Daily Archives: April 25, 2021

Researchers Investigate Origins of White Tripolitaine Olive in Libya – Olive Oil Times

Posted: April 25, 2021 at 2:10 pm

Spanish and Libyan researchers met in Andalusia to identify and characterize the most promising cultivars in the North African country.

One of our goals is to investigate the genetic profile of the trees that grow here and to map the most interesting cultivars for olive farming, said Adel Elmagharbi, aleading researcher on the Libyan olive fingerprinting project at the Biotechnology Research Center (BTRC) in Tripoli.

Most of them were propagated during Italian colonization [from 1911 to 1943] and almost 15years ago, we found afew trees carrying white olives about 20kilometers east of Tripoli, he told Olive Oil Times. That is the Tripolitaine cultivar and we are working with our colleagues in Crdoba to investigate its genetic origin.

The meeting took place at the University of Crdoba after bilateral talks between the International Olive Council (IOC) and Libyan authorities in Madrid. The two sides discussed adding the Tripolitaine cultivar to the IOCs World Catalog of Olive Varieties.

Among those in attendance at the talks were Inas Alhudiri, the BTRC genetic engineering department head. She told Olive Oil Times that the Libyan delegation is working with the IOC to add the most interesting Libyan cultivars to the IOCs olive germplasm bank as part of the True Healthy Olive Cultivars 2 project.

We are working on amemorandum of understanding with the University of Crdoba, which might allow us to conduct the genetic investigation into our cultivars, train our students and experts in all areas of olive propagation and farming and optimize production in Libyan orchards, she said.

According to Mohamed Abusanina, aresearcher at the department of plant tissue culture at BTRC, Libyan scientists have already taken DNA samples from local olive cultivars and sent them over to Spanish experts.

We have more than 40 genotypes for cultivars, he told Olive Oil Times. While some of those varieties came from Italy, most of our orchards here have adapted to our dry weather. Some trees are more than 100years old.

Of primary interest to the researchers is discovering the origin of the Tripolitaine cultivar, which yields white olives similar to the southern Italian Leucocarpa cultivar and is also quite rare.

According to the researchers, the trees appear to thrive in Libyas hot and dry climate. Scientists at the BTRC intend to determine whether the Tripolitaine olive is amutation or adifferent variety and the best way to graft the trees.

One of the biggest challenges facing Libyan olive farmers is finding varieties capable of withstanding the low levels of rainfall received by the country. Even the wetter northern regions of Libya receive only slightly more than 250 to 300 millimetres of rain each year.

In this respect, we must count on many varieties that have shown strong resilience to extreme weather conditions over time, Abusanina said.

According to IOC data, Libya produced 16,500 tons of olive oil in the 2020/21 crop year. However, by improving cultivation techniques and selecting suitable varieties, these experts believe that the country could improve its production figures.

With our Spanish counterparts, we hope to identify which cultivars react better to our climate, which are the most interesting commercial cultivars and how to maximize their yields, to possibly suggest to farmers how and where they could invest more in new olive orchards and receive good olive yields, Alhudiri said.

Away from this project, Libyan officials hope that this renewed cooperation with the IOC will lead to further collaboration and, eventually, the official recognition of Libyan chemical and sensory analysis labs.

Researchers also hope to increase cooperation with some of the countrys neighbors, including Tunisia, Algeria and Morocco, to promote olive oil production across North Africa.

Read more:
Researchers Investigate Origins of White Tripolitaine Olive in Libya - Olive Oil Times

Posted in Genetic Engineering | Comments Off on Researchers Investigate Origins of White Tripolitaine Olive in Libya – Olive Oil Times

Will Quantum Computing Ever Live Up to Its Hype? – Scientific American

Posted: at 2:10 pm

Quantum computers have been on my mind a lot lately. A friend who likes investing in tech, and who knows about my attempt to learn quantum mechanics, has been sending me articles on how quantum computers might help solve some of the biggest and most complex challenges we face as humans, as a Forbes commentator declared recently. My friend asks, What do you think, Mr. Science Writer? Are quantum computers really the next big thing?

Ive also had exchanges with two quantum-computing experts with distinct perspectives on the technologys prospects. One is computer scientist Scott Aaronson, who has, as I once put it, one of the highest intelligence/pretension ratios Ive ever encountered. Not to embarrass him further, but I see Aaronson as the conscience of quantum computing, someone who helps keep the field honest.

The other expert is physicist Terry Rudolph. He is a co-author, the R, of the PBR theorem, which, along with its better-known predecessor, Bells theorem, lays bare the peculiarities of quantum behavior. In 2011 Nature described the PBR Theorem as the most important general theorem relating to the foundations of quantum mechanics since Bells theorem was published in 1964. Rudolph is also the author of Q Is for Quantum and co-founder of the quantum-computing startup PsiQuantum. Aaronson and Rudolph are on friendly terms; they co-authored a paper in 2007, and Rudolph wrote about Q Is for Quantum on Aaronsons blog. In this column, Ill summarize their views and try to reach a coherent conclusion.

First, a little background. Quantum computers exploit superposition (a particle inhabits two or more mutually exclusive states at the same time) and entanglement (a special form of superposition, in which two or more particles influence each other in spooky ways) to do things that ordinary computers cant. A bit, the basic unit of information of a conventional computer, can be in one of two states, representing a one or zero. Quantum computers, in contrast, traffic in qubits, which are constructed out of superposed particles that embody numerous states simultaneously.

For decades, quantum computing has been little more than a hypothesis, or laboratory curiosity, as researchers wrestled with the technical complexities of maintaining superposition and entanglement for long enough to perform useful calculations. (Remember that as soon as you look at an electron or cat, its superposition vanishes.) Now, tech giants like IBM, Amazon, Microsoft and Google have invested in quantum computing, as have many smaller companies, 193 by one count. In March, the startup IonQ announced a $2 billion deal that would make it the first publicly traded firm dedicated to quantum computers.

The Wall Street Journal reports that IonQ plans to produce a device roughly the size of an Xbox videogame console by 2023. Quantum computing, the Journal states, could speed up calculations related to finance, drug and materials discovery, artificial intelligence and others, andcrack many of the defensesused to secure the internet. According to Business Insider, quantum machines could help us cure cancer, and even take steps to reverse climate change.

This is the sort of hype that bugs Scott Aaronson. He became a computer scientist because he believes in the potential of quantum computing and wants to help develop it. Hed love to see someone build a machine that proves the naysayers wrong. But he worries that researchers are making promises they cant keep. Last month, Aaronson fretted on his blog Shtetl-Optimized that the hype, which he has been countering for years, has gotten especially egregious lately.

Whats new, Aaronson wrote, is that millions of dollars are now potentially available to quantum computing researchers, along with equity, stock options, and whatever else causes ka-ching sound effects and bulging eyes with dollar signs. And in many cases, to have a shot at such riches, all an expert needs to do is profess optimism that quantum computing will have revolutionary, world-changing applications and have themsoon. Or at least, not object too strongly when others say that. Aaronson elaborated on his concerns in a two-hour discussion on the media platform Clubhouse. Below I summarize a few of his points.

Quantum-computing enthusiasts have declared that the technology will supercharge machine learning. It will revolutionize the simulation of complex phenomena in chemistry, neuroscience, medicine, economics and other fields. It will solve the traveling-salesman problem and other conundrums that resist solution by conventional computers. Its still not clear whether quantum computing will achieve these goals, Aaronson says, adding that optimists might be in for a rude awakening.

Popular accounts often imply that quantum computers, because superposition and entanglement allow them to carry out multiple computations at the same time, are simply faster versions of conventional computers. Those accounts are misleading, Aaronson says. Compared to conventional computers, quantum computers are unnatural devices that might be best suited to a relatively narrow range of applications, notably simulating systems dominated by quantum effects.

The ability of a quantum computer to surpass the fastest conventional machine is known as quantum supremacy, a phrase coined by physicist John Preskill in 2012. Demonstrating quantum supremacy is extremely difficult. Even in conventional computing, proving that your algorithm beats mine isnt straightforward. You must pick a task that represents a fair test and choose valid methods of measuring speed and accuracy. The outcomes of tests are also prone to misinterpretation and confirmation bias. Testing creates an enormous space for mischief, Aaronson says.

Moreover, the hardware and software of conventional computers keeps improving. By the time quantum computers are ready for the marketplace, they might lose potential customersif, for example, classical computers become powerful enough to simulate the quantum systems that chemists and materials scientists actually care about in real life, Aaronson says. Although quantum computers would retain their theoretical advantage, their practical impact would be less.

As quantum computing attracts more attention and funding, Aaronson says, researchers may mislead investors, government agencies, journalists, the public and, worst of all, themselves about their works potential. If researchers cant keep their promises, excitement might give way to doubt, disappointment and anger, Aaronson warns. The field might lose funding and talent and lapse into a quantum-computer winter like those that have plagued artificial intelligence.

Lots of other technologiesgenetic engineering, high-temperature superconductors, nanotechnology and fusion energy come to mindhave gone through phases of irrational exuberance. But something about quantum computing makes it especially prone to hype, Aaronson suggests, perhaps because quantum stands for something cool you shouldnt be able to understand.

And that brings me back to Terry Rudolph. In January, after reading about my struggle to understand the Schrdinger equation, Rudolph emailed me to suggest that I read Q Is for Quantum. The 153-page book explains quantum mechanics with a little arithmetic and algebra and lots of diagrams of black-and-white balls going in and out of boxes. Q Is for Quantum has given me more insight into quantum mechanics, and quantum computing, than anything Ive ever read.

Rudolph begins by outlining simple rules underlying conventional computing, which allow for the manipulation of bits. He then shifts to the odd rules of quantum computing, which stem from superposition and entanglement. He details how quantum computing can solve a specific problemone involving thieves stealing code-protected gold bars from a vault--much more readily than conventional computing. But he emphasizes, like Aaronson, that the technology has limits; it cannot compute the uncomputable.

After I read Q Is for Quantum, Rudolph patiently answered my questions about it. You can find our exchange (which assumes familiarity with the book) here. He also answered my questions about PsiQuantum, the firm he co-founded in 2016, which until recently has avoided publicity. Although he is wittily modest about his talents as a physicist (which adds to the charm of Q Is for Quantum), Rudolph is boosterish about PsiQuantum. He shares Aaronsons concerns about hype, and the difficulties of establishing quantum supremacy, but he says those concerns do not apply to PsiQuantum.

The company, he says, is closer than any other firm by a very large margin to building a useful quantum computer, one that solves an impactful problem that we would not have been able to solve otherwise (e.g., something from quantum chemistry which has real-world uses). He adds, Obviously, I have biases, and people will naturally discount my opinions. But I have spent a lot oftime quantitatively comparing what we are doing to others.

Rudolph and other experts contend that a useful quantum computer with robust error-correction will require millions of qubits. PsiQuantum, which constructs qubits out of light, expects by the middle of the decade to be building fault-tolerant quantum computers with fully manufactured components capable of scaling to a million or morequbits, Rudolph says. PsiQuantum has partnered with the semiconductor manufacturer GlobalFoundries to achieve its goal. The machines will be room-sized, comparable to supercomputers or data centers. Most users will access the computers remotely.

Could PsiQuantum really be leading all the competition by a wide margin, as Rudolph claims? Can it really produce a commercially viable machine by 2025? I dont know. Quantum mechanics and quantum computing still baffle me. Im certainly not going to advise my friend or anyone else to invest in quantum computers. But I trust Rudolph, just as I trust Aaronson.

Way back in 1994, I wrote a brief report for Scientific American on quantum computers, noting that they could, in principle, perform tasks beyond the range of any classical device. Ive been intrigued by quantum computing ever since. If this technology gives scientists more powerful tools for simulating complex phenomena, and especially the quantum weirdness at the heart of things, maybe it will give science the jump start it badly needs. Who knows? I hope PsiQuantum helps quantum computing live up to the hype.

This is an opinion and analysis article.

Further Reading:

Will Artificial Intelligence Ever Live Up to Its Hype?

Is the Schrdinger Equation True?

Quantum Mechanics, the Chinese Room Experiment and the Limits of Understanding

Quantum Mechanics, the Mind-Body Problem and Negative Theology

For more ruminations on quantum mechanics, see my new bookPay Attention: Sex, Death, and Science and Tragedy and Telepathy, a chapter in my free online bookMind-Body Problems.

