Monthly Archives: May 2021

Could we trace a direct line from Rush Limbaugh, Americas most popular talk radio host until his death in February, to Donald Trump, the worlds least qualified leader since Kaiser Wilhelm II and Americas most destructive president?

We could start this circuitous but plausible journey in 1988, when Limbaughs flagship talk show for WABC in New York made its debut, and end in 2020 with Trumps final State of the Union address, in which he awarded Limbaugh the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the day after the right-wing shock jock revealed that he had lung cancer. Along the way there have been many imitators, including Mike Pencewho before being Trumps vice president hosted a radio show that he dubbed Rush Limbaugh on decaf for WRCR-FM in Indiana. Limbaugh has also served as inspiration for Fox newscasters like Tucker Carlson and the hard-right website Breitbart News, which from 2012 was led by Steve Bannon, who went on to become Trumps chief strategist.

The first thing to note is that if your plan is to change the radio discourse, migrate that change onto TV, render the unsayable sayable in public, influence a major political party, anoint your chosen leader and finally take charge, its going to take a very long time. But it is also eminently possible. Like many US cultural trends, right-wing shock jocks have already arrived on these shores and the fear is that, unless were very careful, they could push our politics towards ever- greater polarisation, and a barren sourness in which compromise cannot grow. This is the environment in which GB News hoves onto the horizon, headed by former Sunday Times editor and Spectator chairman Andrew Neil, respected as a BBC interviewer but never short of a strident conservative opinion. He promises an altogether different kind of rolling TV news commentarymore exciting, robust. Ofcom would once have prevented this unfurling into a homegrown Fox News. But will it still?

Some of the conditions that created shock-jockery and amplified its power were distinctively American. None of it would have been possible without President Reagans cancellation of the fairness doctrine governing radio output in 1987, whereas herefor the momentwe still have Ofcom to cover radio and television and a BBC that maintains strict impartiality rules. (Podcasts, though, are growing and are an unregulated wild west.) To attract listeners and therefore advertising revenue, US radio stations needed a lot of people to be driving long distancesnot just for the share-of-ear but also because many of those calling in to vent their spleen were reluctant to do so in front of their families. The rise of the mobile phone was key to Limbaughs early success: his network did a deal with the phone companies to make it free to call. Contrast Britain, where taxi drivers still have disproportionate representation on call-ins; nobody else spends enough time in the car.

Yet the UK copycattery was almost immediate: by 1988, James Whale of the now defunct Radio Aire hadinfluenced by Howard Stern, a loudmouth of the New York airwaves who regularly hosted Trumpchanged his radio-schtick to become much more controversial. That year Whale also got his radio show simulcast on Yorkshire TV, and before long his mix of rage, blokey humour and climate change scepticism were familiar nationwide.

I once pestered LBC to audition me for a phone-in slot of my own. I didnt get the gig

But while priding themselves on pricking liberal pieties, neither Stern nor his English imitator were movement conservatives like Limbaugh. Nor was Whale quite a slam dunk commercial success. He didnt have an army of disciples and inevitably fell foul of Ofcommost expensively when he told listeners to vote for Boris Johnson in the run-up to the 2008 London mayoral election, costing talkSPORT 20,000 in fines. It was not until the run-up to Brexit that controversialists started to proliferate on our airwaves.

Former Apprentice contestant Katie Hopkins was given her first regular show on LBC in 2016. A year later she was swiftly removed after calling for a final solution on Twitter following the Manchester Arena bombing. Prior to that, her suite of interests was strikingly similar to that of the American right: antipathy towards Islam, a drumbeat of she-asked-for-it misogyny and sideswipes at the obese. It is interesting to read her quotes in cold print; theyre so extreme that in a liberal (like me) they stimulate a visceral but excited disgust, like hearing an intruder. Presumably, for those who agree with her, shes provoking a similar reaction except without the disgust. Such thrilling reactions make sense of what is otherwise puzzling: at its beginning, ultra-conservative speech radio in the US was almost equally popular with Democrats as Republicans. Crucially, though, Hopkins skated too close to literal fascism; a signature of successful shock jocks, both in the US and the UK, is that under the cover of straight-from-the-hip authenticity, theyre always careful not to sound like Hitler.

In the past five years, however, voices who used to be more emollient or at least more veiledNigel Farage, Julia Hartley-Brewer, Mark Dolanhave become more strident, while counter-shocks from the left arrived. Actually, that shouldnt be in the plural: its basically just LBCs James OBrien.

