The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Monthly Archives: July 2017
Mendel.ai raises $2M for AI-powered clinical trial matching platform – MobiHealthNews
Posted: July 7, 2017 at 2:13 am
San Franisco-based Mendel.ai, a startup that is developing an artificial intelligence-powered platform to match people with cancer to clinical trials, has raised $2 million in seed funding from DCM Ventures, BootstrapLabs, Indie Bio, LaunchCapital and SOSV. Medel.ai will use the capital to forge partnerships with hospitals and cancer genomics companies to bring the system into use.
For $99, Mendel.ai will process an unlimited number of medical records for three months to match patients with potential clinical trials. Prospective trial participants can either upload records onto Mendel.ais platform or give their doctors permission to share documents directly with the company. From there, a natural language processing algorithm combs through clinicaltrials.gov data to compare to an individuals medical record and responds with a list of personalized matches. During the course of a users experience on the Mendel.ai platform, the system continuously updates matches, and patients can receive in-app requests to join trials. To improve the power of the platform immediately, Mendel.ai recommends patients undergo DNA testing.
The company, named for the founder of modern genetics science Gregor Mendel, was created out of the frustration over inefficient clinical trial matching. After losing his aunt to cancer and later finding out she could have been connected with a nearby and potentially live-saving clinical trial, Mendel.ai CEO Dr. Karim Galil set out to improve the recruitment process. As it stands, the process is besieged by mountains of data and too little time for both physicians and patients. Doctors cant keep up with all the new clinical trial data as it comes out, and patients can be overwhelmed with selecting a trial from vast databases that work with keywords and typically spit out hundreds of possible matches, yet unfiltered for many eligibility factors.
A lung cancer patient, for example, might find 500 potential trials on clinicaltrials.gov, each of which has a unique, exhaustive list of eligibility criteria that must be read and assessed, Galil told TechCrunch. As this pool of trials changes each week, it is humanly impossible to keep track of all good matches.
Digital innovation activity in the clinical trials arena has been heating up as of late. There are now several companies offering different tools to improve study design, remote monitoring capabilities and patient recruitment and retention in clinical trials, and many are just getting off the ground.
Just last week, the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative released new endpoint recommendations focused on the use of mobile technology in clinical trials. And in the past six months, there has been a slew of seed and early stage funding for companies innovating in the space. Mobile data capture-focused Clinical Research IO raised $1.6 million January. In March, Philadelphia-based VitalTrax raised $150,000 in seed funding to build out software to improve patient engagement in clinical trials. Medidata, a New York City-based company that offers cloud storage and data analytics services for clinical trials, announced in April its plans to acquire Mytrus, a clinical trial technology company focused on patient-focused electronic informed consent and remote trials. Also in April, remote clinical trial company Science 37 raised $29 million to move forward with technology that allows patients to participate in trials from their homes. But while others are focusing on improving data collection quality or study efficiency, the approach of Mendel.ai is on-par with the likes of much larger companies like IBM Watson, which is also experimenting with artificial intelligence to match patients with clinical trials. In the beginning of June, IBM Watson shared data from a Novartis-sponsored pilot, wherein Watson processed data from 2,620 lung and breast cancer patients and was able to cut the time needed to screen for clinical trials by nearly 80 percent.
For Mendel.ai, the task at hand is to integrate with health organizations and cancer genomics centers. Currently, the company is working with the Comprehensive Blood & Cancer Center in Bakersfield, California to enable the centers doctors to match their patients with trials. And while its still early days, Galil told TechCrunch the company wants to see Mendel.ai go head-to-head with IBM Watson.
Read more:
Mendel.ai raises $2M for AI-powered clinical trial matching platform - MobiHealthNews
Posted in Ai
Comments Off on Mendel.ai raises $2M for AI-powered clinical trial matching platform – MobiHealthNews
Prisma’s next AI project is a fun selfie sticker maker called Sticky … – TechCrunch
Posted: at 2:13 am
What do you do after garnering tens of millions of downloads and scores of clones of your AI-powered style transfer app? Why, keep innovating of course.
Meet Sticky, the next app from the startup behindPrisma, which turns selfies into stylized and/or animated stickers for sharing to your social feeds. Sticky is launching today on iOS, with an Android version due in a week or two.
While Prisma gained viral popularity last year, netting its Moscow-based makers around 70 million downloads in a matter of months, its core feature has been rapidly andwidely copied including by social goliaths like Facebook.
The teams response to having their USP eaten alive by others algorithms was to evolve their cool tool into a platform.But with the social app space essentially sewn up (at least in the West) by Facebook, which also owns Instagram and WhatsApp, building momentum and making a lasting impression as a new platform is clearly not an easy task.
Co-founder AramAirapetyan tells us Prismas audience has been very stable for the last six months shaking out to around 10 million monthly active users.
Thats not bad for a ~one-year-old app. But, well, Facebook has two billion monthly users at this point (And thats before you factor in all the Instagram and WhatsApp users.) So its hardly a fair fight.
Still, Prismas team isnt sitting still. Their next app project also applies neural networks to another photo-focused task this time creating selfie stickers for social sharing to messaging platforms such as WhatsApp, WeChat, Apples iMessage and Telegram.
Stickys core tech is an auto cut-out feature that quickly extracts your selfie from whatever background you snapped against so that it can be repurposed into sharable social currency as a standalone sticker.
We trained neural networks to find different objects on a photo/ video and even on a live video stream. So basically our trained neural networks are looking for a person on a photo. Thats all we need. Then we cut out the background and the sticker is ready, explains Airapetyan, describing it as a very complex tech behind an easy user experience.
The app lets you leave your cut-out selfie without any background, or edit the background lightly by tapping through a few full-fill colors options to make the sticker a bit more visually impactful. You can also add a white border around your selfie for extra stickerish delineation.
Airapetyan says more options are planned on the background front in future including the ability to superimpose selfie stickers over photos of your choice.
Its fair to say that, at this MVP stage, the cut-out feature is by no means perfect. It can get very confused by hair, for instance. And certain (high or low) lightning conditions can easily result in bits of your cheek going missing. But with a bit of trial and error you can get a reasonable result and without having to spend much time on it.
