Monthly Archives: February 2022

Government Bans on GMOs Are Making Global Hunger Worseand Do Serious Harm to the Planet | Jeffrey Miron, Sarah Eckhardt – Foundation for Economic…

Posted: February 17, 2022 at 8:22 am

The global controversy over genetically modified organisms is a classic bootleggers and Baptists story. Activists who mistakenly believe that GMOs are dangerous to consume have teamed up with pesticide and insecticide sellers to restrict the worlds poor from life-saving technologies.

This is a tragedy.

GMOs increase crop yields, improve the nutritional value of crops, and decrease greenhouse gas emissions. Those who want to improve standards of living and care for the environment should be appalled by GMO restrictions around the world.

Although the Baptists are skeptical about GMO safety, an overwhelming consensus of scientists agree that GMOs are safe to eat. They do not damage organ health, cause genetic mutations in humans or animals, affect pregnancies, or transfer genes to those who consume them.

The bootlegger alliesthe pesticide and insecticide industries are threatened by high-yielding and disease resistant crops that dont require their products.

Unlike conventional plant or animal breeding, which combines all the genes from two sources, GMOs are created by tweaking an organisms genetic code. This allows for more precise alterations, such as insertion of a disease-resistant gene or one that produces more vitamin C. Targeted alterations allow researchers to improve on conventional breeding practices and create organisms that are optimized for specific agriculture conditions.

This makes them well-suited to increase food security and lift farmers out of poverty. Farmers in poor countries lack access to the seed selection, farm equipment, fertilizers, pesticides, and irrigation technologies that are widespread in wealthy countries. Without these products, their crops are more susceptible to weeds and pests and yield substantially less than crops in the developed world. When pesticides are available, farmers often apply them by hand, which contributes to pesticide poisoning.

The benefits of GMOs are well-known to farmers in these conditions. In Kenya, dairy farmers are petitioning their government to lift the ban on GMOs because the rising prices of non-GMO livestock feeds have put many out of business. Since plant improvements are more targeted, GMOs are higher yielding, require fewer synthetic pesticides and fertilizers, and are more disease resistant than conventional crops.

For example, genetically modified bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) cotton increased Indian cotton yields between 50 and 70 percent between 1975 and 2009 and decreased insecticide poisoning by 2.4 million cases a year. Because farmers lost fewer crops to disease and pests, their profits rose by as much as 50 percent. For farmers who cannot afford tractors and fertilizer, these cost-reducing GMO seeds are an effective way to raise food production.

Yet only four African countries allow GMO crops, and much of southeast Asia restricts GMO access. The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation estimates that GMO restrictions could cost low and middle income nations up to $1.5 trillion in foregone income through 2050. In the Philippines, Bt eggplants were banned by the Supreme Court, even though several studies conducted in the country found numerous health and income benefits.

Beyond all these benefits, GMOs lower carbon emissions per unit produced. Adoption of genetically modified technology decreased greenhouse gas emissions by an equivalent of removing 15.27 million cars from the road in 2018 and saved the world approximately 16.1 million hectares in farmland. This is approximately 14 percent of the United States arable land.

Yet the European Union is moving away from GMOs and aims to have 25 percent of European farms producing organics by 2030.

The GMO debate continues to be controlled by non-scientific groups to the detriment of global hunger and efforts to lower emissions. Governments, particularly those of impoverished nations, should lift their bans and allow full access to GMOs.

See the article here:
Government Bans on GMOs Are Making Global Hunger Worseand Do Serious Harm to the Planet | Jeffrey Miron, Sarah Eckhardt - Foundation for Economic...

Posted in Libertarianism | Comments Off on Government Bans on GMOs Are Making Global Hunger Worseand Do Serious Harm to the Planet | Jeffrey Miron, Sarah Eckhardt – Foundation for Economic…

Sister Wives: Christine Brown Says Polygamy Turned Out …

Posted: at 8:21 am

Sister Wives star, Christine Brown reveals that polygamy turned out to be something different from expected. After over 25 years with Kody, Christine decided to leave her plural marriage with Kody Brown.

