Monthly Archives: September 2021

Hope has entered in this world to stay – The Lutheran World Federation

Posted: September 29, 2021 at 6:58 am

When hope seems to be proven wrong

When hope vanishes and fades away. When realities seem to contradict deep-held hopes, worse still, when they seem to gain ground. Thats a tough one, when hope seems to be proven wrong.

Is it worth holding fast to deep-held hopes, when evidence speaks such a strong opposite language. What to do with that hope, when faced with adverse realities?

I remember back in Chile, serving as a pastor, when I sat down for a conversation with an elderly woman. I have decided not to have any hope anymore, she said. It is just too painful to have it.

Indeed, she had too many stories of disappointed hopes in her life, of broken vows, of stabs in her back. Yet: how does that work, a life without hope? Can you decide not to have hope anymore?

The dilemma and the challenges of hopes against evidence is not new. It is one of the main themes in the letters of the apostle Peter, also in todays passage.

His words address the early Christian community that was in effervescence: because for those touched by faith in those early times, the end of the world, the coming of the Kingdom of God was imminent, just around the corner. They were all sure it would happen at any moment soon. And so, the delay in the fulfilment of promises, on the one hand, but then also the opposition and challenge they experienced as they stood by their hopes, shook the foundations of their faith. They must have wondered: can we still believe in all of this?

True, there is something which goes deeper than the spirit of that time that was bubbling over with the peoples expectations for an imminent completion of Gods promises. Human nature has a strong tendency toward wanting to see things happening here and now. Inmediatismo, we call this in Spanish, an attitude that doesnt know of times, of growth, of sowing and harvesting, but only of the present time. Often, we live, as if there was no tomorrow.

This is why I am always grateful for the seasons of Advent and Lent, which teach us about waiting and preparing, about not anticipating things. They nurture a spirituality that knows about a tomorrow, and waits for it. Nurturing such a spirituality, and hence such a consciousness in todays time, could be one of the most genuine additions we may offer as people of faith during this time when humankind rallies to address climate change.

Back to Peter: unfortunately, the apostle plays a bit into that immediatism, when he fully embracing the spirit of the time asks the early Christians to wait just a little longer. I wish he had taken Jesus advice closer to heart: dont put a timeline to God, Jesus told his disciples. Not even I can do so, he added. Things will come when they have to come. God knows when, and that shall be enough for you to know.

All the rest of Peters advice and admonition, however, is of great encouragement. Particularly when he powerfully links Christian hope to Christ himself, to his death and resurrection. In doing so, Peter connects the early community of Christians, but surely also our generation today, to the very source of our hope, aligning their experiences our experienceswith the life and ministry of Jesus.

In the journey of Jesus, the cross of Christ represents the rebellion of humankind to Gods justice, as it surfaced in Jesus ministry on earth. Or, maybe I should be more nuanced in what I say: it represents the rebellion of all those who could not see what they had gained for their lives by receiving Gods justice, but saw only what they had to lose for the sake of their own lives: notably their privileges. Religious, political, gender-based and ethnic-based privilege.

The cross, therefore, represents the last attempt of those with power to still eradicate from earth the hope in what God is making new. Wipe it out, dont let it take root among us, was the rationale behind the torture and killing of Jesus at the cross, stating a harsh example to everyone on earth to simply forget all he brought to humankind. Push it out of the world.

It was the attempt to convert hope into utopia. Utopia, as the Greek roots of the word say, is about things that have no place, ou-topos, on Earth. It is about things that we think, dream and wish for, but with no place other than in our wishes and minds.

Christian hope, instead, entered the world and stays in it. That is why it became so challenging to those in power. It became rooted in our world in the manger of Bethlehem and took hold of lives, people, communities, up to this very day. Not even the last-minute attempt to push it out by crucifying Christ worked out. This is why Peter speaks powerfully of Christs resurrection, thereby reminding Christians of then and today that our hope is not wishful thinking, nave optimism, but serious business, sealed and confirmed by Jesus death and resurrection. Hope found a place on earth to unfold. It is not a dream, it is a seed already planted and sprouting.

As I reflect today about this admonishment by Peter, I take great courage from it. I dont know what you think, colleagues and friends, but goodness my, what are these times all about? We seem to be going back in so many aspects. I remember discussions with the United Nations on the Beijing+20 commemoration, and their advice: do not push for anything new, just hold the ground! What has happened to the dynamism of the Paris agreement? Will Human Rights be a footnote in history books, 20 years from now?

Where is the significant breakthrough ecumenically? Are we too accommodating to the reality of our brokenness? Where is the church going? Will her message amplify Gods liberating grace, or will she be swallowed by the current meltdown that focuses so much on the but: oh yes, God loves all, but Will she be the guardian of traditions only, or will she also seek to become the midwife of all that God is about to do? Will it be a church focused on her past, or a church aware of its past, yet pressing toward the future, and therefore with a burning hope?

And here we are again, back to the main theme of the apostles letter: hope.

There is this one moment narrated in the Gospels, when Jesus, after revealing to the disciples that his journey would entail suffering and death, told them that they were free to return to their boats at the shores of the lake. Where shall we go after this? was Peters horrified response. There is no back to normal, there is no way to forget what you came to bring to us, there is no way to resume a life that could probably be safer, much quieter, but otherwise so poor, because it would be a life without tomorrow. That is what he said then, and this is why he writes as he does, and encourages us as he does today.

Colleagues and friends: let us start this week of work, knowing that we are part of that uninterrupted story of transformation and hope, of which we do not know when it will end, but of which we know exactly how it will end. In whatever we do and say, let us not become responsive to the hopelessness that might be around uswe would only amplify it. Instead, let us be strong in announcing and expressing all that has entered into our world and continues to unfold through Christ. Let us offer words and signs of hope, and add our own chapter to a story, which is not ours, but Gods. Hope shall be the driver of our work and our witness as ecumenical organizations.

So, back to the beginning of my reflection: what do we do when it gets tough? What Peter suggests: read the present times from the end. Assess history and developments not only from what they are today, but let them stand in light of how things will be at the end. Because of what God has done and continues to do. And, because of what God will eventually do. Knowing this, we are called to a life with hope. It cannot be pushed out of the world. We cannot switch it off like a lamp anyway. It has taken roots among us like a strong tree. Maybe it is like a mustard tree, with its little, tiny seed, and its amazing robust presence in Gods garden. Amen.

Rev. Dr Martin Junge is the General Secretary of the Lutheran World Federation.

