Monthly Archives: January 2022

This Week in Pittsburgh History: The Local Connections to a Super Bowl Upset – Pittsburgh Magazine

Posted: January 9, 2022 at 4:28 pm

Three men with deep Pittsburgh-area connections played key roles in what's considered one of the greatest upsets in sports history.

Embed from Getty Images

Super Bowl III was the first championship game to bear the trademark Super Bowl name. Played on Jan. 12, 1969 at the Orange Bowl in Miami, the game pitted the AFL Champion New York Jets against the NFL Champion Baltimore Colts. The Jets were 19 points underdogs.

Three days before the game, Jets quarterback Joe Namath stunned reporters and fans alike by personally guaranteeing his teams victory. Those who scoffed at the prediction could only shake their heads when the Jets stunned the Colts 16-7.

Three men with deep Pittsburgh-area connections played key roles in whats considered one of the greatest upsets in sports history.

Namath, who was born in Beaver Falls, led his high school football team to the WPIAL Class AA championship with a 9-0 record. Namath also was a standout guard in basketball and outfielder in baseball and after graduation, received offers from several Major League baseball teams including the Pirates, Yankees, Indians, Phillies and Reds. Explaining that his mother wanted him to get a college education Namath accepted a football scholarship from Coach Paul Bear Bryant at the University of Alabama. Namath led the Crimson Tide to a National Championship in 1964. A year later, drafted by the Jets, he was named AFL Rookie of the year.

On the other side of the field in Super Bowl III was another Pittsburgh native, Johnny Unitas, who was considered one of the greatest NFL players of all time. Unitas, a graduate of St. Justins High School in Pittsburgh, attended the University of Louisville where injuries hampered his performance during his senior year. The Steelers drafted Unitas in the ninth round, but he was cut by head coach Walt Kiesling who didnt think Unitas was smart enough to quarterback an NFL team. The Colts thought he had potential and signed Unitas in 1956. A year later, his first as a full-time starter, Unitas led the league in passing yards, touchdown passes and was named the NFLs Most Valuable Player. He would earn MVP honors again in 1964 and 1967 and lead the Colts to championship titles in 1958, 1959, 1968 and Super Bowl V. Injured during Super Bowl III, Unitas came off the bench, engineering the Colts only touchdown drive late in the game.

The final Pittsburgh connection to Super Bowl III was a defensive backfield coach named Chuck Noll. A day after the loss to the Jets, Noll interviewed for the head coaching job with the Steelers.

Learn more about the citys past at The Odd, Mysterious & Fascinating History of Pittsburgh Facebook page.

Continued here:

This Week in Pittsburgh History: The Local Connections to a Super Bowl Upset - Pittsburgh Magazine

Posted in History | Comments Off on This Week in Pittsburgh History: The Local Connections to a Super Bowl Upset – Pittsburgh Magazine

What happens when Russia, China and the US erase history | Column – Tampa Bay Times

Posted: at 4:28 pm

Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.

George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four.

Powerful political forces in China, Russia and the United States are currently engaged in aggressive attempts to rewrite history to consolidate political positions and, as Orwell states, control the future. Examine the following.

In China: For decades, the Chinese Communist Party has ferociously attempted to erase the history of the 1980s movement for democracy. On the mainland, Chinese authorities ban any memorials or public commemoration of the 1989 Tiananmen protests for liberty and democracy. Human rights scholars estimate that close to 1,000 civilians lost their lives, and over 900 were wounded in the Tiananmen massacre when the Communist government brutally suppressed the protestors. The Chinese Communist Party subsequently banned discussion of the massacre and labeled democracy organizers as counter-revolutionaries.

The former British colony of Hong Kong had been the only place on Chinese soil where pro-democracy protesters killed in Tiananmen Square could be commemorated. This changed in December 2021 as Chinese authorities moved to squelch these remembrances. Three public monuments dedicated to the memory of the 1989 Tiananmen protests were forcibly removed including: a 20-foot bronze Goddess of Democracy at the Chinese University of Hong Kong; a Tiananmen massacre wall relief sculpture at Hong Kongs Lingnan University; and a 26-foot statue known as the Pillar of Shame at the University of Hong Kong, which commemorated the pro-democracy protesters killed during the Tiananmen crackdown. Chinese artist Chen Weiming stated: They (the Chinese communists) want to remove the real history of the brutal crackdown. They wouldnt allow any different viewpoints to continue to exist in Hong Kong.

In Russia: In December 2021, the Russian government shut down the most prominent human rights organization, Memorial International. Memorials work focused on the identification and commemoration of the millions of victims of Stalinist purges and labor camps. The organization chronicled the persecutions of the Stalin labor camps and attempted to preserve the memory of its victims. Nobel Peace Prize laureate Andrei Sakharov and other dissidents founded the organization over three decades ago. Putin labeled the organization as foreign agents and supporters of terrorism. The Russian Supreme Court supported Putin and ruled that Memorial must close and be liquidated.

Subscribe to our free Stephinitely newsletter

Columnist Stephanie Hayes will share thoughts, feelings and funny business with you every Monday.

Want more of our free, weekly newslettersinyourinbox? Letsgetstarted.

Putin seeks to mold public opinion around a positive view of the former USSR and soften the image of Stalins regime. Putin thus focuses on the glorious accomplishments of the former Soviet Union as a powerful superpower. According to The New York Times, the Kremlin has moved aggressively to remove interpretations of Russian history by organizations it does not control. Stalins tough rule can appeal to many Russian citizens facing an insecure future and provide a rationale for Putin to continue to amass authoritarian political power.

In the U.S.: Republican Party leadership is attempting to reframe the history of the Jan. 6 riot and insurrection as no big deal. PolitiFact labeled the Republican deluge of justifications, excuses and conspiracy theories the Lie of the Year for 2021. PolitiFacts list of Republicans lies include: falsely claiming that the riot was instigated by left-wing activists; likening the event to a normal tourist visit; denying the visible and filmed role of white supremacists and far-right militia groups in the riot; suggesting that the whole affair was staged by the government; and claiming that the rioters were now held as political prisoners.

