Monthly Archives: April 2021

Traces of Ancient Epidemic Detected in DNA – Archaeology

Posted: April 19, 2021 at 7:12 am

TUCSON, ARIZONAAccording to a Science News report, traces of a viral epidemic some 25,000 years ago have been detected in the DNA of present-day East Asians. Evolutionary geneticist David Enard of the University of Arizona and his colleagues analyzed more than 2,000 publicly available DNA samples from Chinese Dai, Vietnamese Kinh, and African Yoruba people for more than 400 proteins known to interact with coronaviruses. The researchers found that only the East Asian groups showed substantially increased production of all of the proteins. Analysis of the genes related to the production of these proteins suggests they became more common about 25,000 years ago and then leveled off about 5,000 years ago. This indicates that East Asians could have adapted to the infection, or the virus became a less potent cause of disease, Enard explained. Some of the gene variants would have also been useful for fighting other types of viruses as well, he added. Further study is needed to determine if these gene variants offer any protection against SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. To read about a sixteenth-century epidemic in Mexico, go to "Conquistador Contagion."

Read this article:
Traces of Ancient Epidemic Detected in DNA - Archaeology

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on Traces of Ancient Epidemic Detected in DNA – Archaeology

Dynasty draft DNA: Identifying the traits that make up the future elite fantasy football stars – The Athletic

Posted: at 7:12 am

Aim small, miss small.

The application of that phrase originally applied to aiming a muzzle-loader rifle. The concept being that instead of aiming broadly at your target, aim at something very small on your target so that should you miss, you still hit your target. While I have no muzzle-loader experience, I still find the phrase applies to my draft preparation.

Ive always been fond of player scouting dating back to the late 1990s, and Ive been a fan of statistical modeling for long before that. Combining these two passions has made for a great foundation for success at fantasy football, where leveraging my objectivity and available data has allowed me to gain an edge over my competition. Look around the fantasy multiverse and youll see a broad array of data points, metrics and applications bandied about as the secret sauce to winning.

Read more from the original source:
Dynasty draft DNA: Identifying the traits that make up the future elite fantasy football stars - The Athletic

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on Dynasty draft DNA: Identifying the traits that make up the future elite fantasy football stars – The Athletic

Grammar of the Genome: Reading the Influence of DNA on Disease – Baylor University

Posted: at 7:12 am

The human genome has long been a difficult book to read. Modern technological advances have recently opened doors for researchers to begin asking a big question: What parts of our DNA sequences might influence disease? Mary Lauren Benton, Ph.D., recently joined the Baylor Engineering and Computer Science faculty as an assistant professor of bioinformatics, and she is working to answer that question.

Mary Lauren Benton, Ph.D.

If you think of the genome like an instruction manual, Im interested in the grammar, Benton said. Im interested in understanding how short DNA sequences turn genes on and off in different cells and allow for many different outcomes. If we know how a particular sequence influences risk of heart disease, for example, we can use that information to help us guide clinical decisions, whether thats applying different treatments, prescribing different medications or scheduling more preventative care. All of these things can help clinicians to better prioritize and care for patients.

Benton uses computer modeling to look through large data sets of genetic information. Bioinformatics allows for processing of these large data in ways not possible previously, giving room for biological researchers to find patterns and solutions using methods and tools from computer science.

I think of bioinformatics as the intersection of computer science and biology, Benton said. I take tools and methods from computer science, and I apply them to solve fundamental biological questions. We have a lot of really big data sets in biology. The human genome is 3 billion base pairs long, which we cant analyze by hand. The tools from computer science and statistics give us a way to ask questions that we wouldnt be able to otherwise. They open the doors to analyses that would have been impossible even 10 or 20 years ago.

Benton most recently authored The Influence of Evolutionary History on Human Health and Disease, which was published in the Nature Reviews Genetic Journal and takes a look at the evolutionary origins of disease. Being diagnosed with a disease or health problem may feel like a present problem; however, Benton explained that looking at the foundations of a disease is important to understanding how to move forward with treatment.

The foundations and the systems that are involved in disease have really deep evolutionary origins, she said. Cancer might be something that youre diagnosed with today, but the foundation of cancer can be traced back to the idea that we have cells that are able to grow and divide, which also provides the opportunity for tumors to grow.

Benton explained that its important to consider the history of the disease and the systems involved alongside any variants or environmental factors that help to cause the disease. A holistic understanding of disease can influence how patients are treated as well as provide information about how their diseases came to be.

