Daily Archives: July 13, 2017

Beware of Foxconn’s automation plans — Terry Jones – Madison.com

Posted: July 13, 2017 at 7:06 am

President Donald Trump visited Wisconsin a couple weeks ago and hinted we were in for a big surprise.

The surprise was widely believed to be that Foxconn, the Taiwanese company that manufactures the iPhone and other devices, was looking at Wisconsin as a manufacturing site. Recently, Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, R-Rochester, said we need to improve the infrastructure of southeast Wisconsin to make it more enticing to Foxconn.

I would urge Speaker Vos and the Wisconsin Economic Development Corp. to take a hard look at Foxconns record. The Wall Street Journal and other reputable news outlets have reported extensively about workers in Foxconns factories jumping to their deaths because of the high pressure atmosphere in those factories.

Furthermore, Foxconn has announced it has entered into a three-phase automation plan that will fill their factories with Foxbots and almost totally eliminate workers. These developments are very troubling for China as they provided infrastructure, energy sources and a variety of incentives to bring jobs to their rural populations. Foxconn has stated a goal of 30 percent automation by 2020 and full automation shortly thereafter.

Why would Foxconn bring jobs here when its goal is full automation? Beware, Wisconsin.

Terry Jones,Deerfield

See the article here:

Beware of Foxconn's automation plans -- Terry Jones - Madison.com

Posted in Automation | Comments Off on Beware of Foxconn’s automation plans — Terry Jones – Madison.com

In-house automation to cut more jobs: Hexaware CEO – Economic Times

Posted: at 7:06 am

MUMBAI: Automation of information technology processes could lead to more work being moved back in-house, leading to further shrinking of the Indian IT industry in two to three years, said Hexaware CEO R Srikrishna.

Experts too feel the trend is here to stay for some time. At present, most companies work on a hybrid model with some work outsourced to IT companies and some work being done by captive units in-house. Automation of IT processes is expected to reduce the need of people at both the places.

In two-three years what will happen is that organisations would have done a lot of automation work in the captives. Suddenly, they will find that because of automation, 300 people of 1,000 employed by them have nothing to do, while they have 500 people outsourced, said Srikrishna, citing an example.

They have a choice to make about whether to bring that work back in house or let go of those people.

The Indian IT industry is struggling with a decline in traditional IT services as automation threatens their model of generating revenue by adding people. The focus now is to grow revenue faster than the number of employee additions. Companies are increasingly relying on digital deals, usually of smaller size, to make up for the slowness in large traditional deals. There could be a trend towards insourcing as more in-house capacity will be freed due to automation. For the industry as a whole, it will continue the trend of shrinking the industry. I mean, the work has got automated so that has shrunk, and if the remaining gets taken in-house, the outsourcing industry will continue to shrink, said Srikrishna.

Last month, Industry body National Association of Software and Services Companies (Nasscom) projected software export growth in fiscal 2017-18 at 7-8% in constant currency, down from 8.6% last year.

Automation is one reason to move work back. Another is that with so many changes in technology, you need in-house expertise and capability. Technology is now an integral part of business, it is no longer a support function, said Pareekh Jain, senior vice-president, research and India operations at HfS Research. Traditional IT functions will shrink but new opportunities are opening up in digital, cyber security, data analytics and Internet of Things.

IT firms are expected to report a muted growth in the first quarter ended June hurt by wage hikes, visa fees, stronger rupee and slower pace of large deal closures amid uncertainty surrounding protectionist measures in the United States.

The good news is that changes due to automation are not a tsunami. There is a slow riding tide that will not change direction. It will inch up every month, every week, every year, said Srikrishna.

The bad news is that it is not going to change direction for a decade. I don't think a time in the next three-five years whe re you can say this transfor mation is done and dusted. I think we are in for a long haul on transformation.

Srikrishna does not ex pect this financial year to be very different from the last for the IT industry. It could be a little bit better. Frankly, a lot of what gets called cyclical factors are ac tually structural fac tors. I don't think they are going to be away anytime soon, said Srikrishna.

Link:

In-house automation to cut more jobs: Hexaware CEO - Economic Times

Posted in Automation | Comments Off on In-house automation to cut more jobs: Hexaware CEO – Economic Times

The First Fully Automated Toothbrush is Here. And it Cleans Your Teeth in 10 Seconds. – Futurism

Posted: at 7:06 am

In Brief The world's first automated toothbrush is here, and it can brush your teeth perfectly in 10 seconds. This is just one more example of the ways that automation can relieve us of everyday, mundane tasks so we can do what we really want to do instead.

Say hello to Amabrush, the worlds first automatic toothbrush,and goodbye to brushing your teeth for minutes at a time twice a day. Amabrush resembles a mouthguard with soft silicone bristles in it, and it is magnetically attached to a round handle. Put the mouthpiece in, and dont worry about the toothpaste, itll do that for you. It will then go to work, brushing your teeth in the way that your dentist tells you to, in every location in your mouth, all at the same time.

Using this device, brushing all of your teeth to perfection only takes about 10 seconds from start to finish, so its no surprise that the Amabrush isdoing really well on Kickstarter. As this article is being written, they have 25 days to go and have already raised $935,891, surpassing their $56,972 goal.

