Monthly Archives: July 2017

How Derrick Rose can find success again – SB Nation

Posted: July 21, 2017 at 12:02 pm

Success in life is about setting appropriate goals, and fighting like hell to achieve them. Luck (or chaos, depending on your amount of nihilism) plays a massive role. Yet, we each control our own destiny to a degree.

This goes double in the workplace. External forces can derail or enhance your ability to achieve success. But the goals you set and the work you do to achieve them are whats most important in the formula.

This is why Derrick Rose should join the Cavaliers. It would be a departure and a role reversal for the former Most Valuable Player, but it would also set a new path for a career that has grown stale.

First, Rose needs to accept that he is no longer the player who captured the MVP six years ago. Even at just the age of 28, Roses body has already betrayed him. He plays like a 34-year-old point guard who still relies on the athleticism of his peak.

Rose still put up numbers in New York because hes still a high-volume lead guard. What was troubling is that Rose put up those numbers despite being paired with Hall of Fame scorer Carmelo Anthony and burgeoning star Kristaps Porzingis last season. Roses goal was to be a star point guard despite his physical ailments and several seasons of anti-glory. In that quest, he put up surprisingly decent, albeit hollow, numbers.

Despite having his best season since 2012 (when he was an All-Star), Rose was still miscast as a featured player. The Knicks record spells out the bottom line: New York was bad, and only won 40 percent of their games with Rose available.

He needs a different goal as he transitions into the next phase of his career. As the free agent market showed, no one wants that old D-Rose anymore, at least not at the salary hes expecting.

But as several aging former stars have shown us, theres hope yet for Rose. He needs set new goals and work to achieve them.

Consider Shaun Livingston, who suffered perhaps the most gruesome injury in NBA history 10 years ago. Unlike Rose, Liv wasnt yet a star. He was on that path, and then his knee blew it all up.

Liv didnt quit, though. After three years playing sparingly and rehabbing religiously, he set new goals and accepted a new role. He changed his game and his mindset. Hes now an important cog on a two-time champion at age 31.

You sense Rose believes hes more than Livingston, that he can be better than an important cog on a champion. What Rose has to do to look within and determine whats truly better than that while being within the realm of possibility.

Is becoming an All-Star again within the realm of possibility? It could be, in the right situation. History shows us that if you score a lot of points, you have an inside track on winning an All-Star spot. But no team (with one exception) has been willing to give Rose an opportunity to be its offensive focal point this summer. Without opportunity there is no achievement.

Is becoming an important cog on a champion possible? That is absolutely what Rose could become for Cleveland, even though the Cavaliers remain massive underdogs against the Warriors.

Rose is a better player right now than Deron Williams, who arrived midseason to serve as the supplemental shot creator needed to let Kyrie rest and LeBron play off the ball. But Williams was wildly overmatched throughout the playoffs. Rose gives Cleveland a better chance as long as he plays within the system, tries hard on defense, and defers to the Cavaliers brighter stars.

Theres no chance hed score 18 a night as a Cav, or sniff an All-Star nod. But hed be on screens across the world in May and June, and he just might get to hoist a trophy in front of the Q.

Perhaps more importantly, LeBron has the standing to help Rose reset his goals. No one in the league is more successful on and off the court than LeBron. He speaks with authority. Plus, when hes on the court, Rose isnt going to be able to take over the offense. LeBron doesnt let that happen. (Ask Kyrie Irving or Dion Waiters.)

Is Rose ready to sacrifice his personal numbers and his narrow potential for a return to stardom -- potential he likely believes to be greater than what we believe it to be to find a new brand of success? Well see.

The Lakers and Bulls are both reportedly knocking on Roses door. Neither will pay much either, making this largely a decision about role.

On the Lakers, Rose will challenge Lonzo Ball, Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, and Jordan Clarkson for minutes. Hell get plenty -- not start-level as he did in New York, but more than hed likely get in Cleveland. L.A. wont be good, though, and Lonzo is the future. Theres no runway for Rose with the Lakers. Itd be yet another pit stop.