Continue reading here:

Hope has entered in this world to stay - The Lutheran World Federation

Posted in New Utopia | Comments Off on Hope has entered in this world to stay – The Lutheran World Federation

Donald Trump Suggests He Might Be Reinstated Due to ‘Tremendous’ Voter Fraud – Newsweek

Posted: at 6:57 am

Former President Donald Trump said "we'll see what happens" when asked when the country would "get President Trump back" on Saturday. Trump is pictured during his "Save America" rally in Perry, Georgia on September 25, 2021. Sean Rayford/Getty

Former President Donald Trump has suggested he could be inexplicably reinstated as president due to "tremendous voter fraud."

In remarks to conservative media network Real America's Voice, Trump seemingly indicated that baseless conspiracy theories that claim he will quickly regain the presidency if it were a possibility. Host Gina Loudon, who has also served as co-chair of the group Women for Trump, asked the former president when the country would "get President Trump back" at his rally in Perry, Georgia on Saturday.

"Well we're going to see," Trump replied. "There's been tremendous voter fraud. And it's being revealed on a daily basis and we'll see what happens."

Newsweek reached out to the office of Trump for comment.

No credible evidence of substantial voter fraud has been uncovered in the more than 10 months since Trump lost the 2020 presidential election to President Joe Biden, while the election results have long since been certified and finalized. Trump has continued to fight the outcome despite there being no legal pathway for him to be declared the winner or return to office without winning another election.

Trump said he was "looking back" to "find out what happened" during his Saturday interview, while also stressing that some states were "making their rules and regulations" for upcoming elections. The former president said that Republican-backed efforts to change voting laws on issues like ballot signature verification and voter identification would have an impact on future elections.

"I think you're going to be incredibly impressed by what's happening and I think maybe by the next election," said Trump, who has repeatedly hinted that he will be a 2024 candidate without making a firm commitment to run.

Despite Trump's claims that he "won" in 2020, his lawyers failed to convince multiple judges he appointed amid dozens of failed legal challenges in the aftermath of the election. The ex-president has continued to claim that evidence shows massive fraud was a factor in his loss, although no such evidence has been presented and further investigation have only confirmed Biden's victory.

The results of a controversial audit in Arizona's Maricopa County, conducted at the behest of the Republican-controlled state Senate, on Friday found that Trump lost the county to Biden by a slightly larger margin than in the official results. Regardless, fact-free assertions that the exercise provided evidence of fraud and calls for the election to be "decertified" persisted. Trump himself presented a wildly inaccurate summary of the results during his Georgia rally.

"We won at the Arizona forensic audit yesterday at a level that you wouldn't believe," Trump told the crowd on Saturday. "They had headlines that Biden wins in Arizona, when they know it's not true. He didn't win in Arizona. He lost in Arizona based on the forensic audit."

More:

Donald Trump Suggests He Might Be Reinstated Due to 'Tremendous' Voter Fraud - Newsweek

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Donald Trump Suggests He Might Be Reinstated Due to ‘Tremendous’ Voter Fraud – Newsweek

Report: Trump May Be Hit With Multiple Criminal Charges Over His Effort to Overturn the Election in Georgia – Vanity Fair

Posted: at 6:57 am

In the year 2021, its basically a full-time job keeping up with the many lawsuits, civil inquiries, and criminal probes against Donald Trump, which, if you can believe it, surpass the number of times a human woman has agreed to marry him. On the lawsuit front, as of March, the ex-president was facing more than two dozen, which normal people who havent spent their entire lives suing or being sued thousands of times consider a lot. When it comes to civil cases, the New York attorney general is currently looking into whether the Trump Organization manipulated the value of its assets for loans and tax breaks, and recently won a major victory in court. Then of course there are the criminal investigations, which are probably at the top of Trumps mind considering they could result in his going to prison. Obviously, theres the one being led by the Manhattan District Attorneys Office, which has already produced numerous charges against Trumps business and longtime CFO, with more indictments expected. On top of that, hes also under criminal investigation by the D.C. attorney general for inciting the attack on the Capitol, while in Fulton County, Georgia, the D.A.s office is looking at his attempt to overturn the 2020 election. And according to legal experts, the latter situation may end very badly for him!

In a new 109-page report, D.C. think tank the Brookings Institution analyzed publicly available evidence concerning Trumps and his allies efforts to pressure Georgia officials to change the lawful outcome of the election, concluding that the 45th president could be charged with multiple crimes. Obviously, one of the least helpful things Trump has going for him is his infamous phone call to Republican secretary of state Brad Raffensperger on January 3, during which Trump told the guy tofind 11,780 votesto overturn Joe Bidens win in the state. Theres no way I lost Georgia, Trump said numerous times throughout the call, though of course he did. Theres no way. We won by hundreds of thousands of votes.

The report also notes that Trump both publicly pressured and personally contacted a number of Republican officials in the state, including Attorney General Chris Carr and Governor Brian Kemp, to get their help in declaring him the victor. (The men did not go along with the plot, which might explain why Trump pretended to endorse Stacey Abrams for Georgia governor over the weekend.) The report, penned by Norman Eisen, Joshua Matz, Donald Ayer, Gwen Keyes Fleming, Colby Galliher, Jason Harrow, and Raymond P. Tolentino, notes that the then president called Carr and Kemp in December to beg them to go along with his increasingly desperate plans to decertify his loss. The authors warn that criminal liability could extend to Trump allies as well, including Rudy Giuliani.

Among the charges Trump himself could be hit with, the authors believe, are criminal solicitation to commit election fraud; intentional interference with performance of election duties; conspiracy to commit election fraud; criminal solicitation; and state RICO violations, in addition to violations of more than a dozen other Georgia state statutes. We conclude that Trumps post-election conduct in Georgia leaves him at substantial risk of possible state charges predicated on multiple crimes, the report states.

Referencing the fact that Trump would likely claim that everything he did was just part of his job as president, the report declares: Stated simply, soliciting and then threatening senior state officials to alter the outcome of a presidential election does not fall within any reasoned conception of the scope of presidential power.

A spokesman for Fulton County district attorney Fani Willis told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution last week that the investigation is active and ongoing but declined to reveal any details. Prosecutors have reportedly appeared before a grand jury seeking subpoenas for witnesses and documents; hiredthe states top experts on racketeering and conspiracy laws; interviewed at least four of Raffenspergers closest advisers; and started coordinating with the congresspeople probing the events surrounding January 6.

Trumps advisers have reacted to the Georgia probe exactly how one would expect if one paid attention for the last five years. This is simply the Democrats latest attempt to score political points by continuing their witch hunt against President Trump, and everybody sees through it, Jason Miller said in a statement following the launch of the investigation in the spring.