The Amabrush is just one more example of automation doing what it does best: taking over mind-numbingly dull daily tasks, freeing up humans to think about and do more compelling things. Whether its a significant step in automation, like self-driving cars, or just a piece of the puzzle, its all progress in the same direction. By extension, automation can free us from repetitive, dull jobs and free us up for more challenging careers, hobbies, passions, etc. All we have to do is be willing and ready for this change to happen.

More:

The First Fully Automated Toothbrush is Here. And it Cleans Your Teeth in 10 Seconds. - Futurism

Posted in Automation | Comments Off on The First Fully Automated Toothbrush is Here. And it Cleans Your Teeth in 10 Seconds. – Futurism

Packaging Automation Market – Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends and Forecast 2017 – 2025 – PR Newswire (press release)

Posted: at 7:06 am

Global Packaging Automation Market: OverviewThis report proposes strategic analysis of the global packaging automation market, and growth forecast for the period from 2017 to 2025. The scope of the research study covers competitive analysis of several market bifurcations based on the application, type and industries of the packaging automation market across different regional segments.

It also provides breakdown and analysis of several factors affecting the market growth, which are applicably defined as market drivers, restraints, and opportunities. In all, the report includes a complete analysis of the global packaging automation market, and provides an assessment of progress for the period 2017 to 2025, considering the numerous factors affecting the market.

Global Packaging Automation Market: Key Trends and Growth Drivers Packaging is one of the significant elements of the product manufacturing process. It aids in protecting the products from physical damage, dust, and various other factors, adding further value to the products. In order to attain maximum profits, cost cutting becomes important in the light of intense competition and increasing globalization of manufacturing. Standardized HMI helps in reducing the learning curve required for training machine operators. HMI templates that are designed to offer consistent look and feel help the end users to reduce training and development time. While creating customizable and standardized HMIs, screen and navigation options are planned for various uses, so that the screens are easily customized as per the machines efficiently.

Safety regulations are major concerns among manufacturers especially in health care and food and beverage industry, more so in emerging economies such as India, China, and Latin America. Safety regulations can be adhered to by developing applications which include automated reporting capabilities that helps in generating brief reports for each packaging line.

Automation helps in reducing labor cost both directly and indirectly as well. Directly in the sense that every task that is done autonomously requires no labor force, thereby, cutting down the cost. Indirect labor saving is attained through automation that helps in reducing scraps, defective packaging, material handling and component orientation time.

Large industries where bulk of items are packed per minute require robotic automation to fulfil the packaging demand. Application of automated machines means it requires less labor to accomplish the packaging process, thus lessening the labor cost in the long term period. Automation is boosting the demand of packaging automation in the global market since the present automated machineries needs less maintenance, thereby reducing the machine downtime. Investment in automatic equipment is costly that is easily recoverable; but smaller companies do not want to invest huge amounts as they do not want to take risks at the preliminary stage.

The E-commerce sector is booming globally especially in developing countries. Due to the rapid growth of e-commerce, worldwide logistics has become complex and difficult to keep up with. Packaging is an important part of the e-commerce sector. Demand for online shopping has increased in the past couple of years due to which online retailers require large e-fulfilment centers and efficient machinery for packaging the ordered products in bulk.

Global Packaging Automation Market: Key SegmentsOn the basis of industries, the market is bifurcated into logistics, food and beverages, healthcare, retail, electronics, automotive among others. The food and beverage segment accounted for the highest revenue share in 2016. Health care segment is one of the fastest growing market in the global packaging automation market. The packaging automation market is bifurcated into six segments based on the applications. They are palletizing, labeling, filling, capping, wrapping among others. Among these six application segments, palletizing segment held highest market revenue share during the forecast period. Based on types, the market is bifurcated into packaging robot, automated packagers and automated conveyors. The packaging robot segment accounted for the highest revenue share during the forecast period. Based on the region is segregated into North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East and Africa and Latin America. Europe accounted for the highest market revenue followed by Asia Pacific, North America, Middle East and Africa and Latin America.

Companies Mentioned in Report Some of the principal players in the global packaging automation market are Schneider Electric SE (France), Rockwell Automation, Inc. (U.S.), Siemens AG (Germany), ABB Ltd. (Switzerland), Mitsubishi Electric Corporation (Japan), Schneider Electric SE (France), Automated Packaging Systems, Inc. (U.S.), Emerson Electric Co. (U.S.), Beumer Group GmbH & Co., Kg (Germany), Swisslog Holding AG (Switzerland), and Kollmorgen (U.S.)among others.