In the preview for the upcoming Jan 16 episode of Sister Wives, Janelle Brown and Robyn Brown discuss how the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has affected the family.

Janelle admitted that she has been wondering if she still chooses the polygamist lifestyle. She said, Do I still choose plural marriage? Yeah, I still choose it. But Ive had to have that conscious decision with myself.

Janelle admitted to the cameras, My children are almost grown, and theres not a huge necessity anymore to stay. It was a wonderful way to raise children. She admitted, With Kody and I, our relationship is pretty strained. It would be really easy. Its easy to walk away.

Meri said, I havent really ever thought about, Well because Mariah is grown and out of the house, now should I leave the family.' Robyn says, I think Ive been shocked at how weve handled the pandemic. Its made me think, Why would we choose to do it how weve done this?'

However, Christine had something very different to say about what she thinks about plural marriage. She said, What I hoped polygamy to be when I was younger ended up being something very different from what I actually have lived.

Despite her marriage with Kody crumbling and her faith in plural marriage fading, she tried to be positive for the holiday season. Christine said, The thing is were heading into Christmas, and I need to be present and grateful for the family that I have. She says, I am who I am today because of polygamy because I lived it.

On Nov 2, 2021, Christine confirmed that split with Kody through a statement via Instagram. The Instagram post reads: After more than 25 years together, Kody and I have grown apart, and I have made the difficult decision to leave.

TheSister Wivesstar continues, We will continue to be a strong presence in each others lives as we parent our beautiful children and support our wonderful family.

Christines statement ends, At this time, we ask for your grace and kindness as we navigate through this state within our family. With love, Christine Brown.

In the next few episodes of Sister Wives, Christines marriage to Kody will be in the spotlight. Fans will be able to see the reasoning behind her choice to leave her plural marriage after nearly 28 years. Sister Wives airs Sundays on TLC and discovery+.

RELATED: Sister Wives: How Many Children Does Meri Brown Have?

Continue reading here:

Sister Wives: Christine Brown Says Polygamy Turned Out ...

Posted in Polygamy | Comments Off on Sister Wives: Christine Brown Says Polygamy Turned Out …

House of Dlamini – Wikipedia

Posted: at 8:21 am

The House of Dlamini is the royal house of the Kingdom of Eswatini. Mswati III, as king and Ngwenyama of Eswatini, is the current head of the house of Dlamini. Swazi kings up to the present day are referred to as Ingwenyama and they rule together with the Queen Mother who is called Indlovukati.[2] The Swazi kings, like other Nguni nations, practice polygamy and thus have many wives and children.[3]

The Dlamini dynasty traces itself back to a chief Dlamini I (also known as Matalatala), who is said to have migrated with the Swazi people from East Africa through Tanzania and Mozambique.[4] Ngwane III, however, is often considered to be the first King of modern Eswatini, who ruled from 1745 to 1780.[5] In the early years of the Dlamini dynasty, the people and the country in which they resided was called Ngwane, after Ngwane III.[6]

In the early 19th century, the Dlamini centre of power shifted to the central part of Eswatini, known as Ezulwini valley. This occurred during the rule of Sobhuza I. In the south of the country (present day Shiselweni), tensions between the Ngwane and the Ndwandwe led to armed conflict. To escape this conflict, Sobhuza moved his royal capital to Zombodze. In this process, he conquered many of the earlier inhabitants of the country, thereby incorporating them under his rule. Later on, Sobhuza was able to strategically avoid conflict with the powerful Zulu kingdom which was now ruling in the south of the Pongola River. The Dlamini dynasty grew in strength and ruled over a large country encompassing the whole of present Eswatini during this time.[citation needed]

The royal family includes the king, the queen mother, the king's wives (emakhosikati), the king's children, as well as the king's siblings, the king's half-siblings and their families.[citation needed] Due to the practice of polygamy, the number of people who can be counted as members of the royal family is relatively large. For example, King Mswati III is thought to have over 200 brothers and sisters.[7]

Members of the royal family, including the king himself, have courted both internal and international controversy. The king and his household have been criticized for their lavish spending in a country with high poverty rates. Reports have claimed that the king's large number of spouses and children "take up a huge chunk of the [national] budget"[8] and that "the royal family seems to live in its own world that is totally unaffected by the country's struggles".[9]

The king's siblings include Mantfombi Dlamini, the Queen of the Zulus of South Africa, while one of his in-laws is Princess Zenani Mandela-Dlamini, a member of the Mandela chieftaincy family of Mvezo, South Africa.