If you would like to receive the Levin Report in your inbox daily, clickhereto subscribe.

Nothing to see here, just the governor of South Dakota seemingly abusing her position of power to get her daughter a real estate license

Given that she refuses to do anything about COVID-19, Kristi Noem has lots of time on her hands for such pursuits. Per the Associated Press:

Just days after a South Dakota agency moved to deny her daughters application to become a certified real estate appraiser, Governor Kristi Noem summoned to her office the state employee who ran the agency, the womans direct supervisor, and the state labor secretary. Noems daughter attended too. Kassidy Peters, then 26, ultimately obtained the certification in November 2020, four months after the meeting at her mothers office. A week after that, the labor secretary called the agency head, Sherry Bren, to demand her retirement, according to an age discrimination complaint Bren filed against the department. Bren, 70, ultimately left her job this past March after the state paid her $200,000 to withdraw the complaint.

According to the AP, Peters applied to become a certified residential appraiser, which would result in a substantial increase in earnings, in September 2019; in late July 2020, the program that Bren directed moved to deny the license, which reportedly occurs when an applicants work samples dont meet minimum compliance with national standards.On July 26, Bren received a text telling her to be at the governors office the following morning to discuss appraiser certification procedures.

Besides Noem and Peters, Bren said the meeting included Labor Secretary Marcia Hultman; Brens supervisor; the governors general counsel; and, participating by phone, the governors chief of staff and a lawyer from the states Department of Labor and Regulation.

Here is the original post:

Report: Trump May Be Hit With Multiple Criminal Charges Over His Effort to Overturn the Election in Georgia - Vanity Fair

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Report: Trump May Be Hit With Multiple Criminal Charges Over His Effort to Overturn the Election in Georgia – Vanity Fair

NYC Moves to Turn Trumps Bronx Golf Course Over to Homeless Shelter Operator – THE CITY

Posted: at 6:57 am

While Donald Trump battles Bill de Blasio over the mayors decision to dump the former president as operator of a Bronx golf course, the city is playing through proposing a new firm to run the Ferry Point links.

A notice published Monday shows a company called Ferry Point Links LLC is set to be awarded a 13-year Parks Department deal to take over the Jack Nicklaus-designed 18-hole course at the foot of the Bronx-Whitestone bridge.

A firm incorporated under that name in late August, state corporation records indicate sharing both an executives name and address with one of the citys biggest homeless shelter operators, CORE Services Group.

An attorney for the former president vowed to fight the city and the proposed new golf course operators for control of the links, charging Trump is a victim of political retaliation.

A spokesperson for the city Department of Parks and Recreation said that CORE will be teaming up with Bobby Jones Links, an Atlanta company that will be managing the operation of the concession. CORE Services Group did not respond to requests for comment Monday, and Bobby Jones Links was not immediately reachable.

According to the notice posted in Mondays City Record, Ferry Point Links, LLC will pay a minimum of $300,000 a year to the city or a share starting at 7% of the gross proceeds and gradually escalating to 10% by year 13, whichever is higher.

Those terms are slightly more favorable to the operator than those granted to Trump in 2012, in a 20-year deal struck to salvage a troubled project. Trump also committed $10 million to build a clubhouse.

The Parks Department and city Franchise and Concession Review Committee have a hearing scheduled for Oct. 12, with the new concession projected to launch Nov. 15 the day after the one-term presidents deadline to vacate the course.

Following the deadly Jan. 6 insurrection in Washington, de Blasio cited Trumps role in stirring up a mob to invade the U.S. Capitol as reason to terminate all city contracts held by the then-presidents firm.

The city purged its deals with the Trump Organization, which at the time included two ice rinks, the Central Park carousel and the Bronx golf course.

Inciting an insurrection against the U.S. government clearly constitutes criminal activity, de Blasio said at the time. The City of New York will no longer have anything to do with the Trump Organization.

While the other deals were about to expire anyway, the golf course was supposed to be Trumps through 2035, under a deal forged during Mike Bloombergs mayoralty. The Trump Organization, which runs high-end links from Florida to Scotland, fought back.

In a lawsuit pending in Manhattan Supreme Court, Trump Organization lawyers argue that de Blasio did not establish grounds to kill the ex-presidents 20-year deal.

In a default notice to the Trump Organization, then-Parks Commissioner Mitchell Silver said that the then-presidents actions will cause the Licensed Premises to be associated with a violent insurrection against the federal government and would repel tournaments from the Trump-branded course.

The Trump Organization is demanding $30 million in damages and a freeze to de Blasios termination of the golf course deal.

Ken Caruso, an attorney representing the Trump Organization in the pending suit, said de Blasio is off course.

The city has no right to award the license to another operator, said Caruso. The Trump Organizations long-term license for this property is legally binding, enforceable, and remains in full force and effect.

He called the contract cancellation a mere pretext that Mayor de Blasio used as a cover for his political retaliation.

And Caruso said Trump would do combat with the new golf course operator, too.

The citys position has no legal merit and we will continue to vigorously defend our right to possession and control of the property for the remainder of the 20-year term, against both the city and anyone to whom the city purports to issue a replacement license, Caruso added.

Jack Brown, the registered agent for Ferry Point Links LLC, has no known history of managing golf courses. He has, however, been a major provider of homeless services under de Blasio, headquartered at the same address on Main Street in DUMBO.

Brown is CEO of CORE Services Group, which has $544 million in current contracts for family and single adult shelters and $804 million since its first city contract in 2014. The group also operates facilities in Washington.

The nonprofits filings with the Internal Revenue Service show Brown made $869,000 in 2019 from CORE and related organizations. Brown previously led a halfway house organization, Community First Services, critiqued by defense lawyers as providing inadequate services.

A 2012 New York Times investigation found that Brown left a trail of exaggerations and self-dealing as the chief executive at Community First, out-bidding himself for contracts and fabricating an academic credential. The newspaper also found that, while Community First was contractually obligated to provide inmates with support services and pathways to jobs, clients received little more than three meals a day and a bed.

Brown has defended the record of his organization and at a 2017 community meeting called the Times article riddled with inaccuracies and denied claims that there were any problems with its contracts.

CORE Services website boasts it is proud to provide critical services to more than 3,000 individuals every day.

The city launched its search for a new entity to manage the Ferry Point golf course soon after sending Trump its cancellation notice Jan. 15.

In April, the Parks Department informed concessionaires that it had entered negotiations with an unnamed company to take over the Ferry Point Park golf course, and that competitive bidding was not feasible due to the existence of a time-sensitive situation where the existing concession has been terminated.

