Monthly Archives: July 2017

Here’s a First Amendment Case You Should Care About – NewsBusters (press release) (blog)

Posted: July 8, 2017 at 8:52 pm


NewsBusters (press release) (blog)
Here's a First Amendment Case You Should Care About
NewsBusters (press release) (blog)
First Amendment cases are very much on the national mind these days, and the news from the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) is very encouraging for those who believe in strong protections for constitutional freedoms. The court delivered a First Amendment ...

See the article here:
Here's a First Amendment Case You Should Care About - NewsBusters (press release) (blog)

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on Here’s a First Amendment Case You Should Care About – NewsBusters (press release) (blog)

U.S. CFTC Approves Blockchain Startup LedgerX As Cryptocurrency … – CryptoCoinsNews

Posted: at 8:50 pm

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has granted LedgerX LLC registration as a swap execution facility (SEF), making it the first federally regulated SEF allowed to offer clearing services and a trading facility for options based on digital currency for the institutional market.

LedgerX plans to list and clear fully collateralized, physically settled options on bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. SEFs operate under the CFTCs regulatory oversight for the trading of swaps.

Following a review of the LedgerX application, the CFTC determined that LedgerX complied with the necessary regulations.

LedgerX also must not list an intended-to-be-cleared swap until it has a clearing agreement with a registered derivative clearing organization, according to the CFTC. LedgerX also must not list a swap not intended to be cleared until it submits revisions of its rulebook and other pertinent materials to provide for the execution of uncleared swaps.

There now are 25 SEFs registered with the CFTC.

Also read: CFTC to discuss blockchain for derivatives, taps LedgerXs Chou as advisor

LedgerX received an investment from Miami International Holdings Inc. (MIH) in December. MIH invested in LedgerXs parent company, Ledger Holdings, and received a 10-year, exclusive global right to license equity or fixed income products related to digital currencies developed by LedgerX and to develop its own equity or fixed income derivatives based on such LedgerX products to be listed on MIAX Options and MIAX PEARL, MIHs second options exchange.

The CFTC previously appointed Paul L. Chou, CEO and founder of LedgerX, as a bitcoin trading expert to its technical advisory committee. The committee advises the CFTC on the impact of technology innovations for the securities market and financial services, along with the regulatory and legislative response to the growing use of technology in the markets. Committee members include representatives of financial intermediaries, traders, futures exchanges, self-regulatory organizations and market participants.

The CFTC officially recognized bitcoin as a commodity in September of 2015 when it took an enforcement action against a bitcoin operator for being unlicensed. That action marked the most significant bitcoin regulatory move in the U.S., along with the New York State BitLicense, also enacted in 2015.

Featured image from Shutterstock.

Read the original post:
U.S. CFTC Approves Blockchain Startup LedgerX As Cryptocurrency ... - CryptoCoinsNews

Posted in Cryptocurrency | Comments Off on U.S. CFTC Approves Blockchain Startup LedgerX As Cryptocurrency … – CryptoCoinsNews

Top Wall Street strategist sees bitcoin ‘cannibalizing’ gold, worth as much as $55000 – CNBC

Posted: at 8:50 pm

Fundstrat's Tom Lee on Friday became the first major Wall Street strategist to formally lay out his views on bitcoin.

The digital currency could be worth as much as $55,000 by 2022, Lee said in a report titled "A framework for valuing bitcoin as a substitute for gold."

"We believe one of the drivers [of bitcoin] is crypto-currencies are cannibalizing demand for gold," Lee said in the report. "Based on this premise, we take a stab at establishing valuation framework for bitcoin. Based on our model, we estimate that bitcoin's value per unit could be $20,000 to $55,000 by 2022."

Bitcoin traded near $2,540 on Friday. The digital currency has more than doubled in value for the year, and high interest prompted a Goldman Sachs technical analyst, a team of Morgan Stanley analysts and Citi researchers to issue reports on bitcoin or the blockchain technology behind it in the last few months.

