Daily Archives: July 5, 2020

Advising Clients Interested in FIRE – TheStreet

Posted: July 5, 2020 at 10:04 am

Part of the job of a financial adviser is focused on helping clients achieve financial independence and to accumulate a sufficient amount of resources to fund the retirement lifestyle they desire. Arising out of the 2008 financial crisis, the FIRE movement - which stands for financial independence, retire early, has caught the attention of many, from Gen Xers to millennials.

Here are some thoughts on how to advise clients who might be embracing the goals of the FIRE movement.

The FIRE movement embraces the goals of achieving financial independence at a relatively early age and then retiring early. Both the FI and RE parts mean different things to those trying to achieve FIRE as the saying goes.

The premise of FIRE is that by slashing expenses and saving and investing a very high percentage of their income, these folks can achieve financial independence and be able to retire at a much younger age. This might be as much as 70% of more of their annual income that goes toward saving for retirement. FIRE disciples hope to accumulate enough to retire early and live off of their nest egg. How early is early? Ive read about some folks pulling the plug in their 30s and 40s, and in some cases in their 20s.

As with any client, you need to help them define what financial independence means for their situation and what early retirement means. Often, early retirement doesnt mean a total cessation of work for FIRE disciples, but rather it means retiring from the 9-to-5 daily work grind. There are many FIRE folks who earn money writing about their experiences on blogs, discussing them on podcasts, providing coaching to others looking to achieve financial independence and selling courses on the topic. Others may use their exit from being an employee to pursue self-employment of other types in areas of interest to them. Others do truly retire in the traditional sense as well.

Regardless of your clients goals, it's important to work with them to define the amount needed, when it is needed and how it will be invested both before and after their retirement -- whatever that looks like.

A concern for those retiring at a more traditional age, in their 60s, is whether or not they will outlive their money. Given current life expectancies, the financial aspects 20 or 30 years of retirement funding takes planning. A retirement that might last 40 or 50 years (or even longer) takes a ton of planning.

Its important to ensure that clients looking to go the FIRE route, in whatever format they choose in terms of total or partial early retirement, understand the stress that the normal ebbs and flows of the financial markets over a long time horizon will put on their retirement savings. Asset allocation for these clients will need to focus on growth potential within their level of risk tolerance.

In advising clients looking for an exit from the corporate world at an early age as part of their FIRE goals, there are some issues that these clients need to consider. Some of these include:

Health insurance is always a consideration for anyone leaving the conventional workforce prior to Medicare eligibility. If the client is a married couple and only one spouse is going this route, they could use the other spouses employer healthcare plan if that spouse will remain employed. Otherwise it's important that the client consider what they will do to cover this necessity, a serious illness without adequate insurance can be financially devastating.

For clients who have been using tax-deferred retirement plans such as a 401(k) to accumulate funds for their early retirement, they will need to have a plan to tap these accounts early if needed. Money in a traditional 401(k) or IRA will be subject to both taxes and potentially a 10% penalty if tapped prior to age 59. Roth accounts do allow the withdrawal of contributions if certain conditions such as the five-year rule are adhered to.

Overall, the issue of where the money will come from to support their needs once they leave their job is a huge planning issue that you can help these clients with. Which accounts should they tap first? If they are going to be doing something that generates income, will this income be enough to meet their needs?

The FIRE movement is exciting and appealing for many people these days. Like anything else in the financial planning realm, successfully achieving a very early retirement takes planning. For any clients looking to go this route, your expertise and perspective can be crucial to their success.

More:

Advising Clients Interested in FIRE - TheStreet

Posted in Financial Independence | Comments Off on Advising Clients Interested in FIRE – TheStreet

Early Retirees Were Supposed to Be Able to Depend on Rental Income. What They Should Do Now. – Barron’s

Posted: at 10:03 am

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Text size

Using rental properties to generate passive income has been a popular strategy in the financial independence, retire early movement. The coronavirus pandemic is threatening it.

Many property owners have seen their rental streams dry up or slow as unemployment has surged and businesses have closed, leaving landlords with tenants unable to pay, either in part or in full. While more households paid their rent in May as unemployment benefits and stimulus payments kicked in, the level of delinquencies is still elevated and landlords are having to adjust to the disrupted income streams.

Even so, Brent Sutherland, a certified financial planner and founder at Ntellivest, believes its still a good time to be invested in rental properties. Sutherland is an adherent to financial independence and owns rental properties himself, so he offers these tips for managing real-estate investments during this economic downturn.

Be honest with your tenantsand your lenders. Whether dealing with tenants who cant pay, or your mortgage broker, Sutherland recommends opening up lines of communication early.

If you havent already, reach out to tenants and ask them if financial hardship will prevent them from paying their rent. If yes, consider working with them to create a payment plan for when they do go back to work, or offer rent forgiveness for a period of time, contingent on the tenant signing a lease extension. Vacancy is a top concern for rental property owners, Sutherland says, so confidence in having tenants in the future may be worth low cash flow now.

If reduced rental income has made mortgage payments difficult or impossible to make, talk to your lender as soon as you can. All federally backed mortgages are eligible for forbearance during the crisis. Lenders may be willing to offer forbearance or loan modification for loans that arent federally backed, as well, given the magnitude of the economic crisis.

Dont panic, but reassess. Downturns are a natural part of the economic cycle and can be a good opportunity for investors to reassess their assets. If an investor cant sleep at night knowing whats happening with their investments, its likely they were in the wrong asset mix to begin with, Sutherland says.

Newsletter Sign-up

Barrons brings retirement planning and advice to you in a weekly wrap-up of our articles about preparing for life after work.

He urges investors to avoid a fire sale of their properties if they can help it. However, once market volatility has stabilized you can give your investment strategy and risk tolerance an honest evaluation. At that point, he says, if you realize you no longer want to take on the risks of rental property ownership, you can pursue the sale of your properties in favor of other investments.