We can all agree that going back to Chicago would just be plain weird. But heres the thing: that team doesnt have any lead scorers other than Dwyane Wade at the moment. Zach LaVine will almost assuredly miss the beginning of the regular season while recovering from ACL surgery, and odds are Chicago will bring him along slowly given the low likelihood the Bulls will be competitive.

Wade remains an incredibly odd fit, and theres a chance he finds a new home before the season begins through a buy-out or trade. Rose is much better than Kris Dunn at this point, to say nothing of Cameron Payne. Theres no scoring in the frontcourt, even with Nikola Mirotic still unsigned, so Rose would get plenty of minutes and plenty of points. Roses best shot at personal success his best shot at putting up numbers like the Derrick Rose of old -- is returning to Chicago, if the Bulls even truly want him.

But thats not where Roses future lies. He almost assuredly cant be a high-volume player on a good team. This is a critical moment in his transition. How he is remembered in the future and how he gets paid in his 30s depend on what sort of career he molds for himself now.

Its all about finding an achievable role and excelling in it. Cleveland offers that. Well soon find out if Rose agrees, or if he still believes hes capable of being a star.

See the rest here:

How Derrick Rose can find success again - SB Nation

Posted in Nihilism | Comments Off on How Derrick Rose can find success again – SB Nation

What we’ve learned from 6 months of Trump – Circleville Herald

Posted: at 12:01 pm

WASHINGTON Its strange how six months can feel like six exhausting years when theyve produced nothing but a string of nonsensical superlatives.

As Donald Trump celebrates the first eighth of his ridiculous amazing, stupendous, unsurpassed presidency, we mere mortals are left to ponder what we have learned. Well, here are some takeaways:

Facts do not matter to this White House. Trump has publicly lied about important matters more than 100 times since becoming president. These are not just equivocations open to dispute; theyre flat-out, verifiable untruths. For example, he said he has accomplished more and signed more bills into law than any previous president. Not true. His staff follows his lead, disseminating statements that are lies.

Trump not only failed to drain the swamp, he deepened and widened it. He has filled top posts with Wall Streeters and business cronies, doling out jobs like mints to loyal minions. After he promised not to touch Medicaid, which serves the disabled, poor and elderly in nursing homes, we were introduced to a Trumpcare plan that called for disqualifying 75 million and taking another 22 million off health insurance.

He is a costly public servant. He is on track in his first year to spend more taxpayer money on personal travel than President Barack Obama did in eight. We also pay for security at Trump Tower, his hotels and his golf courses. His re-election committee (of course he wants four more years after 2020) has raised millions to pay legal fees and rent for office space in Trump Tower.

Trump does not care that he has the lowest approval rating of any president since polling started (about 70 years). His base loves him even though he has done nothing for them since taking office. Is it any wonder that 34 percent of Americans do not believe in scientific evolution, according to the Pew Research Center? Is it surprising that a majority of Republicans believe that colleges and universities are a negative influence on the country? (Pew again.)

Trump has set the precedent that a presidents conflicts of interest do not matter. Refusing to divest himself of his holdings, he has put his son Junior (the one who loves meeting with Kremlin operatives) in charge. His wealthy daughter and son-in-law have offices in the White House. His hotels draw foreign leaders who want to curry favor. Fees at his Mar-a-Lago golf resort have doubled to $200,000.

Getting rid of excessive and overlapping regulations is one thing. Gutting environmental protection and consumer protection regulations as Trump is doing is another. A future column will detail the astonishing number of actions the administration quietly has taken to further the interests of big business to the detriment of Americans who love their parks, want to breathe clean air, drink clean water and buy products that wont hurt their children.

The artful dealmaker has not managed to make any good deals. Even with a GOP-controlled House and Senate, he could not repeal Obamacare. Instead he sabotages it by eliminating advertising, shortening the enrollment period and not enforcing the mandate to buy insurance or pay a tax to keep premiums low. Wages are not increasing. Exporters of American goods and services will be hurt by the lack of free trade he is engineering. No wall. No tax reform. No infrastructure plan.

The number of investigations caused by Trumps inexplicable fondness for Vladimir Putin, the Russian thief, thug and murderer, is unparalleled for a first term. Trump refuses to admit Russia meddled in our elections yet wants a national registry of all Americans personal information to root out voter fraud the experts say does not exist. Hey, Russia, Trump will make it easy for you to re-elect him.