However, Lee is the first widely followed market strategist to issue a report dedicated to predicting bitcoin's price. Lee also happens to be the most bearish strategist on U.S. stocks currently. He was JPMorgan Chase's chief equity strategist from 2007 to 2014 before co-founding Fundstrat Global Advisors, where he is managing partner and head of research.

The strategist's case for bitcoin is a basic supply-and-demand story, similar to the argument other proponents of bitcoin use when playing up its future as "digital gold."

Gold's market value of $7.5 trillion is exponentially greater than bitcoin's $41 billion. But Lee pointed out the precious metal's supply "is surging as mining soars to all-time highs," while the number of available bitcoins is rapidly approaching its inherent 21 million-coin limit.

"A simulation shows that this will slow even further to less than 1.5% growth by ~2020, meaning bitcoin supply will grow even slower than gold," Lee said.

Bitcoin is also theoretically a better way to store value, proponents contend, since governments can easily decrease a currency's worth by printing more of it.

The constraints on bitcoin's supply and the potential worth of the digital currency mean there will be high demand for a limited product, driving up the price. Bitcoin has already surged from below $1,000 on Dec. 31 to briefly top $3,000 in June.

Lee also expects investors could look at bitcoin as a substitute for gold, and his model shows the digital currency could be valued at $20,300 by 2022. Adding more variables to the model puts the value of bitcoin in five years in a potential range of $12,000 to $55,000.

"In other words, substantial upside exists in owning cryptocurrencies here," Lee said.

He also expects central banks will consider buying the digital currencies if the total market value tops $500 billion. Including bitcoin and its rival ethereum, the value of all cryptocurrencies hovers around $100 billion, according to CoinMarketCap.

"In our view, this is a game changer, enhancing the legitimacy of the currency and likely accelerating the substitution for gold (by investors)," he said.

Lee noted a Bloomberg news report that central banks have looked into the possibility of owning digital currencies.

In March, Federal Reserve Governor Jerome Powell cautioned in a speech about the potential challenges for a central bank to issue a digital currency, including privacy.

To be sure, digital currencies such as bitcoin often swing wildly and operate in unregulated markets. While the lack of regulation is what has attracted many buyers, many consider bitcoin the "Wild West." Three years ago, Mt.Gox, the largest bitcoin exchange then, filed for bankruptcy and said it lost 750,000 of its users bitcoins and 100,000 of the exchange's own.

The future of bitcoin is also in question. This summer, the digital currency could split if developers don't agree on the same system to upgrade bitcoin.

Lee acknowledged bitcoin's volatility in his report, noting that annualized bitcoin volatility is 75 percent, "substantially higher than gold's 10%. But as noted, gold's volatility approached 90% from 1971 to 1980 as the U.S. abandoned the gold standard hence, we expect this to improve over time."

Go here to see the original:
Top Wall Street strategist sees bitcoin 'cannibalizing' gold, worth as much as $55000 - CNBC

Posted in Bitcoin | Comments Off on Top Wall Street strategist sees bitcoin ‘cannibalizing’ gold, worth as much as $55000 – CNBC

Bitcoin can be an asset but not a currency, says China central bank adviser – CNBC

Posted: at 8:50 pm

"Bitcoin does not have the fundamental attributes needed to be a currency as it is a string of code generated by complex algorithms...But I do not deny that virtual currencies have technical value and are a type of asset," he said.

His comments come after the Chinese central bank increased scrutiny of the country's bitcoin exchanges earlier this year, a move that prompted the companies to stop margin lending, introduced trading fees and issue rules to rein in users.

Many governments around the world are still mulling how to regulate and classify bitcoin, whose value surged in June to hit a record just shy of $3,000. China has classified it as a "virtual good".

Squaring in on bitcoin, Sheng said expectations that bitcoin supply would be capped in the year 2140 would make it difficult for it to become a medium of exchange that could meet modern economic development needs as money supply should be related to economic needs.

He also said that Chinese monetary authorities should study issuing a central bank virtual currency that it could regulate and run properly.

