Monthly Archives: May 2021

The Intercept released a video report touting lies about the violent riots that broke out over the summer of 2020 and targeting the conservative journalists who reported on them.

By focusing on sensational, graphic images of violence on the margins of protests and entirely ignoring peaceful demonstrators, even members of the Riot Squad who are not as far right as Schaffer have contributed to a political project: the right-wing medias campaign to portray racial justice protests as anarchic and dangerous, Intercept claimed.

In the media outlets video, a narrator details how conservative reporters made up an informal Riot Squad that followed the violence, destruction, vandalism, and arson that occurred in cities all over the U.S. last year. While the riots, 95 percent of which are linked to Black Lives Matter activism, caused more than $2 billion in damages from May 26 to June 8, corporate media organizations, including The Intercept, hold fast to the idea that these protests were mostly peaceful.

the broader picture is that Black Lives Matter protests have been overwhelmingly peaceful, the Intercept claimed without evidence.

Not only does The Intercept downplay the violence that destroyed businesses, cities, and ended in more than 47 riot-related fatalities, but also targets conservative reporters, many of whom were some of the only on-the-ground journalists in ravaged areas, for choosing to cover the destruction. Reporters Elijah Schaffer, Shelby Talcott, Julio Rosas, and Jorge Ventura are slandered as spurring on false narratives in exchange for appearances on Fox News and fueling online conspiracy theories.

These reporters choices to turn their cameras away from peaceful marches over racist policing to the dangerous and violent looting and rioting that occurred, The Intercept claims, is just meant to add fuel to the fire.

The impact of their work is hard to overstate. Even as they remain relatively unknown, this tight-knit group has produced many of the most viral videos of Black Lives Matter protests over the past year. And those images have helped create the false impression, relentlessly driven home by Fox News and Republican politicians, that the nationwide wave of protests that erupted after George Floyd was killed was nothing but an excuse for mindless rioting, The Intercept narrator said.

The Intercept also accused conservative journalists covering the riots of staking out in aggravated areas such as Portland to record and exaggerate.

It was no accident that Rosas and Ventura chose to spend Inauguration Day this year in Portland. The liberal citys strong anti-fascist protest culture, in a metro area surrounded by ultraconservative exurbs, has for years provided right-wing video journalists with a steady stream of skirmishes to record and exaggerate, the narrator stated.

Reporters were faulted for their coverage of the shooting by Kyle Rittenhouse in Kenosha, Wisconsin and The Intercept even speculated that the Daily Callers Chief Video Director Richie McGinniss refused to release video of the shooting right away because he decided to suppress or delete footage that could be used to convict the young right-wing vigilante.

That fueled speculation that McGinniss might have withheld incriminating visual evidence to shield Rittenhouse, who quickly became a heroto many of the Daily Callers far-right readers and wasdefended by the sites founder, Tucker Carlson, the narrator continued. McGinniss, however, told The Intercept that while he thought he had recorded video of the shooting, he discovered later that he had accidentally hit the wrong button on his iPhone and it did not start recording until after the shots were fired.

Even the one reporter in the so-called Riot Squad who does not work in conservative news faced scrutiny from Intercept for attendingat least 24 Trump rallies before the 2018 midterms and describing them as exhilarating on his video blog. And despite almost all of the reporters coverage of the Capitol riot and pro-Trump thugs, The Intercept still blamed the journalists because all this video evidence of right-wing violence was not used to vilify the rioters the way that clips of far less significant events at left-wing protests were last summer.

The Intercept concluded by scolding Scriberr field reporter Kalen DAlmeida and other reporters for contributing to an atmosphere of paranoia and mistrust, making assaults on journalists more frequent.

Violence against journalists, even ones operating in bad faith, is inexcusable. Unfortunately, videographers like DAlmeida have contributed to an atmosphere of paranoia and mistrust, making assaults on journalists more frequent. And this has also made the work of scrupulous and fair reporting on the politics that plays out on our streets much harder, and more dangerous, The Intercept concluded.

The narrator ends the video with a propagandist statement lamenting the fact that attention on the riots has taken away from criticizing law enforcement.

