The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Daily Archives: July 25, 2017
Raytheon enhances cyber threat hunting with CyberSponse automation tools – PR Newswire (press release)
Posted: July 25, 2017 at 12:08 pm
The combination of Raytheon and CyberSponse capabilities will give existing security operations centers the ability to collect data and react at near machine speed. This approach improves the efficiency of security operations by removing the time consuming and repetitive manual tasks found throughout the incident response lifecycle.
"Our enhanced offering enables our expert human defenders to do what they do best: hunt for more sophisticated, evolving threats," said Mark Orlando, chief technology officer for Raytheon's managed security services business.
SOC orchestration, the method of connecting security tools and data, and automation platforms are gaining traction in the security product market because they automate time-consuming incident response tasks across multiple point security products and case management tools.
"CyberSponse's advanced technology coupled with Raytheon's expertise in managed security services bring together a powerful combination of experience and technology to advance protective measures for customers," said Larry Johnson, CEO of CyberSponse. "Our collaboration with Raytheon enhances our security automation platform which is essentially the central nucleus of security operations teams and toolsets."
About CyberSponseCyberSponse is an automated orchestration engine that fills the gap between automation-only and human dependent security platforms. The CyberSponse Operations Platform permits automation of security tools within an incident management console for easy use and rapid deployment. CyberSponse is backed by a team of self-made entrepreneurs looking to disrupt the security industry with true grit, hard work, and innovative execution. For more information visit CyberSponse or follow us on Twitter.
About RaytheonRaytheon Company, with 2016 sales of $24 billion and 63,000 employees, is a technology and innovation leader specializing in defense, civil government and cybersecurity solutions. With a history of innovation spanning 95 years, Raytheon provides state-of-the-art electronics, mission systems integration, C5ITM products and services, sensing, effects, and mission support for customers in more than 80 countries. Raytheon is headquartered in Waltham, Massachusetts. Follow us on Twitter.
Media ContactRaytheonKate Goulding +1.571.250.2426 iispr@raytheon.com
View original content:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/raytheon-enhances-cyber-threat-hunting-with-cybersponse-automation-tools-300493647.html
SOURCE Raytheon Company
The rest is here:
Posted in Automation
Comments Off on Raytheon enhances cyber threat hunting with CyberSponse automation tools – PR Newswire (press release)
Google Assistant now has 70 home automation partners – VentureBeat
Posted: at 12:08 pm
Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai said hes optimistic about the potential for Google Assistant, and the voice-activated Google Home speaker that it powers.
Pichai said the Assistant SDK released in April should bolster the number of devices developers can create that tap into the power of Google Assistant. He noted that there are now more than 70 home automation partners that let users control devices using Assistant on Google Home and phones including Honeywell, Logitech, and LG.
And he said the company is investing in this area by beefing up the headcount and marketing dollars dedicated to these products.
People are no longer only using a keyboard, mouse, and multi-touch, but are also using emerging inputs like voice and camera to ask questions and get things done in the real world, he said during an earnings call with analysts on Monday. We are seeing this in the way people interact with the Google Assistant, which is already now available on more than 100 million devices since launching last year, and there is more to come.
Interestingly, Google last mentioned Assistant is available on 100 million Android devices in May. The fact the company didnt update the figure suggests Home isnt growing very quickly and neither is Assistant on iPhone, which arrived in May.
The market for virtual assistants has become hot over the last couple of years thanks to the success of Amazons Echo and Dot devices powered by Alexa.In a report released in May, eMarketer said 35.6 million Americans use a voice-activated assistant device as of April, up128 percent from the previous year.
Alphabet and Amazon also face competition from Microsofts Cortana and Apples Siri.
Google Assistant should get a further boost as Alphabet rolls out Google Home to more geographies. Besides the U.S., its now available inCanada, Australia, and the U.K. And in early August, it will go on sale in France and Germany.
We are very focused over the long-term on making sure the Assistant can actually help people get things done in the real world, Pichai said.
