The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Monthly Archives: August 2017
Charlottesville white nationalist demonstrator loses job at libertarian hot dog shop – Washington Post
Posted: August 20, 2017 at 6:40 pm
A campaign to identify the marchers spread on social media following the bloody right-wing rally in Charlottesville. (Thomas Johnson/The Washington Post)
Updated 3:15 p.m.
A white nationalist who participated in the torch-lit march through the University of Virginias campus this weekendhas lost hisjob at a Berkeley, Calif., hot dog restaurant after Twitter users posted his photo and place of employment. The employee, Cole White, was identified online after he was photographed among a shouting and torch-wielding mobduring the march Friday night in Charlottesville.
After being inundated with inquiries, his former employer, Top Dog, in downtown Berkeley, posted a sign on its door that reads:Effective Saturday 12th August, Cole White no longer works at Top Dog. The actions of those in Charlottesville are not supported by Top Dog. We believe in individual freedom and voluntary association for everyone, multiple news outlets reported. The shop has a political bent of its own, as its well-known in Berkeley forthe libertarian stickers and articles posted on its walls, and website.
Top Dogissued a statement to the Washington Post that read, in part:
Colechose to voluntarily resign his employmentwith Top Dogand we acceptedhisresignation.There have been reports that he was terminated.Those reports are false.There have been reports that top dog knowingly employs racists and promotes racist theology.Thattoois false.Individual freedomand voluntaryexchangearecore to the philosophy of Top Dog.We look forward to cooking the same great food forat leastanother50 years.
Another part of the statement noted: Wedorespect our employees rightto theiropinions. They are free to make their own choicesbutmust accept the responsibilities of those choices.
When asked by The Post if White would have been permitted to keep his job had he not resigned, the shop declined to comment further.
White wasin Charlottesville for the Unite the Right rally, which turned deadly on Saturday.James Alex Fields Jr., 20, who was described as a Nazi sympathizer by one of hishigh school teachers,is accused of ramminghis car into a group of counterprotesters, injuring 19 and killingHeather Heyer,32.Two Virginia state troopers H. Jay Cullen, 48, and Berke Bates, 40 were killed while doing surveillance work during Saturdays rally when their helicopter crashed.
Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D) on Aug. 13 said Charlottesville is "stronger" a day after violence erupted in the city. The organizer of a white nationalist rally said clashes occurred because police declined "to do their job." (Whitney Leaming,Bastien Inzaurralde/The Washington Post)
[Discomfort food: Using dinners to talk about race, violence and America]
The mostly male crowd that participated in Friday nights tiki-torch-lit rally did not cover their faces, and they were widely photographed. A Twitter account,@YesYoureRacist, began posting photographs of participants and uncovering their identities. White was among the first itnamed.The account would soon identify students enrolled at the University of Nevada and Washington State University, leading both of the schools to issue statements condemning racism.
Top Dog, a Berkeley campus fixture, isnt shy about its libertarian values. The walls are covered with libertarian bumper stickers, yellowed newspaper articles urging the privatization of the postal service, and hand-lettered signs with statements like, Beware the leader and Theres no government like no government,' wrote SF Weeklyin 1996.
A section of the restaurants website is dedicated to Propergander, posting articles about sanctuary cities, nuclear war and diversity.A recent article about an anti-diversity memo circulating at Google read, in part, Jim Crow is long gone, but it seems that Progressives (which gave us Jim Crow in the first place) now are imposing what essentially is a new form of segregation, that being ideological and religious segregation that is more reminiscent of how the former USSR treated dissidents than anything we have seen in private enterprise. The website was down for a time after the weekends incidents but was online as of Monday afternoon.
[In good hands: How immigrants craft your favorite restaurant dishes]
The restaurant wrote to one Twitter user that it had been overwhelmed with inquiries about White:
The restaurants Facebook page has been deluged with complaints about White, and its Yelp page is under active cleanup alert, due to the high number of people posting negative comments about him (Yelps note says it tries to remove comments related more to news events than users experience with the business). One sample review: Great place for Neo-Nazis. For people who arent Neo-Nazis? Not so much. A hot dog is a hot dog, but a hot dog place thatnot only employs Neo-Nazis but posts alt-right screeds on their webpage is a place that makes me want to vomit. But if you hate minorities, you might have a friend in Berkeleys Top Dog.
By the way, the hot dogs arekosher-style.