See more here:
Will Quantum Computing Ever Live Up to Its Hype? - Scientific American

Posted in Genetic Engineering | Comments Off on Will Quantum Computing Ever Live Up to Its Hype? – Scientific American

10 next-gen Covid-19 vaccines in the race for approval – Clinical Trials Arena

Posted: at 2:10 pm

To aid in the fight against the global Covid-19 pandemic, the past year has seen an urgent rush to develop new and effective vaccines at lightning speed.

Tremendous and collaborative efforts have been made by pharma, governments, scientific experts and patient volunteers to find jabs that will protect the population and slow the disruption that Covid-19 has wrought.

A number of promising candidates from some of the worlds biggest pharma companies have emerged and have already been administered to millions globally.

But, for a number of these vaccines it has been an incredibly bumpy road. With the news of both AstraZenecas vaccine and now Johnson & Johnsons candidate being linked to cases of rare blood clots, governments and their populations are now looking hopefully to candidates further down the pipeline without a reputation for serious adverse events.

With dozens all in different stages of development, and new variants of Covid-19 popping over the last year, the race for the safest and most effective vaccines continues with a new crop of candidates.

Clinical Trials Arena tracks the development of the vaccine candidates at the front of that race for approval.

Candidate name: NVX-CoV2373

Mechanism: Nanoparticle vaccine

GlobalData's TMT Themes 2021 Report tells you everything you need to know about disruptive tech themes and which companies are best placed to help you digitally transform your business.

Trial phase: Phase III

After assessing safety and immunogenicity in Phase I/II clinical trials where the vaccine produced encouragingly high levels of antibodies, NVX-CoV2373 is currently in two pivotal Phase III studies to evaluate vaccine efficacy, safety and immunogenicity.

NVX-CoV2373 clinical trials have enrolled more than 30,000 volunteers around the globe.

NVX-CoV2373 is a protein-based vaccine engineered from the genetic sequence of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes Covid-19.

The candidate was created using US-based Novavaxs recombinant nanoparticle technology to generate antigen derived from the coronavirus spike (S) protein and is complemented with the companys patented saponin-based Matrix-M adjuvant to enhance immune response and stimulate high levels of neutralising antibodies.

In March 2021, Novavax reported that its UK trial determined an efficacy rate of 96% against the original coronavirus and 86% against the UK variant. But in South Africa, where volunteers were exposed to variant B.1.351, the efficacy was only 49%.

The company is now developing a new version of the vaccine that is tailored to the South Africa variant. The vaccine has also been brought into a University of Oxford trial to study the potential efficacy of mixing doses of different vaccines, alongside vaccines from Oxford/AstraZeneca, Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna.

If its own clinical trials succeed, Novavax expects to deliver 100 million doses for use in the United States in 2021.

Candidate name: ZyCoV-D

Mechanism: DNA vaccine (plasmid)

Trial phase: Phase III

ZyCoV-D is India-based Zydus Cadilas plasmid DNA vaccine candidate for Covid-19 that targets the viral entry membrane protein of the virus.

In early animal studies, the firm reported that as well as generating neutralising antibodies post-vaccination, ZyCoV-D also induced T-cell response.

ZyCoV-D can be stored at 2 to 8C for the long term and at 25C for a few months and is administered via Needle Free Injection System (NFIS).

The company has launched an adaptive Phase I/II dose-escalation trial and plans to enrol about 1,000 healthy volunteers. The candidate began Phase II trials in August 2020. The Drugs Controller General of India has granted approval for Zydus Cadila to proceed with Phase III trials which began in January, involving over 30,000 people.

Candidate name: Abdala (CIGB 66)

Mechanism: Protein subunit vaccine

Trial phase: Phase III

Abdala is one of three vaccine candidates for Covid-19 being developed in-house by Cubas Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (CIGB).

Abdala (CIGB 66) is a protein vaccine that uses yeast as a receptor-binding domain (RBD) protein and alumina as an adjuvant.

The platform used to produce Abdalas RBD is the same one that the centre used in the past to develop HeberNasVac, a therapeutic vaccine against hepatitis B.

Abdala is designed to be administered three times, at 14-day intervals.

The Cuban government reports that 48,000 doses of the first of three shots of the jab were administered to members of CIGB and healthcare workers in the country, reaching the full population of participants proposed for the trial.

The ABDALA trial moved to Phase III at the end of February 2021.

Candidate name: VIR-7831

Mechanism: Plant-based adjuvant vaccine

Trial phase: Phase III

Medicago uses a plant-based platform to develop its vaccines. This approach uses living plants as bioreactors to produce non-infectious versions of viruses (called virus-like particles, or VLPs).

VLPs mimic the native structure of viruses, helping them to be easily recognised by the immune system.

Medicago developed its seasonal recombinant quadrivalent VLP vaccine candidate, VIR-7831, just 20 days after working with the SARS-CoV-2 genome.

A single dose of VIR-7831 in mice generated a positive antibody response after 10 days. Results from a Phase I trial show the vaccine was tolerable and generated an immune response in all participants after two doses.

Based on these results, Medicago received the agreement of regulatory authorities to launch Phase II/III clinical trials on 12 November 2020.

The company is also testing the candidate with two additional vaccine adjuvants from GSK and Dynavax.

On 17 February, the US FDA granted the candidate Fast Track designation.

Candidate name: CVnCoV

Mechanism: mRNA-based vaccine

Trial phase: Phase IIb/III

CVnCoV is German clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company CureVacs mRNA-based vaccine candidate, which started development in January 2020. CVnCoV is being developed in collaboration with British pharma giant GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and Bayer.

The candidate is being supported by the German federal government and its development is strengthened by a partnership with the UK Government and its Vaccines Taskforce, which CureVac entered in February 2021.

The vaccine is an optimised, non-chemically modified mRNA, encoding the prefusion stabilized full-length spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and formulated within lipid nanoparticles (LNPs).

Phase I and IIa clinical trials of CVnCoV began in June and September 2020, respectively, in Germany, Belgium, Peru and Panama. Phase I interim data showed that CVnCoV was generally well tolerated across all tested doses and induced strong antibody responses in addition to first indication of T cell activation. CureVac said the quality of immune response was comparable to recovered Covid-19 patients, closely mimicking the immune response after natural Covid-19 infection.

In December 2020, CureVac initiated the HERALD study, a pivotal Phase IIb/III trial taking place in Germany with 36,000 participants, who will receive a 12g dose of CVnCoV.

A complementary Phase III trial at the University Medical Center Mainz of more than 2,500 healthcare workers is also underway and a Phase III trial in Mexico has also begun.

In February 2021, CureVac initiated a rolling submission with the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for CVnCoV.

Candidate name: Bacillus Calmette-Guerin

Mechanism: Live-attenuated vaccine

Trial phase: Phase II/III

Murdoch Childrens Research Institute in Melbourne, Australia is conducting a Phase III trial of the bacillus Calmette-Gurin (BCG) tuberculosis vaccine to see if it also protects against the coronavirus. The trial, called BRACE, is being run in Australia, Brazil, the Netherlands, Spain and the United Kingdom.

Altogether, the trial will recruit more than 10,000 healthcare staff who will be given either the BCG vaccine (currently given to more than 100 million babies worldwide each year to protect against tuberculosis) or a placebo injection. In the UK, routine BCG vaccination ceased in 2005 because of the low rates of TB in the general population.

The BCG vaccine boosts immunity by training the immune system to respond to other subsequent infections with greater intensity.

Previous studies suggest that the BCG vaccine could reduce susceptibility to a range of infections caused by viruses including those similar to the novel coronavirus. This notion is what will be examined by the researchers working on the BRACE trial.

BRACE has received more than $10m from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to allow its global expansion. The Peter Sowerby Foundation has contributed funding to support the UK Exeter trial site.

Candidate name: INO-4800

Mechanism: DNA vaccine (plasmid)

Trial phase: Phase II/III

Composed of an optimised DNA plasmid, INO-4800 is delivered via a proprietary smart device to produce a robust and tolerable immune response. US drug developer Inovio plans to scale production of the device while awaiting study results.

Inovio said INO-4800 is the only nucleic-acid based vaccine that is stable at room temperature for more than a year, at 37C for more than a month and has a five-year projected shelf life at normal refrigeration temperature. The candidate does not need to be frozen during transport or storage.

Preclinical data published in Nature Communications showed that mice and guinea pigs who received INO-4800 demonstrated neutralising antibodies as well as humoral and T-cell responses. In guinea pigs, researchers observed protein-binding antibody titers and blocking of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2)/SARS-CoV-2 S proteins.

Inovio has been working with Advaccine to advance the clinical development of INO-4800 in China, where 640 subjects have been dosed with the first vaccination of a 28-day, two-dose regimen in a Phase II clinical trial. The trial has enrolled both adults who are 18-59 years old and older adults over 60 with the primary endpoints of evaluating safety and immunogenicity within the Chinese population.

A similar independently-run Phase II segment of INOVIOs Phase II/III clinical trial for INO-4800 in the US, called INNOVATE, has started dosing.

In April 2021, Inovio announced results of a study that showed INO-4800 induced a robust T cell response against all spike protein variants tested, which the firm says will be key in providing protection against SARS-CoV-2 variants, in addition to providing similar levels of neutralising activity against both the UK and Brazilian variants as those against the original strain.

Candidate name: hAd5

Mechanism: Adenovirus-based vaccine

Trial phase: Phase I

ImmunityBio is developing a second-generation Covid-19 adenovirus vaccine candidate that targets both spike and nucleocapsid DNA in SARS-CoV-2.

In May 2020, the firms vaccine candidate, which is being manufactured by NantKwest, was selected to participate in Operation Warp Speed, a national program to accelerate Covid-19 vaccine development.

ImmunityBio believes the key to creating long-term immunity to the SARS-CoV-2 virus and overcoming the variants that are rapidly developing around the world is to design a vaccine that activates antibodies as well as memory B and T cells to multiple antigens.

The vaccine has the potential to provide multiple routes of administration (subcutaneous, intranasal and oral) to potentially generate mucosal IgA antibody barriers to the virus in the upper respiratory tract where it first enters the body.

The firms vaccine demonstrated CD4+ and CD8+ antigen-specific T cell responses in mice and protects nasal and lung airways in non-human primates.

ImmunityBio received authorisation from the US FDA to initiate a Phase I trial of its vaccine candidate last October. Results from the study, and others, will inform the companys swift movement into its Phase II/III trial design.

Currently, a Phase Ib study of the vaccine is progressing to assess the safety and immunogenicity of subcutaneous, oral and sublingual prime-boost combinations.

Candidate name: UB-612

Mechanism: Multitope peptide-based vaccine

Trial phase: Phase II/III

Vaxxinity (formerly COVAXX), a subsidiary of United Biomedical (UBI), is developing UB-612, a multitope protein/synthetic peptide-based vaccine candidate for Covid-19. UB-612 is designed to activate both T-cell and B-cell immunity in the body and has shown neutralising antibody activity in mice, rats, and guinea pigs.

In Taiwan, a Phase I trial of up to 60 participants is underway, and a Phase II trial of 3,850 participants has been initiated.

Results from the Phase I study, which evaluated the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of UB-612, showed that the vaccine was generally well-tolerated and elicited robust vaccine-induced CD4+/CD8+ T cell antibody responses.

Vaxxinity is also partnering with medical company Dasa for a Phase II/III trial in Brazil, and with the University of Nebraska for Phase I/II trials in the United States.

Candidate name: GRAd-COV2

Mechanism: Adenovirus-based vaccine

Trial phase: Phase II/III

Biotechnology firms ReiThera (Italy), Leukocare (Germany) and Univercells (Belgium) are partnering to develop GRAd-COV2, an adenovirus-based Covid-19 vaccine.

Continue reading here:
10 next-gen Covid-19 vaccines in the race for approval - Clinical Trials Arena

Posted in Genetic Engineering | Comments Off on 10 next-gen Covid-19 vaccines in the race for approval – Clinical Trials Arena

Electric-vehicle batteries and these crypto uses are investments for the green wave, says UBS – MarketWatch

Posted: at 2:10 pm

An environmental credit crunch will challenge current levels of unsustainable consumption, ratcheting up the pressure on companies to solve climate-related problems and providing opportunities for investors, said Swiss investment bank UBS.

Urgent action is needed to combat the growing climate crisis, the bank said in a report published on Tuesday, outlining how the economic costs of climate change are only adding to the environmental and human toll.

But while investors face increasing uncertainty from climate risks in assessing asset values, there are strong, long-term investing opportunities in sustainable innovations, the bank said on Tuesday.

Leveraging resources like oil and lumber has helped spur incredible economic growth in the modern era, including halving the number of people living in extreme poverty over the last 30 years, UBS UBS, +0.92% said in the report, released ahead of Earth Day on April 22.