Follow this link:
Google Assistant now has 70 home automation partners - VentureBeat
Posted in Automation
Comments Off on Google Assistant now has 70 home automation partners – VentureBeat
Michael Hicks: Automation, trade, urbanization require resilient people – Kokomo Tribune
Posted: at 12:08 pm
Three Ball State colleagues and I recently authored a meta-study analyzing the potential impact of automation, trade and urbanization on regions and households in the United States. The motivation for this study is our casual observation there is great angst over the state of the economy in many corners of the country. We thought it possible turmoil surrounding economic policy has its roots in different economic outcomes between regions and households.
First, close to half of all jobs are at risk of being eliminated by technology that is already in use at commercial locations, while a quarter of all jobs are at risk of trade-related dislocation. To explore this, we mapped data created by researchers at Oxford and Princeton universities estimating the risk of automation and trade related job losses to the 3,144 U.S. counties. This provided an interesting visualization of where potential job losses may cluster. We then conducted a more formal battery of assessments of the clustering of potential job losses across people and places. The results were eye opening.
It turns out the higher a countys risk of losing jobs to automation, the higher the risk in the adjacent counties. This confirms what appears to be true in the maps, and is disconcerting since it means automation-related disruption likely extends across labor markets. This is true also with trade-related job losses. The other side of this relationship is that counties with lower risk of automation or trade-related job losses are adjacent to other low-risk places. This simple fact implies regional inequality might be poised for a big increase.
The study also pointed out as these jobs are lost, other jobs are created, but these new job openings are in different places and require different skills than those that are lost. This prompted us to look at what happens to individual workers and households. There the results were even more startling.
Trade-related job losses due to offshoring or import substitution tend to cut across educational and income levels. There is no correlation between risk of job losses due to trade and either education or earnings. Automation risk couldnt be more different. There is a strong inverse relationship between educational attainment and risk of automation job losses. The data on wages is even starker. Wages for the lowest risk 10 percent of occupations average about $84,000 per year. Wages for the highest risk 10 percent are about $36,000 per year. Indeed, for workers who have more than a 50/50 chance of automation-related job losses, wages are below $40,000 per year. Those with less than a 50/50 chance of automation-related job losses average almost $70,000 per year.
Taken together, the increasing risk of automation and trade-related job losses will disproportionately impact low-wage, low-skilled workers who live in counties with an abundance of other similar workers. This is a perfect recipe for growing income inequality across regions and households. Beyond the distasteful political manifestations of inequality, we should worry that labor market disruptions falling most heavily on those least prepared to adjust could quickly turn into much broader social and economic problems. Automation, and to a lesser degree trade, impacts the most vulnerable people and places in America. Growing urban migration exacerbates the pain for communities.
The findings of our study (www.bsu.edu/cber/publications) should give readers some concern, but we also want to be clear that technological change, trade and the rise of cities generates untold wealth, opportunity and other secondary benefits that can scarcely be measured. Economic growth is good and the results benefit us more than we imagine. I simply point to the 50 extra years of life the average American enjoys since the start of the Industrial Revolution.
Still, rapid technological change, particularly as it affects clustered industries or occupations, can generate real economic discomfort. Change is not always easy, and not every household finds itself clearly better off in the short run. Our hope in authoring this research is that policymakers can prepare for and embrace these changes. To do so, we should think about policies at the state and local level, especially in education policy, that make vulnerable communities and households more resilient to change.
Michael J. Hicks, Ph.D., is director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and a professor of economics at Ball State University. Contact him at cberdirector@bsu.edu.
Read the original:
Michael Hicks: Automation, trade, urbanization require resilient people - Kokomo Tribune
Posted in Automation
Comments Off on Michael Hicks: Automation, trade, urbanization require resilient people – Kokomo Tribune
Workers are not as enthusiastic about artificial intelligence and automation as their bosses – The Australian Financial Review
Posted: at 12:08 pm
Businesses are enthusiastically investigating the possibilities of artificial intelligence and automation, and workers are scared for their future.
A quarter of Australians fear redundancy due to increased use of artificial intelligence and automation as businesses increasingly investigate options, according to a new report into business use of emerging technologies.