America has never before experienced such a violent attempt by an organized mob to prevent the peaceful democratic transfer of power to a new administration. We were all witnesses and can confirm Capitol Police Sgt. Aquilino Gonells description of officers punched, kicked, shoved, sprayed with chemical irritants and even blinded with eye-damaging lasers by a violent mob. We saw the insurrection cause $1.5 million in property damage. We saw the rioters brandishing bats, crutches, flagpoles, skateboards, hockey sticks, knives, zip ties, chemical sprays, a fire extinguisher and other makeshift weapons. The University of Illinois Cline Center for Advanced Social Research stated that the Jan. 6 attack qualified as an attempted coup.

Yet many Republican leaders seem intent on whitewashing the demonstrable facts about Jan. 6 in order to cover for the anti-democratic actions of the Trump administration. Their strategy is working. According to an ABC News-Ipsos survey published on Jan 3, 52 percent of Republicans believed that those involved in the attack on the Capitol were protecting democracy; and 40 percent of Republicans stated that violent actions could be justified. The continuous repetition of lies about Jan. 6 have an impact and are difficult to overcome. Harvard political scientist Theda Skocpol stated: The effort to rewrite history in the service of political power goals is not unheard of in America or anywhere else. What is brazen is the history they want to rewrite includes pictures of what actually happened.

Once a lie is accepted as common knowledge, it can take decades to undo the damage. For example, the lie that the Civil War in the United States was about protecting Southern culture and not about slavery significantly helped prevent civil rights protections for African-Americans for over 100 years. The myths about the Tiananmen Square massacre will help to hold back current movements for democracy in China. Putins revisionist history of Stalinism will help to push public opinion to accept an authoritarian leader and dismiss human rights. Republican attempts to conceal and misrepresent the Jan. 6 insurrection has already invigorated white nationalists and caused many others to question the viability of American democracy itself.

George Orwell was prescient. Through controlling our understanding of the past, leaders around the world today hope to control our future.

William F. Felice is professor emeritus of political science at Eckerd College He is the author of six books on human rights and international relations. He can be reached via his website at williamfelice.com.

Continue reading here:

What happens when Russia, China and the US erase history | Column - Tampa Bay Times

Posted in History | Comments Off on What happens when Russia, China and the US erase history | Column – Tampa Bay Times

Did the Colts just suffer the worst season-finale loss in NFL history? – IndyStar

Posted: at 4:28 pm

All the Colts had to do to make the playoffs was beat the hapless 2-14 Jacksonville Jaguars. They came into the game as 15.5-point favorites ... and they lost. Now their playoff hopes are on life support.

Given the circumstances win and they're in, against the worst team in the league it's fair to ask: Is this the worse season-finale loss in NFL history?

Here are some other possibilities since the NFL went to a 16-game season:

The 2008 Buccaneers came into their season finale against the 4-11 Raiders needing a win tokeep their playoff hopes alive (and they would've made it in, since Dallas beat Philadelphia). They were 10.5-point favorites, but lost at home 31-24. Tampa Bay led 24-14 with 11:27 to go in the game, but the Raiders scored the last 17 points. Coach Jon Gruden, playing his former team, was fired following the season.

Updates: Colts are getting blown out by Jaguars

The 2006 Broncos would've made the playoffs with a win at home against San Francisco (who was 6-9), but lost 26-23 in overtime. Denver tied the game late in the fourth quarter, but the 49ers won with an overtime field goal.

The Lions could have made the playoffs with a win over the 4-11 Bears. Detroitcame into the game as 10-point favorites at home. Detroit led 10-0 in the first quarter and 17-13 in the fourth.The Bears won, 23-20,on a field goal with two seconds left.

The next season, the Lions would go 2-14. They wouldn't have a winning season until 2011.

Follow IndyStar trending sports reporterMatthew VanTryon on Twitter @MVanTryon and email him story ideas at matthew.vantryon@indystar.com.

Read this article:

Did the Colts just suffer the worst season-finale loss in NFL history? - IndyStar

Posted in History | Comments Off on Did the Colts just suffer the worst season-finale loss in NFL history? – IndyStar

How Many Died in the American Civil War? – History

Posted: at 4:28 pm

TheCivil War was the deadliest of all American wars. No one disagrees with that. But how many died has long been a matter of debate.

For more than a century, the most-accepted estimate was about 620,000 dead. A specific figure of 618,222 is often cited, with 360,222 Union deaths and 258,000 Confederate deaths.

This estimate was not an unreasoned guess, but a number that was established after years of research in the late 19th century by Union veterans William F. Fox, Thomas Leonard Livermore and others. Their work involved an exhaustive examination of army documents, muster rolls, cemetery records, census records, pension records and other resources and documents. In 1900, Livermore published a 171-page book of his work, Numbers and Losses in the Civil War in America 1861-1865.

But in 2011, demographic historian Dr. J. David Hacker published A Census-Based Count of Civil War Dead, in the scholarly quarterly, Civil War History, reporting that his in-depth study of recently digitized census data concluded that a more accurate estimate of Civil War deaths is about 750,000, with a range from 650.000 to as many as 850,000 dead.

Hacker, an associate professor of history at the University of Minnesota, believed that a fresh, detailed examination of the numbers from the 1850, 1860 and 1870 U.S. census tabulations might reveal a massive reduction for the young male population in 1870 that would reflect the human toll of the war. And that is what he found. Hackers research concluded that the normal survival pattern for young American men from 1860 to 1870 was far lessby about 750,000than it would have been had no war occurred.

Civil War History called Hackers findings among the most consequential pieces it has ever published. It even further elevates the significance of the Civil War and makes a dramatic statement about how the war is a central moment in American history, said Civil War historian Eric Foner.

The first thing to stress is this is an estimate of the number of men missing in 1870. It is adjusted for possible census undercount and other things, Hacker tells HISTORY. It is not an estimate of the number of people who died on the battlefield. And why are these men missing? I think the only reasonable reason they're missing is because of the Civil War.