But it has come at the cost of depleting those resources. Amid a wider social shift toward sustainability, investors are increasingly looking to evaluate investments under a framework of environmental, social, and governance factors, called ESG.

Plus: Ahead of Bidens climate summit, U.K. toughens its greenhouse gas emissions targets

Companies that are on the right side of history, when it comes to climate change and reducing their own carbon footprint, will better be positioned to prevent climate risks, deal with tighter regulations, and avoid reputational concerns, said Solita Marcelli, UBS Global Wealth Managements chief investment officer for the Americas, in a call with the media.

Companies that emerge as leaders in developing solutions to tackle environmental challenges could really offer attractive long term growth prospects, Marcelli added. We think sustainability will continue to grow as a core part of the decisions that investors make as they build out their portfolios.

UBS grouped some of the most pressing issues related to climate changes into four themes, and suggested potential areas for investment in sectors that address these problems. Heres how it breaks down:

People, health and communities

Air pollution is the greatest environmental-linked threat to humans, UBS said, and is the fourth leading cause of death around the world. Climate change has profound human implications, the bank said, including extreme heat in urban centers that is increasingly claiming lives.

The bank suggests investing in treatments for illnesses linked to climate change, which includes both drugs and medical devices. Urban planning solutions will also be critical, UBS said, including technologies for smart cities data-driven communities that use technology to operate more efficiently.

Energy

Emissions related to energy account for more than two-thirds of global greenhouse gas emissions, according to the bank. But a major problem facing the energy angle of addressing climate change is ensuring that humanitys vast energy needs are met, UBS said. As we move toward new technologies and infrastructure, long-term sustainability needs to be considered, the bank said, and the role of government will be key.

Investors should look to companies with energy-efficiency solutions, as well as those focused on generating renewable energy like wind and solar, according to UBS. Alternative fuels in the form of hydrogen, biofuels, natural gas, and synthetic fuels are also likely to become more popular, the bank said.

More: This technology could transform renewable energy. BP and Chevron just invested

UBS also highlighted the emerging role of electric transport and the role that fuel cell and battery companies will play in facilitating the rise of cleaner vehicles. UBS is bullish on electric vehicles, and predicts that EVs will penetrate 100% of the automobile market by 2040, with Volkswagen XE:VOW joining Tesla TSLA, +1.35% as the most dominant players in an industry that includes rivals NIO NIO, +3.82%, XPeng XPEV, +2.87%, and General Motors GM, +1.54%.

Also read: Buy these 3 battery stocks to play the electric-vehicle party, but stay away from this company, says UBS

Land

Land use follows energy as the second-largest source of global emissions, which come from land-clearing activity like the lumber industry as well as intensive farming, UBS said. But these emissions arent the only extent of the environmental cost of using land resources. There are major environmental costs from habitat and ecosystem destruction that have knock-on effects on the water, food, and air humans need to survive. Land management systems will be key in future sustainability, according to UBS.

One of the key areas the bank said to invest in is land-use monitoring and supply-chain validation systems. This includes projects using blockchain the cryptographic network that underpins bitcoin BTCUSD, -3.39%, ethereum ETHUSD, +2.59%, and even dogecoin DOGEUSD, -8.18% as well as drones.

Smart agriculture, such as biotech, genetic engineering ventures, and vertical farming are another avenue for investment, the bank said. Sustainable production and consumption trends, largely through lab-grown as well as plant-based meat like that made by Beyond Meat BYND, -1.06% are also becoming more popular, UBS said.

Read: As Kerry secures climate pledge with China, heres what else to watch for at Bidens Earth Day summit

Water

Supplies of fresh water one of the worlds scarcest resources will face increasing pressure from rising populations, ongoing urbanization, and industrialization in emerging markets, UBS said. That will come on top of agriculture, which already consumes around 70% of accessible fresh water, according to the report.

Water tech will be critical to solving problems from water supply, UBS said, with investment opportunities including smart water networks, water automation systems, water meters, water testing equipment, and desalination equipment.

UBS said that the size of the global water market was estimated at $655 billion in 2020 and that is expected to grow at mid-single-digit rates annually over the next few years.

Visit link:
Electric-vehicle batteries and these crypto uses are investments for the green wave, says UBS - MarketWatch

Posted in Genetic Engineering | Comments Off on Electric-vehicle batteries and these crypto uses are investments for the green wave, says UBS – MarketWatch

Six from Penn elected to American Academy of Arts & Sciences | Penn Today – Penn Today

Posted: at 2:10 pm

Six members of the University of Pennsylvania faculty have been elected to the American Academy of Arts & Sciences. They are Cristina Bicchieriand Michael Hanchard of the School of Arts & Sciences, Vijay Kumar, dean of the School of Engineering and Applied Science, Stanley Plotkin and Kenneth Zaret of the Perelman School of Medicine, and Sarah Tishkoff, a Penn Integrates Knowledge professor with appointments in Penn Medicine andPenn Arts & Sciences.

They join more than 250 new members honored in 2021, recognized for their work to help solve the worlds most urgent challenges, create meaning through art, and contribute to the common good.

Cristina Bicchieriis the S. J. Patterson Harvie Professor of Social Thought and Comparative Ethics in theSchool of Arts & Sciences. She is also a professor of legal studies at theWharton School.She is the director of theCenter for Social Norms & Behavioral Dynamicsand founding director of theMaster of Behavioral and Decision Sciencesprogram.

Her research sits at the intersection of philosophy, game theory, and psychology, with a primary research focus on judgment and decision-making, as well as on how expectations affect behavior. Bicchieris work also examines the nature and evolution of social norms, how to measure them, and what strategies are necessary to foster social change.

Her most recent book is Norms in the Wild How to Diagnose, Measure, and Change Social Norms (Oxford University Press, 2016). In addition to this most recent honor, she was elected to theGerman National Academy of Sciences.

Michael Hanchard is theGustav C. Kuemmerle Professor of Africana Studies and professor of political science in the School of Arts & Sciences. He also serves as director of the Marginalized Populations Project,a collaborative research initiative designed to explore political dynamics between populations with unequal, minimal, or non-existent state protections and national governments.

His research and teaching interests combine a specialization in comparative politics with an interest in contemporary political theory, encompassing themes of nationalism, racism, xenophobia, and citizenship.

His most recent book isThe Spectre of Race: How Discrimination Haunts Western Democracy (Princeton, 2018).

Vijay Kumaris the Nemirovsky Family Dean ofPenn Engineeringwith appointments in the departments ofMechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics,Computer and Information Science, andElectrical and Systems Engineering.

He is an internationally recognized robotics expert who specializes in multi-agent systems, teams of robots that can cooperate to complete a task. Kumars research on new ways for these teams to sense their environments and communicate will help them collaborate on tasks that no single robot could do on its own, whether splitting up to count oranges in an orchard or coming together to lift a heavy payload.

In addition to holding many administrative positions at Penn, Kumar has served as the assistant director of robotics and cyber physical systems at theWhite House Office of Science and Technology Policy. His lab has founded many startups in robotics, and he is the founder ofExyn Technologies. In addition to this most recent honor, he is a fellow of theAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineersand theInstitute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers and was elected to theNational Academy of Engineeringand theAmerican Philosophical Society.

Stanley Plotkin is an emeritus professor of pediatrics and microbiology at the Perelman School of Medicine, an emeritus professor of virology at the Wistar Institute, and former director of infectious diseases at the Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP).

Plotkin has spent his career focused on developing vaccines for diseases like rubella, polio, rabies, varicella, and cytomegalovirus. He is a past chair of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Committee on Infectious Diseases and of the former AAP Task Force on Pediatric AIDS. He is also a founding member of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society.

In addition to this most recent honor, among many others, Plotkin received the Richard D. Wood Distinguished Alumni Award from CHOP for internationally renowned research in immunology and infectious diseases and the Chevalier of the Legion of Honor insignia from the president of France for his role in vaccine development. He was elected to the National Academy of Sciences and is a fellow of the International Society for Vaccines, AAP, and the College of Physicians of Philadelphia. Plotkin is a consultant to Aventis Pasteur, Paris, for which he has served as medical and scientific director.

Sarah Tishkoffis the David and Lyn Silfen University Professor in Genetics and Biology, holding appointments in thePerelman School of MedicineandSchool of Arts & Sciences.She is also director of thePenn Center for Global Genomics and Health Equity. Tishkoffstudies human genetic diversity, specifically that of African populations, blending field, lab, and computational approaches.

Her work has not only elucidated African population history but also how genetic variation affects traits such as disease susceptibility or ability to metabolize drugs.

In addition to this most recent honor, Tishkoff is a member of theNational Academy of Sciencesand a recipient of anNIH Pioneer Award, aDavid and Lucile Packard Career Award, aBurroughs/Wellcome Fund Career Award, anAmerican Society for Human Genetics Curt Stern Award, and aPenn Integrates Knowledge endowed chair.

Kenneth Zaretis the Joseph Leidy Professor in the Department ofCell and Developmental Biologyat thePerelman School of Medicine. He is also the director of PennsInstitute for Regenerative Medicine. Zaret joined Penn in 2009, where he served as associate director of IRM and co-director of the Epigenetics Program until 2014. He is also a member of theCell and Molecular Biology Graduate Program.

TheZaret Labfocuses on understanding how genes are regulated to allow one type of cell to change into another type, cell type control that occurs in embryonic development and tissue regeneration. Understanding this is crucial to being able to generate new cells at will for therapeutics and for generating experimental models to unveil the basis of and cures for human disease.

In addition to this most recent honor, Zarets awards include, among others, a MERIT Award from the National Institutes of Health, election as a fellow of theAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science, and the Stanley N. Cohen Biomedical Research Award.

Continued here:
Six from Penn elected to American Academy of Arts & Sciences | Penn Today - Penn Today

Posted in Genetic Engineering | Comments Off on Six from Penn elected to American Academy of Arts & Sciences | Penn Today – Penn Today

Science News Roundup: NASA extracts breathable oxygen from thin Martian air; SpaceX rocketship launches 4 astronauts on NASA mission to space station…

Posted: at 2:10 pm

Following is a summary of current science news briefs.

SpaceX rocketship launches 4 astronauts on NASA mission to space station

NASA and Elon Musk's commercial rocket company SpaceX launched a new four-astronaut team on a flight to the International Space Station early on Friday, the first crew ever propelled toward orbit by a rocket booster recycled from a previous spaceflight.

Scientists hope genetic engineering can revive the American chestnut tree

A day before Earth Day, retired forester Rex Mann watched as scientists signed an agreement with the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians in North Carolina to allow for the eventual planting of genetically engineered American chestnut trees on tribal land. Mann, who has heard countless stories about the American chestnut tree that once dominated the Appalachia region, was emotional as he witnessed the signing.

Costa Rica unveils radar that tracks space objects from a farm

Surrounded by clear blue skies and fields of sugar cane crops on the Pacific coast, a farm in the northwest of Costa Rica is now home to a giant radar capable of tracking small objects in space that threaten the safety of astronauts and satellites. Costa Rican President Carlos Alvarado and U.S. and Costa Rican astronauts on Thursday unveiled the four large reflective panels that make up the commercial radar, which is connected to the servers of aerospace company LeoLabs in San Francisco.

NASA extracts breathable oxygen from thin Martian air

NASA has logged another extraterrestrial first on its latest mission to Mars: converting carbon dioxide from the Martian atmosphere into pure, breathable oxygen, the U.S. space agency said on Wednesday. The unprecedented extraction of oxygen, literally out of thin air on Mars, was achieved Tuesday by an experimental device aboard Perseverance, a six-wheeled science rover that landed on the Red Planet Feb. 18 after a seven-month journey from Earth.

SpaceX rocketship launches 4 astronauts on NASA mission to space station

NASA and Elon Musk's commercial rocket company SpaceX launched a new four-astronaut team on a flight to the International Space Station on Friday, the first crew ever propelled into orbit by a rocket booster recycled from a previous spaceflight. The company's Crew Dragon capsule Endeavour, also making its second flight, streaked into the darkened pre-dawn sky atop a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket as its nine Merlin engines roared to life at 5:49 a.m. (0949 GMT) from NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

A black hole dubbed 'the Unicorn' may be galaxy's smallest one

Scientists have discovered what may be the smallest-known black hole in the Milky Way galaxy and the closest to our solar system - an object so curious that they nicknamed it 'the Unicorn.' The researchers said the black hole is roughly three times the mass of our sun, testing the lower limits of size for these extraordinarily dense objects that possess gravitational pulls so strong not even light can escape. A luminous star called a red giant orbits with the black hole in a so-called binary star system named V723 Mon.

