The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Daily Archives: February 6, 2021
Garcia: 2020 election postmortem: The more Trump stirred up his base, the more he scared off everyone else – San Antonio Express-News
Posted: February 6, 2021 at 8:03 am
On the eve of Election Day in 2016, Donald Trump made a characteristically boastful statement about his base of support.
Trump credited himself with building the single greatest movement, politically speaking, in the history of this country.
The next day, the American electorate seemingly proved his point. Voters defied the polls and sent Trump, a willfully crass New York mogul with no governmental experience, to the White House.
The funny thing about Trumps 2016 triumph, however, is that it had none of the earmarks of a movement election.
All appearances aside, Trump didnt win by building a huge grassroots following.
In fact, he got less than 26 percent of all eligible voters, a smaller percentage than the two previous Republican presidential nominees, John McCain and Mitt Romney, both of whom lost in decisive fashion.
Trump benefited not from an excited electorate, but from a depressed one.
Even though his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton, received nearly three million more popular votes than he did, enough traditional Democratic voters were turned off by the options they had been given to stay home. That lack of enthusiasm enabled Trump to win by default in the critical swing states of Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.
Trumps movement primarily was built after he became president, when millions of people who voted for him grudgingly in 2016 turned into deeply committed followers.
I cant count the number of conversations Ive had over the past couple of years with Trump loyalists who voted for him in 2016 either because they hated Clinton or they figured theyd roll the dice with a non-politician. It was only after the election that many of these voters came to believe in Trump as a great leader.
As his following intensified, however, Trumps electoral fortunes diminished.
Over the past four years, his party lost its majority in the U.S. House and U.S. Senate, and Trump became only the third elected president in the past 85 years to get voted out of office.
The ironic turns in Trumps fortunes are dissected in a 27-page 2020 campaign postmortem, written by Trumps chief pollster, Tony Fabrizio, and released last week by Politico.
The postmortem attempts to explain how Trump pulled off the remarkable feat of generating nearly 12 million more votes than he did in 2016, while losing five key states he won in that first election.
Fabrizios report is based on exit-poll analysis of voter behavior in 10 swing states (including Texas) that Trump carried in 2016. In 2020, Trump held five of those states. The other five (Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin) flipped to Democratic nominee Joe Biden.
One of the most telling pieces of the report concerns self-identified independent voters.
In the five election-deciding states that flipped from Trump to Biden, independents made up 28 percent of voters.
In 2016, Trump won the independent vote in those states by 10 percentage points. In 2020, he lost independents by nine percentage points. Given the thin margins in Arizona, Georgia and Pennsylvania, that 19-point swing basically decided the election.
Trumps loss of support was primarily among white men, and largely concentrated among the youngest and oldest segments of the electorate.
Trumps rabidly enthusiastic rally crowds probably convinced him that his downplaying of the COVID-19 pandemic and his eagerness to fully re-open the economy put him in tune with the mood of the country.
In fact, however, Fabrizios report indicates that a strong plurality of voters across the 10 swing states viewed the coronavirus as the most important issue in the country.
More than 70 percent of voters in those states approved of the job performance of Dr. Anthony Fauci, the nations leading epidemiologist, and a frequent target of abuse among Trumps most ardent backers.
More than 75 percent of voters in these 10 states supported a public mask mandate, a policy prescription that Trump generally treated with derision. Among swing-state voters who considered the pandemic to be the most important issue, Biden beat Trump by 45 percentage points.
Trumps relentless disregard for the truth also did him no favors at a time of national crisis. Only 41 percent of voters in the five swing states that flipped from red to blue regarded Trump as trustworthy.
Fabrizios report tells the story of a president whose cult of personality couldnt help him overcome the basic laws of political gravity. The more he stirred up his base with red meat, the more he convinced his devotees that the election was a crusade with near-religious implications, the more he scared off everyone else.
As his base grew bigger and more intense, so did his opposition. For Trump, an enthused electorate meant defeat. Apathy, it turns out, was his best friend.
ggarcia@express-news.net | Twitter: @gilgamesh470
Originally posted here:
Posted in Donald Trump
Comments Off on Garcia: 2020 election postmortem: The more Trump stirred up his base, the more he scared off everyone else – San Antonio Express-News
Why Donald Trump — not Gov. Mike DeWine — should get credit for Ohio nursing home vaccinations: This Week i – cleveland.com
Posted: at 8:03 am
CLEVELAND, Ohio -- Gov. Mike DeWine continues to tout the rapid coronavirus vaccinations in the states nursing homes, but the program is run by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Were talking about who deserves credit on This Week in the CLE.
Listen online here.
Editor Chris Quinn hosts our daily half-hour news podcast, with editors Jane Kahoun, Kris Wernowsky and me.
Youve been sending Chris lots of thoughts and suggestions on our from-the-newsroom account, in which he shares what were thinking about at cleveland.com. You can sign up for free by sending a text to 216-868-4802.
Here are the questions were answering today:
Why does it look a lot more certain that Dr. Amy Acton will be a candidate for the U.S. Senate from Ohio?
Should Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine be taking credit for the success of the nursing home coronavirus vaccination success?
Dennis Kucinich made his bones back in the day by fighting off the attempt to end what is now Cleveland Public Power. Why does that make his campaign finance form so much more interesting as he plans a possible run for mayor?
Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine limits indoor gatherings to 300 because of the coronavirus, so what is the thinking behind giving the Cavs their second exemption to it and letting more than 2,700 fans watch the games at the arena?
