The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Monthly Archives: September 2021
What studying worms, flies and fish says about autism – Spectrum
Posted: September 10, 2021 at 5:41 am
Scientists have also studied the nighttime rituals of another autism model: zebrafish (Danio rerio). Gene-editing techniques enable scientists to create zebrafish with autism-linked mutations, and then they can easily assess how the mutations effect behavior. We can take our fish larvae at 5 days old they have this complex range of behaviors we can easily pipette them into the wells of a 96-well plate, and then track different aspects of their locomotor activity, Hoffman says. The design offers the high throughput and easy replicability of a cell culture study, with the ability to gauge effects on animal behavior.
As a postdoctoral researcher, Hoffman tracked the behavior of 5-day-old zebrafish larvae lacking the autism-linked gene CNTNAP2 and found that they are hyperactive at night. The fish also have fewer-than-usual inhibitory neurons, which dampen neural activity, in the forebrain, replicating findings in mice lacking the same gene and adding heft to the relevance of the fish as an autism model.
Zebrafish are a useful tool for screening potential drugs for autism because chemical compounds can be added directly to the water the fish swim in. In their CNTNAP2 study, published in 2016, Hoffman and her colleagues tested the effects of 14 drugs on the larvae and showed that certain forms of the hormone estrogen can reverse the larvaes hyperactive behavior.
The animals are small and relatively inexpensive, so the team can use them to study the effects of many autism-linked genes in parallel. Hoffmans team is looking at brain activity, movement and sleep-wake cycles across multiple lines of zebrafish with mutations in the fish equivalents of 10 autism-linked genes, including CHD8, CNTNAP2, DYRK1A, GRIN2B and SCN2A. The researchers aim to identify shared characteristics across strains and to identify drugs that could reverse alterations in their behavior.
The CNTNAP2 zebrafish developed in Hoffmans lab are slated to appear on a list of validated zebrafish models curated by the Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative (SFARI). (Spectrum is an editorially independent publication funded by SFARI.) The goal of that list is to make zebrafish research more reliable by steering researchers toward models that pass a test of genetic quality, says SFARI senior scientist Brigitta Gundersen.
Its all a matter of matching your question to the advantages and disadvantages of your model system. Ethan Scott
Zebrafish larvae have another advantage: They are transparent for the first several days of life. As a result, researchers can see the larvaes internal organs, including the gut, enabling them to visualize the effects of autism mutations on gut function, which is often disrupted in autism. In the larvae, researchers can observe the rhythmic movements of the gut muscles, and food moving through the digestive system. Things play out right in front of you, says Julia Dallman, associate professor of biology at the University of Miami in Coral Gables, Florida.
In studies published in 2019 and 2020, Dallmans team showed that the gut muscles contract, and food moves through the gut, unusually slowly in zebrafish with mutations in SYNGAP1 or SHANK3. In people, mutations in these genes are linked to both autism and gastrointestinal distress, including constipation and acid reflux. When we initially set out to look at gut function in these models, my expectation was that [alterations] would be subtle, Dallman says. Its not subtle at all. Her teams studies suggest that slightly different mechanisms underlie gut problems in the two fish strains, so treatment of constipation in autism may not be one size fits all. Dallman plans to test the effects of drugs on both gut function and behavior in the fish, to aid in the search for autism medications that dont worsen constipation, she says.
The transparency of zebrafish larvae also puts early brain development on display. Using specialized microscopes, researchers can visualize the activity of individual neurons and, because the fish are small, simultaneously track the activity of every neuron in the brain. Youre just observing the brain in an intact, alert, behaving, perceiving animal, says Ethan Scott, who studies sensory processing in zebrafish at the University of Queensland in Brisbane, Australia.
Zebrafish have a more similar brain structure to humans than do invertebrate models, Scott says. And although the fish lack a cerebral cortex, the structure at the surface of the human brain, they are useful for studying circuits in other parts of the brain. Its all a matter of matching your question to the advantages and disadvantages of your model system, Scott says.
Scott is using zebrafish larvae with mutations in autism-linked genes to investigate alterations in sensory processing in autism. He and his colleagues are monitoring their brain activity in response to images shown on a computer screen, and to sounds of varying loudness. In a 2020 study, his team showed that zebrafish lacking FMR1, the gene mutated in fragile X syndrome, are hypersensitive to sound. And in four regions of the brain, their neurons react to sound with more frequent or stronger bursts of activity than those in typical fish. The work may help explain sensory hypersensitivity in autism, Scott says.
Here is the original post:
What studying worms, flies and fish says about autism - Spectrum
Posted in Human Genetics
Comments Off on What studying worms, flies and fish says about autism – Spectrum
Seeking the Common Thread in Severe COVID-19 – Precision Vaccinations
Posted: at 5:41 am
(Precision Vaccinations)
Severe COVID-19 patients tend to have one thing in common: insufficient or defective proteins that help regulate the immune system, known as type I interferons (IFNs), stated researchers with Rockefeller University.
Jean-Laurent Casanova, M.D., Ph.D., previously demonstrated that at least 10% of severe cases could be chalked up to either a genetic condition that cripples IFN production or misguided antibodies that attack those crucial proteins.
Two new studies published in Science Immunology on August 19, 2021, explain how another 10% of severe cases are linked to IFN.
These autoantibodies are found even in uninfected individuals, which suggests that they are a cause, rather than an effect, of severe COVID-19.
We can neatly explain much of severe COVID-19 as a net defect in type I IFN, Casanova stated in a press release.
To an extent never seen for any other acute infectious disease, these four studies collectively provide a molecular and immunological explanation for about 20 percent of critical cases.
The new papers highlight additional IFN-related defects unique to severe and fatal COVID-19 cases.
In the first study, Casanova and colleagues found that 1 to 2% of men under the age of 60 who experience severe COVID-19 have deleterious mutations in TLR7, a gene within the X chromosome involved in the production of type I IFN.
In the second study, the scientists demonstrated that confused antibodies were attacking type I IFNs instead of the virus account for a more significant number of severe cases than previously thought 20% of people who died from COVID-19 had high levels of autoantibodies that specifically target and destroy IFNs.
While they are in only about 0.5% of people under age 60, that number rises to 4% at age 70 and up to 7% by age 85.
These findings, resulting from the collaboration of the COVID Human Genetic Effort, a global international consortium co-led by Casanova, have immediate clinical implications.
First, it is quick and easy to test for auto-Abs against type I IFNs in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Screening for these antibodies is even possible in the general population before infection.
