Monthly Archives: February 2022

Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five.

CG DeYoung, LC Quilty, JB Peterson

Journal of personality and social psychology 93 (5), 880, 2007

SH Carson, JB Peterson, DM Higgins

Creativity research journal 17 (1), 37-50, 2005

SH Carson, JB Peterson, DM Higgins

Journal of personality and social psychology 85 (3), 499, 2003

CG DeYoung, JB Peterson, DM Higgins

Personality and Individual differences 33 (4), 533-552, 2002

JB Peterson

New York: Routledge, 1999

RA Mar, K Oatley, JB Peterson

Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG 34 (4), 407-428, 2009

CG DeYoung, JB Peterson, DM Higgins

Journal of personality 73 (4), 825-858, 2005

JB Hirsh, RA Mar, JB Peterson

Psychological review 119 (2), 304, 2012

JB Hirsh, CG DeYoung, X Xu, JB Peterson

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36 (5), 655-664, 2010

D Morisano, JB Hirsh, JB Peterson, RO Pihl, BM Shore

Journal of applied psychology 95 (2), 255, 2010

RA Mar, K Oatley, J Hirsh, J Dela Paz, JB Peterson

Journal of research in personality 40 (5), 694-712, 2006

JB Peterson, J Rothfleisch, PD Zelazo, RO Pihl

Journal of studies on alcohol 51 (2), 114-122, 1990

JB Peterson

Penguin UK, 2018

M Djikic, K Oatley, S Zoeterman, JB Peterson

Creativity research journal 21 (1), 24-29, 2009

SB Kaufman, LC Quilty, RG Grazioplene, JB Hirsh, JR Gray, JB Peterson, ...

Journal of personality 84 (2), 248-258, 2016

CG DeYoung, RG Grazioplene, JB Peterson

Journal of Research in Personality 46 (1), 63-78, 2012

JB Hirsh, JB Peterson

Journal of research in personality 43 (3), 524-527, 2009

RO Pihl, J Peterson, PR Finn

Journal of Abnormal Psychology 99 (3), 291, 1990

CG DeYoung, LC Quilty, JB Peterson, JR Gray

Journal of Personality Assessment, 2013

DM Higgins, JB Peterson, RO Pihl, AGM Lee

Journal of personality and social psychology 93 (2), 298, 2007

See the original post:

Jordan B Peterson - Google Scholar

Controversial Canadian author and psychologist Jordan Peterson has blasted COVID-19 vaccine mandates as an imitation of "a totalitarian state."

The self-proclaimed "professor against political correctness" said that COVID-19 policy was "being driven by people who are more afraid than they should be" during an appearance on the conservative talk show The Rubin Report on Wednesday.

Peterson, who argued that the mandates were an example of "herd" mentality, was diagnosed with COVID-19 in August 2020 while receiving treatment for prescription drug dependence in Serbia and has since been vaccinated against the virus.

"The thing that surprised me the most, probably, was how rapidly we stampeded to imitate a totalitarian state in the immediate aftermath of the release of COVID," Peters said. "You know, if you think it through a little bit, no one really knew how serious the virus was going to be. And so, it was an unknown threat."

"A herd will stampede because the most neurotic member of the herd jumps first, and then [the rest of the herd will] instantly follow them," he added. "And that's kind of what we did in the early stages of the pandemic. The Chinese acted first. Now, unfortunately they are a totalitarian state. And we all followed."

Peterson went on to say that "the breakdown of our rights" caused by COVID-19 public health measures was especially "grating" in Canada. Peterson described mandates that require vaccination as a precondition for travel as "extraordinarily annoying."

"My father isn't vaccinated. He decided not to, partly because they were telling him he had to. And he has his other reasons," Peterson said. "To then find out that there's nothing behind it except the most instrumental and cowardly random polling is extremely disheartening and also maddening and also angering."

"Canadians who aren't vaccinated right now cannot leave the country. Like, what the hell, why is that?" he continued. "I got vaccinated. And people took me to task for that. And I thought, 'All right, I'll get the damn vaccine.' Here's the deal, guys: I'll get the vaccine, you f***ing leave me alone!"

Peterson lamented that becoming vaccinated did not "work," in the sense that he is still required to be tested for COVID-19 to both leave and return to Canada. The psychologist suggested that the travel restrictions were the primary reason to become vaccinated, question why he got the vaccine "if you're not going to leave me alone."

Peterson has described himself as a "classical liberal" but has amassed a large following of mostly conservatives due to his positions on issues of political correctness and identity politics. He first entered the spotlight after opposing a 2016 Canadian law intended to prevent discrimination against transgender people, arguing that the law would unfairly police language.

