessed and enraged, consumed by vengeance, and moving us closer to political violence. His behavior needs attention not because of the past but because of the future. A second Trump term would make the first one look like a walk in the park.
View post:
Posted in Donald Trump
Comments Off on Trump Is Obsessed With Being a Loser – The Atlantic
Pittsburgh out of running to host 2024 Republican National Convention – TribLIVE
Posted: at 6:40 am
Pittsburgh is out of the running to host the 2024 Republican National Convention, Politico reported.
The news outlet reported from Salt Lake City where the Republican National Committee is currently meeting that RNC members are scheduled to visit other cities being considered for the political convention but not Pittsburgh. In addition to Salt Lake City, the other cities include Milwaukee and Nashville.
Allegheny County Republican Chairman Sam DeMarco, a county councilman from North Fayette, said he was disappointed to learn that Pittsburgh is no longer being considered and will miss out on the potential economic benefits of hosting a convention.
Obviously I am disappointed, because I had been optimistic about the impact of $200 million being spent on our region in 2024, DeMarco said. I understand the stiff competition we were up against.
DeMarco said the other cities still in the running have hosted large-scale political conventions in the past, while Pittsburgh has not.
Pittsburgh Mayor Ed Gainey, a Democrat, initially signed a letter of support for bringing the Republican National Convention to Pittsburgh, but backtracked a bit and said his initial support was merely a matter of procedure. In a statement, Gainey said he had concerns about the RNCs potential impact on safety and covid-19 mitigation.
We are one of the most welcoming cities in America and I look forward to sharing our home with the world, said Gainey. As we look for future events to come to Pittsburgh, I am dedicated to ensuring the benefits are shared equitably with our small, local and diverse businesses and that these events reflect and embody the values of Pittsburgh.
Allegheny County Councilwoman Bethany Hallam, D-North Side, said she was elated that Pittsburgh is out of the running. She said she felt political conventions, both Republican and Democratic, would invite too much contention.
How is it actually going to benefit Pittsburgh? How does it benefit the people who have to commute next to protests and counter-protests. I do not believe that the money would help the people who live and work here.
DeMarco said the Pittsburgh hospitality and service industry would benefit from the economic boost.
He criticized local Democratic officials who opposed the bid, arguing that local leaders must go beyond this partisan thing and set forth a vision that embraces what is best for the region and not just our political parties.
Ryan Deto is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Ryan by email at rdeto@triblive.com or via Twitter .
Original post:
Pittsburgh out of running to host 2024 Republican National Convention - TribLIVE
Posted in Republican
Comments Off on Pittsburgh out of running to host 2024 Republican National Convention – TribLIVE
Esper Memoir of Trump Tenure to Move Ahead After Legal Battle Ends – The New York Times
Posted: at 6:40 am
A memoir by the former defense secretary, Mark T. Esper, about his tenure in the Trump administration will be published with minimal redactions after he sued the agency he once led because it wanted to block information in the manuscript, his lawyer said on Friday.
The announcement brought an end to a battle between Mr. Esper and the Defense Department over what material was considered classified and therefore could not be included in his book, titled A Sacred Oath, which is set to be published in May.
Mr. Esper, who was fired by former President Donald J. Trump shortly after he lost re-election in the 2020 race, sued the Department of Defense in November, accusing agency officials of improperly blocking parts of his book under the guise of classification.
Mr. Espers lawyer, Mark S. Zaid, said in a statement on Friday that they had dropped the lawsuit after the Pentagon reversed its decisions about an overwhelming majority of the portions of the book that it had earlier said were classified.
Mr. Zaid said Mr. Esper thought that the remaining redactions to the book were also improper but that they were not central to the book.
Frankly, Secretary Esper has no interest in publishing properly classified information, which he has sworn to and protected for decades, Mr. Zaid said in the statement.
The Defense Department did respond directly to a request for comment about the end of the lawsuit.
There are no changes to the Departments prepublication security and policy review, it said on Saturday. The purpose of Department of Defense prepublication security and policy review is to ensure information damaging to the national security is not inadvertently disclosed.
In the departments prepublication review of Mr. Espers manuscript, it redacted more than 50 pages of the book that absolutely gutted substantive content and important story lines, Mr. Zaid said. This included accounts of some of Mr. Espers interactions with Mr. Trump and his views on actions taken by other countries, according to the lawsuit.