Second, patients with auto-Abs against type I IFN should be vaccinated against COVID-19 as a priority.
Third, live attenuated vaccines, including YFV-17D and vaccines using the YFV-17D backbone against SARS-CoV-2, should not be given to patients with auto-Abs.
Fourth, these patients appeared healthy before SARS-CoV-2 infection, but they should also be carefully followed for other viral illnesses, as exemplified by adverse reactions to YFV-17D.
Fifth, in cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection in unvaccinated individuals with auto-Abs against type I IFNs, the patients should be hospitalized for prompt management.
Early treatment with monoclonal antibodies can be administered in patients without symptoms of severe COVID-19 pneumonia, and IFN- can be administered in the absence of both pneumonia and auto-Abs against IFN-. Rescue treatment by plasma exchange is another therapeutic option in patients who already have pneumonia.
Sixth, blood products, especially plasma, should be screened for anti-IFN auto-Abs, and any products containing such antibodies should be excluded from donation. And plasma from donors convalescing from COVID-19 should be tested for such auto-Abs.
Seventh, given the documented innocuity and potential efficacy of a single injection, early therapy with IFN- may be considered for the contacts of contagious subjects or during the first week after infection, even in the absence of, or before the documentation of auto-Abs against type I IFNs, in elderly patients, who have a higher risk of critical pneumonia and auto-Abs against IFN-2 and IFN-, but not IFN-.
Another possibility would be the administration of monoclonal antibodies that can neutralize SARS-CoV-2.
Finally, it will be essential to decipher the mechanism underlying the development of these auto-Abs, which may differ in patients over and under 65 years of age.
Overall, our findings show that auto-Abs neutralizing concentrations of type I IFN lower than previously reported but still higher than physiological concentrations typical in the elderly population.
Notes: The COVID Human Genetic Effort is an international consortium aiming to discover the human genetic and immunological bases of the various clinical forms of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
The Laboratory of Human Genetics of Infectious Diseases is supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the Rockefeller University, the St. Giles Foundation, the US NIH, and others. These researchers did not disclose relevant industry conflicts of interest.
PrecisionVaccinations publishes fact-checked research-based vaccine news.
More here:
Seeking the Common Thread in Severe COVID-19 - Precision Vaccinations
Posted in Human Genetics
Comments Off on Seeking the Common Thread in Severe COVID-19 – Precision Vaccinations
2nd Precision Health Virtual Summit Provides Look at Innovation Advancing the Promise of Personalized Medicine – Yahoo Finance
Posted: at 5:41 am
Two-day event featured 10% growth in registrations and a wide array of expert stakeholders
INDIANAPOLIS, Sept. 9, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- hc1, the leader in critical insight, analytics, and solutions for precision health, announced today the successful completion of its 2nd annual Precision Health Virtual Summit. Registrations for this year's event grew by 10%, evidencing a growing interest in the innovations and collaborations ushering in a new era of precision health.
(PRNewsfoto/hc1)
The second Precision Health Virtual Summit saw a 10% increase in registrations, showcasing interest in precision health.
The two-day event held in partnership with Becker's Healthcare featured leading experts including keynote presentations from Katherine Capps, president of Health2 Resources and co-founder and executive director of GTMRx (Get the Medications Right) Institute, and David Nash, MD, MBA, founding dean emeritus of Jefferson College of Population Health at Thomas Jefferson University.
In "Precision Health and Population Health: Friends or Foes," Nash discussed how two of healthcare's priority initiatives can work in tandem to achieve cost, access and clinical outcomes goals. Nash explained how eliminating waste in population health is a driver for precision health and ties into addressing cost and access concerns in delivering individualized care for all patients.
"It's amazing how much is changing and how quickly it is changing. Precision medicine harnessing the human genome and being able to deliver precision, personalized careit's a kissing cousin of population health; it's a subset; it's a pillar. One thing is clear: they are not on a collision course. Quite frankly, they are incredibly complementary," Nash said.
"The field of precision health is moving at light speedthe fastest in history," Jeffrey Kuhlman, MD, General Manager, Healthcare Analytics Solution, AdventHealth, told "Precision Health and Genomics: Unlocking Individuality" session moderator Mackenzie Bean, Writer/Reporter, Becker's Hospital Review. "Think about where we were in 1985 with personal computers and IT. Well, that's actually where we are today with omics and with precision health. Not just the next 25 years we're gonna see those truly amazing changes, but even within the next few years we're gonna see light speed changes. What's needed for that is we've got to develop the clinical decision support tools that allow physicians to easily access what's presented to them, in an easy to understand way, in their workflow, that's actionable that more importantly puts patients at the center of the program."
Story continues
In her presentation, "The Future of Precision Health," Capps discussed how personalized medicine and gene therapies are laying the groundwork for better care today and in the future. After providing a real-life account of the medication struggles of a patient with multiple complex conditions, she provided an overview of a new solution called Comprehensive Medication Management (CMM)a method that differs from traditional medication therapy management (MTM) and takes a systematic, integrated and collaborative approach to medications built on an understanding of how genetics influence efficacy through pharmacogenomics.
"The ultimate goal is precision preventative medicine. We believe at the institute that we can move from precise to personalized medicine through the expansion of CMM in the delivery setting through application of knowledge, access to clinical pharmacists, leveraging pharmacogenomics testing. It'll reduce burnout, increase physician, patient satisfaction. It'll lead to better outcomes at a lower cost and it'll ensure that we achieve the quadruple aim," Capps said.
Brad Bostic, Founder, chairman and CEO of hc1, opened the virtual summit with an address that focused on the challenges of healthcare's current one-size-fits-all care delivery model and how data silos create barriers to holistically addressing the needs of individual patients. He also discussed how high-impact technology partnerships are changing this dynamic through a new class of solutions called Precision Health Insight Networks (PHINS).
"I really found it an energizing, exciting opportunity to bring together people from all different parts of the healthcare value chain to talk about how we can solve this challenge of one size fits all trial-and-error care and move to more of a model that's focused on the end outcome of the patient and bringing the most precise possible approach to healthcare," Bostic noted in his closing remarks. "Today we've got about 30% of all healthcare dollars being wasted. In the future, we really need to fix that, and together we can do it. We also see about 128,000 people per year in the U.S. dying from taking medications as prescribed, and with new precision medicine techniques, with better precision approaches to managing health across populations, we can do much, much better and eliminate those unnecessary dollars and unnecessary deaths."
