Daily Archives: July 4, 2017

Commentary: The optimist’s case for automation – Channel NewsAsia

Posted: July 4, 2017 at 8:12 am

SINGAPORE: Singapore faces a serious gap in labour productivity. Singapores labour productivity grew by an average of 2.2 per cent per year from 2000 to 2013, according to estimates by the McKinsey Global Institute (MGI).

Yet for Singapore to maintain historical levels of growth, the city would need to increase its labour productivity by an average of 5.8 per cent per year from 2013 to 2030 - a rate nearly three times as high as in the previous 13 years.

In many countries, increasing labour productivity usually requires employment to shift from less productive sectors, such as agriculture, to more productive ones, like manufacturing.

For Singapore, however, this model might not be workable. Its economy has been restructured to some extent, and its labour market is very tight. Employment shifts among sectors actually reduced Singapores economic growth from 2006 to 2012.

Further labour productivity gains need to take place within sectors. In this regard, automation technologies - which include artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning and robotics - hold considerable promise. Automation could raise productivity growth by 0.8 to 1.4 per cent annually in 20 large countries, according to MGI estimates.

To take advantage of this opportunity, executives and policy makers in Singapore need to understand the nature of todays automation technologies and the potential productivity improvements that they offer to Singapore and other Asian economies.

AI WILL AFFECT BUSINESSES

For decades, organisations have used computers and machines to streamline and perform the work of humans. Recent advances in computing technology, programming techniques and data collection are making it possible for machines to do more cognitive work, such as finding patterns in data and reaching decisions.

When my McKinsey colleagues in China conducted a survey on AI, respondents identified more than 100 ways that AI might affect their industries. Innovation seems likely to accelerate, also because investment is pouring into new applications for AI.

AUTOMATION AFFECT JOBS TO VARYING DEGREES

A common fear is that automation will destroy jobs. But the situation is more nuanced. Tasks like collecting data or doing predictable physical labour can be automated readily. This is not the case for activities that involve social, emotional and cognitive skills, such as dealing with customers and managing workers.

By looking at the potential for automating activities, we found that just 5 per cent of occupations could be fully automated with currently demonstrated technologies. Many more could be partly automated: Some 60 per cent of jobs could have 30 per cent of their activities automated.

These jobs span the pay scales and ranks of organisations, all the way up to those working in companies C-suite leadership roles: Activities consuming more than an estimated 20 per cent of a CEOs working time could be automated using current technologies.

EFFECT WILL DIFFER AMONG GEOGRAPHIES AND SECTORS

Although automation will influence jobs in every sector and country, it will make more of a difference in some places than in others.

The potential for automation is concentrated in four countries with large populations, high wages, or both: China, India, Japan, and the US. These countries account for just over half of the wages and almost two-thirds of the work associated with automatable activities.

Of the 11 Asian countries that MGI studied, Singapore actually has the lowest proportion of work that can be automated with current technologies (44 per cent, which is admittedly still high).

In Singapore, much of the work that can be automated using existing technologies is in the citys larger industries: Manufacturing (equivalent to 213,800 jobs), administrative and support services (134,200 jobs), retail (124,900 jobs), and construction (120,000 jobs). Two smaller sectors have particularly high percentages of automatable work: accommodation and food services (60 per cent) and transportation and warehousing (59 per cent).

ADOPTION DEPEND ON FIVE FACTORS

Some think that automation will happen rapidly, but it appears likely that the adoption of automation will take decades. The pace and extent of automations effect on work activities depends on five factors.

First, whether a demonstrated technology can be turned into a commercial product or service quickly. Second, whether the costs of development and deployment, which have to be covered in advance, can be eventually recouped.

Third, dynamics in the labour market, including demographics, wage levels, and worker training, which can help workers adapt to new technologies. Fourth, the type and distribution of economic benefits such as increased productivity, improved safety, lower labour costs and higher product quality, which determines whether companies have a strong incentive to adopt automation technologies.

Last, regulatory and social acceptance, related to issues such as safety and liability, data privacy and security, and possible increases in unemployment levels.

A projected 50 per cent of all work activities could be automated by around 2035 if these five factors favour the rapid development and adoption of automation technologies.

Should automation develop more slowly, the same level of automation might not occur until 2075.

MAJOR ECONOMIC POTENTIAL

The productivity boost from automation in the worlds 20 largest economies could be equivalent to adding 1.1 billion to 2.3 billion full-time workers when we reach 2065, based on MGI's estimates.

This could increase growth by 0.8 to 1.4 per cent of global GDP annually. Such gains would offset some of the slowdown in workforce growth that is happening in many advanced and some emerging economies - a demographic trend that could cut economic growth nearly in half.

Previous periods of structural economic change created winners and losers, but not in a zero-sum way. In the US, for example, manufacturing employment fell from 25 per cent in 1950 to less than 10 per cent in 2010, but new jobs replaced the ones that disappeared and society was better off on the whole when the transition was complete.