The United States is no longer the leader of the free world and fighter for human rights in the eyes of our once closest allies. After seeing Trump up close and personal at international meetings, some say openly they may never again trust us.

Trumps misogyny, hedonism, lack of discipline, coarse language, bullying and refusal to read briefing papers or attempt to learn what he doesnt know diminish us. The man who convinced millions to watch him say Youre fired every week parlayed celebrity into the White House, but the applause is fading. Only 12 percent liked his disgraceful health care plan. It died.

2017 Tribune Content Agency, LLC

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Continue reading here:

What we've learned from 6 months of Trump - Circleville Herald

Posted in Hedonism | Comments Off on What we’ve learned from 6 months of Trump – Circleville Herald

PS Spotlight: Remembering celebrity fancy dress for the grand Cointreau Ball – The Sydney Morning Herald

Posted: at 12:01 pm

In the years before we had to endure Instagramselfiesfrom the AmalfiCoast, mid-winter was one of the hottest times on the Sydney social calendar.

For an epic 14-year run, Bastille Day would be marked in Sydney with the grandest party of them all, the Cointreau Ball, the ultimate celebration of the '80s and '90s.

On par with today's Met Ball in New York, and dressed up as a promotion for the French liqueur, it was really more of a licence for a boozy knees up, where titled socialites would disappear under dinner tables and get up to all sorts of a mischief before dessert had even arrived.

Remember, this wasan era when such things were rejoicedrather than frowned upon.

Today's PS Spotlight shines back on those days of unbridled hedonism, when 400 or so of this town's most glamorouscitizens would converge on a secret location in a fleet of limos to indulge in an all-night event (one went for 48 hours) of bacchanalian delights, a sort of Mardi Gras at the Ritz, which Sydney has not seen since the lastCointreau Ball was held in 1999.

And yes, a much youngerPS managed to get along to a few Cointreau Balls, and while some of the memories are admittedly a little hazy,a few areindelible.

Like the year Sheila Scotter, the grand dame of Australian society who retained an imperial air about herself well into her dotage and was the founding editrix of Vogue Australia in 1962, turned up dressed as Empress Alexandra Feodorovna, wife of Nicholas II, the last Tsar of Russia. It was a fitting costume as she sailed into the room.

Get the latest news and updates emailed straight to your inbox.

Society set hairdresserJohBaileywas dressed as a living Academy Award one year, his hairless body (thanks to a painful wax session) entirely covered in gold paint that also camouflagedhis goosebumps. Bailey was pulled around the exclusive party on a specially made podium on wheels, towed by a glamorous Oscars "presenter" carrying a huge envelope emblazoned with the words: "And the winner is ..."

Another year Johdescended a grand staircase in a huge showgirl-inspired number replete with ostrich feathers and giant peacock fan tail behind him with the wingspan of a small private jet. The feathers didn't last though, after working the dance floor,Joh's crumpledplumage was a shadow of its former self by night's end, a sight that would have him in rehab according to today's petty puritans.

The brainchild of public relations dynamo Deeta Colvin, the Cointreau Ballwas the first eventin the country to bring dodgem cars and ice rinks into parties. Each year outrageous themes were thoroughly embraced by the party set who turned it into the ultimate costume party, the result ofmonths of meticulous planning.

Before he ended up in jail for dealing cocaine, Gough Whitlam's self-proclaimed "adopted" grandson (although the Whitlam's disowned him years ago)Andrew "Baci" Whitlam turned up to one Hollywood-themedCointreau Ball asLiz Taylor, but there was no room in the limo for the wheelchair he planned to take with him.

A newly single Johanna Griggs arrived dressed as Marilyn Monroe,aspiring party girl and magazine wunderkind Mia Freedman dressed up as aroller girl(complete with skates), while newlyweds Charlotte Dawson and Scott Miller were the hottest "it" couple in town. They truly lookedhappy together.