Newsweek reached out to Peterson for comment.

Read the original here:

Jordan Peterson Says COVID Vaccine Mandates Imitate ...

Evangeline Lilly appeared in a five-minute video this weekend with a direct appeal to Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau concerning the ongoing protests against vaccine mandates in that country. The protests began in late January in the Canadian capital, Ottawa, led by cross-border truck drivers, and has since spread to other cities. The Ant-Man and Lost star, who was born and raised in Western Canada, published her cri de coeur on the Instagram page of Bridge City News, a daily program out of Alberta that airs on The Miracle Channel, Canadas first over-the-air religious television station.

In a calm tone with noticeable "oot"s for "out"s, Lilly opens by telling Trudeau she has concerns about his current approach to, and current treatment of, our fellow Canadians who are protesting your federal vaccine mandates. They have asked to meet with you, Prime Minister; medical experts, top scientists, doctors, nurses, parents, grandparents, intelligent, loving, concerned citizens. Why won't you sit with them?

She goes on to request he listen to what they have to say with a mind open to hearing things that might go against the ideas you are entrenched in. She also suggested he listen to Needle Points by Norman Doidge, the name of a four-part essay published in Tablet Magazine last November, and also the name of a January podcast hosted by Jordan Peterson, the ubiquitous controversial Canadian professor. Lilly says that Doidge, the best-selling author of The Brain That Changes Itself, has painstakingly and comprehensively laid out why these protestors are not unreasonable."

This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

In late January, Lilly attended an anti-vaccine-mandate hullabaloo in Washington, D.C., the same one where Robert F. Kennedy Jr. compared current American public health initiatives to the policies of Nazi Germany. Even in Hitler Germany [sic], you [could] cross the Alps into Switzerland. You could hide in an attic, like Anne Frank did, he said, then later apologized after the Auschwitz Memorial's social media arm called his comments a sad symptom of moral & intellectual decay.

From that event, Lilly posted some black and white shots to her Instagram to support bodily sovereignty while Canadian truckers were rallying for their cross-country, peaceful convoy in support of the same thing.

This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

Following these remarks, Lillys Ant-Man co-star David Dastmalchian, as well as fellow Marvel hero (and Canadian) Simu Liu, made social media comments about of their own about the value of Covid vaccines and the appropriate use of a wide platform.

The third Ant-Man picture, Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania, is scheduled for release in July 2023.

More Great Stories From Vanity Fair

Vanity Fairs Hollywood Issue 2022: See the Full Portfolio Featuring Nicole Kidman, Kristen Stewart, and More Amazons Lord of the Rings Series Rises: Inside The Rings of Power Rene Zellweger Is Unrecognizable as a Midwestern Murdering Mom Oscar Nominations: The Biggest Snubs and Surprises Oprah Winfrey Reveals the Glorious New Color Purple Cast Beware the Tinder Swindler, a Real-Life Dating-App Villain W. Kamau Bell Is Terrified for People to See His Bill Cosby Docuseries The Artist, the Madonna, and the Last Known Portrait of Jeffrey Epstein From the Archive: Inside Bill Cosbys 12-Year Battle of Denials, Doubts, and Legal Machinations Sign up for the HWD Daily newsletter for must-read industry and awards coverageplus a special weekly edition of Awards Insider.

The rest is here:

Evangeline Lilly Appeals to Justin Trudeau To Hear From the People Sitting Out in the Cold at Your Door - Vanity Fair

Americans know very little about Canada. Fewer than half of Americans surveyed in 2011 knew where Canadas capital is (hint: its Ottawa), and two-thirds acknowledged they learned next to nothing about Canadas history in school. (Truth be told, its not as interesting as Americas). In another study, nearly 40% of American eighth-graders thought Canadas government was a dictatorship.

As a colleague of mine recently said, theres an untapped market for a book about Canada written specifically for our neighbors to the south. But then again, making Americans care about Canada has been a losing battle for centuries.

So it came as a pleasant surprise that when Canada recently made international headlines because of protests over vaccine mandates, Americans started to pay attention. The problem is, many people sought to compare and contrast a country they know little about with the only country that most Americans know something about: America.

Writing in The New York Times, Paul Krugman called the trucker protests a slow-moving Jan. 6 with the truckers cast as economic vandals. An MSNBC commentator said that ineffectual law enforcement response to the Ambassador Bridge blockade smacked strongly of what happened with the Capitol Police before and during the attempted putsch on Jan. 6. A CNN correspondent called the demonstrations an insurrection, sedition.

