Daily Archives: February 6, 2021

Quantum Physics | Rakuten Viki

Posted: February 6, 2021 at 8:11 am

Synopsis

Lee Chan Woo (Park Hae Soo) is a man of many talents. A major player in the world of Korean nightlife, he not only runs a successful nightclub, but has made a name for himself as the Hua Tuo of nightlife. Nicknamed after the legendary Chinese physician, Chan Woo has a knack for breathing new life into struggling, nearly bankrupt nightclubs, making them successful once again. A man who lives by his own quantum physical theory, he truly believes that your thoughts and actions shape your reality.But Chan Woos theory is put to the ultimate test when he learns that one of the countrys top celebrities is taking part in a drug party being held at one of the local clubs. Knowing the authorities must be informed, he contacts Officer Park Ki Heon (Kim Sang Ho), knowing hell do what must be done to bring those involved to justice. With Officer Park and his associate, Sung Eun Young (Seo Ye Ji) by his side, Chan Woo and his team begin to investigate the less-than-reputable goings on in some of the citys hottest clubs; but digging deeper brings with it all sorts of nasty consequences.With celebrities, prosecutors, and politicians all involved in the ever-growing scandal, Chan Woo, Eun Young, and Officer Park must confront some of the countrys most powerful people in a fight for justice that may end up costing them everything.An engaging story from start to finish, Quantum Physics is a 2019 crime film directed by Lee Sung Tae.

See original here:

Quantum Physics | Rakuten Viki

Posted in Quantum Physics | Comments Off on Quantum Physics | Rakuten Viki

Switching Nanolight On and Off | Columbia News – Columbia University

Posted: at 8:11 am

A team of researchers led by Columbia University has developed a unique platform to program a layered crystal, producing imaging capabilities beyond common limits on demand.

The discovery is an important step toward control of nanolight, which is lightthat can access the smallest length scales imaginable. The work also provides insights for the field of optical quantum information processing, which aims to solve difficult problems in computing and communications.

We were able to use ultrafast nano-scale microscopy to discover a new way to control our crystals with light, turning elusive photonic properties on and off at will, said Aaron Sternbach, postdoctoral researcher at Columbia who is lead investigator on the study. The effects are short-lived, only lasting for trillionths of one second, yet we are now able to observe these phenomena clearly.

The research appears Feb. 4 in the journal Science.

Nature sets a limit on how tightly light can be focused. Even in microscopes, two different objects that are closer than this limit would appear to be one. But within a special class of layered crystalline materialsknown as van de Waals crystalsthese rules can, sometimes, be broken. In these special cases, light can be confined without any limit in these materials, making it possible to see even the smallest objects clearly.

In their experiments, the Columbia researchers studied the van der Waals crystal called tungsten diselenide, which is of high interest for its potential integration in electronic and photonic technologies because its unique structure and strong interactions with light.

When the scientists illuminated the crystal with a pulse of light, they were able to change the crystals electronic structure. The new structure, created by the optical-switching event, allowed something very uncommon to occur: Super-fine details, on the nanoscale, could be transported through the crystal and imaged on its surface.

The report demonstrates a new method to control the flow of light of nanolight. Optical manipulation on the nanoscale, or nanophotonics, has become a critical area of interest as researchers seek ways to meet the increasing demand for technologies that go well beyond what is possible with conventional photonics and electronics.

Dmitri Basov, Higgins professor of physics at Columbia University, and senior author on the paper, believes the teams findings will spark new areas of research in quantum matter.

Laser pulses allowed us to create a new electronic state in this prototypical semiconductor, if only for a few pico-seconds, he said. This discovery puts us on track toward optically programmable quantum phases in new materials.

Scientists at the Max Planck Institute for the Structure and Dynamics of Matter, University of California-San Diego, University of Washington, Center for Computational Quantum PhysicsFlatiron contributed to the study, Programmable hyperbolic polaritons in van derWaals semiconductors.