Of course the Cointreau Ball generated its own controversies, too. In its later years one scribe pennedit had lost its cutting edge: "a predictable mishmash that's become a self-regarding outing for B-grade celebrities who look like they've been dressed by Helen Keller and Ray Charles." He was never invited again.

That was also the year when some of Sydney's socialites had been bumped from the guest list in favour of soap stars, leading anothercolumnist to declare it was "more E Street than Queen Street".

But that didn't stopLeo Schofield from turning upin what looked like a creation from a Venetian masked ball. His daughter Nell went for a cocktail commando number.

Hotfashion designer of the dayLeona Edmiston wore a body suit that was covered, top to toe, in glittering sequins. Game show host Larry Emdur channelled Hugh Hefner, turning up with a bevy of his New Price Is Right models to finish off the look.

And who could forget television host Kerri-Anne Kennerley and husband John when they came as the Queen and King of Hearts?Indeed,the photoshaunted KAK for years to follow.

Today we now look back and smile and remember what a swell party it was.

See the article here:

PS Spotlight: Remembering celebrity fancy dress for the grand Cointreau Ball - The Sydney Morning Herald

Posted in Hedonism | Comments Off on PS Spotlight: Remembering celebrity fancy dress for the grand Cointreau Ball – The Sydney Morning Herald

Arcade Fire – ‘Everything Now’ Album Review – NME – NME.com

Posted: at 12:01 pm

The Canadian art-rockers are bigger, bolder and more fearful of the future than ever on their colossal fifth album

Arcade Fire have spent a career making a virtue of their own pomposity. Since 2004 debut Funeral, theyve been unafraid to wrestle with big ideas that most bands wouldnt touch with a barge pole. If it sometimes appears as though they believe societys ills can be solved, or at least diagnosed, through the medium of grandiose art-rock records, you nonetheless have to admire their conviction that music ought to represent something more than mere content. Thankfully, after the ambitious-but-uneven Reflektor (2013), Everything Now marks an emphatic return to those lofty standards.

Every song that Ive ever heard is playing at the same time, its absurd, declares starry-eyed frontman Win Butler on the albums title-track, which is certainly one way to describe its mash-up of Dancing Queen and Talking Heads Road to Nowhere. Uplifting, incisive and sublime would be another.

On the flipside, the empty hedonism of Signs of Life and the self-loathing, suicidal youths of Creature Comfort one of whom, Butler notes, Came so close/ Filled up the bathtub and put on our first record, serve as a reminder of the cruel irony that in this age of total connectivity, weve somehow contrived to make ourselves more isolated and alone than ever. Everything Now might occasionally marvel at how far weve come, but its tempered by notes of dread at where were going.

Aptly enough for a record about information overload, its also had the veritable kitchen sink thrown at it, employing myriad styles, multiple big-name producers and the sort of ingenious, overblown marketing campaign thats become the norm for this band. On the two-hander of Infinite Content and Infinite_Content, the same song is presented in contrasting styles one as a knowing postmodern thrash, the other as a languid acoustic ramble but ultimately its the albums sense of humanity, not its innate clever-cleverness, that elevates it to something special. If you cant see the forest for the trees, just burn it all down,urges Butler as the mournful synth-pop of closing track We Dont Deserve Love builds to its climax, no longer sermonising from his pulpit, but howling in empathy from the ether.

Details

Release Date: July 28, 2017

Read more:

Arcade Fire - 'Everything Now' Album Review - NME - NME.com

Posted in Hedonism | Comments Off on Arcade Fire – ‘Everything Now’ Album Review – NME – NME.com

Fiction review: Living the Dream – The Sydney Morning Herald – The Sydney Morning Herald

Posted: at 12:01 pm

Living The Dream, by Lauren Berry.Photo: supplied

Living the Dream

Lauren Berry

Virago, $29.99

This witty debut from Lauren Berry focuses on two young women in London whose dreams seem out of reach. Emma Derringer works at an ad agency; she blogs on the sly and privately keeps her hopes of being a novelist alive, in the face of a soul-crushing job she hates. Clementine Twist has returned from New York empty-handed, finding casual bar work and living with her mum as she desperately tries to advance a career as a screenwriter. The gal pals bond over random hedonism and cynical banter, while resenting other characters who seem to have their lives more together. Berry writes clever, overheard-sounding dialogue and her satire of two woman-children in their late 20s does have sardonic bite. The main trouble, though, is the novel's resolution a belated coming-of-age that skirts around rather than delves into problems the characters face, and feels surprisingly shallow and unearned.