The market has been segmented as follows: Global Packaging Automation Market, by Application:

Palletizing Labeling Filling Capping Wrapping Others

Global Packaging Automation Market, by Type:Packaging Robot Automated Packagers Automated Conveyors

Global Packaging Automation Market, by Industries: Logistics Food and Beverages Health Care Retail Electronics Automotive Others

Packaging Automation Market, by Geography: The market is segmented on the basis of geography into North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa and Latin America

North America U.S. Canada Rest of North America

Europe U.K. Germany France Italy Rest of Europe

Asia Pacific India China Japan Rest of Asia Pacific

Middle East & Africa South Africa U.A.E. Rest of Middle East and Africa

Latin America Brazil Download the full report: https://www.reportbuyer.com/product/4826705/

About Reportbuyer Reportbuyer is a leading industry intelligence solution that provides all market research reports from top publishers http://www.reportbuyer.com

For more information: Sarah Smith Research Advisor at Reportbuyer.com Email: query@reportbuyer.com Tel: +44 208 816 85 48 Website: http://www.reportbuyer.com

View original content:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/packaging-automation-market---global-industry-analysis-size-share-growth-trends-and-forecast-2017---2025-300487423.html

SOURCE ReportBuyer

http://www.reportbuyer.com

Read more:

Packaging Automation Market - Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends and Forecast 2017 - 2025 - PR Newswire (press release)

Posted in Automation | Comments Off on Packaging Automation Market – Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends and Forecast 2017 – 2025 – PR Newswire (press release)

SLC offers Hambantota groundstaff cash, clothes after uniform fiasco – Cricbuzz

Posted: at 7:05 am

SLC UNIFORM FIASCO

Cricbuzz StaffLast updated on Thu, 13 Jul, 2017, 02:35 PM

Many of groundstaff were reported to have been paid only after the trousers were returned following the completion of the 5th ODI between Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe, leaving them stripped down to their underwear. Getty

Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC) on Wednesday offered cash and new clothes to temporary groundsmen, who were forced to handover their uniforms after the fifth One-Day International between Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe.

The groundsman at Hambantota's MRI Cricket Stadium, who were daily wage workers of the region, were given uniforms to wear during the match. This practice of giving uniforms to the local workers, who are called in to put covers on the entire ground in case of a rain was started recently. But on Monday (July 10), they were asked to return their clothes before leaving the venue. Many of them were reported to have been paid only after the trousers were returned, leaving them stripped down to their underwear.

One of the groundsman, who was stripped off his trousers, told Hiru News, "They only paid us for our three days worth of work after taking our clothes."

Another one added: "They hadn't told us to come prepared with another set of clothes. They asked us to hand over the trousers, so we had no choice but to do that."

In the aftermath of the incident, SLC formally apologised to "those subjected to this ignominy".

"That was a very low thing that happened," Thilanga Sumathipala, SLC president, said. "These people come to the ground because of their love of cricket, and to do a service while watching the match. They aren't just there for the money. If rains come, they close up the whole ground within minutes, and then take the covers off again.

"They are our colleagues, not our slaves. The board didn't know anything about this. We had sent that clothing out to our provincial associations, but hadn't taken a decision to get that clothing back.

"The way they were treated is unacceptable and I have ordered that they be given a new set of clothes plus an extra day's wages. It is inhuman and slavery."

Cricbuzz

Follow this link:

SLC offers Hambantota groundstaff cash, clothes after uniform fiasco - Cricbuzz

Posted in Wage Slavery | Comments Off on SLC offers Hambantota groundstaff cash, clothes after uniform fiasco – Cricbuzz

Sri Lanka needs a selfless Mandela – Daily Mirror

Posted: at 7:05 am

Next week on Thursday, July 18 we celebrate the 99th birth-anniversary of South Africas first coloured President and legendary freedom fighter Nelson Mandela who is widely regarded as one of the noblest leaders of modern times.

It is one of the rare events where the United Nations celebrates the birthday of a world leader for his heroic battle for freedom, justice and democracy.

It is easy to break down and destroy. The heroes are those who make peace and build, the United Nations quotes Nelson Mandela as saying.

The UN says everyone has the ability and the responsibility to change the world for the better, and Mandela Day is an occasion for everyone to take action and inspire change.

For 67 years, Nelson Mandela devoted his life to the service of humanity as a human rights lawyer, a prisoner of conscience, an international peacemaker and the first democratically elected President of a free South Africa.

The Nelson Mandela Foundation is dedicating this years Mandela Day to action against poverty, honouring Nelson Mandelas leadership and devotion to fighting poverty and promoting social justice for all.

In December 2015, the UN General Assembly decided to extend the scope of Nelson Mandela International Day to also be utilized to promote humane conditions of imprisonment, to raise awareness about prisoners being a continuous part of society and to value the work of prison staff as a social service of particular importance.

The UN General Assembly not only adopted the revised UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, but also approved that they should be known as the Nelson Mandela Rules to honour the legacy of the late South African President, who spent 27 years in prison in the course of his struggle for freedom, justice and democracy. The UN General Assembly proclaimed Mandelas birthday, July18, as Mandela Day, marking his contribution to the anti-apartheid struggle. It called on the people to donate 67 minutes to doing something for others, commemorating the 67 years that Mandela had been a part of the movement.

Essentially Nelson Mandela was a servant leader. After decades of a battle against the white supremacists he was elected President in 1994 for a five-year term. He was so respected by the people that he could have gone on for two or three terms. Yet he decided to quit after one five-year term in office, giving a lesson to world leaders.

In Sri Lanka former President Mahinda Rajapaksa who was elected in 2005 amended the Constitution to give him the power to go on for more than two terms or for a lifetime. The former President was so confident of his position or popularity that in November 2014 he called an early presidential election, two years before schedule. Perhaps he did not foresee the dramatic crossover that took place in November 2014 when the then Health Minister and Sri Lanka Freedom Party General Secretary Maithripala Sirisena crossed over to form what was described as a rainbow coalition.