Others have taken to pointing out a perceived race-based double standard among those who decried the Black Lives Matter protests in the United States, but now support the Canadian trucker protests. But to my well-meaning American friends engaging in these comparisons, it might be worth exercising a bit more caution before stepping into another nations conversation.

For starters, despite popular misconception, a sizable contingent of the Canadian demonstrators are people of color. And, as Jamil Jivani recently argued in Newsweek, It will be uncomfortable for some to read this, but the truth must be said: We have no reason to believe the majority of truckers in the convoy are racist. In fact, appropriate for the month of February, the trucker convoy is actually a Black history moment.

The problem with compressing the trucker protests into the January 6 box, or other boxes, is that theyre simply different things in different countries and contexts. Journalist Rupa Subramanya spoke to nearly a hundred protesters and couldnt find the hordes of alt-right, QAnon-following conspiracists supposedly sieging Ottawa.

Instead, she found the very opposite.

Benjamin Dichter, a leading spokesman for the Freedom Convoy who recently appeared on Jordan Petersons podcast, told Subramanya: Im Jewish. I have family in mass graves in Europe. And apparently Im a white supremacist.

Theres also not as much civil disobedience as one might suspect given the mainstream coverage of the truckers as far-right extremists. The notion of hate-filled truckers and conspiracists appears mostly overblown, particularly coming from people who months earlier marshaled justifications in the wake of the 2021 protests that resulted in the most expensive insurance-claim payout in American history.

The disproportionate response of the Canadian government in activating Canadas Emergencies Act (which replaced the War Measures Act) is striking. Remarkably, it has only been exercised thrice before: twice during each World War and once when Quebecois separatists kidnapped and murdered the deputy prime minister.

A heavy-handed government response is just what the Canadian-American journalist David Frum fears. As weve seen with the spread of racial justice protests, so too could government overreach inspire similar mobilization across the West.

Even though not even a third of Canadians side with the protestors (essentially the same percentage of support Prime Minister Justin Trudeau received in the last election), the protests have grown, even as some Ottawa residents reported feeling unsafe in their own neighborhoods.

Canadian authorities must think long and hard about their next move. But insinuating that the truckers represent antisemitism, Islamophobia, anti-Black racism, homophobia, and transphobia, as Trudeau has tweeted, well, that seems like a political playbook from south of the border.

Ari David Blaff is a Canadian freelance journalist. His writings have appeared in National Review, Tablet, Quillette and the Institute for Family Studies.

Go here to read the rest:

Canada protests: Why have they been compared to Jan. 6 riot? | Opinion - Deseret News

1867 & All Thatis a lively and riveting romp through some of the most important stories from Canadian political history. The first season retold the stories of the Rebellions of 1837 and 1838 and the long fight in the 1840s over this strange but fundamental Canadian concept called responsible government.

Now Season Two has just launched.

This season1867 & All Thatrecounts the tumultuous road that led to the creation of Canada. Starting with the bitter ethnic and religious fights in the 1850s in the Province of Canada, it introduces the key personalities and events which led an unlikely group of friends and foes to temporarily set aside their differences and forge a country.

The past has a funny way of looking like the present and1867 & All Thatshows that cancel culture and brawling fights over contentious speakers didnt originate with Twitter. In the years before Confederation, crowds shouted down speakers, they smashed windows, and even, on one occasion, trained a cannon on a Catholic Church to prevent a St. Patricks Day parade.

Season Two of1867 & All Thatcontains these stories and more. But it starts with the little remembered story of an Italian priest who riled and divided Canadians more than Jordan Peterson and Dave Chappelle combined.

Heres a taste of episode one:

At some point in that summer of 1853, it must have occurred to Alessandro Gavazzi that this Canadian trip hadnt been such a good idea. If I had to guess Id say the moment of doubt might have come when he found himself mounted atop a high church podium in Quebec City, clasping a wooden chair, swinging it wildly about, trying to defend himself against a mob of irate Catholics who wanted to beat him senseless.

Or maybe not.

Alessandro Gavazzi was no timid man. The Italian liberal nationalist was a revolutionary after all. He had fled his homeland after the failed 1848 revolutions. Gavazzi retreated to London and then to North America, making his living as a public orator. His favourite topic that summer of 1853 was the evils of the Papacy. Gavazzi was a former priestwith the emphasis on former. He still donned clerical robes as a man of God, just no longer as a Catholic. Feeling betrayed by Pope Pius IX who reformers like Gavazzi felt had betrayed the revolution in Italy, Gavazzi had left the church and become a protestant. Like many converts to a new faithor maybe like ex-smokersthe new convert soon became the most vitriolic detractor of his former faith and practice.