Charlottesville residents respond to the violence that erupted in their city Aug. 12. (Elyse Samuels,Zoeann Murphy/The Washington Post)
More from Food:
The new political battleground: Your restaurant receipt
Restaurants show diners what a day without immigrants tastes like
Discomfort food: Using dinners to talk about race, violence and America
See more here:
Posted in Libertarian
Comments Off on Charlottesville white nationalist demonstrator loses job at libertarian hot dog shop – Washington Post
Transhumanism Is Not Libertarian, It’s an Abomination | The … – The American Conservative
Posted: at 6:40 pm
Last week in TAC, Zoltan Istvan wrote about The Growing World of Libertarian Transhumanism linking the transhumanist movement with all of its featureslike cyborgs, human robots and designer babiesto the ideas of liberty. To say Mr. Istvan is mistaken in his assessment is an understatement. Transhumanism should be rejected by libertarians as an abomination of human evolution.
We begin with Mr. Istvans definition of transhumanism:
transhumanism is the international movement of using science and technology to radically change the human being and experience. Its primary goal is to deliver and embrace a utopian techno-optimistic worlda world that consists of biohackers, cyborgists, roboticists, life extension advocates, cryonicists, Singularitarians, and other science-devoted people.
The ultimate task, however, is nothing less than overcoming biological human death and to solve all humanitys problems. Throughout much of Mr. Istvans work on this issue, he seems to think these ideas are perfectly compatible with libertarianismself-evident evenso he doesnt care to elaborate for his befuddled readers.
While most advocates of liberty could be considered, as Matt Ridley coined it, rational optimistsmeaning that generally we are optimistic, but not dogmatic, about progressit is easy to get into a state in which everything that is produced by the market is good per se and every new technology is hailed as the next step on the path of progress. In this sense, these libertarians become what Rod Dreher has called Technological Men. For them, choice matters more than what is chosen. [The Technological Man] is not concerned with what he should desire; rather, he is preoccupied with how he can acquire or accomplish what he desires.
Transhumanists including Mr. Istvan are a case in point. In his TAC article he not only endorses such things as the defeat of death, but even robotic hearts, virtual reality sex, and telepathy via mind-reading headsets. Need more of his grand ideas? How about brain implants ectogenesis, artificial intelligence, exoskeleton suits, designer babies, gene editing tech? At no point he wonders if we should even strive for these technologies.
When he does acknowledge potential problems he has quick (and crazy) solutions at hand: For example, what would happen if people never die, while new ones are coming into the world in abundance? His solution to the fear of overpopulation: eugenics. It is here where we see how libertarian Mr. Istvan truly is. When his political philosophythe supposedly libertarian onecomes into conflict with his idea of transhumanism, he suddenly drops the former and argues in favor of state-controlled breeding (or, as he says, controlled breeding by non-profit organizations such as the WHO, which is, by the way, state financed). I cautiously endorse the idea of licensing parents, a process that would be little different than getting a drivers licence. Parents who pass a series of basic tests qualify and get the green light to get pregnant and raise children.
The most frustrating thing is how similar he sounds to communists and socialists in his arguments. In most articles you read by transhumanists, you can see the dream of human perfection. Mr. Istvan says so himself: Transhumanists want more guarantees than just death, consumerism, and offspring. Much More. They want to be better, smarter, strongerperhaps even perfect and immortal if science can make them that way.
Surely it is the goal of transhumanists that, in their world, the average human type will rise to the heights of an Aristotle, a Goethe, or a Marx. You can just edit the genes of the embryo in the way that they are as intelligent as Aristotle, as poetic as Goethe, and as musically talented as Mozart. There are two problems, though: First, the world would become extremely boring, consisting only of perfect human beings who are masters at everything (which perhaps would make human cooperation superfluous). Second, that quote was famously uttered by the socialist Leon Trotsky.
As Ludwig von Mises wrote sarcastically, the socialist paradise will be the kingdom of perfection, populated by completely happy supermen. This has always been the mantra of socialists, starting with utopian thinkers like Charles Fourier, but also being embraced by the scientific ones like Marx, who derived his notion of history in which communism is the final stage of humanity from Hegel. Hegel himself believed in the man-godnot in the way that God became man through Jesus, but that man could become God one day. Intentionally or not, transhumanists sound dangerously similar to that. What they would actually create would be the New Soviet Man through bio-engineering and total environmental control as the highest social goal. In other words, you get inhuman ideological tyranny taken to a whole new level.