The study from research firm Telsyte looks broadly across Australian businesses and the rapid adoption of new technologies under way, including artificial intelligence and automation, wearable technology, augmented and virtual reality and drones.
It finds that nearly two-thirds of businesses are already dabbling with machine learning or deep learning to improve operations or influence business decision making, with so-called artificial intelligence and automation technology use growing for things ranging from physical robots to digital assistants and chatbots.
Telsytemanaging director Foad Fadaghi said there was a distinct difference in the enthusiasm for intelligent automation among company executives from the general population. Despite regular statements that automation will augment rather than replace jobs, workers are not buying it.
The study found that financial processes are considered ripe for early automation with 65 per cent of chief information officers questioned saying they saw opportunities to deploy machine learning in financial modelling and fraud detection.
However, it is in customer-facing roles that jobs may be noticeably affected first, with almost two thirds of organisations saying they intend to use cognitive computing for applications like chatbots, which mimic human interaction.
"AI intentions are running at two speeds in the Australian market, with businesses much more bullish about using automation technology than consumers," Mr Fadaghi said.
"There is an undercurrent of fear in the average consumer about the impact of AI on jobs and future prospects for later generations in a highly automated world. When we compare with consumer research, we see that mainstream Australians are cautious about technology, in particular automation.
"One in four Australians are concerned they might lose their job to a machine or robot in the future, and only 45 per cent think the future will be betterthanks to the opportunities technology offers."
Elsewhere in the Telsyte study it found that organisations are rapidly adopting the internet of things (IoT), which means non-traditional connected devices like sensors and cameras providing vast amounts of data for analysis.
Almost 90 per cent of technology executives in the study said their organisation would be using IoT for important processes within five years, and 59 per cent of early adopters said they are already seeing cost savings from its introduction.
Meanwhile, over 60 per cent see value in smart wearable devices such as smart watches and smart glasses in their organisation, for internal operations, access control and customer-facing applications. More than half of organisations are investigating augmented reality applications and a quarter of tech executives believe that drones or autonomous flying vehicles will become useful.
Mr Fadaghi said this would include most sectors like agriculture and fishing with underwater drones, mining operations, security and surveillance, transport and logistics, warehousing and emergency services
See the rest here:
Posted in Automation
Comments Off on Workers are not as enthusiastic about artificial intelligence and automation as their bosses – The Australian Financial Review
How automation can help transform the financial services landscape – Finextra (blog)
Posted: at 12:08 pm
Todays financial services institutions are under increasing pressure. Growing consumer confidence, regulatory change and the rise of fresh-faced fintech start-ups means competition in the space is stiffer than ever before. As a result, businesses are having to work harder and smarter to attract and retain clients.
A huge part of this work has focused on technology and how banking services can expand their digital offer. The digital revolution has fundamentally changed the way businesses operate for their customers, and retail banks in particular are increasingly moving online due to consumer demand.
Most recently, the focus has been on automation and artificial intelligence particularly their potential for customer experience. Several banks have been dipping their toes in the chatbot water. Capital One, for example, recently launched their chatbot Eno, which lets customers text to see their balance, transaction history, and pay bills.
But automation can also be used for more than straightforward customer management. The technology has the capability to unlock value across a range of business functions. RPA can be especially useful in transforming complex and time-consuming back-office processes, which in turn will allow companies to free up employees to focus on more value-added work.
RPA is hugely beneficial to commercial finance divisions, for example, where efficiency and cost-effectiveness is of paramount importance. And in such a heavily regulated industry, the technology also eliminates room for human error.
Needless to say, integrating automation is a significant undertaking. While the specifics will depend on the business, the space they operate in, and the extent to which they are aiming to automate their processes, there are three critical ingredients for a successful RPA transformation.
1. Strategic fit
The first and perhaps most important is that RPA must be a strategic fit for the company. Automation needs to be understood not as a process but as a strategic capability that increases business value. This re-engineering will be key to increasing the impact of automation and maximising ROI, and must be given due diligence. Key to success will be for businesses to understand which processes will deliver the biggest business benefit when automated, and follow their roadmap accordingly.