Also worth noting: all processing is done locally on the device, according toAirapetyan.
From here, Sticky shows its Prisma pedigree as you can tap on your cut-out selfie to apply a Prisma-ish style transfer effect (the version I tested had two style options, a black and white and a color style, but the plan is to add lots more cool comic and cartoon-like styles, says Airapetyan).
You can further augment your sticker by adding a text caption too, if you wish.
When youre happy with your creation you can save it or share to your social feeds although at this stage stickers generally share as a picture, rather than a sticker format (but the team is hoping to get support for that and says Telegram and WeChat are working to provide APIs).
Saved stickers are stored as an ongoing, editable collection within the app.
As well as still selfies, Sticky also lets you create animated stickers. To do this, instead of tapping once to snap a selfie you hold down on the camera button while pulling your silly face (or what not) and the app snaps multiple frames and processes these into an animation.
Animated Sticky stickers are displayed in WhatsApp as a GIF with a play button (but loop continuously when viewed in your Sticky sticker collection).
For the time-being, not all the messengers have API for native sticker sharing, notes Airapetyan. Thats why, for example, your sticker is shared like a picture to WhatsApp, or like a GIF if its animated.
He also concedes the cut-out tech is a little rough-round the edges at this point but says it will improve the more people use it given the algorithms are learning from the data.
Sometimes thecut-out tech isnt perfect, but the more people will use Sticky, the better it will become itself! he says. Thats the best thing about the tech. We also work hard to improve it! For example, we can let people create stickers with their pets in hands.
Sticky is surely going to become a better app with lots of more features. We just need to find out what people need first. Stickers, in general, are very popular nowadays and the popularity will spiral up, for sure, he adds.
The app is a free download, and the team isnt even thinking about monetization at this point. We just focus on the product right now, saysAirapetyan.
See original here:
Prisma's next AI project is a fun selfie sticker maker called Sticky ... - TechCrunch
Posted in Ai
Comments Off on Prisma’s next AI project is a fun selfie sticker maker called Sticky … – TechCrunch
Samsung’s Bixby and Why It’s So Hard to Create a Voice AI – New York Magazine
Posted: at 2:13 am
Samsungs Bixby cant hear you right now.
Its conventional wisdom within tech that voice interaction that is, talking to your phone is the future of how we interact with our gadgets, particularly voice interaction through a personal assistant like Google, Siri, Alexa, or Cortana. Samsung desperately wanted to play catch-up, and introduced its own AI agent, Bixby, alongside this years flagship phone, the Samsung Galaxy S8. The only problem? Bixby cant understand you. Or, Bixby can understand you if you speak Korean. But its English-language capabilities, like an MTA project gone bad, just keep getting pushed further and further back.
The field of voice recognition and conversational AI took a huge leap forward about five years ago, as the field of machine learning (specifically, the use of recombinant neural networks) allowed speech-recognition accuracy to leap forward. In 2013, Googles voice-recognition accuracy hovered around 75 percent, per Kleiner Perkinss Mary Meeker. Today, Googles voice recognition is at 95 percent. It did this because Google had tremendous amount of data to train its voice-recognition systems with. (Meeker also says about 20 percent of queries were made by voice, showing why Samsung may be anxious to get Bixby up and running.)
Both Google and Amazon allow their assistants to train against a users own voice, learning a particular persons quirks and regional variations in speech. Even Apple, which has significantly lagged behind the competition, has improved its voice recognition (even if Siri itself can be frustratingly dense about what to do with those voice queries). But even these voice assistants require you to speak clearly with significant pauses between words and clear enunciation. Blur your words together quickly like you do in colloquial speech, and these systems which have collectively thousands of very, very smart people working on them can still be thrown for a loop.
Meanwhile, theres Samsung. A spokesperson for the company, speaking to the Korea Herald, says, Developing Bixby in other languages is taking more time than we expected mainly because of the lack of the accumulation of big data. Google, Amazon, and Apple all have vast libraries of speech to fall back on, and Google in particular has its search engine to simulate the appearance of real depth (even if it can be badly led astray).
None of this is to bag on Samsung. The company is the second-largest manufacturer of cell phones in the world, and its Galaxy smartphones were briefly outselling the iPhone in 2016. Its also an enormous company, of which cell phones are but one of its many going concerns. (Nobody expects Google to turn out washing machines, or Apple to make a vacuum cleaner.) But the table stakes in the world of voice recognition and AI agents are so tremendously high, its hard to see how any company even one as large as Samsung will be able to break through.
Not that thats deterring Samsung. Its reportedly already planning to bring its own Echo competitor to market, code-named the Vega. Its easy to see this as Samsungs reach exceeding its grasp why bring a product to market when you cant even get your phones to understand English? but theres a good reason why Samsung may be forging ahead. Even if it cant rack up the sales numbers the Echo has seen, itll at least get a few more people talking to Samsung and helping it build up its own store of voice data to train against.
Uber tries to play nice.
According to a new report, 20 women spoke about their experiences with sexual harassment at Tesla during a town-hall meeting.
Agata Kornhauser-Duda avoided shaking the presidents hand like a pro.
Wow! Sending and receiving video and photo messages that disappear? How original!
The cheapest bottle from Amazons new wine line retails for $20.
Case closed.
With great power comes great responsibility to make funny Vines.
Dont ask a Chipotle employee to package all your ingredients individually. Just dont do it.
Now you can use voice filters on everything.
Lost in translation.
NPR tweeted the document in honor of the Fourth of July, and the responses are gold.
There isnt really a middle ground between sober and objective news organization and righteous internet vigilante gang.
One of the top Apple analysts says Apples latest and greatest wont have any fingerprint scanner at all.
Having a like button on a website doesnt count as wiretapping.
Facebook is making a slight tweak using a simple metric.
Swarm Simulator is nothing but text, buttons, and watching big numbers get bigger. Its awesome.