Sign up and get the latest stories from THE CITY delivered to you each morning

Read more:

NYC Moves to Turn Trumps Bronx Golf Course Over to Homeless Shelter Operator - THE CITY

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on NYC Moves to Turn Trumps Bronx Golf Course Over to Homeless Shelter Operator – THE CITY

Exactly a year ago, Donald Trump told us exactly who he was and how far he would go – Salon

Posted: at 6:57 am

At first, I couldn't believe what the president said.

My question was quite simple and I anticipated a simple answer. I sought reassurance that whatever else, a peaceful transfer of power after an election one of the cornerstones of the American experience that has made us unique, a fundamental example of why other nations look up to us was not up for debate.

Since George Washington gave up the reins of power and retired to his farm, like an American Cincinnatus, the peaceful transfer of power from president to president has been an example the rest of the world respects and has emulated.

We have taken this for granted. Donald Trump treated this tradition as personal toilet paper.

Whatever else happened during the four years that Donald Trump was president, I expected him and the GOP to uphold this American tradition. Hence, one year ago, on Sept. 23, 2020, I asked Donald Trump whether, come "win, lose or draw," he would accept a peaceful transfer of power. Until he came along, I would never have thought to ask a president such a question. I might as well have asked if they intended to continue breathing.

But Trump was different. The time was different. That briefing, in the Brady Briefing Room of the White House, came during the height of the coronavirus pandemic. The White House press corps had voluntarily reduced our numbers to just 14, in a room that routinely had hosted as many as 110 reporters during Trump's tenure in the White House. Trump, through his press secretary, had routinely skirted this mandate by inviting "guests" from favored news organizations to stand at the back of the room and ask questions. I routinely showed up to counter-program the Trump lackeys.

On the day in question last year, someone with an assigned seat didn't show up for the presidential briefing and rather than allowing a Trump acolyte to take the open seat which was the last seat in the last row I took it myself.

Mind you, I did not believe Trump would call on me. He and I had a past. I had sued him to keep my press pass. He'd called me "fake news" and "that Playboy guy," and had told me to sit down and shut up on several occasions. Once he threatened to walk out of a news conference in the Rose Garden if I didn't shut up. I didn't, and he didn't walk out. He took the question while complaining the whole time.

On Sept. 23, 2020, he surprised me again. Not only did he take my question, but he picked me first and I did not hesitate. The only issue on the minds of millions of Americans then was whether or not Trump would respect the results of the upcoming election. What Trump said to me and told the nation that day was the match that lit the fire leading to the "Big Lie," an insurrection, one dead rioter, dead and beaten Capitol Police officers, and a nation that is still divided, sore and angry. More importantly, Trump has never admitted that he lost the election and he threatens our democracy daily.

No one should be surprised.

Everyone should be outraged.

But some, including high-ranking members of the Republican Party, continue to defend Trump and millions of Americans still believe him no matter what they saw on television, no matter what they were told in news reports and no matter what the reality is.

Kellyanne Conway described this phenomenon as "alternative facts" and that is where millions of Americans, courtesy of a consummate con man, dwell today in the gray nether regions of a constructed fiction where Trump and his minions believe he won; where taking a de-worming drug designed by scientists for horses is preferable to taking a vaccine designed by scientists for humans and where Trump is universally respected and/or feared by the leaders of the rest of the world and where only he can save us.

Trump came closer than most of us know to staging a coup, even after he warned us about that last September. Recent news reports and a new book by Bob Woodward and Robert Costa highlight a six-point plan for Vice President Mike Pence to overturn the 2020 election results.

Other news reports show that Trump and his team knew shortly after the election that there was no basis for challenging its results, and that Sen. Lindsey Graham apparently thought the arguments proposed to challenge the election results amounted to the logic of a "third grader." Still they lied to us.

Now we know what Trump meant when I asked him last year if he would "commit to a peaceful transferal of power after the election." This is what he said:

"We're going to have to see what happens. I've been complaining very strongly about the ballots and the ballots are a disaster. . . get rid of the ballots . . . and there won't be a transfer, frankly, they'll be a continuation. The ballots are out of control. You know it . . ."

"No I don't," I replied.

Trump's traitorous, convoluted and muddy thinking, his flash over substance, his obfuscation of facts and his total disregard for the truth and decency was horrifying then and has largely overwhelmed American politics now.

There are those so convinced that Trump got screwed in the 2020 election that they'll defend the treasonous actions of the insurrectionists on Jan. 6, while at the same time denying that Trump whipped them into a frenzy or that they were in a frenzy at all. With the same breath, there are those who will say the insurrection was a peaceful protest, an FBI, Black Lives Matteror antifa violent action, that it did not occur or was justified or shudder was even patriotic. The actions of that day were the actions of domestic terrorists. I was there. I witnessed it.

Look where we are now.

Division. Denial of facts. It was all there in the statement Trump made. He provided the roadmap to an insurrection on Sept. 23, 2020. People followed it. People died.

A year later, the United States looks even more lost than it was a year ago.

Donald Trump doesn't care. He wants to bring it all down and is trying to run a shadow presidency as he ridicules everything Joe Biden does.

Make no mistake. Biden has his faults. His handling of the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan, the Haitian problem on the border and the alliance with Australia and the U.K., which has created major friction with France, are all wounds that have been self-inflicted and damaging.

But Biden respects the Constitution, and anyone with a modicum of intelligence can see he is trying to work for all of us, not just himself. He has rallied to get Congress and the country to unify working hard to get a bipartisan infrastructure package passed and constantly urging Americans to come together as he pushes hard for voting rights and increased taxes on the rich.

Trump never did that and never could. A year after he fanned the flame of insurrection in a White House briefing, we can clearly see the consequences of those actions. The threat of a coup was real spurred by Trump's disregard for truth, an obsession with being branded a loser and a narcissistic view of the universe that boils down to this: For Donald Trump, we don't matter. Only his own desires matter.

As Kurt Bardella wrote recently in USA Today, "We cannot let our guard down. Today's GOP has patterned itself after extreme and radical factions. Despots who are intent on normalizing violence to achieve their political objectives."

These actions in the GOP are rooted in Donald Trump's words. After he became president, Trump found levers to pull that sated his twisted needs for self-glory and adulation. He is addicted to that. His putrid, warped sense of self cannot permit him to let go and he continues to try and pull us down into the toilet with him.

In the 1993 western "Tombstone," Doc Holliday (played by Val Kilmer) is asked what makes a man like Johnny Ringo, the film's villain. "A man like Ringo has got a great big hole right in the middle of him," he says. "He can never kill enough or steal enough or inflict enough pain to ever fill it."

