Daily Archives: November 14, 2019

How to Watch the Donald Trump Impeachment Hearings – WIRED

Posted: November 14, 2019 at 2:42 pm

Once every 20 to 100 years or so, a US president gets impeached. This is the formal federal process wherein Congress investigates claims of wrongdoing against the sitting leader of the free world. Now its Donald Trump in the hot seat. Public hearings begin on Wednesday, November 13.

The trouble began when a whistleblowers complaint revealed a phone call in which President Trump appeared to ask Ukranian president Volodymyr Zelensky for help investigating the son of former vice president Joe Biden, Trumps most prominent political rival. Gobs of messy details have spilled out since then, culminating in the launch of official impeachment proceedings in the House of Representatives.

As with the impeachments of former presidents Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon, this one will be broadcast live across major news networks. But this is also the first impeachment of the smartphone era, which means a couple things: (1) You can watch it from anywhere, and (2) Many, many, eyeballs will be on this thing.

Heres how to follow along:

Good news! You can watch the whole thing right here in this post. Weve embedded a livestream by PBS Newshour below. Just refresh the page starting at 10 am ET on Wednesday and the video player will be right under this sentence.

Of course, well also be active on social platforms. Well have a live Reuters feed on our Facebook page and on Twitter @WIRED. In the meantime, you can catch our national affairs coverage for the latest news.

More Great WIRED Stories

Go here to read the rest:

How to Watch the Donald Trump Impeachment Hearings - WIRED

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on How to Watch the Donald Trump Impeachment Hearings – WIRED

On the Scoreboard: The Home Team, the Visitors and Trump – The New York Times

Posted: at 2:42 pm

Theyre ruining the game, Mr. Trump told a rally crowd in Alabama in 2017, describing the players protests as a total disrespect of our heritage, and urging team owners to fire them.

Even in the White House, professional sports has never been far away. Mr. Trump has outpaced other modern presidents in his recognition of athletes who like him with the Presidential Medal of Freedom. When he bestowed one in September on the former basketball player Jerry West, he reflected on Mr. Wests home state of West Virginia and his own 2016 election victory.

I shouldnt say this, Mr. Trump said, but I won it by 43 points.

On Monday, several players for the Washington Nationals made political statements when they visited the White House to celebrate their World Series win. Kurt Suzuki, the teams catcher, donned a Make America Great Again hat and was embraced by the president, who reacted ecstatically to the public gesture of support. When video surfaced on Twitter of the pitcher Stephen Strasburg appearing to avoid shaking Mr. Trumps hand, the athlete retorted with one of the presidents favorite insults: #FakeNews. Several other players skipped the visit, but only one, Sean Doolittle, publicly attributed his decision to his antipathy for the president.

Mr. Trump and his supporters have been more sensitive to his reception at events on the road. Mr. Trumps World Series appearance was internally seen as the sort of dutiful presidential event he should attend. Trump allies said little about the booing at Nationals Park compared with the reception he received at the New York City bout, which was expected to be more friendly territory: He has been interested in the sport for years. But when Mr. Trump made a split-second decision to go less than two weeks before the event, even the U.F.C. president, Dana White, believed it was short notice.

We had dinner last Thursday at the White House, and he said Im coming. Im coming to New York, Mr. White told reporters in recent days. And I was like Oh, my God! Thats going to be a rough one! Why dont we do Vegas on the 14th? And New York was the only one that he could do, so he came tonight.

In the end, the social media fight over whether Mr. Trump had drawn more boos than applause at the event went on much longer than the actual U.F.C. match. The president plays close attention to news coverage of how he is received at those events. Mr. Trumps elder sons, Eric and Donald Trump Jr., quickly jumped in to attack the presidents critics who posted video suggesting that he had been booed en masse. Other footage, including that shared by the Trumps, showed the crowd cheering.

Both the substance of the fight and what it meant that a sitting president attended a sport known for its brutal violence was overshadowed.

Go here to see the original:

On the Scoreboard: The Home Team, the Visitors and Trump - The New York Times

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on On the Scoreboard: The Home Team, the Visitors and Trump – The New York Times

John Dean Reveals Just How Bad This Week’s Been For Trump – HuffPost

Posted: at 2:42 pm

John Dean, the White House counsel to President Richard M. Nixon once dubbed the master manipulator of the Watergate scandal, said President Donald Trump had a rough day on Capitol Hill during the first public impeachment hearing.

What struck me today in listening to these two witnesses is they already have more than they had against Richard Nixon to impeach him, Dean said on CNN on Wednesday. Just on all accounts because the evidence is there.

Earlier in the day, two witnesses corroborated accounts that Trump withheld U.S. aid to Ukraine to pressure the country into investigating a political rival.Bill Taylor, the acting U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, also provided bombshell new testimony about a phone call between Trump and Gordon Sondland, ambassador to the European Union.Taylor said a staff member who was with Sondland witnessed the call and told him about it.

Following the call with President Trump, the member of my staff asked Ambassador Sondland what President Trump thought about Ukraine, Taylor testified. Ambassador Sondland responded that President Trump cares more about the investigations of [Joe] Biden, which [Trump attorney Rudy] Giuliani was pressing for.

Dean, who ultimately turned on Nixon and cooperated with prosecutors, said thats the kind of evidence that didnt come out until much later in the Watergate proceedings.Early on, he said, it was my testimony, a few people that were lower in the pecking order than me, and it happened before the tapes.

The infamous Watergate tapes werent released until more than a year after Deans June 1973 testimony.The smoking gun tape a 1972 conversation in which Nixon spoke with his chief of staff about trying to stop the FBI from investigating the Watergate break-in was made public on Aug. 5, 1974.

Nixon announced his resignation three days later as Republican lawmakers abandoned him in wake of the revelation.

REAL LIFE. REAL NEWS. REAL VOICES.

Help us tell more of the stories that matter from voices that too often remain unheard.