Want more? You can find all our past episodes here.
We have an Apple podcasts channel exclusively for this podcast. Subscribe here.
Do you get your podcasts on Spotify. Find us here.
If you use Stitcher, we are here.
RadioPublic is another popular podcast vehicle, and we are here.
On Google Podcasts, we are here.
On PodParadise, find us here.
And on PlayerFM, we are here.
Read the full story on cleveland.coms sister site, Cleveland Business Journal.
Get the best in local business news sent straight to your inbox with the Cleveland Business Journal. Free to sign up.
View original post here:
Posted in Donald Trump
Comments Off on Why Donald Trump — not Gov. Mike DeWine — should get credit for Ohio nursing home vaccinations: This Week i – cleveland.com
A Complete Guide to Transhumanism – The Bioneer
Posted: at 8:02 am
Transhumanism is an intellectual and cultural movement that promotes the use of technology in order to advance the human condition. What this essentially means, is that a transhumanist is someone who believes we should use technology in order to give ourselves enhanced abilities higher IQs, greater strength, longer lifespans, sharper senses you name it. Citius, altius, fortius
Transhuman technology meanwhile, is the technology that one might use in order to accomplish this; including things like gene therapy, bionics and artificial intelligence. And someone who has successfully used transhuman technologies in order to enhance themselves? That would be a posthuman.
What makes all this particularly fascinating though and highly relevant, is the fact that many of the technologies we would need in order to start advancing mankind in this way already exist. Either that, or they are on the verge of being developed to a usable condition. Whats more incredible still, is that many of the technologies will one day be simple and affordable enough that they could be carried out in a home-made lab with only a modest investment.
This is a very real ethical and cultural debate that will be coming to the fore over the next decade and probably in the next few years. The question is, where will you stand on all this? Of course its an area that should be of great fascination to anyone interested in self-development, productivity, nootropics, bodybuilding or biohackers
It wouldnt be a detailed guide to transhumanism if we didnt discuss the history at least a little. Going back to the beginning then, the first transhuman proposals were possibly those postulated by the Geneticist J. B. S. Haldane, whose essay Science and the Future discussed some transhuman concepts very early on. Unfortunately, Haldane was also interested in eugenics which is an association that the transhumanist movement generally tries to avoid.
Haldanes essay prompted a response from a crystallographer from Cambridge, whose essay The World, The Flesh and the Devil discussed how transhuman technologies could aid in space colonization an idea that is generally popular among transhumanists.
The first use of the term transhumanism is generally credited to Julian Huxley, who some consider the founder of transhumanism. In his article, he put forward an argument for human enhancement very similar to the one used by transhumanists today.
Of course, as technology has developed, so transhumanism has become increasingly a relevant discussion while the web has also aided the proliferation of such ideals. This is also why were seeing itreferenced with increasing regularity in fiction.
Interestingly, there are now many currents within transhumanism as different leading thinkers have different things to say on the subject. These schools of thought incude, but are not limited to:
Abolitionism: The idea that we have an obligation to use technology in order to end suffering for all sentient life.
Democratic transhumanism: A political movement emphasizing the use of transhuman technologies in supporting and promoting democracy
Extropianism: Advocates taking a proactive approach to human evolution
Immortalism: The view that we should use technology in order to eliminate ageing and ideally achieve immortality through one means or another
Libertarian transhumanism: The synthesis of libertarianism and transhumanism
Postgenderism: The idea that we should evolve past gender via biotechnology and alternative means of reproduction
Singularitarianism: The belief in and desire for a technological singularity a point in time when technological advancement accelerates so rapidly as to create a kind of utopia
Technogaianism: A movement to use technologies in order to restore the environment transhuman technology included. For instance, we might be able to make ourselves more energy efficient were we to be smaller.
Some transhumanists meanwhile, such as the vocal advocate, designer and author of Primo Posthuman Natasha Vita More, often talk about transhumanism as a form of self-expression as an opportunity to design our own bodies the way we see fit and treat them almost like a canvas.
In many ways, it could be argued that mankind has always had an urge to expand beyond its boundaries and better itself and that this has always been the aim of technology, ever since we first lit a fire. In that way, transhumanism might be considered simply a natural evolution.
While transhumanism has had an interesting past though, it is about to enter its most critical chapter yet as we are on the verge of realizing the technologies that would make posthumanism possible.
Before we go further, lets take a look at some of the top transhuman technologies, where we are with them and what their implications are. Well break these down into some basic categories
One of the most interesting technologies for a transhumanist, is genetic engineering. This is the use of various processes aimed at altering the expression of particular genes or even inserting new genetic material into the genome.
As you probably know, our DNA stored within the nucleus of every cell is the genetic code that tells our body how to build and repair tissue. It contains everything you would need in order to grow a new you, only its a little more complicated than your average flat-pack furniture.
Nevertheless, we have managed now to identify the roles of many genes within the human body which allows us to say with some certainty what inserting new DNA will do, or suppressing particular genes. We have learned this in part by using knockout mice mice with particular genes suppressed so that we can observe the outcome.
The tricky part is inserting said genetic material in to the cell in such a way that it will be likely to be accepted into the genome and then replicated as the cell divides. To do this, we must use a vector which is a transporter. Currently the most popular option involves using a virus such as a retrovirus that has been genetically modified itself, and then getting that to infect the cells and multiply itself. The problem is that this isnt a very accurate method: there is a risk that we could accidentally overwrite important lines of genetic code this way which might lead to tumors and other problems. Furthermore, the use of a virus even a harmless one can trigger an immune response making it dangerous. We are able to modify retroviruses and make knockout mice because the genes are inserted into the germ cell before birth (the sperm or the egg). This is called germ-line therapy as opposed to somatic therapy. Transhumanists are more interested in somatic gene therapy, as it gives the individual the ability to choose their genetic modifications.