Sponsors of the Precision Health Virtual Summit include AWS, Snowflake and leader sponsor Quest Diagnostics. The event was offered free of charge and can be accessed on-demand at hc1.com/summit.
About hc1hc1 is the leader in critical insight, analytics, and solutions for precision health. The hc1 Precision Health Cloud organizes volumes of live data, including lab results, genomics, and medications, to deliver solutions that ensure that the right patient gets the right test and the right prescription. Today, the hc1 Platform powers solutions that optimize diagnostic testing and prescribing for millions of patients nationally. To learn more about hc1's proven approach to personalizing care while eliminating waste for thousands of health systems, diagnostic laboratories, and health plans, visit http://www.hc1.com and follow us on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn.
Media Contact Liz Goar email: liz@npccs.com phone: 813-333-2844
Cision
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/2nd-precision-health-virtual-summit-provides-look-at-innovation-advancing-the-promise-of-personalized-medicine-301372689.html
SOURCE hc1
Originally posted here:
2nd Precision Health Virtual Summit Provides Look at Innovation Advancing the Promise of Personalized Medicine - Yahoo Finance
Posted in Human Genetics
Comments Off on 2nd Precision Health Virtual Summit Provides Look at Innovation Advancing the Promise of Personalized Medicine – Yahoo Finance
Amgen to Present at the 19th Annual Morgan Stanley Global Healthcare Conference – StreetInsider.com
Posted: at 5:41 am
THOUSAND OAKS, Calif., Sept. 9, 2021 /PRNewswire/ --Amgen (NASDAQ: AMGN) will present at Morgan Stanley's 19th Annual Global Healthcare Conference at 2:45 p.m. ET on Tuesday, Sept. 14, 2021. Robert A. Bradway, chairman and chief executive officer at Amgen will present at the conference. Live audio of the conference call will be broadcast over the internet simultaneously and will be available to members of the news media, investors and the general public.
The webcast, as with other selected presentations regarding developments in Amgen's business given at certain investor and medical conferences, can be accessed on Amgen's website, http://www.amgen.com, under Investors. Information regarding presentation times, webcast availability and webcast links are noted on Amgen's Investor Relations Events Calendar. The webcast will be archived and available for replay for at least 90 days after the event.
About AmgenAmgen is committed to unlocking the potential of biology for patients suffering from serious illnesses by discovering, developing, manufacturing and delivering innovative human therapeutics. This approach begins by using tools like advanced human genetics to unravel the complexities of disease and understand the fundamentals of human biology.
Amgen focuses on areas of high unmet medical need and leverages its expertise to strive for solutions that improve health outcomes and dramatically improve people's lives. A biotechnology pioneer since 1980, Amgen has grown to beone ofthe world'sleadingindependent biotechnology companies, has reached millions of patients around the world and is developing a pipeline of medicines with breakaway potential.
For more information, visitwww.amgen.comand follow us onwww.twitter.com/amgen.
CONTACT: Amgen, Thousand OaksMegan Fox, 805-447-1423 (media)Trish Rowland, 805-447-5631 (media)Arvind Sood, 805-447-1060 (investors)
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/amgen-to-present-at-the-19th-annual-morgan-stanley-global-healthcare-conference-301373001.html
SOURCE Amgen
View original post here:
Amgen to Present at the 19th Annual Morgan Stanley Global Healthcare Conference - StreetInsider.com
Posted in Human Genetics
Comments Off on Amgen to Present at the 19th Annual Morgan Stanley Global Healthcare Conference – StreetInsider.com
Indian genetic diversity is more about languages and social systems than just geography, says research – Times Now
Posted: at 5:41 am
Indias genetic diversity is tied to language and social systems rather than geography, says study.  |  Photo Credit: iStock Images
India and its diversity have always been a subject of intrigue to the rest of the world, and a matter of pride for the Indians.
Genetic diversity varies substantially among Indian populations. So much so that at the continental level, the Indian continental group has significantly higher DNA diversity than European and East Asian groups put together.The study of the subcontinents population is of great interest to anthropologists purely because of the sheer size of the Indian population, the complex demographic history, and our unique social structures.
While research in the past has unravelled human genetic variation to a great extent, India's vast reservoir of genetic diversity still has a lot of scope to be explored.
The past genetic analysis of the Indian population had revealed that the diverse groups that we see today in India come from two major ancient populations the Ancestral North Indians (ANI) and the Ancestral South Indians (ASI). Basically establishing that geography is the biggest driver behind the genetic diversity of a population.
However, that is not quite the case, says research from Purdue University. The new study has now indicated that while the geography influencing genetic diversity'theory might stand true for European countries, it is not the case with India.
The study involved a unique model of interdisciplinary research bringing together genetics and computer science to consider jointly many different factors that may have shaped heredities. Using the model the Peristera Paschou, a population geneticist and associate professor of biological sciences at Purdue and Aritra Bose, a doctorate in both data science and genetics analysed a comprehensive dataset that represents the diversity of the Indian subcontinent.
The results opened a range of possibilities that were hitherto unknown. It revealed that in places like India, language and social systems like castes strongly affect how and where people live, implying that our genetic diversity is influenced more than just geography.
To put in perspective, if you know someones genetics among the European population, you can guess where they are from, to within a few kilometres in some cases, and if you know where someones ancestors came from, you have a close approximation of their genetic makeup.
However, in the Indian context, spoken language was seen as a major force in bringing people together in India besides the socio-demographic factors. Simply put, the results threw light on how the Indian people moved into India, and how various groups of people commingled. People who speak the same language (or even similar languages) here tended to be much more closely related, even if they lived far apart geographically.
Now, this model developed to analyse Indias population genetics is significant. Based on this, anthropologists will now be able to study other populations where genetics are not as closely tied to where one lives or hails from. Essentially the non-European populations with rich histories of diversity and migrations.
And this, in turn, will help us understand the history of human movement and cultures. You never know, it might even pave the way to understanding human health and susceptibility to disease, and pave way for advanced medical research where diagnosis and the treatment model will vary with each genetic group.
So, if you are an Indian or an Indian-origin person, dont go about trying to find your ancestors on the internet-based genetic and ancestry services. Those rely on the geography of ones forebears to determine our roots. India is more than just that.