View original post here:

John Dean Reveals Just How Bad This Week's Been For Trump - HuffPost

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on John Dean Reveals Just How Bad This Week’s Been For Trump – HuffPost

Is Trump Already Winning on Impeachment? – The New Yorker

Posted: at 2:42 pm

This coming Wednesday marks the official start of the impeachment hearings against Donald Trump in the House Intelligence Committee, the public beginning of what the historian Jon Meacham rightfully calls a test for the country. The allegations of abuse of power are striking and unprecedented: a President seeking to privatize American foreign policy for his personal political benefit. The hearings on Trumps extortionate Ukraine scheme will be quickly followed by the drawing up of articles of impeachment, a House vote, a Senate trialthe mechanisms of the constitutional process. All the indications are, however, that we already know the outcome of this test. For Trump and his defenders, it is a coup, a show trial, a witch hunt. When that is the starting point, there is no place for the facts, no process that can satisfy, no way to split the difference. Its the reason why a key Trump ally in the Senate, Lindsey Graham, introduced a resolution condemning the Houses proceedings for lacking transparency, and then refused to read the evidence from closed-door depositions this week now that it is being made public. The impeachment investigation is a joke and a political vendetta, Graham told reporters, so why bother?

In such a politically divided moment, Graham is merely saying out loud what has become increasingly obvious: the President has successfully rendered the investigation irrelevant, at least for his most fervent supporters (and that apparently includes virtually all of the Republican elected officials in both the House and the Senate). There is no evidence, no testimony, no revelatory text message, that can sway them. There is a justification for anything that has come out, and for anything that might still be revealed. Trump has framed the impeachment case, as with all the other challenges to his controversial actions over the past few years, as a purely partisan matter of loyalty and legitimacy.

It is not just Trump-loving Republicans who may react to the actual details of the investigation with indifference. Polls suggest that there is now nearly a complete partisan gulf between how Americans view the impeachment matter, with Democrats and independents in favor and Republicans against, in a way that makes the inquiry itself almost beside the point. How much does anyoneon either side of this yawning national dividecare about the evidence if they know in advance how they plan to interpret it? And, of course, the sense of constant crisis is overwhelming. How can Americans bother to keep track of who said what to whom about Ukraine when there will soon be another scandal, another cast of characters, another alarming development to monitor? On Tuesday, Trumps longtime friend Roger Stone went on trial for lying to Congress, and prosecutors said that he did so to protect the President. On Thursday, a New York court ordered Trump to pay two million dollars in damages for illegally misusing his Trump Foundation to help his 2016 campaign. Who knows what tomorrow will bring? There is already a Trump-era precedent that shows that engagement with the facts revealed by impeachment may be less than robust. After the release, this spring, of the four-hundred-and-forty-eight-page Mueller report, even many members of Congress confessed to not having read it, but that did not stop them from pronouncing their opinion on what it did or did not say regarding President Trumps culpability.

Nonetheless, there is an actual investigation, with actual testimony. There are facts and even, in this post-truth age, truths. Since Monday, the House Intelligence Committee has released more than a thousand pages of transcripts from its private depositions with six of the diplomats who were caught up in Trumps scheme to pressure the Ukrainian President, Volodymyr Zelensky, to open investigations into a political rival of Trumps, former Vice-President Joe Biden, and into the debunked conspiracy theory that Ukraine, not Russia, interfered in the 2016 U.S. election. The depositions both confirm and expand upon what is known about the Ukraine affair, and how directly it points back to actions undertaken by Trump himself and by his private attorney Rudy Giuliani.

The most significant new information of the week comes from the revised testimony of Trumps Ambassador to the European Union, Gordon Sondland, released by the committee. After press reports of other witnesses testimony contradicted him, Sondland told the panel that I now recall two vital points differently. Not only was there an explicit quid pro quo between the withholding of nearly four hundred million dollars in U.S. military assistance to Ukraine and Ukraines willingness to publicly investigate Biden, but Sondland himself had made the linkage, in a September 1st conversation with a top Ukrainian official. Somehow, he failed to remember this in his initial testimony.

Sondland is a key witness not easily dismissed by the White House: a Trump appointee who gave a million dollars to the Trump Inauguration and was rewarded with the E.U. ambassadorship, he was seen by the other witnesses as a direct conduit to the President. He had a relationship with President Trump I did not have, Kurt Volker, the former special envoy for Ukraine, testified. He felt he could call the President and that they could have conversations. The depositions released this week make clear why Sondland had little choice but to change his testimony. William Taylor, the top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine, testified about Sondlands September 1st meeting with the Ukrainians and the ultimatum it contained. George Kent, the State Department Deputy Assistant Secretary responsible for Ukraine, also pointed a finger at Sondland, saying that he had talked to the President, POTUS in sort of shorthand, and POTUS wanted nothing less than President Zelensky to go to the microphone and say investigations, Biden, and Clinton.

I learned these and other notable details from reading the transcripts. They make for gripping reading, documenting the ways, large and small, that the irregular channel of Trump and Giuliani, as Taylor calls it, took over from the regular foreign-policy work of the Administration. There is Ambassador Marie Yovanovitchs dawning realization that she is under attack from factions in Ukraine and Washington that she is barely aware of. Watch my back, a Ukrainian minister tells her at one point. When Giuliani and Donald Trump, Jr., publicly attack her, State Department intermediaries try to get Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to help by calling the Fox News host and Trump confidant Sean Hannity. (Hannity, for his part, has denied discussing Ukraine with Pompeo.) But soon enough Yovanovitch is fired anyway, ordered in a late-night phone call to take the next plane back to Washington and removed from her post without cause on Trumps order. Although she served decades in the Foreign Service, Pompeo refuses to speak with her or issue a statement in her defense. Kent calls her ouster the result of a campaign of lies by Giuliani. Taylor, who reluctantly agrees to temporarily succeed Yovanovitch at the U.S. Embassy in Kiev, picks up the story of the Washington snake pit, as he terms it, in his deposition, a detailed accounting of facts made all the more powerful by his testimony to the committee that he is a compulsive note-taker, who brings his small, spiral-bound notebook to key meetings at which the Presidents Ukraine quid pro quos were discussed.