Read this article:
Bitcoin can be an asset but not a currency, says China central bank adviser - CNBC

Posted in Bitcoin | Comments Off on Bitcoin can be an asset but not a currency, says China central bank adviser – CNBC

Bitcoin Can’t Be Considered as Money, Says PBOC Adviser – newsBTC

Posted: at 8:50 pm

China's central bank adviser considers Bitcoin to be a financial asset and not money, calls for the government to create its own digital currency. Read more...

The widespread adoption of Bitcoin among the masses has made it part of the global economic system. While the number of Bitcoin users continue to grow, there is still a lack of clarity about the cryptocurrencys status in the financial system. Countries like Japan have already assigned a legal position to Bitcoin as a currency, and there are others that are mulling regulations to bring the digital currency within the purview of the countrys legal structure.

By design Bitcoin shares similarities with different financial instruments. The cryptocurrency can be classified as both money and asset. However, many governments fear that by calling the virtual currency money, they will be undermining the countrys monetary system. At the same time, they cant simply ignore Bitcoin either, thereby forcing them to call it an asset instead of money.

A recent comment by one of the advisers at the Peoples Bank of China perfectly matches the observation. In an interview Sheng Songcheng mentioned,

Bitcoin does not have the strong fundamental attributes needed to be a currency as it is a string of code generated by complex algorithms But I do not deny that virtual currencies have technical value and are a type of asset.

Sheng went on to further explain the reason behind it by stating that the finite supply of Bitcoin, set to be fulfilled by the year 2140 will create a mismatch between the economic needs of the future and the actual capabilities of the cryptocurrency.

However, Sheng accepts the superiority of the cryptocurrencies over traditional currencies, thanks to their qualities. He believes that a cryptocurrency with more government control over it might be the next step towards creating the future monetary system that is more consistent with the evolving needs.

Currently, Bitcoin holds the status of a virtual good, similar to game tokens, downloadable content, etc. However, new regulations in the near future might soon change it.

Original post:
Bitcoin Can't Be Considered as Money, Says PBOC Adviser - newsBTC

Posted in Bitcoin | Comments Off on Bitcoin Can’t Be Considered as Money, Says PBOC Adviser – newsBTC

Plant Life on the International Space Station is Blossoming – Newsweek

Posted: at 8:50 pm

This article originally appeared on The Conversation.

Gravity is a constant for all organisms on Earth. It acts on every aspect of our physiology, behavior and developmentno matter what you are, you evolved in an environment where gravity roots us firmly to the ground.

But what happens if youre removed from that familiar environment and placed into a situation outside your evolutionary experience? Thats exactly the question we ask every day of the plants we growin our laboratory. They start out here in our earthbound lab, but theyre on their way to outer space. What could be a more novel environment for a plant than the zero-gravity conditions of spaceflight?

Daily Emails and Alerts - Get the best of Newsweek delivered to your inbox

By studying how plants react to life in space, we can learn more about how they adapt to environmental changes. Not only are plants crucial to almost every facet of life on Earth; plants will be critical to our explorations of the universe. As we look to a future of possible space colonization, its vital to understand how plants will fare off planet before we rely on them within space outposts to recycle our air and water and supplement our food.

So even while we stay right here on the ground,our research plantsblast off and head to theInternational Space Station(ISS). Already theyve given us some surprises about growing in zero gravityand shaken up some of our thinking about how plants grow on Earth.

A NASA image shows the International Space Station as it flew over Madagascar, with three of the five spacecraft docked to the station, in this photo taken on April 6, 2016. Tim Peake/ESA/NASA/Handout via Reuters

Learning from Stressed-Out Plants

Plants make especially great research subjects if youre interested in environmental stress. Because theyre stuck in one spotwhat we biologists call sessile organismsplants must cleverly deal in place with whatever their environment throws at them. Moving to a more favorable spot isnt an option, and they can do little to alter the environment around them.

But what they can do is alter their internal environmentand plants are masters of manipulating their metabolism to cope with perturbations of their surroundings. This characteristic is one of the reasons we use plants in our research; we can count on them to be sensitive reporters of environmental change, even in novel environments like spaceflight.