See more here:
Indian genetic diversity is more about languages and social systems than just geography, says research - Times Now
Posted in Human Genetics
Comments Off on Indian genetic diversity is more about languages and social systems than just geography, says research – Times Now
Dame Sarah Gilbert: ‘We don’t need to give vaccine boosters to everybody. Immunity is lasting well’ – Telegraph.co.uk
Posted: at 5:41 am
Dame Sarah is already on the record as not being a fan of jabbing children for the sake of it. She has pointed out that countries should consider vaccinating the small number most at risk, but otherwise is not convinced of the benefits.
If you cant prevent transmission by vaccination and the children are not at risk of severe disease and hospitalisation and death, which the vast majority of children are not, you have to ask yourself: What would be the benefits of vaccinating children?, she told Italian newspaper La Repubblica in July.
We are not going to eradicate Sars-Cov-2. Its going to continue to circulate. And at some point, schools will remain open when there are infected children because, ultimately, we have to move to the point where we are living with the virus.
Dame Sarah first read about a novel virus spreading through the Chinese city of Wuhan on New Years Day 2020. She had designed a vaccine for it within two weeks, which was granted approval for use just 351 days later, one day before the year was out. Her own triplets, all studying biochemistry at university now, took part in the human trial.
A few stuttering months of confusion prior to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) declaring the overall benefits of Dame Sarah's vaccine outweighed the risks of one particular complication (developing a rare blood clot), with the risk of the rare clot from the vaccine eight times less than the risk of a clot caused by Covid-19, according to an Oxford University study Boris Johnson, Sir Keir Starmer, the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and Dame Joan Collins included.
How frustrating it has been, then, for Dame Sarah who has since been lauded around the world, showered in medals and awards, had a Scientist Barbie designed after her, and even invited to sashay on to certain celebrity shows, of which more later to have been forced to spend the past year making clear that the vaccine is definitely safe, not having been chucked together in a lab at top speed like a cake made the night before the village fte.
Indeed, she and Dr Cath Green, associate professor in chromosome dynamics at the Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics at the University of Oxford and part of Dame Sarahs vaccine development team, have also taken the time to write Vaxxers (Hodder & Stoughton, 20), which explains clearly and in a very readable way how carefully and precisely the vaccine was developed.
We wanted to explain how we did this so fast, Dame Sarah explains. We appreciate it is natural for people to be hesitant.
But, in a nutshell, the vaccine came down to two things: advances in technology and development, combined with the reality of working in a pandemic: there was none of the normal hold-ups to slow down the team.
We were able to overlap processes that you would normally do sequentially, she says. We had less waiting to do between elements of work. But we still followed the normal regulatory pathway. Yes, we did it quickly, but we didnt miss any steps out. It is frustrating when people say development was too fast without saying why that would be.
Key to this was some unlikely help that came early on. At the start of January 2020, before the pandemic had been declared, Chinese scientists from Fudan University in Shanghai posted the fully sequenced genetic code for the new virus to enable the worlds scientists to move fast.
Vaccinologists, she says, are a close community. Weve always known that beating Covid was not winner takes all. There was no competition to come first. We need vaccines for everyone in the world.
This business-like approach is connected to Dame Sarahs biotech company Vaccitech, which she set up in 2016. Im a scientist to my core, she says, but Ive always wanted my science to make things better for people. Products can be developed better by a company than a university.
Vaccitech is already moving on, looking at way its vaccines could work in other conditions such as hepatitis B and prostate cancer. Thats the dream to have a targeted cancer treatment.
Posted in Human Genetics
Comments Off on Dame Sarah Gilbert: ‘We don’t need to give vaccine boosters to everybody. Immunity is lasting well’ – Telegraph.co.uk
CRISPR: A guide to the health revolution that will define the 21st century – BBC Science Focus Magazine
Posted: at 5:41 am
Scientists are a cautious bunch, fond of a caveat even when describing their own research. Our favourite expressions are Yes, but and On the other hand and It remains unclear says gene editor Dr Fyodor Urnov. So please add all of that to what Im about to say.
If CRISPR realises 10 per cent of what we practitioners of gene editing dream it to be able to do, it will rival the greatest advances in the history of biomedicine as a technology to impact public health.
Urnov is talking via a crackly Zoom link from his office at the Innovative Genomics Institute (IGI) in Berkeley, California, which is at the forefront of what may prove to be the defining scientific breakthrough of the 21st Century.
CRISPR is a genome editing technology that allows scientists to cut DNA with incredible precision and insert or delete DNA to correct unwanted mutations. To oversimplify the technology, its the power to edit the building blocks of life, just like text on a computer screen. Not only could it enable scientists to switch off genes that lead to a broad spectrum of disease, but it will unshackle all of us from the genetics were born with.
The knowledge gained is amazing and its just really accelerated basic research. That in itself is already transformative, says Dr Robin Lovell-Badge, from the Crick Institute. And the notion that we can actually treat people with genetic diseases in a way that was never possible before is mind boggling.
For much of the past decade, the technology has been confined to the lab. Now, though, the first CRISPR therapies are changing the fate of people born with debilitating inherited conditions. Most of us havent realised it yet, but were in the foothills of a profound medical and technological revolution that raises not only the prospect of new treatments and cures, but also huge questions about ethics, equality and health justice.
The incoming wave of gene-editing applications has been compared to the Industrial Revolution or the birth of the internet in terms of the game-changing impact it will have on society.
Jennifer Doudna, who collaborated with Emmanuelle Charpentier on the development of CRISPR and founded the Innovative Genomics Institute IGI
Biochemist Dr Jennifer Doudna established the IGI to tackle all of that and more. As a non-profit organisation, the institute exists not just to research gene editing, but also make it affordable and accessible to everyone. Its a big claim, given the breadth of CRISPRs potential, so the IGIs leadership team agreed to give BBC Science Focus an exclusive overview of its efforts.
It was there on the Berkeley campus where Doudna and Dr Emmanuelle Charpentier changed the world nearly a decade ago. Their collaboration led to the development of CRISPR-Cas9, the gene-editing tool described in a landmark 2012 paper that won a Nobel Prize.
I think we both had a little sense of, you know, kind of a chill, she says. I still remember that feeling of hairs standing up on my neck, thinking theres something really interesting here. And I would wager that neither of us at the time had any idea where it would end up, because I dont think one ever does.
CRISPR isnt the only gene-editing technology, and the IGI is not the only institute pioneering the field of study. But CRISPR is more versatile, easier to use and cheaper than a lot of other technologies. And whats astonishing is the speed of progress. In less than a decade its gone from discovery to human trials and potential cures, something thats practically unheard of in biomedicine.