On Wednesday, Taylor and Kent will be the two lead witnesses at the impeachment hearings. Reading their sharp, compelling testimony, it is clear why Democrats have chosen them for this role. They come across as patriotic, nonpartisan, and alternately stunned and appalled by events as they unfold over the spring and summer of 2019. But will it matter?

As Trump awaited the opening of what he called next weeks Fake Hearing, the President attacked Taylor and Kent as Never Trumpers and held a series of rallies in bedrock-Republican parts of America, appearing alongside would-be Senate jurors who, like Graham, have made it clear that they do not need to see or hear more evidence to establish their view of the case against Trump. On Wednesday night, in Louisiana, Trump stood onstage with one of the states Republican senators, John Kennedy, who, in Trumpian fashion, used his turn at the microphone to mock House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for opening the impeachment probe in the first place. I dont mean any disrespect, he shouted into the microphone, to cheers from the audience and a grin from the President, but it must suck to be that dumb.

Earlier in the day, at the Capitol, Kennedy had weighed in on the impeachment inquiry, telling reporters, The quid pro quo is a red herring unless you make a distinction between a legal quid pro quo and an illegal quid pro quo, Kennedy said. This did not seem like legal brilliance on the part of Kennedy, or even to make much sense at all. But it was revealing as an example of the latest form of political self-preservation being offered by Senate Republicans, who seem to be responding to the emergence of inconvenient impeachment facts even if they deny that they are doing so. Given that the evidence so strongly shows that Trump withheld U.S. aid and an Oval Office meeting unless the Ukrainians agreed to make a public statement about the investigations that the President wanted, Kennedy and other Senate Republicans have been publicly floating the idea that its perfectly within the Presidents power to do so and, even if improper, hardly rises to the level of an impeachable offense.

Graham offered a slightly different variant this week: while insisting that he would not read the evidence, he also told reporters that the whole mess was a matter of Trump Administration incompetence and incoherence in its Ukraine policy. They seem to be incapable of forming a quid pro quo, he said. Neither of these rationales for Trumps behavior is the robust defense of the Presidents perfect dealings with Ukraine that Trump has demanded of his allies. But both speak to the willingness to endlessly accommodate a President who has convinced his supporters to make even nonsensical arguments on his behalf. The stupid defense; the yeah, so what? defense; the Democrats are bad, so never mind defense. There will be more. Trump has defined winning impeachment as keeping it partisan, so for him this is what winning looks like.

On Wednesday, a few hours after Taylors deposition was released, Trump appeared at the Louisiana rally with Kennedy. He did not address the revelations from the nine hours of testimony, or even bother with an explanation of his actions. He simply told the crowd that corrupt politicians, Nancy Pelosi and Shifty Adam Schiff and the crooked media have launched the deranged, delusional, destructive, and hyper-partisan impeachment witch hunt. The crowd cheered. The defense, at least for that night, had rested its case.

See the article here:

Is Trump Already Winning on Impeachment? - The New Yorker

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Is Trump Already Winning on Impeachment? – The New Yorker

Everyones Already Decided If They Want Trump to Be Impeached – National Review

Posted: at 2:42 pm

U.S. President Donald Trump on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, November 2, 2019. (Yuri Gripas/Reuters)

Making the click-through worthwhile: slogging through the predictable arguments of impeachment; speculation about a coming epic betrayal in the Democratic primary; and some long-delayed auditory fun.

Impeachment Moves Along Like a Kidney Stone

I realize those of us in the news business arent supposed to admit this, but impeachment bores me. We know the basic facts; we all decided whether we thought the presidents acts were worthy of impeachment and removal a long while ago; we know almost all the Democrats are going to vote for impeachment and remove; we know almost all the Republicans will vote against impeaching and removal. The only question is how slowly and painfully this process moves towards a resolution. Right now, its got all the momentum of a kidney stone.

As suggested in yesterdays Corner post, I think Trumps actions are pretty darn shady and an abuse of his powers, and there needs to be some consequence to deter him and future presidents from using the powers of the office to encourage foreign governments from getting into partisan American politics. But the established precedent is that the bar to remove a president from office is high much higher than I thought it ought to be, back in 1998 and theres no getting around the fact that many of the presidents foes have sought to impeach him since he took office, on any reason they can find. On February 10, about three weeks into Trumps presidency, the Democratic polling firm Public Policy Pollingoffered a survey, finding that 46 percent of all respondents supported the impeachment of President Trump, and 80 percent of all self-identified Democrats did. Representative Maxine Waters (D., Calif.) tweeted, get ready for impeachment on March 21, 2017, and Ted Lieu announced he was reading up on it. Way back on May 21, 2017, Ben Domenech predicted, Democrats will impeach Trump if they win the House regardless of what the investigation finds and the investigation he was referring to was one about collusion with the Russians. I hope he bet a lot of money on that outcome.

The House voted on resolutions that included articles of impeachment on December 6, 2017; January 19, 2018; July 16, 2019, and finally voted to begin the current inquiry on October 31. The coup rhetoric from Trump and his defenders is hyperbolic and overwrought there are no tanks in the streets, no martial law, no suspension of the Constitution but its not difficult to see their point: Large swaths of the Democratic opposition never accepted Trumps election, never recognized him as a legitimate president, and have sought to un-do Election Night 2016 with all the obsessive determination of a Terminator trying to prevent the birth of John Connor. Some Democrats want to impeach Trump, also impeach Pence, impeach Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh, and impeach Supreme Court Justice Gorsuch. Kamala Harris pledged that if elected, her Department of Justice would pursue criminal charges against Trump. We heard the lock him up chant at the Washington Nationals game. It is not hyperbolic to state that many Democrats have started with their preferred verdict and are now working backwards to find the justification for it.

Andy McCarthy is correct that the impeachment process can be unpredictable once it gets started. But barring some new revelation, this thing is going to end in a few months with Trump getting impeached by the House and acquitted by the Senate probably the appropriate ignoble legacy the president deserves, putting him alongside Bill Clinton and Andrew Johnson.