A print of a dead soldier at Devil's Den on the battlefield at Gettysburg, by Alexander Gardener (1821-1882) from a negative produced by Timothy H O'Sullivan (1840-1882). The Devil's Den was the scene of bitter fighting during the second day of the Battle of Gettysburg.

SSPL/Getty Images

Many Civil War historians have believed the 620,000 estimate to be too low, especially on the Confederate side, given the lack of written records and the estimates questionable assumption that men in the Confederate army died of disease at the same rate as men in the Union army.

I think that there's been a long, long belief among historians that the numbers that we've been citing for a century or more are not based on solid data but were in fact, crude estimates that were likely to be underreported, Hacker says. And for that reason, I think, the results of my study verified in some people's minds exactly what they had long suspected.

The American Battlefield Trust, however, says it will continue to cite the estimate of 620,000. It praised Hackers initiative, but said his estimated range of 650,000 to 850,000 is very broad, includes civilian casualties, and is not directly linked to the war years of 1861-1865.

They say, How can you publish a number with that big of a possible error range (650,000 to 850,000)? Hacker says. So theyre going to stay with a number that we all know is much more specific. But to me, the 620,000 number has a big error range with it. Its just not published. We shouldnt prefer that number just because it does not include the possible error range.

Hacker's analysis did not break down the estimate for Union and Confederate deaths since the census records did not account for that. However, as a 2011 HISTORY.com story details, his method was able to discern patterns for various regions of birth. For example, the analysis concluded that mortality was significantly higher for white males between the ages of 10 and 44 born in the South (13.1 percent) and in the slave-holding border states of Missouri, Kentucky, Maryland and Delaware (12.7 percent) than for those born in the free states and territories (6.1 percent). The data further suggest that 22.6 percent of Southern men who were between the ages of 20 and 24 in 1860 lost their lives because of the war.

Hacker doubts that further research into national census figures will yield a significantly closer or more accurate estimate of Civil War deaths. At the same time, and he and other quantitative historians are excited about a vast new range of opportunities for census that will be possible with the release in 2022 of a massive, comprehensive digitization of all U.S. census records from 1850 to 1940.

We're looking at a time when there can be some real contributions to historical knowledge using these data that are being released, he said. We not only have complete census data on everybody, we have linked slaves to their owners so you can study slaveholding families. We can link people from census to census, so we can see where people were located, where they moved and observe their transition from, say, single marital status to married, or from married to widowed.

With these new data, were going to be able to get a much more fine-grained picture. So there are some real opportunities for understanding the Civil War generation better than we have in the past. And this is a really exciting time to be a quantitative historian of the Civil War.

Read the original:

How Many Died in the American Civil War? - History

Posted in History | Comments Off on How Many Died in the American Civil War? – History

Rangers History Today: Pair of Texas Aces Elected to Hall of Fame – Sports Illustrated

Posted: at 4:28 pm

On this date in baseball history, former Texas Rangers pitchers Ferguson Jenkins and Gaylord Perry were elected to the Baseball Hall of Fame.

Jenkins and Perry became the first two players to wear a Rangers uniform to reach the Hall of Fame, though both wore different caps on their induction plaques. Jenkins wore his Chicago Cubs hat, while Perry settled on the San Francisco Giants.

Jenkins played for the Rangers from 1974-75, and again from 1978-81. He became the franchises first 20-game winner in 1974, during which he was named the American League Comeback Player of the Year and finished second in AL Cy Young voting. That season, Jenkins led the Rangers with 25 wins, 328 innings pitched and 29 complete games, all of which were new team records. In his career with the Rangers, he went 93-72 with a 3.56 ERA in 197 starts, throwing 90 complete games and 17 shutouts. He struck out 895 batters and walked 315.

For his career, Jenkins went 284-226 with a 3.34 ERA, 267 complete games, 49 shutouts, 3,192 strikeouts and 997 walks. He also played for Philadelphia and Boston. He won the National League Cy Young in 1971 with the Cubs.

Perry played 22 seasons and spent time with San Francisco, Cleveland, Texas, San Diego, the New York Yankees, Atlanta, Seattle, and Kansas City. With the Rangers from 1975-77, along with 1980, Perry went 48-43 with a 3.26 ERA, 55 complete games, 12 shutouts, 575 strikeouts, and 190 walks. At the time of his election, his ERA with the Rangers was the second-lowest in club history.

For his career, Perry went 314-265 with a 3.10 ERA, 303 complete games, 50 shutouts, 3,354 strikeouts, and 1,379 walks. Perry won 20 games in a season five times and was one of a handful of pitchers to win 100 games in each league.

Are we missing a moment from this day in Texas Rangers history? Were happy to add it. Hit us up on Twitter @PostinsPostcard and let us know what to add.

Make sure to like SI's 'Inside The Rangers' on Facebook

More here:

Rangers History Today: Pair of Texas Aces Elected to Hall of Fame - Sports Illustrated

Posted in History | Comments Off on Rangers History Today: Pair of Texas Aces Elected to Hall of Fame – Sports Illustrated

No exaggeration: This might be the most embarrassing moment in Giants history – NJ.com

Posted: at 4:28 pm

It is dangerous to declare anything related to the Giants these days as the worst ever or the lowest point. This is, after all, a franchise that has repeatedly hit rock bottom only to drill a little deeper, and deeper still, and even ... deeper ... still.

Plus, it is necessary to approach such proclamations with caution given the teams history. What might seem like the nadir for this generation of football fans might seem tame in comparison to the fans who endured the dark ages of the 1970s.

And still, even with all those disclaimers in mind, we feel comfortable declaring what happened in the second quarter of the Giants game against Washington as the most embarrassing moment in the franchises near 100-year history.

Really. This was that bad.

The Giants, trailing Washington 3-0 late in the second quarter, were pinned at their own 2-yard line when they did something that raised a white flag over MetLife Stadium in an unprecedented way. They ran a quarterback sneak on second down, and when the play gained two yards, they ran another one on third down.

And then they punted.

Run that one back. Let it sink in. The Giants, a 4-12 team with nothing to lose but another meaningless game, refused to let their offense attempt an actual play against a six-win Washington team. They might as well have just punted on second down!