Its a little bit of whiplash, says Dr Brad Ringeisen, executive director of the IGI. Think about nanoparticles, the nano revolution. Pfizer has nanoparticles in their COVID mRNA vaccine, but that [technology] has taken 30 or 40 years.
Read more about CRISPR:
People born with sickle cell disease will be among the first to benefit from advances in gene editing. In 2019, a woman called Victoria Gray became one of the first people in the world to be treated for a genetically inherited disease with a CRISPR-based therapy.
Born with sickle cell anaemia, she required strong pain medication and regular blood transfusions to stave off the effects of the mutated gene that makes red blood cells warp and block the flow of blood and oxygen around the body. Aside from bouts of excruciating pain, sickle cell anaemia can lead to stroke, hypertension, organ damage and more.
The treatment was not simple. Doctors removed bone marrow cells from Gray and the other patients in the trial, then used CRISPR to edit a gene that activates production of foetal haemoglobin, a protein that can alleviate the symptoms of sickle cell disease. The patients then underwent chemotherapy to destroy most of their bone marrow, after which billions of edited cells were infused back into their bodies.
Victoria Gray, who volunteered to have her sickle cell anaemia treated with CRISPR-based therapy Sarah Cannon Research Institute
Gray no longer requires medication or transfusions, and neither do the other people in her trial, which included patients with a related blood disorder. It seems that a one-time CRISPR treatment has cured them.
Sickle cell disease is probably the easiest target that affects the most people, says Ringeisen. Its about as simple as you can possibly get: you go in and either turn on an alternative gene or you try to correct the one thing. One hundred thousand people in United States have sickle cell disease and I think its over a million people worldwide. So theres a huge impact that can be had.
The IGI is preparing its own sickle cell trial, but the institutes scope also includes many other conditions. As well as blood disorders, it has active research projects on autoimmune disease, neurological disease, cancer and COVID-19. One promising avenue of research is with T-cells, sometimes described as the troops on the ground of our immune system.
Dr Alex Marson, the IGIs director of human health, is running a lab that is working to engineer T-cells using CRISPR to treat different kinds of disease. He is currently planning a clinical trial with a family where a strong genetic mutation has caused different manifestations of autoimmune disease in the younger generation.
In the lab weve corrected cells from these children, he says. Now were working towards doing a clinical trial to take those gene-corrected T-cells and infuse them into at least one of these young adults to try to restore balance in the system and treat the autoimmune disease.
Whereas current T-cell therapies are wildly expensive, Marson envisions a future where off-the-shelf T-cells are manufactured to treat different kinds of disease, their production industrialised to a scale that makes them accessible to anybody who needs them.
Sickle cell disease causes the body to produce unusually shaped red blood cells. These cells do not live as long as other red blood cells and can block blood vessels, leading to problems Getty Images
We can treat infectious diseases by designing immune cells that recognise infections, he says. I think were going to have this sort of flexible ability to actually write the language of the DNA in the immune cell and use it in a drug platform.
This is where things start getting really interesting, because it showcases just how broad the medical applications of CRISPR will be. Its potential lies not just in those conditions caused by a single genetic mutation like sickle cell disease, but any disease that has a genetic component, either in terms of susceptibility or protection.
That includes many of the major killers, including cancer, cardiovascular disease and neurodegenerative disease, plus chronic conditions like inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatoid arthritis.
All disease is on the map, says Ringeisen.
Part of what gives scientists optimism is that gene editing can be used to bestow protective DNA on a person as well as correcting unwanted mutations.
We know there is a genetic change you can make that will dramatically lower your risk of heart disease, says Urnov. How do we know that? Because of very rare individuals who have those genetic changes. And when you study lots of them, its kind of jaw-dropping. Im not going to say theyre immune to heart disease, but theyre close to it.
Doudna believes that CRISPR could even be used more to prevent disease than to treat it. Imagine a time when people get their genome sequenced and be told that you have a gene that makes you have a higher likelihood of getting cardiovascular disease, she says. But you have the option of editing your cells so that you dont have to wait to find out if youre one of the unlucky folks that is susceptible.
Today, lots of us take preventative action to protect our future health. It could be anything from eating a high-fibre diet to keep heart disease at bay, to having a double mastectomy because breast cancer runs in the family. Would you be comfortable editing your DNA to achieve the same results?
Its harder to do the cost-benefit analysis when youre talking about such experimental therapies. There are some who will say that any form of gene editing is playing God and conspiracy theories around COVID-19 vaccines show how mistrust in new technologies can spread.
There can be misrepresentations or just misconceptions embedded in the public mindset that can have a negative effect on what I think should be positive advances, Doudna says. Another example of that is the whole anti-GMO movement.
In November 2018, twin girls were born in China, the so-called CRISPR babies. Biophysicist Dr He Jiankui announced that he had created the worlds first genome-edited babies to widespread condemnation.
Chinese scientist He Jiankui hit the headlines in 2018 for using CRISPR to create the first genetically edited human babies. The press coverage soon turned sour when it emerged that the experiments had been carried out in an unethical, irresponsible manner. Jiankui is now serving a three-year prison sentence Shutterstock
He engineered mutations in human embryos that were later implanted into a woman, crossing an ethical boundary by altering the human germline, meaning the edits he made would also be passed on to future generations. Additionally, he was criticised for flouting normal safety procedures.
Jiankui claimed that he had disabled a gene called CCR5, offering protection against HIV. His critics pointed out that he could have also inadvertently caused mutations in other parts of the genome. Jiankui was jailed in China for three years at the beginning of 2020 and ordered to pay a three million yuan fine (240,000 approx), his work a stark warning to everyone in the gene-editing world.
This field is experimental and we are one severe adverse event from the entire effort being frozen, Urnov says. The painful thing for me and for tens of thousands of folks like me who have spent 40 years building human genetic engineering to treat disease, you know, this technologys now tainted with the concept of designer babies.
We have 250 million people on planet Earth with genetic disease. We should not be talking about designing anyone. We should be putting all of our attention to the fact that there are hundreds of millions of our fellow human beings that have had their fate handed to them on genetic platter, he adds.
There are other challenges to overcome, too. One of the major criticisms of Jiankuis work stems from the fact that gene editing is not yet so precise that scientists haveabsolute faith that any edit only affects the part of the genome being targeted. There can be so-called off-target effects: unintended genetic modification that occurs elsewhere on the target genome. A worst-case scenario in clinical terms might be genotoxicity, where an off-target effect causes DNA damage that could lead to cancer.
