Monthly Archives: May 2021

Macron, Ardern rally nations and tech giants in battle to stamp out online hate – RFI English

Posted: May 18, 2021 at 4:17 am

Issued on: 15/05/2021 - 16:56

The leaders of France and New Zealand warned that social media continued to be a driving force to propagate hate, two years after a white supremacist live-streamed the killing of 51 Muslim worshippers in Christchurch.

President Emmanuel Macron and Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern were speaking Friday at a virtual summit, co-hosted by their countries, aimed at battling extremist content on the internet.

Ardern said efforts to stamp out the spread of harmful content would need to stem from a better understanding of the social media algorithms driving suchcontent.

The existence of algorithms themselves is not necessarily the problem, it's whether or not they are being ethically used, she said, adding that tech companies had shown a real desire to use algorithms for positive interventions.

Macron said the internet had been used as a tool in recent attacks in the US, Austria, Germany and elsewhere adding that new European regulations against extremist content would help coordination efforts.

In a post on Twitter, he saidit was up to "democracies and defenders of freedoms" to find the solutions that would enable afree and secure internet.

Widespread support

More than 50 countries have joined the initiative, known as the Christchurch Call,along with tech giants including Facebook, Google, Twitter, Microsoft and Amazon.

The United States gave its support earlier this week in a shift in policy that cametwo years after former president Donald Trump declined to participate citing concerns overfree speech.

Since Christchurch Call was launched, governments and tech companies have stepped upcooperationto identify violent extremist content online.

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson said the UK had taken down more than 300,000 pieces of terrorist material from the internet over the past decade.

Terrorist content is like a metastasising tumour within the internet, he said in a pre-recorded video shown at the summit.

If we fail to excise it, it will inevitably spread into homes and high streets the world over.

View original post here:

Macron, Ardern rally nations and tech giants in battle to stamp out online hate - RFI English

Comments Off on Macron, Ardern rally nations and tech giants in battle to stamp out online hate – RFI English

‘Dont think Facebook is making the world a better pl..rmer employee on tech giant’s role in global politics – Firstpost

Posted: at 4:17 am

The Associated PressMay 18, 2021 09:27:25 IST

Sophie Zhang worked as a Facebook data scientist for nearly three years before was she fired in the fall of 2020. On her final day, she posted a 7,800-word memo to the companys internal forum such farewell notes, if not the length, are a common practice for departing employees. In the memo, first published by Buzzfeed, she outlined evidence that governments in countries like Azerbaijan and Honduras were using fake accounts to influence the public. Elsewhere, such as India and Ecuador, Zhang found coordinated activity intended to manipulate public opinion, although it wasnt clear who was behind it. Facebook, she said, didn't take her findings seriously.

Zhangs experience led her to a stark conclusion: I have blood on my hands.

Facebook has not disputed the facts of Zhangs story but has sought to diminish the importance of her findings.

We fundamentally disagree with Ms Zhangs characterisation of our priorities and efforts to root out abuse on our platform," Facebook said in a statement. As part of our crackdown against this kind of abuse, we have specialised teams focused on this work and have already taken down more than 150 networks of coordinated inauthentic behaviour. Around half of them were domestic networks that operated in Latin America, the Middle East, North Africa, and in the Asia Pacific region."

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Why were you fired from Facebook?

Ive made the news for much of the work I have done protecting elections. This might sound very important to the average person, but at Facebook I was a very low-level employee. In addition, this work was not my official job. I was conducting it entirely in my spare time, with the knowledge and acquiescence of leadership, of course. At first, the company was supportive of this. But gradually they lost patience with me. I was underperforming.

In your memo, you wrote that you have blood on your hands. Why did you say that?

Whether something was acted on was, as far as I could tell, entirely a function of how much I yelled, how much I made noise.

I know that many of the decisions they have made have had impact in the countries that they worked on. The US is still deeply affected by what happened in 2016 with Russian manipulation on Facebook. For many countries like Honduras or Azerbaijan, this is their own Russia. But its done not by a foreign power, but by their own government and without even bothering to hide.

I tried my best to make decisions based on the information I had at the time. But of course I am just one person. Sometimes I waited on something longer than I should have. At this level of responsibility, your best is often not enough.

How did you get into the work you did?

When I joined the company I was, like many people, deeply affected by Russia 2016. And I decided to start looking for overlap between inauthentic activity and political targets. And I started finding many results in many places, particularly what we call the global South, in Honduras, Brazil, India.

Honduras got my attention because it had a very large amount (of inauthentic behaviour) compared to the others. This was very unsophisticated activity we are talking about. Literal bots. And then I realised that this was essentially a troll farm being run quite openly by an employee of the president of Honduras. And that seemed extraordinarily awful.

Then what did you do?

I talked about it internally. Essentially everyone agreed that it was bad. No one wants to be defending this sort of activity, but people couldnt agree on whose job it was to deal with it.

I was trying desperately to find anyone who cared. I talked with my manager and their manager. I talked to the threat intelligence team. I talked with many integrity teams. It took almost a year for anything to happen.

Youve said there is a priority list of countries. What happens to countries that aren't on that list?

Its not a hard and fast rule. Facebook does takedowns in small countries, too. But most of these takedowns are reactive, by which I mean they come from outside groups tips from opposition groups, tips from NGOs, reporter investigations, reports from the CIA, etc. What happened in this case was that no one outside the company was complaining.

Given the resources Facebook has, why it cant prioritise every country?

The answer that Ive seen at Facebook when I was there, when these questions were asked, was that even though Facebook has a ton of money, human resources are different. Even if you have infinite money, you cant expand its size by a factor of 10 every night. It takes time to train people. It takes time to grow.

And it was willing to believe that for a while when I was there. But I think in retrospect, if they genuinely believed that it was important, they would be taking steps that they arent. They would be focussing very highly on retaining talent in the integrity teams. And they would certainly never have fired me.

How do people still at Facebook try to change this?

Like most employees, theyre just average people who want to do the 9-to-6, want to go home at the end of the day and sleep.

Theres also a self-selection bias. If you think that Facebook is evil, you aren't likely to join Facebook.

But there are many people also who joined Facebook because they wanted to make it better. I was very upfront with them when I joined. I dont think Facebook is making the world a better place. And I told them I wanted to fix it.

Is there a concern among employees about the companys image?

I think employees have gotten more pessimistic over time. But there's also a very strong insularity and perhaps paranoia toward the mainstream press. People are skeptical of what the press says about the company.

I dont want to diminish that Facebook has been very open historically. We had regular access to the CEO. I was able to, as a very low level employee, be involved in our discussions with a company vice president. But its also been changing over time because of fear and worry about employee leaks.

Who is doing the work you did now?

I dont know. I was the only person who was going out on my own to look for this behaviour rather than waiting for people to tell us that something was going on. The reason I found so many things so easily was because there was so much low-hanging fruit.

Facebook says it's taking down many inauthentic accounts and has sought to dismiss your story.

So this is a very typical Facebook response, by which I mean that they are not actually answering the question. Suppose your spouse asks you, Did you clean up the dishes yesterday?" And you respond by saying, I always prioritise cleaning the dishes. I make sure to clean the dishes. I do not want there to be dirty dishes." Its an answer that may make sense, but it does not actually answer that question.

Go here to read the rest:

'Dont think Facebook is making the world a better pl..rmer employee on tech giant's role in global politics - Firstpost

Comments Off on ‘Dont think Facebook is making the world a better pl..rmer employee on tech giant’s role in global politics – Firstpost

Eagles-Giants rivalry may have helped nix Philly’s Amazon HQ2 bid – PhillyVoice.com

Posted: at 4:17 am

Renderings of Amazon's $2.5 billion HQ2 planned for Arlington were met earlier this year with jeers that the building dubbed The Helix kind of, sort of looks like the poo emoji.

Can you imagine that thing in the Navy Yard or University City's Schuylkill Yards? That's where Philadelphiahad pitched the tech giant to set up shop for its second location outside Seattle.