The work is supported as part of Programmable Quantum Materials, an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences.

Read more:

Switching Nanolight On and Off | Columbia News - Columbia University

Posted in Quantum Physics | Comments Off on Switching Nanolight On and Off | Columbia News – Columbia University

The Super Bowl: What is time? – SB Nation

Posted: at 8:11 am

What time is the Super Bowl? Super Bowl LV will be played on Feb. 7, 2021, at the Raymond James Stadium in Tampa, Florida. The game, which will be contested by the AFCs Kansas City Chiefs and the NFCs Tampa Bay Buccaneers, will kick off at 6:30 p.m. ET (5:30 p.m. CT; 3:30 p.m. PT). In the United States, you can watch on CBS. The Super Bowl LV Halftime Show will be headlined by The Weeknd.

Time is a notoriously hard concept to pin down. The first person Im aware of to take a serious crack at it is Aristotle, who offers up his definition of time in Book IV of his Physics (parts 10 and 11): time is number of movement in respect of the before and after.

This curiously circular definition citing the before and after in a definition of time somewhat evades the issue at hand is a relative one. For Aristotle (who seems to be more interested in playing with the concept of now than time itself anyway), time seems to be a sort of basis for change, although its exact nature is confusing, both for the philosopher himself and anyone unfortunate enough to be attempting to thoroughly digest his work.

Relative time turns out not to be that useful, and one of the great achievements of early modernity was capturing and taming time. The development of regular clocks allows for many things, not least more precise measurements of everything else. Its impossible to imagine, for instance, the grand edifice of Newtonian physics being built on water clocks and sundials.

Thanks to the magic of clocks, these days were used to time as a constant, the now ticking second by second into the future with implacable rhythm. This is very helpful both in being able to understand the immediate universe and to maintain a functioning society. But its also both physically wrong and hideously unnatural.

Einstein dealt with the non-static nature of time in 1905 with On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies (tl;dr: holding the speed of light constant means that time must flow differently for observers traveling at different speeds, a fact which has been proved experimentally) and although Im not drunk enough to read about quantum physics Im going to go ahead and assume that quantum theories of time are pretty gnarly too. Humanitys general concept of time only works on a limited, parochial scale.

And honestly, it doesnt work there either. We dont experience time in the way our machines do. It contracts, contorts, extending March 2020 into hideous decades, and turning what ought to be joyous hours into a stumble of drunken seconds. People dont experience time as a regimented flow. Sometimes we pretend to, and every now and then we force ourselves to sync up with it, but formal time is too abstract for us to stay with it for long.

Sports are great examples of our utter inability to mesh perceived time with real time. Since its Super Bowl week, lets take football. An NFL game nominally consists of four 15-minute quarters, but in practice lasts for hours. Why? Because the game clock twists and turns, freezing at some points but not others. The rules of football, with play clocks and timeouts and etc. act as a supplemental set of physics, but its not just the rules which determine how long a game goes.

On average the Super Bowl takes 3 hours, 44 minutes from start to finish. This is significantly longer than NFL average, despite no changes to the rules of the sport, and is entirely a product of capitalisms bizarre intersection with cultural events. Super Bowl ads cost a lot of money, the halftime show and therefore more time needs to be made (made?!) to accommodate both. In a certain sense, then, the societal environs of the game warp time within the game.

The Super Bowl, then operates on about three different layers of time, all distressed in barely-sensical ways. This is fine, because time makes no fucking sense and never will. Things happen, they appear to be irreversible because of ... entropy? ... and we all just hang around and deal with it. What is time? Honestly, I havent the foggiest idea. Maybe the post my friend Chris Greenberg wrote three years ago might help?

Ive given myself a headache now, so I hope this post is long enough for SEO purposes. Dulce et decorum est pro google mori.