Judging from the morning headlines, Im not the only one whos noticed that the live gavel-to-gavel coverage is mostly bringing us information we already know.

NBC News: Plenty of substance but little drama on first day of impeachment hearings

Reuters: Consequential, but dull: Trump impeachment hearings begin without a bang.

New York magazine: The Impeachment Hearings Get Off to a Subdued Start.

One other note: last night, Chris Hayes tweeted, Just to be clear: Hunter Biden in no way, shape or form should have accepted that board appointment. I dont even really think thats in dispute. The Biden campaign sure has heck disputes this! In the October debate, Biden said, my son did nothing wrong. I did nothing wrong. I carried out the policy of the United States government in rooting out corruption in Ukraine . . . My son made a judgment. Im proud of the judgment he made.

Based upon what we know now and dont tell me I dont know about this, Im the one who put together that gargantuan timeline Hunter Biden and Joe Biden accepted a situation that was a glaring conflict of interest, but as far as we can tell, did not violate any U.S. or Ukrainian laws. Theres no law in Ukraine that bars putting an American officials idiot son on your board and paying him gobs of money so that you have a highly placed friend in Washington if you need it. And U.S. bribery laws do not bar presidential relatives from working on corporate boards, even corporations that have business before the American government. (We should have a law barring that.)

CNN reports routinely include statements like, There is no evidence of wrongdoing by either Joe or Hunter Biden in Ukraine which is technically true in the legal sense but represents something of a whitewash. Again, Hunter Bidens gig with Burisma was a conflict of interest that unnerved other officials in the Obama administration and received criticism from the day his board appointment was announced.

But if we can point to an action by Vice President Biden regarding Ukraine that was provably and specifically taken in order to protect Burisma . . . this whole thing looks completely different. A lot of Trump fans believe the pressure to fire state prosecutor Viktor Shokin was brought by Biden in order to protect Burisma. If someone can prove that and keep in mind, Shokin isnt the most reliable witness then this isnt merely Trump looking for dirt on a political opponent, but a genuine case of exactly what Trump is accused of manipulation of U.S. foreign policy for personal benefit. Of course, this should have been handled through more appropriate avenues like the Department of Justice, and not the presidents personal lawyer. But if Burismas appointment of Hunter Biden was a bribe to affect U.S. policy, then Trumps repeated desire to investigate this is much more legitimate.

In this light, Hunter Biden absolutely should be a witness in this proceeding; hes at the heart of what motivated Trump and Giuliani. If Hunter hadnt been on that board, none of this would have happened. Unsurprisingly, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff has made clear he has no interest in calling Hunter Biden as a witness, telling panel Republicans, the impeachment inquiry will not serve as vehicles for any member to carry out the same sham investigations into the Bidens or debunked conspiracies.

Over in Politicos newsletter this morning, Anna Palmer and Jake Sherman write, One surprising thing we heard a few times from people of both parties:that the American public simply believes politics and government are dirty and is not surprised that the president held up military aid to force an investigation into a political rival. In fact, theres a theory that this is seen as business as usual. Is this surprising? Joe Biden insists his son getting an $80,000-per-month gig on a foreign companys board is perfectly fine, Schiff refuses to even look into it, and CNN writes theres nothing wrong with it, and anyone is surprised that American public simply believes politics and government are dirty?

A Shakespearean Betrayal in the Works?

Deval Patrick, a longtime friend of Barack Obama, is running for president. Over at Hot Air, Allahpundit predicts a scenario that would be jaw-dropping: Obama publicly endorsing his longtime buddy Patrick over his vice president, Joe Biden. Pick your comparison: Benedict Arnold, Brutus, Judas. Biden played the loyal good soldier for eight years. Alone in the Democratic field, Biden has defended Obamas record against criticism from the left. Sure, the relationship between Obama and Biden was a little less rosy and more complicated than either man wanted to portray it. But right now, Biden is still the safest bet to be the nominee. Hes held his lead in most polls despite a lot of bumps along the road. All the alternatives have other glaring flaws, and Biden can still plausibly argue hes the candidate most likely to beat Trump.

And now Obama could torpedo his chances, just to roll the dice with Deval Patrick? This is the sort of decision that would spur a bit of a reevaluation of Obama by historians. Hes the man who ran on hope and change, and who showed far too much loyalty to stumblebum cabinet appointees below him like Kathleen Sebelius and Eric Shinseki. Obama never fired anybody.

ADDENDA: A much-delayed edition of the pop culture podcast is coming today! We discuss the launch of Disney Plus and the new Star Wars television series, The Mandalorian, the absolute insanity of the Jets announcing head coach Adam Gase is safe through 2020, the allegedly stabbing-worthy Popeyes chicken sandwich and how it compares to Chik-fil-A, visiting film locations, and a particular figure who didnt kill himself. Watch this space.

Jon Huntsman is running for governor again. Say, when a guy retires as U.S. ambassador to Russia, wouldnt you think he would take some time to write a book? You just wonder if he might have A Warning or something he would like to share.

Read the original:

Everyones Already Decided If They Want Trump to Be Impeached - National Review

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Everyones Already Decided If They Want Trump to Be Impeached – National Review

The Star Wars movies debrief: Attack Of The Clones recap, legacy and best bits – Den of Geek UK

Posted: at 2:41 pm

This article contains spoilers for Attack Of The Clones and the wider Star Wars series.

In hindsight, 2002s Attack Of The Clones had one of the hardest jobs of any chapter in the Skywalker Saga tasked with bridging the gap between young Anakins carefree podracer and the man who would become arguably the most feared baddie in movie history. On top of that, it was expected to spin a love story and a political thriller all at once. Simply put, the expectations were too great.

This second entry in the franchise once again written and directed by series creator George Lucas didnt break the same box-office records that The Phantom Menace did three years earlier. It wasnt even the top-grossing film of the year it was released, outperformed in the US by Peter Jacksons The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers and Tobey Maguires first outing as Spider-Man. Worldwide, it was trounced by fantasy franchise upstart Harry Potter And The Chamber of Secrets (Clones took $640 million, compared with Potters $870 million). Was the thirst for more Star Wars starting to make like Tatooine and dry up?