His speaking tour of British North America began in Toronto and the crowds in that thoroughly protestant city welcomed him heartily. But after Toronto, he travelled to the decidedly Catholic precincts of Quebec Citythat fortified bastion of the French fact in North America founded hundreds of years ago after Champlains first visit. And Quebecs French Catholics as well as its many recently arrived Irish Catholics were not pleased he had come.

In his first public talk he had regaled audiences with his anti-Catholic speeches to much excitement. But the next day, with rumours swirling in the city that local Catholics planned to retaliate, Gavazzi had to scramble to find another church in which to speak after his first host reluctantly cancelled his appearance. Another church opened its doors to him and so Gavazzi spoke on what he titled the Catholic churchs ancient and modern inquisition.

That night, crowds of angry Catholics gathered outside the church even as, inside, Gavazzi offered lurid descriptions of the horrid torture practices of the church during the inquisition. He then turned to the controversial subject of Ireland and the protestant-Catholic fights in that part of the British Islesa subject bound to be more difficult in Quebec, what with the large numbers of recent famine Irish migrants. Thats when someone in the audience shouted:

Its a lie! And then Turn him out!

Perhaps that had been a signal because, at just that moment, the crowd outside the church began its assault. Stones crashed through the windows and rioters burst through the doors. Chaos erupted as rioters attempted to storm the pulpit and pull Gavazzi down. Thats when he grabbed a chair, employing it as a weapon. Others in the crowd hurled songbooks at him. Protestants and Catholics shouted and shoved each other in a general melee. Several angry detractors pushed their way through the crowd and up to the pulpit, heaving Gavazzi off his perch from a height of fifteen feet. Luckily, he landed on the crowd below, their bodies softening his fall. He got to his feet and was helped to safety.

Yet as Gavazzi limped away into the night, the divisions of the Canadas played themselves out in tumultuous fashion amid shouts and shoving on the streets of Quebec.

Read more here:

1867 & All That explores the 19th century's cancel culture - The Hub

Growing up as a middle child in suburban Chicago, Drew Peterson was something of a sport contrarian. When his family rooted for the Cubs, he was in Yankee pinstripes. On Sundays, he was cheering the Chiefs rather than the hometown Bears.

And while his father and older brother considered Michael Jordan the greatest basketball player ever, Peterson preferred LeBron James.

That could simply be a generational bias at play, but its also revealing about the type of player Peterson always wanted to be, and has become as a member of USC mens basketball the past two seasons: A pass-first guard, despite his height at 6-foot-9.

Peterson was not a point guard who had a late growth spurt in high school. He was always taller than his classmates, towering over other kids while playing first base in Little League.

But because he was also so skinny and could not keep up with the physical battles in the post, his father, Mike, emphasized guard skills.

And that suited Peterson just fine.

He likes to make plays, his father said. As much as he likes to score, he likes to drive the ball and dish and make people happy. Its as much his personality as any training he had.

I always liked to pass the ball growing up, even as more of a three, Peterson added. So I always tried to develop my handle and just be able to prove that I can control the ball for more of the game.

Peterson spent his first two college years at Rice, where he displayed many of the same tendencies as a pass-first guard. But he struggled to control the ball against quicker defenders with lower centers of gravity, averaging a career-high 2.7 turnovers as a sophomore.

When he entered the transfer portal in the early months of the pandemic, he rushed into a commitment to Minnesota. But he backed out, wanting to further explore his options.

A scholarship had opened at USC in the meantime, and Peterson was attracted to the university and the basketball program.

Early after Peterson enrolled at USC, head coach Andy Enfield began to emphasize Petersons ability to spread the ball around and run the offense. In Petersons first year with the Trojans, he got some opportunities to back up the teams point guards.

But this season as a senior, Peterson has acted as the Trojans primary ball handler for long stretches of games. As he led 17th-ranked USC in every major category in last weeks win over UCLA, he was bringing the ball up the court on most possessions.

And as impressive as his scoring was that game with a career-high 27 points, Peterson still found opportunities for his teammates, like a perfect skip pass to Chevez Goodwin for an easy dunk.

We were able to flourish together, [Enfields] philosophy and how I play, Peterson said. I always had the confidence, I always wanted to play point guard. Now Im just trusted in big situations to be able to come off ball screens and be able to make plays for my teammates.

When: Sunday, 4:30 p.m.

Where:Galen Center

TV/Radio:Fox Sports 1 / 790 AM

Visit link:

USCs Drew Peterson and the development of a point forward - The San Gabriel Valley Tribune

After two years filled with remote learning, many of us wonder about what an increasingly online world may mean for kids. Well, in a new book, author Mark Bauerlein, who in 2008s The Dumbest Generation lamented the stupefying impact of the digital age, argues that young adults have suffered significant consequences from ubiquitous technology. In his new book, The Dumbest Generation Grows Up, Bauerlein, a senior editor at First Things and an English professor at Emory University, makes the case about the long-lasting psychological and intellectual effect of growing up digital. Given the timeliness and the provocative title, I was interested in hearing what he had to say.

