Daily Archives: July 24, 2017

This post has been updated to reflect that Michael Phelps did not actually race a shark.

A few monthsafter embarrassing Adolf Hitler by winning four gold medals at the 1936 Summer Olympics in Berlin, Jesse Owens traveled to Cuba for an exhibition race against Julio McCaw.

Owens was the fastest runner in the world, but when he lined up against his opponent during halftime of a soccer game, helooked clearly outmatched. McCaw was bigger, more muscular.

He also had four legs.

McCaw was a chestnut gelding.

The history of sports and the history of marketing stunts is filled with stories like this, somewhat to the non-delight of animal rights activists.

Human vs. horse. Human vs. cheetah. Human vs. ostrich. Human vs. dog.

And on Sunday, human (Michael Phelps) vs. shark.

Well, as it turns out, not really.

The motivation for these challenges are typically commercial and often silly none more so than the short-lived Fox TV show, Man vs. Beast. Dwarfs race an elephant pulling an airplane. Pro eaterchallenges bear to hot dog eating contest. Champion sprinter beats giraffein race but loses to a zebra.

Phelps, the winner of 23 Olympic gold medals in swimming, was supposed to race a shark during the Discovery Channels annual Shark Week, which also includes programs titled SHALLOW WATER INVASION, SHARKS AMONG US, and AIR JAWS: NIGHT STALKER. (Anyone who watches these shows while vacationing at the beach is missing a few sea shells upstairs.)

Ive raced the fastest swimmers on the planet, Phelps says in a (ahem) promotional video. Except for one.

Except it was all simulated. (At least his golds werent. We think.)

[Blood in the water: Four dead, a coast terrified and the birth of modern shark mania]

While most human vs. animal races are promotional, at least one was to settle a bar bet. Thats how the annual Man vs. Horse Marathon got started more than 35 years ago in Wales, a place not lacking in collective alcohol consumption. Sports bookies take bets. The horses have a rider. The runners have their shoes. It goes on for 22 miles.

In 2004, on the 25th anniversary of the race, a known marathoner named Huw Lobb became the first of just two humans to win.

It is a very unusual event with men running against horses, he said after the race.

Giddy up.

And then theres cheetahs.

Why race a cheetah? Because its a cheetah! Dictionary entry: It is the fastest animal on land. Sarah the cheetah has the worldwide land record in the 100-meter dash, at 5.95 seconds. Olympic sprinter Usain Bolts time at the same distance: 9.58.

Devin Hester and Chris Johnson, both zippy NFL players, raced a cheetah for National Geographic a few years ago. These guys werent exactly brave there was a wall separating them from the cheetah. (At least they did it live.) Johnson, racing just two laps, lost. Hester won. He had an advantage over the cheetah by racing four laps. (Cheetahs cant make quick turns.)

Back in 1936, facing the Cuban horse, Jesse Owens was also given an advantage a 40-yard head start.

A crowd of 3,000 cheered the Negro flash enthusiastically, the Associated Press reported.

Owens beat the horse by a few lengths. (You can watch a short video here.) Though McCaw had nothing to say after losing, Owens was ecstatic, telling reporters, I would be willing to race a horse without a handicap, even from scratch.

But there was a but: Provided, he said, that the animal selected is not remarkably fast.

It was not the last time Owens raced a horse. Unlike Phelps, Owens struggled to earn a living for years, even as a symbol of freedom trouncing Hitlers hate. Owens appeared at promotional events around the world, racing not just horses but trains, cars, and dogs.

Those races made me sick, he said late in life. I felt like a freak.

Jesse Owens, a legend, was reduced to what these competitions ultimately are a sideshow.

Read more Retropolis:

Blood in the water: Four dead, a coast terrified and the birth of modern shark mania

The disturbing history of cat abuse: Public hangings, pipe beatings and The Great Cat Massacre

O.J.s last defender F. Lee Bailey is broke, disbarred and working above a hair salon

Before Venus and Serena, another tennis diva ruled Wimbledon in red lipstick, sipping cognac between sets

She was attacked 50 years ago for being a woman in the Boston Marathon. This year she ran it again at 70.

Continued here:
The Phelps vs. shark charade was another bizarre episode of humans racing animals - Washington Post

Given developments in artificial intelligence many fear robots will soon surpass human intelligence, rendering human beings superfluous. One comfort for humans has been that at least we are smarter than our ancestors.Turns out even this could be false comfort. Research led by Michael Woodley from the Free University in Brussels has shown that our mental abilities have undergone significant decline since the Victorian era. No wonder Victorian sleuth Sherlock Holmes is still considered the acme of detective skill, and TV serials trying to transplant him into contemporary London or Manhattan are all the rage.

Darwins theory of natural selection has been proffered as an explanation: post-Victorian advances in medicine and nutrition meant that people with lower IQs could also have more children who survived into adulthood. This is usually celebrated as emphatic proof of civilisation, as is our current drive towards automation which will allegedly make greater convenience and leisure available to humanity. But Woodley et al force us to think about what it means if genes driving intelligence are becoming less common.

Arent worrying signs all around us? Its not just that computers already tell healthcare providers what drugs to prescribe and absolutely nail Super Mario. Its also the ludic loop of the modern work day check email and SMSs, then WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, then repeat and repeat. Rather than getting their news from trusted news brands, people are greatly excited by fake news these days. This business of becoming stupid intuitively feels connected to ducking real challenges, not doing work thats actually difficult. Maybe thats why modern day Da Vincis spend their weekends climbing mountains or running marathons. For them, theres no take it easy policy. Growing up in premodern times required many different skills. A lazier life may be making us dumb and dumber.

DISCLAIMER : Views expressed above are the author's own.

Read the rest here:
Dumber than Darwin: Research shows human intelligence is falling since the 19th century - Times of India (blog)