Read the original post:

The Super Bowl: What is time? - SB Nation

Posted in Quantum Physics | Comments Off on The Super Bowl: What is time? – SB Nation

Scientists narrow down the ‘weight’ of dark matter trillions of trillions of times – Livescience.com

Posted: at 8:11 am

Scientists are finally figuring out how much dark matter the almost imperceptible material said to tug on everything, yet emit no light really weighs.

The new estimate helps pin down how heavy its particles could be with implications for what the mysterious stuff actually is.

The research sharply narrows the potential mass of dark matter particles, from between an estimated 10^minus 24 electronvolts (eV) and 10^19 Gigaelectron volts (GeV) , to between 10^minus 3 eV and 10^7eV a possible range of masses many trillions of trillions of times smaller than before.

The findings could help dark matter hunters focus their efforts on the indicated range of particle masses or they might reveal a previously unknown force is at work in the universe, said Xavier Calmet, a professor of physics and astronomy at the University of Sussex in the United Kingdom.

Related: The 11 biggest unanswered questions about dark matter

Calmet, along with doctoral student Folkert Kuipers, also of the University of Sussex, described their efforts in a new study to be published in the March issue of Physical Letters B.

By some estimates, dark matter makes up about 83% of all the matter in the universe. Its thought only to interact with light and ordinary matter through gravity, which means it can only be seen by the way it curves light rays.

Astronomers found the first hints of dark matter when gazing at a galactic cluster in the 1930s, and theories that galaxies are threaded with and fringed by vast halos of dark matter became mainstream after the 1970s, when astronomers realized galaxies were whirling faster than they otherwise should, given how much visible matter they contained.

Related: The 12 strangest objects in the universe

Possible candidates for dark matter particles include ghostly, tiny particles known as neutrinos, theoretical dark, cold particles known as axions, and proposed weakly-interacting massive particles, or WIMPs. The new mass bounds could help eliminate some of these candidates, depending on the details of the specific dark matter model, Calmet said.

What scientists do know is that dark matter seems to interact with light and normal matter only through gravity, and not via any of the other fundamental forces; and so the researchers used gravitational theories to arrive at their estimated range for the masses of dark matter particles.

Importantly, they used concepts from theories of quantum gravity, which resulted in a much narrower range than the previous estimates, which used only Einstein's theory of general relativity.

"Our idea was a very simple one," Calmet told Live Science in an email. "It is amazing that people have not thought of this before."

Einstein's theory of general relativity is based on classical physics; it perfectly predicts how gravity works most of the time, but it breaks down in extreme circumstances where quantum mechanical effects become significant, such as at the center of a black hole.

Theories of quantum gravity, on the other hand, try to explain gravity through quantum mechanics, which can already describe the other three known fundamental forces electromagnetic force, the strong force that holds most matter together, and the weak force that causes radioactive decay. None of the quantum gravity theories, however, as yet have strong evidence to support them.

Calmet and Kuipers estimated the lower bound for the mass of a dark matter particle using values from general relativity, and estimated the upper bound from the lifetimes of dark matter particles predicted by quantum gravity theories. The nature of the values from general relativity also defined the nature of the upper bound, so they were able to derive a prediction that was independent of any particular model of quantum gravity, Calmet said.

The study found that while quantum gravitational effects were generally almost insignificant, they became important when a hypothetical dark matter particle took an extremely long time to decay and when the universe was about as old as it is now (roughly 13.8 billion years), he said.

Physicists previously estimated that dark matter particles had to be lighter than the "Planck mass" about 1.2 x 10^19 GeV, at least a 1,000 times heavier than the largest-known particles yet heavier than 10^minus 24 eV to fit with observations of the smallest galaxies known to contain dark matter, he said.

But until now, few studies had attempted to narrow the range, even though great progress had been made in understanding quantum gravity over the last 30 years, he said. "People simply did not look at the effects of quantum gravity on dark matter before."

Calmet said the new bounds for the masses of dark matter particles, could also be used to test whether gravity alone interacts with dark matter, which is widely assumed, or if dark matter is influenced by an unknown force of nature.