Several members of the royal family have been educated abroad: King Mswati III spent several years at Sherborne School, in Dorset, England, and his eldest daughter Inkhosatana Sikhanyiso Dlamini has studied at St Edmund's College, Ware, in Hertfordshire, and Biola University, in California, United States.[10]

The current official residence of the royal family is the Ludzindzini Palace in Lobamba; other royal palaces exist for the queen consorts. He has received criticism for his "lavish" spending habits.[11]

Follow this link:

House of Dlamini - Wikipedia

Posted in Polygamy | Comments Off on House of Dlamini – Wikipedia

Top 10 buildings in fiction – The Guardian

Posted: at 8:21 am

Rather as everybody supposedly thinks they have a book in them, I wonder if every novelist thinks their mind holds unbuilt architecture. I know I do. Not the technical stuff, obviously. The trigonometry and structural engineering. I mean the exciting freehand sketching bit at the start. The dreaming into existence of a building that didnt exist before.

Of course, conjuring fictional structures on the page is about a lot more than simply satisfying unrealised ambitions: buildings have done an awful lot of work in many a fiction, shaping and expressing characters lives, concretising themes, rooting narratives in time and place.

My debut novel, Peterdown, involved imagining many such buildings. In the universe of the novel, a new five-runway airport has been built in the Thames estuary, and work is about to start on a Japanese-style bullet trainline that will connect the airport up to the regions. My fictional town, Peterdown has been chosen as the site of the railways splitter station, but to make way for the station a building in the town will have to be knocked down. On the shortlist alongside a digital arts centre, and a dilapidated football stadium is the Larkspur Hill, a sprawling brutalist housing estate that I was free to dream into existence without having to worry about budgets, planning restrictions, or whether or not it might blow over in the wind.

Needless to say, the estate is in fine company when it comes to fictional buildings. Here are some of my favourites.

1. Howards End by EM ForsterOne may as well begin with Howards End, one of the most lovingly described buildings in all literature. It is old and little, and altogether delightful red brick theres a very big wych-elm leaning a little over the house, and standing on the boundary between garden and meadow. It is modelled consciously on Rooks Nest, the house in Hertfordshire where Forster lived as a child, and as Oliver Stallybrass says, it: carries as great a structural load of values as any house in fiction. Forster was unambiguous as to its significance to his vision: In these English farms, if anywhere, one might see life steadily and see it whole.

2. High-Rise by JG BallardForster was not alone in believing that buildings are places that can condition the characters of the people that live in them. Ballards unnamed high-rise, a 40-storey behemoth in glass and concrete, which stands near the river, a couple of miles west of the City of London, is a gigantic vertical zoo, its hundreds of cages stacked above each other. That these are gilded cages, owned and occupied by lawyers, doctors and academics, doesnt stop the residents descending into a state of orgiastic dog-barbecuing savagery: In many ways, the high-rise was a model of all that technology had done to make possible the expression of a truly free psychopathology.

3. The Cortlandt housing project in The Fountainhead by Ayn RandThe architect behind Ballards high-rise is given a rough old time, but Rand is much kinder to Howard Roark. His masterpiece is the Cortlandt housing project, which he designs as six buildings, 15 stories high, each made in the shape of an irregular star with arms extending from a central shaft The buildings, of poured concrete, were a complex modelling of simple structural features; there was no ornament; none was needed; the shapes had the beauty of sculpture. Unfortunately, when it is realised it has been traduced by a bunch of second-handers. Roark, being one of Rands typically ameliorative and compromising sorts, blows it up with a load of dynamite.