Its not enough to understand whats happening in a person right now or in the last five years, Benton said. Understanding the million-year history of how people got here is equally important to make advances in personalizing medicine, especially genomic medicine. Having that long lens is something that is often lost in the day-to-day operations of a doctors office.

Benton is excited to be evaluating the way that researchers think about decoding genetic information. While a common approach is to think of genes as being able to be turned off or on with a simple switch, that may not be the most accurate approach.

We study these sets of genetic switches and how they turn genes on and off at the right times. Often, we think about these switches working one-at-a-time; the gene is either on or its off, Benton said. But it is much more complicated than that. There are often multiple switches that act more like a dashboard of knobs and dials that all work together to properly tune the output of the genome.

Bentons research is moving toward the development of new models and ways of thinking about how known individual elements are combined and factored into this much larger, more accurate dashboard. Differences based on demographic histories, environmental variables and evolutionary processes all influence the risk of disease in different ways. A better understanding of genomes and how genetic variants relate to disease has major implications for precision medicine.

Its really vital for precision medicine to take into account the full diversity of the human experience. We cant focus on one particular kind of person or one population. People of European ancestry are over-represented in genetic studies, Benton said. Improving diversity and representation in our genomic studies is vital to understanding how the genome relates to disease and to learning how to appropriately treat all of the patients that might walk through the doors of a clinic.

Precision medicine, in some ways, seems futuristic and far-off. But, in other ways, precision medicine is already being used to protect at-risk individuals from diseases like cancer. While widespread precision medicine may not be seen for a long time, research like Bentons plays a role in better understanding disease risk broadly and providing context for clinical solutions moving forward.

Precision medicine is both happening right now and is something that well probably always be working toward, Benton said. There are things that we understand right now about specific genetic variants that might predispose you to a certain kind of breast cancer, for example. We already have diseases that we can test for or treat differently based on someones genotype. But, because the genome is such a complicated thing, walking into the clinic and handing your DNA sequence to the doctor, who would then read it and prescribe the right treatments on the spot, is a goal that well always be working toward. Still, I expect well see big changes in the next five to 10 years given the current rate of progress.

See the rest here:
Grammar of the Genome: Reading the Influence of DNA on Disease - Baylor University

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on Grammar of the Genome: Reading the Influence of DNA on Disease – Baylor University

Luxury is about roots and DNA: Omega CEO – Moneycontrol

Posted: at 7:12 am

Raynald Aeschlimann believes that young customers are interested in new watches with some vintage appeal, and that stores should be non-intimidating spaces

April 18, 2021 / 10:24 AM IST

Akshay Sawai

Online availability and watches with history are two key drivers to attract young customers, Omega CEO Raynald Aeschlimann believes.

We are finding young people are interested in new watches that have some sort of vintage appeal. We are not talking about simple reissues of classic watches: we are talking about modern watches that might reference the 1950s and 60s in their design, Aeschlimann said in an interview in the April issue of Monocle.

Man stepping on the moon was a giant leap for Omega. It was the official watch of NASA missions, including Apollo XI, when Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin and Michael Collins flew to the silver disc in our sky. That was 1969. Half a century later, Omega still possesses the cachet of being the first watch ever worn on the moon, of being on the hands of Armstrong and Aldrin as they registered one of mankinds greatest achievements.

Our new Speedmaster watches are inspiring for people who werent even born when astronauts were wearing them on the NASA moon-landing missions, but they love the story and the history and the look, Aeschlimann said. Luxury is about roots and DNA and young people respect this.

Coming to the present, Aeschlimann said that having a digital presence helped when the COVID-19 pandemic forced them to close their stores.

We had the difficulty of dealing with 460 shops that were closed temporarily, he said. But we were ready with a digital offering because wed listened to what our customers had wanted in the past. You cant prepare for these things overnight; you cant just wake up in the morning and become creative or flexible it has to be in your DNA.

Nonetheless, Omega has invested in a flagship store in Zurich. It is a departure from luxury stores of the past, which were snobbish and where the product was in enclosures. The brand has emulated the Apple concept of letting customers touch and feel watches.

Read the rest here:
Luxury is about roots and DNA: Omega CEO - Moneycontrol

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on Luxury is about roots and DNA: Omega CEO – Moneycontrol

Mr. Nice Guy: Booksellers give in to ‘bullies,’ cease sales of some titles – Fairfield Daily Republic

Posted: at 7:11 am

Mr. Nice Guy: Bud Stevenson

I have been a fairly reliable customer of Amazon, but now Im having second thoughts.

They recently delisted When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Moment. The book is certainly timely since there has been endless commentary in print and on TV and radio on the subject of transgenderism.