Keeping up with T. Rex was easy, Dutch researchers say

Unlike its popular movie incarnations, Tyrannosaurus rex - the giant meat-eating dinosaur from the Cretaceous period - walked slower than previously thought, most likely ambling around at human walking speed, new Dutch research found. Working with a 3-dimensional computer model of "Trix", a female T. rex skeleton at the Dutch Naturalis museum, researcher Pasha van Bijlert added computer reconstructions of muscles and ligaments to find that it's likely that the dinosaur's preferred speed was 4.61 kms (2.86 miles) an hour, close to the walking pace of humans and horses.

Third-trimester vaccination appears safe; Pfizer/BioNtech vaccine effective in those with chronic illnesses

The following is a roundup of some of the latest scientific studies on the novel coronavirus and efforts to find treatments and vaccines for COVID-19, the illness caused by the virus. Third-trimester vaccination appears safe in early data

(With inputs from agencies.)

Read the rest here:
Science News Roundup: NASA extracts breathable oxygen from thin Martian air; SpaceX rocketship launches 4 astronauts on NASA mission to space station...

Posted in Genetic Engineering | Comments Off on Science News Roundup: NASA extracts breathable oxygen from thin Martian air; SpaceX rocketship launches 4 astronauts on NASA mission to space station…

Gene Editing Service Market 2021 Emerging Trend, Top Companies, Industry Demand, Business Review and Regional Analysis by 2027 The Courier – The…

Posted: at 2:10 pm

The Global Gene Editing Service Market Research Forecast 2021 2027 provides a comprehensive analysis of the market segments, including their dynamics, size, growth, regulatory requirements, competitive landscape, and emerging opportunities of the global industry. It provides an in-depth study of the Gene Editing Service market by using SWOT analysis. The research analysts provide an elaborate description of the value chain and its distributor analysis. This Market study provides comprehensive data that enhances the understanding, scope, and application of this report

The report enhances the decision making capabilities and helps to create an effective counter strategies to gain competitive advantage.

Get Sample Copy of this premium report at:@https://brandessenceresearch.com/requestSample/PostId/1322?utm_source=mcc&utm_medium=GS

* Sample pages for this report are immediately accessible upon request. *

Final Report will add the analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on this industry.

Geographically, this report split global into several key Regions, revenue (Million USD) The geography (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America and Middle East & Africa) focusing on key countries in each region. It also covers market drivers, restraints, opportunities, challenges, and key issues in Global Post-Consumer Gene Editing Service Market.

Key Benefits for Post-Consumer Gene Editing Service Market Reports

The analysis provides an exhaustive investigation of the global Post-Consumer Gene Editing Service market together with the future projections to assess the investment feasibility. Furthermore, the report includes both quantitative and qualitative analyses of the Post-Consumer Gene Editing Service market throughout the forecast period. The report also comprehends business opportunities and scope for expansion. Besides this, it provides insights into market threats or barriers and the impact of regulatory framework to give an executive-level blueprint the Post-Consumer Gene Editing Service market. This is done with an aim of helping companies in strategizing their decisions in a better way and finally attains their business goals.

Key players profiled in the report includes:

Merck, Horizon Discovery Limited, Lonza, GenScript, Eurofins Scientific, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Sangamo Therapeutics, Editas Medicine, CRISPR Therapeutics, Precision Biosciences, Oxford Genetics , Synthego, Vigene Biosciences, EpiGenie, Integrated DNA Technologies, New England Biolabs, OriGene Technologies, Intellia Therapeutics, Transposagen Biopharmaceuticals, Creative Biogene, Agilent Technologies, Danaher, ToolGen, Cellecta, Genecopoeia, and Calyxtand among others.

Segmentation Analysis:

By Technology:(CRISPR)/Cas9, TALENs/MegaTALs, ZFN, Others

By Delivery Method:Ex-Vivo, In-Vivo

By Application:Cell Line Engineering, Animal Genetic Engineering, Plant Genetic Engineering, Other Applications

By End-use:Biotechnology & Pharmaceutical Companies, Academic & Government Research Institutes, Contract Research Organizations

By Service:Contract, In-house

Market Drivers:

Increasing patch management solutions vulnerabilities is driving the growth of the market

Rising need of up to date software will propel the market growth

Growing third party application deployment is a driver for the market

Government regulations for promoting patch management may boost the growth of the market

Market Restraints:

Low vulnerability priority reduction is restraining the growth of the market

Lack of awareness for cyber security will hamper the market growth

Patch testing and compatibility issues may also restrict the growth of the market

Get Methodology:@https://brandessenceresearch.com/requestMethodology/PostId/1322

Table of Content:

There are 15 Chapters to display the Global Gene Editing Service market.

Chapter 1, About Executive Summary to describe Definition, Specifications and Classification of Global Gene Editing Service market, Applications, Market Segment by Types

Chapter 2, objective of the study.

Chapter 3, to display Research methodology and techniques.

Chapter 4 and 5, to show the Gene Editing Service Market Analysis, segmentation analysis, characteristics;

Chapter 6 and 7, to show Five forces (bargaining Power of buyers/suppliers), Threats to new entrants and market condition;

Chapter 8 and 9, to show analysis by regional segmentation[North America (Covered in Chapter 6 and 13), United States, Canada, Mexico, Europe (Covered in Chapter 7 and 13), Germany, UK, France, Italy, Spain, Russia, Others, Asia-Pacific (Covered in Chapter 8 and 13), China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, Southeast Asia, Others, Middle East and Africa (Covered in Chapter 9 and 13), Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Nigeria, South Africa, Others, South America (Covered in Chapter 10 and 13), Brazil, Argentina, Columbia, Chile & Others ], comparison, leading countries and opportunities; Regional Marketing Type Analysis, Supply Chain Analysis

Chapter 10, to identify major decision framework accumulated through Industry experts and strategic decision makers;

Chapter 11 and 12, Global Gene Editing Service Market Trend Analysis, Drivers, Challenges by consumer behavior, Marketing Channels

Chapter 13 and 14, about vendor landscape (classification and Market Ranking)

Chapter 15, deals with Global Gene Editing Service Market sales channel, distributors, Research Findings and Conclusion, appendix and data source.

Thanks for reading this article; you can also get individual chapter wise section or region wise report version like North America, Europe or Asia

Get Full Report:@https://brandessenceresearch.com/healthcare/gene-editing-service-market-industry-analysis

Follow this link:
Gene Editing Service Market 2021 Emerging Trend, Top Companies, Industry Demand, Business Review and Regional Analysis by 2027 The Courier - The...

Posted in Genetic Engineering | Comments Off on Gene Editing Service Market 2021 Emerging Trend, Top Companies, Industry Demand, Business Review and Regional Analysis by 2027 The Courier – The…

Jews, Christians, and Muslims Are Reclaiming Ancient Psychedelic Practices, And That Could Help With Legalization – Rolling Stone

Posted: at 2:09 pm

This column is a collaboration with DoubleBlind, a print magazine and media company at the forefront of the psychedelic movement.

A psychedelic trip can be among the most sacred experiences of a persons life. And yet, that impulse to take a psychedelic for a spiritual reason is often overlooked as a reason to lift prohibition for psychedelic substances.

Oftentimes, cannabis legalization is seen as a model for psychedelics. With cannabis, we are seeing the plant being legalized piecemeal, usually for medical and then recreational use. Indeed, weve already begun to see two main routes to ending psychedelic prohibition: medicalization and decriminalization. But what this binary paradigm of medicalization versus decriminalization conceals is a third way of using psychedelics: getting legal sanction for the spiritual or religious use of psychedelic substances, which, among a variety of traditions, are deemed to be sacred tools used in holy rituals.

No, were not talking about newly formed weed or psilocybin churches that are built around using controlled substances under religious protection; but rather, long-established religions that include the use of psychedelics in contemporary practice. In a small but fast growing movement, members of Abrahamic faiths are incorporating entheogens substances that occasion spiritual experiences into their own practices, and referencing Biblical traditions as precedent for doing so.

Take, for instance, the quickly growing meetup group called Faith+Delics, run by Plant Medicine Law Group founding partner Adriana Kertzer, which has grown to dozens of members in less than half a year, drawing rabbis, priests, scholars, and practitioners of Judaism, Islam, and Christianity. Then theres the Jewish Entheogenic Society on Facebook, boasting close to 1,000 members, not to mention the upcoming Jewish Psychedelic Summit, where dozens of speakers are slated to present on ancient psychedelic ritual and religious frameworks, Jewish shamanism, and contemporary practices. (One of these organizers is Madison Margolin, an author of this article.)

For more than half the past decade, Madison, who is Jewish, has observed and participated in prayer circles and Sabbath rituals involving magic mushrooms, ayahuasca, MDMA, cannabis, and other entheogens. As one underground guide from a Hasidic background who serves plant medicine within the Jewish community puts it, these plants are teachers and healers, helping our people heal from traumas that theyve been going through for thousands of years, as a minority people in Europe and other lands, and helping us embrace our true nature what were born from, and our roots. By working with plant medicine like ayahuasca, many in the community, he says, have transformed their relationships with their spouses, employees, God, religion, and themselves. Rituals involving these plants, he adds, can be practiced in a non-pagan way, but integrated into the sacred of all religions.

And its not all New Age spiritual approaches being applied to established religion, either: Archaeological evidence shows the presence of cannabis residue at holy biblical sites in the ancient city of Tel Arad in Israel, while scholarship also points to the use of acacia wood (containing DMT) and a cocktail of other entheogens used in Israelite incense rituals, as well as kaneh-bosm (cannabis) in Christs holy anointing oil.

But the question remains: For those who incorporate psychedelics into their contemporary practice of a well-established religion, is there legal protection to do so? And if not, could pursuing religious protection be yet another route to ending prohibition?

To start, the First Amendment offers protection for religious observation and practice. Religious freedom is regarded as the first freedom, and is the first thing in the First Amendment, explains Gary Smith, general counsel to the Peyote Way Church of God and founding partner of Guidant Law Firm, which handles cannabis and plant medicine cases. Congress cannot establish or qualify any particular religion. From that perspective, no one needs to go to the government to get permission for the religious use of any substance [as] there is no department of religion, he adds. That being said, you need to have the entheogen at the heart of your religious observation. It cant be merely incidental, but rather a bonafide sacrament.

Take, for instance, the Tel Arad archaeological dig, where cannabis and frankincense were found in an altar at the entrance to the Holy of Holies of a Judahite Shrine. Is that enough to make the argument that Judaism in its modern expression should include cannabis? Maybe, Smith says. If you can prove that theres historical precedent, I think you have a historical argument. But absent that, youd need people to come together in some form of Jewish congregation in good faith with a bona fide argument that cannabis is a central sacrament to their iteration of worship and then under RFRA, it would be the federal governments burden to prove it has a compelling interest to regulate on top of that practice. But a connection between practitioners of an old-world religion and an entheogen can be established with or without historicity, Smith adds; most of all, proving that connection would depend upon those persons coming together in a bonafide religious context (and all that that means).

The Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) prohibits the federal government from substantially burdening a persons exercise of religion, even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability. In other words, even if a substance like ayahuasca is federally illegal, groups using it for sincere religious purposes may be able to seek out protection under RFRA. But proving the sincerity of the religious practice is another feat altogether. The catch-22 is that for anyone pursuing this religious freedom, until a court rules that the practice is compliant with RFRA, there will be an omnipresent potential for discrimiation, or even prosecution.

Truth be told, whether a psychedelic substance can legally be used in religious ceremony is unsettled law with the exception of religious exemptions offered to the Native American Church (NAC) to use peyote, and the Uniao do Vegetal (UDV) and Santo Daime churches to use ayahuasca.

If I were speculating about whether or not a currently established religion could use a controlled substance, I would consider the fact that UDV and Santo Daime are syncretic religions, merging elements of other religions together, says Ismail Ali, policy and advocacy counsel at the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (MAPS), who also advises churches in this area of the law.

UDV and Santo Daime have Christian elements, although they are ayahuasca churches, while the NAC similarly is based to some extent on a church, Ali explains. They take elements of a majority religion and apply it to a minority religion, he says. So looking at that, I think it does make it in some ways more plausible that a community using entheogenic substances that is basing off a currently established religion might be more likely to get an exemption.

But its not so simple as basing an entheogenic practice off an already well-established religion. Members of said religion might need rulings from religious leaders and to show some level of established practice and traditions using entheogens, Ali says.