Follow this link:
Samsung's Bixby and Why It's So Hard to Create a Voice AI - New York Magazine
Posted in Ai
Comments Off on Samsung’s Bixby and Why It’s So Hard to Create a Voice AI – New York Magazine
Is Artificial Intelligence A (Job) Killer? | HuffPost – HuffPost
Posted: at 2:13 am
Theres no shortage of dire warnings about the dangers of artificial intelligence these days.
Modern prophets, such as physicist Stephen Hawking and investor Elon Musk, foretell the imminent decline of humanity. With the advent of artificial general intelligence and self-designed intelligent programs, new and more intelligent AI will appear, rapidly creating ever smarter machines that will, eventually, surpass us.
When we reach this so-called AI singularity, our minds and bodies will be obsolete. Humans may merge with machines and continue to evolve as cyborgs.
Is this really what we have to look forward to?
AI, a scientific discipline rooted in computer science, mathematics, psychology, and neuroscience, aims to create machines that mimic human cognitive functions such as learning and problem-solving.
Since the 1950s, it has captured the publics imagination. But, historically speaking, AIs successes have often been followed by disappointments caused, in large part, by the inflated predictions of technological visionaries.
In the 1960s, one of the founders of the AI field, Herbert Simon, predicted that machines will be capable, within twenty years, of doing any work a man can do. (He said nothing about women.)
Marvin Minsky, a neural network pioneer, was more direct, within a generation, he said, the problem of creating artificial intelligence will substantially be solved.
But it turns out that Niels Bohr, the early 20th century Danish physicist, was right when he (reportedly) quipped that, Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future.
Today, AIs capabilities include speech recognition, superior performance at strategic games such as chess and Go, self-driving cars, and revealing patterns embedded in complex data.
These talents have hardly rendered humans irrelevant.
Reuters
But AI is advancing. The most recent AI euphoria was sparked in 2009 by much faster learning of deep neural networks.
Artificial intelligence consists of large collections of connected computational units called artificial neurons, loosely analogous to the neurons in our brains. To train this network to think, scientists provide it with many solved examples of a given problem.
Suppose we have a collection of medical-tissue images, each coupled with a diagnosis of cancer or no-cancer. We would pass each image through the network, asking the connected neurons to compute the probability of cancer.
We then compare the networks responses with the correct answers, adjusting connections between neurons with each failed match. We repeat the process, fine-tuning all along, until most responses match the correct answers.
Eventually, this neural network will be ready to do what a pathologist normally does: examine images of tissue to predict cancer.
This is not unlike how a child learns to play a musical instrument: she practices and repeats a tune until perfection. The knowledge is stored in the neural network, but it is not easy to explain the mechanics.
Networks with many layers of neurons (therefore the name deep neural networks) only became practical when researchers started using many parallel processors on graphical chips for their training.
Another condition for the success of deep learning is the large sets of solved examples. Mining the internet, social networks and Wikipedia, researchers have created large collections of images and text, enabling machines to classify images, recognize speech, and translate language.
Already, deep neural networks are performing these tasks nearly as well as humans.
But their good performance is limited to certain tasks.
Scientists have seen no improvement in AIs understanding of what images and text actually mean. If we showed a Snoopy cartoon to a trained deep network, it could recognize the shapes and objects a dog here, a boy there but would not decipher its significance (or see the humor).
We also use neural networks to suggest better writing styles to children. Our tools suggest improvement in form, spelling, and grammar reasonably well, but are helpless when it comes to logical structure, reasoning, and the flow of ideas.
Current models do not even understand the simple compositions of 11-year-old schoolchildren.
AIs performance is also restricted by the amount of available data. In my own AI research, for example, I apply deep neural networks to medical diagnostics, which has sometimes resulted in slightly better diagnoses than in the past, but nothing dramatic.
In part, this is because we do not have large collections of patients data to feed the machine. But the data hospitals currently collect cannot capture the complex psychophysical interactions causing illnesses like coronary heart disease, migraines or cancer.
So, fear not, humans. Febrile predictions of AI singularity aside, were in no immediate danger of becoming irrelevant.
AIs capabilities drive science fiction novels and movies and fuel interesting philosophical debates, but we have yet to build a single self-improving program capable of general artificial intelligence, and theres no indication that intelligence could be infinite.
Deep neural networks will, however, indubitably automate many jobs. AI will take our jobs, jeopardising the existence of manual labourers, medical diagnosticians, and perhaps, someday, to my regret, computer science professors.
Robots are already conquering Wall Street. Research shows that artificial intelligence agents could lead some 230,000 finance jobs to disappear by 2025.
In the wrong hands, artificial intelligence can also cause serious danger. New computer viruses can detect undecided voters and bombard them with tailored news to swing elections.
Already, the United States, China, and Russia are investing in autonomous weapons using AI in drones, battle vehicles, and fighting robots, leading to a dangerous arms race.
Now thats something we should probably be nervous about.
Marko Robnik-ikonja, Associate Professor of Computer Science and Informatics, University of Ljubljana
This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.
The Morning Email
Wake up to the day's most important news.
See the article here:
Is Artificial Intelligence A (Job) Killer? | HuffPost - HuffPost
Posted in Artificial Intelligence
Comments Off on Is Artificial Intelligence A (Job) Killer? | HuffPost – HuffPost
A ‘Neurographer’ Puts the Art in Artificial Intelligence – WIRED
Posted: at 2:12 am
Claude Monet used brushes, Jackson Pollock liked a trowel, and Cartier-Bresson toted a Leica. Mario Klingemann makes art using artificial neural networks.
In the past few years this kind of softwareloosely inspired by ideas from neurosciencehas enabled computers to rival humans at identifying objects in photos. Klingemann, who has worked part-time as an artist in residence at Google Cultural Institute in Paris since early 2016, is a prominent member of a new school of artists who are turning this technology inside out. He builds art-generating software by feeding photos, video, and line drawings into code borrowed from the cutting edge of machine learning research. Klingemann curates what spews out into collections of hauntingly distorted faces and figures, and abstracts. You can follow his work on a compelling Twitter feed .
A photographer goes out into the world and frames good spots, I go inside these neural networks, which are like their own multidimensional worlds, and say Tell me how it looks at this coordinate, now how about over here? Klingemann says. With tongue in cheek, he describes himself as a neurographer.