Embarrassing doesnt begin to sufficiently describe it.

Lets remember, the man making this decision is Joe Judge, the head coach that co-owner John Mara is believed to be prepared to bring back for a third season despite a 10-23 overall record. Judge gave an 11-minute sermon about the teams improved culture a week ago, that his former players still dial him and tell him they wish they were still in New Jersey.

It was ridiculous when he said it and that was before Judge added a new term for giving up to footballs modern lexicon.

Surrender Punt? Meet the Surrender Sneak.

The one positive for the Giants: At least there were only a few thousand people inside MetLife Stadium to see it happen. Combine the teams current hopelessness with a bad opponent and a cold, gray January day, and you end up with what might be the lowest home attendance for the team since the stadium opened in 2010 (the NFL does not provide actual attendance numbers, just tickets distributed).

The crowd had to find ways to amuse itself. Everytime the referee made an routine announcement No. 79 is reporting eligible the fans roared with their approval. Judge, during that 11-minute rant, said that every fan has the right to boo my ass out. Somehow, this combination of indifference and scorn was even worse.

Then again, there might be a weird benefit for the fans who braved the cold to watch this lousy, meaningless football game. Theyll be able to tell their kids someday that they saw the most embarrassing moment in Giants history.

MORE FROM STEVE POLITI:

How an ex-Rutgers athlete ended up charged with murder in Tijuana

The search for Luther Wright, once N.J.s greatest hoops talent

It felt like somebody died. How COVID sacked a great Rutgers season

I ate nothing but pimento cheese sandwiches for 24 hours at the Masters

Thank you for relying on us to provide the journalism you can trust. Please consider supporting us with a subscription.

Steve Politi may be reached at spoliti@njadvancemedia.com.

Read more:

No exaggeration: This might be the most embarrassing moment in Giants history - NJ.com

Posted in History | Comments Off on No exaggeration: This might be the most embarrassing moment in Giants history – NJ.com

Corvallis apartment fire reveals history of complaints against landlords – Corvallis Gazette Times

Posted: at 4:28 pm

Just before 6 p.m. on Dec. 28, most of the tenants inside a single family home in Corvallis which had been partitioned into apartments were going about their lives largely unaware except for an out-of-place campfire smell their house was ablaze and everything was about to change.

But the destructive flames that would displace all six units tenants may have been inevitable.

That place was unlivable. It was miserable, said Brian Grant, one of the tenants. He and his housemates had long stories of woe, of questionable wiring, of landlords hard to reach, of poor maintenance and whack-a-mole problems when complaints were finally addressed.

With all that in mind, Im still kind of in shock, Grant said this past week.

Theyre not the only tenants of property owners Kip and Michelle Schoning to relate such stories. Mid-Valley Media has been chronicling allegations against the Schonings, who own rental property throughout the mid-Willamette Valley, for more than a decade.

People are also reading

Likewise, the city of Corvallis has been fielding complaints and investigating potential code violations since the early aughts at least. AndAlbany has had its share of run-ins as well.

The Schonings did not respond to a reporters four requests for interviews left by voicemail on both office and cellphone numbers.

The probable culprit

As flames ripped through the 96-year-old house at 857 NW Tyler Ave. that Tuesday between Christmas and New Year's, tenants and first responders tried to reach Kip and Michelle Schoning to no avail. The property owners finally showed up to the dilapidated property the morning after to speak with Corvallis Division Chief Fire Marshal Jonathon Jones.

I think the biggest concern is that there were known issues with no repair or no remedy done, Jones said. It does appear that this is strictly a building maintenance issue and that electrical is really a high culprit right now. You have one breaker that is running six different apartments.

Three of the tenants reported trying to fix the breaker themselves multiple times saying that it sparked at them whenever they touched it. One of the tenants, Keanna Estes, moved into the apartment in September and said even in that short time, shes had a history with the breaker slipping.

Ive had electrical problems pretty much since I moved in, she said. Sometimes I could go a week without it tripping. Sometimes it would trip 12 times a day.

She called the Schonings several times, Estes said, adding it took Michelle Schoning a week to return her call.

They do not show up, Estes said. They do not come to their property for anything.

The night of the fire

Estes remembers coming home from the grocery store the evening of Dec. 28 when she noticed her hallway light was out. She went to flip the breaker and it sparked. Not long after, she and her boyfriend smelled smoke; they ran outside to grab a flashlight and realized smoke was coming from the roof.

She called 911 immediately and ran up the three flights of stairs to her unit to grab her animals before evacuating. With the fire alarms silent, her boyfriend, Brendyn Irwin, ran around banging on doors, warning people to get out.

Tenant Tanner Eldridge was home with his partner, Hayden Kuhman. They didnt know the house was on fire, though they could smell something.

Another tenant came out and said to get the hell out of the building. Thats when we grabbed our stuff, he said.

Eldridge had just moved to Corvallis in December, and his father started a GoFundMe to replace the belongings that were lost. While all the residents, their guests and their pets made it out safely, the same cannot be said for all the other items that make a home.

We all love Tanner and dont know what comes next for him and his friends, his dad, Chuck Eldridge, wrote.

Grant, who moved in in October, was home when he heard someone banging on his door urging him to get out. He panicked, grabbing what he could, but he too lost most of his personal belongings in the fire.

Grant had no lights or heating in the unit for the entire month of December, he said, and only two electrical outlets worked in the living room. Michelle Schoning sent out four different contractors who took everything apart and still did not know how to fix the issue, he said.

I just strung up Christmas lights from Fred Meyer, so I could see, Grant said. It was so janky.

The lights and heating were working consistently a day or two before the fire, he said. But 10 minutes before the smell of smoke permeated, the breaker went out for the last time.

The tenants sat across the street and watched their apartment burn for a couple of hours as they answered questions from the fire inspector. A city bus transported them to Oregon State University, where they had pizza and water at Cascade Hall, home of campus public safety and ironically a building that partially burned in 1992.

The Red Cross showed up and gave the displaced tenants prepaid cards with $500, so they could replace some necessary items and find a temporary place to stay.

Its oddly weird because it feels like it didnt happen at all, Estes said.