For this reason, whats known as the delivery challenge of CRISPR is a major focus of research, both at the IGI and beyond.
Emmanuelle Charpentier, who worked with Jennifer Doudna on the development of CRISPR Alamy
We can only gain confidence in the safety of these procedures by performing clinical trials, says Dr Ross Wilson, the IGIs director of therapeutic delivery. We are not so hubristic to think that we have the ability to forecast every possible outcome when a new therapeutic procedure is attempted, which is why these trials are being performed methodically and without haste.
Once we have confidence that peoples lives are being saved or transformed for the better, without incurring unwanted outcomes, the technology can be moved into other applications, reducing risks of heart disease, for example.
There are ways to offset this risk of unintended consequences of gene editing. A patients own cells can be sent to the lab for trial editing, giving an informed look at what is likely to happen inside that patients body when they are dosed.
CRISPRoff technology is also under development. This tool allows researchers to target the epigenome, rather than the genome itself. That is, scientists can turn off a particular gene without cutting a strand of DNA by instead targeting the proteins and other molecules that attach themselves to DNA and control when that gene is switched on or off. Because the genome itself is untouched, researchers expect the risk of unwanted effects to be lower.
The pandemic taught us that the public has a major craving for things to be declared safe or unsafe, but in reality its all about the balance between risk and benefit, says Wilson. That ratio looks extremely promising for CRISPR technology, and it improves each year, so the future is bright for therapeutic genome editing.
Doudnas dream for CRISPR is to make it the standard of medical care. For that to happen, one more thing needs to be addressed, and its arguably more complex than any technical hurdle: the cost of treatment.
Gene editing is, or could be, a great leveller in healthcare. But like all experimental treatments, it is research-heavy, labour-intensive and expensive. One of Doudnas fears is that it will become a boutique technology, available only to those who can afford it. This, she says, would not only exacerbate the health gap that already exists between rich and poor, but also create a new kind of health inequality: a gene gap.
The IGI is a non-profit, funded publicly and via philanthropy. Its staff talk of their work not just in technological terms but societal ones too, focused on how to maximise the reach of the technology.
Its a major problem, Urnov says. In the US, [some of] these medicines are sold for $2m, but European countries have refused to even licence them. You have a surreal situation where parents in Europe, whose children have these severe diseases, start GoFundMe campaigns to be able to pay American prices.
We have this gap between the fact that this technology is rapidly expanding in its utility and we are struggling, frankly, with how to make it equitable and affordable.
Add to that the issue of health justice, the fact that if youre born with an inherited condition, an affordable cure may be possible if enough people have the same illness. That would make it economically viable for pharmaceutical companies to invest in the research to develop new treatments.
T-cells (orange) are an important part of the immune system. Scientists could use CRISPR to modify the cells so they could potentially lead to treatments for cancer (blue), cardiovascular disease and arthritis Science Photo Library
If youre born with a rare genetic mutation, that may not be possible. There is this horrific gap between our ability to read that persons DNA and say, Yes, this is the mutation that killed your mom and will kill you, Im sorry to say, and actually developing a treatment that would help that person. Developing such personalised cures has essentially no commercial value. Nobody will ever make money, says Urnov.
Lovell-Badge agrees. The cost is a problem for it becoming really useful for public health, he says. [We need to] start off from the very beginning thinking, How can we do this in a way thats going to be more affordable? Then you approach the problem in a different way.
Unlike so much of the biotech industry, addressing this issue is a cornerstone that the IGI was built on not just developing novel treatments, but creating scalable pipelines for discovery, testing and rollout.
Our mission really has to be ensuring that technology benefits everyone, Doudna says. That was the impetus for the Innovative Genomics Institute in the first place. Many institutes, many companies, many academic labs are now developing gene editing, but not with an eye towards controlling cost and doing the science with a focus on public access to that technology. Thats really our purpose.
The genetic revolution is coming. After pioneering the technology, Doudna is adamant that when it arrives, its available to everybody. As more than one of her colleagues tells us, thats just in her DNA.
Read more
Read this article:
CRISPR: A guide to the health revolution that will define the 21st century - BBC Science Focus Magazine
Posted in Genetic Engineering
Comments Off on CRISPR: A guide to the health revolution that will define the 21st century – BBC Science Focus Magazine
Synthetic biology makes ecologists dream … and tremble : – The Tico Times
Posted: at 5:41 am
The film Jurassic Park (1993) made human beings dream of the possibility of resurrecting species. Almost three decades later, synthetic biology is nearly here not to rescue extinct dinosaurs, but to exterminate harmful animals.
Steven Spielbergs blockbuster film set the action on an imaginary island in Costa Rica (though it was inspired by Cocos Island).
And it is precisely on an island where the first scientific experiments could one day occur, perhaps in the next decade, according to experts and activists at the World Conservation Congress.
80% of the islands in the world share the same problem: mice. They infest crops, eat bird eggs and endanger the fragile local ecosystem.
For more than 25 years, the organization Island Conservation has been dedicated to eradicating invasive species, explains Royden Saah, representative of the organization at the Marseille congress, to AFP.
One of its latest successes was in two of the Galapagos Islands, North Seymour and the islet of Mosquera, using drones and baits. But it is an expensive and uncertain task, and the use of rodenticides can cause collateral damage.
Should we create a genetically modified mouse so that its future generations are exclusively male (or female)? asks Island Conservation on its website.
Saah coordinates a team of researchers, GBIRd, with institutions in the United States, Australia and New Zealand.
We dont have the mouse yet the conservation scientist says. But if we dont investigate, we wont be able to know the potential of this technology.
Saah points out that scientists will only perform experiments in countries interested in the technology.
With synthetic biology coming ever-closer to reality, the more than 1,400 members of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) four years ago created a working group on the issue.
The result is a Charter of Principles on the use of synthetic biology (which includes genetic engineering) that must be voted on this week in Marseille.
The draft of the Charter reaffirms the right of any country to prohibit these activities by appealing to the precautionary principle.
Participants in the debates at the Marseille congress agreed the questions regarding synthetic biology are considerable.
I am also afraid of the potential applications of synthetic biology declared the head of the working group, Kent Redford, when presenting the groups conclusions in Marseille.
There are obvious ecological risks and concerns about genetic modifications of wild species, warns Ricarda Steinbrecher, geneticist and scientific advisor of the NGO ProNatura.