Sutherland believes rents will rise again as the market starts to recover and social-distancing measures allow people to start working again. In the meantime, the advisor says people may need to find ways to replace lost rental income, including taking up a freelance side gig or selling less volatile securities, such as bonds, in order to have more cash on hand.

Make the most of current conditions. One positive aspect of the current downturn is that interest rates are at historic lows, making borrowing cheaper than ever before.

For those whove already built up equity in a property, taking out a home equity line of credit, or Heloc, could help cover living expenses for a while, if necessary. That Heloc could also be used to make improvements to a rental property thats sitting vacantsprucing it up to add to its rental or resale value in the future.

For those looking to increase their holdings, desirable properties may be newly within reach for those with the extra cash to buy them. Not only are interest rates low right now, home prices in some areas could also fall. That combination can be a boon for a savvy investor, Sutherland says. I rather welcome downturns. This is where better investments can be had.

Write to us at retirement@barrons.com

See the original post:

Early Retirees Were Supposed to Be Able to Depend on Rental Income. What They Should Do Now. - Barron's

Posted in Financial Independence | Comments Off on Early Retirees Were Supposed to Be Able to Depend on Rental Income. What They Should Do Now. – Barron’s

How Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Are Spending Their First Fourth of July in America – MarieClaire.com

Posted: at 10:03 am

Samir HusseinGetty Images

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have a whole new set of holidays to celebrate now that they're living in the United States and that, obviously, includes, the Fourth of July. Thanks to the coronavirus pandemic, however, most traditional Fourth of July activities, like barbecues and big, community fireworks displays, are off the table.

So how are the Sussexes planning to celebrate their first Independence Day together in America? Royal expert Katie Nicholl says the couple will be keeping things low-key and enjoying some family time with their one-year-old son, Archie Harrison.

"I think he is just about walking," Nicholl told ET Online of Archie. "He's a very happy little boy, he's loving life in L.A. and they are still staying at Tyler Perry's house. I'm told they haven't found their forever home yet, they're still looking. They really do love that family time and they've had a lot of that recently. They both feel very grateful for that time they've had at home with Archie, watching him achieve all of those milestones."

Even though Harry and Meghan are loving the quality time they've been spending with Archie, Nicholl says they're getting antsy to get back to workespecially now that they're working toward financial independence following their step back from royal work.

"They do need to make money," Nicholl explained. "They've been in L.A. since March, they left the royal family at the end of March, and as yet, they haven't actually earned anything."

For more stories like this, including celebrity news, beauty and fashion advice, savvy political commentary, and fascinating features, sign up for the Marie Claire newsletter.

subscribe here

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io

This commenting section is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page. You may be able to find more information on their web site.

Read more here:

How Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Are Spending Their First Fourth of July in America - MarieClaire.com

Posted in Financial Independence | Comments Off on How Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Are Spending Their First Fourth of July in America – MarieClaire.com

FTSE 100 crash! Here’s why I’d buy cheap shares in July to get wealthy in retirement – Yahoo Finance UK

Posted: at 10:03 am

Were halfway through the year and what a six-month period it has been for most FTSE 100 investors. The pandemic has had a significant impact on equity markets. Following the initial rapid falls in broader indexes in February and March, many shares have since come back to recover some of their losses.

I believe the current volatility is likely to be a near-term headwind. Most economies, as well as FTSE 100 shares, will improve in due course, possibly sooner than later. In the past, stock markets worldwide and in the UK have created massive wealth for long-term investors. They are likely to do so in the future, too. Lets take a closer look.

Market crashes, in general, provide an opportunity to buy FTSE 100 stocks at cheaper valuations. Therefore, investors with a long-term horizon should do their due diligence to identify stocks with strong fundamentals, growth potential in their respective markets, and robust cash flows.

For example, let us assume you had invested 1,000, 10 years ago, in July 2010, in several FTSE 100 shares. Below, Id like to show you how much your investment would be worth now, based on a buy-and-hold strategy and share price appreciation:

Put another way, a modest investment in a range of companies would have meant a sizeable capital appreciation. And these numbers hold despite the market drop since early 2020

If history were to repeat itself, we could expect many FTSE 100 shares to make new highs within the decade. And if there is another market crash in the rest of the year, or at a later date, seasoned investors realise that it means the opportunity to buy solid companies at a discount. And that would mean the road to greater wealth in later life.

Warren Buffett is one of the worlds most renowned investors. One of his famous quotes is, Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful. In other words, those investors who buy shares when others are selling en masse are likely to do well in the markets.

I expect the stocks whose names and metrics I have listed above to do well in the coming years, too. Therefore Id look to buy the dips.

We mostly invest for future goals, such as saving for a deposit on a home, for retirement, or simply gaining financial independence. As part of your investment aims, are you looking for defensive names that are likely to provide stable returns coupled with dividends?

Then there are several other FTSE 100 stocks Id consider buying as well. I believe theyd help ready my portfolio for whatever comes next.I regard AstraZeneca, BAE Systems,British American Tobacco,GlaxoSmithKline, National Grid, Pennon Group,Unilever,andVodafoneas solid picks for a long-term personal portfolio.

Finally, investors who dont have the time or expertise to keep track of individual stocks can invest in FTSE 100 trackers or liquid exchange-traded funds. For example, theiShares UK Dividend UCITS ETF is a basket of the 50 highest-yielding stocks from the FTSE 350 Index. Such a dividend-oriented ETF could be appropriate for most portfolios.Another ETF to consider could be the FTSE All-World ETF, tracking the performance of a large number of stocks worldwide.

The post FTSE 100 crash! Heres why Id buy cheap shares in July to get wealthy in retirement appeared first on The Motley Fool UK.