It should be noted that sometimes transhumanists recognize this themselvesbut if they do, their solutions only make things worse (much worse). Take Adam Zaretsky as example, who says that these new human beings shouldnt be perfect: Its important to make versions of transgenic human anatomy that are not based on idealism. But his solution is frightening: The idea is that you take a gene, say for pig noses, or ostrich anuses, or aardvark tongue, and you paste that into a human sperm, a human egg, a human zygote. A baby starts to form. And: We could let it flow into our anatomy, and these peoplewho yes, are humansshould be appreciated for who and what they are, after they are forced to be born in a really radically strange way. Its no surprise that Rod Dreher calls Mr. Zaretsky a sick monster, because he truly seems to be one when it comes to his transhumanist vision. He wants to create handicapped human beings on purpose.
If this were what libertarians think should happen, it would be sad (thankfully its mostly not). As Jeff Deist notes, it is important to remember that liberty is natural and organic and comports with human action. It doesnt require a new man. Transhumanists may say that the introduction of their idea is inevitable (in Istvans words, Whether people like it or not, transhumanism has arrived) but that is not true. And in this sense, it is time for libertarians to argue against the notion of extreme transhumanism. Yes, the market has brought it about and yes, the state shouldnt prohibit it (though giving your baby a pig nose could certainly be a violation of rights), but still, one shouldnt be relativist or even nihilist about such frightening developments. It would be a shame if the libertarian maxim of Everyone should be able to do whatever one wants to (as long as no one is hurt by it) becomes Everyone should do whatever one can do just because it is possible.
Finally, it comes as no surprise that transhumanists are largely, if not all, atheists (or as Mr. Istvan says: Im an atheist, therefore Im a transhumanist. This just proves what the classical liberal historian Lord Acton talked about when he said, Progress, the religion of those who have none. In the end, transhumanism is the final step to get God out of the way. It would be the continuation of what Richard Weaver wrote about in Ideas Have Consequences: Instead of seeing nature, the world and life overall as a means to get to know God, humans in the last centuries have become accustomed to seeing the world as something that is only there for humans to take and use for their own pleasures. Transhumanism would be the final step of this process: the conquest of death.
You dont have to be religious to find this abhorrent. As we have seen, it would be the end to all religion, to human cooperation overall, in all likelihood to liberty itself, and even the good-bye to humanity. It would be the starting point of the ultimate dystopia.
Kai Weiss is an International Relations student and works for the Austrian Economics Center and Hayek Institute, two libertarianthink tanks based in Vienna, Austria.
Continue reading here:
Transhumanism Is Not Libertarian, It's an Abomination | The ... - The American Conservative
Posted in Libertarian
Comments Off on Transhumanism Is Not Libertarian, It’s an Abomination | The … – The American Conservative
Libertarian Party is the independent voice for NH – Foster’s Daily Democrat
Posted: at 6:40 pm
August 16 - To the Editor:
The recent events in Charlottesville have left me disgusted and ashamed. Our country is better than what was on display last week.
What was even more frightening to me was the echoed silence coming from many members of the Republican Party. For too long they have turned the other cheek to their racist and bigoted members within their party base, fearing to lose their vote come election season.
For too long their silence has enabled the factually incorrect and morally repugnant wing of their party to grow in numbers and in power, to spread their hate-filled ideology, to the point of placing a white-nationalist enabler in the White House with known white-nationalist advisors.
To those in the Republican Party who are as appalled and sickened as I am seeing the racist views and openly practiced neo-Nazism on their airwaves, I beg of you to make a stand. Denounce the evil within your party and root out those within your party who treat others as second class citizens.
Or simply abandon the sinking ship of the GOP, because there is another political party which believes in fiscal conservatism and human rights. There is another party out there that believes that all people are created equal and inhibit certain inalienable rights. There is another party out there that believes all human rights apply to all humans, regardless of demographic. There is a party that believes this so strongly, they put it in their platform for all to see.
Join the Libertarian Party, and leave the racists and bigots to their festering party of white-nationalism enablers, and join a party of principle. Join the party that pledges never to use force to achieve political or social goals. Join a party that accepts everyone of faith, everyone of color, and every one of every gender not because it is popular, but because it is the right and moral thing to do.
I am Brian Shields, and I am running for State Representative in Dovers first ward, and I am doing so as a proud Libertarian because Dover needs a new voice in Concord. A voice that will not stand for bigotry, misogyny, and hatred, and will not turn the other cheek. This, I can promise you. You need someone who will protect your rights, all your rights. You need someone who will not have their vote bullied by party power leadership to further an agenda that doesnt benefit Dover. I am the independent voice Dover needs in Concord.