Its like youre creating a different sect [of an established religion], explains Serena Wu, founding partner at Plant Medicine Law Group. Its a difficult situation here: There has to be something unique about this particular religious practice, that is different from traditional Jewish [or Christain, Muslim, etc.] practice. But then the question is, why would one incorporate entheogens into their religious practice if there are folks practicing the same religion who dont feel the need to do so? If its about more than just getting around the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), Wu explains, the individual would need to articulate how the use of the entheogen applies to their religious practice in a central way. A court will look to see whether you are just now coming up with this idea, like some weed churches, and they will start to question if you have a sincerely held belief.'

Short of expanding RFRA protections or changing the scheduling of certain entheogens, a religious group may use RFRA as a defense in the case of a criminal prosecution, for example, as a result of sacraments being seized by the DEA. There are also other offensive litigation mechanisms, like filing for declaratory or injunctive relief to get the court to say what your rights are and possibly issue an order to restrain the federal government from violating your rights, Wu says. These types of complaints were filed in the UDV and Santo Daime cases. Currently, the Church of the Eagle and Condor, in collaboration with Chacruna, are using a novel strategy, she explains, in regard to cases in which ayahuasca was seized by the Customs and Border Patrol at the border. The Church will, among other things, file FOIA requests to figure out what happened to the seized ayahuasca and establish a legal process to return the sacraments to the churches.

Indeed, the DEA is yet another hurdle religious groups may have to navigate in efforts to gain legal protection. The DEAs process of getting exemption from the CSA is fraught, with many attorneys holding that the agency isnt qualified to be involved in this process, at all, of deciding whats a religion and whats not. The core thing to know is that in order to apply [to the DEA for exemption] you have to say that your use of the substance is necessary for your practice, with necessary being the keyword, Ali says. And yet you also have to stop using it while youre waiting for the DEA to respond. The paradox there is quite apparent. If the substance is so necessary, then an observant religious group wouldnt be able to stop to wait for permission because in suspending use, theyd be showing that the entheogen isnt so necessary after all. Some attorneys even argue this process is unconstitutional because it would require a group or individual to self-disclose illegal activity, without guaranteeing an outcome thereby putting people even more at risk than less.

In general, with administrative procedures in law, theres an exhaustion requirement, Ali explains, showing that all available remedies have been tried before judicial solutions are available. So if there is an available remedy such as the DEA process, if its legitimate, then the courts wont necessarily see the case unless the group gets denied through that process first. What frustrates the situation, however, is when the DEA simply does not respond to the request what some have experienced as all too common a strategy of the agency thereby keeping a group from taking further action without an official rejection.

The bottom line, however, is that necessity of religion is stronger than the goals of the CSA, says Ali. But in the case of an old-world religion, members might first have to prove why an entheogen is so central the practice now, when such rituals have been dormant for the past few thousand years.

With evidence mounting for the incorporation of psychedelics into contemporary Abrahamic religious practice, it may become easier to make a case that these substances are indeed central and necessary: Indeed, in Madisons seven-plus years of reporting on the overlap of religion and psychedelics, weve observed that for those who otherwise would not be practicing religion altogether including secular-raised folks lacking religious insipration, as well as those whove fled from more hardcore orthodox backgrounds psychedeilc spirituality, through ayahuasca, LSD, mushrooms, and other entheogens used during holidays and rituals, has been the only means by which theyve been able to meaningfully practice the religion. Many people have resistance to their religion, the underground plant medicine guide says. But I feel that the medicine is incredibly healing, helping us shed our ancestral baggage, get over these humps, and connect to the Creator.

See original here:

Jews, Christians, and Muslims Are Reclaiming Ancient Psychedelic Practices, And That Could Help With Legalization - Rolling Stone

Posted in Entheogens | Comments Off on Jews, Christians, and Muslims Are Reclaiming Ancient Psychedelic Practices, And That Could Help With Legalization – Rolling Stone

Psychedelic Experience launches new website to help navigate the world of psychedelics – PRNewswire

Posted: at 2:09 pm

Discover a wide variety of safe and peer-reviewed organizations, retreat centers, guides, shamans, and much more!

Through the use of PEx's online (and constantly updated) directory, visitors can search the globe for the perfect resources for their journey.Want to find a Shaman in Central America?No problem. Want to find a psilocybin retreat in the Netherlands, or an Integration Therapist in the U.S. or U.K.?PEx's Directory has it. New to psychedelics and not ready for a full-on experience? No problem!

PEx's website is designed to cater to your needs, with content options for beginners, those with some experience, and those that consider themselves to be more experienced psychonauts. Visitors will also benefit from a diverse catalog of educational, science, and safety resources to ensure they understand their options, no matter where they are on their journey.

Tim Cools, founder of PEx, said "Our mission is to support and facilitate global healing and personal growth through safe and responsible use of plant medicines and psychedelic-assisted treatments. We are a passionate team, driven by the belief that entheogens can change the world for the better."

No matter where you are on your journey, whether it's your first step or you're a seasoned explorer, with PEx, "your trip starts here."

SOURCE PsychedelicExperience.net

https://www.psychedelicexperience.net

See the article here:

Psychedelic Experience launches new website to help navigate the world of psychedelics - PRNewswire

Posted in Entheogens | Comments Off on Psychedelic Experience launches new website to help navigate the world of psychedelics – PRNewswire

COVID-19 – Wikipedia

Posted: at 2:05 pm

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), also known as the coronavirus or COVID, is a contagious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The first known case was identified in Wuhan, China, in December 2019.[7] The disease has since spread worldwide, leading to an ongoing pandemic.[8]

Symptoms of COVID-19 are variable, but often include fever,[9] cough, headache,[10] fatigue, breathing difficulties, and loss of smell and taste.[11][12] Symptoms may begin one to fourteen days after exposure to the virus. At least a third of people who are infected do not develop noticeable symptoms.[13] Of those people who develop noticeable symptoms enough to be classed as patients, most (81%) develop mild to moderate symptoms (up to mild pneumonia), while 14% develop severe symptoms (dyspnea, hypoxia, or more than 50% lung involvement on imaging), and 5% suffer critical symptoms (respiratory failure, shock, or multiorgan dysfunction).[14] Older people are at a higher risk of developing severe symptoms. Some people continue to experience a range of effects (long COVID) for months after recovery, and damage to organs has been observed.[15] Multi-year studies are underway to further investigate the long-term effects of the disease.[15]

Transmission of COVID-19 occurs mainly when an infected person is in close contact[a] with another person.[19][20] Small droplets containing the virus can spread from an infected person's nose and mouth as they breathe, cough, sneeze, sing, or speak. Other people are infected if the virus gets into their mouth, nose or eyes. Airborne transmission is also sometimes possible, as smaller infected droplets and particles can linger in the air for minutes to hours within enclosed spaces that have inadequate ventilation.[20] Less commonly, the virus may spread via contaminated surfaces.[20] People who are infected can transmit the virus to another person up to two days before they themselves show symptoms, as can people who do not experience symptoms.[21][22] People remain infectious for up to ten days after the onset of symptoms in moderate cases and up to twenty days in severe cases.[23]

Several testing methods have been developed to diagnose the disease. The standard diagnostic method is by detection of the virus' nucleic acid by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR), transcription-mediated amplification (TMA), or by reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) from a nasopharyngeal swab.

Preventive measures include physical or social distancing, quarantining, ventilation of indoor spaces, covering coughs and sneezes, hand washing, and keeping unwashed hands away from the face. The use of face masks or coverings has been recommended in public settings to minimise the risk of transmissions. Several vaccines have been developed and many countries have initiated mass vaccination campaigns.

Although work is underway to develop drugs that inhibit the virus, the primary treatment is symptomatic. Management involves the treatment of symptoms, supportive care, isolation, and experimental measures.

During the initial outbreak in Wuhan, China, the virus and disease were commonly referred to as "coronavirus" and "Wuhan coronavirus",[24][25][26] with the disease sometimes called "Wuhan pneumonia".[27][28] In the past, many diseases have been named after geographical locations, such as the Spanish flu,[29] Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, and Zika virus.[30] In January 2020, the WHO recommended 2019-nCov[31] and 2019-nCoV acute respiratory disease[32] as interim names for the virus and disease per 2015 guidance and international guidelines against using geographical locations (e.g. Wuhan, China), animal species, or groups of people in disease and virus names in part to prevent social stigma.[33][34][35] The official names COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 were issued by the WHO on 11 February 2020.[36] Tedros Adhanom explained: COfor corona, VIfor virus, Dfor disease and 19 for when the outbreak was first identified (31 December 2019).[37] The WHO additionally uses "the COVID-19 virus" and "the virus responsible for COVID-19" in public communications.[36]

Symptoms of COVID-19 are variable, ranging from mild symptoms to severe illness.[38][39] Common symptoms include headache,[40] loss of smell[41] and taste,[42] nasal congestion and runny nose, cough, muscle pain, sore throat, fever,[43] diarrhea, and breathing difficulties.[44] People with the same infection may have different symptoms, and their symptoms may change over time. Three common clusters of symptoms have been identified: one respiratory symptom cluster with cough, sputum, shortness of breath, and fever; a musculoskeletal symptom cluster with muscle and joint pain, headache, and fatigue; a cluster of digestive symptoms with abdominal pain, vomiting, and diarrhea.[44] In people without prior ear, nose, and throat disorders, loss of taste combined with loss of smell is associated with COVID-19.[45]

Most people (81%) develop mild to moderate symptoms (up to mild pneumonia), while 14% develop severe symptoms (dyspnea, hypoxia, or more than 50% lung involvement on imaging) and 5% of patients suffer critical symptoms (respiratory failure, shock, or multiorgan dysfunction).[46] At least a third of the people who are infected with the virus do not develop noticeable symptoms at any point in time.[47][48][49][50] These asymptomatic carriers tend not to get tested and can spread the disease.[50][51][52][53] Other infected people will develop symptoms later, called "pre-symptomatic", or have very mild symptoms and can also spread the virus.[53]

As is common with infections, there is a delay between the moment a person first becomes infected and the appearance of the first symptoms. The median delay for COVID-19 is four to five days.[54] Most symptomatic people experience symptoms within two to seven days after exposure, and almost all will experience at least one symptom within 12 days.[54][55]

COVID-19 is caused by infection with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus strain.

The virus is transmitted mainly through the respiratory route after an infected person coughs, sneezes, sings, talks or breathes. A new infection occurs when virus-containing particles exhaled by an infected person, either respiratory droplets or aerosols, get into the mouth, nose, or eyes of other people who are in close contact with the infected person.[57] During human-to-human transmission, an average 1000 infectious SARS-CoV-2 virions are thought to initiate a new infection.

The closer people interact, and the longer they interact, the more likely they are to transmit COVID-19. Closer distances can involve larger droplets (which fall to the ground) and aerosols, whereas longer distances only involve aerosols. Larger droplets can also turn into aerosols (known as droplet nuclei) through evaporation. The relative importance of the larger droplets and the aerosols is not clear as of November 2020; however, the virus is not known to spread between rooms over long distances such as through air ducts. Airborne transmission is able to particularly occur indoors, in high risk locations such as restaurants, choirs, gyms, nightclubs, offices, and religious venues, often when they are crowded or less ventilated. It also occurs in healthcare settings, often when aerosol-generating medical procedures are performed on COVID-19 patients.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. It was first isolated from three people with pneumonia connected to the cluster of acute respiratory illness cases in Wuhan.[58] All structural features of the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus particle occur in related coronaviruses in nature.[59]

Outside the human body, the virus is destroyed by household soap, which bursts its protective bubble.[60]

SARS-CoV-2 is closely related to the original SARS-CoV.[61] It is thought to have an animal (zoonotic) origin. Genetic analysis has revealed that the coronavirus genetically clusters with the genus Betacoronavirus, in subgenus Sarbecovirus (lineage B) together with two bat-derived strains. It is 96% identical at the whole genome level to other bat coronavirus samples (BatCov RaTG13).[62][63] The structural proteins of SARS-CoV-2 include membrane glycoprotein (M), envelope protein (E), nucleocapsid protein (N), and the spike protein (S). The M protein of SARS-CoV-2 is about 98% similar to the M protein of bat SARS-CoV, maintains around 98% homology with pangolin SARS-CoV, and has 90% homology with the M protein of SARS-CoV; whereas, the similarity is only around 38% with the M protein of MERS-CoV. The structure of the M protein resembles the sugar transporter SemiSWEET.[64]

The many thousands of SARS-CoV-2 variants are grouped into clades.[65] Several different clade nomenclatures have been proposed. Nextstrain divides the variants into five clades (19A, 19B, 20A, 20B, and 20C), while GISAID divides them into seven (L, O, V, S, G, GH, and GR).[66]