More reading

tezcang has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK owns shares of and has recommended GlaxoSmithKline and Unilever. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Halma, Hikma Pharmaceuticals, and Pennon Group. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

Motley Fool UK 2020

Link:

FTSE 100 crash! Here's why I'd buy cheap shares in July to get wealthy in retirement - Yahoo Finance UK

Posted in Financial Independence | Comments Off on FTSE 100 crash! Here’s why I’d buy cheap shares in July to get wealthy in retirement – Yahoo Finance UK

The Hope and Struggles of Bhutan’s Women Vegetable Vendors – The Diplomat

Posted: at 10:03 am

Advertisement

Located just below the main town in Thimphu, on the bank of Wang Chhu, Centenary Farmers Market bills itself as the biggest vegetable market in Bhutan. Outside the market, especially on weekends, taxis and private cars congest the roads, struggling to find a parking space. The two-story market is divided into two sections: the ground floor sells vegetables imported from India, while the first floor displays local organic produce. The market is just 12 years old. It was inaugurated in 2008 by Princess Ashi Dechen Yangzom Wangchuck to celebrate the monarchs centenary reign. The market site, within its small life time, has witnessed a gradual change from the previous several seasons, and so also for the vendors there. In this short essay, we offer a peek into the lives of women vendors at the Centenary Farmers Market.

According to the International Labor Organization (ILO), at least 2 billion people, constituting about 61.2 percent of the worlds working population, are absorbed in informal sector employment today. These workers, who enter the informal economy owing to the lack of economic opportunities and other means of livelihood in the formal economy, mostly reside in developing countries. While there are competing claims with regard to the role of informal sector employment in helping to reduce poverty and inequality in the global economy, it cannot be denied that the sector continues to be a refuge for many.

The informal sector covers a wide array of unorganized economic activities in commerce, agriculture, construction, manufacturing, transportation, and services. In Bhutan, according to the Labor Force Survey Report 2018, 73.6 percent of the labor force is currently engaged in the informal sector, mainly comprising individuals with low education, rural area migrants, and poor households. Further, within the sector, almost three-quarters are involved in agriculture-related employment.

While on one hand, the informal sector provides jobs and reduces unemployment, in many cases the jobs are low-paid and guarantee little or no security.

In Bhutans capital, Thimphu, farmers from different parts of the country come to Centenary Farmers Market to sell their produce. The market houses about 400 stalls, providing self-employment to both the farmers and vendors alike. Numbers indicate that these sellers are largely women. But why have so many women conglomerated in the market?

Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.

There are two recurring reasons to account for this, which these women themselves cite. First, women are traditionally expected to perform care-work, provide food to the family, do household work, and other feminine tasks. And this spills over to the kind of work they do. I think Bhutanese always have had this culture of females doing these kinds of work, Tshering said. Regular office works entail fixed (and often long) work hours, and other rigid obligations, and the women who enter the market overcome a lot of barriers and have many obligations. The informal sector gives them a flexible work schedule: both a time to perform their traditional gendered activities, and also a time to earn some money in the hours they can afford to spare.

Second, barriers in education also lead women to this option. While their male friends and siblings go to school, girls were expected to remain home and take care of younger siblings or the elderly. This inequality in access to education continues to date. In 2018, the adult (15 years and older) literacy rate in Bhutan for men was 75 percent, while for women it was 57 percent. This leads to more women being disqualified from formal sector employment, both in the public and private sectors.

Entry into the market has, however, empowered many women, at least to a certain extent. These women have made the best use of the opportunities the Centenary Farmers Market has in store for them.

A study conducted by the National Centre for Women and Children showed that violence against women is not uncommon in Bhutan. The report shows that one in every three ever-partnered women experienced an incidence of violence at least once in their lifetime, and more than 50 percent of those women (meaning one in every two) experienced violence twice or more. One of the three main causes of this intimate partner violence was financial stress in the family. To address the issue, the report recommends financial independence for women.

While a lot of research advocates for full financial independence for women to be empowered, these women have a different insight to offer. My husband consults me about our childrens education; he has to I also contribute, Pema said. We also discuss our saving strategies, and our monthly spending, she added. Merely being a part of the financial decision-making process of and in the family had empowered women, and lowered the chances of being victims of violence.

Many of the women in the market are prime breadwinners in their families, and some supplement their male counterparts incomes. Irrespective of their contributions, these women report displaying a great deal of autonomy in their marriage after becoming vendors and starting to earn money. They also started to schedule their own work time, and could decide what to do on their days off.

This said, not much has changed, however, in terms of sharing their household work. While a few of them report greater gender equality at home, many talk about the pile up of household chores on their day off. I have to wake up very early in the morning, sometimes as early as 3:00 AM when I have a lot of vegetables to carry to the market, Lhamo said. and every day, before I leave for work, I have to prepare breakfast and pack lunch for my kids and husband. Even so, these women articulate a greater feeling of satisfaction and confidence, stemming from the contribution they make to their familys finances.

Get first-read access to major articles yet to be released, as well as links to thought-provoking commentaries and in-depth articles from our Asia-Pacific correspondents.

The testimonies of the women are now laced with strain. While selling vegetables does give them some financial income, for many women, it is not very substantial. Our survey revealed that the average income for each vendor is just about 44,000 Bhutanese ngultrum ($590) a year. This translates into a low lower-middle class income (Bhutans median income, according to the National Statistics Bureau, is about Nu. 200,000 a year).

For the past few years, their average income has been dwindling, as our survey also revealed. The women vendors reported a drop in their real income. They fear it might drop even further with the regular pay hikes in the government sector, and the increase in competition in their market. But on any given day, they have very few options to choose from. Many of them feel selling vegetables was the only job they could do. There are too many vegetable vendors in the market, and that makes profit making difficult. But as an uneducated person what other option do I have? We have to rely on this type of work to earn our living, Pema sighed.

A common grievance among women vendors was the increase in the number of vegetable vendors in the market and adjacent areas, and consequently the reduction in profits over the last few years. More than any other policy suggestion even more than improved sanitation, accessibility, and storage they want the governments intervention in keeping the number of vendors as it is, or even reducing it. Many of them feel licensing vegetable vending would help solve their problem.

Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.

Interestingly however, some of the women reasoned that there were problems with that approach as well: Even if vegetable vendors needed to get a license to sell at the Farmers Market, many who cannot obtain a license would simply skirt the issue by selling their vegetables somewhere else. The state then, in an effort to help the vendors in the Farmers Market, will also have to inconvenience sellers of the secondary informal sector.

The city of Thimphu had already witnessed a similar attempt at this. When the Thimphu Thromde (a second-level administrative division in Bhutan) banned vegetable vending in Norzin Lam (one of the streets in Thimphu), rather than complying with the direction, these secondary informal sector vendors and their supporters retaliated, calling the Thromde antiGNH (Gross National Happiness). This outcry was apparently quite loud on social media. These vendors comprised of individuals who could not get a permanent selling location in the Centenary Farmers Market, and as a result resorted to selling their produce in the streets.

Increasing the stakes is the steady increase in competition coming from department stores, shopping marts, and/or e-commerce, with doorstep delivery now in fashion. On every intersection and streets in the city, big shops are now selling vegetables; and customers who otherwise come to us find it more convenient to buy their vegetables from there, Tenzin said. These shops have made life very convenient for customers who need to do grocery shopping quickly and in lesser amounts, she added. Many of these shops have staff on payroll, pay regular taxes, and keep established lines of supply and distribution. The costs of having these components is offset by the volume of trade and profit margins from other products the shops carry. They very easily outperform the informal sector in pricing their products.

Now with the COVID-19 crisis, and the accompanying changes in market scenes, what changed for these women?

Bhutan is among the few countries that has handled the COVID-19 situation with sufficient care. To date, there have been only 77 cases (mostly from students and returnees), of which 62 have recovered, and zero deaths. Yet, businesses did not go unaffected, and especially informal businesses.

Corona has affected all of us, and to me as a vegetable vendor, Sonam said. Bhutan cannot produce vegetables on large scale, and we import a lot of vegetables from India via Phuntsholing. But the government has imposed restrictions on importing certain vegetables; with the limited local [Bhutanese] suppliers, it has become increasingly challenging for us to maintain stock.

Already under strain, faced with competition coming from both within and outside the sector, the COVID-19 crisis has aggravated these womens situation. Many of their earnings are halved, and their work time has been reduced (although this was set to change starting July 1). The public panic and stay at home campaign has decreased the number of customers they get on a normal day.

Despite their plight, for these women, their hopes are relentless. Even if I earn less, Tshering maintained, I will continue doing this.

Roderick Wijunamai teaches in the Department of Social Sciences, at Royal Thimphu College. Kinley Yangchen is a student of Political Science and Sociology at Royal Thimphu College.

The rest is here:

The Hope and Struggles of Bhutan's Women Vegetable Vendors - The Diplomat

Posted in Financial Independence | Comments Off on The Hope and Struggles of Bhutan’s Women Vegetable Vendors – The Diplomat

To Drive Financial Inclusion, Businesses and Nonprofits Must Come Together, Says This Executive – Triple Pundit

Posted: at 10:03 am

For Theresa Bedeau, senior manager for community development banking at Capital One, the racial wealth gap is not some distant concept its personal.

I grew up in New York City, in the Bronx, and I understood the impact of lack of financial inclusion in my own community, she says. My neighbors lack of economic mobility was not due to any individual shortcomings, but the reality in which we had to navigate our world, which had unequal access to opportunity. Her firsthand knowledge of how financial barriers can limit peoples prospects has made Bedeau a champion of driving financial inclusion among communities that often go underserved.

Indeed, the racial wealth gap has limited opportunities for people of color in the U.S. for generations and it persists even as other socioeconomic gaps narrow. The wealth gap between black and white families grew from about $100,000 in 1992 to $154,000 in 2016 and research indicates it could grow even wider in the wake of COVID-19.

A May study from the International Monetary Fund examined how past pandemics, such as SARS, H1N1 and Ebola, affected wealth disparities. They found that these pandemics raised income inequality overall and hurt employment prospects for those without advanced degrees. This is consistent with recent findings from the National Bureau of Economic Research: Within the bottom fifth of U.S. income earners, who are more likely to be black or Hispanic, 35 percent lost their jobs during the first two months of the pandemic, compared to 9 percent in the top fifth of earners.

Along with holding communities of color back from opportunity, McKinsey estimates the racial wealth gaps dampening effect on consumption and investment will cost the U.S. economy $1 trillion to $1.5 trillion between 2019 and 2028 or 4 to 6 percent of the projected GDP by the end of this decade.

Those numbers are real, Bedeau says. By acknowledging that, we can see that we have a lot of work left to do. Conversations around racial equity can be hard to have, but theyre necessary.

Businesses, particularly those in the financial services sector, have a clear role to play in delivering financial inclusion and empowering more people economically, but they cant go it alone. To drive maximum impact, companies must not only partner with nonprofit organizations and community groups, but also listen to them and value their guidance as experts in what their neighborhoods need, Bedeau says.

Financial inclusion is so much more than owning a bank account. Its about being active participants in the wider financial community and how people want to manage their financial lives, she explains. Part of the way we build trust between a financial institution like ours and the community is to partner with community groups. We have a shared commitment, working with organizations that support entrepreneurship and business ownership. Financial inclusion also begins with savings and a journey toward financial independence and wealth generation for communities that are generally underserved.

A 2017 survey from the FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.)showed that 20 percent of households are underbanked or underserved, and 40 percent of Americans cant cover a $400 emergency expense. As COVID-19 continues to disrupt lives and livelihoods, these issues are becoming even more pronounced. Nearly half of Americans are worried about the pandemics impact on the economy and their financial lives, and 53 percent of lower-income adults reported having trouble paying some of their bills in April.