Kip and Michelle Schoning

Mid-Valley Media has covered the Schonings many times over the years, in articles informally known as the Red Door Stories. When he operated under the name Bula Enterprises, Kip Schoning was known around the mid-valley for painting the doors of run-down houses red and renting to anyone who had the cash without running a background check. The setup naturally appealed to college students who typically dont stay long enough to become a pain in landlords sides.

With the doors no longer crimson-hued, Schonings property management company has changed names several times in the past decade, from Bula Enterprises to Rising Realty LLC to Buena LLC to YourHouse LLC.

Whatever its name, the company is notorious for not returning tenant phone calls, maintaining its properties or making repairs, according to current tenants and those interviewed throughout the years and appearing in a string of "Red Door Stories."

The city of Corvallis Permitting System indicates 857 NW Tyler Ave. has been the site of 18 code violations. Among them was a 2015 tenant complaint that without a functional furnace, her unit was uninhabitable. The city agreed, posting an order for the Schonings to address the problem.

It took the city nearly five months and a court order to convince the property owners to fix the furnace. The judge called the violation egregious because the landlord had known of the broken furnace since October 2011.

The most recent fire wasnt even the first time 857 NW Tyler Ave. made the papers. In 2010, Alice Sparrow, who lived across the street from the house-turned-apartment complex, complained about an overgrowing pile of stinking trash to her then-city councilor, Mike Beilstein.

The rubbish had accumulated because all six units had to dump their refuse into three 30-gallon garbage cans, two of which did not have lids. At the time, the landlords eschewed the local trash haulers services, preferring to send their own crews occasionally, according to tenants interviewed at the time.

Support local news coverage and the people who report it by subscribing to the Corvallis Gazette-Times.

Citing staffing shortages, the city did not act quickly, but 2 1/2 weeks later, a maintenance crew from what was then Bula Enterprises hauled away the pile. It was at least the city's 11th complaint about trash accumulating at the property since 2003.

Incredibly, even that wasn't the first story about 857 NW Tyler. Another set of tenants described to Mid-Valley Media in 2008 how the ceiling caved in in their 4-year-old granddaughter's room. It was only fixed after the city and a reporter got involved, according to previously published reports.

The Schonings became so infamous for exploiting low-income tenants around the mid-valley that statewide legislation was passed in 2009 to protect renters against abusive fees from landlords.

John VanLandingham, a Eugene attorney with the Oregon Law Center, remembers working with a coalition of both tenants and landlords to support Senate Bill 771, outlawing several types of charges, including an upfront lock-change fee, fees for serving pre-eviction warnings and fees for appearing in court.

At the time it passed, court records showed Schoning and Bula Enterprises had initiated more than 800 formal eviction cases in the preceding 15 years. A Corvallis City Hall employee served on the coalition and had mentioned the Schonings by name andthe published reports about them as "inspiration" for the changes, VanLandingham said.

A year later, the Schonings were having problems of their own. In 2010, Mid-Valley Media reported that Kip Schoning escaped his own foreclosure after falling more than a year behind on payments on his and Michelles half-million-dollar Timberhill residence. They ultimately moved out.

Fire investigation

While investigation into the Dec. 28 fire is ongoing, preliminary evidence from the building inspection suggests the fire originated between the second and third floors in the ceiling above a light fixture.

With such an old property, Jones said he still has to investigate what type of work has been done throughout the decades.

That place has had electrical issues for years, Jones said. Every time a handyman was sent over, the problem was fixed, and then something else stopped working. When you have buildings this old, things take place over the years, and standards change.

Once complete, the fire investigation will determine whether or not the building was up to code before the fire occurred.

All three tenants interviewed said their units had smoke detectors, six among them. Not one sounded as flames spread, they said. Oregon state laws requires landlords to install functional smoke alarms and maintain them in working order.

Next steps

A few of the tenants from the burned down property are teaming up to seek legal help. Hiring attorneys can be expensive, and as college students, they said they will need to work together to take the matter to court.

I dont really know whats next, Eldridge said. Maybe a class action suit against them because this is ridiculous. Weve told them about this.

In the meantime, they have to live.

Some of the tenants have friends or family they are staying with until they are able to secure another apartment. Others are staying in a hotel and worrying about where to go. Some have said it is difficult to find available units because most are already occupied by college students who moved in the fall.

Im just planning a way forward, Grant said.

Joanna Mann covers education for Mid-Valley Media. She can be contacted at 541-812-6076 or Joanna.Mann@lee.net. Follow her on Twitter via @joanna_mann_.

Get the latest in local public safety news with this weekly email.

Read the rest here:

Corvallis apartment fire reveals history of complaints against landlords - Corvallis Gazette Times

Posted in History | Comments Off on Corvallis apartment fire reveals history of complaints against landlords – Corvallis Gazette Times

National Spaghetti Day: A look at the history of the dish – Fox News

Posted: at 4:28 pm

Jan. 4 marks National Spaghetti Day in the U.S.

Though spaghetti is known as an Italian dish, the pastas origins are actually disputed.

Spaghettis name, according to the website of Miami-based restaurant Mitalia Kitchen, comes from the Italian word "spago," which means string in Italian.

8 LUCKY NEW YEARS FOODS FROM AROUND THE WORLD

The restaurants website reports that some historians believe pasta was invented in Italy while others believe Marco Polo brought pasta back to Italy from his journey to China.

Jan. 4 is National Spaghetti Day in the U.S., the perfect time to learn about the history of spaghetti. (iStock)

However, a recent book by Italian food historian Massimo Montanari claims that neither of those origin stories are true.

WHATS THE STORY WITH STUFFING? A HISTORY OF THE HOLIDAY DINNER SIDE DISH

In "A Short History of Spaghetti with Tomato Sauce," Montanari reveals that pasta was actually invented in the Middle East around 10,000 to 12,000 years ago, per a review by Publishers Weekly.

The first pasta was a "derivation of unleavened bread cut into flattened strips similar to tagliatelle," the Publishers Weekly review reported.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Meanwhile, the International Pasta Organisation reports that the first version of spaghetti was invented in 1154.