View post:

Fiction review: Living the Dream - The Sydney Morning Herald - The Sydney Morning Herald

Posted in Hedonism | Comments Off on Fiction review: Living the Dream – The Sydney Morning Herald – The Sydney Morning Herald

Letters to the editor, July 21, 2017 – Peterborough Examiner

Posted: at 12:00 pm

Scientific atheism and intellectual contempt

I give you a quote from David Berlinski: "Has anyone provided proof of God's inexistence? Not even close. Has quantum cosmology explained the emergence of the universe or why it is here? Not even close. Have our sciences explained why our universe seems to be fine-tuned to allow for the existence of life? Not even close. Are physicists and biologists willing to believe in anything so long as it is not religious thought? Close enough. Has rationalism and moral thought provided us with an understanding of what is good, what is right, and what is moral? Not close enough. Has secularism in the terrible 20th century been a force for good? Not even close, to being close. Is there a narrow and oppressive orthodoxy in the sciences? Close enough. Does anything in the sciences or their philosophy justify the claim that religious belief is irrational? Not even in the ball park. Is scientific atheism a frivolous exercise in intellectual contempt ? Dead on."

Berlinski was a research assistant in molecular biology at Columbia University,[3] and was a research fellow at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) in Austria and the Institut des Hautes tudes Scientifiques (IHES) in France. How is it that he has come up with a totally different outcome?

Blair Hancock, Downie St.

Vastly different viewpoints on Khadr

Talk about black and white! The two letters printed Wednesday show both sides of this argument, I'm sure.

Mary Liz Allen describes so beautifully the point of view of Mr. Khadr, as the situation presented itself to a child of 15. Marion Hanysh describes a point of view that the rest of our great country is somehow being left out of some prize bestowed upon Mr. Khadr unfairly.

A Canadian is a Canadian and as such deserves all the protection that we have been taught to expect. If you really want to know what a burgeoning "banana republic" feels like, Ms. Hanysh, may I suggest you relocate to Mr. Trump's jurisdiction. I, too, am on the downslide, and am most grateful that my children, grandchildren and great-grandchild are growing up in the best, most open, accepting country on earth.

I sincerely hope that they will be part of an ever-caring and just society, throughout their lifetimes, and beyond. Thank you, Ms. Allen, for helping us all to FEEL what young Omar had to endure for all those years.

Bev Miles, Omemee

Read the rest here:

Letters to the editor, July 21, 2017 - Peterborough Examiner

Posted in Rationalism | Comments Off on Letters to the editor, July 21, 2017 – Peterborough Examiner

Pankaj Mishra’s eloquent anger – The Islamic Monthly

Posted: at 12:00 pm

Much has been made about how the rise of right-wing demagoguery today has roots in the sociopolitical aberrations of 20th-century fascism, a tragic detour in Western modernitys supposedly gradual road of infinite progress. This is much too truncated an analogy for Pankaj Mishra, a London-based Indian writer whose new book, Age of Anger: A History of the Present (to come out later this month), reaches back even further in the history of Western thought to argue that contemporary rage the kind thats being generated and exploited by opportunistic politicians around the world is actually a logical byproduct of liberal rationalism, the bedrock of our modern reality and philosophical backdrop to the now fraying fabric of globalization.

Mishra uses what the 19th-century German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche called ressentiment an existential resentment of other peoples being, caused by an intense mix of envy and sense of humiliation and powerlessness to describe the origins of todays mass expressions of nativist rage, validated by President-elect Donald Trump and his equally insurgent cognates across the world. This ressentiment is caused ultimately by the inherent unevenness of modern politics and economics, which is constructed on the assumption that human nature can be perfected through rationalized self-interest. Those who directly or indirectly sense the illusory nature of this pervasive assumption find themselves in rigged systems that only pretend to an equal and fair playing field, be it money-making, political representation or even interpersonal relationships.