Inspired by OBrienit was exhilarating to hear his dramatic style deployed in the service of decency rather than divisionI once pestered LBC to audition me for a phone-in slot of my own. I did a role-play with a producershe pretending to be Helen, a Southampton nativist who wanted to know why immigrants were allowed to come over here and exist. I cannot begin to describe how difficult this conversation was: never mind landing a point, it was hard keeping my voice level enough so that I didnt sound like a smurf. Helen was taking a very recognisable stance, taken straight from the columns of the Daily Mail; but the conversation was also fragile. Like many callers, she didnt have the rhetorical clout of the average Oxbridge-trained debater. So the presenter has to treat the caller decently, while stoutly rebutting their point of viewall without laughing or swearing. Needless to say, I didnt get the gig.

OBrien, who has been doing an LBC show since 2003, shot to prominence by handling these conversations flawlessly, but also with his pithy, impassioned monologues against Brexit. He notes to me neutrally: I was the first in the country to use the tactics of the shock jock in the service of the opposite agenda.

What used to check campaigning broadcasting from the right or the left were strict impartiality rules, but technology is breaking down the old certainties. When the majority of under 25s are getting their news from either social media or YouTube, the idea that one regulator can ensure balance is fanciful. In February 2020, it was announced that Ofcom would be put in charge of regulating the internet in the UK. All the discussion was around harmful contentinciting violence and self-harm, child pornography and so onrather than disinformation and fake news, let alone political balance. The internets problem is that it sprawls around the world, and theres so much of it. Ofcom enforcing a fairness doctrine would be like trying to turn the ocean vegan. Plus, with former Mail editor Paul Dacre poised to become the bodys next chair, can the organisation really be relied on to fight its corner as it used to, and cleave to the old principles?

he appeal of shock jocks has increased at the same time as both the US and UK have become more diverse and their mass media more sensitive to accusations of prejudice. A functioning and inclusive civil sphere requires that certain opinions can no longer be aired out loud. From views on stop-and-search rules to women wearing miniskirts, the lines of taboo are drawn and redrawn. The list of unsayables necessarily has to be exhaustive if it is to be universal. There are always going to be people who think its gone a bit far; its salutary to note that when Limbaugh first started out, 62 per cent of Republicans but also 48 per cent of Democrats thought the mainstream media had too much liberal bias. So there was definitely a gap in the market. As one radio executive, David Hall, said of Limbaugh, he was always looking to turn somebodys sacred cow into some delicious hamburgers and a couple of steaks.

We havent just imported this trend from America: there is a native tradition of railing against political correctness as it was once called, or woke culture as it has come to be known. OBrien is insistent on this point: We were already much further down the road to Fox News than I thinkanybody realised because the process was so incremental. Ever since Murdoch bought the Sun in 1969, that tabloid sensibility has been very dominant I came from a middlebrow tabloid background: I had an ability to use those tactics but I cared what was true. So I could get a big emotional response without lying to people about a refugee who was going to steal their sausages.

In other words, the radio shock jock was less shocking to a UK audience than youd expect because the red tops had been fulminating against various groups for years: it was often migrants, as well as single mothers and other demonised figures. The first week that I started work at the Evening Standard in 1996, one splash was about a refugee from sub-Saharan Africa getting free HIV treatment on the NHS.

Claiming it couldnt happen here is unsustainable when it already has. Indeed, the Great British media has already crowned a king, only he came from print rather than broadcast: a columnist who never cared much about the truth of what he wrote has become our prime minister.

Successful media personalities quickly realise there is little to gain from complexity, no incentive to compromise, no requirement to be consistent and nothing to be held accountable for. For the tabloid columnist craving eyeballs or the shock jock needing callers, simple solutions are attractive. When you transfer that sensibility into politics, you might end up promising to make Mexicans pay for a wall to keep Mexicans out of America, or float the idea of building a bridge over the Irish Sea to sort out Brexit.

The snare, however, on which shock-jockery as governance will unravel, remains the truth. When those unkeepable promises fail to come off, the people who were angry to start with become angrier. Many will stick with their shocker-in-chief but, as Trump learned to his cost last year, many others may be motivated to vote against him. And it is not only in politics, but also in the broadcast market where there could be limits to jockery. While we perceive ourselves to be more and more polarised, the talk radio we listen toand the expectations and relationships we have with ittells a different story.

Commercial radio has its largest audience share ever, but in terms of speech output, LBC outstrips talkRADIO by some margin (respective reach is 2.8m against less than 500,000). Most of those who fit the shock jock criteria are now at talkRADIOHartley-Brewer, Dolan, Whale, James Max. (Nigel Farage was ditched by LBC last year for comparing Black Lives Matter to the Taliban and so far hasnt been picked up elsewhere.) And talkRADIO was briefly taken off YouTube last year for spreading coronavirus disinformation.