As Roger Kimball, publisher of Encounter Books points out in an essay in The Wall Street Journal, Amazon has no problem offering Adolf Hitlers Mein Kampf, one of the most vicious anti-Semitic books ever written. Mein Kampf is considered by many to be the blueprint for the murder of 6 million Jews during World War II. A competitor of Amazon, Bookshop.org offers the equally troubling works of Louis Farrakhan, who proudly bills himself as the one who exposes the crimes of the Jews over the centuries.

Another author I admire is Heather Mac Donald (note that Mac and Donald are printed separately, not together as MacDonald). She recently wrote The War on Cops, a very timely discussion of how the political left has made police officers the enemy. In the opinion of the censors at Bookshop, portraying the police as vital defenders of the American way of life was too much for their customers.

Bookshop.com explained that it removed When Harry Became Sally because they had multiple complaints and concerns from customers, affiliates and employees about the title. So Hitlers book that advocates the murder of all the Jews in Germany is OK for Bookshop, but a discussion of transgenderism is not.

Let me quote Kimballs opinion of the new censorship: The move to squash Mr. Andersons book (When Harry Became Sally) is the vanguard of a larger effort to silence debate and impose ideological conformity on any contentious issue is which the commissars of woke culture have made an investment. It has nothing to do with principle and everything to do with power.

Kimball goes on to say that Amazon and Bookshop have sided firmly with the bullies.

One wonders how the ultra-sensitive left in this country feel about Rep. Rashida Tlaib, the Democratic congresswoman from Detroit. Tlaib called for the abolition of the police. In a recent comment, she said American policing is inherently and intentionally racist. You might be interested to know that Congresswoman Tlaib is much in demand as a public speaker. Apparently her description last year of President Donald Trump as a mother only added to her popularity.

As I write this I hear that Thursday was Jackie Robinson Day. I believe I was in the eighth grade at Mamaroneck Junior High School when we had an assembly at which Robinson was the guest speaker. It was definitely the most memorable event of my junior high school years.

Robinson had the most mellifluous voice I ever remember hearing, and from that day on I abandoned my allegiance to the New York Yankees and became a Brooklyn Dodgers fan. Robinson, of course, was the first player to break the color barrier, and his spectacular play proved to Major League Baseball owners and managers that they were missing out by ignoring Black players ever since the founding of professional baseball.

For a few years, I had a collection of autographed baseballs I remember Stan Musial but, instead of saving them I batted them around in my neighborhood. I wonder what they would be worth today?

Bud Stevenson, a retired stockbroker, lives in Fairfield. Reach him at[emailprotected].

Related

Continue reading here:
Mr. Nice Guy: Booksellers give in to 'bullies,' cease sales of some titles - Fairfield Daily Republic

Posted in Transhumanist | Comments Off on Mr. Nice Guy: Booksellers give in to ‘bullies,’ cease sales of some titles – Fairfield Daily Republic

Matthew Wong Ink Works, Never Before Exhibited, Will Alight in New York – ARTnews

Posted: at 7:08 am

When the artist Matthew Wong was just starting his painting practice, in 2013, he said in an interview that he had no fixed schedule for going about his workwith one exception. The only thing that takes place at the same time every day is when I get out of bed, I have to do an ink drawing before doing anything else, such as brushing my teeth or eating, Wong told the website Studio Critical. He sometimes experimented in a bathroom at his familys Hong Kong home, he said later, randomly pouring ink onto pagessmashing them togetherhoping something interesting was going to come out of it.

Wong kept making inventive ink drawings in the ensuing years, but it was his luminous oil paintingsvibrant, mysterious, melancholy landscapesthat would win him attention, and make him one of the signal artists of the decade. (Collectors now compete fiercely for them.) By the time Wong died in 2019, at 35, by suicide, he had created some 1,000 paintings and drawings. (His New York gallery, Karma, is readying a catalogue raisonn.) Only a fraction of that material has been seen publicly, and his ink works remain little known. However, that may be about to change.

On May 5, Cheim & Read will open an exhibition focused on Wongs efforts in that unforgiving mediumjust ink, water, and rice paperat its Chelsea gallery, which it shuttered in 2019 and leased out, moving to the Upper East Side. Matthew Wong: Footprints in the Wind, Ink Drawings 20132017 includes 24 pieces that have never before been exhibited. Its a collaboration with the Matthew Wong Foundation, a nonprofit founded by the Toronto-born artists parents, Monita and Raymond Wong, to preserve his legacy and pursue philanthropic work. Its mission is currently being finalized.