After all, not everyone can be a recipient of modernitys material promises. Not every family in, say, China and Indian can be the proud owner of multiple SUVs, swimming pools and spacious garages, regardless of what the flagbearers of liberal globalization proclaim. Any attempt to do so would collapse an already frail planet before its even halfway realized. Those whore beginning to feel this gap between modern realities and modern promises in places like Asia and elsewhere turning to the same sort of nativist inwardness thats currently being exploited by strongmen like Indias Narendra Modi and the Philippines Rodrigo Duterte.

The GOP having majority sway over all three branches of the US government is scary enough, but its the global metastasis of this angry pattern thats truly frightening, as Asia and Africa long heralded as the rising tigers of liberal globalism produce their own versions of ressentiment demagoguery. Mishra reminds us that these waves of humiliated masses who feel like modernity has let them down are not unique to history. Theyre a type whove long existed in the Wests own history of modernization, a process thathasnt come to terms with the imperfections and limits of human nature, the darker aspects of our tainted souls thatgive rise to resentment and angry humiliation.

When the young man of promise fails to be admitted into the club of modern aspiration, he responds with bitterness at those whove been more successful, or those who he thinks have prevented him from attaining his rightful piece of the pie: Muslims, immigrants, gays, etc. This is where the response to getting left behind eventually morphs into a nativist and often fanatical defense of ones own sociocultural sect.

It takes a less-than-optimistic voice like Mishras to remind and prove to the public that, far from being the results of social or historical aberration, ressentiment is the inevitable byproduct of the continuous application of the conclusions of Enlightenment rationalism. This is when humankind replaced God with the Self, thus positing just as their societies entered an industrial age that the direction of civilization can be controlled by mans own rationalized self-interest.

Mishra quotes 20th-century Austrian writer Robert Musil in a recent introductory essay to Age of Anger: Its not that we have too much intellect and too little soul, but that we have too little intellect in matters of the soul. It seems like a simplistic reduction of what looks to most of us like a whole universe of various problems, but Mishra is convincing in his demonstration of how modern problems arent the products of modernity-gone-wrong, but of modernity itself. This sounds awfully similar to the social critiques presented by a host of traditionalist and Muslim intellectuals, from Hamza Yusuf to Seyyed Hossein Nasr and, though Mishra may not agree, it seems that Age of Anger is pointing toward broader solutions (insofar as they exist and its not clear that Mishra thinks they do) that would have to make use of organized religion.

It turns out that as the global order frays, religion itself isnt going anywhere. The global experience of Muslim terrorism, for example, is also an aspect of todays ressentiment. It points out that, among other things, religions have retained their power despite secular modernitys insistence that faith itself belongs ultimately to the myopic and backward stupidities/superstitions of simple people. Todays proponents of radical modernism now morphing precipitously into a mean laicism thanks to the rise of ISIS and the ongoing war on terror would be hard pressed to come up with a workable solution to our global crisis, since the problem is to be found at the heart of their own derivative worldview.

See the rest here:

Pankaj Mishra's eloquent anger - The Islamic Monthly

Posted in Rationalism | Comments Off on Pankaj Mishra’s eloquent anger – The Islamic Monthly

Thanks to blocked lecture, Ben Shapiro has a message about free speech for Berkeley defender Dianne Feinstein – Washington Examiner

Posted: at 11:59 am

The University of California, Berkeley's decision to block another conservative lecture, this time featuring popular author Ben Shapiro, rightfully sparked a fresh round of disgust among free speech advocates on Wednesday.

The school is under heavy fire from conservatives for a series of First Amendment controversies that unfolded over the course of the last school year, even facing a lawsuit from Young America's Foundation and the Berkeley College Republicans over Ann Coulter's canceled lecture in April. Between the riots that blocked Milo Yiannopoulos from speaking and the university's decision to cancel Coulter's lecture, Berkeley has become a high-profile battleground of the contemporary campus speech movement.

During a Senate hearing last month, Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, criticized the school in his remarks decrying the state of free speech in higher education. In response, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., ardently defended her state's flagship university.