Folks have been curious about how plants respond to spaceflight from the very beginning of our ability to get there. We launchedour first spaceflight experimenton Space Shuttle Columbia back in 1999, and the things we learned then are still fueling new hypotheses about how plants deal with the absence of gravity.

Were in Florida, Our Research Plants Are in Space

Spaceflight requires specialized growth habitats, specialized tools for observation and sample collection, and of course specialized people to take care of the experiment on orbit.

A typical experiment begins on Earth in our lab with the planting of dormant Arabidopsis seeds in Petri plates containing a nutrient gel. This gel (unlike soil) stays put in zero gravity, and provides the water and nutrients the growing plants will need. The plates are then wrapped in dark cloth, taken to Kennedy Space Center, and eventually loaded into the Dragon Capsule on top of a Falcon 9 rocket to catch a ride to the ISS.

Once docked, an astronaut inserts the plates into the plant growth hardware. The light inside stimulates the seeds to sprout, cameras record the growth of the seedlings over time, and at the end of the experiment, the astronaut harvests the 12-day-old plants and save them in tubes of preservative.

Once returned to us on Earth, we can run more tests on the preserved samples to investigate the unique metabolic processes the plants engaged while on orbit.

Unraveling it Back in the Lab

One of the first things we found was that certain root growth strategies that everyone had assumed need gravity actually dont require it at all.

To seek out water and nutrients, plants need their roots to grow away from where they are planted. On Earth, gravity is the most important cue for the direction to grow, but plants also use touch (think of the root tip as a sensitive fingertip) to help navigate around obstacles.

Back in 1880, Charles Darwin showed that when you grow plants along a slanted surface, the roots dont grow straight away from the seed, but rather take a jog to one side. This root growth strategy is called skewing.Darwin hypothesizedthat a combination of gravity and the root touching its way across the surface was behind itand for 130 years, thats what everyone else thought too.

But in 2010, we saw that the roots of the plants we grew on the ISS marched across the surface of their Petri plate in aperfect example of root skewingno gravity required. It was quite a surprise. So whats really behind root-skewing on orbit, since its obviously not gravity?

Plants on the ISS do have a potentially second source of information from which they could get a directional cue: light. We hypothesized that in the absence of gravity to point roots away from the direction of the leaves, light plays a bigger role in root guidance.

What we found was that yes, light is important, but not just any light will dothere has to be a gradient of light intensity for it to act as a useful guide. Think of it in terms of a good smell: you can navigate to the kitchen with your eyes closed when cookies are just coming out of the oven, but if the whole house is flooded equally with the scent of chocolate chip cookies, you couldnt find your way.

Adjusting Their Metabolic Toolbox on the Fly

In the absence of gravity, plants cant use the tools theyre used to for navigation, so they had to craft together another solution. They can do that by regulating the way they express their genes. That way they can make more or less of specific proteins that are helpful or not in zero gravity. Various plant parts came up with their own gene regulation strategies.

We found a number of genes involved in making and remodeling cell walls areexpressed differentlyin space-grown plants. Other genes involved with light-sensingnormally expressed in leaves on Earthare expressed in roots on the ISS. In leaves, many genes associated with plant hormone signaling are repressed, and genes associated with insect defense are more active.These same trendsare also seen in the relative abundance of proteins involved in signaling, cell wall metabolism and defense.

These patterns of genes and proteins tell a storyin microgravity, plants respond by loosening their cell walls, along with creating new ways to sense their environment.

We track these gene expression changes in real time by labeling specific proteins with a fluorescent tag. Plants engineered withglowing fluorescent proteinscan then report how they are responding to their environment as it is happening. These engineered plants act as biological sensorsbiosensors for short. Specialized cameras and microscopes let us follow how the plant is utilizing those fluorescent proteins.