Klingemanns one big project for Google so far is an interactive online installation launched in November that uses image recognition to find visual connections between any two images in a giant collection covering thousands of years of art historysay a roman sculpture and a Frida Kahlo self-portrait . While working in secret on a sequel to that project at Google, Klingemann has been exploring the potential of neurography in public on his own time. Many of his recent creations were made with a technique trendy among machine learning researchers called generative adversarial networks , which, given the right source material, can teach themselves to fabricate strikingly realistic digital images and audio files.
Some computer science researchers are using the method to fill in missing details in patchy radio telescope images. Others are using it to train systems to process health records without risking real patient data. [I dont quite understand. How would records be put at risk? Clarify?] Klingemann has harnessed it to generate images that combine the styles of 19th century portraits and 21st century selfies , and fabricating impressively realistic footage like this clip of 1960s French chanteuse Francoise Hardy.
Klingemann's work is in turn inspiring other artists. In a Barcelona show called My Artificial Muse earlier this month, artist Albert Barqu-Duran spent three days painting a fresco of an image Klingemanns software had generated from a stick figure modelled on John Everetts famous painting Ophelia .
All of which raises the perennial question: Is this art ? Klingemann says he and others using neural networks this way will have to gradually earn their place in the art world just as video and digital artists had to do over the last several decades. These new forms always have a hard time being accepted by the establishment, he says.
Jessi Hempel
Melinda Gates and Fei-Fei Li Want to Liberate AI from Guys With Hoodies
David Weinberger
Our Machines Now Have Knowledge Well Never Understand
Helen Greiner
Why Robots Are As Interesting As Humans
Right now Klingemann has to work hard to find the training data that will cause his neural networks to produce interesting results. Hes built himself a Tinder-style interface to quickly work through piles of newly generated neurographs and find the few that strike him as any good. I produce a thousand images and maybe two or three are great, 50 are promising, and the rest are just ugly or repetitive, he says.
As you may have noticed, the images he does select typically come with more than a little of the uncanny about them; Klingemann has lost count of the times hes been told the faces and figures his code generates are reminiscent of Francis Bacons famously grotesque and disturbing work.
The comparison is apt. Its also evidence of how far artificial neural networks are from really understanding images or artnot that computers have warped minds. Im doing creepy right now because I cant do non-creepy, I wish I could, Klingemann says. In two or three years, the creepiness will go away, which might make it more creepy because we wont be able to distinguish from a photo or painted artwork. The uncanniest AI artist of all might be the one whose raw output doesnt look artificial.
Originally posted here:
A 'Neurographer' Puts the Art in Artificial Intelligence - WIRED
Posted in Artificial Intelligence
Comments Off on A ‘Neurographer’ Puts the Art in Artificial Intelligence – WIRED
Is Artificial Intelligence Over-Hyped? – MediaPost Communications
Posted: at 2:12 am
Worldwide spending on cognitive and artificial intelligence (AI) systems is predicted to increase 59.3% year-over-year to reach $12.5 billion by the end of 2017, according to an International Data Corporation (IDC) spending guide. That number is forecast to almost quadruple by 2020, when spending on AI is predicted to reach more than $46 billion.
If personalization was the marketing buzzword of 2016, then 2017 is the year of artificial intelligence. As more cloud vendors tout their own AI systems, however, could AI be over-hyped?
Joe Stanhope, vice president and principal analyst at Forrester, says a cultural dissonance exists with AI, thanks to science fiction, and that many people have a preconceived notion about what artificial intelligence really is.
A lot of people are talking a big game about AI and how it will change the world, but today its only applied in extremely discrete ways, says Stanhope. Theres a lot of hype around it.
advertisement
advertisement
Stanhope says this overexposure creates a dissonance, compounded by marketers trust issues with AI.
Marketers have a right to be skeptical about artificial intelligence, says Stanhope, adding that it is imperative that they begin to educate themselves about AI, since it is highly complex and difficult to understand without a doctoral degree in statistics, math or engineering.
Stanhope recommends that marketers become "educated about AI techniques and algorithms to develop a functional understanding of how it works. By educating themselves, marketers can be more critical of vendors AI-driven applications.
AI gets thrown out quite a bit, but marketers need to get to the point where they can ask, 'what can your AI do for me now'?" says Stanhope. You need to be able to ask, and they [vendors] need to be able to define and validate that question.
Although it may not be as exciting as changing the world, Stanhope says there are very realistic applications for AI today. Humans have become the bottleneck in marketing, he says, and AI has the potential to make marketers and marketing better.
AI is an efficiency play, says Stanhope, describing how it helps marketers manage data, experiment with segmentation, and takes out the human drudgery of menial tasks. He recommends that marketers dip their toes in AI by applying it to one existing use case first, and then broadening the scope when new use cases become available and trust is built.
Youre not turning over the whole marketing team to a computer, says Stanhope.
Stanhope also recommends that AI marketers investigate whether their ESP offers some sort of AI function, as it is easier to evaluate an add-on solution than find a completely new product.
View post:
Is Artificial Intelligence Over-Hyped? - MediaPost Communications
Posted in Artificial Intelligence
Comments Off on Is Artificial Intelligence Over-Hyped? – MediaPost Communications
A Look At The Artificial Intelligence Companies And My Top 5 – Seeking Alpha
Posted: at 2:12 am
Note: This article first appeared on my Trend Investing Marketplace service on June 8. All data is therefore as of that date.
I wrote previously about the relatively new trend of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in my article. This time I plan to take a look at the main companies to consider for investing in AI, and select my top 5.
AI - "machines with brains"
Source
Many AI companies are unlisted and acquired before IPO
According to CB Insights, "over 200 private companies using AI algorithms across different verticals have been acquired since 2012, with over 30 acquisitions taking place in Q1'17 alone." Perhaps CB Insights will be next. The graph below gives further details. The left side list also gives an idea of the current AI leaders and acquirers.