2. Buy-in
Next, there also needs to be buy-in for transformation and automation from the C-suite for RPA to be a success. Cultural adoption may often require education and careful articulation of the business benefits of the solution, and lack of internal support at a senior level can be one of the major stumbling blocks to implementation.
3. Engagement
Legacy IT systems and resistance from existing IT departments can often be a barrier to transformation and automation. To avoid potential opposition, automation adopters would do well to focus on IT engagement from the get-go. Bringing the IT function on board at the beginning of the automation journey will help to set a clear roadmap for transformation and identify any potential roadblocks that lie ahead.
Of course, automation is no small undertaking. While the steps outlined above will form the backbone of the transformation, it isnt often as simple as 1,2,3. However, businesses have much to gain from RPA and by integrating it where appropriate, banking services can strategically use technology to drive finance forward.
More here:
How automation can help transform the financial services landscape - Finextra (blog)
Posted in Automation
Comments Off on How automation can help transform the financial services landscape – Finextra (blog)
Government’s crackdown on illegal low wages for apprentices – FE Week
Posted: at 12:07 pm
Rogue employers who illegally underpay apprentices have been threatened with severe jail sentences, under a new government crackdown on abuses of workers rights.
Sir David Metcalf (pictured above), the governments new director of labour-market enforcement,today warned that the worst offenders could face prison sentences as long as two years.
The crackdown comes just days after FE Week reported that it was more than likely that no employer had ever been prosecuted or even fined for paying apprentices less the national minimum wage.
A much-delayed Department for Education survey released last week showed that 18 per cent of apprentices were paid illegal wages in 2016, up from 15 per cent in 2014.
Government inaction allowed employers to leave UK apprentices half a million pounds out of pocket in 2015-16 alone.
Tackling labour market abuses is an important priority for the government and I am encouraged it has committed record funds to cracking down on exploitation, said Sir David, who was appointed to the new position in January, in order to oversee a crackdown on workplace exploitation.
Over the coming months I will be working with government enforcement agencies and industry bodies to better identify and punish the most serious and repeat offenders taking advantage of vulnerable workers and honest businesses.
A Department for Business, Energy, and Industrial Strategy spokesperson confirmed to FE Week that this crackdown commitment would apply to employers who fail to pay apprentices at least the minimum wage of 3.50 per hour for anyone aged 24 or under.
The wider national minimum and living wage enforcement statistics show that in 2016-17, government teams managed to recoup a record 10.9 million in back pay for 98,150 of the UKs lowest-paid workers a 69 per cent increase on the previous year.
BEIS said businesses that failed to pay workers at least the legal minimum wage were also fined 3.9 million, with employers in hospitality and retail sectors among the most prolific offenders.
However, there have been just 13 prosecutions since 2007 for minimum wage violations, four of which came in 2016-17.
A BEIS press officer claimed to not have information on whether any of these related to underpaid apprentices.
Jon Richards, head of education at Unison, said his union has raised concerns about weak regulation of apprentices pay with government on a number of occasions.
He said that if this new crackdown is true and not further government spin, then it might make employers sit up and take notice.
Apprentices are already paid a pittance, so any employer trying to exploit them further deserves what they get, he added.
BEIS explained in February that from October 2013, the government revised the naming and shaming scheme to make it simpler to name and shame employers which break NMW law.
It identified a record 359 breaches that month alone, but continues to refuse to say whether any concerned apprentices.
Five months ago, BEIS announced that employers paying their workers less than the minimum wage could face prosecution, and not only have to pay back arrears of wages to the worker at current minimum wage rates, but also face financial penalties of up to 200 per cent of arrears, capped at 20,000 per worker.
Business minister Margot James claimed the government is firmly on the side of hard-working people and is determined to stamp out any workplace exploitation, from minimum wage abuses to modern slavery.