And in a new book by Brad Stone, author of "The Everything Store" and therecently published "Amazon Unbound,"it appears Philly's proposal was among the top finalists to be considered. One of the hangups, apparently, was thatsoon-to-be Amazon CEO Andy Jassyis a New York Giants fan.

Here's a tidbit from Mashable, which examined some interesting details from Stone's book and what they reveal about Amazon founder and outgoing CEO Jeff Bezos:

Philadelphia made an aggressive push to court Amazon when the HQ2 search was unveiled late in 2017, offering an enticing tax incentive package that would have amounted to about $5.5 billion, including Pennsylvania's $1 billion tax break. Mayor Jim Kenney touted the city's geography as the "Goldilocks zone" of logistics and talent for an East Coast Amazon hub, which might have brought some 50,000 jobs to the city.

And while Amazon's HQ2 search team was impressed with what Philadelphia had to offer, Stone's book details how the personal wishes of Amazon executives largely dictated the ultimate decision to choose a two-site plan in Northern Virginia and Queens. The New York site was abandoned amid major political pushback, prompting Amazon to opt for a 25,000-employee site in Arlington and a plan to distribute another 25,000 across its other U.S. offices.

Amazon also selected Nashville as the site of its "Operations Center of Excellence," touting 5,000 jobs and an investment of $230 million.

For Philadelphia residents, the consolation of missing out on Amazon HQ2 is that its arrival likely would have been a mixed bag. If Seattle's rising rents over the past decade are any indication, Amazon would have changed housing economics in Philadelphia. One study from Zillow estimated that Philly's median rentcould have jumped as high as an additional $138 within a year of Amazon landing here.

In the long-run, it appears that Amazon probably will invest heavily in the Philadelphia area, anyway. The company has added multiple warehouses in recent years and eventually may have its sights on the redeveloped site of the Philadelphia Energy Solutions refinery that was closed after an explosion in 2019.

It's hard to imagine that an NFC East rivalry truly influenced Amazon's decision not to move to Philly, but it's still amusing to consider that the Eagles were in the thick of their Super Bowl LII run during the early stages of the company's HQ2 search.

Read the original:

Eagles-Giants rivalry may have helped nix Philly's Amazon HQ2 bid - PhillyVoice.com

Comments Off on Eagles-Giants rivalry may have helped nix Philly’s Amazon HQ2 bid – PhillyVoice.com

YouTube, Snapchat Move to Bring Influencer Economy In-House – Hollywood Reporter

Posted: at 4:17 am

Creators are the new currency. And they are a commodity in increasingly high demand.

As digital influencers keep gaining in popularity, companies like YouTube, Snapchat and TikTok are increasingly leaning in and betting that their pathway to growth lies with these independent content producers.

From our standpoint, the velocity of the creator economy today has made things completely undeniable to the rest of the world, YouTube chief business officer Robert Kyncl tells The Hollywood Reporter. We see this as a completely new space that got opened up, that has brought incredible creativity that was not something we could really imagine previously.

And the tech giants are putting their money where their mouths are, committing hundreds of millions of dollars to support, create and entice creators to produce for their platforms.

At the Interactive Advertising Bureaus virtual NewFronts marketplace from May 3 to 7, presentations were a stark contrast to just a few years ago, when YouTube was betting its future on scripted fare like the Karate Kid sequel Cobra Kai (which has since landed at Netflix), and Snapchat unveiled a slate of a dozen scripted shows spanning the genres drama, horror and fantasy.

Why the shift? TikTok, the red-hot mobile app, explained it in a sizzle reel that ran during its May 6 presentation. As Olivia Rodrigos song drivers license played (a song propelled to the top of the Billboard charts in part due to its success on the platform), some of the years viral TikToks filled the screen, alongside a message: Traditionally, a select few have defined culture. But not anymore. Enter TikTok.

The power of TikTok is in our community, and how they engage with brands and creators. Brands want to be a part of the cultural moments, said Sandie Hawkins, GM of U.S. business solutions for TikTok. And as shoppable technology proliferates, creators arent just about making content that drives users to the grocery store or Amazon, but about getting them to buy products within the app or video ecosystem at the same moment they tout them.

[Ecommerce] is massively important to the success of any client that is in business right now. Period, says Cond Nast global chief revenue officer Pamela Drucker Mann. In many cases, this can be their number one distribution channel. Show them an option that helps them unlock ecommerce revenue, whether that is in video or anywhere else, that is going to be a priority for them.

Cond Nast is in the midst of a shoppable push of its own on platforms like TikTok. In its presentation, TikTok highlighted how it drove sales of Ocean Spray cranberry juice and American Eagle exercise pants alongside the hashtag #TikTokMadeMeBuyIt.

Craig [Brommers], the CMO of American Eagle, told us the leggings sell out every time they restock, says Sophia Hernandez, the head of TikTok U.S. business marketing.

Its a message that is clearly resonating with marketers. Snapchat used its May 5 event to unveil a Creator Marketplace that ultimately will connect brands to the platforms creative talent.

We want to give creators a chance to enjoy a living on the platform, says Snap Inc. vp sales for the Americas Peter Naylor. And for Snap, it means more advertising partners can produce and execute compelling creative on Snapchat without the need for extensive resources.

YouTube, meanwhile, sought to retake control of the creator narrative, leaning into its history and sheer scale to secure marketing dollars earmarked for creators.

It is something that we just feel incredibly proud to have pioneered, and continue to lead in, Kyncl says of the creator economy.

The focus on creators continues even to the original programs commissioned by the video platforms. Scripted shows were mostly sidelined this year in favor of unscripted fare, and prominent creators were front and center.

Snapchats new shows were fronted by Grammy-winning rapper Megan Thee Stallion as well as popular creators Charli and Dixie DAmilio. YouTubes originals included a kids show led by creator Guava Juice, and one from environmentalist Jack Harries. YouTubes biggest new show, Best Shape of My Life, stars Will Smith, a world-famous celebrity but also a YouTube creator with 9.3 million subscribers, as the company was eager to highlight.

We love anybody who embraces the platform, Kyncl says. They can come from anywhere, it can be someone like [creator] Liza Koshy, or someone like Will Smith. It is about their attitude and their leaning into the platform and connection to the audiences.

But in a world with multiple scaled platforms, creators cant be taken for granted, and even digital juggernauts have to fight for the next generation of talent.

A version of this story first appeared in the May 12 issue of The Hollywood Reporter magazine.Click here to subscribe.

Go here to see the original:

YouTube, Snapchat Move to Bring Influencer Economy In-House - Hollywood Reporter

Comments Off on YouTube, Snapchat Move to Bring Influencer Economy In-House – Hollywood Reporter

Chinese Giant JD.com Seeks $3.4 Billion in Logistics IPO. Heres What to Know. – Barron’s

Posted: at 4:17 am

Text size

After a blockbuster year for e-commerce boosted by the Covid-19 pandemic, Chinas JD.com is seeking to raise up to $3.4 billion by listing its logistics arm.

JD Logistics is an integrated supply-chain player in China, offering services from warehousing to distribution, from manufacturer to end customer. Its initial public offering is set to be one of the largest in Hong Kong this year.

Shares in the e-commerce giant JD.com closed less than 1% lower in Hong Kong, while its Nasdaq-listed U.S. shares similarly fell less than 1%.

The back story. JD.comone of Chinas internet giants established its in-house logistics division in 2007. The group built out warehousing and delivery infrastructure and supply-chain technologies through this division for a decade, before formally spinning out the company in 2017. Since then, JD Logistics has continued to serve JD.com, alongside offering services to external clients.

The company operated more than 900 warehouses across China by the end of 2020, with its logistics network using high-tech tools like self-driving vehicles and autonomous robots. Its 32 smart mega warehouses across China include a fully unmanned center in Shanghai.