Insights from Space

This kind of research gives us new understanding of how plants sense and respond to external stimuli at a fundamental, molecular level. The more we can learn about how plants respond to novel and extreme environments, the more prepared we are for understanding how plants will deal with the changing environments theyre up against here on Earth.

And of course our research will inform collective efforts to take our biology off the planet. The observation that gravity isnt as vital to plants as we once thought is welcome news for the prospect of farming on other planets with low gravity, and even on spacecraft where there is no gravity. Humans are explorers, and when we leave earths orbit, you can bet well take plants with us!

Anna-Lisa Paul is a Research Professor, Graduate Faculty in Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Florida.

Robert Ferl is the Director of the Interdisciplinary Center for Biotechnology Research, University of Florida.

More:
Plant Life on the International Space Station is Blossoming - Newsweek

Posted in Space Station | Comments Off on Plant Life on the International Space Station is Blossoming – Newsweek

Meet the mice who soared through space and back again – The San Gabriel Valley Tribune

Posted: at 8:50 pm

Move over, Mickey, Southern California has new rodent celebrities. You might call them Micetronauts 2.0.

The first group of star-trekking mice to ever travel to the International Space Station has returned to their home at a UCLA lab, where theyre being studied for a promising new therapy to regrow lost bone density.

All the rodents from ISS made it back alive and healthy on July4!, said Dr. Chia Soo, a lead researcher on UCLAs NELL-1 study.

A group of forty mice blasted into low-Earth orbit 220 miles up on June 3 from Florida, as part of a robust NASA science mission. Other projects on board included an investigation into mysterious pulsar stars believe to hold keys for better navigation and time-keeping capabilities on Earth, and a fruit-fly study into treating weakened cardiac muscles.

Half the mice in the NELL-1 study are still living on the Space Station and being treated with the protein that Soo and her team believe may spur degraded bone to regrow.

The other half splashed down inside a SpaceX Dragon spacecraft in the Pacific Ocean off Baja California on Monday, and were unloaded the following morning in San Pedro.

The mice passed through the Earths 3,000-degree Fahrenheit atmosphere, at a rate of force equal to about five times their body weight, without injury, scientists said.

They looked really good. They were very healthy, said Louis Stodieck, director of BioServe Space Technologies at the University of Colorado Boulders aerospace-engineering sciences division.

When the 20 still-orbiting astro-mice return to join those now back in the lab, their bone development will be compared.

Stodieck, who managed the rodents complex travel and care accommodations, joined UCLA researchers as the first to greet the returning rodents. During their travel, they lived inside a special habitat and ate moist, nutrient-rich food bars developed by NASA. (Think of a power bar but not quite so sweet, said Stodieck. The mice love it. Its very good, Ive actually tried it.).

Like returning astronauts, the micetronauts appeared initially unsteady in gravity. Their space habitat had mesh walls, allowing them to crawl around with stability.

They get so adapted to microgravity, that gravity probably feels a little hard, Stodieck said. They looked a little bit tenuous, but theyre getting used to it.

Since the Soviet Sputnik program returned the first animals dogs, rodents and insects from a brief trip around the Earth in 1957, the U.S. Space Shuttle program has gone on to return animals from rocket trips.

Advertisement

But these are the first U.S. rodents to participate in a lengthy microgravity research trip, and to board the space stations National Laboratory, Stodieck said.

These studies, with animal models, are few and far between. They are difficult and expensive, he said. Its very important for us, in any of these studies, to maximize their scientific utility. The space station is a tremendous laboratory platform. Were learning a lot of things.

Increasingly, researchers are studying the effects of microgravity on stem cells to understand the full potential of space research.

But the mice are promising some exciting results that could help many people on Earth, according to the scientists.

Astronauts (and micetronauts) experience severe bone loss when they travel outside Earths gravity-laden atmosphere. Floating around in microgravity not only depletes bone mass, it also weakens muscles most notably, heart muscle.

If it can work for microgravity-related bone loss, then it could have increased use for patients one day on Earth who have bone loss from trauma or aging, Soo said.