Though spaghetti is known as an Italian dish, the pastas origins are actually disputed, with some historians saying pasta was invented in Italy, while others said the dish was brought to Italy from China by Marco Polo. (iStock)

According to National Today, the oldest known documentation of pasta is from the first century B.C., when Roman poet Quintus Horatius Flaccus wrote about "sheets of dough called lagana."

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR LIFESTYLE NEWSLETTER

Meanwhile, the production of spaghetti started in Sicily in the 12th century, the website reported.

The first written mention of spaghetti and tomato juice is from 1870 in an Italian chefs cookbook, according to National Today.

According to the International Pasta Organisation, Italy is the top country where pasta was consumed in 2019, followed by Tunisia, Venezuela, Greece and Chile.

Read the original:

National Spaghetti Day: A look at the history of the dish - Fox News

Posted in History | Comments Off on National Spaghetti Day: A look at the history of the dish – Fox News

‘The View’ wants a conservative co-host. That’s where it gets complicated. – Goshen News

Posted: at 4:25 pm

SAN DIEGO Wanted: Popular female-driven talk show dominated by intolerant liberals who preach tolerance seeks token "conservative" woman willing to be bullied, mocked, baited and talked down to on a daily basis by sanctimonious and condescending co-hosts. Ideal candidate should lean right, but not too far. Should hit back, but not too hard. Congeniality is a must, as long as it doesn't interfere with squabbling. Genuine conservatives need not apply.

I realize that ABC's "The View" isn't the place for serious social commentary. I never believed otherwise.

But it's much worse than I thought. The curtain has been lifted, and the show where five women sit around a table arguing about politics and culture has been revealed to be a full-blown comedy sketch.

Here's the latest bit: The producers who are hunting for a permanent "conservative" co-host to replace Meghan McCain, who recently stepped down are aiming impossibly high. Apparently, on that show, only the liberal co-hosts which include comedians Whoopi Goldberg and Joy Behar benefit from the bigotry of low expectations.

What producers want is what a former show staffer called a "unicorn." The former staffer told Politico: "They want someone who is going to fight but not too hard, because they don't want it to be ugly and bickering."

Catch that? The bosses at "The View" apparently want someone from the right who can throw a punch but who will also pull her punches.

Of course. They wouldn't want a conservative panelist to land a solid right jab now and then. One of the liberal co-hosts who will likely sign off on whomever gets the gig might get flustered.

Why not just be honest and say outright that you want someone who will behave herself, mind her manners and play nice in the sandbox?

That aspect of the unicorn search seems custom-made for folks on the right. I just can't imagine any producer on any talk show anywhere even on Fox News being so afraid that a liberal panelist might go "fully lefty" and cause an ugly scene that descends into bickering.

Let's be clear. No matter what the producers claim, they aren't really looking for a conservative woman. They're looking for a woman who fits their narrow and rigid idea of what constitutes a conservative. They don't want someone who is right-wing, they just want someone a little "right-ish."

Liberal co-host Sunny Hostin, a former federal prosecutor, told New York Magazine's "The Cut" in November that the new host should have a divergent point of view on most issues.

"Right now, we still do need a really conservative voice," she said at the time.

However, Hostin quickly added a qualifier.

"I also believe it's really important to not have someone on the panel who spreads misinformation, who adheres to the big lies, who is an anti-vaxxer, because I think that's dangerous," she said.

In other words: No Donald Trump supporters or anyone who thinks the 2020 presidential election was stolen. No one who is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci, the chief medical adviser to the president. No one who questions the claims, sound bites and balderdash that sometimes flow from the Democratic Party.

I've watched the show. And I've done television commentary on CNN, Fox News and MSNBC for almost 30 years.

Make no mistake. The "conservative" seat at that table is a dangerous place to be no matter who sits in it. Whoever gets the gig will be picked on from the start from her "morally superior" counterparts. She can stand up to the bullies, but she had better do it with a smile. Only liberals can sneer.

For the most part, the co-hosts are likely to keep the conversation civil. Politics isn't everything, after all. Producers are likely to choose someone who can relate to her colleagues in other ways.

For instance, they're bound to look favorably on prospects who already live in Manhattan, where the show is filmed. Maybe she sends her kids to private school on the Upper West Side. Don't expect them to hire a conservative woman from Texas, Kansas or Georgia.

At the same time, because television is a strange beast indeed, the producers also don't want the new co-host to be too chummy with her colleagues. Audience surveys show that viewers like it when sparks fly.

In other words, producers of "The View" are looking for the television version of Goldilocks someone conservative but not too conservative. Someone just right but not too far to the right.

Sorry, folks. Didn't anyone tell you? That's a fairy tale.

We are making critical coverage of the coronavirus available for free. Please consider subscribing so we can continue to bring you the latest news and information on this developing story.

Continue reading here:

'The View' wants a conservative co-host. That's where it gets complicated. - Goshen News

Comments Off on ‘The View’ wants a conservative co-host. That’s where it gets complicated. – Goshen News

What Is Hungarian Conservatism? – The American Conservative

Posted: at 4:25 pm

Last night my son Matt and I had dinner with my favorite teacher from high school, a historian. We got to talking about war and nations, and I mentioned that Matt and I were startled to learn last summer in Hungary about how the decisive fact in Hungarian political thinking of the past century is the Trianon Treaty. Trianon, as they call it, was the treaty that dealt with Hungary after World War I. It reduced Greater Hungary to a rump state, taking away two-thirds of its territory. The Hungarians regard it as a national catastrophe, as I explained, though I pointed out to my teacher that the Slovaks, Romanians, and other minorities who were at the time living under Hungarian rule in those territories, and who were given by Trianon their own land, do not think it was a catastrophe at all. Matt, showing that he has mastered one of the basic principles of historical analysis, then said, You dont have to agree with the Hungarian point of view to recognize how important this issue is to them, and to factor that in when you are trying to understand why they think the way they do.