LBC, meanwhile, has become much more podcast-like, with intense, intimate conversations. People imagine that if youre on speech radio you have to be a zealot or an ideologue to get the numbers, says Iain Dale, a Conservative who has turned out to be a pluralist behind the mic, but that is simply not the case. When I was on Drive, I trebled the numbers in three years. If people trust you as a presenter, if you havent got a threatening voice, if you dont shout at people, you will get them to open up in a way that they havent done to their own best friends. If youre doing a phone-in thats quite delicate, you dont need a full switchboard. All you need is four or five people who you give time to breathe.

Call-ins are like Victorian fairgrounds: people throw themselves into a boxing ring with a pro. The amateur never winsand no ones rooting for them

Phone-ins are a co-produced drama: the caller arrives with a clear sense of what the host wants. You may not realise how fine that attunement is until the host changes and the callers take a while to catch up. Shelagh Fogarty, who situates her politics thusIm not particularly a leftie or a rightie. I was probably the perfect BBC presenterjoined LBC from Radio 5 Live in 2014, feeling that as she approached 50 she wanted to express her own opinions more freely. She remembers that in the first months, some of the callers would be really coming at me. You know that sense of going quite red with shock in a conversation? Theyd be ringing to accuse me. OBrien calls this a gladiatorial format: the callers I wanted put through were the ones that were convinced that theyd get the better of me.

More than gladiators, it reminds me of the Victorian fairground, where people would throw themselves into the ring with a professional boxer. The amateur never winsand no ones rooting for them. But theres also a moral dimension: listeners come to witness hubris being bested and strength celebrated. Like the fervent monologues that have always been a signature of conservative radio but have taken on a new energy and reach since theyve been filmed, clipped and shared on social media, such moments create communities. People use the phrase echo chamber pejoratively despite the fact that it is a deeply human urge to be among people who have the same values and laugh at the same things.

Yet radio is a versatile medium: there are ways besides combat to create communities. Recently the unguarded personal encounter has become a signature of political discussion. Theres a world of difference between frankness and picking fights for their own sake, and even LBC breakfast host Nick Ferrari now sounds mellower, more curious. Meanwhile, OBrien says: Ive had a ton of therapy over the last few years, and Im very different now to how I was even in 2015. I was a very combative individual, I spent my life with my fists up, thinking that was normal. Then I stopped asking what people think and I started asking why they think it What I try to provide now is common ground and solace. Its still going to boil the piss of your average racist, but its not going to boil the piss of your average Brexit voter. Theyre just going to have to admit that Im right.

The dominant mood of commercial radionot to mention the much more regulated BBCis moving on from the controversialists. In the US, shock jocks (Limbaugh until his death and Sean Hannity) occupied spots one and three on the most listened-to formats in the country, with around 13m weekly listeners each; public news was at spots two and four. But in the UK, BBC audiences tower over their rivals. Radio 4s weekly reach was nearly 11m by the period after the 2019 election, and its not even as popular as Radio 2.

So while commercial radio has enjoyed spikes in growth, its unsurprising that Mohit Bakaya, controller of Radio 4 and Radio 4 Extra, sounds sanguine. We dont tend to do as well on social media [as commercial] but its a mistake to think we have to emulate it, or chase its audience on those terms. Wed lose something that, once wed lost, wed never get back. Even so, this idea that every programme within itself has to be 100 per cent balanced, thats just not true, Bakaya says. Rather, the mission is to create a public square for civilised, decent conversation, in which the highest value is whats true and whats meaningful.

Frankly, you could argue the finer points of what the BBC deems meaningful. Not to mention how it arrives at its editorial priorities, including the extent to which it follows the lead of a mostly right-wing print media andsince former Tory council candidate Tim Davie became director-general with major Tory donor Richard Sharp as chairwhether or not it accepts an agenda laid down by the government.

Yet what you couldnt do is discern much influence from more controversial speech radio: barring the odd 5 Live presenter such as Stephen Nolan, the BBC hasnt tried to mimic controversy-seekers. Listener habits and the ecosystem of British speech radio tell a complicated story, one that challenges the assumption that theres a geyser of unheard rage and division just waiting for its political explosion. Regulation may no longer be able to save us, but empathy is playing bigger at the box office. The shock jocks moment may have come and gone.

See the article here:

Rise of the British shock jock - Prospect

As a schoolboy, Britains prime minister Boris Johnson appeared to be convinced that the normal rules did not apply to him.

I think he honestly believes that it is churlish of us not to regard him as an exception, one who should be free of the network of obligation which binds everyone else, wrote Johnsons Eton College house master, Martin Hammond, in 1982, as quoted in Andrew Gimsons biography of the premier.