Its been a year since the horrifying cellphone video of George Floyds murder drove millions of Americans to the streets to demand justice, he said. But its important to keep in mind that the conservative media has been working almost nonstop to undercut the movement for black lives by spreading the lie that the nations main problem is the protesters, not the police.

Some journalists targeted by The Intercept report responded to the outlets attacks on Twitter.

Jordan Davidson is a staff writer at The Federalist. She graduated from Baylor University where she majored in political science and minored in journalism.

Read more from the original source:

Intercept Touts Lies About Riots While Maliciously Attacking Conservative Journalists For Reporting On Them - The Federalist

The same day a troubling national jobs report showed businesses cant hire workers partly because politicians have risked inflation to make everyone welfare recipients in the name of COVID relief, Wisconsin Democrats put out a video calling for people to show us your stimmy shimmy. After an outcry on Twitter, the Democrat account deleted the video, but another user saved it:

The video shows people dancing about getting a stimmy, or stimulus check, and having $$$ in the bank and $$$ in the pocket. Thank you POTU$, reads one caption.

Approximately 83 percent of American tax filers were sent the latest round of stimulus checks Congress approved after Joe Biden took office, including tens of millions who never lost jobs in the past year of rolling government lockdowns. Couples could earn as much as $160,000 per year and still get one of the deficit-funded checks that totaled up to $1,400 per person.

Nine million net jobs were lost due to COVID shutdowns, while so far 161 million Americans have gotten checks. In addition to repeatedly sending nearly everyone checks, Congress also boosted unemployment benefits so that many Americans can currently make more money not working than by going back to work.

Studies have found that while most used some stimulus money to pay bills and maintain their pre-pandemic levels of spending, recipients are also spending a significant amount of stimulus checks on restaurant takeout, discretionary spending, paying down debt, boosting savings, and investing not exactly items required to keep people alive. Half of those ages 24 to 35 reported on one survey that they were spending half the stimulus on the stock market.

Explosions in government spending and constant bailouts that have flooded state, local, and individual budgets with unneeded and unearned cash have brought the national debt to approximately $28 trillion, and unfunded federal liabilities (the amount Congress has promised to pay out in the future above what it has required welfare programs like Social Security to take in) to the unfathomable level of $148 trillion.

Contrary to claims that government debt isnt a major problem, abroad rangeof facts show that it can have serious negative consequences, such as lower wages, weak economic growth, increased inflation, higher taxes, reduced government benefits, or combinations of such results. These, in turn, impair peoplesquality of lifeand can reduce theirlife expectancy. Some of these impacts may have already begun, writes James Agresti for the Foundation for Economic Education.

Agresti notes that the Government Accountability Office warns that the costs of federal borrowing will be borne by tomorrows workers and taxpayers, which may reduce or slow the growth of the living standards of future generations. Economists also note that governments overwhelmed with debt at these levels almost always use inflation to steal from citizens more than they tend to notice when governments take that money directly through higher taxes.

Completely ignoring all of these factors, Wisconsin Democrats instead chose to celebrate the fact that Congress has encouraged people to take money from the nations future and lose the self-support, self-respect, and job skills that accrue from employment.

This is so disrespectful to all the people who lost their livelihoods and their businesses to lockdowns, noted Federalist Senior Contributor Georgi Boorman. Its not a jackpot at a Vegas slot machine, its money our great-grandchildren will be paying back.

Read the rest here:

Wisconsin Democrats Try To Hide Shameful Video Celebrating Welfare - The Federalist

Former President Donald Trump said comparing former President Jimmy Carters presidency to the Biden administration is unfair.

I see that everybody is comparing Joe Biden to Jimmy Carter. It would seem to me that is very unfair to Jimmy Carter. Jimmy mishandled crisis after crisis, but Biden has CREATED crisis after crisis, Trump wrote in a statement Wednesday.

Trump then listed off all of Bidens self-inflicted crises.

First there was the Biden Border Crisis (that he refuses to call a Crisis), then the Biden Economic Crisis, then the Biden Israel Crisis, and now the Biden Gas Crisis, Trump wrote. Joe Biden has had the worst start of any president in United States history, and someday, they will compare future disasters to the Biden Administrationbut no, Jimmy was better!