In the presidential election on January 8, 2015, Mr. Sirisenas rainbow coalition soared to a spectacular victory. As a result we today have a national unity government between the two major parties, the United National Party (UNP) and the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP).

President Sirisena in one of his first speeches from the Dalada Maligawa pledged he would be a servant leader and work for the abolition of the wide-powered Executive Presidency. He and other government leaders also committed themselves to work towards the mission of a peaceful, just and all inclusive society. We hope that in our country also we would see a Nelson Mandela who is sincerely ready to go beyond personal gain or glory and work for freedom, justice and democracy.

See original here:

Sri Lanka needs a selfless Mandela - Daily Mirror

Posted in Abolition Of Work | Comments Off on Sri Lanka needs a selfless Mandela – Daily Mirror

Citizens’ Assembly recommendations include abolition of mandatory … – Irish Legal News

Posted: at 7:05 am

The Citizens Assembly has recommended abolition of mandatory retirement ages; elimination of the time gap between retirement and eligibility for the old age pension and that pensions be linked to average earnings, the Irish Examiner reports.

The recommendations come after a weekend of hearings during which the assembly looked at various issues relating to pensions for older people, work and income.

It voted on 16 proposals, which will be the basis for a report to be sent to the Dil and Seanad.

Eighty-six per cent of assembly members said mandatory retirement ages should be abolished, while 96 per cent said the issue of people being forced to retire at 65 but being ineligible for the State pension until 66 should be resolved.

The introduction of a mandatory pension scheme in addition to the state pension was supported by 87 per cent of those present, while 88 per cent said the pension ought to be pegged to average earnings.

A substantial majority also agreed to recommend that private pension schemes be renationalised.

Michael Collins, assistant professor of social policy at University College Dublin, suggested that tax breaks for those who invest in private pensions should be brought to an end.

The policy of supporting private pension provision through tax breaks is skewed towards those on higher incomes, he said.

It is worth considering whether society should more efficiently use its resources to provide an improved basic living standard for all pensions, one well above the minimum income standard, and discontinue subsidising private pensions savings.

Ms Justice Mary Laffoy, assembly chairwoman(pictured), said she aimed to have the report ready for the Oireachtas by the end of September.

10 July 2017

See the article here:

Citizens' Assembly recommendations include abolition of mandatory ... - Irish Legal News

Posted in Abolition Of Work | Comments Off on Citizens’ Assembly recommendations include abolition of mandatory … – Irish Legal News

It’s time to radically rethink university tuition fees – The Guardian

Posted: at 7:05 am

9,000 tuition fees need to be replaced with a fair and financially sustainable system. Photograph: Getty

University tuition fees are back in the spotlight. Labours manifesto pledge to abolish fees saw a re-energised student constituency help put paid to expectations of a Conservative majority. Now, Conservative political leaders are scrambling to respond to the issue. The overwhelming impression we are left with is that the current system has lost credibility. It must be swept away and replaced with one that is both fair and financially sustainable.

Students and their parents feel they have been unfairly treated by paying the bulk of their higher education costs themselves they are right. Under the 2017 system the average debt for graduates is over 50,000, with students from the lowest income families averaging nearly 60,000. This is politically unsustainable.

I believe there needs to be a fresh approach. It is in the national interest for universities in England to be able to educate students, carry out research and contribute to the community. A strong university system is crucial for economic and social development, with society and businesses alike benefiting from a well-educated graduate workforce so it is fair that they should foot significant proportions of the cost.

The pre-2012 system was a reasonable compromise, with students paying approximately one third of the total fees through an interest-free, index-linked government repayment scheme.

Since there are three beneficiaries of higher education, there should be three principal sources of funding: taxpayers, companies and the individual. As well as tuition fees and general taxation, there should be a payroll tax or levy on enterprises with the proceeds earmarked for higher education. Introducing a contribution from companies will ensure that philanthropic funding provides a vital boost without serving as a substitute.

There is a pressing need to develop a new system, now that several recent developments have thrown into sharp relief how unsustainable the 2012 student finance system is. Firstly, the rate of interest on student loans from September will be an eye-watering 6.1%. This means that most recent graduates will find their real debt increasing in their early years of graduate employment, even though they are making payments through the tax system and paying tax after 21,000 at a rate of 29%.

Secondly, the decision to bring nurses and midwives into the fees system attacks a large and valuable group. These students are studying to enter professions that are highly valued socially but poorly paid. Entrants to these professions are much more likely to be drawn from working class backgrounds than those of other professions such as medicine, law and accountancy. While studying, these students are expected to work 2,100 hours in practice, on the wards and in the clinics. The student midwives need to successfully deliver 40 babies. Nursing and midwifery students work night and weekend shifts how are they to undertake paid holiday jobs and part-time work?

Successful nursing and midwifery graduates will typically progress to earnings of around 35,577. Graduates with an average debt of 50,000 will find that it never diminishes in real terms until it is eventually written off after 30 years. The impact of the student loan system is that our nurses and midwives will simply receive a take-home pay cut of 4.8% (at the top of the scale). This makes absolutely no sense when there is a significant and growing national shortage throughout England of both nurses and midwives.

The fee reform has also had a disastrous impact on the number of part-time students and mature students. This has made much-needed continuous professional development more difficult. The government should contribute to provide re-training and re-education instead the current system inhibits this.