Sir David will start consulting with stakeholders from today, ahead of his first full strategy, due later this year. To contribute, you can email directorsoffice@lme.gsi.gov.uk
Read the original here:
Government's crackdown on illegal low wages for apprentices - FE Week
Posted in Wage Slavery
Comments Off on Government’s crackdown on illegal low wages for apprentices – FE Week
PM Modi’s policies boost FDI – Business Today
Posted: at 12:07 pm
The cumulative foreign direct investment (FDI) in April-May stood at $10.02 billion compared with $8.12 billion in the corresponding period last year. This translated into an increase of 23 per cent in the first two months of the current fiscal, according to the information shared in a Lok Sabha reply by commerce and industry minister Nirmala Sitharaman. When the NDA government assumed power in 2014, India's FDI flows were around $36 billion and since then it has been increasing. The total FDI inflows in financial year 2016/17 stood at $60 billion, increasing 8 per cent from 2015/16.
Some of key reforms initiatives proved instrumental for their growth. FDI got a big boost when their limits were enhanced in critical sectors like insurance and defence. This was instrumental in foreign investors committing more money for their Indian operations. Except for a small negative list, most sectors are open for 100 per cent FDI under the automatic route. According to a recent note by Angel Broking, "The government was instrumental in removing most of the products from the approval list to the automatic approval list, which made the entire task of foreign investors much easier." In the last Union Budget, the government has also scrapped the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB). After the abolition of FIPB the work of monitoring the compliance with conditions under the FDI approvals, including the past cases approved by erstwhile FIPB, has been assigned to the concerned administrative ministries or departments.
With easing of FDI norms and an improvement in the "Ease of Doing Business" in India, we could see FDI growing consistently and that would ensure that the gap with FPI is maintained, the blog adds.
Link:
Posted in Abolition Of Work
Comments Off on PM Modi’s policies boost FDI – Business Today
How the social gospel movement explains the roots of today’s religious left – Salon
Posted: at 12:07 pm
Throughout American history, religion has played a significant role in promoting social reform. From the abolitionist movement of the early 19th century to the civil rights movement of the 20th century, religious leaders have championed progressive political causes.
This legacy is evident today in the group called religious progressives, or the religious left.
The social gospel movement of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, as I have explored in my research, has had a particularly significant impact on the development of the religious left.
What is the social gospel movement and why does it matter today?
What was the social gospel?
The social gospels origins are often traced to the rise of late 19th-century urban industrialization, immediately following the Civil War. Largely, but not exclusively, rooted in Protestant churches, the social gospel emphasized how Jesus ethical teachings could remedy the problems caused by Gilded Age capitalism.
Movement leaders took Jesus message love thy neighbor into pulpits, published books and lectured across the country. Other leaders, mostly women, ran settlement houses designed to alleviate the sufferings of immigrants living in cities like Boston, New York and Chicago. Their mission was to draw attention to the problems of poverty and inequality especially in Americas growing cities.
Charles Sheldon, a minister in the city of Topeka, Kansas, explained the idea behind the social gospel in his 1897 novel In His Steps. To be a Christian, he argued, one needed to walk in Jesuss footsteps.
The books slogan, What would Jesus do? became a central theme of the social gospel movement which also became tied to a belief in what Ohio minister Washington Gladden called social salvation. This concept emphasized that religions fundamental purpose was to create systemic changes in American political structures.
Consequently, social gospel leaders supported legislation for an eight-hour work day, the abolition of child labor and government regulation of business monopolies.
While the social gospel produced many important figures, its most influential leader was a Baptist minister, Walter Rauschenbusch.
The legacy of Walter Rauschenbusch
Rauschenbusch began his career in the 1880s as minister of an immigrant church in the Hells Kitchen section of New York. His 1907 book, Christianity and the Social Crisis asserted that religions chief purpose was to create the highest quality of life for all citizens.
Rauschenbusch linked Christianity to emerging theories of democratic socialism which, he believed, would lead to equality and a just society.
Rauschenbuschs writings had a major impact on the development of the religious left in the 20th century. After World War I, several religious leaders expanded upon his ideas to address issues of economic justice, racism and militarism.
Among them was A.J. Muste, known as the American Gandhi, who helped popularize the tactics of nonviolent direct action. His example inspired many mid-20th century activists, including Martin Luther King Jr.