Since being spun off in 2017, JD Logistics has grown quickly, with revenue growth of 32% between 2018 and 2019 and 47% from 2019 to 2020. It recorded net losses of more than 2 billion yuan ($300 million) in both 2018 and 2019, and a net loss of 4 billion yuan in 2020. The group expects its net loss for 2021 to increase significantly compared with 2020, in part due to lower profit margins from a decrease in government support related to the Covid-19 pandemic.

JD.com floated its pharmaceutical and health services division, JD Health, in Hong Kong in December 2020, raising $3.5 billion, and itself listed in Hong Kong in June 2020 after years of its shares being traded on the Nasdaq.

Also:China Cracked Down on Its internet Giants. The Rebound Will Be Slow.

Whats new. JD.com said on Monday that it would seek to raise up to 264,132 million Hong Kong dollars ($3.4 billion) through the listing of JD Logistics. The IPO would be the second-largest in Hong Kong in 2021, since Tencent-backed video-sharing app Kuaishou floated in February to raise $5.4 billion.

JD Logistics intends to issue 609.2 million sharesaround 10% of its stockwithin an expected price range of HK$39.36 to HK$43.36, according to filings. The company is slated to retain more than 64% of the total shares. An overallotment option, or green shoe, would allow for the sale of another 91 million shares to raise up to a further $510 million.

Cornerstone investors including Softbanks Vision Fund, Tiger Global, Blackstone, and Temasek HoldingsSingapores state-backed investment companyhave committed to buying around $1.5 billion worth of shares. The final pricing for the IPO is expected on Friday, before the shares begin trading on May 28. Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, and Chinese investment bank Haitong are the joint sponsors of the IPO.

In its prospectus, the group made the case that it was a tech-driven supply-chain and logistics expert, with proprietary tools allowing it to substantially improve the operational efficiencies of customers supply chains. The key risks to JD Logistics business, according to the filings, include intense competition in the e-commerce and services space, Chinese macroeconomic conditions, and the fact that a significant portion of its revenue has historically come from JD.com.

Plus:Chinese Retailer JD.com Beats Sales Estimates. The Online Boom May Be Here to Stay.

Looking ahead. Investors can view JD Logistics going public as a way to play a few familiar high-tech trends, including artificial intelligence and 5G-linked breakthroughs in autonomous vehicles and robots. These technologies have serious implications for supply chains. More broadly, JD Logistics would be another way to gain exposure to the e-commerce sector as consumer spending ramps upin China and around the worldwith the economic recovery from the Covid-19 pandemic.

But investors must be aware that the group would go public into a tough regulatory environment, with Chinese regulators cracking down on tech companies. Last month, regulators warned 13 groups, including a JD.com subsidiary, over antitrust issues, and share prices in the sector have faced headwinds since February amid rising interest rates and regulatory concerns in both the U.S. and China.

And the market has had recent cause for concern about the Chinese tech and logistics sector more broadly. One of JD Logistics competitors, SF Holding, saw its stock price crash more than 44% from highs in February after it posted a surprise quarterly loss. That prompted questions about lofty valuations beyond SF, which is Chinas largest listed courier group. Expect JD Logistics to face similar scrutiny.

More:

Chinese Giant JD.com Seeks $3.4 Billion in Logistics IPO. Heres What to Know. - Barron's

Comments Off on Chinese Giant JD.com Seeks $3.4 Billion in Logistics IPO. Heres What to Know. – Barron’s

Evolving into Connected Warehouses: The First Step Toward Long-Term Success – DC Velocity

Posted: at 4:17 am

In the past year,onlinebuying has skyrocketed due to the COVID-19 pandemic,vastly acceleratinge-commerce andcondensinga growth dynamic that would have otherwise taken a decade into a matter ofmonths.As a result, warehouses are operating at some of the highest capacity levels weve ever seen.The need for additional space and productivity is so great that some companies,such as Amazon,have eventurned to abandoned malls and golf coursesto developnew warehouse facilities.This surge of e-commerce growth, coupled with the critical demand for warehousing space of any kind, hasplacednew demands on logistics and warehouse operationsnamely,a substantial increase in workers, space and transportation efficiency. Since most operations cannot scale resources proportionally with demand increases, this has exacerbated an ongoing needfor innovative solutionsthat canincrease worker productivity, asset usage and space utilization.To do more with less, many operators are looking at all new technologies to help, including the drive towards automation. Becoming a fullyautomated warehousehas become theultimate goalformany logisticsand warehouse operators. While this remains an ambitious end goal,the reality is that automated technologies are not there yet, and costs are far beyond most operators capital budgets.In fact,even Amazon has statedthat it would take at least 10years before thetech giantcould entirely automate its fulfillment processes.Our takeaway is that if a company like Amazon, with effectively unlimited resources, doesnt see full automation in the near term, the rest of the industry will need even more time for technologies to mature and costs to become manageable.Thepast year has exposed the inability of current approaches to handle higher outputs without significant workforce and facility investments.So how can logistics and warehouse operators make changes to increase operations and productivity in the near term?Smarter warehousesstartwith connectivityAs operators look for both near and long-term ways to enhance productivity, they must start by setting the groundwork for those operations with connectivity. Currently, the vast majority of warehouses have limited to no connectivity infrastructure and those that do tend to have the bare minimum to perform required operations. The good news is there are many different wireless technologies, such as Wi-Fi, 5G and various Internet of Things protocols, that operators can leverage to deploy devices that fit each of their specific needs.While some high-end facilities have advanced connectivity infrastructures, they are the exception rather than the rule.Existing facilities will need to evolve to a fully connected warehouse to support the new wave of technology needed to boost productivity within their existing footprints.Operators will first need to build the infrastructure that any new technology will depend on.Its all about the dataAs the transition from a fully worker-driven facility to a highly automated facility takes place, a critical success factor will be the ability of humans and automated material handling equipment (MHE) to efficiently work within the same facility. Strictly relying on spatially unaware systems, such as warehouse management systems (WMS), wont solve this problem. Rather, the solution lies in providing automated devices, humans and WMS with the necessary spatial context of the entire facility and its contents to correctly identify the optimal resource required to perform each task efficiently.With the increase in automated MHE deployments, such as AS/RS systems,cobotsand AGVs, the key test of their usefulness will be how adaptable they can be within their environments. While most of these technologies can navigate locally with the help of lidar, vision systems and/or sensors, they typically lack the facility-level spatial awareness needed to co-exist with human workers, ever-changing inventory location, and other legacy materials handling systems. This added level of detail will be critical for optimal productivity, efficiency and safety.The same goes for WMS. Most of these systems have no idea where an inventory item is in relation to the worker picking an order, let alone any autonomous vehicles. Combining WMS data with spatial data for the facility will increase operational visibility to enable slotting enhancements and optimized workforce and asset allocation.To achieve spatial awareness and its benefits, operators can easily integrate their different data silos into warehouse spatial intelligence (WSI) solutions. WSI is a new category of software solutions that have emerged to address urgent market needs amid the pandemic, pulling data into a common interface and analyzing the multiple data sources to provide clear visibility and productivity metrics. Because WSI solutions sit on top of existing data silos, there is considerably less risk and cost versus upgrading an entire WMS or hiring dedicated personnel to continuously optimize robots.WSI solutions integrate the real-time location of workers, status of docks, legacy materials handling and new automated material handling equipment with facility layouts and inventory location for seamless interoperability.Beyond improving productivity and efficiency of day-to-day operations, WSI solutions can improvesafetyby providingdetailed congestion analysesto improve routing and movement within the warehouse, helping to preclude collisions and improve overall safety.WSI canalsobe integrated with forklifts to assess and improve driver behavior and set up alerts to identify common points of unsafe interactions between forklifts and workers.This is all made possible by starting with a foundation of connectivity and spatial context that supports a range of applications and technologies to create a truly smart warehouse.The interface of the connected warehouse is WSIWSI solutions are the glue of the connected warehouse because they create a single interface between different siloed applications and data sources. WSI bridges the many distinct data sources together and provides a spatial and analytical lens through which operators form actionable insights on how they can improve workforce scheduling, optimize inventory layout, increase physical space usage, and reduce facility maintenance and operational costs. In doing so, warehouse operators can make data-driven process changes and measure results as they implement swift remediations to optimize their operations.By evolving fromthe traditional four walls and a roof model to a fully connected warehouse, operators can increase the efficiency and productivity of their facilities by 20-30%. Although logistics operators haveestablishedanend goal of becoming fullyautomated,even the industry giants recognize it will takeat least a decade to get there.By implementing innovative solutions such as WSIto bring together data from independent siloes, connected warehouses will lay the groundwork for continuous improvement through technological innovation for decades to come.