Wong famously honed his artistic approach in libraries and onlinehe maintained a blog, where he posted photos of some of the drawings in the upcoming show, and he liked to talk art on Facebook. Thats how John Cheim (Cheim & Reads cofounder) first got to know him. In 2015, Matthew and his mother Monita came to visit me in New York for the first time and brought along a tube of large black ink drawings, Cheim said in an email. Matthew was a striking presencetall, handsome, a shock of black hair and large black eyeglasses, all carefully considered. I found the ink drawings to be singular, intense. He bought one from the unknown artist, and they kept their conversations going.

As with Wongs alluring oils, his ink works invite comparisons to some giant names while still being unmistakably his own. They have the swirling energy of a Charles Burchfield, the dense, hypnotic patterning of a Yayoi Kusama, and the uncanny eeriness of a Ralph Albert Blakelock. Without the presence of color, they help reveal how Wong built up his beguiling canvases. In The Watcher (2017), hundreds of quick, short lines radiate from a giant sun as an enigmatic bird perches atop a rock, one eye staring out of the picture. In an untitled 2015 forest scene, at least three figures may or may not be looming amid a virtuosic array of diverse marks. There is always a lot to take in.

Last year, Wongs parents gave a sprawling ink 2016 workmore than six feet tall (and exhilarating even as a tiny digital image)to the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York. Suggesting a free-floating world within another world, it is potently surreal, and yet tender and intimate in the way it emerges from just simple brushstrokes: black liquid on white paper. It is as if you can feel the particles in the air, Cheim said of Wongs ink works. The space between the interior and the exterior dissolvesa kind of psychological pantheism presents itself.

See the original post:
Matthew Wong Ink Works, Never Before Exhibited, Will Alight in New York - ARTnews

Posted in Pantheism | Comments Off on Matthew Wong Ink Works, Never Before Exhibited, Will Alight in New York – ARTnews

Libertarian vs. Liberal: Key Differences and Similarities

Posted: at 7:07 am

The Libertarian vs. Liberal debate is confusing for some, but once you understand it, its clear as day. While both of these political thought processes have some areas that overlap, youll soon understand the fundamental differences between the history, modernization, and 20th century belief systems behind them.

The foundation of Libertarianism is that liberty is the most critical political value to uphold. Liberty means that you have the freedom to make your own choices in your life no matter what. Others are not able to control you or interfere in your life, and you should not interfere in theirs either.

Libertarians believe that this attitude will create a cosmopolitan society united by mutual respect rather than divided by nationalistic belief systems that create ripples in our society.

In a Libertarian world, youre free to try whatever you want, implement new ideas, live life on your own terms, and live truly free as long as those freedoms do not initiate force against another individual. group, or government.

Since we are all moral equals, no one person has the right to be more powerful than the other. This is where Libertarianism conflicts with the two-party system we have in our American society today.

Libertarians see the government as a threat to our liberty because they are. Regardless of which side youre on, either party possesses some form of totalitarian control over certain aspects of our lives.

If youre a liberal, you believe that the government should have control over your money, how much you pay in taxes, how you get your healthcare, and where you go to school.

If youre a conservative, you believe that the government should have control over who accesses the country, what happens to criminals, what drugs you can take, what religion you can practice, and who you should marry.

Of course, those are blanket statements that might be a little extreme, but thats an overall look at it. Libertarians believe that we should have control over all these areas. The government shouldnt have any involvement in these areas because that will infringe on our ability to maintain a free society.

The modern American Liberal believes in equality and much of that thinking is based off the overall foundation of the ideology and political stance. Liberalism stands for increased personal rights and the general foundation of their beliefs are:

Liberalism grew in popularity during the Age of Enlightenment when Western philosophers and economists started to pull away from traditional Conservatism, promoting free markets and free trade.

In reality, traditional Liberalism is much different from modern Liberalism in the United States. The word liber means free in Latin, which stands for the free markets and free trade that these people believed in at the time.

This is quite contrasting from the modern-day liberals who believe that the government should have more control and more intervention in the operation of our economy and world markets.

Lets apply modern Liberals vs. Libertarians to the issues we face today. Weve seen many questions arise in recent years about what makes a utopian society and what we need to practice to get as close to that as possible.

Even when a Libertarian agrees with one party on an issue, they have very different reasons as to why they agree. For example, some might think that Libertarians lean towards Conservatives on immigration. While that is true, there are many different reasons for that.

Libertarian: Libertarians believe that the government shouldnt stand in the way of any transaction between two parties, and heres why. Both people generally have something to gain in every transaction.