Trump isnt the only one to notice the similarities between the two Democratic presidencies.

Joe Biden is the new Jimmy Carter: -Stagflation -Higher taxes -And rising gas prices 2021 meet 1979, Republican Rep. Jim Jordan tweeted on Tuesday.

President Biden has been in office for nearly four months and is already having his Jimmy Carter moment. This is crushing for our country and U.S. leadership around the globe, said Rep. Mike Waltz in a statement. As Jimmy Carter put it best, there is a crisis of confidence and President Biden is lost in the wilderness.

Biden isnt the next FDR hes the next Jimmy Carter, Donald Trump Jr. wrote on Twitter last week.

Twitter used Trump Jr.s tweets to spin the topic and claim that Carters presidency was marked with successes such as the former Democrat presidents Nobel Peace Prize.

Jordan Davidson is a staff writer at The Federalist. She graduated from Baylor University where she majored in political science and minored in journalism.

Photo The U.S. National Archives/Falconer, David

Excerpt from:

Trump: Comparisons Of Biden And Carter Are Unfair ... To Carter - The Federalist

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra falsely claimed there is no law banning partial-birth abortions on Wednesday.

When asked whether he would uphold a law banning partial-birth abortions during the House Energy and Commerce Committee, Health Subcommittee hearing, Becerra denied there was a law against it.

There is no law that deals specifically with the term partial-birth abortions, Becerra told Republican Rep. Gus Bilirakis.

Becerra also claimed that there is no medical term like partial-birth abortion.

Roe v. Wade is a very clear, settled precedent and a woman has a right to make decisions about her reproductive health, and we will make sure that we forced the laws protect those rights, Beccera said.

Despite Becerras assertion, there are laws that define partial-birth abortions. Not only does the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 characterize it, but the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the law and its definition in Gonzales v. Carhart.

According to the law, partial-birth abortion is an abortion in which a physician deliberately and intentionally vaginally delivers a living, unborn childs body until either the entire babys head is outside the body of the mother, or any part of the babys trunk past the navel is outside the body of the mother and only the head remains inside the womb, for the purpose of performing an overt act (usually the puncturing of the back of the childs skull and removing the babys brains) that the person knows will kill the partially delivered infant.

Becerra previously dodged questions about his stance on partial-birth abortions during his Senate confirmation hearing in February

You voted against a ban on partial-birth abortion. Why? Sen. Mitt Romney asked.

I understand that people have different deeply held beliefs on this issue. We may not always agree on where to go, but I think we can find some common ground, the former California attorney general said.

Susan B. Anthony List President Marjorie Dannenfelser condemned Becerras comments and said the HHS Secretary works hand-in-glove with the White House to expand abortion on demand.

Becerra can hardly plead ignorance on this topic. As a freshman congressman, he voted against the ban. This shameless lie is standard for the most radical pro-abortion administration in history. It should not be hard to recognize that partially delivering a baby and then suctioning his or her brain is not only illegal, but utterly inhumane, Dannenfelser said.

Jordan Davidson is a staff writer at The Federalist. She graduated from Baylor University where she majored in political science and minored in journalism.

Go here to see the original:

HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra Claims There Are No Laws Banning Partial-Birth Abortions - The Federalist

If questioning the results of a presidential election were a crime, as many have asserted in the wake of the controversial 2020 election and its aftermath, nearly the entire Democratic Party and media establishment would have been incarcerated for their rhetoric following the 2016 election.In fact, the last time they accepted the legitimacy of a presidential election they lost was in 1988.

After the 2000 election, which hinged on the results of a recount in Florida, Democrats smeared President George W. Bush as selected, not elected. When Bush won re-election against then-Sen. John Kerry in 2004, many on the left claimed that voting machines in Ohio had been rigged to deliver fraudulent votes to Bush. HBO even produced and aired Hacking Democracy, a documentary that added fuel to the conspiracy theory fire of conversations about the 2004 results. But nothing holds a candle to what happened in 2016 after Donald Trumps surprising defeat of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Rather than accept that Trump won and Clinton lost, the political and media establishments desperately sought to explain away Trumps victory. What they settled on was a destructive conspiracy theory that crippled the government, empowered Americas adversaries, and illegally targeted innocent private citizens whose only crime was not supporting Hillary Clinton.