4. Mr Biswass house in A House for Mr Biswas by VS NaipaulNot all fictional buildings would require dynamite to knock them down. A single well-aimed kick would probably do the job for Mr Biswass house: two of the wooden pillars supporting the staircase landing were rotten, whittle away towards the bottom and green with damp at the lightest breeze the sloping corrugated iron sheets rose in the middle and gave snaps which were like metallic sighs. For all its faults, Biswass house is evidence that he is modern man, a self-authoring, property-owning individual, and it means he wont have lived without even attempting to lay claim to ones portion of the earth; to have lived and died as one had been born, unnecessary and unaccommodated.

5. Pemberley in Pride and Prejudice by Jane AustenIts impossible, on a list such as this, to overlook Austen, with her keen eye for property and its central role in the British class system. Mansfield Park or Northanger Abbey, so rich in gothic ornaments, might have worked, but Darcys pad Pemberley gets the nod: It was a large, handsome, stone building, standing well on rising ground, and backed by a ridge of high woody hills Elizabeth was delighted. And who wouldnt be?

6. The Castle by Franz KafkaKafkas castle sits on a hill above a village: It was neither a stronghold nor a new mansion, but a rambling pile consisting of innumerable small buildings closely packed together and of one or two storeys. The protagonist Ks relationship to the castle might represent mans alienation in the face of totalising bureaucracies, or our never-satisfied yearning for religious salvation. Either way, its an exemplar of what David Foster Wallace identified as the central Kafka joke: That our endless and impossible journey toward home is in fact our home. Which would make it an odd choice, youd have thought, as a source of inspiration for a real building, but the Spanish architect Ricardo Bofill disagreed, using it as the template for an apartment block in 1968.

7. The Ministry of Love in Nineteen Eighty-Four by George OrwellYou get a better sense of the architecture of the Senate House-inspired Ministry of Truth an enormous pyramidical structure of glittering white concrete but it is The Ministry of Love, or Miniluv as its known in Newspeak, that stays with you longest. It was a place impossible to enter except on official business, and then only by penetrating through a maze of barbed-wire entanglements, steel doors, and hidden machine-guns nests. The building has no windows and is home to the most famous room in all literature, located many metres underground, as deep down as it was possible to go. It is, of course, Room 101 and the thing that is in Room 101 is the worst thing in the world.

8. 11 rue Simon-Crubellier in Life: A Users Manual by Georges PerecIt was hard to leave out the old tenement in Tom McCarthys splendid Remainder, but when it comes to buildings in experimental fiction it is difficult to look beyond the apartment block at 11 rue Simon-Crubellier. Using a staircase of questionable cleanliness, the reader roams around the building from the grand apartments of the lower floors with Louis XIII armchairs up to Smautf the butlers servants quarters in the eaves. The effect is akin to a cutaway illustration of a building where the front wall is removed allowing you to peer in at the outsized characters within.

9. The Library of Babel by Jorge Luis BorgesI have steered clear of fictional buildings in fantasy fiction as you could easily fill a Top 10 with them alone (Gormenghast, Bilbo Bagginss hole etc), but I couldnt not include Borges mind-bending Library of Babel. It is composed of an indefinite and perhaps infinite number of hexagonal galleries, with vast air shafts between, surrounded by very low railings. From any of the hexagons one can see, interminably, the upper and lower floors. The library is total and contains all possible books, including the autobiographies of the archangels and the treatise that Bede could have written (but did not). It can only be the handiwork of a god.

10. The Cathedral in The Spire by William GoldingIts a shame that Lord of the Flies swallows all the oxygen when it comes to William Golding because his other books deserve a lot more attention than they get, particularly his book about Neanderthals, The Inheritors, and, most of all, this visionary masterpiece. Almost all the action takes place in a fictional cathedral on to which a monomaniacal dean, Jocelin, is demanding that builders graft a new 400ft spire despite everyone warning him that the buildings foundations will never support such a weight. Throughout, the reader perceives the cathedral from the deans reverent perspective. It is, as he puts it, the bible in stone.