Several notable variants of SARS-CoV-2 emerged in late 2020. Cluster 5 emerged among minks and mink farmers in Denmark. After strict quarantines and a mink euthanasia campaign, it is believed to have been eradicated. The Variant of Concern 202012/01 (VOC 202012/01) is believed to have emerged in the United Kingdom in September. The 501Y.V2 Variant, which has the same N501Y mutation, arose independently in South Africa.[67][68]

Three known variants of SARS-CoV-2 are spreading among global populations As of January 2021[update], including the UK Variant (referred to as B.1.1.7) first found in London and Kent, a variant discovered in South Africa (referred to as 1.351), and a variant discovered in Brazil (referred to as P.1).[69]

Using whole genome sequencing, epidemiology and modelling suggest the new UK variant VUI-202012/01 (the first variant under investigation in December 2020) transmits more easily than other strains.[70]

COVID-19 can affect the upper respiratory tract (sinuses, nose, and throat) and the lower respiratory tract (windpipe and lungs).[71] The lungs are the organs most affected by COVID-19 because the virus accesses host cells via the enzyme angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), which is most abundant in type II alveolar cells of the lungs.[72] The virus uses a special surface glycoprotein called a "spike" (peplomer) to connect to ACE2 and enter the host cell.[73] The density of ACE2 in each tissue correlates with the severity of the disease in that tissue and decreasing ACE2 activity might be protective,[74] though another view is that increasing ACE2 using angiotensin II receptor blocker medications could be protective.[75] As the alveolar disease progresses, respiratory failure might develop and death may follow.[76]

Whether SARS-CoV-2 is able to invade the nervous system remains unknown however it is clear that many people with COVID-19 exhibit neurological or mental health issues. The virus is not detected in the CNS of the majority of COVID-19 people with neurological issues. However, SARS-CoV-2 has been detected at low levels in the brains of those who have died from COVID-19, but these results need to be confirmed.[77] Loss of smell results from infection of the support cells of the olfactory epithelium, with subsequent damage to the olfactory neurons.[78] SARS-CoV-2 could cause respiratory failure through affecting the brain stem as other coronaviruses have been found to invade the CNS. While virus has been detected in cerebrospinal fluid of autopsies, the exact mechanism by which it invades the CNS remains unclear and may first involve invasion of peripheral nerves given the low levels of ACE2 in the brain.[79][80][81] The virus may also enter the bloodstream from the lungs and cross the blood-brain barrier to gain access to the CNS, possibly within an infected white blood cell.[77]

The virus also affects gastrointestinal organs as ACE2 is abundantly expressed in the glandular cells of gastric, duodenal and rectal epithelium[82] as well as endothelial cells and enterocytes of the small intestine.[83]

The virus can cause acute myocardial injury and chronic damage to the cardiovascular system.[84] An acute cardiac injury was found in 12% of infected people admitted to the hospital in Wuhan, China,[85] and is more frequent in severe disease.[86] Rates of cardiovascular symptoms are high, owing to the systemic inflammatory response and immune system disorders during disease progression, but acute myocardial injuries may also be related to ACE2 receptors in the heart.[84] ACE2 receptors are highly expressed in the heart and are involved in heart function.[84][87] A high incidence of thrombosis and venous thromboembolism have been found people transferred to Intensive care unit (ICU) with COVID-19 infections, and may be related to poor prognosis.[88] Blood vessel dysfunction and clot formation (as suggested by high D-dimer levels caused by blood clots) are thought to play a significant role in mortality, incidences of clots leading to pulmonary embolisms, and ischaemic events within the brain have been noted as complications leading to death in people infected with SARS-CoV-2. Infection appears to set off a chain of vasoconstrictive responses within the body, constriction of blood vessels within the pulmonary circulation has also been posited as a mechanism in which oxygenation decreases alongside the presentation of viral pneumonia.[89] Furthermore, microvascular blood vessel damage has been reported in a small number of tissue samples of the brains without detected SARS-CoV-2 and the olfactory bulbs from those who have died from COVID-19.[90][91][92]

Another common cause of death is complications related to the kidneys.[89] Early reports show that up to 30% of hospitalized patients both in China and in New York have experienced some injury to their kidneys, including some persons with no previous kidney problems.[93]

Autopsies of people who died of COVID-19 have found diffuse alveolar damage, and lymphocyte-containing inflammatory infiltrates within the lung.[94]

Although SARS-CoV-2 has a tropism for ACE2-expressing epithelial cells of the respiratory tract, people with severe COVID-19 have symptoms of systemic hyperinflammation. Clinical laboratory findings of elevated IL2, IL7, IL6, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GMCSF), interferon gamma-induced protein10 (IP10), monocyte chemoattractant protein1 (MCP1), macrophage inflammatory protein 1alpha (MIP1alpha), and tumour necrosis factor (TNF) indicative of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) suggest an underlying immunopathology.[85]

Additionally, people with COVID-19 and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have classical serum biomarkers of CRS, including elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), D-dimer, and ferritin.[95]

Systemic inflammation results in vasodilation, allowing inflammatory lymphocytic and monocytic infiltration of the lung and the heart. In particular, pathogenic GM-CSF-secreting Tcells were shown to correlate with the recruitment of inflammatory IL-6-secreting monocytes and severe lung pathology in people with COVID-19.[96] Lymphocytic infiltrates have also been reported at autopsy.[94]

Multiple viral and host factors affect the pathogenesis of the virus. The S-protein, otherwise known as the spike protein, is the viral component that attaches to the host receptor via the ACE2 receptors. It includes two subunits: S1 and S2. S1 determines the virus host range and cellular tropism via the receptor binding domain. S2 mediates the membrane fusion of the virus to its potential cell host via the H1 and HR2, which are heptad repeat regions. Studies have shown that S1 domain induced IgG and IgA antibody levels at a much higher capacity. It is the focus spike proteins expression that are involved in many effective COVID-19 vaccines.[97]

The M protein is the viral protein responsible for the transmembrane transport of nutrients. It is the cause of the bud release and the formation of the viral envelope.[98] The N and E protein are accessory proteins that interfere with the host's immune response.[98]

Human angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (hACE2) is the host factor that SARS-COV2 virus targets causing COVID-19. Theoretically the usage of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and ACE inhibitors upregulating ACE2 expression might increase morbidity with COVID-19, though animal data suggest some potential protective effect of ARB. However no clinical studies have proven susceptibility or outcomes. Until further data is available, guidelines and recommendations for hypertensive patients remain.[99]

The virus' effect on ACE2 cell surfaces leads to leukocytic infiltration, increased blood vessel permeability, alveolar wall permeability, as well as decreased secretion of lung surfactants. These effects cause the majority of the respiratory symptoms. However, the aggravation of local inflammation causes a cytokine storm eventually leading to a systemic inflammatory response syndrome.[100]

The severity of the inflammation can be attributed to the severity of what is known as the cytokine storm.[101] Levels of interleukin1B, interferon-gamma, interferon-inducible protein 10, and monocyte chemoattractant protein1 were all associated with COVID-19 disease severity. Treatment has been proposed to combat the cytokine storm as it remains to be one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in COVID-19 disease.[102]

A cytokine storm is due to an acute hyperinflammatory response that is responsible for clinical illness in an array of diseases but in COVID-19, it is related to worse prognosis and increased fatality. The storm causes the acute respiratory distress syndrome, blood clotting events such as strokes, myocardial infarction, encephalitis, acute kidney injury, and vasculitis. The production of IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, TNF-alpha, and interferon-gamma, all crucial components of normal immune responses, inadvertently become the causes of a cytokine storm. The cells of the central nervous system, the microglia, neurons, and astrocytes, are also involved in the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines affecting the nervous system, and effects of cytokine storms toward the CNS are not uncommon.[103]

Pregnancy response

Nowadays, there are many unknowns for pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic. Given that they are prone to suffering from complications and severe disease infection with other types of coronaviruses, they have been identified as a vulnerable group and advised to take supplementary preventive measures.[104]

Physiological responses to pregnancy can include:

However, from the current evidence base, it is difficult to draw final conclusions on whether pregnant women are at increased risk of grave consequences of this virus.[104]

In addition to the above, other clinical studies have proved that SARS-CoV-2 can affect the period of pregnancy in different ways. On the one hand, there is little evidence of its impact up to 12 weeks gestation. On the other hand, COVID-19 infection may cause increased rates of unfavorable outcomes in the course of the pregnancy. Some examples of these could be fetal growth restriction, preterm birth, and perinatal mortality, which refers to the fetal death past 22 or 28 completed weeks of pregnancy as well as the death among live-born children up to seven completed days of life.[104]

COVID-19 can provisionally be diagnosed on the basis of symptoms and confirmed using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or other nucleic acid testing of infected secretions.[105][106] Along with laboratory testing, chest CT scans may be helpful to diagnose COVID-19 in individuals with a high clinical suspicion of infection.[107] Detection of a past infection is possible with serological tests, which detect antibodies produced by the body in response to the infection.[105]

The standard methods of testing for presence of SARS-CoV-2 are nucleic acid tests,[105][108] which detects the presence of viral RNA fragments.[109] As these tests detect RNA but not infectious virus, its "ability to determine duration of infectivity of patients is limited."[110] The test is typically done on respiratory samples obtained by a nasopharyngeal swab; however, a nasal swab or sputum sample may also be used.[111][112] Results are generally available within hours.[105] The WHO has published several testing protocols for the disease.[113]

A number of laboratories and companies have developed serological tests, which detect antibodies produced by the body in response to infection. Several have been evaluated by Public Health England and approved for use in the UK.[114]

The University of Oxford's CEBM has pointed to mounting evidence[115][116] that "a good proportion of 'new' mild cases and people re-testing positives after quarantine or discharge from hospital are not infectious, but are simply clearing harmless virus particles which their immune system has efficiently dealt with" and have called for "an international effort to standardize and periodically calibrate testing"[117] On 7September, the UK government issued "guidance for procedures to be implemented in laboratories to provide assurance of positive SARS-CoV-2 RNA results during periods of low prevalence, when there is a reduction in the predictive value of positive test results".[118]

Chest CT scans may be helpful to diagnose COVID-19 in individuals with a high clinical suspicion of infection but are not recommended for routine screening.[107][119] Bilateral multilobar ground-glass opacities with a peripheral, asymmetric, and posterior distribution are common in early infection.[107][120] Subpleural dominance, crazy paving (lobular septal thickening with variable alveolar filling), and consolidation may appear as the disease progresses.[107][121] Characteristic imaging features on chest radiographs and computed tomography (CT) of people who are symptomatic include asymmetric peripheral ground-glass opacities without pleural effusions.[122]

Many groups have created COVID-19 datasets that include imagery such as the Italian Radiological Society which has compiled an international online database of imaging findings for confirmed cases.[123] Due to overlap with other infections such as adenovirus, imaging without confirmation by rRT-PCR is of limited specificity in identifying COVID-19.[122] A large study in China compared chest CT results to PCR and demonstrated that though imaging is less specific for the infection, it is faster and more sensitive.[106]

In late 2019, the WHO assigned emergency ICD-10 disease codes U07.1 for deaths from lab-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and U07.2 for deaths from clinically or epidemiologically diagnosed COVID-19 without lab-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection.[124]

The main pathological findings at autopsy are:

Preventive measures to reduce the chances of infection include staying at home, wearing a mask in public, avoiding crowded places, keeping distance from others, ventilating indoor spaces, managing potential exposure durations,[129] washing hands with soap and water often and for at least twenty seconds, practising good respiratory hygiene, and avoiding touching the eyes, nose, or mouth with unwashed hands.[130][131] Poor hygienic conditions in underdeveloped countries such as the Dominican Republic, where there is also a gender, class, and ethnic gap, complicate the whole process of COVID-19 prevention.[132]

Those diagnosed with COVID-19 or who believe they may be infected are advised by the CDC to stay home except to get medical care, call ahead before visiting a healthcare provider, wear a face mask before entering the healthcare provider's office and when in any room or vehicle with another person, cover coughs and sneezes with a tissue, regularly wash hands with soap and water and avoid sharing personal household items.[133][134]

The first COVID-19 vaccine was granted regulatory approval on 2December by the UK medicines regulator MHRA.[135] It was evaluated for emergency use authorization (EUA) status by the US FDA, and in several other countries.[136] Initially, the US National Institutes of Health guidelines do not recommend any medication for prevention of COVID-19, before or after exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, outside the setting of a clinical trial.[137][138] Without a vaccine, other prophylactic measures, or effective treatments, a key part of managing COVID-19 is trying to decrease and delay the epidemic peak, known as "flattening the curve".[139] This is done by slowing the infection rate to decrease the risk of health services being overwhelmed, allowing for better treatment of current cases, and delaying additional cases until effective treatments or a vaccine become available.[139][140]