The intellectual influences on King were extensive. However, it was Rauschenbusch who first made King aware of faith-based activism. As King wrote in 1958,
It has been my conviction ever since reading Rauschenbusch that any religion which professes to be concerned about the souls of men and is not concerned about the social and economic conditions that scar the soul, is a spiritually moribund religion only waiting for the day to be buried.
Social salvation and the religious left today
Kings statement highlights the importance of the social gospel concept of social salvation for todays religious left.
Although many of its primary leaders come out of liberal Protestant denominations, the religious left is not a monolithic movement. Its leaders include prominent clergy, such as the Lutheran minister Nadia Boltz-Weber as well as academics such as Cornel West. Some of the movements major figures, notably Rev. Jim Wallis, are evangelicals who identify with what is often called progressive evangelicalism.
Others come from outside of Christianity. Rabbi Michael Lerner, founder of the organization Network of Spiritual Progressives, seeks not only to promote interfaith activism but also to attract persons unaffiliated with any religious institutions.
These leaders often focus on different issues. However, they unite around the social gospel belief that religious faith must be committed to the transformation of social structures.
The Network for Spiritual Progressives mission statement, for example, affirms its desire
To build a social change movement guided by and infused with spiritual and ethical values to transform our society to one that prioritizes and promotes the well-being of the people and the planet, as well as love, justice, peace, and compassion over money, power and profit.
One of the most important voices of the religious left is North Carolina minister William Barber. Barbers organization, Repairers of the Breach, seeks to train clergy and laity from a variety of faith traditions in grassroots activism. Barbers hope is that grassroots activists will be committed to social change by rebuilding, raising up and repairing our moral infrastructure.
Other organizations associated with the religious left express similar goals. Often embracing democratic socialism, these groups engage issues of racial justice (including support for the Black Lives Matter movement), LGBT equality and the defense of religious minorities.
An attractive option?
Despite the public visibility of activists like Barber, some question whether the religious left can become a potent political force.
Sociologist James Wellman observes that often religious progressives lack the social infrastructure that creates and sustains a social movement; its leaders are spiritual entrepreneurs rather than institution builders.
Another challenge is the growing secularization of the political left. Only 30 percent of Americans who identify with the political left view religion as a positive force for social change.
At the same time, the religious lefts progressive agenda in particular, its focus on serving societys poor might be an attractive option for younger Americans who seek alternatives to the perceived dogmatism of the religious right. As an activist connected with Jim Walliss Sojourners organization noted,
I think the focus on the person of Jesus is birthing a younger generation. Their political agenda is shaped by Jesus call to feed the hungry, make sure the thirsty have clean water, make sure all have access to healthcare, transform America into a welcoming place for immigrants, fix our inequitable penal system, and end abject poverty abroad and in the forgotten corners of our urban and rural communities.
This statement not only circles back to Charles Sheldons nineteenth century question, what would Jesus do? It illustrates, I argue, the continued resiliency of the core social gospel belief in social salvation for a new generation of activists.
Can the religious left achieve the public status of the religious right? The theme of social salvation that was critical to Walter Rauschenbusch, A.J. Muste and Martin Luther King Jr. might, I believe, very well galvanize the activism of a new generation of religious progressives.
Christopher H. Evans, Professor of the History of Christianity, Boston University
See the article here:
How the social gospel movement explains the roots of today's religious left - Salon
Posted in Abolition Of Work
Comments Off on How the social gospel movement explains the roots of today’s religious left – Salon
Democrats should embrace the freedom to not choose – The Week Magazine
Posted: at 12:06 pm
Sign Up for
Our free email newsletters
Democrats came out Monday with their agenda for the 2018 election, and to everyone's surprise, it's not terrible. In fact, it's sorta half-decent!
The slogan is "A Better Deal," and the agenda includes anti-trust reforms, cheaper prescription drugs, and a plan to create 10 million jobs with infrastructure spending and tax credits. There's a lot to like here, particularly in the clever and true way Democrats cast anti-trust reforms as a way to increase Americans' freedom. But Democrats are also missing the chance to sell universal social programs this way. These programs also increase freedom the freedom to not have to choose.