Source: CB Insights
Alphabet Inc (NASDAQ: GOOG, GOOGL)
Wikipedia quotes: "According to Bloomberg's Jack Clark, 2015 was a landmark year for artificial intelligence, with the number of software projects that use AI within Google increased from a "sporadic usage" in 2012 to more than 2,700 projects."
Google's research projects often have the idea of automating everything, and connecting everything and everyone online (such as "Project Loon").
Google search is already using complex algorithms (e.g. RankBrain) and deep learning techniques.
Google's Home is a recent example of Google's move into AI with their inbuilt "Google Assistant" (similar to Siri, Alexa, Bixby, M, Cortana and Watson). The assistant responds to any sentence beginning "Hey Google". A key is the voice recognition technology and microphones, so that the assistant can correctly understand you and make appropriate responses.
Google announced its first chip, called the Tensor Processing Unit (TPU), in 2016. That chip worked in Google's data centers to power search results and image-recognition. A new version will be available to clients of its cloud business.
Google is a leader in autonomous car systems, which uses plenty of AI. It helps they already have Google maps. Google also have android auto car entertainment and internet capability.
Some AI acquisitions include: DNNresearch (voice and image recognition), DeepMind Technologies (deep learning, memory), Moodstock (visual search), Api.ai. (bot platform), Kaggle (predictive analytics platform).
Amazon Echo Dot has Alexa, Google Home has Hey Google, and Apple smartphone has Siri
Source
Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN)
Amazon's home speaker Echo (and Echo Dot) and personal assistant "Alexa" is an example of Amazon's move into AI. Alexa is perhaps the most successful AI powered personal assistant thus far, especially as it is able to do over 10,000 online and offline functions.
Amazon Web Services ("cloud") offers deep-learning capabilities, allowing users to use up to 16 of Nvidia's Tesla K80 GPUs.
Amazon's AI acquisitions include Orbeus (automated facial, object and scene recognition), Angel ai (Chatbots), and Harvest.ai (cyber security).
Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD)
AMD are a semiconductor manufacturer. The company's new AI chips are the Radeon Instinct series. AMD are also racing to put its chips into AI applications. AMD will release its ROCm deep-learning framework, as well as an open-source GPU-accelerated library called MIOpen. The company plans to launch three products under the new brand in 2017.
Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL)
Apple has been an AI leader with their voice (and face) recognition software used by their personal assistant Siri (on your smartphone), introduced in 2011. In October 2016, Apple hired Russ Salakhutdinov from Carnegie Mellon University as its director of AI research.
Apple is working on a processor devoted specifically to AI-related tasks. The chip is known internally as the "Apple Neural Engine". Apple have an autonomous vehicle development team that uses AI, and they are also said to be working on augmented reality using AI chips. Apple is reportedly developing a specific AI chip for mobile devices.
Apple is also a leader in the areas of Virtual Reality ((VR)) and Augmented Reality ((AR)) headsets. Apple's ARKit will available soon and may one day may replace the smartphone. Apple iPhone users could get their first taste of AR technology later this year. The 10-year anniversary Apple iPhone will be enhanced with AR features.
Apple has made several AI acquisitions including Perceptio (deep learning technology for smartphones, that allows phones to independently identify images without relying on external data libraries), Emotient (can assess emotions by reading facial expressions), and RealFace (facial recognition).
VR and AR headsets are the next potential big thing
Source
Baidu (NASDAQ: BIDU)
Baidu are the Google of China, so not surprisingly they have followed in Google's footsteps developing deep learning search functionality, as well as autonomous driving.
Facebook (NASDAQ: FB)
Mark Zuckerberg has become very interested in AI, since initially using it for simple tasks. Facebook has chatbots and Zuckerberg has developed his own personal assistant "M". The Facebook site uses AI to then direct targeted advertising to match your likes.
Facebook holds more than $32 billion in cash on its balance sheet and produced more than $13 billion in free cash flow over the last year. The company does not pay any dividends and has no debt. This means Facebook can pretty much buy up any rivals or promising new AI or tech companies. Some acquisitions include Face.com (facial recognition), Masquerade (a selfie app that lets you do face-swaps), Occulus (virtual reality), Eye Tribe (eye tracking software) and Zurich Eye (enables machines to see).
Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg has recently said that "the next big thing is augmented reality." He sees a world where we use AR glasses to project an image like a computer screen. The tricky part is the mouse, and so Facebook's team are looking at using direct brain to glasses technology, or something like eye movements to control your screen.
International Business Machine's (NYSE: IBM)
IBM should not be underestimated in AI, as they have previously led the AI industry. They became famous in this area when their supercomputer/personal assistant Watson was able to beat two quiz champions live on television. Apparently Watson can read 40 million documents in 15 seconds.
IBM have acquired Cognea (virtual assistants with a depth of personality), Alchemy deep learning, natural language processing (specifically, semantic text analysis, including sentiment analysis) and computer vision (specifically, face detection and recognition), and Explorys (a healthcare intelligence cloud company that has built one of the largest clinical data sets in the world, representing more than 50 million lives).
Intel (NASDAQ: INTC)
Intel are the global leading semiconductor manufacturer, with a dominant position in the desktop/PC market.
Intel also acquired Indisys (intelligent dialogue systems), Saffron (cognitive computing), Itseez (vision systems), and recently paid $15.3b for Mobileye (used in autonomous driving). Intel also recently spent $400 million to buy deep-learning startup Nervana. The company intends to integrate Nervana technology into Xeon and Xeon Phi processor lineups. Intel claims Nervana will deliver up to a 100-fold reduction in the time it takes to train a deep learning model within the next three years.
Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT)
Microsoft's background is in PC/desktop software (Office etc), and in gaming (XBox).
AI was first adopted by hyperscale data centers such as Microsoft, Facebook, and Google, which used AI for image recognition and voice processing. Microsoft's Azure offers deep-learning capabilities support for up to four of Nvidia's slightly older GPUs.
Microsoft also have a personal assistant name "Cortana".
Microsoft AI acquisitions include : Netbreeze (social media monitoring and analytics), Equivio (machine learning), SwiftKey (analyzes data to predict what a user is typing and what they'll type next), Genee (an AI app that acts as a digital personal assistant to schedule meetings), and Maluuba (deep learning, natural language processing).
Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA)
Nvidia design and sell industry leading AI chips, which puts them at the top of the AI pyramid. They collaborate, design and sell their various types of chips to almost all the top tech companies.
Nvidia's background is as a designer and seller of graphic processing units ((GPUs)) to dominate the gaming industry.
The company has expanded their products to include AI chips such as the Tesla P100 GPU, making them a leader in AI. Those chips are popular with data centers, and autonomous and semi-autonomous vehicles. Tesla recently decided to drop Mobileye and go for Nvidia technology for their autonomous vehicles.
Bloomberg summarizes well; "Nvidia has become one of the chipmakers leading the charge to provide the underpinnings of machine intelligence in everything from data centers to automobiles. As the biggest maker of graphics chips, Nvidia has proved that type of processor's ability to perform multiple tasks in parallel has value in new markets, where artificial intelligence is increasingly important."
Qualcomm (NASDAQ: QCOM)
Qualcomm's revenue has mostly come from wireless modem licensing fees, especially as a key supplier to Apple. However the company are currently facing legal (U.S. FTC and Apple litigation) and other issues such as pressure on declining smartphone related revenues. Qualcomm are also operate in the areas of IoT, security and networking industries. Given the coming boom in autonomous vehicles, Qualcomm are in the process of buying NXP Semiconductors (NASDAQ:NXPI) (for $47b), the leader in high-performance, mixed-signal semiconductor electronics - and a leading solutions supplier to the automotive industry.
Qualcomm Inc.'s latest Snapdragon chip for smartphones has a module for handling artificial intelligence tasks.
Samsung (OTC: SSNLF)
Samsung are the global number 2 semiconductor manufacturer, and the global number 1 smartphone seller. The rise of AI will lead to a huge increase in demand for both computer processing chips and memory chips - which Samsung can supply.
Samsung's "Bixby" is similar to Apple's personal assistant Siri.
In virtual reality (VR) headsets, as of Q1 2017, Samsung is the current market leader with 21.5% market share. Sony is second with 18.8%, followed by HTC with 8.4%, Facebook with 4.4%, and TCL 4%. Total worldwide shipments of augmented reality and virtual reality headsets reached 2.3M in the first quarter, according to IDC. The VR headsets represented over 98% of the sales. An IDC report from March predicts the amount of shipped AR and VR headsets will reach 99.4M units by 2021.
Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA)
Tesla are the global leader in Autonomous Vehicles ((AVs)). As AVs progress from stage 1 to stage 5 (full autonomy) Tesla can be a large beneficiary in terms of electric car sales and transport as a service (taxi company). Tesla may also benefit from selling their AV technology to other car manufacturers, or if they expand into using AI in the home as they already have the power wall and solar roof. Meaning Tesla may end up being your taxi company, your energy supplier, and your content provider both in your car and home. All of these can be run using AI programs from your smartphone. Elon's latest venture is neural networks - wherein he is looking at how we can connect the brain directly to a device.
Others to consider
Ebay Inc (NASDAQ:EBAY), General Electric (NYSE:GE), Nice Ltd (NASDAQ:NICE), Oracle (NYSE:ORCL), Salesforce.com (NYSE:CRM), Skyworks Solutions (NASDAQ:SWKS), Softbank (OTC:SFBTF)(they bought out chip designer ARM, and own 4.95% of Nvidia), Sophos Group (LN:SOPH) (IT security), and Twitter (NYSE:TWTR).
The companies that make the hardware behind the AI boom - especially the optics (transceivers, transponders, amplifiers, lasers and sensors)
With all booms often it is wisest to buy those that make the picks and shovels. In this case it is the optics (transceivers, transponders, amplifiers, lasers and sensors), cameras, semiconductors and so on. I have already discussed Samsung, Nvidia, Intel, Qualcomm, and AMD above, as they will do well from semiconductor design and sales.
Some of the major optics providers that can do very well include:
Note: I will most likely write a separate article on how to benefit from the AI boom by buying the picks and shovels stocks behind the boom.
Conclusion
AI will be invisible, yet it will be everywhere. AI appears on our smartphones, with virtual assistants, augmented and virtual reality headsets, robots, in data centers, and in semi and fully autonomous vehicles.
My top 5 AI stocks to play the coming AI boom are Apple, Samsung, Alphabet Google, Facebook, and Nvidia. If I could find the next Nvidia or listed small cap AI company with potential I would include them in a top 6. For now I have not yet found, as mostly they get bought out by the tech giants before going public.
Apple and Samsung are chosen as they are the global top two smartphone sellers (the smartphone and AR/VR devices will mostly be the operating systems for mass market retail AI), they have very loyal customer bases to cross-sell new AI products to, and also control what chips they use in their devices. Apple may move towards their own AI chip, and Samsung are the global number 2 chip maker already.
Alphabet Google and Facebook dominate the internet, and therefore have a large influence on the retail and business market. They are both already leaders in AI, with the financial backing to buy out any competitive threats. We could perhaps add Amazon to this group also.
Nvidia are the clear chip design leader in the AI space, and have an excellent track record. They are a must have in any AI portfolio. AMD would be a cheaper alternative for those worried about Nvidia's valuation.
Finally an equally wise move would be to buy the "pick and shovel" makers behind the boom such as Applied Optoelectronics and Fabrinet.
I am interested to hear your favorite AI stock and why. As usual all comments are welcome.
Disclosure: I am/we are long GOOG, FB, SSNLF, FN, AAOI.
I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Additional disclosure: The information in this article is general in nature and should not be relied upon as personal financial advice.
Editor's Note: This article discusses one or more securities that do not trade on a major U.S. exchange. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks.