"If we found a dark matter particle with a mass outside the range discussed our paper, we would not only have discovered dark matter, but also very strong evidence that there is some new force beyond gravity acting on dark matter," he said.

Originally published on Live Science.

Read the original post:

Scientists narrow down the 'weight' of dark matter trillions of trillions of times - Livescience.com

Posted in Quantum Physics | Comments Off on Scientists narrow down the ‘weight’ of dark matter trillions of trillions of times – Livescience.com

Meaning and Morality Without God: Atheists Know Better Than They Think – Christianheadlines.com

Posted: at 8:11 am

Nature documentaries like the BBCs Planet Earth, Blue Planet, and most recently, A Perfect Planet, are amazing masterpieces of modern videography, displaying creation in detail and majesty. Every creature soaring through the sky, or streaking through the deep, or thundering over the savannah exhibits power, beauty, and unmistakable purpose. David Attenboroughs grandfatherly narration and Hans Zimmers moving musical scores only add to the childlike awe these films induce.

All of which makes it even more odd when Attenborough declares that all of this glory lacks purpose, or that it arose by chance and natural selection, and that none of it bears witness to any meaning or Mind beyond itself.

A recent article on atheism, also from across the pond, reminded me of this contradiction. In The Guardian, Harriet Sherwood described a new project from the University of Kent that seeks to discover whether disbelieving in God makes people less spiritual overall. According to the projects authors, atheism doesnt necessarily entail unbelief in other supernatural phenomena. Nor do unbelievers lack for a sense of purpose, despite lacking anything to ascribe ultimate meaning to [in] the universe.

In the article, Sherwood profiled several unbelievers, from an agnostic to a free thinker to Positivist pastor and Satanic priest (who makes it clear he doesnt believe in a literal Satan). All of them insist that life can be deeply meaningful and even moral without God.

We can determine for ourselves what is meaningful, said one. The meaning of life, suggested one woman, is to make it the best experience you can, to spread love to those around you. Beauty and tradition are at the core of my philosophy, said another. One self-identified atheistic Jew explained, Being part of a religious community offers music, spirituality and relationshipsit reminds me Im on a journey to understand myself better and motivates me to help others.

Hearing outspoken unbelievers proclaim that meaning and morality arent accidents is about as jarring as hearing David Attenborough proclaim that the worlds most amazing creatures areaccidents.There is an inability of atheists to let go of the transcendent.

In his book, Miracles, C.S. Lewis wrote about the passionate moral activism of a famous atheist of his day, H.G. Wells. Moments after men like Wells admit that good and evil are illusions, Lewis said, you will find them exhorting us to work for posterity, to educate, to revolutionise, liquidate, live and die for the good of the human race.

But how do unbelievers, naturalists as Lewis calls them, account for such ideas? Certainly, nature is no help. If thoughts of meaning and morality find their origin in arrangements of atoms in our brains, then they can no more be called true, Lewis observed, than can a vomit or a yawn.

Lewis concludes that when Wells and other unbelievers say we ought to make a better world, they have simply forgotten about their atheism. That is their glory, he concludes. Holding a philosophy which excludes humanity, they yet remain human. At the sight of injustice, they throw all their Naturalism to the winds and speak like men and like men of genius. They know far better than they think they know.

Id love to ask the people behind masterpieces like Planet Earth, or the unbelievers profiled in The Guardian, about this contradiction. Years ago, I had a similar conversation with a woman I was seated beside on an airplane. She had very strong moral opinions about all kinds of things, but scoffed at me, How can you believe in God! I gently asked her why she believed in right and wrong. It was a fun conversation, and it made me realize that it is possible to affirm the human gut-level intuition about beauty and wonder and morality, while questioning where all of those things come from.

And if you havent read Lewis masterful book Miracles, add it to the list. If its been a while, its worth revisiting. Fair warning: unbelievers should beware. As Lewis himself said, A young man who wishes to remain a sound atheist cannot be too careful of his reading.