"I know of no effort at Berkeley, at the University of California, to stifle student efforts to speech," she said at the time, continuing, "And if there is a specific effort, I would certainly appreciate it if people brought that to my attention."

Ben Shapiro is happy to help.

"If there is no effort to stifle free speech at Berkeley," Shapiro responded in an email to the Washington Examiner, "why has Berkeley failed to protect Milo Yiannopoulos' event, cancelled Ann Coulter's event, and now makes excuses about lack of availability for a speech already cleared by the College Republicans?"

"If Feinstein is so unconcerned about this, she should push her fellow Democrats in California to sponsor legislation requiring the suspension or expulsion of students who utilize violence to prevent others' free speech," he concluded.

Easy enough. But will the senator agree?

In a statement to Young America's Foundation (my previous employer), the organization set to sponsor his lecture, Shapiro indicated he won't accept the university's excuses. "Using ridiculous pretexts to keep conservatives from speaking is unsurprising but disappointing. We'll find a way to get this event done, and UC Berkeley has a moral and legal obligation to ensure we do so," he declared.

Emily Jashinsky is a commentary writer for the Washington Examiner.

Excerpt from:
Thanks to blocked lecture, Ben Shapiro has a message about free speech for Berkeley defender Dianne Feinstein - Washington Examiner

Posted in Free Speech | Comments Off on Thanks to blocked lecture, Ben Shapiro has a message about free speech for Berkeley defender Dianne Feinstein – Washington Examiner

Commentary: Free speech far from free – Jacksonville Journal Courier

Posted: at 11:59 am

There is a cartoon making the rounds on Facebook accompanied by comments announcing that Rick Friday, the cartoonist who drew the panel, had been fired by The Farm News, a Fort Dodge, Iowa, publication, after 21 years on the job.

The cartoon depicts two guys in bib overalls standing at a fence row. One of them says, I wish there was more profit in farming and the second guy says, There is. In the year 2015, the CEOs of Monsanto, DuPont Pioneer and John Deere combined made more money than 2,129 Iowa farmers.

Not exactly knee-slappingly funny, but apparently the companies named in the cartoon are also big advertisers with The Farm News.

The posting quotes the fired cartoonist as saying, When it comes to altering someones opinion or someones voice for the purpose of wealth, I have a problem with that. Its our constitutional right to free speech and our constitutional right to free press.

Although I can understand Fridays frustration at being let go, his objection that being fired is a violation of his constitutional rights of free speech and a free press shows a remarkable ignorance about those rights.

The First Amendment to the Constitution states: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

The First Amendment says that the government cannot pass laws prohibiting cartoonists from making fun of companies, but with respect to its employees, The Farm News can and is completely within its rights to fire the cartoonist.

The First Amendment outlines a relationship between the government and the people, not between a publishing enterprise and its employees. The management of The Farm News has an obligation to its owners and employees to maintain the financial integrity of the company. When one employees behavior threatens the finances of the company, management may discipline or even terminate the employee without violating his freedom of speech and press rights.

The constitutional protections of speech and press freedom do not guarantee that people may express themselves any way they want. You cannot post on the company bulletin board a notice declaring that the boss is an imbecile and then expect to be protected from being disciplined or fired because of your First Amendment rights. There is nothing in the Constitution compelling companies to spend advertising money in a particular publication, nor is there any provision in the First Amendment that requires a particular company to employ someone.

The government may not constrain Friday from drawing and having his cartoons published, but his employers are within their rights to fire him without violating his First Amendment rights.

Colin Kaepernick, the NFL quarterback who refused to stand for the National Anthem last year, was completely within his rights not to stand. However, just like Kaepernicks relation with the NFL, Fridays dismissal from The Farm News is not a violation of his First Amendment rights.

The First Amendment prohibits the government from silencing individuals and the press in most cases, but it is silent on work arrangements voluntarily entered into between both employees and management.

The Farm News has since rehired Rick Friday.

http://www.myjournalcourier.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/web1_web-freespeech.jpg

Jacksonville resident Jay Jamison writes each Friday for this page.

.