Link:

Evolving into Connected Warehouses: The First Step Toward Long-Term Success - DC Velocity

Comments Off on Evolving into Connected Warehouses: The First Step Toward Long-Term Success – DC Velocity

Foreign tech giants to be forced to open offices in Russia as officials look to stop companies ignoring demands from regulators – RT

Posted: at 4:17 am

Large foreign IT companies that refuse to open offices and have official representation in Russia could be completely banned from having advertisements on their websites and could be prevented from accepting any form of payment.

Thats according to Alexander Khinshtein, an MP for the ruling United Russia party, who says his proposed bill would not infringe on users interests but would force companies to be accountable to the countrys laws. As things stand, foreign tech companies often avoid demands from the Russian authorities, as they have no physical base inside the country, and ignoring legal requests typically goes unpunished.

READ MORE:Russian Foreign Ministry says Twitter no longer independent social media, but a tool of 'digital diktat' under control of West

Our bill would oblige owners of large information resources with a daily audience of more than 500,000 people in Russia to open official representative offices to fully represent their interests and be responsible for their activities, including in the government and courts, he wrote on messenger app Telegram, noting that refusal to comply would see sanctions imposed, including a complete ban on accepting payments and restrictions on advertising.

Unfortunately, many of the IT giants openly abuse their monopolistic position by violating the requirements of our legislation, he explained.

According to Khinstein, the way to get compliance from foreign IT companies is to create economic incentives for them to comply with Russian legislation.

In recent months, a number of social media companies have been targeted by the Russian authorities for refusing to comply with demands to remove content. In particular, Twitter attracted the attention by Roskomnadzor, the countrys media regulator, for ignoring requests to delete thousands of posts with illegal material, including child pornography and incitements to commit suicide.

In February, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova slammed Twitter as a tool of Western countries to impose a global digital diktat, after the website removed 100 accounts it alleged were linked to the Kremlin.

On March 5, Roskomnadzor announced that it would fine not just Twitter, but foreign-based networks Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, and Telegram for failing to delete posts that called for teenagers to attend unauthorized protests. Two Russian websites VKontakte and Odnoklassniki were also fined.

If you like this story, share it with a friend!

Read more from the original source:

Foreign tech giants to be forced to open offices in Russia as officials look to stop companies ignoring demands from regulators - RT

Comments Off on Foreign tech giants to be forced to open offices in Russia as officials look to stop companies ignoring demands from regulators – RT

In major milestone, China successfully lands Zhurong rover …

Posted: at 4:16 am

China's Zhurong Mars rover, mounted atop a rocket-powered lander, dropped away from its orbiting Tianwen-1 mothership Friday and descended to touchdown on the red planet, official news agencies confirmed, a superpower feat that highlights the growing prowess of the Chinese space program.

The China National Space Administration confirmed Zhurong, named after the god of fire in Chinese mythology, landed on a broad plain known as Utopia Planitia Friday at 7:18 p.m. EDT (7:18 a.m. Saturday Beijing time) after a fiery plunge through the thin martian atmosphere.

Thomas Zurbuchen, NASA's director of space science at NASA Headquarters, congratulated China on the successful landing, tweeting, "together with the global science community, I look forward to the important contributions this mission will make to humanity's understanding of the Red Planet."

Like NASA's Perseverance rover before it, Zhurong relied on a heat shield and protective aeroshell to protect it from the extreme temperatures generated after hitting the atmosphere at nearly three miles per second. Once through the plasma heating zone, a large parachute presumably unfurled as planned, dramatically slowing the craft to sub-sonic velocities.

Finally, about seven minutes after hitting the atmosphere, the lander was programmed to fall free of its parachute, firing small rocket engines for a powered descent to the surface.

After extensive tests and checkout China has not revealed the rover's schedule two ramps will unfurl, allowing the six-wheel rover to roll off the lander's upper deck and down onto the surface for at least three months of robotic exploration.

"Tianwen-1 is going to orbit, land and release a rover all on the very first try," mission managers wrote before launch in the journal Nature Astronomy. "No planetary missions have ever been implemented in this way. If successful, it would signify a major technical breakthrough."

Trending News

The Tianwen-1 orbiter and Zhurong lander arrived in orbit around Mars on February 10, seven months after launch from Wenchang Satellite Launch Center on Hainan Island in the South China Sea. Eight days later, NASA's $2.4 billion Perseverance rover successfully landed in Jezero crater on the edge of Utopia Planitia.

The nuclear-powered Perseverance is NASA's ninth and most technologically advanced Mars lander to successfully reach the surface, carrying a suite of sophisticated cameras, spectrometers and other instruments designed to search for signs of past microbial life.

It also carries a complex sample caching mechanism to collect rock and soil samples for eventual return to Earth and deployed a small helicopter Ingenuity that has carried out five successful test flights to date.

Tianwen-1 is the first all-Chinese mission to the red planet and its most sophisticated interplanetary probe to date. While not in the same league with Perseverance, the combination of a powerful orbiter and surface rover for China's first attempt at Mars is a harbinger of more ambitious missions to come.

Only two other nations the United States and the Soviet Union have ever landed spacecraft on Mars. NASA's record stands at nine successful landings in 10 attempts while Russia endured eight lander failures with just one partial success.

"There is certainly life on Mars! We're the life of the party!" the Chinese space agency tweeted.

The Tianwen-1 mother ship, which will remain in orbit around the martian poles throughout its two-year mission, is equipped with seven instruments, including high- and medium-resolution cameras; a ground-penetrating radar; a mineralogy spectrometer; a magnetometer; and two charged particle detectors.

The 530-pound rover, roughly the size of NASA's Spirit and Opportunity rovers that landed on Mars in 2004, is equipped with six instruments, including a multi-spectral camera, a terrain camera, a ground-penetrating radar, magnetic field detector, meteorology sensors and others.

As with Perseverance, Chinese flight controllers will not be able to operate the Zhurong rover in realtime. Mars and Earth are currently separated by 198 million miles and radio signals, traveling at 186,000 miles per second, take nearly 18 minutes to cross the gulf.

Instead, flight controllers will uplink commands for the rover and then await the results, relayed back to Earth through the Tianwen-1 orbiter.

China has successfully sent two rovers to the moon, including one that landed on the never-before-visited far side. An attempt to send an orbiter to Mars atop a Russian rocket in 2011 ended in failure when the Zenit booster malfunctioned.

See the rest here:

In major milestone, China successfully lands Zhurong rover ...