A wide variety of people might face barriers to financial empowerment from students uncertain about how they will fit into the modern workforce, to seniors struggling to understand online and mobile banking, to aspiring entrepreneurs looking to bootstrap their businesses.

The focus of Capital Ones nonprofit partnerships is to reach all of these groups. We have strong, deep relationships with community organizations, Bedeau says. What I love is that we work with these organizations in our daily work. Connecting with them helps ensure that our products and tools are meeting the needs of the community and addressing the challenges they face.

Building greater capacity for financial inclusion is essentially about a commitment to economic justice, she continues. Take, for example, Capital Ones work with the Long Island Community Foundation to close the racial wealth gap in the borough, with the potential to add a $24 billion boost to the local economy. The partnership is community-led so that it can be responsive to local needs. That is really reflective of the way we approach our community partnerships, Bedeau says.

Founded in Queens, New York, in 2008, Grameen America builds on the legacy and proven model of Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Muhammad Yunus. His revolutionary but simple idea is that all people can lift themselves out of poverty through their own entrepreneurial spirit.

Grameen America, a longtime Capital One partner, provides microloans starting at no more than $2,000, along with financial training and support, to its members. As part of the program, members open free savings accounts with commercial banks, including Capital One, and make weekly deposits.

The target population is women who live below the federal poverty line, for whom the mainstream financial system is often out of reach. The women Grameen serves previously had few options for accessing capital, and most lacked bank accounts and had little to no credit history.

Grameen Americas programming has expanded to 15 U.S. cities, disbursed $1.42 billion in loans and served 129,000 women. For more than a decade, Capital One has been supporting Grameen Americas microloan programs in New York City, Houston, Miami and New Jersey, along with technology and capacity-building initiatives to help scale and empower more low-income women entrepreneurs. And theres a huge demand for that support, with an $87 billion gap in financing for small businesses.

The women in Grameen Americas program use their microloans to launch a wide range of small businesses everything from selling empanadas out of a shopping cart to a full-fledged restaurant and business storefront, says Alethia Mendez, vice president of operations and program strategy for Grameen America.

A key part of Grameens approach is its peer-to-peer lending model. A cohort of five women, who are known to each other through friends and the community, make lending decisions collectively, forming a trust network, Mendez explains. This helps encourage responsible financial practices and repayment.

The more than 99 percent repayment rate is a testament to the power of the cohort and those individuals who society might not consider credit-worthy, she says. One of the biggest influencers is that they dont want to let each other down. These are women who are friends, trusted individuals from their community, so in a sense they have created a bond of accountability.

For Bedeau, what makes Grameen America so impactful is that they listen to what people on the ground say they need.

Their recipe is quite simple: Meet the women where they are [and] connect them with the right financial products and services, she says. "At the core of what they do is understanding peoples needs and how they want to live their lives. For many of these women, it might be the first time theyve opened a savings account. Working with Grameen America presents a great opportunity for us to build a relationship with these women and support them in their goals to build wealth for themselves, their families and their communities.

There is a huge demand for more solutions like these. The number of women running businesses has doubled over the past two decades. But in the U.S., women are the recipients of only 4 percent of all small business loans, and the lending gap is even wider for women of color, as TriplePundit has previously reported.

Fundamentally, we believe that both the private and public sectors have a responsibility to do more and to be intentional about this type of support, Mendez says. Capital One has been a strong partner and supporter, from a programmatic as well as a philanthropic and funding perspective. These partnerships advance financial inclusion for the women they serve and also build our own capacity as an organization, so we can be strong for the hundreds and thousands of women we work with.

This article series is sponsored by Capital One and produced by the TriplePundit editorial team.

Image credit:Christina @ wocintechchat.com via Unsplash

More here:

To Drive Financial Inclusion, Businesses and Nonprofits Must Come Together, Says This Executive - Triple Pundit

Posted in Financial Independence | Comments Off on To Drive Financial Inclusion, Businesses and Nonprofits Must Come Together, Says This Executive – Triple Pundit

NON-FICTION: WANTING TO BE UNWED – DAWN.com

Posted: at 10:03 am

Lets clarify at the outset that Single by Choice: Happily Unmarried Women! is not as some would immediately assume a book of angry rants spewing venom against men. Instead, this anthology of essays, edited by Kalpana Sharma, is about that bizarre concept unthinkable in our part of the world: freedom of choice as applied by women to their own lives.

Nowhere are women more limited for choice than on the subject of marriage. From a very early age, marriage is pushed as the end goal for almost every girl, as the defining moment when she can start to experiment with, and experience, life. Want to wear make-up (for many of my generation, at least)? Do it after marriage. Want to travel? After marriage, with your husband. Want to live on your own? Heres hoping you can after marriage.

Its not surprising then that, for most of the essayists, remaining single was a choice they made after experiencing a little bit of life. As they dove headfirst into fulfilling careers and enjoyed the financial independence it brought, as they grew more mature and observant, as their parents eased up with what will people say?, the pot simmering with marital possibilities kept getting pushed to yet another backburner, until it eventually fell off the stove altogether.

Sports journalist Sharda Ugra gets it spot on. Having built a comfortable life, with her own apartment and freedom to do whatever she wants, whenever she wants, she asks a very pertinent question of Marriage itself: What is it you offer me in exchange for turning away from this life?

Standard answers pour in: security (not always; married women are routinely threatened with eviction by husbands and in-laws), companionship (husbands do die, even the most loving ones), and children to safeguard against loneliness in old age (until they move away). Social validation is a very important factor: marriage is seen as an achievement, cementing the fact that a woman was pretty enough, desirable enough and valuable enough to be acquired by a man.

A book of essays presents the other side of the story, heart-warming and funny accounts of women evading the pressures of settling down

Fairly weak arguments, really, but alas, so deeply rooted.