With baseless claims of hacked voting totals, illegal voter suppression, and extensive media manipulation, the Russian collusion hoax had it all. But more than anything, the belief that Trump stole the 2016 election had the support of the most powerful institutions, individuals, and even government agencies in the country.

You can run the best campaign, you can even become the nominee, and you can have the election stolen from you, Clinton told her followers in 2019.

I know hes an illegitimate president, Clinton claimed of Trump a few months later. She even claimed during an interview with CBS Sunday Morning that voter suppression and voter purging and hacking were why she lost.

Former President Jimmy Carter agreed.

[Trump] lost the election and was put into office because the Russians interfered on his behalf, he told NPR in 2019. Trump didnt actually win the election in 2016.

Their view was widely shared by most prominent Democrats in Congress. Rep. John Lewis of Georgia, for example, said he was skipping Trumps inauguration in 2016 because he believed Trump was illegitimate, and that the Russians participated in helping this man get elected. Lewis also skipped the inauguration of President George W. Bush, claiming that Bush, too, was an illegitimate president.

A few members of Congress joined him in 2001. In 2017, one out of every three Democrats in the U.S. House boycotted Trumps inauguration. Many said they refused to take part in the installation of an illegitimate president.

Not only did corporate media not condemn leading Democrats refusal to accept the results of the 2016 election, the media were also super spreaders of wild conspiracy theories about how Trump and Russia colluded to steal the election from Clinton. They dutifully regurgitated false leaks from corrupt intelligence officials suggesting that Trump and his staff had committed treason. They ran stories suggesting that Republicans who didnt support their conspiracy theory were insufficiently loyal to the country.

Some even suggested Russia may have hacked voting machines and vote totals in a bid to steal the election from Clinton. It was all nonsense. Even Robert Mueller, who ran a multi-year and multi-million-dollar government investigation into claims that Trump personally colluded with Russian President Vladimir Putin to steal the election from Clinton, found there was no evidence to support the claim.

Rather than being shunned by their peers for peddling leaks and lies that had no basis in reality, the reporters who pushed this conspiracy theory were lauded by their peers, received raises and promotions, and were given Pulitzers for reporting that turned out to be detached from reality.

From 2016 through 2020, the easiest way to achieve stardom on the political left was to loudly proclaim your belief that 2016 was an illegitimate election stolen by the Russians on behalf of a corrupt traitor. Dissent, up to and including the assertion that the President of the United States was a secret Russian spy, was the highest form of patriotism.

And then 2020 happened.

With the snap of their fingers, Americas electoral system went from irredeemably corrupt and broken in 2016 to unquestionably safe in 2020. Voting methods that were allegedly used to steal elections in 2004 and 2016 suddenly became sacrosanct and impenetrable in 2020. Whereas so-called election experts repeatedly warned pre-2020 about the pitfalls of electronic voting and widespread mail-in balloting, by November of 2020, any discussion about the vulnerabilities of those methods was declared to be verboten.

If, as I believe, concerns about election integrity were valid in 2000, and 2004, and 2008, and 2012, and 2016, then surely those concerns were even more valid in 2020, an election unlike any other in American history due to the COVID-19 pandemic that gripped the world and radically altered Americas electoral system.

Across the country at the state, local, and federal level, hundreds of significant structural changes to the manner and oversight of elections were instituted, resulting in what Time Magazine called a a revolution in how people vote. Some of these changes were enacted by state legislatures, some by courts, and others by county and state election officials. Many changes were allegedly justified by the global pandemic, although Democrats had long advocated for them and now seek to make them permanent.

The bedrock of the American republic is that elections must be free, fair, accurate, and trusted. Election lawyers will tell you that fraud is almost impossible to conclusively find after the fact, and that to fight it, strong rules and regulations are needed on the front end. Thats why Democrats and Republicans fight so bitterly about the rules and regulations that govern the process.