Publication date: February 5, 2021

Photo courtesy: GettyImages/Boonyachoat

BreakPointis a program of the Colson Center for Christian Worldview. BreakPoint commentaries offer incisive content people can't find anywhere else; content that cuts through the fog of relativism and the news cycle with truth and compassion. Founded by Chuck Colson (1931 2012) in 1991 as a daily radio broadcast, BreakPoint provides a Christian perspective on today's news and trends. Today, you can get it in written and a variety of audio formats: on the web, the radio, or your favorite podcast app on the go.

John Stonestreet is President of the Colson Center for Christian Worldview, and radio host of BreakPoint, a daily national radio program providing thought-provoking commentaries on current events and life issues from a biblical worldview. John holds degrees from Trinity Evangelical Divinity School (IL) and Bryan College (TN),and is the co-author of Making Sense of Your World: A Biblical Worldview.

See the original post:
Meaning and Morality Without God: Atheists Know Better Than They Think - Christianheadlines.com

Posted in Atheism | Comments Off on Meaning and Morality Without God: Atheists Know Better Than They Think – Christianheadlines.com

‘Friends’ Star Matthew Perry Dated Julia Roberts By Wooing Her With Quantum Physics and Funny Jokes – Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Posted: at 8:11 am

Matthew Perry played one of the funniest characters on Friends. He excelled at deadpan, self-deprecating humor that truly made Chandler Bing a delight. And as it turns out, that sense of silliness extended to his life beyond the set.

Perry was relatively unknown in Hollywood before getting cast in the iconic NBC sitcom. Playing Chandler helped catapult the actor to fame, and the role even led to a few high profile romances with fellow Hollywood stars.

The Friends alum even hooked up with A-lister Julia Roberts, and it was all thanks to funny jokes and a bit of quantum physics.

Before his role of Chandler made Perry a superstar, the actor struggled with feelings of awkwardness in his dating life.

During the early stages of Friends he told show creators that while he was not an unattractive man, he did feel just awful with women, InTouch reported.

I also am not comfortable with any silence at all, Perry said during a 2004 Dateline interview. I have to break any awkward moment or silence with a joke.

Eventually, Perrys jovial nature attracted multiple romantic partners. Goofing around even led to a long term relationship with Roberts.

RELATED: Friends: This 1 Famous Co-Star Was Super Nervous to Appear on the Series I Remember Losing Sleep

By 1996, Friends was one of the hottest comedies on television. NBC execs decided to capitalize on that popularity by airing a special 2-part episode immediately following the Super Bowl game that year. And they knew they needed some special celebrity guest stars to make it even more enticing.

Getting Julia Roberts was incredibly exciting. We knew she would have the right touch for it. And when she said yes, it was pretty awesome, series co-creator Marta Kauffman told The Hollywood Reporter.

Producer Kevin S. Bright followed up with a funny story about how that happened. Do you know the story of how we got her? Matthew (Perry) asked her to be on the show, Bright recalled.

She wrote back to him, Write me a paper on quantum physics and Ill do it. My understanding is that Matthew went away and wrote a paper and faxed it to her the next day.

Roberts played Perrys love interest in the Friends episode titled The One After the Super Bowl. And their playful banter didnt end there. After filming wrapped, the two actors stayed in touch and eventually began a romantic relationship.

There was a lot of flirting over faxing, writer Alexa Junge told THR. She was giving him these questionnaires like, Why should I go out with you? And everyone in the writers room helped him explain to her why. He could do pretty well without us, but there was no question we were on Team Matthew and trying to make it happen for him.

Perry and Roberts dated for about one year, doing their best to keep the relationship hidden from nosy tabloid reporters. And it was all thanks to Perrys sense of humor channeled through Chandler.