They understand the importance of market participants and how it impacts the prices of goods and services. When there are strict regulations put in place, the system generally favors larger companies over smaller, newer ones.

Liberal: In terms of economic issues, Liberals tend to favor more government control in this area. They would prefer the government to determine what people get paid, when they get paid, and how they get paid.

By doing this, Liberals believe that it will create more equality, help lift more people out of poverty, and be better for the greater good. While this sounds great, its a nightmare for Libertarians and American Republicans.

The opposing forces believe that mandated wages will result in a crippling economy because the people at the top will not be able to support the higher wages. This break down will eventually result in layoffs and a falling stock market.

Libertarian: Foreign policy is the area that unites most Libertarians, and its the clearest of all their belief systems. They believe that war is never the option because it creates widespread death, destruction, violates civil liberties, and encourages a nationalist way of thinking.

This policy directly contradicts the conservative way of thinking where the military is one of the most important factors in their party.

Libertarians believe in individual freedom and individual liberty, which cannot coincide with the process of recruiting, drafting, training, and treating people like soldiers fighting for the social and economic freedom of the county as a whole.

They believe that war is a last resort and that its never our purpose to interfere in foreign relations because its up to the individual to resolve their own problems.

Liberal: Here is another area where Liberals believe that its the responsibility of the American government to interfere in foreign relations. Liberalism believes that we need to send foreign aid because its our moral responsibility, and its not up to us to judge the opposing democracy; we simply need to help.

Libertarian: They have a unique take on criminal justice. If we look at the immense overpopulation of American prisons, we need to understand why we have so many more people incarcerated compared to every other country in the world.

They believe that we need to stop sending people to jail for using drugs because the limited government shouldnt have control over what substances people use in the first place. We should also look at the penalties for severe crimes like assault and murder.

We need to address the process of rehabilitating criminals and whether or not were actually making a difference in the lives of those incarcerated and the lives of those on the outside affected by the criminal.

Overcriminalization is a clear-cut issue, and weve created too many laws and regulations that strip our liberty and create unequal separations between those in power and the average layman.

Liberal: Here is an interesting area where things flip in modern politics. While we generally believe that Conservatives feel that less government control is better, heres where they prefer the government to step in and take the wheel.

Liberalism takes a soft approach and tries to see the good in all people, where Conservatism sees criminals as threats to society who must be eradicated because theyre threatening the freedom of everyone else.

Libertarian: This party believes that free movement and trade should have no border, and anyone should be allowed to morally move products and services across country lines. If youre trying to do so ethically, there shouldnt be any bureaucratic interference, such as tariffs, regulations, or duties.

Economists studying this philosophy believe that the world GDP would double, resulting in more international trade, a larger pool of qualified candidates for trade, and a wealthier world as a result.

The less interference the government has in trade, the better opportunities there are for the individual to create wealth.

That said, Libertarians understand the potential economic impact of immigration and how it can suck the well dry, so to speak, but the Conservative mentality of immigrants coming to the country to live off the welfare state and take our jobs doesnt hold any weight in a Libertarian society.

Liberal: This is another situation where Liberals prefer to step back and let nature work itself out. Liberals believe in open-borders and that we have no right to control who comes or goes from our country. As you can likely tell, this is considered highly reckless to both Conservatives and Libertarians. Conservatives believe that its our responsibility to think of our own citizens first, and we need to protect our borders to keep ourselves safe.

Libertarian: Our government allows citizens a certain number of rights provided they can conduct themselves responsibly. For example, the second amendment is the right to bear arms. As a citizen, each person has the right to own a gun provided they do not use it to recklessly harm others.

Libertarians feel that these amendments only make sense in a democratic society where the government needs to provide you with them in the first place.

In a Libertarian society, the philosophy believes that all people should be protected by these rights regardless of their social status or group membership. Some of these rights include:

Here is a key difference between Libertarian and Liberal. The bolded point at the end also applies to the doctors and facilities who would conduct the procedure. Thats the foundation of the Libertarian belief system. Its that no one persons rights can infringe on the rights of another, no matter what.

If an individual desires an abortion, they can do so, as this issue is up to each person and the government should not be involved in their decision process.

The same applies to same-sex marriage. You have the right to marry who you want, but you cannot attempt to take legal action or smear the reputation of a church leader or business that doesnt want to participate in the union.

Liberal: This is the area where freedoms tend to compound, and the original foundation of Liberalism comes into play. Liberals believe that the individual should have the right to do with their lives as they please. This means they can marry who they like, do with their bodies as they choose, and right for their rights if they feel theyve been mistreated.