As automation progresses, economic growth will increase most if workers who are affected by automation continue working at the same levels of productivity. Meeting this condition will require concerted action in the private and public sectors.

Business leaders could find ways to redeploy the displaced, either within their own organisations or elsewhere. Policy makers should develop measures to help workers develop new skills and to promote the creation of new jobs.

Singapore is well-positioned to help its workers enter the age of automation, thanks to efforts like the SkillsFuture programme, which helps workers pay for the training theyll need to keep up with the demands of the digital economy.

The Government also has institutions in place, like the Smart Nation Programme Office, that could assist with tracking the progress of automation and devising new initiatives to help companies deploy advanced technologies. Tying spending and incentives to investments in new technologies more closely could be one approach.

I am optimistic that Singapore and other Asian economies have the human and technological capital, as well as the international outlook, to capitalise on the opportunities created by automation while limiting the downside.

Diaan-Yi Lin is Managing Partner of McKinsey & Company in Singapore.

Read this article:

Commentary: The optimist's case for automation - Channel NewsAsia

Posted in Automation | Comments Off on Commentary: The optimist’s case for automation – Channel NewsAsia

Lesson from the cupcake ATM: Better to be a baker than a seller – Quartz

Posted: at 8:12 am

Sprinkles, a chain of bakeries, has installed 15 or so cupcake ATMs around the US. Beyond providing on-demand desserts at any time of day or night, these machines also hold a valuable lesson for workers who fear that robots will take their jobs.

The lesson: dont become a cupcake seller.

Prestige Economics founder Jason Schenker thinks kioskification and related trends in the service industry are just getting started. In the cupcake world, that means the baker should focus solely on making the cakes. The ATM, meanwhile, handles the simple, repetitive task of selling them, freeing up bakers to focus on developing new flavors or other high-value tasks.

An ATM, kiosk, or some other delivery system can increase sales, because it attracts customers frustrated by long lines or who want a cupcake during non-business hours. (Or, they are intrigued by the novelty of it.) If sales go up, then more workers are needed to make products to fill the machinesideally, the sort of work thats more meaningful to them than exchanging money for cupcakes. Schenker suggests that, in this way, kiosks could help create more jobs.

As it happens, thats generally what happened with cash ATMs since they were invented 50 years ago. Since 2000, the number of bank tellers in the US has increased by 2% per year, faster than the rest of the labor market, according to research by James Bessen (pdf), an economist at the Boston University School of Law.

ATMs let banks operate branches at lower costs, which allowed lenders to open more of them. Therefore, automation itself sometimes brings growing employment to occupations, according to Bessen.

The same could be true in other industries, like the robo-advisors that are capturing a small but growing share of the financial advice business. Schenker points out that many industries make the bulk of their profit from 20% of their customersthe so-called 80/20 rule. Automation could allow financial firms to focus the efforts of human employees on personalized services for clients who have more complicated, lucrative needs.

Not everyone is convinced. The notion that automation could permanently reduce the need for human employment is a reason some think universal basic income will become necessary. French leftwing presidential candidate Benot Hamon suggested taxing wealth created by robots and providing citizens with monthly income payments. Microsoft founder Bill Gates thinks a robot tax could be used to fund public services and training programs.

These days, if bank-teller jobs are under threat, arguably its not because of the ATM but rather the iPhone. Smartphones are streamlining a wide range of banking services, and more transactions are now made without cash. Since peaking in 2009, the number of bank branches in the US has started to decline (pdf), reducing jobs for tellers as well (paywall).

The ATM itself has also been forced to evolve, offering more features, like accepting cash deposits and integrating into our digital lives by connecting with mobile phones, according to Accentures Jeremy Light. He argues that ATMs will become even more important as bank branches close down. Humans, meanwhile, will focus on roles that provide more complex services, like advice.

Its hard to predict which jobsif anywill be created as a result of robots, apps, and other forms of automation. But as Schenkers cupcake theory suggests, innovation doesnt always destroy jobs, even in the industry its transforming.

Read next: Weve been worrying about the end of work for 500 years

Go here to see the original:

Lesson from the cupcake ATM: Better to be a baker than a seller - Quartz

Posted in Automation | Comments Off on Lesson from the cupcake ATM: Better to be a baker than a seller – Quartz

How two slaves won their freedom – Royal Gazette

Posted: at 8:11 am

Published Jul 4, 2017 at 8:00 am (Updated Jul 4, 2017 at 7:48 am)

The video of police officer Jeronimo Yanez shooting Philando Castile as Castile calmly reached for his licence is just one more piece of evidence for how American laws work to oppress the powerless

By now, most have seen the jarring dash cam video of police officer Jeronimo Yanez shooting Philando Castile as Castile calmly reached for his licence. Just as shocking, a jury acquitted Yanez. The verdict, in the eyes of many, was just one more piece of evidence for how American laws work to protect the powerful and oppress the powerless.

But while the American legal system can be seen as largely constructed to maintain the status quo, it has also served as an agent of change to expand rights even in the years before the Constitution was ratified. Activists, even slaves, have used the courts to weaponise American ideals and escape oppression.