Originally posted here:

'Friends' Star Matthew Perry Dated Julia Roberts By Wooing Her With Quantum Physics and Funny Jokes - Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Posted in Quantum Physics | Comments Off on ‘Friends’ Star Matthew Perry Dated Julia Roberts By Wooing Her With Quantum Physics and Funny Jokes – Showbiz Cheat Sheet

A world-first method to enable quantum optical circuits that use photons – Tech Explorist

Posted: at 8:11 am

Till 2025, the collective sum of the worlds data will grow from 33 zettabytes this year to a 175ZB by 2025. The security and privacy of such sensitive data remain a big concern.

Emerging quantum communication and the latest computation technologies offer a promising solution. However, it requires powerful quantum optical circuits that can securely process the massive amounts of information we generate every day.

To help enable this technology, scientists in USCs Mork Family Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science have made a breakthrough in quantum photonics.

A quantum optical circuit uses light sources to generate photons on-demand in real-time. The photons act as information-carrying bits (qubits).

These light sources are nano-sized semiconductor quantum dotstiny manufactured collections of tens of thousands to a million atoms packed within a volume of linear size less than a thousandth of the thickness of typical human hair buried in a matrix of another suitable semiconductor.

They have so far been demonstrated to be the most flexible on-demand single-photon generators. The optical circuit requires these single-photon sources to be masterminded on a semiconductor chip. Photons with an almost identical wavelength from the sources should then be delivered a guided way. This permits them to be controlled to shape collaborations with different photons and particles to transmit and process information.

Until now, there has been a significant barrier to the development of such circuits. The dots have different sizes, and shapes mean that the photons they release do not have uniform wavelengths. This and the lack of positional order make them unsuitable for use in the development of optical circuits.

In this study, scientists showed that single photons could be emitted uniformly from quantum dots arranged precisely. Scientists used the method of aligning quantum dots to create single-quantum dot, with their remarkable single-photon emission characteristics.

It is expected that the ability to align uniformly-emitting quantum dots precisely will enable the production of optical circuits, potentially leading to novel advancements in quantum computing and communications technologies.

Jiefei Zhang, currently a research assistant professor in the Mork Family Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, said,The breakthrough paves the way to the next steps required to move from lab demonstration of single-photon physics to chip-scale fabrication of quantum photonic circuits. This has potential applications in quantum (secure) communication, imaging, sensing, and quantum simulations and computation.

The corresponding author Anupam Madhukar said,it is essential that quantum dots be ordered in a precise way so that photons released from any two or more dots can be manipulated to connect on the chip. This will form the basis of building unit for quantum optical circuits.

If the source where the photons come from is randomly located, this cant be made to happen.

The current technology that allows us to communicate online, for instance using a technological platform such as Zoom, is based on the silicon integrated electronic chip. If the transistors on that chip are not placed in exact designed locations, there would be no integrated electrical circuit. It is the same requirement for photon sources such as quantum dots to create quantum optical circuits.

Evan Runnerstrom, program manager, Army Research Office, an element of the U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Commands Army Research Laboratory, said,This advance is an important example of how fundamental solving materials science challenges, like how to create quantum dots with precise position and composition, can have big downstream implications for technologies like quantum computing. This shows how AROs targeted investments in basic research support the Armys enduring modernization efforts in areas like networking.

Using a method called SESRE (substrate-encoded size-reducing epitaxy), scientists created a precise layout of quantum dots for the circuits. They then fabricated regular arrays of nanometer-sized mesas with a defined edge orientation, shape, and depth on a flat semiconductor substrate composed of gallium arsenide (GaAs). Quantum dots are then created on top of the mesas by adding appropriate atoms using the following technique.

Zhang said,This work also sets a new world-record of ordered and scalable quantum dots in terms of the simultaneous purity of single-photon emission greater than 99.5%, and in terms of the uniformity of the wavelength of the emitted photons, which can be as narrow as 1.8nm, which is a factor of 20 to 40 better than typical quantum dots.

That with this uniformity, it becomes feasible to apply established methods such as local heating or electric fields to fine-tune the photon wavelengths of the quantum dots to exactly match each other, which is necessary for creating the required interconnections between different quantum dots for circuits.