The belief system might sound the same as the Libertarianism version, but theres a fundamental difference here.

Liberals believe that everyone should share these beliefs and that its up to the government to enforce this. For example, while Liberals believe that same-sex marriage is a right, they think that the government needs to force these beliefs on everyone.

Libertarians believe that everyone has the right to see it through their own lens, and no one person should force their beliefs on someone because it strips away their own personal liberty and rights to freedom.

Libertarian: Libertarians believe that its your right to choose your medical providers and treatments. They see that the government interferes in the progression of medicine by imposing harsh regulations on pharmaceutical companies and laboratories to limit the use of experimental health care.

In a nutshell, if the government cant understand the use of a treatment and there isnt enough science to back it up, they wont support it. If they dont support it, the researchers will not receive the funding they need to continue their research, which will stop the growth right in its tracks.

This belief system feels that voluntary institutions would do a much better job of caring for people by reducing costs and allowing for individuals to benefit from the economic rewards of health care. Private charity can certainly have its place, but as a whole, health care and medicine shouldnt be a commercial enterprise.

Liberal: The Liberal vs. Libertarian belief is that health care is better left in the hand of the government because individual medicine will lead to corruption, inflated prices, and monopolization. This contrasts the Capitalist way of thinking where many Conservatives believe that its up to the individual to decide what type of health care theyd like, how theyd like to pay for it, and where theyd want to go for it.

Many people compare the Liberal philosophy on health care to socialized medicine, and theres some truth to this. Socialized medicine is complete government control over what you pay for health care, what doctors you see, what procedures you get, and where you go to get those procedures done.

Libertarians see this as a complete violation of our liberties because we should have the freedom to choose our doctors, procedures, and facilities. It should be between the individual and the practicing physician without any government intervention other than to protect the patient from fraud and malpractice.

Liberalism, as a tradition and political science, essentially stands for equality. The policy believes that all people deserve equal opportunities for building wealth, voicing their opinions, and protecting themselves.

In fact, the first recorded use of the word liberal dates back to 1375, describing the liberal arts education as the education of the free man. This early connection between education and Liberalism gave way to the more modern take of the phrase.

During the Period of Enlightenment, the word started to take on a positive note, being described as a belief system that was free from prejudice and free from bigotry. The word liberalism first appeared in English in 1815, and it wasnt until the 19th century that people started using it as a political term to describe parties and world movements.

In European Liberalism, you have an equal divide between the moderates and progressives. The moderates lean towards elitism, and progressives more frequently support the universalization of institutions, including education and property. As time passed, moderates passed progressives as the defenders of European Liberalism.

The way this differs from modern-day Libertarianism is the belief that the government still needs to maintain control over certain areas of our economy, gun control, and health care. Libertarians believe that there are two parties in every situation and they both can benefit from transactions, thus, theres no need for government intervention.

They also believe that gun control is left in the hands of the people who need to defend themselves. The government should have no role in this and its up to the people whether or not they want to own a firearm. The same ideology applies to health care. One thing about Libertarianism is that it hasnt changed much since its introduction and much of the political philosophy is the same.

The Nolan Chart pictured above is a diagram originally developed by American Libertarian David Nolan in 1969. There are two axes representing the contrast between economic freedom and personal freedom. This philosophy differs from that of famous Libertarians such as Ayn Rand and Friedrich A. Hayek.

Ultimately, the further you rise up the vertical y-axis, the more personal freedom you gain, but the less economic freedom you have.

The further you move right across the horizontal x-axis, the more economic freedom you have but, the less personal freedom.

In the middle, you have Centrists who favor a mixture of both economic and personal freedom.

The chart shows that Liberals favor personal freedom over economic freedom, while Conservatives favor economic freedom over personal freedom.

The extremists in the equation would be Libertarians and Authoritarians. Libertarians favor both personal and economic freedom while Authoritarians, Statists, or Communists, as some might like to call them, prefer limited freedom and total government control.

We believe that this article should clear up any concerns you have in the Libertarian vs. Liberal comparison. They are extremely different, and even in areas where their beliefs start to overlap, there are fundamental differences supporting those beliefs. Its crucial that you understand these factors when developing your own political opinions and stances.

Now, when someone asks you, are Libertarians liberal? Youll have a clear answer and a thorough understanding of the differences.