Posted in Mars | Comments Off on In major milestone, China successfully lands Zhurong rover …

Exploration of Mars – Wikipedia

Posted: at 4:16 am

Overview of the exploration of Mars

The planet Mars has been explored remotely by spacecraft. Probes sent from Earth, beginning in the late 20th century, have yielded a large increase in knowledge about the Martian system, focused primarily on understanding its geology and habitability potential.[1] Engineering interplanetary journeys is complicated and the exploration of Mars has experienced a high failure rate, especially the early attempts. Roughly sixty percent of all spacecraft destined for Mars failed before completing their missions and some failed before their observations could begin. Some missions have met with unexpected success, such as the twin Mars Exploration Rovers, Spirit and Opportunity which operated for years beyond their specification.[2]

As of May2021[update], there are three operational rovers on the surface of Mars, the Curiosity and Perseverance rovers, both operated by the United States of America space agency NASA, as well as the Zhurong rover, part of the Tianwen-1 mission by the China National Space Administration (CNSA).[3][4] There are eight orbiters surveying the planet: Mars Odyssey, Mars Express, Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, Mars Orbiter Mission, MAVEN, the Trace Gas Orbiter, the Tianwen-1 orbiter, and the Hope Mars Mission, which have contributed massive amounts of information about Mars. The stationary lander InSight is investigating the deep interior of Mars. No sample return missions have been attempted for Mars and an attempted return mission for Mars' moon Phobos (Fobos-Grunt) failed at launch in 2011.[5] In all, there are 12 probes currently surveying Mars, with a 13th, the Ingenuity helicopter, which has completed its 5 planned flights.

The next missions expected to arrive at Mars are:

Mars has long been the subject of human interest. Early telescopic observations revealed color changes on the surface that were attributed to seasonal vegetation and apparent linear features were ascribed to intelligent design. Further telescopic observations found two moons, Phobos and Deimos, polar ice caps and the feature now known as Olympus Mons, the Solar System's second tallest mountain. The discoveries piqued further interest in the study and exploration of the red planet. Mars is a rocky planet, like Earth, that formed around the same time, yet with only half the diameter of Earth, and a far thinner atmosphere; it has a cold and desert-like surface.[6]

One way the surface of Mars has been categorized, is by thirty "quadrangles", with each quadrangle named for a prominent physiographic feature within that quadrangle.[7][8]

The minimum-energy launch windows for a Martian expedition occur at intervals of approximately two years and two months (specifically 780 days, the planet's synodic period with respect to Earth).[11] In addition, the lowest available transfer energy varies on a roughly 16-year cycle.[11] For example, a minimum occurred in the 1969 and 1971 launch windows, rising to a peak in the late 1970s, and hitting another low in 1986 and 1988.[11]

Starting in 1960, the Soviets launched a series of probes to Mars including the first intended flybys and hard (impact) landing (Mars 1962B).[13] The first successful flyby of Mars was on 1415 July 1965, by NASA's Mariner 4.[14] On November 14, 1971, Mariner 9 became the first space probe to orbit another planet when it entered into orbit around Mars.[15] The amount of data returned by probes increased dramatically as technology improved.[13]

The first to contact the surface were two Soviet probes: Mars 2 lander on November 27 and Mars 3 lander on December 2, 1971Mars 2 failed during descent and Mars 3 about twenty seconds after the first Martian soft landing.[16] Mars 6 failed during descent but did return some corrupted atmospheric data in 1974.[17] The 1975 NASA launches of the Viking program consisted of two orbiters, each with a lander that successfully soft landed in 1976. Viking 1 remained operational for six years, Viking 2 for three. The Viking landers relayed the first color panoramas of Mars.[18]

The Soviet probes Phobos 1 and 2 were sent to Mars in 1988 to study Mars and its two moons, with a focus on Phobos. Phobos 1 lost contact on the way to Mars. Phobos 2, while successfully photographing Mars and Phobos, failed before it was set to release two landers to the surface of Phobos.[19]

Mars has a reputation as a difficult space exploration target; just 25 of 55 missions through 2019, or 45.5%, have been fully successful, with a further three partially successful and partially failures.[citation needed] However, of the sixteen missions since 2001, twelve have been successful and eight of these are still operational.

Missions that ended prematurely after Phobos 1 and 2 (1988) include (see Probing difficulties section for more details):

Following the 1993 failure of the Mars Observer orbiter, the NASA Mars Global Surveyor achieved Mars orbit in 1997. This mission was a complete success, having finished its primary mapping mission in early 2001. Contact was lost with the probe in November 2006 during its third extended program, spending exactly 10 operational years in space. The NASA Mars Pathfinder, carrying a robotic exploration vehicle Sojourner, landed in the Ares Vallis on Mars in the summer of 1997, returning many images.[20]

Mars Landing Sites (16 December 2020)

NASA's Mars Odyssey orbiter entered Mars orbit in 2001.[21] Odyssey's Gamma Ray Spectrometer detected significant amounts of hydrogen in the upper metre or so of regolith on Mars. This hydrogen is thought to be contained in large deposits of water ice.[22]

The Mars Express mission of the European Space Agency (ESA) reached Mars in 2003. It carried the Beagle 2 lander, which was not heard from after being released and was declared lost in February 2004. Beagle 2 was located in January 2015 by HiRise camera on NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) having landed safely but failed to fully deploy its solar panels and antenna.[23][24] In early 2004, the Mars Express Planetary Fourier Spectrometer team announced the orbiter had detected methane in the Martian atmosphere, a potential biosignature. ESA announced in June 2006 the discovery of aurorae on Mars by the Mars Express.[25]

In January 2004, the NASA twin Mars Exploration Rovers named Spirit (MER-A) and Opportunity (MER-B) landed on the surface of Mars. Both have met and exceeded all their science objectives. Among the most significant scientific returns has been conclusive evidence that liquid water existed at some time in the past at both landing sites. Martian dust devils and windstorms have occasionally cleaned both rovers' solar panels, and thus increased their lifespan.[26] Spirit rover (MER-A) was active until 2010, when it stopped sending data because it got stuck in a sand dune and was unable to reorient itself to recharge its batteries.[5]

On 10 March 2006, NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) probe arrived in orbit to conduct a two-year science survey. The orbiter began mapping the Martian terrain and weather to find suitable landing sites for upcoming lander missions. The MRO captured the first image of a series of active avalanches near the planet's north pole in 2008.[27]

Rosetta came within 250km of Mars during its 2007 flyby.[28] Dawn flew by Mars in February 2009 for a gravity assist on its way to investigate Vesta and Ceres.[29]

Phoenix landed on the north polar region of Mars on May 25, 2008.[30] Its robotic arm dug into the Martian soil and the presence of water ice was confirmed on June 20, 2008.[31][32] The mission concluded on November 10, 2008 after contact was lost.[33] In 2008, the price of transporting material from the surface of Earth to the surface of Mars was approximately US$309,000 per kilogram.[34]

The Mars Science Laboratory mission was launched on November 26, 2011 and it delivered the Curiosity rover on the surface of Mars on August 6, 2012 UTC. It is larger and more advanced than the Mars Exploration Rovers, with a velocity of up to 90 meters per hour (295 feet per hour).[35] Experiments include a laser chemical sampler that can deduce the composition of rocks at a distance of 7 meters.[36]

MAVEN orbiter was launched on 18 November 2013, and on 22 September 2014, it was injected into an areocentric elliptic orbit 6,200km (3,900mi) by 150km (93mi) above the planet's surface to study its atmosphere. Mission goals include determining how the planet's atmosphere and water, presumed to have once been substantial, were lost over time.[37]

The Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) launched their Mars Orbiter Mission (MOM) on November 5, 2013, and it was inserted into Mars orbit on September 24, 2014. India's ISRO is the fourth space agency to reach Mars, after the Soviet space program, NASA and ESA.[38] India successfully placed a spacecraft into Mars orbit, and became the first country to do so in its maiden attempt.[39]

The ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter arrived at Mars in 2016 and deployed the Schiaparelli EDM lander, a test lander. Schiaparelli crashed on surface, but it transmitted key data during its parachute descent, so the test was declared a partial success.[40]

The following entails a brief overview of Mars exploration, oriented towards orbiters and flybys; see also Mars landing and Mars rover.

Between 1960 and 1969, the Soviet Union launched nine probes intended to reach Mars. They all failed: three at launch; three failed to reach near-Earth orbit; one during the burn to put the spacecraft into trans-Mars trajectory; and two during the interplanetary orbit.