The prepublication review system is meant to stop current and former employees of the executive branch from sharing information that is classified and could damage national security if released, but Mr. Esper was not the first Trump administration official to encounter trouble during the process.
In 2020, a career official who oversaw the prepublication review of a book by John R. Bolton, a national security adviser in the Trump administration, accused White House aides of improperly politicizing the manuscript review.
Numerous inquiries. Since former President Donald Trumpleft office, there have been many investigations and inquiries into his businesses and personal affairs. Heres a list of those ongoing:
Investigation into criminal fraud. The Manhattan district attorneys office and the New York attorney generals officeare investigating whether Mr. Trump or his family business, the Trump Organization, engaged in criminal fraud by intentionally submitting false property values to potential lenders.
Investigation into tax evasion. As part of their investigation, in July 2021, the Manhattan district attorneys office charged the Trump Organization and its chief financial officer with orchestrating a 15-year scheme to evade taxes.A trial in that case is scheduled for summer 2022.
Mr. Zaid said that review process was broken because of the time and money required to challenge the decisions in court and because ultimately the department reversed its position on an overwhelming majority of classification decisions it earlier asserted were so vital to the national security interests of the United States, when the fact is they never were.
Mr. Esper submitted a draft of the manuscript for the review process in late May, and came to believe the process was taking an unusually long time, according to the lawsuit. The Defense Office of Prepublication and Security Review returned the manuscript in October without a written explanation for the deletions, the lawsuit said.
Mr. Esper said that some of the redactions asked me to not quote former President Trump and others in meetings, to not describe conversations between the former president and me, and to not use certain verbs or nouns when describing historical events.
I was also asked to delete my views on the actions of other countries, on conversations I held with foreign officials, and regarding international events that have been widely reported, Mr. Esper continued. Many items were already in the public domain; some were even published by D.O.D.
Read the original post:
Esper Memoir of Trump Tenure to Move Ahead After Legal Battle Ends - The New York Times
Posted in Donald Trump
Comments Off on Esper Memoir of Trump Tenure to Move Ahead After Legal Battle Ends – The New York Times
Ex-Donald Trump adviser Jason Miller weighs in on Biden administration, Covid crisis in US, and more – WION
Posted: at 6:40 am
Jason Miller, the ex-senior adviser of the former US President Donald Trump spoke to WION on a range of issues, including the Biden administration, the current coronavirus (COVID-19) situation in the United States.
Amid the escalating border situation between Russia and Ukraine, Miller also commented on Joe Biden's take on the Ukraine crisis and the stance that the US has taken on the conflict.
Question)Donald Trump has said he may consider a pardon for the capitol hill rioters if he returns to office does that mean he is most definitely running in 2024 or is it still a maybe?
Answer)That's with regard to people he believes were treated unfairly and did not commit any truly illegal or violent activity. Of course, if somebody assaulted law enforcement or if they created to damage or did something to assault or hurt another person.
Obviously, they should be fully prosecuted.
Even though there has not been a formal decision yet, I am pretty confident that Trump does run again in 2024. Many people would say they think there would be a rematch but I don't think Joe Biden runs again in 2024.
My prediction is it would be Trump versus California Governor Gavin Newsom in 2024.
Question)If and when Donald Trump does run for president in 2024, what would be the main focus of his campaign?
Answer)First would be to try to restore some of the American greatness that he was able to lead us toward in his first term. I would say that Trump is by far the most consequential single-term president in US history.
I have advised President Trump that he needs to make sure his relationship with Quad Allies in particular with India needs to be much stronger than it was in his first term. I do think they improved during his first term but they could be stronger especially when we look at this common concern with China.
ALSO READ |Ex-Trump adviser speaks to WION on reports that some White House records were torn up and taped back
Question)We are talking at a time when Covid-19 continues to wreak havoc across the United States. The US in fact has a far higher Covid death rate than other wealthy countries how would you grade the Biden administration's handling of the Covid-19 crisis?
Answer)Joe Biden ran on a promise to effectively end Covid-19 and we have seen anything but that. We have not seen our stockpiles restored. We are just now starting to get to the point where at-home testing kits are being sent out. No efforts by the US to hold the CCP in China accountable. That's one of the things where I am most frustrated with the Biden administration for not taking stronger action in seeking some aspect of economicreparations.
China and the CCP allowed this virus to spread all over the world and they lied about it and covered it up.