For those who see genetic modification as desirable, there is hope. There are other vector options for instance that show promise, such as the use of injections, gene guns, magnetofection or even nanoparticles. Having your DNA altered by nanorobots it sure doesnt get much more science fiction than that. Another option involves treating stem cells from bone marrow and then injecting them back in to the body. This allows for more precision and removes the need for a viral vector. Using different viruses such as lentiviruses also may pose less risk.
Its also possible to inject new DNA into the surrounding membrane of the cell and not into the nucleus itself. This way, the new DNA will be expressed, but it will not be replicated during cell division. This type of non-insertional gene therapy is only temporary, but removes many of the potential risks. Non-insertional gene therapy can also be achieved using adeno-associated viruses. Its worth noting that some cells such as immune cells or liver cells survive for decades.
And despite the current challenges facing genetic modification, the process has been used successfully in a therapeutic capacity in a number of instances.
Possible Transhuman Uses for Genetic Modification
These techniques have been developed primarily in order to treat a number of genetic conditions. Right now they arent 100% safe or effective, but in the next few years they may well be and we could use non-insertional gene doping relatively safely right now.
So what are the transhuman applications for this kind of technology?
Myostatin for Super Strength
One example would be to knock out the myostatin gene. This is a gene responsible as you might have guessed for producing the protein myostatin. Myostatins main role in the body appears to be the suppression of muscles and by removing it, we can see an immediate increase in muscle size and strength.
Whats really interesting though, is that this has already been achieved in mice (1). Thats right, super mice with naturally exaggerated strength and muscle mass have been created through germ-line genetic modification. It led to no negative side effects either.
And in case youre still not convinced this would be a viable treatment, consider that animals and humans have been recorded as having this mutation occur naturally. It can also be achieved through selected breading in certain species of animal. The Belgian Blue Cow is a species of cow that all have this mutation. Its even thought possible that some bodybuilders could have the mutation (or a variant on it). Flex Wheeler is reported to have claimed to have such a mutation.
So then bodybuilders, in the near future you could get a 30% boost in muscle mass possibly even permanently from a single injection.
Erythropoetin
Erythropoietin is a hormone responsible for the production of red blood cells. EPO can be used already as a performance enhancer, but using gene therapy it might be possible to provide this extra EPO production endogenously (2). In fact, this one is quite far along as the therapy has already been trademarked by Oxford Biomedica as Repoxygen intended to treat anemia (yeah right). It has also been proven in mice, but has yet to be extensively tested on human subjects.
Using these two methods of gene doping (the term used when gene therapy is used for performance enhancement), it would already be possible to have someone who could lift much heavier items and run for sustained periods. I personally, would be most interested in a therapy to increase the ratio/activation of fast and super-fast muscle fiber which is also very much on the cards.
Telomerase Gene Therapy
Not interested in becoming a super soldier? Then how about just living much longer?
By increasing the production of telomerase through gene therapy, researchers have managed to slow down ageing by 24% for mice from a single treatment (3). Telomerase is an enzyme that is normally only active before birth in most cells and that works by adding to the end of DNA sequences. In effect this means it repairs the telomeres, which are the non-essential ends of DNA. This is important, because a little DNA is lost during mitosis every time a cell splits. For a while, telomeres provide a buffer ensuring no vital data is corrupted, but once the telomeres run out, information starts getting lost and we begin to age.
By increasing telomerase then, we can rebuild the telomeres and thus increase the number of divisions our DNA can go through before getting ground down. In the study, it was found that the treatment was more effective the earlier it was administered. In an earlier 2007 study, it was found that using the same process in germ-line gene therapy could extend the lifespan up to 40%.
This is only one process by which ageing may occur. Our cells are also bombarded constantly throughout our lives by free radicals which can gradually cause them to deteriorate and even damage our DNA. Gene therapy may also be able to defend against this process however, by thickening the cell membranes. This would also make us less susceptible to radiation and even heat!
These are three big possible transhuman applications for gene doping, but there are many other potential uses. For instance, it wouldnt be a big stretch to imagine inserting a gene to increase the production of certain neurotransmitters in the brain (which could be done with non-insertional therapy). Endogenous modafinil anyone?
Bionics, in the transhuman sense, is the use of robotics in order to enhance the human condition. This might mean for instance, swapping out your arm for a robotic arm that can punch through walls Deus Ex Human Revolution style. Already, some bionic limbs are demonstrably superior from the originals in some ways. The blades worn by amputee runners for instance, are in some cases more energy efficient than running on normal legs. Of course theyre inferior in many other ways, but its certainly possible to imagine how this might not be the case in future.
Replacing limbs is only one possible transhuman application of bionics however. At the same time, we might imagine one day being able to upgrade or augment our eyesight. Bionic eyes already exist which (4) work by stimulating the optic nerve in order to create a low resolution representation of the outside world. One day this same technology could actually increase our resolution, allow us to see a greater range of wavelengths, or to experience augmented reality.
Brain chips have already been used in order to stimulate neurons for other aims too. A couple of patients for instance have already received brain chips designed to stimulate the brain in such a way as to combat depression (full store here). We know that suppressing the areas of the brain relating to language can increase maths ability, while stimulating the memory centers can uncover lost memories so imagine what could potentially come from stimulating the brain this way. This wouldnt necessarily need an implant thanks to the possibility of Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation that can work through the scalp.