The Libertarian Party is the independent voice New Hampshire needs in the State House. If you are politically homeless, check us out. We welcome everyone with open arms.
Brian Shields
Libertarian Candidate for State Representative, Strafford 13
See more here:
Libertarian Party is the independent voice for NH - Foster's Daily Democrat
Posted in Libertarian
Comments Off on Libertarian Party is the independent voice for NH – Foster’s Daily Democrat
Golden Rule recommended by Communities of Faith – Victoria Advocate
Posted: at 6:40 pm
Golden Rule recommended by Communities of Faith Victoria Advocate Most of us know the Golden Rule: "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." The words may vary, but every major religion, culture and even those who identify as not being religious have a bottom line for how people are to treat one another. |
View post:
Golden Rule recommended by Communities of Faith - Victoria Advocate
Posted in Golden Rule
Comments Off on Golden Rule recommended by Communities of Faith – Victoria Advocate
Marriott launches category marketing strategy with ‘Golden Rule … – Marketing Dive
Posted: at 6:40 pm
Dive Brief:
The Marriott campaign is the latest indicator that brands are viewing video marketing as a category of its own with the goal to reach a variety of screens instead of thinking about video as either linear TV or digital. Marriott International has been a leader in innovative content marketing such as large-scale storytelling via its Two Bellmen branded short film series and tapping Snapchat for an unscripted original series.
By bringing together four Marriott brands under a single theme, this likely enables the company to put more resources against the effort than it could for any of these brands on an individual basis. Marriott recognizes that it needs a cross-screen approach and to deliver quality content to meet consumers high expectations these days. The challenge will be providing each brand with a strong enough personality on its own to drive bookings.
The Golden Rule campaign points to Marriott's willingness to take risks and try new approaches, an approach that has made it a leader in digital marketing.Starwood Preferred Guest, a hotel loyalty program run by Marriott, recently updated its smartphone application to provide mobile check-in at 22 U.S. hotels, the latest mobile check-in deployment by Marriott. The company was also an early adopter of iMessage apps.
View post:
Marriott launches category marketing strategy with 'Golden Rule ... - Marketing Dive
Posted in Golden Rule
Comments Off on Marriott launches category marketing strategy with ‘Golden Rule … – Marketing Dive
The Golden Rule Of Payer Marketing – OPEN MINDS (registration)
Posted: at 6:40 pm
The Golden Rule Of Payer Marketing
Executive Briefing | by Athena Mandros | August 17, 2017
Greetings from sunny California, where today we kicked off The OPEN MINDS Management Best Practices Institute. Throughout the day, Ive had a lot of interesting conversations with attendees everything from new strategies for combating the opioid epidemic, to new models for integration with primary care, to new technologies to promote better care coordination. Interestingly, all of these conversations came back to one resounding theme: The importance of building relationships between payers and provider organizations.
In a market filled with change, there are many opportunities for innovation, but the reality is that most of these programs and services are not sustainable in the long-term without a payer partner. Because the traditional roles of provider organizations and health plans are shifting as we move to a more value-based reimbursement market, there are more opportunities for innovative partnership models and gainsharing arrangements with payers (see The Business Model Transition To Value-Based Care).
We discussed this theme in more detail in the session, Finding The New Opportunities With Health Plans: How To Market Your Services To Managed Care, led by Steve Ramsland, Ed.D., Senior Associate, OPEN MINDS and featuring Dawn S. Kingsley, MSHA, Vice President, Payer Contracting & Strategy, Centerstone America. Mr. Ramslands one golden rule for success in our current market? Dont treat health plans like adversaries treat them like partners.
Weve discussed the idea of payer and provider organization partnerships before (see What Do You Bring To The Table? and Strategies, Tools & Techniques That Enable PayerProvider Collaborations & Partnerships) but what does this type of partnership look like in practice? A partnership needs to be mutually beneficial to both organizations this means there needs to be some give and take and a genuine interest in working towards the same goals. This requires regular communication; developing relationships with both clinical and network staff; learning about the needs of the health plan in your market, keeping them informed about your organization; and two-way sharing of outcomes, data, and accomplishments.
For an on-the-ground perspective, we heard from Dawn Kingsley at Centerstone, a non-profit behavioral health organization operating in five states with more than 59 open contract discussions with a variety of payers. These contracts run along the full continuum of reimbursement options from fee-for-service, to case rates, to capitation.
