The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Monthly Archives: February 2021
Why the red planet captures our imagination in movies and books – WTOP
Posted: February 22, 2021 at 2:16 pm
Much of our popular literature and films about Mars, such as "War of the Worlds," "Invaders from Mars," and "Mars Attacks!," has supposed that there is life on the red planet -- but life that is hostile and out to get us.
Consider the odds of your having been born: from the earliest stirrings of protohominid life the ones writer Arthur C. Clarke and director Stanley Kubrick imagined in 2001: A Space Odyssey to the present, across untold generations.
The odds against your being you are massive, while the odds for your being you are infinitesimal. It is one of the great wonders of the universe that here you are, alive on Earth, breathing the air.
So it is with the stars, the planets with everything in the universe: The odds are always with nothingness and annihilation, and always against existence. It is remarkable and supremely unlikely that our planet survived the intense violence of the early solar system, though not without its dings: After all, one prominent theory holds, it was a collision with a body about the size of Mars that knocked the chunk of real estate called the Moon into our sky.
Miraculously, Earth did survive, allowing life and eventually, our kind to evolve. And for as long as humans have been around, we have been fascinated by Mars, and more than a little fearful of it, too.
Much of our popular literature and films about Mars, such as War of the Worlds, Invaders from Mars, and Mars Attacks!, has supposed that there is life on the red planet but life that is markedly hostile to ours and out to get us.
The widespread presupposition that there is life on Mars is fairly recent. It can be traced to the Italian astronomer Giovanni Schiaparelli, who mapped the planet in 1877 and bestowed on its regions aspirational names such as Elysium, Eden and Utopia.
Schiaparelli believed that he could detect oceans on the planets surface, as well as canals that, he supposed, were made by beings with knowledge of engineering. Percival Lowell, an Arizona-based astronomer, did Schiaparelli better around 1895, believing that he could make out an elaborate irrigation system that required an advanced civilization to build.
Popular culture soon caught up to that science, especially through the pen of Edgar Rice Burroughs, whose John Carter novels imagined that a time portal connected Earth and Barsoom, or Mars, allowing easy movement between the two. When Carter traveled there in the second volume, The Gods of Mars (1914), he encountered this watery scene: To my left the sea extended as far as the eye could reach, before me only a vague, dim line indicated its further shore, while at my right a mighty river, broad, placid and majestic, flowed between the scarlet banks to empty into the quiet sea before me.
Burroughss Mars was very much like our Earth, with all its struggles for power and wealth, and Burroughs had a good explanation for why the planet had no evident water on the surface: Its inhabitants had diverted it to underground waterways, to protect it from evaporation and hide it from one another.
Most of Barsoom, he wrote, was instead covered by moss that grew in the dead sea bottoms that stretched across the planet. A few hidden valleys harbored forests and marshes, as well as warring kingdoms once rich in agricultural and mineral treasures that are foolish enough to do each other in and kill their planet in the bargain.
As recently as the 1960s, it was assumed that Mars had life. Only with the arrival of NASAs Mariner 4 mission in 1965 did we finally come to think of Mars as a definitively dead planet, the flybys showing a surface battered by meteoritic cratering and without the slightest hint of living things. Far from Eden, Mars was a kind of cold hell, gasping its last even as Earth was taking its first gulps of oxygenated breath.
Thats the Mars that Mark Watney finds in Andy Weirs brilliant 2011 The Martian. Apart from the plants he grows hes an accomplished botanist hes the sole life form on the red planet, having been lost in a howling sandstorm and abandoned by his fellow explorers. Eminently resourceful, he manages to keep himself alive, but not without plenty of close scrapes.
The odds are emphatically against him, he knows: If the oxygenator breaks down, Ill suffocate, he says. If the water reclaimer breaks down, Ill die of thirst. If the Hab (the Mars Lander Habitat) breaches, Ill just kind of explode. If none of those things happen, Ill eventually run out of food and starve to death.
Even with such risks, talk is increasingly turning to the colonization of Mars, now a very real prospect that was once the province of fiction. Kim Stanley Robinsons 1990s Mars Trilogy, made up of the novels Red Mars, Green Mars and Blue Mars, posits that soon in 2026, to be exact well begin that colonization, bringing Mars back to life through terraforming and creating an oxygenated atmosphere.
The trilogy is also refreshingly utopian, unlike the usual gloomy stance of much Mars-set fiction, in that Robinson imagines how by remaking the planet, well become better, more equitable people, welcoming strangers into our midst and founding a true Eden on high.
For his part, Elon Musk, the inventor and entrepreneur, has announced preliminary plans to fund a colony of at least 80,000 settlers, which puts us squarely into the territory of Ray Bradbury, the science fiction writer whose 1950 novel The Martian Chronicles envisions a sort of suburban Earth transposed to Mars.
The only problem is that Martians are already there, and when humans land on the red planet in the then-distant year of 1999, it doesnt take long for the Martians to hunt them down. The Earthlings have their revenge as Bradbury imagines a pandemic that wipes out the Martians, leaving the planet to a new breed of colonists who just may, Bradbury hints, have been a distant cousin to the vanished Martians.
Musks colonists will be flying on one-way tickets, unlike Weirs Mark Watney. And even if they were to have round-trip fare, whether they would have a planet worth coming home to is another matter. Bradburys book ends with the folks back home nuking themselves into oblivion as surely as Burroughs Barsoomians did.