I went on to explain to my teacher that spending that time in Hungary was eye-opening because it revealed how willfully ignorant American governmental, policy, and media elites are about why the Hungarian government does the things it does and why replacing Viktor Orban with some EU-friendly liberal would probably make less of a difference than many Westerners think. Hungary, I explained, has been at the mercy of Great Powers for most of the previous century. Trianon was imposed by the victors, and divided the country. Then, after World War II, the Soviets colonized Hungary, and kept it prisoner for forty years. Every Hungarian, no matter what his politics, feels deeply in his bones the sense of humiliation at having no national agency. Even many liberal Hungarians eager to cooperate with the European Union have within them a sense of the precarity of their freedom and self-determination.

Matt added that it didnt start at Trianon. In 1848, Hungarian patriots cast off the Habsburg crown, and fought for Hungarian independence. Their initial victory was reversed when the Russians invaded at the Kaisers request, and restored Habsburg rule, though in modified form. The Habsburgs executed thirteen Hungarian generals who led the rebellion; they are remembered today in Hungary as the Thirteen Martyrs of Arad.

The point is that if you want to understand why Hungarians think the way they do about the EU, about immigration, and about many other things you have to be aware of this history: the history of a distinct Central European people, with their own unique language, having to battle constantly against being conquered and having their identity and agency subsumed by the invaders. This does not make the Hungarians right about this or that issue, but it does help you understand their perspective.

With that history in mind, take a look at this YouTube clip of a speech young Viktor Orban, sporting a mullet, delivered in 1989 at the reburial of Imre Nagy, the 1950s Communist leader of Hungary executed by the invading Soviets for resisting them in 1956. Orban was a staunch anti-communist, but in this speech delivered courageously in a ceremony attended by the Communist rulers of Hungary, who were still at that time in power he praises Nagy for being a Hungarian patriot, defending the sovereignty of the nation despite his communism. Turn on the subtitles to understand the entire speech:

Now, Id like to draw your attention to this new essay by Balazs Orban (no relation to the prime minister), the head of Matthias Corvinus Collegium in Budapest, and a top adviser to the Prime Minister. In it, he discusses the differences between Hungarian conservative thought and Anglo-Saxon conservative thought. Consider this:

Anglo-Saxon countries, as a rule, have long coastlines. For this reason, throughout their history they have been naval and trading powers, and frequently established overseas colonies. One consequence of this was that they encountered foreign cultures more frequently, and, as a result, regularly had to define the relationship of foreign cultures to their own. Continental powers fundamentally fear the emergence of nomadic peoples, while maritime powers are themselves nomadic.

In addition, Anglo-Saxon countries have at times pursued an expansionary foreign policy. This was, in part, to establish their values, including some form of their own social, political, and economic arrangements, in a given territory. There were economic and political reasons for this, since it enabled them to create a familiar environment, a semi-domestic environment within their area of influence. At the same time, these processes led politicians and thinkers in these countries to ideologize, to a certain extent, the particular merits of the British or American way of life, as well as their political and economic systems, and to argue that they should replace the customs and traditions of indigenous peoples.

This is why Anglo-Saxon traditions andvalues have increasingly lost their pragmatic character, becoming instead a kind of political ideology with expansive political aspirations.These ideologizing processes were present during the heyday of the British Empire, during the Cold War competition between the Soviet Union and the United States, and after the emergence of the post-1990 neoliberalworld order, and all have left their mark on Anglo-Saxon conservative thinking.

Look at this map of Central Europe, and where Hungary is located. Continental powers fundamentally fear the emergence of nomadic peoples, Balazs Orban writes (the Hungarians were themselves such a people when they first arrived in the Carpathian Basin that they settled). Geography goes a long way to explaining mindset:

This is crucial:

The guiding thread of Hungarian conservativethinking has always been to represent the Hungarian national interest, and thus the preservation of the countrys sovereignty andfreedomthis is understood to supersede any theoretical concepts.11The Hungarian conservative tradition is in this sensepragmatic, in that it makes flexible use ofthe means at its disposal to attain its ends. One might remark that there is nothingsurprising in this, since conservative thoughtis taken to be pragmatic in principle. But how does this attitude manifest itself inHungarian conservative thinking? In thefact that Hungarian conservative thinking is essentially defensive in character. If the central problem has always been theprotection of Hungarian sovereignty, nationaland individual freedom, and the attainment of the national interest, then the economic and cultural expansion which has come toseem natural and self-evident in Anglo-Saxon countries has here taken a back seat. Indeed, Hungarys experience has rather been one ofbeing conquered by foreign powers, and ofalien ideas and social phenomena entering the country despite having no organic roots within the local culture, meaning that the defence of Hungarian values and the attainment of thenational interest became the guiding motivesof Hungarian conservatism. As in the Anglo- Saxon example, it is also possible in the caseof Hungarian conservatism to outline in four regards why Hungarian conservative thinkinghas become essentially defensive in nature.

One of the most obnoxious tendencies of American mainstream foreign policy elites, of both the Left and the Right, is the assumption that American values are universal, and should be accepted as such. I had no direct experience of foreign peoples who viewed the US as a culturally imperialist country until I started going to the countries of Central Europe. Once you start seeing things through their eyes, its remarkable (or was to this American) how much of a bully we Americans can be. Its not that they reject all our values; in fact, they agree with most of them. What they resent is American arrogance in using our soft power and hard power to turn all foreign people into Americans. I used to think that this was pretty much a vacant leftie complaint, but when you experience it on your own, you realize that it really is true. Viktor Orban is the bte noire of the European Union, but it is crucially important to grasp that he does not demand that other EU countries follow Hungarys values and example; he only wants Hungary to be left alone to govern itself as it sees fit, within general limits. He is defending Hungarian sovereignty. If Hungarian voters turn the Fidesz Party out of office later this spring and overturn the law banning LGBT material aimed at minors, then fine: that is a decision that will have been made by the Hungarian people, through their duly elected representatives. It will not have been imposed on them by Brussels.