The trouble is that many of The Phantom Menaces issues ring true with its sequel, too. Jar Jar Binks role is smaller, but hes no less irritating, while the amount of CGI employed serves not only to make the entire film feel more sterile than a Kamino laboratory, but also hasnt aged particularly well. What does hold up is the movies soundtrack, once again composed by series legend John Williams in particular Across the Stars, which serves as the one bright point of a tragically mismanaged love story subplot, as well as the first use of The Imperial March in the series chronology.

Set 10 years on from The Phantom Menaces conclusion, Padm (Natalie Portman) hasnt aged a day and maintains an active role in galactic politics despite stepping down as the Queen of Naboo. After surviving an assassination attempt, shes re-introduced to a much older Anakin, this time played by everyones favourite whipping boy, Hayden Christensen. From there, Episode 2 does its best to juggle three separate subplots across its almost two-and-a-half hour runtime.

The first, Anakins transition to the Dark Side of the force, arguably takes a major backseat to his relationship with Padm. Our hero is brash, headstrong, and more than a little creepy (I dont think she liked me watching her, he claims while discussing Padms security detail in Coruscant), but its after a vivid nightmare and subsequent attempt to free his mother that he takes his first steps towards the Dark Side slaughtering Tusken Raiders en masse, including their children.

Unfortunately, the love angle doesnt offer too much chemistry. Natalie Portman is an excellent actress, but outside of a throwaway line or two, her relationship with Christensens Anakin never feels real, and therefore the stakes never feel high and thats without the horrendous writing and delivery of the now meme-famous sand conversation (you know the one).

More interesting is the political storm brewing in the Galactic Senate, as Palpatine (Ian McDiarmid) begins making moves to grant himself emergency powers. Unfortunately, most of this is told through clunky exposition, as George Lucas again opts to tell the audience rather than show them.

Where the film does deliver is in finally showing us the power of the Jedi and the numbers that they operated in at their peak. In the final battle on Geonosis, dozens of Jedi can be seen swinging their lightsabers, and even poor framing aside, it feels good to finally see these legendary warriors working as a team. Sith Lord Count Dooku (aka Darth Tyranus), a new addition to the franchise, steals the show thanks to a scenery-chewing performance from the late, great, Christopher Lee. Hes more than enough for a Jedi or two, but more on that later.

We also find ourselves introduced to fan-favourite Boba Fett, albeit as a surly pre-teen with a pretty cool Mandalorian dad, Jango who serves as the basis for the titular clones. These turn out to be early incarnations of everyones favourite Imperial footsoldiers, the Stormtroopers. These white-clad warriors somehow have much better aim than their successors though, making short work of the bugs and droids on Geonosis.

Seeing them battle alongside Yoda and the other Jedi is one of the movies greatest moments,but sadly comes almost two hours in. In fact, Tusken slaughter aside, the only other real action sequence of note is the early Coruscant chase, which offers a much deeper look at the capital of the Republic. Its sad, then, that the only space action here is Obi-Wan tailing Jango within an asteroid belt although Episode 3 thankfully offers a hefty battle early on which does mitigate things somewhat.

Thats arguably Attack Of The Clones' biggest issue it has toomuch of a gap to bridge. In attempting to put forward three cohesive plotlines, it ends up offering three barely functioning ones and thats without mentioning the wooden dialogue, ill-advised CGI, and Hayden Christensens stunted delivery. Despite a handful of redeeming qualities (Christopher Lee being a very big one), Clones remains something of a low point for the Star Wars franchise.

Best lightsaber bit: The clash between Jedi Knights and Battle Droids in the arena on Geonosis is fun, but the clear standout is Obi-Wan and Anakin taking on Count Dooku. The elder Sith Lord is more than a match for both Jedi, and ends up lopping off Anakins hand and incapacitating Obi-Wan before Yoda turns up to save their hides and show off some nifty, yo-yo like combat moves. Not bad for a Jedi Master in his 800s.

Best non-lightsaber bit: The vertiginous flying car chase sequence through the 'streets' of Coruscant, seemingly miles above the ground, offers the movies first action scene and its a doozy as Obi-Wan and Anakin hunt down shapeshifting would-be assassin Zam Wesell.

Jedi wisdom: As much as we want to go with the fact that sand is coarse (thanks for that, Anakin), well go with a salient piece of wisdom from Obi-Wan: Trust your feelings then, you will be invincible If only Instagram existed in the galaxy far, far away, the Jedi would be cleaning up in the inspirational life-advice stakes.

Rules of the Force: Aside from the usual abilities to run, somersault and use the Force Push, we get the impression that Jedi are immune to hurting themselves from long falls. In the initial Coruscant chase, Anakin and Obi-Wan both fall huge distances before landing on different speeders. Either the vehicles are made of foam, or the Jedi have protective powers that prevent them from meeting a splattery end like a fly on a windshield. We also learn a little bit more about the corruptive pull of the Dark Side of the Force as Yoda explains of former Jedi (and his old Padawan) Dooku, lies, deceit, creating mistrust are his ways now" and get our first look at the Sith's ablility to project Force lightning.

Who has a bad feeling about this? Anakins the one with the dodgy premonition this time, and hes quite right to be wary its when he and his comrades are being prepared for execution by a trio of big beasties in the arena on Geonosis.

Galactic stop-offs: Theres plenty of sightseeing to be done, although in terms of new destinations the key ones are Kaminos cloning labs suspended above stormy seas, Geonosis network of caves and bug-tunnels (and huge gladiatorial arena, of course), and an asteroid belt somewhere between the two. Returning from The Phantom Menace are Coruscant (although we get to see a lot more of it here), Tatooine and Naboo.

Who wins?It's a draw. This feels like the most 50/50 ending of the saga, with arguments to be made for both sides (Yoda, for one, doesnt accept victory). Anakin is wounded, and has been corrupted into taking his first steps towards the Dark Side, but hes also married to Padm albeit in secret, away from the Jedi Council. Meanwhile, Dooku is shown to have the plans for a certain planet-destroying space station, and Palpatine has more power than any Supreme Chancellor before him. Its OK though, because the Clone Troopers will keep us safe, right?