His is far from the only novel to imagine a ruined home planet, a trope thats becoming ever more common as, indeed, we befoul the one nest we now have. As science fiction vehicles such as Elysium and Blade Runner have instructed us, Earth is a place well be lucky to leave.
View post:
Why the red planet captures our imagination in movies and books - WTOP
Posted in Mars Colonization
Comments Off on Why the red planet captures our imagination in movies and books – WTOP
Think tank: City life on Mars? Creating human centred communities in space and beyond – SmartCitiesWorld
Posted: at 2:16 pm
The space race is well and truly on with outposts planned for the moon and settlements in preparation for Mars. As of February 2021, there are three separate Mars missions landing on the red planet - China, United Arab Emirates, and the USA. Last weeks awe-inspiring images of the red planet from NASAs Perseverance space rover just shows how much space exploration continues to capture our imagination.
But, as with humans major voyages across the seas some centuries ago on our own planet Earth, the primary focus seems to be on bragging rights and monetising whatever resources are there. Tesla CEO Elon Musk has embedded in the terms of service on its Starlight project that he will not adhere to international law but will create new legislation once on Mars. Based on how he treats the humans that work for him on Earth Im going to hazard a guess that anyone brave, or poor, enough to journey to a planet many years away is not going to have a strong union to ensure they are being treated fairly.
The United States has broken with tradition by leading the Artemis Accords, which critics say carves up the moons resources for participating nations. Prior to this there were two UN led treaties - the Outer Space Treaty and the Moon Treaty. In these agreements the moon and other celestial bodies should be used exclusively for peaceful purposes, their environments should not be disrupted, and the UN should be informed of the location and purpose of any station established on these bodies. Unlike the Artemis Accords, these agreements state that the moon and its natural resources are the common heritage of mankind and that an international regime should be established to govern the exploitation of such resources when such exploitation is about to become feasible.
We are now at a point where we have major decisions to make that will affect the future of humans living in space. The Covid epidemic and climate change are global phenomena that are revealing the systems that, in their best light, bind us together and provide support and at their worst create divisions and suffering for many. We are feeling the effects of colonisation and capitalism that have been weaving threads for hundreds of years and that are harming our planet and our people.
We are moving into space quickly, and in many ways quietly. My guess is that many of us have no idea the scope and scale of what is already taking place above us and how many billions in dollars are being invested.
Along with these capital investments, there are many groups that are looking at the incredible science that takes us into space and helps us learn about our amazing universe; many that are looking at alternate resources for our resource strapped planet; and there are discussions about the incredible engineering and design that will be needed to provide space travel and housing.
Many of us have no idea the scope and scale of what is already taking place above us
In all of this, I have found very few that have talked about the creation of cities in space. Human places where we have families, make friends, cook, read, play sports, worship, paint, write and build. Where we are born, grow, age, and eventually die. The everyday minutiae and the big dreams mixed together. We spend a great deal of time in government in the development of liveable cities. Cities where people work, live and play. Cities that are equitable, inclusive, safe, and secure. Cities that are creative, fun, and allow for human connections. Space communities should be no different. These ideals need to be planned into these spaces as they are being built rather than as an afterthought.
This is where smart cities can weigh in. Across the globe questions about equity, community, governance and digital rights have become a key topic in smart city conversations. We can look to places like Estonia and Barcelona to see human centred ways of approaching space communities. These communities can provide examples of good governance and developing engaged communities. For example, Estonia has declared the internet a human right and has also built citizen focussed government services that are based on trust.
In Barcelona, e-democracy has been implemented where citizens data are both protected and used for their benefit. This includes the citizen participation platform Decidim, which helps citizens, organizations and public institutions self organise democratically at any scale. This will be important as new communities develop in places that are foreign for everyone. Building communities in space will require careful thought and a lot of communication as everyone figures out the new societal norms and rules.
Digital infrastructure and communication will be the primary mode of communication throughout human communities in space including hotels; mining, engineering or communications companies; government science ports such as the International Space Station; medical stations or hospitals as communities grow; entertainment and other social spaces such as recreational facilities; and this is just scratching the surface.
These are areas that smart cities excel in and have been working on for many years - much longer than the term smart city has existed. Again we can look at issues that have arisen around the digital divide and that have been amplified by the Covid-19 pandemic. Fair and equal access to digital tools must be available to all humans in space, no matter what their job is or how much wealth they have. A cleaner or a line cook at a space hotel should have the same ability to communicate with their family members on earth as an astronaut, CEO or celebrity.
So we need to ask, will we build these technological cities based on open, democratic and human principles as originally sought in The Outer Space Treaty or will we succumb to the issues we sometimes are having on Earth with technology in regards to division, authoritarianism, surveillance, and loneliness? The time to think about this is now before a culture is established that will be hard to erase.
Read more here:
Think tank: City life on Mars? Creating human centred communities in space and beyond - SmartCitiesWorld
Posted in Mars Colonization
Comments Off on Think tank: City life on Mars? Creating human centred communities in space and beyond – SmartCitiesWorld
New app brings Mars exploration closer to life on Earth – The First News
Posted: at 2:16 pm
The mobile app from Warsaw-based firm Immersion VR presents NASAs Perseverance rover mission and the surface of Mars in an interactive way. Immersion VR
Polish developer Immersion has created an augmented reality application that allows users to follow NASAs Perseverance Mars rover on its historic mission to the Red Planet.
On Thursday, NASA successfully landed its rover in a deep crater, near the planet's equator, called Jezero.