Continued here:
A Look At The Artificial Intelligence Companies And My Top 5 - Seeking Alpha
Posted in Artificial Intelligence
Comments Off on A Look At The Artificial Intelligence Companies And My Top 5 – Seeking Alpha
What Does Baidu Have In Its Artificial Intelligence Pipeline? – Barron’s
Posted: at 2:12 am
Barron's | What Does Baidu Have In Its Artificial Intelligence Pipeline? Barron's As COO of Baidu Mr. Qi Lu said, Baidu will all in AI and continues to emphasize AI (artificial intelligence) as the key strategic focus given the window of opportunity for Baidu. Its AI strategy will be empowered by DuerOS (conversational AI ... China can seize opportunity to lead global AI development, Baidu executives say Baidu embraces artificial intelligence, set to build an open ecosystem |
The rest is here:
What Does Baidu Have In Its Artificial Intelligence Pipeline? - Barron's
Posted in Artificial Intelligence
Comments Off on What Does Baidu Have In Its Artificial Intelligence Pipeline? – Barron’s
The Meme-ing of Life – Aitkin Independent Age
Posted: at 2:12 am
More and more often now, I hear the word meme working its way into casual conversation. I saw this meme on Facebook, a relative tells me. Let me show you this meme on my phone, says a co-worker. Our friend group needs better memes, bemoans a friend. On more than one occasion, I have been shown memes that havent quite been memes. Now, Im not a prescriptivist (that is, I dont elevate one ideal use of language over other uses). I am fascinated with weird and wild ways language and culture evolve, and Im not foolish enough to presume that evolution can be successful policed. When strange, alien noises like meme start entering the everyday lexicon, however, I think theres little harm in trying to figure out where they came from, and why. With the word meme in particular, its a rather interesting history.
The word meme was first coined by scientist Richard Dawkins in his 1976 book, The Selfish Gene. The word was originally modeled after gene, drawing on the Greek mimeme, or that which is imitated. The word described practices, traditions and ideas that spread through culture, much like genes are capable of replicating and spreading. Dawkins aimed to explain how evolutionary principles, looked at through the lens of memes, could be applied to cultural development, an idea that would go to be developed into the field of memetics. Memetics as a field of studies has been met with contention; some feel the ambiguity of what qualifies as a meme and the chaotic nature of their spread makes studying them pseudoscientific.
Of course, in day-to-day parlance, meme doesnt seem to refer to anything so broad or theoretical. I almost exclusively hear the word in the context of internet memes. The internet is by its very nature a means for sharing ideas, which lends itself to the replication and repetition of ideas. Going viral is common online terminology, and anything that has gone viral that is, spread like a disease is by definition a meme.
I imagine its hard to use or interact with the internet at large and not encounter some form of meme, though also incredibly easy to be blissfully unaware that you have. New memes spawn on a daily basis and can be specific to any of a thousand online subcultures. I initially mentioned the dilution of the words meaning. Ive seen the word used to describe any weird or funny online image. Its understandable why such images would be called memes, as memes are often weird and funny images. However, such usage strips the word of some intrigue and nuance the replication, repetition and modification of a pre-existing idea or form.
Memes are not always funny images. In fact, given the repetition en masse, most memes quickly become unfunny. Ive occasionally seen complaints that present day internet meme culture develops too quickly. A new meme can suddenly become overplayed in the course of a single day, if not hours. In part, this comes about because memes themselves have developed their own online culture. An expectation exists that any funny or mildly unclever thing will become a meme, which leads to a self-fulfilling prophecy and a short meme lifespan.
If memes so quickly become unfunny, one might ask, Why all this hubbub about memes and internet and subculture? It wouldnt be too difficult to hammer out a think piece about internet memes as an apocalyptic harbinger of a conformist youth culture. But memes arent some wholly new concept. The Kilroy was here graffiti is a meme dating back to before World War II. Knock-knock and numerous other well-known jokes are memes. Urban legends, aphorisms and fairy tales are all concepts that spread memetically. Rather than just a current fad, meme is a relatively new word for something ancient. The language and words we use to communicate are constantly developing, and memes are just another form of language or perhaps language is a form of meme.
Evan Orbeck is a Messenger staff writer.
Originally posted here:
Posted in Memetics
Comments Off on The Meme-ing of Life – Aitkin Independent Age
Lions have what it takes to claim immortality against All Blacks – Irish Times
Posted: at 2:12 am
How to quantify this one? Rugbys greatest series, to quote Sky Sport NZs advertising campaign and that hyperbole doesnt seem excessive has reached its first series-deciding showdown since 1993. Viewed in that light, its possibly the biggest game of the professional era outside of World Cups.
For the back-to-back world champions, its an opportunity for a somewhat remodelled, younger team, captained by Kieran Read in his 100th test, and marshalled by the world player of the year, Beauden Barrett, and his brothers, to emulate illustrious names of the All Blacks past in the post-Richie McCaw and Dan Carter era and cement their own status.
For the Lions its an even rarer chance to grasp a slice of rugby-playing immortality, and emulate something only one Lions squad has ever achieved before. Then it was the sepia-tinged class of Willie John, Gibson, an array of Welsh legends and others, back in 1971.
Thats all then. Truly, its a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, never to be experienced again.
The very nature of the tour and the series so far has set up the climax perfectly. The Lions were largely written off before this suicidal tour and from the outset. Gradually the quality of their players was honed into two strong teams, albeit one stronger than the other.
Even then, in the first test, they left opportunities behind, whereas the All Blacks clinically took theirs, whereupon the Lions defied expectations as 5/1 outsiders a week ago with a drama-filled comeback, admittedly against 14 men for 45 of the last 55 minutes on a raucous night in a rain-sodden Westpac Stadium. They were the clinical ones, with two nicely created and strongly finished tries. The Red Army were in raptures and are liable to be buttressed by further re-enforcements here. The All Blacks fans have been provoked into finding their voice. Another filthy forecast will only add to the drama.
Whod have thought, at the outset, that coming into this climactic third test, the Lions would not only have the momentum, but would have an unchanged side in a test for the first time since 1993? And meanwhile, that the All Blacks would be making three changes in personnel, including a 20-year-old (Jordan Barrett) and 24-year-old (Ngani Laumpape) making their first test starts in an untried back three and new midfield?
Revenge is a powerful spur in rugby, not least when the matches come close together. Wounded pride, and a whiff of cordite and all that, and therell plenty in the Auckland air. The Lions had it last week, the All Blacks this, and Ireland felt the full, brutal force of this blacklash in November.