Immediate action is needed in parliament to restore an inflation uplift only arrangement for student fee debt and for HM Government to meet the fee costs for nurses and midwives. I am optimistic that a majority can be secured for both proposals.

One question remains: would abolishing fees mean a re-introduction of a cap on student numbers? While I welcomed the abolition of the overall student number control, it is clear that it has had detrimental effects. It was neither necessary nor good policy for all number controls to be abandoned on all individual institutions. This has simply resulted in greater competition for students to come to university X rather than Y. It has not resulted in a concerted effort to increase the number of students studying at university. In fact, numbers of full-time students are dipping slightly and numbers of part-time students have diminished very sharply.

Instead, government should abolish the overall number control while subjecting individual institutions to a form of crawling peg control, dampening individual fluctuations while still allowing for overall growth and for institutions to grow or decline in the medium term. A new form of clearing could be introduced for all unplaced and appropriately qualified students at the end of the admissions cycle. This will widen participation and lead to sustainable reform.

Current higher education policy makes it likely that many universities will become financially unstable amid the scramble for students. We are already seeing the early warning signs with the 4% drop in applications and announcements of job loss programmes in a number of institutions. Reform is needed now in the interests of the students, graduates, universities and the country as a whole.

Join the higher education network for more comment, analysis and job opportunities, direct to your inbox. Follow us on Twitter @gdnhighered. And if you have an idea for a story, please read our guidelines and email your pitch to us at highereducationnetwork@theguardian.com.

Looking for a higher education job? Or perhaps you need to recruit university staff? Take a look at Guardian Jobs, the higher education specialist

See the rest here:

It's time to radically rethink university tuition fees - The Guardian

Posted in Abolition Of Work | Comments Off on It’s time to radically rethink university tuition fees – The Guardian

Selfies: Rampant narcissism or healthy empowerment? – The Sydney Morning Herald

Posted: at 7:04 am

Ally Garrett, a 29-year-old body-positive or "fat acceptance" activist, has a tattoo on her left thigh that helps explain why she's so passionate about posting selfies. It shows a yellow rose above a big red heart emblazoned with a single word: MYSELF. It's inky testimony to the millennial conviction that loving yourself, and being public about it, is nothing to be embarrassed about. It would have horrified my grandmother, fond of frosty Calvinist maxims along the lines of "Self-praise is no recommendation".

Garrett, whose right thigh shows Kim Kardashian as a madonna, meets me on a clear day in Sydney to talk about the world's continuing preoccupation with selfies, a passing fad that refuses, doggedly, to pass. It's how we get on to the separate, but not unrelated, subject of the self-love movement and radical self-love gurus like Gala Darling. Darling, once a depressed New Zealander with an eating disorder and now happy head of a mini self-love empire, is the author of a seminal text on the subject. Her message takes up where the '80s and '90s self-esteem movements left off, and declares that you are not merely adequate; you are "magnificent", "a shimmering, exploding supernova" who can have a life "bursting with magic, miracles, bliss and adventure", once you learn how to "fall madly in love with yourself". You can see how posting selfies could be a natural step in that empowering romance.

But they can also be an act of defiance. For a fat girl teased at school, for a fat woman living in a thinworshipping world, it took courage for Ally Garrett to post her first bikini selfies on social media some years back. Now there's no stopping her. A stream of selfies shows her in bikinis, sheer black lingerie, with friends, with cats, on rocks, on planes, looking powerful or pimpled, saucy in eyeliner. Even her phone conspires.

"I have a photo editing app and if you haven't taken a selfie that day, it sends you a notification," she says, laughing. "It's like, 'You look gorgeous today. Take a selfie.' " So how many does she take? "In a selfie session, if I'm feeling good or feeling a way that I want to share or document, then I could take 50. Then I'd narrow them down to four or five favourites and ask my housemate or my sister which one I should put up. They're always like, 'They all look exactly the same', and I'm like, 'No! They're so different.' "

After talking to Garrett, I try taking 50 selfies in a sitting. I only get to 11 before I'm pooped. The results can best be described as disappointing, despite taking pointers from sources like Kylie Jenner's Five Tips for Scoring the Perfect Selfie. I suspect the problem is that I'm not a luminous young woman. And I'm an amateur, unlike Garrett, who strikes a gleaming, professional pose the moment the phone is lifted. She is also pretty gorgeous and confident, even if she does worry excessively about her fringe. Of course, there are conventionally plain women, plain fat women and older women who post selfies but news flash they are wildly outnumbered and out-"liked" by the pretty, slim ones.

Selfie trends have come and gone since the arrival of the front-facing camera (introduced into mobile phones in 2003, although selfies didn't really become a cultural phenomenon until the iPhone4 included one in 2010). A walk down memory lane: #babybjorn, #duckface, #iwokeuplikethis, #bathroom, #elevator, #after-sex, #sexyselfie, #grandmaselfies, #dangerousanimal. Even the sex-toy industry got in on the act, with a selfie stick for orgasm selfies: "a powerful insertable vibrator featuring a built-in illuminated video camera". (Some buyers found it disappointingly medical.)