The app takes users through the various stages of the Perseverance mission in an interactive way, including the launch, landing and exploration of Marss surface.Immersion VR
The app takes users through the various stages of the Perseverance mission in an interactive way, including the launch, landing and exploration of Marss surface.
It was developed for the US general science and culture television Smithsonian Channel and uses NASA data and pictures.
The technology also presents a vision of a future colonisation of the Red Planet, and, for fun, brings Perseverance closer to the users home by allowing them toImmersion VR
"Work on the concept started in September, which gave us very little time considering the challenge that we agreed to undertake," said Bartosz Roslonski, an Immersion board member.
"It is the second project that we've carried in collaboration with the Smithsonian Channel."
The technology also presents a vision of a future colonisation of the Red Planet, and, for fun, brings Perseverance closer to the users home by allowing them to "park" the rover in the their garage or in front of their house.
Immersion has been creating augmented reality products since 2014.
According to Roslonski, each element of the app was developed in consultation with NASA and the Smithsonian Institute, a US organisation that brings together some of the world's most famous museums.
The app can be downloaded free of charge from both Google Play and AppStore.
Excerpt from:
New app brings Mars exploration closer to life on Earth - The First News
Posted in Mars Colonization
Comments Off on New app brings Mars exploration closer to life on Earth – The First News
A six-wheeled, Mini-sized rover is currently parked on Mars – Top Gear
Posted: at 2:16 pm
Big news, space fans! Theres a new six-wheeled, one-tonne exploratory rover the size of a Mini Cooper parked on Mars. Yep, last night, at 8.55pm GMT, NASA pulled off one of the most audacious parking manoeuvres in history so we can find out more about the Red Planet. Which with a bit of Top Gear logic means were now one step closer to the inaugural MarsGP.
Perseverance is the largest, most advanced rover NASA has ever sent to another world, and getting it to land on the Martian planet was no mean feat. Seriously, if the thought of parallel parking into a tight space gives you sweaty palms, youve got to give props to the parking job NASA just pulledoff.
See, Perseverance left Earth seven months ago and has since travelled 293 million miles to Elon Musks future home. Last night, it punctured the Martian atmosphere at a pretty brisk 12,000mph, to then begin its approach to touchdown on the dusty red surface. The spacecrafts self-guided descent included using a heatshield to slow it down to a still-pretty-brisk 1,200mph, before a supersonic parachute (thats a great Indie band name) popped out of the rover to reduce its speed to a more palatable few hundred miles perhour.
Thats when a set of rocket thrusters came in to play to counteract the severe act of falling; slowing it down even further and placing it in a hover about 20 metres above the planets surface. The final act of this complex series of manoeuvres NASA dubbed the seven minutes of terror, was for the rover to be lowered by cables to the surface using a rocket platform called a skycrane.
Unsurprisingly, everyone at mission control lost their beans when flight controller Swati Mohan announcedTouchdown confirmed! Perseverance safely on the surface of Mars, ready to begin seeking signs of past life,and a circus ofsocial-distanced fist-bumping and hollas rang out as PPE clad space scientists began toparty.
The six-wheeled vehicle landed in the Jezero crater, and like anyone in a new environment, will spend the next week or so assessing its surroundings and taking lots of pictures to beam back to its family and friends to post on social media. Then itll get to work, spending at least the next two years drilling into the local rocks, looking for evidence of pastlife.
Why? Well, that spot is thought to have held a giant lake billions of years ago. Because where theres been water, theres the possibility of signs of life. And Perseverance will use its seven cameras and suite of tech to find and sample fossilized remains of ancient microscopic Martian life with the help of a mini-helicopter called Ingenuity. Thats currently strapped to its belly but will be freed for the first powered flight on another planet in history. Now doesnt that soundcool?
Landing on Mars is always an incredibly difficult task and we are proud to continue building on our past success, said JPL Director Michael Watkins. But, while Perseverance advances that success, this rover is also blazing its own path and daring new challenges in the surface mission. We built the rover not just to land but to find and collect the best scientific samples for return to Earth, and its incredibly complex sampling system and autonomy not only enable that mission, they set the stage for future robotic and crewedmissions.
If Perseverance is a success, it then lends itself to human exploration of the Red Planet. And then if thats a success, the possibility of colonisation of that big Red Planet up there, which is what Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos are having a pretty expensive tte--tte. Until then, if we hearthat Perseverance is doing six-wheeled drifts around the rim of the Jezero crater (or that its found NASAs Curiosity rover for a drag race), well let youknow.
Original post:
A six-wheeled, Mini-sized rover is currently parked on Mars - Top Gear
Posted in Mars Colonization
Comments Off on A six-wheeled, Mini-sized rover is currently parked on Mars – Top Gear
Greta Thunberg’s ironic video of the colonization of Mars within hours of the arrival of NASA’s Perseverance rover – Explica
Posted: at 2:16 pm
Greta Thunberg satirical tourism ad
The young Swedish activist Greta Thunberg released a video in which she ironic about the colonization of Mars by humans while the Earth is neglected, a planet that according to experts is going through a climate change that puts its existence at risk.
In the video, Mars is ironically shown as an ideal place for humans to live, where there are no wars, crime, pandemics or pollution.
Mars, a pristine planet, a new world where we can start over. Mars offers maximum freedom. Freedom to pave a new path for humans. Freedom to create a new way of life. Freedom to forever change the course of humanity says a voiceover as images of the red planet appear.
At the end of the spot launched by Fridays for future (FFF), the environmental student movement created by Greta Thunberg, claims that 99% of the population will stay on Earth, which is why it calls for taking care of it and fighting climate change.