What happened during the 2020 election deserves to be investigated and discussed. It must be investigated and discussed, not in spite of media and political opposition to it, but because of that opposition. That is why I am writing a book about what happened before, during, and after the 2020 presidential election.

The American people deserve to know what happened. They deserve answers, even if those answers are inconvenient. They deserve to know the effect of flooding the system with tens of millions of mail-in ballots. They deserve to know how and why Big Tech and corporate political media manipulated the news to support certain political narratives while outright censoring stories they now admit were true.

The American people deserve to know why courts, without the consent of the accountable legislative bodies charged with writing election laws, were allowed to unilaterally rewrite the rules in the middle of the game. Voters deserve to know why so many in government so vociferously fought to avoid audits and recounts and hide the vote-counting process from the public.

Republicans began sounding the alarm about how difficult it might be to trust the outcome of the 2020 elections long before November. They talked about how widespread changes in the manner the country conducts elections would lead to uncertainty, confusion, and delays. They were worried about universal mail-in balloting, which led to some addresses getting a half dozen ballots for previous residents who had once registered to vote at the address.

They knew that a bipartisan commission co-chaired by Jimmy Carter himself found that absentee balloting was the largest source of potential fraud in United States elections. They were worried about how lowering, or in some cases outright eliminating, standards for signature verification on mail-in ballots could make it impossible to challenge fraudulently cast ballots.

They were worried about unsupervised drop boxes that enabled third-party ballot harvesting becoming vectors for voter fraud. They worried about how ballot management in some areas was privately funded by corporate oligarchs who are overtly hostile to the Republican Party. They continued their complaints about how lack of updates to voter rolls would cause worse problems in an election based on mail-in balloting.

Republicans also screamed bloody murder about tech censorship of conservative voices and news stories about Democrats that the public had a right to know. They were horrified by a media complex that moved from extreme partisan bias to unabashed propaganda in defense of their preferred political party. They watched as a completely legitimate story about international corruption involving the Biden family business and implicating Joe Biden himself was crushed by media and tech companies colluding to suppress it.

None of those problems went away after the election. If anything, the concern grew as tens of millions more Americans saw the problems associated with sloppy elections in which it takes days to find out just how many people voted, much less how they voted.

They saw how difficult it was to maintain independent oversight of the counting process, whether in Atlanta, where observers were told that counting had stopped for the night but hadnt, or in Philadelphia, where observers were kept so far away from the ballot counting that a court had to intervene. They began to see the significance of the mad rush to change voting laws, sometimes surreptitiously or otherwise outside the purview of the state legislatures. And they saw how the media didnt even bother investigating before dismissing all concerns about how the election was run.

The fact of the matter is that the elite powers did whatever it took to make sure that Trump lost re-election in 2020. They admitted as much in a victory lap masquerading as a news article in Time Magazine that referred to the individuals and institutions behind the efforts to oust Trump as a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information.

The story of how these institutions worked to rig the 2020 results needs to be told, and I plan to tell it. My book, entitled Rigged: How The Media, Big Tech, And Democrats Seized Our Elections, tells the story of how the political, media, and corporate establishments changed election laws and procedures, reduced or eliminated oversight of ballots, manipulated the COVID-19 response, stoked the violent racial unrest, published fake news, censored accurate news, and did everything in their power to make sure what happened in 2016 a Trump election victory would never happen again in 2020.

The book will include interviews from lawyers, campaign activists, and election officials who were on the ground in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin, and other swing states. It will include discussions with elected lawmakers from across the country, including senators and members of Congress, about the importance of election integrity.

My book will contain never-before-told eyewitness stories about what really went down in 2020, not just in the presidential race, but in tight House and Senate races as well. The book will contain analysis of how media and Big Tech oligarchs used their power to control information on the Internet to manipulate peoples behavior before and after the 2020 election. My book will contain not just interviews about the election with top officials from the Trump White House and presidential campaign, but also interviews with Trump himself.