SpaceXs reusable rockets and spacecraft are enabling U.S. researchers to send experiments to orbit affordably from America for the first time in years.

Five years ago, the self-propelling Dragon became the first commercial spacecraft to dock at the International Space Station. Its able to return to Earth by plopping, Space Shuttle-style, into the ocean.

Its also built to return to space repeatedly throughout its life.

The Dragon craft that returned the 20 mice to Earth on July 3 previously flew to the Space Station in 2014.

SpaceXs business model relies on such high-tech recycling and on a consistent, persistent launch calendar.

Keeping pace with growing customer demand, SpaceX launched its third rocket in 12 days last Wednesday just 48 hours after two successive dramatic last-second aborts on the launch pad.

The mission also carried hundreds of fruit flies for an investigation into the effects of microgravity on the cardiovascular system.

Fruit fly hearts have similar components to humans and are much closer to humans, in some respect, than mice and rats, said Karen Ocorr, who is leading the study at Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute in La Jolla.

The research team sent hundreds of flies packed in six tissue box-sized habitats. Four of the boxes carried 2,000 fly eggs, and others carried hundreds of breeding adults, intended to give birth in space to flies that would return to Earth.

We have a team of 12 people who will be present in the lab when we receive the flies back, Ocorr said. Well spend the next month or more trying to understand the effects on their skeletal muscle and heart muscle function, among other things.

People who have long-term illnesses, or are infirm and spend a long time in bed, experience progressive cardiac dysfunctions, she said, adding that this study could help develop new therapies for weak hearts.

Lennox Middle School students will also soon get back research from inside this Dragon. Theyre studying whether lemon-mint plants grow better, worse, or the same in microgravity, as part of the Student Spaceflight Experiments Program.

We wanted to use mint because its something we use a lot in our Hispanic culture, said Nayeli Salgado, one of the Lennox school team members. It has many uses stomach aches, ear aches. You can use it instead of medicine. It takes the pain away.

Read more:
Meet the mice who soared through space and back again - The San Gabriel Valley Tribune

Posted in Space Station | Comments Off on Meet the mice who soared through space and back again – The San Gabriel Valley Tribune

GOOD NEWS FROM SCHOOLS: Students attend STEM camp at Piedmont College – Gwinnettdailypost.com

Posted: at 8:49 pm

Rising seventh- through 10th-graders from Lilburn, Radloff and Osborne middle schools, and Meadowcreek and North Hall high schools have spent part of their summer at a STEM camp at Piedmont College.

The goal is to work collaboratively to determine how to create a sustainable colony on Mars.

The Piedmont College Woodrow Wilson Georgia Teaching Fellowship STEM Camp seeks to foster and enhance education in the fields of science, technology, engineering and math.

We seek to inspire the next generation of STEM leaders through learning experiences that promote inquiry and critical thinking, said Bill Nye, the camps director and a science department chair at Meadowcreek High. Moreover, we seek to provide high quality, rigorous and authentic opportunities which promote outstanding academic achievement for all students.

The camp aims to increase campers understanding of survival and sustainability on Mars within activities related to environmental science, biotechnology and engineering robotics.

We believe that through collaborative and well-coordinated efforts, students in secondary schools can find solutions to not only the problems of today, but of the future, Nye said. Students must be challenged to explore possibilities for existence beyond Earth. As Mars is the next most inhabitable planet in the solar system, the exploration of a sustainable life on Mars is warranted.

Nye added that students increased their understanding of biotechnology through DNA extraction and completing a genetic transformation lab by transferring a jellyfish gene into bacteria to witness bioluminescence. The campers applied engineering and coding skills to use a drone to explore a mock Mars landscape, and to program robots to explore regions of interest and extract needed resources. Their further exploration of alternative energy sources will apply their content to energy limitations on Earth as well as Mars.

The field of environmental science has also been explored as students work with simulated Martian soil to determine how to grow crops on Mars and create a sustainable colony. Further explorations into urban agriculture tie directly into the need for locally developed produce and community gardens at Meadowcreek cluster schools and across the community, Nye said.