The Mars 1M programs (sometimes dubbed Marsnik in Western media) was the first Soviet unmanned spacecraft interplanetary exploration program, which consisted of two flyby probes launched towards Mars in October 1960, Mars 1960A and Mars 1960B (also known as Korabl 4 and Korabl 5 respectively). After launch, the third stage pumps on both launchers were unable to develop enough pressure to commence ignition, so Earth parking orbit was not achieved. The spacecraft reached an altitude of 120km before reentry.

Mars 1962A was a Mars flyby mission, launched on October 24, 1962 and Mars 1962B an intended first Mars lander mission, launched in late December of the same year (1962). Both failed from either breaking up as they were going into Earth orbit or having the upper stage explode in orbit during the burn to put the spacecraft into trans-Mars trajectory.[5]

Mars 1 (1962 Beta Nu 1), an automatic interplanetary spacecraft launched to Mars on November 1, 1962, was the first probe of the Soviet Mars probe program to achieve interplanetary orbit. Mars 1 was intended to fly by the planet at a distance of about 11,000km and take images of the surface as well as send back data on cosmic radiation, micrometeoroid impacts and Mars' magnetic field, radiation environment, atmospheric structure, and possible organic compounds.[41][42] Sixty-one radio transmissions were held, initially at 2-day intervals and later at 5-day intervals, from which a large amount of interplanetary data was collected. On 21 March 1963, when the spacecraft was at a distance of 106,760,000km from Earth, on its way to Mars, communications ceased due to failure of its antenna orientation system.[41][42]

In 1964, both Soviet probe launches, of Zond 1964A on June 4, and Zond 2 on November 30, (part of the Zond program), resulted in failures. Zond 1964A had a failure at launch, while communication was lost with Zond 2 en route to Mars after a mid-course maneuver, in early May 1965.[5]

In 1969, and as part of the Mars probe program, the Soviet Union prepared two identical 5-ton orbiters called M-69, dubbed by NASA as Mars 1969A and Mars 1969B. Both probes were lost in launch-related complications with the newly developed Proton rocket.[43]

The USSR intended to have the first artificial satellite of Mars beating the planned American Mariner 8 and Mariner 9 Mars orbiters. In May 1971, one day after Mariner 8 malfunctioned at launch and failed to reach orbit, Cosmos 419 (Mars 1971C), a heavy probe of the Soviet Mars program M-71, also failed to launch. This spacecraft was designed as an orbiter only, while the next two probes of project M-71, Mars 2 and Mars 3, were multipurpose combinations of an orbiter and a lander with small skis-walking rovers that would be the first planet rovers outside the Moon. They were successfully launched in mid-May 1971 and reached Mars about seven months later. On November 27, 1971 the lander of Mars 2 crash-landed due to an on-board computer malfunction and became the first man-made object to reach the surface of Mars. On 2 December 1971, the Mars 3 lander became the first spacecraft to achieve a soft landing, but its transmission was interrupted after 14.5 seconds.[44]

The Mars 2 and 3 orbiters sent back a relatively large volume of data covering the period from December 1971 to March 1972, although transmissions continued through to August. By 22 August 1972, after sending back data and a total of 60 pictures, Mars 2 and 3 concluded their missions. The images and data enabled creation of surface relief maps, and gave information on the Martian gravity and magnetic fields.[45]

In 1973, the Soviet Union sent four more probes to Mars: the Mars 4 and Mars 5 orbiters and the Mars 6 and Mars 7 flyby/lander combinations. All missions except Mars 7 sent back data, with Mars 5 being most successful. Mars 5 transmitted just 60 images before a loss of pressurization in the transmitter housing ended the mission. Mars 6 lander transmitted data during descent, but failed upon impact. Mars 4 flew by the planet at a range of 2200km returning one swath of pictures and radio occultation data, which constituted the first detection of the nightside ionosphere on Mars.[46] Mars 7 probe separated prematurely from the carrying vehicle due to a problem in the operation of one of the onboard systems (attitude control or retro-rockets) and missed the planet by 1,300 kilometres (8.7106au).[citation needed]

In 1964, NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory made two attempts at reaching Mars. Mariner 3 and Mariner 4 were identical spacecraft designed to carry out the first flybys of Mars. Mariner 3 was launched on November 5, 1964, but the shroud encasing the spacecraft atop its rocket failed to open properly, dooming the mission. Three weeks later, on November 28, 1964, Mariner 4 was launched successfully on a 7-month voyage to Mars.[citation needed]

Mariner 4 flew past Mars on July 14, 1965, providing the first close-up photographs of another planet. The pictures, gradually played back to Earth from a small tape recorder on the probe, showed impact craters. It provided radically more accurate data about the planet; a surface atmospheric pressure of about 1% of Earth's and daytime temperatures of 100C (148F) were estimated. No magnetic field[47][48] or Martian radiation belts[49] were detected. The new data meant redesigns for then planned Martian landers, and showed life would have a more difficult time surviving there than previously anticipated.[50][51][52][53]

NASA continued the Mariner program with another pair of Mars flyby probes, Mariner 6 and 7. They were sent at the next launch window, and reached the planet in 1969. During the following launch window the Mariner program again suffered the loss of one of a pair of probes. Mariner 9 successfully entered orbit about Mars, the first spacecraft ever to do so, after the launch time failure of its sister ship, Mariner 8. When Mariner 9 reached Mars in 1971, it and two Soviet orbiters (Mars 2 and Mars 3) found that a planet-wide dust storm was in progress. The mission controllers used the time spent waiting for the storm to clear to have the probe rendezvous with, and photograph, Phobos. When the storm cleared sufficiently for Mars' surface to be photographed by Mariner 9, the pictures returned represented a substantial advance over previous missions. These pictures were the first to offer more detailed evidence that liquid water might at one time have flowed on the planetary surface. They also finally discerned the true nature of many Martian albedo features. For example, Nix Olympica was one of only a few features that could be seen during the planetary duststorm, revealing it to be the highest mountain (volcano, to be exact) on any planet in the entire Solar System, and leading to its reclassification as Olympus Mons.[citation needed]

The Viking program launched Viking 1 and Viking 2 spacecraft to Mars in 1975; The program consisted of two orbiters and two landers these were the second and third spacecraft to successfully land on Mars.

The primary scientific objectives of the lander mission were to search for biosignatures and observe meteorologic, seismic and magnetic properties of Mars. The results of the biological experiments on board the Viking landers remain inconclusive, with a reanalysis of the Viking data published in 2012 suggesting signs of microbial life on Mars.[54][55]

The Viking orbiters revealed that large floods of water carved deep valleys, eroded grooves into bedrock, and traveled thousands of kilometers. Areas of branched streams, in the southern hemisphere, suggest that rain once fell.[56][57][58]

Mars Pathfinder was a U.S. spacecraft that landed a base station with a roving probe on Mars on July 4, 1997. It consisted of a lander and a small 10.6 kilograms (23lb) wheeled robotic rover named Sojourner, which was the first rover to operate on the surface of Mars.[59][60] In addition to scientific objectives, the Mars Pathfinder mission was also a "proof-of-concept" for various technologies, such as an airbag landing system and automated obstacle avoidance, both later exploited by the Mars Exploration Rovers.[59]

After the 1992 failure of NASA's Mars Observer orbiter, NASA retooled and launched Mars Global Surveyor (MGS). Mars Global Surveyor launched on November 7, 1996, and entered orbit on September 12, 1997. After a year and a half trimming its orbit from a looping ellipse to a circular track around the planet, the spacecraft began its primary mapping mission in March 1999. It observed the planet from a low-altitude, nearly polar orbit over the course of one complete Martian year, the equivalent of nearly two Earth years. Mars Global Surveyor completed its primary mission on January 31, 2001, and completed several extended mission phases.[citation needed]

The mission studied the entire Martian surface, atmosphere, and interior, and returned more data about the red planet than all previous Mars missions combined. The data has been archived and remains available publicly.[61]