Question)What do you make of the rhetoric we have seen coming in from Joe Biden on the Ukraine crisis and the stance that the US has taken on the conflict?
Answer)We are stuck in the middle ground here. Joe Biden does not exhibit the confidence or the strength to ward off Putin's aggression.
Much of Putin's strategy is to rally his domestic base. Do I think ultimately Putin will go and try to take over all of Ukraine? No. Do I think he wants to try to slow nato or even EU expansion? Absolutely.
But the problem is with Joe Biden exhibiting such weakness on the global stage and having a lack of real international dialogue with Putin, it's allowed Putin to essentially be emboldened.
The major threat, the real concern in the global geopolitical space is I think it's a matter of when and not if china takes over Taiwan.
And I think that's something that's going to be a massive shock for the entire Indo-Pacific theatre. President xi is watching Biden's weakness in dealing with Putin and I think is probably emboldened to make that move against the island nation.
China is an existential threat not just to the US but to democracies around the world.
Watch the full interview here:
See original here:
Posted in Donald Trump
Comments Off on Ex-Donald Trump adviser Jason Miller weighs in on Biden administration, Covid crisis in US, and more – WION
Republicans say they’ll probe GoFundMe over Freedom Convoy donations – The Week Magazine
Posted: at 6:40 am
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) and multiple Republican state attorneys general have announced plans to investigate fundraising company GoFundMe, Reuters and The Hill reported. The Republican officials allege that GoFundMe may have violated state laws by refusing to distribute funds raised to support the "Freedom Convoy," a group of truckers and other demonstrators protesting Canada's COVID-19 policies.
According to The Daily Wire, the Republican attorneys general of Missouri, West Virginia, Ohio, and Louisiana have all said they plan to investigate whether GoFundMe defrauded donors from their states.
The convoy first entered Ottawa on Jan. 29 and has been blocking streets and keeping residents awake with loud honking ever since, The Washington Post reported.
GoFundMe said it deleted the fundraiser after being told by Ottawa police "that the previously peaceful demonstration has become an occupation." According to BBC, as of Saturday the protests were still mostly peaceful, having resulted in only three arrests.
The company initially said donors would have to apply for refunds and that any remaining funds would go to charities approved by GoFundMe, but later reversed course and made refunds automatic.
"It is a fraud for @gofundme to commandeer $9 million in donations sent to support truckers and give it to causes of their own choosing. I will work with [Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody] to investigate these deceptive practices these donors should be given a refund," DeSantis wrote on Twitter on Saturday, several hours after GoFundMe announced that all donations to the Freedom Convoy would be automatically refunded.
DeSantis also stated the amount in question in a slightly misleading manner. The funds GoFundMe refused to distribute totaled about 9 million Canadian dollars (equivalent to about 7.9 million U.S. dollars).
Around 1 million Canadian dollars were distributed to the protest's organizers before GoFundMe removed the fundraiser.
Excerpt from:
Republicans say they'll probe GoFundMe over Freedom Convoy donations - The Week Magazine
Posted in Republican
Comments Off on Republicans say they’ll probe GoFundMe over Freedom Convoy donations – The Week Magazine
Evers vetoes Republican bill banning critical race theory – WIZM NEWS
Posted: at 6:40 am
MADISON, Wis. (AP) Gov. Tony Evers vetoed a Republican bill that would have prohibited Wisconsin public schools from teaching students and training employees about concepts such as systemic racism and implicit bias.
Republicans who approved the bill do not have enough votes to override Evers veto.
Wisconsins proposal follows a national trend of Republican-controlled legislatures moving to thwart certain ideas they associate with critical race theory, a framework legal scholars developed in the 1970s and 1980s that centers on the view that racism is systemic in the nations institutions and serves to maintain the dominance of whites in society.
Evers said he vetoed the bill because he objected to creating new censorship rules that restrict schools and educators from teaching honest, complete facts about important historical topics like the Civil War and civil rights.
Evers, a former state superintendent of schools, said students deserve to learn without interference from politicians.
The proposal would have prohibited teaching that one race or sex is superior to another, that a person is inherently racist or sexist by virtue of his or her race or sex, and that a persons moral character isnt determined by race or sex.
Read more from the original source:
Evers vetoes Republican bill banning critical race theory - WIZM NEWS
Posted in Republican
Comments Off on Evers vetoes Republican bill banning critical race theory – WIZM NEWS