Like Johnny Ringo, Donald Trump seeks revenge for being born.

A year after he told us, in response to my question about the election, how he would bend reality to suit his needs, he still tries. Since he has had some success in retaining his base (and more importantly for him, in raising money), there are other Republicans following his act.

United we stand. Divided we fall. Trump is the king of division. For the rest of us to stand he must fall. He must be prosecuted. He must be culled from the body politic.

Only then can we possibly hope to address "Trumpism."

Trump showed us his hand a year ago. Time is long overdue to show him the back of ours.

See original here:

Exactly a year ago, Donald Trump told us exactly who he was and how far he would go - Salon

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Exactly a year ago, Donald Trump told us exactly who he was and how far he would go – Salon

Right-Wing Prophet Claims God Wants Donald Trump to Only Listen to Right-Wing Prophets – HillReporter.com

Posted: at 6:57 am

Right-wing prophet and conspiracy theorist Robin Bullocks circular arguments in defense of former President Donald Trump and his lies have gotten crazier in recent weeks, but his latest is simply dizzying in its self-serving ludicrousness.

On Monday, Bullock appeared on the Elijah Streams YouTube Channel and proclaimed that God told him to advise Trump to ignore his aides and instead listen to charlatans such as himself when it comes to the 2020 election. What makes this is particularly entertaining is that Bullocks supposed revelations about Trump somehow returning to power have all been dead wrong.

You must move quickly, says the Lord. I heard those around you, and I heard this conversation, Steve. I heard those around you that advised you saying, do not listen to the prophets this time. Thus said the Lord. They have their own agenda. They are planning their own future and it does not include you,' God said, according to Bullock.

But I heard this. Listen to this prophet what Im talking about this because I have a mantel from heaven to say these things. This is an anointing to speak into the political realm. Im a prophet to the nations and a prophet to this nation and a prophet from Jerusalem to speak, Bullock continued.

And the Lord says this and I heard these things. I heard a conversation say, dont listen to the prophets this time. Wait. Do this, do that. I heard their conversation but the Lord says they have their own agenda in their minds and it dont include President Trump. It dont include him at all. They plan on running his time out, Bullock added of Trumps sycophants.

Watch below:

Read more:

Right-Wing Prophet Claims God Wants Donald Trump to Only Listen to Right-Wing Prophets - HillReporter.com

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Right-Wing Prophet Claims God Wants Donald Trump to Only Listen to Right-Wing Prophets – HillReporter.com

Trump’s revival: How his rallies reveal him to be the ultimate follower – Salon

Posted: at 6:57 am

Donald Trump returned to his beloved rally stage over the weekend to perform his greatest hits in front of a Georgia crowd. It was a large and ecstatic crowd. What else is new? If there was any hope of Trump's fans getting tired of him, there is no sign of it yet.

From asking the crowd what it must be like to be married to Hillary Clinton and eliciting a raucous rendition of "Lock Her Up!" to complaining about the border as his followers chanted "Build That Wall," Trump delivered his tried and true staples. He declared that he loves law enforcement and the military and the 2nd Amendment and even bragged about making people say Merry Christmas once again. And when he asked, "Is there anything as fun as a Trump rally?" he truly brought the house down. In the end, they all danced awkwardly to the 70s hook-up song, YMCA before heading home spent and satisfied.

This stuff never gets old, apparently.

But for all the familiar old saws, Trump spent most of his time pushing the Big Lie, taking it to even higher levels of delusion, implying that President Obama stole his two elections and asserting that the Arizona "fraudit" went his way:

He also got huge applause trashing Republicans he believes betrayed him by failing to cheat, at one point suggesting that Georgia Democrat Stacey Abrams would be a better governor than the current GOP governor Brian Kemp.His followers loved every minute of it, lustily booing Kemp and Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. In their minds, as in Trump's, the Democrats and RINOs are one in the same: They are the enemy.

Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.

It's hard to know if the rally crowd represents the average Trump follower but the polls indicate that he isstill massively popularwith Republicans so it stands to reason they are generally happy with the Trumpism on display at his gatherings. As so many have marveled when asked what they like about him,he says what they're thinking.

I couldn't help but ponder that when I read some recent analyses of the 2020 election once again looking at the question of "what does the white working class voter really want?" The Washington Post's Monkey Cage blogturned the spotlighton the upcoming Virginia governor's race and looked at the three big cultural markers that separatethe urban from the rural voters:faith, gun ownership and race.

I don't think I have to explain the differences among the Democrats and Republicans on those issues. Democratic strategist James Carville blames the urban voters for being elitist and chasing away voters with their big city ways. Analyst Ruy Teixeirabelievesthat Democrats are out of step culturally with the mainstream of America and, as a result, have put a ceiling on their appeal. Teixeira makes a number of suggestions as to how to become more culturally palatable to Real Americans and suggests:

The way to lift that ceiling is clear: move to the center to embrace the views enumerated above, all of which are compatible with a robust program of full employment, social safety net expansion and public investment. Indeed, the ironic aspect of this is that the public writ large, including the median voter, are more open to such a program than they have been in decades, yet the Democrats' cultural leftism interferes with their ability to focus on their popular economic program and avoid unpopular positions that have little to do with that program.

In other words, he believes that delivering a popular economic program will bring them back as long as the Democrats don't upset them with all this cultural leftism. But after crunching the numbers, the Monkey Cage analysts found that it's not urban arrogance or cultural leftism that's at the root of the problem and neither are different attitudes about gun ownership or faith. The problem israce.This is evident by the fact that rural white voters simply refuse to acknowledge that racism exists:

[I]f voters in urban and rural areas acknowledged White privilege at the same rate, the urban-rural voting divide would be relatively small, just eight points. That the divide is actually 32 points speaks to the powerful role that racism plays in fueling this gap. Perhaps it's no surprise, then, that Virginia Republican candidate Glenn Youngkinattacked the teaching of critical race theory, making it a cornerstone of his campaign.

Our findings suggest that messaging isn't the problem, as Carville asserted. Rather, rural Americans prefer Trump's racially charged politics and denial that racism exists. Fueled by a core disagreement over racism in the United States, the urban-rural divide is likely to continue in 2021 and beyond.

This analysis tracks with earlier findings in the wake of the 2016 election when the media decided that Trump's win was based upon the "economic anxiety" of the white working class and spent months chasing them through diners in the South and the rustbelt to prove it. Then, as now, the analysis just didn't add up. Non-college educated voters exist throughout the country but the ones who loved Trump were those white, mostly rural, and often more affluent Fox News viewers who were filled with grievance and resentment against people of color.