Republicans (and a significant fraction of neoliberal Democrats) often fetishize choice. They use blatantly circular reasoning to present any free-market system as evidence of free choices being freely made. But this is nonsense. Market concentration often reduces freedom.
A deep market with lots of independent sellers is one thing. But a market with just a few or one seller is quite another. (For cable internet at my apartment in D.C., for example, I have the "choice" of Comcast or nothing.) The Better Deal agenda presents this quite nicely, showing that monopolies and oligopolies are not just economically inefficient, but also a sharp abridgment of individual liberty. People are forced not only to pay whatever the monopolist demands, but also to accept its (generally horrible) regulations of service.
Worse, unlike a government-run monopoly like the Post Office or a power utility, people have no democratic say in the operation of a monopoly. Its corporate management gets to invoke the violent authority of the state to enforce its (invariably foot-thick) contracts getting cops to drag a paying customer off a plane if the airline decides he doesn't get to fly, for example while making no concession to democratic oversight. It is, in essence, statist authoritarianism.
But another aspect of valorizing market choices as the fountainhead of freedom is how it implicitly leaves out non-market options in particular, the freedom to not choose. As anyone who has tried to corral a pack of millennials trying to figure out which bar to attend for happy hour can attest, making decisions takes work and the more complicated the decision, the more work it requires. Americans today are constantly forced to make staggeringly complex decisions about the most important issues of life health care, education, retirement, and more.
Even for people with good health insurance, simply accessing it properly is often a dreadful chore. You've got to make sure you've got the right program, correctly navigate the rapidly shifting coverage networks, and schedule an appointment all done under the looming knowledge that one screwup could cost thousands as the provider seizes the opportunity to mercilessly price-gouge an out-of-network patient. Afterwards, there's a good chance you're in for a prolonged battle with the provider and the insurer about who will pay and how much.
Wouldn't it be better and simpler to just have straightforward health coverage ensured by the government and not have to make all these frustratingly complex choices?
The experience of investing for retirement is even worse (though the potential negative consequences not as bad). Which mutual fund to select? What portfolio balance? How much to contribute? Answering these questions cleverly would be extremely challenging for average people even without the associated industry of swindlers who make their money tricking people into high-fee plans.
Then there is the sheer fact of having to interact with financial companies at all. Like many in my generation, coming of age precisely when Wall Street crooks blew up the world economy instilled a strong dislike for and suspicion of the financial system. Those feelings strengthened exponentially as I did more research and discovered the role of Big Finance in skyrocketing inequality, monopolization, and asset-stripping thousands of American companies as well as immense crimes like systematic mortgage fraud, money laundering for drug cartels and terrorists, and market rigging. The fact that retirement tax benefits are thinly disguised tax shelters for the rich, and that banksters invariably get off with, at worst, a wrist-slap fine, added fury to my dislike.
Wouldn't it be better and simpler to just make Social Security more robust and spare most Americans from dealing with these crooks?
Private monopolies that rob consumers of choice obviously limit Americans' liberty. Democrats are right to crack down on corporate America with aggressive anti-trust reform. But not all choice is good. Indeed, for the basics of life education, health care, retirement, and so on people don't want to waste away precious hours and days navigating needlessly complex choices, many of which are deviously engineered to screw over normal working stiffs. Most of us just want decent schools for our kids, good health care for ourselves and our families, and a retirement that won't leave us starved and forgotten. We don't want to make endless choices every step of the way.
A Medicare-for-all health-care system or expanded Social Security benefits (which have increasing support among Democrats, but are not contained in their Better Deal plan) would allow citizens to not bother. Instead of being forced to "take responsibility" for such things individually, they would simply always be there, paid out of taxes. The motivation is not to get "free" benefits from the government. I, for one, would be happy to pay a large premium in taxes to get such benefits, if only to save myself from multiple future stress-induced heart attacks.