The campaign aims against the arrival of the Perseverance rover on Mars, the most ambitious space mission of the POT It will look for signs of ancient microbial life.
FILE PHOTO. Image of the Rover Perseverance, the largest and most sophisticated laboratory spacecraft to reach Mars, in an illustration courtesy of the US space agency. NASA / JPL-Caltech / Handout via REUTERS. ATTENTION EDITORS: THIS IMAGE WAS PROVIDED BY A THIRD PARTY
In this regard, FFF, through a statement, assured that Space programs funded by governments and 1% of the worlds ultra-rich are focused on Mars and states that NASAs Perseverance cost 2.7 billion dollars to develop, launch, operations and analyze while most humans will never have the opportunity to visit or live on Mars..
This is not due to a lack of resources, but to the fact that our global systems do not care about us and refuse to take equitable action, the document reads.
It is estimated that the arrival of the Perseverance rover to Mars will be this Thursday at 20.55 GMT.
Perseverance rover arrives on Mars, NASAs most ambitious space mission to the red planet
Greta Thunberg registered her name and the motto of the environmental movement she leads
Greta Thunberg was left in the middle of a controversy with the Indian police after expressing her support for the farmers protests against the Government
Read the original:
Greta Thunberg's ironic video of the colonization of Mars within hours of the arrival of NASA's Perseverance rover - Explica
Posted in Mars Colonization
Comments Off on Greta Thunberg’s ironic video of the colonization of Mars within hours of the arrival of NASA’s Perseverance rover – Explica
Elon Musk faces rejection by French villagers as they deny permission to install antennas – Republic TV
Posted: at 2:16 pm
Recently, residents of a small village in France have objected to SpaceX owner Elon Musk using their lands for the purpose of providing satellite-powered internet to Earthlings. Saint-Senier-de-Beuvron asked Musk to keep the new antennas far away from their land. This is because they fear that the signals could pose some kind of harm to the residents.
Musk aims at providing fast internet for remote areas all over the world. For this, he needs to install thousands of satellites and antennas on the ground which will help in capturing the signal. These signals will then be bounced back to the individual user terminals that will be connected by cables. The contractor had already secured permission in France to install nine three-metre-tall radomes which will help in protecting the antennas. It was in December when Saint-Senier issued a decree to block all construction on the field.
Read:'Exclusive Community': Elon Musk Stans Have Their Own Dating App For Tesla Owners
The installation of antennas has created a lot of chaos among the villagers. The farmers are worried that this would lead to less production of milk by the cows. However, there are farmers who have started naming their cows on Musk and his company. One of them is SpaceX du Beuvron.
In another significant development, Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates recently said during an interview that he is not a "Mars person" and would rather invest his money on something that poses greater challenges to humanity. Speaking to New York Times opinion writer Kara Swisher, Gates said he is not a person who would invest his money for travelling to space when he can buy vaccines to save life on Earth. Gates' comment is in contrast to the views of Musk, who has, on several occasions, expressed his desire to colonize Mars.
Read:'I Am An Alien': Elon Musk Responds To Indian Entrepreneur's Query On Success
Gates, however, praised Musk for his contributions towards the fight against climate change by making electric passenger cars. Gates said "underestimating Elon Musk is not a good idea", adding he has made important contributions with Tesla in the fight against climate change. Gates further added that while Tesla was doing some important stuff, it is not sufficient to tackle climate change, which would require focus from other industries as well.
Read:Elon Musk Says He Bought Some Dogecoin For Son, Sparks 16% Surge In Currency
Also Read:Elon Musk Says He Bought Some Dogecoin For Son, Sparks 16% Surge In Currency
Go here to read the rest:
Elon Musk faces rejection by French villagers as they deny permission to install antennas - Republic TV
Posted in Mars Colonization
Comments Off on Elon Musk faces rejection by French villagers as they deny permission to install antennas – Republic TV
NASA lands Perseverance rover: Why going to Mars ought to matter to you – The Shepherd of the Hills Gazette
Posted: at 2:16 pm
This artists illustration shows a sky crane gently lowering Perseverance to the surface of Mars.
NASA
NASA on Thursday successfullylanded its most advanced rover ever on the surface of another planet. The Mars 2020 Perseverance roveris the fifth such rolling robot the space agency has sent to the red planet, and when the mission is over, it will have cost nearly $3 billion.
With a pandemic bringing everyday existence on the surface of our own planet to arguably its lowest point since humans entered the space age several decades ago, its fair to wonder why were devoting any resources to sending our best tech to explore a cold, dead desert planet bathed in radiation.
There are actually a number of arguments that range from the philosophical to more practical. Here are three for those who cant fathom how sending a nerdy dune buggy carrying a tiny helicopter on a 100-million-mile road trip is justifiable.
Theres some evidence that suggests our two nearest planetary neighbors, Mars and Venus, were once habitable. Today, theyre both deadly places, though the dangers of Mars are at least theoretically manageable through technology and perhaps some ambitious terraforming.
Perseverance landed in Jezero Crater, which is thought to have once been the site of a large river delta flowing into a crater lake. Conditions may have been right for life, which the rover hopes to find evidence of.
This Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter image shows the Jezero Crater delta region.
NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS/JHU-APL
But something happened. Mars lost much of its atmosphere and it dried up and became the colder, inhospitable world we know today.
Somewhere in this past there might be some lessons and cautionary tales for earthlings. If our two closest neighbors were transformed from more friendly climes to the relative hellscapes they are today, we should want to know more about what happened. Its certainly worth more than one visit.