Larry Sabato of the University of Virginiabegs to differwith both of these analyses. He agrees that economic insecurity had little to do with non-college educated votes for Trump in 2020 but believes it's "fundamentally" about ideology. He writes:

I find that support for Donald Trump among white working class voters reflected conservative views across a wide range of policy issues including social welfare issues, cultural issues, racial justice issues, gun control, immigration, and climate change. In other words, the rejection of the Democratic Party by white working class voters is fundamentally ideological. This fact makes it very unlikely that Democrats will be able to win back large numbers of white working class voters by appealing to their economic self-interest.

I don't know which of these analyses are correct, although I'm deeply skeptical that taming the "cultural left" will have any effect on those who are allegedly so offended by it that they will instead vote for the likes of Donald Trump.I am convinced that racism lies at the heart of most of the grievance and hostility that animates the right, and I also think that easily evolves into a more holistic worldview that encompases grievance across the entire ideological spectrum leading to conspiratorial thinking and an abandonment of critical thinking. Still, I'm not sure that adds up to a coherent ideology. It's more of a tribal identity.

Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.

Trumpism's appeal rests on the fact that Trump himself is very careful to stay within the bounds of all those issues Sabato lists. He uses his rallies to feel them out and adjust accordingly. In that way he is the ultimate follower, not a leader. What he does isexpresstheir loathing for racial and religious minorities and immigrants, gun control advocates, climate change, tolerance, equality and pluralism in the crude, bullying, hostile way that validates their existing beliefs. Basically, he completes them.

Excerpt from:

Trump's revival: How his rallies reveal him to be the ultimate follower - Salon

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Trump’s revival: How his rallies reveal him to be the ultimate follower – Salon

Trump’s planning to run again in 2024: Will his supporters ever realize he hates them? – Salon

Posted: at 6:57 am

In May of this year, Donald Trump began tellingassociates that he plans to run for president in 2024 if he is healthy enough. In July, he told dinner pals that he is running. Just this month, he reiterated that he is likely to runagain.The twice-impeached ex-president is increasing his media appearances and planning campaign-style rallies in Georgia and Iowa.

Trump's humiliating defeat to Joe Biden which he refuses to acknowledge even occurred has fomented a yearning for redemption. Whether he actually runs again remains uncertain, but he wants his supporters to be ready, willingand primed.

As Trump keeps his millions of supporters in suspense, they must answer one difficult question: Do they really want to continue to support a man who despises them and hurts them?

Donald Trump has always abhorred his supporters. He does not feelan ounce of empathy or affection for those who profess their devotion to him. He sees his supporters as weak, stupidand inferior. They are losers to him. He hates his supporters as much as he wants to destroy his detractors.

Actions speak louder than words. Just look at Trump's actions toward his supporters.

The best example is his detached, irresponsibleand inept handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. Hundreds of thousands of Americans died on his watch. He relied on conspiracy theories, magical thinking, blatant liesand distractions to fool the American public. Trump followers in red states have died in huge numbers because they erroneously and foolishly believed he was the benevolent master of their fate. Nothing could be further from the truth. He was, in fact, an accessory to murder. His supporters' lives meant nothing to him.

Another example is Trump's incitement of the insurrection of the Capitol on Jan.6. He was willing to overthrow democracy in order to remain in power. So he fabricated the Big Lie, knowing full well that his cult followers would carry out his anti-democratic mission. Was he on the front line with his supporters? Of course not because he is a coward. He watched it all unfold on television as he cheered them on fromthe protected and comfortable surroundings of the White House. Trump wanted the election undermined and demanded that followersaccomplish that goal. The result was failure, destruction, deaths, arrestsandwidespread condemnation. Trump has left his followers dangling in defeat. He has taken no responsibility for his incitement andhas demonstrated no concern or remorse for his loyalists who face damaging legal consequences. He has thrown them under the bus because he detests them.

Millions of aggrieved Americans have tethered themselves to Trump's fake persona of superiority and strength. They think he is the answer to their prayers. They think he cares about their lot in life. They think he will remedy their grievances. But nothing could be further from the truth.

Trump is a shameless opportunist. He manipulates people to achieve his personal goals, then discards them. He does not care if his supporters are racists, felons, crooksor murderers. He does not care if they are xenophobes or misogynists. He will accept the support of anyone who will blindly follow his lead and put him on a pedestal after all, exalted status is what he longs for. He desperately wants to be a dictator so that his grifting and corrupt impulses can run wild. And, remember, dictators only care about themselves and loathe people who expect anything from them.

Trump scorns those who are weak or foolish enough to need him. He does not want to be needed he wants others to serve and satiate his needs. He thrives on their praise, adulationand unconditional loyalty. The whole concept of public service is foreign to him because he perceives every interaction is a transactional game that must be won. And winning, for him, inevitably means defeat and humiliation of the other person. In Trump's psyche, even his supporters need to be humiliated and defeated.

It is puzzling that Trump supporters have not realized that he does not give a damn about their grievances or station in life. His Republican Party literally has no platform or set of guiding principles all that was abandoned during the 2020 campaign.Nor does theRepublican Partyhave a single substantive policy initiative on the table. Other than conservative judicial appointments, Trump did absolutely nothing for his supporters during his miserable presidential term. Except, of course, to let them be killed by a virus and incite them to a failed overthrow of democracy.

Until Trump is goneand the Republican Party reinvents itself, Trump supporters are all alone to fend for themselves. Their cult leader is an illusion. He is a pied piper leading them only to destruction. He has brought them only pain and suffering andsold them a bill of goods consisting of lies and conspiracy theories.

All because he despises his supporters. That's the best reason why they should dump him now, before he harms them even more.

Continued here:

Trump's planning to run again in 2024: Will his supporters ever realize he hates them? - Salon

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Trump’s planning to run again in 2024: Will his supporters ever realize he hates them? – Salon

Republicans at Odds Over Infrastructure Bill as Vote Approaches – The New York Times

Posted: at 6:54 am

WASHINGTON Business groups and some Senate Republicans working at cross-purposes with Republican leaders in the House have mounted an all-out drive to secure G.O.P. votes for a bipartisan infrastructure bill ahead of a final vote on Thursday.

Although the measure is the product of a compromise among moderates in both parties, House Republican leaders are leaning on their members to reject the $1 trillion infrastructure bill by disparaging its contents and arguing that it will only pave the way for Democrats to push through their far larger climate change and social policy bill.