ProNatura and Friends of the Earth are some of the NGOs that have sounded the alarm in Marseille. The Charter of Principles has not been sufficiently debated, they believe.
Among other reasons, scientists dont even agree on the exact frontiers of synthetic biology.
Does a modified mouse still belong to its original species, or does it create a new one?
One of the examples proposed by scientists in favor of experimentation is to recreate the material of a rhinoceros horn, so that this animal can escape extinction.
I have not found anything that prevents further investigation, Saah says about synthetic biology.
The debate is intense, but the situation in some places is just as pressing.
Samuel Gon, science advisor for the Nature Conservancy in Hawaii, says he cant wait.
Synthetic biology is not an option. It will not arrive in time to save the birds of the islands, he explained to AFP.
Of the more than 50 endemic species of honeybirds that were known in Hawaii, only about 15 remain, five in a critical state of extinction.
Historically, Hawaii didnt have mosquitoes. When they were introduced, beginning in the 19th century, some were carrying malaria a disease that has devastated local bird populations.
Hawaiian conservation authorities are preparing to use a known technique to sterilize mosquitoes by inoculating them with a bacterium, Wolbachia.
Beyond the ecological urgency, some scientists seem irresistibly drawn to bigger dreams.
A few months ago a group of researchers claimed that they had achieved the complete sequence of the genome of a million-year-old mammoth.
The technical challenges to achieve the reliable sequence of the genome of extinct species are immense, warns the report of the IUCN experts.
Steinbrecher is even more emphatic. We have to accept that some species have gone extinct, however disappointing it may be. The main objective is to preserve what we already have.
The featured photo shows Costa Ricas Cocos Island. Photo is used for illustrative purposes.
Go here to read the rest:
Synthetic biology makes ecologists dream ... and tremble : - The Tico Times
Posted in Genetic Engineering
Comments Off on Synthetic biology makes ecologists dream … and tremble : – The Tico Times
Letter to the editor: No exemptions on genetically-engineered foods and plants – BayToday.ca
Posted: at 5:41 am
People want to know that all genetically engineered foods have been rigorously assessed for safety by Health Canada, including any new gene-edited foods
Dear Editor,
Many Canadians may not be aware that Health Canada is proposing to remove regulation from most new genetically engineered foods. Local candidates in the federal election may not even be aware!
Health Canada is proposing to let some new genetically engineered foods onto the market without any government safety checks. In fact, companies wouldnt even have to tell Health Canada that these new foods exist. Many of these unregulated foods would be produced by the new genetic engineering techniques called gene editing. But gene-edited foods need to be carefully assessed by our government, not just left to companies to evaluate safety.
Mandatory government safety assessments for all genetically engineered foods are necessary. People want to know that all genetically engineered foods have been rigorously assessed for safety by Health Canada, including any new gene-edited foods. Private companies cannot be trusted to test for safety properly!
We need transparency, independent science, and government oversight! Information and analysis by the Canadian Biotechnology Action Network are available here.
Sincerely,Julie Dupuis
Noelville
Original post:
Letter to the editor: No exemptions on genetically-engineered foods and plants - BayToday.ca
Posted in Genetic Engineering
Comments Off on Letter to the editor: No exemptions on genetically-engineered foods and plants – BayToday.ca
What the Space Exploration Initiative offers our community MIT Media Lab – MIT Media Lab
Posted: at 5:40 am
The Space Exploration Initiative is intentionally structured as a cross-cutting launchpad in direct service of our MIT community. We make opportunities available for researchers across the Institute to deploy cutting- edge research in world class aerospace environmentsfrom simulations of microgravity to prized access inside the International Space Station. Since Ariel Ekblaw founded the Space Exploration Initiative in 2016, the team has grown to support 50+ students, staff, and faculty.
The Space Exploration Initiative takes an iterative approach to testing and deploymentsfrom parabolic flights, to suborbital launches, to the International Space Station and soon, to the surface of the moon. We support a recurring cadence of these flight opportunities and welcome students, staff, and faculty from across MIT (and occasionally collaborators outside MIT) to apply and participate in the program. If your project is accepted for a flight opportunity, SEI covers flight-associated costs and will mentor you through the full process. To hear about all opportunities and open-calls, write in to explorespace@media.mit.edu and ask to be added to the mailing list.
SEI charters an annual ZERO-G parabolic flight for 14-15 projects and 25 researchers across MIT Media Lab, several departments at MIT, and outside collaborators. To help support this flight opportunity, SEI teaches a course each Fall term on project development, prototyping, and deployment readiness for parabolic flights.
Check out past flights here: https://www.media.mit.edu/projects/microgravity-research-flights-with-the-space-exploration-intiative/overview/
How to apply? If youre a student and first-time flyer, we ask you to apply for and take the Zero-Gravity Flight course (more information below); if youre an MIT faculty member or post-doc, or an outside-MIT prospective collaborator, please reach out directly to explorespace@media.mit.edu and indicate interest in the Zero-G Program.
SEI launched six payloads on Blue Origins New Shepard suborbital rocket in May 2019. These payloads crossed the 100km Karman line and tested research during three minutes of sustained microgravity inside the experiment capsule. This mission marked MITs first research launch with Blue Origin, and the Media Labs first suborbital launch. The SEI continues to charter suborbital research flights for the MIT community, including four nanolabs to fly in mid 2021.
How to Apply: Future opportunities are solicited through open-calls, sent to our mailing list.
Check out our past flight here: https://www.media.mit.edu/posts/blue-origin-projects-round-up/
In March 2020, SEI sent five payloads to the ISS on SpaceX CRS-20. The payloads were deployed over a 30 day internal mission, allowing the research teams to study the effects of microgravity, on-station radiation environment, and launch loads on their hardware. For this launch opportunity, the payloads were integrated into the Nanoracks BlackBox platform. A second planned ISS mission is underway for Q4 2021. SEI supports other formats for ISS deployments as well, including astronaut interaction payloads and other apparatus chambers.
How to Apply: Future opportunities are solicited through open-calls, sent to our mailing list.
Check out our past flight here: https://www.media.mit.edu/posts/iss-mission-2020/
The SEI is jointly coordinating lunar payload concepts and near-term lunar surface transport launch opportunities, as part of the MIT To the Moon to Stay mission. Projects are drawn from the SEI Operating in the Lunar Environment graduate course (more info below), and from other active research work across MITs campus.