You can read all of our Star Wars recaps here.

What did you think of Attack of the Clones? Are there any other aspects of it that you love, any that you didn't, or anything that weve missed? Let us know in the comments below!

See original here:

The Star Wars movies debrief: Attack Of The Clones recap, legacy and best bits - Den of Geek UK

Posted in Cloning | Comments Off on The Star Wars movies debrief: Attack Of The Clones recap, legacy and best bits – Den of Geek UK

INDIA Indian doctor: Medical innovation should not try to replace the Creator – AsiaNews

Posted: at 2:41 pm

Dr Pascoal Carvalho addressed the 21st convention of Indias Catholic nurses in Mumbai. He spoke about the ethical aspects of genetic engineering, citing the doctrine of the Church towards human cloning and stem cells. Respect for human dignity must prevail from conception to natural death.

Mumbai (AsiaNews) Medical innovation, which increasingly uses modern technologies to improve life, should not attempt to artificially replicate creation, said Dr Pascoal Carvalho, a doctor from Mumbai and a member of the Pontifical Academy for Life, speaking at the 21st convention of Catholic nurses (8-10 November).

In his address on 9 November, he referred to therapeutic cloning, stem cells and modified human DNA before an audience of more than 200 Catholic health workers.

"[W]e can rest assured in the wisdom of the Church," he said, because for her, The dignity of a person must be recognized in every human being from conception to natural death.

Some areas of medical research that raise serious moral and ethical questions touch stem cells, embryos and DNA.

In his view, today There is a growing threat of overestimating genetic modification techniques and underestimating the repercussions of cloning and human gene therapy.

On the one hand, we have the positive results of therapeutic cloning aimed at organ and tissues reconstructed in laboratory for transplanting into patients to reduce the risk of rejection; on the other, reproductive cloning, like in the case of Dolly the sheep, seeks to reproduce living beings.

He warns against research that leads to alterations in an organisms DNA, like the famous case of the Chinese scientist who in 2018 said that he had created two twins in the laboratory immune to the HIV virus. This kind of experiment can reduce life expectancy and increase susceptibility to other, and perhaps more common, diseases.

The doctor cites the Dignitas Personae, which defines any attempt at human cloning as unacceptable, because it represents a serious offense to the dignity of the person and fundamental equality between men.

As for therapeutic cloning, To create embryos with the intention of destroying them, even with the intention of helping the sick, is completely incompatible with human dignity, because it makes the existence of a human being at the embryonic stage nothing more than a means to be used and destroyed. It is gravely immoral to sacrifice a human life for therapeutic ends.

Citing the doctrine of the Church, Dr Carvalho stresses the importance of the method with which stem cells are taken. In his view, Methods which do not cause serious harm to the subject from whom the stem cells are taken are to be considered licit.

This is generally the case when tissues are taken from: a) an adult organism; b) the blood of the umbilical cord at the time of birth; c) foetuses who have died of natural causes.

Overall, the doctor believes that modern gene technologies raise new moral questions, whilst attempts to create a new type of human being contains an ideological element in which man tries to take the place of his Creator.

Continued here:

INDIA Indian doctor: Medical innovation should not try to replace the Creator - AsiaNews

Posted in Cloning | Comments Off on INDIA Indian doctor: Medical innovation should not try to replace the Creator – AsiaNews

Here’s a The Mandalorian Clone Theory and What It Could Mean – /FILM

Posted: at 2:41 pm

Posted on Wednesday, November 13th, 2019 by Ben Pearson

The first episode of the Disney+ series The Mandalorian features a surprising reveal, one that ties back to the prequel trilogy and may have significant implications for the rest of the Star Wars franchise moving forward. There will be spoilers ahead as we dig into that last minute discovery.

A majority of the first episode of The Mandalorian is spent following the title character on a hunt for a target that is 50 years old. At the end of the episode, he discovers that his target is a creature of the same species as Yoda. Since the actual Yoda died after living for more than 900 years, the different aging process of this creature makes sense. (George Lucas has always been incredibly protective of all information about Yodas origins and his species, so its interesting that Lucasfilm is finally able to start playing in that corner of the sandbox all these years after the sale to Disney.) But how does this impact what might come next?

The insignia on the sleeves of the characters in the image above is seen in Attack of the Clones as an emblem worn by all of the clones on the planet Kamino. And wouldnt you know it? Someone on Twitter noticed the same emblem on the sleeve of Doctor Pershing, the guy who nearly got blasted by The Mandolorian in Werner Herzogs sketchy meeting room in the pilot episode.

Pershing made it very clear that he wanted The Asset (aka Baby Yoda) brought in alive, and his uniform seems to imply that hes associated with the remnants of the Empire in some way. Could it be that Baby Yoda is a clone of the little green guy we know and love? That emblem certainly points to cloning as being something this series is almost certainly going to tackle down the line, and there are a few reasons why a Yoda clone might be a gamechanger for the Star Wars universe. Well get to those in just a second.

As the Still Watching podcast reminded me, Freddie Prinze Jr.s rant on the beliefs of Dave Filoni and George Lucas made it clear that Star Wars is all about the concept of balance. Anakin Skywalker was born in 41 BBY (which stands for Before the Battle of Yavin, the climactic confrontation at the end of A New Hope), and since this show is set nine years after the fall of the Empire (read: the Battle of Yavin) and Baby Yoda is actually 50 years old, that means Baby Yoda was born in the same year as Anakin.

Anakin was said to be The Chosen One, apparently born from the Force itself, but he was corrupted and went to the Dark Side, ultimately becoming one of the most fearsome people in the galaxy. Was his journey predetermined by the Force? Does the franchises overarching idea of balance indicate that this Yoda baby was born as a positive counter to Anakins eventual evil? Or was Anakin intended to be good all along and this creature was intended to be his negative counterbalance? Food for thought.