See original here:

Libertarian vs. Liberal: Key Differences and Similarities

Posted in Liberal | Comments Off on Libertarian vs. Liberal: Key Differences and Similarities

Conservative Vs. Liberal – 8 Key Differences

Posted: at 7:07 am

It can be so hard to find a true comparison between a conservative and a liberal since they approach almost every issue with different philosophies and underlying assumptions. Because of their different methods and philosophies, there are many differences that need to be explored between conservative and liberal.

Below are some of the most important differences between conservatives and liberals.

A conservative believes that a judge should determine whether or not laws are permissible under the Constitution. They should also settle any debates that occur regarding the meaning of these laws. A liberal believes that a judge is a way to get unpopular legislation passed. They want a judge to who will impose their will.

A conservative is a die-hard patriot. They truly believe that the U.S. is a great nation. A liberal is more of interested in the world view instead of the best interest of the U.S.

Communism Vs. Fascism

Conservatives are also capitalists. They believe that when an entrepreneur amasses wealth through their own hard work, it benefits the country. Liberals are socialists. They believe that entrepreneurs who are successful have somehow cheated the system.

A conservative believes in God. They also believe that the U.S. has been so successful because it is a Christian nation, guided by God. A liberal is not usually a Christian and many times are hostile to anything Christian.

A conservative has the belief that individual Americans have the Constitutional right to defend themselves and their loved ones with guns. A liberal believes that taking the guns from individual, law-abiding citizens; they can prevent the criminals from using guns in any crime.

A conservative believes that all people should be judged solely on their character and the merits of their actions, not on their color. A liberal does not think it is wrong to discriminate based on race as long as the minority group as a whole primarily benefits.

Abortion, to a conservative, ends the life of an innocent child. They oppose abortion. Liberals believe that it is more important to not inconvenience the mother; therefore it is easier to end the life of the child.

Conservatives are not necessarily Republicans, but they do have many of the same belies; reduce the size of government, low taxes, balanced budget, get the country out of debt. Liberals, many of which would be classified as Democrats, believe in big government, high spending, high taxes and big debt.

According to most conservatives the Government tends to be wasteful, incompetent and inefficient. Less government is the key to a successful government. A liberal views government as the solution. More government programs or mandates will fix all the problems.

The below table demonstrates the key differences between a conservative and a liberal in short.

Read more from the original source:

Conservative Vs. Liberal - 8 Key Differences

Posted in Liberal | Comments Off on Conservative Vs. Liberal – 8 Key Differences

The Liberal Party is faking social media, so what will Facebook do? – Crikey

Posted: at 7:07 am

How much Australian political content on Facebook is fake, and does the social media platform really care?

Liberal MPs faking engagement on Facebook prompts us to ask: (a) how much of Australias political Facebook is, well, fake? And (b) does Facebook care?

A recent whistleblower report out of the United States on Facebooks failures to block fake engagement suggests that (a) it could be quite a bit and (b) that Facebook cares about as much as the squeaking of local political wheels requires of them.

Just last February, Treasurer Josh Frydenberg was eager to engage with Facebook at the most senior levels over how much money Facebook would pay News Corp and Nine (not much, compared to Facebook revenues, it turned out). A year on, theres notably less enthusiasm to clean up the pollution of political debate where it most directly affects Australians: in their local communities.

Register your email address to get FREE access on a 21-day trial.

See the article here:

The Liberal Party is faking social media, so what will Facebook do? - Crikey

Posted in Liberal | Comments Off on The Liberal Party is faking social media, so what will Facebook do? – Crikey

5 things to watch for when the Liberals unveil the federal budget – CBC.ca

Posted: at 7:07 am

After a year that saw federal spending reach levels not seen since the Second World War, the Liberal government will release a long-awaited budget Monday that will offer a roadmap to a post-pandemic economic recovery.

Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland's first budget as finance minister will attempt to balance measures meant to reduce the severity of COVID-19's third wave with efforts to set the stage for an economic rebound.

The budget will account for record emergency spending driven by measures tofight the pandemic and blunt its economic impact.

Freeland is also expected to provide details of a plan to spend up to $100 billion in stimulus and jump-start progress on a number of Liberal priorities ahead of a possible election this year.

"We will have more to tell you next Monday about the plan we are implementing to keep Canadians safe, to create jobs for the middle class and to rebuild a clean, resilient economy," Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said in French at a press conference on Friday.

"All of the measures in Budget 2021 are focused on helping you through this crisis and rebuilding a stronger Canada for everyone."

Here are five items to look out for when Freeland opens the government's books.

The budget is expected to take major steps toward funding a national early learning and child care system a pledge Liberal politicians have made for decades.

At the party's policy convention two weeks ago, Freeland said the time is ripe to fulfilan old promise.