Read the original:

Top 10 buildings in fiction - The Guardian

Posted in Ayn Rand | Comments Off on Top 10 buildings in fiction – The Guardian

Trump can now count on Thiel, the hi-tech billionaire who finances his revenge Corriere.it – D1SoftballNews.com

Posted: at 8:21 am

from Massimo Gaggi

Peter Thiel, former mentor of Mark Zuckerberg (who left), stayed behind in 2016. Now back, and with many millions of dollars he supports 16 Trumpian nominations

Convinced that the political establishment and globalization have failed and that the time has come to dismantle federal institutions, Peter Thiel, the arch-conservative billionaire from Silicon Valley who was a great supporter of Donald Trump in 2016, but in 2020 remained behind the lines, disappointed by the way of governing of the republican president, who has returned: since last autumn he has organized public and private meetings in which he transfers his philosophy of disruption professed as a Silicon Valley entrepreneur.

Venture capitalist of technology, but with a historical and philosophical university education, Thiel, who in his famous essay Zero to One (three million copies sold) argues that you have to have blind faith in technology, give all the power to start-ups and innovative entrepreneurs and accept monopolies (according to him, competition in hi-tech a waste of resources), he is now devoting much of his time and his immense resources to politics.

The way it moves sheds light (a sinister light) on what is happening on the conservative front. Not only the return of Trump and the ousting of Republican MPs who refused to consider Bidens election illegitimate: Spending tens of millions of dollars to support four Senate and 12 House nominations, Thiel now the largest Republican campaign backer along with Citadels Ken Griffin doesnt just help the former president get his revenge. Above all, he tries to replace conservative parliamentarians who respect the mechanisms of political representation with ultr determined to undermine the democratic parliamentary system. A goal that transpires from the political speeches he held behind closed doors, but also from public statements such as: My thoughts, apocalyptic but also full of hope that we have finally reached a breaking point in our situation. While the disapproval of the choice of his colleagues, the entrepreneurs of the social networks, to begin (belatedly) to hinder the spread of blatant falsehoods and narratives made of dark conspiracies, leaks from his better the conspiracy theories of the QAnon and Pizzagate (Democratic leaders accused of being pedophiles raping children in the back room of a Washington pizza place, ed) than a Ministry of Truth.

Against any kind of regulationconvinced that technological progress must be pursued relentlessly and without worrying about possible costs and dangers for society, Thiel a ultra-libertarian follower of Ayn Rand who also flirts with alt-right groups and it is easy, for example, to argue that the South African apartheid regime (which he did not support) was the most economically efficient. After all, since 2009 Thiel says he no longer believes that freedom and democracy are compatible.

In 2016, called into the transition team preparing the new government after Trumps election, Thiel proposed interventions to disrupt the administration and choices by far-right men who frightened even Steve Bannon, then Mephistophelic right arm of the new president. Today, abandoned to his fate Mark Zuckerberg of whom he was the mentor since 2005 (he left the board of Meta-Facebook, while remaining a shareholder of the company), the entrepreneur of the ultra-secret technologies of Palantir (which he supplied to the CIA and the Pentagon), maximum guardian of the so-called surveillance capitalism thanks to the control of penetrating technologies such as facial recognition, ready for a full immersion in politics.

His standard bearers are two of his former employees: the fund manager and author of American Elegy JD Vance candidate for a senatorial seat in Ohio and the former general manager of his companies (and co-author of Zero to One) Blake Masters aiming to be an Arizona senator. But Thiel is also betting on Texas junkyard senator Ted Cruz, House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy, and candidates trying to oust Republican MPs who voted in favor of Donald Trumps impeachment.

February 15, 2022 (change February 15, 2022 | 22:34)

REPRODUCTION RESERVED

Visit link:

Trump can now count on Thiel, the hi-tech billionaire who finances his revenge Corriere.it - D1SoftballNews.com

Posted in Ayn Rand | Comments Off on Trump can now count on Thiel, the hi-tech billionaire who finances his revenge Corriere.it – D1SoftballNews.com

Elon Musk tells Biden the Tesla Model 3 is most manufactured US car – Business Insider

Posted: at 8:20 am

Elon Musk hit back at President Joe Biden on Wednesday, saying Tesla's Model 3 is the most manufactured American car in the country.

The Tesla CEO was replying to Biden's tweet last week about making federal government vehicles electric, offering more manufacturing jobs, and building supply chains in the US.