Among key scientific findings, Global Surveyor took pictures of gullies and debris flow features that suggest there may be current sources of liquid water, similar to an aquifer, at or near the surface of the planet. Similar channels on Earth are formed by flowing water, but on Mars the temperature is normally too cold and the atmosphere too thin to sustain liquid water. Nevertheless, many scientists hypothesize that liquid groundwater can sometimes surface on Mars, erode gullies and channels, and pool at the bottom before freezing and evaporating.[citation needed]

Magnetometer readings showed that the planet's magnetic field is not globally generated in the planet's core, but is localized in particular areas of the crust. New temperature data and closeup images of the Martian moon Phobos showed that its surface is composed of powdery material at least 1 metre (3feet) thick, caused by millions of years of meteoroid impacts. Data from the spacecraft's laser altimeter gave scientists their first 3-D views of Mars' north polar ice cap.[citation needed]

Faulty software uploaded to the vehicle in June 2006 caused the spacecraft to orient its solar panels incorrectly several months later, resulting in battery overheating and subsequent failure.[62] On November 5, 2006 MGS lost contact with Earth.[63] NASA ended efforts to restore communication on January 28, 2007.[64]

In 2001, NASA's Mars Odyssey orbiter arrived at Mars. Its mission is to use spectrometers and imagers to hunt for evidence of past or present water and volcanic activity on Mars. In 2002, it was announced that the probe's gamma-ray spectrometer and neutron spectrometer had detected large amounts of hydrogen, indicating that there are vast deposits of water ice in the upper three meters of Mars' soil within 60 latitude of the south pole.[citation needed]

On June 2, 2003, the European Space Agency's Mars Express set off from Baikonur Cosmodrome to Mars. The Mars Express craft consists of the Mars Express Orbiter and the stationary lander Beagle 2. The lander carried a digging device and the smallest mass spectrometer created to date, as well as a range of other devices, on a robotic arm in order to accurately analyze soil beneath the dusty surface to look for biosignatures and biomolecules.[citation needed]

The orbiter entered Mars orbit on December 25, 2003, and Beagle 2 entered Mars' atmosphere the same day. However, attempts to contact the lander failed. Communications attempts continued throughout January, but Beagle 2 was declared lost in mid-February, and a joint inquiry was launched by the UK and ESA. The Mars Express Orbiter confirmed the presence of water ice and carbon dioxide ice at the planet's south pole, while NASA had previously confirmed their presence at the north pole of Mars.[citation needed]

The lander's fate remained a mystery until it was located intact on the surface of Mars in a series of images from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter.[65][66] The images suggest that two of the spacecraft's four solar panels failed to deploy, blocking the spacecraft's communications antenna. Beagle 2 is the first British and first European probe to achieve a soft landing on Mars.[citation needed]

NASA's Mars Exploration Rover Mission (MER), started in 2003, was a robotic space mission involving two rovers, Spirit (MER-A) and Opportunity, (MER-B) that explored the Martian surface geology. The mission's scientific objective was to search for and characterize a wide range of rocks and soils that hold clues to past water activity on Mars. The mission was part of NASA's Mars Exploration Program, which includes three previous successful landers: the two Viking program landers in 1976; and Mars Pathfinder probe in 1997.[citation needed]

The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) is a multipurpose spacecraft designed to conduct reconnaissance and exploration of Mars from orbit. The US$720 million spacecraft was built by Lockheed Martin under the supervision of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, launched August 12, 2005, and entered Mars orbit on March 10, 2006.[68]

The MRO contains a host of scientific instruments such as the HiRISE camera, CTX camera, CRISM, and SHARAD. The HiRISE camera is used to analyze Martian landforms, whereas CRISM and SHARAD can detect water, ice, and minerals on and below the surface. Additionally, MRO is paving the way for upcoming generations of spacecraft through daily monitoring of Martian weather and surface conditions, searching for future landing sites, and testing a new telecommunications system that enable it to send and receive information at an unprecedented bitrate, compared to previous Mars spacecraft. Data transfer to and from the spacecraft occurs faster than all previous interplanetary missions combined and allows it to serve as an important relay satellite for other missions.[citation needed]

The ESA Rosetta space probe mission to the comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko flew within 250km of Mars on February 25, 2007, in a gravitational slingshot designed to slow and redirect the spacecraft.[69]

The NASA Dawn spacecraft used the gravity of Mars in 2009 to change direction and velocity on its way to Vesta, and tested out Dawn's cameras and other instruments on Mars.[70]

On November 8, 2011, Russia's Roscosmos launched an ambitious mission called Fobos-Grunt. It consisted of a lander aimed to retrieve a sample back to Earth from Mars' moon Phobos, and place the Chinese Yinghuo-1 probe in Mars' orbit. The Fobos-Grunt mission suffered a complete control and communications failure shortly after launch and was left stranded in low Earth orbit, later falling back to Earth.[71] The Yinghuo-1 satellite and Fobos-Grunt underwent destructive re-entry on January 15, 2012, finally disintegrating over the Pacific Ocean.[72][73][74]

The NASA Mars Science Laboratory mission with its rover named Curiosity, was launched on November 26, 2011,[75][76] and landed on Mars on August 6, 2012 on Aeolis Palus in Gale Crater. The rover carries instruments designed to look for past or present conditions relevant to the past or present habitability of Mars.[77][78][79][80]

NASA's MAVEN is an orbiter mission to study the upper atmosphere of Mars.[81] It will also serve as a communications relay satellite for robotic landers and rovers on the surface of Mars. MAVEN was launched 18 November 2013 and reached Mars on 22 September 2014.[citation needed]

The Mars Orbiter Mission, also called Mangalyaan, was launched on 5 November 2013 by the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO).[82] It was successfully inserted into Martian orbit on 24 September 2014. The mission is a technology demonstrator, and as secondary objective, it will also study the Martian atmosphere. This is India's first mission to Mars, and with it, ISRO became the fourth space agency to successfully reach Mars after the Soviet Union, NASA (USA) and ESA (Europe). It also made ISRO the second space agency to reach Mars orbit on its first attempt (the first national one, after the international ESA), and also the first Asian country to successfully send an orbiter to Mars. It was completed in a record low budget of $71 million,[83][84] making it the least-expensive Mars mission to date.[85]

The ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter is an atmospheric research orbiter built in collaboration between ESA and Roscosmos. It was injected into Mars orbit on 19 October 2016 to gain a better understanding of methane (CH4) and other trace gases present in the Martian atmosphere that could be evidence for possible biological or geological activity. The Schiaparelli EDM lander was destroyed when trying to land on the surface of Mars.[86]

In August 2012, NASA selected InSight, a $425 million lander mission with a heat flow probe and seismometer, to determine the deep interior structure of Mars.[87][88][89] Two flyby CubeSats called MarCO were launched with InSight on 5 May 2018[90] to provide real-time telemetry during the entry and landing of InSight. The CubeSats separated from the Atlas V booster 1.5 hours after launch and traveled their own trajectories to Mars.[91][92][93] InSight landed successfully on Mars on 26 November 2018.[94]

The United Arab Emirates launched the Hope Mars Mission, in July 2020 on the Japanese H-IIA booster.[95] It was successfully placed into orbit on 9 February 2021. It is studying the Martian atmosphere and weather.