B. Orban explains that in the 19th century, Hungarys ruling class wanted to modernize the nation, but to do so on terms that suited Hungary. That is, they accepted the need to modernize, but wanted to do so in ways that preserved Hungarian sovereignty and traditions. The emphases are mine in this passage below:

In the first half of the 1870s, thethreat of state bankruptcy was a daily topic of conversation. It was in this situation thatJnos Asbth, a former government officialand Member of Parliament, published a book entitledHungarian Conservative Politics, which as the name suggestsemphasized the need for a conservative change in political direction.19The significance of Asbth and his work cannot beoveremphasized, as his ideas are, in a sense, echoed in Hungarian conservative thinking tothis day. The essence of Asbths critique isthat the bankruptcy of liberal politics stems from the fact that liberals consider theory more important than practice.20In other words, they are more interested in whether liberal principles prevail in a political decision than in whether thedecision is truly to the benefit or detriment ofthe nation, or in line with Hungarian interests.

It is worth noting that Asbths criticism is directed against the excessive liberalism of the governing elite. He criticizes the rapidly alternating liberal administrations for adopting Western patterns in the belief that these will bring automatic benefits, without considering their long-term effects on the life of the nation. For example, Asbth cites the regulation of economic conditions. Governments expected so much from free competition that they introduced all the elements of a laissez-faire economic system almost at once. According to Asbth, this was a mistake: at that time Hungarian economic actors were not yet ready to compete with better-funded Austrian and Czech industries, and the domestic economy, far from flourishing, entered a period of recession. This is a painfully familiar phenomenonwe need only consider the missteps of the Hungarian liberal administrations in the post-1989 period.

Think of what happened to Russia in the aftermath of the USSRs collapse. Following American advice, the successor administration of Boris Yeltsin tried shock therapy to establish a free market economy. It caused chaos and widespread despair, and led to the popular election of Vladimir Putin. Similarly, in Hungary, many of the state-owned industries were sold at fire sale prices to Westerners, leaving Hungary at the mercy of foreigners. When I first arrived in Hungary back in 2018, I think it was, my Hungarian friend showing me around told me that a big reason Viktor Orban became popular after his election in 2010 was that he repatriated many of those industries. She said that you could say that he put them in the hands of his political cronies, which might be true, but beside the point: Hungarians have the power to deal with that kind of thing through their elected representatives, but they were powerless when ownership was foreign.

B. Orban says that what we now call national conservatism is an Anglo-Americanization of Hungarian conservatism:

This movement calls itself national conservatism, and, curiously, the views it espouses reflect presumably unintentionallythe principles of national Hungarian conservative thought. The movement is critical of globalization, encourages opposition to the unconditional enforcement of free trade, criticizes liberal politics for its lack of interest in practical results, and sees the pursuit of national interests and the preservation of national traditions as the primary task of politics. So what was new in the West in the 2010s is essentially the natural state of conservative thinking and politics in Hungary. It is not difficult to see why it has turned out this way. We Hungarians already had to deal with the problems currently faced by the Westand especially in the Anglo-Saxon worldin the nineteenth century. We were among those compelled to adapt to a changing world, rather than the other way around. We had to learn how to preserve our independence and how to assert our interests in a world where conditions did not depend so much on our will as on the limitations of our strategic thinking and room for manoeuvre.

Read the whole thing. Its really interesting. You dont have to agree with or support Viktor Orban to learn from this essay. One gets so weary of the mantras repeated by American establishment talking heads of the Left and the Right, about how Hungary is one step away from fascism, blah blah blah. It is demonstrably untrue, and reflects not only ignorance of the facts, but also the knee-jerk substitute of ideology for reality. I recall Peter Kreko, one of the foremost liberal critics of the Orban government, saying last summer at the Esztergom festival, when he and I were onstage together, that his allies in the West do the anti-Orban forces no favors by talking about Hungary as fascist, or near-fascist. Its simply not true, and as I see it, it is yet another example of arrogant Western do-gooders trying to impose their own ideological view of the world on peoples whose histories and values are different.

Last summer, I wrote an essay in The Spectator defending Orban from Western criticism. I said, in part, with reference to the new, highly controversial law prohibiting the dissemination of pro-LGBT information to minors and preserving parental authority when it comes to the sex education of their children:

Thanks to the newOrbn-backed law, Hungarian parentswonthave to deal with their kids coming home from school asking them what gender they are, really. Theywonthave to worry, like many American parents do, that their childrens school is conspiring tokeep their childs gender identity secret from them.Theywonthave to worry, like British parents, about a 4,000percentincrease in youth referrals for gender treatment in just a decade.

I imagine that most Hungarian parents will support this, and if not, Hungary remains a democracy; on July 21, Orbn announced an upcoming national referendum on the law. In the meantime, Hungary retains a free press, which is at liberty to criticize the supposed homophobia and transphobia of the government, and to call on voters to reject the law in the referendum and throw the bigots out in 2022. Hungarians remain free to protest the states policies, as thousands of Pride protesters did in Budapest in late July. Of course, everything came off peacefully; some Viktator, that Orbn.

This is how things are supposed to work in a democracy. But now a coalition of democratic European leaders are ganging up on Hungary, threatening to smash it for daring to assert its own cultural sovereignty. They are vowing to withdraw EU funding over Hungarys moves to keep NGOs and broadcasters from indoctrinating Hungarian children with cheerful songs featuring sexually mutilated beavers, in an effort to destroy what religious tradition, their mothers and fathers and common sense says is true about gender.

At the European summit earlier this summer, French president Emmanuel Macron, furious at Hungarys new law, lashed out at conservative central European for undermining what has built the core of our western liberal democracy for centuries. Macron called it a cultural, civilizational battle that we must fight.

The idea that the Blues Clues Pride Parade aimed at pre-kindergarten children is rooted in centuries of Western democratic thought is about as absurd and ideological a claim as is possible to make. This shows you how fanatical Western elites are when it comes to Hungary. Even if you dont agree with the Fidesz Partys policies, read Balazs Orbans essay to understand its roots. And if you are a conservative, read the essay to understand why some of us see Hungarian conservatism as a model on which to draw to create a new kind of American conservatism, one faithful to our own values and traditions.

Continue reading here:

What Is Hungarian Conservatism? - The American Conservative

Comments Off on What Is Hungarian Conservatism? – The American Conservative