Direct brain-computer interfaces are also an area of interest for transhumanists. Already there have been cases of paralyzed patients using brain implants in order to interface with machines and even surf the web, while some companies are already developing crude external brain controllers for computer games and other applications. More life-changing though, might be the ability to implant a harddrive into your brain to gain photographic memory, or even to increase your cognitive skills with some sort of built-in calculator
Other Technologies
Gene doping and bionics are only two examples of transhuman technologies that are in development/already available. Some of these are relatively mundane, while others are insanely ambitious.
It is a desire for many transhumanists for instance to actually upload themselves to the internet by encoding their consciousness. Others would like to have their brains removed and kept alive artificially such that they would be able to control a robotic body. This might sound completely like science fiction, but terrifyingly monkey brains have already been kept alive outside of the body and still shown activity. This is whats known as an isolated brain. One researcher has even managed the successful head transplant of a monkey (though the monkey died after seven days when the body rejected the new tissue). Heres the Wikipedia page of the late neurosurgeon who accomplished this disturbing feat, for your further, morbid reading.
Back to the less disturbing meanwhile, some people consider Iron Man-like endoskeletons (battle armour!) to be examples of transhumanism, while nanotechnology holds many potentials. Virtual reality could be considered almost transhuman and could certainly be used for transhuman applications (Lawnmower Man style!).
AI is also often discussed alongside other topics (read this on the Game of Life, its only loosely related but I think it holds the key to unlocking artificial intelligence). AI is the posthuman that was never human to begin with. Its also AI that might someday lead to the singularity the point where technology begins to accelerate so quickly that the world becomes unrecognizable in no time at all. When you consider the technological advancements that a super-advanced AI would make possible, you can understand how this might happen.
If you consider anyone who has used a transhuman technology in order to enhance themselves a posthuman (normally we reserve the term for those who have changed a significant amount, but go with it), then there are already transhumans living among us.
One great example is the legendary Kevin Warwick. Warwick is a researcher and figurehead for transhumanism who has used himself as a human guinea pig going as far as to implant a microelectrode array into his own nervous system allowing him to remotely control a robotic arm by moving his own arm and even to achieve a crude form of telepathic communication with his wife who also received implants (5). Its worth noting that the implant was eventually extracted due to mechanical failure nevertheless it was a success in the meantime and a relatively non-invasive procedure.
Meanwhile, there also exists an entire underground movement of grinders who are interested in using available technology to push the limits of the human body using themselves as human laboratories. As they put it on biohack.me they hack [their] bodies with artifacts from the future-present.
Thats right, this is going on right now. While there are some ambitious goals being thrown around on the forums, the most common biohack to be performed effectively is the neodymium magnet implant. Here a magnet is implanted in the nerve-dense tip of one finger and via a small surgical procedure. Because neodymium is such a strong magnet, it will actually vibrate slightly when in an electromagnetic field. This essentially gives the user a sixth sense as they are able to detect the presence of fields which would otherwise be undetectable without external hardware.
In many ways though, you could consider transhuman technology to already be commonplace it all depends on your definition of the word. If you consider transhuman technology to be anything that allows us to subjectively improve the human condition, then really many things we use today could be considered examples.
An obvious candidate would be something like plastic surgery or even tattoos and piercings. If we consider that the people making these changes believe they are improving themselves through technology, then in a way that is transhuman.
Of course we normally reserve the term for less cosmetic changes and more significant alterations to the human skill set. In that case though, we might consider current performance enhancing techniques to be transhuman in a way. What about steroids or even caffeine for instance? Sure, neither of these are permanent, but then neither is non-insertional gene doping which we do generally consider transhuman. And yes, anabolic steroids have side effects that could be considered almost sub-human, but really any improvement is subjective and almost bound to come at some cost. Just try increasing your brains ability to focus for instance, without it also negatively affecting your creativity. Likewise, an increase in fast twitch muscle fibre could theoretically decrease slow-twitch fibre (proportionally at least) thus negatively impacting on endurance. Does that make it not transhumanism?
Some could even look at the web or smartphones as a type of transhumanism. We use them every day almost as an extension of ourselves and in that way a smartphone is almost an exo-cortex. A smartwatch or Google Glass only takes this further. And if an Iron Man suit is transhuman technology, why not shoes that give you extra jumping height?
In general, the weak definition of transhuman technology is likely to cause many debates moving forward and be a limiting factor. This is especially true when you consider the vast differences between proposed transhuman technologies. If you embrace transhumanism does that mean you embrace all of it? Cant you be a fan of gene therapy while not supporting life extension or vice versa? If we tar every technology with the same brush, it may well prevent safer and more viable technologies from becoming available.
With transhuman technologies, ideologies and objectives so varied and disparate, its no wonder that there are so many currents within the larger movement.
This brings us nicely to the small matter of ethics. Transhumanism has always been a divisive subject, owing to the massive implications it has for our entire way of life and the fact that it will impact on nearly every aspect of human existence.
I actually did my dissertation on the Public Perception of the Ethics of Transhumanism which includes transcripts of focus group discussions. So if youd like to see what an in-depth debate on the subject looks like, you can download that here.
As briefly mentioned, a concern for life extension would be the inflation for the population. Where would everyone go? And would we have enough supplies if we all lived 30% longer? One possible answer is space colonization, but we are currently much closer to extending the human lifespan than we are to being able to populate other planets.