A COVID19 vaccine is a vaccine intended to provide acquired immunity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV2), the virus causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID19). Prior to the COVID19 pandemic, there was an established body of knowledge about the structure and function of coronaviruses causing diseases like severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), which enabled accelerated development of various vaccine technologies during early 2020.[141] On 10 January 2020, the SARS-CoV-2 genetic sequence data was shared through GISAID, and by 19 March, the global pharmaceutical industry announced a major commitment to address COVID-19.[142]

In Phase III trials, several COVID19 vaccines have demonstrated efficacy as high as 95% in preventing symptomatic COVID19 infections. As of April2021[update], 13 vaccines are authorized by at least one national regulatory authority for public use: two RNA vaccines (the PfizerBioNTech vaccine and the Moderna vaccine), five conventional inactivated vaccines (BBIBP-CorV, CoronaVac, Covaxin, WIBP-CorV and CoviVac), four viral vector vaccines (Sputnik V, the OxfordAstraZeneca vaccine, Convidecia, and the Johnson & Johnson vaccine), and two protein subunit vaccines (EpiVacCorona and RBD-Dimer).[143] In total, as of March2021[update], 308 vaccine candidates are in various stages of development, with 73 in clinical research, including 24 in Phase I trials, 33 in Phase III trials, and 16 in Phase III development.[143]

Many countries have implemented phased distribution plans that prioritize those at highest risk of complications, such as the elderly, and those at high risk of exposure and transmission, such as healthcare workers.[144] Stanley Plotkin and Neal Halsey wrote an article published by Oxford Clinical Infectious Diseases that urged single dose interim use in order to extend vaccination to as many people as possible until vaccine availability improved.[145] Several other articles and media provided evidence for delaying second doses in the same line of reasoning.[146][147][148]

Social distancing (also known as physical distancing) includes infection control actions intended to slow the spread of the disease by minimising close contact between individuals. Methods include quarantines; travel restrictions; and the closing of schools, workplaces, stadiums, theatres, or shopping centres. Individuals may apply social distancing methods by staying at home, limiting travel, avoiding crowded areas, using no-contact greetings, and physically distancing themselves from others.[4] Many governments are now mandating or recommending social distancing in regions affected by the outbreak.[155]

Outbreaks have occurred in prisons due to crowding and an inability to enforce adequate social distancing.[156][157] In the United States, the prisoner population is aging and many of them are at high risk for poor outcomes from COVID-19 due to high rates of coexisting heart and lung disease, and poor access to high-quality healthcare.[156]

Self-isolation at home has been recommended for those diagnosed with COVID-19 and those who suspect they have been infected. Health agencies have issued detailed instructions for proper self-isolation.[158] Many governments have mandated or recommended self-quarantine for entire populations. The strongest self-quarantine instructions have been issued to those in high-risk groups.[159] Those who may have been exposed to someone with COVID-19 and those who have recently travelled to a country or region with the widespread transmission have been advised to self-quarantine for 14 days from the time of last possible exposure.[citation needed]

The WHO and the US CDC recommend individuals wear non-medical face coverings in public settings where there is an increased risk of transmission and where social distancing measures are difficult to maintain.[160][161] This recommendation is meant to reduce the spread of the disease by asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic individuals and is complementary to established preventive measures such as social distancing.[161][162] Face coverings limit the volume and travel distance of expiratory droplets dispersed when talking, breathing, and coughing.[161][162] A face covering without vents or holes will also filter out particles containing the virus from inhaled and exhaled air, reducing the chances of infection.[163] But, if the mask include an exhalation valve, a wearer that is infected (maybe without having noticed that, and asymptomatic) would transmit the virus outwards through it, despite any certification they can have. So the masks with exhalation valve are not for the infected wearers, and are not reliable to stop the pandemic in a large scale. Many countries and local jurisdictions encourage or mandate the use of face masks or cloth face coverings by members of the public to limit the spread of the virus.[164]

Masks are also strongly recommended for those who may have been infected and those taking care of someone who may have the disease.[165] When not wearing a mask, the CDC recommends covering the mouth and nose with a tissue when coughing or sneezing and recommends using the inside of the elbow if no tissue is available. Proper hand hygiene after any cough or sneeze is encouraged. Healthcare professionals interacting directly with people who have COVID-19 are advised to use respirators at least as protective as NIOSH-certified N95 or equivalent, in addition to other personal protective equipment.[166]

The WHO recommends ventilation and air filtration in public spaces to help clear out infectious aerosols.[167][168][169]

The Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health recommends a healthy diet, being physically active, managing psychological stress, and getting enough sleep.[170]

There is no good evidence that vitamin D status has any relationship with COVID-19 health outcomes.[171]

Thorough hand hygiene after any cough or sneeze is required.[172] The WHO also recommends that individuals wash hands often with soap and water for at least twenty seconds, especially after going to the toilet or when hands are visibly dirty, before eating and after blowing one's nose.[173] However, despite the measures recommended by the WHO, not all households have access to some basic necessities. In the Dominican Republic, 46% of households do not have access to safe drinking water. Only 44.9% receive drinking water at home every two to three days[132]. When soap and water are not available, the CDC recommends using an alcohol-based hand sanitiser with at least 60% alcohol.[174] For areas where commercial hand sanitisers are not readily available, the WHO provides two formulations for local production. In these formulations, the antimicrobial activity arises from ethanol or isopropanol. Hydrogen peroxide is used to help eliminate bacterial spores in the alcohol; it is "not an active substance for hand antisepsis." Glycerol is added as a humectant.[175]

After being expelled from the body, coronaviruses can survive on surfaces for hours to days. If a person touches the dirty surface, they may deposit the virus at the eyes, nose, or mouth where it can enter the body and cause infection.[18] Current evidence indicates that contact with infected surfaces is not the main driver of COVID-19,[176][177][178] leading to recommendations for optimised disinfection procedures to avoid issues such as the increase of antimicrobial resistance through the use of inappropriate cleaning products and processes.[179][180] Deep cleaning and other surface sanitation has been criticized as hygiene theater, giving a false sense of security against something primarily spread through the air.[181][182]

The amount of time that the virus can survive depends significantly on the type of surface, the temperature, and the humidity.[183] Coronaviruses die very quickly when exposed to the UV light in sunlight.[183] Like other enveloped viruses, SARS-CoV-2 survives longest when the temperature is at room temperature or lower, and when the relative humidity is low (<50%).[183]

On many surfaces, including as glass, some types of plastic, stainless steel, and skin, the virus can remain infective for several days indoors at room temperature, or even about a week under ideal conditions.[183] On some surfaces, including cotton fabric and copper, the virus usually dies after a few hours.[183] As a rule of thumb, the virus dies faster on porous surfaces than on non-porous surfaces.[183] However, this rule is not absolute, and of the many surfaces tested, two with the longest survival times are N95 respirator masks and surgical masks, both of which are considered porous surfaces.[183]

The CDC says that in most situations, cleaning surfaces with soap or detergant, not disinfecting, is enough to reduce risk of transmission.[184][185] The CDC recommends that if a COVID-19 case is suspected or confirmed at a facility such as an office or day care, all areas such as offices, bathrooms, common areas, shared electronic equipment like tablets, touch screens, keyboards, remote controls, and ATM machines used by the ill persons should be disinfected.[186] Surfaces may be decontaminated with 6271 percent ethanol, 50100 percent isopropanol, 0.1 percent sodium hypochlorite, 0.5 percent hydrogen peroxide, and 0.27.5 percent povidone-iodine. Other solutions, such as benzalkonium chloride and chlorhexidine gluconate, are less effective. Ultraviolet germicidal irradiation may also be used.[167] A datasheet comprising the authorised substances to disinfection in the food industry (including suspension or surface tested, kind of surface, use dilution, disinfectant and inocuylum volumes) can be seen in the supplementary material of.[179]

There is no specific, effective treatment or cure for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.[187][needs update][188] Thus, the cornerstone of management of COVID-19 is supportive care, which includes treatment to relieve symptoms, fluid therapy, oxygen support and prone positioning as needed, and medications or devices to support other affected vital organs.[189][190][191]

Most cases of COVID-19 are mild. In these, supportive care includes medication such as paracetamol or NSAIDs to relieve symptoms (fever, body aches, cough), proper intake of fluids, rest, and nasal breathing.[192][188][193][194] Good personal hygiene and a healthy diet are also recommended.[195] The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend that those who suspect they are carrying the virus isolate themselves at home and wear a face mask.[196]

People with more severe cases may need treatment in hospital. In those with low oxygen levels, use of the glucocorticoid dexamethasone is strongly recommended, as it can reduce the risk of death.[197][198][199] Noninvasive ventilation and, ultimately, admission to an intensive care unit for mechanical ventilation may be required to support breathing.[200] Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used to address the issue of respiratory failure, but its benefits are still under consideration.[201][202]

The severity of COVID-19 varies. The disease may take a mild course with few or no symptoms, resembling other common upper respiratory diseases such as the common cold. In 34% of cases (7.4% for those over age 65) symptoms are severe enough to cause hospitalization.[207] Mild cases typically recover within two weeks, while those with severe or critical diseases may take three to six weeks to recover. Among those who have died, the time from symptom onset to death has ranged from two to eight weeks.[62] The Italian Istituto Superiore di Sanit reported that the median time between the onset of symptoms and death was twelve days, with seven being hospitalised. However, people transferred to an ICU had a median time of ten days between hospitalisation and death.[208] Prolonged prothrombin time and elevated C-reactive protein levels on admission to the hospital are associated with severe course of COVID-19 and with a transfer to ICU.[209][210]

Some early studies suggest 10% to 20% of people with COVID-19 will experience symptoms lasting longer than a month.[211][212] A majority of those who were admitted to hospital with severe disease report long-term problems including fatigue and shortness of breath.[213] On 30 October 2020 WHO chief Tedros Adhanom warned that "to a significant number of people, the COVID virus poses a range of serious long-term effects." He has described the vast spectrum of COVID-19 symptoms that fluctuate over time as "really concerning". They range from fatigue, a cough and shortness of breath, to inflammation and injury of major organs including the lungs and heart, and also neurological and psychologic effects. Symptoms often overlap and can affect any system in the body. Infected people have reported cyclical bouts of fatigue, headaches, months of complete exhaustion, mood swings, and other symptoms. Tedros has concluded that therefore herd immunity is "morally unconscionable and unfeasible".[214]

In terms of hospital readmissions about 9% of 106,000 individuals had to return for hospital treatment within two months of discharge. The average to readmit was eight days since first hospital visit. There are several risk factors that have been identified as being a cause of multiple admissions to a hospital facility. Among these are advanced age (above 65 years of age) and presence of a chronic condition such as diabetes, COPD, heart failure or chronic kidney disease.[215][216]

According to scientific reviews smokers are more likely to require intensive care or die compared to non-smokers,[217][218] air pollution is similarly associated with risk factors,[218] and pre-existing heart and lung diseases[219] and also obesity contributes to an increased health risk of COVID-19.[218][220][221]

It is also assumed that those that are immunocompromised are at higher risk of getting severely sick from SARS-CoV-2.[222] One research that looked into the COVID-19 infections in hospitalized kidney transplant recipients found a mortality rate of 11%.[223]

Genetics also plays an important role in the ability to fight off the disease. For instance, those that do not produce detectable type I interferons or produce auto-antibodies against these may get much sicker from COVID-19.[224][225] Genetic screening is able to detect interferon effector genes.[226]

Pregnant women may be at higher risk of severe COVID-19 infection based on data from other similar viruses, like SARS and MERS, but data for COVID-19 is lacking.