"We're making "buy American" a reality not just a promise," Biden tweeted.

Musk responded twice to the president's tweet on Wednesday first, he linked to a US Today article reporting that Tesla's Model 3 was the first electric vehicle to reach number one in Cars.com's 2021 American-Made Index (AMI), meaning it contributes the most to the US economy.

Musk wrote in the tweet caption, "[ahem]."

Five hours later, the billionaire tweeted in reply to Biden's tweet again, saying: "Model 3 is literally the most made in America car in well of course America."

Musk has criticized Biden over the past few months for leaving out Tesla, while praising Ford and General Motors.

The Tesla CEO has calledthe president "a damp sock puppet in human form" after Biden posted a video on Twitter, saying that GM and Ford were making more electric vehicles in the US than ever before without mentioning Tesla.

"Starts with a T, Ends with an A, ESL in the middle," Musk also tweeted in response to Biden's video.

In early February, Biden said in a speech that Tesla was America's "largest electric-vehicle manufacturer" after facing callsto include the automaker in the national electric vehicle discussion.

Here is the original post:

Elon Musk tells Biden the Tesla Model 3 is most manufactured US car - Business Insider

Posted in Elon Musk | Comments Off on Elon Musk tells Biden the Tesla Model 3 is most manufactured US car – Business Insider

Compliance Into The Weeds – Elon Musk and Tesla Redux – JD Supra

Posted: at 8:20 am

Compliance into the Weeds is the only weekly podcast that takes a deep dive into a compliance-related topic, literally going into the weeds to explore a subject more fully.

This week, Matt and I return to one of Matt's favorite topics, Elon Musk/Tesla. We consider some of the issues: What happens when a runaway CEO leads a business? Implications of new SEC investigation? State of California investigation into racial discrimination. Where has the Board been all this time? Will the attitude of the SEC Seemore+

This week, Matt and I return to one of Matt's favorite topics, Elon Musk/Tesla. We consider some of the issues: What happens when a runaway CEO leads a business? Implications of new SEC investigation? State of California investigation into racial discrimination. Where has the Board been all this time? Will the attitude of the SEC regarding enforcement change?

Listen to the Compliance into the Weeds podcast in Compliance Podcast Network to learn more like Matt and I discuss these issues for Elon Musk and Tesla on corporate governance. #CITW #Podcast #Compliance #ElonMusk #Tesla #CPN Seeless-

View post:

Compliance Into The Weeds - Elon Musk and Tesla Redux - JD Supra

Posted in Elon Musk | Comments Off on Compliance Into The Weeds – Elon Musk and Tesla Redux – JD Supra

Elon Musk And Dogecoin Co-Creator Say Twitter Needs To Take Urgent Action Against Crypto Scams – Benzinga – Benzinga

Posted: at 8:20 am

Tesla Inc. (NASADQ:TSLA) CEO Elon Musk has agreed to a comment by Dogecoin (CRYPTO: DOGE) co-creator Billy Markus that Twitter Inc. (NASDAQ:TWTR) needs to curb cryptocurrency scam activity on its social media platform.

What Happened: Markus asked Twitter to take action on the super irritating cryptocurrency scams, to which Musk commented by saying, Agreed. This has been broken for a long time.

See Also: How To Buy Bitcoin (BTC)

Why It Matters: In January, Musk criticized Twitters decision to let users have verified non fungible tokens (NFT) as profile pictures and suggested that the company was wasting resources on this effort instead of trying to curb spam activity.

Cryptocurrency scams particularly by impersonators of Musk, Ethereum (CRYPTO: ETH) co-founder Vitalik Buterin and other notable figures have been widespread in recent years on Twitter.

The scammers typically ask Twitter users to send cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC), Ethereum or Dogecoin to specific wallet addresses, promising to multiply the cryptocurrency that investors send.

Cryptocurrency scammers made nearly $8 billion from investors across the world in 2021, it was reported in December.

Last year, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) said that Musk impersonators stole over $2 million in cryptocurrency giveaway scams.

Price Action: Bitcoin is up 1.3% during the past 24 hours, trading at $44,043.05 at press time. Dogecoin is up 1.2% during the period to $0.1496.