Then there is the possibility of a worsening class divide. Imagine if only wealthy people could afford to become immune to disease, to increase the lifespan of their children in-utero, or to enhance their IQ. In such a scenario, you would create a genuine second class citizen.
You also need to think about where these technologies would likely find use first and foremost: the answer being sporting competitions and the military. What are the ethics behind a supersoldier? Perhaps one made not to feel pain? And how will sports cope with gene doping that is almost impossible to detect? Bodybuilders: how would you feel if the general population were suddenly able to get as strong as you with no need to do any actual training? Youd then possibly feel pressured into doing the same just in order to keep up (though this is already a bit of an issue in bodybuilding thanks to anabolic steroids). Again, this isnt science fiction these are questions well be forced to answer in the next few years. Some experts even expected to see gene doping as early as the 2012 Olympics. Weve missed that deadline, but its only a matter of time
Perhaps my biggest complaint with some of the transhuman community is their disinterest in improving themselves through training. I cant understand why someone would express an interest in a myostatin injection, and yet not already be working out. When thats the case, you cant help but wonder if people are looking for an easy solution. And wouldnt that cheapen the journey somewhat? Shouldnt strength be earned? (Ill weigh in with my detailed views on the ethics of transhumanism in a future post).
Then there are questions regarding what it might do to our identity as humans and the religious aspect. What could happen to us were we to start playing God and leave behind our humanity? And while it might sound like the stuff of comic books what if it got into the hands of the wrong people? We could have genuine supervillains.
On the other hand, a transhumanist might argue that it should be our human right to express and change ourselves in any way we desire. That we could use transhuman technologies to end suffering, lead to greater advancements in other areas, expand into the stars and cure the planet. Some people are concerned that transhumanism would lead to us all looking the same as perfect Ken and Barbie dolls, but transhumanists themselves say the opposite would be true that wed finally be able to change our bodies to demonstrate our personalities and to serve our interests and hobbies. Transhumanism could open us up to whole new experiences and it could actually help us to remove inequality by giving us all the means to be the best versions of ourselves the way we interpret that.
We have always had an urge to expand ourselves and to test our limits and many of the breakthroughs we enjoy today were the result of taking risks. Show a car to someone from the 17th Century and they would probably tell you it was unethical and unsafe. They wouldnt necessarily be wrong either, but does that mean we should have never invented the automobile?
Truth is, I dont know the answer, but if we never try then well never know.
Posted in Transhuman
Comments Off on A Complete Guide to Transhumanism – The Bioneer
A New Generation of Transhumanists Is Emerging | HuffPost
Posted: at 8:02 am
A new generation of transhumanists is emerging. You can feel it in handshakes at transhumanist meet-ups. You can see it when checking in to transhumanist groups in social media. You can read it in the hundreds of transhumanist-themed blogs. This is not the same bunch of older, mostly male academics that have slowly moved the movement forward during the last few decades. This is a dynamic group of younger people from varying backgrounds: Asians, Blacks, Middle Easterners, Caucasians, and Latinos. Many are females, some are LGBT, and others have disabilities. Many are atheist, while others are spiritual or even formally religious. Their politics run the gamut, from liberals to conservatives to anarchists. Their professions vary widely, from artists to physical laborers to programmers. Whatever their background, preferences, or professions, they have recently tripled the population of transhumanists in just the last 12 months.
"Three years ago, we had only around 400 members, but today we have over 10,000 members," says Amanda Stoel, co-founder and chief administrator of Facebook group Singularity Network, one of the largest of hundreds of transhumanist-themed groups on the web.
Transhumanism is becoming so popular that even the comic strip Dilbert, which appears online and in 2000 newspapers, recently made jokes about it.
Despite its growing popularity, many people around the world still don't know what "transhuman" means. Transhuman literally means beyond human. Transhumanists consist of life extensionists, techno-optimists, Singularitarians, biohackers, roboticists, AI proponents, and futurists who embrace radical science and technology to improve the human condition. The most important aim for many transhumanists is to overcome human mortality, a goal some believe is achievable by 2045.
Transhumanism has been around for nearly 30 years and was first heavily influenced by science fiction. Today, transhumanism is increasingly being influenced by actual science and technological innovation, much of it being created by people under the age of 40. It's also become a very international movement, with many formal groups in dozens of countries.
Despite the movement's growth, its potential is being challenged by some older transhumanists who snub the younger generation and their ideas. These old-school futurists dismiss activist philosophies and radicalism, and even prefer some younger writers and speakers not have their voices heard. Additionally, transhumanism's Wikipedia page -- the most viewed online document of the movement -- is protected by a vigilant posse, deleting additions or changes that don't support a bland academic view of transhumanism.
Inevitably, this Wikipedia page misses the vibrancy and happenings of the burgeoning movement. The real status and information of transhumanism and its philosophies can be found in public transhumanist gatherings and festivities, in popular student groups like the Stanford University Transhumanist Association, and in social media where tens of thousands of scientists and technologists hang out and discuss the transhuman future.
Jet-setting personality Maria Konovalenko, a 29-year-old Russian molecular biophysicist whose public demonstrations supporting radical life extension have made international news, is a prime example.
"We must do more for transhumanism and life extension," says Konovalenko, who serves as vice president of Moscow-based Science for Life Extension Foundation. "This is our lives and our futures we're talking about. To sit back and and just watch the 21st Century roll by will not accomplish our goals. We must take our message to the people in the streets and strive to make real change."