The selfie trend itself, however, shows no signs of slowing. We just can't get enough of ourselves. It's hard to come by accurate figures but in 2016, Google calculated that more than 24 billion selfies were posted in 2015 on its Google Photos app alone. In 2014, the company claimed that Android devices were capturing 93 million selfies every day. One estimate claims that 74 per cent of all images on Snapchat are selfies and that 1000 selfies are uploaded to Instagram every 10 seconds.

Get the latest news and updates emailed straight to your inbox.

Scores of scholars have picked over the phenomenon, analysing everything from selfie-taking at funerals or Auschwitz, to visual cues like head position, emotional expression, gender and age. On average, women post far more selfies than men until they hit about 40, at which point the trend reverses. (No surprise to me.) They also tilt their heads more.

Apart from just being fun, selfies can be a powerful political statement, says Garrett, who positions herself as a "fat femme" (for feminine) on the queer spectrum. Every minutely calibrated shade of identity politics, body politics, feminism, etc, can now be found chatting online, and selfies are part of the dialogue. Take #VBO, for example, meaning visible belly outline.

"The fat activism movement started," Garrett explains, "but then there was criticism within the movement, along the lines of, 'Yeah, this is great but often the really popular plus-size bloggers are still hourglass figures.' So then this movement started for #VBO primarily fat women, or fat femmes, some non-binary fatties taking pictures where you can see the belly more predominantly."

Who knew? Selfies, then, are a means to many ends, although even Garrett admits people tend to post ones that show them, or their magical lives, to advantage. "That sits alongside the expectation that social media is your highlight reel, not your real life."

Rebecca Carnegie*, 26, works in fashion media, where it's expected people will use selfies to build a "personal brand". She agrees that they have become an essential tool in art-directing an online fantasy life. Left to her own devices, Carnegie would never take a selfie. Her friends, on the other hand, are hooked on them, sometimes posting between 15 and 20 a day. "Whenever we go out, they insist on taking them before we leave, while we're in the Uber, at the venue, in the bathroom if it's nice, on the streets, with our cocktails, with our dessert, on the way to wherever else we're going. Sometimes it's of us as a group, sometimes it's of themselves. I think they like to have a mix so it looks like they're not just obsessed with their own image."

WE RE NOT NECESSARILY MORE SELF-ABSORBED THAN PREVIOUS GENERATIONS. WE JUST HAVE THE TECHNOLOGY TO BROADCAST THAT SELF-ABSORPTION.

Youth, of course, has always been in love with its gilded self. As one 28-year-old tells me, "We're not necessarily more self-absorbed than previous generations. We just have the technology to broadcast that selfabsorption." But it's also true that the pressure to project an enviable, successful life has become relentless. "Social media has made it really important to live out your life online," says Carnegie. "It's not enough to just be there, in the moment. People like everyone to know they have a great life and great friends and are always having a great time." It's the downside of being told you're really a shimmering supernova: you can feel obliged to look like one 24/7.

Carnegie says many of her friends are convinced a selfie is a powerful act "not just taking it but sharing it, having it out there in the world"

"And there are a lot of reasons to do it. One friend broke up with her boyfriend recently and she's posting a lot. She wants to keep up that appearance of not being brokenhearted, in case the ex-boyfriend is looking at her social media. And you do get a lot of data about who's looking at your pictures, so you can tell."

The "likes" are reinforcing, but they're also pretty meaningless, Carnegie says. That hasn't stopped people from wanting them or taking it personally if they don't get many.

"Numbers are so powerful and selfies do tend to get more likes. With my friends, I make sure I like every selfie they post because I don't want them to ask me why I didn't."

"I DON'T see taking selfies as being vain. For years I hated my reflection and now I love it! The curves of my cheeks, my tiny little nose, my lips that form my unique smile it's all me and I love it! So I will take as many selfies as I damn well please. I encourage you to do the same!" @curvykatpsm

"To an outsider this must seem like such a boring and selfindulgent IG account because it's just pic after pic of me. But to me it is a place that gives me a sense of pride and achievement Through these selfies and snaps I am garnering a true love and appreciation for my body. For someone who has spent their life feeling nothing but shame and disgust about their body, that's monumental." @chocolatecurvesmodel

(Posts published on a "body positive" site.)

When the Oxford Dictionary made "selfie" word of the year in 2013, ahead of "twerk", columnists, academics, misogynists, feminists and bloggers of all stripes had something to say about the apparently innocuous act of taking a photo of yourself. Did selfies indicate clinical narcissism? Just another Me Decade with added me-ness or a cry for help from a generation lost in a celebrity swamp? How could selfies be said to "empower" or build communities when they thrive on consumer capitalism's great drivers: comparison, envy and fear?

The debate goes on. Selfies as a worrying sign of the times are touched on in a recent book by journalist Will Storr, called Selfie: How We Became so Self-obsessed and What It's Doing to Us. Among other things, Storr takes a searching look at the role of hyper-individualists like Ayn Rand, of neoliberalism and the evangelistic selfesteem programs that built up a head of steam last century, some cultish, some even state-sanctioned. What are the consequences of taking such a confected pride in ourselves, but also living in an age of judgemental perfectionism? If all this, playing out in selfies and social media, is supposed to build people up all those likes, comments, all that hyperbolic feedback then why are eating disorders, depression, suicide and self-harming on the rise? Why do many studies show people feel worse about themselves after they've been on social media sites?