It will give a behind-the-scenes look at election night at the White House, and at pivotal moments in the campaign, such as the planning and execution of the surprisingly successful Republican National Convention. It will answer which of the many fake news stories published about Trump bothered him the most, how the Democrats caught Republicans flat-footed on mail-in balloting, what the Trump administrations biggest COVID mistake was, and who the Trump campaign thought was Bidens best media representative. (Hint: Its not who you think.) And it will show what went wrong during the electoral challenges in battleground states, and who was responsible for them.

Rigged: How The Media, Big Tech, And Democrats Seized Our Elections will be published by Regnery Publishing and is available for pre-order now. I have no doubt that the same powers that worked to oust Trump in 2020 will do everything they can to suppress this book in 2021, but I dont care.The story has to be told.

View original post here:

Mollie Hemingway Writes 2020 Election Book Media Don't Want Read The ruling class did everything - The Federalist

In aftermath of a cyberattack shutting down the Colonial Pipeline causing gas shortages up and down the East Coast, President Joe Biden said the solution is to educate people.

When asked what words he had for Americans worried about climbing fuel prices and shortages, Biden said that he thought a better-educated workforce is the answer.

Id also point out that, I think what this shows is that I think we have to make a greater investment in education, as it relates to being able to train and graduate more people proficient in cybersecurity, Biden said. I think that one of the most important things we have to do to really claim our place as the leading innovator in the world is to have a better-educated workforce.

A skilled, educated workforce and cybersecurity, Biden claimed, is part of the long-term answer because Fortune 500 companies told him that while he was vice president.

Its important that we do this and the cybersecurity piece is one I think youre gonna see where we need significantly larger number of experts in the area of cybersecurity, working for private companies as well as private companies being willing to share data as to what how theyre protecting themselves, Biden said. I think thats part of the long-term answer not just in terms of energy but across the board.

Biden also touted his administrations efforts to lift restrictions on fuel transportation.

In the meantime made it easier for us to have lifted some of the restrictions on the transportation of fuel, as well as access to the United States military providing fuel and with vehicles to get it there were places where its badly needed, Biden said.

Jordan Davidson is a staff writer at The Federalist. She graduated from Baylor University where she majored in political science and minored in journalism.

Go here to see the original:

Biden Claims Education Is The Key To Solving Gas Shortages - The Federalist

I only hope that we never lose sight of one thing that it was all started by a mouse. So said Walt Disney in a 1954 television special, referring to Mickey Mouse, which brought his eponymous company enduring success. Nearly seven decades later, executives at The Walt Disney Company apparently think everything stems from race. Disneys embrace of critical race theory has turned a company created by its namesake to provide wholesome entertainment for the entire family into a hotbed of division.

Christopher Rufo of the Manhattan Institute recently obtained a presentation given by Disney to its employees regarding its Reimagine Tomorrow diversity initiative. The presentation instructs Disney cast members to challenge colorblind ideologies and rhetoric, and avoid conflating the black experience with other communities of color, because of a unique history that has led to anti-black racism.

The presentation does not merely attempt to define employees by race and gender, or reference concepts of critical race theory like white fragility, intersectionality, and microaggressions. It goes further, actively indoctrinating cast members by telling them to examine and work through feelings of guilt, shame, and defensiveness to understandwhat needs to [be] healed. And it pits workers against each other, encouraging cast members to be accountable by flagging problematic posts on company message boards.

The presentations obsessive focus on race, racial and cultural divisions, and Americas flaws directly contradicts the image of a company firmly rooted in Americana. One cannot easily reconcile the images of Main Street, U.S.A. fashioned to resemble Disneys boyhood home of Marceline, Missouri with language instructing employees to reflect on the countrys racist infrastructure. Does CEO Bob Chapek consider America a racist country, and if so, why does the company promote nostalgia for a nation with a long history of systemic racism and transphobia?

After Rufos reporting was published, Disney issued a statement but then removed the entire diversity and inclusion program from its internal company portal.

Disneys fixation on race relations in the United States also contrasts with its behavior in China, where the company has arguably profited from racial genocide. Rather than condemning Chinas brutal crackdown on its Uyghur Muslim population in Xinjiang province, Disney filmed its live-action remake of Mulan there, going so far as to thank Chinese government bodies in the credits.