How to Apply: Email explorespace@media.mit.edu and ask to be added to the lunar payload working group.
Since 2018, the Space Exploration Initiative has offered a course on project development, prototyping, and deployment readiness for parabolic flights. Admitted student teams are offered project-deployment slots on SEIs annually chartered parabolic research flight. This course covers three main topic areas: rapid prototyping and engineering skills to prepare projects for operation in microgravity; logistics, training, and safety pre-approval steps to meet flight readiness requirements and pass a Technical Readiness Review (TRR); and creative and technical lenses for the future of space exploration. SEIs Mission Integrator, Sean Auffinger, is an added support for the students in this class, as they prepare experiments and documentation for the upcoming flight.
Learn more about the course here: zero-gravity.pubpub.org
New for Spring 2021, and expected to be taught again in 2022, Operating in the Lunar Environment is a collaboration between MIT AeroAstro and SEI. This course is a detailed exploration of the design and engineering challenges posed by operating in the lunar environment. Students gain hands-on experience, working in teams, to design a payload to address strategic objectives associated with NASAs Artemis program, aiming to enable near-term sustainable settlements on the lunar surface. Lectures and associated recitations explore varying mission goals and operating environments, from lunar-class launch, to orbiters, landers, rovers, and habitats. Guest lectures include prominent engineers, scientists, industry players and policymakers who have direct experience in lunar mission design and development. Students and project teams that successfully complete a CDR at the end of the class will be supported by SEI towards prospective lunar surface payload opportunities as part of MITs To the Moon to Stay Program.
Learn more about the course here: tothemoon.pubpub.org
The Space Exploration Initiatives dedicated Arts Curator, Xin Liu, finds new creative avenues for SEI supported projects to share their work. Most notably, SEI has participated in Ars Electronica for the past three consecutive years. In addition, SEI supports Visiting Artists through MIT CAST to create artwork for microgravity, democratizes access to space through an International Artists Open Call, and curates a space-focused exhibit at Beyond the Cradle each year to inspire and enable art in space. SEIs Arts Curator specializes in concept development, visual communication, and curation.
Learn more about Sojourner2020 here: media.mit.edu/posts/sojourner-2020
Visit our Virtual Spaceship for Ars Electronica 2020: spaceship.media.mit.edu
The SEI includes a support staff team of 11 membersscientists, engineers, architects, designers, an arts curator, and a mission integrator. This team offers many resources to the MIT community, including but not limited to: mechanical and electrical contract engineering; astronaut ethnography and user research to inform human-factors prototyping; rapid prototyping and fabrication advising; visual communication and arts curation; and direct mission integration support for everything from microgravity research to lunar payloads. SEI also regularly welcomes undergraduate student researchers (UROPs), visiting students, Research Affiliates, and outside research collaborators to join us in our work.
The Space Exploration Initiative facilitates monthly roundtable meetings to engage the MIT community in space based research. This is the best way to meet the group and keep up to speed with all opportunities through SEI. Meeting times and location are announced to the mailing list.
Since its founding in 2016, the Space Exploration Initiative has hosted a series of special talks and workshops on and off campus on topics including: life in space; design for microgravity; space health and well- being; the ethics of space exploration; space law; and democratizing access to space. A recent highlight from the Apollo 11 Landing 50th Anniversary year was an SEI sponsored ML Talks on moonshots past and future: To the Moon to Stay | From the Moon with Love. We were joined by Jessy Kate Schingler, Alex MacDonald, and Cady Coleman in conversation with Dava Newman. Outside of MIT, SEI has hosted talks and workshops at conferences including SXSW and IAC, and with other academic institutions such as Harvard, Yale, NYU, and RISD.
Our annual flagship event, Beyond the Cradle, takes a creative spin on the future of space exploration. Now in its sixth year, Beyond the Cradle brings together over 60 speakersleading space industry chief executives, space science researchers, sci-fi authors and designers, Hollywood visionaries, and NASA and international astronautsto inspire the audience to envision, co-design, hack, and build our space future together. Past speakers have included Nobel Laureate, Rai Weiss; Former Deputy Administrator of NASA, Dava Newman; SpaceX Principal Mars Development Engineer, Paul Wooster; Artist Laurie Anderson; Director, J.J. Abrams; author Neal Stephenson; and Astronauts Cady Coleman, Nicole Stott, Leland Melvin, Jeff Hoffman, Paolo Nespoli and many others!
The Space Exploration Initiatives founding mission is to rigorously, vigorously build out the technologies of our space future while keeping our innovations and team as open and accessible as possible. Beyond the Cradles art gallery and breakout workshop sessions democratize access by inviting and uniting new disciplines and voices in our event.
The event hosts over 350 in-person attendees (via private invitation only) and reaches six continents with several thousand members who tune in via our livestream, Twitter and YouTube channel. Beyond the Cradle is part of MIT Space Week, a broader celebration of space exploration technology and futurist vision at MIT and beyond.
Further details and archived video footage: beyond.media.mit.edu
MIT Space Week: spaceweek.mit.edu
SEI provides seed funding to a few projects each year, typically after engaging with the Zero-Gravity Flight Course, if the project can demonstrate a strong need and rigorous research results towards further flight deployments. We also run grant programs that can fund graduate RAs, whether youre a student in MAS (Media Lab) or another department. If you have already worked with SEI before and are interested in funding to continue or further expand your work, or are an already-admitted/current student looking for RA funding, please reach out directly to SEI Director, Ariel Ekblaw. The SEI can also assist and mentor projects with larger fundraising goals, on a case-by-case basis.
As an example, learn more about our recurring space health program with TRISH: https://www.media.mit.edu/posts/sei-trish-seed-funding/
The SEI facilitates many outreach programs, including our flagship Climate CubeSat Co-Building program (paused due to covid), online learning content through MITs Full Steam Ahead, and international open-calls for youth and adults alike to participate in space technology and arts development. These efforts directly address the Initiatives goals for the democratization of space, bringing space hacking into reach for the next generation and for a broader swath of humanity.
Learn more about SEIs outreach efforts here: sei-engagement.pubpub.org
Learn about an SEI-sponsored global outreach effort in partnership with MIT AeroAstro: humans.mit.edu
Follow this link:
What the Space Exploration Initiative offers our community MIT Media Lab - MIT Media Lab
Posted in Space Exploration
Comments Off on What the Space Exploration Initiative offers our community MIT Media Lab – MIT Media Lab