Tianwen-1 is a Chinese mission, launched on 23 July 2020. It includes an orbiter, a lander and a 240 kilograms rover.[96] The orbiter was placed into orbit on 10 February 2021. The Zhurong rover successfully soft landed on 14 May 2021 (UTC).[4]

The Mars 2020 mission by NASA was launched on 30 July 2020 on a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket from Cape Canaveral. It is based on the Mars Science Laboratory design. The scientific payload is focused on astrobiology.[97] It includes Perseverance rover and Mars Helicopter Ingenuity, which undertook flights successfully. Unlike older rovers that relied on solar power, Perseverance is nuclear powered, to survive longer than its predecessors in this harsh, dusty environment. The car-size rover weighs about 1 ton, with a robotic arm that reaches about 7 feet, zoom cameras, a chemical analyzer and a rock drill.[98][99]

After traveling 293 million miles to reach Mars over the course of more than six months, Perseverance successfully landed on February 18, 2021. Its initial mission is set for at least one Martian year, or 687 Earth days. It will search for signs of ancient life and explore the red planet's surface.[100][101]

Other future mission concepts include polar probes, Martian aircraft and a network of small meteorological stations.[110] Longterm areas of study may include Martian lava tubes, resource utilization, and electronic charge carriers in rocks.[114][115] Micromissions are another possibility, such as piggybacking a small spacecraft on an Ariane 5 rocket and using a lunar gravity assist to get to Mars.[116]

The human exploration of Mars has been an aspiration since the earliest days of modern rocketry; Robert H. Goddard credits the idea of reaching Mars as his own inspiration to study the physics and engineering of space flight.[117] Proposals for human exploration of Mars have been made throughout the history of space exploration; currently there are multiple active plans and programs to put humans on Mars within the next ten to thirty years, both governmental and private, some of which are listed below.

Human exploration by the United States was identified as a long-term goal in the Vision for Space Exploration announced in 2004 by then US President George W. Bush.[118] The planned Orion spacecraft would be used to send a human expedition to Earth's moon by 2020 as a stepping stone to a Mars expedition. On September 28, 2007, NASA administrator Michael D. Griffin stated that NASA aims to put a person on Mars by 2037.[119]

On December 2, 2014, NASA's Advanced Human Exploration Systems and Operations Mission Director Jason Crusan and Deputy Associate Administrator for Programs James Reuthner announced tentative support for the Boeing "Affordable Mars Mission Design" including radiation shielding, centrifugal artificial gravity, in-transit consumable resupply, and a lander which can return.[120][121] Reuthner suggested that if adequate funding was forthcoming, the proposed mission would be expected in the early 2030s.[122]

On October 8, 2015, NASA published its official plan for human exploration and colonization of Mars. They called it "Journey to Mars". The plan operates through three distinct phases leading up to fully sustained colonization.[123]

On August 28, 2015, NASA funded a year long simulation to study the effects of a year long Mars mission on six scientists. The scientists lived in a bio dome on a Mauna Loa mountain in Hawaii with limited connection to the outside world and were only allowed outside if they were wearing spacesuits.[125][126]

NASAs human Mars exploration plans have evolved through the NASA Mars Design Reference Missions, a series of design studies for human exploration of Mars.

In 2017 the focus of NASA shifted to a return to the Moon by 2024 with the Artemis program, a flight to Mars could follow after this project.

The long-term goal of the private corporation SpaceX is the establishment of routine flights to Mars to enable colonization.[127][128][129] To this end, the company is developing Starship, a spacecraft capable of crew transportation to Mars and other celestial bodies, along with its booster Super Heavy. In 2017 SpaceX announced plans to send two uncrewed Starships to Mars by 2022, followed by two more uncrewed flights and two crewed flights in 2024.[128] Starship is planned to have a payload of at least 100 tonnes.[130] Starship is designed to use a combination of aerobraking and propulsive descent, utilizing fuel produced from a Mars (in situ resource utilization) facility.[128] As of mid 2021, the Starship development program has seen successful testing of several Starship prototypes.[131]

Mars Direct, a low-cost human mission proposed by Robert Zubrin, founder of the Mars Society, would use heavy-lift Saturn V class rockets, such as the Ares V, to skip orbital construction, LEO rendezvous, and lunar fuel depots. A modified proposal, called "Mars to Stay", involves not returning the first immigrant explorers immediately, if ever (see Colonization of Mars).[118][119][132][133]

Go here to read the rest:

Exploration of Mars - Wikipedia

Posted in Mars | Comments Off on Exploration of Mars – Wikipedia

This week in space: Sounds of Mars, private astronauts in space – Chron

Posted: at 4:16 am

"This Week In Space" brings you whats new and exciting in space exploration and astronomy once a week, every week. From supernovae to SpaceX or Mars missions to black holes, if its out of this world, its covered here:

China put the first piece of its planned space station into orbit, but marred the accomplishment by letting a rocket stage tumble back down to Earth in a totally uncontrolledand dangerousfashion. For several days, everyone from backyard astronomers to the US Space Force watched to see where the 23-ton, 17,000 mph projectile would crash and potentially wreak destruction. NASA and other space agencies condemned Chinas negligence, to which the Peoples Republic responded that it was being held to a double standard: when debris from the booster stage of a Falcon 9 rocket rained down over the Pacific Northwest last March, SpaceX drew much much less bad press. The key difference? SpaceX intended to deorbit its booster safely but was held back by a technical failure. China always planned to simply drop its rocket on the Earth like litter. Luckily for them, the booster broke apart over the Indian Ocean last Sunday, and no damage was done.

New map may show humanity's future in space

Travel space from your computer thanks to new mapping aided by data from the Gaia spacecraft.

In a monumental feat of cartography, a group of European astronomers have created a detailed and accurate 3D map of nearby space that you can fly through. Every known star and planet within 30 lightyears is included. These are the closest stellar systems to Earth, so there's a good chance that the first life we may ever discover on another planet outside the solar system would be around one of them. And if humanity were ever to leave the Sun for other systems, these stars would be the first destinations.

The map is a synthesis of decades of scientific results. It is polished with new data from the Gaia spacecraft, an ESA mission that aims to measure the precise locations of around 1 billion stars.

Rover captures sounds of Mars, space helicopter in flight

In a two-minute recording of audio and video from the Martian surface, the Perseverance rover watched Ingenuity, the first space helicopter, take flight and return from a nearly 900-foot round trip. Although this is Ingenuitys fourth flight, it is the first time a spacecraft has ever recorded the sound of another. Listen: underneath the steady, surreal throb of the rushing Martian wind, you can make out whirring from Ingenuitys blades as it passes close to the rover.

The goal of Ingenuity was always simply to find out what it's like to fly on Mars. Now that it has conducted test flights so successfully time and again, NASA has announced that the helicopter will soon transition to actually helping Perseverance by undertaking scouting missions.

NASA agrees to first private astronaut mission (without Tom Cruise, for now)

404095 05: Actor Tom Cruise (C), with film producer Toni Myers (3rd L) and astronauts from the International Stace Station mission Nancy Currie (L), Susan Helms (2nd L), Jim Voss (2nd R), and Russian Cosmonaut Yuri Usachev (R) flash a thumbs up as they attend the premiere of the movie "Space Station 3-D."

In a historic moment for the privatization of space, a corporation has officially bought four tickets to the International Space Station. In 2022 (at the earliest), Axiom Space will send three investors and an ex-NASA astronaut to dock a SpaceX Dragon capsule on the ISS and stay there for eight days. Although it is not exactly clear what the visitors will be up to, activities appear to include outreach for hospitals and research for the Candiian and Israeli space agencies.

The tickets are said to cost $55 million apiece. Axiom will foot the bill for their crews supplies and storage space on the station, while NASA has agreed to pay Axiom to bring low-temperature samples back to the Earth.

While it was initially thought that Tom Cruise and director Doug Liman (of "The Bourne Identity" fame) would join the mission as part of a movie they are making, this plan seems to be postponed for now. Axiom is aiming for their ISS visit to be the first of many, though. Mr. Cruise should have plenty of opportunities to become an astronaut.

Asa Stahl is an astrophysics PhD candidate at Rice University and the award-winning author of the pop science childrens book "The Big Bang Book." His research is aimed at discovering planets around other stars in order to answer some of our biggest questions, like "How special is the Earth?" and "How did we get here?" His recent book has been recognized as an Edward Jack Keats Award Honoree, an NSTA-CBC Outstanding Science Book, and a Sakura Medal Finalist.

Read the original post:

This week in space: Sounds of Mars, private astronauts in space - Chron

Posted in Mars | Comments Off on This week in space: Sounds of Mars, private astronauts in space – Chron