While current Executive Chairman and former CEO Bob Iger said in an internal training video that Disney should be taking a stand on political controversies, in 2019 he said just the opposite regarding Chinas human rights crackdown in Hong Kong: To take a position that could harm our company in some form would be a big mistake.

Finally, the presentations focus on equity focus[ing] on the equality of the outcome belies the behavior of company executives. According to the companys proxy statement, in 2020 outgoing CEO Iger received over $31.5 million in total compensation, with incoming CEO Chapek receiving another $19.5 million. If Disney wants to promote equity, does it plan on capping executive compensation at the companys median salary, to ensure all cast members receive equal outcomes?

Disney aficionados know that Roy E. Disney not once but twice used shareholder activism to defend the company his uncle founded. His first Save Disney campaign, in the 1980s, sought to prevent a hostile takeover that would dismantle the company. Twenty years later, Roy Disneys second proxy campaign ultimately led to Michael Eisners removal as CEO. As a longtime Disney owner appalled by the messages sent by this presentation, I believe that conservatives may need to embark on a third Save Disney shareholder campaign this one to sever the companys reliance on critical race theory.

On July 17, 1955, the parks namesake dedicated Disneyland by reading a plaque that began To all who come to this happy place, welcome. Little did Walt Disney suspect that decades later, his company would seek to define and divide cast members by race. Like any mortal man, Walt Disney had his faults, but he deserves better than the companys current descent into progressive indoctrination and cultural Marxism.

View original post here:

It's Time For A Third 'Save Disney' Campaign To End Racial Segregation - The Federalist

Senior Editor Christopher Bedford joins Culture Editor Emily Jashinksy to talk this week in politics including the potential ousting of Rep. Liz Cheney, and how it raises the question: To what is extent is loyalty to Donald Trump a litmus test Republican leaders and Republican voters?

On the one hand, you have a good chunk of the Republican base that is more loyal to Trump than they are to the Republican party, Jashinsky said. At the same time there is the contingency of suburban voters that are Trump isnt why they vote Republican.

Listen here:https://mp3.ricochet.com/2021/05/FRH_May7_withad_mixdown.mp3

More here:

Podcast: Liz Cheney And The GOP's Trump Litmus Test - The Federalist

Like the Schuman Declaration in 1950, the Conference on the Future of Europe could pave the way for a reform of the EU, the Spinelli Group which gathers federalist MEPs and national parliamentarians with the Union of European Federalists and the European Movement International has said.

In its appeal Our federal, sovereign, democratic Europe, the group demands a federal Europe. While the demand itself is not new, the document has catapulted it into the mainstream after it was signed by hundreds of political and cultural personalities from all over Europe and from different political forces.

According to Social Democrat MEP Brando Benifei (S&D), president of the Spinelli Group, the initiative stems from the groups conviction that the EU needs to change, and that action is needed now.

Mobilisation, organisation, participation, will be the key words of the next years if we actually want to produce the change that the European Union needs, Benifei said.

Renew Europe MEP Sandro Gozi, president of the Union of European Federalists (UEF), stressed the need to exploit the full political potential of this unprecedented Conference, and the appeal would kickstart a permanent dialogue with all the citizens attending the conference and with national and European parliamentarians.

The speeches by Costa and Von der Leyen were very cautious, especially on the possible objectives to be taken as a follow-up to the conference, for example on the revision of the treaties. We need to create a strong pressure from below. We will ask to participate in the conference as NGOs: its a tough battle, but we have all the requirements to ask for it, Gozi said.

Such broad support shows that after the EUs strong response to the pandemic, the Conference on the Future of Europe has raised high expectations in European society.

A recent Eurobarometer showed that citizens understand that the EU can be an instrument for solving fundamental problems, but should be strengthened in crucial areas such as health, security and defence, social policy where the EU has little competences and powers.

This would require EU treaty reform, something that shall not be taboo, according to European Parliament President David Sassoli.

Proponents believe the appeal may at least give the European Parliament the option to use for the first time its power of initiative on treaty reform as a follow up to the conference.