A visible green line reflected by oxygen molecules is seen at the edge of Earths atmosphere.
NASA
We imagine Earth as a big floating ball teeming with life, but the reality is more tenuous. When viewed from orbit, a greenish line of glowing oxygen marking the edge of our atmosphere is visible above our planet. This glowing line reveals the true fragility of our planets habitable zone, which is not the entire planet, but rather a small bubble on its surface extending from roughly sea level to a few miles in altitude, and not really including the polar regions, either.
When seen this way, it almost feels as though that bubble could easily pop. It happened on Mars, so maybe it could happen here.
Im paraphrasing John F. Kennedy doing the hard things because they are hard speaking about the Apollo project to put humans on the moon. Its not an entirely honest justification for spending the big chunk of the US budget that was dropped on NASA to get us there, however.
The dawn of the space age, the Apollo program and the breathtaking speed with which we went from fully earthbound to hitting golf balls on the moon was motivated in no small part by military and geopolitical concerns.
Its easy to look back and think that we wasted a significant chunk of our gross domestic product on a Cold War space race that was more about ego and national pride than science and exploration. Its a fair criticism. But whatever the motivation, the results were more than just bragging rights and a flag in the Sea of Tranquility.
See all photos
By going to space, we have revolutionized life on Earth.
The ways this is true are too numerous to list, so think of just one: What began with the terrifying (to Americans) successful launch of the Soviet bucket of bolts named Sputnik eventually created our modern lifestyle that depends on thousands of successor satellites beaming all our information, images, transactions and communications around the world at light speed.
What started as technological muscle flexing between global powers has changed countless aspects of the daily life of billions of humans.
Exploring Mars involves overcoming countless challenges through engineering and innovation, not to mention Perseverance and Ingenuity. What we learn from the successes and failures of meeting those challenges may spark the next revolution that will make life in 2071 beyond anything we can imagine right now.
Elon Musks goal is to establish a city on Mars.
SpaceX
Youve already heard this one. Elon Musk, one of the richest dudes in history, wants to build a city on Mars and make humans a multiplanetary species or something like that. Part of this argument is that Earth is not nearly as safe and secure as it seems. Massive solar flares, impact by a comet, nuclear annihilation, environmental collapse and perhaps catastrophes we havent even thought of are all very much possibilities, so it makes sense to have a backup plan.
Thats the pessimistic version of this case thats easiest to argue. But we rarely hear the other side of this vision argued, which is more in line with the Star Trek ethic: To boldly go
From the lab to your inbox. Get the latest science stories from CNET every week.
These days it can be hard to even talk about setting up shop on Mars because the words I might use to describe such an activity have become justifiably taboo words like colonize, settle and occupy. Its true that the history of human expansion is littered with horrors, and Musk using the fear of an uncertain future to sell a new kind of colonialism does give me pause.
But I dont think thats the right way to look at it, and its not how the people behind Perseverance think about it. The missions goals are strictly about scientific discovery and technological demonstration. So much so that some of the wonder of whats actually being accomplished can get lost.
Think about how you, as an individual, have grown as a person each time you visit a new place or experience something new. Your first day of school, first time outside your town or state, first plane ride, first time abroad, etc.
I remember one particular jet-lagged morning in my 20s in a dirt-cheap hostel in Thailand waking up before dawn and walking around a little neighborhood in Bangkok. Around every corner was something unfamiliar: words I couldnt understand, things being sold as food I never thought of as edible, people doing activities I couldnt identify as exercise or prayer or something in between.
It became clear that morning that I knew very, very little about the wider world. When I finally die or get uploaded to the cloud, I will hopefully be a bit less ignorant, but the same basic statement will certainly still be true.
Going to Mars and beyond could be the same sort of eye-opening experience for humanity as a species. Becoming multiplanetary doesnt have to be about having a backup plan, it could be about evolving and becoming better, wiser and a little less ignorant about the universe and our place in it.
FollowCNETs 2021 Space Calendarto stay up to date with all the latest space news this year. You can even add it to your own Google Calendar.
See the original post:
NASA lands Perseverance rover: Why going to Mars ought to matter to you - The Shepherd of the Hills Gazette
Posted in Mars Colonization
Comments Off on NASA lands Perseverance rover: Why going to Mars ought to matter to you – The Shepherd of the Hills Gazette
More Maine towns consider becoming 2nd Amendment sanctuaries, even as how it would be enforced remains unclear – Bangor Daily News
Posted: at 2:15 pm
Red flag laws, invasive gun registration initiatives and a growing fear of proposed legislative firearms restrictions have spawned a burgeoning Second Amendment sanctuary movement intent on preserving the right to keep and bear arms.
And while there are only two such designated towns in Maine Fort Fairfield and Paris more local governments are considering passing gun sanctuary resolutions.
Brownfield just called me about it, said Rusty Brackett, chairman of Paris Maines select board.
And Fort Fairfield town leaders said several towns have asked to see their resolution after the council declared Fort Fairfield a Second Amendment sanctuary in January.
So, what is a Second Amendment sanctuary?
While the pronouncements vary, these gun safe havens declared by towns, cities, counties, states and sheriffs around the nation are basically created through local resolutions, ordinances and, in some cases, state laws, aimed at pushing back against state and federal gun control measures passed or proposed.