We now have an approach and a material platform to provide scalably and ordered sources generating potentially indistinguishable single-photons for quantum information applications. The approach is general and can be used for other suitable material combinations to create quantum dots emitting over a wide range of wavelengths preferred for different applications, for example, fiber-based optical communication or the mid-infrared regime, suited for environmental monitoring and medical diagnostics.

View original post here:

A world-first method to enable quantum optical circuits that use photons - Tech Explorist

Posted in Quantum Physics | Comments Off on A world-first method to enable quantum optical circuits that use photons – Tech Explorist

A Humanist Leader Is Stepping Down and Hoping a Person of Color Will Replace Him – Friendly Atheist – Patheos

Posted: at 8:11 am

There are always changes of leadership in the non-profit world. Weve seen quite a bit of it in the insular world of organized atheism. But this one hits me personally.

Roy Speckhardt, the executive director of the American Humanist Association, is stepping down from his position after 15 years at the helm (and 20 years with the organization). Ive known him ever since I became involved in this (loose) community nearly two decades ago, and hes been a consistent voice of reason in a community that often claims that word but doesnt always deserve it.

It would be hard to describe all the ways hes shaped how people see Secular Americans in a more inclusive, positive light but I would just point out that he helped steer the formation of the Secular Coalition for America (a lobbying group in D.C.), oversaw a legal team that argued in front of the Supreme Court, and helped convince Rep. Jared Huffman to go public with his humanism.

I suspect there are very few long-term activists in our community who havent worked with him, directly or indirectly, at some point. Were all better off because of that.

So why step down now?

While there are always multiple factors in a decision like this, one reason stands out.

Speckhardt acknowledges that the atheist world remains a predominantly white cis male one thats certainly still the stereotype and one way to change that is making sure women, LGBTQ individuals, and people of color are in positions of power. Speckhardt has routinely elevated those voices within the AHA, but ultimately, hes always been the guy at the top of the pyramid. Hes the one who gets quoted in the media, for example, by virtue of his position.

So as he leaves his post, hes urging the AHA board to give strong consideration to replacements who arent like him, especially people of color since weve rarely seen them running atheist groups of this size. In a statement sent to me, he explained:

Being at the helm of such an organization as the AHA, whose mission is so critical to our times and whose influence far outstrips its size, was the greatest honor of my life, but Ive decided its time for me to step down and make room for new leadership. It is my emphatic hope that my seat is filled with a Black or Brown humanist because our movement has gone too long without such diversity at the helm and this would open the door for the AHA to truly achieve its potential as a humanist and anti-racist institution.

Obviously, the position is open to everyone who wants to apply. (The job is already listed on LinkedIn.) But its no small thing when the leader of one of the largest atheist groups in the country gives his board clear direction on how he believes they should move forward.

The current President of the AHA Board of Directors, Sunil Panikkath, said that Speckhardt will stay in his position until a new leader is selected.

Speckhardt hasnt announced his future plans just yet, though his next book, Justice Centered Humanism, will come out in April.

(Screenshot via YouTube)

Read this article:
A Humanist Leader Is Stepping Down and Hoping a Person of Color Will Replace Him - Friendly Atheist - Patheos

Posted in Atheism | Comments Off on A Humanist Leader Is Stepping Down and Hoping a Person of Color Will Replace Him – Friendly Atheist – Patheos

Federalism | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

Posted: at 8:10 am

Overview

Federalism is a system of government in which the same territory is controlled by two levels of government. Generally, an overarching national government is responsible for broader governance of larger territorial areas, while the smaller subdivisions, states, and citiesgovern the issues of local concern.

Both the national government and the smaller political subdivisions have the power to make laws and both have a certain level of autonomy from each other.

In the United States, the Constitution has established a system of dual sovereignty, under which the States have surrendered many of their powers to the Federal Government, but also retained somesovereignty.Examples of this dual sovereignty are described in the U.S. Constitution.