[Edited byAlexandra Brzozowski]

The rest is here:

Federalists: Conference on the Future of Europe could kickstart EU reform - EURACTIV

The Walt Disney Corporation has been allegedly holding extensive critical race theory training for employees.

Internal documents obtained by Christopher Rufo, a senior fellow at Manhattan Institute, show Disney launching a diversity and inclusion program called Reimagine Tomorrow. The trainings discuss the leftist ideas of systemic racism, white privilege, white fragility, white saviors, microaggressions, and antiracism. The subtitle of the booklet guide reads: Allyship for Race Consciousness.

Disney, which owns ABC, ESPN, Touchstone Pictures, Marvel, Lucasfilm, and other major media companies, instructed employees to take ownership of educating yourself about structural anti-Black racism as well as not rely on your Black colleagues to educate you, which would be emotionally taxing.

When Americas storied places of joy and refuge from the cares of the world turn themselves into partisan actors and political indoctrination factories, the harm to our social fabric is immeasurable, Stanley Kurtz, a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, told The Federalist. Disney is dividing the country it once helped to inspire, inviting entirely justified blowback from the vast number of Americans it now derogates, disregards, and caricatures. I thought politicized baseball was the unkindest cut of all, but now this. As Disney and other woke corporations plunge America into the bitterest cultural conflict in memory, they deserve to feel shame, not pride.

The training modules centralize the notion of anti-racism the idea that Americans must acknowledge their country is systemically racist and eradicate any semblance of a colorblind society. The company told employees they must also work through feelings of guilt, shame, and defensiveness to understand what is beneath them and what needs to be healed, harping on the notion of implicit bias. The phrase All Lives Matter was communicated as derogatory, and so was the phrase I dont see color.

One module in the training titled What Can I Do About Racism? instructed staff to denounce the idea of equality and instead favor equity. The corporation crafted a 21-Day Racial Equity and Social Justice Challenge that was followed by a white privilege checklist. The checklist claims a variety of statements, if affirmed, indicate a persons privilege. This includes some of the following statements:

Below is the full document Rufo obtained from a Disney whistleblower:

In addition to other modules, employees were provided several outside resources. This included a guide titled 75 Things White People Can Do For Racial Justice that claims readers should support defund[ing] the police and decolonize your bookshelf.

The guide also claims employees should read The New York Timess inaccurate and divisive 1619 Project by Nikole Hannah-Jones. Streaming service Hulu, owned by Disney, is streaming a docuseries on Hannah-Joness work. The company described the 1619 Project as a landmark undertaking of the brutal racism that endures in so many aspects of American life today.

Dr. James A. Lindsay, the founder of New Discourses and the author of

This is happening pretty much everywhere, Lindsay said. Whats happening at Disney, while it looks very extreme, is actually quite typical. We see almost exactly the same kinds of things playing out in terms of what these trainings are made up of and what they include. The picture that has to come across somehow is these arent isolated incidents. This is government agencies. This is churches. This is virtually every university. This is many if not most school districts.

Further dividing its employees by race and sex, Disney crafted affinity groups for minority employees to join. The groups are titled Hola for latino individuals, Compass for asians, and Wakanda for blacks. The objective of the groups is to provide culturally-authentic insights for employees and encourage diversity, inclusion, belonging, identity, and allyship. There is no group provided for all individuals to join.

Employees told Rufo the corporation sends almost daily memos on such issues and that Disney is completely ideologically one-sided. Numerous employees concurred and one claimed the corporate environment is very stifled.

Its been very stifling to feel like everyone keeps talking about having open dialogue and compassionate conversations, but when it comes down to it, I know if I said one thing that was truthful, based on data, or even just based on my own personal experience, it would actually be rather unwelcomed, a Christian and conservative employee said.

In a video obtained by Rufo, Executive Chairman Bob Iger allegedly said Disney will not shy away from politics and should be taking a stand on identity politics issues. Iger also allegedly said the films Dumbo, Aladdin, and Fantasia are racist content. The company fired The Mandalorian actress Gina Carano in February for not displaying allegiance to identity politics while continuing to do business with a genocidal Communist China.

Read more:

Bombshell Report: Disney Pushing Critical Race Theory On Employees - The Federalist