Still, as this movement takes root in Maine, it remains unclear how such measures will affect local law enforcement, the sale of guns and ammunition, mental health situations involving guns and the commission of criminal acts. Additionally, a fear-based rush to pass such resolutions without public discussion and discourse could lead to future unintended consequences for municipalities.
In Fort Fairfield, Bob Kilcollins, the town councilor who drafted the towns recently approved resolution, is confident in the town councils decision as he points to pending federal legislation, H.R. 127, introduced in January by Democratic U.S. Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas.
Just read it, he said, holding up a copy as others in his Route 165 sport shop expressed fears that new gun laws will take away the rights of legal gun owners. The resolution protects us from bogus gun laws these bills affect legal gun owners and there is a fear today that the new administration now in office will play games with our constitutional rights and that is not fair.
If passed, Rep. Jackson Lees new bill limits or prohibits certain ammunition, establishes a firearm registration system, a database of gun owners, as well as strict licensing requirements.
While Kilcollins said Fort Fairfield now only follows one gun law, the Second Amendment, the weight and meaning of such resolutions is debatable.
There are some, like Geoff Bickford, the head of Maines Gun Safety Coalition, who say these Second Amendment Sanctuaries are nothing more than temper tantrums.
Others, like Lillie Lavado, chairwoman of the Aroostook County Democrats, find the term sanctuary as it relates to guns, objectionable.
In this context, sanctuary is intentionally offensive to refugees and survivors of mass shootings. Extremist rhetoric is manufacturing partisan tensions, resulting in radical movements like the Second Amendment sanctuary plot, Lavado said on Friday. Today, Aroostook Countys leaders should be focused on equitable expansion of opportunities for us all, rather than obsessing over the 230-year-old Second Amendment.
Nonetheless, giving these pro-gun moves little credence is dangerous, said Kris Brown, president of Brady, a gun violence prevention organization.
This is not a grassroots movement, but rather it is a National Rifle Association marketing campaign, she said. They are attempting to recast all gun laws as violating the Second Amendment. This confuses people.
But as the power and definition of such sanctuaries gets bandied about, the movement is gaining steam with hundreds of U.S. localities passing similar measures. Additionally, several states including Alaska, Idaho, Wyoming, Kansas are already designated Second Amendment sanctuaries while others have introduced legislation that, if passed, would designate the entire state as a Second Amendment sanctuary.
To take it even further, a proposed Texas law, H.B. 112, states that any law enforcement officer enforcing certain gun laws could be charged with a Class A misdemeanor.
Constitutional scholar Shawn Fields, assistant professor of law at Campbell Universitys Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law in North Carolina, said cloudy interpretations of the Second Amendment and the way the resolution is drafted have bearing on its weight.
If the town drafts a generic resolution stating the town rejects all unconstitutional gun laws, the move is likely symbolic. And those identifying specific gun laws the town will not enforce may have more teeth, Fields said.
The Fort Fairfield resolution expresses opposition to any law that would unconstitutionally restrict the rights of citizens to peacefully keep and bear arms, and it declares its intent to oppose unconstitutional restrictions on this right.
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
Town Manager Andrea Powers explained that the town only rejects unconstitutional gun laws.
But there lies the problem. How are towns interpreting whether a gun law is unconstitutional?
The answer for Fort Fairfield is found in the constitution, meaning any law that infringes on the right to keep and bear arms, according to Powers.
Thats a tricky question, Fields said. A Second Amendment absolutist says that anything that tries to restrict weapons violates the constitution. But that was not its purpose. Do red flag laws violate the Constitution? We dont know. The Supreme Court has not decided.
There is a lot of room for interpretation of the Second Amendment, said Fields, who explained there have been only two U.S. Supreme Court Second Amendment decisions, one in 1934 and the other in 2008, making the parameters of the amendment harder to define.
Some of this comes down to whether the municipality has the support of local law enforcement.
Sheriffs have enormous discretion not to enforce laws like red flag or gun registration, Fields said. And a police chief makes choices every day about what to enforce.
Kilcollins, like hundreds of other U.S. town leaders, is adamantly convinced law enforcement will back the towns rejection of all unconstitutional gun laws because they take an oath to defend the Constitution.
They will stand behind us, he said.
After repeated calls to the Fort Fairfield police and the Aroostook County Sheriff, they were not reached for comment.
Conversely, Brackett, the chairman of Paris, Maines, board of selectmen, is not so sure about the power of his towns resolution passed in 2019.
Paris gun safe designation may be a symbolic measure, according to Brackett, but because the town supports a persons right to own guns, the board unanimously passed the resolution.
We wanted to let them know where we stand, Brackett said on Thursday, referring to Democrats. Our new president wants nothing more than to take our guns. Hed like to take all our guns away.
Consider what happened in New Mexico: 29 of 33 sheriffs signed a declaration saying they would not enforce newly proposed gun laws relating to background checks, domestic abuse protection orders, extreme risk (red flag laws) and safe storage. And in emails to local leaders, the sheriffs encouraged towns to become Second Amendment sanctuaries.
If a woman suffering domestic violence gets a restraining order to remove a gun, she needs to know the sheriff will do so, Brown said. This is very dangerous. This idea that the Second Amendment is without limits . . . the Second Amendment does not guarantee everyone a gun.
Following an extensive public records request, the Brady organization obtained documents and copies of the New Mexico Sheriffs correspondence with the NRA. And according to Brown, the sheriffs used language in their Second Amendment sanctuary declaration that was fed to them from the NRA.
In a recent paper published in the Northwestern University Law Review, Fields talked about his theory that state home rule laws may offer recourse to these gun safe havens.