Before debates about the Constitution began, states grappled with how to adapt the lofty ideals promised by the Declaration of Independence to the reality of slavery. The first was Massachusetts. Its 1780 Constitution marked Revolutionary Americas first attempt to create new legal and political arrangements that gave individual citizens rights in the newly liberated nation.

Yet in Massachusetts, as in every other American colony, the constitutional promise that all men are born free and equal did not hold true for African-American slaves. The application of the law exposed the imbalance between the powerful and the powerless, the included and excluded.

Two Massachusetts slaves highlighted this contradiction. Sheffields Elizabeth Bett Freeman heard the Massachusetts Constitution read aloud, and the next day approached prominent local lawyer Theodore Sedgwick, asking: I heard that paper read yesterday, that says all men are created equal, and that every man has a right to freedom. Im not a dumb critter; wont the law give me my freedom?

Sedgwick took Freemans case.

In May 1781, the same month that Betts case was heard in Great Barringtons County Court, a Worcester slave, Quock Walker, sued his former master, Nathaniel Jennison, for battery. Walker, likewise believing he had a legal right to freedom, had run away from Jennison and gone to work at the neighbouring Caldwell farm, where the abolitionist brothers John and Seth Caldwell helped Walker to find a lawyer and take his case to Worcester County Court.

The county courts decided in both Freemans and Walkers favour. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, the states highest legal authority, was tasked with enforcing the states foundational laws and applying its promised rights and freedoms to all residents. Freeman, Walker and their allies pressed the court to decide whether the Constitutions laws and rights pertained to slaves, hoping to change the conversation to include, rather than exclude, this Massachusetts community.

It worked. The Supreme Court Chief Justice, William Cushing, explained that the 1780 Constitution and the new nations ideals rendered slavery illegal because a different idea had taken hold when the Constitution declared all men are born free and equal. As a result, he could conclude only that slavery was inconsistent with our own conduct and Constitution.

Within a decade, pressured by both the court decisions and their communities, Massachusetts slave owners voluntarily freed their slaves, often by changing the arrangements to those of wage labour. The 1790 federal census listed no slaves in Massachusetts, making it the first state comprehensively to abolish slavery.

Abolition in Massachusetts happened because Freeman and Walker took the states and the countrys founding laws and precepts at their word. In highlighting the contradiction between concepts of equality and rights, and the circumstances of slavery, they found powerful allies who helped to bring their cases to the states most powerful legal bodies, forcing collective decisions that would reverberate across the state.

Protection of the powerful is written into the law of the land, but so too are avenues to use ideas of freedom and equality to change communal conversations and legal practices. And it is this tradition that has begotten constitutional victories expanding rights and freedoms to increasingly greater number of Americans over the past two centuries.

A San Francisco-born Chinese-American cook worked with attorneys and community organisations to win the 1898 Supreme Court case United States v Wong Kim Ark, which made clear that the 14th Amendments promise of birthright citizenship should apply to all Americans.

When that promised citizenship was still not extended to Native Americans, Yakama performer Nipo Strongheart and other native activists gathered tens of thousands of signatures on petitions, allied with the Indian Rights Association, and pressured Congress to pass the 1924 Indian Citizenship Act.

And it was individual African-American parents in Topeka pursuing educational opportunities for their children who worked with NAACP lawyers and their allies to win Brown v Board of Education in 1954.

The landmark Supreme Court decision demonstrated that all Americans were included equally in the public education system, began the dismantling of Jim Crow segregation and launched the Civil Rights Movement. Those parents, like Strongheart, Wong, and Freeman and Walker before them, used ideas to create a more just society, providing hints as to how todays activists can best work to achieve progress.

Ben Railton, professor of English and American studies at Fitchburg State University, is the author of four books, numerous online articles and a daily blog of public American studies scholarship

Read the original here:

How two slaves won their freedom - Royal Gazette

Posted in Wage Slavery | Comments Off on How two slaves won their freedom – Royal Gazette

Independence Day: A gift of long-view leadership – Washington Times

Posted: at 8:11 am

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

Happy Independence Day a holiday we owe to the visionary signers of the Declaration of Independence back in 1776. From the youngest to the oldest - Edward Rutledge was only 26 years old at the time and Ben Franklin was 70 - the signers were people who took the long view. They thought in terms of the distant future; in terms of years and generations, not news cycles. Because of their long view, their leadership was transformative.

We would do well to learn from their example.

The remarkable 18th century individuals who gave America freedom were, like other great leaders who took the long view, people who never lost sight of their primary ideals and principles. Although they were never rigid compromise is always needed for effective democratic leadership they avoided distraction and petty entanglements. There would be no American democracy without them.