Yet Warren Gatland is adamant, as is Johnny Sexton, that this Lions team can be even better again.
We also still dont think were at our best, we still think we can improve. Obviously theres going to be an improvement in the All Blacks but its something we dont think is going to be a shock to us. Rory Best spoke earlier in the week about how the Irish felt they didnt handle the physicality that the All Blacks brought in the game two weeks after the Chicago game, even though theyd spoken about it. Were ready for it.
I think theyre going to try to dominate us up front, particularly in the tight five, and try and give some of their inexperienced backs some go-forward. If they dont get that advantage up front and were aware of making sure we try and negate the threat of their tight five it should make the game interesting.
Despite their Queenstown time-out, and satisfaction from last week, theres no sense that the Lions players are content with their lot, according to Gatland.
I havent witnessed that. I hope I dont see it on Saturday night because that would be pretty disappointing. Theres a group of players there who are incredibly competitive and realise this is a massive opportunity to win a series in NZ. It doesnt come round very often. These Irish players who played in Chicago know what it was like two weeks later; theyve another chance to make sure they dont get caught with their pants down.
As in the previous two tests, the lines in the sand are liable to again be drawn close in along the gain line. The All Blacks won the collisions in round one, the Lions with some tampering in personnel in round two. The personnel now largely remains the same, with Laumape on from the start after being the All Blacks most potent runner, but also their weakest defender, a week ago.
Sean OBriens availability is a game changer, or at any rate his nonavailability would have been. If the Lions can reproduce the same strength and accuracy in the tackle close in, and if OBrien, Sam Warburton and co can slow down the All Blacks customary high-tempo game in other words, if they can stifle Beauden Barrett, they have every chance.
With yet more biblical rain forecast, the scrums could be a significant factor, as again will the referee, in this instance Romain Poite. He showed in the series decider four years ago that, as ever, he is both a strong, thick-skinned personality and favours the scrum going forward, whatever the means. The All Blacks will assuredly go after the Lions at scrum time.
The Lions have lost the penalty count by a combined 24-15 in the tests to date, and Gatland clearly feels the Lions havent been given a fair deal yet, and particularly in this series. He will meet with Poite, his assistants Jerome Garces and the hitherto unsatisfactory Jaco Peyper, a description that could also apply to the TMO George Ayoub.
All Gatland wants is that they have an open mind.
Thats the message I will hopefully give to the officials tomorrow night when I meet them. Weve got the confidence and self-belief to win this Saturday and win the series, so all we ask of them is to be open-minded, not to be surprised by us being in front and good enough to win. Thats an important message I am trying to deliver. I am not questioning their integrity or anything. Its just that sometimes its a mindset. The message is just, if there are some 50-50 calls, to be open-minded.
To support Gatlands theory that there is more in this team, the Sexton-Farrell combo was at the heartbeat of the two tries that turned the game on its head and has given the lie to Warrenball while giving them a cutting edge, which has been sharpened by a brand-new back three who have only played two games together. They also have a core of proven Lions. They wont be fazed.
The All Blacks havent lost at Eden Park since France won 23-20 in 1994, and have won 37 tests in a row there. They are hot favourites, and could win well, but if opportunity knocks, these Lions have tries in them.
After all the verbal sparring up until this point a week ago, both Gatland and Steve Hansen assumed a more restrained, balanced mindset, culminating in them both being quite philosophical on Thursday. Indeed, both had the exact same choice of wordswhen maintaining this game will not define these players.
Nor should it. They all have or will achieve plenty more.
Nevertheless, immortality beckons, and all that.
NEW ZEALAND: Jordan Barrett (Hurricanes); Israel Dagg (Crusaders), Anton Lienert-Brown (Chiefs), Ngane Laumape (Hurricanes), Julien Savea (Hurricanes); Beauden Barrett (Hurricanes), Aaron Smith (Highlanders); Joe Moody (Crusaders), Codie Taylor (Crusaders), Owen Franks (Crusaders), Brodie Retallick (Chiefs) Samuel Whitelock (Crusaders), Jerome Kaino (Blues), Sam Cane (Chiefs), Kieran Read (Crusaders, captain).
Replacements: Nathan Harris (Chiefs), Wyatt Crockett (Crusaders),
Charlie Faumuina (Blues), Scott Barrett (Crusaders), Ardie Savea (Hurricanes), TJ Perenara (Hurricanes), Aaron Cruden (Chiefs) or Lima Sopoaga (Highalnders), Malakai Fekitoa (Highlanders).
BRITISH AND IRISH LIONS: Liam Williams (Scarlets, Wales); Anthony Watson (Bath Rugby, England), Jonathan Davies (Scarlets, Wales), Owen Farrell (Saracens, England), Elliot Daly (Wasps, England); Johnny Sexton (Leinster, Ireland), Conor Murray (Munster, Ireland); Mako Vunipola (Saracens, England,) Jamie George (Saracens, England), Tadhg Furlong (Leinster, Ireland), Maro Itoje (Saracens, England), Alun Wyn Jones (Ospreys, Wales), Sam Warburton (Cardiff Blues, Wales, capt), Sean OBrien (Leinster, Ireland), Taulupe Faletau (Bath Rugby, Wales).
Replacements: Ken Owens (Scarlets, Wales), Jack McGrath (Leinster, Ireland), Kyle Sinckler (Harlequins, England), Courtney Lawes (Northampton, England), CJ Stander (Munster, Ireland), Rhys Webb (Ospreys, Wales), Ben Teo (Worcester Warriors, England), Jack Nowell (Exeter, England).
Referee: Romain Poite (France).
Previous meetings: Played 40. New Zealand 30 wins, 3 draws, Lions 7 wins.
Betting (Paddy Powers): 2/7 New Zealand, 22/1 Draw, 7/2 Lions. Handicap betting (Lions +11 pts): evens New Zealand, 19/1 draw, evens Lions.
Forecast: The Lions to win.
Originally posted here:
Lions have what it takes to claim immortality against All Blacks - Irish Times
Posted in Immortality
Comments Off on Lions have what it takes to claim immortality against All Blacks – Irish Times