With the home rule, it depends on how the home rule statute is written, Fields said on Thursday. There is at least the possibility.
Maine is a home rule state. Home rule can sometimes give a local government the authority to supersede state law.
Still, Aroostook County District Attorney Todd Collins said that the sanctuary concept is the opposite of how localities often change state laws. For example, there is a statewide disorderly conduct law, but a locality might choose to make it more stringent than the state law.
In the case of Second Amendment sanctuaries, the locality is choosing to reject state law.
This is the opposite of home rule, he said.
Ultimately, there will be a test case when a gun law is not enforced and someone gets hurt, Brown said.
I am worried that innocent people will lose lives, she said. Ultimately, I think local government is influenced by a handful of people. I think it is very important for people who care about how law enforcement protects them, [to] raise their voices.
See the article here:
More Maine towns consider becoming 2nd Amendment sanctuaries, even as how it would be enforced remains unclear - Bangor Daily News
Posted in Second Amendment
Comments Off on More Maine towns consider becoming 2nd Amendment sanctuaries, even as how it would be enforced remains unclear – Bangor Daily News
Second Amendment Resolutions Add Emphasis to Adage That ‘All Politics is Local’ – AmmoLand Shooting Sports News
Posted: at 2:15 pm
Establishing formal rights enforcement partnerships between citizens and peace officers is crucial. (Newton County Sheriffs Office/Facebook)
U.S.A. -(Ammoland.com)-Last September, AmmoLand hosted one of my articles about a resolution being considered by the Halifax County Board of Supervisors to support a local militia. The move was in response to unprecedented gun grabs being enacted in Virginia and was one of a number of responses that include establishing what are being called Second Amendment sanctuaries. The Halifax resolution didnt go forward due to self-imposed ignorance and gutlessness on the part of a critical mass of supervisors, and predictable misrepresentation and fear-mongering by the media.
One was a resolution approved in December 2019 by the Amherst County Board of Supervisors that declared the rights of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms must be respected, celebrated and upheld; urged the state and federal governments not to pass further infringements and burdens; expressed intent to take lawful actions to protect and support the rights of its citizens [and] not to aid in unconstitutional efforts to restrict these rights; and oppose any provision, law or regulation that may impose additional regulatory burdens or result in mandates to expend additional public funds on enforcement or administration of such laws, or to require constitutional officers of the locality to do so
The second link my correspondent provided went further, a May 2, 2020 resolution (scroll to pg. 8) adopted by another Board of Supervisors recognizing the militia within the county of Bedford pursuant to the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 13 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Cutting to the chase, heres what they resolve to do:
[W]e express our intent to uphold and protect the Second Amendment and Article I, 13 rights and to prepare for service or to serve as a member of the Militia in Bedford County; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that in order to support the Militia, enhance the safety and security of the citizens of Bedford County and establish, as our founders intended, a barrier against a tyrannical government, the Board hereby expresses its intent to:
(1) Decline to expend county resources for any effort to enforce unconstitutional laws enacted after January 20, 2020 restricting ownership and use of firearms that are in common use required for self-defense by individual citizens or for service to the community as part of the Militia in Bedford County.
(2) Recognize the right to assemble and train to arms for service individually or in groups in the event they are called or ordered out for lawful purposes
(3) Support opportunities for law-abiding citizens to assemble for recreational and civic purposes and train to arms that enhance the individual citizens ability to defend himself, his family, his community; and the Militias ability to respond effectively to a crisis.
the Board hereby declares our intent to oppose all unconstitutional restrictions on the Bill of Rights and specifically the Second Amendment to the U. S. Constitution and Article I, 13 of the Constitution of Virginia through such legal means as may be expedient, including, without limitation, legal process.
Thats better. It goes beyond Second Amendment Sanctuary declarations and recognizes the purposes and the right of citizens to train and to possess the minimal type of weaponry needed for performing Militia duty (we are, after all, basically talking semiautos here). The ornery among us (OK, me), might point out that some of us may be ineligible for the law-abiding qualifier because we refuse to comply with existing disarmament edicts and opt to retain banned firearms, magazines, and the like in defiance of such blatant and arrogant infringements.
And then theres the problem of existing law in states like Virginia, which essentially declare:
Groups of armed individuals that engage in paramilitary activity or law enforcement functions without being called forth by a governor or the federal government and without reporting to any government authority are acting as unauthorized private militias.
Theyll need to take care and especially be on guard against CIs/provocateurs trying to lure them into violation traps.
Its nice to see more counties and states waking up to the existential obey or be destroyed threat that the violence monopolists are forcing on gun owners. Its great to see so many movements turning the sanctuary maneuver adopted by the left to impede immigration law enforcement around and using it to resist the evisceration of what founder Tench Coxe called the birthright of an American.
Heres what they dont do, at least until now: They dont actually enforce rights, which if you think about it, is the sworn duty of every law enforcer. They might not help the feds or the state rape a citizen of his rights, but they dont stop them from the act, either.
Daniel Horowitz at The Blaze notes that Newton County, Missouri aims to change that. Their commission not only declares federal infringements invalid, but it also criminalizes their enforcement and authorizes the arrest of agents:
That one has some teeth in it. It also marks the county, the commissioners, and the sheriff as cancel culture targets for advancing such an ordinance, and as actual targets if they attempt to enforce it.
Now, how about a Bedford-type Militia resolution to supplement this and cement a partnership with the citizens they serve?And how about if the movement grows? Thats where the adage In unity there is strength comes in, and more importantly, where YOU come in.