How exactly Baby Yodas appearance will affect the rest of The Mandalorian remains to be seen, although I personally hope it results in at least one scene that serves as the Star Wars version of John Woos Hard Boiled finale, in which Chow Yun-Fats character blasts his way through baddies at a hospital with a baby in his arms.

But assuming Baby Yoda survives the events of this series, whats the endgame here? Is there a chance an older version of that character shows up in The Rise of Skywalker? Ive seen some speculation that Emperor Palpatine may be behind the bounty, potentially so Palpatine could somehow leave his old body and take over this new possibly Force-sensitive new one. (It seems that a species with a long lifespan might interest the Emperor, whos obsessed with the concept of immortality.) And since Yoda was one of the most powerful Jedi in the galaxy, the Emperor could think that inhabiting a clone of him might be just what the doctor ordered.

Personally, I doubt that will happen.J.J. Abrams has talked about that movie serving as a conclusion to the entire Skywalker saga, and it would be strange to introduce this character so late in the game.Then again, Kevin Feige has said that audiences will need to watch the Disney+ Marvel shows in order to fully understand whats happening in the Marvel movies going forward, so Disney clearly isnt above implementing that cross-platform tactic. I cant fathom how that characters appearance in The Rise of Skywalker would be satisfying, but I also think including the Emperor in the new movie at all sounds like a terrible idea. Maybe Abrams and the Lucasfilm Story Group have cooked up a scenario in which all of these puzzle pieces fit perfectly, but I think they probably have enough on their plate without adding yet another character into the mix.

Read more:

Here's a The Mandalorian Clone Theory and What It Could Mean - /FILM

Posted in Cloning | Comments Off on Here’s a The Mandalorian Clone Theory and What It Could Mean – /FILM

The Mandalorian Hints at the Return of Kamino Cloning | CBR – CBR – Comic Book Resources

Posted: at 2:41 pm

WARNING: The following contains spoilers for the first episode of The Mandalorian, now streaming on Disney+.

The Mandalorian's premiere on Disney + was chock-full of Easter eggs, small homages and surprises for Star Wars fans of every era. The series presents a fascinating look at the decade after the Battle of Endor, as it takes place 8 years after the Rebels destroyed the second Death Star.

One of the sneakiest ones was the blink-and-you-miss-it emblem on Doctor Pershing's sleeve. This sign, which can be better seen in the official pictures, is, according to The Attack of the Clones visual dictionary, a Kaminoan emblem worn by all clones, as noticed by Twitter user MarvelSW.

RELATED: Star Wars: The Mandalorian Release Schedule, First Three Synopses Revealed

In The Mandalorian, Dr. Pershing (Omid Abtahi) works with the Client (Werner Herzog), an older man who dresses, acts and sounds like a remnant of the fallen Empire. The Client hires Dyn Jarren, the titular Mandalorian (Pedro Pascal) to find "a 50-years old asset," and offers to pay him with Beskar, a legendary alloy that can deflect almost any hit from any weapon, and seems to be an essential part of the Mandalorian culture.

However, the Client also makes it clear that, if the mission gets complicated, he would still pay the Dyn Jarren half of the agreed Beskar for proof of termination of the asset. This is where the Client and Doctor Pershing differ: Pershing seems disgusted at the idea of terminating the asset, and his behavior wanes dramatically from his enthusiastic entrance.

Viewers who have watched the first episode know that "the asset," despite being 50 years old, is a baby from the same unknown species as the Jedi Masters Yoda and Yaddle. After he finds the relatively young alien, Jarren seems taken with it, for lack of a better word, going so far as to shoot IG-11 (Taika Waititi), a fellow member of the Bounty Hunter's Guild who had received the unequivocal order to terminate the alien. The last shot of the first episode shows Jarren reaching out his hand to the baby while their crib floats mid-air, possibly indicating a levitating connection with the Force.

RELATED: Star Wars: Rogues, Scoundrels, and Bounty Hunters Is a Must-Have

That short sequence of events is packed with meaning that sets up an arc that could extend through the first season and even the entire series. Although Dr. Pershing doesn't look like Boba Fett, the "doctor" shares his complexion and origin, as well as sinister-looking spectacles, so there's a chance that he might be the nerdier iteration of the same genetic stock or a descendant of one of the Fett clones who remained in Kamino. In any case, the fact that a scientist linked to a cloning facility is interested in acquiring a potentially Force-wielding infant points to the idea that some remnants of the Empire would still like to experiment on Force-sensitives.

As a curiosity, in The Force Unleashed tie-in comic books, Boba Fett found out long after the Clone Wars that the Empire had been doing terrible experiments with his "brothers," so there is a chance that The Mandalorian's showrunners might be scavenging some threads from that plotline.

RELATED: The Mandalorian: Favreau Interested in Tapping Into Star Wars Legends

However, whether the Client or Dr. Pershing or the seed of the First Order wants to clone enough Yodas to spam the entire halaxy with strange grammar is not as important as how the end of the first episode sets up the Mandalorian's internal conflict.

On the one hand, Jarren feels strongly about protecting Mandalorian children, particularly foundlingsg. The first thing that he does after getting paid is to visit the Armorer, a Mandalorian priestess-smith who forges a Beskar pauldron for his armor and rejoices in the idea that the leftover riches will "sponsor many foundlings."

"Good. I was once a foundling," Jarren answers, as he flashes back to the hovel where he was locked up in the middle of a battlefield, hands reaching up for his parents. However, the payment in Beskar for delivering baby Yoda would be enough not just to forge an entire armor, but an entire ship and to set up his Tribe for life.

RELATED: Star Wars: What Are Imperial Death Troopers Doing in The Mandalorian?

After the Client hints that Beskar is a powerful incentive, the Armorer expresses a similar sentiment; she is surprised that an Imperial sympathizer would be returning Beskar stolen during the Great Purge. This payment would mean a lot for the Mandalorians in exile, particularly because money is hard to come by and the Mandalorians have been unrooted for such a long time. To forgo the prize could be considered tantamount to failing his Tribe and all those Mandalorian foundlings.