Their opposition has ratcheted up pressure on Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who has the more progressive members of her Democratic caucus threatening to withhold their support for the infrastructure package until Congress acts on that broader bill. If Republicans unite in opposition, Ms. Pelosi can afford to lose as few as three Democrats on the bill.

But some Republican senators who helped write the bill, along with influential business groups who support it including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Business Roundtable have started a countereffort to try to persuade House Republicans to back the legislation.

Its a good bill; its right there for the country, so Im encouraging Republicans to support it, said Senator Rob Portman, Republican of Ohio and one of the bills negotiators, who said he was working the phones hard. Therell be some that have told me they will, but theyre under a lot of pressure.

How the conflicting pressure campaigns play out could determine the fate of the infrastructure bill. On Tuesday, liberal Democrats accused Ms. Pelosi of a betrayal for abandoning her promise that the House would not take up the infrastructure bill until after the Senate secured passage of the larger measure.

While Democratic leaders are working hard to secure as many of those liberal votes as possible, they know defections will have to be made up by House Republicans.

Id say the bill is likely to pass, but its going to be a squeaker, Neil Bradley, an executive vice president and the chief policy officer for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, who once worked for the House Republican leadership, said on Tuesday.

Representative Steve Scalise, Republican of Louisiana, who runs his partys vote-pressuring operation in the House, is closely tracking which Republicans intend to vote for the infrastructure bill.

Were working to keep that number as low as we possibly can, he said.

A few House Republicans who are members of the bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus have announced their support for the measure, including Representatives Tom Reed of New York, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania and Don Bacon of Nebraska. On Monday, Representative Don Young of Alaska, the longest serving member of the House, announced his support with an impassioned speech on the House floor.

Moderate Democrats say others may follow suit maybe as many as 20 Republican votes if Ms. Pelosi can win over enough liberals to keep it close. But with a Thursday vote looming, time is running out.

Representative Peter Meijer, a freshman Republican from Michigan, said he had heard from Republicans from both sides, but when he asked whether it would be better for both bills to pass or both to fail, the consensus is better both fail. President Biden saddling infrastructure with this $3.5 trillion albatross around its neck was a poison pill for those of us who wanted a bipartisan solution, he said.

The infrastructure bill is an unusual phenomenon in a starkly polarized Congress: a truly bipartisan and significant bill, hammered out by Democrats and Republicans before it passed the Senate last month with 69 votes, 19 of them Republican, including that of the minority leader, Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.

With $550 billion in new federal spending, the measure would provide $65 billion to expand high-speed internet access; $110 billion for roads, bridges and other projects; $25 billion for airports; and the most funding for Amtrak since the passenger rail service was founded in 1971. It would also renew and revamp existing infrastructure and transportation programs set to expire on Friday.

But because House Democratic leaders have at least verbally packaged it with a larger, $3.5 trillion climate change and social policy bill, it has been caught up in the politics of that measure and broader Republican efforts to thwart President Bidens agenda.

Mr. Scalise put it in the loftiest of terms on Tuesday: This week, were going to see an epic battle play out between free-market capitalism and big-government socialism. Thats whats at stake.

With Democrats publicly feuding over Mr. Bidens agenda, senior Republicans have little interest in having their rank-and-file bail Ms. Pelosi out of her predicament.

The legislative crisis thats before her is one of her own creation that she needs the progressives to bail her out of, said Representative Jason Smith of Missouri, the ranking Republican on the House Budget Committee.

Supporters of the infrastructure bill are trying to stay cleareyed about the bills merits, not the broader politics.

Its true people have been rhetorically linking the two, but really they arent, Mr. Bradley said. If that vote passes, the bill goes to the president for his signature.

And they argue that House Republicans are making the wrong political calculation about the infrastructure measure. G.O.P. leaders have warned that the bill is a Trojan horse whose passage would only increase the chances of Democrats passing the more costly plan that Mr. Biden calls his Build Back Better agenda, which is packed with expansions of social safety net programs, initiatives to combat climate change and tax increases on corporations and the wealthy.

I just think its not accurate, Mr. Portman said.

Instead, some proponents of the infrastructure measure see its passage as a potential setback for the bigger plan. They argue that the enactment of the infrastructure bill could sap progressives of their leverage to dictate the terms of the more ambitious and costly piece of their agenda.

Joshua Bolten, a former White House chief of staff for George W. Bush who is president of the Business Roundtable, said the chief executives organization was pushing for the bills passage, running radio and social media ads in Republican districts and pressing for meetings with lawmakers.

This is a really good bill. Its urgently needed. It will have a dramatic effect on the productivity of U.S. economy. Its investment really well spent, he said on Tuesday. Pass it now and have the fight over the other bill later.

Senator Mitt Romney, Republican of Utah, said he had lobbied every member of his states delegation to support the measure.

I cant predict where they will end up, but Im certainly encouraging people to consider the merits of the bill as opposed to worrying about what outside observers have to say, he said.

In this case, House Republican leaders appear to be heeding pressure from conservative groups, who have disparaged the infrastructure bill as bloated with spending that goes far beyond its stated purpose. And, they predict that moderate Democrats who have pressed for its passage will be angered enough by its demise that they will exact revenge by bringing down the social policy bill.

This is a desperate administration looking for a win to distract Americans from the Biden-caused crises, both home and abroad, while opening the floodgates to trillions more in spending to come, said Representative Beth Van Duyne, Republican of Texas.

The supporters of the larger bill see an alternative political cause-and-effect. The most liberal House members have long warned that once the infrastructure bill passes, moderate to conservative Democrats will peel away from the larger bill, having already secured their priority.

Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, another Republican supporter of the infrastructure plan, said the bills significance went beyond roads, bridges and rail lines.

Its not just the benefits of the policy were putting in place and the build-out of needed infrastructure; its also the message being sent that at a time when so much is dysfunctional in the Congress, you can build bipartisan initiatives that are going to be enduring, she said, adding,If it should fail, I think that in and of itself sends a pretty tough message.

Emily Cochrane contributed reporting.

More:

Republicans at Odds Over Infrastructure Bill as Vote Approaches - The New York Times

Posted in Republican | Comments Off on Republicans at Odds Over Infrastructure Bill as Vote Approaches – The New York Times

Republicans plow forward with election challenges | TheHill – The Hill

Posted: at 6:54 am

Republicans are marching forward with plans to challenge the 2020 election, undeterred by the outcome of the controversial audit in Arizona that reaffirmed President BidenJoe BidenHouse panel to tee up debt ceiling hike with three weeks to avert default Yellen chastises GOP as debt default countdown begins Overnight Defense & National Security Presented by AM General Senators slam Pentagon officials MOREs victory in the states largest county.