Models of people with long views are found in other times and places, as well. Perhaps the best known 20th century transformative leader is South Africas Nelson Mandela. His long view sustained him through 27 years of imprisonment until his vision for the country was actualized by the abolition of apartheid, and his election as president. Mandela stepped down from the presidency after one term, an act that led to praise from Americans on both the right and left sides of the political spectrum. President Obama and Charles Krauthammer both compared Mandela to George Washington for stepping away from power. Krauthammer wrote, Thats George Washington. That does not happen often in Africa or anywhere. He never took the power to his head. He never was intoxicated by it. And the example he set is extremely unusual and probably the most lasting to his country.

People who take the long view are not distracted by ego, power, or petty conflict. We need more leaders like that.

If you want to refresh yourself about the meaning of Independence Day and the value of long-view leadership, read Natan Sharanskys Fear No Evil and The Case For Democracy: The Power of Freedom To Overcome Tyranny and Terror. The first is a memoir of oppression in the Soviet Union, where Sharansky spent 9 years in prisons and gulag. The second book explains the beliefs that sustained him then, and which have motivated him since, in his work as an Israeli political leader.

Any discussion of contemporary leaders with a long view must include Aung San Suu Kyi, who became Myanmars leader in 2015, after 15 years of house arrest under her countrys military dictatorship.

None of these people is perfect. They were and are human, flawed individuals like the rest of us. What makes them extraordinary, and defines them as models of leadership is their ability to maintain focus on their values with patience and peacefulness.

Great leaders indeed, great human beings avoid distraction and petty conflict.

On this Independence Day holiday lets be thankful for Americas founders and their long view. Let us resolve to seek and support leaders like them.

See the rest here:

Independence Day: A gift of long-view leadership - Washington Times

Posted in Abolition Of Work | Comments Off on Independence Day: A gift of long-view leadership – Washington Times

Freedom Writers (2007) – IMDb

Posted: at 8:09 am

Edit Storyline

It's 1994 in Long Beach, California. Idealistic Erin Gruwell is just starting her first teaching job, that as freshman and sophomore English teacher at Woodrow Wilson High School, which, two years earlier, implemented a voluntary integration program. For many of the existing teachers, the integration has ruined the school, whose previously stellar academic standing has been replaced with many students who will be lucky to graduate or even be literate. Despite choosing the school on purpose because of its integration program, Erin is unprepared for the nature of her classroom, whose students live by generations of strict moral codes of protecting their own at all cost. Many are in gangs and almost all know somebody that has been killed by gang violence. The Latinos hate the Cambodians who hate the blacks and so on. The only person the students hate more is Ms. Gruwell. It isn't until Erin holds an unsanctioned discussion about a recent drive-by shooting death that she fully begins to ... Written by Huggo

See more here:

Freedom Writers (2007) - IMDb

Posted in Freedom | Comments Off on Freedom Writers (2007) – IMDb

‘Symbols of freedom’: Uncovering the history of Miller Grove in Pope County – The Southern

Posted: at 8:09 am

The story of Miller Grove, a small community of freed African-Americans who settled in Pope County in 1844, is slowly coming into focus through the work of the US Forest Service and students from the SIU Center for Archaeological Investigations.

According to CAI Director Mark Wagner, there are silences in history that can only be filled in through the excavation of their remains, and Miller Grove is one of those communities.

The vestiges of the Miller Grove community now lie deep within the Shawnee Forest about 20 miles from Vienna, off a path leading from a county road that can best be called a trace.

This summer, the SIU Center for Archaeological Investigations hosting its annual field school at the site. Wagner, along with about a dozen students, is in the process of sifting through layers of soil to uncover relics from this once thriving rural settlement.

Wagner said the silence surrounding Miller Grove may have been self-imposed.

Communities get silenced for different reasons, but the people out here appear to have silenced themselves, partially because they were most likely involved in the Underground Railroad, he said.

Wagner said the only direct proof they have of this is in the oral history collected from the descendants of the original community members. Those descendants live all over the U.S., and traveled to the site during 2004 and 2005 to share recollections and stories passed down through their families.

Today, the only physical reminder of the community that remains is the cemetery, which has more than 100 graves, and a series of home sites, now reduced to rubble and barely distinguishable from the natural variables of the landscape.

Shawnee National Forest Heritage Program Manager Mary McCorvie said the community settled in such a remote location intentionally.

The community is surrounded by branches of Hayes Creek, so it is surrounded by water on three sides," McCorvie said. "This means there is only one way in, and you know who is coming and going.

Wagner said this was important because in the 1840s and 1850s in Southern Illinois, leading up to the Civil War, slave catchers were common in the region, and it was not unheard of for freed slaves to be kidnapped under the pretense that they were runaway slaves.

Artifacts uncovered at the site, specifically a Union Army General Service button and a Union Army Revolver, showed McCorvie and Wagner that someone living in the community had been in the Colored Troops during the war, but that they could not tie it to a specific family in the settlement.

McCorvie said the community was founded by Harrison Miller, his wife Lucinda, and their three children, who traveled to the woodlands of Pope County from a Tennessee plantation.

In order to settle in the region, the former enslaved family was required to provide documents proving their freedom, and pay a bond of $1,000 to insure they would not become wards of the state.