Read Next: This Dogecoin And Shiba Inu Knockoff Named After Jeff Bezos' Pet 'Luna' Is Up Over 70% Today

See the original post:

Elon Musk And Dogecoin Co-Creator Say Twitter Needs To Take Urgent Action Against Crypto Scams - Benzinga - Benzinga

Posted in Elon Musk | Comments Off on Elon Musk And Dogecoin Co-Creator Say Twitter Needs To Take Urgent Action Against Crypto Scams – Benzinga – Benzinga

Its not Elon Musks SpaceX rocket thats going to hit the moon, but space junk is a real th – iNews

Posted: at 8:20 am

We cant, as it turns out, pin this one on Elon Musk. Part of an old spacecraft is going to crash into the moon early next month, and initial reports suggested that it was the second stage of a Falcon 9 rocket, built by Musks company SpaceX to launch a climate-monitoring satellite in 2015.

This made a lot of people very angry. (One well-known UK Twitter account suggested that Nasa should crash the International Space Station into Musk, rather than the Pacific Ocean as planned, when it reaches the end of its life.)

Unfortunately for Musks many detractors, it turns out that the rocket was not built by SpaceX but by the Chinese government. The confusion arose because tracking small objects (and a four-ton, 15ft-long rocket counts as small in space) is really difficult.

The story does matter, though. The fundamental point is that putting things in space is important. There are probably 5,000 working satellites in orbit right now, says Jacob Geer, head of space surveillance and tracking at the UK Space Agency. They provide navigation for phones and cars, communications, banking. An awful lot of modern life involves satellite data.

Unfortunately, as well as those 5,000 or so working satellites, there are also millions of pieces of debris. As well as huge chunks like the old Chinese rocket booster, Nasa estimates that there are 23,000 the size of a softball or larger, but half a million the size of a marble, and hundreds of millions of tiny ones a bit larger than a grain of sand.

And because each of them is travelling at around 25,000mph, even the smallest can be devastating. Even a piece of debris 1cm across could destroy a satellite, says Don Pollacco, director of Warwick Universitys Centre for Space Domain Awareness. A head-on collision at a closing speed of 50,000mph would be like a grenade.

Its a growing problem, for two reasons. One is that the number of satellites goes up monthly. The British space company OneWeb is launching 30 or more microsatellites every month; Musks Starlink satellites are going up at a rate of 50 or so a month. And the other is that the number of pieces of debris in orbit is going up too, as bigger bits fragment.

We think space is infinite, so historically we havent cared about it that much, says Pollacco. Nowadays rocket boosters are given less energy so they fall back to Earth, but in the past, those boosters went into orbit. There are thousands of tonnes of old boosters sitting in orbit, just dumped, full of fuel, and sometimes they have a collision or explode and create more debris.

Even worse, every so often a country blows up a satellite with a missile to show off its military prowess. Russia famously did it last year, creating a cloud of satellite-bits. But, says Pollacco, the Americans have done it, the Chinese have done it, the Indians.

As a result, there are near misses every day. Geer says that in the UK, a team of military and civilian analysts are tracking debris using radar and telescopes, and have to warn British satellite operators about 1,500 times a month that theyre at risk of collision, so they can get out of the way. And there have been collisions, most famously in 2009 when an active communications satellite was hit by a derelict Russian military one, and many smaller-scale ones.

There are reasons to be optimistic. One is that there is growing international awareness of the problem. There are internationally agreed guidelines, and although some countries notably Russia and China are less than fastidious about them, others are putting them into law: the UKs Space Industry Act makes sustainable use of space a legal requirement.

Another is that there are efforts notably by UK organisations, backed by the Government to capture defunct British satellites and decelerate them so they burn up in the atmosphere.

But thats only feasible with large objects: you cant send a satellite up to capture hundreds of thousands of marble-sized fragments. For that, you need tracking, and while we do have some facilities, Pollacco says we are underinvesting. What annoys me is satellite missions cost hundreds of millions, he says. We rely on the military, using radars designed to look for missiles not optimal, because theyre meant for looking at lower altitudes.