Rick

Rick: So, Mark, whats the big picture?

Mark: Back in 2008, when I wrote The Dumbest Generation, the word on millennials was a big cheer. Web 2.0 was racing ahead, and teens were praised as the digital natives, early adopters leading America into a superconnected 21st century. One book had the title Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation. My response: No! This is awful! In my book, I wrote about how 250 selfies and 4,000 texts per month were a disasterwhich brought charges of old fogey, Luddite, curmudgeon from educators and digiphiles at the many lectures I gave in the months following my book release. Fifteen years later, millennial glow is no more. The consequences of letting them close their books, cut off the elders, and dive into screens in their teens are all too clear as they hit their 30s: a generation increasingly nonreligious, unpatriotic, bouncing from job to job, uninterested in marriage and kids, unhappy.

Rick: Can you say a bit more about why you think technology has harmed children and young adults?

Mark: The tools put them in a bubble of adolescence, alone in the bedroom texting and chatting, viewing and gaming, filming and talking with one another. What have we done to them? I ask in the first sentence of the new book. The screens we handed them didnt provide equipment to manage ordinary woes of adulthood. They didnt get a humanities formation that would make them feel they live in a wondrous stream of civilization, an inheritance of masterpieces, heroes and villains of epic stature, visions of transcendence, a great country, momentous events, heights of eloquence, . . . and that left them rootless and bitter and fragile, searching for purpose and meaning in the screen and in extreme ideological movements. Oh yes, the supervisors of the young failed them and damaged them, and our 30-year-old doesnt know what to do. He has five hours of leisure time per day and he devotes seven minutes to reading.

Rick: This is obviously a passionate critique. For those who are skeptical, whats some evidence that things are as bad as you say?

Mark: SAT writing scores dropped 15 points from 2006 to 2016, when SAT scrapped the writing requirement. ACT college readiness in reading dropped 8 points from 2009 to 2019. Majors in the humanities in higher ed. have plummeted. I wish knowledge levels were high, but NAEP U.S. history and ACT science scores arent reflecting that. I wish emotional and mental well-being were indicating some improvement, but depression, anxiety, narcissism, and suicide are up, while job satisfaction and optimism are down. One-third of millennial males will never have married by age 40. They are more intolerant and mistrustful than older Americans, too, and they have a vindictive outlook. When they see a microaggression, they want the culprit to pay dearly. This is the source of the cancel culture they favor.

Rick: In your new book, you talk about youth becoming dangerous adults. What do you mean by this?

Mark: When a person is happy to sign a petition with 2,000 others to get a stranger fired for telling a dumb racial joke on social media; when students demand that a question be added to course evaluations asking whether the teacher committed any microaggressions during the semester; when the election of Donald Trump inspires outright trauma among young Dems; when young editors in tears demand Jordan Petersons latest book be canceled . . . we are in the realm of danger.

Rick: You argue that technology is a big driver for the shifts that concern you. But how you do you think about unpacking the impact of technology from other social, cultural, and political changes?

Mark: The thing I focus on is how ubiquitous screens drew millennials away from, in a word, civilization. The 2008 crash was badand a little knowledge of the Depression would give perspective. Trumps triumph was debilitatingand knowing of the shock in 1901 of Teddy Roosevelt taking charge would have done the same. They nurse socialist dreamsand a little Orwell and Hayek would temper those fantasies. Thats what civilization endows: a steadying force against the pressures of the moment. The iPhone only aggravated those pressures.

Rick: OK, so for readers persuaded by your critique, what are one or two things youd urge schools and educators to do?

Mark: Boost literary curriculum. Why are the young so fractious and reactive? Because they havent read enough novels, performed in plays, and memorized poems. Recitation and performance get them out of their heads, force them to use better words and assume other personalities. Novels make them consider motive and imagine feelings they dont have themselves, which builds cognitive empathy. Yes, more literary education, make them become for a moment Lady Macbeth, Emily Dickinson, Frederick Douglass, and Jay Gatsby. Thats a very healthy thing for an adolescent to do. The phone pushes the opposite, turning what should be a time of expansion into contraction, a Daily Me, as it used to be called, that only promotes narcissism, and we know how Narcissus ended.

This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.

Read the original:

Have We Raised the 'Dumbest Generation'? (An Author Q&A) (Opinion) - Education Week