While very young children have experienced lower rates of infection, older children have a rate of infection that is similar to the population as a whole.[227][228] Children are likely to have milder symptoms and are at lower risk of severe disease than adults. The CDC reports that in the US roughly a third of hospitalized children were admitted to the ICU,[229] while a European multinational study of hospitalized children from June 2020 found that about 8% of children admitted to a hospital needed intensive care.[230] Four of the 582 children (0.7%) in the European study died, but the actual mortality rate could be "substantially lower" since milder cases that did not seek medical help were not included in the study.[231][232]

Complications may include pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multi-organ failure, septic shock, and death.[233][234][235][236] Cardiovascular complications may include heart failure, arrhythmias, heart inflammation, and blood clots.[237][238][239][240] Approximately 2030% of people who present with COVID-19 have elevated liver enzymes, reflecting liver injury.[241][138]

Neurologic manifestations include seizure, stroke, encephalitis, and GuillainBarr syndrome (which includes loss of motor functions).[242][243] Following the infection, children may develop paediatric multisystem inflammatory syndrome, which has symptoms similar to Kawasaki disease, which can be fatal.[244][245] In very rare cases, acute encephalopathy can occur, and it can be considered in those who have been diagnosed with COVID-19 and have an altered mental status.[246]

In the case of pregnant women, it is important to note that, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, pregnant women are at increased risk of becoming seriously ill from COVID-19. [247] This is because pregnant women with COVID-19 appear to be more likely to develop respiratory and obstetric complications that can lead to miscarriage, premature delivery and intrauterine growth restriction. [247]

Some early studies suggest that that ten to twenty percent of people with COVID-19 will experience symptoms lasting longer than a month.[248][249] A majority of those who were admitted to hospital with severe disease report long-term problems, including fatigue and shortness of breath.[250] About 5-10% of patients admitted to hospital progress to severe or critical disease, including pneumonia and acute respiratory failure.[251]

By a variety of mechanisms, the lungs are the organs most affected in COVID-19.[252] The majority of CT scans performed show lung abnormalities in people tested after 28 days of illness.[253]

People with advanced age, severe disease, prolonged ICU stays, or who smoke are more likely to have long lasting effects, including pulmonary fibrosis.[254] Overall, approximately one third of those investigated after four weeks will have findings of pulmonary fibrosis or reduced lung function as measured by DLCO, even in people who are asymptomatic, but with the suggestion of continuing improvement with the passing of more time.[252]

The immune response by humans to CoV-2 virus occurs as a combination of the cell-mediated immunity and antibody production,[255] just as with most other infections.[256] Since SARS-CoV-2 has been in the human population only since December 2019, it remains unknown if the immunity is long-lasting in people who recover from the disease.[257] The presence of neutralizing antibodies in blood strongly correlates with protection from infection, but the level of neutralizing antibody declines with time. Those with asymptomatic or mild disease had undetectable levels of neutralizing antibody two months after infection. In another study, the level of neutralizing antibody fell four-fold one to four months after onset of symptoms. However, the lack of antibody in the blood does not mean antibody will not be rapidly produced upon reexposure to SARS-CoV-2. Memory B cells specific for the spike and nucleocapsid proteins of SARS-CoV-2 last for at least six months after appearance of symptoms.[257] Nevertheless, 15 cases of reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 have been reported using stringent CDC criteria requiring identification of a different variant from the second infection. There are likely to be many more people who have been reinfected with the virus. Herd immunity will not eliminate the virus if reinfection is common.[257] Some other coronaviruses circulating in people are capable of reinfection after roughly a year.[258] Nonetheless, on 3March 2021, scientists reported that a much more contagious COVID-19 variant, Lineage P.1, first detected in Japan, and subsequently found in Brazil, as well as in several places in the United States, may be associated with COVID-19 disease reinfection after recovery from an earlier COVID-19 infection.[259][260]

Several measures are commonly used to quantify mortality.[261] These numbers vary by region and over time and are influenced by the volume of testing, healthcare system quality, treatment options, time since the initial outbreak, and population characteristics such as age, sex, and overall health.[262] Data has changed throughout the course of the pandemic, as much within as between countries. However, what has remained constant is the prevalence of women affected by Covid in contrast to men, although the fatalities have not been as high as theirs. This was especially so at the beginning of the pandemic. This might be due to the fact that both professional and home care affairs have been an area relegated to women in history. These are obviously closer to the virus than other areas of work.[263] Regarding age and sex, in India, for instance, COVID-19 cases between men and women did not represent a uniform ratio among different age groups. Mortality rates were higher in women, especially in the 40-49 year age group. The socioeconomic status can also affect the number of people affected by COVID-19. We do not own precise data about this factor, but in other national contexts it has been found that marginalised groups are at higher risk of infection and death.[264] The mortality rate reflects the number of deaths within a specific demographic group divided by the population of that demographic group. Consequently, the mortality rate reflects the prevalence as well as the severity of the disease within a given population. Mortality rates are highly correlated to age, with relatively low rates for young people and relatively high rates among the elderly.[265][266][267] In fact, one relevant factor of mortality rates is the age structure of the countries populations. For example, the case fatality rate for COVID-19 is lower in India than in the US since Indias younger population represents a larger percentage than in the US.[264]

The case fatality rate (CFR) reflects the number of deaths divided by the number of diagnosed cases within a given time interval. Based on Johns Hopkins University statistics, the global death-to-case ratio is 2.1% (3,099,838/146,479,113) as of 25 April 2021.[6] The number varies by region.[268][269] The CFR may not reflect the true severity of the disease, because some infected individuals remain asymptomatic or experience only mild symptoms, and hence such infections may not be included in official case reports. Moreover, the CFR may vary markedly over time and across locations due to the availability of live virus tests.

Total confirmed cases over time

Total confirmed cases of COVID-19 per million people[270]

Total confirmed deaths due to COVID-19 per million people[271]

A key metric in gauging the severity of COVID-19 is the infection fatality rate (IFR), also referred to as the infection fatality ratio or infection fatality risk.[272][273][274] This metric is calculated by dividing the total number of deaths from the disease by the total number of infected individuals; hence, in contrast to the CFR, the IFR incorporates asymptomatic and undiagnosed infections as well as reported cases.[275]

A December 2020 systematic review and meta-analysis estimated that population IFR during the first wave of the pandemic was about 0.5% to 1% in many locations (including France, Netherlands, New Zealand, and Portugal), 1% to 2% in other locations (Australia, England, Lithuania, and Spain), and exceeded 2% in Italy.[276] That study also found that most of these differences in IFR reflected corresponding differences in the age composition of the population and age-specific infection rates; in particular, the metaregression estimate of IFR is very low for children and younger adults (e.g., 0.002% at age 10 and 0.01% at age 25) but increases progressively to 0.4% at age 55, 1.4% at age 65, 4.6% at age 75, and 15% at age 85.[276] These results were also highlighted in a December 2020 report issued by the WHO.[277]

At an early stage of the pandemic, the World Health Organization reported estimates of IFR between 0.3% and 1%.[278][279] On 2July, The WHO's chief scientist reported that the average IFR estimate presented at a two-day WHO expert forum was about 0.6%.[280][281] In August, the WHO found that studies incorporating data from broad serology testing in Europe showed IFR estimates converging at approximately 0.51%.[282] Firm lower limits of IFRs have been established in a number of locations such as New York City and Bergamo in Italy since the IFR cannot be less than the population fatality rate. As of 10 July, in New York City, with a population of 8.4 million, 23,377 individuals (18,758 confirmed and 4,619 probable) have died with COVID-19 (0.3% of the population).[283] Antibody testing in New York City suggested an IFR of ~0.9%,[284] and ~1.4%.[285] In Bergamo province, 0.6% of the population has died.[286] In September 2020 the U.S. Center for Disease Control & Prevention reported preliminary estimates of age-specific IFRs for public health planning purposes.[287]

Early reviews of epidemiologic data showed gendered impact of the pandemic and a higher mortality rate in men in China and Italy.[289][290][291] According to global data, COVID-19 case fatality rates are higher among men than women in most countries. However, in a few countries like India, Nepal, Vietnam, and Slovenia the fatality cases are higher in women than men.[264] This might be due to the fact that both professional and home care affairs have been an area relegated to women in history. These are obviously closer to the virus than other areas of work. For example, in Spain since the sanitary crisis began, healthcare workers have been more affected than anyone else. Almost 50,000 of them have been affected, of whom a 66% are women.[263]

The Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention reported the death rate was 2.8% for men and 1.7% for women.[292] Later reviews in June 2020 indicated that there is no significant difference in susceptibility or in CFR between genders.[293][294] One review acknowledges the different mortality rates in Chinese men, suggesting that it may be attributable to lifestyle choices such as smoking and drinking alcohol rather than genetic factors.[295] Smoking, which in some countries like China is mainly a male activity, is a habit that contributes to increasing significantly the case fatality rates among men.[264] Sex-based immunological differences, lesser prevalence of smoking in women and men developing co-morbid conditions such as hypertension at a younger age than women could have contributed to the higher mortality in men.[296] In Europe, 57% of the infected people were men and 72% of those died with COVID-19 were men.[297] The fact that women boast a longer life expectancy than men also makes a bigger group of female population at risk of contracting the disease. Not only that, it also creates an ageist dynamic that can end up in discrimination for being both a woman and old.[263] As of April 2020, the US government is not tracking sex-related data of COVID-19 infections.[298] Research has shown that viral illnesses like Ebola, HIV, influenza and SARS affect men and women differently.[298] The WHO issued a report in 2007 that showed that more than half the SARS cases at the beginning of 2000 were women.[263]

Regarding the spread of information about COVID-19, many researchers and experts agreed that data on COVID-19 infection should be sex-disaggregated. This would allow to develop solutions to the pandemic from a gender-equitable perspective, given sex-differences in fatality rates. Also, this would allow experts to deliver high-quality data separately to men and women.[264]

In the US, a greater proportion of deaths due to COVID-19 have occurred among African Americans and other minority groups.[299] Structural factors that prevent them from practicing social distancing include their concentration in crowded substandard housing and in "essential" occupations such as retail grocery workers, public transit employees, health-care workers and custodial staff. Greater prevalence of lacking health insurance and care and of underlying conditions such as diabetes, hypertension and heart disease also increase their risk of death.[300] Similar issues affect Native American and Latino communities.[299] On the one hand, in the Dominican Republic there is a clear example of both gender and ethnic inequality. In this Latin American territory, there is great inequality and precariousness that especially affects Dominican women, with greater emphasis on those of Haitian descent.[132] According to a US health policy non-profit, 34% of American Indian and Alaska Native People (AIAN) non-elderly adults are at risk of serious illness compared to 21% of white non-elderly adults.[301] The source attributes it to disproportionately high rates of many health conditions that may put them at higher risk as well as living conditions like lack of access to clean water.[302] Leaders have called for efforts to research and address the disparities.[303] In the U.K., a greater proportion of deaths due to COVID-19 have occurred in those of a Black, Asian, and other ethnic minority background.[304][305][306] More severe impacts upon victims including the relative incidence of the necessity of hospitalization requirements, and vulnerability to the disease has been associated via DNA analysis to be expressed in genetic variants at chromosomal region 3, features that are associated with European Neanderthal heritage. That structure imposes greater risks that those affected will develop a more severe form of the disease.[307] The findings are from Professor Svante Pbo and researchers he leads at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology and the Karolinska Institutet.[307] This admixture of modern human and Neanderthal genes is estimated to have occurred roughly between 50,000 and 60,000 years ago in Southern Europe.[307]

Biological factors (immune response) and the general behaviour (habits) can strongly determine the consequences of COVID-19.[264] Most of those who die of COVID-19 have pre-existing (underlying) conditions, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease.[308] According to March data from the United States, 89% of those hospitalised had preexisting conditions.[309] The Italian Istituto Superiore di Sanit reported that out of 8.8% of deaths where medical charts were available, 96.1% of people had at least one comorbidity with the average person having 3.4 diseases.[208] According to this report the most common comorbidities are hypertension (66% of deaths), type2 diabetes (29.8% of deaths), Ischemic Heart Disease (27.6% of deaths), atrial fibrillation (23.1% of deaths) and chronic renal failure (20.2% of deaths).

Most critical respiratory comorbidities according to the CDC, are: moderate or severe asthma, pre-existing COPD, pulmonary fibrosis, cystic fibrosis.[310] Evidence stemming from meta-analysis of several smaller research papers also suggests that smoking can be associated with worse outcomes.[311][312] When someone with existing respiratory problems is infected with COVID-19, they might be at greater risk for severe symptoms.[313] COVID-19 also poses a greater risk to people who misuse opioids and methamphetamines, insofar as their drug use may have caused lung damage.[314]

In August 2020 the CDC issued a caution that tuberculosis (TB) infections could increase the risk of severe illness or death. The WHO recommended that people with respiratory symptoms be screened for both diseases, as testing positive for COVID-19 could not rule out co-infections. Some projections have estimated that reduced TB detection due to the pandemic could result in 6.3 million additional TB cases and 1.4 million TB-related deaths by 2025.[315]

Link:

COVID-19 - Wikipedia

Posted in Covid-19 | Comments Off on COVID-19 – Wikipedia