And what message do selfies send to women in particular? Yes, there are all those body-positive hashtags, but even there the focus is still on women's appearance. It's hard to ignore the mountain of selfie sites where "hotness" remains the revered female commodity. All those teenage girls needing to hear, over and over, "OMG, you're so pretty/hot/gorgeous!!!!"

Cause for concern? Not according to writers like New Yorker Rachel Syme, herself a devoted selfie taker, and also young and attractive, it's perhaps relevant, although risky, to note. In 2015, Syme wrote an impassioned online ode to selfies, witheringly disposing of selfie haters along the way, her sights often trained on middle-aged men, misogynists and old-school feminists.

Syme's eloquent panegyric, Selfie, claims that dismissing them as narcissism, or just silly, misses the point. Selfies, she says, are empowering, creative, diverse and an important plank in the revolutionary selflove movement ("revolutionary" because it makes a change from women hating themselves). In selfie-land, women finally have control over the how, when and where of their own image. Selfies hand power to the invisible, the marginalised, the doubting.

"Those who see selfies as signs of the end times," she writes, "are focusing on the outliers; the bad actors. The people who accidentally fall into a waterfall and die in the pursuit of the perfect shot. The kids who get addicted to the digital feedback loop and start relying on hearts to get up in the morning. The moms and dads who take selfies when they should be watching their babies; the seething loners who use their selfies as a way to spread hate (if this hate spills over into violence, then selfies will surely get the blame)... What the critics don't focus on is how to decode the language of selfies when they are being used correctly: what the people in them are trying to do with their portraiture."

To New Yorker Rachel Syme, selfies are both empowering and creative. Photo: Instagram/Rachsyme

As part of her essay, Syme sought and received brave, often potent, selfies from people undergoing chemo, say, or heartbreak; evidence of a selfie world beyond #Ihot. Indeed, Syme makes selfie-posting sound like a noble act, horribly misunderstood by those who think it's vanity or a kind of Zelig-like me-ism.

"When a young woman takes a picture alone, in a museum," she admonishes, "those who don't take selfies will scowl, thinking that she is ignoring the art that surrounds her. They will wonder why she cannot stop and breathe in the high culture without the safety blanket of her phone. But maybe, just maybe, this youth is someone who feels less than welcome in this museum, finding it an institution that is cold and sterile and enforcing of a visual language that doesn't always include faces that look like hers. Maybe it is a big deal to finally see herself there, standing in the same frame as the grand artistic canon."

Of course, it isn't so very different from having your picture taken standing next to the Three Sisters or Niagara Falls. It's just that you're the one doing the taking. And the posting, sometimes many times a day. And wanting those likes. Isn't that just another way of encouraging approval-seeking?

"If you put a selfie online," Ally Garrett acknowledges, "and there's an element of 'click like', you are seeking validation in some form. Helen Razer wrote a piece on that, saying, no, selfies aren't actually empowering because you're still saying please like me. But then, do we expect women to grow up in a culture that says those things but to be resilient enough to not want validation or not want to feel beautiful? So it brings up this odd predicament of, 'Be beautiful, but don't enjoy it. Do things to your appearance, but make it look effortless.' "

SHE'S RIGHT, of course, in that selfies and social media are rife with contradictions and mixed messages. A way to take control. A way to be enslaved by old paradigms, and now by your own hand. A way to be "authentic". A way to fake it. Selfies have become increasingly un-self-like, thanks to filters, photo-altering apps like Facetune and aids like built-in light-up phone cases, as recommended by selfie queens like Kim Kardashian.

Emma Dockery, 34, is a Melbourne casting agent. She looks at pictures of people all day long, but technology, and the obsession with celebrity posing, are making her job that much harder. Early on, she had to deal with the rash of photoshopped studio portraits. Now it's crazy selfies.

"Quite often you'll ask for a selfie and you'll get a photo taken at some absolutely extreme angle, you know, extreme Princess Di eyes up into the camera, with only the smallest part of their forehead showing," she says. "For a while, I was constantly getting these Snapchat selfies, where they'd have this ethereal glow or their faces would be totally obscured by a cloud of golden butterflies, or they'd send one with the dog filter on. So it was like, 'Okay, I have absolutely no idea what you look like, but if we're casting for a cartoon dog, well, you're it!'" She's saddened that young girls don't feel they can be themselves. "You're looking for a real, warts-and-all teenager and when you get an extreme, pout-lipped selfie back, you do wonder, 'Oh heck, is this how you feel you have to look for us?' "

A lot of Dockery's friends are mad selfie-posters but she's the opposite. We talk about what happens to the plain-looking girls. "Well, that's me," she says, laughing. "I won't post. My face is nowhere on social media because how could I compete with the babes out there with 2000 hits and 'Omigod, you're so beautiful!!'? Some of us aren't, so we're just going to stick with posting photos of what we're eating, and dogs. And captions that show how funny you can be about a chocolate."

I ask if she thinks selfies are narcissistic or useful. "If you want to present yourself to the world through photographs you take, then go for gold," she says. "But in a world dominated by a lot of male gaze, I do wonder whether taking selfies of yourself is the way to combat that. It's one of those areas where it has grown so quickly, everyone is struggling to figure out what it all means. It's like early feminist debate about pornography is it good, is it bad, are we for it or against it? If you're creating yourself, if you consent to it, does that make it fine?"