I might be somewhat out of the ordinary in just how much I dislike being rammed into Neoliberal Decision Hell. But I think it's safe to assume the percentage of people who actually enjoy figuring out insurance networks or poring over mutual fund packets is small. People have better things to do than become amateur experts in a dozen different white-collar professions. Democrats should realize this. A Better Deal ought to mean saving Americans from ever having to deal with this maddening nonsense.
Continue reading here:
Democrats should embrace the freedom to not choose - The Week Magazine
Posted in Freedom
Comments Off on Democrats should embrace the freedom to not choose – The Week Magazine
Venezuela’s Freedom Fighters – Project Syndicate
Posted: at 12:06 pm
GENEVA After months of violence and anti-government protests, Venezuela is approaching the political precipice. President Nicols Maduros push toward autocratic rule culminates on July 30, with the planned election of a constituent assembly to rewrite the countrys constitution. And while there is still time to change course, the path back toward democracy is quickly fading from view.
In May, when Maduro announced his plan to establish a constituent assembly, he presented it as a way to restore confidence in his government, which has struggled to recover from economic decline amid collapsing oil prices. But as the vote has drawn closer, it has become clear that Maduros intent has always been to consolidate his power, and impose on Venezuelas 31 million people an authoritarian, pseudo-socialist system. By rigging the vote with handpicked candidates, the president appears willing to use any means to maintain power.
The world got a taste of Maduros true aims earlier this month. On July 5, government- backed paramilitary forces, in collusion with the National Guard, attacked the opposition-controlled National Assembly. For six hours, politicians and employees were held at gunpoint; one hostage, Assembly President Julio Borges, described the siege as evidence of the countrys descent into complete anarchy.
That brazen assault preceded a national referendum, organized by opposition parties, to gauge support for Maduros plan to redraft the constitution. If the prevailing sentiment wasnt clear to the president before the July 16 plebiscite, it was after: more than seven million people participated, with an astonishing 98% rejecting the proposal a clear repudiation of Maduros government.
To carry out the plebiscite, Mesa de la Unidad Democrtica (MUD), the oppositions umbrella organization, activated a network of voting centers, operating with full transparency, in just a few days. And by holding the referendum, MUD has managed, with one vote, to do what Maduro has failed to do during his entire presidency: unite the country.
In contrast to government-organized electoral initiatives, every Venezuelan, regardless of political affiliation, was invited to participate and express their views. For those of us who observed the voting, it was a reminder that, while Venezuela is currently being mismanaged, the public remains prepared to fight for their country and its democratic institutions.
MUDs referendum set the stage for the crisis that will come to a head this week. Opposition groups and protesters are boycotting the constituent assembly election, but the consolidation of presidential power that Maduro is seeking will not be the only issue on their minds. Protesters are also calling on the government to release political prisoners, uphold the current constitution, and establish a government of national unity to restore economic and political stability.
Given the stakes, it is no surprise that the Maduro government immediately sought to discredit the July 16 referendum. Votes were still being counted when the head of the National Electoral Council, Tibisay Lucena, dismissed the process as invalid and legally irrelevant.
But just as the attack on the National Assembly failed to quell public anger, so, too, will the governments dismissal of the referendums results. Venezuelans preferred option is to move ahead peacefully, along the lines proposed last year by the Vatican, which called for early presidential elections, a more autonomous parliament, and other measures. For its part, the National Assembly has already begun to put together a precise roadmap for implementing similar demands endorsed in the July 16 referendum.
Moreover, Maduro faces mounting pressure to cancel the constituent assembly election. Colombia, France, Spain, the European Union, and the United States have called on him to back down, and US President Donald Trump has threatened new sanctions if the voting goes ahead. The solidarity is welcome, but it will not be enough to alter the current trajectory. More regional pressure is needed and quickly if further violent disorder is to be averted.
The regime can still stop Venezuelas downward spiral, and Venezuelans have shown clearly that they are determined to fight for their countrys future. To ensure a return to democracy in Venezuela, the international community must stand up as well.
Link:
Posted in Freedom
Comments Off on Venezuela’s Freedom Fighters – Project Syndicate