During the 1840s and 1850s, the area where the Millers bought property and established a farm became the destination for other emancipated families from south-central Tennessee, who also bought land nearby.

As the community expanded, three additional families joined the Millers the Dabbs, the Singletons and the Sydes. Together they built homesteads, a church and a school.

Wagner said in all likelihood the Miller Grove community did participate in the Underground Railroad. Oral histories suggest that Crow Knob, a sandstone bluff that overlooks the community to the south, was used to light signal fires to guide freedom seekers to Millers Grove.

Additionally, Sand Cave, located a few miles west of Crow Knob and north of Miller Grove, appears in stories and local myths as a place to hide runaway slaves. It all makes sense in the bigger picture of whats going on, Wagner said.

Wagner said free communities were in the region near the Ohio Rivers division between the slave states of the south and the free states of the north, and the Ohio River became an important boundary line after 1850, when the Fugitive Slave Law was enacted.

McCorvie said her fascination with the excavation came in the form of the small things found there a button, pieces of pottery and food remains.

These things represent the first things these people ever got to own," she said. "They represent the first choices someone ever made for themselves as an adult. That button, those dishes, what to eat and wear, these were all chosen for them until the time they were manumitted.

"These small relics are really very big symbols of freedom.

View original post here:

'Symbols of freedom': Uncovering the history of Miller Grove in Pope County - The Southern

Posted in Freedom | Comments Off on ‘Symbols of freedom’: Uncovering the history of Miller Grove in Pope County – The Southern

Keeping Freedom, and Growth, in the Fourth – National Review

Posted: at 8:09 am

What is the Fourth of July? Its a wonderful time. Were outdoors. Were with family and friends. Were playing golf or fishing. There are barbecues and baseball and fireworks and all that good stuff.

And beneath it all, supporting it all, there is freedom. Freedom. The Fourth of July is about freedom, if nothing else. Americas freedom, of course. But a freedom that extends to all people. One that leads to greatness and prosperity. A freedom that has become the backbone of the world.

I would like to take a moment this holiday to revisit the sources of that freedom. They were outlined so eloquently in perhaps the greatest document ever written, the Declaration of Independence. And theyre as crucial now as they were 241 years ago.

Its a well-known story. Back in 1776, the Continental Congress sought freedom from tyranny. They said, Were revolting against a British monarchy and parliament that doesnt represent us. Were rebelling against laws we dont control and are capricious to say the least.

To formalize this revolt, the congress formed a committee of five. Chosen were Thomas Jefferson, Robert Livingstone (New Jersey), John Adams, Ben Franklin, and Roger Sherman (Connecticut). A pretty spiffy group of thinkers and writers.

Their task was to draft a statement of independence although what they came up with was so much more.

Their document, The Unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, was adopted on July 4, 1776, after days of debate and revision. The document begins:

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Natures God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

Id like to underscore the civility of that opening. This document is an example of civility. The great American revolt was a defense of the right of discussion. Civil discourse. Respectful disagreement.

Then there are The Laws of Nature and Natures God. We derive our freedoms not from governments, but from God. It was a revolutionary thought at a time when dictatorial monarchs across Europe believed they were gods.

Then we have perhaps the most famous sentence in the English language, if any language:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

That truly was revolutionary stuff. And it was beyond just the colonies.

The authors were saying, Were speaking about the people here, but also about oppressed peoples everywhere, those burdened with dictatorial, who-cares-about-the-little-people governments.

And they spoke of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Life. Our very existence.

Liberty. You cant take my freedom away.

The pursuit of happiness. To live the way we want to live, to do the work we want to do, to marry whom we want to marry; to have kids, accumulate property, and be prosperous.

Ive said this often: The most populist desire of the people of the United States and other free nations is long-lasting, deep-seated prosperity. Speaking of which, the long list of complaints against George IIIs Britain included: cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world (protectionism), imposing Taxes on us without our Consent (remedied with supply-side tax cuts), and (hat tip Seth Lipsky, New York Sun) a hint of stable money: the amount and payment of [judges] salaries.

But the Declaration, critically, goes on:

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government.

Taking these statements together, we see a pecking order. There is God, a higher power or Natures God, who grants us the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. And whatever government is formed around this works for the people. And if the government lacks the consent of the people, there must be great change.

From the Lord, to us, and then to government.

And when government breaks down, does poorly, or becomes corrupt, it needs to be replaced one way or another.

Theres a little bit of that going on today, is there not?

Its the Fourth of July. Its freedom day. The government works for us, not the other way around.

If it doesnt, the government gets kicked out on its keister.

Larry Kudlow is CNBCs senior contributor. His new book is JFK and the Reagan Revolution: A Secret History of American Prosperity, written with Brian Domitrovic.

Read more from the original source:

Keeping Freedom, and Growth, in the Fourth - National Review

Posted in Freedom | Comments Off on Keeping Freedom, and Growth, in the Fourth – National Review

Freedom – What Is It – WSAU (blog)

Posted: at 8:09 am

Freedom Is Not what many young people think it is. Younger Generations think that freedom means you can go to the movies when you choose to. They may think freedom is the ability to pick what restaurant you can eat at. They may also think freedom is the ability to get in a car and drive where you want.