As for counterarguments, the first would probably be that women who choose to remain single must have some raging vendetta against men. The actual case is far different. Several writers mention wanting or having had long-term relationships with kind, caring and sincere men, but almost all are aware that once marriage is formalised, the dynamics of a relationship change. This is not hostility towards men, but towards typified gender roles which are strengthened within the institution of marriage.

It is not a question about domesticity either, of mad, career-driven harpies who refuse to cook and clean. These women cherish their homes and speak of the joy they get from cooking and taking care of their houses, their families and their friends. Perhaps it is an aversion to having their domesticity dictated by someone else. They must exchange how they want to live, with how they must live.

For men, it would be similar to being a seth, as opposed to working for a seth. As Laila Tyabji, chairperson of an NGO for womens empowerment, writes in Being Single is Not Being Solitary: life on my own terms seemed increasingly delightful and, gradually, the compromises and adjustments of marriage seemed more and more claustrophobic. She goes on to point out that this does not mean celibacy, adding, My idea of bliss became a lover who lived down the lane.

The second argument would be placing the greater good above individual choice. The pursuit of individual choice is often considered detrimental to the fabric of society and, more often than not, is not expected of women. Journalist and author Freny Manecksha writes in Happily Unmarried Ever After about campaigns in the Parsi community, encouraging marriages and procreation. The goal was to raise the numbers of a dwindling community, and it involved denouncing single Parsi women as selfish for not wanting to become baby-making machines. The women towards whom these campaigns were aimed rightfully laughed in the campaigners faces.

Most of the 13 essays in the book are heart-warming and funny accounts of young women evading the pressures from family of settling down. In Slouching Towards Singledom, magazine editor Aditi Bishnoi sketches a hilarious image of her parents creating a marriage profile for her. Others write of finding one tactic or the other to delay or avoid meetings, keeping at it long enough to limbo-dance their way out from under the marriageable age bar that grows comfortingly closer with each passing year.

But, as human rights activist Asmita Basu writes in Im Not in Transit, the point is not to glorify a single life or denounce all marrieds. Each state has its unique advantages and disadvantages. And so, Single by Choice presents the other side of the story, too, with several essays taking note of the pitfalls of never having been in a conscious coupling.

There is, of course, social ostracisation at a wedding celebration, Manecksha is not allowed to participate in a Parsi fertility ritual of planting a mango sapling. There are workplace issues, where a single woman is not given the same considerations as married women who have husbands and children and so can claim social legitimacy.

Then, most importantly, there is the difficulty of finding a place to live and being allowed to live there in peace. In Single And Free, copy editor Sherna Gandhy writes of single women having to endure suspicious glances from watchmen, neighbours, and of being seen by the censorious as being fast a sentiment echoed by Tyabji as well as doctor and professor Vineeta Bal, whose every visitor to her university campus housing man, woman, young, old is scrutinised, the implication, again, being that the lady of the house has by virtue of being unmarried no virtue to speak of. In Dalit writer Bamas essay Uphill Flows the River, being a single woman in her village is such an anomaly that her neighbours advertise to all and sundry that I live alone, and by doing so, put my safety in jeopardy.

Essentially, what it all boils down to is this: women are tired of being told how to live and some of them are finding the courage to do something about it, by not doing what is expected. They have nothing against marriage, but they dont see it as the right option for them. And thats all they ask, for the freedom to live as they please.

The reviewer is a member of staff

Single by Choice: Happily Unmarried Women!Edited by Kalpana SharmaWomen Unlimited, IndiaISBN: 978-9385606229152pp.

Published in Dawn, Books & Authors, July 5th, 2020

Read the original post:

NON-FICTION: WANTING TO BE UNWED - DAWN.com

Posted in Financial Independence | Comments Off on NON-FICTION: WANTING TO BE UNWED – DAWN.com

Gendered Perspective on Access to Justice in Myanmar’s Refugee Community during COVID-19 | Towards Global Goals 2030 – OneWorld.net

Posted: at 10:03 am

New Delhi: COVID-19 pandemic cannot be viewed solely as a health and economic crisis. Besides inhuman conditions people live in even as they fight the pandemic, there is an upswing in gender-based violence. According to a report by United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) titled Gender-based violence and COVID-19[1], gender-based violence (GBV)increases during every type of emergencybe it economic crisis, conflict or disease outbreaks.

Another report titled, WHO Warns of Surge of Domestic Violence in Europe, a six-month lockdown could see an increase of GBV cases by 31 million worldwide.Dr Hans Kluge, the Regional Director for Europe for the World Health Organization (WHO), the UNFPA has warned that there could be an extra 31 million cases of gender-based violence if lockdowns were to continue for six months, he said.

To cite an instance, the Rohingya community in the Cox Bazaar area of Myanmar live in unplanned, unsanitary refugee camps with little financial and humanitarian aid, let alone medical facilities. But this pandemic has a fiercer impact on the women in the area who not only face the above mentioned threats but are now also silent victims of a deeper structural menace of gender-based inequality and violence.

The formal justice system in Myanmar to protect women in poorer regions such as Rakhine has failed to deliver. The problem lies not only in the administrative backlogs like corruption but also with the capillarity of structural patriarchy that runs through the entire system. Reporting of gender abuse and domestic violence would not only entail shame in the community and probably the risk of losing out on the economic safety net provided by the patriarch in the family. Cultural values and norms which reinstate patriarchal attitude within the communities also stigmatise women who are divorcees. Thus, formal authorities are likely to treat issues of domestic abuse as marital discord rather than actual acts of criminal violence. This has created a norm of reluctance in reporting cases of GBV. Only nine cases of domestic violence and two cases of sexual assault were recorded through a questionnaire given to 1,252 households[2].

While formal mechanisms of justice were always out of reach for women who were impacted by GBV, the informal means of justice through communitarian and self-help groups has been reduced significantly due to COVID-19-induced lockdown. Thus, NGOs and humanitarian workers can do little. Additionally, safe spaces and other non-essential services have been forced to cease operations, amputating any recourse mechanisms for GBV victims.