Ms. Kingsley discussed the steps that Centerstone utilizes in building new partnerships with health plans in their markets. The first step is mapping the market and trying to understand the payers pain points. Ms. Kingsley explained that their team actually completes a SWOT analysis of each payer to drive their marketing decisions. This gives them a picture of what health plans are looking for and how Centerstone can meet their needs.
The second step is actually finding the right person to talk to and developing that initial relationship. The most important part of this step is being persistent. It may take months to cultivate a positive relationship, and it may require some looking for connections through different avenues with different approaches, but generally this persistence will pay off.
Finally, once you make the connection, dont waste your opportunity. When discussing your organization with the health plan, remember they are not looking only for your organizations merits, they are looking for a proposal of how your organization can help them to meet their goals. This proposal cannot be one size fits all, it needs to address the specific problems that the health plan is looking to solve. Ms. Kingsley noted that its unlikely that an organization will be able to meet all of a payers needs, but you should be able to fill a niche for them.
Moving to value-based contracting is a slow process and often times, provider organizations will be operating in both worlds. The key is working with payers to manage both types of contracts and developing relationships with the goal of becoming an exclusive provider organization.
For more on managed care contracting be sure to join us at The 2017 OPEN MINDS Executive Leadership Retreat for the session, Meta-Leadership In Action: Partnerships With Managed Care, led by OPEN MINDS Senior Associate, Ken Carr. And, be sure to follow our coverage of The 2017 OPEN MINDS Management Best Practices Institute over the next couple days on Twitter @openmindscircle #OMBestPractices.
See original here:
The Golden Rule Of Payer Marketing - OPEN MINDS (registration)
Posted in Golden Rule
Comments Off on The Golden Rule Of Payer Marketing – OPEN MINDS (registration)
Marriott Debuts ‘Golden Rule’ Campaign – TravelPulse
Posted: at 6:40 pm
PHOTO: Courtyard by Marriott is one of the four classic select brands featured in the campaign. (photo via Flickr/Mike Mozart)
Marriott International is taking a new approach to brand marketing.
Debuting the "Golden Rule" campaign Monday, Marriott's brand category approach focuses on the company's four "classic select" brands: Courtyard by Marriott, Fairfield Inn & Suites, Four Points by Sheraton and SpringHill Suites.
Together, the four chains comprise more than one-third of the properties in Marriott's 30-brand portfolio.
The Golden Rule campaign is the primetime television debut for all four brands outside of Courtyard's NFL ads, as well as the television debut of the Four Points and SpringHill Suites brands.
The multi-platform media plan will also see the brands advertised in cinema, in-flight and mobile entertainment. The campaign features a 60-second spot titled "Human" along with a trio of 30-second spots focusing on true stories of altruism involving real-life Marriott associates.
The spots will airon networks likeFOX, ABC and CBS during the campaign's first week.
Digital-only content highlighting real Marriott team members and guests from around the world will complement the ads, with a docu-series planned for later this fall.
READ MORE:Marriott Launches 'Hotel Countdown' Reality Series
"With these four brands comprising a third of Marriotts portfolio, we use our powerhouse status to celebrate human connections, whether its in Seattle or Singapore," Marriott's Vice President Global Brand Marketing, Paige Francis, said in a statement. "Beyond a campaign, this illustrates that the hospitality we deliver at these four brands can serve as a guiding principle of how all people should treat each other."
The campaign debuted in the U.S. but will expand internationally to Canada next month.
You can visit goldenrule.marriott.com to learn more about the campaign and view some of the spots.
You may use your Facebook account to add a comment, subject to Facebook's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your Facebook information, including your name, photo & any other personal data you make public on Facebook will appear with your comment, and may be used on TravelPulse.com. Click here to learn more.
Go here to read the rest:
Posted in Golden Rule
Comments Off on Marriott Debuts ‘Golden Rule’ Campaign – TravelPulse
Opinion: The golden rule – Pocono Record
Posted: at 6:40 pm
By Star Parker
British writer and theologian G.K. Chesterton observed, "It is hatred that unites people while love is always individual."
The use of hatred to mobilize has a long and bloody history. We should understand why it works so well. It taps into human weakness. It exploits the unwillingness of individuals to take responsibility for their own lives, to courageously confront life's ambiguities and inconsistencies, and still move forward constructively. It's so much easier to blame someone else.
This is what racism is about.
Speaking to the horrible incident in Charlottesville, President Donald Trump condemned the "egregious display of bigotry and violence" on "many sides" that's "been going on for a long time in our country." The president appealed for the "hate and violence" to stop and that we "come together as Americans."