It is true that in an extremely oppressive governmental regime, those things can be limited, but they're usually never fully taken away. Communists can go to the movies, so long as the government has approved those movies. Communist can pick what restaurant to eat at, so long as that restaurant is allowed to function.

True freedom comes from UnalienableRights that God has given us. This is what the Forefathers believed in. What does unalienable rights mean? Rights that are Incapable of being alienated, surrendered, or transferred to another. The U.S. Declaration of Independence states: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal and endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

To ensure these freedoms; our forefathers gave us a Constitution which limits the government's ability to intrude on our rights. It does not limit your individual rights but only the government's ability to oppress them.

Freedom of speech is key to keeping these rights. You must have the freedom to politically disagree with one another through free speech.

"Hate Speech" is a tool of the left to destroy your freedoms in the future. They hope to convince you that Free Speech should not be free. They will try to use something most people can agree upon as hateful, in order to get you to allow them to limit free speech. Most people dislike racist speech, so it's easy to get people to say "yeah, we need to stop racist hate speech". The people that are for this do not know that they are being tricked into fascism.

If a "Hate Speech" bill was going to be passed in Congress, who gets the determine what is 'hate speech'? Is saying -White rich people are the cause of america's problems- hate speech? That statement offends rich white people. Is saying -abortion is murder- hate speech? It offends a woman who had an abortion. Is disagreeing with Obamacare hateful to people? It may just depend on who is writing the law. Even worse than that, it may just depend on who was interpreting the law.

The left is well aware of this. It is the sole reason why they keep pounding the term 'hate speech'. Don't believe me? The left in America has always battled to take away your freedoms.

What party is for the government to control your health care? What party pushes to regulate how much soda you can drink? What party wants to regulate how much money a CEO can earn? What party wants to regulate how much you can drive through CO2 emission regulations? What party wants to regulate hate speech, which would include any movie that produces a political speech that is considered hateful? What party encourages Facebook to regulate hate speech on the internet as much as possible? What party tries to stop Christians from expressing their beliefs in public areas? What party says you have to accept homosexuality as normal or else you're considered a bigot? What party forces you to pay for abortions through taxpayer funding? What party believes in forcing you to pay for other people's college tuition's?

I could go on and on. It is the left who destroys the freedoms of American citizens. The more government regulation over your life, the less Freedom you have automatically.

It is the conservatives who fight for your freedoms by demanding smaller government and less regulations. Ironically, as we demand smaller government, we are called the Fascists by the left.

God has given us our an inalienable rights. But Liberals have given us the reasons why those rights are too dangerous for us, and we must not be allowed to have them.

Read the original post:

Freedom - What Is It - WSAU (blog)

Posted in Freedom | Comments Off on Freedom – What Is It – WSAU (blog)

Physicists put new spin on computer technology – Phys.Org

Posted: at 8:08 am

July 4, 2017 Associate Prof. Barry Zink with (left to right) Devin Wesenberg, Alex Hojem and Rachel Bennett. Credit: University of Denver

New research from a team of DU physicists has the potential to serve as the foundation for next-generation computer technology.

In the quest to make computers faster and more efficient, researchers have been exploring the field of spintronicsshorthand for spin electronicsin hopes of controlling the natural spin of the electron to the benefit of electronic devices. The discovery, made by Professor Barry Zink and his colleagues, opens a new era for experimental and theoretical studies of spin transport, a method of harnessing that natural magnetization, or spin, of electrons.

"Our approach requires a fundamentally different way of thinking about the nature of how spin moves through a material," Zink says.

Computers currently rely on electrons to process information, moving data through tiny, nano-sized wires. These electrons generate heat, however, as they travel through the wires. This heat, along with other factors, limits computer speed.

Past research has successfully demonstrated spin transport using crystalline, or ordered, materials as magnetic insulators. In Zink's new study, recently published in Nature Physics, the team was able to demonstrate spin transport through a synthetic material that is notably amorphous, or non-ordered, both magnetically and structurally.

The discovery is significant because manufacturing this amorphous synthetic material, known as yttrium iron garnet, is easier than growing the silicon crystals currently used in computer processors.

"The existing materials known to have this type of spin transport are difficult to produce," Zink says. "Our material is very easy to produce, simple to work with and potentially more cost-effective."

Dean Andrei Kutateladze of the Division of Natural Sciences and Mathematics emphasizes the significance of the team's findings.

"This spectacular result from the Zink research group amply illustrates the vibrant research environment in the division, where teacher-scholars create new knowledge working hand-in-hand with students," he says. "It also underscores the critical importance of support for fundamental research. Just as basic research in Bell Labs in the '50s and '60s paved the way for smartphones and other wonders of the current technological revolution, physicists such as Dr. Zink are building platforms for the next great technological leap."