The approach seems to have stayed with Johnson throughout his career, repeatedly landing him in hot water. For weeks, the government has been fending off allegations of sleaze -- British shorthand for scandals of corruption, questionable sexual behavior, or other shady dealings. Adding to the impression of disarray, it emerged that Johnsons cellphone number is still available on the Internet, from a press release published 15 years ago.

U.K. Parliamentary Sleaze Watchdog May Investigate Boris Johnson

The political donations watchdog has now opened an official inquiry after concluding there were reasonable grounds to believe the law had been broken in the way refurbishments to Johnsons apartment were paid for.

Potential penalties include fines or criminal charges, depending on which rules may have been breached. On the face of it, just a week away from crucial local elections on May 6, the political price could be high.

Johnson insists he broke no laws and is complying fully with the rules on political funding and the investigations into what happened. I dont think theres anything to see here, he said on Thursday, describing the row as a farrago of nonsense.

While most Conservatives believe their leader will ride out the storm, few are happy about it. One senior Tory figure attributes the premiers difficulties to his casual approach, which has become worse since the pandemic suspended or compromised the usual procedures for holding ministers to account.

In the words of one of Johnsons own ministers, this ridiculous row about expensive wallpaper in the Downing Street flat is typical of the premiers carelessness and shows he probably didnt think through the implications of his actions.

Yet overall, Johnson seems to have been right. So far in his career, his disregard for the normal rules of engagement has not held him back for long. In fact, it has been a large factor in his appeal as a politician who isnt part of the mainstream.

For Gimson, author of Boris: The Making of the Prime Minister, one reason why Johnson is so popular and has won over people who voted Labour all their lives is because he deliberately shuns political correctness, speaking out controversially and obviously flouting normal rules.

Boris makes things interesting, sometimes by things going wrong, Gimson said. He has never really been at all conscientious about following rules and he is obviously more tolerant of chaos and strife around him than other people.

Johnson plays up the performance, too. When he is getting ready to be photographed or to appear on television, the prime minister does the exact opposite of a slickly-styled politician. Instead of tidying himself up for the cameras, he runs a meaty hand through his blond hair to make it messy.

He shrugged off allegations of an affair with American businesswoman Jennifer Arcuri, who was given taxpayer funding while Johnson was Mayor of London. None of this mattered much in 2019, when he led the Tories to a historic 80-seat majority at the general election.

Tory MP James Sunderland said voters are very supportive of Johnson and want a prime minister who is visual and outspoken. Boris Johnson is a personality.

He said voters are not bothered by the row over the apartment because this is just another attempt to find sleaze and scandal when its just not there.

One senior party official said the premier would be fine as long as next weeks elections in local English districts go well. Johnson and the Conservatives are ahead of the Labour opposition in opinion polls, with a YouGov survey for the Times giving the Tories an 11-point lead on Thursday.

But the sheer weight of allegations piling up against Johnson and his Conservatives remains a risk. For one thing, regulators may be less tolerant than voters. In 2018, parliamentary authorities rapped him for repeatedly being late in disclosing payments hed received.

In another report in 2019, the authorities were even less impressed that he had failed to register his ownership of a share of a house in the countryside. Parliaments Committee on Standards concluded with concern that these two investigations demonstrated a pattern of behavior by Johnson.

While he wasnt trying to hide anything, Johnson displayed an over-casual attitude toward obeying the rules along with a lack of effective organization within his office, the panel said. Further breaches could lead to more serious sanctions in future, it warned.

The big danger for the premier is that the investigations into the Downing Street flat take months or longer to conclude, while the drip-drip of allegations continues. Johnson has made an enemy of his former aide, Dominic Cummings, who is now on the warpath and ready to give evidence under oath.

If this episode hurts him, it will be because it bolsters an impression of untrustworthiness and of casualness that the Lex Greensill lobbying affair and other recent disclosures have fanned, said Bronwen Maddox, director of the Institute for Government. After a year when many people have lost relatives and friends to the virus or lost their jobs and struggled to support themselves, revelations that the prime ministers girlfriend has recruited a designer to overhaul the flat, spending tens of thousands of pounds, will seem graceless.

In the end, even with a forgiving public, the most popular prime ministers run out of road, according to Gimson. Every sort of charm wears off eventually.

With assistance by Kitty Donaldson, and Alex Morales

(Updates with PMs phone number online, latest poll numbers from third paragraph)

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.

Follow this link:

Chaotic Johnson Always Struggled With Rules, and U.K. Voters Love It - Bloomberg