For these remarks the president is being attacked.
Immediately, former Vice President Biden tweeted out "only one side." Congressional Black Caucus member Maxine Waters followed suit with the same.
But President Trump is right. The use of hate to blame others, the refusal to take personal responsibility for one's life, is going on and has been going on in our nation "for a long time" on "many sides."
Being honest about this does not justify the vile white supremacist violence and murder in Charlottesville. But to claim that these distorted individuals are the exclusive locus of bigotry in America does not help our cause.
The Black Lives Movement, for example, has been going on for a number of years, with rallies laced with threats, blame and violent language.
Eight police officers were murdered by young black men in Dallas and Baton Rouge last year. According to then-Dallas police chief David Brown, during the standoff in Dallas, the young black assailant "said he was upset at white people. The suspect said he wanted to kill white people, especially white officers."
We can't solve our problems if we refuse to be honest about them and if, in trying to solve them, we demonstrate the same behavior that caused them suppression of the truth, blame, absence of personal responsibility.
I am astounded when those on the black left speak out self-righteously about white bigotry.
If not bigotry of the black left, how do we explain the absence of any mention of Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas in the new National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, D.C.?
Or the absence of any mention of America's first black secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice, who grew up in Birmingham, Alabama, from the Civil Rights Institute in Birmingham?
As the black left moves to whitewash all evidence of the confederacy and the civil war from our history, they also want to whitewash the present and pretend the only blacks in America are liberals. And while they do it, they claim a monopoly on tolerance.
The Charlottesville incident began with a movement from the left to remove a statue of Confederate General Robert E. Lee.
In an interview several months ago, Condoleezza Rice was asked about removing statues of individuals who represent history that repels us. She said, "When you start wiping out your history, sanitizing your history to make you feel better, it's a bad thing."
Reality is what it is. Not what those with a political agenda choose it to be.
And in this sense, President Trump told the truth. Bigotry and violence is coming from "many sides" and it has been for a "long time."
How do we ultimately solve the problem? Here are the words of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. from a speech he gave when he was 14 years old:
"We cannot have an enlightened democracy with one great group living in ignorance...We cannot be truly Christian people so long as we flout the central teachings of Jesus: brotherly love and the Golden Rule."
Star Parker is an author and president of CURE, Center for Urban Renewal and Education. Contact her at http://www.urbancure.org. Contact her at http://www.urbancure.org. To find out more about Star Parker and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at http://www.creators.com.
Read the original here:
Posted in Golden Rule
Comments Off on Opinion: The golden rule – Pocono Record
Even in red states, liberal candidates are climbing into power in the nation’s cities – Washington Post
Posted: at 6:40 pm
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. Randall Woodfin is not going to talk about change. The 36-year old Democrat, a candidate for mayor of Birmingham, is running to unseat a two-term incumbent and he is selling a vision of how his city, which had lost one-third of its population since the 1960s, could be economically transformed.
It just feels dangerous to boil that down to change.
That word will trip you up, said Woodfin, sitting in a campaign office covered in maps and volunteer walk lists. This is not about that. Change for changes sake is what got us Trump. This is about progress for everybody.
Woodfin, a soft-spoken attorney and former school board member, has spent a whole year on his bid for mayor. In that time, Democrats have been locked out of national power, further diminished in state legislatures and wiped out in rural America. That has left the increasingly blue cities and suburbs as the obvious places for Democrats to attempt to rebuild.
In May, Philadelphias progressives helped civil rights attorney Larry Klasner win the Democratic primary for district attorney; if he wins a full term this November, the citys top legal job will be held by a lawyer who defended members of Black Lives Matter and will refuse to seek the death penalty. In Jackson, Miss., progressive-backed candidate Chokwe Antar Lumumba won the mayors office, promising to make Mississippis capital the most radical city on the planet.
The trend is continuing. Birminghams August 22 primary is one of dozens of 2017 races where progressive candidates are trying to climb into power, knitting together community organizers, new activists and the remnants of Sen. Bernie Sanderss (I-Vt.) presidential bid to form new left-wing majorities.
I think Donald Trumps win changed the way we thought about elections, Woodfin said. I tell people, Listen: Whatever you want in 2020, from a new president, youre not going to get it if you just think about 2020. We know people who work two jobs, and have to take two buses to get to them. We know people who just finished high school and dont have jobs. Were talking to them right now, about a decision they can make right now.