The months-long audit in Maricopa County ended on Friday with a report showing Biden in fact slightly expanded his margin of victory over former President TrumpDonald TrumpVaccines, abortion, Trump dominate final Virginia governor's debate Yellen chastises GOP as debt default countdown begins Overnight Defense & National Security Presented by AM General Senators slam Pentagon officials MORE.

But proponents of Trumps false claims about a rigged election have so far ignored those findings. Republicans in states like Pennsylvania, Texas and Wisconsin are pressing forward with extensive reviews of the 2020 election results at the behest of Trump.

I think the biggest takeaway is that that election should have never been certified as it was counted, and the movement is really not going to go away, its just going to build and become stronger, one Trump aide said.

Instead of conceding that Biden won both Maricopa County and Arizona, Trumps allies have seized on other factors that some 23,000 mail-in ballots may have come from addresses other than a voters current address, for instance to insist that the election results cannot be trusted.

Republicans in the Arizona state Senate are hoping to use the findings of the audit as a jumping-off point for new election-related legislation. Meanwhile, some Republicans are demanding that officials expand the scope of the election reviews.

Mark Finchem, a Republican candidate for secretary of state, called on Friday for an audit of the 2020 vote in Pima County, where Tucson is located.

Now that the audit of Maricopa is wrapping up, we need to Audit Pima County the 2nd largest county in AZ, Finchem tweeted. There are 35k votes in question from multiple sources & I want answers.

Keith Naughton, a veteran Republican strategist, said that part of the reason GOP officials and candidates are pushing forward with their calls to reexamine the election results is that they likely have more to lose by not supporting additional audits.

Theres still pressure from their primary voters who want to see this review, Naughton said. At the end of the day, everyones in their own silos. If youre consuming that conservative media, youre not getting the message that [the Arizona audit] was this unambiguous endorsement of Bidens win. Plus, Trumps never going to admit that he lost.

Republicans in other states dont appear to be taking any lessons away from the election audit in Maricopa County, which dragged on for months longer than expected and drew intense scrutiny throughout its lifetime.

Last week, hours after Trump publicly demanded that Texas Gov. Greg AbbottGreg AbbottProposed Texas map adds two new congressional districts to Austin, Houston Texas surpasses 4 million COVID-19 cases threshold The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Alibaba - Democrats stare down 'hell' week MORE back legislation to launch a forensic audit of the 2020 election, the Texas secretary of states office announced a comprehensive forensic audit of the election results in four of the states largest counties.

The audit was one of the first times such a review has been launched in a state the former president won. While Republicans had pushed for audits in swing states that handed Trump defeats, such as Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, Trump won Texas by about 6 points.

Abbott defended his states decision to review the results of the 2020 election, saying that it has nothing to do with Trump. Rather, he said the audits would be conducted out of a responsibility to ensure the integrity of and confidence in the elections in the state of Texas.

There are audits of every aspect of government, Abbott said on Fox News Sunday. We have a state auditor, theres a federal auditor for the way the government operations work. Businesses that are public companies are subject to an annual audit. Why do we audit everything in this world, but people raise their hands in concern when we audit elections, which is fundamental to our democracy?

But despite that assertion, there are well-known political risks for Republicans who break with the former president. One Republican strategist who has worked on races in Texas pointed to Trump critics like Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger as a cautionary tale.

Raffensperger, a Republican, drew Trumps ire after he defended the accuracy of the 2020 election in Georgia, which Biden narrowly won. Since then, Trump has vowed to campaign against Raffensperger and has endorsed Rep. Jody HiceJody Brownlow HiceTrump says Stacey Abrams 'might be better than existing governor' Kemp Trump stokes GOP tensions in Georgia Herschel Walker will speak at Trump rally in Georgia MORE (R-Ga.), who is running to replace him next year.

You see what happens when you criticize the election fraud stuff. Look at Brad Raffensperger, the strategist said. The grassroots is still with President Trump and if he says the election was stolen, a lot of people are going to believe the election was stolen.

Trump is expected to keep applying pressure to have similar audits conducted as he continues to stew over his 2020 defeat and mulls a comeback bid in 2024. And even without examples of widespread fraud or irregularities, his repeated claims of wrongdoing are inserting enough confusion that Republicans say that audits are useful regardless of the available evidence.

He definitely is going to keep pushing this, the Trump aide said.

The big thing that was missing in Arizona, that I think really needs to be done not just in swing states but really just to give voters a peace of mind about their registration rules in their election processes, they should have audits and canvasses in any state, just to make sure, take a second look, because theres so many questions about how our elections have been administered, the aide continued.

That argument is emerging as a main driver of both conspiracy theories broadly and the specific pushes for audits in key states, particularly in states where Democrats with footholds in the government push back on the GOP efforts.

In an interview Friday, just hours before the Arizona results were released, Pennsylvania state Sen. Jake Corman (R) pounced on state Attorney General Josh Shapiro (D) for suing to stop state Republicans from subpoenaing personal information of millions of voters.

If theres nothing there, as they claim, then well be spending a lot of our time doing this and not finding anything, Corman said on former Trump strategist Stephen Bannons podcast. Heres the sad part about it. Lets say hypothetically they were successful in court and they stop this. That just adds to the conspiracy, that just adds to peoples doubts about the system.

Not every Republican is confident that conducting the audits presents the GOP with a winning message heading into the midterm elections.

Elevating conspiracy theories about voter fraud runs the risk of both turning off the same moderates who rebuked Trump in 2020 and drawing attention away from Biden, whom Republicans view as a potent foil in the midterms amid a slew of crises, including the coronavirus, the economy and the messy withdrawal from Afghanistan.

I think the whole audit effort is extremely counterproductive. We need to stop looking backwards and start looking forwards as a party, said one national GOP strategist.

And in places like Arizona and Georgia, these are highly competitive races, and if theyre fought along the battle lines of whether or not the Biden administration has the country moving in the right direction, then Republicans have a really good chance to win, the person said, referencing two purple states with Senate and gubernatorial races next year. But if the next campaign is really about the last campaign, then I think its detrimental to the cause.

Still, Trump wields the largest megaphone in the GOP, and with Republicans fearful of crossing him, the party is expected to keep pushing the audits.

When asked if he had any hope that the audits would be dropped given Trumps vocal support for him, the national strategist simply replied, It certainly makes it more difficult to do so.

Read the original:

Republicans plow forward with election challenges | TheHill - The Hill

Posted in Republican | Comments Off on Republicans plow forward with election challenges | TheHill – The Hill