Further, poverty and lack of financial independence amongst women in the Rohingya community has led to inadequate access to internet and mobiles, especially during the time of a pandemic. This has impacted womens access to information on crucial issues like safety shelters, self-help groups, justice missions and basic knowledge regarding maternal healthcare and sanitation.

Many NGOs and self-help groups like Myanmar Womens Affairs Federation and UNICEF Safe Spaces in Cox Bazaar have started a policy of door-to-door information dispensation and gender-based sensitization.[3] However, this is a less effective measure as in-home activities do not solve the vulnerability of women who continue to struggle within the four walls and share the same restricted space with their oppressor/s.

This issue, therefore, needs to be looked at from a holistic point of view to guarantee women access to increased informal means of justice coupled with self-confidence building measures to battle structural prejudices associated with domestic violence. However, these should also be accompanied with tangible efforts towards economic self-sufficiency by increasing skill training and jobs for women. Labour force participation in Myanmar is disparate at 51.3 percent for women against 79.9 percent for men.[4] In order to reduce reversal of progress made in realising SDG 5 for Gender Equality and SDG 16 for a more equal and inclusive society, the government of Myanmar and UN Womenneed to adopt and adapt to the new normal imposed by the pandemic conditions. Collective sensitization of society and informal conduits of justice needs to be strengthened through a bottom-up approach to challenge deep-rooted patriarchal power structures that are bulwarks against women achieving justice and gender equality.

(Tamanna Dahiya is an intern with OneWorld Foundation India)

References:

[1] Gender-based violence and COVID-19. UNDP, United Nations, https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/womens-empowerment/gender-based violence-and-covid-19.html

[2] Consolidated Summary Report Access to Justice and Informal Justice Systems: UNDP in Myanmar. UNDP, United Nations , http://www.mm.undp.org/content/myanmar/en/home/library/democratic_governance/Consolidated_Summary_Report_Access_to_Justice_and_Informal_Justice_Systems.html.

[3] Preventing a Silent Crisis for Rohingya Women and Girls during COVID-19 Pandemic. UNICEF, http://www.unicef.org/coronavirus/preventing-silent-crisis-rohingya-women-and-girls-during-covid-19-pandemic.

[4] Human Development Reports. | Human Development Reports, hdr.undp.org/en/composite/GII.

Go here to read the rest:

Gendered Perspective on Access to Justice in Myanmar's Refugee Community during COVID-19 | Towards Global Goals 2030 - OneWorld.net

Posted in Financial Independence | Comments Off on Gendered Perspective on Access to Justice in Myanmar’s Refugee Community during COVID-19 | Towards Global Goals 2030 – OneWorld.net

New Zealands other pandemic political correctness – Spiked

Posted: at 10:03 am

Post-BLM, even a popular ice-cream brand name can be deemed a source of racial oppression.

Alongside Covid-19, it seems another debilitating infection has returned to New Zealand: the pandemic of political correctness.

Political correctness is, of course, an opportunistic affliction, something that most on the left carry asymptomatically. The problem for everyone else is that were all potentially exposed to its chronic stupidity.

The new outbreaks latest victim? Ice-cream.

The humble Eskimo Pie, an ice-cream treat beloved of Kiwis for generations, is to be renamed in the wake of the Black Lives Matter movement sweeping the globe. That it wasnt an indigenous circumpolar person killed by a police officer in Minneapolis makes no difference. Its now just not cool to call Inuit people all 183,000 of them Eskimos.

Times change but its still a chilling move, if youll excuse the pun. No one of Inuit descent has complained about the brand name Eskimo Pies, though in 2009 an Inuit visitor from Canada, Seeka Lee Veevee Parsons, did say she was shocked by the sale of Eskimo lollies another Kiwi favourite in New Zealand.

Nevertheless, the maker of Eskimo Pies, Tip Top, has decided to drop the name so as to be part of the solution on racial equality. How changing the name of an ice-cream sold for decades in a country more than 12,000 kilometres from even the closest Inuit native is part of the solution to racial equality remains unclear.

And no word yet on what the ice-creams new name might be, but one presumes it wont be Inuit Pie or Yupik Sandwich. Odds on itll be something as inoffensive as possible perhaps something catchy like frozen, smooth, semi-solid vanilla foam coated in cocoa solids and cocoa butter. Itll likely have to be zero-sugar and low-fat, too.

One person who presumably wont be eating whatever Eskimo Pies become, though, is New Zealand Herald reporter Siena Yates. Yates, an entertainment reporter, wrote an op-ed explaining why shes decided to have weight-loss surgery.

Were all fatphobic apparently. And, as it turns out, racist and a bit sexist. Thats why Yates, a person of colour, is overweight and now in need of surgical intervention. Fatphobia is all related to anti-blackness, says Yates, quoting US academic and author Sabrina Strings who, in her book Fearing the Black Body: The Racial Origins of Fat Phobia, said that during times of colonisation and slavery, overfeeding and fatness were evidence of savagery and racial inferiority.

Sure, journalism these days is a tough gig, but its not yet slavery as far as I know. And this diagnosis will likely come as a surprise to the huge numbers of non-slaves also suffering from obesity around the world.

Heres a simple piece of weight-loss advice, Siena: lay off the (Eskimo) pies.

John Mitchell is a writer based in New Zealand.

Picture by: Sarah Cohen-Rose and Chris Cohen, published under a creative-commons licence.

Help spiked prick the Covid consensus

So here we are 14 weeks into Britains three-week lockdown. We hope you are all staying sane out there, and that spiked has been of some assistance in that. We have ramped up our output of late, to provide a challenge to the Covid consensus. But we couldnt have done that without your support. spiked unlike so many things these days is completely free. We rely on our loyal readers to fund our journalism. So if you enjoy our work, please do consider becoming a regular donor. Even 5 per month can be a huge help. You can donate here.Thank you! And stay well.

To enquire about republishing spikeds content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.