In recent years, the off-year municipal races that follow presidential elections have seen turnout plummet to the teens or single digits. Just 11.5 percent of eligible voters in Los Angeles voted this past March to re-elect Mayor Eric Garcetti; fewer than 65,000 Detroiters voted in this months mayoral primary, which incumbent Mike Duggan won in a landslide.
That low level of voter interest has given progressives an opportunity. In both Philadelphia and Jackson, turnout was low but higher than in elections four years earlier. Some of the boost came from Our Revolution, the group Sanders founded after his primary campaign ended, which has made under-the-radar endorsements in urban elections, directing money and clout toward left-wing candidates.
The folks at Our Revolution had not done as good a job as they should at touting these things, Sanders said in an interview. I believe when we talk about revitalizing American democracy, we start with local offices and grass roots campaigns. The media will talk about congressional races, sure; but I think what we are seeing is a revolution at the local level, in the cities.
Sanderss focus on municipal races comes from experience. In the 1970s, he waged four quixotic bids for statewide office in Vermont. In 1981, supporters in Burlington realized that, while losing everywhere else, he had been over-performing in the citys working class wards a revelation that led to his first mayoral run, which he won.
The paths for the new progressive urban candidates are not quite as clear. In 2016, most cities went solidly for Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries; Woodfin himself was a Clinton supporter. Democrats, firmly in control of most big and diverse cities before the election, gained ground with Clinton on the ballot.
But the new progressive campaigns aim to replace the current Democratic regimes, with their comfortable business community relations, with progressives who want to use what powers they have to redistribute wealth. In Atlanta, State Sen. Vincent Fort (D-Ga.) is running to replace Mayor Kasim Reed by energizing the left. His platform is Sanders on a local scale a $15 minimum wage, marijuana decriminalization and two years of free tuition at college within the city.
In an interview at this months Netroots Nation conference, where May the Fort Be With You merchandise was more visible than anything pitching a national candidate, Fort emphasized that he was one of the only black politicians in the South who backed Sanders, and was doing best where Sanders had performed well against Clinton. He was adding to that support with a campaign about redirecting the citys growth, to the people who needed it.
Twenty years ago, Atlanta, depending on what study you look at, was 20 percent gentrified, said Fort. Now were 70 percent gentrified. If we dont start talking about income inequality and affordable housing in a real honest way, were going to have a city thats made of the very wealthy and the very poor, and the middle class is going to get screwed.
Woodfins campaign platform is not quite so radical, but it shares a narrative that downtown has gobbled up money and attention while most of the citys black and poor residents have suffered or jogged in place. Free community college is packaged with a school-to-startup pipeline. The plan for combating crime would divert high-risk, repeat offenders into a different court than one-time offenders who could be rehabilitated.
Woodfin has been more responsive than his rivals including the incumbent mayor, William Bell to a growing community of activists. Richard Rice, 35, who wore a Woodfin for Mayor shirt to the citys August 13 vigil in solidarity with anti-racism protesters, said he got on board after his group, the Grassroots Coalition of Birmingham, submitted a Black Agenda to every candidate. Woodfin was the first to sign on, committing to everything from rehabilitation of ex-convicts to the end of food deserts in poor neighborhoods.
Most of our elected officials are black, but were still falling behind, said Rice. We had 120 homicides this year. The poverty rate is 30 percent. And hes talking about the issues we put in front of him.
That, for activists, was the difference between change and progress. Woodfin would not be the only change candidate on the ballot. Bells bid for a third term, after decades in city government, was being challenged by an array of candidates. In pure name recognition, the strongest challenger was a former Auburn University wide receiver named Chris Woods, whod plowed his own money into the race. At an August 14 candidate forum attended by only Woods and Woodfin, Woods frequently answered questions about urban policy with anecdotes about his football career; Woodfin gave low-key, multipart answers quoting from his agenda.
But by the final days of the race, the forums have almost become a distraction from the on-the-ground organizing. Just 27,435 ballots were cast in 2013, the last time Birmingham elected its city government; over the long campaign, Woodfins volunteers have talked to thousands more voters than that.
On Saturday, they got one more boost from the national progressive network when Nina Turner, the new president of Our Revolution, flew in for a get-out-the-vote rally. The former Ohio state senator cast Woodfin as the public servant of public servants, the savior of his city, if people put sweat equity into electing him.
We cant ask other folks to do more for us than we will do for ourselves, she said.
Woodfin took the microphone, apologizing for having to follow a tub-thumping speech from Turner. Quietly, he ran his volunteers back through his platform, pointing to the neighborhood around them to give it some grounding.