The research team includes Davor Balzar, chair of DU's Department of Physics and Astronomy, graduate students Devin Wesenberg and Rachel Bennett, newly minted doctorate holder Alex Hojem and colleagues at Colorado State University. The scientists carried out their research using custom-designed micromachined thermal isolation platforms in DU's physics laboratories. The team's next step is to undertake more testing and verification.

"We're looking to see if we can reproduce this in different types of amorphous materials, as not a lot is known about such materials," Zink says. "Twenty years from now, they could be an important part of how computers work."

A core mission of DU's Division of Natural Sciences and Mathematics is to offer students unprecedented access to research opportunities. By working alongside distinguished faculty mentors in state-of-the-art facilities, undergraduates and graduates are able to apply their newfound knowledge to research that changes lives and challenges ideas.

Explore further: Spinning electrons open the door to future hybrid electronics

More information: Devin Wesenberg et al. Long-distance spin transport in a disordered magnetic insulator, Nature Physics (2017). DOI: 10.1038/nphys4175

A discovery of how to control and transfer spinning electrons paves the way for novel hybrid devices that could outperform existing semiconductor electronics. In a study published in Nature Communications, researchers at ...

An electron carries electrical charge and spin that gives rise to a magnetic moment and can therefore interact with external magnetic fields. Conventional electronics are based on the charge of the electron. The emerging ...

Modern computer technology is based on the transport of electric charge in semiconductors. But this technology's potential will be reaching its limits in the near future, since the components deployed cannot be miniaturized ...

Computers process and transfer data through electrical currents passing through tiny circuits and wires. As these currents meet with resistance, they create heat that can undermine the efficiency and even the safety of these ...

Researchers from the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS) have made a discovery that could lay the foundation for quantum superconducting devices. Their breakthrough solves one the main ...

It doesn't happen often that a young scientist makes a significant and unexpected discovery, but postdoctoral researcher Stephen Wu of the U.S. Department of Energy's Argonne National Laboratory just did exactly that. What ...

By gently prodding a swirling cloud of supercooled lithium atoms with a pair of lasers, and observing the atoms' response, researchers at Swinburne have developed a new way to probe the properties of quantum materials.

Researchers at the University of Southampton have cast doubt over established explanations for certain behaviours in pulsars - highly magnetised rotating neutron stars, formed from the remains of supernovae.

New research from a team of DU physicists has the potential to serve as the foundation for next-generation computer technology.

Scientists at The Australian National University (ANU) have designed a new nano material that can reflect or transmit light on demand with temperature control, opening the door to technology that protects astronauts in space ...

A new technique allows researchers to characterize nuclear material that was in a location even after the nuclear material has been removed a finding that has significant implications for nuclear nonproliferation and ...

Researchers at the University of Melbourne have demonstrated a way to detect nuclear spins in molecules non-invasively, providing a new tool for biotechnology and materials science.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Go here to see the original:

Physicists put new spin on computer technology - Phys.Org

Posted in Technology | Comments Off on Physicists put new spin on computer technology – Phys.Org

Is technology delivering in schools? Our panel debates – The Guardian

Posted: at 8:08 am

Are tablets an asset in the classroom or a distraction? Photograph: Getty Images/Hero Images

From interactive whiteboards that aid language learning to virtual reality headsets that demonstrate Newtons laws of motion, technology has the potential to yield strong results in the classroom. And yet the benefits are far from universal. Some teachers struggle to get the most out of expensive gadgetry, meaning schools risk investing thousands of pounds in hi-tech apparatus that fails to deliver, as reported by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development in 2015.

Meanwhile, school technology budgets are falling. The average ICT budget for 2017-18 is forecast to be 13,800 for a primary school, a 4% decline year on year, and 58,230 for secondaries, a 7% fall, according to the British Educational Suppliers Association (Besa).

So how should schools prioritise to ensure this money is spent on the most useful technology?

To discuss the way ahead, the Guardian held a panel debate, sponsored by technology provider Brother, called Technology: Money Saver or Money Waster? A panel of four experts in the field discussed the issue with an audience of educationists, teachers and technology specialists.

Weve gone through 10 years of device fetishism, said panellist Donald Clark, founder of technology in education company PlanB Learning. He said schools had been investing in tablets for their pupils, despite evidence indicating that they are poor teaching tools.

You have to look from a pedagogic and learning point of view, he added. Research shows that when children write on tablets they have a high error rate. It slows kids down, they resort to a truncated style and it is a disaster in terms of literacy also, you cant code. He said tablets should be seen as a consumer device rather than an aid for learning.

However, a member of the audience, art teacher Gill Jenkins, said she had successfully used tablets for an art project with year 10 pupils and they were really engaged in it.

Success depended on the context in which technology was used, said panel member John Galloway, an advisory teacher who used technology with children with special educational needs. If the iPad was used for the wrong activities such as writing or coding it would give poor results, he said. Used in the right way, however, it could be a powerful teaching tool. One of biggest barriers to technology adoption is teachers being given the time to be trained to use it, he added. Research published by Besa in January revealed that about 60% of teachers had made training in technology one of their key aims for this year.