Article VI of the U.S. Constitution contains the Supremacy Clause, which reads,"This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding." This effectively means that when the laws of the federal government are in conflict with the laws of a state's government, the federal law will supersede the state law.

Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution describes specific powers which belong to the federal government. These powers are referred to as enumerated powers.

The Tenth Amendmentreserves powers to the states, as long as those powers are not delegated to the federal government. Among other powers, this includes creating school systems, overseeing state courts, creating public safety systems, managing business and trade within the state, and managing local government. These powers are referred to as reserved powers.

Concurrent powers refers to powers which are shared by both the federal government and state governments. This includes the power to tax, build roads, and create lower courts.

For more on federalism, see this Florida State University Law Review article, this Vanderbilt Law Review article, and thisStanford Law Review article.

Continue reading here:

Federalism | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

Posted in Federalism | Comments Off on Federalism | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

Federalism | Constitution USA | PBS

Posted: at 8:10 am

Federalism is one of the most important and innovative concepts in the U.S. Constitution, although the word never appears there. Federalism is the sharing of power between national and state governments. In America, the states existed first, and they struggled to create a national government. The U.S. Constitution is hardwired with the tensions of that struggle, and Americans still debate the proper role of the national government versus the states. Chief Justice John Marshall, the longest-serving leader of the Supreme Court, noted that this question is perpetually arising, and will probably continue to arise, as long as our system shall exist.

E Pluribus Unum: out of many states, one nation. In 1776, the newly independent states acted like 13 quarreling brothers and sisters. These united states had vast differences in history, geography, population, economy, and politics. Each state wanted all the powers of sovereign nations: to make treaties, receive ambassadors, coin money, regulate commerce. But they had to give up some of those powers in order to survive on the world stage. To that end, they agreed to the Articles of Confederation, the first constitution of the United States. It created a firm league of friendship among the states, along with a legislature of very limited powers. Congress was very weak: it could wage war and negotiate peace, but not raise taxes to pay for either. Each state had one vote in Congress, and any changes to the Articles required unanimous consent.

After the war ended in 1783, strains in the union reemerged, and the country was in danger of falling apart. The states could not agree on how to pay Revolutionary War soldiers, and many veterans returned home to farms saddled with debt and taxes. In 1786-87, as part of an uprising known as Shays' Rebellion, farmers in western Massachusetts closed the courts to prevent foreclosure on their farms. Also, the states themselves were not inclined to obey the peace treaty they had just signed with Great Britain. As George Washington noted in 1786: If you tell the Legislatures they have violated the treaty of peace and invaded the prerogatives of the confederacy they will laugh in your face. He added: What a triumph for the advocates of despotism to find that we are incapable of governing ourselves.

Faced with the very real problems of a weak central government, Congress issued a resolution in February 1787 calling for a convention to amend the Articles of Confederation. But at the Philadelphia convention, which opened on May 25, 1787, delegates quickly began to consider an entirely new form of government, federalism, which shared power between the states and a more robust central government with truly national powers.

After four months, the delegates drastically changed the relationship among the states and created a new national government, abandoning the Articles of Confederation. This new government had executive and judicial powers, along with expanded legislative authority. Unlike the Confederation, states in the new legislature would not be represented equally. Instead, big states with large populations exercised more power in Congress. Slaveholding states were allowed to count three-fifths of their enslaved population for representation and taxation purposes. To count slaves fully would only have increased the political power of slave states.

On September 17, 1787, the delegates approved and signed an entirely new Constitution for the United States of America. Once approved by the people, the Constitution's federal system would create a unique solution to sharing power among the states and the national government. Even George Washington admitted that the Constitution was not perfect, but rather--in the words of its Preamble--the next step in a more perfect union.

Federalism content written by Linda R.Monk, Constitutional scholar

Read the original here:

Federalism | Constitution USA | PBS

Posted in Federalism | Comments Off on Federalism | Constitution USA | PBS