That means that the warnings of impending collisions are very imprecise a piece of debris could miss by several miles and because its expensive to move a satellite, often operators dont bother and take the gamble.

But for, he says, a few tens of millions of pounds, we could build a system of optical telescopes that could monitor everything in an orbit above about 400 miles high. You dont even need big telescopes, he says. You just need to use them in clever ways, to detect moving objects, track their orbits and predict them. His team at Warwick is working on projects that could do that even with small objects. With more precise warnings, operators could move their satellites only when necessary, and not take the risk of sudden destruction.

The moon-crashing rocket may not have been Musks and, in fact, says Pollacco, old Apollo spacecraft and other things crash into the moon all the time: its not that unusual. And Musks Starlink enterprise showed an admirable commitment to avoiding space junk, by launching them so low that they will automatically de-orbit if they go wrong. (Last time, 40 of them got taken out by the Earths atmosphere expanding during a solar storm.)

But Starlink, and the many other groups putting large numbers of small satellites out there, are filling the sky with metal. Thats a good thing the metal is up there to do useful things for us but keeping it up there is starting to get difficult.

See original here:

Its not Elon Musks SpaceX rocket thats going to hit the moon, but space junk is a real th - iNews

Posted in Elon Musk | Comments Off on Its not Elon Musks SpaceX rocket thats going to hit the moon, but space junk is a real th – iNews

Trump Makes New Claims About His Wealth After Accountants Drop Him – The New York Times

Posted: at 8:19 am

Mazars decision to withdraw was clearly a result of the A.G.s and D.A.s vicious intimidation tactics used also on other members of the Trump Organization, Mr. Trump said in his statement. Mazars, who were scared beyond belief, in conversations with us made it clear that they were willing to do or say anything to stop the constant threat which has gone against them for years.

Numerous inquiries. Since former President Donald Trumpleft office, there have been many investigations and inquiries into his businesses and personal affairs. Heres a list of those ongoing:

Investigation into criminal fraud. The Manhattan district attorneys office and the New York attorney generals officeare investigating whether Mr. Trump or his family business, the Trump Organization, engaged in criminal fraud by intentionally submitting false property values to potential lenders.

Investigation into tax evasion. As part of their investigation, in July 2021, the Manhattan district attorneys office charged the Trump Organization and its chief financial officer with orchestrating a 15-year scheme to evade taxes.A trial in that case is scheduled for summer 2022.

He pointed out that, in its letter informing the Trump Organization that its financial statements from 2011 to 2020 should no longer be relied upon, Mazars also said it had not concluded that the statements, as a whole, contained material discrepancies. The firm did say, however, that the totality of circumstances, including its own investigation into the financial statements, had led it to conclude they were unreliable.

Mazars did not respond to a request for comment.

The somewhat muddled nature of the explanation by Mazars makes it hard to assess the motivation, and potential legal implications, behind its decision to part ways with Mr. Trump. Lynn Turner, the former chief accountant at the Securities and Exchange Commission, said the new information that Mazars learned of could require its previous financial statements to be revised. Although those original statements contained many disclaimers, coming into possession of significant new facts could leave the firm vulnerable to a lawsuit.

They aint gonna issue that letter otherwise, he said.

In addition to signing off on Mr. Trumps statements of financial condition, which were used mostly when seeking bank loans or other credit, Mazars also prepared his tax returns, though the firm did not raise doubts about those in its letter.

Intentionally filing false tax returns with the government is a criminal offense, and there has been no indication that prosecutors are pursuing that avenue. As such, Mr. Trumps tax filings have long been considered perhaps the most accurate portrayal of his financial condition.

The New York Times in 2020 obtained decades of tax return information for Mr. Trump and his companies, which revealed that for all his claims of stellar business acumen and high net worth, he actually lost money in many years, had huge bank loans coming due and faced a long-running I.R.S. audit that could cost him $100 million. He often paid little or no federal income taxes.

Original post:

Trump Makes New Claims About His Wealth After Accountants Drop Him - The New York Times

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Trump Makes New Claims About His Wealth After Accountants Drop Him – The New York Times