Galloway added that some technology may not have worked originally but may yet become commonplace. Virtual learning environments (VLEs), for example, failed to take off in the UK when they were introduced 10 years ago but may have been ahead of their time, and Google Classroom has now picked up the baton.

Michael Mann, an educationist at the innovation lab at Nesta (formerly the National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts) a charity that promotes innovation believed educational technology was struggling to fulfil its potential. To address this, Nesta was giving grants to companies to measure the impact of classroom technology, and looking at ways to help teachers test out technology in their classrooms.

One of biggest barriers to technology adoption is teachers being given the time to be trained

Mann advocated small-scale trials of technology before making big investments. Do small-scale testing with a teacher passionate about it and they can show other teachers where it is relevant and where it isnt, he said. If they find out it doesnt work which is often the case a costly rollout can be avoided.

Naureen Khalid, a school governor and co-founder of @UkGovChat, a Twitter forum for school governors, said governors are demanding rigorous evidence before splashing out on new technology. Schools are poor and funding isnt going to get any better. We are custodians of public money and as a governor I cant commit to doing a trial and then writing it off.

The panel was split over whether teachers should be the arbiters of technology investment in schools. Clark argued against this, saying schools should rely on in-depth research into the educational effectiveness of the technology. If teachers tested out technology in their lessons, they risked wasting valuable teaching time and using pupils as guinea pigs. But others pointed out that much teaching was risky and experimental, with uncertain results, and technology was no different although more expensive if it failed. Furthermore, research reports may be paid for by the technology companies involved, making them far from independent.

From the audience, technology writer Terry Freedman doubted that research reports into classroom technology were much use for teachers, as they were often long, difficult to read and inconclusive.

Ultimately, anecdotal evidence is really good, he said. Teachers trying something in the classroom should ask what problem they are trying to solve, highlight the good bits and offer a five-minute evaluation.

Mann said Nesta was piloting an online funding platform called Rocket Fund, where teachers could pitch ideas relating to the use of technology in the classroom and connect with corporate and community donors. This was also helping to spread experiences and ideas among schools.

He pointed to online learning initiatives such as Third Space Learning which connected primary school pupils with tutors in India and Sri Lanka to provide lower-cost online tutoring as one scheme that had worked well.

The panel discussed whether a centralised procurement approach whereby an overall body collected evidence on the educational benefits of different devices could help streamline the process. But concerns were expressed that some teachers might struggle to trust technology recommended by another teacher and would insist on trying it out themselves.

Control groups, where the results of a class using specific technology were compared to those of a class without the technology, were also discussed. But Galloway thought this would be a messy approach as much depended on the teacher, their relationship with the class and the engagement levels of the students involved.

And what of virtual reality? Clark pointed out that VR headsets could be effective in teaching Newtons laws of motion and demonstrating weightlessness, while Galloway said VR had huge potential for children with special needs: a child in a wheelchair could experience the top of St Pauls Cathedral or the bottom of a mineshaft; a child with autism could take a virtual trip around the British Museum to prepare them for the real thing.

Galloway also pointed to eye-gaze technology, which helped people control computers through their eye movements, as a technology with useful applications. Meanwhile, artificial intelligence was touted as a powerful technology for transforming the classroom, with applications in marking and exams.

The panel agreed that teachers could benefit from taking part in ResearchED meetings. The body, which was founded by two teachers, brings together teachers, researchers and policymakers to share information on technology teaching tools.

From the audience, Ahrani Logan, co-founder of Peapodicity, an educational technology studio specialising in science, technology, engineering and mathematics subjects, said tech startups could run evaluations of classroom technology, since they excelled in analytics.

Sandra Crapper, education adviser at Onefourseven, an educational advisory service providing professional development to primary schools, said teachers could learn about technology from pupils. Our job is to analyse where it might lead them in a positive and productive way, she said. The panel suggested that teachers could make use of the smartphones most children brought into classrooms, although there were problems of security and behaviour associated with this.

As schools face yet more budget cuts, governors and heads will have to make some stark choices but technology is certain to play a part in the classroom of the future. And while there was much debate on how decisions should be made, it seems that finding ways for teachers to share information about what works will be key.

Kate Hodge (chair) Head of content strategy at Jaywing Content and former Guardian Teacher Network editor

Michael Mann Senior programme manager, education team, innovation lab, Nesta

John Galloway Advisory teacher for ICT/SEN and inclusion

Donald Clark Founder, PlanB Learning

Naureen Khalid School governor and co-founder of @UKGovChat

Follow us on Twitter via @GuardianTeach, like us on Facebook, and join the Guardian Teacher Network for lesson resources and the latest articles direct to your inbox

Looking for a teaching job? Or perhaps you need to recruit school staff? Take a look at Guardian Jobs, the education specialist

Read the original post:

Is technology delivering in schools? Our panel debates - The Guardian

Posted in Technology | Comments Off on Is technology delivering in schools? Our panel debates – The Guardian