Read the original post:
Commentary: Free speech far from free - Jacksonville Journal Courier

Posted in Free Speech | Comments Off on Commentary: Free speech far from free – Jacksonville Journal Courier

DeVos urges state legislators to take on foes of campus free speech – Washington Times

Posted: at 11:59 am

DENVER | Education Secretary Betsy DeVos offered a reminder Thursday to state legislators frustrated by protests shutting down free speech at public universities: You control the purse strings.

Ms. DeVos, who delivered her remarks at the American Legislative Exchange Council annual meeting, said that we all have a role to play in reversing the trend toward campus intolerance, which has been manifested in recent years with the muzzling of conservative speakers and viewpoints.

For state legislators, you have the power of the purse, she said. And I wouldnt hope to suggest how you might approach that, but I think that really bringing some of the most egregious examples to the forefront we all have the opportunity to use our bully pulpits to talk about these things and bring light to places of darkness where speech is not being allowed to be free and open and heard.

Her comments came with state lawmakers increasingly exasperated by campus melees, including last semesters University of California, Berkeley rioting and the student takeover at Evergreen State College, driven by students unwilling to brook dissenting opinions.

Let me say I think this is a really, really important issue, one that has become even more important in the last couple of years, said Ms. DeVos. We have seen in far too many cases an intolerance toward listening to and at least hearing from others that have different perspectives than ours.

State lawmakers have begun to react. In Washington, a pair of Republican legislators introduced bills in June to defund Evergreen State and transform it into a private college.

For those who might find such a solution extreme, ALEC unveiled last month the Forming Open and Robust University Minds Act (FORUM), a piece of model legislation aimed at reopening debate on increasingly close-minded campuses.

The model policy eliminates campus free-speech zones, reaffirms First Amendment rights, allows those whose free speech rights may have been violated to bring causes of action and requires free speech education for students as well as administrators and campus police.

The measure also empowers legislators to hold universities accountable by requiring each institution to report on free speech issues prior to the legislatures appropriations process.

Shelby Emmett, director of ALECs Center to Protect Free Speech, said the proposed policy differs from others that require free speech education only for incoming freshmen.

Obviously, theres a problem with free speech on campus well before freshmen arrive if you have administrators or campus police officers who think you can detain or arrest or suspend a student because they passed out a Constitution, said Ms. Emmett. I think its easy to go after the students, but this is a cultural problem.

The focus today lies with progressive students suppressing conservatives, but this is not at all a political issue, said Ms. Emmett.

This happens on both sides, she said. It goes back and forth. Free speech is one of those things where people say they love it until they dont love it.

Universities have seen their reputations take a hit as a result of their apparent opposition to conservative views.

A survey released last week by the Pew Research Center found 58 percent of Republicans believe higher education has a negative effect on the nation, compared with just 36 percent who say the effect is positive.

The reverse was true two years ago, when 54 percent of Republicans found higher education positive and 37 percent said it was negative.

In between those two surveys, there have been massive student demonstrations, notably the campus shutdown in 2015 at the University of Missouri, as well as incidents at private institutions such as Yale University and Claremont McKenna College.

Ms. DeVos can speak from personal experience: In May students booed and interrupted her graduation address at Bethune-Cookman University in Orlando, Florida.

The education secretary typically draws a protest crowd driven by teachers unions wherever she speaks, but there were no demonstrators Thursday outside the Hyatt Regency Denver for her ALEC address.

The day before she arrived, however, several hundred foes of her school choice agenda held a rally at the state capitol and then marched to the Hyatt Regency, chanting resist and holding signs with messages like ALEC Leave Our Kids Alone!

The marchers were greeted by ALEC staffers who passed out water bottles in the nearly 100-degree heat. The message on the water bottles: Quenching your thirst for free speech.

Thats perfect, said Ms. DeVos.

Free speech is a very important issue, and one which I plan to continue to talk and speak out about, and I hope all of you who have opportunities to do that in your states will do the same, she said. Because the value of hearing and learning from others is an invaluable, invaluable thing.

Link:
DeVos urges state legislators to take on foes of campus free speech - Washington Times

Posted in Free Speech | Comments Off on DeVos urges state legislators to take on foes of campus free speech – Washington Times