Dockery offers all this warily, worried she's going to step on one of the landmines that litter the landscape of contemporary feminism. She can see that posting selfies might be a powerful act, a brave act, but she also has reservations. "Part of me thinks a lot of it is just people putting photos of themselves out there, hoping someone will write a nice comment about them," she says. "That makes me feel diabolically sad for where we are, especially as women."

There is something poignant, at least, about some selfie-posting. "Selfies are all about presenting a face to the world," agrees 32-year-old Mimi Johnson*, as she recalls a work trip to Bali. "There I was, staying in the most beautiful villa, with my own pool and an amazing tropical garden. All I was doing was spending hours on these lilos in the pool, taking selfies and trying not to fall in with my phone. I took hundreds, wanting to get the perfect one.

"Finally I thought, this is stupid, I'm in this incredible place and I'm not actually enjoying it. All I'm doing is worrying about presenting this image to other people. 'Hey, look at me having the perfect holiday.' "

She thinks part of her motivation was simply wanting to connect. "I don't think it was narcissism, really. I think I was a little lonely and a little bored. When people post back, it's like an endorphin hit that instant moment of validation. And now there's this hard-wired need, compulsion, to share. It's like you haven't enjoyed an experience unless you've put it on social media."

THERE IS nothing as simultaneously familiar and strange as one's own reflection. You have only to stare at yourself, or even a picture of yourself, for more than a minute to have that weird "Who the hell are you?" feeling.

In 1970, an American psychologist called Gordon Gallup devised a test, called the mirror self-recognition test, to assess self-awareness in other species. As part of the study, chimps were anaesthetised, marked with an odourless dye and, once awake, put in front of a mirror. If they touched the dyed spot on their body, it suggested they realised that the reflection was of themselves.

A lot of species have since failed the test. Many animals seem to think the reflection is another of their kind, but that has its own effect. It helps with loneliness. Mirrors can have a calming effect on different animals, particularly isolated ones. Here is a creature like them, mimicking their behaviour. Echoes of Narcissus, who didn't realise it was his own beautiful and responsive image that he had fallen in love with in the pool.

As Gallup and his colleague wrote in 1970: "The animal confronting its own reflection has complete control over the behaviour of the image, and therefore the image is always attentive and ready to reciprocate when the animal is."

I can't help thinking that is part of the appeal of selfies. Here's someone just like you, smiling at you in a loving, happy way, full of the milk of human you-ness, and ready to pose and click a hundred times for that perfect shot of you. A constant, forgiving companion. Then you send the image out there, into the vast, jostling, lonely universe of cyberspace. You hear your own echo, see your own shadow, confirm you exist.

*Some names have been changed.

Read the original post:

Selfies: Rampant narcissism or healthy empowerment? - The Sydney Morning Herald

Posted in Personal Empowerment | Comments Off on Selfies: Rampant narcissism or healthy empowerment? – The Sydney Morning Herald

AG Sessions under fire for closed-door speech to Alliance Defending Freedom – CNN

Posted: at 7:03 am

Sessions' attendance at the closed-press "Summit on Religious Liberty" hosted by the Alliance Defending Freedom, was first disclosed Tuesday morning -- but the department has declined requests to release his full remarks.

In response to a CNN request, the group said that it would not provide a transcript of Sessions' remarks.

LGBTQ rights organizations blasted Sessions for attending the event.

"ADF is the most extreme anti-gay legal organization -- so extreme that it does not concede even that gay or transgender people should be permitted to exist as such," said Shannon Minter of the National Center for Lesbian Rights. "They are a truly destructive force in our country, and it is appalling that the attorney general of the United States would lend them the imprimatur of his office."

Several other LGBTQ advocates said they were particularly troubled by the decision to keep Sessions' remarks private.

"The attorney general has every right to speak to a group like Alliance Defending Freedom," said David Stacy, Government Affairs Director of Human Rights Campaign, a civil rights group promoting LGBTQ equality. "What troubles us is that his remarks are being kept hidden from the public at the same time he has been tasked by the President with issuing religious discrimination policies that ADF has long promoted."

In May, President Donald Trump signed an executive order entitled, "Promoting Free Speech and Religious Liberty," which directed Sessions to "issue guidance interpreting religious liberty protections in federal law," but nothing has happened to date.

"Many times during the Obama administration, HRC hosted appearances by the president, vice president and Cabinet officials -- I cannot remember a single instance in which those remarks were not fully open to the media and the remarks and/or video made widely available to the public," Stacy added.

Sessions pledged his support late last month to "continue to enforce hate crime laws aggressively," and revealed for the first time his focus on crimes against those in the transgender community, despite previous opposition as a senator to the federal Hate Crimes Prevention Act.

The Justice Department's LGBTQ affinity group also celebrated Pride month in June, though it remains unclear what administration officials said at the event, because it too was closed to the press.

CNN's Ariane de Vogue contributed to this report.

See the original post here:

AG Sessions under fire for closed-door speech to Alliance Defending Freedom - CNN

Posted in Freedom | Comments Off on AG Sessions under fire for closed-door speech to Alliance Defending Freedom – CNN