Read more from the original source:

New Zealands other pandemic political correctness - Spiked

Posted in Political Correctness | Comments Off on New Zealands other pandemic political correctness – Spiked

Trump’s political NDAs are an abomination to the First Amendment. – Slate

Posted: at 10:03 am

President Donald Trump in the White House press briefing room on Thursday.Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Donald Trump has long revealed himself to be a bully, one who punches down yet screams bloody murder when someone else so much as taps him. Nowhere is this trait more manifest than in his free speech hypocrisy. Throughout his political campaigns and his presidency, Trump has routinely decried the scourge of political correctness, slammed the weakness of snowflakes who cant handle his telling it like it is, and demanded the right to publish factual misstatements without correction on private social media platforms. Yet Trump has wielded the extraordinary powers and privileges of the presidencyusing everything from the presidential bully pulpit to the classification system to his leverage over executive branch personnelto threaten, intimidate, and punish those whose words embarrass or anger him.

Lest the advantages of his office not fully protect him from unwelcome speech, Trump also continues to employ a technique that he has long used in his private life, his business life, and his political life: contracts featuring nondisclosure and nondisparagement clauses, or NDAs. At the moment, Trump is engaged in litigation to stop the publication of a book by his niece, Mary Trump, which reportedly contains damaging revelations about him. Because Mary once signed an NDA, Trump has declared that she is not allowed to write a book. On Wednesday, a New York Supreme Court appellate judge lifted a temporary restraining order on publication of the book. Given the heightened public interest in information about the president and the strong presumption against prior restraints on publications of any kind, the interests at stake are on Mary Trumps side.

Of course, though, Trumps penchant for NDAs goes well beyond his own family. More troubling still is his practice of requiring campaign staffers and White House employees to sign sweeping NDAs that bar them from criticizing Trump, his family members, or any Trump organizations for the rest of the signers lives. A recently filed case, now pending in federal district court in Manhattan, offers a fresh look at Trumps use of NDAs to muzzle former campaign staffers.

In Denson v. Donald J. Trump for President Inc., Jessica Denson, who worked on the 2016 campaign, seeks a judgment declaring that the form NDA that the campaign required its employees, contractors, and volunteers to sign is unenforceable. When Denson filed a previous state-court lawsuit against the campaign raising claims related to her employment, the Trump campaign sought to enforce the NDA against Denson through arbitration, claiming she violated the NDA by filing the lawsuit. Although an arbitrator initially granted damages to the campaign, a New York state appellate court vacated the award on the grounds that public policy prohibits parties from using NDAs to punish individuals for filing lawsuits. The court did not weigh in on the validity of the NDA itself, noting that any challenge to the campaigns NDA would have to be presented to the arbitrator in the first instance. While the campaigns arbitration proceedings were pending, Denson filed a federal lawsuit seeking to have the NDA declared invalid. The federal court agreed with the Trump campaign that Denson had to resolve her claim through arbitration. When Denson sought to initiate her own class arbitration challenging the NDA, however, the campaign asserted that it could itself choose to bypass arbitration, and insisted that the plaintiff file her purported claims in court. In her current lawsuit, filed last month, Denson does just that.

The NDA that Denson challenges is breathtaking in its scope. Its nondisparagement clause prohibits campaign workers, for the rest of their lives, from demean[ing] or disparag[ing] publicly the campaign, Donald Trump, Trump family members, or Trump companies. The nondisclosure clause forever bars campaign workers from revealing confidential information or using such information in any way detrimental to Mr. Trump, his family, or any Trump businesses. Confidential information includes any information with respect to the personal life, political affairs, and/or business affairs of Mr. Trump or any Family Member. On the off chance that the definition leaves some kernel of information unshielded, it extends as well to all information of a private, propriety or confidential nature or that Mr. Trump insists remain private or confidential (emphasis mine).

Denson argues that the NDA is invalid on multiple grounds, including the First Amendments speech and press clauses and New York state contract law. Among Densons contract law arguments is the notion that any benefit from enforcing the contract is outweighed by the public interest in the free exchange of ideas. At the heart of each legal claim are two key insights about free speech in a democratic system. First, the right of the people to criticize and to share information about government officials is essential to democracy and the rule of law. Indeed, the U.S. Supreme Court has extolled our profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials. Second, speech that scrutinizes government officials is as vulnerable as it is valuable. One need not be a hardened cynic to fear that those who wield power will use it to suppress their critics. This commonsense insight is manifest in numerous aspects of First Amendment law, including the presumption against content-based restrictions on speech and the high bar that public figures must surmount to win damages against speakers who defame them.

The Trump campaigns sweeping NDA affronts these foundational principles. This would be so even if Trump had not won the presidency and were merely an influential politician. That he is now the president of the United States makes starker still the NDAs insult to free speech and democratic discourse.

Finally, although the courts may not need to reach Densons First Amendment claim, given the strength of her state law positions, it is important to put to rest the notion that the campaigns NDA is a purely private instrument, and that the First Amendment therefore does not apply. It is true that the campaign organization technically is a private and not a governmental entity. However, the NDAs terms extend well beyond the time of Trumps candidacy and pertains to all information and views about Trump the president as well as Trump the candidate and private citizen. It seeks to stifle any unapproved utterance, from thousands of individuals throughout the course of their lives, about the president of the United States. The First Amendment would mean little if its protections could be circumvented so easily.

Trump has made clear that he values free speech only for himself and his supporters. The Constitution and the laws of New York state are not, thankfully, so selective.

For more of Slates news coverage, subscribe to What Next on Apple Podcasts or listen below.

Readers like you make our work possible. Help us continue to provide the reporting, commentary, and criticism you wont find anywhere else.

Read the rest here:

Trump's political NDAs are an abomination to the First Amendment. - Slate

Posted in Political Correctness | Comments Off on Trump’s political NDAs are an abomination to the First Amendment. – Slate