Transhumanist celebrities like Konovalenko are changing the way the movement gets its message across to the public. Gauging by the rapidly increasing number of transhumanists, it's working.
A primary goal of many transhumanists is to convince the public that embracing radical technology and science is in the species' best interest. In a mostly religious world where much of society still believes in heavenly afterlives, some people are skeptical about whether significantly extending human lifespans is philosophically and morally correct. Transhumanists believe the more people that support transhumanism, the more private and government resources will end up in the hands of organizations and companies that aim to improve human lives and bring mortality to an end.
Calling all HuffPost superfans!
Sign up for membership to become a founding member and help shape HuffPost's next chapter
Original post:
A New Generation of Transhumanists Is Emerging | HuffPost
Posted in Transhuman
Comments Off on A New Generation of Transhumanists Is Emerging | HuffPost
transhumanism : The Corbett Report
Posted: at 8:02 am
This week on the New World Next Week: the NY Times wants Biden to appoint a reality czar; Elon Musk is creating brain-chipped monkey gamers; and Californians fight back against COVID mandates in schools.
Read More
Youve all heard by now that The Great Reset is upon us. But what is The Great Reset, exactly, and what does it mean for the future of humanity? Join James for this in-depth exploration of the latest rebranding of the New World Order agenda and its vision of a post-human Fourth Industrial Revolution.
Read More
Pete Quinones of Freeman Beyond the Wall talks to James Corbett about the Great Reset, the Fourth Industrial Revolution, and the coming biosecurity state.
Read More
It promises a fantastic future in which humans overcome disease, aging, and even death. It just requires us to take the final step and merge fully with machines. But its secret past in crypto-eugenics reveals a darker future, one in which a GenRich elite rule over the GenPoor masses. Are you ready to give up your humanity?
Read More
Posted in Transhuman
Comments Off on transhumanism : The Corbett Report
Transhuman | Museum Ulm
Posted: at 8:02 am
July 11, 2020December 13, 2020
+++ Unfortunately, the exhibition can no longer be visited due to the closure of the museum until at least 20 December 2020 as a result of corona-related measures to contain the pandemic. Due to a lack of planning security, loan contracts and logistical reasons, we are unfortunately unable to extend the exhibition beyond the official end of the exhibition on 13 December 2020. We regret this very much and ask for your understanding.
We also need the exhibition rooms for the rebuilding of our upcoming large annual exhibition 2021 A Woodstock of Ideas Joseph Beuys, Achberg and the German South which is to be shown in the Museum Ulm from 23 January 2021 until 6 June 2021.
What remains. More than little consolation. The beautiful, rich, worth reading and worth seeing exhibition publication designed by our graphic artist Eva Hocke bibliophile and exclusively available in our museum shop.+++
On 24 June 2020, he celebrates his 250th birthday, an inventor who is as brilliant as he is risk-taking: Albrecht Ludwig Berblinger. Better known as Schneider von Ulm, he went down in history with his flight attempt in 1811. The anniversary celebrations under the title Berblinger 2020 will not only pay tribute to his work, but will also focus on innovation, inventiveness, courage and an open urban society.
Almost everyone today is familiar with Albrecht Ludwig Berlingers flight test. However, another invention by the famous inventor is largely unknown: Albrecht Ludwig Berblinger developed movable prostheses for the injured soldiers of the Napoleonic Wars and thus invented the basic design for modern leg prostheses.
This medical-historical success story is the occasion for the Museum Ulm, in the context of the 250th anniversary of the birth of Albrecht Ludwig Berblinger, to devote itself to the complementation, imitation and improvement of human nature, the desirable body and the artificial human being in an exhibition on the history of art, culture and technology.
Historical prostheses and pictorial representations of their applications are juxtaposed with contemporary interpretations and visions of overcoming our physiological limitations through scientific, technological and design disciplines.
In the face of technological progress, current contemporary artistic positions also reflect prosthetics up to the cyborg; the exhibition presents works by:
Kader Attia I Sophie de Oliveira Barata I Anna Blumenkranz I Renaud Jerez I Mari Katayama I Alexander Kluge I Erika Mondria I Aimee Mullins I Miguel Angel Rojas I Martha Rosler I Keisuke Shimakage I Igor Simi I Stelarc
The exhibition is accompanied by a publication (German/English, 264 pages, numerous illustrations, 20 ).
In cooperation with the
Funded by the
German Federal Cultural Foundation
With friendly support
On the anniversary of
Visit link:
Transhuman | Museum Ulm
Posted in Transhuman
Comments Off on Transhuman | Museum Ulm
transhuman – Wiktionary
Posted: at 8:02 am
English[edit]Etymology[edit]
trans- + human, also attested as trans-human in the 1950s. Attributed to Teilhard de Chardin, as French trans-humain (noun, sometimes capitalised as (le) Trans-humain), who used it alongside ultra-humain ("the ultra-human"). As a countable English noun (plural transhumans) introduced by F. M. Esfandiary in the 1960s (here trans- is short for transitional).
transhuman (comparative more transhuman, superlative most transhuman)
Turning fallible human foot soldiers into transhuman machines who need neither sleep nor food, and are incapable of resistance and independent thought, is a Napoleonic dream .
A template for those who will become transhuman.
I believe that this is important, because taken in isolation the kind of enhancements portrayed by transhuman philosophers might seem relatively innocuous.
The transhuman ideal is based upon a reconception of evolution, a perfecting and transcending of the human race through the next step in progress: not through biological mutation but through science and technology.