"I really believe COVID has created a window of political opportunity and maybe an epiphany on the importance of early learning and child care," Freeland said.

The Liberals say they believe a nationalchild care system will boost economic growth and productivity by creatingwell-paidjobs andfreeing up more women to work.

Freeland has pointed to Quebec's system where parents pay a flatrate of $10 a day per child as a potential model.

Morna Ballantyne, executive director of the advocacy group Child Care Now, said the budget will have to include a significant financialcommitment to show the government isserious about funding more spaces and bringing costs down for parents.

"We want to see a signal that the federal government is ready and willing to work together with provinces and territories to make sure that a system can actually be built,because it is going to require a collaborative effort," said Ballantyne.

The fall economic statement released in November projected the deficit would reach $381.6 billion by the end of March 2021.

It's likely that number is even higher now,given that several benefits programs the wage subsidy, the rent subsidy and the recovery, sickness and caregiving benefits have been extended into the late spring as the countryconfronts a third wave of the pandemic.

Freeland also announced the government's intention to introduce a short-term stimulus package valued at $70 billion to $100 billion over roughly three years that would launch after vaccines are distributed and life begins to return to normal.

Sources have told CBC Newsthe budget is expected to project a downward trajectory for the deficitbut is not expected to propose a timeline for eliminating it.

Economists and business groups will be looking for a sign that the Liberals have a plan in place to keep spending in check so that it doesn't overheat the economy orlead to unsustainable debt payments if interest rates rise.

"The federal government can boost business confidence and encourage higher levels of private sector investment by committing to a responsible and prudent post-pandemic fiscal plan that avoids unnecessary new spending and seeks to gradually ease the burden of public debt,"Goldy Hyder, president and CEO of the Business Council of Canada, wrote in a March 1 letter to Freeland.

Hyder is encouraging the government to adopt a clear fiscal anchor a benchmark to serve as a theoretical cap on spending and deficits.

The government has said the spending taps will remain open until several "fiscal guardrails" tied to the labour market are met. Those include improvements in employment, unemployment and total hours worked, though the Liberals have not revealed specific targets for each.

The Liberals' slogan for their post-pandemic agenda "build back better" refers in part to their desire to speed up the transition to a green, low-carbon economy.

Expect a significant portion of the planned stimulus spending to go toward investments in clean energy technology, jobs and infrastructure. That means money forbuilding charging stations for electric vehicles, retrofitting old-stock commercial buildings and homes and helping natural resource industries transition to cleaner energy.

Through investments in greening homes and buildings, the government hopes to create a domestic retrofit industry and supply chain for products such as energy-efficient windows and doors.

Shortly after budget day, the government is expected to release more ambitious greenhouse gas reduction targets. The current target is 30 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030.

Monday's budget likelywill sketch out how the Liberals plan to meet that more ambitious target.

It's become a common refrain that the COVID-19 pandemic has exposed pre-existing and deep-seated inequalities in Canadian society and it's one the Liberals say they take to heart.

The budget is expected to include an emphasis on supportingpeople who have been disadvantaged historically,and those who have been hardest hit by the pandemic. That includes seniors living in long-term care,young people, Indigenous people and non-white, racialized Canadians.

Advocatessay they want the budget to address high levels of unemployment among racialized Canadians, including those with Asian and Black heritage and Indigenous Canadians.

"This could be the once-in-the-lifetime chance that the government will have this huge amount of fiscal power to correct some very long-standing inequalities," said Avvy Go, executive director of the Southeast Asian Legal Clinic.

"It will create so many jobs that it will be a missed opportunity if we don't use the spending power to address some of the systemic racism, as well as systemic sexism within the labour market by creating jobs for more women,both men and women of colour, [and] people with disabilities."

In the throne speech, the Liberals said they remaincommitted to a national, universal pharmacare system.The party's membership recently reinforced that commitmentat the Liberal policy convention.

But it's not clear that commitment means money in the budget to move the project forward.

The government has taken only incremental steps since anadvisory panelrecommended creating a universal, single-payer public pharmacare system. The panelpredicted that such a programwould cost$3.5 billion over 10 years starting in 2022, rising to $15.3 billion annually in 2027.

National pharmacare is a key NDP demand but some budget watchers believe the pandemic might further delay the initiative because it would require long-term structural spending and negotiations with the provinces some of which are opposed to the very idea of a national pharmacare program.

View post:

5 things to watch for when the Liberals unveil the federal budget - CBC.ca

Posted in Liberal | Comments Off on 5 things to watch for when the Liberals unveil the federal budget – CBC.ca