We want to be able to walk down a walkable sidewalk, he said. We want the swings to work in the playgrounds our kids play in. People want to feel safe on their own porch, yall.
He paused to tie it all together.
This is not about change for changes sake, he said. This is about progress.
Read more at PowerPost
Original post:
Posted in Liberal
Comments Off on Even in red states, liberal candidates are climbing into power in the nation’s cities – Washington Post
Wolfenden: not so liberal on homosexuality after all – The Guardian
Posted: at 6:40 pm
PSNI and Garda officers in the Belfast Gay Pride parade on August 5. Irelands gay prime minister, Leo Varadkar, said it was only a matter of time before same-sex marriage is legal in the north. Photograph: Charles McQuillan/Getty Images
The 60th anniversary of the Wolfenden report, which recommended an end to the ban on male homosexuality, will fall on 4 September. Although it was groundbreaking and led to subsequent gay law reform in 1967, it was also flawed.
John Wolfenden, who chaired the committee that produced the report, is often hailed as a great liberal reformer. But he opposed homosexual equality and obstructed fellow committee members who proposed a more far-reaching decriminalisation. A cautious conservative, he described homosexuality as morally repugnant on a BBC TV programme and wanted only small changes in the law.
His opinions dominated the committees deliberations, which suggested that homosexuality was partly a matter of self-control, comparable to the extent to which coughing can be controlled. Such attitudes contributed to the subsequent half-baked, partial decriminalisation of sex between men 10 years later.
Gay rights veterans Antony Grey and Allan Horsfall, who campaigned in the 1960s for the implementation of the report, believed it was more restrictive than it could have been but that it gave the gay community a valuable springboard from which to campaign for law reform.
Wolfenden argued, commendably, that what is deemed by many people to be immoral (homosexuality) should not necessarily be criminal; that the law should not dictate private morality. He proposed that homosexual behaviour should not be prosecuted, providing it took place in private, with consent and involved no more than two men, both aged 21 or over. There was never any question of legalising same-sex acts.
The report did not urge the repeal of anti-gay laws, merely a policy of non-prosecution in certain circumstances. The existing, often centuries-old laws were to remain on the statute book under the heading unnatural offences.
This advocacy of limited decriminalisation was a de facto reiteration of support for anti-gay discrimination in law.
As well as proposing a gay age of consent five years higher than the heterosexual limit of 16, Wolfenden recommended that in the case of a man aged 21 or over who was convicted of consenting oral sex or masturbation with a 16- to 21 year-old male the maximum penalty should be increased from two to five years. These homophobic proposals were incorporated into the subsequent law reform, the 1967 Sexual Offences Act.
Home Office transcripts of the internal deliberations of the Wolfenden committee provide an insight into the thinking of Wolfenden and other members, revealing a battle between those like him who wanted little change in the law and others who were more critical of the way the criminal justice system treated gay and bisexual men.
Wolfenden was often an obstacle to progressive recommendations. On three key issues, he played a negative role. When committee members discussed the age of consent, Wolfenden was aghast to discover that seven wanted 18, one advocated 17 and only three supported his proposal of 21. In a committee session in 1955, Wolfenden indicated his belief that young men could be seduced and corrupted into homosexuality. He was adamant that he would never put his name to a report recommending anything other than 21 as the age of consent. He overrode the majority who favoured a lower age limit.
Equally shocking, Wolfenden wanted to keep anal sex illegal in all circumstances, even between consenting adults in private. He also supported retaining the option of punishing serious cases of anal sex with life imprisonment. Wolfenden watered down criticism of the police by fellow committee members, exonerating officers over their use of agents provocateurs in parks and lavatories. Defending the police, his report insisted the committee was on the whole favourably impressed by the way officers carried out their unpleasant task.
Wolfendens sanction of undercover operations as legitimate gave them the nod of approval. If he had exposed and condemned such tactics instead, police entrapment may have declined (rather than subsequently increasing) and thousands of gay and bisexual men might have been spared arrest.
There were omissions too. He did not recommend the decriminalisation of the invitation and facilitation of homosexual acts, nor of the crime of men chatting each other up in public.
But though Wolfendens proposals were flawed, he set Britain on the path to gay law reform. That was progress.
The author is director of the Peter Tatchell Foundation http://www.petertatchellfoundation.org
Read the original:
Wolfenden: not so liberal on homosexuality after all - The Guardian
Posted in Liberal
Comments Off on Wolfenden: not so liberal on homosexuality after all – The Guardian