The instructors for the Piedmont STEM Camp are Woodrow Wilson Fellows in a pre-service teacher graduate program at Piedmont College. These STEM-specialized educators have experience in STEM fields. Theyve been embedded for the past year in math and science courses as intern-partners with a certified teacher and will be experiencing their first year as a classroom teacher in just a few weeks.

This model allows new teachers to develop their craft prior to flying solo and consequently are immediate contributors to their respective departments and colleagues bringing new instructional techniques to the classroom with an emphasis on the application of learning to ensure students are college and career ready upon graduation, Nye said.

The final project for the Piedmont STEM campers was to create a plan for a sustainable Mars colony. Students will have the opportunity to submit their Mars colonization proposal to several NASA competitions including the NASA Ames Space Settlement Contest.

Keith Farner writes about education. Good News from Schools appears in the Sunday edition of the Daily Post.

Success! An email has been sent with a link to confirm list signup.

Error! There was an error processing your request.

Get Breaking News alerts from the Gwinnett Daily Post delivered to your email.

Daily local news headlines from across Gwinnett County.

Daily sports headlines from across Gwinnett County, including high school, professional and college news.

Read more from the original source:
GOOD NEWS FROM SCHOOLS: Students attend STEM camp at Piedmont College - Gwinnettdailypost.com

Posted in Mars Colonization | Comments Off on GOOD NEWS FROM SCHOOLS: Students attend STEM camp at Piedmont College – Gwinnettdailypost.com

Genetically modified food is too advanced for its out-of-date regulations – The Hill (blog)

Posted: at 8:49 pm

Last week, the USDA published a series ofquestionsseeking input to establish a National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard, as mandated by amendments to the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 that went into effect in July 2016.

TheNational Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard Actrequires the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture to establish disclosure standards for bioengineered food. The Act preempts state-based labeling laws for genetically modified organisms (GMOs), such as those adopted inVermontlast year.

The USDA is considering public input on the disclosure standards untilJuly 17, 2017. Two key issues are under consideration. The first is whether certain genetic modifications should be treated as though they are found in nature for example, a mutation that naturally confers disease resistance in a crop. The second concerns what types of breeding techniques should be classified as conventional breeding among "conventional breeding" techniques are hybridization and the use of chemicals or radiation to introduce random genetic mutations.

These seemingly mundane questions strike at the heart of GMO controversies and implicate the use of breakthrough CRISPR gene editing technologies. Gene editing allows novel and precise genetic modifications to be introduced into crops and animals intended for human consumption. The answers to the USDA's questions are significant because the Disclosure Standard Act exempts from mandatory disclosure genetic modifications obtained without recombinant DNA (rDNA) techniques that can otherwise be found in nature.

However, CRISPR gene editing need not rely on using any foreign DNA and can introduce genetic modifications that mirror those already found in nature. Unlike rDNA and conventional breeding methods, CRISPR technologies introduce genetic changes with far greater accuracy and precision.

In 2016, the USDAdeclined to regulatetwo CRISPR crops a mushroom and a waxy corn under regulations governing traditionalGMOs. But other regulatory agencies, including the FDA and EPA, have not yet made determinations on crops or animals modified with CRISPR technology, and uncertainty looms concerning the regulatory status of this new breed ofGMOs.

Opponents ofGMOs, who commonly argue thatGMOsare harmful to human health, decried the USDA's decision not to regulate CRISPR crops and argued thatpowerful corporations had found ways to circumvent the law through technical loopholes in outdated regulations.

Yet three decades of scientific research suggest that present-dayGMOcontroversies are not grounded in scientific fact. For instance, despite frequent rumors aboutGMO-induced cancers, a scientific consensus has now formed to support the health and environmental safety of genetically modified crops for animal and human consumption. That proposition is supported by investigations of theU.S. National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicineas well as scientific panels including the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the American Medical Association, the European Commission, and National Academies of Science in Australia, Brazil, China, France, Germany, India, the United Kingdom, and other countries.