In a study of transhumanists and video games, fully twothirds of the participants claimed that video games incline players toward a transhuman sense of self.
This "other world" is transcendent because the experience of the sacredan encounter with a reality transcending immanent lifegives birth to the idea that there are absolute, that is, transhuman, realities.
Thus, regardless of whether one prefers to replace the father symbol with other human symbols like mother and maternalor with transhuman and transsexual symbols like first/last realitynone of these images or symbols are really integral to the message of the Gospels.
Subjectivity, as a paradoxically transhuman phenomenon of awareness renderred only in ecologies, is rendered into inscriptions and images even as no self is adequate to the report.
transhuman (countable and uncountable, plural transhumans)
In the same way that a transhuman is a transitional human, Christians are also humans in transition, living in a kingdom that has come and yet is coming, strangers in the world.
On the coffee table rested a sculpture of the fundamental, recombinant DNA of the present transhumans.
In practice, this technological transhumation would wreak havoc on the earth. While modern transhumans are meant to come into being through technology, Augustine offers two models of transhumans made by a divine rather than a human creator -- Adam and Eve in Eden and the resurrected saints in heaven.
Will it happaen again if we transition from human to transhuman?
I bet every critter that thinks it thinkseven the transhumansworry about how to do right for themselves and the ones they love.
Imagine a living computer running a simulation where math functions within the simulation think. Then consider an implication of anthrocosmology: if human consciousness created reality and transhumans can simulate any reality they can imagine, that suggest the physical universe has no special status above any other virtual reality.
Now ask yourself a question, don't these transhumans have as much a right in killing us for food as we do in killing cows?
More here:
transhuman - Wiktionary
Posted in Transhuman
Comments Off on transhuman – Wiktionary
Deadpool’s Monster Army and the X-Men’s Nation Share a Surprising Tactic – Screen Rant
Posted: at 8:02 am
The X-Men are really big into combining their powers now, something Deadpool uses when it's time to smash invading symbiotes.
Having a country seems to be all the rage in comics these days. After all, in addition to traditional mainstays like Black Panther's Wakanda and Doctor Doom's Latveria, the X-Men now have the mutant nation of Krakoa, and Deadpool, of all people, has found himself the monarch of the Monster Nation. With countries come culture, and there seems to be some cultural cross-pollination going on in the pages of Marvel Comics. In Deadpool #10, written by Kelly Thompson and illustrated by Gerardo Sandoval, the Merc with a Mouth seems to have borrowed a page from X-Men to combine the powers of his constituents into a fearsome symbiote-smashing giant robot! But what precedent does this increasing common occurrence set, and what implications does it have going forward?
Combining powers is nothing new in comics. Perhaps is the most famous example is "the Fastball special" which would see Colossus launch Wolverine at their adversaries. However, Krakoa has taken this concept to a whole new level, developing much more intricate - and potentially dangerous - combinations. After all, some mutants wield various elements, controlled by sheer force of will. Any emotional instability could spell disaster. Fortunately, most mutants in Krakoa have an insurance policy in the form of their resurrection through psychic downloads.
Related: Deadpool Just Saved Captain America and Cyclops in the Most Ridiculous Way
On the pages of Deadpool, the titular monarch is using the powers of former enemy Jelby to create a massive gelatinous body to house his team, and then use their individual powers against the symbiotes threatening his nation and the world at large. Jelby also captures Deadpool's pet, Jeff the Landshark, who had been infected by a symbiote, and by the end of the adventure, even helps capture a massive symbiote dragon. Ultimately, the move to combine powers - which Deadpool fittingly refers to as "Plan X" - pays off.
Still, from a storytelling perspective, there are potential pitfalls for power combination. Its possible power combination could become nothing more than a plot device, or worse, a deus ex machina. After all, Krakoa is a blossoming transhumanist state, and it's possible no individual situation poses much of a threat thanks to the sheer number of power combinations at the mutants' disposal now. Ultimately, the story could suffer, especially if the emphasis falls on the "wow factor" of power combination instead of the character dynamics working behind the scenes.
Of course, this new mutant culture could be a way of raising the stakes. After all, would the mutants be so willing to engage in these dynamics if they didn't have resurrection pods? Cheating death typically doesn't end well. If or when Krakoa loses its resurrection capability, mutants could put themselves in considerable danger performing these maneuvers. The comics have already explored how vulnerable clones feel in the face of uncertain resurrection. What if the mutants had to perform these literally death-defying moves without a safety net?
Ultimately, the question is moot in Deadpool's case, as his Monster Nation is shown to be almost everything Krakoa is not - a rag-tag mix of monsters, aliens, villains, and even regular humans working together. If Deadpool can duplicate a key mutant technology without much effort, it's possible Krakoa might not be as innovative - or even stable - as they believe. All of this suggests Krakoa's recent breakthrough might really be leading the mutant nation down a path with very fragile feet of clay.
Next: The Wu-Tang Clan Just Entered Marvel's Fight Against Marvel's King in Black
The Most Heroic Titan Just Turned Evil in DC Comics
Read more here:
Deadpool's Monster Army and the X-Men's Nation Share a Surprising Tactic - Screen Rant
Posted in Transhuman
Comments Off on Deadpool’s Monster Army and the X-Men’s Nation Share a Surprising Tactic – Screen Rant
Pasadena: Whats that Amazing Building on the Corner of Del Mar and Wilson? – coloradoboulevard.net
Posted: at 8:01 am
South side of Tianqiao and Chrissy Chen Neuroscience Research Building (Photo Caltech.edu)
By Kate Bartlett
The Tianqiao and Chrissy Chen Neuroscience Research Building (CNRB) was dedicated on January 29, 2021. Virtual attendees included more than 850 Caltech leaders, researchers, students, alumni and friends. The 150,000 square-foot luminous copper building contains research and teaching laboratories, a 150-seat lecture hall and a neurotechnology center in which grad students and postdocs can set up complicated experiments requiring system engineering, measurement of behavior,stimuli observation and new software. The expansive windows provide sunlight to the teaching and conference rooms, and the human-focused gathering spaces feature skylights and gardens.