There's a chance that Jarren could have shot IG-11 because he wanted the whole payment and not a quarter of it, but from what we have seen in the first episode, that doesn't seem to be in character. So this means that if the Mandalorian chooses to protect the baby, he will be risking his professional reputation as well.

RELATED: Star Wars: Aliens, Creatures and Droids Is Charming But Hardly Essential

Even if The Mandalorian is sold on the action-filled promise of its bounty-hunting star, the first episode's most powerful image involves its heavily armored lead simply reaching out to the crib that's filled with the hope that (relatively) new life always presents.

Created by Jon Favreau, The Mandalorian stars Pedro Pascal, Gina Carano, Carl Weathers, Giancarlo Esposito, Emily Swallow, Omid Abtahi, Werner Herzog and Nick Nolte. New episodes arrive each Friday on Disney+.

NEXT: Everything You Need to Know About Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order

Fallen Angels Reveals Who's Really Running the X-Men Now

Tags:star wars,Star Wars: The Mandalorian

Read the original post:

The Mandalorian Hints at the Return of Kamino Cloning | CBR - CBR - Comic Book Resources

Posted in Cloning | Comments Off on The Mandalorian Hints at the Return of Kamino Cloning | CBR – CBR – Comic Book Resources

Voice Cloning Market Industry Insights, Top Trends, Drivers, Growth and Forecast to 2028 – Downey Magazine

Posted: at 2:41 pm

Global Voice Cloning Market: Snapshot

The demand within the global market for voice cloning is expected to experience a sturdy rise in the years to come. Voice cloning has multiple applications across a wide array of industries which has played a key role in the growth of the global market for voice cloning. Several industries and sectors including banking, electronics, healthcare, and entertainment use voice cloning technologies. Voice cloning is used in electronic devices to run automated audios for giving out instructions. The rise in the demand for electronic device with audio assistance has played a major role in market growth.

Order Brochure for more Detailed Information @ https://www.tmrresearch.com/sample/sample?flag=B&rep_id=4251

The entertainment industry frequently uses voice replication to generate video clips, audios, podcasts, and movies. This factor shall also emerge as a key driver of demand within the global market for voice cloning in the years to come. Voice cloning is also used in the healthcare industry to create automated voice assistance for high-end healthcare products. Use of voiceovers for creating explainer videos and digital collaterals has also played a major role in the growth of the global market for voice cloning. There is a stellar need for improved voice cloning to create better audio impact in animated movies and films.

The market for voice cloning in North America has been expanding at a stellar rate. This is attributed to the presence of a starry entertainment industry in the US and Canada. Moreover, the market for voice cloning in Asia Pacific is also growing due to the same reason. Other regional segments in the global voice cloning market are Europe and Latin America.

GlobalVoice Cloning Market: Overview

The demand within the global market for voice cloning has been rising on account of the need to replicate voices for various applications in industrial processes and entertainment activities. Voice cloning has enabled successful execution of text-to-speech applications in mobile phones, desktops, and laptops which has played a key role in the growth of the global market for voice cloning. The advent of several software applications that involve the use of voice cloning have given an impetus to the growth of the global market. Furthermore, voice cloning was considered to be a complex process a few decades ago due to technological limitations. However, with advancements in software and hardware capabilities, it has become extremely easy to effectuate voice cloning in hardware devices and software applications. Furthermore, the advantages and agility served by voice cloning is expected to be a key parameter for growth within the global market for voice cloning. It is also true that the global market for voice cloning would expand as new entertainment avenues take shape across the world.

The global market for voice cloning may be segmented on the basis of the following parameters: component, application, deployment mode, vertical, and region. It is vital to get a thorough understanding of these market segments in order decipher the market dynamics.

A report on the global voice cloning market sheds value on some of the key standpoints for market growth. The report is a representation of the trends, opportunities, regional dynamics, and restraints that have housed in the global market for voice cloning in recent times. The regional segmentation has been distinctly highlighted in the report to give a wide purview of the market.

GlobalVoice Cloning Market: Trends and Opportunities

The demand within the global market for voice cloning has been rising on account of the tremendous technological advancements that have offset in the electronics and communication industries. New software tools that are equipped with voice feedback and other features relating to artificial voice have given an impetus to the growth of the global market for voice cloning. Moreover, the presence of multiple providers of voice cloning services has also led to the generation of voluminous revenues in this market. Wireless assistants such as Alexa, Siri, and other modes were possible only due to the presence of voice cloning. Furthermore, chatbots are other amongst others software applications that have played a pivotal role in enhancing the growth prospects of the global market for voice cloning. Besides this, the popularity of digital games, accessibility options, and interactive learning has also created tremendous demand within the global market for voice cloning in recent times.

GlobalVoice Cloning Market: Regional Outlook

The technological revolutions that has birthed across the US has resulted in the development of several specialised hardware and software capabilities in the country. For this reason, the growth of the global market for voice cloning in North America is expected to trace an ascending path in the years to come. The market for voice cloning in Europe, Asia Pacific, and Latin America is also expected to grow at a robust rate in the years to come.

Request TOC for Facts & Tables @ https://www.tmrresearch.com/sample/sample?flag=T&rep_id=4251

GlobalVoice Cloning Market: Competitive Landscape

Microsoft, AWS, IBM, AT&T, Nuance Communications, Baidu, and iSpeech are some of the key vendors operational in the global market for voice cloning.

About TMR Research:

TMR Research is a premier provider of customized market research and consulting services to business entities keen on succeeding in todays supercharged economic climate. Armed with an experienced, dedicated, and dynamic team of analysts, we are redefining the way our clients conduct business by providing them with authoritative and trusted research studies in tune with the latest methodologies and market trends.

Contact:

TMR Research,3739 Balboa St # 1097,San Francisco, CA 94121United StatesTel: +1-415-520-1050

Continue reading here:

Voice Cloning Market Industry Insights, Top Trends, Drivers, Growth and Forecast to 2028 - Downey Magazine

Posted in Cloning | Comments Off on Voice Cloning Market Industry Insights, Top Trends, Drivers, Growth and Forecast to 2028 – Downey Magazine