In its rulemaking process, the USDA should rely upon science and facts. With regard to crops and animals with DNA altered through gene editing, rulemakers ought to distinguish among ways that CRISPR technology may be used to edit genes. For instance, CRISPR technology can be used as a DNA construct that is incorporated into the DNA of plant or animal cells, or as a preassembled RNA and protein complex.

How gene editing is carried out matters, because some methods appear to fall within the disclosure requirements while others do not. The law definesbioengineered foodas food that contains genetic material modified through in vitro rDNA techniques. Thus, under the Disclosure Standard Acts statutory constraints, CRISPR food created using DNA constructs that are incorporated into plant or animal cells would likely fall under the mandatory disclosures.

However, food derived from rDNA-free CRISPR gene editing using transient preassembled RNA and protein complexes should be excluded from the bioengineered food definition because such complexes are degraded shortly after gene editing takes place and do not insert themselves into the target organism DNA.

The nuances of ever-evolving biotechnological innovation highlight the complexity of our regulatory system and the need to modernize it. The National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard Act is just one of the latest pieces of that regulatory patchwork to emerge. Rules establishing bioengineered food disclosures should be coherent and science-based. Gene editing that uses no foreign DNA, is more precise than conventional breeding methods, and causes genetic modifications already found in nature should not be subject to onerous disclosure standards.

Paul Enrquez is a lawyer and scientist currently doing research in Structural & Molecular Biochemistry at North Carolina State University. His work focuses on the intersection of science and law and has been featured in both legal and scientific journals. He explores rising legal and regulatory issues concerning genome editing in crop production in depth and makes policy recommendations in his recently published article CRISPRGMOs.

The views expressed by contributors are their own and not the views of The Hill.

See the article here:
Genetically modified food is too advanced for its out-of-date regulations - The Hill (blog)

Posted in Genetic Engineering | Comments Off on Genetically modified food is too advanced for its out-of-date regulations – The Hill (blog)

Finding Love in a Lower Manhattan Courthouse – New York Times

Posted: at 8:48 pm

Mr. Lytle quickly denied that accusation and offered his own defense. They were going out eating every day but I was bringing my own lunch, trying to eat healthier, and reading a lot, he said. I guess I was just trying to make the best of the situation, because jury duty is usually never any fun.

But he found out otherwise on May 30, 2014 which happened to be his 27th birthday when he finally accepted one of those lunch offers, and went along with Ms. Nelson and two other jurors to a nearby restaurant/bar.

That day I learned that he has a very funny, subtle and surprising sense of humor, Ms. Nelson said. He notices small quirks in people.

He noticed a lot more than that in Ms. Nelson. She was very attractive and made me laugh, he said. She was also a very intelligent person who knew a lot about science and had a very interesting career.

They began going out for lunch with greater frequency, and one night in June, they went for drinks with four fellow jurors, all of whom disappeared during the course of the evening, leaving Ms. Nelson and Mr. Lytle alone in a social setting for the first time.

Ms. Nelson invited Mr. Lytle back to her apartment to watch an episode of The Bachelor, along with her roommate, and Mr. Lytle accepted. When the show ended, they went dancing at a Manhattan bar.

That was kind of the turning point in our relationship, said Ms. Nelson, who was living on the Upper East Side at the time, while Mr. Lytle lived in Washington Heights.

They were soon dating, and became a more serious item in the days after the trial ended in late July 2014.

The nicest thing about Jordan is that being with him always felt so natural and right, Ms. Nelson said. I met him at a time when I was going on a lot of first dates, and most of them always felt very childish, but Jordan was always kind and considerate and never one to play games. We just seem to balance each other out very well.

Recently, a friend of Ms. Nelsons called to bemoan the fact that she had received a jury duty notice.

It might not be as bad as you think, Ms. Nelson told her. You never know, you might meet your future husband there.

Read the original:
Finding Love in a Lower Manhattan Courthouse - New York Times

Posted in Human Genetics | Comments Off on Finding Love in a Lower Manhattan Courthouse – New York Times