The CNRB houses the Chen Institute of Neuroscience, as well as faculty and researchers from other disciplines; before the completion of the CNRB, neuroscience labs were located primarily in the Beckmann Behavioral Building, Kirchoff Building, Moore Building and Broad Institute. The open design between the second and third floors makes interaction easier and promotes imaginative research, according to David Anderson, Professor of Biology and Director of the Chen Institute.
The Tianqiao and Chrissy Chen Institute for Neuroscience at Caltech originally was born from a chance encounter with a news report on the ability to control a robotic arm using only a persons mind. Tianqiao Chan and his wife, Chrissy Luo, created the Institute to allow researchers to jumpstart new projects while the CNRB was under construction.
Caltech researchers probe the circuitry, cells and molecular, chemical and electrical pathways of the brain, pursue the neurological basis of personality, develop new brain imaging technique, map brain circuits, develop neurotechnology to treat brain disorders, investigate social cognition and emotions in humans, and quantify behaviors and correlate them to brain activity.
Viviana Gradinaru, professor of neuroscience and biological engineering and director the Center for Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, said the Chen Institute is like a trampoline:
In science, we have to make leaps of faith. We have to jump high, and you jump much higher on a trampolineespecially one that has a safety net thats big enough and welcoming of others and other opinions. This is what the Chen family provided us.
Colorado Boulevard.net is your place for enlightening events, informative news and social living for the greater Pasadena area. We strive to inform, educate, and work together to make a better world for all of us, locally and globally.
See the original post:
Pasadena: Whats that Amazing Building on the Corner of Del Mar and Wilson? - coloradoboulevard.net
Posted in Neurotechnology
Comments Off on Pasadena: Whats that Amazing Building on the Corner of Del Mar and Wilson? – coloradoboulevard.net
Should the Senate convict Donald Trump? Heres what the American people think – Brookings Institution
Posted: at 8:00 am
Although public opinion doesnt determine the outcome of impeachment trials, it shapes the environment within which senators must decide. Based on multiple polls conducted during the past month, here are five key facts about Americans sentiment as Donald Trumps second Senate trial looms.
With former president Trumps trial set to begin in the Senate, a clear but not overwhelming majority of Americans favor removing him from office. In surveys conducted by 6 different polling organizations between January 10 and February, support for his removal averaged 52%, while 42% were opposed.[i]
There have been no clear trends in public opinion in the month since the assault on the U.S. Capitol on January 6. One of the earliest surveys, conducted by Quinnipiac University between January 7th and 10th, found 52% favoring removal and 45% opposed. The next Quinnipiac poll (January 15-17) reported a 54-42 split, while the latest (January 28-February) put it at 50-45. Similarly, a comparison among the different polling organizations found no trend. It appears that most people made up their minds early on and havent changed them.
Although many observers believe that the case against Mr. Trump is significantly stronger than it was in his first impeachment trial, the share of Americans who want to see him convicted is only modestly higher than it was a year ago. Between December 18, 2019, when the House impeached then-President Trump for the first time, and on February 5, 2020, when the Senate acquitted him, support for removing him from office averaged between 46.4 and 48.5%. This was between 4 and 6 points lower than the average in support of conviction during the past four weeks of this, his second impeachment trial.
Support for barring Donald Trump from future public office, which averages 56%, is somewhat higher than for just convicting him. The Monmouth University survey found that when respondents who opposed conviction but favored barring him from office were told that he could not be barred unless he was convicted, support for conviction rose from 52 to 55%. With 56% of the public wanting to bar him from public office, Trump will face steep odds against regaining the presidency in 2024, even if he is acquitted.
Patterns of support for convicting or acquitting Mr. Trump closely mirror the divisions that prevailed throughout his presidency. Nearly all Democrats support conviction, while nearly all Republicans opt for acquittal. Non-whites favor conviction more than whites, women more than men, and whites with college degrees more than whites without them. According to Quinnipiac, the gender gap among white Americans was a stunning 23 points: 56% of white women favored conviction, compared to just 33% of white men.
As we begin Trumps second impeachment trial, it is hard to distinguish judgments about convicting him from judgments about the Trump presidency and Trump the man. The share of Americans who support convicting him is almost identical to the share who ousted him from office by voting for Joe Biden. Seventeen Republican senators would need to join all the Senate Democrats to convict Trump in his second trial. But so long as Senate Republicans from red states fear the wrath of their voters if they break ranks, few are likely to do so. The court of public opinion will have to move more strongly in favor of conviction to influence wavering Republicans, and so far, theres scant evidence that this will happen.
[i] Sources: Monmouth University, The New York Times, Times of San Diego, Politico, CS Monitor, Quinnipiac University
Continue reading here:
Should the Senate convict Donald Trump? Heres what the American people think - Brookings Institution
Posted in Donald Trump
Comments Off on Should the Senate convict Donald Trump? Heres what the American people think – Brookings Institution