Horowitz lets us know about the website SanctuaryCounties.com, where we can find out about similar efforts in our areas of operation, and further points us to the Constitution Action Network, for people of the same state and county to meet, collaborate, and raise awareness of the power of state and local government to interpose against the growing list of blatant constitutional violations and extra-lawful lawmaking
Former House Speaker Tip ONeill once observed that All politics is local. Its easy to see, especially in Blue States dominated by high population density urban areas, how citizens in flyover/drive-through country can feel like their voices will never be heard and that its useless to even try. When we get closer to home, our impact becomes stronger, especially if we involve ourselves in what the Democrats know to be effective, but which far too many gun owners seem unwilling to even try: Organizing.
Ideally, we should be working toward all three goals: A Second Amendment Sanctuary resolution, a Militia resolution, and a Second Amendment enforcement bill. I urge you to find out whats going on where you live, if productive organizing looks feasible there, and what you need to do to be a part of it.
About David Codrea:
David Codrea is the winner of multiple journalist awards for investigating/defending the RKBA and a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament. He blogs at The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance, is a regularly featured contributor to Firearms News, and posts on Twitter: @dcodrea and Facebook.
Here is the original post:
Second Amendment Resolutions Add Emphasis to Adage That 'All Politics is Local' - AmmoLand Shooting Sports News
Posted in Second Amendment
Comments Off on Second Amendment Resolutions Add Emphasis to Adage That ‘All Politics is Local’ – AmmoLand Shooting Sports News
Steven Reske: Bruce Castor needs lesson on the First Amendment – TribLIVE
Posted: at 2:15 pm
TribLIVE's Daily and Weekly email newsletters deliver the news you want and information you need, right to your inbox.
Pennsylvanias Bruce Castor choked on the First Amendment. Unfortunately, while his performance was nearly universally panned, no critics mentioned one jarring error. His gaffe occurred in the very first moments of his opening salvo and was on an issue foundational to President Trumps defense. While at first blush his factual misrepresentation might appear narrow, it is not minuscule. Rather, Castor constructed a First Amendment analysis laid on a factually erroneous foundation and ending with a reductive plea which boils down to; its first so its important. Castors problem, though, is simply, the First Amendment wasnt meant to be first.
Its not surprising that Trumps defense attorneys relied on the First Amendment. What is surprising is, given this reliance, they have so little understanding of its history. Castors opening statement incorrectly stressed repeatedly Now its not an accident its not an accident that the very first liberty in the first article of the Bill of Rights is the First Amendment which says Congress shall make no law abridging freedom of speech, etc. Congress shall make no law. The very first one. The most important one. Actually, it is first because of exactly that, an absolute accident.
Todays First Amendment is a combination of what was originally intended as the third and fourth of 19 amendments James Madison introduced on June 8, 1789 as the Bill of Rights. The House of Representatives agreed to 17 of Madisons proposals. The Senate then cut and condensed these 17 down to 12. At this point todays First Amendment became the proposed Third Amendment.
Congress then approved these 12 proposed amendments and they were sent to the existing states for ratification. The proposed first two amendments, however, failed to garner three-fourths of the state legislators votes required for ratification. Thus, on Dec. 15, 1791 what Congress proposed as the Third Amendment became todays First Amendment by mere happenstance of history.
It may be worth noting that the proposed Second Amendment concerned congressional compensation. While it would take more than two centuries, it passed in 1992, becoming the 27th Amendment. The proposed First Amendment concerned the number of members from the House of Representatives allocated to the states. Had it passed, todays House would have more than 6,000 representatives, more than 10 times its current size. Maybe things worked out for the best.
The First Amendments speech clause, only one of its five clauses, is vital to, and certainly a cherished cornerstone of, democracy. But if Castors shoddy legal analysis leads him to conclude todays 10 amendments of the Bill of Rights progress purposefully in descending order of importance, how does he explain the role played by the highly placed Third Amendment? No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner. That ones not exactly at the forefront of our constitutional conversation.
In fact, an even closer look at the First Amendments speech clause in isolation from its other four clauses reveals even more trouble with this line of thinking. The speech clause Congress eventually approved as its proposed third of 12 amendments didnt even start out as Madisons third. He placed the anti-establishment, and free exercise, of religion clauses alone in his Third Amendment. Madison merely saw fit to put the freedoms of speech, press, and assembly in his Fourth Amendment.
Madison is referred to as the Father of the Constitution. His proposed Fourth Amendment protecting speech reads; The people shall not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak, to write, or to publish their sentiments; and the freedom of the press, as one of the great bulwarks of liberty, shall be inviolable. It was back when the Senate cut and condensed the Houses 17 proposed amendments down to 12 that Madisons speech protection moved up to third.
So Castor really relied on a speech clause that was in the fourth, then in the third, and then somehow, after navigating 2 years of the political process, ended up in our First Amendment. His constitutional misapprehension is enough to leave one speechless.
Steven Reske is an attorney and former legal editor-at-large of Minnesota Law & Politics.
Categories:Featured Commentary | Opinion
TribLIVE's Daily and Weekly email newsletters deliver the news you want and information you need, right to your inbox.
More Featured Commentary Stories
Read the rest here:
Steven Reske: Bruce Castor needs lesson on the First Amendment - TribLIVE
Posted in Second Amendment
Comments Off on Steven Reske: Bruce Castor needs lesson on the First Amendment – TribLIVE







